Air-To-Air Energy Recovery Heat Exchangers
Air-To-Air Energy Recovery Heat Exchangers
Air-To-Air Energy Recovery Heat Exchangers
Copyright 2003 American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and AirConditioning Engineers, Inc. It is presented for educational purposes only. This article may not be copied and/or distributed electronically or
in paper form without permission of ASHRAE.
Air-To-Air Energy
Recovery Heat Exchangers
By John Dieckmann, Member ASHRAE, Kurt W. Roth, Ph.D., Associate Member ASHRAE,
and James Brodrick, Ph.D., Member ASHRAE
This is the sixth article covering a new energy-saving technology evaluated in a recent U.S. Department of Energy report,
which is available at www.eren.doe.gov/buildings/documents.
significant fraction of the makeup airflow rate (>~75%). Second, the temperature and humidity of the exhaust air must be
close to that of the conditioned space, i.e., heat losses or gains
in the return and exhaust ductwork must be small.
Energy Savings Potential
When OA is introduced into the interior space of a building at
a higher or lower temperature than the interior temperature, it
must be cooled or heated (respectively) to bring it to the space
temperature. By exchanging heat with the exhaust airstream to
precool (during cooling season) or preheat (heating season) incoming OA, heat exchangers reduce the sensible portion of the
ventilation-induced air-conditioning and heating loads. Enthalpy exchangers also transfer humidity and thus diminish the
latent cooling and heating (dehumidification and humidification, respectively) portion of the ventilation load.
On the other hand, ERHXs increase ventilation fan energy
because of the additional pressure drop posed by the devices.
ASHRAEs Handbook1 indicates that wheel and flat-plate heat
exchanger pressure drops (in inches of water) range from 0.25 to
1.0 (62 to 250 Pa) and 0.1 to 1.5 (25 to 375 Pa), respectively. In
practice, the ERHX face velocity has a large impact on the magnitude of the increase in ventilation fan energy consumption.
In a reasonably tight building, ERVs can reduce annual cooling and heating energy consumption by about one-third.2,3
Taking fan energy into account, an ERV has a maximum national energy savings potential of 0.5 to 0.6 quads in commercial buildings. In addition, ERVs can reduce peak heating and
cooling loads by up to one-third.2 Actual energy savings and
peak cooling load reductions for a specific building depend
greatly upon local climate and building OA requirements.
Market Factors
In addition to reducing HVAC energy consumption, ERHXs
also reduce the required air-conditioning capacity for the building because they decrease the contribution of the OA to the
design air-conditioning load. For instance, a simple calculation shows that roughly every 170 cfm (80 L/s) exhausted from
an ERV reduces peak air-conditioning tonnage by 1 ton (3.5
kW).* The decrease in required air-conditioning tonnage off*
ASHRAE Journal
57
T4, H4
Return Air
T3, H3
Supply Air
Outdoor Air
T2, H2
Exhaust
Blower
Dampers
Makeup
Air
Plenum
Return
Air
Plenum
Evaporator
ERHX
ERHX
T1, H1
Exhaust Air
Balance of Unitary
Air Conditioner
sets the first-cost premium of the ERHXs and leads to attractive payback periods of about two years.
Although ERVs appear to have attractive economics in a sizeable percentage of applications, only about 1% of potential applications specify ERVs. ERHXs for ventilation suffer from a
perception of higher first cost in the marketplace, in some instances because HVAC system designers do not take full credit
for the offset in chiller or unitary air-conditioner capacity (cost)
afforded by the device. The heat/enthalpy transfer surfaces of an
ERHX require periodic cleaning to maintain effectiveness. The
frequency depends on the cleanliness of the OA and exhaust air.
In colder climates during the heating season, frosting protection
may be necessary. Heat wheels and enthalpy wheels also are perceived as having greater maintenance requirements than flat plate
heat exchanger devices, due to moving parts and past opera-
tional experiences with early equipment, although current designs have corrected the reliability problems of early equipment.
References
1. 2000 ASHRAE HandbookHVAC Systems and Equipment, Chapter 44: Air-to-Air Energy Recovery.
2. TIAX. 2002. Energy consumption characteristics of commercial
building HVAC systems volume III: energy savings potential. Final
Report to U.S. DOE, Office of Building Technologies, July.
58
ASHRAE Journal
ashrae.org
August 2003