Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Verno v. Hilliard, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Joseph Paul Verno appealed a district court decision denying relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials and denying his request to expunge a charge from his prison record. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Verno v. Hilliard, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views3 pages
    Joseph Paul Verno appealed a district court decision denying relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials and denying his request to expunge a charge from his prison record. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6278

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Joseph Paul Verno appealed a district court decision denying relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials and denying his request to expunge a charge from his prison record. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    11 views3 pages

    Verno v. Hilliard, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Joseph Paul Verno appealed a district court decision denying relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials and denying his request to expunge a charge from his prison record. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6278

    JOSEPH PAUL VERNO,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WAYNE HILLIARD, Unit Manager; AARON EDISON,
    Counselor; WILLIAM THOMPSON, Warden of Federal
    Correctional Institution, Morgantown; MARY E.
    MCBRIDE, Acting Administrator National Inmate
    Appeals
    of Bureau of Prisons, Justice
    Department,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-95-69-1)
    Submitted:

    January 9, 1997

    Decided:

    January 21, 1997

    Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joseph Paul Verno, Appellant Pro Se. William David Wilmoth, United
    States Attorney, Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED
    STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Verno appeals the district court's order denying relief on his
    Bivens* complaint and denying his request to have a charge expunged
    from his prison record. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Verno v. Hilliard,
    No. CA-95-69-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of


    Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    3

    You might also like