Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Ellis v. Sizer, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Charles Edward Ellis Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Ellis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. It also denied Ellis' motion for a transcript at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Ellis v. Sizer, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Charles Edward Ellis Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Ellis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. It also denied Ellis' motion for a transcript at government expense.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6947

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Charles Edward Ellis Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Ellis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. It also denied Ellis' motion for a transcript at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Ellis v. Sizer, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Charles Edward Ellis Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Ellis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. It also denied Ellis' motion for a transcript at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6947

    CHARLES EDWARD ELLIS, JR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANK SIZER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-3945-CCB)

    Submitted:

    October 8, 1998

    Decided:

    October 26, 1998

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Edward Ellis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran,
    Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney
    General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Ellis v. Sizer, No. CA-97-3945-CCB (D. Md. June 17,
    1998). We also deny Appellants motion for transcript at government
    expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like