Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Sampson v. City of Cambridge, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant City of Cambridge, Maryland in a case brought by plaintiff Ina Sampson. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its June 5, 2008 order granting summary judgment to the defendant. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Sampson v. City of Cambridge, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant City of Cambridge, Maryland in a case brought by plaintiff Ina Sampson. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its June 5, 2008 order granting summary judgment to the defendant. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-04-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-1691

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant City of Cambridge, Maryland in a case brought by plaintiff Ina Sampson. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its June 5, 2008 order granting summary judgment to the defendant. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Sampson v. City of Cambridge, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant City of Cambridge, Maryland in a case brought by plaintiff Ina Sampson. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The Court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its June 5, 2008 order granting summary judgment to the defendant. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-1691

    INA SAMPSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MARYLAND,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William D. Quarles, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:06-cv-01819-WDQ)

    Submitted:

    March 31, 2009

    Decided:

    April 16, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    R. Scott Oswald, Adam Augustine Carter, Gregory Sharma-Holt, THE


    EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
    Kevin Karpinski, Victoria M. Shearer, KARPINSKI, COLARESI &
    KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ina
    granting

    Sampson

    defendants

    appeals
    motion

    the

    for

    district

    summary

    courts

    judgment.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    affirm

    Sampson v.

    for

    the

    City

    of

    June 5, 2008).

    reasons

    stated
    No.

    Cambridge,

    by

    the

    order

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district

    1:06-cv-01819-WDQ

    court.
    (D.

    Md.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like