Tyner v. Sizer, 4th Cir. (2002)

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7120

DONALD J. TYNER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL
FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-001426-L)

Submitted:

December 19, 2002

Decided:

December 31, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald J. Tyner, Appellant Pro Se.


John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Donald J. Tyner seeks to appeal the district courts order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000).
An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus
proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate
of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of
appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district
court on the merits absent a substantial showing of the denial of
a constitutional right.

28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) (2000); see Rose

v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 318
(2001).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that Tyner has not made the requisite
showing.
2002).

See Tyner v. Sizer, No. CA-00-1426-L (D. Md. June 28,


Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal.


facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

You might also like