FPSO
FPSO
FPSO
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
Bachelor of Engineering (HONS) in Petroleum Engineering
Course:
PCE1IPI Introduction to the Petroleum Industry
Submitted by :
Melissa Lee Jia Chie
Lecturer-in-Charge:
Mr Matthew Smith
Date of Submission:
30th October 2012
ABSTRACT
ii
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
. iv
Introduction
1
Brief History of FPSOs ...
. 2
How Does An FPSO Function
. 3
Turret Mooring System
. 5
Internal Turret Mooring System .
.. 7
External Turret Mooring System .
. 7
Double-hull Arrangements
11
Advantages and Disadvantages of FPSO
. 11
FPSO Spill Risk
13
Examples Of FPSOs In Different Countries
14
FPSO Castellon Delta 1987
.... 14
Girassol FPSO
.. 14
iii
List of Figures
Figure 1(a) An early permanently moored FSO in a side-by-side export
arrangement,
1972 .............................................................................................................
..... 2
Figure 1(b) An early FPSO Castellon, in Spain, 1976
. 2
Figure 1(c) A modern FPSO with an external turret mooring in a tandem
export arrangement
............................................................................................................
....... 3
Figure 1(d) A modern FPSO with an internal turret mooring in a tandem
export arrangement
............................................................................................................
....... 3
Figure 2 Features of an FPSO ..
... 4
iv
INTRODUCTION
FPSO, which stands for Floating Production Storage and Offloading unit, is
a floating vessel that is able to produce crude oil and gas. An FPSO system
consists of the following major parts:
-
Vessel (hull)
Topsides (processing system, accommodation, machinery space,
helideck)
Mooring system
Export system (offloading, shuttle tanker)
Subsea systems and flowlines
Fig.1(a) An early
permanently moored FSO
in a side-by-side export
arrangement, 1972
Fig. 4 FPSO
Components
8
The processing equipment aboard the FPSO is similar to what would be
found atop a production platform. Usually built in modules, FPSO
production equipment can consist of water separation, gas treatment, oil
processing, water injection and gas compression, among others.
Hydrocarbons are then transferred to the vessels double-hull for storage.
Crude oil that is stored onboard is frequently transferred to shuttle tankers
or ocean barges going ashore, via a loading hose. Loading oil from the
stern of the FPSO to the bow of the shuttle tanker is known as tandem
loading. While gas is many times transferred to shore via pipeline or reinjected into the field to boost production.
(b)
Fig.9 Sample topsides layout of a ship-shaped offshore unit FPSO : (a) with
an accommodation forward and an internal turret; (b) with an
accommodation aft and an internal turret.
Figure 8 shows an example of the overall field layout involving both oil
and gas. Figure 9 shows typical layouts of an FPSO topsides facility. The
accommodation is located in the bow area as shown in Figure 9(a) or in
the stern area as shown in Figure 9(b). The vessel layout is designed so
that the separation between the accommodation (including the principal
evacuation systems) and the major hydrocarbon hazards should be
maximized. The accommodation and the turret are separated as far away
as possible when a turret-mooring system is adopted with risers and
mooring facilities located at the bow; refer to Figure 9(b).
This configuration is beneficial also because turret motions can be
minimized while weathervaning capacity can be maximized. Also, when
the accommodation with a helideck is located at the stern in a conversion,
the proximity so achieved, to the engine room that contains many of the
major vessel systems including utility systems, can be an advantage.
DOUBLE-HULL
An aspect that needs to be considered for design and operation of an
FPSO is the protection of cargo tanks from damage caused by collisions
with shuttle tankers, particularly when a side-by-side configuration is to be
used for exporting cargo. A new-build FPSO hull usually has double sides,
but the bottom is not necessarily double-skinned.
Double bottoms are generally not required because damage from hull
grounding is unlikely. However, if the FPSO is a disconnectable type and
may need to leave the station from time to time under its own power, a
double bottom may be required by regulation. Also, if the FPSO is located
in a very shallow location with some chance of contact with the sea
bottom, a double bottom may be necessary.
ADVANTAGES AND
DISADVANTAGES OF FPSO
FPSOs are the most common type of floating production system. They
represent 61 percent of the production units now in operation and 70
11
Advantages :
1) Can be built in a shorter time => quicker profits
The average semi-submersible oil rig takes 3-4 years to build, and a
jack-up rig 2-3 years. From laying the keel in dry dock to first launch,
an FPSO could be rolled out in months to a year, or even less if an
existing vessel is simply being modified into an FPSO.
2) FPSOs do not have to be custom built
Unlike their fixed platform and semi-submersible counterparts, an
FPSO does not have to start its life as an FPSO. The first ever FPSO,
BPs Castellon, was an oil tanker in a former life, and many of its
descendants are also vessels that have been converted from
transporters to harvesters of hydrocarbons. Recycling assets in
this way saves a lot of costs.
3) FPSOs can evade harsh weather
FPSOs are mobile units and hence are able to navigate away from
potentially perilous weather conditions. Permanent installations
would be vulnerable in the hurricane-riddled Gulf of Mexico, cyclonic
activity zones like the South China Sea and iceberg-infested waters
around the Arctic circle, whereas FPSOs are able to relocate and
elude these dangers.
4) FPSOs can move from field to field
FPSOs were conceived as the perfect solution to develop marginal
fields and so find themselves ideally disposed to a world with
rapidly exhausting conventional reserves. Once the source of
hydrocarbons has plateaued in a specific site, an FPSO unit can
then move on to its next target. In this way, owner/operators are
dispensing with the need to build and maintain costly platforms in
economically dubious situations, whilst retaining value with the
employment of a reusable unit.
5) Abandonment costs are less than for fixed platforms.
When a well becomes economically unviable due to underproduction or depletion, the removal of equipment, capping of the
well and any environmental clean up, that has to be enacted before
12
6) FPSOs are ideal for deep water drilling
With operators having to drill deeper than ever before to hit the
black gold, deep and ultra-deep water plays like the Santos Basin,
the US Gulf Lower Tertiary and the Arctic region are becoming more
plausible choices for an oil-thirsty world. In areas such as these,
where subsurface pipelines would be logistically challenging and
export by shuttle tankers is increasingly expensive, an FPSO is the
best choice as a tailored upstream and midstream unit rolled into
one.
7) FPSOs eliminate the need for costly and expansive underwater
infrastructure
In a situation where laying pipelines is not a cost-effective solution,
the FPSO is particularly well-adapted. FPSOs tap in to existing well
centres with its retractable risers, negating the need for extensive
undersea hydrocarbon transportation.
8) FPSOs are more environmentally friendly than rigs
While many rigs have been in operation for several decades and
have a permanent ecological footprint, an FPSO can be designed
and redesigned for more environmentally friendly field operations.
Disadvantages :
1) The subsea tiebacks associated with FPSOs generally bring higher
well maintenance costs.
2) Internal turret requires dry-docking and are more expensive than
external turret designs and it takes a longer period of time to be
built.
3) FPSOs are sensitive to motions.
4) High turret/fluid swivel costs.
5) High maintenance costs.
13
Risk analysis shows that only 1.8 percent of crude oil volumes lost during
all phases of FPSO operations would take place during the transfer of oil
from the vessel to the shuttle tanker.
EXAMPLES OF FPSOs IN
1) FPSO Castellon
Delta 1977 COUNTRIES
DIFFERENT
-
2) Girassol FPSO
- Worlds largest FPSO vessel
- Constructed in Korea and has been constructed as a joint venture
between Bouygues Offshore and Stolt Offshore within a period of 21
months
- The vessel has a production capacity of 200,000 barrels per day and
a storage capacity of 2,000,000 barrel storage capacity
CONCLUSION
The trend of offshore oil and gas development has been shifting from
fields in shallow and medium waters to fields in deeper waters. Shipshaped offshore units such as FPSOs have been recognized as one of the
most reliable, economical solutions to develop offshore oil and gas
reserves in deep water areas.
Although FPSOs have been in existence since the late 1970s, their
complexity and size have been gradually increasing, and there are still a
number of problem areas related to designing, building, and operating
these units that must be resolved for achieving the high integrity in terms
of safety, health, the environment, and economics/financial expenditures.
15
REFERENCES
1. Anish, 2011 January 16, What is FPSO (Floating Production Storage
and Offloading) System? URL:
http://www.marineinsight.com/marine/types-of-ships-marine/what-isfpso-floating-production-storage-and-offloading-system/ Date
accessed : 2012 October 21
2. Tim Hadar, 2011 December 22, 10 Reasons Why FPSOs Are The
Future Of Oil And Gas. URL : http://www.oilandgasiq.com/strategymanagement-and information/articles/ten-reasons-why-fpsos-arethe-future-of-oil-and-ga/ . Date accessed : 2012 October 21
3. How Do FPSOs Work? URL:
http://www.rigzone.com/training/insight.asp?
insight_id=299&c_id=12. Date accessed : 2012 October 21
4. FLOATING TECHNOLOGY: Tanker lightering, transport leaks carry
highest risk in FPSO operations URL : http://www.offshoremag.com/articles/print/volume-60/issue-11/news/floatingtechnology-tanker-lightering-transport-leaks-carry-highest-risk-infpso-operations.html . Date accessed : 2012 October 21
5. Luk. W, 1.4 A Brief History of the FPSO Installations, URL :
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50405874/1-4-A-Brief-History-of-theFPSO-Installations date accessed : 2012 October 21
6. Aziz.A, 2011 May 4, Offshore Structures, URL :
http://offshoreengineeringstudy.blogspot.com/ Date accessed : 2012
October 21
7. Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema, Turret Mooring, URL:
http://www.offshoremoorings.org/moorings/2006/Groep6/Real
%20page/Turret_main.htm
Date accessed : 2012 October 21
16