Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25 views

    Maxfield v. Commissioner, Soc, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Maxfield appealed the district court's decision upholding the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Maxfield's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Maxfield v. Commissioner, Soc, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    25 views2 pages
    William Maxfield appealed the district court's decision upholding the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Maxfield's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-02-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2126

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    William Maxfield appealed the district court's decision upholding the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Maxfield's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    25 views2 pages

    Maxfield v. Commissioner, Soc, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Maxfield appealed the district court's decision upholding the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Maxfield's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2126

    WILLIAM C. MAXFIELD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap.
    James P. Jones, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-03-85-2)

    Submitted:

    January 28, 2005

    Decided:

    February 17, 2005

    Before WILLIAMS and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joseph E. Wolfe, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant.


    Donna L.
    Calvert, Regional Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Regional
    Chief Counsel, Allyson Jozwik, Assistant Regional Counsel,
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States
    Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William C. Maxfield appeals the district courts order
    upholding the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security
    Administration

    to

    deny

    Maxfields

    application

    for

    insurance benefits and supplemental security income.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    disability
    We have

    Accordingly, we

    district

    court.

    Maxfield v. Commr, No. CA-03-85-2 (W.D. Va. July 1, 2004).

    See
    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like