07 Conclusions

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

55

CHAPTER 7
CONCLUSION

The present work reports the results obtained to study the effects of re-entrant
bowl geometry on turbocharged diesel engine performance and emissions using CFD
approach. The important conclusions based on the present work are summarised below.

Initially cold flow analysis was conducted for baseline bowl. The results of
motoring simulation are validated with the available experimental results to ensure the
reliability of the simulation. Combustion simulation was carried out for three different
re-entrant bowl configurations viz., Baseline, Bowl 2 and Bowl 3 to investigate the effect
of re-entrant bowl geometry on engine performance and emissions in a DI diesel engine
at full load conditions at 2400 rpm.
The computation of baseline bowl was validated with the available experimental
results of a DI turbocharged diesel engine and the results support a good degree of
confidence in the numerical predictions. The variation of temperature, pressure, swirl and
TKE are investigated.

Based on this investigation, the following conclusions are drawn:

1)

The peak pressure and temperature are obtained at 3 to 4 CA aTDC for all the
three cases. The pressure and temperature obtained are higher for Bowl 3 with
more re-entrancy.

2)

The variation of maximum temperature between Bowl 3 and baseline is 6 % and


variation of peak pressure between Bowl 3 and baseline is 9 %.

56

3)

Bowl 3 creates 25 % more swirl than baseline bowl at firing TDC and also it
provides 35 % higher TKE than baseline bowl at firing TDC.

4)

Bowl 3 shows a higher gross-IMEP than other two bowls and hence ISFC of
Bowl 3 is lower than other two bowls. The difference between the gross-IMEP
values of Bowl 3 and baseline bowl is approximately 6 %.

5)

Around 46 % reduction in soot at EVO is achieved for the Bowl 3 compared to


baseline bowl.

6)

However, this is at the expense of NOx which increases by about 15 % due to


high temperature rise in Bowl 3.

7)

Bowl 2 was found to be worse than the baseline bowl based on the performance
and emission, since the swirl and TKE levels of Bowl 2 are less than baseline
bowl.
In summary, Bowl 3 enhance the turbulence and hence results in better air-fuel

mixing process among all three bowls in a DI diesel engine. As a result, the ISFC and
soot emission are reduced, although the NOX emission is increased owing to better mixing
and a faster combustion process. Globally, since the reduction of soot is larger

(-46 %

as regards baseline) than the increase of NOX (+15 % as regards baseline), it can be
concluded that Bowl 3 is the best trade-off between performance and emissions.

The accurate prediction of pressure traces and heat release data is what is
ultimately desired to allow simulation of potential bowl designs without having to prototype every possible design variation. This capability allows more potential designs to be
evaluated to identify the promising few for proto-typing and testing. This will lead to

57

substantial savings of time and money in developing more sophisticated designs of diesel
engines.
7.1 SCOPE FOR FUTURE WORK
The recommendations for future work are outlined below:

1. Different turbulence models other than RNG k- model and different combustion
models other than eddy break-up model can be investigated.

2. Comparison of multi-step split injection on emissions compared to normal injection


can be done.

3. The same study can be extended to include the suction and exhaust strokes of the
piston.

4. The simulation can be carried out with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to investigate
the effects of different EGR fraction on the engine performance and emissions.

You might also like