NABL 218 - Desktop Surveillance
NABL 218 - Desktop Surveillance
NABL 218 - Desktop Surveillance
NABL
Desktop Surveillance
Issue No. 02
Issue date: 29.05.2013
Amendment No.02
Amendment date: 15.01.2015
AMENDMENT SHEET
Sl
Page
Clause
Date of
No.
No.
Amendment
2/4
ii/4
Preface
11.03.2014
15.01.2015
Amendment made
Reasons
QO
Summary of NCs of last internal audit & CPAIC
Minutes of MRM
recommendations
4/4
12.2
15.01.2015
Signature Signature
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PREFACE
Director
For an accredited laboratory to maintain its accreditation status, it is mandatory that the laboratory continues to comply
with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 or ISO: 15189: 2007/ ISO: 15189: 2012 (whichever is relevant) and
NABL policies. Once a laboratory has been accredited for the first time, NABL conducts onsite surveillance visit within
the first year of accreditation to verify the continued compliance. In the subsequent accreditation cycles of 2 years,
instead of onsite surveillance visits, NABL has evolved a monitoring system for verifying the continued compliance of
the laboratory by conducting desktop surveillance.
For this purpose the laboratory should provide the information as per this document and the same will be considered
to verify the continued compliance for maintaining accreditation. The information provided by the laboratory is
evaluated at NABL secretariat and if the information is conforming to the requirements; the laboratory is allowed to
continue its accreditation status based on desktop surveillance. However; if the information provided is insufficient to
establish the continued compliance; an onsite surveillance visit may be conducted or NABL may call for further
additional evidences to fulfil the requirements for continuation of accreditation.
The laboratories are therefore advised to provide the desired information accurately as per the format. The information
provided is subject to verification at onsite surveillance (if conducted) or in subsequent reassessment visit. Any wrong
information provided may lead to adverse decision by NABL.
Discipline(s):
Accreditation validity period:
Period of the report:
1. Status of implementation and monitoring the effectiveness of corrective actions(s) taken on non-conformities raised
during last re-assessment: (please provide details in tabular format)
Non-conformities raised during last
assessment
taken
2. Summary of last internal audit findings and corrective actions taken on non-conformities raised during the audit
a)
b)
c)
d)
Name(s)
ofQualification
auditors(s) &
designation
Affiliation
(Internal/ External)
Yes/No
Training status
Yes/ No
l)
m)
Non-conformities
Sl.
actions taken
r)
s)
n)
(Closed/
t)
v) 3.
Management Review Meeting
w) 3.1 Summary of last Management Review
x) a)
Date
y)
Status
Open)
No
.
q)
u)
o)
p)
of
last
Management
Review____________________________________________________________
b)
Whether all the agenda points as required by the relevant standard (ISO/IEC 17025 / ISO 15189)
af) Complain
S.
ag) Complaint
t No. &
ah) Investigation
details
ai) Corrective
findings
action taken
date
al)
am)
an)
ao)
ap)
Yes/No
aj) Status
settled/
ak) unsettled
aq)
ar)
as)
at) 5. Details of internal quality control (IQC) checks practiced by the laboratory
au) a)
Which of the following quality control measures are used by the laboratory, please tick appropriate
column(s).
i.
av) Use of Certified reference material/reference material.
aw) ax)
ii.
az) Use of internal quality control material
ba) bb)
iii.
bd) Replicate testing using same or different method.
be) bf)
iv.
bh) Retesting of retained item
bi) bj)
v.
bl) Replicate calibration using same or different method
bm) bn)
vi.
bp) Recalibration of retained items.
bq) br)
vii.
bt) Use of control charts using control samples
bu) bv)
viii.
bx) Use of control charts using check standards
by) bz)
ix.
cb) Correlation of results for different characteristics of an item
cc) cd)
x.
cf) Any other technique(s); Please specify......
cg) ch)
cj)
b) Details of IQC plans of the laboratory as per accredited scope mentioning frequency of IQC checks
ck)
(Annexure: _______________)
c) Whether the compliance criterion is defined, met and corrective actions taken if required
Yes/ No
cl) 6. Details of participation in EQAS/ PT/ ILC and initiation of ILC by the laboratory
cm) a)
cn) b)
co) c)
____________________________________
cp) Results of EQAS/ PT/ ILC participation
ay)
bc)
bg)
bk)
bo)
bs)
bw)
ca)
ce)
ci)
any)
cq)
EQA
cr) PT
S/ PT
programme
providers (or)
No.
cs) Paramete
ct) Z Score/
En Value /
analysis in case of
SDI
unsatisfactory
ILC/
performance
coordinating
laboratory
cv)
cx)
cy)
cz)
da)
cw)
db)
dc) 7. Please furnish detail of the reference standards, CRM, equipments, held by the laboratory
dd)
de)
S.
No.
dh)
dm)
di)
dj)
df)
Date of calibration
dg)
Metrological
(reference standard/
traceability/ calibration
agency
(CRM)
dk)
dl)
Note: Equipments, CRM, Reference standards details shall be given separately wherever applicable
dn)
Does the laboratory identify training needs of its employees and prepare an annual training plan
Yes/No
dq) b)
Whether the training plan implemented
dr) c)
Please
provide
clarifications
of
Yes/ No
lapses
in
implementation
__________________________________
ds) d)
Whether the effectiveness of training is evaluated and records are maintained
(if
any)
Yes/ No
dt)
du) 9. Has there been a change in the following aspects of the laboratory operations since last assessment?
dv) a)
Legal Status
: Yes/No (If yes, give details thereof)
dw) b)
Ownership
: Yes/No (If yes, give details thereof)
dx) c)
Top Management
: Yes/No (If yes, give details thereof)
dy) d)
Key Laboratory Personnel
: Yes/No (If yes, give details thereof)
dz) e)
Policies
: Yes/No (If yes, give details thereof)
ea) f)
Resources
: Yes/No (If yes, give details thereof)
eb) g)
Laboratory Premises
: Yes/No (If yes, give details thereof)
ec) h)
Major Test/ Calibration equipment
: Yes/ No (If yes, give details thereof)
ed) i)
Authorised signatories
: Yes/ No (If yes, give details thereof)
ee) Note: For any of above stated changes; laboratory should have informed NABL within 15 days of its change as defined
in NABL 131. The above declarations cannot be considered as an application for change
ef) 10. Does the laboratory want a change/ addition in authorised signatories? If yes please furnish bio data of
proposed authorised signatories along with signatures in NABL Form 71
eg) Note: Approval of authorised signatories is subject to verification of competence by NABL
eh)
ei) 11. Desktop surveillance fee details: __________________________________________________________
ej) Note: Provide the DD number/ bank details along with the amount paid. All payments shall be payable at New Delhi
ek)
ep) 12.2 Please furnish a self declaration by the head of the laboratory/ laboratory director for continued compliance
of the laboratory to ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 or ISO 15189:2007 / ISO: 15189: 2012 (whichever is applicable) and
relevant NABL specific criteria (s) (to be specified) since last on site assessment. Annexure...
eq) Note: The self declaration to be given on laboratorys letter head
er)
es) 13.
All information provided above is true and I am aware that any wrong information / declaration given therein
Signature
of
Laboratory
Head/
Laboratory
Director__________________________________________________________
ev) Name
&
Designation
_________________________________________________________________________________
ew) Date
&
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ex)
ey)
ez)
fa)
fb)
fc)
fd)
fe)
ff)
fg)
fh)
fi)
Place
fj)
fk)
fl)
fm)
fn)
fo)
fp)
fq)
fr)
ga)
fs)
ft)
fu)
fv)
fw)
fx)
fy)
fz)
National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
NABL House
Plot No. 45, Sector 44,
Gurgaon - 122002, Haryana, India
Tel. no.: 91-124-4679700 (30 lines)
Fax: 91-124-4679799
Website: www.nabl-india.org