Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 22 views

    Harris v. Gibb, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals filed by Rodney Victor Harris against a judge and prosecutor in Giles County Circuit Court. The district court dismissed Harris' 42 USC 1983 complaints without prejudice, finding them frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and also found the appeals frivolous, dismissing them based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals were consolidated and an oral argument was not held as the facts and legal issues were clear in the documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Harris v. Gibb, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    22 views3 pages
    This document summarizes two appeals filed by Rodney Victor Harris against a judge and prosecutor in Giles County Circuit Court. The district court dismissed Harris' 42 USC 1983 complaints without prejudice, finding them frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and also found the appeals frivolous, dismissing them based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals were consolidated and an oral argument was not held as the facts and legal issues were clear in the documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-01-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7371

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes two appeals filed by Rodney Victor Harris against a judge and prosecutor in Giles County Circuit Court. The district court dismissed Harris' 42 USC 1983 complaints without prejudice, finding them frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and also found the appeals frivolous, dismissing them based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals were consolidated and an oral argument was not held as the facts and legal issues were clear in the documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    22 views3 pages

    Harris v. Gibb, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals filed by Rodney Victor Harris against a judge and prosecutor in Giles County Circuit Court. The district court dismissed Harris' 42 USC 1983 complaints without prejudice, finding them frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and also found the appeals frivolous, dismissing them based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals were consolidated and an oral argument was not held as the facts and legal issues were clear in the documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7371

    RODNEY VICTOR HARRIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COLIN ROBERT GIBB, Judge, Giles County Circuit
    Court,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    No. 03-7372

    RODNEY VICTOR HARRIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PHILLIP CORMANY STEELE,
    County Circuit Court,

    Prosecutor,

    Giles
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-3-546-7; CA-03-550-7)

    Submitted: January 15, 2004

    Decided:

    January 28, 2004

    Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rodney Victor Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    In

    these

    consolidated

    appeals,

    Rodney

    Victor

    Harris

    appeals the district courts orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983


    (2000)

    complaints

    without

    1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (2000).

    prejudice

    under

    28

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    that these appeals are frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the

    appeals on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Harris v.

    Gibb, No. CA-3-546-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2003); Harris v. Steele,
    No. CA-03-550-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2003).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 3 -

    You might also like