DNV Os C104 2014

OFFSHORE STANDARD
DNV-OS-C104
Structural Design of Self-Elevating Units

(LRFD Method)
JULY 2014
The electronic pdf version of this document found through http://www.dnv.com is the officially binding version
DET NORSKE VERITAS AS
FOREWORD
DNV is a global provider of knowledge for managing risk. Today, safe and responsible business conduct is both a license
to operate and a competitive advantage. Our core competence is to identify, assess, and advise on risk management. From
our leading position in certification, classification, verification, and training, we develop and apply standards and best
practices. This helps our customers safely and responsibly improve their business performance. DNV is an independent
organisation with dedicated risk professionals in more than 100 countries, with the purpose of safeguarding life, property
and the environment.
DNV service documents consist of among others the following types of documents:
Service Specifications. Procedural requirements.
Standards. Technical requirements.
Recommended Practices. Guidance.
The Standards and Recommended Practices are offered within the following areas:
A) Qualification, Quality and Safety Methodology
B) Materials Technology
C) Structures
D) Systems
E) Special Facilities
F) Pipelines and Risers
G) Asset Operation
H) Marine Operations
J) Cleaner Energy
O) Subsea Systems
U) Unconventional Oil & Gas
Det Norske Veritas AS July 2014

Any comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected]
This service document has been prepared based on available knowledge, technology and/or information at the time of issuance of this document, and is believed to reflect the best of
contemporary technology. The use of this document by others than DNV is at the user's sole risk. DNV does not accept any liability or responsibility for loss or damages resulting from
any use of this document.
Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

CHANGES CURRENT Page 3
CHANGES CURRENT
General
This document supersedes DNV-OS-C104, April 2012.
Text affected by the main changes in this edition is highlighted in red colour. However, if the changes involve
a whole chapter, section or sub-section, normally only the title will be in red colour.
Det Norske Veritas AS, company registration number 945 748 931, has on 27th November 2013 changed its
name to DNV GL AS. For further information, see www.dnvgl.com. Any reference in this document to
Det Norske Veritas AS or DNV shall therefore also be a reference to DNV GL AS.
Main changes July 2014

General
The definition to structural categorisation in Ch.2 Sec.1 is updated. In parallel, the document structure has been
brought in line with other DNV Offshore Standards with the introduction of chapters and a decimal numbering
system with subsequent updates to cross-references as follows:
Introduction of chapters: Ch.1. Introduction (i.e previous Sec.1 becomes Ch.1 Sec.1), Ch.2. Technical
content (i.e. previous Sec.2 becomes Ch.2 Sec.1, previous Sec.3 becomes Ch.2 Sec.2 etc) and Ch.3.
Classification and certification.
Change to decimal numbering system (e.g. previous clause A101 becomes 1.1.1, previous B200, becomes
2.2 etc).
Ch.1 Sec.1 Introduction
Remaining parts of previous Sec.1.
[3.1]: Revised and simplified verbal forms.
Ch.2 Sec.1 Structural categorisation, material selection and inspection principles
[2]: A guidance note has been deleted and definitions for primary steel categories have been updated.
Ch.3 Sec.1 Classification
As moved from previous Sec.1, completed with some clarifying statements and additional references.
Editorial corrections
In addition to the above stated main changes, editorial corrections may have been made.

Contents Page 4
CONTENTS
CHANGES CURRENT ................................................................................................................... 3
CH. 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 7

Sec. 1
Introduction......................................................................................................................... 7
1
General ....................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.1
Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 7
1.2
Objectives ........................................................................................................................................ 7
1.3
Scope and application ...................................................................................................................... 7
References .................................................................................................................................................. 8
2.1
Offshore standards ........................................................................................................................... 8
2.2
Recommended practices, classification notes and other references ................................................ 8
Definitions .................................................................................................................................................. 8
3.1
Verbal forms .................................................................................................................................... 8
3.2
Terms ............................................................................................................................................... 8
Abbreviations and symbols ...................................................................................................................... 9
4.1
Abbreviations................................................................................................................................... 9
4.2
Symbols............................................................................................................................................ 9
CH. 2 TECHNICAL CONTENT ......................................................................... 11

Sec. 1
Structural categorisation, material selection and inspection principles...................... 11

1
2
3
Sec. 2
Design principles ............................................................................................................... 14

1
Sec. 3
General ..................................................................................................................................................... 11
1.1
Scope.............................................................................................................................................. 11
Structural categorisation ........................................................................................................................ 11
Material selection .................................................................................................................................... 11
3.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 11
3.2
Design and service temperatures ................................................................................................... 12
3.3
Selection of structural steel............................................................................................................ 12
Inspection categories ............................................................................................................................... 13
4.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 13
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 14
1.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 14
1.2
Overall design ................................................................................................................................ 14
1.3
Details design ................................................................................................................................ 14
Design conditions..................................................................................................................................... 14
2.1
Basic conditions ............................................................................................................................. 14
2.2
Transit ............................................................................................................................................ 14
2.3
Installation and retrieval ................................................................................................................ 15
2.4
Operation and survival................................................................................................................... 16
Environmental conditions....................................................................................................................... 17
3.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 17
3.2
Wind............................................................................................................................................... 17
3.3
Waves............................................................................................................................................. 17
3.4
Current ........................................................................................................................................... 18
3.5
Temperature ................................................................................................................................... 18
3.6
Snow and ice .................................................................................................................................. 18
Method of analysis................................................................................................................................... 18
4.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 18
4.2
Global structural models ................................................................................................................ 19
4.3
Local structural models.................................................................................................................. 20
4.4
Fatigue analysis.............................................................................................................................. 20
Design loads ....................................................................................................................... 21

1
2
3
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 21
1.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 21
Permanent loads ...................................................................................................................................... 21
Variable functional loads........................................................................................................................ 21

Contents Page 5
6
7
8
Sec. 4
Ultimate limit states (ULS)............................................................................................... 27

1
Sec. 5
General ..................................................................................................................................................... 30
1.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 30
Fatigue analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 30
2.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 30
2.2
World-wide operation .................................................................................................................... 30
2.3
Restricted operation ....................................................................................................................... 30
2.4
Simplified fatigue analysis............................................................................................................. 30
2.5
Stochastic fatigue analysis ............................................................................................................. 31
Accidental limit states (ALS) ........................................................................................... 32

1
2
3
4
5
6
Sec. 7
General ..................................................................................................................................................... 27
1.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 27
1.2
Global capacity .............................................................................................................................. 27
Structural capacity.................................................................................................................................. 27
2.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 27
2.2
Footing strength ............................................................................................................................. 28
2.3
Leg strength ................................................................................................................................... 29
2.4
Jackhouse support strength ............................................................................................................ 29
2.5
Hull strength................................................................................................................................... 29
Scantlings and weld connections............................................................................................................ 29
Fatigue limit states (FLS) ................................................................................................. 30

1
Sec. 6
3.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 21
3.2
Lifeboat platforms.......................................................................................................................... 21
3.3
Tank loads...................................................................................................................................... 21
Environmental loads ............................................................................................................................... 22
4.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 22
4.2
Wind loads ..................................................................................................................................... 22
4.3
Waves............................................................................................................................................. 23
4.4
Current ........................................................................................................................................... 23
4.5
Wave and current loads.................................................................................................................. 24
4.6
Sea pressures during transit ........................................................................................................... 25
4.7
Heavy components during transit .................................................................................................. 25
Deformation loads ................................................................................................................................... 25
5.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 25
5.2
Displacement dependent loads....................................................................................................... 26
Accidental loads....................................................................................................................................... 26
6.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 26
Fatigue loads ............................................................................................................................................ 26
7.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 26
Combination of loads .............................................................................................................................. 26
8.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 26
General ..................................................................................................................................................... 32
1.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 32
Collisions .................................................................................................................................................. 32
2.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 32
Dropped objects....................................................................................................................................... 33
3.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 33
Fires .......................................................................................................................................................... 33
4.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 33
Explosions ................................................................................................................................................ 33
5.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 33
Unintended flooding................................................................................................................................ 33
6.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 33
Special considerations....................................................................................................... 35
1
2
3
General ..................................................................................................................................................... 35
Pre-load capacity ..................................................................................................................................... 35
2.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 35
Overturning stability............................................................................................................................... 36
3.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 36

Contents Page 6
Air gap...................................................................................................................................................... 36
4.1
General........................................................................................................................................... 36
CH. 3 CLASSIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION ......................................... 38

Sec. 1
Classification ..................................................................................................................... 38
1
General ..................................................................................................................................................... 38
1.1
Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 38
1.2
Application..................................................................................................................................... 38
1.3
Documentation............................................................................................................................... 38
App. A Permanently installed self-elevating units ...................................................................... 39

A.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 39
A.2 Fatigue...................................................................................................................................................... 39
A.3 Inspection and maintenance ..................................................................................................................... 39
CHANGES HISTORIC ................................................................................................................. 40

Ch.1 Sec.1 Introduction Page 7
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
1 General
1.1 Introduction
1.1.1 This standard provides principles, technical requirements and guidance for the design and construction
of self-elevating units.
1.1.2 This standard is based on the load and resistance factor design (LRFD). LRFD is defined in DNV-OS-C101.
1.1.3 Self-elevating units may alternatively be designed according to working stress design principles, which
is defined in DNV-OS-C201.
1.1.4 The standard has been written for general world-wide application. Coastal State regulations may include
requirements in excess of the provisions of this standard depending on size, type, location and intended service
of the offshore unit/installation.
1.2 Objectives
1.2.1 The objectives of this standard are to:
provide an internationally acceptable standard of safety for self-elevating units by defining minimum
requirements for the structural design, materials and construction
serve as a technical reference document in contractual matters between purchaser and manufacturer
serve as a guideline for designers, purchasers, contractors and regulators.
specify procedures and requirements for units and installations subject to DNV verification and
classification services.
1.3 Scope and application

1.3.1 This standard applies to all types of self-elevating units constructed in steel.
1.3.2 All marine operations shall, as far as practicable, be based upon well-proven principles, techniques,
systems and equipment and shall be undertaken by qualified, competent personnel possessing relevant
experiences.
1.3.3 A self-elevating unit is designed to function in a number of modes, e.g. transit, operational and survival.
Design criteria for the different modes shall define and include relevant consideration of the following items:
intact condition, structural strength

damaged condition, structural strength
fatigue strength
accidental damage
air gap
overturning stability
watertight integrity and hydrostatic stability.
Limiting design criteria when going from one mode to another shall be established and clearly documented.
Watertight integrity and hydrostatic stability shall comply with requirements given in DNV-OS-C301.
1.3.4 For novel designs, or unproven applications of designs where limited or no direct experience exists,
relevant analyses and model testing, shall be performed which clearly demonstrate that an acceptable level of
safety is obtained.
1.3.5 Requirements concerning riser systems are not considered in this standard.
1.3.6 Structural design covering marine operation sequences is not covered in this standard and shall be
undertaken in accordance with the requirements stated in Rules for Planning and Execution of Marine
Operations.

2 References
2.1 Offshore standards
2.1.1 The standards listed in Table 1-1 include provisions, which through reference in this text constitute
provisions for this standard.
2.1.2 Other recognised standards may be used provided it is demonstrated that these meet or exceed the
requirements of the standards referenced in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1 DNV offshore standards
Reference
DNV-OS-A101
DNV-OS-B101
DNV-OS-C101
DNV-OS-C301
DNV-OS-C401
DNV-OS-D101
DNV-OS-D301
Title
Safety Principles and Arrangement
Metallic Materials
Design of Offshore Steel Structures,
General (LRFD method)
Stability and Watertight Integrity
Fabrication and Testing of Offshore Structures
Marine and Machinery Systems and Equipment
Fire Protection
2.2 Recommended practices, classification notes and other references

The documents listed in Table 1-2 include acceptable methods for fulfilling the requirements in the standard
and may be used as a source of supplementary information. Only the referenced parts of the documents apply
for fulfilment of the present standard.
Table 1-2 Recommended practices, classification notes and other references
Reference
DNV-RP-C104
DNV-RP-C201
DNV-RP-C202
DNV-RP-C203
DNV-RP-C205
DNV Classification Note 30.1
SNAME 5-5A
Title
Self-Elevating Units
Buckling Strength of Plated Structures
Buckling Strength of Shells
Fatigue Strength Analysis of Offshore Steel Structures
Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads
Buckling Strength Analysis of Bars and Frames, and Spherical Shells
Foundations
Structural Reliability Analysis of Marine Structures
Site Specific Assessment of Mobile Jack-Up Units
3 Definitions
3.1 Verbal forms
Table 1-3 Verbal forms
Term
Definition
Shall
Verbal form used to indicate requirements strictly to be followed in order to conform to the document.
Should
Verbal form used to indicate that among several possibilities one is recommended as particularly suitable,
without mentioning or excluding others, or that a certain course of action is preferred but not necessarily
required.
May
Verbal form used to indicate a course of action permissible within the limits of the document.
3.2 Terms
3.2.1 Self-elevating unit or jack-up: A mobile unit having hull with sufficient buoyancy to transport the unit
to the desired location, and that is bottom founded in its operation mode. The unit reaches its operation mode
by lowering the legs to the seabed and then jacking the hull to the required elevation.
3.2.2 Moulded baseline: A horizontal line extending through the upper surface of hull bottom shell.
3.2.3 Installation condition: A condition during which a unit is lowering the legs and elevating the hull.
3.2.4 Operating conditions: Conditions wherein a unit is on location for purposes of drilling or other similar
operations, and combined environmental and operational loadings are within the appropriate design limits
established for such operations. The unit is supported on the seabed.

3.2.5 Retrieval conditions: Conditions during which a unit is lowering the hull and elevating the legs.
3.2.6 Survival conditions: Conditions wherein a unit is on location subjected to the most severe environmental
loadings for which the unit is designed. Drilling or similar operations may have been discontinued due to the
severity of the environmental loadings. The unit is supported on the seabed.
3.2.7 Transportation or transit conditions: All unit movements from one geographical location to another.
3.2.8 Field move: A wet transit that would require no more than a 12-hour voyage to a location where the unit
could be elevated, or to a protected location.
3.2.9 Ocean transit: A wet transit that would require more than a 12-hour voyage to a location where the unit
could be elevated, or to a protected location.
3.2.10 Dry transit: A transit where the unit is transported on a heavy lift unit.
3.2.11 Wet transit: A transit where the unit is floating during the move.
3.2.12 Sustained wind velocity: The average wind velocity during a time interval (sampling time) of 1 minute.
The most probable highest sustained wind velocity in a period of N years will be referred to as the N years
sustained wind. This is equivalent to a wind velocity with a recurrence period of N years.
3.2.13 Gust wind velocity: The average wind velocity during a time interval of 3 s. The N years gust wind
velocity is the most probable highest gust velocity in a period of N years.
3.2.14 One hour wind velocity: The average wind velocity during a time interval of one hour.
4 Abbreviations and symbols

4.1 Abbreviations
Abbreviations used in this standard are given in DNV-OS-C101 or in Table 1-4.
Table 1-4 Abbreviations
Abbreviation
LAT
MWL
SNAME
In full
Lowest astronomical tide
Mean still water level
Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers
4.2 Symbols
4.2.1 Latin characters:
ah
av
a
go
h
hop
k
m
ni
n0
pd
pdyn
pe
ps
qd
zb
A
CD
CM
CS
D
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
horizontal acceleration
vertical acceleration
the intercept of the design S-N curve with the log N axis
acceleration due to gravity
the shape parameter of the Weibull stress range distribution
vertical distance from the load point to the position of maximum filling height
the roughness height
inverse slope of the S-N curve
the number of stress variations in i years appropriate to the global analysis.
total number of stress variations during the lifetime of the structure
design pressure
pressure head due to flow through pipes
dynamic pressure
static pressure
critical contact pressure of spudcan
vertical distance from moulded baseline to load point
area of spudcan in contact with seabed
drag coefficient
inertia coefficient
shape coefficient
member diameter

DB
FV
Fvd
FVP
HS
KC
L
M
Med
MO
MS
MU
P
PE
PHd
PVd
R
T
TTH
TZ
Um
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
depth of barge
maximum design axial load in one leg (without load factors)
maximum design axial load in one leg (with load factors)
minimum required pre-load on one leg
significant wave height
Keulegan-Carpenter number
length or breadth of barge
mass of unit, cargo, equipment or other components
maximum design eccentricity moment
overturning moment
stabilising moment
minimum design moment restraint of the leg at the seabed
static axial load on one leg
Euler buckling load for one leg
horizontal design force on heavy component
vertical design force on heavy component
equivalent radius of spudcan contact area
wave period
transit draught
zero-upcrossing period
the maximum orbital particle velocity
4.2.2 Greek characters:
n0
ni
f,D
f,E
f,G,Q
M
s
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
amplification factor for leg bending response

extreme stress range that is exceeded once out of n0 stress variations
extreme stress range that is exceeded once out of ni stress variations.
density
partial load factor for deformation loads
partial load factor for environmental loads
partial load factor for permanent loads
material factor for steel
safety coefficient against overturning

Ch.2 Sec.1 Structural categorisation, material selection and inspection principles Page 11
CHAPTER 2 TECHNICAL CONTENT

SECTION 1 STRUCTURAL CATEGORISATION, MATERIAL SELECTION
AND INSPECTION PRINCIPLES
1 General
1.1 Scope
1.1.1 This section describes the structural categorisation, selection of steel materials and inspection principles
to be applied in design and construction of self-elevating units.
1.1.2 The structural application categories are determined based on the structural significance, consequences
of failure and the complexity of the joints. The structural application categories set the selection of steel quality
and the inspection extent of the welds.
1.1.3 The steel grades selected for structural components shall be related to calculated stresses and
requirements for toughness properties and shall be in compliance with the requirements given in DNV-OSB101 and DNV-OS-C101.
2 Structural categorisation
Application categories for structural components are defined in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.3. Structural
members of self-elevating units are grouped as follows:
Special category
1) Vertical columns in way of intersection with the mat structure.
2) Areas of concentrated stresses in elements of bottom of leg, including leg connection to spudcan or mat.
3) Intersections of lattice type leg structure that incorporates novel construction, including the use of steel
castings.
4) Areas of concentrated stresses in elements of guide structures, jacking and locking system(s), jackhouse
and support structure.
5) Areas of concentrated stresses in elements of crane pedestals, etc. and their supporting structure.
Primary category
1) Combination of bulkhead, deck, side and bottom plating within the hull which forms Box or I type
main supporting structure.
2) All components of lattice type legs and external plating of cylindrical legs.
3) Jackhouse supporting structure and bottom footing structure that receives initial transfer of load from legs.
4) Internal bulkheads, shell and deck of spudcan or bottom mat supporting structures which are designed to
distribute major loads, either uniform or concentrated, into the mat structure.
5) Main support structure of heavy substructures and equipment e.g. cranes, drill floor substructure, lifeboat
platform and helicopter deck.
Secondary category
1) Deck, side and bottom plating of hull except areas where the structure is considered for primary or special
application.
2) Bulkheads, stiffeners, decks and girders in hull that are not considered as primary or special application.
3) Internal bulkheads and girders in cylindrical legs.
4) Internal bulkheads, stiffeners and girders of spudcan or bottom mat supporting structures except where the
structures are considered primary or special application.
3 Material selection
3.1 General
3.1.1 Material specifications shall be established for all structural materials. Such materials shall be suitable
for their intended purpose and have adequate properties in all relevant design conditions. Material selection
shall be undertaken in accordance with the principles given in DNV-OS-C101.

3.1.2 When considering criteria appropriate to material grade selection, adequate consideration shall be given
to all relevant phases in the life cycle of the unit. In this connection there may be conditions and criteria, other
than those from the in-service, operational phase, that provide the design requirements in respect to the
selection of material. (Such criteria may, for example, be design temperature and/or stress levels during marine
operations.)
3.1.3 In special areas structural cross-joints essential for the overall structural integrity where high tensile
stresses are acting perpendicular to the plane of the plate, the plate material shall be documented with proven
through thickness properties, e.g. by utilising Z-quality steel.
3.1.4 Material designations are defined in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.3.
3.2 Design and service temperatures

3.2.1 The design temperature for a unit is the reference temperature for assessing areas where the unit may be
transported, installed and operated. The design temperature shall be lower or equal to the lowest mean daily
temperature in air for the relevant areas. For seasonal restricted operations the lowest mean daily temperature
in air for the season may be applied.
3.2.2 The service temperatures for different parts of a unit apply for selection of structural steel. The service
temperatures are defined as presented in [3.2.3] to [3.2.6]. In case different service temperatures are defined in
[3.2.3] to [3.2.6] for a structural part the lower specified value shall be applied.
3.2.3 External structures above the lowest astronomical tide (LAT) for the unit in elevated operation or above
the light transit waterline during transportation shall not be designed for a service temperature higher than the
design temperature for the unit.
3.2.4 External structures below the lowest astronomical tide (LAT) during elevated operation and below the
light transit waterline during transportation need not to be designed for service temperatures lower than 0C.
3.2.5 Internal structures of mats, spudcans, legs and hull shall have the same service temperature as the
adjacent external structure if not otherwise documented.
3.2.6 Internal structures in way of permanently heated rooms need not be designed for service temperatures
lower than 0C.
3.3 Selection of structural steel

3.3.1 The grade of steel to be used is in general to be related to the service temperature and thickness as shown
in the tables in DNV-OS-C101 Sec.4 for the various application categories.
3.3.2 For rack plates with specified minimum yield stress equal to 690 N/mm2 in rack and pinion jacking
systems steel grade NV E690 is acceptable for rack plates with thickness up to 250 mm and for service
temperature down to -20C.
3.3.3 When post weld heat treatment is carried out in agreement with customer, steel grades may be selected
according to a higher service temperature than stipulated in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.3 Table 3-3.
Guidance note:
In such cases the thickness limitations in Table D3 may be selected one column left of the actual service temperature
for the structure, i.e. for service temperatures 0C, -10C, -20C, -25C and -30C the thickness limitation can be
based on 10C, 0C, -10C, -20C and -25C, respectively.
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
3.3.4 For areas subjected to compressive and/or low tensile stresses, consideration may be given to the use of
lower steel grades than stated in the tables of DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.3.
3.3.5 The toughness requirements for steel plates, sections and weldments exceeding the thickness limits in
the table shall be evaluated in each separate case.
3.3.6 Grade of steel to be used for thicknesses less than 10 mm and/or design temperature above 0 C should
be specially considered in each case.
3.3.7 Use of steels in anaerobic conditions or steels susceptible to hydrogen induced stress cracking (HISC)
should be specially considered as specified in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.3.

4 Inspection categories
4.1 General
4.1.1 Welding and the extent of non-destructive examination during fabrication, shall be in accordance with
the requirements stipulated for the appropriate inspection category as defined in DNV-OS-C101.
4.1.2 Inspection categories determined in accordance with DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.3 provide requirements
for the minimum extent of required inspection.
Guidance note:
When considering the economic consequence that repair may entail, for example, in way of complex connections with
limited or difficult access, it may be considered prudent engineering practice to require more demanding requirements
for inspection than the required minimum.
4.1.3 When determining the extent of inspection, and the locations of required NDT, in additional to evaluating
design parameters (for example fatigue utilisation), consideration should be given to relevant fabrication
parameters including:
location of block or section joints
manual versus automatic welding
start and stop of weld etc.

Ch.2 Sec.2 Design principles Page 14
SECTION 2 DESIGN PRINCIPLES

1 Introduction
1.1 General
1.1.1 The structure shall be designed according to the LRFD method with limit states and design conditions as
described in the present standard. A general description of the format of LRFD method is given in DNV-OSC101.
1.1.2 Relevant load combinations shall be established for the various design conditions and limit states based
on the most unfavourable combinations of functional loads, environmental loads and/or accidental loads.
1.1.3 Modelling and analysis of the structure shall satisfactorily simulate the behaviour of the actual structure,
including its supporting system, and the relevant environmental conditions. Reasonable simplifications may be
introduced as a part of structural idealisation.
1.1.4 Limiting environmental and operating conditions (design data) for the different design conditions shall
be specified by the customer.
1.1.5 Requirements regarding certification of jacking gear machinery are given in DNV-OS-D101.
1.1.6 The effect of earthquakes may be of significance for operations of self-elevating units in some regions.
For loads and design against seismic events see DNV-OS-C101 and Ch.3 Sec.1 [1.2.6].
1.2 Overall design

1.2.1 The overall structural safety shall be evaluated on the basis of preventive measures against structural
failure put into design, fabrication and in-service inspection as well as the unit's residual strength against total
collapse in the case of structural failure of vital elements.
For vital elements, which are designed according to criteria given for intact structure, the likelihood and
consequence of failure should be considered as part of the redundancy evaluations. The consequence of
credible accidental events shall be documented according to the ALS, see Sec.6.
1.2.2 When determining the overall structural design, particular care shall be taken such that the solution does
not lead to unnecessarily complicated connections.
1.3 Details design

1.3.1 Structural connections should, in general, be designed with the aim to minimise stress concentrations and
reduce complex stress flow patterns. Connections should be designed with smooth transitions and proper
alignment of elements. Large cut-outs should be kept away from flanges and webs of primary girders in regions
with high stresses.
1.3.2 Transmission of tensile stresses through the thickness of plates should be avoided as far as possible. In
cases where transmission of tensile stresses through the thickness cannot be avoided, structural steel with
improved through thickness properties may be required, see Sec.1 [3].
1.3.3 Units intended for operations in cold areas shall be so arranged that water cannot be trapped in local
structures or machinery exposed to the ambient temperature.
1.3.4 If the unit is intended to be dry-docked the footing structure (i.e. mat or spudcans) shall be suitably
strengthened to withstand associated loads.
2 Design conditions
2.1 Basic conditions
The following design conditions, as defined in Sec.1 [3], shall be considered as relevant for the unit:
transit condition(s)
installation condition
operating condition(s)
survival condition
retrieval condition.
2.2 Transit
2.2.1 The present standard considers requirements for wet transits, i.e. field moves or ocean transits as defined

in Sec.1 [3]. Requirements in case of dry transit on a heavy lift vessel are considered to be covered by the
warranty authority for the operation.
2.2.2 A detailed transportation assessment shall be undertaken for wet transits. The assessment should include
determination of the limiting environmental criteria, evaluation of intact and damage stability characteristics,
motion response of the global system and the resulting, induced loads. The occurrence of slamming loads on
the structure and the effects of fatigue during transport phases shall be evaluated when relevant.
Guidance note:
For guidance on global analysis for the transit condition see DNV-RP-C104 Sec.4.5 and for environmental loading
see DNV-RP-C205.
2.2.3 The structure may be analysed for zero forward speed in analysis of wet transits.
2.2.4 The legs shall be designed for the static and inertia forces resulting from the motions in the most severe
environmental transit conditions, combined with wind forces resulting from the maximum wind velocity.
2.2.5 The leg positions for both field moves and ocean moves shall be assessed when considering structural
strength for transit condition.
2.2.6 In lieu of a more accurate analysis, for the ocean transit condition the legs shall be designed for the
following forces considered to act simultaneously:
120% of the acceleration forces caused by the roll and pitch of the unit
120% of the static forces at the maximum amplitude of roll or pitch
wind forces from a 45 m/s wind velocity.
Guidance note:
The effect of heave, surge and sway are implicitly accounted for by use of the 20% upscaling of the motions.
2.2.7 For the field move position the legs may be designed for the acceleration forces caused by a 6 degree
single amplitude roll or pitch at the natural period of the unit plus 120% of the static forces at a 6 degree
inclination of the legs unless otherwise verified by model tests or calculations.
2.2.8 Dynamic amplification of the acceleration forces on the legs shall be accounted for if the natural periods
of the legs are such that significant amplification may occur.
2.2.9 If considered relevant, the effect of vortex shedding induced vibrations of the legs due to wind shall be
taken into account.
Guidance note:
For guidance relating to vortex induced oscillations see DNV-RP-C205 Sec.9.
2.2.10 The hull shall be designed for global mass and sea pressure loads, local loads and leg loads during
transit.
2.2.11 Satisfactory compartmentation and stability during all floating operations shall be ensured, see DNVOS-C301.
2.2.12 Unless satisfactory documentation exists demonstrating that shimming is not necessary, relevant leg
interfaces (e.g. leg and upper guide) shall be shimmed in the transit condition.
2.2.13 All aspects of transportation, including planning and procedures, preparations, seafastenings and
marine operations should comply with the requirements of the warranty authority.
2.2.14 The structural strength of the hull, legs and footings during transit shall comply with the ULS, FLS and
ALS given in Sec.4, Sec.5 and Sec.6, respectively.
2.3 Installation and retrieval

2.3.1 Relevant static and dynamic loads during installation and retrieval shall be accounted for in the design,
including consideration of the maximum environmental conditions expected for the operations and leg impact
on the seabed.

Guidance note:
Guidance relating to simplified and conservative analytical methodology for bottom impact on the legs is given in
DNV-RP-C104 Sec.4.6.
2.3.2 The capacity of the unit during pre-loading must be assessed. The purpose of pre-loading is to develop
adequate foundation capacity to resist the extreme vertical and horizontal loadings. The unit should be capable
of pre-loading to exceed the maximum vertical soil loadings associated with the worst storm loading.
Guidance note:
Guidance relating to pre-loading is given in Classification Note 30.4 Sec.1 and Sec.8.
2.3.3 The hull structure shall be analysed to ensure it can withstand the maximum pre-loading condition.
2.3.4 The structural strength of the hull, legs and footings during installation and retrieval shall comply with
the ULS given in Sec.4.
2.4 Operation and survival

2.4.1 The operation and survival conditions cover the unit in the hull elevated mode.
2.4.2 A detailed assessment shall be undertaken which includes determination of the limiting soils,
environmental and mass criteria and the resulting, induced loads.
2.4.3 Dynamic structural deflection and stresses due to wave loading shall be accounted for if the natural
periods of the unit are such that significant dynamic amplification may occur.
Guidance note:
It is not necessary to include dynamic amplification for the ULS checks (yield and buckling) when DAF 1.10.
DAF = Dynamic Amplification Factor obtained as described in DNV-RP-C104 Sec.4.4.4, item (i).
2.4.4 Non-linear amplification (large displacement effects) of the overall deflections due to second order
bending effects of the legs shall be accounted for whenever significant.
2.4.5 The effect of leg fabrication tolerances and guiding system clearances shall be accounted for.
2.4.6 The leg/soil interaction shall be varied as necessary within the design specifications to provide maximum
stress in the legs, both at the bottom end and at the jackhouse level.
2.4.7 Critical aspects to be considered in the elevated condition are structural strength, overturning stability
and air gap.
2.4.8 The structural strength of the hull, legs and footings during operation and survival shall comply with the
ULS, FLS and ALS given in Sec.4, Sec.5 and Sec.6. The ULS assessment should be carried out for the most
limiting conditions with the maximum storm condition and maximum operating condition examined as a
minimum.
Guidance note:
The hull will typically comprise the following elements:
- decks
- sides and bottom plating
- longitudinal bulkheads
- transverse bulkheads and frames
- longitudinal girders and stringers
- stringers and web frames on the transverse bulkheads
- jackhouses.
2.4.9 The strength of the hull shall be assessed based on the characteristic load conditions that result in
maximum longitudinal tension and compression stresses (for yield and buckling assessment) in deck and
bottom plating.
2.4.10 The effect of large openings in the hull (e.g. drill slot) that affect the distribution of global stresses
should be determined by a finite element model accounting for three dimensional effects.

3 Environmental conditions
3.1 General
3.1.1 All environmental phenomena that may contribute to structural damages shall be considered. Such
phenomena are wind, waves, currents, ice, earthquake, soil conditions, temperature, fouling, corrosion, etc.
3.1.2 The specified environmental design data used for calculating design loads for intact structure are to
correspond with the most probable largest values for a return period of 100 years, see DNV-OS-C101.
3.1.3 For damaged structure calculations a return period of one year shall be used, see DNV-OS-C101.
3.1.4 The environmental design data may be given as maximum wave heights with corresponding periods and
wind- and current velocities and design temperatures or as acceptable geographical areas for operation. In the
latter case the customer is to specify the operational areas and submit documentation showing that the
environmental data for these areas are within the environmental design data.
3.1.5 The statistical data used as a basis for design must cover a sufficiently long period of time.
3.2 Wind
3.2.1 Wind velocity statistics shall be used as a basis for a description of wind conditions, if such data are
available. Sustained, gust, and one hour wind are defined in Ch.1 Sec.1 [3].
3.2.2 Characteristic wind design velocities shall be based upon appropriate considerations of velocity and
height profiles for the relevant averaging time.
Guidance note:
Practical information in respect to wind conditions, including velocity and height profiles, is documented in DNVRP-C205 and DNV-RP-C104 Sec.2.4 and 3.4.
For units intended for unrestricted service (worldwide operation) a wind velocity vR of not less than 51.5 m/s
combined with maximum wave forces will cover most offshore locations. vR = Reference 1 minute wind speed at a
height 10m above the still water level. The corresponding wind force should be based on a wind velocity profile given
by DNV-RP-C205 Chapter 2. Clause 2.3.2.12, or equivalent. See also the guidance given in DNV-RP-C104 Sec.2.4
and 3.4.
3.2.3 When wind tunnel data obtained from reliable and adequate tests on a representative model of the unit
are available, these data will be considered for the determination of pressures and resulting forces.
3.3 Waves
3.3.1 Wave conditions which shall be considered for design purposes may be described either by deterministic
(regular) design wave methods or by stochastic (irregular seastate) methods applying wave energy spectra.
3.3.2 Short term irregular seastates are described by means of wave energy spectra that are characterised by
significant wave height (HS), and average zero-upcrossing period (TZ).
Analytical spectrum expressions are to reflect the width and shape of typical spectra for the considered height.
The shortcrestedness of waves in a seaway, i.e. the directional dispersion of wave energy, may be taken into
account. The principal direction of wave encounter is defined as the direction of maximum wave energy
density.
Guidance note:
For open sea locations the Pierson-Moskowitz (P-M) type of spectrum may be applied. For shallow water, or locations
with a narrow fetch, a narrower spectrum should be considered (e.g. Jonswap spectrum).
Practical information in respect to wave conditions is documented in DNV-RP-C205 Sec.3 and DNV-RP-C104
Sec.2.2.
3.3.3 The long term behaviour of the sea is described by means of a family of wave spectra, the probability of
occurrence for each spectrum being taken into account.
3.3.4 For this purpose one needs the joint probability density function for HS and TZ, which may be obtained
from wave statistics. A description of the long term seastates based on the use of hindcastings may also be
accepted. Wave statistics for individual principal directions of wave encounter should be used, otherwise
conservative assumptions shall be introduced.
Extreme wave heights are expressed in terms of wave heights having a low probability of occurrence.
The N year wave height is the most probable largest individual wave height during N years. This is equivalent
to a wave height with a return period of N years.

3.3.5 In deterministic design procedures, based on regular wave considerations, the wave shall be described
by the following parameters:
wave period
wave height
wave direction
still-water depth.
The choice of an appropriate design wave formulation has to be based on particular considerations for the
problem in question. Shallow water effects shall be accounted for.
3.3.6 The design waves shall be those that produce the most unfavourable loads on the considered structure,
taking into account the shape and size of structure, etc.
The wave period shall be specified in each case of application. It may be necessary to investigate a representative
number of wave periods, in order to ensure a sufficiently accurate determination of the maximum loads.
3.4 Current
3.4.1 Adequate current velocity data shall be selected from the statistics available. Different components of
current shall be considered, such as tidal current and wind generated current.
3.4.2 The variation of current velocity over the water depth shall be considered when this is relevant.
3.5 Temperature
The design temperature shall be specified as necessary for the areas where the unit is to operate or be
transported, Sec.1 [3.2].
3.6 Snow and ice

Snow and ice shall be considered as necessary for the areas where the unit is to operate or be transported.
4 Method of analysis
4.1 General
4.1.1 Structural analysis shall be performed to evaluate the structural strength due to global and local effects.
4.1.2 The following responses shall be considered in the structural design whenever significant:
dynamic stresses for all limit states

non-linear wave loading effects, (e.g. effect of drag and finite wave elevation)
non-linear amplification due to second order bending effects of the legs (P-delta effect)
effects of leg fabrication tolerances and leg guiding system clearances
slamming induced vibrations
vortex induced vibrations (e.g. resulting from wind loads on structural elements in a flare tower or in lattice
legs above jackhouses)
friction and wear (e.g. at leg guiding system or at riser system interfaces with hull structures).
4.1.3 Non-linear amplification of the overall deflections due to second order bending effects of the legs shall
be accounted for whenever significant. The non-linear bending response may be calculated by multiplying the
linear leg response by an amplification factor as follows:
1
= ---------------------1 P/ P E
P
PE
=
=
static axial load on one leg

Euler buckling load for one leg.
4.1.4 In the unit elevated mode the global structural behaviour may be calculated by deterministic quasi-static
analysis, directly considering non-linear wave and leg bending effects. The effect of dynamics should be
represented by an inertia force contribution at the level of the hull centre of gravity or by a dynamic
amplification factor, as specified in DNV-RP-C104.
4.1.5 In case of significant uncertainties related to the non-linear, dynamic behaviour, stochastic time domain
analysis may be performed. The selection of critical seastate for the analysis should be properly considered.
Guidance note:
For shallow waters the significant wave height should be corrected as shown in DNV-RP-C205 Sec.3.
The irregular wave simulation may be performed as presented in DNV-RP-C205 Sec.3.

4.1.6 Where non-linear loads may be considered as being insignificant, or where such loads may be
satisfactorily accounted for in a linearized analysis, a frequency domain analysis may be undertaken. Transfer
functions for structural response shall be established by analysis of an adequate number of wave directions,
with an appropriate radial spacing. A sufficient number of periods shall be analysed to:
adequately cover the site specific wave conditions
to satisfactorily describe transfer functions at, and around, the wave cancellation and amplifying periods
to satisfactorily describe transfer functions at, and around, the resonance period of the unit.
4.1.7 As an alternative to time domain analysis model testing may be performed when non-linear effects
cannot be adequately determined by direct calculations. Model tests should also be performed for new types of
self-elevating units.
4.1.8 For independent leg units, the static inclination of the legs shall be accounted for. The inclination is
defined as the static angle between the leg and a vertical line and may be due to fabrication tolerances, fixation
system and hull inclination, as specified in DNV-RP-C104.
4.1.9 The seabed conditions, and therefore the leg and soil interaction, need to be considered as it affects the
following:
leg bending moment distribution
overall structure stiffness and therefore the natural period of the unit
load distribution on the spudcans.
The leg and soil interaction should be varied as necessary between an upper and lower bound to provide
conservative response limits at the bottom leg and footing area and at the jackhouse level.
Guidance note:
As the leg and soil interaction is difficult to predict, it is acceptable and conservative to assume pinned and fixed
conditions as the lower and upper bounds, respectively.
For further guidance see Classification Note 30.4 Sec.8, DNV-RP-C104, Sec23.6 and SNAME 5-5A.
4.1.10 The leg and hull connection may be designed by any of or combination of the following methods:
a fixation system, i.e. rack chock

a fixed jacking system, i.e. pinions rigidly mounted to the jackhouse
a floating jacking system, i.e. pinions mounted to the jackhouse by means of flexible shock pads
a guiding system by upper and lower guides.
The characteristics and behaviour of the actual leg and hull connection system need to be properly represented
in the appropriate global and local analyses.
Guidance note:
Practical information in respect to modelling leg and hull interaction is documented in DNV-RP-C104 Sec.4.3 or
SNAME 5-5A, Section 5.6.
4.2 Global structural models

4.2.1 A global structural model shall represent the global stiffness and behaviour of the unit. The global model
should usually represent the following:
footing main plating and stiffeners

leg truss or shell and stiffeners
jackhouse and leg/hull interaction
main bulkheads, frameworks and decks for the deck structure (secondary decks which are not taking part
in the global structural capacity need not be modelled)
mass model.
4.2.2 Depending on the purpose of the analysis and possible combination with further local analysis the
different level of idealisation and detailing may be applied for a global structure. The hull may either be
represented by a detailed plate and shell model or a model using grillage beams. The legs may be modelled by
detailed structural models or equivalent beams, or a combination of such.
Guidance note:
For further guidance regarding modelling procedures see DNV-RP-C104 or SNAME 5-5A.

4.3 Local structural models

4.3.1 An adequate number of local structural models should be created in order to evaluate response of the
structure to variations in local loads. The model(s) should be sufficiently detailed such that resulting responses
are obtained to the required degree of accuracy. A number of local models may be required in order to fully
evaluate local response at all relevant sections.
The following local models should be analysed in the evaluation of ULS:
footing, mat or spudcan. Including the lower part of the leg (typically at least 2 bays)
stiffened plates subjected to tank pressures or deck area loads
leg and hull connection system including jackhouse support structure
support structure for heavy equipment such as drill floor and pipe racks
riser hang off structure
crane pedestal support structure
helicopter deck support structure.
4.3.2 A detailed finite element model should be applied to calculate the transfer of leg axial forces, bending
moments and shears between the upper and lower guide structures and the jacking and/or fixation system. The
systems and interactions should be properly modelled in terms of stiffness, orientation and clearances. The
analysis model should include a detailed model of the leg in the hull interface area, the guides, fixation and/or
jacking system, together with the main jackhouse structure.
Guidance note:
The detailed leg model should normally extend 4 bays below and above the lower and upper guides, respectively.
Guidance note:
For further guidance regarding modelling procedures see DNV-RP-C104 or SNAME 5-5A.
4.4 Fatigue analysis

4.4.1 The fatigue life shall be calculated considering the combined effects of global and local structural
response. The expected dynamic load history shall be specified in the design brief as basis for the calculations.
4.4.2 Stress concentration factors for fatigue sensitive structural details that cannot be obtained from standard
tables, e.g. due to different structural arrangement or that dimensions are out of range of the formula, shall be
determined by a finite element analysis.

Ch.2 Sec.3 Design loads Page 21
SECTION 3 DESIGN LOADS

1 Introduction
1.1 General
1.1.1 The requirements in this section define and specify load components and load combinations to be
considered in the overall strength analysis as well as design pressures applicable in formulae for local
scantlings.
1.1.2 Characteristic loads shall be used as reference loads. General description of load components and
combinations are given in DNV-OS-C101. Details regarding environmental loads are described in DNV-RPC205 and DNV-RP-C104 Sec.2 and 3.4. Presentation of load categories relevant for self-elevating units is
given in [2] to [8].
2 Permanent loads
Permanent loads are loads that will not vary in magnitude, position, or direction during the period considered
and include:
'lightweight' of the unit, including mass of permanently installed modules and equipment, such as
accommodation, helicopter deck, drilling and production equipment
permanent ballast
hydrostatic pressures resulting from buoyancy
pretension in respect to drilling and production systems (e.g. risers, etc.).
3 Variable functional loads

3.1 General
3.1.1 Variable functional loads are loads that may vary in magnitude, position and direction during the period
under consideration.
3.1.2 Except where analytical procedures or design specifications otherwise require, the value of the variable
loads utilised in structural design should be taken as either the lower or upper design value, whichever gives
the more unfavourable effect. Variable functional loads on deck areas may be found in DNV-OS-C101, Sec.3.
These should be applied unless specified otherwise in deck load plans, design basis or design brief.
3.1.3 Variations in operational mass distributions (including variations in tank load conditions) shall be
adequately accounted for in the structural design.
3.1.4 Design criteria resulting from operational requirements should be fully considered. Examples of such
operations may be:
drilling, production, workover, and combinations thereof

consumable re-supply procedures
maintenance procedures
possible mass re-distributions in extreme conditions.
3.1.5 Dynamic loads resulting from flow through air pipes during filling operations shall be adequately
considered in the design of tank structures.
3.2 Lifeboat platforms

Lifeboat platforms shall be checked for ULS and ALS if relevant. A dynamic factor of 0.2 g0 due to retardation
of the lifeboats when lowered shall be included.
3.3 Tank loads

3.3.1 A minimum design density () of 1.025 t/m3 should be considered in the determination of the appropriate
scantlings of tank arrangements.
3.3.2 The extent to which it is possible to fill sounding, venting or loading pipe arrangements shall be fully
accounted for in determination of the maximum design pressure which a tank may be subjected to.
3.3.3 Dynamic pressure heads resulting from the filling of such pipes shall be included in the design pressure
head where such load components are applicable.

3.3.4 All tanks shall be designed for the following internal design pressure:
av
2
p d = g 0 h op f, G, Q + ----- f, E (kN m )
g0
hop
= vertical distance (m) from the load point to the position of maximum filling height. For tanks adjacent to the
sea and situated below the extreme
operational draught (TE) during wet transit, hop should not be taken less than the distance from the load point
to the static sea level.
av
= maximum vertical acceleration, (m/s2), being the coupled motion response applicable to the tank in question.
The vertical acceleration term only applies to transit conditions. For conditions with the deck elevated av may
be taken equal to zero.
f,G,Q = partial load factor for permanent and functional loading, see Sec.4 Table 4-1
f,E = partial load factor for environmental loads, see Sec.4 Table 4-1
Descriptions and requirements related to different tank arrangements are given in DNV-OS-D101 Ch.2 Sec.3
[3.3].
A special tank filling design condition shall be checked according to ULS loading combination a) for tanks
where the air-pipe may be filled during filling operations. The following additional internal design pressure
conditions shall be used:
2
p d = ( g 0 h op + p dyn ) f, G, Q ( kN m )
pdyn
= pressure (kN/m2) due to flow through pipes, minimum 25 kN/m2

Guidance note:
This internal pressure need not to be combined with extreme environmental loads. Normally only static global
response need to be considered.
3.3.5 Requirements for testing of tank tightness and structural strength are given in DNV-OS-C401 Ch.2
Sec.4.
4 Environmental loads
4.1 General
4.1.1 General considerations for environmental loads are given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.2 [5] and [6], in
DNV-RP-C205 and in DNV-RP-C104.
4.1.2 Combinations of environmental loads are stated in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.2 Table 2-4.
4.2 Wind loads

4.2.1 In conjunction with maximum wave forces the sustained wind velocity, i.e. the 1 minute average
velocity, shall be used. If gust wind alone is more unfavourable than sustained wind in conjunction with wave
forces, the gust wind velocity shall be used. For local load calculations gust wind velocity shall be used.
4.2.2 Formulas for calculation of wind loads may be taken from DNV-RP-C205 Sec.5. See also the guidance
given in DNV-RP-C104 Sec.2.4 and 3.4.
4.2.3 Applicable shape coefficients for different structure parts are given in Table 3-1. For shapes or
combination of shapes which do not readily fall into the categories in Table 3-1 the formulas in DNV-RP-C205
Sec.5 should be applied.

Table 3-1 Shape coefficient

Type of structure or member
Hull, based on total projected area
Deckhouses, jack-frame structure, sub-structure, draw-works
house, and other above deck blocks, based on total projected
area of the structure.
Leg sections projecting above the jack-frame and below the
hull
Isolated tubulars, (e.g. crane pedestals, etc.)
Isolated structural shapes, (e.g. angles, channels, boxes,
I-sections), based on member projected area
Derricks, crane booms, flare towers (open lattice sections only,
not boxed-in sections)
Cs
1.0
1.1
See DNV-RP-C205.
0.5
1.5
According to DNV-RP-C205 or by use of the
appropriate shape coefficient for the members
concerned applied to 50% of the total projected area.
4.2.4 For local design the pressure acting on vertical external bulkheads exposed to wind shall in general not
be taken less than 2.5 kN/m2.
4.2.5 For structures being sensitive to dynamic loads, for instance tall structures having long natural period of
vibration, the stresses due to the gust wind pressure considered as static shall be multiplied by an appropriate
dynamic amplification factor.
4.2.6 The possibility of vibrations due to instability in the flow pattern induced by the structure itself should
also be considered.
4.3 Waves
4.3.1 The basic wave load parameters and response calculation methods in this standard shall be used in a wave
load analysis where the most unfavourable combinations of height, period and direction of the waves are
considered.
4.3.2 The liquid particle velocity and acceleration in regular waves shall be calculated according to recognised
wave theories, taking into account the significance of shallow water and surface elevation.
Linearized wave theories may be used when appropriate. In such cases appropriate account shall be taken of
the extrapolation of wave kinematics to the free surface.
4.3.3 The wave design data shall represent the maximum wave heights specified for the unit, as well as the
maximum wave steepness according to the unit design basis.
The wave lengths shall be selected as the most critical ones for the response of the structure or structural part
to be investigated.
Guidance note:
Practical information in respect to wave conditions, including wave steepness criteria and wave stretching, is
documented in DNV-RP-C205, Sec.3. See also DNV-RP-C104 Sec.2.2 and 2.3.
4.3.4 For a deterministic wave analysis using an appropriate non-linear wave theory for the water depth, i.e.
Stokes' 5th or Dean's Stream Function, the fluid velocity of the maximum long-crested 100 year wave may be
multiplied with a kinematic reduction factor of 0.86. The scaling of the velocity shall be used only in
connection with hydrodynamic coefficients defined according to [4.5.3], i.e. CD 1.0 for submerged tubular
members of self-elevating units.
Guidance note:
The kinematics reduction factor is introduced to account for the conservatism of deterministic, regular wave
kinematics traditionally accomplished by adjusting the hydrodynamic properties.
4.4 Current
Characteristic current design velocities shall be based upon appropriate consideration of velocity and height
profiles. The variation in current profile with variation in water depth, due to wave action shall be appropriately
accounted for.

Guidance note:
Practical information in respect to current conditions, including current stretching in the passage of a wave, is
documented in DNV-RP-C205 Sec.4 and DNV-RP-C104 Sec.2.3 and 3.4.
4.5 Wave and current loads

4.5.1 Wave and current loads should be calculated using Morisons equation.
Guidance note:
For information regarding use of Morisons equation see DNV-RP-C205 Sec.6 and DNV-RP-C104 Sec.3.4.
4.5.2 Vector addition of the wave and current induced particle velocities should be used for calculation of the
combined wave and current drag force. If available, computations of the total particle velocities and
acceleration based on more exact theories of wave and current interaction may be preferred.
4.5.3 Hydrodynamic coefficients for circular cylinder in oscillatory flow with in-service marine roughness,
and for high values of the Keulegan-Carpenter number, i.e. KC > 37, may be taken as given in Table 3-2.
Table 3-2 Hydrodynamic coefficients
Surface condition
Multiyear roughness
k/D > 1/100
Mobile unit (cleaned)
k/D < 1/100
Smooth member
k/D < 1/10000
The Keulegan-Carpenter number is defined by:
Drag coefficient
CD(k/D)
Inertia coefficient
CM(k/D)
1.05
1.8
1.0
1.8
0.65
2.0
U T
m
K c = ------------D
k = the roughness height

D = the member diameter
Um = the maximum orbital particle velocity
T = the wave period
More detailed formulations for CD of tubular members depending on surface condition and Keulegan-Carpenter number
can be found in DNV-RP-C205 Sec.6.
4.5.4 The roughness for a mobile unit (cleaned) applies when marine growth roughness is removed between
submersions of members.
4.5.5 The smooth values may apply above MWL + 2 m and the rough values below MWL + 2 m, where MWL
is the mean still water level, as defined in DNV-RP-C205 Figure 4-2.
4.5.6 The above hydrodynamic coefficients apply both for deterministic wave analyses when the guidance
given in [4.3.4] is followed and for stochastic wave analysis.
4.5.7 Assumptions regarding allowable marine growth shall be stated in the basis of design.
4.5.8 For non-tubular members the hydrodynamic coefficients should reflect the actual shape of the cross
sections and member orientation relative to the wave direction.
Guidance note:
Hydrodynamic coefficients relevant to typical self-elevating unit chord designs are stated in DNV-RP-C205 Sec.5 and
DNV-RP-C104 Appendix A6. See also SNAME 5-5A.
Equivalent single beam stiffness parameters for lattice-type legs may be obtained from DNV-RP-C104 Appendix A1.

4.6 Sea pressures during transit

4.6.1 Unless otherwise documented the characteristic sea pressure acting on the bottom, side and weather deck
of a self-elevating unit in transit condition should be taken as:
p d = p s f, G, Q + p e f, E
where the static pressure is:
p s = g 0 (TTH z b )
ps = 0
for zb TTH
(kN/m 2 )
( kN /m 2 )
for zb > TTH
The dynamic pressure for sides and bottom is:

for zb TTH
p e = 0.07 g 0 L (kN/m 2 )
pe = g 0 (TTH + 0.07 L z b )
(kN/m 2 )
for zb > TTH
and for weather decks:

p e = g 0 (0.75 D B + 0.07 L z b )
p e 6. 0
TTH
zb
DB
L
=
=
=
=
(kN/m 2 )
( kN/m 2 )
heavy transit draught (m) measured vertically from the moulded baseline to the uppermost transit waterline
vertical distance in m from the moulded baseline to the load point.
depth of barge (m)
greater of length of breadth (m)
4.6.2 In cases where pressure difference is investigated, i.e. transit condition, the pressures shall be combined
in such a way that the largest pressure difference is used for design.
4.6.3 In case of pressure on both sides of bulkheads, the load factor shall be applied on the pressure difference.
The case of a permanently filled tank being empty shall also be considered.
4.7 Heavy components during transit

The forces acting on supporting structures and lashing systems for rigid units of cargo, equipment or other
structural components should be taken as:
P Vd = ( g 0 f, G, Q a v f, E )M
P Hd = a h f, E M ( kN )
av
ah
M
PVd
PHd
=
=
=
=
=
( kN )
vertical acceleration (m/s2)

horizontal acceleration (m/s2)
mass of cargo, equipment or other components (ton)
vertical design force
horizontal design force.
For units exposed to wind, a horizontal force due to the design gust wind shall be added to PHd.
Guidance note:
For self-elevating units in transit condition, h and v need not be taken larger than 0.5 g0 (m/s2).
PHd is applied at the vertical position of the load resultant(s) to account for the vertical force couple introduced at the
foundations of the heavy equipment.
5 Deformation loads
5.1 General
Deformation loads caused by inflicted deformations, such as temperature loads, built-in deformations, etc.
should be considered as appropriate.
Further details and description of deformation loads are given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.2 [8].

5.2 Displacement dependent loads

Load effects that are a consequence of the displacement of the unit in the elevated condition shall be accounted
for. Such effects are due to the first order sway (P-delta), and its enhancement due to the increased flexibility
of the legs in the presence of axial loads, i.e. Euler amplification.
Guidance note:
Simplified method to include the P- effect is given in DNV-RP-C104 Sec.4.4.7.
6 Accidental loads
6.1 General
6.1.1 The following ALS events shall be considered in respect to the structural design of a self-elevating unit:
collision
dropped objects (e.g. from crane handling)
fire
explosion
unintended flooding during transit.
6.1.2 Requirements and guidance on accidental loads are given in DNV-OS-C101 and generic loads are given
in DNV-OS-A101.
7 Fatigue loads
7.1 General
7.1.1 Repetitive loads, which may lead to possible significant fatigue damage, shall be evaluated. The
following listed sources of fatigue loads shall, where relevant, be considered:
waves (including loads caused by slamming and variable (dynamic) pressures)

wind (especially when vortex induced vibrations may occur)
currents (especially when vortex induced vibrations may occur)
mechanical vibration (e.g. caused by operation of machinery)
mechanical loading and unloading (e.g. due to jacking or crane operations).
The effects of both local and global dynamic response shall be properly accounted for when determining
response distributions related to fatigue loads.
7.1.2 Further considerations with respect to fatigue loads are given in DNV-RP-C203.
8 Combination of loads
8.1 General
8.1.1 Load combinations for the design limit states are, in general given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.2.
Specific load factors for self-elevating units for the ULS are given in Sec.4.
8.1.2 Structural strength shall be evaluated considering all relevant, realistic load conditions and combinations.
Scantlings shall be determined on the basis of criteria that combine, in a rational manner, the effects of relevant
global and local responses for each individual structural element.
8.1.3 A sufficient number of load conditions shall be evaluated to ensure that the characteristic largest (or
smallest) response, for the appropriate return period, has been established.
Guidance note:
For example, maximum global, characteristic responses for a self-elevating unit may occur in environmental
conditions that are not associated with the characteristic, largest, wave height. In such cases, wave period and
associated wave steepness parameters are more likely to be governing factors in the determination of maximum and
minimum responses.

Ch.2 Sec.4 Ultimate limit states (ULS) Page 27
SECTION 4 ULTIMATE LIMIT STATES (ULS)

1 General
1.1 General
1.1.1 The ULS capacity of the structure shall be checked according to the LRFD format. General
considerations with respect to definition of the design format, combination of loads, methods of analysis and
capacity checks for the ULS are given in DNV-OS-C101.
1.1.2 Both global and local capacity shall be checked with respect to ULS. The global and local stresses shall
be combined in an appropriate manner.
1.1.3 Analytical models shall adequately describe the relevant properties of loads, stiffness, displacement,
satisfactorily account for the local system, effects of time dependency, damping, and inertia.
1.1.4 Two sets of design load combinations, a) and b) shall be checked. Partial load factors for ULS checks of
self-elevating units according to the present standard are given in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 Load factors - ultimate limit states
Load categories
Combination of design loads
a
b
1)
Permanent and variable

functional loads, f,G,Q
Environmental loads, f,E
Deformation loads, f,D
1.2 1)
1.0
0.7
1.2
1.0
1.0
If the load is not well defined with an upper possible limit, e.g. masses with certain uncertainty, the coefficient should be increased
to 1.3.
1.1.5 The loads shall be combined in the most unfavourable way, provided that the combination is physically
feasible and permitted according to the load specifications. For permanent and variable functional loads, a load
factor of 1.0 shall be used in load combination a) where this gives the most unfavourable response.
1.1.6 The material factor M for ULS yield check should be 1.15 for steel structural elements. Material factors
M for ULS buckling checks and bolt connections are given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.4. Material factors M
for ULS weld connections are given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.8.
1.2 Global capacity

1.2.1 Gross scantlings may be utilised in the calculation of hull structural strength, provided a corrosion
protection system in accordance with DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.9 is installed and maintained.
1.2.2 Ultimate strength capacity check shall be performed for all structural members contributing to the global
and local strength of the self-elevating unit. The structures to be checked include, but are not limited to, all
plates and continuous stiffeners in the following:
main load bearing plating in mat and spudcan type footings

all leg members in truss type legs
outer plating in column type legs
jackhouse and supporting structure
main load-bearing bulkheads, frameworks and decks in the hull structure
girders in the hull structure.
2 Structural capacity
2.1 General
2.1.1 Design principles for strength analysis are given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.4 and DNV-RP-C104.
2.1.2 Structural members shall be checked for the most unfavourable combinations of loadings. Girders,
pillars, bulkheads, decks and other plate panels shall be checked for relevant combinations of global and local
stresses. Buckling strength analysis shall be based on the characteristic buckling strength for the most
unfavourable buckling mode.
Guidance note:
Acceptable calculation methods with respect to buckling strength are given in DNV-RP-C201, DNV-RP-C202 and
Classification Note 30.1 Sec.2.

2.1.3 Initial imperfections in structural members shall be accounted for. For lattice leg structure this will
include imperfections for single beam elements as well as for complete leg assembly.
2.2 Footing strength

2.2.1 In the elevated condition account shall be taken of the loads transferred from the legs and the
corresponding seabed reaction. The bottom mat or spudcan structure shall be designed to facilitate proper
diffusion of these loads.
2.2.2 High stress concentrations at the connection between leg and mat or spudcan shall be avoided as far as
possible.
2.2.3 The effect of an uneven distribution of critical contact stresses over the foundation area shall be
examined taking into account a maximum eccentricity moment from the soil resulted from [2.2.4], uneven
seabed conditions and scouring.
2.2.4 The strength checks for the spudcan, the leg-to-spudcan connections and the two lowest leg bays (lattice
legs) for separate type spudcans should normally not be based on lower loads than given below:
(i) The design load Fvd is evenly distributed over 50% of the bottom area:
M ed = 0.425Fvd R and qd =
qd
Med
Fvd
R
Fvd
, where
0.5R 2
= design contact pressure

= design eccentricity moment
= maximum design axial load in the leg accounting for functional loads and environmental overturning loads,
including load factors
= equivalent radius of spudcan contact area
i) The design load Fvd is concentrically distributed over a range of bearing areas, from the minimum design
penetration (supported on spudcan tip) up to and including full spudcan bottom area.
ii) If elevated condition is designed based on Pinned leg footings:
iii) The spudcan and the leg-to-spudcan connections are to be designed for the maximum vertical reaction and
the associated horizontal reaction in conjunction with 35% of the maximum calculated moment at the lower
guide (to account for the eccentric effects of possible scour and uneven bottom conditions) acting in the
most unfavourable direction. The maximum lower guide bending moment is to be calculated with pinended conditions.
iv) If elevated condition is designed based on moment fixity at leg footings:
a) The maximum vertical reaction, in conjunction with the associated horizontal reaction and spudcan-soil
fixity moment, acting in the most unfavourable direction.
b) The maximum spudcan-soil fixity moment in conjunction with the associated vertical and horizontal
reactions, acting in the most unfavourable direction.
The design values in (i) to (iv) used as basis for design of the spudcan and lower leg shall be defined in the
design basis or design brief, and stated in the unit's Operation Manual.
The design moments and soil pressures above are based on a relative homogenous seabed, for example for sand
or clay seabed. Local stiff soil supporting in the bottom plate outside the strong tip should be avoided. It is
assumed that this will be evaluated in the sea bed surveys in connection with site specific assessments when
the unit is used on specific locations.
Guidance note:
Cases (i) and (ii) above are always to be checked together with one of the cases (iii) or (iv). Case (iii) or (iv) is checked
based on the leg footing assumption used in design.
For quadratic shaped spudcans: The equivalent radius above may be taken as R= 0.5 w, where w = width of the
quadratic spudcan base.
For other types of bottom support, e.g. mats special considerations should be made.
2.2.5 For internal compartments which are not freely vented to the sea when the mat or spudcan is resting on
the seabed, the design loads shall include a head of water equal to the design water level as well as any effects
of wave pressure.

2.3 Leg strength

2.3.1 The boundary conditions for the legs at the seabed shall be varied within realistic upper and lower limits
when the scantlings of the legs are determined. The variation in boundary conditions shall take into account
uncertainties in the estimation of soil properties, non-linear soil-structure interaction, effects due to repeated
loadings, possible scouring, etc.
2.3.2 When determining the forces and moments in the legs, different positions of the hull supports along the
legs shall be considered.
2.3.3 Due attention shall be paid to the position and duration of load transfer between the leg and hull,
including the shear force in the leg between supporting points in the hull structure.
2.3.4 Lattice-type legs shall be checked against overall buckling, buckling of single elements and punching
strength of the nodes, see DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.4.
2.3.5 Bottom impact forces occurring during installation and retrieval conditions shall be satisfactorily
accounted in the design.
Guidance note:
A simplified analytical methodology relevant to installation and retrieval conditions is described in DNV-RP-C104.
2.4 Jackhouse support strength

Special attention shall be paid to the means for the leg support, the jackhouses, the support of the jackhouse to
the main hull, and the main load transfer girders between the jackhouses.
2.5 Hull strength

Scantlings of the hull shall be checked for the transit conditions with external hydrostatic pressure and inertia
forces on the legs as well as for the pre-loading and elevated conditions, see DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.4.
3 Scantlings and weld connections

Minimum scantlings for plate, stiffeners and girders are given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.4.
The requirements for weld connections are given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.8.

Ch.2 Sec.5 Fatigue limit states (FLS) Page 30
SECTION 5 FATIGUE LIMIT STATES (FLS)

1 General
1.1 General
1.1.1 General requirements for the FLS are given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.5. Guidance concerning fatigue
life calculation may be found in DNV-RP-C203 and DNV-RP-C104 Sec.7.
1.1.2 The design fatigue life of the unit shall be minimum 20 years.
1.1.3 For units intended to follow normal inspection requirements according to class requirements, i.e. 5 yearly
inspections in dry dock or sheltered waters, a Design Fatigue Factor (DFF) of 1.0 may be applied for accessible
members. For not accessible members DFF shall be applied to structural elements according to the principles
in DNV-OS-C101.
1.1.4 Units intended to stay on location for prolonged survey period, i.e. without planned dry dock or sheltered
water inspection, shall comply with the requirements given in App.A.
1.1.5 Assumptions related to the resistance parameters adopted in the fatigue design, e.g. with respect to
corrosion protection, shall be consistent with the unit's in-service inspection and maintenance plans (see DNVRP-C203).
1.1.6 Local effects, for example, due to:
slamming
sloshing
vortex shedding
dynamic pressures
shall be included in the fatigue damage assessment when relevant.

1.1.7 In the assessment of fatigue resistance, relevant consideration shall be given to the effects of stress
concentrations, including those occurring as a result of:
fabrication tolerances, including due regard to tolerances in way of connections involved in fabrication
sequences or section joints
cut-outs
details at connections of structural sections (e.g. cut-outs to facilitate construction welding)
attachments.
1.1.8 Local, detailed finite element analysis of critical connections (e.g. leg and footing connection) should be
performed in order to identify local stress distributions, appropriate SCFs, and/or extrapolated stresses to be
utilised in the fatigue evaluation. Dynamic stress variations through the plate thickness shall be checked and
considered in such evaluations when relevant, see DNV-RP-C203 Sec.2 for further details.
1.1.9 Principal stresses (see DNV-RP-C203 Sec.2.2) should be utilised in the evaluation of fatigue responses.
2 Fatigue analysis
2.1 General
The required models and methods for fatigue analysis for self-elevating units or jack-ups are dependent on type
of operation, environment and design type of the unit. For units operating at deeper waters where the first
natural periods are in a range with significant wave energy, e.g. for natural periods higher than 3 s, the dynamic
structural response need to be considered in the fatigue analysis.
2.2 World-wide operation

For world wide operation the analyses shall be performed utilising environmental data (e.g. scatter diagram,
spectrum) given in DNV-RP-C205. The North Atlantic scatter diagram shall be utilised.
2.3 Restricted operation

The analyses shall be performed utilising relevant site specific environmental data for the area(s) the unit will
be operated. The restrictions shall be described in the operation manual for the unit.
2.4 Simplified fatigue analysis

2.4.1 Simplified fatigue analysis may be performed in order to establish the general acceptability of fatigue
resistance, or as a screening process to identify the most critical details to be considered in a stochastic fatigue
analysis, see [2.5].

Ch.2 Sec.5 Fatigue limit states (FLS) Page 31
2.4.2 Simplified fatigue analyses should be performed utilising appropriate conservative design parameters.
Normally a two-parameter, Weibull distribution (see DNV-RP-C203 Sec.2.14.) may be utilised to describe the
long-term stress range distribution, giving the following extreme stress range:
1
--h
( ln ( n 0 ) )
a
- ---------------------------- n = ---------------------1
0
m
---
m n 0 1 + ---
h
( DFF )
n0
1
---m
= the total number of stress variations during the lifetime of the structure
= extreme stress range that is exceeded once out of n0 stress variations.
The extreme stress amplitude
ampl_n is thus given by ( n / 2 )

0
h
a
(1+m/h)
m
DFF
=
=
=
=
=
the shape parameter of the Weibull stress range distribution, see e.g. DNV-RP-C104 Sec.7.9
the intercept of the design S-N curve with the log N axis, see DNV-RP-C203 Sec.2.3
is the complete gamma function, see DNV-RP-C203 Sec.2.14
the inverse slope of the S-N curve, see DNV-RP-C203 Sec.2.14
Design Fatigue Factor.
2.4.3 When the simplified fatigue evaluation involves utilisation of the dynamic stress responses resulting
from the global analysis, e.g. 100 years, the response should be suitably scaled to the return period of the basis,
minimum fatigue life of the unit. In such cases, scaling may be undertaken utilising the appropriate factor found
from the following:
n = n
0
ni
log n 0
------------log n i
1
--h
= the number of stress variations in i years appropriate to the global analysis
n = the extreme stress range that is exceeded once out of ni stress variations.
i
2.5 Stochastic fatigue analysis

2.5.1 Stochastic fatigue analyses shall be based upon recognised procedures and principles utilising relevant
site specific data or world wide environmental data.
2.5.2 Simplified fatigue analyses should be used as a screening process to identify locations for which a
detailed, stochastic fatigue analysis should be undertaken.
2.5.3 Fatigue analyses shall include consideration of the directional probability of the environmental data.
Providing that it can be satisfactorily checked, scatter diagram data may be considered as being directionally
specific. Scatter diagram for world wide operations (North Atlantic scatter diagram) is given in DNV-RPC205. Relevant wave spectra and energy spreading shall be utilised. Normally a Pierson-Moskowitch spectrum
and a cos4 spreading function is utilised in the evaluation of self-elevating units. Further details are given in
DNV-RP-C104.
2.5.4 Structural response shall be determined based upon analyses of an adequate number of wave directions.
Generally a maximum radial spacing of 15 degrees should be considered. Transfer functions should be
established based upon consideration of a sufficient number of periods, such that the number, and values of the
periods analysed:
adequately cover the wave data

satisfactorily describe transfer functions at, and around, the wave cancellation and amplifying periods
(consideration should be given to take account that such cancellation and amplifying periods may be
different for different elements within the structure)
satisfactorily describe transfer functions at, and around, the relevant excitation periods of the structure.
2.5.5 Stochastic fatigue analyses utilising simplified structural model representations of the unit (e.g. a space
frame model) may form basis for identifying locations for which a stochastic fatigue analysis, utilising a
detailed model of the structure, should be performed (e.g. at critical intersections).

Ch.2 Sec.6 Accidental limit states (ALS) Page 32
SECTION 6 ACCIDENTAL LIMIT STATES (ALS)

1 General
1.1 General
1.1.1 ALS shall be assessed for relevant accidental events. Principally satisfactory protection against
accidental damage should be obtained by the following two means:
low damage probability

acceptable damage consequences.
Further information about safety principles and arrangements with respect to design towards accidental events
are given in DNV-OS-A101.
1.1.2 The capability of the structure to redistribute loads during and after accidents should be considered when
designing the unit.
After damage requiring immediate repair, the unit is to resist functional and environmental loads corresponding
to a return period of one year.
Guidance note:
Energy absorption by impact types of accidental events requires the structure to behave in a ductile manner. Measures
to obtain adequate ductility are:
- make the strength of connections of primary members in excess of that of the member
- provide redundancy in the structure, so that alternate load redistribution paths may be developed
- avoid dependence on energy absorption in slender members with a non-ductile post buckling behaviour
- avoid pronounced weak sections and abrupt change in strength or stiffness
- use non-brittle materials.
1.1.3 The loads and consequential damage due to accidental events such as:
collision
dropped objects (e.g. from crane handling)
fire
explosion
unintended flooding during transit
shall be considered to avoid loss of floatability or capsizing during transit, on-bottom instability in elevated
operation or survival conditions, pollution or loss of human life. Requirements for compartmentation and
floating stability are given in DNV-OS-C301.
1.1.4 Analysis and requirements to satisfy strength criteria are given in the present standard and in DNV-OSC101 Ch.2 Sec.6.
1.1.5 The damage consequences of accidental events other than those listed in [1.1.3] shall if relevant be
specially considered in each case applying an equivalent standard of safety.
2 Collisions
2.1 General
2.1.1 Collision by a supply vessel against a leg of a self-elevating unit shall be considered for all elements that
may be hit either by sideways, bow or stern collision. The vertical extent of the collision zone shall be based
on the depth and draught of visiting supply vessels.
Guidance note:
Simplified procedures for calculation of vessel impact on self-elevating unit legs may be found in DNV-RP-C104
Sec.8.
2.1.2 A collision will normally only cause local damage of the leg. However, the global strength and
overturning stability of the unit shall also be checked. With lattice type legs the damaged chord or bracing and
connections may be assumed to be non-effective for check of residual strength of the unit after collision.
2.1.3 Assessment of dynamic effects and non-linear structural response (geometrical and material) should be
performed as part of the impact evaluation.

3 Dropped objects
3.1 General
3.1.1 Critical areas for dropped objects shall be determined on the basis of the actual movement of potential
dropped objects (e.g. crane or other lifting operation mass) relative to the structure of the unit itself. Where a
dropped object is a relevant accidental event, the impact energy shall be established and the structural
consequences of the impact assessed.
3.1.2 A dropped object impact against a chord or bracing will normally cause complete failure of the element
or its connections. These parts should then be assumed to be non-effective for the check of the residual strength
of the unit after the dropped object impact.
3.1.3 Critical areas for dropped objects shall be determined on the basis of the actual movement of loads
assuming a minimum drop direction within an angle with the vertical direction:
5 in air
15 in water.
Dropped objects shall be considered for vital structural elements of the unit within the areas given above.
4 Fires
4.1 General
4.1.1 A structure that is subjected to a fire shall have sufficient structural capacity until completed evacuation.
The following fire scenarios shall be considered:
jet fires
fire inside or on the hull
fire on the sea surface.
4.1.2 Further requirements concerning accidental limit state events involving fire is given in DNV-OS-A101.
4.1.3 Structural assessment with respect to fire may be omitted provided fire protection requirements made in
DNV-OS-D301 are met.
5 Explosions
5.1 General
5.1.1 With respect to design loads resulting from explosions, one or more of the following design philosophies
are relevant:
ensure that hazardous locations are located in unconfined (open) locations and that sufficient shielding
mechanisms (e.g. blast walls) are installed
locate hazardous areas in partially confined locations and design utilising the resulting, relatively small
overpressures
locate hazardous areas in enclosed locations and install pressure relief mechanisms (e.g. blast panels) and
design for the resulting overpressure.
5.1.2 As far as practicable, structural design accounting for large plate field rupture resulting from explosion
loads should be avoided due to the uncertainties of the loads and the consequences of the rupture itself.
5.1.3 Structural support of blast walls and the transmission of the blast loads into main structural members
shall be evaluated when relevant.
6 Unintended flooding
6.1 General
6.1.1 For the transit condition, structural effects as a results of heeling of the unit after damage flooding as
described in DNV-OS-C301 shall be accounted for in the structural strength assessment. Boundaries which
shall remain watertight after unintended flooding shall be checked for external water pressure.
6.1.2 The unit shall be designed for environmental condition corresponding to 1 year return period after
damage flooding, see DNV-OS-C101.

Guidance note:
The environmental loads may be disregarded if the material factor M is set to 1.33.
6.1.3 Local exceeding of the structural resistance level may be acceptable provided redistribution of forces due
to yielding, buckling and fracture is accounted for.
6.1.4 Wave pressure, slamming forces and green sea shall be accounted for in all relevant areas. Local damage
may be accepted provided progressive structural collapse and damage of vital equipment is avoided.
6.1.5 Position of air-intakes and openings to areas with vital equipment which need to be available during an
emergency situation e.g. emergency generators, shall be considered taking into account the wave elevation in
a 1 year storm condition.

Ch.2 Sec.7 Special considerations Page 35
SECTION 7 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS

1 General
Some special items to be considered in relation to robust design and safe operation of self-elevating units are
described in this section.
2 Pre-load capacity
2.1 General
2.1.1 Minimum required pre-load capacity with reference to the global strength and the seabed design
assumptions for units with separate footings shall be accounted for in the design.
Guidance note:
It should be noted that actual soil conditions at operation sites may require higher pre-loads than those set up by the
leg strength, e.g. to secure against sudden penetration.
2.1.2 The assessment of pre-load capacity given in [2.1.3] and [2.1.4] should be performed with the
characteristic functional and environmental loads, i.e. without load factors.
2.1.3 Units with separate footings which are designed for a pinned leg-bottom connection are to have a
capability to pre-load the legs up to at least 100% of the maximum design axial loads in the legs accounting for
functional loads and environmental overturning loads.
For units that shall operate in soil conditions where exceeding of the soil capacity will result in large
penetrations, a pre-load higher than the maximum survival axial load case axial load will be required. Examples
of such soils are generally soft clays, or conditions where hard soils are underlain by softer soils and there is a
risk of a punch-through failure.
A recommended approach for determination of required pre-load is given in Classification Note 30.4.
2.1.4 Units with separate footings where the design is based on a specified moment restraint of the legs at the
seabed are to have a capability to pre-load the legs up to a level which shall account for the maximum design
axial loads in the legs due to functional loads and environmental overturning loads plus the specified moment
restraint at the bottom.
In lieu of a detailed soil/structure interaction analysis the required pre-load may in this case be determined by
the following factor:
For cohesive soils, e.g. clay:
F VP
1
---------- = -------------------------------FV
2 A MU
1 ----------- ---------2
R FV
For cohesionless soils, e.g. sand:
F VP
1
---------- = --------------------------------
FV
A M U
1 2
----------- ---------2
R FV
FVP
FV
MU
A
R
=
=
=
=
=
minimum required pre-load on one leg

maximum design axial load in the leg accounting for functional loads and environmental overturning loads
minimum design moment restraint of the leg at the seabed
area of spudcan in contact with soil
equivalent radius of spudcan contact area.
2.1.5 For cohesionless soils, the above requirement to pre-load capacity may be departed from in case where
a jetting system is installed which will provide penetration to full soil contact of the total spudcan area.
2.1.6 The potential of scour at each location should be evaluated. If scour takes place, the beneficial effect of
pre-loading related to moment restraint capacity may be destroyed. At locations with scour potential, scour
protection should normally be provided in order to rely on a permanent moment restraint.

3 Overturning stability
3.1 General
3.1.1 The safety against overturning is determined by the equation:
M
s --------sMO
MO = overturning moment, i.e. caused by environmental loads

MS = stabilising moment, i.e. caused by functional loads
s = safety coefficient against overturning
= 1.1.
Guidance note:
It is allowed to use load factor = 1.0 on all loads contributing to MS and MO in the overturning stability check above.
If the design is based on a specified moment restraint of the legs at the seabed, the calculated leg footing moments are
not to be included in MS above.
3.1.2 The stabilising moment due to functional loads shall be calculated with respect to the assumed axis of
rotation, and with the unit's lateral deflections taken into consideration.
For self-elevating units with separate footings the axis of rotation may, in lieu of a detailed soil-structure
interacting analysis, be assumed to be a horizontal axis intersecting the axis of two of the legs. It may further
be assumed that the vertical position of the axis of rotation is located at a distance above the spudcan tip
equivalent to the lesser of:
half the maximum predicted penetration or
half the height of the spudcan.
For self-elevating units with mat support, the location of the axis of rotation may have to be specially
considered.
3.1.3 The overturning moment due to wind, waves and current should be calculated with respect to the axis of
rotation defined in [3.1.2].
The overturning stability shall be calculated for the most unfavourable direction and combination of
environmental and functional loads according to the load plan for the unit. The dynamic amplification of the
combined wave and current load effect shall be taken into account.
3.1.4 The lower ends of separate legs shall be prevented from sideway slipping by ensuring sufficient
horizontal leg and soil support.
4 Air gap
4.1 General
4.1.1 Clearance between the hull structure and the wave crest is normally to be ensured for the operating
position.
4.1.2 The requirement to the length of the leg is that the distance between the lower part of the deck structure
in the operating position and the crest of the maximum design wave, including astronomical and storm tides,
is not to be less than 10% of the combined storm tide, astronomical tide and height of the design wave above
the mean low water level, or 1.2 m, whichever is smaller. Expected subsidence of the structure shall be taken
into account.
4.1.3 Crest elevation above still water level is given in Figure 7-1.
4.1.4 A smaller distance may be accepted if wave impact forces on the deck structure are taken into account
in the strength and overturning analysis.
4.1.5 Clearance between the structure and wave shall be ensured in floating condition for appurtenances such
as helicopter deck, etc.

Figure 7-1
Crest elevation

Ch.3 Sec.1 Classification Page 38
CHAPTER 3 CLASSIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION

SECTION 1 CLASSIFICATION
1 General
1.1 Introduction
1.1.1 As well as representing DNVs recommendations on safe engineering practice for general use by the
offshore industry, the offshore standards also provide the technical basis for DNV classification, certification
and verification services.
1.1.2 This chapter identifies the specific documentation, certification and surveying requirements to be applied
when using this standard for certification and classification purposes.
1.1.3 A complete description of principles, procedures, applicable class notations and technical basis for
offshore classification is given by the applicable Offshore Service Specifications for Classification as listed in
Table 1-1.
Table 1-1 DNV offshore service specifications
Reference
DNV-OSS-101
DNV-OSS-102
DNV-OSS-103
DNV-OSS-104
Title
Rules for Classification of Offshore Drilling and Support Units
Rules for Classification of Floating Production, Storage and Loading Units
Rules for Classification of LNG/LPG Floating Production and Storage Units or Installations
Rules for Self-Elevating Drilling units
Guidance note:
The OSS-104 provides an overview of convectional self-elevating units (i.e. independent legs, not self-propelled and
with rack and pinion jacking system). All other design alternatives are covered by DNV-OSS-101.
1.2 Application
1.2.1 It is assumed that the units will comply with the requirement for retention of the Class as defined in the
above listed service specifications.
1.2.2 Where codes and standards call for the extent of critical inspections and tests to be agreed between
contractor or manufacturer and client, the resulting extent is to be agreed with DNV.
1.2.3 DNV may accept alternative solutions found to represent an overall safety level equivalent to that stated
in the requirements of this standard.
1.2.4 Any deviations, exceptions and modifications to the design codes and standards given as recognised
reference codes shall be approved by DNV.
1.2.5 Technical requirements given in DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.7, related to Serviceability Limit States, are
not mandatory as part of classification.
1.2.6 Technical requirements given in DNV-OS-C101 related to design for earthquakes are not mandatory as
part of classification.
1.3 Documentation
Documentation for classification shall be in accordance with the NPS DocReq (DNV Nauticus Production
System for documentation requirements) and DNV-RP-A201.

App.A Permanently installed self-elevating units Page 39
APPENDIX A PERMANENTLY INSTALLED SELF-ELEVATING UNITS

A.1 Introduction
A.1.1 General
A.1.1.1 The requirements and guidance given in this Appendix are supplementary requirements for units that
are intended to stay on location for prolonged periods, normally more than 5 years.
A.1.1.2 The requirements apply to all types of self-elevating units.
A.1.1.3 Permanently installed self-elevating units shall be designed or documented for the site specific
environmental and soil conditions. Fatigue properties and facilities for survey on location shall be specially
considered.
A.1.1.4 Adequate corrosion protection shall be implemented to cover the entire prolonged operation period.
A.2 Fatigue
A.2.1 General
A.2.1.1 Design Fatigue Factors (DFF) are introduced as fatigue safety factors. DFF shall be applied to
structural elements according to the principles in DNV-OS-C101.
A.2.1.2 Fatigue safety factors applied for permanently installed self-elevating units shall be given dependent
on the criticality of the detail and accessibility for inspection and repair. Special considerations should be made
for the leg in the splash zone, submerged parts legs and spudcan, and possible inaccessible parts of the spudcan.
A.2.1.3 The fatigue analysis should focus on members that are essential to the overall structural integrity of the
unit.
Fatigue susceptible areas may include:
the leg to hull holding system

the leg members and joints in the vicinity of the upper and lower guides
the leg members and joints in the splashing zone
the leg members and joints in the lower part of the leg near the spudcan
the spudcan to leg connection.
Guidance note:
See DNV-OS-C101 Ch.2 Sec.9 [2.2] with respect to vertical extent of splash zone.
A.3 Inspection and maintenance

A.3.1 Facilities for survey
A.3.1.1 Surveys may be carried out on location based on agreed procedures outlined in a maintenance system
and survey arrangement, without interrupting the function of the unit. The following matters shall be taken into
consideration to be able to carry out surveys on location:
arrangements and methods for survey of hull, legs and seabed foundation structure
corrosion protection of hull, legs and seabed foundation structure
underwater cleaning facilities.
A.3.1.2 The In Service Inspection program (IIP) should reflect possible stress concentrations in critical areas,
fatigue criticality, and the previous operational and inspection histories.

CHANGES HISTORIC Page 40
CHANGES HISTORIC
Note that historic changes older than the editions shown below have not been included. Older historic changes
(if any) may be retrieved through http://www.dnv.com.
April 2012 edition

Main changes:
General
Update the reference to latest recommended practice, i.e. to DNV-RP-C104 instead of Classification Note
31.5.
Some minor updates and clarification in text.
Sec.2
C302 Material Grade NV690 E is sufficient for thick rack plates.
Sec.3
Dynamic Amplification Factor omitted when DAF 1.10 Guidance note B403.
Wind profile Guidance note to C202.
Wind unrestricted service Guidance note to C302.
Sec.4
Clarify vertical position of heavy equipment during transit Guidance note D700.
Guide for simplified P effect Guidance note E201.
Sec.5
Spudcan design loads B204.
Sec.8
Load factor = 1.0 for overturning stability check Guidance note C100.

DNV Os C104 2014

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DNV Os C104 2014

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DNV Os C104 2014

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

OFFSHORE STANDARD

Structural Design of Self-Elevating Units

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Det Norske Veritas AS July 2014

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

Main changes July 2014

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

CH. 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 7

CH. 2 TECHNICAL CONTENT ......................................................................... 11

Structural categorisation, material selection and inspection principles...................... 11

Design principles ............................................................................................................... 14

Design loads ....................................................................................................................... 21

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

Ultimate limit states (ULS)............................................................................................... 27

Accidental limit states (ALS) ........................................................................................... 32

Fatigue limit states (FLS) ................................................................................................. 30

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

CH. 3 CLASSIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION ......................................... 38

App. A Permanently installed self-elevating units ...................................................................... 39

CHANGES HISTORIC ................................................................................................................. 40

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

1.3 Scope and application

intact condition, structural strength

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

2.2 Recommended practices, classification notes and other references

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

4 Abbreviations and symbols

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

4.2.2 Greek characters:

amplification factor for leg bending response

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

CHAPTER 2 TECHNICAL CONTENT

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

3.2 Design and service temperatures

3.3 Selection of structural steel

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

SECTION 2 DESIGN PRINCIPLES

1.2 Overall design

1.3 Details design

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

2.3 Installation and retrieval

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

2.4 Operation and survival

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

3.6 Snow and ice

dynamic stresses for all limit states

static axial load on one leg

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, July 2014

a fixation system, i.e. rack chock

4.2 Global structural models

footing main plating and stiffeners

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS