Ib 1
Ib 1
Ib 1
Please be advised that the course material is regularly reviewed and updated on
the eLearning platform. SHEilds would like to inform students downloading these
printable notes and using these from which to study that we cannot ensure the
accuracy subsequent to the date of printing. It is therefore important to access
the eLearning environment regularly to ensure we can track your progress and to
ensure you have the most up to date materials.
Version 1.2c (06/11/2012)
Relevant Standards
Working Environment (Air Pollution, Noise and Vibration) Recommendation, 1977 (No. 156)
Radiation Protection Convention, 1960 (No. 115)
Benzene Recommendation, 1971 (No. 144)
Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 (No.139)
Occupational Cancer Recommendation, 1974 (No.147)
Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention 1969 (No.129)
Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Recommendation, 1969 (No. 133)
To put the control of chemicals into perspective, this element begins with an overview of the principles aimed at controlling the use of chemicals in the workplace as contained within:
ILO Chemicals Convention (C170) and Recommendation (R177)
ILO Asbestos Convention (C162) and Recommendation (R172)
C170 - Chemicals Convention, 1990 (No. 170)
Convention concerning Safety in the use of Chemicals at Work (Entry into force: 04 Nov
1993)Adoption: Geneva, 77th ILC session (25 Jun 1990) - Status: Up-to-date instrument (Technical Convention).
The convention was convened having regard to the need for co-operation within the International
Programme on Chemical Safety.
The convention was intended to protect workers, the general public and the environment from the
harmful effects of chemicals. The convention states that it is essential to protect to reduce the incidence of chemically induced illness and injuries at work by:
evaluating all chemicals to determine their hazards
Provide employers with a mechanism to obtain from suppliers information about the chemicals
used so that an effective programme to protect workers from chemical hazards can be implemented.
To provide workers with information about chemicals at their workplace and appropriate preventive measures to participlate in protective programmes
Establishing principles for such programmes to ensure the safe use of chemicals.
The convention is arranged in seven parts and consists of twenty-seven articles.
Part 1 Scope and definitions
Articles 1and 2
Article 2 covers the definitions of terms used throughout the convention.
Chemicals means chemical elements and compounds, and mixtures thereof , whether natural or
synthetic. Hazardous chemical is defined as any chemical which has been classified in accordance with article 6.The term `use of chemicals at work covers activities where a worker may be
exposed to a chemical. Including Production, Handling, Storage, Transport, Disposal & treatment
, Release, Maintenance, repair and cleaning of equipment and containers for chemicals.
Part II General Principles
Articles 3-5
Part III Classification and related measures
Article 6 Classification systems
Article 7 Labelling and marking
Article 8 Chemical safety data sheets
Article 9 Responsibilities of suppliers
Part IV Responsibilities of employers
Article 10 Identification
Article 11 Transfer of chemicals
Article 12 Exposure
Article 13 Operational control
Article 14 Disposal
Article 15 Information and training
Article 16 Co-operation
Part V Duties of workers
Article 17
Part VI Rights of workers and their representatives
Article 18
Part VII Responsibility of Exporting states
Articles 19-27
It is recommended that candidates familiarise themselves with the requirements of this convention. The convention is available on the following link:
http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:1371090029550894::NO:12100:P1
2100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312315:NO
Article 8 on chemical safety data sheets is relevant to this unit.
Article 8 states that:
1. For hazardous chemicals, chemical safety data sheets containing detailed essential information regarding their identity, supplier, classification, hazards, safety precautions and emergency
procedures shall be provided to employers.
2. Criteria for the preparation of chemical safety data sheets shall be established by the competent authority, or by a body approved or recognised by the competent authority, in accordance
with national or international standards.
3. The chemical or common name used to identify the chemical on the chemical safety data
sheet shall be the same as that used on the label.
R177 - Chemicals Recommendation, 1990 (No. 177)
Recommendation concerning Safety in the use of Chemicals at WorkAdoption: Geneva, 77th ILC
session (25 Jun 1990) - Status: Up-to-date instrument (Technical Convention). The proposals
contained in this recommendation supplement the Chemicals Convention, 1990.
Articles 6 and 7 of the Recommendation regarding classification, state that:
6. The criteria for the classification of chemicals established pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 1, of
the Convention should be based upon the characteristics of chemicals including:
(a) toxic properties, including both acute and chronic health effects in all parts of the body;
(b) chemical or physical characteristics, including flammable, explosive, oxidising and dangerously reactive properties;
(c) corrosive and irritant properties;
(d) allergenic and sensitising effects;
(e) carcinogenic effects;
(f) teratogenic and mutagenic effects;
(g) effects on the reproductive system.
7. (1) As far as is reasonably practicable, the competent authority should compile and periodically
update a consolidated list of the chemical elements and compounds used at work, together with
relevant hazard information.
(2) For chemical elements and compounds not yet included in the consolidated list, the manufacturers or importers should, unless exempted, be required to transmit to the competent authority,
prior to use at work, and in a manner consistent with the protection of confidential information under Article 1, paragraph 2 (b), of the Convention, such information as is necessary for the maintenance of the list.
It is recommended that candidates familiarise themselves with the requirements of this recommendation. The recommendation is available on the following link:
http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312515
1.2 ILO - Safety in the Use of Chemicals at Work an ILO Code of Practice
ILO - Safety in the use of Chemicals at Work an ILO Code of Practice
Overview
The code provides practical guidance on the implementation of the provisions of the Chemicals
Convention, 1990 (No. 170), and Recommendation, 1990 (No. 177). It is an ILO contribution to
the International Programme on Chemical Safety of UNEP, the ILO and the WHO (IPCS).
The code is the outcome of a PIACT Project. PIACT was explained in Unit A, and is an acronym
for the International Programme for the Improvement of Working Conditions and Environment.
The objective of the code is to provide guidance to those who have responsibilities for framing
provisions relating to the use of chemicals at work and offers guidelines to suppliers, employers,
and workers organisations. The code is not intended to replace national laws, regulations or accepted standards.
The code of practice is arranged as follows:
1. General provisions
2. General obligations, responsibilities and duties
3. Classification systems
4. Labelling and marking
5. Chemical safety data sheets
6. Operational control measures
7. Design and installation.
8. Work systems and practices
9. Personal protection
10. Information and training
11. Maintenance of engineering control measures
12. Monitoring in the workplace
13. Medical health surveillance
14. Emergency procedures and first aid
15. Investigation and reporting of accidents, occupational diseases and other incidents
Annex A: A possible approach for the protection of confidential information.
1.3 covers definitions of terms used throughout the code of practice. This list includes a definition
of the `competent authority'. Competent authority: A minister, government department or other
public authority with the power to issue regulations, orders or other instructions having the force
of law.
2: General obligations responsibilities and duties
The competent authority should:
formulate and state a coherent policy on safety in the use of chemicals at work, which forms
part of the national policy on occupational safety and health and the working environment required by the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155).
review national measures and practice against international regulations, standards and systems, and with the measures and practice recommended by the code.
should formulate and implement the necessary measures including laws, standards and criteria
for safety in the use of chemicals at work to give effect to Convention No. 170 and Recommendation No. 177.
periodically review the stated policy and the existing measures to implement that policy.
ensure that compliance with laws and regulations concerning safety in the use of chemicals at
work is secured by an adequate and appropriate system of inspection.
have the power, if justified on safety and health grounds, to either:
prohibit or restrict the use of certain hazardous chemicals; or
(b) require advance notification and authorisation before such chemicals are used.
have powers to specify categories of workers who, for reasons of safety and health, are not allowed to use specified chemicals or are allowed to use them but only under conditions prescribed
in accordance with national laws or regulations.
establish:
a) systems and specific criteria appropriate for classifying chemicals.
b) systems and specific criteria for assessing the relevance of the information required to determine whether a chemical is hazardous;
c) requirements for marking and labelling chemicals.
d) criteria for the information contained in the chemical safety data sheets received by employers.
extend the application of classification systems taking into account harmonisation with internationally recognised systems.
require manufacturers and importers to provide it with information on specified criteria for assessing the hazards of chemical elements and compounds which are not yet included in the consolidated list compiled by the competent authority.
ensure that criteria are established on measures which provide for safety of workers.
Employers should:
Set out a written policy on arrangements on safety in the use of chemicals.
Ensure chemicals used at work are labelled or marked in accordance with the code and that
chemical safety data sheets are provided. Chemicals should not be used until all this information
has been obtained.
Maintain a record of hazardous chemicals.
Make an assessment of the risks arising from the use of chemicals.
Take appropriate measures to protect workers against the risk identified by the assessment.
Comply with appropriate standards , codes and guidelines in the use of chemicals.
Make adequate arrangements to deal with incidents and accidents.
Provide workers with necessary, appropriate and periodic instruction and training.
Provide health and safety measures to other establishments in other countries if they are part of
a multi-national enterprise without discrimintation.
Workers should:
take all reasonable steps to eliminate or minimise risk to themselves and to others.
take care of their own health and safety and that of other persons who may be affected by their
acts or omissions at work.
make proper use of all devices provided for their protection or the protection of others.
report forthwith to their supervisor any situation which they believe could present a risk, and
which they cannot properly deal with themselves.
Suppliers of chemicals (whether manufacturers, importers or distributors)
should ensure that:
such chemicals have been classified or their properties assessed;
such chemicals are marked to indicate their identity;
hazardous chemicals are labelled;
chemical safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals are prepared and provided to employers;
in accordance with the codes guidelines.
the properties of all chemicals are identified and assessed
all chemicals they supply are classified in accordance with systems and criteria approved or
recognised by the relevant competent authority.
ensure that revised labels and chemical safety data sheets are prepared and provided to employers.
confidential information not included in the chemical data sheet should disclose the information
in accordance with section 2.6.
4: Labelling and marking
The competent authority should establish requirements for the marking and labelling of chenmicals. Suppliers should ensure that chemicals are marked and hazardous substances labelled.
Employers should not use chemicals which have not been labelled or marked.
The purpose of labelling is to provide essential information on the classification, hazards and precautions to be observed and should cover both acute and chronic exposure.
Labelling requirements, which should be in conformity with national requirements, should cover:
the information to be given on the label, including as appropriate:
trade names;
identity of the chemical;
name, address and telephone number of the supplier;
hazard symbols;
nature of the special risks associated with the use of the chemical;
safety precautions;
identification of the batch;
the statement that a chemical safety data sheet giving additional information is
available from the employer;
the classification assigned under the system established by the competent
authority;
the legibility, durability and size of the label;
the uniformity of labels and symbols, including colours
5: Chemical safety data sheets
The competent authority should establish criteria for the preparation of chemical safety data
sheets for hazardous chemicals. Suppliers should ensure that safety data sheets are provided to
employers. Workers and their representatives have a right to chemical data sheets and information on them.
Information included on the safety data sheets as established by the competent authority should
include:
(a) chemical product and company identification
(b) information on ingredients (composition)
(c) hazard identification
(d) first-aid measures
(e) fire-fighting measures
(f) accidental release measures
(g) handling and storage
(h) exposure controls and personal protection
(i) physical and chemical properties
(j) stability and reactivity
(k) toxicological information
(l) ecological information
(m) disposal considerations
(n) transport information
(o)Regulatory information
(p) other information
It is recommended that candidates familiarise themselves with the requirements of this Code of
Practice. The Code of Practice is available on the following link:
http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@safework/documents/normativ
einstrument/wcms_107823.pdf
tatives.
Article 7 -Workers shall comply with prescribed safety and hygiene procedures relating to occupational exposure to asbestos.
Article 8 - Employers and workers or their representatives shall co-operate as closely as possible
at all levels in the undertaking of the measures prescribed in the convention.
Part III Protective and Preventive Measures
Articles 9-19
Article 9 exposure to asbestos shall be prevented or controlled by one or more of the following
measures :
(a) making work in which exposure to asbestos may occur subject to regulations prescribing adequate engineering controls and work practices, including workplace hygiene;
(b) prescribing special rules and procedures, including authorisation, for the use of asbestos or of
certain types of asbestos or products containing asbestos or for certain work processes
Article 10 -Where necessary to protect the health of workers and technically practicable, national
laws or regulations shall provide for one or more of the following measures(a) replacement of asbestos or of certain types of asbestos or products containing asbestos by
other materials or products or the use of alternative technology, scientifically evaluated by the
competent authority as harmless or less harmful, whenever this is possible;
(b) total or partial prohibition of the use of asbestos or of certain types of asbestos or products
containing asbestos in certain work processes.
Article 11 - The use of crocidolite and products containing this fibre shall be prohibited.
Article 12 - Spraying of all forms of asbestos shall be prohibited.
Article 13 Employers shall notify the competent authority of certain types of work involving exposure to asbestos.
Article 14 producers, suppliers and manufacturers shall be responsible for adequate labeling of
containers and products that is easily understood by workers.
Article 15 - Limits of workers exposure to asbestos will be prescribed by the competent authority.
The exposure limits or other exposure criteria shall be fixed and periodically reviewed and updated In all workplaces where workers are exposed to asbestos, the employer shall take all appropriate measures to prevent or control the release of asbestos dust into the air, to ensure that
the exposure limits or other exposure criteria are complied with and also to reduce exposure to as
low a level as is reasonably practicable.
Article 16 - Each employer shall be made responsible for the establishment and implementation
of practical measures for the prevention and control of the exposure.
Article 17 Demolition of plants or structures containing friable asbestos insulation materials ,
and removal of asbestos from buildings or structures where asbestos is likely to become airborne
shall only be undertaken by contractors who are recognized by the competent authority as qualified to carry out such work. The employer or contractor shall be required before starting demolition work to draw up a work plan specifying the measures to be taken, including measures to(a) provide all necessary protection to the workers;
(b) limit the release of asbestos dust into the air; and
(c) provide for the disposal of waste containing asbestos in accordance with Article 19 of this
Convention.
Article 18 - The employer should provide appropriate clothing , which should not be worn outside
the workplace where workers personal clothing may become contaminated with asbestos dust.
The handling and cleaning of work and special protective clothing shall be carried out under controlled conditions. National laws shall prohibit the taking home of such clothing and personal protective equipment (PPE.The employer shall be responsible for cleaning, maintenance and storage of work clothing, special protective clothing and PPE. Facilities shall be provided by the employer for those workers exposed to asbestos to take a bath or shower at the workplace.
Article 19 - Employers shall dispose of waste containing asbestos in a manner that does not pose
a health risk to the workers concerned, including those handling asbestos waste, or to the population in the vicinity of the enterprise. Appropriate measures shall be taken by the competent authority and by employers to prevent pollution of the general environment by asbestos dust released from the workplace.
Part IV Surveillance of the Working Environment and Workers Health
Articles 20 & 21
Article 20 - the employer shall measure the concentrations of airborne asbestos dust in workplaces, and shall monitor the exposure of workers to asbestos at intervals and using methods
specified by the competent authority. The competent authority shall prescribe the period of time
for which the records of monitoring of the working environment and the exposure of workers to
asbestos shall be kept. Employers, representatives and inspection services shall have access to
these records.
Article 21 - Workers who are or have been exposed to asbestos shall be provided, with such
medical examinations as are necessary to supervise their health in relation to the occupational
hazard, and to diagnose occupational diseases caused by exposure to asbestos. The monitoring
shall not incur a cost to the worker and be free of charge and take place in working hours. Workers shall be informed of their medical examinations and receive individual advice concerning their
health in relation to their work. If it is medically inadvisable for a worker to continue to be exposed
to asbestos then efforts shall be made to provide those workers with another means of maintaining their income. A system of notification of occupational disease caused by asbestos shall be
developed by the competent authority.
Part V Information and Education
Article 22 - . The competent authority shall:
make appropriate arrangements to promote the dissemination of information and the education
of all concerned with regard to health hazards due to exposure to asbestos and to methods of
prevention and control.
ensure that employers have established written policies and procedures on measures for the
education and periodic training of workers on asbestos hazards and methods of prevention and
control.
The employer shall:
ensure that all workers exposed or likely to be exposed to asbestos are informed about the
health hazards related to their work, instructed in preventive measures and correct work practices
and receive continuing training in these fields.
Part VI Final Provisions
Articles 23-30
It is recommended that candidates familiarise themselves with the requirements of this convention. The convention is available on the following link:
http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312307
R172 - Asbestos Recommendation, 1986 (No. 172) Recommendation concerning Safety in
} Release of chemicals have been identified as the cause of long-term environmental damage
} Damage highest in agricultural, chemical and energy sectors
} ILO standard setting and technical assistance in chemical safety 1919
} First binding instrument developed in 1921 (white lead)
} Not only conventions but also COPs, Guides etc.
} ILO list of occupational diseases diseases from exposure to chemicals
ILO OSH Information Systems
} ILO active not only in chemical safety
} Website provides information on all instruments free of charge
} Specific information on chemical safety can be assessed
} Ongoing programme of uploading all documents free of charge on the website
Chemical Safety at Work
} ILO approach
} Historical background
} Activities and products
} Difficulties in chemical safety
} ILO response
-Chemicals convention (No 170),1990
-GHS
-International chemical safety cards
-ILO chemicals control toolkit
ILO Involvement in Chemical Safety
} White lead convention (No.13), 1921
} UNEP/ILO/WHO IPCS, 1980
} Chemicals Convention (No.170), 1990
} Prevention of Major Industrial Accidents Convention (No.174) , 1993
} UNCED and follow-up
ILO Activities and Products
} A series of programmes were started after Bhopal disaster in 1984
} Technical cooperation projects (India etc).
} Conventions (170 and 174)
} Codes of practice (Chemicals, Major industrial accidents, asbestos)
} Major hazard control: manual
} Training manuals: chemicals and agrochemicals
} Encyclopaedia on OHS
} International chemical safety cards (IPCS)
} CIS information centres (>100 national and collaborating centres)
Difficulties in chemical safety
} Each chemical has a different hazard
} Users usually cannot analyze hazards
} Safe handling cannot be ensured without safety information
} Information flow should be from suppliers (manufacturers, importers, distributors) to employers
and then to the workforce
Means for providing information
} Labelling (concise information providing the intrinsic properties of the chemical on the
container)
} Chemical safety data sheets (comprehensive safety information for use on the shop floor
ILO Response
} Chemicals convention (No. 170), 1990
} Globally Harmonized System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)
} International Chemical Safety Cards (ICSC)
} ILO Chemical Control Toolkit
Chemicals Convention, 1990 (No.170)
} Targeted and specific instrument
} Presupposes the existence of a system for assessing risks and setting limits
} No provisions on health surveillance, recording, notification and sanctions
} Instead, C170 provides a system for the sound management of chemicals
} Focussed on specific subject matter
Key elements of Chemicals Convention (No.170)
} National policy on chemical safety
} Classification systems
} Labelling and marking
} Chemical safety data sheets
} Responsibilities of suppliers
} Responsibilities of employers
} Duties and rights of workers
GHS-Globally Harmonised System
} Follow-up to the adoption of C170
} Development of a single, globally harmonised system to address classification of chemicals ,
labels and safety data
} Work undertaken under the IOMC, focal points being ILO, OECD and UN SCTDG
} 10 years to develop
IOMC, OECD & UN SCTDG
IOMC - The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals was established in 1995 to strengthen cooperation and increase coordination in the field of chemical
safety
OECD -The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is to promote policies
that will improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world.
UN SCTDG This stands for the UN Sub-Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods
Need for harmonisation
} National implementation and trade requires a harmonised system for hazard classification and
labelling
} Major systems were already in use:
-UN Transport Recommendations
-EU Directives on substances and preparations
-Canadian and US requirements for Workplace, Consumers and Pesticides
} Requirements were different under each system, for example:
-EU Class 1 cut off for acute toxicity was 25mg/kg (oral), whereas US systems was 50mg/kg
(oral)
-Hence all chemicals classified between 25 and 50 mg/kg were classified differently
-Labels were also different
Need for harmonisation continued..
} Adopted in December 2002
} Designed to cover all chemicals, including mixtures
} Provide for chemical hazard communication requirements for workplace, transport, consumers
and environment
Respiratory system.
The air then passes over the larynx (voice box), down the trachea which divides into two bronchi
(singular: bronchus).
Each bronchus branches into bronchioles, which are repeatedly branched into terminal bronchioles, which lead to an infundibulum of alveoli, very much like a bunch of grapes from which the
flesh has been removed.
The alveoli (or air sacs) form the delicate lining of the lungs, across which gas exchange between
the blood and the air takes place.
In order to protect the delicate tissue, the alveoli are covered by a thin film of moisture. To make
certain that inhaled air is moist and warm, all the airways are covered with wet, warm mucus.
The upper respiratory system is formed by the nasal cavities, pharynx and larynx. The lungs contain the bronchi, bronchioles, terminal bronchioles and the alveoli. These organs, with some of
the trachea, fill the major part of the thoracic cavity.
The left and the right lung are not quite the same. The right lung has three lobes or sections; the
left lung has two lobes.
The entrance to the larynx is protected by a muscular flap, the epiglottis, which closes during
swallowing. Loss of control of the epiglottis allows "aspiration" to occur.
The space between the lungs is called the mediastinum. It contains the heart, the great blood
vessels, oesophagus and thoracic duct.
A number of air sacs (alveoli) cluster together at the end of each terminal bronchiole to form an
infundibulum. The alveoli are lined with a single layer of epithelium, across which gases diffuse.
Each infundibulum is covered with a network of blood capillaries which have a single wall of epithelium. Thus, gases are able to pass to and from blood capillary vessels and alveoli.
it easier to swallow and the enzyme it contains begins to change starches into sugar.
The tongue rolls the food into a bolus which is easily swallowed, and then it is pushed to the back
of the mouth and into the oesophagus.
Digestive System
The oesophagus.
The oesophagus is a muscular tube about 25 cm long, reaching from the pharynx to the stomach.
It is positioned behind the trachea and passes through the diaphragm.
Material does not "fall down" the oesophagus under gravity, but is carried down by a series of
peristaltic contractions which produce packages of material, each called a "bolus".
Muscular action provides the transporting mechanism throughout the remaining parts of the gastrointestinal tract.
The oesophagus is separated from the stomach by the cardiac sphincter, a ring of muscular fibres which prevent normal regurgitation of stomach contents back into the oesophagus.
During its passage through the oesophagus, slightly alkaline aqueous secretions are passed into
foodstuffs, as part of the digestive process.
Peristalsis (muscular action) then pushes the food into the stomach.
The Stomach.
The stomach is an enlarged section of the gastrointestinal tract which forms a receptacle for
foodstuffs passed from the oesophagus.
It is constructed of several muscle systems which enable foodstuff to be continually mixed while
the main digestive process takes place.
The digesting materials are held in the stomach by the pyloric sphincter.
The stomach holds 2.5 to 3.8 litres, but it is elastic and can contain much more.
It lies below the diaphragm, in front of the pancreas, with the spleen on the left side of the fundus
of the stomach. The bulk of the liver lies to the right of and behind the stomach (as viewed from
the side).
The stomach provides an acid medium for digestion. The acid secreted is hydrochloric acid, the
concentration of which gives a pH of about 1. Gentle movements in the stomach will churn the
food to a semi-liquid state called chime. The hydrochloric acid will kill germs and help the enzymes to work.
At given intervals, the pyloric sphincter will open to allow a little food to pass into the small intestine. Occasionally, the pyloric sphincter in infants fails to work correctly; this is known as pyloric
stenosis. This was once a fatal condition but now a simple operation can remedy the problem.
The warmth of the body will also melt the fats.
The Small Intestine.
The small intestine is the region in which the greater part of digestion takes place.
The small intestine is a muscular tube about 6m long, with an internal diameter approximately 3.5
cm, which extends from the pyloric sphincter of the stomach to the large intestine.
The first part of the small intestine is the duodenum, a horseshoe-shaped section, situated by the
digestive organs of the gall bladder and pancreas.
These organs supply digestive secretions for alkaline digestion in the small intestine. The pH of
the digestive juices ranges from 8.8 to 8.0.
The submucosa of the small intestine is thrown into many folds possessing numerous finger-like
projections called villi (singular - villus), whose walls are richly supplied with blood capillaries.
Absorption of the end-products of digestion occurs through the villi and into the underlying blood
vessels. From the villi, the blood capillaries converge to form the hepatic portal vein which delivers absorbed food to the liver. Non-nutrients such as toxic chemicals as well as nutrients may
The walls of the atria are thinner than those of the ventricles as they only pump blood to the
lungs, while the ventricles pump blood around the body.
Between the atrium and the ventricle of each side is an atrio-ventricular opening, guarded by the
tricuspid valve on the right and the bicuspid, or mitral, valve on the left side of the heart.
When the valves are closed, they seal off the atria from the ventricles. These valves only allow
blood to flow downwards.
The pulmonary and aortic valves control the blood-flow from the heart.
The blood vessels that take blood around the body are divided into three types. They are arteries,
veins and capillaries.
Arteries.
The arteries have a muscle coating and are slightly elastic to make carrying blood from the heart
easier. The blood is pumped into the main arteries, which branch down into smaller and narrower
tubes and carry blood to all parts of the body. The thinnest of the arteries are called arterioles,
and they link with even smaller blood vessels called capillaries.
Arteries are three-layered structures comprising:
(i) An outer protective coat of fibrous and connective tissue.
(ii) A middle muscular coat which exerts a steady pressure on the blood. When an artery is cut,
the muscular wall remains active, so blood continues to flow in spurts which coincide with the
pump of the heart and contraction and relaxation of the muscles of the artery walls.
(iii) The innermost lining of pavement epithelium is perfectly smooth, offering no resistance to the
flow of blood; but smooth as the coat is, adhesions do sometimes occur, particularly in later life,
with consequent narrowing of the arteries. This condition is known as arteriolosclerosis.
Veins.
Veins have the same three layers as arteries, but the middle muscular coat is thinner, less elastic,
less firm and more likely to collapse. This occurs when a vein is cut. The vessel tends to close,
stopping the flow of blood.
In addition, where blood in veins travels against gravity, such as in the limbs, there are pocket
valves in the lining epithelium. These pockets fill up if the blood attempts to flow back, bulging out
and blocking the vein against a back-flow. Oncoming blood forces the blood in the pockets forwards.
Capillaries.
In the capillaries, the process of exchange takes place where oxygen is given to the cells and
waste products returned into the blood.
The walls of the narrow blood capillaries are only one cell thick, which allows ease of access and
egress for materials at the molecular level.
The returning blood then enters small blood vessels called venules. The venules link up to form
larger and larger veins, which return blood to the heart.
The veins have a wider bore than arteries and, in many of them, there are small no return valves
that aid returning blood.
Blood.
The blood is a thick red liquid, composed of four parts, plasma, red cells, white cells and platelets.
When damaged blood comes into contact with the air or damage tissue it becomes sticky and
clots.
Plasma is the liquid part of the blood. It is a clear, pale yellow fluid consisting of 90% water. The
remaining 10% is made up of food, waste products, hormones, minerals and plasma proteins,
such as fibrinogen.
Red cells (red corpuscles or erythrocytes) - their main function is to carry oxygen from the lungs
into the tissues. They are made in the bone marrow, and are biconcaved in appearance.
White cells (white corpuscles or leucocytes) their main function is to protect the body from infection. Many of the white cells are made in the bone marrow, but some are made in the lymph
Systemic Circulation.
Oxygenated blood from the pulmonary circulation enters the left atrium, passes through the bicuspid valve to the left ventricle, and is pumped into the aorta which curves upwards over the
heart. It sends out offshoots to the chest, the upper limbs and the head.
It then curves round, descends through an opening in the diaphragm into the abdomen, finally
branching into the legs.
Blood leaves the aorta by various arteries, taking oxygenated blood, nutrients and secretions to
the organs and tissues. Arteries branch to become arterioles which, in turn, branch to become
blood capillaries, from which plasma and its inclusions diffuse into intercellular spaces and then
into individual cells.
Not all the blood plasma and waste fluids are returned to the blood capillaries; excess volume is
taken by the lymphatic vessels.
The plasma now returned to the blood is deoxygenated and contains carbon dioxide, sometimes
secretions necessary for other organs (e.g. hormones) and waste products.
The capillaries unite to become venules, venules become veins and blood flows from the organs
and systems, finally to enter the right atrium of the heart via the inferior and superior vena cava.
The systemic circulation has two ancillary subsystems:
1. Portal circulation.
2. Renal circulation.
Portal Circulation.
Organs normally only receive arterial blood, but the liver, besides receiving arterial blood in the
hepatic artery , direct from the abdominal aorta, receives venous blood via the portal vein, which
is formed from veins from the spleen, pancreas, stomach and small intestines.
The functions of the liver are concerned with some, or all, of the products of these organs, and
their proximity to the liver warrants direct routing.
The spleen supplies materials from the breakdown of red blood corpuscles; the pancreas sup-
plies insulin and probably glucagon for the control of blood sugar.
The stomach supplies body nutrients following digestion.
The veins leaving these four organs unite to become the portal vein, which also enters the liver
with the hepatic artery.
The blood in the portal vein is de-oxygenated, since its oxygen has been used in respiration in
the organs it has left.
With oxygen from the hepatic artery, the liver is able to release sufficient energy for its important
task and finally blood, now de-oxygenated but rich in the products and secretions of the liver,
leaves this organ via the hepatic vein enters the inferior vena cava and is returned to the right
auricle of the heart.
Renal Circulation.
This is important because it is the function of the kidneys to remove impurities from the blood.
The renal artery receives blood at high pressure from the aorta. The high blood pressure in the
renal artery is an important factor in the passing of nitrogenous waste and water into the kidneys.
Deoxygenated blood, which in every other respect is at its purest, leaves the kidney via the renal
vein and then moves on to the inferior vena cava.
Pulmonary Circulation.
Deoxygenated blood leaves the heart via the pulmonary artery. (Blood leaves the heart in arteries.)
In the systemic circulation, arteries contain oxygenated blood.
The pulmonary artery divides to carry blood to both lungs, where carbon dioxide and water vapour diffuse into the alveoli of the lungs.
Oxygen from the alveoli diffuses into blood capillaries, oxygenating the haemoglobin of the erythrocytes to oxyhaemoglobin.
Oxygenated blood is returned to the left ventricle of the heart by two pulmonary veins from each
lung.
able to limit the level of trauma if given quickly enough, which prevent the secondary associated
problems
Epidermis.
The epidermis forms the tough outermost layer of skin that protects the more delicate tissues underneath.
It is composed of stratified (or layered) epithelium. Epithelium is defined as a coating or lining tissue. It is thickest in parts such as the palms of the hands which suffer harder wear, and thinnest
on the lips.
Within the epidermis, there are two cell zones:
The horny zone, which can be considered as a layer where flattened epithelial cells are changing into a dead proteinaceous substance called keratin, which forms the outermost layers of the
epidermis. It takes about forty days to completely replace the epidermis.
The germinal (or living) zone, which forms the deeper level in the epidermis, and consists of living cells which can reproduce and move to the horny zone. They do not, however, have a blood
supply as normal living tissue, but are nourished by lymph secretions which circulate between
them.
Dermis.
The dermis, or the true living skin, forms the inner part of the skin structure and is tough and elastic. It consists of mainly collagen fibres, which are interlaced with elastic fibres and is thicker than
the epidermis. The dermis contains:
Lymph vessels which form a network throughout the dermis and epidermis.
Sensory nerve endings which are sensitive to touch, pressure, pain and change in temperature.
Sweat glands and their ducts which produce dilute salt solution and aid cooling.
Hair roots and the arrectores pilorum (which are the involuntary muscles attached to the hair
follicles).
The sebaceous glands produce a greasy liquid called sebum which spreads over the surface of
the skin to keep it supple.
Capillary blood vessels set out at various intervals on the surface of the dermis. The flow of
blood through these areas is important in the control of heat transfer mechanisms.
Route of Attack on the skin.
The skin is the next vulnerable area, as it can be in contact with toxic substances, which may be
solid, liquid or gaseous, and in very high concentrations (i.e. in terms of quantity of substance to
skin area).
Fortunately, the epidermis has many layers of protection and does not allow solid or gaseous
substances to be absorbed (in general).
So only liquids provide a hazard.
If contact between the epidermis and a toxic substance does occur, a considerable amount of
contaminant can usually be removed before excessive absorption has taken place. Wearing normal clothing effectively reduces the area available for exposure to a toxic agent. However, the
skin of the hands, arms and legs usually has some breaks in its surface, and thus entry into the
body "by injection" is always a possibility.
Inflammation of the skin is much the same as for any other body organ; there are blood capillary
changes, there is increased permeability and there is migration of cells. Inflamed skin is painful,
sometimes itchy, often red and fissured, sometimes accompanied by exudate and shedding of
scales.
Chemicals attack the skin by pervasion or implantation, resulting in contact dermatitis, which may
take a number of forms:
Irritant Dermatitis: This is caused by corrosive irritants such as acids, alkalis, detergents, oils, metallic particles, solvents, oxidising and reducing agents and some biological agents (e.g. giant
hogweed). If the irritant is particularly aggressive, it can result in destruction of the skin.
Acute Irritant Dermatitis: Acute inflammation can be brought about by contact with acids and alkalis.
Structure:
There are three layers of tissue in the walls of the eye. They are:
The outer fibrous layer: sclera and cornea.
The sclera is the white of the eye, forms the outermost layer of tissue and consists of a firm, fibrous membrane that maintains the shape of the eye and gives attachment to the extraocular or
extrinsic muscles.
The sclera continues to the front of the eye as a clear, transparent epithelial membrane called the
cornea. Light rays pass through the cornea to reach the retina.
The cornea is convex anteriorly and is involved in refracting or bending light rays to focus them
on the retina.
The middle vascular layer; choroids, ciliary body and iris.
Choroid: The choroid lines the inner surface of the clear. It is very rich in blood vessels and is a
deep chocolate brown in colour. Light enters the eye through the pupil, stimulates the nerve endings in the retina and then is absorbed by the choroids.
Ciliary body: This gives attachment to the suspensory ligament which, at the other end, is attached to the capsule enclosing the lens. Contraction and relaxation of the ciliary muscle changes
the thickness of the lens which bends, or refracts, light rays entering the eye to focus them on the
retina. The epithelial cells secrete aqueous fluid into the anterior segment of the eye, i.e. the
space between the lens and the cornea.
Iris: this is the visible coloured part of the eye and extends from the ciliary body, lying behind the
cornea in front of the lens. It is a circular body composed of pigment cells and two layers of muscle fibres, one circular and the other radiating.
Pupil: this lies in the centre of the iris. The pupil varies in size depending on the intensity of the
light. In bright light, the circular muscle fibres of the iris contract and constrict the pupil. In dim
light, the radiating muscle fibres contract, dilating the pupil.
Lens: this is a highly elastic circular biconvex transparent body, lying immediately behind the pupil. It is suspended from the ciliary body by the suspensory ligament and enclosed with a transparent capsule. Its thickness is controlled by the ciliary muscle through the suspensory ligament.
The lens bends light rays reflected by objects in front of the eye.
The inner nervous tissue layer: retina.
The retina is the innermost layer of the wall of the eye and lines about three quarters of the eyeball. It is an extremely delicate structure and is especially adapted to be stimulated by light rays.
It is composed of several layers of nerve cell bodies and their fibres, lying on a pigmented layer of
epithelial cells which attach it to the choroid.
The retina is the photosensitive part of the eye and the light-sensitive nerve cells are the rods and
cones.
Structures inside the eyeball are the lens, aqueous fluid (humour) and vitreous body.
Eyelids and Eyelashes: These protect the eye from injury.
The reflex closure of the lids occurs when the conjunctiva or eyelashes are touched, when an object comes close to the eye or when a bright light shines into the eye this is called the conjunctival or corneal reflex.
Blinking at about 3- to -7 second intervals spreads tears and meibomian secretions over the cornea, preventing drying.
Lacrimal apparatus.
The lacrimal glands are situated in the recesses in the frontal bones of each eye. Each gland is
approximately the size and shape of an almond, and is composed of secretory epithelial cells.
The glands secrete tears composed of water, mineral salts, antibodies, and lysozyme, a bactericidal enzyme.
Fluid from the tears and the secretion of the meibomian glands is spread over the cornea by
blinking. The functions of this mixture of fluids include :
washing away irritating materials. e.g. dust and grit;
the bacteriocidal enzyme lysozyme prevents microbial infection;
its oiliness delays evaporation and prevents drying of the conjunctiva;
nourishment of the cornea.
Route of entry into the body via the eye.
Another possible route of entry into the body is via the mucous membranes of the eye. Substances in the form of dust, mist, spray, fume or vapour may dissolve in the moist covering of the
eyelids and undergo absorption into the bloodstream (lachrymation).
sound. The tympanic membrane is a continually growing structure, which allows it to close if it
has a hole in it and to extrude a ventilation tube.
The sound waves that enter the pinna strike the ear drum. These vibrations are passed on into
the inner ear through the oval window.
The inner ear.
The inner ear consists of fluid filled tubes embedded in bone. It has two parts, the cochlea which
is concerned with hearing and the semi-circular canals which are concerned with balance.
The vibrations that are picked up in the middle ear are passed onto the cochlea, where the
movement of fluid (perilymph) makes hair cells move and stimulates impulses that are sent to the
brain.
Filtering and Cleaning - the hairs at the anterior napes trap larger particles. Smaller particles such
as dust and microbes settle and adhere to the mucus.
Mucus protects the underlying epithelium from irritation and prevents drying.
With the beating of the cilia cells, the mucus is wafted towards the throat where it is swallowed or
expectorated.
Olfactory function of the nose The chemical particles which are given off by odorous substances are carried into the nose on inhalation.
The nerve endings, which are located in the roof of the nose, are stimulated by these chemical
substances.
The nerve impulses, which result from this stimulation are conveyed by the olfactory nerve to the
brain where the sensation of smell is perceived.
Sniffing concentrates these chemical particles more quickly into the roof of the nose which increases the number of cells stimulated, and the perception of smell is increased.
The sense of smell can be lost when the nasal mucosa are inflamed, therefore preventing the
odorous substances reaching the olfactory area of the nose.
Adaptation Perception of an odour quickly decreases and eventually ceases if an individual is
continuously exposed to it. This loss of perception is specific to the odour.
Previously, we have already looked at the main routes of entry of harmful substances into the
human body i.e. inhalation, ingestion, skin pervasion and injection. We also identified target organs and target systems.
We will now add a little further to this by discussing the distinctions between inhalable and respirable dust, as this information will be needed in unit B5 (monitoring). In addition, we will further
look at the body's defensive responses.
after a period, develop a build-up of toxicant in the body. This is another problem to be considered in connection with chronic toxicity. The lung also provides the largest area of epithelium for
the absorption process to occur.
When you are considering the risk of a material in terms of inhalation, the questions to be asked
are:
Is it gas?
Is it a liquid that will easily give off vapours?
If it is a solid, can respiratable dust be generated, or vapours?
If the answers are "yes", then you will be dealing with conditions which provide the greatest risk of
entry of substance into the lungs.
Ciliary Escalator.
The extensive branching of the bronchus and bronchioles causes an increase in the total crosssectional area of the airway passages, and also of the surface area over which the air travels.
This has the combined effect of:
reducing the velocity of the flow rate, which allows some particles to sediment out of the airstream;
providing a greater surface area on which particles may be deposited by sedimentation or by
impaction at the bends.
The efficiency of the filtration system is best expressed in terms of the size of particulate matter
which is able to penetrate the system. Not all particulate matter has the same shape and dimensions, so values quoted may vary, depending upon the unifying system used.
ESDm
Table Salt
100
Human hair
50 (diameter CSA)
25-50
Cocoa
8-10
Rust (Fe203)
Clay dust
0.1-1.0
The particulate matter removed may either be swallowed or expectorated. The ciliary escalator
takes about 24 hours to clear particulate matter from the airways.
Biochemical Clearance or Phagocytosis.
When particulate matter becomes deposited in the alveoli, it triggers a defensive mechanism
which involves the movement of granulocytes from the blood into the alveoli.
These amoeba-like cells are called phagocytes. They engulf foreign bodies in an effort to neutralise their harmful action. If the material is inert, the full phagocyte with its engulfed particles migrates away along lymphatic channels, to "retire" in a dormant area of the lung structure, away
from its functioning parts. This may be in a secluded lymph node (gland), or somewhere under
the pleural covering of the lungs. Some phagocytes move out of the alveoli and are cleared by
sufficient time for them to be deposited in the alveolus and they are exhaled out again. This is
shown on the BMRC penetration curve below.
Figure 2.2. British Medical Research Council penetration curve for respirable particles
showing 50% cut point at 5mm.
Key Point:Inhalable dust is dust that is hazardous when deposited anywhere in the respiratory tree. Particles in the region
of 7 - 20 microns will penetrate to the bronchioles and are inspirable, while particles in the size range 0.5 - 7 microns are
respirable.
Cut Point: Describes the performance of cyclones and other particle size selective devices. For personal sampling, the 50% cut
point is the size of the dust that the device collects with 50% efficiency.
Airborne dust concentration
The concentration of dust to which a person is exposed is also critical to the impact on the health
of the person exposed. This is measured in the breathing zone of the worker, which is an imaginary hemisphere of approximately 30 cm, extending in front of their face and measured from the
midpoint of an imaginary line joining the ears (see diagram below).
Goblet cells in the conducting airways secrete mucus which, forming sputum, is expectorated or
swallowed; and the nose itself filters out the largest particles.
Before we attempt to study the respiratory defence mechanisms in detail, we need to return for a
moment to the respiratory tract (Figures 1.1 and 1.3).
Those parts of the respiratory pathway down to, and including, the terminal bronchioles are the
conducting airways; those beyond constitute the respiratory units, where gas exchange occurs.
Initial filtration of particles larger than 10 m takes place in the hairs in the nasal cavity.
Smaller particles and aerosols between 7 and 10 m are trapped in the mucus secreted by goblet
cells lining the conducting airways, and then transported upwards by the ciliary escalator to the
pharynx where they can be either swallowed or expectorated (see Figure 2.4).
Figure 2.4
Smaller particles and aerosols between 0.5 and 7 m pass into the respiratory units, where
deposition takes place in the respiratory bronchioles and alveoli. Here, they may be ingested as
foreign bodies by macrophages, large cells normally found in tissues which produce blood cells.
Macrophages may migrate back along the respiratory pathways to the ciliary escalators, ultimately to be swallowed or expectorated. It is also thought that some transport occurs through the
alveolar membrane and into the circulatory system.
Some diffuse and come into contact with the airway or alveolar membrane.
Once in the bloodstream, the toxic substance (e.g. benzene) may act upon the blood itself or be
carried around until it affects another organ, such as the liver, kidneys or bladder. Materials swallowed may be excreted unchanged in the faeces. Others may be acted upon by enzymes, acids,
and other processes in the gut, or be absorbed and pass via the portal vein to the liver. Here they
may be further acted upon and metabolised, or conjugated into a variety of soluble by products to
be excreted in the urine.
Some toxic materials, such as lead, are initially stored in the bones of the skeleton so the toxic
effects can be minimised by slowly allowing it to leach back into the bloodstream.
The various pathways which may be taken by toxic materials deposited in the conducting airways
and respiratory units are shown in Figure 2.5.
Substances which pass through the alveolar membrane enter directly into the pulmonary capillaries, or find their way into the tissue spaces of the lungs from which they are drained by the lymphatic system. Substances reaching the interstitial spaces are sometimes stored harmlessly prior
to draining into the lymphatic system (e.g. tin and iron compounds), or may result in damage or
set up disease processes (e.g. fibrosis or pneumoconiosis). Because the lymph glands act as filters for substances or micro-predators (such as phagocytes) which are being carried away by the
lymphatic system, they are often involved in lung disease. Many cancers of the lung, for example,
start in the lung's lymph glands.
Figure 2.5
Table 2.1 shows nine examples of input substances, their sites of contact in the respiratory pathways, together with their principal effects.
Input Substance
Site of Contact
Effect
1
4 Di-isocyanates (TDI)
Conducting airways
5 Cotton dust
Conducting airways
Inflammation
Inflammation
Immuno-pathological reaction
Immuno-pathological reaction (e.g. asthma)
Immuno-pathological reaction (e.g. byssinosis)
6 Fibrogenic dusts:
Silica
Asbestos
7 Radio-isotopes
8 Hardwood dusts
9 Cigarette smoke
Neoplasia (cancers)
Neoplasia (cancers)
Metaplasia of bronchial
lining (lung cancer)
Figure 2.6
Stage 1: Chemotaxis - proximity of foreign body stimulates movement of phagocyte towards intruder.
Stage 2: Adhesion of foreign body to phagocyte. It is thought the immune response (qv) is the
basis for adhesion.
Stage 3: Ingestion of foreign body into the phagocytic cell, and
Stage 4: inclusion of the foreign body attracts a lysosome which discharges enzymes into the
phagosome, i.e. the mixture of enzymes and the foreign body.
Stage 5: Nitric oxide synthesising enzymes chemically digest the foreign body which may remain
in the phagocyte's cytoplasm; or the phagosome may be deposited in the surrounding tissue or
fluids and thence into the lymphatic system. Alternatively, the foreign body may remain as an indigestible inclusion while the phagocyte migrates to other tissue.
Harmful particles, micro-predators and other foreign bodies engulfed by phagocytes may thus be
rendered harmless.
Acute Inflammation.
Acute inflammation is the immediate defensive reaction of tissue to any injury and is typified by
the following sequence of events:
(i) Initially, the capillary vessels in the area of tissue affected briefly constrict.
(ii) Then the same blood vessels dilate, and the capillary walls become more permeable.
(iii) Protein-rich fluid (plasma) exudes from the capillaries into the surrounding tissue, causing
swelling (oedema).
(iv) Phagocytes migrate through the capillary walls towards the harmful input, where they ingest it
together with any damaged tissue.
(v) Tissue-dwelling macrophages join with the phagocytes and scavenge the affected area, which
is sometimes additionally bonded by fibrinogen (a protein associated with blood clotting).
Healing Process.
Towards the end of the inflammatory phase, cells called fibroblasts appear and secrete collagen.
This is a fibrous protein which cross-links with polysaccharides (sugars) to form a meshwork of
scar tissue which steadily builds up to repair the affected area. While this is going on, if the affected area is close to the skin, epidermal cells remove any final debris in the area and begin to
dismantle the scar tissue.
Chronic Inflammation.
Sometimes, excessive amounts of collagen are formed and in certain chronic inflammatory responses, macrophages die and other macrophages phagocytose their dead.
The combination of living and dead macrophages forms structures known as giant cells. Scarring
is a repair process by which gaps in tissue are made good.
In some types of chronic inflammation, however, this repair process becomes disordered. The
overgrowth of scar tissue, brought about by over-production of collagen, shrinks and contracts,
tearing and distorting the surrounding tissues. In the lungs, this results in the condition known as
emphysema and some types of pneumoconiosis result in extensive scarring and fibrosis.
Immune Response.
This term describes the mechanisms concerned with defence and preservation of normal body
integrity. In its classical form, a wide range of chemicals and micro-predators provoke an immune
response which involves the production of antibodies within the space of a few days. Whenever
next the antigen enters the body, it reacts with the residual antibody and the combination of antigen and antibody can be phagocytosed as detailed above.
In addition to the classical disposal of antigens, two other types of immune response are recognised:
(i) Surveillance.
Sometimes dividing cells give rise to mutant forms and any excess could result in the growth of
abnormal tissue (benign or malignant). Surveillance by immune response results in these mutants
being recognised as alien and destroyed.
(ii) Self-disposal.
Redundant blood and tissue cells need to be phagocytosed from the body, and the immune response ensures that redundant cells are recognised as distinct from functioning cells.
The immune response can be regarded as the mechanism concerned with identifying and preparing any harmful inputs, or the resulting damaged tissues for the inflammatory process.
Harmful inputs which can provoke an immune response include:
Respiratory Inflammation.
The respiratory pathway is vulnerable to attack by many irritants and corrosives or any other substances which attack the skin. The terminology of the inflammatory processes follows the pathway of air into the lungs, via:
Rhinitis,
Laryngitis,
Tracheitis,
Bronchitis.
Pneumonia: In extreme cases, the effects of inflammation lead to swelling and exudation of fluids,
resulting in narrowing or even total blocking of the small conducting airways.
Exudation in the alveoli leads to interference with respiratory gas exchange, even to a fatal degree.
Gases of low solubility will penetrate the respiratory pathway deep into the alveoli. Such gases
include sulphur dioxide, ozone, phosgene and oxides of nitrogen.
The inflammation caused results in fluid accumulating in the respiratory units (oedema).
Other irritants include metal fumes (metal fume fever) and polymer fumes (polymer fume fever).
Inflammation of the Skin.
Inflammation of the skin is much the same as for any other body organ; there are blood capillary
changes, there is increased permeability and there is migration of cells.
Inflamed skin is painful, sometimes itchy, often red and fissured, sometimes accompanied by
exudate and shedding of scales.
Chemicals attack the skin by pervasion or implantation, resulting in contact dermatitis, which may
take a number of forms:
Irritant Dermatitis.
This is caused by corrosive irritants such as acids, alkalis, detergents, oils, metallic particles, solvents, oxidising and reducing agents and some biological agents (e.g. giant hogweed). If the irritant is particularly aggressive, it can result in destruction of the skin.
Acute Irritant Dermatitis.
This is brought about by contact with acids and alkalis, for example, which result in acute inflammation.
Cumulative Insult Dermatitis.
This typically develops after repeated exposure to weak irritants over a long period of time.
Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
Also known as Contact Sensitisation Dermatitis, it is associated with a wide range of substances.
Some metals, such as cobalt and nickel, produce allergic reactions. With nickel, for example, contact with its alloys or salts can result in a form of contact dermatitis which may also affect skin on
other parts of the body not directly exposed to the agent.
Once this sensitivity (to very small amounts) has developed, it is usually permanent.
It is almost impossible to give a list of materials known to cause sensitisation dermatitis.
Certainly it would be very long, but would include coal-tar products, explosives, photographic
chemicals, dyestuffs and intermediates, insecticides, oils, resins, alkyd resins and plasticisers.
Page 1
The exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide between air, blood and body tissues is known as
Multiple Choice (HP)
Answer 1:
Respiration
Response 1:
Correct
Jump 1:
Next page
Answer 2:
Inspiration
Response 2:
Jump 2:
This page
Answer 3:
Expiration
Response 3:
Jump 3:
This page
Answer 4:
Perspiration
Response 4:
Jump 4:
This page
Page 2
The upper part of the respiratory tract consists of all of the following EXCEPT
Multiple Choice (HP)
Answer 1:
Lungs
Response 1:
Correct
Jump 1:
Next page
Answer 2:
Larynx
Response 2:
Jump 2:
This page
Answer 3:
Pharynx
Response 3:
Jump 3:
This page
Answer 4:
Response 4:
Jump 4:
This page
Page 3
This protective structure helps to keep food and fluids out of the airways
Multiple Choice (HP)
Answer 1:
Epiglottis
Response 1:
Correct
Jump 1:
Next page
Answer 2:
Oesophagus
Response 2:
Jump 2:
This page
Answer 3:
Larynx
Response 3:
Jump 3:
This page
Answer 4:
Glottis
Response 4:
Jump 4:
This page
Page 4
This structure warms, moistens and filters inhaled air
Nose
Response 1:
Correct
Jump 1:
Next page
Answer 2:
Trachea
Response 2:
Jump 2:
This page
Answer 3:
Lungs
Response 3:
Jump 3:
This page
Answer 4:
Epiglottis
Response 4:
Jump 4:
This page
foot of the finger-nail, the knuckle of the hand, or dorsum (top) of the foot. They are circular in
shape, up to one centimetre in diameter and look as if they are punched out, hence 'chrome hole'.
Some penetrate deeply, even to the bone and, although usually painless, they itch incessantly,
especially at night. In chromium plating and anodising, where chromic acid fumes are frequently
present, inhalation leads to perforation of the nasal septum. This effect has even been reported in
people spray painting anti-corrosive zinc chromate-based paints.
Cancer of the Lung.
The first reported case of cancer of the respiratory system in a chrome worker occurred in a 47year old man who had worked in the chromate industry in Scotland (1890).
Since then, it has been established that the incidence of lung cancer is about 3.6 times that of the
'normal' population, but with a latency period of about 25 years, this figure for risk may be an underestimate.
Preventive Measures.
Prevention of chrome-related diseases depends primarily on the removal of the dust or mist at
source by suitable ventilation equipment; cleanliness, supported by regular medical supervision,
and covering cuts and abrasions with suitable dressings.
Where contact with the arms or hands is likely, then workers should be supplied with adequate
protective equipment, including gloves, aprons and boots; but great care needs to be taken to
ensure that solutions cannot run down the arms or legs and into the protective clothing, or severe
ulceration may result.
Good hygiene is particularly important, and should be encouraged by the provision of ample
washing facilities backed up with good care of the hands, using barrier creams and lanolin-based
creams.
affected areas.
Control of Potential Dermatitic Situations.
The main aim in the control of potential dermatic situations is the limitation of exposure to a level
where the risk is eliminated, or reduced to a practical minimum.
For dusts and vapours, total enclosure with mechanical handling and exhaust ventilation systems
provides a safe place strategy. The exhausted materials should be rendered safe, and not indiscriminately vented into the atmosphere.
For liquids, pastes, or dustless solids, mechanical handling may be satisfactory.
When it is not possible to provide a safe place strategy, a safe person strategy must be adopted
and suitable protective equipment provided, e.g. gloves, impervious overalls with close-fitting collars and cuffs, wellington boots; and, in certain circumstances, half-mask respirators. Barrier
creams provide very limited protection where primary irritants are encountered, and are useless
against cutaneous sensitisers.
Where protective equipment is supplied, management is mainly responsible for its use and
should provide adequate supervision and the necessary incentives for workers to use the equipment when they are not supervised.
Personal hygiene should really only provide a 'back up' if a breakdown in safety control occurs;
but, in practice, it does provide a positive method of reducing the risk of contracting dermatitis.
Where there is a known risk from cutaneous sensitisers, 'patch testing' personnel before they are
exposed to potentially hazardous conditions is a commonly used practice. Patch testing involves
applying a small amount of various materials to the skin, often on the forearm, and checking to
see whether or not a positive reaction to the material occurs. Patch testing must only be carried
out by a professionally-trained person.
Problems resulting from occupational dermatitis should always be referred to a dermatologist with
adequate industrial experience in your particular industry.
3.17 Carcinogenesis.
Background.
A cancer is a growing mass of non-productive tissue that is relentlessly progressive, ending in the
death of the individual.
This tissue growth is termed a malignant tumour and can spread within the body via the bloodstream or the lymphatic system. This process, termed metastasis, leads to the formation of other
small tumours scattered widely throughout the body.
These new tumours can grow into nearby tissues and destroy them as a consequence, by a
process termed invasion. Metastasis and invasion are the two characteristics that distinguish malignant tumours from those classified as benign.
Descriptions of the important terms associated with carcinogenesis are as follows:
Tumour: a swelling related to the growth of diseased cells, which grows at the expense of other
healthy cells in its vicinity. There are basically two kinds: benign and malignant.
Benign tumours usually grow very slowly, remain localised and their cell structure is often similar
to the cells of origin.
Malignant tumours grow rapidly without restraint, spread into surrounding tissue and have their
own cell structure, unlike the cells of origin. The term cancer is used to describe the formation of
malignant tumours.
Carcinogen: an agent (either physical, chemical or viral) which has the ability to produce malignant tumours. In terms of occupational cancer, the carcinogenic agent will be physical and
chemical.
Occupational carcinogen: a carcinogen which induces cancer in a person as a result of their occupation. This is a definition given by the World Health Organisation and appears to be clear and
simple. Unfortunately, in practice the classification of a cancerous condition arising from occupation is far from simple.
Formation of Cancerous Cells.
It is generally accepted that cancerous cells are formed by the carcinogen attacking the mechanism which controls the reproduction of normal cells. The toxic action of carcinogens differs from
'ordinary' toxic action:
They upset the fundamental cell reactions within the cell structure, whereas ordinary toxic substances mainly upset the general metabolic processes which prevent cells from functioning normally.
They evoke irreversible effects which continue after exposure to the carcinogen has ceased. The
action of ordinary toxic agents usually stops when the exposure ceases, and recovery generally
follows.
The effects of a carcinogenic agent will not appear for many years after exposure. The period of
time is its latency period. Periods between 5 and 50 years are given for different agents. During
this time, there is little or no warning of the eventual tragic outcome. 'Ordinary' toxic agents can
evoke an acute response and also a chronic response.
The particular point made above highlights the importance of strict control in the use of carcinogenic substances. Once the symptoms have been diagnosed, the problem will often have
reached the point of no return.
No-threshold Concepts.
Later in this unit, we will consider dose-response relationships, which are based on the concept of
a minimum level of toxin exposure below which no harmful effect can be detected.
The assumption is that below this specific level, the degree of harm inflicted by the toxin is insignificant and will not cause lasting damage.
This threshold level for acute toxic effects can therefore be used to define workplace exposure
limits.
In the case of carcinogenic toxins, the situation is much more complex.
Theoretically, a single 'hit' or reaction of a compound or its metabolite on the crucial part of one
DNA molecule might be sufficient to initiate a cancerous change. Hence there is no threshold of
harm, and any level of exposure to a carcinogen has the potential to cause cancer.
In practice, however, the chances of one molecule reaching the target site are probably small for
most compounds and depend on a number of factors including potency, absorption, distribution
and metabolism.
The capacity of the particular cell to repair such damage will also be important.
You should therefore appreciate how the concept of a no-threshold level of harm for carcinogenic
substances differs significantly from the approach to exposure limits applied to other toxins, and
thus affects the assessment of risk and the setting of appropriate control standards.
Setting and Justifying Control Strategies for New Suspected Carcinogens.
In practice, there must be a threshold dose for a particular carcinogen, but is it difficult to determine in mammals in vivo because the critical biochemical changes at cellular level are impossible
to detect.
The results from animal carcinogenicity testing studies are particularly hard to assess.
It is difficult to show an increased frequency of tumours in a small population, such as those used
in animal cancer studies in which there may already be a significant incidence of some types of
tumour.
There is also a practical statistical limit which determines the frequency of occurrence of a cancer
which can be detected. Hence assessing cancer risk from carcinogenicity studies is very difficult.
As a result, those conducting and assessing the tests tend to err on the side of caution.
Another problem is the need to use high doses close to the maximum tolerated dose in carcinogenicity testing.
This approach is contentious since carcinogens may show dose-dependent metabolism, which
can distort interpretation of the carcinogenicity data for weak carcinogens tested at dose levels
much higher than occupationally expected.
Consequently, a compound may only be carcinogenic under the extreme dosing conditions of the
test.
Extrapolation between species is also a problem in risk assessment and the interpretation of toxicological data. The species or strain used in a particular carcinogenicity study may have a high
incidence of a specific type of tumour. The assessment of the significance of an increase in the
incidence of this tumour, and its relevance to man, can pose particular problems.
Therefore, risk assessment for carcinogenicity tends to be much more difficult than for any other
type of toxic effect. The incidence of a toxic effect may be measured under precise laboratory
conditions, but extrapolation to a real-life situation to give an estimate of risk involves many assumptions and gives rise to uncertainties.
The setting of control standards from these risk assessments is therefore often based on obscure
data, which may be without precise scientific foundation.
In practice, there is little alternative to extrapolation from scientific studies, since for new chemical
substances, human data is not available and toxic effects in man cannot be verified by direct ex-
perimentation.
Thus evaluation of human exposure from the limited data available tends to lead to a worst-case
estimation which, by definition, will tend to exaggerate the risk to human health.
3.20 Summary.
In this element, we have considered the main routes and mechanisms of attack by toxic, corrosive and dermatitic substances, dusts and fibres. We looked at the various routes of entry and
absorption routes, including the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal tract and the skin.
Target organs and systems are important elements of our studies, so we have covered the significance of the bloodstream, the circulatory system, the lymphatic system, the liver, the urinary
system and the reproductive system in unit B1.
The body's defensive responses are obviously highly significant, and we have studied inhalation
and respiratory defences and defensive cells.
Finally, we have discussed carcinogenesis and mutagenesis, including the formation of cancerous cells, the no-threshold concepts and the influence of environmental and non-occupational
factors.
Class of Toxin
Example
Hepatotoxins
Liver
Jaundice, liver
enlargement
Carbon tetrachloride
Nephrotoxins
Kidney
oedema, Proteinuria
Neurotoxins
Nervous system
Halogenated
hydrocarbons
Narcosis, behavioural Mercury and
changes
compounds,
Chloroform, ether
Cyanosis, loss of
Carbon monoxide,
consciousness
cyanides
Lung toxins
Lungs
Cough, difficulty
breathing
Asbestos, siliceous
dust
Reproductive toxins
Cutaneous agents
Skin
Defatting, rashes,
irritation
Eye toxins
Eye
Ketones, chlorinated
organic solvents
ples of corrosive materials, but even dilute solutions of bases such as sodium or ammonium hydroxide may also be very corrosive, particularly in contact with the eyes.
Irritant
An Irritant is a chemical which may cause reversible inflammation on contact.
Harmful
This denotes a substance that may cause damage to health. It should be considered as similar to
toxic but less dangerous. It should still be treated and handled with caution.
Dermatitic
Dermatitis is an inflammation of the skin which may be brought about by repeated contact with
chemicals. A wide variety of chemicals may be responsible, especially those which can cause defatting of the skin, such as chlorinated solvents. Irritation, cracked skin and blisters are common
symptoms. Dermatitis may also arise if a person is susceptible to sensitisation, and is allergic to
butyl rubber, latex or other types of gloves designed to protect the skin from contact with chemicals.
Dermatitis may seem a comparatively minor problem compared to the other hazards posed by
chemicals, but should be regarded as a potentially serious condition and not ignored.
Sensitisation
A sensitiser is a chemical which may lead to the development of allergic reactions after repeated
exposure.
Carcinogenic
A Carcinogenic chemical is one which is believed to be capable of causing cancer, that is, acting
as a carcinogen.
A Carcinogen is a chemical known or believed to cause cancer in humans. The number of proven
carcinogens is comparatively small, but many more chemicals are suspected to be carcinogenic.
Mutagenic
A mutagenic agent or mutagen is one which is capable of causing mutations. It may also (but
does not necessarily) act as a carcinogen.
A mutation is a heritable change in genetic material - in other words, a change which can potentially be passed from parent to child. This change may occur in a gene or in a chromosome, and
may take the form of a chemical rearrangement, or a partial loss or gain of genetic material.
Asphyxiant
An asphyxiant is a material capable of reducing the level of oxygen in the body to dangerous levels. Most commonly, asphyxiants work by merely displaying air in an enclosed environment. This
reduces the concentration of oxygen below the normal level of around 19% which can lead to
breathing difficulties, unconsciousness or even death.
The danger is (in theory) posed by any gas which is potentially present at high levels in the environment.
Some asphyxiants act directly upon the oxygen-carrying ability of the blood. Carbon monoxide,
for example, binds strongly to the haemoglobin molecule, which is responsible for the transport of
oxygen around the body. This reduces the amount of haemoglobin which is free to transport oxygen, possibly to dangerous levels. Carbon monoxide is produced in potentially large amounts
when material is burnt with a limited supply of oxygen. It is generated at often substantial levels
when cigarettes are smoked.
Isocyanates
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Mineral Oils
Vinyl Chlorides
MbOCA (2,2 Dichloro-4,4 Methylene Dianiline).
Cement
Ammonia
Chromium
Wood dust
Nickel
Siliceous dust
Sulphuric Acid
Sodium Hydroxide
Solvents
Lead and compounds
Asbestos
4.4 Mercury
Elemental mercury is a member of the heavy metal group, with a density greater than lead.
It is unique in that it is a liquid at normal temperatures and pressures, a property used to advantage in the electrical industry where liquid contacts are required, or for measuring equipment such
as thermometers or barometers.
It is a relatively un-reactive metal, quite easily extracted from its main sulphide ores. For this reason, mercury, like lead, has been known for a considerable time. Its toxic potential was recognised by the Romans.
Mercury is able to form inorganic compounds, e.g. mercuric chloride (HgCl2) (corrosive sublimate), mercurous chloride (Hg2Cl2) (calomel), and organic compounds, e.g. diethyl mercury or
methyl mercury hydroxide.
In 18th and 19th century England, mercury was used in the production of felt, which was used in
the manufacturing of hats common of the time. People who worked in these hat factories were
exposed daily to trace amounts of the metal, which accumulated within their bodies over time,
causing some workers to develop dementia caused by mercury poisoning. "Mad as a Hatter" is a
colloquial phrase used in conversation to refer to a crazy person and it became popular as a way
to refer to someone who was perceived as insane.
Mode of Entry.
Elemental mercury liquid is not absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract or through the skin in normal circumstances.
Absorption of mercury metal vapour does occur readily following inhalation into the lungs. There
is vague evidence that the vapour is absorbed into the body following skin contact.
Liquid mercury does readily form mercury vapour in considerable concentrations at room temperatures, but the ability to vaporise is almost completely prevented by the formation of a dust or
moisture layer over the free surface of the liquid.
It is for this reason that many schools or electrical workshops have mercury vapour-free atmospheres, but have small lakes of mercury metal under benches or the floor.
The situation changes dramatically if the temperature is raised above normal ambient levels, and
vaporisation then becomes vigorous and potentially very hazardous.
When mercury liquid is used with surfaces open to the atmosphere, a layer of water should be
Organo-mercury compounds used as fungicides in seed dressing, e.g. ethyl or diethyl mercury.
Manufacture of detonators using mercury fulminate.
4.5 Benzene
Benzene has a molecular formula C6H6 and its structural formula provides the basic structure for
aromatic chemicals (Figure 4.1)
4.6 Phenol
Phenol has a molecular formula C6H5OH and a structure related to benzene which is shown in
Figure 4.2.
Figure 4.2
Acute Effects.
The main effect following a high level of absorption occurs within the central nervous system. Collapse and coma follow rapidly after the body has been in contact with phenol solutions. Death often results following contact. Periods of between 30 minutes and several hours before death occurs have been recorded, depending upon concentration of the liquid and the area of body af-
fected.
In high concentrations, phenol solution can cause death if the body area contaminated exceeds
15-20%.
Where death is delayed or the absorption is not fatal, extensive damage occurs in the kidneys,
liver, pancreas and spleen. A pulmonary oedema could also occur following inhalation.
Chronic Effects.
Exposure to phenol, and absorption over long periods, especially of vapours or fumes, cause digestive disturbances, e.g. vomiting, excessive salivation or diarrhoea. Nervous disorders, e.g.
headache, dizziness and mental disturbances can also occur. Dermatitis often follows contact
with the skin. Liver and kidney failure following long exposure have been recorded as causes of
death.
4.8 Aliphatics.
Aliphatic halogen compounds are used extensively as solvents and reagents for manufacturing
processes.
Apart from their ability to cause dermatitis, and especially the particular condition termed
'chloracne' from compounds containing chlorine, they can cause carcinogenic responses in animals as well as in humans, e.g. vinyl chloride (see later). They can cause acute narcotic responses in high concentrations; they can be addictive, and can cause liver failure.
Target Organs.
Aliphatic organic compounds have a high affinity for fats, waxes and greases, hence their use as
solvents. When they are absorbed into the body, they will concentrate in areas of high body fat.
The two main target organs are the brain and the liver.
In the brain, they interfere with the central nervous system which results in a narcotic response.
In the liver, they cause toxic metabolic processes which can eventually lead to necrosis (breakdown) of liver tissue. As the liver is the main detoxification organ for harmful body substances,
any failure will result in rapid body damage, even premature death.
Examples.
Two classic examples of halogenated hydrocarbons which exemplify the above-stated problems
are trichloroethylene and tetrachloromethane (carbon tetrachloride).
Trichloroethylene (TCE).
This compound was officially listed as an animal carcinogen in July 1976 by the United States
National Cancer Institute, and therefore constitutes a potential risk to humans.
Since that time, research has not identified a definite link with human risk.
In the UK, the substance is still under review, but concern by the Health and Safety Executive
may be described as marginal.
The potential of TCE to trigger a narcotic response is accepted, and strict control over airborne
concentration should be maintained.
Where a gassing accident situation occurs, the result may be permanent brain damage or death.
In low concentration, the effects are mainly debilitating, i.e. headaches, drowsiness, fatigue and
loss of ability to concentrate.
The potential risk from TCE as a liver toxin generally results from low, and apparently harmless,
inhalation over many years. As a breakdown in the liver structure occurs, i.e. cirrhosis, liver functions are impaired. Stomach pains, vomiting and jaundice are typical symptoms.
Tetrachloromethane (CTC).
CTC (carbon tetrachloride) is cited as a substance with a carcinogenic risk for humans.
There is, however, some doubt as to the direct ability of CTC to evoke a carcinogenic response
on its own. Many references to CTC list the substance as a co-carcinogen, i.e. it has the ability to
assist another compound to evoke a carcinogenic response.
CTC has the ability to cause narcosis in the same way as TCE and the symptoms are similar.
As well as affecting the brain (CNS) and the liver, CTC causes injury to the kidneys. There is evidence to suggest that the kidneys are more vulnerable to attack than the liver.
CTC has been used in the past in portable fire extinguishers, a wax polish solvent and a general
degreasing agent. It is still used for certain chemical manufacturing processes, e.g. fluoroalkanes
used for aerosol propellants.
Other chlorinated hydrocarbons that may be encountered are 1,1-trichloroethane (genklene),
sym-tetrachloroethane, trichloromethane (chloroform), and tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene).
4.9 Isocyanates
Organic di-isocyanate compounds are used to make adhesives, synthetic rubber, polyurethane
paints and lacquers and quick-drying printing inks. Their most important application, however, is
in the manufacture of plastics, especially the flexible and rigid (poly) urethane foams.
A large number of di-isocyanates can be made, but only a few have important industrial applications:
Hexamethylene di-isocyanate (HDI) was the first to be used, but this aliphatic isocyanate is very
volatile and was found to cause significant respiratory problems, following which it was withdrawn
from use in Great Britain when a suitable alternative was found.
This was toluene di-isocyanate (TDI), an aromatic compound; but this, in turn, was eventually
found to be responsible for severe respiratory problems because of its irritant effect. However,
TDI is still widely used in the manufacture of flexible foams and paints; it presents a severe hazard to fire fighters.
A more recent introduction, with virtually no vapour hazard, is methane diphenyl isocyanate
(MDI).
Effects and Symptoms.
Of the commonly used isocyanates, both HDI and TDI act as irritants and allergens.
Irritant effects include rhinitis (inflammation of the mucous membrane of the nose), pharyngitis
(inflammation of the part of the throat immediately beyond the mouth), bronchitis, and, in cases of
excessive exposure, bronchiolitis obliterans.
In most cases, the symptoms and signs clear rapidly after the worker is removed from contact
with the isocyanate.
But in many of those who have shown a quick initial recovery, the symptoms have recurred, often
violently, after further contact with even very low concentrations of isocyanate (a condition known
as sensitisation).
Others are known to suffer from a chronic form of asthma, particularly in cold weather, and have
to depend on bronchodilator inhalations to ameliorate the symptoms.
Figure 4.3
There are, however, many such compounds, and a large number have been listed as having carcinogenic potential. They will always be found together in mixtures having a varying level of concentration.
Recent evidence suggests that the carcinogenic potential of PCH is enhanced by a very small
concentration of extremely potent PCH containing atoms of sulphur in its structure.
Occupations or Processes at Risk.
The following is a list of processes or occupations where workers are at risk from PCH mixtures:
Coke ovens.
Patent fuel manufacture.
Distillation of coal tar.
Bitumen-felt production and uses (e.g. roofing).
ulcerated condition.
Without medical intervention, tumours will spread to the testicle, spermatic chord and into the abdomen. For many, the condition has been fatal. During the time leading up to death, considerable
weight loss and pain can occur.
If early diagnosis of the condition is made, then, as with other skin cancers, recovery from the
condition becomes possible. Better still, the condition can be avoided if sufficient care is taken to
'design out' conditions that allow a worker to become saturated with oil.
When there is a possibility of oil contamination of the genital area, the workers must be made fully
aware of the potential risk, and be provided with special personal hygiene facilities, i.e. regular
use of clean working clothes and underwear, with special washing facilities.
To overcome possible reticence in reporting adverse genital conditions, compulsory medical inspections must be adopted as a back-up service.
There is no evidence that the polymerised material, polyvinylchloride (PVC), has any carcinogenic potential, except where there may be residues of VCM in the material. No VCM has been
detected in PVC which has been decomposed.
Other Harmful Effects of Vinyl Chloride.
Having discussed the carcinogenic properties of vinyl chloride, it is appropriate to review the other
harmful effects produced by this material:
Sclerotic skin changes: a marked hardening in the skin involving changes in the collagen fibres.
Osteoporosis: loss of calcium from the bones. It occurs in the bones of the fingers, hands and
wrists, but has also been reported in certain bones in the pelvic girdle.
Reynaud's Disease: a condition related to circulatory problems in the fingers. In this case, it is not
induced by vibration.
Thrombocytopenia: a reduction in the number of thrombocytes in the blood, which reduces the
ability of blood to form clots; extensive bleeding occurs in open wounds and excessive bruising is
caused by relatively light knocks to the body.
Fibrosis of the liver: mainly concerned with fibrotic changes in the portal vein.
Impaired liver function: identified by abnormal results from blood and urine tests.
Impaired lung function: associated with fibrotic changes in the delicate tissue sections of the lung.
It causes reduced efficiency in gaseous exchange.
Narcosis: caused by inhalation of high concentrations of vinyl chloride. Fat-soluble compounds
have the characteristic action of depressing the central nervous system and producing narcosis.
The level of the effect is related to the extent that the substance dissolves in brain tissue. Vinyl
chloride vapour was once considered as a human anaesthetic. Fortunately, there is no record of
its general use.
Carcinogenicity.
In view of the above comments, MbOCA is considered genotoxic and an animal carcinogen. The
mechanisms suggested for carcinogenicity seen in animal studies are related to metabolic processes in the human liver; related substances, which are known human carcinogens, are believed
to act by similar metabolic pathways.
Consequently, MbOCA is regarded as carcinogenic to humans. A no-effect level has not been
established, and skin absorption may account for a significant proportion of uptake. Due to these
uncertainties, a Workplace Exposure Limit (WEL) has been set, with skin designated as the potential absorption route.
This indicates the difficulty in interpreting toxicological data and extrapolating the findings to set
exposure standards for humans. The WEL set for MbOCA represents a compromise between
cautious interpretation of the available toxicological data and standards of exposure which industry can realistically achieve.
4.15 Cement
Cement is widely used in construction. Anyone who uses cement (or anything containing cement,
such as mortar, plaster and concrete) or is responsible for managing its use should be aware that
it presents a hazard to health.
Health effects.
Cement can cause ill-health mainly by:
Skin contact;
Inhalation of dust; and
Manual handling.
Skin contact.
Contact with wet cement can cause both dermatitis and burns.
Dermatitis.
Skin affected by dermatitis feels itchy and sore, and looks red, scaly and cracked. Cement is capable of causing dermatitis by two mechanisms - irritancy and allergy.
Irritant dermatitis is caused by the physical properties of cement that irritate the skin mechanically. The fine particles of cement, often mixed with sand or other aggregates to make mortar or
concrete, can abrade the skin and cause irritation resulting in dermatitis. With treatment, irritant
dermatitis will usually clear up. But if exposure continues over a longer period, the condition will
get worse and the individual is then more susceptible to allergic dermatitis.
Allergic dermatitis is caused by sensitisation to the hexavalent chromium (chromate) present in
cement. The way this works is quite distinct from that of irritancy. Sensitisers penetrate the barrier
layer of the skin and cause an allergic reaction. Hexavalent chromium is known to be the most
common cause of allergic dermatitis in men.
Research has shown that between 5% and 10% of construction workers may be sensitised to
cement and that plasterers, concreters and bricklayers are particularly at risk. Once someone has
become sensitised to hexavalent chromium, any future exposure may trigger dermatitis. Some
skilled tradesmen have been forced to change their trade because of this. The longer the duration
of skin contact with a sensitiser, the more it will penetrate the skin and the greater the risk of sensitisation will become. Therefore, if cement is left on the skin throughout the working day, rather
than being washed off at intervals, the risk of contact sensitisation to hexavalent chromium will be
increased. Both irritant and allergic dermatitis can affect a person at the same time.
Wet cement can cause burns. The principal cause is thought to be the alkalinity of the wet cement. If wet cement becomes trapped against the skin, for example by kneeling in it or if cement
falls into a boot or glove, a serious burn or ulcer can rapidly develop. These often take months to
heal, and in extreme cases will need skin grafts or can even lead to amputation. Serious chemical
burns to the eyes can also be caused following a splash of cement.
Inhalation of dust.
High levels of dust can be produced when cement is handled, for example when emptying or disposing of bags. In the short term, exposure to high levels of cement dust irritates the nose and
throat. Scabbling or concrete cutting can also produce high levels of dust which may contain silica.
Manual handling.
Working with cement also poses risks such as sprains and strains, particularly to the back, arms
and shoulders from lifting and carrying cement bags, mixing mortar etc. More serious damage to
the back can be caused in the long term if workers are continually lifting heavy weights.
Skin contact.
You should first consider using elimination or substitution to prevent the possibility of contact with
cement. Otherwise, you should apply control measures which minimise contact with the skin either directly or indirectly from contaminated surfaces in the working environment. An important
way of controlling cement dermatitis is by washing the skin with warm water and soap, or other
skin cleanser, and drying the skin afterwards. Sinks should be large enough to wash the forearms
and have both hot and cold (or warm) running water. Soap and towels should be provided. Facilities for drying clothes and changing clothes should also be available.
Gloves may help to protect skin from cement, but they may not be suitable for all aspects of construction site work. Caution is advised when using gloves as cement trapped against the skin inside the glove can cause a cement burn. You should provide protective clothing, including overalls with long sleeves and long trousers.
Employers are required to arrange for employees to receive suitable health surveillance where
there is exposure to a substance known to be associated with skin disease and where there is a
reasonable likelihood that the disease may occur. This means you should provide health surveillance for workers who will be working with wet cement on a regular basis.
Health surveillance is needed to:
Protect individuals;
Identify as early as possible any indicators of skin changes related to exposure, so that steps can
be taken to treat their condition and to advise them about the future; and give early warning of
lapses in control.
Health surveillance must never be regarded as reducing the need to control exposure or to wash
cement off the skin.
Simple health surveillance will usually be sufficient. Skin inspections should be done at regular
intervals by a competent person, and the results recorded. Employers will probably need the help
of an occupational health nurse or doctor to devise a suitable health surveillance regime and they
will need to train a 'responsible person', for instance a supervisor, to carry out the skin inspections.
A responsible person is someone appointed by the employer who, following instruction from an
occupational health physician or nurse, is competent to recognise the signs and symptoms of
cement-related dermatitis. The responsible person should report any findings to the employer,
and will need to refer cases to a suitably-qualified person (e.g. an occupational health nurse).
The employer must keep health records containing the particulars set out in the Appendix to the
General COSHH Approved Code of Practice. Employers are also required to provide employees
with information, instruction and training on the nature of the risk to health, and the precautions to
be taken.
This should include characteristic signs and symptoms of dermatitis.
Employees should be encouraged to examine their own skin for any such signs and report them.
Reports should be made to the 'responsible person' or to the occupational health nurse.
4.16 Ammonia
Ammonia is a colourless gas with a pungent odour, readily soluble in water, with which it forms
ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH).
It is used as a refrigerant, in petrol refining, metallurgy, water purification, fertilisers, and in the
manufacture of many drugs and chemicals.
Ammonia Burns.
Burns, which may be severe and even fatal, may follow splashing of ammonia onto the skin.
If ammonia gets into the eyes, there is an immediate effect on the conjunctiva, causing severe
pain. Ulceration of the conjunctiva and cornea, scarring of the tissues and lenticular opacity may
interfere with vision, even causing blindness. Apparatus to irrigate the eyes with water must
therefore be installed wherever the hazard of splashing with ammonia exists, although goggles/face masks should always be worn. Irrigation must be promptly applied and continued for at
least an hour.
Effects and Symptoms.
One of the largest and best documented cases of ammonia poisoning occurred on 11th September, 1940 when 75 people were overcome in the cellars of the Wenlock Brewery, London, used
as an air-raid shelter. Debris from an explosion fell on the refrigeration plant, causing it to leak
ammonia gas.
Those farthest from the leak were the least affected, with smarting of the eyes and mouth, accompanied by pain on swallowing. All were hoarse and could hardly raise their voices above a
whisper, and there was a strong smell of ammonia on the breath. The lips, mouth and tongue
were reddened and raw; the conjunctiva and eye-lids were red and swollen.
The group with moderate exposure additionally complained of a feeling of tightness in the chest,
difficulty in swallowing, coughing and sometimes blood-stained sputum. Moist sounds were present in the lungs, and several developed ulcers in the buccal mucosa and cornea. Some developed oedema of the lungs (liquidity) within six hours and the overall fatality rate of this group was
22%.
Survivors rapidly recovered a semblance of normal health, although hoarseness only cleared up
over a number of weeks.
Preventive Measures:
All equipment containing ammonia should be tested and inspected regularly, and any necessary
repairs effected immediately.
Detectors should be fitted to operate at well below the occupational exposure limit (25 ppm LTEL,
8-hour TWA; 35 ppm STEL, 15 minutes), with control valves placed outside the building.
Gas-masks/canister respirators must be provided and stored in a readily accessible locality.
Employees must be instructed as to the dangers, and trained in how to avoid them.
Every workman engaged in repair or maintenance work must carry a gas-mask in case of an escape of gas.
No work should be attempted on ammonia plant without initiating a permit-to-work.
Some other gases having a high hazard potential are:
Sulphur dioxide (SO2)
Sulphur trioxide (SO3)
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2 and N2O4)
Nitrous oxide (N2O)
Nitric oxide (NO)
Chlorine (Cl2)
Phosgene (COCl2)
4.17 Chromium
Chrome.
Air contaminated with chromic acid mist, or with dust from chromates or dichromates, is the principal source of harmful exposure in industry.
Chromium plating is carried out using an electrolyte containing about 50% chromic acid and, during electrolysis, reddish-brown fumes of chromic acid are forced off in the form of mist by the evolution of bubbles of hydrogen at the cathode.
Anodising, a coating highly resistant to corrosion is formed on aluminium and its alloys through
the anodic oxidation of aluminium. Again, chromic acid is used as the solution in which anodising
is carried out, and the hydrogen liberated at the cathode carries significant quantities of chromic
acid mist into the atmosphere. It is this chromic acid, and any dissolved salts of chromium it contains, that are responsible for the dermatitis, ulceration and even lung cancer.
Dermatitis and Chrome Ulcers.
Lesions of the skin due to chromium salts have been known since 1827 when it was found as
chrome holes on the fingers of bichromate workers in Glasgow.
It has since been established that both chromates and bichromates of sodium and potassium,
together with chromic acid, may cause either dermatitis or localised ulceration.
Exposure to these substances occurs in chromium plating, French polishing, calico printing, pho-
The following health problems are among the effects associated with exposure to wood dust:
Skin disorders;
Obstruction in the nose, and rhinitis;
Asthma;
A rare type of nasal cancer.
Regulation 6(1) of the COSHH Regulations2,4 requires an assessment to be made (and normally
recorded) of risks to health associated with wood dust, together with any action needed to prevent or control those risks.
Regulation 7(1) goes on to say that exposure to wood dust should be prevented, or where this is
not reasonably practicable, adequately controlled.
Hardwood dust and softwood dust have been assigned maximum exposure limits (MELs) of 5
mg/m3 (8-hour time-weighted average) under the COSHH Regulations. Therefore exposure by
inhalation to wood dust should be reduced so far as is reasonably practicable and in any case
below the MEL. In COSHH, hardwood dust is defined as a carcinogen.
Regulations 7(3) and 7(5) specify additional requirements for the control of carcinogens.
Precautions.
If exposure to wood dust cannot be prevented altogether, then assess the risk to health from exposure to airborne dust by:
Finding out if exposure to dust is being adequately controlled in your workplace.
A dust lamp can be used to show up the dust and where it is coming from; where necessary carrying out dust sampling7 (your trade association should be able to give advice on organisations
which can do this) and determining whether workers will be exposed to airborne dust levels in
excess of the MEL.
Exposure to airborne dust may be adequately controlled by:
Using a process or method of work that reduces the generation of dust to a minimum;
Providing dust control equipment to all dust producing processes to stop the dust entering the
workroom atmosphere, eg local exhaust ventilation at woodworking machines; and
Making sure that plant and equipment is properly maintained.
Keep ventilation ducts free from blockages and repair broken or damaged ducts. Maintain filter
units and other plant equipment regularly in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and COSHH.
Where measures taken to reduce exposure to airborne dust are inadequate, then in addition suitable10 respiratory protective equipment must be provided and used. It should be selected from
equipment that carries the European Community mark of conformity (the CE mark) and be appropriate to adequately control the exposure to the substance creating the risk.
Provide other personal protective equipment, such as eye protection, overalls and gloves, where
necessary. Make sure it is suitable12 and kept in good order. Launder overalls and aprons regularly.
Provide good washing facilities with hot and cold water, soap and towels and encourage a high
standard of personal hygiene.
Provide vacuum cleaning equipment to remove dust from clothing, where this is a problem. Prevent the use of compressed airlines for this purpose.
Make sure workers are adequately informed, instructed, trained and supervised. This is essential
if they are to understand the precautions and their duties and responsibilities
4.19 Nickel
Nickel carbonyl, also known as tetracarbonylnickel, is the organonickel compound with the
chemical formula Ni(CO)4. This pale-yellow metal carbonyl is very volatile at room temperature
and highly toxic. Nickel Carbonyl can be used to nickel-coat steel and other metals and to make
very pure nickel. It is an intermediate in the Mond process for the purification of nickel and is a
reagent in organometallic chemistry.
Toxicology and safety considerations.
Ni(CO)4 is highly hazardous, much more so than implied by its CO content, reflecting the effects
of the nickel if it were released in the body. Nickel carbonyl may be fatal if absorbed through the
skin or more likely, inhaled due to its high volatility. Its LC50 for a 30-minute exposure has been
estimated at 3 ppm, and the concentration that is immediately fatal to humans would be 30 ppm.
Some subjects exposed to puffs up to 5 ppm described the odour as musty or sooty, but since the
compound is so exceedingly toxic its smell provides no reliable warning against a potentially fatal
exposure.
Historically, laboratories that used Ni(CO)4 would keep a canary in the lab as an indicator of
nickel carbonyl toxicity, due to the higher sensitivity of birds to this poison.
Human systemic effects by inhalation:
Somnolence,
Fever, and
Other pulmonary changes.
Vapours may cause:
Coughing,
Dyspnea (difficult breathing),
Irritation,
Congestion and oedema of the lungs,
Tachycardia (rapid pulse),
Cyanosis,
Headache,
Dizziness, and
Weakness.
Toxicity by inhalation is believed to be caused by both the nickel and carbon monoxide liberated
in the lungs. Chronic exposure may cause cancer of lungs or nasal sinuses.
Sensitisation dermatitis is fairly common. It is considered the most hazardous compound of nickel
in the workplace. It is lipid-soluble and can cross biological membranes (e.g., lung alveolus,
blood-brain barrier, placental barrier).
The vapours of Ni(CO)4 can autoignite.
Nickel carbonyl poisoning is characterised by a two-stage illness. The first consists of headaches
and chest pain lasting a few hours, usually followed by a short remission. The second phase is a
chemical pneumonitis which starts after typically 16 hours with symptoms of cough, breathlessness and extreme fatigue. These reach greatest severity after four days, possibly resulting in
death from cardiorespiratory or renal failure. Convalescence is often extremely protracted, often
complicated by exhaustion, depression and dyspnea on exertion. Permanent respiratory damage
is unusual. The carcinogenicity of Ni(CO)4 is a matter of debate.
Nickel carbonyl vapor decomposes quickly in air, lasting only about a minute.
can be affected in much less time. Amorphous silica, such as fumed silica is not associated with
development of silicosis, but may cause irreversible lung damage in some cases. Laws restricting
silica exposure with respect to the silicosis hazard specify that they are concerned only with silica
that is both crystalline and dust-forming.
Silicosis, also known as Potter's rot, is a form of occupational lung disease caused by inhalation
of crystalline silica dust, and is marked by inflammation and scarring in forms of nodular lesions in
the upper lobes of the lungs. It is a type of pneumoconiosis.
Silicosis (particularly the acute form) is characterized by shortness of breath, cough, fever, and
cyanosis (bluish skin). It may often be misdiagnosed as pulmonary edema (fluid in the lungs),
pneumonia, or tuberculosis.
The name silicosis (from the Latin silex, or flint) was originally used by Visconti in 1870. The recognition of respiratory problems from breathing in dust dates to ancient Greeks and Romans. Agricola, in the mid-16th century, wrote about lung problems from dust inhalation in miners. In 1713,
Bernardino Ramazzini noted asthmatic symptoms and sand-like substances in the lungs of stone
cutters. With industrialization, as opposed to hand tools, came increased production of dust. The
pneumatic hammer drill was introduced in 1897 and sandblasting was introduced in 1904, both
significantly contributing to the increased prevalence of silicosis.
Classification of silicosis is made according to the disease's severity (including radiographic pattern), onset, and rapidity of progression. These include:
Chronic simple silicosis
Usually resulting from long-term exposure (10 years or more) to relatively low concentrations of
silica dust and usually appearing 1030 years after first exposure. This is the most common type
of silicosis. Patients with this type of silicosis, especially early on, may not have obvious signs or
symptoms of disease, but abnormalities may be detected by x-ray. Chronic cough and exertional
dyspnea are common findings. Radiographically, chronic simple silicosis reveals a profusion of
small (<10 mm in diameter) opacities, typically rounded, and predominating in the upper lung
zones.
Accelerated silicosis
Silicosis that develops 510 years after first exposure to higher concentrations of silica dust.
Symptoms and x-ray findings are similar to chronic simple silicosis, but occur earlier and tend to
progress more rapidly. Patients with accelerated silicosis are at greater risk for complicated disease, including progressive massive fibrosis (PMF).
Complicated silicosis
Silicosis can become "complicated" by the development of severe scarring (progressive massive
fibrosis,or also known as conglomerate silicosis), where the small nodules gradually become confluent, reaching a size of 1 cm or greater. PMF is associated with more severe symptoms and
respiratory impairment than simple disease. Silicosis can also be complicated by other lung disease, such as tuberculosis, non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, and fungal infection, certain
autoimmune diseases, and lung cancer. Complicated silicosis is more common with accelerated
silicosis than with the chronic variety.
Acute silicosis
Silicosis that develops a few weeks to 5 years after exposure to high concentrations of respirable
silica dust. This is also known as silicoproteinosis. Symptoms of acute silicosis include more rapid
onset of severe disabling shortness of breath, cough, weakness, and weight loss, often leading to
death. The x-ray usually reveals a diffuse alveolar filling with air bronchograms, described as a
ground-glass appearance, and similar to pneumonia, pulmonary edema, alveolar hemorrhage,
and alveolar cell lung cancer.
Signs and symptoms.
Because chronic silicosis is slow to develop, signs and symptoms may not appear until years after exposure. Signs and symptoms include:
Dyspnea (shortness of breath) exacerbated by exertion
Cough, often persistent and sometimes severe
Fatigue
Tachypnea (rapid breathing) which is often labored
Loss of appetite and weight loss
Chest pain
Fever
Gradual dark shallow rifts in nails eventually leading to cracks as protein fibres within nail beds
are destroyed.
In advanced cases, the following may also occur:
Cyanosis (blue skin).
Cor pulmonale (right ventricle heart disease).
Respiratory insufficiency.
Patients with silicosis are particularly susceptible to tuberculosis (TB) infection-known as silicotuberculosis. The reason for the increased risk-3 fold increased incidence-is not well understood. It
is thought that silica damages pulmonary macrophages, inhibiting their ability to kill mycobacteria.
Even workers with prolonged silica exposure, but without silicosis, are at an increased risk (3-10
fold) for TB.
Pulmonary complications of silicosis also include Chronic Bronchitis and airflow limitation (indistinguishable from that caused by smoking), non-tuberculous Mycobacterium infection, fungal lung
infection, compensatory emphysema, and pneumothorax. There are some data revealing an association between silicosis and certain autoimmune diseases, including nephritis, Scleroderma,
and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, especially in acute or accelerated silicosis.
In 1996, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reviewed the medical data and
classified crystalline silica as "carcinogenic to humans." The risk was best seen in cases with underlying silicosis, with relative risks for lung cancer of 2-4. Numerous subsequent studies have
been published confirming this risk. In 2006, it was concluded that "The silicosis-cancer association is now established, in agreement with other studies and meta-analysis."
Pathophysiology.
When small silica dust particles are inhaled, they can embed themselves deeply into the tiny alveolar sacs and ducts in the lungs, where oxygen and carbon dioxide gases are exchanged.
There, the lungs cannot clear out the dust by mucous or coughing.
Furthermore, the surface of silicon dust can generate silicon-based radicals that lead to the production of hydroxyl and oxygen radicals, as well as hydrogen peroxide, which can inflict damage
to the surrounding cells.
Diagnosis.
There are three key elements to the diagnosis of silicosis. First, the patient history should reveal
exposure to sufficient silica dust to cause this illness. Second, chest imaging (usually chest x-ray)
that reveals findings consistent with silicosis. Third, there are no underlying illnesses that are
more likely to be causing the abnormalities. Physical examination is usually unremarkable unless
there is complicated disease. Also, the examination findings are no specific for silicosis. Pulmonary function testing may reveal airflow limitation, restrictive defects, reduced diffusion capacity,
mixed defects, or may be normal (especially without complicated disease). Most cases of silicosis
do not require tissue biopsy for diagnosis, but this may be necessary in some cases, primarily to
exclude other conditions.
For uncomplicated silicosis, chest x-ray will confirm the presence of small (< 10 mm) nodules in
the lungs, especially in the upper lung zones. Using the ILO classification system, these are of
profusion 1/0 or greater and shape/size "p", "q", or "r". Lung zone involvement and profusion increases with disease progression. In advanced cases of silicosis, large opacity (> 1 cm) occurs
from coalescence of small opacities, particularly in the upper lung zones. With retraction of the
lung tissue, there is compensatory emphysema. Enlargement of the hilum is common with
chronic and accelerated silicosis. In about 5-10% of cases, the nodes will calcify circumferentially,
producing so-called "eggshell" calcification. This finding is not pathognomonic (diagnostic) of silicosis. In some cases, the pulmonary nodules may also become calcified.
A computed tomography or CT scan can also provide a mode detailed analysis of the lungs, and
can reveal cavitation due to concomitant mycobacterial infection.
Prevention.
The best way to prevent silicosis is to identify work-place activities that produce respirable crystalline silica dust and then to eliminate or control the dust ("primary prevention"). Water spray is often used where dust emanates. Dust can also be controlled through dry air filtering.
Following observations on industry workers in Lucknow (India), experiments on rats found that
jaggery (a traditional sugar) had a preventive action against silicosis.
Treatment.
Silicosis is an irreversible condition with no cure. Treatment options currently focus on alleviating
the symptoms and preventing complications.
These include:
Stopping further exposure to silica and other lung irritants, including tobacco smoking.
Cough suppressants.
Antibiotics for bacterial lung infection.
TB prophylaxis for those with positive tuberculin skin test or IGRA blood test.
Prolonged anti-tuberculosis (multi-drug regimen) for those with active TB.
Chest physiotherapy to help the bronchial drainage of mucus.
Oxygen administration to treat hypoxemia, if present.
Bronchodilators to facilitate breathing.
Lung transplantation to replace the damaged lung tissue is the most effective treatment, but is
associated with severe risks of its own.
For acute silicosis, Whole-lung lavage (see Bronchoalveolar lavage) may alleviate symptoms, but
does not decrease overall mortality.
Epidemiology.
Occupational silicosis.
Silicosis is the most common occupational lung disease worldwide, it occurs everywhere but is
especially common in developing countries. From 1991 to 1995, China reported more than
24,000 deaths due to silicosis each year. In the United States, it is estimated that one million-two
million workers have had occupational exposure to crystalline silica dust and 59,000 of these
workers will develop silicosis sometime in the course of their lives.
Although silicosis has been known for centuries, the industrialization of mining has led to an increase in silicosis cases. Pneumatic drilling in mines and less commonly, mining using explosives, would raise rock dust. In the United States, a 1930 epidemic of silicosis due to the construction of the Hawk's Nest Tunnel near Gauley Bridge, West Virginia caused the death of at
least 400 workers. Other accounts place the mortality figure at well over 1000 workers, primarily
African American transient workers from the southern United States. Workers who became ill
were fired and left the region, making an exact mortality account difficult. The Hawks Nest Tunnel
Disaster is known as "America's worst industrial disaster. The prevalence of silicosis led some
men to grow what is called a miner's mustache, in an attempt to intercept as much dust as possible.
Chronic simple silicosis has been reported to occur from environmental exposures to silica in regions with high silica soil content and frequent dust storms.
Because of work-exposure to silica dust, silicosis is an occupational hazard to mining, sandblasting, quarry, ceramics and foundry workers, as well as grinders, stone cutters, refractory brick
workers, tombstone workers, pottery workers, and others. Brief or casual exposure to low levels
of crystalline silica dust are said to not produce clinically significant lung disease.
acid under Table II of the convention as a chemical frequently used in the illicit manufacture of
narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances.
4.23 Solvents
Solvents are chemical substances. In construction products, they act as carriers for surface coatings such as paints, varnishes, adhesives and pesticides.
The most common solvents found in construction are:
White spirit - in paints, varnishes and cleaning products.
Xylene - in paints, adhesives and pesticides.
Butanol - in natural and synthetic resins, paints and lacquers.
Many construction products contain mixtures of solvents. Exposure to solvents can have serious
effects on workers' health. If you use solvents or manage or supervise someone who does, or if
you are involved in the specification of solvent-based products for use in construction, you need
to be aware that exposure can be a health hazard and safe working practices must be used to
minimise the risk of exposure.
Solvents can make you ill by:
Breathing in vapours - paints, paint strippers and glues give off solvent vapours as they dry or
cure and these vapours may be harmful. Deliberate inhalation of solvent vapours (glue sniffing)
can kill.
Skin contact - some solvents can be absorbed through the skin. Repeated or prolonged skin contact with liquid solvents may cause dermatitis.
Eye contact - contact with liquid solvent and solvent vapour can cause irritation and inflammation.
Ingestion - solvents can be taken into the body on contaminated food, drink and cigarettes.
People have accidentally drunk solvents that have been kept in old, unlabelled drinks containers.
The main effects of solvents are irritation of the skin, eyes and lungs, headache, nausea, dizziness and light headedness.
Exposure can impair co-ordination and this can make people more prone to accidents such as
falling off ladders. People may lose concentration on important or difficult tasks and they may react more slowly to dangerous situations. The effect can vary from person to person and will generally be made worse by drinking alcohol.
Very high exposures can cause unconsciousness and even death, for instance where adhesives
are used in unventilated confined spaces, or where there are serious spillages. Other possible
effects on health vary according to which solvent people are exposed to. Anyone who has been
exposed to solvents and feels that their health has been affected should seek medical advice
Work with solvent-based construction products is subject to the Control of Substances Hazardous
to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH), which require the health risk to be assessed and then prevented or controlled. Users will find information on the hazards on the containers but they should
also get information (often as 'Hazard Data Sheets') from manufacturers and suppliers. Users
then need to consider how those hazards can be prevented or controlled.
Designers or people who specify products for use in construction have a duty under regulation 13
of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations (CDM) to avoid risks to the health and
safety of those carrying out construction work. Where it is not possible to avoid the risk, they
should specify the least hazardous products which perform to an acceptable standard. If solventbased products cannot be avoided, the designer or specifier should provide information about
safe use.
Precautions.
Preventing exposure.
First of all, consider whether the solvent-based products need to be used at all. Can they be replaced by an alternative, less hazardous material? For example, use a water-based formulation if
possible; these are widely available.
Controlling exposure.
If solvent-based products are used, make sure the work area is well ventilated. Open doors, windows, roof lights etc to increase ventilation and make sure that they are kept open. Local exhaust
(mechanical) ventilation may be necessary in some cases.
If possible, avoid spraying solvent-based products, as this causes more vapour to get into the air
than using a brush.
Store solvents in properly labelled, suitable containers. Use dispensers where possible to keep
evaporation to a minimum and reduce spillage. Keep lids on containers unless contents are being
poured or dipped etc. Use sealed containers for solvent waste.
Dispose of solvent-soaked rags in closed containers.
Train workers in how to minimise exposure and in how to deal with spillages.
Spillages can lead to very high exposures and greatly increased fire risk. The risks from spillages
and the precautions needed to deal with them should be considered in a risk assessment before
the work starts.
Fire.
Many solvents are flammable. Take precautions to avoid fire and explosion risks; in particular, do
not smoke in areas where solvents are used. Store products containing solvents in a secure and
well-ventilated area.
Personal protective equipment (PPE).
If exposure cannot be adequately controlled in any other way, workers should wear PPE. They
may need to wear one or more of the following:
Protective overalls.
Appropriate gloves that have been specially selected for use with solvents.
Face shields.
Respiratory protective equipment, where ventilation does not provide adequate control.
Half-mask respirators fitted with the appropriate filter may be sufficient in many instances, but
compressed airline breathing apparatus may be necessary where solvents are sprayed, or when
working in a confined space.
Those who need to wear PPE should be trained in its proper use and in its limitations. Store the
equipment in clean, dry conditions away from chemicals - a locker would be suitable. PPE should
be maintained and kept clean and fit for wear.
Hygiene.
Good personal hygiene is very important. Facilities for washing and changing should be provided
and workers should wash their hands before eating, drinking, smoking and going to the toilet.
Eating, drinking and smoking should take place away from the work area. You should not smoke
in areas where solvents are used - solvents passing through a cigarette can break down into
even more harmful substances.
Articles which become heavily contaminated with solvent should be removed immediately. Overalls and contaminated personal clothing should be laundered before being re-worn. It may be
necessary to air them in a safe place first, to let the solvent evaporate off. Laundering should only
be done by professional cleaners who have been told of the nature of the contamination.
Thinners should not be used to remove paint or grease from the skin, as this can cause the skin
to become dry and inflamed. Proper cleaning materials, e.g. soap or other cleanser, should be
provided and used.
First aid.
Anyone who appears to have been affected by solvents should be taken into the fresh air immediately and given appropriate first-aid treatment. Heavily- contaminated clothing should be removed as soon as possible. Wash solvent splashes off the skin with plenty of water and cover
any wounds with a suitable dressing. Splashes of solvent in the eye should be treated by washing
the eye with water for at least 10 minutes before the injured person is transferred to hospital.
A variety of chemicals are used to clean building facades, statues, etc. These may be acid-based,
e.g. hydrochloric acid (HCI), hydrofluoric acid (HF), phosphoric acid (H3PO4), nitric acid (HNO3)
or alkali-based, for example caustic soda (sodium hydroxide -NaOH) or caustic potash (potassium hydroxide - KOH). Information is available that gives health and safety guidance for anyone
who uses these materials or is responsible for managing or supervising their use.
Health effects.
Chemical cleaners can cause serious ill health mainly by:
skin contact: acids and alkalis cause burns which are often slow to heal; and
Inhaling fumes or mist: concentrated solutions of acids and alkalis may give off toxic and corrosive fumes. Spray application produces a mist which may also be toxic and corrosive.
Concentrated solutions from which the dilute working solutions are made up pose the greatest
risk, but even dilute solutions can cause serious injury. This is particularly true of HF where skin
contact with diluted solution can cause very serious and extremely painful burns which may not
be felt until up to 24 hours after contact.
4.24 Lead
Lead.
Elemental lead is one of the heavy metals, having a relatively high density of 11.34 kg m-3 (most
other metal densities are below 9 kg m-3).
It is not a reactive metal, especially under average conditions. Being fairly soft and having a low
melting temperature of 600C, as well as being a relatively easy metal to extract from its principal
ore, lead sulphide, lead has provided mankind with a useful material of construction since early
times. Some lead figures are believed to have been made as early as 3800 BCE and lead beads
have been found at Catalhuyuk in Turkey, dating back to 6400 BCE. The use of lead in plumbing
systems was well established by the time of the Roman Empire; the Latin name for lead, plumbum nigrum, literally 'black soft metal' has given the English language the word 'plumber'.
Lead compounds have been, and are still being, used as raw materials in manufacturing processes, and as a material of construction.
They can be roughly categorised into inorganic lead, e.g. lead oxide in lead/acid batteries, lead
chromate (chrome yellow) red lead (Pb2O4) used for pigments (although its use is being reduced
and banned by some countries), and organic lead, e.g. petrol antiknock agent, lead tetraethyl
(Pb(C2H5)4), another product which will eventually be discontinued.
Mode of Entry.
Lead metal in its massive solid state has virtually no ability to be absorbed into the body by any of
the three normal modes of entry.
As a fume or very finely divided dust, lead inhalation becomes a serious risk as a potential mode
of entry. In this form, however, lead metal will almost certainly have been changed to lead oxide,
so the absorption reactions will not be truly representative of lead metal itself. Absorption by skin
contact or via the gastrointestinal tract has no occupational risk.
For inorganic lead compounds, inhalation of dusts generally poses the most serious situation.
Absorption by skin contact and ingestion is limited.
For organic lead compounds, inhalation and skin contact form the main occupational mode of entry for absorption into the body. Ingestion poses only a minor risk. The best example of an organic
lead compound is lead tetraethyl. It is highly volatile at normal temperature and passes easily
through the skin following skin contact.
When lead compounds are absorbed into the body, the inorganic compounds produce different
symptoms from the organo-lead compounds.
An important point to note about the entry of the element lead into the metabolism of the body by
occupationally-induced situations is that lead is also a ubiquitous substance in the natural world.
The element enters into our bodies in small but regular doses from the food we eat and the water
we drink.
As lead has no known beneficial effect in the metabolic process, it is not required and so any additional absorption of the element lead resulting from occupation is an added body burden.
Target Organs.
The target organs associated with lead intoxication are:
Central nervous system.
Gastrointestinal tract.
Blood and blood-forming organs.
Exterior (straightening) muscles of the wrist or foot.
The gums.
Lead becomes incorporated in bone structure where it accumulates, giving it a site where it can
become a cumulative toxin.
Effects and Symptoms.
Intoxication by inorganic lead compounds leads to general symptoms related to the gastrointestinal tract, the nervous system and the blood.
Acute intoxication, resulting in general from inhalation of high concentrations of lead fume or dust,
produces nausea, vomiting and headaches. This is often followed by constipation and severe intermittent colic. During the attack of colic, the victim becomes very pale, feels cold and may sweat
freely. If the brain becomes affected, then dullness, restlessness, tremor convulsion or coma may
develop.
When exposure has occurred over long periods and chronic intoxication takes place, other clinical
symptoms develop. The classical symptoms are headaches, anaemia, palsy (muscle weakness),
the appearance of a blue line on the gums and, very rarely, encephalopathy (changes in the
nerve output of the brain).
(i) The headache is related to adverse effects on brain activity.
(ii) Anaemia results from the interference by leaded metabolic substance in the synthesis of haemoglobin.
(iii) Palsy results from the paralysis of the motor neurones that control muscles. The particular
muscles concerned are those liable to fatigue due to occupational activity. "Wrist drop" was a
characteristic symptom where the conditions had been allowed to proceed untreated. "Foot drop"
has also been recorded. With better hygiene control, these conditions hopefully belong to occupational disease history.
The famous blue line on the gums associated with lead intoxication results from soluble lead
compounds being precipitated from the general circulation as lead sulphide in the gum region below the lower front teeth. The sulphide is a black compound but appears blue in the gum tissue.
The condition results from the reaction of lead ions with sulphide ions generated by microorganisms in gum tissue. The blue line is not a direct measure of lead intoxication, only an indication of the absorption of lead into the body's metabolism.
The depth of colour produced is, however, an indication of the duration and severity of the exposure to which the victim has been subjected.
The incorporation of lead into the body metabolism causes certain biochemical abnormalities to
occur. These effects are related to the impairment of haemoglobin synthesis. The particular effects are outside the requirements of this course, but you should note they are used in the diagnosis of lead intoxication.
One point of note is that the presence of lead can cause a breakdown of haemoglobin structure.
It can therefore be classified as a weak haemolitic toxin.
The concentration of lead compounds in the blood as a measure of lead intoxication must be
used with extreme caution. Lead is stored in the body from natural and possibly occupational input; the blood lead level generally indicates the state of the balance between the body and the
leaded bone store.
However, it has been shown that the balance can be upset and, under certain circumstances,
massive amounts of lead can be discharged into general circulation from the bone store. A raised
body temperature can cause this situation to occur.
Absorption of lead tetraethyl, or tetraethyl lead (TEL), as it is more accurately described, is a very
hazardous situation. The material is highly toxic in low atmospheric concentrations, and inhalation
of the vapour can have fatal consequences.
Its absorption into the body mainly affects the central nervous system. It produces restlessness, a
raised level of excitement and talkativeness, muscular twitching and possible delusions, acute
and violent mania. These conditions are accompanied by a fall in body temperature and a drop in
normal blood pressure.
Where the level of intoxication is lower, headaches, vertigo, fatigue, a sense of physical weakness, and insomnia with disturbing dreams are classic symptoms.
4.25 Asbestos
It is generally accepted that the type of asbestos classified as crocidolite (blue asbestos) is the
causative agent for mesothelioma. It belongs to a group of inorganic crystalline fibrous silicates
generally called asbestos.
Mesothelioma is the name given to malignant tumours that develop in the pleura and the peritoneum. It is a very rare disease in normal circumstances. Where there has been exposure to asbestos, however, the possibility of developing the disease is markedly increased.
Evidence from many studies indicates that not only are the workers directly involved with the material at risk, but also those who work in the vicinity of its use.
The problem also affects the localities around the area where the material is used, and a high incidence of the disease often occurs in areas 'down wind' from factories involved with asbestos
products. The families of asbestos workers are also at risk, as cases have been reported where
wives and children have succumbed to the disease.
The risk of mesothelioma from the other types of asbestos in general use, i.e. amosite (brown
asbestos) and chrysotile (white asbestos), is considerably reduced, but there is a risk.
Asbestos Types - Crocidolite( Blue) Chrysotile (White) Amosite (Brown)
The mode of entry into the body is generally by inhalation into the lungs. Mesothelioma of the
pleura occurs when the asbestos fibres have migrated through the lung structure into the pleura,
where they can remain undisturbed until they trigger off this sinister disease.
Mesothelioma of the peritoneum can result from fibres migrating through the gastrointestinal tract
to reside in the relative physiological calm of the peritoneum. The fibre may enter the gastrointestinal tract by simple ingestion, but the mechanism most likely is the swallowing of fibres removed
from the respiratory system by the cilia escalator after inhalation.
Tumour development in the peritoneum sometimes occurs from tumours which began in the
pleura.
Factors Involved in Tumour Formation.
The carcinogenic potential of asbestos substances is generally accepted as being related to the
physical size of the fibre and not its chemical composition.
The importance of size has been demonstrated experimentally on rats, where crocidolite fibres
which had been reduced to a non-fibrous dust did not evoke a carcinogenic response in the
pleura, compared with fibrous crocidolite which did evoke a response.
The evidence as to the precise size of fibre required to evoke the carcinogenic response is still
subject to considerable debate, although a general area of potential harm is agreed. Fibres having diameters greater than 0.2 m but less than 0.5 m have been given in research literature.
Fibre lengths in excess of 10 m or between the range 10 to 80 m have been put forward.
The aspect ratio, i.e. the ratio of fibre length to diameter, has been quoted as 10:1 and 5:1.
The general standard for defining risk fibres are those which have a length greater than 5 m and
a diameter less than 3 m, with an aspect ratio of 3:1. There is still some doubt about the validity
of these dimensional characteristics in determining risk.
An important question arising from the relationship between the physical dimension of crocidolite
fibres and their ability to evoke a carcinogenic response is: 'Can other fibrous materials evoke the
same response?'
The answer is unfortunately 'yes'. Aluminium silicate fibres and glass-fibres of equivalent dimension have induced pleural tumours in experimental animals.
The ability of crocidolite to migrate into the pleura and peritoneum and evoke a harmful response
is generally believed to be related to its ability to produce fine, straight fibres. They are able to
break up into the size range which can migrate fairly freely in body tissue and take with them their
potential for harm. When they cease their wandering and 'retire' to a quiet haven, they are then
able to concentrate their irritation in that particular area.
Amosite tends to produce less fine fibres than crocidolite; its potential for harm is therefore reduced.
Chrysotile forms curly fibres which tend to gather into bunches. These properties reduce its ability
to migrate through tissue, which considerably reduces its potential to evoke mesothelioma; but, if
finely milled, the curly fibres can be reduced to dimensions comparable with crocidolite fibres, so
the potential of white asbestos to evoke mesothelioma becomes dramatically increased. It is a
point which is not well publicised.
The exact mechanism by which the cell damage is caused is unknown. One tentative hypothesis
postulates that the potentially harmful size range of the fibres equates to that of viruses, but the
exact relationship has not been explained.
Symptoms:
Pleural Mesothelioma.
In the early stages of tumour growth, there is an increase in fluid around the lungs, which causes
breathlessness and a feeling of heaviness within the chest. It is often mistaken for a heart condition or the ageing process.
As tumour growth rate increases, the lungs and structures in the thoracic cavity become more
compressed until the effects are fatal. Pain usually only develops in the final stages of the disease, due to the effects upon the nerves in the walls of the thoracic cavity and in the spine. The
pain level is very difficult to control.
Peritoneal Mesothelioma.
The tumour development follows a similar course to that in the pleura. Initially, a general swelling
of the abdomen occurs which is often mistaken as 'middle-age' spread. As the tumour size increases, normal movement of the intestine is impeded and constipation follows. Pain is sometimes experienced when defecation takes place. Eventually, cramp pains cause the victim to seek
medical help.
In both cases, the medical diagnosis of the condition is of no value. The victim has, by this time,
long passed the point of no return. One glimmer of hope is that in a few cases, tumours have
spontaneously disappeared.
About six months after recognising there is something wrong with their bodies, the victims will
usually seek medical advice. Few live longer than about a year after consultation; many less.
It is not possible to define conditions or safety limits whereby this form of cancer can be prevented. There is little or no hope of recovery if the condition develops.
The condition occurs fairly readily where there is exposure to blue asbestos. It is likely to arise
from brown asbestos and may possibly arise from white asbestos.
The latency period of mesothelioma is not well-defined. Values ranging from 5 to 60 years are
quoted; the average is about 25 years. Exposure times have been as low as two months.
Except for laggers and insulators whose exposure ranges over the working lifetime, i.e. 25-50
years, the average exposure for victims in one epidemiological survey was about 10 years.
These facts are put forward as the basis of the argument that not only should blue asbestos be
banned from use, but the other forms as well. There are counter arguments of economics related
to employment in the asbestos industry, and the value of asbestos as an industrial and social material of construction.
4.26 CHIP
It is now time to look at these regulations in more detail, as well as the use of risk and safety
phrases and the application of safety data sheets in preventing ill-health arising from the use of
chemicals.
CHIP refers to the Chemicals (Hazard Information and Packaging for Supply) Regulations 2009,
which came into force on 6th April 2009. These regulations are also known as CHIP 4.
CHIP is the law that applies to suppliers of dangerous chemicals. It is intended to protect people
and the environment from the effects of those chemicals by requiring suppliers to provide information about the dangers, and to ensure that they are safely packaged.
CHIP requires the supplier of a dangerous chemical to:
identify the hazards (dangers) of the chemical, a process known as 'classification';
give information about the hazards to their customers; suppliers usually provide this information
on the package itself (e.g. a label); and
package the chemical safely.
NOTE: Safety data sheets (SDS) are no longer covered by the CHIP regulations. The laws that
require a SDS to be provided have been transferred to the European REACH regulation.
'Supply' means making a chemical available to another person. Manufacturers, importers, distributors, wholesalers and retailers are all examples of suppliers.
CHIP applies to most chemicals, but not all. The details of those to which it applies are set out in
the regulations. Some chemicals, such as cosmetics and medicines, are outside the scope and
have their own laws.
The CHIP Regulations have been amended because of the adoption of the European Regulation
on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures, known as the CLP
Regulation. The CLP Regulation is the European Union's adoption of the internationally-agreed
Global Harmonised System on the classification and labelling of chemicals, known as the 'GHS'.
CLP will be covered later in this unit.
The CLP Regulation was published on 31st December 2008 and entered into legal effect on 20th
January 2009
Abbreviation
Hazard
Description of hazard
Explosive
Chemicals that
Explode
Oxidising
F+
Extremely Flammable
Highly Flammable
Abbreviation
Hazard
Description of hazard
T+
very toxic
toxic
Carc Cat 1
category 1
carcinogens
Carc Cat 2
category 2
carcinogens
Carc Cat 3
category 3
carcinogens
Muta Cat 1
category 1 mutagens
Muta Cat 2
category 2 mutagens
Muta Cat 3
category 3 mutagens
Repr Cat 1
category 1
reproductive toxins
Chemicals that
produce or increase
the incidence of nonheritable effects in
progeny and/or an
impairment in
reproductive functions
or capacity.
Repr Cat 2
category 2
reproductive toxins
Chemicals that
produce or increase
the incidence of nonheritable effects in
progeny and/or an
impairment in
reproductive functions
or capacity.
Repr Cat 3
category 3
reproductive toxins
Chemicals that
produce or increase
the incidence of nonheritable effects in
progeny and/or an
impairment in
reproductive functions
or capacity.
Xn
harmful
corrosive
Xi
irritant
Abbreviation
Hazard
Description of hazard
4.30 REACH
REACH is a new European Union regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals. It came into force on 1st June 2007 and replaces a number of
European Directives and Regulations with a single system.
Aims.
REACH has several aims:
To provide a high level of protection of human health and the environment from the use of
chemicals.
To make the people who place chemicals on the market (manufacturers and importers) responsible for understanding and managing the risks associated with their use.
To allow the free movement of substances on the EU market.
To enhance innovation in and the competitiveness of the EU chemicals industry.
To promote the use of alternative methods for the assessment of the hazardous properties of
substances e.g. quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR).
No data, no market.
A major part of REACH is the requirement for manufacturers or importers of substances to register them with a central European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). A registration package will be supported by a standard set of data on that substance. The amount of data required is proportionate
to the amount of substance manufactured or supplied.
If a manufacturer does not register their substances, then the data on them will not be available
and as a result, they will no longer be able to manufacture or supply them legally, i.e. no data, no
market.
Scope and exemptions.
REACH applies to substances manufactured or imported into the EU in quantities of 1 tonne per
year or more. Generally, it applies to all individual chemical substances on their own, in preparations or in articles (if the substance is intended to be released during normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of use from an article).
Some substances are specifically excluded:
Radioactive substances.
Substances under customs supervision.
The transport of substances.
Non-isolated intermediates.
Waste.
Some naturally occurring low-hazard substances.
Some substances, covered by more specific legislation, have tailored provisions, including:
Human and veterinary medicines.
Food and foodstuff additives.
Plant protection products and biocides.
Other substances have tailored provisions within the REACH legislation, as long they are used in
specified conditions:
Isolated intermediates.
Substances used for research and development.
Pre-registration.
It is estimated that there are around 30,000 substances on the European market in quantities of 1
tonne or more per year. Registering all of these at once would be a huge task for both industry
and regulators. To overcome this, the registration of those substances already being manufactured or supplied is to take place in three phases. These phases are spread over 11 years. To
benefit from these phased-in deadlines, manufacturers or importers needed to pre-register their
substances from 1st June to 1st December 2008.
Registration.
Registration is a requirement on industry (manufacturers/importers) to collect and collate specified sets of information on the properties of those substances they manufacture or supply at or
above 1 tonne per year. This information is used to perform an assessment of the hazards and
risks that a substance may pose and how those risks can be controlled. This information and its
assessment is submitted to the European Chemicals Agency in Helsinki. Further information on
registration can be found on the ECHA website[13].
Joint registration and data sharing.
This is the principle that for any one substance, a single set of information on its intrinsic properties is produced that is shared by all those companies that manufacture or supply that substance.
Business specific (e.g. company name) and business sensitive (e.g. how it is used) information is
submitted separately by each company. The Companies will work together to get an agreement
on information sharing through a Substance Information Exchange Forum (SIEF). It is the responsibility of the businesses involved in the SIEF to work out the details of how the information
is shared. A role for national authorities in this aspect of REACH is not foreseen. Companies who
submit joint registrations via a SIEF benefit from a reduced registration fee.
Evaluation.
Dossiers submitted in support of registration will be subject to evaluation under REACH as follows:
Compliance checking: This is a check of the quality of the information submitted by industry. It
will be undertaken by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki and will be on a sample (at least 5%) of dossiers submitted at each tonnage level.
Dossier Evaluation: For substances registered at the highest tonnage levels (=100 tonnes/annum) a proposal is made by the registrant detailing those animal tests they consider are
required from the list of standard tests in Annexes IX and X of REACH. The ECHA will evaluate
these testing proposals to prevent unnecessary animal testing.
Substance evaluation: This is undertaken by national Competent Authorities on substances that
have been prioritised for potential regulatory action because of concerns about their hazardous
properties. A key regulatory outcome of evaluation could be the imposition of restrictions on the
manufacture, supply or use of a substance. Substance evaluation may also lead to a substance
being added to the priority list for authorisation, or a proposal to change the classification and labelling.
All dossiers will undergo an automated completeness check to ensure that all the relevant pieces
of information are present. This completeness check will not assess the quality or suitability of the
information. Further details on evaluation can also be found on the ECHA website.
Authorisation.
In order to place on the market or use substances with properties that are deemed to be of 'very
high concern', industry must apply for an authorisation. The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
in Helsinki will publish an initial list containing substances to be considered for the authorisation
process by 1 June 2009. A company wishing to market or use such a substance must submit an
application to the ECHA for an authorisation. Decisions on authorisation are made by the European Commission, taking advice from the ECHA and member states. Applicants will have to
demonstrate that risks associated with uses of these substances are adequately controlled or that
the benefits of their use outweigh the risks. Applicants must also analyse whether there are safer
suitable alternatives or technologies. If there are, then they must prepare substitution plans and if
not, then they should provide information on research and development activities if appropriate.
Restrictions.
If any substance poses a particular threat and it is deemed to require Community-wide action, it
can be restricted. Restrictions take many forms, from a total ban to not being allowed to supply it
to the general public. Restrictions can be applied to any substance, including those that do not
require registration. This part of REACH takes over the provisions of the Marketing & Use Directive.
Classification and labelling.
An important part of chemical safety is clear information about any hazardous properties of a
substance. The classification of different chemicals according to their characteristics (for example, those that are corrosive, or toxic to fish, etc.) currently follows an established system, which
is reflected in REACH. The CLP regulation deals with this and dovetails with REACH.
Substances of Very High Concern.
Some substances have hazards that have serious consequences, e.g. they cause cancer, or they
have other harmful properties and remain in the environment for a long time and gradually build
up in animals. These are 'substances of very high concern'. This category also includes substances shown to be of equivalent concern, such as "endocrine disruptors". One of the aims of
REACH is to control the use of such substances via authorisation and encourage industry to substitute these substances for safer ones.
Information in the supply chain.
The passage of information along the supply chain is a key feature of REACH. Users should be
able to understand what manufacturers and importers know about the dangers involved in using
chemicals and how to control risks. However, in order for suppliers to be able to assess these
risks, they need information from the users. REACH provides a framework in which information
can be passed both up and down supply chains.
REACH adopts and builds on the previous system for passing information - the Safety Data
Sheet (see section 1.5). This needs to accompany materials down through the supply chain, providing the information users require to ensure chemicals are safely managed. In time, it is intended that these safety data sheets will include information on safe handling and use.
Preparing for REACH.
REACH will impact most businesses in the UK in some way. It is important to understand what
your role is in REACH, and what you can do now to be sure you are prepared.
Compile an inventory.
An inventory of every chemical that comes into, is part of, or goes out of the business needs to be
compiled.
You need to know all the substances you use. For preparations, you need to find out what the
ingredients are. Keep a record of each one, and include essential information, for example the
name of the chemical and the percentage in any preparations. You can use this information to
determine the tonnage per year.
Additionally, you need to know whether you produce or import articles. If you do, establish if any
substance (which is intended to be released under normal or reasonably foreseeable conditions
of use) is present in these articles in quantities totalling over 1 tonne.
Once this inventory has been established, you can begin to understand what substances you rely
on, and consider the impact on your business should REACH influence the supply (or for registrants, the production or import) of a substance. Consider contingencies, for example alternative
supply routes, chemicals or processes, or supporting suppliers in their REACH obligations, etc.
Prioritise.
Every business using chemicals that are not exempt from REACH needs to understand how
valuable these substances are to them, and plan to make effective business decisions based on
this knowledge. Consider the importance of each substance to your business. Ask yourself the
following sorts of question:
For what is it used?
Are the uses to which you put chemicals going to be supported by their registrants?
How much of it do you use?
Are there any alternative substances or processes that could replace this?
Will your supplier/s maintain supply of important substances if REACH impacts the commercial
R39/27/28 Very Toxic: danger of very serious irreversible effects in contact with skin and if swallowed
R39/28 Very Toxic: danger of very serious irreversible effects if swallowed
R40 Limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect
R41 Risk of serious damage to eyes
R42 May cause sensitisation by inhalation
R43 May cause sensitisation by skin contact
R42/43 May cause sensitisation by inhalation and skin contact
R44 Risk of explosion if heated under confinement
R45 May cause cancer
R46 May cause heritable genetic damage
R48 Danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure
R48/20 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation
R48/20/21 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation and in contact with skin
R48/20/21/22 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed
R48/20/22 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation and if swallowed
R48/21 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure in contact with skin
R48/21/22 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure in contact with
skin and if swallowed
R48/22 Harmful: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure if swallowed
R48/23 Toxic: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation
R48/23/24 Toxic: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation
and in contact with skin
R48/23/24/25 Toxic: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed
R48/23/25 Toxic: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation
and if swallowed
R48/24 Toxic: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure in contact with skin
R48/24/25 Toxic: danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure in contact with skin
and if swallowed
R68/20/21/22 Harmful: possible risk of irreversible effects through inhalation, in contact with skin
and if swallowed
R68/20/22 Harmful: possible risk of irreversible effects through inhalation and if swallowed
R68/21 Harmful: possible risk of irreversible effects in contact with skin
R68/21/22 Harmful: possible risk of irreversible effects in contact with skin and if swallowed
R68/22 Harmful: possible risk of irreversible effects if swallowed
Safety Phrases
Safety Number Safety Phrase
S1 Keep locked up
S(1/2) Keep locked up and out of the reach of children
S2 Keep out of reach of children
S3 Keep in a cool place
S3/7 Keep container tightly closed in a cool place
S3/7/9 Keep container tightly closed in a cool, well-ventilated place
S3/9/14 Keep in a cool, well-ventilated place away from ... (incompatible materials to be indicated
by the manufacturer)
S3/9/14/49 Keep only in the original container in a cool, well-ventilated place away from ... (incompatible materials to be indicated by the manufacturer)
S3/9/49 Keep only in the original container in a cool, well-ventilated place
S3/14 Keep in a cool place away from ... (incompatible materials to be indicated by the manufacturer)
S4 Keep away from living quarters
S5 Keep contents under ... (appropriate liquid to be specified by the manufacturer)
S6 Keep under ... (inert gas to be specified by the manufacturer)
S7 Keep container tightly closed
S7/8 Keep container tightly closed and dry
S7/9 Keep container tightly closed and in a well-ventilated place
S7/47 Keep container tightly closed and at temperature not exceeding ... OC (to be specified by
the manufacturer)
S8 Keep container dry
S9 Keep container in a well-ventilated place
S12 Do not keep the container sealed
S13 Keep away from food, drink and animal feeding stuffs
S14 Keep away from ... (incompatible materials to be indicated by the manufacturer)
S15 Keep away from heat
S16 Keep away from sources of ignition - No smoking
S17 Keep away from combustible material
S18 Handle and open container with care
S20 When using do not eat or drink
S20/S21 When using do not eat, drink or smoke
S21 When using do not smoke
S22 Do not breathe dust
S23 Do not breathe gas/fumes/vapour/spray (appropriate wording to be specified by the manufacturer)
S24 Avoid contact with skin
S24/25 Avoid contact with skin and eyes
S25 Avoid contact with eyes
S26 In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice
S27 Take off immediately all contaminated clothing
S27/S28 After contact with skin, take off immediately all contaminated clothing, and wash imme-
A Highly Flammable solid is one that is spontaneously combustible in air at ambient temperature, readily ignites after brief contact with a flame or evolves highly flammable gases in contact
with water or moist air.
An Extremely Flammable Liquid (F+) is one with a flash point less than 0 C and a boiling point
of 35 C or less.
Carcinogens
Category 1 - substances known to be carcinogenic to humans.
Category 2 - substances that should be regarded as if they are carcinogenic to humans, for which
there is sufficient evidence, based on long-term animal studies and other relevant information, to
provide a strong presumption that human exposure may result in the development of cancer.
Category 3 - substances that cause concern owing to possible carcinogenic effects but for which
available information is not adequate to make satisfactory assessments.
Categories 1 and 2 carry the "toxic" (T) symbol and the Risk Phrase R45 (may cause cancer) or
R49 (may cause cancer by inhalation).
Category 3 carries the "harmful" (Xn) symbol and the Risk Phrase R40 (possible risk of irreversible effects).
Very Toxic (T+) and Toxic (T)
LCn - This abbreviation is used for the exposure concentration of a toxicant lethal to n% of a
test population e.g. LC50
LDn - This abbreviation is used for the dose of a toxicant lethal to n% of a test population.
Evident Toxicity- this concept is used to designate toxic effects after exposure to a substance
tested, which are so severe that exposure to the next highest fixed dose would probably lead to
death.
Very Toxic (T+)
Acute lethal effects:
R28 "Very Toxic if swallowed": LD50 oral, rat < or = 25mg/kg: less than 100% survival at 5mg/kg
oral, rat.
R27 "Very Toxic in contact with skin": LD50 dermal, rat or rabbit: < or = 50mg/kg.
R26 "Very Toxic by inhalation"; LC50 inhalation, rat, for aerosols or particulates < or =
0.25mg/litre/4h
Non-lethal irreversible effects after a single exposure:
R39 "Danger of very serious irreversible effects": Irreversible damage is likely to be caused by a
single exposure by an appropriate route, generally in the above dose ranges. In order to indicate
the route of exposure, combinations of Risk Phrases may be used e.g. R39/23 i.e. 'Danger of
very serious irreversible effects by inhalation'.
Toxic (T)
Acute lethal effects:
R25 "Toxic if swallowed"; LD50 oral, rat 25 < LD50 < or = 200mg/kg: At 5mg/kg, oral, rat less
than 100% survival but evident toxicity.
R24 "Toxic in contact with skin"; LD50 dermal, rat or rabbit: 50 < LD50 < or = 400mg/kg.
R23 "Toxic by inhalation"; LC50 inhalation, rat, for aerosols or particulates: 0.25 < LD50< or =
1mg/litre/4hr
Non-lethal irreversible effects after a single exposure:
R39 "Danger of very serious irreversible effects": Irreversible damage is likely to be caused by a
single exposure by an appropriate route, generally in the above dose ranges. In order to indicate
the route of exposure, combinations of Risk Phrases may be used e.g. R39/23 i.e. 'Danger of
very serious irreversible effects by inhalation'.
Severe effects after repeated or prolonged exposure:
R48 "Danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure": Serious damage is likely to be
caused by repeated or prolonged exposure by an appropriate route. "Toxic with R48" is used
when effects are observed at levels of the order of:
Oral, rat < or = 5mg/kg(bodyweight)/day
Dermal, rat or rabbit < or = 10mg/kg(bodyweight)/day
Enforcement.
The SDS requirements in REACH became law on 1st June 2007. This means the changes detailed in this leaflet under 'What information needs to be provided on a SDS?' should already be
implemented now. However, as the requirements for SDS in REACH are similar to those they replace, enforcement of these new requirements in the UK is currently pragmatic. New prints of
SDS should conform to the new standards.
If new information on hazards or risk management measures becomes available, the SDS should
be updated without delay and the new format should be used. In addition, if new information has
been generated from the registration process (including the production of exposure scenarios)
the SDS should again be updated without delay in the new format. In other cases, suppliers
should seek to update their SDS as soon as is practicable.
Future of SDS
There is a new Regulation regarding the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and
mixtures, the "CLP Regulation" (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008). The Regulation will be the
means by which the United Nations' Globally Harmonised System (GHS) of Classification and
Labelling of Chemicals will be implemented in the EU. This Regulation will change the way in
which hazard classification and labelling is expressed and will in turn lead to further changes to
SDS. If a substance or mixture is classified in accordance with the CLP Regulation before 1 December 2010, then that classification may be provided in the SDS along with the classification in
accordance with either Directive 67/548/EEC or 1999/45/EC.
More information is available at http://www.hse.gov.uk/ghs/eureg.htm. />
Many countries already have regulatory systems in place for these types of requirements. These
systems may be similar in content and approach, but their differences are significant enough to
require multiple classifications, labels and safety data sheets for the same product when marketed in different countries or even in the same country when parts of the life cycle are covered
by different regulatory authorities. This leads to inconsistent protection for those potentially exposed to the chemicals, as well as creating extensive regulatory burdens on companies producing chemicals. For example, in the United States, there are requirements for classification and
labelling of chemicals for the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Department of Transportation, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
The GHS itself is not a regulation or a standard. The GHS Document (referred to as "The Purple
Book") establishes agreed hazard classification and communication provisions with explanatory
information on how to apply the system. The elements in the GHS supply a mechanism to meet
the basic requirement of any hazard communication system, which is to decide if the chemical
product produced and/or supplied is hazardous and to prepare a label and/or Safety Data Sheet
as appropriate. Regulatory authorities in countries adopting the GHS will thus take the agreed
criteria and provisions, and implement them through their own regulatory process and procedures
rather than simply incorporating the text of the GHS into their national requirements. The GHS
Document thus provides countries with the regulatory building blocks to develop or modify existing national programs that address classification of hazards and transmittal of information about
those hazards and associated protective measures. This helps to ensure the safe use of chemicals as they move through the product life cycle from "cradle to grave."
The Purpose and process of Classification of dangerouse chemicals with reference to
Chapter 1.3.2 of the Globally Harmonised System (GHS)
General Considerations on the GHS
Scope of the system
The GHS applies to pure substances and their dilute solutions and to mixtures.
One objective of the GHS is for it to be as simple and transparent with a clear distinction between
classes and categories in order to allow for self-classification as far as possible. For many hazard classes the criteria and semi-quantitative or qualitative and expert judgement is required to
interpret the data for classification purposes. Furthermore, for some classes of hazard (e.g. eye
irritation, explosives or self-reactive substances) a decision tree approach is provided to enhance
ease of use.
Concept of classification
The GHS uses the term Hazard Classification to indicate that only the intrinsic hazardous properties of substances or mixtures are considered.
Hazard classification incorporates only THREE steps:
(a) identification of relevant data regarding the hazards of a substance or mixture
(b) subsequent review of those data to ascertain the hazards associated with the substance or
mixture; and
(c) a decision on whether the substance or mixture will be classified as a hazardous substance or
mixture and the degree of hazard, where appropriate, by comparison of the data with agreed
hazard classification criteria.
4.35 Labelling
The European Commission proposed the European Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (known as the CLP Regulation).
This was considered in detail during negotiations between Member States, the Council and the
European Parliament, between July 2007 and June 2008. The UK was represented by the HSE
throughout the negotiations.
The CLP Regulation was published in the European Union's Official Journal on 31st December
2008 and entered into legal effect on 20th January 2009, subject to a lengthy transitional period
(see below).
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/documents/classification/index_en.htm#h2-clpregulation-(ec)-no-1272/2008
Transitional periods.
The Regulation provides a transition period to allow a gradual migration from the existing system
to the new regime. This transition period is up to 7 years (the Regulation will apply to the classification of substances from 1st December 2010, and to the classification of mixtures from 1st
June 2015). The transitional period will end on 1st June 2015 when the CLP Regulation enters
fully into force.
Over time, the CLP Regulation will replace the:
Dangerous Substances Directive (67/548/EEC)
Dangerous Preparations Directive (1999/45/EC)
Impact on the CHIP regulations and the proposed new CHIP 4.
These Directives have been implemented in the UK as CHIP 4, which will need to be adjusted
slightly to include the necessary enforcing regulations to deal with the CLP Regulation, and to
ensure that domestic law continues to be current with the changes at European level during the
transitional period.
http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/clp_introductory_en.pdf
This pdf, although quite long, gives excellent guidance as to the application of CLP regulations
and the way in which they vary from the current, outgoing scheme.
This article from SHP by Douglas Leech, Technical Manager of the Chemicals Business Association, gives an in-depth assessment of the CLP regulations and is well worth the time taken to read
it.
"The dream of global harmonisation (GHS) of the classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of
chemicals, originally conceived by the United Nations, came closer to fruition on 31st December
2008, when the European Union published Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, heralding the introduction
of European CLP1. While the long-term aims of these provisions are welcome - facilitating international trade, reducing costs, and improving the flow of information throughout the chemical
supply chain - the new provisions will involve significant changes and costs for industry over a
relatively short period of time.
The key dates in the process are: 1st December 2010, when substances must be reclassified and
labelled in line with the new global system; and 1st June 2015, when the same process will be
applied to mixtures (formerly called preparations).
Each element of the chemical supply chain - manufacturer, importer, downstream user, and distributor - has specific duties under the new provisions, as well as a responsibility to cooperate
with other suppliers in respect of the classification, labelling and packaging of substances.
The United Nations has been developing the new system since the Rio Earth Summit in 1992.
The Summit's Agenda 21 included the mandate to create 'a globally harmonised hazard classification and labelling system, including Safety Data Sheets and easily understood symbols'.
Under the GHS each hazard class and category is a 'building block'. The EU will implement the
vast majority of the available 'blocks' (77 out of 84) and has introduced harmonisation by making
the legislation a directly-acting Regulation, so EU member states do not have to pass domestic
legislation. Individual countries can simply select which 'blocks' they wish to implement.
Thus, the new system implies increased centralisation at EU level through directly-acting regulations and the operations of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). The latter is responsible for
developing methodologies, tools and technical guidance through REACH Implementation Projects (RIPs). For example, RIP 3.6 has been developing guidance on the classification and labelling under the proposed GHS-based Regulation, and the proposals were discussed at the 16th17th June meeting of the Competent Authority for REACH and Classification And Labelling (CA-
RACAL).
The EU claims it has designed the GHS-based Regulation to dovetail with other European
chemical legislation particularly REACH, which came into force in June 2007. The resulting system aims to provide one, global framework for identifying and describing chemical hazards. This
framework is complemented by a single system for communicating these hazards through symbols, labels and Safety Data Sheets.
The UK has consolidated all previous amendments to its Chemicals (Hazard Information and
Packaging for Supply) Regulations (CHIP) as well as introducing provisions to enforce the EU
CLP Regulation into CHIP 4 (Statutory Instrument 791/2009), which came into force on 6th April
2009. The UK CHIP Regulations will be repealed when the implementation of the CLP Regulation
is complete in June 2015.
Classification.
The classification hierarchy used by the new provisions is as follows: Explosive; Gases; Flammable; Other Flammable Materials; Oxidising Substances and Organic Residues; Toxic and Infectious Substances; Radioactive Materials; Corrosives; and Miscellaneous Dangerous Substances.
The Regulation also contains more than 7000 translated classifications in the form of Annex VI
table 3.1. This, along with table 3.2, replaces the list of substance classifications within the previous Directive's Annex I, the 'approved supply list'.
Annex VII of the CLP Regulation incorporates a 'translation' table, which can be used to convert
classifications under the current Dangerous Substances Directive to new classifications made by
applying the GHS criteria. If there is no direct equivalent, the least severe classification is assigned. The supplier has a duty to decide if a more severe classification is required.
The EU has said its intention is to help suppliers or importers of substances and mixtures comply
with their obligations under the new Regulation without having to reclassify, as long as the chemical has already been classified under the existing system. However, if a supplier or importer decides not to use the 'translation' table they must fully re-evaluate the substance or mixture using
the criteria in the Regulation.
The new CLP Regulation therefore creates a substance classification and labelling inventory that
will be populated by classifications determined by industry. Much of the information provided on
these classifications will be submitted as part of the suppliers' REACH registration for those substances placed on the market.
The classification of mixtures is a slightly more complex process owing to the fact that they can
contain numerous substances of different hazard classes. The regulation provides three alternative methods for the classifier to choose from:
* Test the mixture to determine classification; or
* Read across, as per Article 61; or
* Acute toxicity estimates (ATE), as per Annex I part 3.1.
The first option is usually impracticable owing to the sheer level of testing required, and the cost
of compliance. The tests are the same as those required for registration under REACH. The third
option, acute toxicity estimates, requires more information and is labour-intensive. It requires a
different skill set and the services of a toxicologist. This method is generally assumed to be an
accurate calculation method but, at present, the level of information and data available to guarantee an accurate calculation is not readily to hand. However, this process will become easier as
REACH gathers pace.
Labelling.
In labelling terms, the provisions introduce two 'signal words': Danger designates more serious
hazard categories; Warning is used for less severe hazard categories. The first stage of the label-
who delay risk accruing substantial disadvantages when the regulations take full effect.
5.0 Principles of Epidemiology and the Principles of Deriving and Applying Toxicological
Data
Here we begin with a comprehensive review of the principles of toxicological investigation and
their use and limitation in recognising health hazards.
METHODS OF TOXICOLOGICAL TESTING.
Legal Requirements.
Regulations relating to the use of new substances in the UK require a range of physico-chemical,
toxicological and eco-toxicological studies.
The level of testing depends on the quantity of substance that is intended to be produced, but the
types of toxicological studies that are required are given below (and described in more detail
later):
at low doses, no organisms will show a response, i.e. they all live;
at higher doses, all organisms show a response, i.e. they all die;
in between, there is a range of doses over which some organisms respond and others do
not.
The dose-response curve is S-shaped and the mid-point represents the dose which would cause
an effect (in this case death) in 50% of the organisms. It is designated as the LD50.
You should appreciate that LD50 is not an exact value, and in recent years there has been much
discussion as to its usefulness and necessity in toxicology. In 2001, the OECD abolished the requirement for the oral test. The LD50 values may vary for the same compound between different
groups of the same species of animal. The size of the sample used in testing varies; it can be as
many as one hundred or as few as twenty. During the discussions on the abolition of the LD50
test requirement, the OECD said that under its new system, the number of animal deaths could
be as few as three per test, implying that the total test population could be somewhere in the region of six.
This link gives access to an abstract of a study concerning the use of the Fixed Dose procedure
and its merits over the LD50 test.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(90)90117-6
However, the value is of use in comparing how toxic a substance is in relation to other sub-
stances. Table 3.1 gives examples of LD50 values for a variety of chemical substances.
Compound
LD50 (mg/kg)
Ethanol
10,000
DDT
100
Nicotine
Tetrodotoxin
0.1
Dioxin
0.001
Botulinus toxin
0.00001
Table 3.1
ED50 (effective dose for 50%) and TD50 (toxic dose for 50%) are related parameters which indicate the dose at which a biological response is likely.
Comparison of ED50 with LD50 gives an indication of the margin of safety between the dose
which causes the first identifiable effect and that which is fatal.
Testing for carcinogenic potential is more complex, since there is no simple dose-response relationship.
The toxicology of carcinogens is approached in a different way but still involves exposing laboratory animals (usually rats and mice) to the chemical by oral, inhalation or skin contact techniques.
There are also short-term predictive tests available which are considered to simulate potential
carcinogenicity in man. They are called short term, in contrast to the usual lifetime studies in rodents, which can take three to four years before a result is available.
Short term tests include:
We will consider some of these tests in more detail later in this study unit.
Once a dose-response relationship has been demonstrated, there are a number of parameters
that can be derived from it.
If exposure is oral and lethality is used as the end point, LD50 can be determined as we have
seen previously. LD50 is defined as 'a statistically derived expression of a single dose of a material that can be expected to kill 50% of the animals'.
However, the S-shaped dose-response curve can be further analysed mathematically to determine doses that have a higher or lower probability of fatality.
The determination of LD90 from the dose response curve, for example (see Figure 3.1) enables
estimation of the dose that will kill the majority (i.e. 90%) of a sample of animals.
When the route of exposure is inhalation and lethality is used as the end point, it is the concentration of the airborne toxin that is of concern. Since the amount of toxin inhaled depends on the duration of exposure, there are two ways to express this data:
The lethal concentration can be determined for a specified duration of exposure. If the median
lethal concentration is determined, this is designated as LC50, which is defined as the statistically
derived expression of the concentration of airborne toxin that can be expected to kill 50% of ex-
posed animals in a specified time. As indicated above, the resulting dose-response relationship
can be used to estimate other corresponding parameters such as LC90.
The lethal time can be determined for exposure to a given concentration of airborne toxin. If the
median lethal time is determined, this is designated as LT50, which is defined as the statistically
derived expression of the exposure time necessary that can be expected to kill 50% of exposed
animals at a specified concentration of airborne substance.
With all these parameters, it is important to remember that they simply represent statistically determined doses, concentrations or times, derived experimentally in the manner described above.
Their use in comparing the 'toxicity' of different substances, and consequently their potential to
cause occupational ill-health must be qualified by a clear understanding of the limitations of the
method by which this statistical data is derived.
We made reference earlier to the concept of a dose below which no effect or response is measurable. This is termed the threshold dose and can be clearly demonstrated with responses such
as lethality. This concept of a threshold dose for the toxic effect is an important one, and implies
that there will be a dose at which the response does not occur in any member of the population.
This is shown in Figure 3.1 where the dose response curve shows no deviation from the x-axis
(% effect = 0) until log dose reaches a value of 5 units. The term for this is the 'no observed adverse effect level' or NOAEL. We have already discussed the converse of this with carcinogens,
where a threshold dose cannot be established and therefore it must be assumed that any exposure to carcinogenic substances has the possibility of an adverse effect.
The NOAEL is important for setting exposure limits such as workplace exposure standards, which
are designed to represent a level of exposure at which there is no evidence of harm. We will discuss the application of this type of toxicity data in establishing criteria for occupational exposure
limits in Unit B3.
Result
Action/Classification
5 mg/kg
< 90% survival > 90%
survival but toxicity > 90%
survival no toxicity
50 mg/kg
500 mg/kg
Type of chemical under study (novel compound or in use for some time)
Selection of doses (quantity; single dose or repeated doses)
Species and strain of animal (extrapolation to human exposure)
Exposure route (comparable with likely occupational exposure route)
Method of exposure (physical and/or chemical properties of substance)
Experimental observations and measurements to be made (similarities with other compounds of known toxicity)
genic properties.
(b) Long-term toxicity tests involve lifetime studies on animals exposed to potentially toxic substances, and are able to provide a wealth of information on mode of action, dose effect relationships and target organs.
(c) Chemical analogy tests enable predictions to be made on possible mode of toxic activity
based on the chemical structure and properties of substances.
We shall examine each of these different test methods in turn to determine the methodology and
also the possible limitations in their use.
Mutagenicity Testing.
Mutagenesis occurs as a result of interaction between mutagenic agents (agents able to cause
mutations) and the genetic materials of organisms. Evolution of living species is based on spontaneous mutation followed by natural selection.
Mutations that give a natural advantage to a species survive to be promoted by natural selection,
whereas those that reduce the chances of survival are eliminated.
However, in recent years a growing number of toxic substances have been shown to possess
mutagenic properties, and the concern is the inability to predict the eventual effects of human exposure to these substances.
In addition, tests for mutagenicity are now more widely used because of their use as a rapid
screening method for carcinogenicity, because most mutagens have been found to be carcinogens. Furthermore, mutagenicity tests are useful in establishing the mode of action of carcinogens, since human tumours often display chromosomal abnormalities.
Gene Mutation.
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) consists of a long double helical chemical strand of ordered nucleic
acid bases.
The order and combination of the four different types of base provide a genetic code which contains unique information (in 'packets' called genes) to enable the synthesis of proteins and the
construction of living matter.
As well as holding the information necessary for the growth of organisms, this genetic information
can also be transmitted from one generation of cells to the next through self-replication. In this
way, species of organisms survive through reproduction.
Gene mutations involve additions or deletions of bases in the DNA molecules. In addition, a
mutagenic chemical, or part of it, may be incorporated into the DNA molecule.
In either case, these changes to the DNA molecule may cause the substitution of a new amino
acid or a different amino acid sequence in the synthesised protein molecule, thus leading to a
modification (possibly damaging) to the biological properties of the protein.
The most common test to detect genetic mutation is the Ames test. The basis of this test is to expose bacteria to the suspected mutagen and observe for detectable mutation. This is done by
using a special type of Salmonella typhimurium bacteria which has been genetically modified to
grow only in a medium containing histidine (a type of amino acid).
Normal bacteria, however, will multiply in a histidine-deficient medium.
Consequently, the test bacteria are incubated in a medium which contains insufficient histidine
and therefore no growth takes place.
If a mutagen is now added to the medium, it will cause a genetic change which reverses the
original genetic modification and now enables affected bacteria to multiply as normal in the histidine-deficient environment.
Hence the observation of appreciable growth indicates that reverse mutation has taken place,
and the substance in question does have mutagenic properties.
Since this test only involves the exposure of bacteria to the mutagen, it is termed an 'in vitro' test.
However, gene mutation tests can also be carried out 'in vivo' (in a host animal, usually a mouse)
by injecting the host with the mutagen and directly examining either micro-organisms or host cells
for evidence of genetic damage.
Chromosomal Effects.
The effect of a mutagen on a chromosome (an assembly of genes) may be great enough to be
visible microscopically, either as structural aberrations or changes in numbers.
Heritable Effects.
At present, there is no direct correlation between laboratory tests for heritable mutations and human experience. Nevertheless, if a substance has been shown to be mutagenic in a variety of
test systems, including heritable mutations in mammals, it must be considered as a mutagen in
humans unless there is convincing evidence to the contrary.
Long-term Animal Toxicity Studies.
Humans are more often exposed to chemicals at levels much lower than those that are acutely
fatal, but they are exposed over longer periods of time. To assess the nature of these toxic effects
under these more realistic situations, long-term toxicity studies on animals are conducted. The
key elements of such studies are outlined below.
Experimental Design.
Species and number:
Generally, two or more species should be used that metabolise the chemical in a way similar to
humans (often rats and dogs are used due to size, availability and the amount of toxicological
data already available on these animals).
Equal numbers of male and female animals should be used, with from 10 to 50 animals in each
dose group.
Route of administration:
The chemical should be administered by the likely route of exposure.
For most chemicals, the route will be oral, so the chemical will be incorporated into the diet or
drinking water.
For special circumstances such as industrial products, agricultural products and drugs, dermal
application or inhalation may be used.
Dose and duration:
Dosage will be set at three levels:
Duration is generally two years for rats and seven years or more for dogs.
Observations and Examinations.
Body weight and food consumption:
Decreased body weight gain is a simple but sensitive indicator of toxic effects.
Food consumption is also a useful indicator.
Appearance and behaviour: - both of these parameters, along with development of any abnormalities, should be noted.
Laboratory tests: - these include blood and urine sampling and testing.
Post-mortem examination:
All dead animals should be subjected to a full pathological examination, including weight and
analysis of major organs.
Correlation between general observations, clinical laboratory tests and post-mortem examination
for major organs and systems can provide valuable information on the effects and mechanism of
action of the chemical in question.
Evaluation:
The parameters of observations and examinations described above will provide information on
the toxicity of the chemical under test with respect to the target organs, the effects on these organs, and the dose-effect and dose-response relationships.
In addition, the NOAEL from long-term studies can be used to determine exposure limits or 'acceptable daily intakes' for humans, as we have discussed previously.
the structure of the substance (including structures of impurities), through the use of structure activity relationships and data on analogous substances referred to above.
Preliminary assessments of chemical carcinogens often begin with a close examination of chemical structure. Whilst chemicals that have structures similar to known carcinogens or mutagens are
not necessarily carcinogenic themselves, they will be assigned a high priority in any carcinogen
testing programme. In addition, there is evidence to show that certain chemical structures have
been shown to be correlated with carcenogenicity.
5.4 Epidemiology.
In this section, we are going to look at epidemiology (determining the cause having first observed
the effects) by examining the main methodologies of epidemiology, the sources of information
available, their application and limitations and also the use of epidemiological techniques in the
workplace.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE.
You will remember that occupational health and hygiene are concerned with recognition, measurement, evaluation and control. Epidemiology is the science which forms the basis of the four
stages. At its crudest, epidemiology may be said to be the elucidation of the cause, having first
observed the effects. For example, if a number of workers on a particular process are suddenly
affected by dermatitis, i.e. the effect, it is likely that the cause is of occupational origin, possibly a
new raw material. However, the cause can often only be established in the light of current knowledge and understanding. John Snow (1813-1858) flew in the face of conventional wisdom when
he suggested that cholera was due to contaminated water rather than airborne miasmas.
A semblance of the cause-effect relationship in occupational disease has been recognised since
early times. Hippocrates, the father of medicine (born 460 BC), was probably among the first to
recognise lead as a cause of colic; and Pliny (23-79 AD) describes mercurialism in writing of the
diseases of slaves.
One of the greatest technical manuals ever written is De Re Metallica by Agricola, whose real
name was Georg Bauer (1494 - 1555), completed in 1530 but first published in Basle in 1556. He
described and illustrated in detail the techniques and methods used by German mining engineers
to win metallic ores, and also covered aspects of occupational diseases (he was a medical doctor
by profession). On miners in the Carpathian mountains, he comments:
On ventilation: 'If a shaft is very deep and no tunnel reaches to it, or no drift from another shaft
connects to it, or when a tunnel is of great length and no shaft reaches to it, then the air does not
replenish itself. In such a case, it (the air) weighs heavily upon them (the miners), causing them to
breathe with difficulty and extinguishing lamps. It is therefore necessary to install machines to enable the air to be renewed and for the miners to carry on their work.' (See Figure 4.1.)
Figure 4.1.
On accidents: 'The Burgomeister gives no-one permission to enter the mines after blasting until
the poisonous vapours are cleared.'
On diseases of the lung: 'If the dust has corrosive qualities, it eats away the lungs and implants
consumption in the body. In the mines of the Carpathian mountains, women are found who have
married seven husbands, all of whom this terrible consumption has carried off to a premature
death.'
To protect miners against the effects of the dust, Agricola advised purification of the air by ventilation and the use of loose veils over their faces.
Paracelsus (1493-1541) published the first monograph devoted entirely to the occupational dis-
eases of mine and smelter workers (Von der Bergsucht und Anderen Bergkrankheiten, 1567).
Although he makes correct clinical observations, he then unfortunately turns to unproven alchemical notions to explain them:
'The lung sickness comes through the power of the stars, in that their peculiar characteristics are
boiled out, which settle on the lungs in three different ways: in a mercurial manner like a sublimated smoke that coagulates, like a salt spirit, which passes from resolution to coagulation, and
thirdly, like a sulphur, which is precipitated on the walls by roasting.'
If Hippocrates is the father of medicine, then Bernardino Ramazzini (1633-1714) is the father of
occupational medicine. His De Morbis Artificum Diatriba (1700) contains accounts of the occupational diseases suffered by
miners of metals,
healers by inunction,
chemists,
potters,
tinsmiths,
glass-workers,
painters,
sulphur-workers,
blacksmiths,
workers with gypsum and lime,
apothecaries,
cleaners of privies and cesspits,
fullers,
oil pressers,
tanners,
cheese-makers,
tobacco-workers,
corpse-carriers,
midwives,
wet nurses,
vintners and brewers,
bakers and millers,
starch-makers,
sifters and measurers of grain,
stone-cutters,
launderers,
workers handling flax, jute and silk,
bathmen,
salt-makers,
workers who stand for long periods,
sedentary workers,
grooms,
porters,
athletes,
runners,
singers,
preachers,
farmers,
fishermen,
soldiers,
learner men,
priests and nuns,
printers,
scribes and notaries,
confectioners,
weavers,
coppersmiths,
carpenters,
grinders of metals,
brick-makers,
well-diggers,
sailors and rowers,
hunters and
soap-makers.
In short, most of the important occupations of the day. As a result of his investigations, he added
an important question to the Hippocratic art, urging physicians to ask of their patients, 'What is
your occupation?' He also 'urged physicians to leave their apothecary's shop, which is redolent
with cinnamon, and to visit the latrines where they may see the cause of ill-health.'
Thames at London Bridge. He found there were 14 times more fatalities from cholera in people
drinking the Southwark supply than in those drinking the Thames Ditton supply.
He became absolutely convinced when he learned of the death of a Hampstead woman who sent
a carrier daily to collect water from the Broad Street pump, and died of cholera as a result. Her
niece, who had visited her for a day, also became the only victim of the disease in her district.
As Snow was proclaiming that dirty water was responsible for the epidemic, so a Parliamentary
enquiry was establishing the cause as stale air from the closely-packed tenements in the area,
thus proving that Miasmatic Theory was still prevalent amongst most eminent medical men of the
day.
Figure 4.2: Cholera Deaths Between 19 Aug and 30 Sept, 1854, as Plotted by John Snow
Plotting the Incidence of Legionnaires' Disease.
Environmental Health Officers investigating two outbreaks of Legionnaires' Disease around the
BBC's Bush House in 1987 and Leicester Square in 1988 used Snow's method of plotting the in-
Strength: the relative incidence of the disease in exposed and unexposed groups.
Consistency: observing the disease in different places and at different times by different
observers.
Specificity: where the association (between cause and effect) is limited to specific workers
and to a particular type of disease, there is a strong argument in favour of causation.
Biological gradient: if an increase in dose or exposure brings about an increase in incidence, then there is strong evidence of causation.
Biologically plausible: the relationship should not conflict with known facts of the natural
history and aetiology of the disease.
Analogy: similar chemicals, biological agents and physical inputs being likely to have similar effects.
Preventive action: if the preventive action works, i.e. there is a reduction in the effect, then
it is likely the cause was correctly identified, e.g. a reduction in an atmospheric contaminant affecting the frequency or severity of the disease or other associated event. It is perhaps this final criterion which may be said to be the proof of the pudding.
In the case of the original 1976 American Legionella outbreak, health investigators identified the
following causal factors:
Strength: early on, it had been established that the victims were mainly convention delegates.
Consistency: Similar outbreaks had occurred in Pontiac in 1968 and shortly after, other
outbreaks were identified in Vermont (1977), Indiana (1978) and Oxford, England (1979).
Specificity: air conditioning plant was soon implicated as an indirect cause.
Biological gradient: eventually, it was established that potential victims had to inhale an
aerosol containing a high concentration of Legionella pneumophilia.
Biological plausibility: A suggestion that an anti-military madman had murdered the legionnaires smacked of hysteria rather than accounting for the known biological facts.
Analogy: all the evidence pointed to a biological cause (bacterium, virus, etc.)
Preventive action: cleaning and sterilising possible water sources eliminated the bacterium from water tanks and other water supplies.
The success of preventative action is proof that the epidemiologists had correctly identified the
cause of the disease, together with the events and circumstances necessary to link cause with
effect.
PROBLEMS IN ACHIEVING CONTROL.
It is fortunate that the measures implemented for the control of Legionnaire's Disease and elimination of the bacterium from water systems proved simple and effective.
This is not always the case, and sometimes the interval between implementation of control
measures and an observed decline in the incidence of a disease may cover many years.
In these circumstances, it is inevitable that doubts will arise as to the effectiveness of the control
measures and, consequently, as to the actual cause. Some examples will serve to illustrate the
point.
Example 1: Lead Poisoning.
Lead poisoning became notifiable in the potteries in 1896, when there were 351 cases out of
some 5,000 at risk. Although the overall rate began to fall almost immediately, the number of
deaths remained fairly constant for a number of years afterwards.
Lead poisoning became notifiable in all factories in 1899 and the cases of poisoning fell from
more than a thousand in 1900 to 55 in 1960; but again the death rate did not follow a similar pattern. Indeed, it increased in some years (see Figures 4.3 and 4.4).
In the electric accumulator industry, the incidence of lead poisoning rose from 1900 until the
passing of the Lead Accumulator Regulations in 1924, after which there was a decline in the incidence of poisonings (see Figure 4.5). Once again, the death rate remained relatively constant.
It would have been comparatively easy in this period to suggest that it was not lead which was
responsible for the disease; but we now know that the time lag is largely due to the long-term effects of lead poisoning, and because the bones store large amounts of lead, releasing it slowly
over a number of years.
Figure 4.3: Lead Poisoning in the Potteries
Figure 4.5: Notified Cases of Lead Poisoning in the Electric Accumulator Industry
Example 2: Mesothelioma.
Diseases such as mesothelioma may have a latency period of as much as 40 years between exposure and manifestation, so we must expect to diagnose causes of the disease well into this
century, even though asbestos has been subject to tight controls since the 1970s.
Example 3: Dermatitis.
With diseases such as dermatitis, where the victim may become sensitised, the disease may
"flare up" again following only very small exposure to the harmful agent, or to another agent
which is chemically analogous.
characteristics of both groups and, unlike the follow-up study (see below), the outcome is known.
The case-control method may be used, for example, to investigate the frequency of asbestos
workers who have respiratory problems or lung disease against a control group drawn from the
general population. It is quicker and less expensive than a cohort study (see below), and is often
used as the first step to see if there may be an association between a suspected cause and a
known effect. It is also useful in investigating a disease of low prevalence. Unfortunately, however, case-controlled studies are generally less informative than cohort studies and spurious associations are likely to occur.
The Follow-up Study.
This study takes a group of exposed (and possibly non-exposed control) persons where the exposure is defined and accurately known. The group is then followed up over an appropriate period of time to assess the eventual outcome of the exposure. This method is prospective (following the group forward in time) and avoids the problem of tracing exposure history retrospectively,
as with the case-control study.
Follow-up studies are useful for:
A cohort study is a specific type of follow-up study where a population is defined in advance for
exposure characteristics, followed for a period of time and then the outcome measured. Follow-up
studies are designed to observe incidence of occupational ill-health and should, naturally, extend
over a period of time longer than that required for the outcome to develop.
Such retrospective studies are used to determine whether there is an association, for example,
between exposure to asbestos (the cause) and the incidence of lung cancer (the effect), and
uses two groups (cohorts) of subjects:
Exposed.
Unexposed (the control group).
The incidence of lung cancer is then calculated for each group, and if significantly more people
suffer in the exposed group then there is strong evidence for cause and effect.
In cases where there is insufficient past data on which to work, it will be necessary to set up a
prospective study.
Cohort studies are concerned with the relationship between the cause, as evidenced by the history and nature of the exposure, and the effect, i.e. the presence of the disease.
The advantages of cohort studies are that they provide:
a more accurate account of exposure related to deaths or disease and a direct estimate of
the risk associated with the causal factors;
information on secular trends which reveal changes in the degree of risk.
It may be necessary to wait many years for the development of the disease (mesothelioma might take as long as 40 years to manifest itself).
Some of the cohort may be lost over the period of study.
Primary monitoring to identify hazards. Population studies are frequently the only way of
identifying an occupational risk of disease such as lung cancer, coronary heart disease,
varicose veins, or rheumatic disorders, because they are common in the general population.
Secondary monitoring to keep known hazards under control. Surveillance of a group of
workers exposed to recognised hazards identifies any susceptible individuals and assesses the value of preventive measures and the effectiveness of control measures.
Determining causes helps to establish health standards. Studying groups of workers may
lead to a determination of the association with the exposure to a contaminant such as a
dust or vapour; leading to the establishment of the cause and occupational hygiene standards such as workplace exposure limits (WELs).
Community studies reveal how many people are affected and how seriously. Priorities can
then be established, enabling preventive action to be taken when and where it is needed.
Evaluating health services to find out how they are used, their success in reaching certain
standards and the value attached to them by the population they serve.
In terms of the practical application of epidemiological methods to occupational health and hygiene, secondary monitoring is particularly important and is now implemented through the Control
of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations.
Primary monitoring - the recognition of hazards - may be said to be a consequence of good primary procedures. Thus, if some workers begin to exhibit symptoms of dermatitis where no previous incidence has been recognised, there is a strong possibility that it has been caused by a
change either in the process or in work patterns, or by the introduction of a new or replacement
raw material. Having observed the effect, it should be possible to determine the cause by studying work patterns and raw materials.
As we have seen, the purpose of the epidemiological study is to establish the distribution of
health-related events or states in a specified population, and also the factors responsible. This
information can then be applied in the control of the particular health problem.
Practical Application of Epidemiological Methods.
In order to plan and implement an epidemiological study, the following broad steps need to be
followed:
Establish the objectives of the study and what hypotheses need to be tested. (Is disease A
caused by agent B?)
Define the study population, bearing in mind statistical limitations of study and control
group size.
Prepare a protocol and also any questionnaires needed.
Undertake a pilot study to test methodology.
Collect and analyse data.
Test hypotheses and record and report conclusions.
The exact detail of the study will depend on the type of epidemiological investigation that is being
performed.
Limitations of Epidemiology.
The main problems of epidemiological studies, which have been touched on in the previous sections, include:
The 'healthy worker' effect, whereby the control group has a different health status compared with the cases (pre-employment health screening has the effect of excluding less
healthy individuals, and consequently raising the general health of employed persons in
comparison to those not in work).
A poor response rate which reduces the sample size and its statistical significance.
A high turnover of study populations.
The latency period between exposure and effect is longer than the study period.
Poor quality of health affects data and/or exposure data.
No effect of exposure noted, which may be a consequence of a poor or small study population.
In this way, the cause-association hypothesis that aims to relate occupational exposure to incidences of ill-health should be able to be validated, either positively or negatively.
fied form of the Draize test called the low volume eye test may reduce suffering and provide more
realistic results and this was adopted as the new standard in September 2009. However, the Draize test will still be used for substances that are not severe irritants.
The most stringent tests are reserved for drugs and foodstuffs. For these, a number of tests are
performed, lasting less than a month (acute), one to three months (subchronic), and more than
three months (chronic) to test general toxicity (damage to organs), eye and skin irritancy,
mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, and reproductive problems. The cost of the full complement of tests is several million dollars per substance and it may take three or four years to
complete.
These toxicity tests provide, in the words of a 2006 United States National Academy of Sciences
report, "critical information for assessing hazard and risk potential". Nature reported that most
animal tests either over- or underestimate risk, or do not reflect toxicity in humans particularly
well, with false positive results being a particular problem. This variability stems from using the
effects of high doses of chemicals in small numbers of laboratory animals to try to predict the effects of low doses in large numbers of humans. Although relationships do exist, opinion is divided
on how to use data on one species to predict the exact level of risk in another.
Acute and Chronic Toxicity
Acute toxicity describes the adverse effects of a substance which result either from a single exposure or from multiple exposures in a short space of time (usually less than 24 hours). To be
described as acute toxicity, the adverse effects should occur within 14 days of the administration
of the substance.
Acute toxicity is distinguished from chronic toxicity, which describes the adverse health effects
from repeated exposures, often at lower levels, to a substance over a longer time period (months
or years).
It is widely considered unethical to use humans as test subjects for acute (or chronic) toxicity research. However, some information can be gained from investigating accidental human exposures (e.g. factory accidents). Otherwise, most acute toxicity data comes from animal testing or,
more recently, in vitro testing methods and inference from data on similar substances.
Limits for short-term exposure, such as STELs or CVs, are only defined if there a particular acute
toxicity associated with a substance.
Short-Term Exposure Limit, STEL;
Threshold limit value-short-term exposure limit, TLV-STEL
Ceiling value, CV;
Threshold limit value-ceiling, TLV-C
Experimental values
No observed adverse effect level, NOAEL
Lowest observed adverse effect level, LOAEL
Maximum tolerable concentration, MTC, LC0;
Maximum tolerable dose, MTD, LD0
Minimum lethal concentration, LCmin;
Mimimum lethal dose, LDmin
Median lethal concentration, LC50; Median lethal dose, LD50;
Median lethal time, LT50
Absolute lethal concentration, LC100; Absolute lethal dose, LD100
For existing chemicals, toxicological information may also be obtained from epidemiological data
such as human exposure in the workplace, or humans and animals exposed in the general environment. So, for example, workplace exposure may be determined from the measurement of potentially toxic substances or their metabolites in human body fluids.
Similarly environmental exposure to pesticides may be determined in the field by measurement of
pesticide levels in wild birds.
The main types of toxicity tests are described below.
Acute Toxicity Tests.
These are designed to determine the effects which occur within a short period after dosing.
These tests can determine a dose-response relationship and the LD50 value.
The initial tests will involve increasing the dose to a sample of animals by successive orders of
magnitude (factors of 10) in order to establish the range of toxic effects.
Once this has been established, a study similar to that outlined in Table 3.2 can be carried out in
order to classify the substance. Note that the criterion used is 90% survival.
TABLE HERE
Table 3.2: Investigation of Acute Oral Toxicity
If a large enough sample of animals is used at each dosage level, the LD50 value can be determined from analysis of the data.
Subacute Toxicity Tests.
These involve exposing animals to a substance for a prolonged period of one or three months,
which enables toxic effects which have a slow onset to be detected.
This type of exposure provides information on the target organs affected by the substance, and
the major toxic effects. Such tests also allow measurement of the substance in blood and tissues
to be made.
The information gained can be used in the design of the next type of test, the chronic toxicity test.
Chronic Toxicity Tests.
These tests involve lifetime exposure of animals to the substance under study.
Similar measurements to those described for subacute toxicity tests can be made throughout the
study to identify the development of pathological changes, which can then be detected in a postmortem.
Other long-term changes in measurements such as food and water intake, body weight, and behavioural changes can serve to indicate harmful effects.
These types of study are important in determining possible effects of long-term occupational exposure, or environmental exposure to low levels of chemicals.
For all three types of toxicity test, the following parameters should also be considered:
Type of chemical under study (novel compound or in use for some time)
Selection of doses (quantity; single dose or repeated doses)
Species and strain of animal (extrapolation to human exposure)
Exposure route (comparable with likely occupational exposure route)
Method of exposure (physical and/or chemical properties of substance)
Experimental observations and measurements to be made (similarities with other compounds of
known toxicity)
Introduction
The science of toxicology is based on the principle that there is a relationship between a toxic reaction (the response) and the amount of poison received (the dose). An important assumption in
this relationship is that there is almost always a dose below which no response occurs or can be
measured. A second assumption is that once a maximum response is reached any further increases in the dose will not result in any increased effect.
One particular instance in which this dose-response relationship does not hold true, is in regard to
true allergic reactions. Allergic reactions are special kinds of changes in the immune system; they
are not really toxic responses. The difference between allergies and toxic reactions is that a toxic
effect is directly the result of the toxic chemical acting on cells. Allergic responses are the result of
a chemical stimulating the body to release natural chemicals which are in turn directly responsible
for the effects seen. Thus, in an allergic reaction, the chemical acts merely as a trigger, not as the
bullet.
For all other types of toxicity, knowing the dose-response relationship is a necessary part of understanding the cause and effect relationship between chemical exposure and illness. As
Paracelsus once wrote, "The right dose differentiates a poison from a remedy." Keep in mind that
the toxicity of a chemical is an inherent quality of the chemical and cannot be changed without
changing the chemical to another form. The toxic effects on an organism are related to the
amount of exposure.
Measures of exposure
Exposure to poisons can be intentional or unintentional. The effects of exposure to poisons vary
with the amount of exposure, which is another way of saying "the dose." Usually when we think of
dose, we think in terms of taking one vitamin capsule a day or two aspirin every four hours, or
something like that. Contamination of food or water with chemicals can also provide doses of
chemicals each time we eat or drink. Some commonly used measures for expressing levels of
contaminants are listed in table 1. These measures tell us how much of the chemical is in food,
water or air. The amount we eat, drink, or breathe determines the actual dose we receive.
Concentrations of chemicals in the environment are most commonly expressed as ppm and ppb.
Government tolerance limits for various poisons usually use these abbreviations. Remember that
these are extremely small quantities. For example, if you put one teaspoon of salt in two gallons
of water the resulting salt concentration would be approximately 1,000 ppm and it would not even
taste salty!
Dose-effect relationships
The dose of a poison is going to determine the degree of effect it produces. The following example illustrates this principle. Suppose ten goldfish are in a ten-gallon tank and we add one ounce
of 100-proof whiskey to the water every five minutes until all the fish get drunk and swim upside
down. Probably none would swim upside down after the first two or three shots. After four or five,
a very sensitive fish might. After six or eight shots another one or two might. With a dose of ten
shots, five of the ten fish might be swimming upside down. After fifteen shots, there might be only
one fish swimming properly and it too would turn over after seventeen or eighteen shots.
The effect measured in this example is swimming upside down. Individual sensitivity to alcohol
varies, as does individual sensitivity to other poisons. There is a dose level at which none of the
fish swim upside down (no observed effect). There is also a dose level at which all of the fish
swim upside down. The dose level at which 50 percent of the fish have turned over is known as
the ED50, which means effective dose for 50 percent of the fish tested. The ED50 of any poison
varies depending on the effect measured. In general, the less severe the effect measured, the
lower the ED50 for that particular effect. Obviously poisons are not tested in humans in such a
fashion. Instead, animals are used to predict the toxicity that may occur in humans.
The potency of a poison is a measure of its strength compared to other poisons. The more potent
the poison, the less it takes to kill; the less potent the poison, the more it takes to kill. The potencies of poisons are often compared using signal words or categories as shown in the example in
table 2.
The designation toxic dose (TD) is used to indicate the dose (exposure) that will produce signs of
toxicity in a certain percentage of animals. The TD50 is the toxic dose for 50 percent of the animals tested. The larger the TD the more poison it takes to produce signs of toxicity. The toxic
dose does not give any information about the lethal dose because toxic effects (for example,
nausea and vomiting) may not be directly related to the way that the chemical causes death. The
toxicity of a chemical is an inherent property of the chemical itself. It is also true that chemicals
can cause different types of toxic effects, at different dose levels, depending on the animal species tested. For this reason, when using the toxic dose designation it is useful to precisely define
the type of toxicity measured, the animal species tested, and the dose and route of administration.
Toxicity assessment is quite complex, many factors can affect the results of toxicity tests. Some
of these factors include variables like temperature, food, light, and stressful environmental conditions. Other factors related to the animal itself include age, sex, health, and hormonal status.
The NOEL (no observable effect level) is the highest dose or exposure level of a poison that produces no noticeable toxic effect on animals. From our previous fish example, we know that there
is a dose below which no effect is seen. In toxicology, residue tolerance levels of poisons that are
permitted in food or in drinking water, for instance, are usually set from 100 to 1,000 times less
than the NOEL to provide a wide margin of safety for humans.
The TLV (threshold limit value) for a chemical is the airborne concentration of the chemical (expressed in ppm) that produces no adverse effects in workers exposed for eight hours per day five
days per week. The TLV is usually set to prevent minor toxic effects like skin or eye irritation.
Very often people compare poisons based on their LD50's and base decisions about the safety of
a chemical based on this number. This is an over-simplified approach to comparing chemicals
because the LD50 is simply one point on the dose-response curve that reflects the potential of
the compound to cause death. What is more important in assessing chemical safety is the
threshold dose, and the slope of the dose-response curve, which shows how fast the response
increases as the dose increases. While the LD50 can provide some useful information, it is of limited value in risk assessment because the LD50 only reflects information about the lethal effects
of the chemical. It is quite possible that a chemical will produce a very undesirable toxic effect
(such as reproductive toxicity or birth defects) at doses which cause no deaths at all.
A true assessment of chemical toxicity involves comparisons of numerous dose-response curves
covering many different types of toxic effects. The determination of which pesticides will be Restricted Use Pesticides involves this approach. Some Restricted Use Pesticides have very large
LD50s (low acute oral toxicity), however, they may be very strong skin or eye irritants and thus
require special handling.
The knowledge gained from dose-response studies in animals is used to set standards for human
exposure and the amount of chemical residue that is allowed in the environment. As mentioned
previously, numerous dose-response relationships must be determined, in many different species. Without this information, it is impossible to accurately predict the health risks associated with
chemical exposure. With adequate information, we can make informed decisions about chemical
exposure and work to minimize the risk to human health and the environment.
LD stands for "Lethal Dose". LD50 is the amount of a material, given all at once, which causes
the death of 50% (one half) of a group of test animals. The LD50 is one way to measure the
short-term poisoning potential (acute toxicity) of a material.
Toxicologists can use many kinds of animals but most often testing is done with rats and mice. It
is usually expressed as the amount of chemical administered (e.g., milligrams) per 100 grams (for
smaller animals) or per kilogram (for bigger test subjects) of the body weight of the test animal.
The LD50 can be found for any route of entry or administration but dermal (applied to the skin)
and oral (given by mouth) administration methods are the most common.
What does LC50 mean?
LC stands for "Lethal Concentration". LC values usually refer to the concentration of a chemical in
air but in environmental studies it can also mean the concentration of a chemical in water.
For inhalation experiments, the concentration of the chemical in air that kills 50% of the test animals in a given time (usually four hours) is the LC50 value.
Why study LD50s?
Chemicals can have a wide range of effects on our health. Depending on how the chemical will
be used, many kinds of toxicity tests may be required.
Since different chemicals cause different toxic effects, comparing the toxicity of one with another
is hard. We could measure the amount of a chemical that causes kidney damage, for example,
but not all chemicals will damage the kidney. We could say that nerve damage is observed when
10 grams of chemical A is administered, and kidney damage is observed when 10 grams of
chemical B is administered. However, this information does not tell us if A or B is more toxic because we do not know which damage is more critical or harmful.
Therefore, to compare the toxic potency or intensity of different chemicals, researchers must
measure the same effect. One way is to carry out lethality testing (the LD50 tests) by measuring
how much of a chemical is required to cause death. This type of test is also referred to as a
"quantal" test because it is measures an effect that "occurs" or "does not occur".
Who invented the idea of an LD50?
In 1927, J.W. Trevan attempted to find a way to estimate the relative poisoning potency of drugs
and medicines used at that time. He developed the LD50 test because the use of death as a "target" allows for comparisons between chemicals that poison the body in very different ways. Since
Trevan's early work, other scientists have developed different approaches for more direct, faster
methods of obtaining the LD50.
What are some other toxicity dose terms in common usage?
LD01 Lethal dose for 1% of the animal test population
LD100 Lethal dose for 100% of the animal test population
LDLO The lowest dose causing lethality
TDLO The lowest dose causing a toxic effect
Why are LD50 and LC50 values a measure of acute toxicity?
Acute toxicity is the ability of a chemical to cause ill effects relatively soon after one oral administration or a 4-hour exposure to a chemical in air. "Relatively soon" is usually defined as a period
of minutes, hours (up to 24) or days (up to about 2 weeks) but rarely longer.
How are LD/LC50 tests done?
In nearly all cases, LD50 tests are performed using a pure form of the chemical. Mixtures are
rarely studied.
The chemical may be given to the animals by mouth (oral); by applying on the skin (dermal); by
injection at sites such as the blood veins (i.v.- intravenous), muscles (i.m. - intramuscular) or into
the abdominal cavity (i.p. - intraperitoneal).
The LD50 value obtained at the end of the experiment is identified as the LD50 (oral), LD50
(skin), LD50 (i.v.), etc., as appropriate. Researchers can do the test with any animal species but
they use rats or mice most often. Other species include dogs, hamsters, cats, guinea-pigs, rabbits, and monkeys. In each case, the LD50 value is expressed as the weight of chemical administered per kilogram body weight of the animal and it states the test animal used and route of exposure or administration; e.g., LD50 (oral, rat) - 5 mg/kg, LD50 (skin, rabbit) - 5 g/kg. So, the example "LD50 (oral, rat) 5 mg/kg" means that 5 milligrams of that chemical for every 1 kilogram body
weight of the rat, when administered in one dose by mouth, causes the death of 50% of the test
group.
If the lethal effects from breathing a compound are to be tested, the chemical (usually a gas or
vapour) is first mixed in a known concentration in a special air chamber where the test animals
will be placed. This concentration is usually quoted as parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per
cubic metre (mg/m3). In these experiments, the concentration that kills 50% of the animals is
called an LC50 (Lethal Concentration 50) rather than an LD50. When an LC50 value is reported,
it should also state the kind of test animal studied and the duration of the exposure, e.g., LC50
(rat) - 1000 ppm/ 4 hr or LC50 (mouse) - 5mg/m3/ 2hr.
Which LD50 information is the most important for occupational health and safety purposes?
Inhalation and skin absorption are the most common routes by which workplace chemicals enter
the body. Thus, the most relevant from the occupational exposure viewpoint are the inhalation
and skin application tests. Despite this fact, the most frequently performed lethality study is the
oral LD50. This difference occurs because giving chemicals to animals by mouth is much easier
and less expensive than other techniques. However, the results of oral studies are important for
drugs, food poisonings, and accidental domestic poisonings. Oral occupational poisonings might
occur by contamination of food or cigarettes from unwashed hands, and by accidental swallowing.
How do I compare one LD50 value to another and what does it mean to humans?
In general, the smaller the LD50 value, the more toxic the chemical is. The opposite is also true:
the larger the LD50 value, the lower the toxicity.
The LD50 gives a measure of the immediate or acute toxicity of a chemical in the strain, sex, and
age group of a particular animal species being tested. Changing any of these variables (e.g., type
animal or age) could result in finding a different LD50 value. The LD50 test was neither designed
nor intended to give information on long-term exposure effects of a chemical.
Once you have an LD50 value, it can be compared to other values by using a toxicity scale. Confusion sometimes occurs because several different toxicity scales are in use. The two most common scales used are the "Hodge and Sterner Scale" and the "Gosselin, Smith and Hodge Scale".
These tables differ in both the numerical rating given to each class and the terms used to describe each class. For example, a chemical with an oral LD50 value of 2 mg/kg, would be rated
as "1" and "highly toxic" according to the Hodge and Sterner Scale (see Table 1) but rated as "6"
and "super toxic" according to the Gosselin, Smith and Hodge Scale (see Table 2). It is important
to reference the scale you used when classifying a compound.
It is also important to know that the actual LD50 value may be different for a given chemical depending on the route of exposure (e.g., oral, dermal, inhalation). For example, some LD50s for
dichlorvos, an insecticide commonly used in household pesticide strips, are listed below:
ment promotes enhanced international cooperation and coordination on the scientific validation of
non- and reduced-animal toxicity testing methods.
unit). Care should be taken if the predicted value is close to the threshold, while if the predicted
value is well above or below the BCF threshold, the prediction is much more reliable.
Models for carcinogenicity give a quite large error. About one out three chemicals is wrongly predicted. Better results can be obtained if the applicability domain of the model is evaluated. At
least three models for carcinogenicity should be used, because the results vary. In case of
agreement, the prediction is more reliable.
Relation/Comparison with other methods
Any model, such as animal models (also called in vivo) or cellular models (in vitro models), is a
system which applies to a specific situation, and simplifies a complex system, which cannot be
used experimentally for investigation. For instance, in case of toxicity studies, the target is human
health, and for environmental studies the target may be a certain ecosystem. In practice, all current models simplify the final target. The rabbit model will never replace the human being, and
similarly the trout used in a tank cannot replace the complex environmental system where many
different fishes, and animal, and environmental conditions exist. Methods like in vitro and in silico
models are often called alternative methods, because they can be used as alternative to animal
models. In addition, these methods can be used to provide further information, to better address
the final target: human beings and environment. Thus, it would be reductive to see in silico methods simply as surrogate of animal models.
The comparison and integration of in vivo, in vitro and in silico, have been discussed during the
workshop organized by the EC funded project RAINBOW.
The debate
There is a debate on the use of QSAR in particular, and in silico models in general. The acceptability of these tools depends on the user and the purpose.
Major criticisms are:
In silico models are not reliable
Toxicity is too complex to be modeled
In vivo veritas. This means that only the real experiment on the animal will provide the real result.
Indeed, all in silico models should give a proof of their performance. In the past, the classical
models were developed using all data, which were used to build up a model without any validation of the model. The points were fitted in a linear regression, and no demonstration was given if
this regression was applicable to other chemicals (Kaiser, K. L. E. at all, 1999).
The interest on the use of in silico models for regulatory purposes contributed to the discussion
on the validation of the in silico models. A clear definition of the possible use of the model should
be given, and pitfalls clearly indicated, for all in silico methods, such as QSAR, read-across and
docking studies. Examples in this direction are the tools developed within CAESAR, which guide
the user, indicating results on similar compounds, and errors.
Even if toxicity is complex, some phenomena are simplier and rules have been identified. For instance, in case of aquatic toxicity most of the chemicals can be explained with quite simple relationships (for more info refer to the DEMETRA project). Genotoxicity has been modeled in large
extent on the basis of some toxic fragments or related QSAR models (more info at CAESAR project). Improvement seems possible, on the basis of more data (and there are huge initiatives in
this direction, such as ToxCast), better models, and integration of models.
Even in vivo models cannot provide all answers. A wise integration of models, including in silico
models, can only improve our knowledge. In silico models take advantage of computers to better
examine the data and information available. Disregard this would mean not to use all pieces of
information we have.
Challenges
In silico tools can offer immediate, world-wide, free (in many cases) access to a formidable
amount of tools: databases, libraries of structures and properties, literature studies, models.
Within a few years ToxCast will produce experimental data on 100,000 chemicals, omics will pro-
duce huge amount of data, HTPS will generate unprecedented amount of data. No single human
expert will have the time and the possibility to dig these incredibly large collections of results.
Even today thousands of chemicals are present in libraries with their toxicity properties.
The sooner the correct use of in silico models will be widespread, the better, in order to take advantage and exploit these results.
QSAR and REACH
REACH legislation states that Non-Testing Methods (NTM) can be used within REACH. These
methods include Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models and read-across.
Before making an animal experiment the industry should verify if alternative methods exist. However, so far there is a deep gap of knowledge on which methods are available and can be used in
practice. READ MORE
The EU Regulation REACH which entered into force in 2007 in the EU represents today the most
advanced system in the world to register, evaluate and authorize chemical substances. According
to latest estimates some fourty or fifty thousand substances will be processed in three phases,
starting with high production volumes (beyond 1,000 t) and the most concerning substances. The
deadline of the first phase has been on 30 November 2010.
To correctly evaluate the impact on the environment and human health industry will pay a high
cost (billions of euros), and there is the risk that millions of animals will be sacrified to produce the
necessary toxicity data. It is also uncertain if the number of certified laboratories is sufficient to
cope in a reasonable time (years) with the need to produce such data.
To limit these problems, the REACH legislation promotes the use of non-testing methods. These
methods include the read across and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). Read
across bases the evaluation of the unknown compound on the values of similar chemicals, while
the QSAR (or SAR in case of models non quantitative) uses some chemical descriptors to evaluate the toxicity. Experience on the validity, predictivity and feasibility of these tools is still under
discussion
gen required feeding the test substance to or injecting it into laboratory animals such as rats or
mice and then examining them for evidence of tumor formation. Testing took years to complete,
hundreds of animals, and millions of dollars.
Any substance that causes bacterial mutation in the Ames test is not given further consideration
for development. A substance that does not produce bacterial mutation still must undergo animal
testing, but at least the manufacturer has a good idea that it is not a cancer-causing agent.
volume for gaseous preparations at least one substance posing human health or environmental
hazards; or
(b) in an individual concentration of 0,1 % by weight for non-gaseous preparations at least one
substance that is persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic or very persistent and very bioaccumulative in accordance with the criteria set out in Annex XIII or has been included for reasons other
than those referred to in point (a) in the list established in accordance with Article 59(1); or
(c) a substance for which there are Community workplace exposure limits.
4. The safety data sheet need not be supplied where dangerous substances or preparations offered or sold to the general public are provided with sufficient information to enable users to take
the necessary measures as regards the protection of human health, safety and the environment,
unless requested by a downstream user or distributor.
5. The safety data sheet shall be supplied in an official language of the Member State(s) where
the substance or preparation is placed on the market, unless the Member State(s) concerned
provide otherwise.
6. The safety data sheet shall be dated and shall contain the following headings:
1. identification of the substance/preparation and of the company/undertaking;
2. hazards identification;
3. composition/information on ingredients;
4. first-aid measures;
5. fire-fighting measures;
6. accidental release measures;
7. handling and storage;
8. exposure controls/personal protection;
9. physical and chemical properties;
10. stability and reactivity;
11. toxicological information;
12. ecological information;
13. disposal considerations;
14. transport information;
15. regulatory information;
16. other information.
7. Any actor in the supply chain who is required to prepare a chemical safety report according to
Articles 14 or 37 shall place the relevant exposure scenarios (including use and exposure categories where appropriate) in an annex to the safety data sheet covering identified uses and including specific conditions resulting from the application of Section 3 of Annex XI.
Any downstream user shall include relevant exposure scenarios, and use other relevant information, from the safety data sheet supplied to him when compiling his own safety data sheet for
identified uses.
Any distributor shall pass on relevant exposure scenarios, and use other relevant information,
from the safety data sheet supplied to him when compiling his own safety data sheet for uses for
which he has passed on information according to Article 37(2).
8. A safety data sheet shall be provided free of charge on paper or electronically.
9. Suppliers shall update the safety data sheet without delay on the following occasions:
(a) as soon as new information which may affect the risk management measures, or new information on hazards becomes available;
(b) once an authorisation has been granted or refused;
(c) once a restriction has been imposed.
The new, dated version of the information, identified as "Revision: (date)", shall be provided free
of charge on paper or electronically to all former recipients to whom they have supplied the sub-
stance or preparation within the preceding 12 months. Any updates following registration shall
include the registration number.
Communication of chemicals hazards to users, in respect of the typical content (format
and types of data) of labels and Safety Data Sheets (Ref GHS Chapters 1.4 and 1.5)
To provide a high level of protection of human health and the environment from the use of
chemicals.
To make the people who place chemicals on the market (manufacturers and importers)
responsible for understanding and managing the risks associated with their use.
To allow the free movement of substances on the EU market.
To enhance innovation in and the competitiveness of the EU chemicals industry.
To promote the use of alternative methods for the assessment of the hazardous properties
of substances e.g. quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR).
No data, no market.
A major part of REACH is the requirement for manufacturers or importers of substances to register them with a central European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). A registration package will be supported by a standard set of data on that substance. The amount of data required is proportionate
to the amount of substance manufactured or supplied.
If a manufacturer does not register their substances, then the data on them will not be available
and as a result, they will no longer be able to manufacture or supply them legally, i.e. no data, no
market.
Scope and exemptions.
REACH applies to substances manufactured or imported into the EU in quantities of 1 ton per
year or more. Generally, it applies to all individual chemical substances on their own, in preparations or in articles (if the substance is intended to be released during normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of use from an article).
Some substances are specifically excluded:
Radioactive substances.
Substances under customs supervision.
The transport of substances.
Non-isolated intermediates.
Waste.
Some naturally occurring low-hazard substances.
Some substances, covered by more specific legislation, have tailored provisions, including:
Other substances have tailored provisions within the REACH legislation, as long they are used in
specified conditions:
Isolated intermediates.
Substances used for research and development.
Pre-registration.
It is estimated that there are around 30,000 substances on the European market in quantities of 1
ton or more per year. Registering all of these at once would be a huge task for both industry and
regulators. To overcome this, the registration of those substances already being manufactured or
supplied is to take place in three phases. These phases are spread over 11 years. To benefit
from these phased-in deadlines, manufacturers or importers needed to pre-register their substances from 1st June to 1st December 2008.
Registration.
Registration is a requirement on industry (manufacturers/importers) to collect and collate specified sets of information on the properties of those substances they manufacture or supply at or
above 1 tonne per year. This information is used to perform an assessment of the hazards and
risks that a substance may pose and how those risks can be controlled. This information and its
assessment is submitted to the European Chemicals Agency in Helsinki. Further information on
registration can be found on the ECHA website.
Joint registration and data sharing.
This is the principle that for any one substance, a single set of information on its intrinsic properties is produced that is shared by all those companies that manufacture or supply that substance.
Business specific (e.g. company name) and business sensitive (e.g. how it is used) information is
submitted separately by each company. The Companies will work together to get an agreement
on information sharing through a Substance Information Exchange Forum (SIEF). It is the responsibility of the businesses involved in the SIEF to work out the details of how the information
is shared. A role for national authorities in this aspect of REACH is not foreseen. Companies who
submit joint registrations via a SIEF benefit from a reduced registration fee.
Evaluation.
Dossiers submitted in support of registration will be subject to evaluation under REACH as follows:
Compliance checking: This is a check of the quality of the information submitted by industry. It will
be undertaken by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki and will be on a sample
(at least 5%) of dossiers submitted at each tonnage level.
Dossier Evaluation: For substances registered at the highest tonnage levels (=100 tonnes/annum) a proposal is made by the registrant detailing those animal tests they consider are
required from the list of standard tests in Annexes IX and X of REACH. The ECHA will evaluate
these testing proposals to prevent unnecessary animal testing.
Substance evaluation: This is undertaken by national Competent Authorities on substances that
have been prioritised for potential regulatory action because of concerns about their hazardous
properties. A key regulatory outcome of evaluation could be the imposition of restrictions on the
manufacture, supply or use of a substance. Substance evaluation may also lead to a substance
being added to the priority list for authorisation, or a proposal to change the classification and labelling.
All dossiers will undergo an automated completeness check to ensure that all the relevant pieces
of information are present. This completeness check will not assess the quality or suitability of the
information. Further details on evaluation can also be found on the ECHA website.
Authorisation.
In order to place on the market or use substances with properties that are deemed to be of 'very
high concern', industry must apply for an authorisation. The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
in Helsinki will publish an initial list containing substances to be considered for the authorisation
process by 1 June 2009. A company wishing to market or use such a substance must submit an
application to the ECHA for an authorisation. Decisions on authorisation are made by the Euro-
pean Commission, taking advice from the ECHA and member states. Applicants will have to
demonstrate that risks associated with uses of these substances are adequately controlled or that
the benefits of their use outweigh the risks. Applicants must also analyse whether there are safer
suitable alternatives or technologies. If there are, then they must prepare substitution plans and if
not, then they should provide information on research and development activities if appropriate.
Restrictions.
If any substance poses a particular threat and it is deemed to require Community-wide action, it
can be restricted. Restrictions take many forms, from a total ban to not being allowed to supply it
to the general public. Restrictions can be applied to any substance, including those that do not
require registration. This part of REACH takes over the provisions of the Marketing & Use Directive.
Classification and labelling.
An important part of chemical safety is clear information about any hazardous properties of a
substance. The classification of different chemicals according to their characteristics (for example, those that are corrosive, or toxic to fish, etc.) currently follows an established system, which
is reflected in REACH. The CLP regulation deals with this and dovetails with REACH.
Substances of Very High Concern.
Some substances have hazards that have serious consequences, e.g. they cause cancer, or they
have other harmful properties and remain in the environment for a long time and gradually build
up in animals. These are 'substances of very high concern'. This category also includes substances shown to be of equivalent concern, such as "endocrine disruptors". One of the aims of
REACH is to control the use of such substances via authorisation and encourage industry to substitute these substances for safer ones.
Information in the supply chain.
The passage of information along the supply chain is a key feature of REACH. Users should be
able to understand what manufacturers and importers know about the dangers involved in using
chemicals and how to control risks. However, in order for suppliers to be able to assess these
risks, they need information from the users. REACH provides a framework in which information
can be passed both up and down supply chains.
REACH adopts and builds on the previous system for passing information - the Safety Data
Sheet (see section 1.5). This needs to accompany materials down through the supply chain, providing the information users require to ensure chemicals are safely managed. In time, it is intended that these safety data sheets will include information on safe handling and use.
5.21 Summary.
In this study unit, we have seen that there are legal requirements as to the toxicological testing of
new substances - the level of testing depends on the quantity of substance to be produced.
A key concept in toxicology is the dose-response relationship, 'dose' being the amount per unit of
body mass of toxic substance to which the organ is exposed, and 'response' being the resultant
effect.
The mid-point of the S-shaped dose-response curve represents the dose which would cause
death in 50% of the organisms - LD50. LD90 enables estimation of the dose that will kill the majority (i.e. 90% of a sample of animals). Lethal concentration (LC) can be determined for a specified duration of exposure.
There are three types of toxicity test acute (to determine the effects which occur within a short period after dosing);
subacute (to provide information on the target organs affected by the substance and the major
toxic effects); and
Part of body
affected
Time scale of
appearence
Effect
Example
Irritant or cor- Any, but usually A few minutes Inflammation, burns and blisters of
Ammonia, sulphuric a
rosive
the eyes, lungs to several days exposed area. Frequently healed af- nitrogen oxides, caust
and skin
soda
Fibrogenic
Allergic
Days to years
Dermatitic
Skin
Days to years
Poisonous
A few minutes
to many years
Carbon tetrachloride,
cury, cadmium, carbo
monoxide, hydrogen c
nide.
Asphyxiants
Lungs
Minutes
Page 5.
Examples of commonly occurring _____ substances include -acids, ammonia, sodium hydroxide
Multiple Choice (HP)
Answer 1:
corrosive
Response 1:
Jump 1:
Next page
Answer 2:
harmful
Response 2:
Jump 2:
This page
Answer 3:
dermatitic
Response 3:
Jump 3:
This page
Answer 4:
carcinogenic
Response 4:
Jump 4:
This page
Page 6.
The deposition of aerosols and particles in the respiratory system by the Ciliary escalator mechanism is for particle sizes of
Multiple Choice (HP)
Answer 1:
Above 10m
Response 1:
Jump 1:
This page
Answer 2:
7-10m
Response 2:
Jump 2:
Next page
Answer 3:
0.5-7m
Response 3:
Jump 3:
This page
Page 7.
_____ grow rapidly without restraint, spread into surrounding tissue and have their own cell structure, unlike the cells of origin. The term cancer is used to describe the formation of these tumours.
Multiple Choice (HP)
Answer 1:
Benign tumours
Response 1:
Jump 1:
This page
Answer 2:
Malignant tumours
Response 2:
Jump 2:
Next page
Page 8.
Irritation symptoms may be caused by
Multiple Choice (HP)
Answer 1:
Eye toxins
Response 1:
Jump 1:
This page
Answer 2:
Cutaneous agents
Response 2:
Jump 2:
Next page
Answer 3:
Hematopoietic agents
Response 3:
Jump 3:
This page
Answer 4:
Neurotoxins
Response 4:
Jump 4:
This page
Page 9.
Mercury, Chloroform, ether are likely to damage which Target Organ/System
Multiple Choice (HP)
Answer 1:
Skin
Response 1:
Jump 1:
This page
Answer 2:
Reproductive
Response 2:
Jump 2:
This page
Answer 3:
Nervous
Response 3:
Jump 3:
Next page
Answer 4:
Kidney
Response 4:
Jump 4:
This page