Joc 1980,45,1035
Joc 1980,45,1035
Joc 1980,45,1035
1035
equatorial alcohol ratio but also enolized 90% of the ketone. When LiH and LiOR were allowed to react under
similar conditions (expt 64), a 74:26 ratio of axial to
equatorial alcohol was observed, but 72% of the ketone
was enolized.
When ketones 11,111, and IV were allowed to react with
these reagents, lesser amounts of enolization were observed
with very stereoselective results. All the reagents studied
produced 99 and 100% axial alcohol when allowed to react
with ketones I1 and 111, respectively. The reactions with
camphor (ketone IV) produced greater than 90% exo alcohol with little enolization except for expt 64 and 66 which
produced 70 and 64%, respectively, of the starting ketone.
These reagents represent a method of using lithium and
sodium hydride for reduction which has not been previously reported.
of
(Hi
+ A1 4- 2Hz
NaAlH,
+ LiCl
eNaAlH,
140 C
EbO
LiA1H4
+ NaCl
(3)
(4)
NaA1(CH2CHzR)4 ( 5 )
CpzTiCIz
RCHZCH2Al(NR2)2
(6)
Experimental Section
Apparatus. All reactions were performed under nitrogen or
argon a t the bench by using Schlenk-tube techniques or in a
glovebox equipped with a recirculating system to remove oxygen
and solvent vapors. Calibrated syringes equipped with stainless-steel needles were used to transfer reagents. All glassware
and syringes were heated in an oven and cooled under a flow of
nitrogen or argon. All inorganic and organic compounds, including
internal standards for GLC, were prepared by weighing the reagent
in a tared volumetric flask and diluting with the appropriate
solvent.
Proton NMR spectra were obtained by using a Varian Model
A-60 60-MHz spectrometer or a JEOL Model PFT-100 100-MHz
Fourier transform spectrometer. All chemical shift values are
expressed in parts per million (6 values) relative to Me,Si as the
internal standard. All mass spectra were obtained by using a
Hitachi RMU-7 mass spectrometer. GLC analyses were obtained
by using an F&M Model 720 gas chromatograph. IR spectra were
obtained by using a Perkin-Elmer Model 621 IR spectrometer.
High-pressure reactions were carried out by using an autoclave
rated to 15000 psi obtained from the Superpressure Division of
the American Instrument Co.
Analytical Methods. Gas analyses were carried out by hydrolyzing samples with 0.1 M HC1 on a standard vacuum line
equipped with a Toepler pump. Aluminum was determined by
adding excess standard EDTA solution to hydrolyzed samples
and then back-titrating with standard zinc acetate solution at pH
4 with dithizone as an indicator. Amines were analyzed by injecting hydrolyzed samples with an internal standard on the gas
chromatograph. Carbon and hydrogen analyses were carried out
by Atlantic Microlab, Inc.
All products arising from the quenching of reactions of hydrides
and alkynes with HzO, DzO, Iz, or COz were identified by GLC
and compared to authentic samples obtained commercially or
synthesized by known methods. All NMR spectra were obtained
in CDC13 or benzene-d,.
Lithium and sodium trimethylaluminohydrides were prepared
by the equimolar addition of a benzene, diethyl ether, or T H F
solution of trimethylaluminum (obtained from Ethyl Corp. and
distilled under vacuum in a drybox) to a lithium or sodium hydride
slurry in the appropriate solvent. The addition was carried out
in a one-necked round-bottomed Cask equipped with a magnetic
stirring bar and a pressure-equalizing addition funnel while being
cooled with an ice-water bath. The addition funnel was fitted
with a rubber serum cap which was attached to an argon-filled
manifold connected to a mineral oil filled bubbler by a syringe
needle. After the addition and stirring (usually 10 min) the
reaction mixture became a clear, pale brown solution which was
analyzed for aluminum by EDTA titration and for lithium and
sodium by flame-ionization photometry.
Sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminohydride(Vitride T) was
obtained as a 70% toluene solution from Matheson Coleman and
Bell.
Lithium and sodium bis(diethy1amino)- and bis(diisopropy1amin0)aluminohydride were prepared by adding, with stirring at
0 C, a stoichiometric amount of diethylamine or diisopropylamine
to a T H F solution of lithium or sodium aluminum hydride.
(6) E. C. Ashby and S. Noding, J . Org. Chem.. 44, 4364 (1979).
(7) F. W. Walker and E. C. Ashby, J . Chem. Educ.. 45, 654 (1968).
Hydrometalation
the products were the cis alkenes which were confirmed by coinjection of authentic samples in the gas chromatograph. From
Zweifel's work," it is known that hydroaluminated compounds
quenched with iodine maintain their regiochemistry. Therefore,
the iodoalkene obtained from the quenching with I2 of the reaction
involving 2-hexyne was 2- and 3-iodo-cis-2-hexene. NMR was
used to distinguish between the two isomers:
H
/c=c
BU
Cp2T1C12
CP~TI(H)C
LIAIH~CI
(8)
/I
i
\Me
/H
\Me
R C H ~ C H ~ A I H ~ L CI P ~ T I
H. 5.25.
+ LiAlH,
TiCI,
H20
C6H14 ( 7 )
quenched with DzO which in effect monitors the production of the hydrometalated intermediate. When these
reactions were quenched with bromine, only 70% of the
corresponding bromide was obtained in most cases.
Therefore, the product obtained from the quenching of the
reaction with HzO could be misleading in terms of the
formation of the intermediate hydrometalated product.
We have recently reported that the reaction of LiAlH4with
olefins in the presence of NiClz results in the formation
of the reduction product in quantitative yield in almost
every case; however, addition of DzO to the reaction
mixture resulted resulted in very low deuterium incorporation in the product.12
Since previous work has not definitely shown the presence of a hydrometalation intermediate in the reduction
of olefins with complex metal hydrides, we investigated
the hydrometalation reaction of unsaturated molecules in
more detail, particularly looking for a different hydride
and/or catalyst that would give a higher percentage of
hydrometalated intermediate as evidenced by deuterium
incorporation in the product. Lithium and sodium aluminum hydride, lithium and sodium trimethylaluminohydride, lithium and sodium bis(dialky1amino)aluminohydride, and Vitride [sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminohydride] were allowed to react with a series of
alkenes and alkynes in a 1:l ratio in the presence of 5 mol
% of CpzTiClz in THF. The results are presented in
Tables I and 11. Titanocene dichloride was chosen as the
catalyst because it worked so well in the previously studied
hydrometalation reaction with bis(dialkylamino)alanes,6
and since then Sato3 has investigated other catalysts.
The results of Tables I and I1 show that all of the hydrides behaved similarly. When allowed to react with
terminal alkenes, the reactions were over in 10 min at room
(11) G. Zweifel and C. C. Whitney, J . Am. Chem. SOC.,89, 2753 (1967);
G. Zweifel and R. B. Steel, ibid.. 89, 2754 (1967): G. Zweifel. J. T. Snow.
and C. C. Whitney, ibid., 90, 7139 (1968).
(12) E. C. Ashby and J. J. Lin, Tetrahedron Lett., 51, 4481 (1977).
'
(IO)
H'
--.-
R C H ~ C H ~ A I H ~ L ID 2 O
RCH2CH2D
(11)
/cp
CH31
c,' JH3 ,
i\&b/H
\CP
H'
CH3
Hydrometalat ion
-
Table I. Reactions of Complex Aluminum Hydrides with Alkenes and Alkynes in t h e Presence of 5 mol % of Cp:TiCI,"
LiAIH,
NaAIH,
LiAlMe,H
NaAlMe,H
prodprodprodprodproduct
D
uct
D
uct
D
uct
D
uct
D
yield, incorp, yield, incorp, yield, incorp, yield, incorp, yield, incorp,
alkene or alkyne
1-0cteneC
1-hexene
styrened
methylenecyclohexane
2-ethyl1-hexene
neohexene
cis2-hexene
trans2-hexene
cyclohexene
1-methyl-1cyclohexene
1-octyne
phenylethyne
4 -0cty ne
2-hexynee
1-phenyl1- pro py n e
product
%b
%b
octane
hexane
ethyl benzene
methylcyclohexane
98
99
70
70
99
100
100
95
99
99
75
71
100
100
97
94
2-ethyl hexane
70
95
71
2,2-dimethylbutane
hexane
60
55
62
5
hexane
cyclohexane
methylcyclohexane
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
octane
1-octene
ethylbenzene
4
3
13
4
3
15
2
5
6
6
10
5
6
10
styrene
cis-4-octene
cis-2-hexene
1-phenylpropane
10
99
99
15
1Vdeuterio-cis-1-
1-(trimethyl-
silyl )-1-octyne
%b
7c
%b
7c
98
98
73
69
100
100
94
94
100
99
71
69
100
100
98
93
100
100
72
70
100
100
99
94
91
71
95
70
93
69
93
56
58
6
53
58
3
53
59
2
51
%b
11
100
100
55
99
98
8
100
100
50
9
100
99
17
95
90)
75
94
(90)
70
11
100
100
51
9
99
100
13
100
99
11
51
99
100
14
100
100
50
phenyl-1-oropene
(90)
2-deuterio-cis-l~
phenyl-1-propene
(10)
5%
3-phenyl- 1-propene
1-(trimethylsily1)15
octane
cis-l-(trimethylsilyl)- 35
1-octene
(10)
10)
85
20
17
18
82
18
13
13
83
19
19
17
86
20
17
18
82
16
65
39
67
34
65
30
68
35
61
a All reactions were carried out in THF at room temperature for 2 h in a 1: 1 molar ratio of complex aluminohydride to
alkene o r alkyne.
Yields were determined by GLC based on internal standards.
When the reaction was quenched with
a solution of I2 in benzene, a 95% yield of only 1-iodooctane was obtained.
90% PhCH(D)CH, formed. e When the
reaction was quenched with a solution of I, in benzene, a 95% yield of a 51:49 ratio of 2-iodo- t o 3-iodo-cis-2-hexenewas
obtained.
D '/bp
- /H
-c
Ph
'Me
A'
D2@
CHZ
M+
1VI
H
H\
ti-C-C=CHz
P'h
'
B
lcjc
ti
/D
c,=c
Ph
'Me
B'
Table 11. Reactions of Selected Alkenes and Alkynes
with Complex (Dialky1amino)aluminohydrides in the
Presence of 5 mol % Cp.TiCl,=
complex
aluminum hydride
LiAIH,(NEt,),
LiAlH,( N-i-Pr?'):
NaAIH,(NEt,),
alkene or
alkyne
D
yield, incorp,
product
octane
1-octene
octane
4-octyne
4-octene
cis-2-octene octane
96
10
11
95
5
98
1-octene
1-octyne
octane
1-octene
octane
4-octyne
4-octene
cis-2-octene octane
92
12
1-octene
1-octyne
15
15
13
93
trace
1-octene
1-octyne
octane
1-octene
octane
4-octyne
4-octene
cis.2-octyne octane
NaAlH,(N-i-Pr,), 1-octene
1-octyne
octane
1-octene
octane
4-octyne
4-octene
cis-2-octene octane
97
96
11
97
2
95
10
13
91
2
97
96
93
were carried out in THF at room t e m perature f o r 2 h in a 1: 1 molar ratio of complex aluminohydride to alkene or alkyne.
+ n-BuLi
-CIHlO
C6HI3C=CLi
Me3SiC1
LiCl
C6Hl3C=CSiMe3 (13)
react under the conditions stated in Tables I and 11, the
reaction was slow even at 60 "C. The best results obtained
showed a 35% yield of cis-1-(trimethybily1)-1-octene(65%
deuterium incorporation) and a 15% yield of 1-(trimethylsily1)hexane (20% deuterium incorporation). Presumably because of the bulkiness of the trimethylsilyl
group, some homolysis of the intermediate alkenyl titanium compound takes place, resulting in hydrogen abstraction from solvent, causing poor deuterium incorporation of the product when D 2 0 is added (eq 14).
In conclusion, hydroalumination reactions using complex
aluminohydrides work extremely well for terminal alkenes
and internal alkynes but do not work well for internal
alkenes and terminal alkynes. An interesting observation
which is a result of this work is that t,he regiochemistry
/\
c=,
H13C6
S i !+le3
Hx /
/H
C=C
SH
SiMe3
1041
/H
/c=c
(14)
SiMe3
H1326
room temp
i-C4HI0 LiH
(1)
(1971).