Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Barnes, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vernon Earl Barnes appealed his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He challenged the denial of his motion to suppress. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court's findings and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling on the reasoning stated in the district court's oral findings and written opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Barnes, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Vernon Earl Barnes appealed his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He challenged the denial of his motion to suppress. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court's findings and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling on the reasoning stated in the district court's oral findings and written opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-4282

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Vernon Earl Barnes appealed his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He challenged the denial of his motion to suppress. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court's findings and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling on the reasoning stated in the district court's oral findings and written opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Barnes, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vernon Earl Barnes appealed his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He challenged the denial of his motion to suppress. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court's findings and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling on the reasoning stated in the district court's oral findings and written opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-4282

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    VERNON EARL BARNES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-00541-L)

    Submitted:

    January 7, 2002

    Decided:

    January 18, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Elizabeth L. Pearl, Assistant
    Federal Public Defender, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas
    M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Joseph L. Evans, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Vernon Earl Barnes appeals his conviction for being a felon in
    possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his
    motion to suppress.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts oral findings and written opinion and find no reversible


    error.
    court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district


    (J.A. 137-58, 169-74).

    We dispense with oral argument be-

    cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like