Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Hakizimanah v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Hakizimanah v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-04-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6083

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Hakizimanah v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6083

    YAHYA Z. HAKIZIMANAH,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
    OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-971583-AMD)
    Submitted:

    March 26, 1998

    Decided:

    April 9, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Yahya Z. Hakizimanah, Appellant Pro Se. Annabelle Louise Lisic,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. Hakizimanah v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1583-AMD
    (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like