Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Robinson v. Apfel, Commissioner, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Venson J. Robinson appealed a district court decision upholding the Social Security Commissioner's finding that Robinson was not disabled and not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income. 2) The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning in Robinson v. Apfel, No. CA-97-1154-5-18JI (D.S.C. June 21, 1999).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Robinson v. Apfel, Commissioner, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Venson J. Robinson appealed a district court decision upholding the Social Security Commissioner's finding that Robinson was not disabled and not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income. 2) The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning in Robinson v. Apfel, No. CA-97-1154-5-18JI (D.S.C. June 21, 1999).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-03-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-2197

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Venson J. Robinson appealed a district court decision upholding the Social Security Commissioner's finding that Robinson was not disabled and not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income. 2) The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning in Robinson v. Apfel, No. CA-97-1154-5-18JI (D.S.C. June 21, 1999).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Robinson v. Apfel, Commissioner, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Venson J. Robinson appealed a district court decision upholding the Social Security Commissioner's finding that Robinson was not disabled and not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income. 2) The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. 3) The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's decision based on the reasoning in Robinson v. Apfel, No. CA-97-1154-5-18JI (D.S.C. June 21, 1999).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-2197

    VENSON J. ROBINSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    KENNETH S.
    SECURITY,

    APFEL,

    COMMISSIONER

    OF

    SOCIAL
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (CA-97-1154-5-18JI)

    Submitted:

    February 15, 2000

    Decided:

    March 7, 2000

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    W. Daniel Mayes, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. Frank W.
    Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J. Rene Josey, United States
    Attorney, John Berkley Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Chief Counsel, Michele M. Kelley, Assistant
    Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY
    ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Venson J. Robinson appeals the district courts order upholding the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security finding
    that Robinson is not disabled and not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income. We have reviewed
    the record and the district courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Robinson v. Apfel, No. CA-97-1154-5-18JI (D.S.C. June 21, 1999).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like