Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Ricky Turner v. Corporal Porter, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricky Lamar Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various correctional officers and officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Turner appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. As the opinions are unpublished, they do not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Ricky Turner v. Corporal Porter, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    Ricky Lamar Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various correctional officers and officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Turner appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. As the opinions are unpublished, they do not constitute binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6554

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Ricky Lamar Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various correctional officers and officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Turner appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. As the opinions are unpublished, they do not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    Ricky Turner v. Corporal Porter, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricky Lamar Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various correctional officers and officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Turner appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. As the opinions are unpublished, they do not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6554

    RICKY LAMAR TURNER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CORPORAL PORTER,
    Defendant Appellee,
    and
    WILLIAM C. SMITH, Superintendent; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
    VINCENT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CASIANOS; CORPORAL PITTMAN; D.
    T. MASKELONY, Captain; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. O. CARY;
    NURSE TRISHA,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:12-cv-00431-TSE-TCB)

    Submitted:

    August 21, 2014

    Decided:

    August 26, 2014

    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ricky Lamar Turner, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
    COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ricky Lamar Turner appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Turner v. Porter, No. 1:12-cv-00431-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va.

    filed Mar. 31 & entered Apr. 1, 2014).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like