Sign 108

SIG N
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
108
Management of patients with stroke or TIA:

assessment, investigation, immediate
management and secondary prevention
A national clinical guideline
December 2008
KEY TO EVIDENCE STATEMENTS AND GRADES OF RECOMMENDATIONS

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
1++
High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a very low risk of bias
Well conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a low risk of bias
1 -
Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias
2++ High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies

High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a
high probability that the relationship is causal
2+ Well conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a
moderate probability that the relationship is causal
2 - Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that
the relationship is not causal
3
Non-analytic studies, eg case reports, case series
Expert opinion
GRADES OF RECOMMENDATION
Note: The grade of recommendation relates to the strength of the evidence on which the
recommendation is based. It does not reflect the clinical importance of the recommendation.
A At least one meta-analysis, systematic review, or RCT rated as 1++,
and directly applicable to the target population; or
A body of evidence consisting principally of studies rated as 1+,
directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results
B
A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++,
directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+
C
A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+,
directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++
Evidence level 3 or 4; or
Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+
GOOD PRACTICE POINTS

Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development
group.
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS) is committed to equality and diversity. This guideline
has been assessed for its likely impact on the six equality groups defined by age, disability, gender,
race, religion/belief, and sexual orientation.
For the full equality and diversity impact assessment report please see the published guidelines section
of the SIGN website at www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/published/numlist.html. The full report in paper form
and/or alternative format is available on request from the NHS QIS Equality and Diversity Officer.
Every care is taken to ensure that this publication is correct in every detail at the time of publication.
However, in the event of errors or omissions corrections will be published in the web version of this
document, which is the definitive version at all times. This version can be found on our web site www.
sign.ac.uk.
This document is produced from elemental chlorine-free material and
is sourced from sustainable forests
Management of patients with stroke or TIA:

assessment, investigation, immediate
management and secondary prevention
A national clinical guideline
December 2008
Management of patients with stroke or TIA: assessment, investigation, immediate management and secondary prevention
ISBN 978 1 905813 40 7

Published December 2008
SIGN consents to the photocopying of this guideline for the
purpose of implementation in NHSScotland
Elliott House, 8 -10 Hillside Crescent
Edinburgh EH7 5EA
www.sign.ac.uk
CONTENTS
Contents
1
Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1
1.1
The need for a guideline....................................................................................................... 1
1.2
Remit of the guideline.......................................................................................................... 1
1.3
Definitions........................................................................................................................... 2
1.4
Statement of intent............................................................................................................... 3
2 Key recommendations......................................................................................................... 4
2.1
Management of suspected stroke or TIA............................................................................... 4
2.2
In-hospital care..................................................................................................................... 4
2.3
Assessment, diagnosis and investigation............................................................................... 4
2.4
Treatment of ischaemic stroke.............................................................................................. 4
2.5
Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA..................................... 5
2.6
Carotid intervention............................................................................................................. 5
2.7
Provision of information....................................................................................................... 5
Management of suspected stroke or TIA.............................................................................. 6
3.1
Systems of care..................................................................................................................... 6
3.2
Pre-hospital.......................................................................................................................... 7
3.3
In-hospital............................................................................................................................ 7
Assessment, diagnosis and investigation.............................................................................. 10
4.1
Clinical assessment.............................................................................................................. 10
4.2
Brain imaging for suspected acute stroke or TIA................................................................... 11
4.3
Carotid evaluation................................................................................................................ 12
4.4
Cardiac imaging................................................................................................................... 14
4.5
Diagnostic tests.................................................................................................................... 15
Treatment of ischaemic stroke............................................................................................. 16
5.1
Thrombolysis....................................................................................................................... 16
5.2
Antiplatelet agents................................................................................................................ 17
5.3
Anticoagulants..................................................................................................................... 18
5.4
Neuroprotectants.................................................................................................................. 20
5.5
Reducing raised intracranial pressure................................................................................... 20
5.6
Decompressive surgery........................................................................................................ 21
5.7
Mechanical reperfusion........................................................................................................ 22
5.8
Prior statin therapy............................................................................................................... 23
Treatment of primary intracerebral haemorrhage............................................................... 24
6.1
Haematoma evacuation........................................................................................................ 24
6.2
Thrombolysis....................................................................................................................... 24
6.3
Haemostatic therapies.......................................................................................................... 25
6.4
Reducing raised Intracranial pressure................................................................................... 25
7 Other causes of stroke......................................................................................................... 26

7.1
Cerebral venous thrombosis................................................................................................. 26
7.2
Extracranial cervical arterial dissection...................................................................................... 26
8 Physiological monitoring and intervention.......................................................................... 28

8.1
Physiological monitoring...................................................................................................... 28
8.2
Physiological intervention.................................................................................................... 28
Management
ofpain
patients
with stroke
or cancer
TIA: assessment, investigation, immediate management and secondary prevention
Control of
in adults
with
9 Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA................................. 34

9.1
9.2
Statins.................................................................................................................................. 35
9.3
Anticoagulants..................................................................................................................... 36
9.4
Antihypertensives................................................................................................................. 37
9.5
Atrial appendage occlusion.................................................................................................. 38
9.6
Carotid endarterectomy........................................................................................................ 38
9.7
Patent foramen ovale and stroke........................................................................................... 38
10 Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with primary intracerebral haemorrhage............... 40

10.1
Blood pressure reduction...................................................................................................... 40
10.2
10.3
Anticoagulants..................................................................................................................... 40
10.4
Statins.................................................................................................................................. 41
11 Carotid intervention............................................................................................................ 42
11.1
Carotid endarterectomy........................................................................................................ 42
11.2
Carotid angioplasty and stenting........................................................................................... 45
11.3
Periprocedural antiplatelet or antithrombotic therapy........................................................... 45
12 Promoting lifestyle changes................................................................................................. 46

12.1
Interventions to promote lifestyle change............................................................................. 46
12.2
Altering dietary fat intake..................................................................................................... 46
12.3
Reducing dietary salt............................................................................................................ 47
12.4
Fruit and vegetable consumption.......................................................................................... 48
12.5
Vitamin supplements............................................................................................................ 48
12.6
Weight reduction................................................................................................................. 48
12.7
Smoking............................................................................................................................... 48
12.8
Alcohol................................................................................................................................ 48
12.9
Exercise................................................................................................................................ 49
13 Provision of information...................................................................................................... 50
13.1
Providing information and support....................................................................................... 50
13.2
Sources of further information.............................................................................................. 52
14
Implementing the guideline................................................................................................. 55
14.1
Resource implications of key recommendations................................................................... 55
14.2
Auditing current practice...................................................................................................... 55
14.3

Additional advice to NHSScotland from NHS Quality Improvement Scotland and the
Scottish Medicines Consortium............................................................................................ 56
15
The evidence base............................................................................................................... 57
15.1
Systematic literature review.................................................................................................. 57
15.2
Recommendations for research............................................................................................. 57
15.3
Review and updating............................................................................................................ 59
16 Development of the guideline............................................................................................. 60

16.1
Introduction......................................................................................................................... 60
16.2
The guideline development group........................................................................................ 60
16.3
Consultation and peer review............................................................................................... 62
Abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 63
Annexes ............................................................................................................................................ 66
References........................................................................................................................................... 94
1 INTRODUCTION
Introduction
1.1 the need for a guideline

Stroke is the third biggest cause of mortality and the main cause of disability in Scotland. The
Scottish Borders Stroke study measured the community based crude incidence of first-ever-ina-lifetime stroke (FES) in Scotland at 2.8/1,000 of the population.1 Around 8,500 FESs occur
per annum in Scotland,2 with around 130,000 in the UK.
Stroke is an age-dependent illness and approximately 80% of people with FES present at 65
years of age and over.1,2 The predicted increase in this proportion of the Scottish population
and the greater increase in the older old (over 80 years),3 will be paralleled by a continuing
increase in the number of strokes in Scotland.
1.2 REMIT of the guideline

1.2.1
overall objectives
This guideline replaces SIGN 13 Management of patients with stroke I: Assessment, investigation,
immediate management and secondary prevention and SIGN 14 Management of patients with
stroke II: Management of carotid stenosis and carotid endarterectomy, which were published
in 1997.4,5
This guideline takes account of advances in both stroke treatment and imaging. The guideline
uses an updated evidence base to support recommendations for all aspects of acute stroke care
including the management of carotid stenosis.
The guideline complements SIGN 78 Management of patients with stroke: Identification and
management of dysphagia and SIGN 64 Management of patients with stroke: Rehabilitation,
prevention and management of complications, and discharge planning.6,7 As stroke shares risk
factors with cardiovascular disease, primary prevention of stroke has been covered in SIGN
97 Risk estimation and the prevention of cardiovascular disease8 and is not discussed in this
guideline.
The guideline follows the patient pathway from the onset of a suspected stroke and covers
management of suspected stroke by non-stroke specialist practitioners, and clinical and
radiological assessment. Treatment, monitoring and prevention of recurrent stroke in patients
with ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), primary intracerebral haemorrhage
(PICH) and asymptomatic carotid disease are also covered. There is also a section addressing the
information and support needs of patients and carers. Management of patients with subarachnoid
haemorrhage has not been addressed.
The guideline development group has based the recommendations in this guideline on answers
to a series of key questions (see Annex 1).
1.2.2 target users of the guideline

This guideline will be of particular interest to stroke physicians, stroke nurses, specialists in
geriatric medicine and care of the elderly, neurologists, neuroradiologists, radiologists, vascular
surgeons, cardiologists, general physicians, speech and language therapists, physiotherapists,
occupational therapists, pharmacists, specialists in emergency medicine, specialists in intensive
care, paramedics, specialists in public health, nurse practitioners and general practitioners.
1.3
definitions
The definitions of some terms vary from one study to another and these outlines are not
rigid.
Stroke
The World Health Organization (WHO)

definition of stroke is a focal neurological deficit
(loss of function affecting a specific region of
the nervous system) due to disruption of its
blood supply.9 Most strokes result from a blood
vessel being blocked by a clot, and around one
in ten from a ruptured blood vessel causing a
haemorrhage. This affects the supply of oxygen
and nutrients, causing damage to the brain
tissue.
Transient ischaemic attack (TIA)
Historically defined as a neurological deficit

caused by interruption in blood supply to the
brain (or retina), in which all symptoms resolve
within 24 hours. Stroke and TIA have identical
symptoms and represent a continuum, with
only an arbitrary time limit distinguishing them.
Proposals to change the definition recognise that
most TIAs resolve fully within 30-60 minutes.10
Permanent damage to brain tissue occurs in at
least half of TIAs. Retinal TIAs are usually brief
episodes of monocular visual loss and may
be referred to as amaurosis fugax or transient
monocular blindness.
Minor stroke
Arbitrarily, this is considered to be a stroke (ie

symptoms persisting for 24 hours or longer) with
minor neurological deficit, for example, scoring
<5 on the National Institutes of Health stroke
scale (NIHSS, see Annex 2). Minor strokes may
be associated with significant disability.
Disabling stroke
Defined as a stroke with persisting disability that

impairs independence (for example a modified
Rankin Score, mRS3, see Annex 3).
Cryptogenic stroke
A stroke in which no generally accepted cause is

identified after investigation.
Carotid artery territory event
A stroke or TIA involving an area of brain which

derives its blood supply from a branch of the
internal carotid artery (ICA). This includes
temporary monocular blindness or amaurosis
fugax (the ophthalmic artery being a branch
of the ICA). It is also known as an anterior
circulation stroke/TIA.
Posterior circulation event
A stroke or TIA involving an area of brain which

derives its blood supply from a branch of the
vertebral or basilar arteries.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.4 Statement of intent

This guideline is not intended to be construed or to serve as a standard of care. Standards
of care are determined on the basis of all clinical data available for an individual case and
are subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and patterns of care
evolve. Adherence to guideline recommendations will not ensure a successful outcome in
every case, nor should they be construed as including all proper methods of care or excluding
other acceptable methods of care aimed at the same results. The ultimate judgement must be
made by the appropriate healthcare professional(s) responsible for clinical decisions regarding
a particular clinical procedure or treatment plan. This judgement should only be arrived at
following discussion of the options with the patient, covering the diagnostic and treatment
choices available. It is advised, however, that significant departures from the national guideline
or any local guidelines derived from it should be fully documented in the patients case notes
at the time the relevant decision is taken.
1.4.1
Patient version
A patient version of this guideline has been developed in collaboration with Chest, Heart &
Stroke Scotland and is available from the SIGN website, www.sign.ac.uk.
1.4.2
Prescribing of licensed medicines outwith their marketing

authorisation
Recommendations within this guideline are based on the best clinical evidence. Some
recommendations may be for medicines prescribed outwith the marketing authorisation (product
licence). This is known as off label use. It is not unusual for medicines to be prescribed outwith
their product licence and this can be necessary for a variety of reasons.
Generally the unlicensed use of medicines becomes necessary if the clinical need cannot
be met by licensed medicines; such use should be supported by appropriate evidence and
experience.
Medicines may be prescribed outwith their product licence in the following circumstances:
for an indication not specified within the marketing authorisation
for administration via a different route
for administration of a different dose.
Prescribing medicines outside the recommendations of their marketing authorisation alters
(and probably increases) the prescribers professional responsibility and potential liability. The
prescriber should be able to justify and feel competent in using such medicines.
Any practitioner following a SIGN recommendation and prescribing a licensed medicine outwith
the product licence needs to be aware that they are responsible for this decision, and in the
event of adverse outcomes, may be required to justify the actions that they have taken.
Prior to prescribing, the licensing status of a medication should be checked in the current
version of the British National Formulary (BNF).
1.4.3 additional advice to nhsscotland from NHS quality improvement

scotland and the scottish medicines consortium
NHS QIS processes multiple technology appraisals (MTAs) for NHSScotland that have been
produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England and
Wales.
The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) provides advice to NHS Boards and their Area Drug
and Therapeutics Committees about the status of all newly licensed medicines and any major
new indications for established products.
SMC advice and NHS QIS validated NICE MTAs relevant to this guideline are summarised in
the section on implementation.
2 Key recommendations
The following recommendations were highlighted by the guideline development group as being
clinically very important. They are the key clinical recommendations that should be prioritised
for implementation. The clinical importance of these recommendations is not dependent on
the strength of the supporting evidence.
2.1
Management of suspected stroke or TIA
2.1.1 systems of care

B

;;
Emergency medical services should be redesigned to facilitate rapid access to specialist

stroke services.
Patients with suspected stroke should have:
ambulance priority (blue light) in appropriate cases
rapid triage on arrival at hospital
immediate access to specialist stroke services
rapid brain imaging
rapid specialist assessment.
2.2 in-hospital care

A

2.3
Stroke patients requiring admission to hospital should be admitted to a stroke unit

staffed by a coordinated multidisciplinary team with a special interest in stroke care.
Assessment, diagnosis and investigation
2.3.1 brain imaging for suspected acute stroke or TIA

A

All patients with suspected stroke should have brain imaging immediately on
presentation.
2.3.2 carotid evaluation

A

All patients with non-disabling acute stroke syndrome/TIA in the carotid territory who
are potential candidates for carotid surgery should have carotid imaging.
2.4
Treatment of ischaemic stroke
2.4.1
Thrombolysis
A

2.4.2
Decompressive surgery
A

Patients admitted with stroke within four and a half hours of definite onset of symptoms,
who are considered suitable, should be treated with 0.9 mg/kg (up to maximum 90 mg)
intravenous rt-PA.
For individuals aged up to 60 years who suffer an acute MCA territory ischaemic stroke
complicated by massive cerebral oedema, surgical decompression by hemicraniectomy
should be offered within 48 hours of stroke onset.
2 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS
2.5 Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke or

TIA
2.5.1 antiplatelet agents
A

Low-dose aspirin (75 mg daily) and dipyridamole (200 mg modified release twice daily)
should be prescribed after ischaemic stroke or TIA for secondary prevention of vascular
events.
Clopidogrel (75mg daily) monotherapy should be considered as an alternative to

combination aspirin and dipyridamole after ischaemic stroke or TIA for secondary
prevention of vascular events.
2.5.2 statins
A

A statin should be prescribed to patients who have had an ischaemic stroke, irrespective
of cholesterol level.
Statin therapy after haemorrhagic stroke is not routinely recommended unless the risk
of further vascular events outweighs the risk of further haemorrhage.
2.6 Carotid intervention

2.6.1
Symptomatic Carotid Artery Disease

A

All patients with carotid artery territory stroke (without severe disability, mRS2)
or transient ischaemic attack should be considered for carotid endarterectomy as soon
as possible after the index event.
Carotid endarterectomy (on the internal carotid artery ipsilateral to the cerebrovascular
event) should be considered in all:
male patients with a carotid artery stenosis of 50-99% (by NASCET method)
female patients with a carotid artery stenosis of 70-99%.
For all patients, carotid endarterectomy should be performed as soon as the patient is
stable and fit for surgery, ideally within two weeks of event.
2.7 Provision of information

2.7.1
Providing information and support

A

Information should be offered to patients and carers in a variety of formats, including

easy access.
Caregivers should be offered ongoing practical information and training individualised

for the needs of the person for whom they are caring.
3.1
systems of care
There is a paucity of evidence describing the best systems of care to allow efficient and
rapid assessment and treatment of patients with suspected stroke. There is good evidence,
however, that early assessment, diagnosis and in-hospital treatment of patients with suspected
stroke reduces mortality and morbidity. The availability of effective acute treatment for stroke
necessitates rapid transfer to hospital (see sections 5, 6 and 7).
Two systematic reviews and one Health Technology Assessment (HTA) identified seven barriers
to timely assessment of patients with suspected stroke:11-13
patient or family not recognising symptoms of stroke or delay seeking help11,12

patient or family calling general practitioner (GP) first11,12
incorrect triage11
delays in neuroimaging11,12
delays in following in-hospital pathways11,12
delay in obtaining consent11
physician unfamiliarity with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) use.11
Public awareness of the symptoms of stroke should be increased.

People should be advised to contact the emergency medical services immediately if
they suspect they may be having a stroke.
Interventions reported in three systematic reviews and one small non-randomised study as attempts
to speed up presentation of patients with suspected stroke had more impact on in-hospital delays
than out-of-hospital delays.13-16 The range of interventions described to overcome barriers was
varied and included complex, multifaceted interventions, and the interventions may not be
applicable to every healthcare setting.13-16 There was no clear evidence that any intervention in
isolation improved clinical outcome, although multifaceted interventions may be more effective
than single interventions.13 The interventions included:
2++
2++
education programmes to improve the general publics recognition of symptoms of

stroke13
training paramedics to diagnose stroke more accurately and decrease time to hospital13
helicopter transfer13
training emergency medical staff in acute stroke care13
reorganisation of hospital systems13,14
multifaceted interventions (including telemedicine systems).13,15
B

;;
2++
Emergency medical services should be redesigned to facilitate rapid access to specialist

stroke services.
Patients with suspected stroke should have:
ambulance priority (blue light) in appropriate cases
rapid triage on arrival at hospital
immediate access to specialist stroke services
rapid brain imaging
rapid specialist assessment.
3 MANAGEMENT OF SUSPECTED STROKE OR TIA
3.2
pre-hospital
3.2.1 pre-hospital assessment

Standard assessment scales based on face, arm and speech impairments are simple tools to improve
the speed and accuracy of diagnosis in patients with suspected stroke,17-22 although there is a
small risk of wrong diagnosis. The three signs most diagnostic of stroke (facial paresis, arm drift,
abnormal speech) are assessed by FAST (face arm speech test, see Annex 4).18
The assessment scales were generally validated by clinically trained personnel, although FAST,18
MASS (Melbourne acute stroke scale, see Annex 5)22 and CPASS (Cincinnati pre-hospital stroke
scale)19 show acceptable accuracy when used by non-medically trained people (eg paramedics).
When used by paramedic staff indirect comparison favours the use of FAST and MASS22 tests over
CPASS and LAPSS (Los Angeles pre-hospital stroke scale).22
The positive predictive value (PPV) for suspected stroke patients assessed by paramedics using
FAST was 78% (95% confidence interval, CI 72% to 84%).18 Twenty seven per cent of patients
with confirmed stroke or TIA were admitted within one hour of onset of symptoms of stroke and
68% within three hours.18
2++
2+
Use of MASS was associated with an increase in diagnostic accuracy from 78% to 94%, a decrease
in door to doctor time from 43 to 25 minutes, a decrease in door to computerised tomography (CT)
time from 187 to 127 minutes, and an increase in advanced notification to the hospital from 13%
to 25% of patients.22 Paramedic assessment with MASS was associated with increased telephone
prenotification for acute treatment from 18% to 36%.22 Patients admitted after prenotification had
higher treatment priority (74% compared to 34%), earlier doctor assessment (15 minutes compared
to 31 minutes) and earlier CT scan (94 minutes compared to 144 minutes).22
No comparison of the assessment scales was identified.
C

Standard assessment scales such as FAST or MASS are recommended for pre-hospital
assessment to:
increase the accuracy of the initial stroke diagnosis
assist with more rapid diagnosis
speed up consideration for treatment
assist with more rapid referral to specialist services.
3.3 in-hospital
3.3.1 in-hospital assessment
When used by medical or emergency department staff, the ROSIER (recognition of stroke in the
emergency room) scale (see Annex 6) was superior to CPASS, LAPSS and FAST. In a study of
343 patients use of the ROSIER scale gave accurate diagnosis in 2-3 minutes.20 When internally
validated at a cut-off score greater than zero, the ROSIER scale had a diagnostic sensitivity of
92%, specificity of 86%, PPV=88%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 91%. Prospective
validation in 173 consecutive patients referred with suspected stroke showed sensitivity of 93%
(89% to 97%), a specificity of 83% (95% CI 77% to 89%), PPV=90% (95% CI 85% to 95%),
and NPV=88% (95% CI 83% to 93%).20
C

2++
Standard assessment scales such as ROSIER are recommended for emergency

department staff to:
increase the accuracy of the initial stroke diagnosis
assist with more rapid diagnosis.
3.3.2 in-hospital care

Evidence from a large systematic review of a wide range of trials of organised stroke unit care
indicates that stroke patients have better clinical outcomes in terms of survival, returning home
and independence if they are managed in a stroke unit rather than admitted to a general ward or
remaining at home.23 The trials included patients with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or PICH,
although a minority of trials excluded patients with transient symptoms. The study described an
effective stroke unit as a multidisciplinary team, coordinated through regular multidisciplinary
meetings, providing multiple interventions.
1+
There was insufficient evidence to assess whether acute stroke units with a short period of
admission, roving stroke teams or general neurology units resulted in improved clinical outcomes
for patients with suspected stroke.
A

Stroke patients requiring admission to hospital should be admitted to a stroke unit

staffed by a coordinated multidisciplinary team with a special interest in stroke care.
;;

Patients with TIA requiring admission to hospital should be admitted directly to a stroke
unit staffed by a coordinated multidisciplinary team with a special interest in stroke
care.
Evidence from three studies of very early assessment and initiation of secondary prevention
therapy after TIA or minor stroke strongly suggests that early intervention (within 24 hours)
reduces the risk of early stroke recurrence, although the studies do not directly address the
question of admission.24-26 In a before and after study based on a community cohort, early
active management at a daily TIA clinic was associated with an 80% drop in the risk of stroke
recurrence.24 A study of a 24 hour access TIA clinic from which 74% of patients were sent
home the same day showed that stroke recurrence was less than expected.26
2+
Assessing the risk of recurrence is covered in section 4.1.1 and Annex 7.

B

Patients with TIA and minor stroke, who are at high risk of early recurrence, should
undergo specialist assessment and begin treatment promptly.
3.3.3 integrated care pathways

A care pathway can be defined as a plan of care that aims to promote organised and efficient
multidisciplinary patient care based on the best available evidence. Care pathways are complex
interventions made up of a number of components, are often implemented with some form of
education and usually form all or part of the patient record.16
One systematic review of three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 observational studies
found that the routine application of an integrated care pathway did not substantially improve
patients outcomes in terms of survival or independence compared to standard multidisciplinary
care. Potential benefits in preventing urinary tract infections were only seen in studies that were
prone to bias.16
The components of a multidisciplinary stroke care team and the roles of the team members have
been described.6
B

The routine implementation of care pathways for acute stroke management or stroke
rehabilitation is not recommended where a well organised multidisciplinary model of
care exists.
2+
3 MANAGEMENT OF SUSPECTED STROKE OR TIA
3.3.4 telemedicine consultation

Scotland has a geographically scattered population and patients with suspected stroke often
present to rural hospitals without a resident stroke physician. When there is no specialist
available there may be a delay to diagnosis, which is relevant for thrombolysis with its narrow
time window for administration of rt-PA (see section 5.1.1).
Telemedicine allows a distant stroke physician to interact with stroke patients, carers and the
local doctor remotely and to view brain scans.27 The stroke physician can take a history, view
the examination, counsel the patient and carers about the risks and benefits of thrombolysis and
guide the attending doctors management. This interaction can occur within minutes of arrival in
hospital and patients can receive thrombolysis locally.
Five observational studies of telemedicine networks for acute stroke from around the world were
identified.28-32 A systematic review of five networks concluded that telemedicine systems can be
feasible, acceptable and technically and diagnostically reliable in acute stroke management, and
that telemedicine consultations were associated with improved delivery of rt-PA.15
B

2++
In areas without a local stroke specialist, telemedicine consultation should be considered

to facilitate treatment in patients eligible for thrombolysis.
4.1
clinical assessment
4.1.1 risk of recurrence

Patients with minor stroke or TIA are at risk of recurrent stroke. Standard assessment scales can
help to prioritise those patients at higher risk.
Five cohort studies demonstrated the prognostic value of age, duration of symptoms, weakness,
speech problems, blood pressure and history of diabetes.33-35 The use of assessment scores
(such as ABCD, based on age, blood pressure, clinical features, and duration of symptoms) in
patients with mild stroke or TIA predicts early recurrence.33-37 One study of patients admitted
to hospital found limited discrimination when using the ABCD score.33
2++
2+
The revised score ABCD2, which includes history of diabetes, has been extensively tested and
shown to be reliable (see Annex 7).34
C

The ABCD2 score should be used to identify patients who are at highest risk of recurrent
stroke to allow very rapid investigation and treatment.
4.1.2 diagnosis of haemorrhage

Scoring tools, such as the Siriraj score, have insufficient precision to predict the presence of
haemorrhage reliably.38 One diagnostic study found the sensitivity and specificity for predicting
an infarct to be 0.78 and 0.80 respectively. By summarising seven other studies of patients with
a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke, the sensitivities and specificities of the Siriraj score were
found to be highly variable, ranging from around 0.4 to 0.9 and 0.7 to 0.95 respectively.38
2++
Imaging is essential to exclude haemorrhage (see section 4.2).

4.1.3 assessment of degree of dependency
Once a patient has been admitted, the use of standard impairment scales, such as NIHSS, short
NIHSS, Guys Score, Canadian neurological scale (CaNS), Scandinavian stroke scale (SSS) score
or the Los Angeles motor scale (LAMS), can be predictive of the degree of dependency and
length of hospital stay.17, 39-46 NIHSS is the most evaluated scale but is not clearly superior to
other scales (see Annex 2).17
The impairment scales are insufficiently precise on which to base individual treatment decisions.
The exception is rt-PA where the use of NIHSS categories to determine suitable patients is stipulated
in the licence.
10
Impairment scales should be considered to help discussion of likely outcomes after stroke
with patients and carers.
;;

Patients in the acute phase of stroke should not be denied treatment based on an impairment
score.
;;
The use of impairment scales may be considered for audit and benchmarking.
2++
2+
4 ASSESSMENT, DIAGNOSIS AND INVESTIGATION
4.2 brain imaging for suspected acute stroke or TIA

4.2.1
Why perform imaging?

Brain imaging is essential to differentiate haemorrhagic from ischaemic events and to exclude
stroke mimics such as tumours.38,47 Making a positive diagnosis of ischaemic stroke by identifying
an ischaemic lesion and by determining both its location (for example, cortical, lacunar or
posterior circulation) and its size may guide further investigations, management and predict
outcome. Excluding intracranial haemorrhage influences management, particularly in patients
already on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.
4.2.2
Timing of imaging
An HTA explored the optimum timing of brain imaging for patients in the acute phase of
stroke.48 A decision analysis model was developed comparing a scan all patients within 48
hours pathway of care in acute stroke against alternative scan strategies. The most cost-effective
strategy, in terms of least overall cost and most quality adjusted life years (QALYs) after adjusting
for different age ranges, proportions of infarcts and accuracy of CT, was to scan all patients
immediately.
1++
A All patients with suspected stroke should have brain imaging immediately on
presentation.
4.2.3
Modality of imaging
The modality used to image an acute stroke syndrome is determined by patient factors, the
purpose of the imaging and the accuracy of the modality for the suspected stroke syndrome at
the time from ictus at which the patient presents.
CT is widely available, practical, quick and easy to use in ill patients. CT is highly sensitive to
haemorrhage in patients in the hyperacute stage. In patients with ischaemic stroke, particularly
those presenting with mild neurological deficits, CT imaging is often normal in the first few
hours. The accuracy of CT for ischaemic stroke delineation improves after six hours and in
the first few days but it remains less accurate than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in
determining site and extent of ischaemic damage, particularly for small lesions and lesions in
the posterior fossa. CT accuracy is reduced beyond one week after the stroke event. In particular,
the discrimination between haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke origin is impaired as blood
products are absorbed.49,50
2++
2-
Evidence is emerging that MRI may be superior to CT,51 although MRI may be contraindicated
in up to a fifth of patients because they are too ill, confused, dysphasic, have an intraocular or
intracerebral metallic foreign body or have a pacemaker.52
2++
4
MRI with diffusion weighted imaging for ischaemia and gradient echo sequences to detect
haemorrhage is superior to CT scanning for accurate determination of the cause of stroke
syndrome at all time points after presentation, particularly in the first few hours for ischaemia.51
MRI also exhibits less variability in interpretation than CT for ischaemia, including site and
extent. MRI is more sensitive at detecting haemorrhage at this stage.51
2++
CT scanning is recommended for most patients in the acute phase of stroke.
MRI with diffusion weighted and gradient echo sequences is recommended (where
available and practical) for the diagnosis of acute stroke syndromes in patients who:
are not severely ill, especially where either neurological deficit is mild and the
clinical likelihood is that the lesion is small or lies in the posterior fossa or
present late (after one week).
The advantages and disadvantages of using CT and MRI are summarised in Annex 8.
11
4.2.4
Brain and vascular imaging to investigate the underlying cause of

intracerebral haemorrhage
There is a lack of data on investigating the underlying causes of intracerebral haemorrhage.
Generally, the underlying cause is related to age. Arteriovenous malformations are the most
common cause in young patients, degenerative small vessel disease in the middle aged and
amyloid angiopathy in the elderly.53 There is no evidence about which patients should undergo
further brain or vascular imaging, which imaging modality should be used or the timing of
further imaging.
;;

4.2.5
In patients presenting with an intracerebral haemorrhage, where an underlying

intracerebral abnormality is suspected, follow-up brain and vascular imaging may be
considered in discussion with an appropriate specialist.
Who should interpret the brain scan?

A meta-analysis of 15 studies of inter-observer reliability of assessing CT scans for early changes
of cerebral infarction (1,281 scans, 709 readers) concluded that there was little evidence
regarding who is best to read a scan. In all specialties experienced readers were more consistent
and accurate than less experienced readers and training in interpreting scans improved
performance.54 Observers were classified as expert (neuroradiologists with a major interest in
stroke), experienced (radiologists or physicians with more than five years of experience in reading
stroke CT scans in clinical practice), or less experienced (trainees, neurologists, physicians
developing a specialisation in stroke, or radiologists learning to interpret stroke CT scans but
with less than five years of experience).
2+
Similar comparative studies for MRI interpretation do not exist.

C

Unenhanced CT brain scans for detection of early changes of infarction should be

interpreted by personnel trained and experienced in stroke radiology.
Medical personnel trained and experienced in stroke radiology should interpret CT

and MRI brain scans from all time frames.
4.2.6 teleradiology
Teleradiology links allow electronic transfer of brain images to a remote reader and have been
widely used for several years. One small observational study demonstrated its validity and
reliability compared to reading hard copies on a view box.55
;;
4.3
Teleradiology links may be used to transfer brain images to a remote specialist.
carotid evaluation
4.3.1 carotid imaging in Patients with carotid territory TIA or Stroke and/or
retinal event
A good quality meta-analysis showed that the most cost-effective diagnostic strategies for carotid
stenosis are those that offer surgery to a larger proportion of patients quickly after the warning
TIA/minor stroke.56 The benefit of performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) diminishes with time
from the event (see section 11), reinforcing the need for early assessment. The nearer to the time
of stroke/TIA, the less important the actual degree of stenosis is in predicting benefit from CEA.
The time of highest risk for recurrence of stroke/TIA is in the first hours or days after the primary
warning event as stroke related to carotid bifurcation disease relates to stability of the plaque. TIA
carries at least as high a risk of subsequent disabling stroke as minor stroke and its investigation
and treatment should be treated with equivalent urgency. Cost-effectiveness modelling shows
the best strategy is to offer surgery to a larger proportion of patients earlier than is currently the
case in Scotland.56
12
1+
A systematic review found that Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography angiography (CTA),
magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) all have high
sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing 70-99% carotid artery stenosis (by the NASCET method,
see Annex 9) in patients with ipsilateral carotid territory ischaemic symptoms.57 Data were too
limited to provide reliable estimates of accuracy for patients with 50-69% stenosis.57 Non-invasive
imaging avoids potential complications of invasive arteriography, but there is consistent evidence
that imaging tests which produce angiographic images have better reproducibility, lower interobserver variation and higher accuracy in assessing/quantifying carotid disease than ultrasound
techniques.57 Of the non-invasive options contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
(CE-MRA) is the most accurate modality (see Table 1).57 Ultrasound has high sensitivity for detecting
carotid bifurcation disease and a normal ultrasound excludes disease. The poor specificity of
ultrasound for degree of disease when present, high inter-observer variability and insensitivity
for disease at other sites in the extracranial vasculature means that when an initial carotid duplex
examination is abnormal secondary corroborative imaging is required.57
1+
Table 1 Sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive imaging for patients with 70-99% carotid
artery stenosis (by the NASCET method)57
Imaging
modality
Sensitivity
95% CI
Specificity
95% CI
CE-MRA
0.94
0.88-0.97
0.93
0.89-0.96
Doppler
ultrasound
0.89
0.85-0.92
0.84
0.77-0.89
MRA
0.88
0.82-0.89
0.84
0.76-0.97
CTA
0.77
0.68-0.84
0.95
0.91-0.97
All patients with non-disabling acute stroke syndrome/TIA in the carotid territory who
are potential candidates for carotid surgery should have carotid imaging.
Initial carotid imaging with duplex ultrasound or alternative should be performed

rapidly once a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or TIA in the carotid territory is made.
;;
Initial carotid imaging should be performed within 48 hours of presentation.
Corroborative imaging is recommended to confirm and more accurately grade carotid

disease if duplex carotid ultrasound is abnormal.
Non-invasive angiographic carotid imaging (CE-MRA) should be performed and

interpreted by radiologists specifically trained and with specialist interest in vascular
imaging.
;; Duplex ultrasound criteria for grading of carotid disease should be standardised and
regularly audited against another modalities and surgical findings.
Criteria for carotid duplex reporting are shown in Annex 10.
13
4.3.2 carotid imaging in Patients scheduled for Cardiac Surgery and

Asymptomatic for TIA/Stroke
No good quality evidence was identified to suggest whether or not screening asymptomatic
patients, who are undergoing cardiac surgery, for carotid artery disease improves outcomes.
;;

4.3.3
Patients undergoing cardiac surgery who are asymptomatic for stroke or TIA should not
be screened for carotid disease.
Carotid Plaque Morphology, composition and activity

Ulcerated plaque and plaque activity as identified by transcranial Doppler (TCD) confers increased
risk of recurrent stroke at all grades of stenosis. Carotid duplex has poor sensitivity for detection
of ulceration compared to angiography, CE-MRA and CTA.58-61
No prospective trials were identified with outcomes supporting routine imaging to determine
carotid plaque composition or activity and whether these should influence therapy decisions.
4.4
cardiac imaging
An HTA assessed clinical and cost effectiveness of echocardiography in stroke. The metaanalysis confirmed that there is insufficient evidence to make recommendations on the use of
echocardiography in all patients with stroke.62
In the absence of significant carotid disease echocardiography may identify intracardiac thrombus
in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation or evidence of recent myocardial infarction. The distinction
between trans-thoracic and trans-oesophageal echocardiography is unclear. The latter has higher
accuracy for intracardiac thrombus, but may be associated with increased complications in patients
with acute stroke. It is also more expensive, reducing its ultimate cost effectiveness.
There is a lack of evidence to support the routine use of echocardiography to identify atrial septal
abnormalities, mitral valve disease or complex aortic atheroma in patients with stroke. Pick up
rates for cardiac imaging are higher in patients with a clinical suspicion of cardiac disease and
in those without other risk features for stroke. Echocardiography should be considered in those
patients with clinical findings and/or baseline investigations suggesting cardiac disease, and in
cases of cryptogenic stroke.62
No evidence was identified regarding either the use of simple chest radiography for cardiac
assessment or for the use of more sophisticated techniques such as cardiac CT and cardiac MRI
specifically in stroke patients. Evidence was also lacking to support routine cardiac imaging to
identify intracardiac thrombus, the prevalence of which is low in patients with stroke, particularly
those with documented carotid disease (those patients already found to have a potential source
of cerebral atheroembolism).62
Lack of good quality evidence to support cardiac imaging does not necessarily reflect lack of
benefit.
14
The routine use of echocardiography with contrast media for evaluation of patients
with stroke is not recommended.
Echocardiography should be considered in patients with:

clinical findings and/or baseline investigations suggesting cardiac disease
cryptogenic stroke.
;;

Routine chest radiography and electrocardiogram (ECG) is recommended in patients

with stroke.
;;

The use of cardiac CT and MRI should be limited to secondary specialist investigations
for specific problem solving where other tests are inconclusive.
2++
2++
2++
4.5
diagnostic tests
There are good clinical arguments for performing standard haematological or biochemical tests
on patients with a stroke or TIA, although few studies were found on their use or their effect
on management or outcomes.
;;

Standard haematological and biochemical tests such as a full blood count, erythrocyte
sedimentation rate, blood glucose, renal biochemistry and cholesterol level should be
performed on patients with a stroke or TIA as a minimum.
Studies describing diagnostic tests for inherited thrombophilias, antiphospholipid antibodies,

other auto-antibodies or measuring homocysteine levels are inconsistent. There is evidence to
suggest that these tests do not help to either predict the risk of further stroke, or direct further
management decisions.63,64
C

2+
3
The routine requesting of thrombophilia screens, antiphospholipid antibodies, other

auto-antibodies or homocysteine levels is not recommended.
15
5.1
Thrombolysis
5.1.1 intravenous thrombolysis

A Cochrane review of intravenous (IV) thrombolysis includes data from RCTs of streptokinase and
the alteplase form of rt-PA. Initial trials evaluated streptokinase, which has since been excluded
from routine clinical use due to safety concerns and lack of evidence of efficacy.65
1++
Thrombolytic therapy with rt-PA (alteplase 0.9 mg/kg up to maximum 90 mg) administered
within four and a half hours of stroke onset according to protocols stated in the product licence
significantly reduces death and disability at 90 days.65,66
1++
The odds of a favourable outcome (full or nearly full recovery from stroke) are strongly related
to the time to treatment and are significantly greater the earlier that treatment is delivered. The
odds ratio (OR) for favourable outcome is 2.8 (95% CI 1.8 to 4.5) for 090 minutes, 1.6 (95%
CI 1.1 to 2.2) for 91180 minutes, and 1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9) for 181270 minutes in favour
of rt-PA treatment.67 Administration later than 4.5 hours is associated with an increased risk of
mortality and the risk:benefit ratio has not been established.67
1++
The incidence of symptomatic neurological deterioration due to intracerebral haemorrhage is

increased approximately threefold to around 2% with IV alteplase.66,68,69
1++
2++
2-
Selection of patients for IV alteplase treatment based on MRI protocols (diffusion-perfusion mismatch
>20% and diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume less than 120 ml) is associated with similar
proportions of favourable outcomes but reduced proportions of deaths and severe disability when
compared with patients selected by CT alone within the 0-3 hour time window.70-72 Selection by
the same MRI protocols was also associated with similar outcomes in the 3-6 hour window. All
RCTs of IV thrombolysis, however, selected patients on the basis of CT alone.66,67,72
2+
3
A

A
5.1.2
Patients admitted with stroke within four and a half hours of definite onset of symptoms,
who are considered suitable, should be treated with 0.9 mg/kg (up to maximum 90 mg)
intravenous rt-PA.
Onset to treatment time should be minimised.
Systems should be optimised to allow the earliest possible delivery of intravenous
rt-PA within the defined time window.
Streptokinase should not be used for treatment of patients in the acute phase of
stroke.
Thrombolysis should be administered within the context of an acute stroke service.

Local protocols for the administration of thrombolytic therapy should be
developed.
Intra-arterial thrombolysis
The volume of evidence for intra-arterial thrombolysis is small as relatively few patients are enrolled
in RCTs. Several agents have been examined including rt-PA, urokinase (UK) and recombinant
pro-urokinase (r-proUK). Urokinase and recombinant pro-urokinase are not currently available
in the United Kingdom.
A systematic review included 44 studies of intra-arterial thrombolysis for anterior circulation
stroke, only three of which were RCTs.73 Two of the RCTs compared intra-arterial r-proUK plus
heparin with placebo plus heparin (PROACT I and II, n=220). Thirty three of the studies were
case series of patients treated with urokinase (total n=835).
A further case series of IA urokinase reported a significantly better chance of favourable outcome
compared with matched historical controls.74 Reported recanalisation rates were higher than in
historical control series (around 65% with super-selective administration compared to around
20%), and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage rates were 4-10%.
16
2++
5 TREATMENT OF ISCHAEMIC STROKE
Basilar artery occlusive stroke has a high mortality (approximately 90%) without
recanalisation.73
2++
In a systematic review of case series of intravenous (n=76) and intra-arterial (n=344) treatment
recanalisation was reported more often with IA treatment but survival rates and favourable
outcomes were similar.75 Treatment was started within 12 hours of symptom onset in 73-77%
of patients, but within six hours in 29%.75 One RCT of IA urokinase included only 16 patients.
Four out of eight patients receiving UK had good outcome compared with only one out of
eight in the control group.76 Combined IA alteplase and treatment with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
inhibitor abciximab achieved higher recanalisation rates and a higher proportion of favourable
clinical outcomes compared to a historical control series receiving IA alteplase alone, with or
without stenting in either group.77
12+
2-
Recanalisation rates are known to be significantly poorer with certain sites of occlusion (for
example, carotid T occlusions) and reocclusion more common with others (for example, basilar
artery). Combined IV-IA treatment can be planned from the outset. Since recanalisation is the
major determinant of successful outcome in stroke patients treated with IV thrombolytic therapy,
and the majority of recanalisation occurs within two hours of drug administration, rescue IA
therapy is a logical development of treatment.70
One RCT comparing IV plus IA alteplase (IV 0.6 mg/kg plus IA maximum 20 mg) with placebo
plus IA alteplase, two retrospective and two prospective case series (n=63) were included in a
systematic review.73 A further prospective study of IV plus IA therapy reported a higher proportion
of favourable clinical outcomes than historical controls from published IV thrombolysis RCTs
with similar rates of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage.78
A prospective case series reported comparable outcomes in patients treated with standard IV
alteplase who recanalised (as defined by ultrasound) and those who failed to recanalise after
30 minutes of IV treatment who subsequently received IA alteplase.79
B

Intra-arterial thrombolysis may be considered for patients with proximal middle cerebral
artery occlusion or basilar artery occlusion that presents beyond four and a half
hours.
Treatment should be delivered within six hours of symptom onset in patients with
middle cerebral artery occlusion.
1+
2++
23
Intra-arterial thrombolysis should be administered as soon as possible after symptom

onset.
Intra-arterial thrombolysis should only be carried out by an appropriately trained
interventional neuroradiologist.
5.2 antiplatelet agents

5.2.1 aspirin
A systematic review of twelve RCTs of over 40,000 patients showed that aspirin at 160 or 300
mg daily reduced death and disability, recurrent stroke, and improved the likelihood of full
recovery in patients with ischaemic stroke.80 Two trials of aspirin (160 or 300 mg) given within
48 hours of stroke onset contributed 94% of the data analysed in the review. One was an open
label trial and did not require a CT scan before randomisation. Exclusion criteria for these RCTs
were vague and in all of the included trials mortality was lower than in the placebo arm (4-9%),
suggesting that major strokes were under-represented.
A

Aspirin 300 mg daily should be commenced within 48 hours of ischaemic stroke and
continued for at least 14 days.
;;

In patients with dysphagia aspirin (300 mg) should be administered rectally or by enteral
tube.
1++
17
Guidelines are available covering the identification and management of dysphagia following
stroke,7 and for administration of medication to patients with enteral feeding tubes or swallowing
difficulties.81
Standard protocols for IV and IA thrombolytic therapy presently advise avoidance of aspirin for
24 hours after thrombolytic drug treatment.80
Aspirin for preventing recurrent stroke is discussed in section 9.1.
;;
Aspirin should be avoided within 24 hours of IV or IA thrombolytic therapy.
5.2.2 aspirin plus clopidogrel

A small RCT of 110 patients with carotid stenosis showed that dual therapy with aspirin and
clopidogrel significantly reduced the proportion of patients with embolic signals on transcranial
Doppler ultrasound. The study was not powered to examine clinical end points.82 The FASTER
trial randomised 392 patients with TIA or minor stroke to aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel for
90 days, commencing within 24 hours of symptom onset. A non-significant 3.8% absolute risk
reduction (ARR) in total stroke was found for the combination therapy.25 Dual therapy with aspirin
and clopidogrel given to patients within 48 hours of TIA or minor stroke was one component
of several interventions in a prospective study, including early statins, antihypertensives and
carotid endarterectomy. The contribution of combined aspirin and clopidogrel to the reduced
stroke risk is not clear but there was no increase in the risk of intracerebral or other haemorrhage
in the study group overall.24
1+
2-
Insufficient evidence exists to support the routine use of the combination of aspirin and
clopidogrel for treating patients in the acute phase of stroke.
5.3 anticoagulants
The administration of anticoagulants is contraindicated during the first 24 hours after IV
thrombolytic therapy.83 Although recanalisation may be more successful, the risk of haemorrhage
increases. Evidence on adjunctive anticoagulation is limited and neither the safety nor efficacy
has been established.83
5.3.1 unfractionated heparin

Fixed dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) commenced within 48 hours of ischaemic stroke of
any aetiology (including patients with atrial fibrillation) does not reduce the chances of death
or dependence after 3-6 months and is not significantly superior to aspirin alone.84 A reduction
of recurrent strokes (nine fewer for every 1,000 patients treated) was offset by nine extra
symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhages for every 1,000 patients treated, and nine additional
major extracranial haemorrhages for every 1,000 patients treated.
High dose UFH given within three hours of stroke onset was associated with a significant
reduction in death or dependence. Patients eligible for very early heparin treatment are also
likely to be candidates for thrombolysis.85
18
1++
5.3.2 Low Molecular Weight heparins and heparinoids

A non-significant trend towards reduction in death and dependence at 3-6 months was seen for
low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and heparinoids when compared to control, which was
a mixture of placebo, aspirin, and unfractionated heparin (OR=0.85; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.08).86
1++
In patients with atrial fibrillation, weight-adjusted high dose LMWH (dalteparin 100 iu/kg) was
not superior to aspirin in preventing early stroke recurrence and carried a significantly higher
risk of extracerebral haemorrhage.87
1+
Symptomatic and asymptomatic venous thromboembolic events are highly significantly reduced
by all heparin treatments. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is avoided in 281 patients for every
1,000 treated and pulmonary thromboembolisms (PTE) are avoided in four patients per 1,000
treated.84 LMWH and heparinoids are associated with a significantly greater reduction in DVT
than UFH without any additional hazard.86 Enoxaparin 40 mg once daily is superior to UFH
5,000 units twice daily and is not associated with any increase in bleeding complications or
difference in mortality.88
1++
1+
5.3.3 heparin plus aspirin

Combined treatment with aspirin and UFH reduced recurrent stroke by 10 fewer per 1,000
patients treated, although a significant increase in the number of symptomatic intracranial
haemorrhages was also reported (10 more per 1,000 patients). For patients in atrial fibrillation
(AF) with acute ischaemic stroke aspirin reduces the risk of further stroke by 21% giving a
number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one stroke of 100 over 2-4 weeks.89 Any benefit of
UFH in this situation is offset by the increase in haemorrhagic stroke.89
5.3.4
Warfarin
In one trial 100 patients received warfarin within two weeks of stroke onset and none had
haemorrhagic worsening.89 Large, disabling strokes were under-represented. An arbitrary time
limit of two weeks is recommended for delaying warfarin treatment for AF following acute
stroke.89
5.3.5
1++
1+
Fibrinogen-depleting agents
Fibrinogen-depleting agents did not reduce death or dependence when given within six hours
of stroke onset.90 There was no benefit from ancrod given within six hours of stroke onset, and
a significant increase in symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial haemorrhage.91 When all
ancrod trial results are considered, no benefit on death or dependence was evident (OR=93;
95% CI 0.77 to 1.12, calculated from primary data).
A
1+
The routine use of anticoagulants (UFH, LMWH, heparinoids, oral anticoagulants, direct
thrombin inhibitors, fibrinogen-depleting agents) is not recommended for the treatment
of acute ischaemic stroke.
Anticoagulants are not recommended in patients with progressing stroke.
In patients at high risk of venous thromboembolic disease LMWH should be considered

in preference to UFH.
Following administration of IV thrombolysis, heparin should not be given in any form

for 24 hours.
For patients in atrial fibrillation following stroke, anticoagulation with warfarin can be
introduced early in patients with minor stroke or TIA, but should be deferred for two
weeks after onset in those with major stroke.
19
5.4 Neuroprotectants
Many agents have been studied for a potential neuroprotective effect in patients with stroke.
There are systematic reviews of glutamate antagonists,92 calcium antagonists,93, 94 the free radical
scavenger tirilazad,95 vinca alkaloids,96 oral citicoline,97 the sodium antagonist lubeluzole,98
corticosteroids,99 methylxanthine derivatives (pentoxiffyline, propentofylline and pentofylline),100
aminophylline,101 and piracetam102 and phase III RCTs of the free radical spin trap NXY 059,103
5HT1a agonist repinotan,104 neutrophil chemotaxis inhibitors enlimomab105 and UK-279,276,106
magnesium,107 nalmefene,108 diazepam,109 chlomethiazole,110 cerebrolysin,111 and the free radical
scavenger edaravone.112
These agents have widely differing pharmacological actions. For the majority of agents, there was
no evidence of benefit or harm. The exceptions are:
Definite harm (increase in odds of death or dependence)
tirilazad (OR=1.23; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.50)95
enlimomab (adjusted p=0.004 for worse distribution of Rankin grade).105
1++
1+
Possible harm
aptiganel hydrochloride (mortality OR=1.32; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.93)92

selfotel (mortality OR=1.19; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.74)92
corticosteroids (OR=1.08; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.72)99
calcium antagonists (OR 1.07 0.97 to 1.18)94
gavestinel (mortality OR=1.12; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.32).92
1+
Possible benefit (reduced odds of death or dependence)

citicoline (good outcome OR=1.38; 95% CI 1.10 to1.72)97
non-cortical stroke syndromes treated with magnesium (poor outcome OR=0.75; 95% CI
0.58 to 0.97).107
1++
1+
For other agents, there was insufficient evidence to define benefit or harm.
;;

5.5
Neuroprotectant agents should be used only within the context of randomised controlled
trials.
reducing raised Intracranial pressure

Stroke with symptomatic space occupying cerebral oedema affects approximately 5% of
hospitalised patients with stroke.
5.5.1 mannitol
A systematic review of mannitol in acute stroke included only one RCT of 77 patients, reported
in 1978.113 Temporary reduction in intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with cerebral oedema
in massive middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction (malignant MCA syndrome) was reported, but
there was no effect on clinical outcomes.
5.5.2
Hypertonic saline
Hypertonic saline (10%) reduced ICP (and elevated cerebral perfusion pressure) for up to
four hours after failure of mannitol in space occupying ischaemic stroke or ICH in eight
patients.114
20
1++
5.5.3 glycerol
A systematic review of 10 RCTs (n=945) of glycerol to reduce raised ICP showed a trend
towards reduced mortality within the treatment period (typically seven days, OR=0.78; 95%
CI 0.58 to 1.06), which was significant when analysis was restricted to five truly randomised
trials. 115 There was no reduction in mortality at the end of follow up.116 Only two trials reported
functional outcomes and there was no significant effect seen (OR=0.73; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.42).
A subsequent retrospective cohort study of 442 patients found no effect on mortality, and
significantly increased mortality when glycerol was co-administered with corticosteroids.115
1++
2+
5.5.4 head positioning

In stable patients with MCA infarction, cerebral perfusion pressure and MCA flow velocity
were significantly higher with flat head positioning compared to head elevation of 15 or 30
degrees.117,118 No effect on clinical outcomes was reported.
5.5.5
23
CORTICOSTEROIDS
A systematic review of seven trials of corticosteroids in acute stroke showed no evidence of
benefit.99 In a small retrospective study of corticosteroids in acute stroke 30 day mortality was
increased.115
1++
2-
5.6 Decompressive surgery

Patients with stroke involving the MCA territory and complicated by massive cerebral oedema
comprise a small proportion (3-10%) of the overall number of patients with stroke. Younger
patients tend to be over-represented in this group and the untreated mortality is very high (up to
80%).119
Pooled analysis of the data from three RCTs of hemicraniectomy for malignant MCA infarction
found significantly reduced mortality with hemicraniectomy.119 Patients were eligible if they
were between the ages of 18-60, were within 45 hours of symptom onset with severe MCA
infarct (NIHSS >15, see section 4.1.3) and had CT scan evidence of an infarct involving
>50% of the MCA territory (or MRI volume >145 cm2). Surgical hemicraniectomy and
duroplasty performed within 48 hours of symptom onset increased survival to 80% compared
to 28% with conservative management (ARR=50%; NNT=2). The effects of surgery are the
same in patients below and above the age of 50 but have not been evaluated in those over the
age of 60. The proportion of patients surviving with severe disability at three months (mRS>4,
see Annex 3) was significantly increased. The proportion with severe disability, however, was
less with longer follow up, consistent with delayed recovery in this younger population.
A further study examined the additive effect of mild hypothermia (35C) with hemicraniectomy
compared to hemicraniectomy alone in an RCT of 25 patients. There was no placebo group
as all patients received surgical treatment and this was performed early after stroke within a
mean of 15 ( 6) hours. There was a trend towards a better clinical outcome at six months with
combined hypothermia and surgery but this was not significant. Hypothermia did not appear
to have any additional risks associated with it as a treatment.120
A

1++
1+
For individuals aged up to 60 years who suffer an acute MCA territory ischaemic stroke
complicated by massive cerebral oedema, surgical decompression by hemicraniectomy
should be offered within 48 hours of stroke onset.
It is uncertain whether selected patients older than 60 years will benefit from surgical
decompression.
21
5.7 mechanical reperfusion

5.7.1 clot retrieval
Mechanical clot retrieval may be an alternative to drug therapies in patients with contraindications
to IV thrombolysis. It requires suitably trained and experienced interventional neuroradiologists
using interventional neuroradiology facilities.
Mechanical clot retrieval with the MERCI (mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischaemia)
device is associated with a recanalisation rate of 46-54% when deployed within eight hours
of symptom onset, which was higher than historical controls.121,122 Treatment with the MERCI
device is associated with clinically significant procedural complications in 7-10% of patients and
with a symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage rate of 7-10%, which is comparable to that of IA
thrombolysis within six hours. Half of all bleeds were subarachnoid haemorrhages resulting from
vessel perforation. Recanalisation is not necessarily associated with better clinical outcomes and
no RCT with concurrent controls has been undertaken.
C

Mechanical clot retrieval devices, when used by experienced interventional

neuroradiologists, may be considered in patients:
ineligible for thrombolytic drug therapy or
who have failed to improve clinically or recanalise following intravenous
thrombolysis.
Mechanical clot disruption (including clot maceration by guidewire, clot snaring and balloon
angioplasty) may achieve recanalisation in patients with persistent MCA or ICA occlusion after
standard IV or IA rt-PA.123,124 Immediate recanalisation was achieved in 38% of patients and
final recanalisation in 75% compared to rates of 6% and 72% for simple clot penetration by
microcatheter.123 Bleeding risks did not appear to be increased.
5.7.2
2+
2-
Transcranial doppler and thrombolysis

The use of continuous pulsed wave TCD ultrasound at 2 MHz in patients undergoing IV rt-PA
thrombolysis for middle cerebral artery occlusions (diagnosed by ultrasound) within three hours
of symptom onset is associated with higher rates of early recanalisation and a trend towards
more favourable clinical outcomes compared to thrombolysis alone. Forty nine per cent of
patients had complete recanalisation or dramatic recovery at two hours compared to 30% of
patients receiving rt-PA alone (relative risk reduction, RRR=1.6; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.6).125 At
three months 42% of patients receiving ultrasound had better functional outcome compared
to 29% of the control group (p=0.2).125 Similar findings were reported for transcranial colour
coded sonography (TCCS) at identical frequency.126
1+
;; Augmentation of IV thrombolysis by continuous 2 MHz pulsed wave TCD ultrasound

should be considered in the context of further clinical trials.
Using lower frequencies of ultrasound causes less heating and gives better penetration, but
there is an excess risk of inrtacerebral haemorrhage.127
B
22
TCD ultrasound at lower (kilohertz) frequencies is not recommended.
1+
5.8 Prior statin therapy

Evidence from retrospective studies suggests that in addition to reducing the risk of recurrent
stroke, statin pre-treatment may improve stroke outcome.
A small single centre RCT randomised 89 patients with ischaemic stroke, on prior statin therapy,
to either atorvastatin 20 mg (initiated within 24 hours of symptom onset) or withdrawal of statin
therapy for three days.128 Withdrawing statins increased the risk of death and dependency at
90 days (OR=4.66; 95% CI 1.46 to 14.91), and increased the risk of a poor clinical outcome
(mRS>2; 60% versus 39%; p=0.043).
1-
Guidelines are available covering the identification and management of dysphagia following
stroke,7 and for administration of medication to patients with enteral feeding tubes or swallowing
difficulties.81
;;

Patients with ischaemic stroke on prior statin therapy should continue treatment, via a
nasogastric tube, if necessary.
23
Treatment of primary intracerebral

haemorrhage
6.1
haematoma evacuation
The evidence for haematoma evacuation and clot lysis for primary intracerebral haemorrhage
is inconsistent due to the small size and heterogeneous entry criteria of most RCTs in this area,
compounded by the very long time span over which these RCTs have been conducted.
Three systematic reviews of ICH evacuation each make different judgements on data from
RCTs.129-131 One systematic review of four RCTs (n=354) included data from an RCT conducted
in 1961, before use of CT to confirm diagnosis.130 A metaanalysis of seven RCTs and two quasirandomised trials (total n=1,258), also included data from non-randomised trials.131 There was a
non-significant trend towards reduced mortality (OR=0.84; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.07) and reduced
death or dependence (OR=0.82; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06) for surgical intervention.91 One trial
contributed the greatest number of patients (1,033) to this systematic review, but covered a wide
range of interventions in a heterogeneous population over an extended time period.132
1++
1+
Other analyses from STICH (Surgical Treatment for IntraCerebral Haemorrhage) indicate an
extremely wide variation in the rate of surgical intervention by country.133 More than 75% of
surgical interventions were by craniotomy.
In the single RCT published since the 2006 systematic review, with intervention within eight hours
of onset, there was a non-significant reduction in death (48% versus 57%) and good functional
outcome was significantly more frequent (33% versus 9%).134
1+
Minimally invasive surgical approaches such as stereotactic aspiration of haematoma after

instillation of lytic drugs suggest benefit (death OR=0.29; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.59; death or
dependence OR=0.48; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.96) but RCTs have included only 185 subjects.135
1+
Routine surgical evacuation by craniotomy is not recommended for supratentorial

primary intracerebral haematoma.
If surgical evacuation of primary intracerebral haematoma is considered:

minimally invasive procedures including stereotaxy-guided evacuation should be
considered as an alternative to craniotomy
early intervention (within eight hours of symptom onset) is recommended.
6.2 thrombolysis
Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) is an established independent risk factor for poor prognosis
in ICH. External ventricular drain (EVD) placement allows monitoring and intracranial pressure
management.136
24
A single RCT of patients with PICH and hydrocephalus requiring EVD, randomising to urokinase
(n=7) or placebo was identified.137 Intraventricular urokinase speeds up radiological resolution
of IVH clots. Treatment reduced the half-time of radiological resolution by a mean of 3.8 days,
from 8.5 in the placebo group to 4.7 in the urokinase treated group The trial was too small to
assess the effect on functional outcomes and mortality and did not have a non-surgical control
group for comparison.
1-
Case series identified by a systematic review report more favourable outcomes than historical
controls, where used, with IVH lysis either by rt-PA or urokinase administered either continuously
or intermittently via an external ventricular drain.136 There was no reported increase in risk of
haemorrhage or other adverse outcomes.
6 TREATMENT OF PRIMARY INRTACEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE
6.3
haemostatic therapies
RCTs of haemostatic therapy are justified on the basis of natural history studies that identify
the prognostic importance of early haematoma expansion in the first four hours after symptom
onset, and the association of expansion and larger haematoma volume with poor outcome.
A systematic review of four RCTs showed that, despite methodological limitations, recombinant
factor VIIa significantly reduced the risk of death or dependence within 90 days of PICH.138
1++
Preliminary results from a study of recombinant factor VIIa in acute haemorrhagic stroke
treatment showed reductions in haematoma volume growth similar to previous studies but
failed to show any benefits on death or dependency at 90 days with 20 mcg/kg or 80 mcg/kg
of factor VIIa compared to placebo.139
;;

6.4
Haemostatic therapies should only be used in primary intracerebral haemorrhage within

randomised controlled trials.
reducing raised Intracranial pressure
6.4.1 corticosteroids
A systematic review of corticosteroids in primary intracerebral haemorrhage included five RCTs,
all of which used dexamethasone 4-12 mg for 2-16 days.140 Two trials conducted in the 1970s
did not confirm the diagnosis radiologically and in one, 28% of patients were found to have
had ischaemic stroke at autopsy.140
1++
At one month, dexamethasone had no significant effect on mortality (RR=1.14; 95% CI 0.91
to 1.42) or death or dependence (RR=0.95; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.09). A non-significantly higher
number of complications was reported in patients treated with dexamethasone.140
B

Corticosteroids should not be used for treatment of primary intracerebral

haemorrhage.
6.4.2 mannitol
One RCT compared IV mannitol infusions to placebo for control of raised ICP in spontaneous
primary intracerebral haemorrhage.141 Four-hourly infusions of 100 ml of 20% mannitol for
five days in patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH did not affect one-month mortality
(16 out of 65 mannitol-treated patients compared to 16 out of 63 untreated patients, OR=0.96;
95% CI 0.40 to 2.31 as calculated by guideline development group) or three month death or
dependence on the Barthel Index (39 out of 65 patients compared to 34 out of 63, OR=1.28;
95% CI 0.60 to 2.74).
B

1+
Intravenous mannitol should not be used routinely for treatment of raised intracranial
pressure in patients with primary intracerebral haemorrhage.
Significant benefit or harm from these interventions cannot be excluded.
25
7 Other causes of stroke

7.1 Cerebral venous thrombosis
Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke, affecting only two to four people per
million per year, accounting for 0.5% of all strokes.142, 143 Diagnosing cerebral venous thrombosis
is difficult and CVT are often assumed to be ischaemic infarcts. Clinical symptoms are very variable
and non-specific. CT appearances can be subtly different and other imaging such as MR or CT
venography may be required. The aetiology is often multifactorial and underlying thrombophilias
are found in 22% of patients.142,143
7.1.1 anticoagulants
Anticoagulation appears to be safe following cerebral venous thrombosis and may be associated
with an improvement in outcome and reduced mortality.
A systematic review identified one poor quality and one small RCT (80 patients in total) to
include in a meta-analysis. Treatment with anticoagulation (dose adjusted unfractionated heparin
and the LMWH, nadroparin) commenced within 10 to 32 days of diagnosis and continued for
three weeks, followed by warfarin therapy for 10 weeks, appears to be relatively safe. No new
symptomatic inrtacerebral haemorrhages occurred during treatment with anticoagulants.144
1++
A case series reported the rate of ICH in patients with CVT at between 0% and 5.4%.143
Anticoagulation resulted in non-significant reductions in death or dependency at three months
and non-significant reductions in death from any cause.
Intravenous UFH or subcutaneous LMWH followed by warfarin therapy should be

considered in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis.
;;

Anticoagulation with warfarin (target INR 2-3) should usually be continued for 6-12
months following the recommendations for treatment of deep vein thrombosis and
pulmonary thromboembolism.
7.1.2 thrombolysis
A Cochrane review of thrombolysis for cerebral venous thrombosis identified no RCTs.145
A retrospective non-randomised study of local urokinase suggested that thrombolysis in
cerebral venous thrombosis appears safe but its routine clinical use cannot be supported.146 It
may be indicated in selected cases where there is ongoing clinical deterioration despite other
therapy.142,147
2++
4
There is insufficient evidence to support thrombolysis for cerebral venous thrombosis.
7.2 Extracranial cervical arterial dissection

Extracranial cervical arterial dissection is an uncommon cause of stroke, accounting for 2.5%
of all strokes and 5-22% of strokes in young people (<45 years). The incidence of carotid
artery dissections is two to three per 100,000 per year. Aetiologies include chiropractic neck
manipulations and arteriopathies such as fibromuscular dysplasia and cystic medial necrosis.
26
Dissections of the vertebral arteries are less well defined but occur in 1 to 1.5 per 100,000 per
year in a hospital population series.148 Multiple arteries are involved in 28% of patients and the
vertebral arteries in around 25%. The risk of recurrence of carotid dissection is around 1% per
annum. The subsequent risk of stroke was around 1% and the risk of TIA around 2% over a
follow-up period of 31 months in one case series.148
One long term follow-up study over six to seven years showed annual rates of ipsilateral stroke
of 0.7% and of any stroke of 1.4% for those left with permanent carotid stenosis or occlusion.
Following transient stenosis with complete or partial recovery (<50% stenosis), the annual rate
of ipsilateral stroke after treated carotid dissection was 0.3% and of any stroke was 0.6%.149
7 OTHER CAUSES OF STROKE
The most likely cause of stroke in cervical artery dissection is embolism from the dissection
flap but some cases may be due to haemodynamic compromise from the dissection itself.150 It
is important to be aware of the possibility of intracranial extension of the dissection resulting in
subarachnoid haemorrhage. This diagnosis should be excluded in the usual way if symptoms are
suggestive prior to initiating treatment with antiplatelets or anticoagulation.151
3
4
7.2.1 anticoagulants and antiplatelets

A Cochrane review identified no RCT evidence on the treatment of extracranial cervical arterial
dissection.152 Comparative analysis of case series found that there was no significant difference in
outcomes in terms of either benefit or detriment between antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation.
Surgical treatment does not appear to be beneficial but little evidence exists to confirm this.
A Canadian multicentre prospective series of 116 patients (67 vertebral and 49 carotid dissections),
found a 15% risk of recurrent TIA, stroke or death at one year of follow up. The event rate for
patients on anticoagulation was not significantly different to those on aspirin.153
In patients with extracranial cervical arterial dissection consider treatment with

either:
anticoagulation for three to six months or
antiplatelet agents.
;;

The possibility of subarachnoid haemorrhage should be excluded prior to initiating

therapy if there are features suggestive of this complication.
;;

Further imaging of the cervical arteries may be required to assess healing or progression
of the vascular lesion.
7.2.2 endovascular stenting

Two small case series (n=18) demonstrated the feasibility of using endovascular stenting for
carotid artery dissection.154, 155 The procedures were well tolerated and only one TIA occurred
following stenting. No other conclusions could be drawn.
Cervical artery pseudo-aneurysms occur following carotid artery dissection in 5-40% of cases.
Follow up of patients on aspirin treatment of up to three years revealed no clinical or radiological
events. Over time 5-25% resolved completely, 16-30% reduced in size and 59-65% remained
unchanged.156
D

Endovascular stenting is not routinely recommended for extracranial cervical arterial

dissection or cervical artery pseudo-aneurysms.
;;

Stenting may be considered if recurrent ischaemic events occur despite medical therapy
or where traumatic dissection has occurred with a high risk of stroke.
27
8 Physiological monitoring and intervention

8.1
physiological monitoring
Little evidence was identified relating to intensity of physiological monitoring. The studies that have
been done looked at different individual components of physiological monitoring. Trials addressing
intensity tended to compare continuous monitoring with four to six times daily measurements
for a period of 48 to 72 hours. The patients included all had ischaemic strokes. The studies did
not address monitoring of conscious level or pulse rate as individual items. Patients who had
received thrombolysis were not included.
A prospective study of 268 patients with ischaemic stroke comparing continuous monitoring
(blood pressure, electrocardiogram, oxygen saturation, temperature) for 72 hours in a stroke
unit compared to routine care (less intense monitoring) showed that more intensive care led to
a 2.5 fold increase in the probability of a good outcome at discharge. This may be due to earlier
detection and correction of complications.157
2+
A small RCT (54 patients) compared a stroke care monitoring unit (SCMU) to conventional stroke
unit care. Monitoring for 48 hours was associated with a lower proportion of patients who died
or had a poor outcome at three months. The average length of stay was shorter for the SCMU (16
5 days versus 25 7 days).158
1+
Continuous or frequent physiological monitoring in the acute phase of stroke identifies adverse
physiological events that may require intervention.
;;
An active monitoring protocol should include frequent observations of:

blood pressure
blood glucose
oxygen saturation
temperature
ECG
respiratory rate
heart rate
pulse rate
conscious level.
;;

Monitoring should be balanced against other important aspects of stroke unit care,
particularly early mobilisation and rehabilitation.
8.2 Physiological intervention

8.2.1 fluid replacement therapy
Many patients are dehydrated on admission, and this may be associated with a poorer outcome.159
Delivery of intravenous fluids is routine acute treatment in stroke, particularly in patients at risk
of dehydration, such as those with reduced conscious level or swallowing impairment.
There are limited data available on the use of intravenous fluids in acute stroke. No studies were
identified to determine the most effective type or volume of infusion.
28
Data extrapolated from evidence in patients with hyperglycaemia support avoidance of dextrose
in the early post-stroke phase.160
1+
The available evidence consistently showed no benefit from haemodilution in the acute phase of
stroke, rather there was a modest trend towards harm, except in patients with polycythaemia.161
A meta-analysis of studies of haemodilution using plasma expanders (dextran, hydroxyethyl
starch and albumin) compared to standard fluid replacement therapy found no evidence of
benefit over standard regimens in terms of reducing mortality or improving functional outcome
in survivors.161
1++
8 PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INTERVENTION
Whilst not designed as an efficacy study, a study of the effects of hydroxyl ethyl starch showed
no benefit over crystalloid solution.162
1-
The use of standard IV saline infusion was associated with a significant fall in plasma glucose
within the first 24 hours after acute ischaemic stroke.160
1+
A small study of 34 stroke patients with dysphagia randomised to either intravenous or subcutaneous
fluid replacement therapy suggests that the latter will satisfactorily maintain plasma osmolality
within normal limits.163
2+
There are no RCTs directly comparing saline to other crystalloids.

;;

Early assessment of fluid balance and initiation of an appropriate IV fluid regime

to maintain normal serum osmolality (or euvolaemia) should be part of routine clinical
practice.
To prevent iatrogenic hyperglycaemia, IV saline infusion is preferable to glucose

containing preparations.
Haemodilution is not recommended as a routine treatment in acute stroke with the

possible exception of patients with polycythaemia.
For patients in whom IV fluids are not appropriate, subcutaneous fluids can be used
to maintain plasma osmolality within the normal range.
8.2.2 blood pressure management

Patients with the highest and lowest levels of blood pressure recorded within 24 hours of an
acute stroke have been shown to have early neurological decline and poorer outcome.164 The
evidence about the relative risks or benefits of actively elevating or lowering blood pressure is
inconclusive.
A systematic review showed that a variety of agents including beta blockers, calcium channel
blockers (CCB), nitric oxide donors and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors all lower
blood pressure after acute ischaemic stroke.165 None of the studies found a robust association
between blood pressure reduction and improved outcomes. Further systematic reviews of
CCBs and nitric oxide donors failed to show any association between treatment and improved
outcome.94,166
2-
1++
Blood pressure elevation using either phenylephrine or dexamphetamine has been associated
with reduction in infarct size. A small study (45 patients) suggests that blood pressure elevation
with dexamphetamine may improve early outcome.167,168
1-
Small studies looking at surrogate markers of cerebral blood flow, such as SPECT, showed that
both perindopril or losartan given within 2-7 days of stroke onset do not lower cerebral blood
flow.169,170 One study of perfusion weighted MRI suggested that phenylephrine may reduce infarct
size.168 These interventions have not been tested in RCTs with clinical end points.
1+
Compared to placebo, candesartan given early after acute stroke appears to be associated
with a reduction in further events despite a lack of effect on blood pressure.171 The study was
underpowered and did not meet its primary end points, so no firm conclusions on BP lowering
can be made.171
1-
Bendroflumethazide at 2.5 mg was shown to be ineffective at lowering blood pressure in patients

with mild to moderate hypertension in the early post-stroke period.172
1++
Nimodipine has a negative effect on outcomes associated with a reduction in diastolic blood
pressure but not with lowering of systolic blood pressure.169
1+
Lisinopril appears to be safe in the acute phase of stroke but its clinical benefit is uncertain. Given
orally to patients with hypertension (140/90 mmHg), 5 mg within 24 hours of stroke onset
significantly lowered blood pressure within four hours of administration. No difference was found
in neurological or functional outcomes at 90 days.173
1+
29
Ongoing trials are exploring whether BP should be lowered acutely following stroke, and whether
antihypertensive therapy should be continued or stopped in the first few days after stroke.174,175
A

Blood pressure should not be actively managed as a routine in patients in the acute
phase of ischaemic stroke.
;;

Where possible, patients should be randomised into ongoing clinical trials of BP

manipulation.
8.2.3 blood glucose management

Hyperglycaemia occurs in 20% to 63% of patients admitted with ischaemic stroke and in the
absence of prior diabetes.176, 177 Acute post-stroke hyperglycaemia is associated with larger infarct
volumes and cortical involvement,178,179 which may be associated with ischaemia of the insular
cortex.180 Hyperglycaemia at any time after acute stroke is an important determinant of infarct
expansion and may be associated with poorer functional outcome.178
A meta-analysis suggests that the relative risk of death in hyperglycaemic non-diabetic stroke
patients is increased by 3.3 (95% CI 2.3 to 4.6).177 Observational data suggest that over a third of
patients with ischaemic stroke without previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes may have impaired
glucose tolerance or diabetes confirmed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which persists
at discharge.181
No evidence was identified to support early active treatment of mild to moderate hyperglycaemia
in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. An RCT comparing a 24 hour glucose/potassium/insulin
(GKI) infusion with standard intravenous saline infusion in 933 patients with a blood glucose
level between 7 and 17 mmol/L was terminated early due to slow recruitment.160 There was no
difference in mortality or other measured outcomes between the two groups. The GKI regimen
used was labour intensive and there was a 16% risk of persisting low glucose requiring rescue
treatment. There was an absolute reduction in glucose of 0.57 mmol/L compared to saline
infusion. Potential confounders included an effect on blood pressure in the insulin treated group
and a lack of standardisation of management after 24 hours.
B Routine use of insulin regimens to lower blood glucose in patients with moderate
hyperglycaemia after acute stroke is not recommended.
C Patients with hyperglycaemia (random blood glucose >7 mmol/L) should be formally

assessed (by OGTT) to exclude or confirm a diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance

or diabetes.
;;
Hypoglycaemia should be corrected according to local protocols.
;;
Patients with diabetes should be treated according to local protocols.
8.2.4 feeding
Oropharyngeal dysphagia affects a large proportion of patients in the acute phase of stroke.
Swallowing difficulties can result in serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia,
undernutrition, dehydration and missed medication. It is important that early screening for
symptoms of dysphagia is carried out on admission and before giving food, drink or administering
oral medications.
Guidelines are available on the identification and management of dysphagia following stroke,7
and for the administration of medication to patients with enteral feeding tubes or swallowing
difficulties.81
In patients who have difficulty taking food and oral medication safely due to a low consciousness
level and/or the presence of dysphagia, nutrition may be provided via a nasogastric (NG) tube
or a percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) tube. There is no clear guidance on how quickly feeding
should be initiated and which feeding tube is more suitable.
30
1+
3
1+
A multicentre RCT investigated the timing and method of enteral feeding for patients with
dysphagia in the acute phase of stroke. There was no statistically significant difference between
early and delayed feeding on mortality and morbidity. Early tube feeding showed a non-significant
absolute risk reduction in death of 5.8% (95% CI -0.8 to 12.5; p=0.09).182 There was a borderline
statistically significant increase of 7.8% in the absolute risk of death or poor outcome in the use of
PEG compared with NG (95% CI 0.0 to 15.5; p= 0.05).182 An RCT investigating the routine use
of oral nutritional supplements recruited non-dysphagic patients who were adequately nourished
prior to their stroke.183 No significant difference was identified between the study groups, although
no evidence was identified for withholding the focused use of nutritional supplements in patients
recognised at risk through nutritional screening. 183
1++
A Early placement of a nasogastric feeding tube should be considered in patients identified

as unable to take adequate oral intake.
A Routine use of nutritional supplements is not recommended.
8.2.5 supplementary oxygen therapy
A single centre quasi-randomised study of 550 non-hypoxic patients in the acute phase of stroke
compared normobaric supplemental oxygen (100%) at 3 litre/minute for 24 hours via nasal
catheter to no treatment.184 There was no statistically significant difference in one year survival
(OR=0.82; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.19; p=0.300) between treatment and no treatment and no statistically
significant difference in neurological or disability scores at seven months. Sub-analysis found a
non-significant trend towards oxygen therapy increasing mortality in the mild/moderate stroke
group but being of benefit in the severe stroke group.
1-
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine treatment of non-hypoxic patients in the

acute phase of ischaemic stroke with 100% normobaric oxygen.
Two systematic reviews of the same three RCTs of hyperbaric oxygen for acute ischaemic stroke
concluded that although there was no convincing evidence that hyperbaric oxygen therapy is
effective for patients with ischaemic stroke, there was no evidence that it is ineffective.185, 186 A
third review assessed two of the three RCTs.187 The RCTs included were all small (n=106) and
underpowered. Due to significant methodological differences analyses of time elapsed from stroke
to treatment with hyperbaric oxygen, dose of oxygen and length of treatment course could not
be performed. Only data on mortality could be pooled. There were no significant differences in
mortality at six months in those receiving hyperbaric oxygen compared to control (RR=0.61;
95% CI 0.17 to 2.2; p=0.45).185
A

1++
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for patients with acute ischaemic stroke is not recommended
outwith the setting of a clinical trial.
8.2.6 management of pyrexia

Increased body temperature in the acute phase of stroke is associated with poor outcome and the
source of any increased body temperature should be investigated.188
2+
A systematic review did not identify any evidence that either physical cooling or the use of
medication to lower temperature has an effect on outcome.189
1++
Three small trials studying the effect of paracetamol (166 patients in total) and ibuprofen (24) in
lowering temperature in patients with acute stroke showed the limitations of antipyretic medications
in achieving normothermia for patients with fever.190-192 Treatment with a daily dose of 6,000 mg
of paracetamol resulted in a small reduction in body temperature.191
1-
Increased body temperature should be investigated and antipyretic medications may

be administered to assist in lowering the body temperature.
31
8.2.7 induction of hypothermia

No robust evidence was identified on the induction of hypothermia as a treatment for patients
with ischaemic stroke.
One small RCT (n=25) of patients with malignant ischaemic stroke suitable for hemicraniectomy
compared the safety and therapeutic benefit of hemicraniectomy combined with mild hypothermia
(25C) versus hemicraniectomy alone.120 There was no statistically significant difference between
the two groups in death or clinical outcome measures (NIHSS, BI and mRS), although there
was a trend in favour of hemicraniectomy plus hypothermia using NIHSS and Barthel outcome
measures. The groups were not well matched as more patients in the hemicraniectomy group
had right sided infarcts and more patients in the combination group had additional infarcts of
cerebral arteries, which may have affected clinical outcome scores. The randomisation process
and investigator blinding were also unclear.
8.2.8
1-
Early mobilisation
A systematic review found good long term benefit from early neurological rehabilitation as part
of routine stroke care. Early mobilisation and early neurorehabilitation were not clearly defined.
Early was from one to three days and mobilisation was any physical activity of the body initiated
either by the patient or by the environment (for example, positioning in bed, sitting on the edge
of the bed, or standing up). Studies using comparisons between stroke units and general wards
showed that stroke units had better outcomes, although the practice of getting patients out of bed
within 24 hours in one of the studies may be confounding.193
A

1++
Early mobilisation, including positioning in bed, sitting on the edge of the bed, or standing
up should be considered for patients within the first three days after a stroke.
8.2.9 physical therapy

A systematic review of the impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke included
studies with diverse interventions and flawed methodology. Insufficient evidence was identified
in terms of functional outcome for traditional neurological treatment approaches.
Task orientated exercise training applied intensively and early, showed a small benefit.194 An
observational study of 830 patients with moderate or severe strokes looked at the association
between patient characteristics, the intensity and amount of therapy, and outcomes using the
functional independence measure (FIM) of level of assistance in rehabilitation and functional
assessment measure (FAM), and length of stay. Patients with moderate strokes did better with
early participation in higher order and more challenging therapy activities aiming for shorter
more intense rehabilitation. Patients with severe strokes did better with more extended
rehabilitation.195 Neither timing nor the rehabilitation activities were clearly defined. A small
study (58 patients with mild to severe stroke) monitored patient activity between 8 am and 5
pm over a period of two days and identified high levels of bed rest. At five days post stroke
patients with mild stroke spent 11% of the day in active walking and 53% of the time they
were resting in bed. Patients were alone for 60% of the time, spending 85.5% of their day in
or beside their bed.196
D
32
Patients suitability for early, active rehabilitation should be considered.

Healthcare professionals managing patients in the acute phase of stroke should
consider how to actively engage patients throughout the day.
1++
1+
2+
3
8.2.10 active positioning

A systematic review of four RCTs looking at oxygen saturation and positioning included 183
patients. There was heterogeneity in the testing positions, selection criteria, outcome measures and
definition of hypoxia. Positioning did not affect oxygen saturation in patients without respiratory
comorbidity. There was limited evidence that in patients with stroke who suffer from, or are at
risk of, hypoxia an upright sitting position was beneficial, while being supine or side lying was
shown to be detrimental.197
A small study (24 patients) of the effect of body position on arterial oxygen saturation in the first
72 hours following mild to moderate stroke found no significant differences between four lying
or sitting positions.198 A larger study of 129 patients with stroke who were unable to walk without
assistance and required help to change position, measured arterial oxygen saturation by pulse
oximetry in five different positions maintained for 10 minutes. Sitting in a chair, if the patient was
fit to do so, gave significantly higher mean arterial oxygen saturation than any other position.
Lying on the left side (regardless of which side was hemiplegic) resulted in lower mean arterial
oxygen saturation. The median inclusion time was 72 hours.199
Flat positioning improved middle cerebral artery mean blood flow velocity, measured by TCD
ultrasound in patients in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke compared to elevating the head of
the bed by 30 or 15 degrees.118 The study was small (20 patients) and inconclusive on patient
outcomes.
C
1++
2+
2-
Patients should be placed in an upright sitting position, if their medical condition

allows.
Hypoxia inducing positions (on left side or slumped in a chair) should be avoided.
33
9 Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with

ischaemic stroke or TIA
Multiple strategies for the secondary prevention of subsequent vascular events may be effective
following stroke and TIA. A strategy combining three medications (aspirin, a statin and an
antihypertensive) with diet and exercise may reduce recurrent vascular events in patients with
cerebrovascular disease by 80% over five years in patients with an initial cerebrovascular
event.200 In appropriate individuals at high risk, further benefit could be gained from carotid
endarterectomy, oral anticoagulation, glycaemic control and smoking cessation.200
In an outpatient clinic rapid assessment of patients following a TIA or minor stroke and initiation
of secondary prevention with antiplatelet, statin and antihypertensive therapy and urgent carotid
imaging with rapid vascular surgical referral as appropriate resulted in an 80% reduction in the
risk of early recurrent stroke.24

See section 5.2 for additional guidance on antiplatelet treatment.
Following the initial treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with aspirin there is currently insufficient
evidence to support the use of either dipyridamole or clopidogrel alone in preference to aspirin
for preventing recurrent stroke.201-206
1++
Clopidogrel was more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the combined end point of ischaemic
stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death (RRR=8.7%; 95% CI 0.3 to 16.5; p=0.043;
ARR=0.51%; NNT=196 to prevent one event over a year) except in the subgroup recruited with
prior stroke where there was no significant benefit of clopidogrel over aspirin (RRR=7.3%; 95%
CI -5.7 to 18.7; p=0.26; ARR=0.56%; NNT=179 to prevent one event over a year).207
1++
9.1.1 combination therapy

A systematic review and a subsequent RCT compared the use of aspirin in combination with
dipyridamole with aspirin alone or dipyridamole alone.201, 202 The combination of aspirin and
dipyridamole significantly reduced the risk of the composite end point of MI, stroke or vascular
death compared with aspirin alone (OR=0.82; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91; ARR=1% per year, 95%
CI 0.1 to 1.8; NNT=104; 95% CI 55 to 1006) without an increase in bleeding complications.24
Benefit from this combination was maintained for the five years duration of the trial. The two
largest RCTs used a modified release preparation of dipyridamole (200 mg twice daily). Twenty
six per cent of those taking dipyridamole in the ESPRIT trial discontinued it.202
Dipyridamole is commonly associated with headache. A small study (146 patients) found dose
titration of dipyridamole modified release (200 mg daily for one week then 200 mg twice daily)
resulted in a non-significant reduction in the incidence of headache.208
Two large RCTs evaluated the use of aspirin and clopidogrel in combination.204, 206 In the MATCH
trial there was no significant benefit of aspirin and clopidogrel in combination over clopidogrel
alone in a high risk population with recent ischaemic stroke or TIA for the combined end point of
ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, vascular death, or rehospitalisation for acute ischaemia
(RRR=6.4%; 95% CI -4.6 to 16.3; p=0.24). The rate of life threatening and major bleeding was
increased in the combination group.204 In the CHARISMA trial a population of patients with multiple
vascular risk factors or established vascular disease was randomised to aspirin in combination
with clopidogrel or aspirin alone. There was no significant difference in the combined end point
of MI, stroke or vascular death (RRR=0.93; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.05; p=0.22).
The rate of moderate bleeding was higher in the combination group. The combination of aspirin
and clopidogrel is no more effective than aspirin or clopidogrel alone for secondary prevention of
ischaemic stroke but is associated with an increase in moderate or life threatening bleeding.206
34
1++
1-
1++
1++
9 PREVENTING RECURRENT STROKE IN PATIENTS WITH ISCHAEMIC STROKE OR TIA
An RCT in 20,332 patients followed up for a mean of 2.5 years, compared aspirin 25 mg plus
dipyridamole extended release 200 mg twice daily with clopidogrel 75 mg with the primary
outcome of first recurrent stroke. The net risk of recurrent stroke did not differ between the two
groups (11.7% in the aspirin/dipyridamole group compared to 11.4% in the clopidogrel group;
95% CI 0.95 to 1.11).209
1+
In patients with aspirin-related gastrointestinal intolerance there is no evidence that clopidogrel is

better tolerated than aspirin or that addition of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) improves symptoms,
with the exception of those with a previously healed peptic ulcer.210
1+
Low-dose aspirin (75 mg daily) and dipyridamole (200 mg modified release twice daily)
should be prescribed after ischaemic stroke or TIA for secondary prevention of vascular
events.
Dose titration of dipyridamole may help to reduce the incidence of headache.
Clopidogrel (75mg daily) monotherapy should be considered as an alternative to

combination aspirin and dipyridamole after ischaemic stroke or TIA for secondary
prevention of vascular events.
;;

Patients with a documented aspirin hypersensitivity should receive treatment with

clopidogrel monotherapy.
;;

Patients unable to tolerate aspirin and dipyridamole combination therapy or clopidogrel

monotherapy should receive treatment with aspirin or dipyridamole monotherapy.
The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is not recommended for long term secondary
prevention of ischaemic stroke or TIA.
9.1.2 triflusal
A meta-analysis showed no significant difference between aspirin and triflusal for secondary
prevention of serious vascular events, including ischaemic stroke and TIA.211 Two doses of
triflusal were used in the included trials (600 mg and 900 mg). The confidence intervals of the
meta-analysis were wide and cannot exclude the possibility that triflusal is significantly better or
worse than aspirin. Triflusal was associated with a significantly lower risk of minor and major
bleeding episodes but had a higher risk of non-haemorrhagic gastrointestinal episodes.211 A
significant number of patients discontinued the study medication early for reasons other than the
primary outcome.
1++
Trifusal is not currently licensed in the UK.
9.2
statins
There is consistent evidence from two systematic reviews212, 213 and a subsequent RCT214
that treatment with a statin significantly reduces the relative risk of ischaemic stroke by 21%
(OR=0.79; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.85) although stroke death is not significantly reduced (OR=0.91;
95% CI 0.76 to 1.10). The effect was seen without an associated increase in haemorrhagic stroke
(OR=0.90; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.22). The reduction in stroke risk is proportional to the lowering of
low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and occurs irrespective of baseline cholesterol level.215
Treatment with a statin also significantly reduces coronary events and all-cause mortality.215
1++
Atorvastatin at 80 mg daily given to patients with recent stroke or TIA reduced ischaemic stroke
and cardiovascular events after TIA or ischaemic stroke. Over a median follow up of 4.9 years
the absolute risk reduction in fatal or non-fatal stroke was 2.2% (95% CI 0.2 to 4.2%) giving an
NNT over five years of 45 to prevent one fatal or non-fatal stroke. There were more haemorrhagic
strokes in the atorvastatin group giving a hazard ratio of 1.66 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.55). The absolute
risk increase was 0.9% giving a number needed to harm (NNH) of 107 over five years.215
35
Simvastatin at 40 mg daily given to patients with prior cerebrovascular disease reduced the
incidence of any major vascular event (RRR=20%; 95% CI 8 to 29%; p=0.01), but did not
reduce the risk of subsequent stroke.215
1++
A systematic review pooled 8,832 individual patients with prior cerebrovascular disease treated
with a statin, including simvastatin (40 mg), atorvastatin (80 mg) and pravastatin (40 mg).216 The
overall relative risk reduction for any type of stroke in statin users was 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to
0.99). The relative risk of ischaemic stroke is reduced to 0.8 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.92) but there is an
increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke with a hazard ratio of 1.73 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.50).
1++
A statin should be prescribed to patients who have had an ischaemic stroke, irrespective
of cholesterol level.
Atorvastatin (80 mg) should be considered for patients with TIA or ischaemic stroke.
A Other statins (such as simvastatin 40 mg) may also be considered as they reduce the
risk of major vascular events.
A

Statin therapy for prevention of further vascular events post-haemorrhagic stroke is not
recommended routinely unless the risk of further vascular events outweighs the risk of
further haemorrhage.
9.3 anticoagulants
9.3.1
Patients with non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke

A systematic review comparing anticoagulants with antiplatelets in patients with non-cardioembolic
ischaemic stroke looked at 4,076 patients in five trials.217 Despite the heterogeneity of the studies,
there was no difference in all-cause mortality in patients treated with either antiplatelets or low
(INR 1.42.8) or medium (INR 2.13.6) intensity anticoagulation. All-cause mortality was higher
for intensive anticoagulation (INR 3.0-4.5) as were major bleeding complications.
The oral anticoagulant versus aspirin arm of the ESPRIT trial showed that in patients with TIA
or non-disabling stroke, oral anticoagulants are no more effective than aspirin for secondary
prevention of vascular events.218 Although there is possibly a protective effect against ischaemic
events, this is offset by an increase in bleeding complications.
A

1++
1+
Anticoagulation is not recommended for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with

non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke.
9.3.2 patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke

In patients in atrial fibrillation early risk of recurrent stroke is around 5% within two weeks.89 In
patients with AF treated with aspirin, the stroke risk is 10% per annum in those with a previous
stroke compared to 2.7% in those without a previous stroke. This is reduced to 4% and 1.5% per
annum respectively with oral anticoagulants.219
A systematic review concluded that warfarin was more effective for prevention of all vascular events
OR=0.67 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.91) and recurrent stroke OR=0.49 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.72), which is
equivalent to 60 fewer recurrent strokes per year per 1,000 patients treated.220 Major extracranial
bleeding was more frequent in patients treated with warfarin OR=5.16 (95% CI 2.08 to 12.83)
but absolute differences were small. No significant increase in intracranial bleeding was reported
OR=1.99 (95% CI 0.44 to 9.88) but the confidence intervals were wide.220
36
1++
1+
1++
Despite the increased incidence of AF and the higher stroke risk in the elderly (>75 years)
anticoagulation is underused in this age group. One trial comparing dose-adjusted warfarin (INR
2.0-3.0) to aspirin 300 mg daily in a group of octogenarians found more adverse events in the
aspirin group (33% compared to 6%, p=0.002).221 Compared to aspirin 75 mg in patients aged
>75 years with AF, warfarin significantly reduced the risk of stroke, arterial embolism or other
ICH (21 events with warfarin, 48 events with aspirin; yearly risk 1.8% versus 3.8%; RRR=0.48
95%, CI 0.28 to 0.8; p= 0.003; ARR=2%; 95% CI 0.7 to 3.2; NNT=50 over one year).222 This
benefit takes into account any intracranial haemorrhages and occurs without any increase in the
risk of extracranial haemorrhage (1.4% warfarin, 1.6% aspirin per annum).
A

Patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA who are in atrial fibrillation should be offered
warfarin with target INR 2.0-3.0.
In the absence of contraindications and patient preference for alternative treatment,

warfarin should be offered routinely to elderly patients (>75 years) with ischaemic
stroke or TIA who are in atrial fibrillation.
1+
1-
No evidence was identified to support benefit from the routine use of aspirin in addition to
warfarin.
9.4
Antihypertensives
There is a well established link between blood pressure and stroke,223 and between blood pressure
treatment and reduction in stroke risk.224
Current guidelines for management of hypertension from the British Hypertension Society suggest
systolic BP should be treated to <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP to <85 mm Hg,225 with a target
of 130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes.226
While many studies have included small numbers of patients with previous stroke, there have
been relatively few studies looking at secondary prevention in patients presenting with ischaemic
or haemorrhagic stroke.
A systematic review identified seven RCTs looking at prevention of recurrent vascular events in
patients with previous stroke or TIA.227 Lowering BP or treating established hypertension reduced
stroke (OR=0.76; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.92), non-fatal stroke (OR=0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.95),
myocardial infarction (OR=0.79; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.98) and total vascular events (OR=0.79; 95%
CI 0.66 to 0.95). No effect was seen on vascular or all-cause mortality. There was heterogeneity
in the studies due to the class of drugs used, with beta blockers having no discernible effect.
Reduction in stroke was related to the difference in systolic BP between treatment and control
groups (p=0.002).
One study of patients with a history of stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) looked at blood
pressure lowering with perindopril (an ACE inhibitor) alone, perindopril in combination with
indapamide (a thiazide) or placebo. Patients unable to tolerate the combination were excluded
during run in. BP lowering with perindopril and indapamide in combination resulted in a
reduction in recurrent stroke and major vascular events. Five years of treatment resulted in one
less fatal or non-fatal vascular event for every 11 patients treated (95% CI 9 to 16). BP lowering
with a combination of perindopril and indapamide was shown to be safe in patients who have
had a stroke or TIA and who are either hypertensive or normotensive.228
In an open label study comparing eprosartan and nitrendipine for secondary prevention of
stroke/TIA both drugs achieved target BP reductions. The cerebrovascular and cardiovascular
end points were not significantly different.229
A

All patients with a previous stroke or TIA should be considered for treatment with an
ACE inhibitor (for example, perindopril) and thiazide (for example, indapamide)
regardless of blood pressure, unless contraindicated.
Patients with hypertension should be treated to <140/85 mm Hg (<130/80 mm Hg

for patients with diabetes).
1++
1+
1+
37
9.5
Atrial appendage occlusion

Atrial fibrillation is present in up to 17% of all patients with stroke, and in up to 25% of strokes
in patients aged over 80 years.230 Approximately 90% of left atrial thrombi are found in the
left atrial appendage (LAA).231 Surgical occlusion of this structure may have the potential to
reduce stroke.232
Atrial appendage obliteration can be done surgically (such as during valve replacement surgery)
or by a percutaneous implanted left atrial appendage occlusive device.
A single randomised controlled pilot study of LAA occlusion randomised 77 patients with risk
factors for stroke undergoing coronary artery bypass to either LAA occlusion or control. LAA
occlusion rose from 43% to 87% after performing four cases (p=0.0001). Two patients had
perioperative thromboembolic events (both in the occlusion group). There were no further
strokes during a 137 month follow-up period.233 A case series of 66 patients who underwent
percutaneous LAA occlusion with the WATCHMAN LAA transcatheter system found that
at 45 days 93% had successful sealing of the LAA. Two devices had embolised (successfully
retrieved) and the device was subsequently modified. There were two cardiac tamponades, one
air embolism and one delivery wire fracture. Two patients had TIA, and two patients died from
unrelated causes.234 A further series of six patients undergoing surgical LAA closure at the time
of valve surgery showed that only one patient had complete LAA occlusion, and one patient had
a stroke during follow up.235
2+
No RCTs of atrial appendage occlusion were identified that focused on outcome.

;;

9.6
Left atrial appendage occlusion should only be considered as part of a randomised

controlled clinical trial.
carotid endarterectomy
The role of carotid endarterectomy is discussed in section 11.
9.7 Patent foramen ovale and stroke

Approximately 40% of patients with ischaemic stroke have no underlying cause identified.
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) with right to left shunt is more common in patients with cryptogenic
stroke (4466%) compared to the general population (up to 27%). In one study of patients with
cryptogenic stroke and PFO on transoesophageal echo, who were treated with aspirin, the four
year rate of recurrent stroke was 2.3% for PFO alone, 15.2% for PFO and atrial septal aneurysm,
and 4.2% for neither.236
2++
A single RCT comparing anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke,
which included sub-analysis of patients with PFO (present in 39% of patients with cryptogenic
stroke), randomised patients between 30 and 85 years of age to either warfarin or aspirin.237 The
rate of recurrent stroke or death at two years was 14.3% in those with PFO, compared to 12.7%
without (OR=0.86; CI 0.41 to 1.80). There was no significant difference in event rates between
patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO treated with aspirin (17.9%, n=56) and those treated
with warfarin (9.5%, n=42; hazard ratio, HR=0.52; 95% CI 0.16 to 1.67; p = 0.28). As this was
a substudy, it was not powered to demonstrate superiority of one therapy in patients with PFO.
1-
Although no RCTs of closure of PFO compared to medical therapy were identified, evidence
from a systematic review of case series suggests that percutaneous transcatheter closure of PFO
may reduce the risk of recurrent stroke more than medical therapy alone. The review identified
six studies (895 patients) looking at medical management of PFO, and 10 studies (1,355 patients)
looking at transcatheter closure.238 Medical therapy varied by type and dose (aspirin, warfarin and
clopidogrel). There was a trend towards an increased incidence of recurrent events with increasing
age. With medical therapy, the incidence of stroke or TIA after one year of follow up ranged from
3.812%. With transcatheter closure of PFO, TIA or stroke incidence was 0-4.9%. The incidence
of major or minor procedural complications was 1.45% and 7.9% respectively. Patients in the
medically treated groups were at higher prevalence of risk factors for atherosclerosis.
38
Patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO should be treated with antiplatelet therapy
to reduce the risk of recurrence.
Transcatheter closure of PFO may be considered for patients with recurrent cryptogenic
stroke on optimal medical management.
39
10 Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with

primary intracerebral haemorrhage
There is little evidence on prevention of recurrent vascular events following primary intracerebral
haemorrhage.
10.1 blood pressure reduction

An RCT of secondary prevention in patients who had haemorrhagic stroke concluded that lowering
blood pressure (non-acutely) following ICH using a combination therapy of ACE inhibitor and
thiazide diuretic helps to prevent further vascular events.228, 239 One group of patients received
4 mg perindopril and a second group received combination therapy of 4 mg perindopril and
2.5 mg indapamide.228 Only 10% of the study population had haemorrhagic stroke, and these
patients were younger with a mean age of 61 years compared to 64 for patients with ischaemic
stroke. The risk reduction was greater for patients with (primary) haemorrhage. For ICH the RRR
was 76% (95% CI 55 to 87) for combination therapy and 1% (95% CI -75 to 42) for perindopril
alone compared to placebo.
A

1++
Lowering blood pressure (non-acutely) following ICH using a combination therapy of

ACE inhibitor and thiazide diuretic should be considered to prevent further vascular
events.

A systematic review on the safety of antithrombotic agents for patients with ICH concluded that
aspirin should not be used acutely when the risk of future vascular events is low. The use of aspirin
in the acute phase of ICH may be justified if there is a high risk of a cardiac ischaemic event.240
B

The use of aspirin following ICH is not recommended to prevent further vascular events
when the risk of recurrence is low.
The use of aspirin following ICH may be considered when there is a high risk of cardiac
ischaemic events.
2++
10.3 anticoagulants
No clinical trials were identified describing the use of anticoagulants after ICH. A decision analysis
based on assumptions of risk of recurrent ICH and the risks associated with aspirin and warfarin
therapy concluded that anticoagulation cannot be safely recommended for atrial fibrillation
following either a lobar or deep ICH unless an individual is at very high risk of ischaemic stroke.241
Aspirin may be a reasonable strategy for treating those with a prior deep ICH and an intermediate
or higher risk of ischaemic stroke.241
D
;;

40
Anticoagulation therapy following ICH is not recommended.

In patients with a very high risk of further thrombotic or cardiac ischaemic events specialist
advice should be sought.
10 PREVENTING RECURRENT STROKE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY INRTACEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE
10.4
statins
An RCT of statin therapy to prevent recurrent stroke included 4,731 patients, 93 of whom had
haemorrhagic stroke. Forty five patients were recruited to the treatment arm and received 80 mg
of atorvastatin and forty eight received placebo.214 Individual outcomes for these patients were not
reported and the numbers were too small to be meaningful. In the treatment group there were 218
ischaemic strokes and 55 haemorrhagic strokes compared to 278 ischaemic and 33 haemorrhagic
strokes in the placebo group. There were more haemorrhagic strokes in the atorvastatin group
giving a hazard ratio of 1.66 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.55). The absolute risk increase was 0.9% giving
an NNH of 107 over five years.
1++
There are risks and benefits of statin treatment in this population and the potential risk of
intracerebral haemorrhage should be considered (see section 9.2).
A

Statin therapy after haemorrhagic stroke is not routinely recommended unless the risk
of further vascular events outweighs the risk of further haemorrhage.
;;

In this group of patients, their overall vascular risk profile should be taken into
account when considering the risks and benefits of statin.
41
11 Carotid intervention
11.1 Carotid endarterectomy
11.1.1
Symptomatic Carotid Artery Disease

Meta-analysis242 and analysis of pooled data from three RCTs243 comparing best medical treatment
with best medical treatment plus carotid endarterectomy in over 6,000 patients showed surgery
to be highly effective in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis (70% by NASCET method,
without near occlusion nor occlusion, see Annex 9), and modestly effective in patients with
moderate stenosis (50-69% by NASCET method). These studies were performed in patients
without severe disability (mRS2; see Annex 3).
1++
Subsequent studies also found no evidence to support the traditional view that endarterectomy
should be delayed in patients with minor stroke who are neurologically stable.244, 245 In patients
with 50-69% stenosis (by NASCET method) the only statistically significant benefit occurred if
surgery was performed within two weeks of the event (see Table 2).243
1+
Table 2 Number needed to treat to prevent one ipsilateral stroke at five years in patients with
50% stenosis by NASCET method243
Time of surgery post primary event
NNT
within 2 weeks
2 to 4 weeks
10
4 to 12 weeks
18
longer than 12 weeks
125
A systematic review of operative risk in relation to timing of surgery did not demonstrate an excess
risk from early surgery compared to late surgery in neurologically stable patients.246
1++
Published risks from carotid endarterectomy did not significantly change between 1985 and
2001,247 with a 1.4%-2.9% risk of death and a 4.2%-6.5% risk of death or stroke combined.
Reported complication rates were lower in studies where non-neurologists made the postoperative
assessment.
In patients with a progressing neurological deficit or stuttering stroke, there is a lack of evidence
about whether surgery should be performed as an emergency and no recommendation can be
made to support this.
Pooled analysis showed greater benefit of CEA in older patients (in patients with 50-99% stenosis
by NASCET method).243 The absolute risk reduction with surgery in terms of five-year cumulative
risk of ipsilateral carotid ischaemic stroke and any stroke or death within 30 days after surgery
was 19.2% (95% CI 10.2% to 28.2%) in those aged 75 or over, 8.6% (95% CI 4.2% to 13.0%)
in those aged 65-74 and 5.6% (95% CI 1.6% to 9.6%) in those less than 65 years of age. This is
despite an increase in postoperative mortality in older patients.248
Only 10% of patients in the analysis were over 75 years of age and very few were over 80
years.
42
1++
11 CAROTID INTERVENTION
Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of pooled data show that women gain less benefit than men
from carotid endarterectomy (for patients with 50-99% stenosis).243, 248 The NNT to prevent one
stroke at five years is nine for men and 36 for women. There is clear benefit in women with 7099% stenosis but not in those with 50-69% stenosis.243 This is driven by a higher operative risk
in women243, 248 and more rapid reductions in risk of stroke recurrence on medical therapy with
time in women.243
A

All patients with carotid artery territory stroke (without severe disability, mRS2)
or transient ischaemic attack should be considered for carotid endarterectomy as soon
as possible after the index event.
Carotid endarterectomy (on the internal carotid artery ipsilateral to the cerebrovascular
event) should be considered in all:
male patients with a carotid artery stenosis of 50-99% (by NASCET method)
female patients with a carotid artery stenosis of 70-99%.
For all patients, carotid endarterectomy should be performed as soon as the patient is
stable and fit for surgery, ideally within two weeks of event.
There is no justification for withholding carotid endarterectomy from older patients

who are considered fit for surgery.
All patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy should receive optimal medical therapy
in addition to surgery.
;;

Surgery should be performed by specialist surgeons in centres that participate in formal

audit of operative outcomes.
1++
A proportion of patients who are severely disabled immediately following their stroke event
can make rapid recovery such that they meet the criteria used in the studies (mRS2).
;;

11.1.2
Patients who are severely disabled immediately following their stroke event should
be considered for carotid endarterectomy if they recover sufficiently to meet the criteria
for surgery.
ASymptomatic Carotid Artery Disease

A systematic review of three RCTs (5,223 patients) showed that CEA for asymptomatic carotid
stenosis reduces the risk of ipsilateral stroke by around 30% over three years compared to
medical treatment (see Table 3). Two of the trials recruited patients with stenosis of 60% or
greater reduction in diameter determined by non-invasive tests or angiogram and the third 5099% diameter stenosis. The absolute risk reduction is small (around 1% per annum) while the
rate of perioperative stroke or death is approximately 3%. Any benefit would be negated by a
higher preoperative complication rate, suggesting that only operators with a complication rate less
than 3% should perform CEA in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The relative risk of
perioperative stroke or death or any subsequent stroke was 0.69 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.83) and the
RR of perioperative stroke or death or any subsequent ipsilateral stroke was 0.71 (95% CI 0.55 to
0.90). There was a non-significant trend toward fewer events (any stroke or death) in the surgical
group. Subgroup analyses comparing older and younger patients, and men and women were
inconclusive, although there was a trend to less benefit in women and older patients.249
1++
43
Table 3 Number of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease needed to treat with CEA
to prevent an unfavourable outcome within three years249
Outcome
NNT
Perioperative stroke or death or ipsilateral stroke
59
Perioperative stroke or death or any subsequent

stroke (primary outcome)
36
Any stroke or death
49*
*not significant
A

;;
B

11.1.3
CEA should be considered for asymptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis
and no ipsilateral event for at least six months.
CEA may be of more benefit for patients who:
are <70 years of age
are male
have bilateral disease.
CEA should only be performed by operators with a low (<3%) perioperative stroke or
death rate.
Patients with carotid disease scheduled for Cardiac Surgery

There is a lack of good quality evidence for surgical interventions in patients with carotid disease
and asymptomatic for TIA/stroke who are scheduled for cardiac surgery.
;; Routine carotid endarterectomy prior to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is not
recommended in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
11.1.4
Carotid Surgery Technique

A meta-analysis, based on seven RCTs and quasi-randomised controlled trials, involving 1,307
operations in 1,127 patients concluded that patch closure was associated with a significant
reduction in all strokes (OR=0.33), ipsilateral strokes (OR=0.31) and combined stroke and death
(OR=0.39).250 There was no significant reduction in death alone, although the total number of
deaths was small, only 10 deaths in the six trials with available data (10/1019, overall risk=1.0%).
It remains unclear whether patching is associated with a higher or lower perioperative mortality
than primary closure (OR=0.73; 95% CI 0.20 to 2.60; p = 0.6).
A

Patch angioplasty should be used as the closure method in all carotid endarterectomies
performed by conventional methods.
A well conducted meta-analysis of five RCTs comparing conventional carotid endarterectomy

with eversion method in 2,465 patients (2,589 arteries) concluded that there was no significant
difference in perioperative stroke or death rate and stroke during follow up.251
A

44
1+
Changing surgical technique from conventional carotid endarterectomy to eversion

method is not recommended.
1++
11 CAROTID INTERVENTION
A meta-analysis of seven RCTs (554 operations) and 41 non-randomised controlled trials (25,622
operations) found no reliable evidence to guide the choice between local or general anaesthesia
for patients undergoing carotid surgery.252
A

1+
The choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgery should be made by
the individual operator/anaesthetist.
A systematic review found no data to support or refute the use of routine shunting over selective
shunting in CEA. 253
11.2
carotid angioplasty and stenting

A Cochrane review of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) included seven RCTs (involving
941 patients) comparing endovascular treatment with carotid endarterectomy or medical
therapy, and a further five RCTs (involving 2,286 patients) comparing CAS with surgery, which
were stopped early.254 Not all studies were included in each analysis due to differing methods
and reporting of results. Some studies included symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Metaanalysis used fixed-effect and random-effects models.
There was a statistically significant excess of deaths or strokes within 30 days of treatment with
CAS compared to CEA (OR=1.39; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.84; p=0.02) using the fixed-effects model.
This result lost statistical significance using the random-effects model (OR=1.44; 95% CI 0.91 to
2.26; p=0.12). There was no statistical difference between treatments for the end points of 30day stroke, myocardial infarction or death or stroke during long term follow up. Follow-up data
to a maximum of 36 months were available for CAS. Endovascular therapy significantly reduced
the risk of cranial nerve injury, OR=0.07 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.20; p<0.00001). Only two of the
seven studies included data on cerebral protection devices and found no significant difference
in risk of death or stroke at 30 days between endovascular treatment with or without a cerebral
protection device (OR=0.77; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.46; p=0.43, with significant heterogeneity). No
significant difference was found comparing endovascular treatment and surgery in asymptomatic
patients (OR=1.06; 95% CI 0.16 to 6.94; p=0.96), although only two trials were available, one
of which recorded no deaths or strokes at 30 days. Two small studies comparing endovascular
with medical treatment, in patients considered unfit for surgery, failed to show any significant
difference in risk of stroke or death at 30 days (OR=0.39; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.14; p=0.09).
A

Carotid angioplasty and stenting is not recommended outwith ongoing randomised

controlled trials.
;;

Angioplasty and stenting may be considered for patients with high risk of stroke
recurrence and a hostile surgical neck (for example, previous radical neck dissection
or radiotherapy).
1++
11.3 Periprocedural antiplatelet or antithrombotic therapy

A systematic review suggested that antiplatelet treatment given after CEA reduces the rate of
stroke, but not of death.255 Antiplatelet treatment was started before CEA in four of the six RCTs
reviewed, but five days and up to three months after CEA in the other two studies. The individual
study results do not conclusively show that one regimen is superior to the other.
1++
Antiplatelet treatment is described in section 5.2 and antiplatelet therapy to prevent recurrent
stroke is discussed in section 9.1.
A
Standard antiplatelet treatment should be given after CEA.
45
12 Promoting lifestyle changes

Patients often have numerous risk factors for recurrent stroke. Reducing the risk of recurrent
stroke may require the patient to make significant lifestyle changes. A combination of three
strategies for preventing recurrent stroke (dietary modification, exercise, aspirin, a statin and
an antihypertensive) may result in a cumulative RR reduction of 80%.200
12.1 interventions to promote lifestyle change

Patients with stroke may find it challenging to change their lifestyle especially if they are trying
to reduce several risk factors. Patients not only need advice about lifestyle changes but support
from healthcare professionals to make changes.
An observational study of 60 patients in a population of people at risk of stroke compared simple
advice or motivational interviewing with behavioural change against a control group. Most success
was achieved when patients chose which risk factor to focus on, when milestones were set and
when one change was made at a time. The model used was FRAMES (see Table 4) together with
the identification of stages of readiness to change; pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation,
action and maintenance. The patients had to show a readiness to change for the intervention to
be successful.256 Although the study was designed to investigate risk of stroke it is reasonable to
extrapolate the evidence to secondary prevention.
Table 4 The FRAMES model of behavioural change 256

Feedback
patient receives information about current status
Responsibility
patient assumes responsibility for change
Advice
patient receives suggestions that will help him or her in the change process
Menu
patient receives a number of alternative strategies for modifying the problem

behaviour
Empathy
patient receives warm support and respect
Self efficacy
patient develops an I can do this attitude
;;

12.2
Patients should be encouraged to take responsibility for their own health and be supported
to identify, prioritise, and manage their risk factors.
Altering dietary Fat intake
12.2.1 saturated fat

A Cochrane review of 27 trials (18,196 participants) examined the effect of reduction or
modification of dietary fats for at least six months on reducing serum cholesterol levels and on
total and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The review included trials of high- (seven),
moderate- (six) and low-risk (14) participants. Trials involving high-risk participants included
men only. There was no significant effect on total mortality (rate ratio of 0.98; 95% CI 0.86 to
1.12), a trend towards protection from cardiovascular mortality (rate ratio of 0.91; 95% CI 0.77
to 1.07), and significant protection from cardiovascular events (rate ratio of 0.84; 95% CI 0.72
to 0.99). This effect was non-significant if studies at high risk of bias were removed. Trials with
at least two years of follow up provided stronger evidence of protection against cardiovascular
events (rate ratio of 0.76; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90). The reviewers concluded that there is a small
but potentially important reduction in cardiovascular risk with a reduction or modification of
dietary fat intake, seen particularly in trials of longer duration.257
A

46
Diets low in total and saturated fats should be recommended to all for the reduction
of cardiovascular risk.
1++
12 PROMOTING LIFESTYLE CHANGES
12.2.2
omega-3 fats
There is conflicting evidence from two systematic reviews on the benefits associated with
increased consumption of omega-3 fats for the prevention of cardiovascular or stroke disease.257,258
It is not clear that dietary or supplemental omega-3 fats change total mortality, cardiovascular
events or cancer in people with, or at risk of, cardiovascular disease.257
For secondary prevention most trials reported that fish oil significantly reduced all-cause
mortality, MI, cardiac and sudden death, and stroke. Effects on stroke were inconsistent, and
the evidence suggests that increased consumption of omega-3 fats from fish or fish oil, but not
of -linolenic acid (ALA, found in certain vegetable oils, such as flax seed, soybean, walnuts,
canola) may be beneficial. The review also stated that five cohort studies provided no evidence
to support the hypothesis that fish consumption reduces the risk of stroke.258
In view of this uncertain effect and in order to avoid conflicting dietary advice, no change is
recommended in the current dietary guidelines (two 140 g portions of fish, one of which should
be a fatty fish, per week).259
;;

1++
All individuals should eat at least two portions of fish per week, one of which should be
a fatty fish.
No evidence was identified to advise people to stop taking supplemental omega-3 fats.
12.3
reducing dietary Salt

A meta-analysis of 28 trials on the effect of moderate salt reduction on blood pressure
demonstrated that a modest reduction in salt intake for four or more weeks has a significant effect
on blood pressure in both hypertensive and normotensive individuals. The pooled estimates
of blood pressure fall were 4.96/2.73 0.40/0.24 mm Hg in hypertensive patients (p<0.001
for both systolic and diastolic) and 2.03/0.97 0.27/0.21 mm Hg in normotensive individuals
(p<0.001 for both systolic and diastolic). A reduction of salt intake of 6 g per day (100 mmol
or 2.3 g sodium per day) predicted a fall in blood pressure of 7.11/3.88 mm Hg (p<0.001 for
both systolic and diastolic) in hypertensive patients and 3.57/1.66 mm Hg in normotensive
individuals (systolic: p<0.001; diastolic: p<0.05).260
1+
A Cochrane review of advice to reduce salt intake lasting at least six months also reported small
but significant benefits to blood pressure. Long term maintenance of low sodium diets was
difficult for individuals, even with considerable advice, support and encouragement.261
1+
The Food Standards Agency has recommended that adults should consume no more than 6 g
of salt per day (approximately equivalent to one teaspoonful).262
A

;;
People with hypertension should be advised to reduce their salt intake as much as
possible to lower blood pressure.
All individuals should aim to consume less than 6 g of salt per day.
47
12.4 Fruit and Vegetable consumption

A meta-analysis of cohort studies addressing primary prevention of all cerebrovascular events
including ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke and TIA showed that the risk of stroke decreased
in a dose-respondent fashion as fruit and vegetable consumption increased.263 The risk of stroke
was decreased by 11% (RR=0.89; 95% CI 0.85 to 0.93) for each additional portion per day
of fruit, by 5% (RR=0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.97) for fruit and vegetables and by 3% (RR 0.97,
0.92 to 1.02, which was non-significant) for vegetables.
2++
Many observational studies of fruit consumption correlate with healthy behaviours and lifestyle in
general, for example smoking less, exercising more and having a higher level of education.
C

12.5
Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption is recommended to reduce risk of stroke

or TIA.
vitamin supplements
An association between hyperhomocysteinaemia and vascular disease including stroke has been
demonstrated in epidemiological studies.264 There is a twofold greater risk of stroke associated
with hyperhomocysteinaemia.
A trial of vitamin B12 and folate in patients with stroke found that lowering total homocysteine
by 2 mmol/L (027 mg/L) with high-dose B-multivitamin therapy did not prevent recurrent stroke
in patients with recent ischaemic stroke.265
1++
1+
There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about vitamin therapy to prevent

recurrent stroke. A study of vitamins B12, B6 and folic acid therapy in patients with previous
stroke or TIA is ongoing.266
B
12.6
Vitamin supplementation is not recommended in patients following ischaemic stroke.
weight reduction
One systematic review of RCTs of diet to reduce weight, which evaluated the effect on blood
pressure, was identified. Only small numbers of patients were included in the trials (six trials
including 361 participants).267 Dietary interventions to reduce weight were moderately effective
at reducing blood pressure. Diets producing weight loss in the range of 3% to 9% body weight
were partially associated with blood pressure reductions of about 3 mm Hg systolic and diastolic.
The review was underpowered to detect differences in morbidity or mortality outcomes.
B

12.7
Patients and individuals at risk of cardiovascular disease, who are overweight, should
be targeted with interventions designed to reduce weight, and to maintain this
reduction.
smoking
Tobacco smoking is strongly and dose-dependently associated with all cardiovascular events,
including coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and cardiovascular
death.268,269 Smoking cessation reduces these risks substantially, although the decrease is dependent
on the duration of cessation.270,271
B

All people who smoke should be advised to stop and offered support to help facilitate
this in order to minimise cardiovascular and general health risks.
12.8 alcohol
;;

48
1+
When giving advice to patients with stroke, the current general advice of no more than
two to three units of alcohol per day for women and no more than three to four units of
alcohol per day for men, with at least two drink-free days per week for both men and
women, should be recommended.272,273
2++
4
12 PROMOTING LIFESTYLE CHANGES
12.9
exercise
Physical activity is an important aspect of lifestyle that patients at risk of recurrent stroke can
modify.274 A meta-analysis of epidemiological data from large observational studies looking at
primary prevention (not stroke specific) indicated that physical activity may reduce the risk of
stroke.274 Increased occupational activity was associated with a lower risk of ischaemic stroke
compared to a moderate or inactive occupation. Overall moderate occupational activity gave a 15%
lower risk in total stroke compared to inactive people. The majority of these studies were carried
out at least six months, and in some cases up to 12 years post stroke and involved participants who
were ambulatory. It may be reasonable to extrapolate this information to secondary prevention.
2+
There may be many reasons why older people do not participate in physical activities.275
lack of interest
lack of access to a car
shortness of breath
joint pain
dislike of going out alone
perceived lack of fitness
lack of energy
doubting that exercise can lengthen life.
A systematic review of physical fitness training after stroke identified 12 trials (289 patients) with
an intervention to improve either muscle strength with or without cardiorespiratory fitness.276
Many of the trials had participants who volunteered and were ambulatory. Trial quality was
varied and outcome measures were very diverse. The benefits of physical fitness training
appeared to be short term only. Consequently, few conclusions can be drawn about the impact
of physical fitness training. A second systematic review of the same data showed no evidence
of effect rather than evidence of no effect.277 Individual studies showed an increase in quality
of life and reduction in the level of impairment. Secondary prevention was not an outcome but
positive effects from cardiovascular training on gait speed, stair climbing, human activity profile,
motor function, workload and exercise time were reported. A study comparing three 40 minute
sessions of treadmill training a week for six months with a programme of common components of
conventional rehabilitation showed that treadmill training was superior at improving cardiovascular
fitness.278 In a small study (13 participants) patients in a water-based programme of three one hour
sessions per week for eight weeks showed significant improvement in cardiovascular fitness over
the control group at least one year post stroke.279
1++
1+
An observational study of 25 patients one to 12 years post stroke taking part in an exercise group
demonstrated that improvement in balance and functional activity could be acquired well after
the initial stroke episode and improvement was retained at least one month after the programme
stopped.280 The benefits of physical exercise, in terms of function and quality of life, tend to be
lost after the formal programme of exercise stops.281,282
Nationally recognised recommendations state that all adults should accumulate 30 minutes
of moderate activity on most days of the week.283 National guidance is available on the most
effective way to promote physical activity.284,285
`B
Lifelong participation in programmes of exercise after stroke should be encouraged.
;; Exercise programmes should ideally be delivered by exercise instructors with knowledge

and training in exercise and stroke.
Many stroke patients are more disabled than those included in these studies, have language and
cognitive problems, coexisting physical disease and are elderly. There is a paucity of data on
more disabled patients.
49
13 Provision of information
This section reflects the issues likely to be of most concern to patients and their carers. These
points are provided for use by health professionals when discussing the acute phase of stroke with
patients and carers and in guiding the production of locally produced information materials.
13.1 Providing information and support

13.1.1 information needs of patients and carers in the acute phase of stroke
The information needs of patients with stroke change over time.
The overall effectiveness of information provision has not been conclusively demonstrated.
Evaluation of structured information provision and the strategies used to provide it are sparse.286
Verbal and written information may be more effective than either format alone and information
individualised to the patient rather than general information more beneficial. No conclusive
evidence was identified on how to tailor information.286
A systematic review suggested that information provision and educational sessions are more
effective than provision of a leaflet alone.286 Success can be limited if strategies of information
provision are unacceptable. In one study, 58% of patients failed to attend three or more outpatient
educational sessions, although the reason for non-attendance was not detailed.
1++
One study showed that younger patients required more medical information as well as having
questions concerning exercise and post-stroke sexual activities. Women ranked receiving
information on post-stroke management higher than men.287 Carers information requirements
also differ with age and sex.288 Female relatives place more importance on information. Relatives
with higher educational level place less importance on counselling.
In hospital 77% of patients and carers wanted information on preventing further strokes, 65%
on where to obtain further information, 65% on causes of stroke, 61% on risk factors for stroke,
60% on recovery, 54% on what a stroke is and 53% on stroke-related medications.289 Seventy
five per cent of carers wanted information on the emotional or psychological effects of stroke.289
At six months the most frequently desired topic by both patients and carers was prevention
of further strokes (67% of people surveyed), where to obtain more information (33%) and the
cognitive effects of stroke (33%).289
In one study patients were given a guide on discharge, which they could use as a reference
tool. Patients and carers suggested topics for the guide. The patients were all younger with few
disabilities and had healthy carers. The study showed that 59% of patients and caregivers wanted
to receive information once or twice, 22% three to six times or more frequently,19-59% would
like to receive information within 24 hours and 22% on day one to two weeks after the event.
The preferred information was medical information about the course of the disease, its cause,
consequences and treatment (see Table 5).290 At six months patients and carers still require
information and in a self reporting study some people may have forgotten between discharge
and six months that they had received information.289 A questionnaire of knowledge of stroke
showed that family members do not retain information offered concluding that information
should be given frequently.291
50
In one study 119 out of 252 patients responded to a questionnaire about the usefulness of a
patient-held record. Twenty seven per cent had lost it, only 59% read it and two thirds said that
they had difficulty in getting staff to record in it. Half of patients thought it was more trouble
than benefit.292
2+
Material given to patients and carers may not be suitable. One study showed that the readability
and accessibility of material was equivalent to 11th grade (UK equivalent of fourth year at
secondary school, age 15). The average ability of the carers was 9th grade (second year at
secondary school, age 13) and the patients 7-8th grade (primary 7-first year at secondary school,
age 11-12).289
13 PROVISION OF INFORMATION
Table 5 The five most important issues identified by patients and carers looking for
information290
Issue
Medical Information
Consequences of stroke
Experiences of other patients and caregivers
Home recovery
Advice for the partner and the social circle
D

Each patient should be individually assessed on his or her readiness to receive

information.
Healthcare professionals should take a patients age, gender, educational status and
communication support needs into account when assessing their need for
information.
Information should be offered to patients and carers in a variety of formats, including

easy access.
Information should be tailored to the phase of the patients journey.
Information should be repeated and re-offered at appropriate intervals.
;;
Information giving should be documented to allow consistency.
13.1.2 support needs of carers in the acute phase of stroke

No evidence was identified about structured support for carers.
Fifty per cent of family members in one study were overly optimistic about the functional ability
of the patient at discharge.291 In a study of 14 patients, semistructured interviews showed that
carers are unprepared for the impact of caring for someone who has had a stroke.293, 294
Relatives needs are reported as information, counselling (communication and support) and
accessibility to staff.288 They often find the first three days of hospitalisation very emotional and
tiring. In this period most relatives focus on the patient and their illness rather than their own
needs.288 Carers may have to adapt to altered or additional roles (for example, driving) and their
relationship with the patient may change.293
Carers can feel that they lack knowledge and are unable to help or cope. They often require
information that they feel may not have been provided to them by staff. The carers burden is
lessened when they are able to care for the person with stroke in hospital.293,294
A systematic review of intervention studies for caregivers of people after a stroke studied four
types of support programmes targeted at caregivers problems and needs:
providing specialist services

(psycho) education
counselling
social support by peers.
1++
Counselling programmes appeared to have most positive outcomes in terms of health related
quality of life, satisfaction, confidence and knowledge, problem solving skills, emotional state,
burden and caregiver preparedness. The aim of counselling was to teach caregivers coping
strategies to reduce stress. Counselling was more effective than education alone. Up to three
years after counselling confidence and knowledge about patient care and use of active coping
strategies were increased. Counselling is a time consuming intervention with around about
eight hours of individual counselling given. More research is required taking into account the
needs of caregivers.295
51
Training care givers in basic skills reduces the burden of care and improves quality of life for
patients and carers.296 Three to five 30-40 minute sessions of training defined by the needs of
the patient were effective. The type of training offered in the study is shown in Table 6. At three
and 12 months patients whose caregivers had received training reported significantly improved
quality of life and mood outcomes and burden of care was reduced and quality of life and
mood outcomes were improved in caregivers. The study was biased towards middle class, fit
participants and may not be applicable to all patients with stroke and their carers. There were
no data on which type of training was most useful. The study was in the rehabilitation setting
but the results may be extrapolated to the acute setting.
Table 6 Caregiver training provided by healthcare professionals296
Instruction on common stroke-related problems
positioning
prevention of bed sores
continence
nutrition
gait facilitation
advice on benefits and local services
Hands on training tailored to the needs of the patient
moving and handling
activities of daily living and communication
mobilisation
;;

Healthcare professionals should discuss the caring role and its implications with
relatives.
Healthcare professionals should actively involve carers and find out what support they
need.
Caregivers should be offered ongoing practical information and training individualised

for the needs of the person for whom they are caring.
;;

Carers should be given advice about where to seek support (for example, GP, voluntary
organisations, etc).
D
;;
13.2
Carers support needs should be addressed prior to patient discharge.

A named healthcare professional should be responsible for coordinating discharge.
sources of further information
13.2.1 national organisations specific to stroke

Chest, Heart & Stroke Scotland
65 North Castle Street, Edinburgh, EH2 3LT
Tel: 0131 225 6963 Fax: 0131 220 6313 Advice Line: 0845 077 6000
www.chss.org.uk Email: [email protected]
Offers rehabilitation and support to people affected by stroke through the Volunteer Stroke
Service (VSS). The CHSS Advice Line offers confidential, professional advice from trained
nurses on all aspects of chest, heart and stroke illness, backed up by free booklets, fact sheets
DVDs and videos.
52
1++
13 PROVISION OF INFORMATION
Connect
16-18 Marshalsea Road, London, SE1 1HL
Tel: 020 7367 0840
www.ukconnect.org
Works to promote effective services, new opportunities and a better quality of life for people
living with aphasia. Useful publications for people with aphasia and carers of people with
aphasia are available.
Different Strokes (Scotland)
53 Elmore Avenue, Glasgow, G44 5BH
Tel: 0141 569 3200
www.differentstrokes.co.uk Email: [email protected]
Helps stroke survivors of working age to optimise their recovery, take control of their own lives
and regain as much independence as possible by providing a national network of weekly exercise
classes, practical, easy to use information, newsletters, interactive website and StrokeLine
telephone service.
DIPEX. Personal experiences of health and illness
www.dipex.org/stroke
The High Blood Pressure Foundation
Department of Medical Sciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South,
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU
Tel: 0131 332 9211
Speakability
1 Royal Street, London SE1 7LL
Helpline: 080 8808 9572
www.speakability.org.uk
Offers impartial information and support for people with aphasia and their carers through its
helpline, website and training courses, and distributes its own fact sheets, low-cost publications
and videos.
The Stroke Association
Links House, 15 Links Place, Edinburgh EH6 7EZ
Tel: 0131 555 7240 Fax: 0131 555 7259 National Stroke Helpline: 0845 30 33 100
www.stroke.org.uk Email: [email protected]
Funds research into prevention, treatment and better methods of rehabilitation, and helps
stroke patients and their families directly through its Rehabilitation and Support Services. It
also produces publications including patient leaflets, Stroke News (a quarterly magazine) and
information for health professionals.
strokeinfoplus
www.strokeinfoplus.scot.nhs.uk
Provides access to stroke patient leaflets, and information on stroke support groups, social
security benefits, medicines and treatment, and the evidence and clinical trials on which
treatment is based.
13.2.2
local organisations specific to stroke

Inverclyde Centre for Independent living Stroke Rehabilitation Group
10-16 Gibshill Road , Greenock, Inverclyde, PA15 2UP
Tel: 01475 714350
Together Opening Doors
Marjorie Hall, Millgreen House Millgreen, Dumfries, DG2 7QY
The Way Head Group
Corona Marshall, 52 Campsie Drive, Milngavie, East Dumbartonshire, G62 8HX
Tel: 0141 570 2869
53
13.2.3 national organisations

DVLA
Drivers Medical Group, DVLA, Swansea, SA99 1TU
Tel: 0870 600 0301 (Monday to Friday, 8.00 am to 5.30 pm and Saturday, 8.00am to
1.00pm) Fax: 0845 850 0095
www.dvla.gov.uk/medical.aspx Email: [email protected]
Completed medical questionnaires can be returned by post, FAX, or email. Details of the
specific medical condition can be noted by telephone, along with full name, date of birth and/
or driver number (if known).
54
14 IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE
14 Implementing the guideline

This section provides advice on the resource implications associated with implementing the
key clinical recommendations, and advice on audit as a tool to aid implementation.
Implementation of national clinical guidelines is the responsibility of each NHS Board and is an
essential part of clinical governance. Mechanisms should be in place to review care provided
against the guideline recommendations. The reasons for any differences should be assessed
and addressed where appropriate. Local arrangements should then be made to implement the
national guideline in individual hospitals, units and practices.
14.1
resource implications of key recommendations

A National Clinical and Resource Impact Assessment based on recommendations identified by
the guideline development group likely to have major resource implications will be available
from the Scottish Health Technologies Group (www.nhshealthquality.org) in 2009. The
assessment will summarise the likely resources required and the associated costs of implementing
the guideline, with the objective of facilitating more rapid implementation.
14.2
Auditing current practice

A first step in implementing a clinical practice guideline is to gain an understanding of current
clinical practice. Audit tools designed around guideline recommendations can assist in this
process. Audit tools should be comprehensive but not time consuming to use. Successful
implementation and audit of guideline recommendations requires good communication between
staff and multidisciplinary team working.
14.2.1
Mandatory Core Data Set

The clinically led Scottish Stroke Care Audit aims to improve the quality of care provided by
the hospitals in all NHS Boards by collating and reporting upon data collected by the Managed
Clinical Networks (MCNs).297
The system collects a mandatory core data set for each episode which leads a patient to be
referred to a hospital. A minimum dataset has been defined which has the mandatory core data
at its centre but which aims to provide information to reflect the quality of the stroke service.
This dataset includes six variables which describe case mix and allows correction of case fatality
and functional outcome data. This minimum dataset will provide information on:
patient demographics
the process of care and its appropriateness, and
the performance of services in relation to the national clinical standards.
14.2.2
National time-limited audits of specific aspects of stroke service

Although the minimum dataset reflects aspects of stroke services for which there is very robust
evidence that compliance will influence patient outcomes, the quality of many other aspects
of stroke care also needs to be addressed. This can be achieved by defining an extended data
set to be collected for each patient for a set period of time.
55
14.2.3 key points to audit

In addition the guideline development group has identified the following as key points to audit
to assist with the implementation of this guideline:
time to assessment of acute stroke patient

time to assessment of TIA patient
time to access proper multidisciplinary stroke unit
time to brain imaging
time to carotid assessment with duplex
the performance of carotid duplex examinations when compared to other tests (usually
CE-MRA)
carotid endarterectomy outcomes compared between centres
has recommended medication initiation occurred, where appropriate, prior to discharge
from hospital (eg antiplatelet, statin, ACE inhibitor, diuretic).
14.3 additional advice to nhsscotland from NHS quality improvement

scotland and the scottish medicines consortium
In February 2004 the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) advised that alteplase (rt-PA)
(Actilyse) is accepted for restricted use within NHSScotland for the treatment of acute ischaemic
stroke (www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/smc/files/Alteplase.pdf).
The NHS QIS validated NICE (Single) Technology Appraisal Guidance No 122: Alteplase
for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke does not differ materially from the SMC
recommendation.
The NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance No. 94: Statins for the prevention of cardiovascular
events has been considered by NHS QIS. No important differences were identified and NHS
QIS advises that it is as valid for Scotland as for England and Wales.
56
15 THE EVIDENCE BASE
15 The evidence base

15.1
systematic literature review

The evidence base for this guideline was synthesised in accordance with SIGN methodology. A
systematic review of the literature was carried out using an explicit search strategy devised by
a SIGN Information Officer. Databases searched include Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PsycINFO,
and the Cochrane Library. The year range covered was 2000-2007. Internet searches were
carried out on various websites including the US National Guidelines Clearinghouse. The main
searches were supplemented by material identified by individual members of the development
group. Each of the selected papers was evaluated by two members of the group using standard
SIGN methodological checklists before conclusions were considered as evidence.
15.1.1
literature search for economic issues

A SIGN Information Officer conducted a literature search of the NHS Economics Evaluations
Database (NEED) for studies that highlighted economic issues related to management of acute
stroke.
15.1.2
literature search for patient issues

At the start of the guideline development process, a SIGN Information Officer conducted a
literature search for qualitative and quantitative studies that addressed patient issues of relevance
to the acute phase of stroke. Databases searched include Medline, Embase, Cinahl and PsycINFO,
and the results were summarised and presented to the guideline development group. A copy
of the Medline version of the patient search strategy is available on the SIGN website.
15.2
recommendations for research

The guideline development group was not able to identify sufficient evidence to answer all of
the key questions asked in this guideline. The following areas for further research have been
identified:
15.2.1

The most accurate methods of identification and early assessment of TIA and minor stroke in
patients who need to be seen within 24 hours.
15.2.2

The role of CT perfusion and MRI perfusion imaging as potential complementary modalities to
guide thrombolysis therapy.
The role of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission
tomography (PET) for aiding diagnosis of stroke.
Assessment of computed tomography angiography accuracy compared with other standards for
carotid imaging in patients with carotid territory TIA or stroke and/or retinal event.
Prospective trials of routine carotid imaging to determine whether carotid plaque composition
or activity can influence therapy decisions.
57
15.2.3

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of r-tPA in some patient groups, such as the very elderly (over
80 years) and those with rapidly improving symptoms.
Evaluation of imaging-based protocols for selection of patients suitable for r-tPa therapy.
Comparison of IV and IA thrombolysis for treatment of all types of stroke are required.
Randomised controlled trials of IA therapy in patients who fail to recanalise after routine IV
thrombolysis.
Evaluation of dual therapies for the treatment of acute stroke and TIA.
Further evaluation of the use of mannitol and hypertonic saline in ischaemic stroke associated
with raised intracranial pressure.
Assessment of horizontal head positioning in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.
Mechanical clot retrieval devices should be further evaluated in randomised controlled trials.
RCTs to investigate the clinical outcomes and the safety of administration of microbubble
ultrasound contrast agents to increase recanalisation rates.
15.2.4
Treatment of primary inrtacerebral haemorrhage

Further RCTs to assess the efficacy of surgical interventions for acute primary inrtacerebral
haemorrhage, addressing in particular:
early surgical evacuation (for example, six hour time window) versus conservative
treatment
minimally invasive surgery including aspiration via burr hole or stereotaxy, with and without
instillation of thrombolytic drugs, versus medical therapy and/or craniotomy
standardised medical management of patients in both arms of future trials.
RCTs evaluating the thrombolysis in patients with PICH.

Evaluation of the efficacy of mannitol or other interventions to reduce raised ICP perioperatively
in patients undergoing surgical evacuation.
15.2.5 Other causes of stroke
Evaluation of endovascular stenting to treat extracranial cervical arterial dissection or cervical
artery pseudo-aneurysms.
A comparison of the efficacy of anticoagulation with antiplatelet therapy for treating extracranial
artery dissection.
15.2.6
Physiological monitoring and intervention

The role of continuous compared to frequent monitoring in the acute phase of stroke.
Further evaluation of the benefits and risks of blood pressure lowering in the acute phase of
stroke.
Further assessment of the benefit of mobilising patients.
Evaluation of active positioning in the acute phase of stroke, including RCTs to assess the effect
on cerebral blood flow of placing patients flat (0 head of the bed elevation).
15.2.7
Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke

Transcatheter closure of PFO should be considered as part of an RCT for patients with a first
cryptogenic stroke and PFO with right to left shunt.
58
15 THE EVIDENCE BASE
15.2.8
Carotid intervention
An RCT of surgical interventions, such as CEA in patients with carotid disease who are
asymptomatic for TIA/stroke and are scheduled for cardiac surgery.
15.2.9
Provision of information
What information patients and carers need, how patients and carers are given information
(verbal, written etc) and in what format (easy access etc).
15.2.10 promoting lifestyle changes

Further research is required on:
people who are more disabled by stroke
exercise programmes beginning sooner after stroke
how to motivate people to participate in lifelong exercise.
15.3
review and updating

This guideline was issued in 2008 and will be considered for review in three years. Any updates
to the guideline in the interim period will be noted on the SIGN website: www.sign.ac.uk.
59
16 Development of the guideline

16.1 introduction
SIGN is a collaborative network of clinicians, other healthcare professionals and patient
organisations and is part of NHS Quality Improvement Scotland. SIGN guidelines are developed
by multidisciplinary groups of practising clinicians using a standard methodology based on a
systematic review of the evidence. Further details about SIGN and the guideline development
methodology are contained in SIGN 50: A Guideline Developers Handbook, available at
www.sign.ac.uk
16.2 the guideline development group

Dr Paul Syme
(Chair)
Professor Peter Langhorne
(Vice-Chair)
Dr Anthony Byrne
(Secretary)
Ms Ros Anderson
Mrs Sheena Borthwick

Mrs Audrey Bruce

Mr Rod Chalmers
Ms Hazel Fraser
Ms Isobel Greenlees
Ms Michele Hilton-Boon
Dr Roberta James
Mrs Anne Kinnear
Mrs Katie Lambert

Dr Mary Joan Macleod

Mr John McCall
Dr Gillian Mead

Dr Keith Muir

Dr Paul Neary
Ms Heather Paterson
Professor Jill Pell

Dr Scott Ramsay

Dr Giles Roditi
Mr Tony Scanlon
Dr Tim Shallcross
60
Consultant Physician, Borders General Hospital, Melrose

Professor of Stroke Care, Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Consultant Physician, Stirling Royal Infirmary
Senior Pharmacist, Borders General Hospital, Melrose
Speech and Language Therapist, Western General Hospital,
Edinburgh
Lead Stroke Nurse (Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland),
Astley Ainslie Hospital, Edinburgh
Consultant Vascular Surgeon, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Stroke Coordinator, Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline
Lay Representative, Fife
Information Officer, SIGN
Programme Manager, SIGN
Principal Pharmacist, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Stroke Nurse (Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland), Royal
Victoria Hospital, Edinburgh
Senior Lecturer in Clinical Pharmacology,
University of Aberdeen
Stroke Specialist Nurse, Stirling Royal Infirmary
Senior Lecturer in Geriatric Medicine,
University of Edinburgh
Senior Lecturer in Neurology, University of Glasgow and
Consultant Neurologist, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow
Consultant Cardiologist, Borders General Hospital, Melrose
Principal Pharmacist, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Henry Meehan Professor of Public Health,
University of Glasgow
Consultant Physician and Geriatrician with an interest in
Stroke, St Johns Hospital, Livingston
Consultant Radiologist, Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Lay representative, Glasgow
Consultant Physician, Caithness General Hospital
16 DEVELOPMENT OF THE GUIDELINE
Mr Peter Stonebridge
Mr Paul Teenan
Mrs Amanda Wong

Consultant in Vascular Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee

Consultant Vascular Surgeon, Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Site Lead Physiotherapist, Queen Margaret Hospital,
Dunfermline
The membership of the guideline development group was confirmed following consultation
with the member organisations of SIGN. All members of the guideline development group
made declarations of interest and further details of these are available on request from the
SIGN Executive.
Guideline development and literature review expertise, support and facilitation were provided
by the SIGN Executive.
16.2.1
Patient Involvement
In addition to the identification of relevant patient issues from a broad literature search, SIGN
involves patients and carers throughout the guideline development process in several ways.
SIGN recruits a minimum of two patient representatives to guideline development groups
by inviting nominations from the relevant umbrella, national and/or local patient focused
organisations in Scotland. Where organisations are unable to nominate, patient representatives
are sought via other means, for example, from consultation with health board public involvement
staff.
Further patient and public participation in guideline development was achieved by involving
patients, carers and voluntary organisation representatives at the National Open Meeting (see
section 16.3.1). Patient representatives were invited to take part in the peer review stage of
the guideline and specific guidance for lay reviewers was circulated. Members of the SIGN
patient network were also invited to comment on the draft guideline section on provision of
information.
16.2.2 acknowledgements
SIGN is grateful to the following former members of the guideline development group.
Dr Niall Campbell
Dr Judith Keighley

Ms Avril Kerr
Dr Hamish MacRitchie
Dr Ron MacWalter

Ms Claire Ritchie

General Practitioner, Hawick

General Practitioner, Strathbrock Partnership Centre,
Broxburn
Nurse Practitioner, Strathbrock Partnership Centre, Broxburn
Consultant Radiologist, Borders General Hospital, Melrose
Consultant Physician of General and Acute Stroke Medicine,
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee
Occupational Therapist, Southern General Hospital,
Glasgow
61
16.3
consultation and peer review
16.3.1 national open meeting

A national open meeting is the main consultative phase of SIGN guideline development, at
which the guideline development group presents its draft recommendations for the first time.
The national open meeting for this guideline was held on 26th June 2007 and was attended by
317 representatives of all the key specialties relevant to the guideline. The draft guideline was
also available on the SIGN website for a limited period at this stage to allow those unable to
attend the meeting to contribute to the development of the guideline.
16.3.2 specialist review
This guideline was also reviewed in draft form by the following independent expert referees,
who were asked to comment primarily on the comprehensiveness and accuracy of interpretation
of the evidence base supporting the recommendations in the guideline. The guideline group
addresses every comment made by an external reviewer, and must justify any disagreement
with the reviewers comments.
SIGN is very grateful to all of these experts for their contribution to the guideline.
Dr Malcolm Alexander
Dr Rodney Burnham
Ms Annette Cameron
Dr George Crookes

Dr Carol Davidson
Dr Katherine Henderson

Dr Christine McAlpine
Mr David Paul
Associate Medical Director, NHS 24

Registrar, Royal College of Physicians, London
Speech and Language Therapist, Aberdeen
Clinical Director/Chief Operating Officer, NHS 24 and
Interim Medical Director for the Scottish Ambulance Service
Director of Public Health, Ayrshire and Arran
Emergency Department Consultant, St Thomas Hospital,
London
British Geriatrics Society, London
Lay Representative, Glasgow
16.3.3 sign editorial group

As a final quality control check, the guideline is reviewed by an editorial group comprising
the relevant specialty representatives on SIGN Council to ensure that the specialist reviewers
comments have been addressed adequately and that any risk of bias in the guideline
development process as a whole has been minimised. The editorial group for this guideline
was as follows:
Dr Keith Brown
Professor Tracey Howe
Dr Rajan Madhok
Ms Clare Mayo
Mrs Fiona McMillan
Dr Safia Qureshi
Dr Graeme Simpson
Dr Sara Twaddle
Dr Christine Walker
62
Chair of SIGN; Co-Editor

Allied Health Professions
The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow
The Royal College of Nursing
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
SIGN Programme Director; Co-Editor
The Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Director of SIGN; Co-Editor
The Royal College of Radiologists, Faculty of Radiology
ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviations
ABCD/ABCD2
age, blood pressure, clinical features, and duration of symptoms
ACE
angiotensin converting enzyme
AF
atrial fibrillation
ALA
-linolenic acid
ARR
absolute risk reduction
BI
Barthel index
BNF
British National Formulary
BP
blood pressure
CABG
coronary artery bypass graft
CaNS
Canadian neurological scale
CAS
carotid angioplasty and stenting
CCB
calcium channel blockers
CC
common carotid
CCA
common carotid artery
CEA
carotid endarterectomy
CE-MRA
contrast-enhanced MRA
CHARISMA

Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischaemic Stabilisation,

Management and Avoidance
CHD
coronary heart disease
CI
confidence interval
CPASS
Cincinnati pre-hospital stroke scale
CT
computerised tomography
CTA
computed tomography angiography
CVT
cerebral venous thrombosis
DVT
deep vein thrombosis
DWI
diffusion weighted imaging
EDV
end diastolic velocity
ECG
electrocardiogram
ECST
European Carotid Surgery Trial
ESPRIT

European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia

Trial
EVD
external ventricular drain
FAST
face arm speech test
FASTER

Fast Assessment of Stroke and Transient ischaemic attack to prevent

Early Recurrence
FAM
functional assessment measure
FES
first-ever-in-a-lifetime stroke
63
64
FIM
functional independence measure
FRAMES
feedback, responsibility, advice, menu, empathy, self efficacy
GCS
Glasgow coma scale
GKI
glucose/potassium/insulin
GP
general practitioner
HR
hazard ratio
HTA
Health Technology Assessment
IA
intra-arterial
ICA
internal carotid artery
ICH
intracerebral haemorrhage
ICP
intracranial pressure
INR
international normalized ratio
iu
international units
IV
intravenous
IVH
intraventricular haemorrhage
LAA
left atrial appendage
LAMS
Los Angeles motor scale
LAPSS
Los Angeles pre-hospital stroke scale
LDL
low density lipoprotein
LMWH
low molecular weight heparin
MASS
Melbourne acute stroke scale
MATCH

Management of Atherothrombosis with Clopidogrel in High-risk patients

with recent TIA or ischaemic stroke
MCA
middle cerebral artery
MCN
Managed Clinical Network
MERCI
mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischaemia
MI
myocardial infarction
MRA
magnetic resonance angiography
MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
mRS
modified Rankin scale
MTA
multiple technology assessment
NASCET
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial
NEED
NHS Economics Evaluations Database
NG
nasogastric
NICE
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
NIHSS
National Institutes of Health stroke scale
NNH
number needed to harm
NNT
number needed to treat
NPV
negative predictive value
ABBREVIATIONS
OGTT
oral glucose tolerance test
OR
odds ratio
PAD
peripheral arterial disease
PEG
percutaneous gastrostomy
PET
positron emission tomography
PFO
patent foramen ovale
PICH
primary inrtacerebral haemorrhage
PPI
proton pump inhibitor
PPV
positive predictive value
PROACT
Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism
PSV
peak systolic velocity
PTE
pulmonary thromboembolism
QALY
quality adjusted life year
RCT
randomised controlled trial
ROSIER
recognition of stroke in the emergency room
r-proUK
recombinant pro-urokinase
RR
relative risk
RRR
relative risk reduction
rt-PA
recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
SCMU
stroke care monitoring unit
SMC
Scottish Medicines Consortium
SPECT
single photon emission computed tomography
SSS
Scandinavian stroke scale
STICH
Surgical Treatment for IntraCerebral Haemorrhage
SWI
susceptibility weighted imaging
TCD
transcranial Doppler
TCCS
transcranial colour coded sonography
TIA
transient ischaemic attack
UFH
unfractionated heparin
UK
urokinase
WHO
World Health Organization
65
Annex 1
Key questions used to develop the guideline
MANAGEMENT OF SUSPECTED STROKE OR TIA
Key question
See guideline
section
1. In patients suspected of stroke or TIA do out-of-hospital systems of care

improve the number of patients referred, the speed of referral and the
implementation of acute interventions?
Consider:
a. emergency department protocols
b. ambulance protocols
c. NHS 24 protocols
d. telemedicine services.
3.1, 3.3.4
2. In patients with symptoms suggestive of acute stroke or TIA does the use
of a standard assessment scale/method/tool compared to a standard history
and examination, improve:
a. accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of diagnosis
b. speed of referral to specialist services
c. time to diagnosis and treatment?
Consider: ambulance service, accident and emergency, nursing, primary care
and general practice
3.2, 3.3.1
3. In patients with suspected stroke or TIA which form of hospital care
reduces death or dependency?
a. general ward vs home
b. stroke unit vs home
c. stroke unit vs general ward
d. stroke team vs general ward
e. acute stroke unit vs general ward
f. neurology unit vs general ward.
Consider: medical receiving units, acute medical units and high dependency
units
3.3.2
4. In patients with suspected stroke or TIA does implementation of an

integrated care pathway reduce complications, death, dependency or
length of hospital stay?
3.3.3
Consider: primary and secondary care

5. In people with previous stroke or TIA what strategies improve the control
of risk factors, eg drug compliance/concordance, smoking cessation, BP
control, HbA1C levels?
a. education programmes
b. mini intervention programmes from health professionals (eg nurse,
doctor)
c. prompts to healthcare professionals regarding patient education.
Consider: physician/doctor advice and nurse advice
66
ANNEXES
ASSESSMENT, DIAGNOSIS AND INVESTIGATION

Key question
See guideline
section
6. In patients with suspected stroke or TIA does the use of assessment tools
identify those at low risk of:
a. early stroke recurrence
b. significant dependency
c. requiring hyper acute treatment such as thrombolysis
d. cerebral haemorrhage?
Consider: ambulance service, Accident and Emergency, nursing, primary care
and general practice
4.1.1-4.1.3
7. In patients with likely acute stroke or TIA what is the evidence that brain
imaging (CT, MRI) results in change of management, is cost effectiveness
and reduces disability or death?
4.2.2
Consider: no imaging, early, late (<3, <6, <14, <48 hours, <1 week, >1
week
8. In patients with likely acute stroke or TIA what is the evidence that
brain imaging within 3, 6, 24, 48, >48 hours results in a change of
management, increased diagnostic accuracy in terms of differentiation
of infarct from haemorrhage (sensitivity and specificity for infarct AND
haemorrhage)?
4.2.3
Consider: CT, CT perfusion, MRI perfusion, MRI diffusion

9. In patients with confirmed diagnosis of primary intracerebral haemorrhage
which modality of brain imaging (no imaging, MRI, MRA, cerebral
angiography, CTA) affects management, diagnostic accuracy and diagnosis
of underlying cause of stroke?
4.2.4
Consider: intracranial aneurysm, cavernoma, ICVM

10. In patients with likely acute stroke or TIA who have undergone brain
4.2.5
imaging with CT or MRI how does interpretation of imaging by interpreters
with different levels of expertise, including radiographer, general physician,
stroke physician, general radiologist, neuroradiologist (with or without use
of scoring system eg ASPECT) change management and affect diagnostic
accuracy eg detection of early infarction?
11. In patients with likely acute stroke or TIA does the use of remote diagnostic 4.2.6
aids such as teleradiology or telemedicine change management, diagnostic
accuracy, time to diagnosis, disability, death, use of thrombolysis, time to
treatment or use of surgery?
67
12. In patients with carotid territory TIA or stroke and/or retinal event
(including amaurosis fugax, transient monocular blindness and retinal
artery occlusion) does carotid imaging improve accuracy of diagnosis for
carotid disease on the symptomatic side (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy,
NPV & PPV) for the following outcomes?
a. plaque burden
b. plaque composition
c. plaque morphology
d. stenosis degree
e. stenosis extent
f. tandem disease (ipsilateral at site other than carotid bifurcation/carotid
bulb/internal carotid origin).
Consider:
a. ultrasound (greyscale)
b. duplex/Doppler ultrasound
c. contrast-enhanced ultrasound
d. CT angiography
e. MR angiography
f. contrast-enhanced MR angiography
g. angiography/arteriography
h. rotational angiography/arteriography.
13. In patients scheduled for cardiac surgery and who are asymptomatic
for TIA/stroke which modality of carotid imaging is most effective for
improving the outcomes of recurrent stroke/dependency/death?
a. duplex ultrasound
b. CT angiography
c. MR angiography
d. contrast-enhanced MR angiography
e. angiography/arteriography
f. rotational angiography.
Consider:
4.3.2
a. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)

b.v alve replacement (aortic and/or mitral valves, with/without
CABG)
c. left ventricular aneurysmectomy (with/without CABG)
d. thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.
14. In patients with confirmed stroke or TIA does imaging of the heart change
management?
Consider:
68
a. trans-thoracic echo
b. trans-oesophageal echo (TOE, TEE)
c. contrast-enhanced echo
d. trans-cranial Doppler
e. cardiac CT
f. cardiac MRI.
4.4
ANNEXES
15. In patients with confirmed stroke or TIA which diagnostic tests change
4.5
management/treatment?
a. thrombophilia screen (anti-thrombin, protein C, protein S, APC
resistance, Factor V Leiden genotyping, prothrombin 20210
mutation)
b. auto-antibody screen
c. rheumatoid factor
d. anti-nuclear factor
e. ANCA
f. anti-DNA
g. anti-cardiolipin antibodies
h. lupus anticoagulant
i. genetic testing
j. coagulation screen
k. serum protein electrophoresis
l. immunoglobulin levels
m.homocysteine levels
n. syphilis serology
o. sickle cell screen.
TREATMENT OF ISCHAEMIC STROKE
Key question
See guideline
section
16. Which therapeutic interventions in acute ischaemic stroke patients reduce 5.1-5.7
death or dependence, compared with placebo/standard management?
a. thrombolysis (IV) vs placebo
b. thrombolysis (IA) vs IV thrombolysis or vs placebo
c. general (anterior circulation)
d. basilar artery occlusion
e. antiplatelet agents vs control/placebo
f. heparin (UF or LMWT): heparin vs control or UF vs LMWT
g. neuroprotectants vs placebo
h. r educing raised ICP (positioning, hyperventilation, mannitol,
hypertonic saline, glycerol vs control)
i. decompressive surgery
j. hemicraniectomy vs control
k. post fossa decompression vs control
l. post fossa decompression vs EVD
m.EVD vs control
n. mechanical reperfusion vs control
clot retrieval
transcranial Doppler plus thrombolysis vs thrombolysis only
microbubbles.
17. In patients with acute ischaemic stroke, does temporary withdrawal of
intervention reduce death or dependence?
Consider:
5.8
a. antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole)

b. warfarin
c. antihypertensive therapy (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers,
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonists,
alpha blockers, centrally acting agents)
d. statins.
69
TREATMENT OF PRIMARY INRTACEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE

Key question
See guideline
section
6.1-6.4
18. Which interventions reduce death or dependence in patients with PICH
(primary intracerebral haemorrhage)?
a. haematoma evacuation, immediate vs delayed vs none
b. neuroprotective agents vs placebo
c. thrombolysis vs placebo
d. recombinant factor VIIa vs placebo
e. acute blood pressure lowering vs no blood pressure lowering
f. vitamin K or fresh frozen plasma or concentrated clotting factors vs
placebo
g. interventions to reduce raised intracranial pressure (mannitol etc vs
placebo.
OTHER CAUSES OF STROKE
Key question
See guideline
section
19. In patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis which interventions
reduce death or dependence vs control?
a. anticoagulation (warfarin or heparin) vs placebo
b. anticoagulation vs antiplatelet agents
c. antiplatelet agents vs placebo
d. thrombolysis vs above therapies.
7.1
20. In patients with extracranial arterial dissection, which interventions

reduce death or dependency vs control?
a. warfarin vs aspirin
b. stenting vs control.
7.2
PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INTERVENTION
70
Key question
See guideline
section
21. In patients with acute stroke does the intensity (more vs less) of
physiological monitoring (heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, oxygen
saturation) in conjunction with a management protocol reduce death and
dependence?
a. blood glucose
b. blood pressure
c. temperature
d. oxygen saturation.
8.1
ANNEXES
22. In patients with acute stroke, which interventions vs control reduces death 8.2
or dependence?
a. intravenous fluids
- IV fluids vs oral fluids
- saline vs other (dextrose, Ringers, Hartmanns)
- high vs standard volume (>2 litres/24 hours vs <2 litres/24
hours)
b. blood pressure management
- active lowering vs control
- active elevating (sympathomimetic agents or plasma expanders
vs control)
- withdrawing antihypertensive drugs vs continuing
c. lowering blood glucose (insulin vs control)
d. f eeding (early vs deferred feeding, NG, PEG, supplementary
feeding)
e. s upplementary oxygen therapy vs standard, normobaric vs
hyperbaric
f. management of pyrexia (antipyretics vs control)
g. early mobilisation
h. active positioning
i. induction of hypothermia vs control.
71
PREVENTING RECURRENT STROKE IN PATIENTS WITH ISCHAEMIC STROKE OR TIA

Key question
See guideline
section
23. In patients with ischaemic stroke (or TIA) which therapies are proven to
9.1-9.5, 11.1,
reduce the incidence of recurrent stroke or cardiovascular events (non12.2.5
fatal MI, vascular death, non-fatal recurrent stroke)?
a. antiplatelet agents
- aspirin vs placebo, vs others in list, high dose>300mg vs low
dose (<300mg ), immediate vs deferred), aspirin vs aspirin plus
dipyridamole
- clopidogrel vs placebo, vs aspirin, vs aspirin plus clopidogrel, vs
dipyridamole plus aspirin
- dipyridamole vs placebo, vs aspirin, vs aspirin plus dipyridamole,
standard vs modified release
- triflusal vs aspirin
- combinations of these.
b. statins
- statins vs placebo
- statin vs statin (different drugs)
- statin vs other lipid-lowering interventions (fibrates, ezetemibe,
nicotinamide, cholestyramine, surgical)
- immediate vs delayed statin therapy.
- statin treatment to cholesterol target vs treatment irrespective of
cholesterol level.
c. anticoagulation
- in patients in AF. Warfarin vs placebo, warfarin vs aspirin or
clopidogrel/aspirin, or warfarin plus aspirin. Immediate vs
delayed.
- which INR?
- other stroke aetiologies (warfarin vs placebo, warfarin vs aspirin,
warfarin vs clopidogrel or combinations)
d. antihypertensives
- specific agents vs placebo
- specific agents vs each other, and also combinations.
- immediate v deferred treatment
- blood pressure target vs treatment irrespective of blood pressure
e. vitamins, minerals, dietary supplements/nutraceuticals vs placebo
f. carotid endarterectomy
g. atrial appendage occlusion.
24. In patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke, which
interventions reduce recurrent stroke or cardiovascular events?
a. antiplatelet vs warfarin
b. closure vs medical therapy (antiplatelets or warfarin).
72
9.7
ANNEXES
PREVENTING RECURRENT STROKE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY INRTACEREBRAL

HAEMORRHAGE
Key question
See guideline
section
25. In patients with PICH what interventions prevent recurrent vascular events
(recurrent stroke or cardiovascular events (non-fatal MI, vascular death,
non-fatal recurrent stroke)?
a. blood pressure reduction
b. antiplatelet agents
c. anticoagulation
d. statins.
10.1-10.4
26. In patients with haemorrhagic transformation of an ischaemic infarction does withdrawal
of antiplatelet agent (aspirin/clopidogrel/dipyridamole) or anticoagulant (warfarin, heparin)
affect death or disability?
CAROTID INTERVENTION
Key question
See guideline
section
27. In patients with carotid territory TIA or stroke and/or retinal event
(including amaurosis fugax, transient monocular blindness and retinal
artery occlusion) does carotid intervention reduce recurrent stroke/
dependency/death?
a. surgical carotid endarterectomy
b. carotid angioplasty and stent
c. carotid angioplasty and stent with cerebral protection.
11.1.1, 11.2
28. Patients with carotid disease who are asymptomatic in that (ipsilateral)
carotid territory does carotid intervention reduce recurrent stroke/
dependency/death?
11.1.2, 11.2
29. In patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with carotid disease and who are 11.1.3
asymptomatic for TIA/stroke which carotid intervention reduces recurrent
stroke/dependency/death?
Consider:
a. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
b.valve replacement (aortic and/or mitral valves, with/without CABG)
c. left ventricular aneurysmectomy (with/without CABG)
d. thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.
30. In patients undergoing surgical carotid endarterectomy which carotid
surgery techniques reduces recurrent stroke/dependency/death?
a. local versus general anaesthetic
b. shunt or no shunt
c. patch or no patch
d. monitor with transcranial Doppler vs none
e. monitor with EEG vs none
f. monitor with infra-red spectroscopy vs none.
11.1.4
73
31. In patients undergoing surgical carotid endarterectomy or carotid

angioplasty/stent does periprocedural antiplatelet or antithrombotic
therapy (aspirin, dipyridamole, clopidogrel, ticlopidine and abciximab)
reduce stroke/dependency/death/bleeding (haemorrhage)?
11.3
32. In patients presenting with stroke, TIA, crescendo TIA or stuttering
stroke and/or retinal events (amaurosis fugax, transient monocular
blindness and retinal artery occlusion) and carotid disease suitable for
intervention does early intervention reduce recurrent stroke/dependency/
death compared to delayed intervention or late intervention?
PROVISION OF INFORMATION
Key question
See guideline
section
33. What evidence is there for when and how patients with suspected stroke/
TIA and carers should be offered information?
12.1.1
34. What evidence is there that individualised information for patients

with suspected stroke/TIA and carers is more beneficial than generic
information?
Consider: literacy, age, ethnicity, risk factors, format (visually impaired,
aphasia, dysphasia.
12.1.1
35. What information do patients with stroke want?

a.Why have I had a stroke?
b.Will I have another stroke?
c.What caused the stroke?
12.1.1
36. What practical information can be given to carers about the day-to-day
living of a patient with acute stroke?
12.1.2
Consider: clothing, food and drink, eating, texture, dysphagia, impact of stroke
on lifestyle, mood, personality.
37. What early and ongoing support do carers need to help them cope with
caring for a patient with stroke?
12.1.2
Consider: who should be their contact (practically and emotionally), methods

of support
38. What evidence is there that encouraging independence in patients with
stroke is beneficial?
12.2.1
Consider: reducing dependence, self help, taking responsibility, patient centred

goal setting, informed decision making
39. What is the evidence that changing lifestyle prevents secondary stroke
(secondary prevention)?
Consider: obesity, exercise, smoking, diet (lower fat, lower salt, higher fruit and
vegetable.
74
12.2.2-12.2.8
ANNEXES
40. What are the best ways of motivating people to continue exercising after
discharge and are there any exercise programmes that link physiotherapist
led exercise and gym?
12.2.9
Consider: education, transition

41. What are the symptoms of stroke and who should the patient contact
under which circumstances?
42. How acceptable is telemedicine for patients with suspected stroke/TIA and
their carer/family?
Consider: specialist opinion, rural locations, communication between
healthcare professional and patient/carer
43. What factors influence drug compliance for secondary prevention in
patients with (acute) stroke?
Consider: cost (if not on free prescription), poor information, lack of
understanding of benefits vs harms, patients ability (physical and mental), lack
of support
75
Annex 2
NIH stroke scale
The NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate
the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visualfield loss, extra-ocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained
observer rates the patents ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each
item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable
items. The single patient assessment requires less than 10 minutes to complete.
A free educational website presented by the International Electronic Education Network
provides tutorials, assessment and accreditation on the use of the NIHSS. The target audiences
for this programme are first responders, physicians, neurologists, nurses, clinical raters and
medical students (www.nihstrokescale.org).

76
ANNEXES
Annex 2 (continued)
77
Annex 2 (continued)
78
ANNEXES
Annex 2 (continued)
79
Annex 2 (continued)
80
ANNEXES
Annex 2 (continued)
81
Annex 2 (continued)
82
ANNEXES
Annex 2 (continued)
83
Annex 2 (continued)
84
ANNEXES
Annex 2 (continued)
85
Annex 3
Modified Rankin score298
A record of the functional outcome after an event based upon the extent of any disability
or disabling symptoms experienced by the patient following the event, measured using the
modified Rankin score (mRS) tool.
86
Score
Symptoms
Description
No symptoms
No symptoms at all. Score of 0
No significant disabling
symptoms
No significant disability despite

symptoms; able to carry out all usual
duties and activities. Score of 1
Slight disability
Unable to carry out all previous

activities but able to look after their
own affairs without assistance. Score
of 2
Moderate disability
Requiring some help but able to walk

without assistance. Score of 3
Moderate/severe disability
Unable to walk without assistance and

unable to attend to own bodily needs
without assistance. Score of 4
Severe disability
Bedridden, incontinent and requiring

constant nursing care and attention.
Score of 5
Dead
Score of 6
ANNEXES
Annex 4
Face arm speech test (FAST) and instructions
Adapted from Harbison et al and reproduced by kind permission of Lippincott, Williams and
Wilkins, Baltimore18
STROKE (FACE ARM SPEECH TEST)
SPEECH IMPAIRMENT YES
NO
FACIAL PALSY YES
NO
AFFECTED SIDE L
ARM WEAKNESS YES
NO
AFFECTED SIDE L
FACIAL MOVEMENTS
Ask patient to smile or show teeth
- Look for NEW lack of symmetry - Tick the YES box if there is an unequal smile or
grimace or obvious facial asymmetry
- Note which side does not move well, and mark on the form whether it is the
patient's right or left side
ARM MOVEMENTS
- Lift the patient's arms together to 90 if sitting, 45 if supine and ask them to hold the
position for 5 seconds then let go
- Does one arm drift down or fall rapidly?
- If one arm drifts down or falls, note whether it is the patient's left or right arm
SPEECH
If the patient attempts a conversation
- Look for NEW disturbance of speech
- Check with companion
- Look for slurred speech
- Look for word-finding difficulties. This can be confirmed by asking the patient to
name commonplace objects that may be nearby, such as a cup, chair, table
keys, pen
- If there is a severe visual disturbance, place an object in the patient's hand and ask
him/her to name it
87
Annex 5
MASS Test
Adapted from Bray et al and reproduced by kind permission of S. Karger AG, Basel.22
Assessment
History items
Age>45 years
Absent history of seizure or epilepsy
At baseline not wheelchair bound or bedridden
Blood glucose level between 2.8 and 22.2 mmol/L
Physical assessment items (normal and abnormal outcomes)
Facial droop
Patient smiles or shows teeth
(both sides move equally, one side does not move)
Arm drift
Patient closes eyes and extends both arms out for 10 seconds
(both arms move/both arms do not move, one arm does not move/one arm drifts
compared to the other)
Hand grip
Place a hand in each hand of the patient and ask him/her to squeeze hands
(both grip equally/not at all, unilateral weak/no grip)
Speech
Repeats a sentence
(normal, slurred/incorrect words, unable to speak)
Criteria for identifying stroke

Presence of any physical assessment item
All history items answered yes
88
ANNEXES
Annex 6
ROSIER scale proforma
Reprinted from Lancet Neurology, 4 (11), Azlisham Mohd Nor, John Davis, Bas Sen, Dean
Shipsey, Stephen J Louw, Alexander G Dyker, Michelle Davis, Gary A Ford. The Recognition
of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) scale: development and validation of a stroke
recognition instrument, 72734, Copyright (2005), with permission from Elsevier.20
ASSESSMENT
Date
Time
SYMPTOM ONSET
Date
Time
GCS
E= M=
V=
BP
*BM
*If BM<3.5mmol/L treat urgently and reassess once blood glucose normal
Has there been loss of consciousness or syncope? Y (1)
N (0)
Y (1)
N (0)
Has there been seizure activity?
Is there a NEW ACUTE onset (or on awakening from sleep)

I.
Asymmetric facial weakness Y (+1)
N (0)
II.
Asymmetric arm weakness Y (+1)
N (0)
III.
Asymmetric leg weakness Y (+1)
N (0)
IV.
Speech disturbance Y (+1)
N (0)
V.
Visual field defect Y (+1)
N (0)
*Total Score________(2 to + 5)
Provisional diagnosis
Stroke
Non-stroke (specify)_______________________________
* Stroke is unlikely but not completely excluded if total scores are 0.

BM blood glucose, BP blood pressure (mmHg), GCS Glasgow coma scale, E eye, M motor, V verbal
89
Annex 7
ABCD/ABCD2
Reprinted from The Lancet, 366 (9479), Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Flossmann E, Lovelock CE,
Redgrave JN, Warlow CP, Mehta Z. A, A simple score (ABCD) to identify individuals at high
early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack, 29-36, Copyright (2005), with permission
from Elsevier.34, 299
Risk factor
Category
Score
Age of patient
Age60
Age<60
1
0
Blood pressure at
assessment
140 mm Hg systolic or >90 mm Hg diastolic

Other
1
0
Clinical features
at presentation
Unilateral weakness
Speech disturbance (no weakness)
Other
2
1
0
Duration of TIA
symptoms
60 minutes
10-59 minutes
<10 minutes
2
1
0
Diabetes
1
TOTAL
Early risk of stroke after TIA:

Scores 0-3: low risk
Scores 4-5: moderate risk
Scores 6-7: high risk
90
/7
ANNEXES
Annex 8
Brain imaging for stroke
The choice of imaging of the brain in the acute phase of stroke is between CT and MRI (see
section 4.2.3). It is difficult to recommend which modality to use exclusively, as this will depend
upon individual patient circumstances. The strengths and weaknesses of both modalities are
shown in the table below to help inform choice. For the purposes of this table CT brain imaging
is unenhanced (without contrast) and MRI while also unenhanced is assumed to include diffusion
weighted imaging (DWI) and some form of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) sequences.
CT
MRI
Geographic availability
Widely available throughout

Scotland including some
island locations.
Increasing availability in
Scotland but still mainly
confined to the larger centres.
Out-of-hours availability
Generally available out-ofhours.
Still very limited availability outof-hours in Scotland.
Imaging unwell patients
Images rapidly acquired and

suitable for imaging acutely
unwell or obtunded patients.
May present difficulties in

unwell or confused patients,
longer examination times than
CT. Some patients ineligible for
MRI due to contraindications
such as for those patients
dependent upon pacemakers.
Sensitivity for ischaemia
Insensitive in first few

hours with poor interobserver agreement for
early ischaemic changes.
Increasing accuracy with
time and size of infarct.
Relatively insensitive for
small infarcts, especially in
posterior fossa structures.
Highly sensitive for ischaemia at

all time points and in all brain
regions.
Sensitivity for
haemorrhage
Highly sensitive for

haemorrhage in first hours
and days but this decreases
with time from ictus.
Sensitive for parenchymal

haemorrhage at all time points
following stroke.
The high sensitivity of CT for haemorrhage, its rapid acquisition and applicability in unwell
patients allows diagnostic decision making in many of those presenting with acute stroke
syndrome, especially where a substantial territory of brain is likely to be involved. For patients
presenting at later time points (days) MRI has advantage in differentiating haemorrhage from
ischaemia. Patients presenting with limited or unusual neurology (NIHSS 3), especially
brainstem syndromes, may also be better served by MRI as the first imaging investigation.
MRI is also useful after initial negative CT scan, where there is diagnostic doubt or the
definitive depiction of ischaemic damage will aid future management.
91
Annex 9
Carotid stenosis
A misconception engendered by the concentration on stenosis measurement is that stenosis
causes stroke when in fact it is not stenosis in itself (luminal narrowing impeding blood flow)
that is the main cause of stroke, rather in the context of carotid disease stroke is usually caused
by atheroembolism. At the time of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy
Trial (NASCET) the only imaging methodology available to visualise carotid atheromatous disease
burden was conventional selective carotid angiography using cut film. The sole means by which
these images could be analysed for disease quantification was to measure stenosis. In NASCET
the stenosis was measured with the luminal diameter of the normal appearing internal carotid
artery distal to the site of stenosis as the denominator. A potential limitation of this is that at
higher grades of narrowing when the normal vessel beyond a stenosis becomes depressurised
this intrinsically affects the calculation. As a small vessel the potential errors in measurement
of the internal carotid are relatively greater than in a larger artery such as the common carotid.
The European Carotid Surgery Trial also used angiographic measurement but did not demand
selective arteriograms and used a different method for stenosis calculation using the perceived
normal diameter of the vessel at the site of disease (usually the carotid bulb) as the denominator.
This normal diameter is not actually delineated on arteriography and it is likely that this
measurement was judged by extrapolation of the common carotid artery diameter proximal to
the disease. It has been proposed that the denominator should be the common carotid artery,
unaffected by post-stenotic pressure phenomena and better inter-observer diameter estimation,
however, the NASCET criterion has become the accepted standard.
The figure below shows a comparison of the methods used to measure carotid stenosis as assessed
by diameter reduction shown on angiography. There is also a diagrammatic representation
of ulcerated plaque for which simple stenosis assessment would underestimate the degree of
pathology and potential for atheroembolism.
Picture of bifurcation with different denominators illustrated
A
C
92
ANNEXES
Annex 10
Carotid Duplex Reporting
The degree of internal carotid artery stenosis as found with carotid duplex ultrasound should
be reported in broad categories. Attempts to grade carotid stenosis to more precise degrees by
ultrasound are inappropriate. The grade of stenosis reported should be based on a combination
of parameters and not just one variable. The report should state the velocity measurements
and also the gray-scale and colour Doppler findings. A degree of stenosis >50% should be
corroborated by a second imaging modality.300
Degree of stenosis ICA PSV
(%)
(cm/sec)
Plaque estimate
(%)
ICA/CCA PSV
ratio
ICA EDV
(cm/sec)
Normal
<125
None
<2.0
<40
<50
>125
<50
<2.0
<40
50-69
125-230
50
2.0-4.0
40-100
70 but less than

near occlusion
>230
50
>4.0
>100
Near occlusion
High, low or
undetectable
Visible
Variable
Variable
Total occlusion
Undetectable
Visible, no
detectable lumen
Not applicable
Not
applicable
ICA internal carotid artery, PSV peak systolic velocity, CCA common carotid artery
EDV end diastolic velocity
Reprinted from Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale
and Doppler US diagnosis-society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference.
Radiology 2003;229:340-346 with permission from The Radiological Society of North
America (RSNA)300
93
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
94
Syme P, Byrne A, Chen R, Devenny R, Forbes J. Community-based

stroke incidence in a Scottish population: the Scottish Borders
Stroke Study. Stroke 2005;36(9):1837-43.
NHS National Services Scotland. Information Services Division.
Stroke: incidence and mortality. [cited 13 Nov]. Available from
url: http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/information-and-statistics.
jsp?pContentID=2432&p_applic=CCC&p_service=Content.
show&
Wood R, Bain M. The Health and well-being of older people in
Scotland. Insights from national data. . [cited 30 Oct]. Available
from url: http://isd.scot.nhs.uk/isd/files/older.pdf
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management
of patients with stroke I: Assessment, investigation, immediate
management and secondary prevention. Edinburgh: SIGN; 1997.
(SIGN guideline 13). Available from url: http://www.sign.ac.uk/
pdf/sign13.pdf
of patients with stroke II: Management of carotid stenosis and
carotid endarterectomy. Edinburgh: SIGN; 1997. (SIGN guideline
14). Available from url: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign14.pdf
of patients with stroke. Rehabilitation, prevention and management
of complications, and discharge planning. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2002.
(SIGN guideline 64). Available from url: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/
sign64.pdf
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of
patients with stroke: Identification and management of dysphagia.
Edinburgh: SIGN; 2004. (SIGN guideline 78). Available from url:
http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign78.pdf
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Risk estimation
and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Edinburgh: SIGN;
2007. (SIGN guideline 97). Available from url: http://www.sign.
ac.uk/pdf/sign97.pdf
World Health Organzation. Stroke, cerebrovascular accident.
[cited 13 Nov]. Available from url: http://www.who.int/topics/
cerebrovascular_accident/en/
Albers GW, Caplan LR, Easton JD, Fayad PB, Mohr JP, Saver JL,
et al. Transient ischemic attack--proposal for a new definition. N
Engl J Med 2002;347(21):1713-6.
Kwan J, Hand P, Sandercock P. A systematic review of barriers
to delivery of thrombolysis for acute stroke. Age Ageing
2004;33(2):116-21.
Sandercock P, Berge E, Dennis M, Forbes J, Hand P, Kwan J, et
al. A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and
barriers to implementation of thrombolytic and neuroprotective
therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in the NHS. Health Technology
Assessment 2002;6(26).
Kwan J, Hand P, Sandercock P. Improving the efficiency of delivery
of thrombolysis for acute stroke: A systematic review. Qjm: Monthly
Journal of the Association of Physicians 2004;97(5):273-9.
Belvis R, Cocho D, Marti-Fabregas J, Pagonabarraga J, Aleu A,
Garcia-Bargo MD, et al. Benefits of a prehospital stroke code
system: Feasibility and efficacy in the first year of clinical practice in
Barcelona, Spain. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2005;19(2):96-101.
Wu O, Langhorne P. The challenge of acute-stroke management
in the United Kingdom: does telemedicine offer a solution?
International Journal of Stroke 2006;1(4):201-7.
Kwan J, Sandercock P. In-hospital care pathways for stroke. The
Cochrane Library. 2005;
Goldstein LB, Simel DL. Is this patient having a stroke? Journal of
the American Medical Association 2005;293(19):2391-402.
Harbison J, Hossain O, Jenkinson D, Davis J, Louw SJ, Ford
GA. Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care,
emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face
arm speech test. Stroke 2003;34(1):71-6.
Hurwitz AS, Brice JH, Overby BA, Evenson KR. Directed use of
the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale by laypersons. Prehospital
Emergency Care 2005;9(3):292-6.
Nor AM, Davis J, Sen B, Shipsey D, Louw SJ, Dyker AG, et al. The
Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) scale:
Development and validation of a stroke recognition instrument.
Lancet Neurology. Vol. 2005;4(11):727-34.
Nor AM, McAllister C, Louw SJ, Dyker AG, Davis M, Jenkinson D,
et al. Agreement between ambulance paramedic- and physicianrecorded neurological signs with Face Arm Speech Test (FAST) in
acute stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35(6):1355-9.
22. Bray JE, Martin J, Cooper G, Barger B, Bernard S, Bladin C.

Paramedic identification of stroke: community validation of the
Melbourne ambulance stroke screen. Cerebrovascular Diseases
2005;20(1):28-33.
23. Langhorne P, Pollock A. What are the components of effective
stroke unit care? Age and Ageing. 2002;31(5):365-71. (23 ref).
24. Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Chandratheva A, Marquardt L, Geraghty O,
Redgrave JN, et al. Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic
attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study):
a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Lancet
2007;370(9596):1432-42.
25. Kennedy J, Hill MD, Ryckborst KJ, Eliasziw M, Demchuk AM,
Buchan AM. Fast assessment of stroke and transient ischaemic
attack to prevent early recurrence (FASTER): a randomised
controlled pilot trial. Lancet Neurology 2007;6(11):961-9.
26. Lavallee PC, Meseguer E, Abboud H, Cabrejo L, Olivot JM,
Simon O, et al. A transient ischaemic attack clinic with round-theclock access (SOS-TIA): feasibility and effects. Lancet Neurology
2007;6(11):953-60.
27. Levine SR, Gorman M. Telestroke : the application of telemedicine
for stroke. Stroke 1999;30(2):464-9.
28. LaMonte MP, Bahouth MN, Hu P, Pathan MY, Yarbrough KL,
Gunawardane R, et al. Telemedicine for acute stroke: triumphs
and pitfalls. Stroke 2003;34(3):725-8.
29. Shafqat S, Kvedar JC, Guanci MM, Chang Y, Schwamm LH.
Role for telemedicine in acute stroke. Feasibility and reliability
of remote administration of the NIH stroke scale. Stroke
1999;30(10):2141-5.
30. Wang S, Gross H, Lee SB, Pardue C, Waller J, Nichols FT, 3rd, et
al. Remote evaluation of acute ischemic stroke in rural community
hospitals in Georgia. Stroke 2004;35(7):1763-8.
31. Wiborg A, Widder B. Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural
areas: The Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia (TESS) Project. Stroke
2003;34(12):2951-6.
32. Berthier E, Decavel, P, Christian, M, et al,. Evaluating the
reproducibility and routine use of the NIHSS by telemedicine
with emergency neurology network (RUN-STROKE) programme.
Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;19(suppl 2):59.
33. Cucchiara BL, Messe SR, Taylor RA, Pacelli J, Maus D, Shah Q, et
al. Is the ABCD score useful for risk stratification of patients with
acute transient ischemic attack? Stroke 2006;37(7):1710-4.
34. Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, Giles MF, Elkins
JS, Bernstein AL, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to
predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet
2007;369(9558):283-92.
35. Rothwell PM. With what to treat which patient with recently
symptomatic carotid stenosis? Practical Neurology 2005;5(2):6883.
36. Johnston SC, Gress DR, Browner WS, Sidney S. Short-term
prognosis after emergency department diagnosis of TIA. Jama
2000;284(22):2901-6.
37. Tsivgoulis G, Spengos K, Manta P, Karandreas N, Zambelis
T, Zakopoulos N, et al. Validation of the ABCD score in
identifying individuals at high early risk of stroke after a transient
ischemic attack: a hospital-based case series study. Stroke
2006;37(12):2892-7.
38. Hui AC, Wu B, Tang AS, Kay R. Lack of clinical utility of the Siriraj
Stroke Score. Internal Medicine Journal 2002;32(7):311-4.
39. Appelros P, Terent A. Characteristics of the National Institute
of Health Stroke Scale: results from a population-based stroke
cohort at baseline and after one year. Cerebrovascular Diseases
2004;17(1):21-7.
40. Llanes JN, Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Leary MC, Eckstein M, Saver
JL. The Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS): a new measure to
characterize stroke severity in the field. Prehospital Emergency
Care 2004;8(1):46-50.
41. Muir KW, Weir CJ, Murray GD, Povey C, Lees KR. Comparison of
neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke prognosis.
Stroke 1996;27(10):1817-20.
42. Tirschwell DL, Longstreth WT, Jr., Becker KJ, Gammans RE, Sr.,
Sabounjian LA, Hamilton S, et al. Shortening the NIH Stroke scale
for use in the prehospital setting. Stroke 2002;33(12):2801-6.
43. Weimar C, Konig IR, Kraywinkel K, Ziegler A, Diener HC. Age and
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score within 6 hours after
onset are accurate predictors of outcome after cerebral ischemia:
development and external validation of prognostic models. Stroke
2004;35(1):158-62.
44. Bruno A, Saha C, Williams LS. Using change in the National
Institutes of Health Stroke Scale to measure treatment effect in
acute stroke trials. Stroke 2006;37(3):920-1.
REFERENCES
45. Christensen H, Boysen G, Truelsen T. The Scandinavian stroke

scale predicts outcome in patients with mild ischemic stroke.
Cerebrovascular Diseases 2005;20(1):46-8.
46. Wright CJ, Swinton LC, Green TL, Hill MD. Predicting final
disposition after stroke using the Orpington Prognostic Score. Can
J Neurol Sci 2004;31(4):494-8.
47. Weir CJ, Murray GD, Adams FG, Muir KW, Grosset DG, Lees KR.
Poor accuracy of stroke scoring systems for differential clinical
diagnosis of intracranial haemorrhage and infarction. Lancet
1994;344(8928):999-1002.
48. Wardlaw JM, Seymour J, Cairns J, Keir S, Lewis S, Sandercock
P. Immediate computed tomography scanning of acute stroke is
cost-effective and improves quality of life. Stroke 2004;35(11):247783.
49. Wardlaw J, Keir SL, Dennis M. The impact of delays in computed
tomography of the brain on the accuracy of diagnosis and
subsequent management in patients with minor stroke. Journal Of
Neurology, Neurosurgery, And Psychiatry 2003;74(1):77-81.
50. Wardlaw JM, Keir SL, Seymour J, Lewis S, Sandercock PAG, Dennis
MS, et al. What is the best imaging strategy for acute stroke? Health
Technology Assessment 2004;8(1).
51. Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, Luby M, Butman JA, Demchuk
AM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography
in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke:
a prospective comparison. Lancet 2007;369(9558):293-8.
52. Wardlaw JM, Farrall AJ. Diagnosis of stroke on neuroimaging. BMJ
2004;328(7441):655-6.
53. Warlow C, Dennis M, van Gijn J, Hankey G, Sandercock P, Bamford
J, et al. Stroke: A practical guide to management. Oxford: Blackwell
Science; 1996.
54. Wardlaw JM, Mielke O. Early signs of brain infarction at CT:
observer reliability and outcome after thrombolytic treatment-systematic review. Radiology 2005;235(2):444-53.
55. Johnston KC, Worrall BB. Teleradiology Assessment of
Computerized Tomographs Online Reliability Study (TRACTORS)
for acute stroke evaluation. Telemed J E Health 2003;9(3):22733.
56. Wardlaw J, Chappell F, Stevenson M, De Nigris E, Thomas S, Gillard
J, et al. Accurate, practical and cost-effective assessment of carotid
stenosis in the UK. Health Technology Assessment 2006;10(30).
57. Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, Wartolowska K, Berry E, NHS
Research and Development Health Technology Assessment Carotid
Stenosis Imaging Group. Non-invasive imaging compared with
intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid
stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367(9521):1503-12.
58. Barry R, Pienaar C, Nel CJ. Accuracy of B-mode ultrasonography
in detecting carotid plaque hemorrhage and ulceration. Ann Vasc
Surg 1990;4(5):466-70.
59. DOnofrio M, Mansueto G, Faccioli N, Guarise A, Tamellini
P, Bogina G, et al. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced
magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery
stenosis. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006;111(1):93-103.
60. Saba L, Caddeo G, Sanfilippo R, Montisci R, Mallarini G. CT and
ultrasound in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with
surgical results: potentialities and advantages of multidetector row
CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28(6):1061-6.
61. Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Valentine RJ, Modrall JG, Smith S, Clagett
GP. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced
magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting. J
Vasc Surg 2007;46(2):257-64.
62. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Effectiveness and
cost effectiveness of echocardiography and carotid imaging in the
management of stroke. [cited 30 Oct]. Available from url: http://
www.ahrq.gov/clinic/tp/strokemantp.htm
63. Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW, van Bockxmeer FM, Lofthouse E, Staples
N, Baker RI. Inherited thrombophilia in ischemic stroke and its
pathogenic subtypes. Stroke 2001;32(8):1793-9.
64. Levine SR, Brey RL, Tilley BC, Thompson JL, Sacco RL,
Sciacca RR, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies and subsequent
thrombo-occlusive events in patients with ischemic stroke. Jama
2004;291(5):576-84.
65. Wardlaw JM, del Zoppo G, Yamaguchi T, Berge E. Thrombolysis
for acute ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID
#CD000213).
66. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti
D, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute
ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359(13):1317-29.
67. Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, Kaste M, von Kummer R, Broderick
JP, et al. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled
analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet
2004;363(9411):768-74.
68. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A, Hacke W, Millan M, Muir K,

et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3-4.5 h after acute ischaemic
stroke (SITS-ISTR): an observational study. Lancet 2008.
69. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W,
et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the
Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study
(SITS-MOST): an observational study.[erratum appears in Lancet.
2007 Mar 10;369(9564):826]. Lancet 2007;369(9558):275-82.
70. Ribo M, Molina CA, Rovira A, Quintana M, Delgado P, Montaner
J, et al. Safety and efficacy of intravenous tissue plasminogen
activator stroke treatment in the 3- to 6-hour window using
multimodal transcranial Doppler/MRI selection protocol. Stroke
2005;36(3):602-6.
71. Kohrmann M, Juttler E, Fiebach JB, Huttner HB, Siebert S, Schwark
C, et al. MRI versus CT-based thrombolysis treatment within and
beyond the 3 h time window after stroke onset: a cohort study.
Lancet Neurology 2006;5(8):661-7.
72. Thomalla G, Schwark C, Sobesky J, Bluhmki E, Fiebach JB, Fiehler
J, et al. Outcome and symptomatic bleeding complications of
intravenous thrombolysis within 6 hours in MRI-selected stroke
patients: comparison of a German multicenter study with the
pooled data of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS tPA trials. Stroke
2006;37(3):852-8.
73. Pettersen JA, Hudon ME, Hill MD. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in
acute ischemic stroke: A review of pharmacologic approaches.
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 2004;2(2):285-99.
74. Nedeltchev K, der Maur TA, Georgiadis D, Arnold M, Caso V,
Mattle HP, et al. Ischaemic stroke in young adults: predictors of
outcome and recurrence. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &
Psychiatry 2005;76(2):191-5.
75. Lindsberg PJ, Mattle HP. Therapy of basilar artery occlusion:
a systematic analysis comparing intra-arterial and intravenous
thrombolysis. Stroke 2006;37(3):922-8.
76. Macleod MR, Davis SM, Mitchell PJ, Gerraty RP, Fitt G, Hankey
GJ, et al. Results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of
intra-arterial urokinase in the treatment of acute posterior circulation
lschaemic stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2005;20(1):12-7.
77. Eckert B, Koch C, Thomalla G, Kucinski T, Grzyska U, Roether J, et
al. Aggressive therapy with intravenous abciximab and intra-arterial
rtPA and additional PTA/stenting improves clinical outcome in
acute vertebrobasilar occlusion: combined local fibrinolysis and
intravenous abciximab in acute vertebrobasilar stroke treatment
(FAST): results of a multicenter study. Stroke 2005;36(6):1160-5.
78. Broderick J. Combined Intravenous and Intra-Arterial Recanalization
for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Interventional Management of Stroke
Study. Stroke 2004;35(4):904-11.
79. Sekoranja L, Loulidi J, Yilmaz H, Lovblad K, Temperli P, Comelli
M, et al. Intravenous versus combined (intravenous and intraarterial) thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a transcranial
color-coded duplex sonography--guided pilot study. Stroke
2006;37(7):1805-9.
80. Sandercock PA, Counsell C, Gubitz GJ, Tseng MC. Antiplatelet
therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. 2008; CD000029.
81. Smyth J, editor. The Newt guidelines for administration of
medication to patients with enteral reeding tubes or swallowing
difficulties. Wrexham: North East Wales NHS Trust; 2006.
82. Markus HS, Droste DW, Kaps M, Larrue V, Lees KR, Siebler M,
et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin in
symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using doppler embolic
signal detection: the Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of
Emboli in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CARESS) trial. Circulation
2005;111(17):2233-40.
83. Adams HP, Jr., del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan
A, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with
ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/
American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology
Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and
the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of
Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the
American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline
as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2007;38(5):1655711.
84. Gubitz G, Sandercock P, Counsell C. Anticoagulants for acute
ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library 2005; (ID #CD000024).
85. Camerlingo M, Salvi P, Belloni G, Gamba T, Cesana BM, Mamoli
A. Intravenous heparin started within the first 3 hours after onset of
symptoms as a treatment for acute nonlacunar hemispheric cerebral
infarctions. Stroke 2005;36(11):2415-20.
86. Sandercock P, Counsell C, Stobbs SL. Low-molecular-weight
heparins or heparinoids versus standard unfractionated heparin
for acute ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library 2005;
95
87. ODonnell MJ, Berge E, Sandset PM. Are there patients with
acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation that benefit from low
molecular weight heparin? Stroke 2006;37(2):452-5.
88. Sherman DG, Albers GW, Bladin C, Fieschi C, Gabbai AA, Kase CS,
et al. The efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated
heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after acute
ischaemic stroke (PREVAIL Study): an open-label randomised
comparison. Lancet 2007;369(9570):1347-55.
89. Hart RG, Palacio S, Pearce LA. Atrial fibrillation, stroke, and acute
antithrombotic therapy: analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stroke
2002;33(11):2722-7.
90. Liu M, Counsell C, Zhao XL, Wardlaw J. Fibrinogen depleting
agents for acute ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library 2003;
91. Hennerici MG, Kay R, Bogousslavsky J, Lenzi GL, Verstraete M,
Orgogozo JM, et al. Intravenous ancrod for acute ischaemic stroke
in the European Stroke Treatment with Ancrod Trial: a randomised
controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368(9550):1871-8.
92. Muir KW, Lees KR. Excitatory amino acid antagonists for acute
stroke. The Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID #CD001244).
93. Horn J, Limburg M. Calcium antagonists for ischemic stroke: A
systematic review. Stroke 2001;32(2):570-6.
94. Horn J, Limburg M. Calcium antagonists for acute ischemic stroke.
The Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID #CD001928).
95. Tirilazad International Steering Committee. Tirilazad for acute
ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library 2005; (ID #CD002087).
96. Bereczki D, Fekete I. Vinpocetine for acute ischaemic stroke. The
Cochrane Library 2005; (ID #CD000480).
97. Davalos A, Castillo J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Secades JJ, Mercadal
J, Lopez S, et al. Oral citicoline in acute ischemic stroke: An
individual patient data pooling analysis of clinical trials. Stroke
2002;33(12):2850-7.
98. Gandolfo C, Sandercock P, Conti M. Lubeluzole for acute ischaemic
stroke. The Cochrane Library 2005; (ID #CD001924).
99. Qizilbash N, Lewington SL, Lopez-Arrieta JM. Corticosteroids
for acute ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library 2005; (ID
#CD000064).
100. Bath PMW, Bath-Hextall FJ. Pentoxifylline, propentofylline and
pentifylline for acute ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library.
2005; (ID #CD000162).
101. Bath PMW. Theophylline, aminophylline, caffeine and analogues
for acute ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID
#CD000211).
102. Ricci S, Celani MG, Cantisani TA, Righetti E. Piracetam for
acute ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID
#CD000419).
103. Lees KR, Zivin JA, Ashwood T, Davalos A, Davis SM, Diener HC,
et al. NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke. New England Journal of
Medicine 2006;354(6):588-600.
104. Teal P, Silver FL, Simard D. The BRAINS study: safety, tolerability,
and dose-finding of repinotan in acute stroke. Can J Neurol Sci
2005;32(1):61-7.
105. Enlimomab ASTI. Use of anti-ICAM-1 therapy in ischemic
stroke: results of the Enlimomab Acute Stroke Trial. Neurology.
2001;57(8):1428-34.
106. Krams M, Lees KR, Hacke W, Grieve AP, Orgogozo JM, Ford GA,
et al. Acute Stroke Therapy by Inhibition of Neutrophils (ASTIN):
an adaptive dose-response study of UK-279,276 in acute ischemic
stroke. Stroke 2003;34(11):2543-8.
107. Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke (IMAGES) Study
Investigators, Lees KR, Muir KW, Ford I, Reid L, Mendelow
AD, et al. Magnesium for acute stroke (Intravenous Magnesium
Efficacy in Stroke trial): Randomised controlled trial. Lancet
2004;363(9407):439-45.
108. Clark WM, Raps EC, Tong DC, Kelly RE. Cervene (Nalmefene) in
acute ischemic stroke: Final results of a phase III efficacy study.
Stroke 2000;31(6):1234-9.
109. Lodder J, van Raak L, Hilton A, Hardy E, Kessels A. Diazepam to
improve acute stroke outcome: results of the early GABA-Ergic
activation study in stroke trial. a randomized double-blind placebocontrolled trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;21(1-2):120-7.
110. Lyden P, Shuaib A, Ng K, Levin K, Atkinson RP, Rajput A, et al.
Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in ischemic stroke (CLASS-I):
final results. Stroke 2002;33(1):122-8.
111. Ladurner G, Kalvach P, Moessler H, Cerebrolysin Study G.
Neuroprotective treatment with cerebrolysin in patients with
acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Neural
Transmission 2005;112(3):415-28.
112. Otomo E, Tohgi H, Kogure K, Hirai S et al. Effect of a novel
free radical scavenger, edaravone (MCI-186), on acute brain
infarction. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study
at multicenters. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;15(3):222-9.
96
113. Bereczki D, Liu M, do Prado GF, Fekete I. Mannitol for acute stroke.
114. Schwarz S, Georgiadis D, Aschoff A, Schwab S. Effects of hypertonic
(10%) saline in patients with raised intracranial pressure after stroke.
Stroke 2002;33(1):136-40.
115. Zuliani G, Cherubini A, Atti AR, Ble A, Vavalle C, Di Todaro F,
et al. Prescription of anti-oedema agents and short-term mortality
in older patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Drugs Aging
2004;21(4):273-8.
116. Righetti E, Celani MG, Cantisani T, Sterzi R, Boysen G, Ricci
S. Glycerol for acute stroke. The Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID
#CD000096).
117. Schwarz S, Georgiadis D, Aschoff A, Schwab S. Effects of body
position on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion in patients
with large hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2002;33(2):497-501.
118. Wojner-Alexander AW, Garami Z, Chernyshev OY, Alexandrov AV.
Heads down: flat positioning improves blood flow velocity in acute
ischemic stroke.[see comment]. Neurology 2005;64(8):1354-7.
119. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, et al.
Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle
cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled
trials. Lancet Neurology 2007;6(3):215-22.
120. Els T, Oehm E, Voigt S, Klisch J, Hetzel A, Kassubek J. Safety
and therapeutical benefit of hemicraniectomy combined with
mild hypothermia in comparison with hemicraniectomy alone in
patients with malignant ischemic stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases
2006;21(1-2):79-85.
121. Smith WS. Safety of mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous
tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Results of the
multi Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI)
trial, part I. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2006;27(6):117782.
122. Smith WS, Sung G, Starkman S, Saver JL, Kidwell CS, Gobin YP, et al.
Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic
stroke: results of the MERCI trial. Stroke 2005;36(7):1432-8.
123. Noser EA, Shaltoni HM, Hall CE, Alexandrov AV, Garami Z,
Cacayorin ED, et al. Aggressive mechanical clot disruption:
a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke? Stroke
2005;36(2):292-6.
124. Qureshi AI, Siddiqui AM, Suri MF, Kim SH, Ali Z, Yahia AM, et
al. Aggressive mechanical clot disruption and low-dose intraarterial third-generation thrombolytic agent for ischemic stroke: a
prospective study. Neurosurgery 2002;51(5):1319-27.
125. Alexandrov AV, Molina CA, Grotta JC, Garami Z, Ford SR,
Alvarez-Sabin J, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis
for acute ischemic stroke. New England Journal of Medicine
2004;351(21):2170-8.
126. Eggers J, Koch B, Meyer K, Konig I, Seidel G. Effect of ultrasound
on thrombolysis of middle cerebral artery occlusion. Ann Neurol
2003;53(6):797-800.
127. Daffertshofer M, Gass A, Ringleb P, Sitzer M, Sliwka U, Els T, et
al. Transcranial low-frequency ultrasound-mediated thrombolysis
in brain ischemia: increased risk of hemorrhage with combined
ultrasound and tissue plasminogen activator: results of a phase II
clinical trial. Stroke 2005;36(7):1441-6.
128. Blanco M, Nombela F, Castellanos M, Rodriguez-Yanez M, GarciaGil M, Leira R, et al. Statin treatment withdrawal in ischemic stroke:
A controlled randomized study. Neurology 2007;69(9):904-10.
129. Fernandes HM, Gregson B, Siddique S, Mendelow AD. Surgery
in intracerebral hemorrhage. The uncertainty continues. Stroke
2000;31(10):2511-6.
130. Prasad K, Shrivastava A. Surgery for primary supratentorial
intracerebral haemorrhage. The Cochrane Library. 2000; 2:
131. Teernstra OP, Evers SM, Kessels AH. Meta analyses in treatment
of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematoma. Acta
Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148(5):521-8.
132. Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM, Murray GD,
Teasdale GM, Hope DT, et al. Early surgery versus initial
conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial
intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in
Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial. Lancet
2005;365(9457):387-97.
133. Gregson BA, Mendelow AD. Stich Investigators. International
variations in surgical practice for spontaneous intracerebral
hemorrhage. Stroke 2003;34(11):2593-7.
134. Pantazis G, Tsitsopoulos P, Mihas C, Katsiva V, Stavrianos V,
Zymaris S. Early surgical treatment vs conservative management for
spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hematomas: A prospective
randomized study. Surg Neurol 2006;66(5):492-501.
REFERENCES
135. Teernstra OP, Evers SM, Lodder J, Leffers P, Franke CL, Blaauw G,
et al. Stereotactic treatment of intracerebral hematoma by means
of a plasminogen activator: a multicenter randomized controlled
trial (SICHPA). Stroke 2003;34(4):968-74.
136. Lapointe M, Haines S. Fibrinolytic therapy for intraventricular
hemorrhage in adults. The Cochrane Library 2002;
137. Naff NJ, Hanley DF, Keyl PM, Tuhrim S, Kraut M, Bederson J, et al.
Intraventricular thrombolysis speeds blood clot resolution: results
of a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
Neurosurgery. 2004;54(3):577-84.
138. You H, Al-Shahi R. Haemostatic drug therapies for acute primary
intracerebral haemorrhage. The Cochrane Library 2006;
139. Mayer SA. Recombinant activated Factor VII for acute intracerebral
hemorrhage. Stroke 2007;38(2):763-7.
140. Feigin VL, Anderson N, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J, Bennett
DA. Corticosteroids for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
and primary intracerebral haemorrhage. The Cochrane Library.
2005;
141. Misra UK, Kalita J, Ranjan P, Mandal SK. Mannitol in intracerebral
hemorrhage: a randomized controlled study. Journal of the
Neurological Sciences 2005;234(1-2):41-5.
142. Bousser MG, Ferro JM. Cerebral venous thrombosis: an update.
Lancet Neurology 2007;6(2):162-70.
143. Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J, Bousser MG, Barinagarrementeria
F, Investigators I. Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus
thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein
and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke 2004;35(3):664-70.
144. Stam J, de Bruijn SFTM, DeVeber G. Anticoagulation for cerebral
sinus thrombosis. The Cochrane Library. 2002; 2002:
145. Ciccone A, Canho P, Falco F, Ferro JM, Sterzi R. Thrombolysis for
cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis. The Cochrane Library.
2004;
146. Wasay M, Bakshi R, Kojan S, Bobustuc G, Dubey N, Unwin DH.
Nonrandomized comparison of local urokinase thrombolysis
versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for superior sagittal sinus
thrombosis. Stroke 2001;32(10):2310-7.
147. Einhaupl K, Bousser MG, de Bruijn SF, Ferro JM, Martinelli I, Masuhr
F, et al. EFNS guideline on the treatment of cerebral venous and
sinus thrombosis. Eur J Neurol 2006;13(6):553-9.
148. Touze E, Gauvrit JY, Moulin T, Meder JF, Bracard S, Mas JL. Risk
of stroke and recurrent dissection after a cervical artery dissection:
a multicenter study. Neurology 2003;61(10):1347-51.
149. Kremer C, Mosso M, Georgiadis D, Stockli E, Benninger D,
Arnold M, et al. Carotid dissection with permanent and transient
occlusion or severe stenosis: Long-term outcome. Neurology
2003;60(2):271-5.
150. Steinke W, Schwartz A, Hennerici M. Topography of cerebral
infarction associated with carotid artery dissection. J Neurol
1996;243(4):323-8.
151. Norris JW. Extracranial arterial dissection: anticoagulation is the
treatment of choice: for. Stroke 2005;36(9):2041-2.
152. Lyrer PA. Extracranial arterial dissection: anticoagulation is the
treatment of choice: against. Stroke 2005;36(9):2042-3.
153. Beletsky V, Nadareishvili Z, Lynch J, Shuaib A, Woolfenden A,
Norris JW, et al. Cervical arterial dissection: time for a therapeutic
trial? Stroke 2003;34(12):2856-60.
154. Assadian A, Senekowitsch C, Rotter R, Zol C, Strassegger J,
Hagmuller GW. Long-term results of covered stent repair of
internal carotid artery dissections. Journal of Vascular Surgery. Vol.
2004;40(3):484-7.
155. Cohen JE, Ben-Hur T, Gomori JM, Umansky F, Lylyk P, Rajz G.
Stent-assisted arterial reconstruction of traumatic extracranial
carotid dissections. Neurological Research. Vol. 2005;27(Suppl
1):S73-S8.
156. Georgiadis D, Caso V, Baumgartner R. Acute therapy and
prevention of stroke in spontaneous carotid dissection. Clin Exp
Hypertens 2006;28(3-4):365-70.
157. Cavallini A, Micieli G, Marcheselli S, Quaglini S. Role of
monitoring in management of acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke
2003;34(11):2599-603.
158. Sulter G, Elting JW, Langedijk M, Maurits NM, De Keyser J.
Admitting acute ischemic stroke patients to a stroke care monitoring
unit versus a conventional stroke unit: a randomized pilot study.
Stroke 2003;34(1):101-4.
159. Bhalla A, Wolfe CDA, Rudd AG. Management of acute physiological
parameters after stroke. Qjm: Monthly Journal of the Association
of Physicians 2001;94(3):167-72.
160. Gray CS, Hildreth AJ, Sandercock PA, OConnell JE, Johnston DE,
Cartlidge NE, et al. Glucose-potassium-insulin infusions in the
management of post-stroke hyperglycaemia: the UK Glucose Insulin
in Stroke Trial (GIST-UK). Lancet neurology 2007;6(5):397-406.
161. Asplund K. Haemodilution for acute ischaemic stroke. The

Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID #CD000103).
162. Woessner R, Grauer MT, Dieterich HJ, Bepperling F, Baus D,
Kahles T, et al. Influence of a long-term, high-dose volume therapy
with 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or crystalloid solution on
hemodynamics, rheology and hemostasis in patients with acute
ischemic stroke. Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled,
double-blind study. Pathophysiology of Haemostasis & Thrombosis
2003;33(3):121-6.
163. Challiner YC, Jarrett D, Hayward MJ, al-Jubouri MA, Julious SA. A
comparison of intravenous and subcutaneous hydration in elderly
acute stroke patients. Postgrad Med J 1994;70(821):195-7.
164. Castillo J, Leira R, Garcia MM, Serena J, Blanco M, Davalos A.
Blood pressure decrease during the acute phase of ischemic stroke
is associated with brain injury and poor stroke outcome. Stroke
2004;35(2):520-6.
165. Blood pressure in Acute Stroke Collaboration. Interventions for
deliberately altering blood pressure in acute stroke. The Cochrane
Library 2001;
166. Bath PMW, Willmot M, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall FJ. Nitric oxide
donors (nitrates), L-arginine, or nitric oxide synthase inhibitors for
acute stroke. The Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID #CD000398).
167. Martinsson L, Wahlgren NG. Safety of dexamphetamine in acute
ischemic stroke: a randomized, double-blind, controlled doseescalation trial. Stroke 2003;34(2):475-81.
168. Hillis AE, Ulatowski JA, Barker PB, Torbey M, Ziai W, Beauchamp
NJ, et al. A pilot randomized trial of induced blood pressure
elevation: effects on function and focal perfusion in acute and
subacute stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2003;16(3):236-46.
169. Nazir FS, Overell JR, Bolster A, Hilditch TE, Lees KR. Effect of
perindopril on cerebral and renal perfusion on normotensives
in mild early ischaemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Cerebrovascular Diseases 2005;19(2):77-83.
170. Nazir FS, Overell JR, Bolster A, Hilditch TE, Reid JL, Lees KR. The
effect of losartan on global and focal cerebral perfusion and on
renal function in hypertensives in mild early ischaemic stroke. J
Hypertens 2004;22(5):989-95.
171. Schrader J, Luders S, Kulschewski A, Berger J, Zidek W, Treib J, et
al. The ACCESS Study: evaluation of Acute Candesartan Cilexetil
Therapy in Stroke Survivors. Stroke 2003;34(7):1699-703.
172. Eames PJ, Robinson TG, Panerai RB, Potter JF. Bendrofluazide
fails to reduce elevated blood pressure levels in the immediate
post-stroke period. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2005;19(4):253-9.
173. Eveson DJ, Robinson TG, Potter JF. Lisinopril for the treatment of
hypertension within the first 24 hours of acute ischemic stroke and
follow-up. Am J Hypertens 2007;20(3):270-7.
174. Cossacs Trial Group. COSSACS (Continue or Stop post-Stroke
Antihypertensives Collaborative Study): rationale and design. J
Hypertens 2005;23(2):455-8.
175. Thomas D, Bath PM, Lees K, Hextall FJ, Skene A, Pocock S, et
al. Glyceryl trinitrate vs. control, and continuing vs. stopping
temporarily prior antihypertensive therapy, in acute stroke:
Rationale and design of the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke
(ENOS) trial (ISRCTN99414122). International Journal of Stroke
2006;1(4):245-9.
176. Kiers L, Davis SM, Larkins R, Hopper J, Tress B, Rossiter SC, et
al. Stroke topography and outcome in relation to hyperglycaemia
and diabetes. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
1992;55(4):263-70.
177. Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Pathak P, Gerstein HC. Stress
hyperglycemia and prognosis of stroke in nondiabetic and diabetic
patients: a systematic overview. Stroke 2001;32(10):2426-32.
178. Baird TA, Parsons MW, Phanh T, Butcher KS, Desmond PM, Tress
BM, et al. Persistent poststroke hyperglycemia is independently
associated with infarct expansion and worse clinical outcome.
Stroke 2003;34(9):2208-14.
179. Parsons MW, Barber PA, Desmond PM, Baird TA, Darby DG,
Byrnes G, et al. Acute hyperglycemia adversely affects stroke
outcome: a magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy study.
Ann Neurol 2002;52(1):20-8.
180. Allport LE, Butcher KS, Baird TA, MacGregor L, Desmond PM, Tress
BM, et al. Insular cortical ischemia is independently associated with
acute stress hyperglycemia. Stroke 2004;35(8):1886-91.
181. Vancheri F, Curcio M, Burgio A, Salvaggio S, Gruttadauria G, Lunetta
MC, et al. Impaired glucose metabolism in patients with acute stroke
and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Qjm: Monthly
Journal of the Association of Physicians 2005;98(12):871-8.
182. Dennis M. Effect of timing and method of enteral tube feeding
for dysphagic stroke patients (FOOD): A multicentre randomised
97
183. Dennis MS, Lewis SC, Warlow C, Collaboration FT. Routine

oral nutritional supplementation for stroke patients in hospital
(FOOD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet
2005;365(9461):755-63.
184. Ronning OM, Guldvog B. Should stroke victims routinely receive
supplemental oxygen? A quasi- randomized controlled trial. Stroke
1999;30(10):2033-7.
185. Bennett MH, Wasiak J, Schnabel A, Kranke P, French C. Hyperbaric
oxygen therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. The Cochrane Library.
2005;
186. Carson S, McDonagh M, Russman B, Helfand M. Hyperbaric
oxygen therapy for stroke: A systematic review of the evidence.
Clin Rehabil 2005;19(8):819-33.
187. Alternative Therapy Evaluation Committee for the Insurance
Corporation of British C. A review of the scientific evidence on the
treatment of traumatic brain injuries and strokes with hyperbaric
oxygen. Brain Injury 2003;17(3):225-36.
188. Hajat C, Hajat S, Sharma P. Effects of poststroke pyrexia on
stroke outcome: A meta-analysis of studies in patients. Stroke
2000;31(2):410-4.
189. Correia M, Silva M, Veloso M. Cooling therapy for acute stroke.
190. Dippel DW, van BEJ, van GHM, van dWHB, Meijer RJ, Kappelle LJ,
et al. Effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on body temperature in
acute ischemic stroke: a double-blind, randomized phase II clinical
trial. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2001;32:1607-12.
191. Dippel DW, van Breda EJ, van der Worp HB, van Gemert HM,
Meijer RJ, Kappelle LJ, et al. Effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen)
and ibuprofen on body temperature in acute ischemic stroke PISA,
a phase II double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
[ISRCTN98608690]. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2003;3(2):6.
192. Sulter G, Elting JW, Maurits N, Luyckx GJ, De Keyser J. Acetylsalicylic
acid and acetaminophen to combat elevated body temperature in
acute ischemic stroke.[see comment]. Cerebrovascular Diseases
2004;17(2-3):118-22.
193. Diserens K, Michel P, Bogousslavsky J. Early mobilisation after
stroke: Review of the literature. Cerebrovascular Diseases. Vol.
2006;22(2-3):183-90.
194. Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJM,
Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on
functional outcomes after stroke: whats the evidence? Clinical
Rehabilitation. 2004;18(8):833-62. (230 ref).
195. Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B.
Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier
and more aggressive therapy better?[see comment]. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S101-S14.
196. Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Donnan G. Inactive and alone:
physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care.
Stroke 2004;35(4):1005-9.
197. Tyson SF, Nightingale P. The effects of position on oxygen saturation
in acute stroke: a systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation.
2004;18(8):863-71. .
198. Chatterton HJ, Pomeroy VM, Connolly MJ, Faragher EB, Clayton L,
Tallis RC. The effect of body position on arterial oxygen saturation
in acute stroke. Journals of Gerontology. Series A. Biological
Sciences & Medical Sciences 2000;55(4):M239-44.
199. Rowat AM, Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. Patient
positioning influences oxygen saturation in the acute phase of
stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2001;12(1):66-72.
200. Hackam DG, Spence JD. Combining multiple approaches for the
secondary prevention of vascular events after stroke: A quantitative
modeling study. Stroke 2007;38(6):1881-5.
201. De Schryver ELL, Algra A, van Gijn J. Dipyridamole for preventing
stroke and other vascular events in patients with vascular disease.
202. Esprit Study Group, Halkes PH, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, Koudstaal
PJ, Algra A. Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin alone
after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): randomised
203. Hankey GJ. Secondary prevention of recurrent stroke. Stroke. Vol.
2005;36(2):218-21.
204. Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, Cimminiello C, Csiba L,
Kaste M, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel
alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in
high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9431):331-7.
205. Bhatt DL, Topol EJ. Clopidogrel added to aspirin versus aspirin alone
in secondary prevention and high-risk primary prevention: rationale
and design of the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and
Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA)
trial. Am Heart J 2004;148(2):263-8.
98
206. Bhatt DL, Fox KA, Hacke W, Berger PB, Black HR, Boden WE, et
al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention
of atherothrombotic events. New England journal of medicine
2006;354(16):1706-17.
207. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients
at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee.
Lancet 1996;348(9038):1329-39.
208. Chang YJ, Ryu SJ, Lee TH. Dose titration to reduce dipyridamolerelated headache. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2006;22(4):258-62.
209. Diener HC, Sacco R, Yusuf S, Steering C, Group PRS. Rationale,
design and baseline data of a randomized, double-blind, controlled
trial comparing two antithrombotic regimens (a fixed-dose
combination of extended-release dipyridamole plus ASA with
clopidogrel) and telmisartan versus placebo in patients with strokes:
the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes
Trial (PRoFESS). Cerebrovascular Diseases 2007;23(5-6):368-80.
210. Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC, Wong VW, Leung VK, Kung NN, et al.
Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent
ulcer bleeding. N Engl J Med 2005;352(3):238-44.
211. Costa J, Ferro JM, Matias-Guiu J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Torres F. Triflusal
for preventing serious vascular events in people at high risk. The
Cochrane Library 2005;
212. Amarenco P, Labreuche J, Lavallee P, Touboul P. Statins in stroke
prevention and carotid atherosclerosis: systematic review and upto-date meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(12):2902-9. .
213. Cheung BM, Lauder IJ, Lau CP, Kumana CR. Meta-analysis of large
randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on
cardiovascular outcomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004;57(5):64051.
214. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A, 3rd, Goldstein LB,
Hennerici M, Rudolph AE, et al. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke
or transient ischemic attack. New England Journal of Medicine
2006;355(6):549-59.
215. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. Effects of cholesterollowering with simvastatin on stroke and other major vascular events
in 20 536 people with cerebrovascular disease or other high-risk
conditions. Lancet 2004;363(9411):757-67.
216. Vergouwen MD, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M, Roos YB. Statin
treatment and the occurrence of hemorrhagic stroke in patients with
a history of cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 2008;39(2):497-502.
217. Algra A, De Schryver EL, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, Koudstaal PJ. Oral
anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing further
vascular events after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke of
presumed arterial origin.[update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2001;(4):CD001342; PMID: 11687110]. The Cochrane Library
2006;
218. Algra A. Medium intensity oral anticoagulants versus aspirin
after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): a randomised
controlled trial. Lancet Neurology 2007;6(2):115-24.
219. van Walraven C, Hart RG, Singer DE, Laupacis A, Connolly S,
Petersen P, et al. Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular
atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis. Jama
2002;288(19):2441-8.
220. Saxena R, Koudstaal PJ. Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy
for preventing stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation
and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. The Cochrane
Library. 2005; (ID #CD000187).
221. Rash A, Downes T, Portner R, Yeo WW, Morgan N, Channer KS.
A randomised controlled trial of warfarin versus aspirin for stroke
prevention in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation (WASPO). Age
and ageing 2007;36(2):151-6.
222. Mant J, Hobbs FD, Fletcher K, Roalfe A, Fitzmaurice D, Lip GY,
et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly
community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial
Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised
223. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J, et
al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1,
prolonged differences in blood pressure: Prospective observational
studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet
1990;335(8692):765-74.
224. Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, Feigin VL, Rodgers A. Blood pressure
and stroke: an overview of published reviews [corrected and
republished, article originally printed in Stroke 2004 Mar;35(3):77685]. Stroke. 2004;35(4):1024-33. .
225. Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, Davis M, McInnes GT, Potter
JF, et al. Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the
fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS
IV. J Hum Hypertens 2004;18(3):139-85.
REFERENCES
226. Neal B, MacMahon S, Chapman N, Blood Pressure Lowering

Treatment Trialists C. Effects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists,
and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively
designed overviews of randomised trials. Blood Pressure Lowering
Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 2000;356(9246):195564.
227. Rashid P, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P. Blood pressure reduction and
secondary prevention of stroke and other vascular events: a
systematic review. Stroke 2003;34(11):2741-8.
228. Progress Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindoprilbased blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals
with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack.[erratum appears
in Lancet 2001 Nov 3;358(9292):1556][summary for patients in Can
Fam Physician. 2002 Oct;48:1625-9; PMID: 12474869]. Lancet
2001;358(9287):1033-41.
229. Schrader J, Luders S, Kulschewski A, Hammersen F, Plate K, Berger
J, et al. Morbidity and mortality after stroke, eprosartan compared
with nitrendipine for secondary prevention: Principal results
of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES). Stroke
2005;36(6):1218-24.
230. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an
independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke
1991;22(8):983-8.
231. Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke
in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg
1996;61(2):755-9.
232. Garcia-Fernandez MA, Perez-David E, Quiles J, Peralta J, GarciaRojas I, Bermejo J, et al. Role of left atrial appendage obliteration
in stroke reduction in patients with mitral valve prosthesis: a
transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol
2003;42(7):1253-8.
233. Healey JS, Crystal E, Lamy A, Teoh K, Semelhago L, Hohnloser SH,
et al. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS): results of a
randomized controlled pilot study of left atrial appendage occlusion
during coronary bypass surgery in patients at risk for stroke. Am
Heart J 2005;150(2):288-93.
234. Sick PB, Schuler G, Hauptmann KE, Grube E, Yakubov S, Turi ZG,
et al. Initial worldwide experience with the WATCHMAN left atrial
appendage system for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Am
Coll Cardiol 2007;49(13):1490-5.
235. Schneider B, Stollberger C, Sievers HH. Surgical closure of
the left atrial appendage - a beneficial procedure? Cardiology
2005;104(3):127-32.
236. Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, Zuber M, Cabanes L, Derumeaux
G, et al. Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent
foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med
2001;345(24):1740-6.
237. Homma S, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR, Sciacca RR, Mohr JP,
Investigators PFOiCSS. Effect of medical treatment in stroke patients
with patent foramen ovale: patent foramen ovale in Cryptogenic
Stroke Study. Circulation 2002;105(22):2625-31.
238. Khairy P, ODonnell CP, Landzberg MJ. Transcatheter Closure
versus Medical Therapy of Patent Foramen Ovale and Presumed
Paradoxical Thromboemboli: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern
Med 2003;139(9):753-60.
239. Chapman N, Huxley R, Anderson C, Bousser MG, Chalmers J,
Colman S, et al. Effects of a perindopril-based blood pressurelowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke according to
stroke subtype and medical history: the PROGRESS Trial. Stroke
2004;35(1):116-21.
240. Keir SL, Wardlaw JM, Sandercock PA, Chen Z. Antithrombotic
therapy in patients with any form of intracranial haemorrhage:
a systematic review of the available controlled studies.
Cerebrovascular Diseases 2002;14(3-4):197-206.
241. Eckman MH, Rosand J, Knudsen KA, Singer DE, Greenberg SM.
Can patients be anticoagulated after intracerebral hemorrhage? A
decision analysis. Stroke 2003;34(7):1710-6.
242. Cina CS, Clase CM, Haynes RB. Carotid endarterectomy for
symptomatic carotid stenosis. The Cochrane Library 2000;
CD001081.
243. Rothwell PM, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, European Carotid Surgery
Trialists C. Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid
Surgery Trial. Stroke 2003;34(2):514-23.
244. Ballotta E, Da Giau G, Baracchini C, Abbruzzese E, Saladini M,
Meneghetti G. Early versus delayed carotid endarterectomy after
a nondisabling ischemic stroke: a prospective randomized study.
Surgery 2002;131(3):287-93.
245. Welsh S, Mead G, Chant H, Picton A, ONeill PA, McCollum CN.
Early Carotid Surgery in Acute Stroke: A Multicentre Randomised
Pilot Study. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2004;18(3):200-5.
246. Bond R, Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of the risks

of carotid endarterectomy in relation to the clinical indication for
and timing of surgery. Stroke 2003;34(9):2290-301.
247. Bond R, Rerkasem K, Shearman CP, Rothwell PM. Time trends
in the published risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy
for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cerebrovascular Diseases
2004;18(1):37-46.
248. Bond R, Rerkasem K, Cuffe R, Rothwell PM. A systematic review
of the associations between age and sex and the operative risks of
carotid endarterectomy. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2005;20(2):6977.
249. Chambers BR, Donnan GA. Carotid endarterectomy for
asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Cochrane Library. 2005;
250. Bond R, Rerkasem K, AbuRahma AF, Naylor AR, Rothwell PM. Patch
angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. The
Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID #CD000160).
251. Cao P, De Rango P, Zannetti S. Eversion vs conventional carotid
endarterectomy: A systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
2002;23(3):195-201.
252. Rerkasem K, Bond R, Rothwell PM. Local versus general anaesthesia
for carotid endarterectomy. The Cochrane Library. 2005; (ID
#CD000126).
253. Bond R, Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Routine or selective carotid
artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of
monitoring in selective shunting). The Cochrane Library 2002;
254. Ederle J, Featherstone RL, Brown MM. Percutaneous transluminal
angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. The Cochrane
Library. 2007;
255. Engelter S, Lyrer P. Antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke and
other vascular events after carotid endarterectomy. The Cochrane
Library 2006;
256. Miller ET, Spilker J. Readiness to change and brief educational
interventions: successful strategies to reduce stroke risk. J Neurosci
Nurs 2003;35(4):215-22.
257. Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Higgins JPT, Thompson RL, Clements
G, Capps N, et al. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing
cardiovascular disease (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library
2004(Issue 2).
258. Wang C, Harris WS, Chung M, Lichtenstein AH, Balk EM, Kupelnick
B, et al. n-3 Fatty acids from fish or fish-oil supplements, but not
alpha-linolenic acid, benefit cardiovascular disease outcomes in
primary- and secondary-prevention studies: a systematic review.
Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84(1):5-17.
259. Food Standards Agency. Healthy diet: nutrition essentials: fish and
shellfish. [cited 3 Nov]. Available from url: http://www.eatwell.gov.
uk/healthydiet/nutritionessentials/fishandshellfish/
260. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood
pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Implications for
public health.[see comment]. J Hum Hypertens 2002;16(11):76170.
261. Hooper L, Bartlett C, Davey SG, Ebrahim S. Advice to reduce dietary
salt for prevention of cardiovascular disease. The Cochrane Library.
2004;
262. Food Standards Agency. Science on salt. [cited 3 November].
Available from url: http://www.salt.gov.uk/science_on_salt.html
263. Dauchet L, Amouyel P, Dallongeville J. Fruit and vegetable
consumption and risk of stroke: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Neurology 2005;65(8):1193-7.
264. He K, Merchant A, Rimm EB, Rosner BA, Stampfer MJ, Willett
WC, et al. Folate, vitamin B6, and B12 intakes in relation to risk
of stroke among men. Stroke 2004;35(1):169-74.
265. Toole JF, Malinow MR, Chambless LE, Spence JD, Pettigrew LC,
Howard VJ, et al. Lowering homocysteine in patients with ischemic
stroke to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and death:
the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) randomized
controlled trial. Jama 2004;291(5):565-75.
266. Hankey GJ, Algra A, Chen C, Wong MC, Cheung R, Wong L, et
al. VITATOPS, the VITAmins TO prevent stroke trial: rationale
and design of a randomised trial of B-vitamin therapy in patients
with recent transient ischaemic attack or stroke (NCT00097669)
(ISRCTN74743444). Int J Stroke 2007;2(2):144-50.
267. Mulrow C, Chiquette E, Ange lL, Cornell J, Summerbell C,
Anagnostelis B. Dieting to reduce body weight for controlling
hypertension in adults The Cochrane Library, 2004;
268. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to
smoking: 50 years observations on male British doctors. Bmj
2004;328(7455):1519.
269. Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ. Environmental tobacco smoke
exposure and ischaemic heart disease: an evaluation of the
evidence. Bmj 1997;315(7114):973-80.
99
270. Ockene IS, Miller NH. Cigarette smoking, cardiovascular disease,

and stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the
American Heart Association. American Heart Association Task
Force on Risk Reduction. Circulation 1997;96(9):3243-7.
271. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH, Walker M. Smoking
cessation and the risk of stroke in middle-aged men. Jama
1995;274(2):155-60.
272. MacGregor J. Lord Presidents report on action against alcohol
misuse. London: HMSO; 1991.
273. Department of Health. Sensible drinking: report of an
interdepartmental working group. London: The Department;
1995.
274. Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, Feskens EJ, Boshuizen HC, Verschuren
WM, Saris WH, et al. Physical activity and stroke. A meta-analysis
of observational data. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33(4):787-98.
275. Crombie IK, Irvine L, Williams B, McGinnis AR, Slane PW, Alder
EM, et al. Why older people do not participate in leisure time
physical activity: a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents.
Age Ageing 2004;33(3):287-92.
276. Saunders DH, Greig CA, Young A, Mead GE. Physical fitness
training for stroke patients. The Cochrane Library 2005; 2005:
277. Meek C, Pollock A, Potter J, Langhorne P. A systematic review of
exercise trials post stroke. Clin Rehabil 2003;17(1):6-13.
278. Macko RF, Ivey FM, Forrester LW, Hanley D, Sorkin JD, Katzel
LI, et al. Treadmill exercise rehabilitation improves ambulatory
function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke: A
randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. Vol. 2005;36(10):2206-11.
279. Chu KS, Eng JJ, Dawson AS, Harris JE, Ozkaplan A, Gylfadttir
S. Water-based exercise for cardiovascular fitness in people with
chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical
Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2004;85(6):870-4.
280. Eng JJ, Chu KS, Kim CM, Dawson AS, Carswell A, Hepburn KE. A
community-based group exercise program for persons with chronic
stroke. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(8):1271-8.
281. Mead GE, Greig CA, Cunningham I, Lewis SJ, Dinan S, Saunders
DH, et al. Stroke: a randomized trial of exercise or relaxation. J
Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55(6):892-9.
282. Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S, Reker D, Lai SM, Richards L.
Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled
trial of therapeutic exercise for subacute stroke survivors. Stroke
2005;36(8):1764-70.
283. Scottish Executive. Lets make Scotland more active: A strategy for
physical activity. Edinburgh: The Executive; 2003.
284. Hillsdon M, Foster C, Cavill C, Naidoo B, Crombie H. A review of
the evidence on the effectiveness of public health interventions for
increasing physical activity amongst adults: a review of reviews.
Evidence briefing. [cited 3 Nov]. Available from url: http://www.
nice.org.uk/nicemedia/documents/physical_activity_adults_
eb.pdf
285. NHS Health Scotland. Cardiovascular disease: a guide to primary
prevention in Scotland. A report on behalf of the Heart Health
National Learning Network. [cited 3 Nov]. Available from url:
http://www.vhscotland.org.uk/library/nhs/CVD0.pdf
286. Forster A, Smith J, Young J, Knapp P, House A, Wright J. Information
provision for stroke patients and their caregivers. The Cochrane
Library. 2005; (ID #CD001919).
287. Choi-Kwon S, Lee SK, Park HA, Kwon SU, Ahn JS, Kim JS. What
stroke patients want to know and what medical professionals think
they should know about stroke: Korean perspectives. Patient Educ
Couns 2005;56(1):85-92.
288. van der Smagt-Duijnstee ME, Hamers JP, Abu-Saad HH, Zuidhof A.
Relatives of hospitalized stroke patients: their needs for information,
counselling and accessibility. J Adv Nurs 2001;33(3):307-15.
289. Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Worrall L, Read SJ. Evaluating current
practice in the provision of written information to stroke patients
and their carers... including commentary by OConnell B,
Sullivan K. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation.
2004;11(7):303-10.
290. Wachters-Kaufmann C, Schuling J, The H, Meyboom-De Jong B.
Actual and desired information provision after a stroke. Patient
Educ Couns 2005;56(2):211-7.
291. Stein J, Shafqat S, Doherty D, Frates EP, Furie KL. Family member
knowledge and expectations for functional recovery after stroke.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82(3):169-74.
292. Ayana M, Pound P, Lampe F, Ebrahim S. Improving stroke patients
care: a patient held record is not enough. BMC health services
research 2001;1(1):1.
293. Brereton L, Nolan M. You do know hes had a stroke, dont you?
Preparation for family care-giving--the neglected dimension. J Clin
Nurs 2000;9(4):498-506.
100
294. Brereton L, Nolan M. Seeking: a key activity for new family carers
of stroke survivors. J Clin Nurs 2002;11(1):22-31.
295. Visser-Meily A, van Heugten C, Post M, Schepers V, Lindeman
E. Intervention studies for caregivers of stroke survivors: a critical
review. Patient Educ Couns 2005;56(3):257-67.
296. Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, Melbourn A, Patel A, Knapp M, et al.
Training carers of stroke patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ
2004;328(7448):8.
297. NHS National Services Scotland. Information Services Division.
Scottish Stroke Care Audit. [cited 3 Nov]. Available from url: www.
strokeaudit.scot.nhs.uk/index.htm
298. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of
60. Scott Med J 1957;2:200-15.
299. Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Flossmann E, Lovelock CE, Redgrave JN,
Warlow CP, et al. A simple score (ABCD) to identify individuals
at high early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet
2005;366(9479):29-36.
300. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD,
Bluth EI, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler
US diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus
Conference. Radiology 2003;229(2):340-6.
REFERENCES
101
ISBN 978 1 905813 40 7

Elliott House
8 -10 Hillside Crescent
Edinburgh EH7 5EA
www.sign.ac.uk

Sign 108

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sign 108

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sign 108

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SIG N

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network

Management of patients with stroke or TIA:

KEY TO EVIDENCE STATEMENTS AND GRADES OF RECOMMENDATIONS

Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias

2++ High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies

Non-analytic studies, eg case reports, case series

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+

GOOD PRACTICE POINTS

This document is produced from elemental chlorine-free material and

is sourced from sustainable forests

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network

Management of patients with stroke or TIA:

ISBN 978 1 905813 40 7

The need for a guideline....................................................................................................... 1

Remit of the guideline.......................................................................................................... 1

Management of suspected stroke or TIA............................................................................... 4

Assessment, diagnosis and investigation............................................................................... 4

Treatment of ischaemic stroke.............................................................................................. 4

Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA..................................... 5

Management of suspected stroke or TIA.............................................................................. 6

Assessment, diagnosis and investigation.............................................................................. 10

Brain imaging for suspected acute stroke or TIA................................................................... 11

Treatment of ischaemic stroke............................................................................................. 16

Reducing raised intracranial pressure................................................................................... 20

Prior statin therapy............................................................................................................... 23

Treatment of primary intracerebral haemorrhage............................................................... 24

Reducing raised Intracranial pressure................................................................................... 25

7 Other causes of stroke......................................................................................................... 26

Cerebral venous thrombosis................................................................................................. 26

Extracranial cervical arterial dissection...................................................................................... 26

8 Physiological monitoring and intervention.......................................................................... 28

9 Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA................................. 34

Atrial appendage occlusion.................................................................................................. 38

Patent foramen ovale and stroke........................................................................................... 38

10 Preventing recurrent stroke in patients with primary intracerebral haemorrhage............... 40

Blood pressure reduction...................................................................................................... 40

Carotid angioplasty and stenting........................................................................................... 45

Periprocedural antiplatelet or antithrombotic therapy........................................................... 45

12 Promoting lifestyle changes................................................................................................. 46

Interventions to promote lifestyle change............................................................................. 46

Altering dietary fat intake..................................................................................................... 46

Reducing dietary salt............................................................................................................ 47

Fruit and vegetable consumption.......................................................................................... 48

Providing information and support....................................................................................... 50

Sources of further information.............................................................................................. 52

Implementing the guideline................................................................................................. 55

Resource implications of key recommendations................................................................... 55

Auditing current practice...................................................................................................... 55

The evidence base............................................................................................................... 57

Systematic literature review.................................................................................................. 57

Recommendations for research............................................................................................. 57

Review and updating............................................................................................................ 59

16 Development of the guideline............................................................................................. 60

The guideline development group........................................................................................ 60

Consultation and peer review............................................................................................... 62

1.1 the need for a guideline

1.2 REMIT of the guideline

2++ High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies