Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Jesse Yates, III v. Julie Garrison, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Jesse G. Yates, III and Melissa Long Yates appealed a district court decision denying relief on their Bivens complaint and related claims against Julie Garrison. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit also denied the Yates' motion to strike the informal response brief and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Jesse Yates, III v. Julie Garrison, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    29 views2 pages
    1) Jesse G. Yates, III and Melissa Long Yates appealed a district court decision denying relief on their Bivens complaint and related claims against Julie Garrison. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit also denied the Yates' motion to strike the informal response brief and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-2394

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Jesse G. Yates, III and Melissa Long Yates appealed a district court decision denying relief on their Bivens complaint and related claims against Julie Garrison. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit also denied the Yates' motion to strike the informal response brief and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    29 views2 pages

    Jesse Yates, III v. Julie Garrison, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Jesse G. Yates, III and Melissa Long Yates appealed a district court decision denying relief on their Bivens complaint and related claims against Julie Garrison. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit also denied the Yates' motion to strike the informal response brief and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-2394

    JESSE G. YATES, III; MELISSA LONG YATES,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    JULIE GARRISON,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Richard L.
    Voorhees, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC)

    Submitted:

    April 23, 2015

    Decided: April 27, 2015

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se.


    Richard
    Caldarone,
    Joan
    Iris
    Oppenheimer,
    UNITED
    STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington D.C., for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jesse

    G.

    Yates,

    III,

    and

    Melissa

    Long

    Yates

    appeal

    the

    district courts order denying relief on their complaint filed


    pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
    Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and related claims.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Yates

    v. Garrison, No. 5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2014).


    We

    deny

    the

    Yateses

    motion

    to

    strike

    the

    informal

    response

    brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like