Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Abdul-Khabir v. Stearns, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Khidr Abdul-Khabir v. several officials at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Abdul-Khabir's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that Abdul-Khabir's claims lacked merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Abdul-Khabir v. Stearns, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Khidr Abdul-Khabir v. several officials at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Abdul-Khabir's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that Abdul-Khabir's claims lacked merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-11-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7424

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Khidr Abdul-Khabir v. several officials at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Abdul-Khabir's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that Abdul-Khabir's claims lacked merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Abdul-Khabir v. Stearns, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Khidr Abdul-Khabir v. several officials at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Abdul-Khabir's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that Abdul-Khabir's claims lacked merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7424

    KHIDR ABDUL-KHABIR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    D. STEARNS, Sergeant, Hampton Roads Regional
    Jail; E. TAYLOR, Captain, Hampton Roads
    Regional
    Jail;
    DAVID
    SIMONS,
    Assistant
    Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail;
    C. POE, Sergeant (Classification) Hampton
    Roads
    Regional
    Jail;
    ROY
    W.
    CHERRY,
    Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-02-708-2)

    Submitted:

    November 7, 2002

    Decided:

    November 15, 2002

    Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Khidr Abdul-Khabir, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Khidr Abdul-Khabir appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed

    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    See Abdul-Khabir v. Stearns,

    No. CA-02-708-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 2002).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like