Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Jihad Arif Williams' request for a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. As such, they denied the certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal. The court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials so oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Jihad Arif Williams' request for a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. As such, they denied the certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal. The court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials so oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6634

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Jihad Arif Williams' request for a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. As such, they denied the certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal. The court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials so oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Jihad Arif Williams' request for a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. As such, they denied the certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal. The court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials so oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6634

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JIHAD ARIF WILLIAMS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-94-18-D, CA-97-192-R)

    Submitted:

    August 13, 1998

    Decided:

    September 3, 1998

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jihad Arif Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Breeding Peters, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jihad A. Williams seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We have
    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Williams, Nos. CR94-18-D; CA-97-192-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 26, 1997). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like