CS-23 Decision ED 2003 14 RM

ED Decision 2003/14/RM
Final
14/11/2003
European Aviation Safety Agency
DECISION NO. 2003/14/RM

OF THE EXECUTIVE D IRECTOR OF THE
AGENCY
of 14 November 2003
on certification specifications, including airworthiness codes and acceptable means of
compliance for normal, utility, aerobatic and commuter category aeroplanes ( CS-23 )
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation
Safety Agency1 (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 13 and
14 thereof,
Having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 of 24 September 2003 2 laying
down implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and
related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production
organisations, in particular 21A.16A of Part 21 thereof;
Whereas :
(1)
The Agenc y shall issue certification specifications, including airworthiness codes and
acceptable means of compliance, as well as guidance material to be used in the certification
process.
(2)
The Agency has, pursuant to Article 43 of the Basic Regulation, consulted widely interested
parties on the matters which are subject to this Decision and following that consultation
provided a written response to the comments received,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
OJ L 240, 7.09.2002, p. 1.
OJ L 243, 27.09.2003, p. 6.
Article 1
The certification specifications, including airworthiness codes and acceptable means of compliance
for normal, utility, aerobatic and commuter category aeroplanes are those laid down in the Annex to
this Decision.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on 14 November 2003. It shall be published in the Official
Publication of the Agency.
Done at Brussels, 14 November 2003.
For the European Aviation Safety Agency,

Patrick GOUDOU
Executive Director
European Aviation Safety Agency
Certification Specifications
for
Normal, Utility, Aerobatic,
and Commuter Category
Aeroplanes
CS-23
CS-23
ii
CONTENTS (general layout)
CS23
Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes
BOOK 1 AIRWORTHINESS CODE

SUBPART A
GENERAL
SUBPART B
FLIGHT
SUBPART C
STRUCTURE
SUBPART D
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
SUBPART E
POWERPLANT
SUBPART F
EQUIPMENT
SUBPART G
OPERATING LIMITATIONS AND INFORMATION
APPENDICES: A, C, D, F, G, H, I, and J
BOOK 2 ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF COMPLIANCE (AMC):
SUBPART C
STRUCTURE
SUBPART D
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
SUBPART E
POWER-PLANT
SUBPART F
EQUIPMENT
SUBPART G
OPERATING LIMITATIONS AND INFORMATION
APPENDIX A
FLIGHT TEST GUIDE
C-1
CS-23
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
C-2
CS-23
BOOK 1
EASA Certification Specifications

for
Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category
Aeroplanes
CS-23
Book 1
Airworthiness code
1-0-1
BOOK 1
CS-23
1-0-2
BOOK 1
CS-23
SUBPART A GENERAL
CS 23.1
(a)
Applicability
This airworthiness code is applicable to
(1) Aeroplanes in the normal, utility and

aerobatic categories that have a seating
configuration, excluding the pilot seat(s), of nine
or fewer and a maximum certificated take-off
weight of 5670 kg (12 500 lb) or less; and
(2) Propeller-driven
twin-engined
aeroplanes in the commuter category that have a
seating configuration, excluding the pilot seat(s),
of nineteen or fewer and a maximum certificated
take-off weight of 8618 kg (19 000 lb) or less.
CS 23.3
Aeroplane categories
(a) The normal category is limited to nonaerobatic operations.

Non-aerobatic operations
include
(1)
flying;
(2)
Any manoeuvre incident to normal

Stalls (except whip stalls); and
(3) Lazy eights, chandelles and steep turns

or similar manoeuvres, in which the angle of bank
is not more than 60.
(b) The utility category is limited to any of the
operations covered under sub-paragraph (a); plus
(1) Spins (if approved for the particular
type of aeroplane); and
(2) Lazy eights, chandelles, and steep
turns, or similar manoeuvres in which the angle of
bank is more than 60 but not more than 90.
(c) The aerobatic category is without
restrictions, other than those shown to be necessary
as a result of required flight tests.
(d) Commuter category operation is limited to
any manoeuvre incident to normal flying, stalls
(except whip stalls) and steep turns in which the
angle of bank is not more than 60.
(e) Except for commuter category, aeroplanes
may be certificated in more than one category if the
requirements of each requested category are met.
1A1
CS-23
BOOK 1
1A2
BOOK 1
CS-23
SUBPART B FLIGHT
is shown. The maximum

established so that it is
GENERAL
CS 23.21
(1)
Proof of compliance
(2)
Tolerance
+5%, 1%
C.G.
7% total travel
CS 23.23
(b)
The load distribution must not exceed

(1)
(A)
(ii) The required minimum crew,

and fuel and oil to full tank capacity.
(b) Minimum weight. The minimum weight
(the lowest weight at which compliance with each
applicable requirement of CS-23 is shown) must
be established so that it is not more than the sum
of
The selected limits;
(1) The empty weight determined under

CS 23.29;
(2) The limits at which the structure is

proven; or
(2) The weight of the required minimum

crew (assuming a weight of 77 kg (170 lb) for
each crew member); and
(3) The limits at which compliance with

each applicable flight requirement of this
subpart is shown.
CS 23.25
Oil at full capacity, and
(B) At least enough fuel for

maximum continuous power operation
of at least 30 minutes for day-VFR
approved aeroplanes and at least 45
minutes for night-VFR and IFR
approved aeroplanes; or
Load distribution limits
(a) Ranges of weight and centres of gravity

within which the aeroplane may be safely operated
must be established and must include the range for
lateral centres of gravity if possible loading
conditions can result in significant variation of
their positions.
Not less than the weight with:-
(i)
Each seat occupied, assuming a
weight of 77kg (170 lbs) for each occupant
for normal and commuter category
aeroplanes, and 86kg (190 lbs) for utility
and acrobatic category aeroplanes, except
that seats other than pilot seats may be
placarded for a lesser weight; and
(b) The following general tolerances are

allowed during flight testing. However, greater
tolerances may be allowed in particular tests
Critical items affected by weight
Not more than the least of
(iii) The highest weight at which

compliance with each applicable flight
requirement is shown, and,
(2) By systematic investigation of each

probable combination of weight and centre of
gravity, if compliance cannot be reasonably
inferred from combinations investigated.
+5%, 10%
be
(ii) The design maximum weight,

which is the highest weight at which
compliance with each applicable structural
loading condition of CS-23 (other than
those complied with at the design landing
weight) is shown; or
(1) By tests upon an aeroplane of the

type for which certification is requested, or by
calculations based on, and equal in accuracy to,
the results of testing; and
Weight
must
(i)
The highest weight selected by
the applicant; or
(a) Each requirement of this subpart must be

met at each appropriate combination of weight and
centre of gravity within the range of loading
conditions for which certification is requested.
This must be shown
Item
weight
(3)
The weight of
(i)
For
turbojet
powered
aeroplanes, 5% of the total fuel capacity
of that particular fuel tank arrangement
under investigation; and
Weight limits
(a) Maximum weight. The maximum weight

is the highest weight at which compliance with
each applicable requirement of CS-23 (other than
those complied with at the design landing weight)
(ii) For other aeroplanes, the fuel

necessary for one-half hour of operation
at maximum continuous power.
1B1
CS-23
BOOK 1
CS 23.29
Empty weight and corresponding centre of gravity
(a) The empty weight and corresponding

centre of gravity must be determined by weighing
the aeroplane with
(1)
(2) During a closed throttle glide at

VNE, the propeller may not cause an engine
speed above 110% of maximum continuous
speed.
Fixed ballast;
(c) Controllable pitch propellers without

constant speed controls. Each propeller that can
be controlled in flight, but that does not have
constant speed controls, must have a means to
limit the pitch range so that
(2) Unusable fuel determined under

CS 23.959; and
(3)
(1) The lowest possible pitch allows

compliance with sub-paragraph (b)(1); and
Full operating fluids, including

(i)
Oil;
(ii)
Hydraulic fluid; and
(iii) Other fluids required for

normal operation of aeroplane systems,
except potable water, lavatory precharge
water, and water intended for injection in
the engines.
(2) The highest possible pitch allows

compliance with sub-paragraph (b)(2).
(d) Controllable pitch propellers with
constant speed controls. Each controllable pitch
propeller with constant speed controls must have
(1) With the governor in operation, a
means at the governor to limit the maximum
engine speed to the maximum allowable takeoff rpm; and
(b) The condition of the aeroplane at the time

of determining empty weight must be one that is
well defined and can be easily repeated.
CS 23.31
(2) With the governor inoperative, the

propeller blades at the lowest possible pitch,
with take-off power, the aeroplane stationary,
and no wind, either:-
Removable ballast
(i)
A means to limit the maximum
engine speed to 103 percent of the
maximum allowable take-off r.p.m., or
Removable ballast may be used in showing

compliance with the flight requirements of this
subpart, if
(ii) For an engine with an

approved overspeed, means to limit the
maximum engine and propeller speed to
not more than the maximum approved
overspeed.
(a) The place for carrying ballast is properly

designed and installed, and is marked under
CS 23.1557; and
(b) Instructions are included in the aeroplane
flight manual, approved manual material, or
markings and placards, for the proper placement of
the removable ballast under each loading condition
for which removable ballast is necessary.
PERFORMANCE
CS 23.45
CS 23.33
Propeller speed and pitch limits
(a) General. The propeller speed and pitch

must be limited to values that will assure safe
operation under normal operating conditions.
(a) Unless
otherwise
prescribed,
the
performance requirements of this subpart must be
met for
(1)
(b) Propellers not controllable in flight. For

each propeller whose pitch cannot be controlled in
flight
(1) During take-off and initial climb at
the
all-engine(s)-operating
climb
speed
specified in CS 23.65, the propeller must limit
the engine rpm, at full throttle or at maximum
allowable take-off manifold pressure, to a speed
not greater than the maximum allowable takeoff rpm; and
General
Still air and standard atmosphere;
(2) Ambient atmospheric conditions, for

commuter
category
aeroplanes,
for
reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes of
more than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) maximum weight
and for turbine engine-powered aeroplanes.
(b) Performance data must be determined
over not less than the following ranges of
conditions
1B2
BOOK 1
CS-23
(3) Take-off distance and take-off run

of CS 23.59; and
(1) Aerodrome altitude from sea-level

to 3048 m (10 000 ft); and
(2) For reciprocating engine-powered
aeroplanes of 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or less
maximum weight, temperatures from standard
to 30C above standard; or
aeroplanes of more than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb)
maximum weight and turbine engine-powered
aeroplanes, temperature from standard to 30C
above standard, or the maximum ambient
atmospheric temperature at which compliance
with the cooling provisions of CS 23.1041 to
23.1047 is shown, if lower.
(4)
Landing distance of CS 23.75.
The effect on these distances of operation on

other types of surface (e.g. grass, gravel) when
dry, may be determined or derived and these
surfaces listed in accordance with CS 23.1583 (p).
(h) For commuter category aeroplanes, the
following also apply:
(1) Unless otherwise prescribed, the
take-off, en-route, approach and landing
configurations for the aeroplane must be
selected;
(c) Performance data must be determined

with the cowl flaps or other means for controlling
the engine cooling air supply in the position used
in the cooling tests required by CS 23.1041 to
23.1047.
(2) The aeroplane configuration may

vary with weight, altitude and temperature, to
the extent that they are compatible with the
operating procedures required by sub-paragraph
(h) (3);
(d) The available propulsive thrust must

correspond to engine power, not exceeding the
approved power, less
(3) Unless otherwise prescribed, in

determining the critical-engine-inoperative
take-off performance, take-off flight path and
accelerate-stop distance, changes in the
aeroplanes configuration, speed and power
must be made in accordance with procedures
established by the applicant for operation in
service.
(1)
Installation losses; and
(2) The power absorbed by the

accessories and services appropriate to the
particular ambient atmospheric conditions and
the particular flight condition.
(4) Procedures for the execution of

discontinued approaches and balked landings
associated with the conditions prescribed in
CS 23.67 (c) (4) and 23.77 (c) must be
established; and
(e) The performance as affected by engine

power must be based on a relative humidity of
(1) 80% at
temperature; and
and
below
standard
(2) 34% at and above

temperature plus 28C (plus 50F).
standard
(5) The procedures established under

sub-paragraphs (h) (3) and (h) (4) must
Between the two temperatures listed in subparagraphs (e) (1) and (e) (2) the relative humidity
must vary linearly.
(i)
Be able to be consistently
executed by a crew of average skill in
atmospheric
conditions
reasonably
expected to be encountered in service;
(f) Unless
otherwise
prescribed
in
determining the take-off and landing distances,
changes in the aeroplanes configuration, speed
and power must be made in accordance with
procedures established by the applicant for
operation in service. These procedures must be
able to be executed consistently by pilots of
average skill in atmospheric conditions reasonably
expected to be encountered in service.
CS 23.49
(g) The following, as applicable, must be

determined on a smooth, dry, hard-surfaced
runway
(a) VSO and VS1 are the stalling speeds or the

minimum steady flight speed (CAS) at which the
aeroplane is controllable with
(1)
(2)
23.55;
(ii) Use methods or devices that

are safe and reliable; and
(iii) Include allowances for any
reasonably expected time delays in the
execution of the procedures.
Take-off distance of CS 23.53 (b);

Accelerate-stop
distance
of
Stalling speed

aeroplanes, engine(s) idling, the throttle(s)
closed or at not more than the power necessary
CS
1B3
CS-23
BOOK 1
for zero thrust at a speed not more than 110% of

the stalling speed; and
(2) For
turbine
engine-powered
aeroplanes, the propulsive thrust may not be
greater than zero at the stalling speed, or, if the
resultant thrust has no appreciable effect on the
stalling speed, with engine(s) idling and
throttle(s) closed;
(3)
Propeller(s) in the take-off position;
(4) The aeroplane in the condition

existing in the test in which VSO and VS1 are
being used;
(5)
Centre of gravity in the position
which results in the highest value of VSO and
VS1; and
(6)
Weight used when VSO or VS1 are
being used as a factor to determine compliance
with a required performance standard.
(b) VSO and VS1 must be determined by flight
tests using the procedure and meeting the flight
characteristics specified in CS 23.201.
(c)
VSO at maximum weight must not
exceed 113 km/h (61 knots) for
(1)
Single-engined aeroplanes; and
(2) Twin-engined
aeroplanes
of
2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight
that cannot meet the minimum rate of climb
specified in CS 23.67 (a) (1) with the critical
engine inoperative.
CS 23.51
Take-off speeds
(a) For normal utility and aerobatic category

aeroplanes, the rotation speed VR, is the speed at
1B4
BOOK 1
CS-23
(3)
(iii) 110 VSI; or

(iv) The speed that allows attaining
the initial climb-out speed, V2, before
reaching a height of 11 m (35 ft) above
the take-off surface in accordance with
CS 23.57 (c) (2).
(3) For any given set of conditions, such
as
weight,
altitude,
temperature
and
configuration, a single value of VR must be
used to show compliance with both the oneengine-inoperative take-off and all-engineoperating take-off requirements.
(4) The take-off safety speed, V2, in
terms of calibrated airspeed, must be selected
for the aeroplane so as to allow the gradient of
climb required in CS 23.67 (c) (1) and (c) (2)
but must not be less than 110 VMC or less than
120 VSI.
(5) The one-engine-inoperative take-off
distance, using a normal rotation rate at a speed
9.3 km/h (5 knots) less than VR established in
accordance with sub-paragraph (c)(2), must be
shown not to exceed the corresponding oneengine-inoperative take-off distance determined
in accordance with CS 23.57 and 23.59 (a) (1)
using the established VR.
The take-off,
otherwise performed in accordance with
CS 23.57 must safely be continued from the
point at which the aeroplane is 11 m (35 ft)
above the take-off surface, at a speed not less
than the established V2 minus 9.3 km/h (5
knots).
(6) With all engines operating, marked
increases in the scheduled take-off distances
determined in accordance with CS 23.59 (a) (2)
may not result from over-rotation of the
aeroplane or out-of-trim conditions.
CS 23.53
Take-off performance
(a) For normal, utility and aerobatic category

aeroplanes the take-off distance must be
determined in accordance with sub-paragraph (b),
using speeds determined in accordance with
CS 23.51 (a) and (b).
(b) For normal, utility and aerobatic category
aeroplanes the distance required to take-off and
climb to a height of 15 m (50 ft) above the take-off
surface must be determined for each weight,
altitude and temperature within the operational
limits established for take-off with
(1)
Take-off power on each engine;
(2) Wing
position(s); and
flaps
in
the
take-off
Landing gear extended.
(c) For commuter category aeroplanes, takeoff performance as required by CS 23.55 to

CS 23.59 must be determined with the operating
engines within approved operating limitations.
CS 23.55
Accelerate-stop distance
For each commuter category aeroplane, the

accelerate-stop distance must be determined as
follows:
(a) The accelerate-stop distance is the sum of
the distances necessary to
(1) Accelerate the aeroplane from a
standing start to VEF with all engines operating;
(2) Accelerate the aeroplane from VEF
to V1, assuming the critical engine fails at VEF;
and
(3) Come to a full stop from the point at
which V1 is reached.
(b) Means other than wheel-brakes may be
used to determine the accelerate-stop distances if
that means
(1)
Is safe and reliable; and
(2) Is used so that consistent results can

be
expected
under
normal
operating
conditions.
CS 23.57
Take-off path

take-off path is as follows;
(a) The take-off path extends from a standing
start to a point in the take-off at which the
aeroplane is 457 m (1 500 ft) above the take-off
surface, at or below which height the transition
from the take-off to the en-route configuration
must be completed; and
(1) The take-off path must be based on
the procedures prescribed in CS 23.45;
(2) The aeroplane must be accelerated
on the ground to VEF at which point the critical
engine must be made inoperative and remain
inoperative for the rest of the take-off; and
(3) After reaching VEF, the aeroplane
must be accelerated to V2.
(b) During the acceleration to speed V2, the
nose gear may be raised off the ground at a speed
not less than VR. However, landing gear retraction
must not be initiated until the aeroplane is
airborne.
1B5
CS-23
BOOK 1
take-off to the point at which the aeroplane is

11 m (35 ft) above the take-off surface,
determined by a procedure consistent with
CS 23.57.
(c) During the take-off path determination, in

accordance with sub-paragraphs (a) and (b)
(1) The slope of the airborne part of the
take-off path must not be negative at any point;
(b)
(2) The aeroplane must reach V2 before

it is 11m (35 ft) above the take-off surface and
must continue at a speed as close as practical to,
but not less than, V2, until it is 122 m (400 ft)
above the take-off surface;
(1) The horizontal distance along the

take-off path from the start of the take-off to a
point equidistant between the lift off point and
the point at which the aeroplane is 11 m (35 ft)
above the take-off surface, determined under
CS 23.57; or
(3) At each point along the take-off

path, starting at the point at which the aeroplane
reaches 122 m (400 ft) above the take-off
surface, the available gradient of climb must not
be less than 12%; and
(2) 115% of the horizontal distance,

with all engines operating, from the start of the
take-off to a point equidistant between the liftoff point and the point at which the aeroplane is
11 m (35 ft) above the take-off surface,
determined by a procedure consistent with
CS 23.57.
(4) Except for gear retraction and

automatic propeller feathering, the aeroplane
configuration must not be changed, and no
change in power that requires action by the pilot
may be made, until the aeroplane is 122 m
(400 ft) above the take-off surface.
(d) The take-off path to 11 m (35 ft) above
the take-off surface must be determined by a
continuous take-off.
(e) The take-off flight path from 11 m (35 ft)
above the take-off surface must be determined by
synthesis from segments; and
(1) The segments must be clearly
defined and must be related to distinct changes
in configuration, power or speed;
(2) The weight of the aeroplane, the
configuration and the power must be assumed
constant throughout each segment and must
correspond to the most critical condition
prevailing in the segment; and
(3) The take-off flight path must be
based on the aeroplanes performance without
ground effect.
CS 23.59
Take-off distance and take-off

run

take-off distance must be determined. The
determination of the take-off run is optional.
(a)
The take-off run is the greater of
CS 23.61
Take-off flight path

take-off flight path must be determined as follows:
(a) The take-off flight path begins 11 m
(35 ft) above the take-off surface at the end of the
take-off distance determined in accordance with
CS 23.59.
(b) The net take-off flight path data must be
determined so that they represent the actual takeoff flight paths, as determined in accordance with
CS 23.57 and with sub-paragraph (a) , reduced at
each point by a gradient of climb equal to 08%.
(c) The prescribed reduction in climb gradient
may be applied as an equivalent reduction in
acceleration along that part of the take-off flight
path at which the aeroplane is accelerated in level
flight.
CS 23.63
Climb: general
(a) Compliance with the requirements of

CS 23.65, 23.66, 23.67, 23.69 and 23.77 must be
shown
(1)
Out of ground effect; and
(2) At speeds which are not less than

those at which compliance with the powerplant
cooling requirements of CS 23.1041 to 23.1047
has been demonstrated.
The take-off distance is the greater of
(1) The horizontal distance along the

take-off path from the start of the take-off to the
point at which the aeroplane is 11 m (35 ft)
above the take-off surface, determined under
CS 23.57; or
(3) Unless otherwise specified, with one

engine inoperative, at a bank angle not
exceeding 5 degrees.
(2) 115% of the horizontal distance,

with all engines operating, from the start of the
1B6
BOOK 1
CS-23

2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight,
compliance must be shown with CS 23.65 (a),
23.67 (a), where appropriate and CS 23.77 (a) at
maximum take-off or landing weight, as
appropriate in a standard atmosphere.
(c) For normal, utility and aerobatic category
reciprocating engined aeroplanes of more than
2 722 kg (6 000 lb) maximum weight and turbine
engine-powered aeroplanes in the normal, utility
and aerobatic category, compliance must be
shown, at weights, as a function of aerodrome
altitude and ambient temperature, within the
operational limits established for take-off and
landing respectively, with
(1) CS 23.65 (b) and 23.67 (b) (1) and
(2), where appropriate, for take-off; and
(2) CS 23.67 (b) (2), where appropriate,
and CS 23.77 (b), for landing.
(d) For commuter category aeroplanes,
compliance must be shown, at weights as a
function of aerodrome altitude and ambient
temperature within the operational limits
established for take-off and landing respectively,
with
normal, utility and aerobatic category must have a

steady gradient of climb after take-off of at least
4% with
(1)
(2) The landing gear extended except

that, if the landing gear can be retracted in not
more than 7 seconds, it may be assumed to be
retracted;
(3) The wing flaps in the take-off
position(s); and
(4) A climb speed as specified in
CS 23.65 (a) (4).
CS 23.66
one-engine-
(1) The critical engine inoperative and

its propeller in the position it rapidly and
automatically assumes;
(2) CS 23.67 (c) (3), 23.67 (c) (4) and

23.77 (c) for landing.
(2)
power;
The remaining engine
at take-off
(3) The landing gear extended except

that, if the landing gear can be retracted in not
more than 7 seconds, it may be assumed to be
retracted;
Climb: all engines operating
(a) Each normal, utility and aerobatic

category reciprocating engine-powered aeroplane
of 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight
must have a steady gradient of climb at sea level of
at least 83% for landplanes or 67% for seaplanes
and amphibians with

position(s);
(5)
The wings level; and
(6) A climb speed equal to that achieved

at 15 m (50 ft) in the demonstration of CS
23.53.
(1) Not more than maximum continuous

power on each engine;
(2)
Take-off climb:
inoperative
For normal, utility and aerobatic category

reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes of more
than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) maximum weight and
turbine engine-powered aeroplanes in the normal,
utility and aerobatic category, the steady gradient
of climb or descent must be determined at each
weight, altitude and ambient temperature within
the operational limits established by the applicant
with
(1) CS 23.67 (c) (1), 23.67 (c) (2) and

23.67 (c) (3) for take-off; and
CS 23.65
The landing gear retracted;

position(s); and
(4) A climb speed not less than the
greater of 11 VMC and 12 VS1 for twinengined aeroplanes and not less than 12 VS1
for single-engined aeroplanes.
(b) Each normal, utility and aerobatic
category reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes
of more than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) maximum weight
and turbine engine-powered aeroplanes in the
1B7
CS-23
BOOK 1
CS 23.67
(v) A climb speed equal to that

achieved at 15 m (50 ft) in the
demonstration of CS 23.53.
Climb: one-engine-inoperative

2 722kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight the
following apply:
(2) The steady gradient of climb must not be

less than 075% at an altitude of 457 m (1 500 ft)
above the take-off or landing surface, as
appropriate with
(1)
Each aeroplane with a VSO of more than
113 km/h (61 knots) must be able to maintain a
steady climb gradient of at least 15% at a pressure
altitude of 1524 m (5 000 ft) with
(i)
The critical engine in-operative
and its propeller in the minimum drag
position;
(ii) The remaining engine at not
more than maximum continuous power;
(i)
The
critical
engine -inoperative and its propeller in the minimum
drag position;
(iii) The landing gear retracted;

(iv)

(v)
12 VS1.

(iv)
(v)
12 VS1.
The wing flaps retracted; and

A climb speed not less than
(1) Take-off: landing gear extended.

The steady gradient of climb at the altitude of
the take-off surface must be measurably
positive with
(i)
The critical engine inoperative
and its propeller in the position it rapidly
and automatically assumes;
(i)
position;
(ii) The remaining engine at takeoff power;

(iii) The landing gear extended, all

landing gear doors open;
(v)
12 VS1.
(c) For commuter category aeroplanes, the

following apply:
(2) For each aeroplane with a VSO of

113 km/h (61 knots) or less, the steady gradient
of climb or descent at a pressure altitude of
1524 m (5 000 ft) must be determined with
(iv)
(iv) The wing flaps in the take-off

position(s);


utility and aerobatic category
(v)
The wings level; and
(vi)
A climb speed equal to V2.
(2) Take-off: landing gear retracted.

The steady gradient of climb at an altitude of
122 m (400 ft) above the take-off surface must
be not less than 20% with
(i)
and its propeller in the position it rapidly
and automatically assumes;
(1) The steady gradient of climb at an

altitude of 122 m (400 ft) above the take-off
surface must be measurably positive with
(i)
position;

position(s); and
(v)

position(s); and
A climb speed equal to V2.
(3) En-route. The steady gradient of

climb at an altitude of 457 m (1 500 ft) above
1B8
BOOK 1
CS-23
the take-off or landing surface, as appropriate,

must be not less than 12% with

its propeller in the minimum drag position;
(i)
position;
(2) The remaining engine at not more

than maximum continuous power;

(iv)
(v)
A climb speed not less than 12
(3)
(4)
(5)
A climb speed not less than 12 VS1.
CS 23.71
VSI.
(4) Discontinued approach. The steady
gradient of climb at an altitude of 122 m
(400 ft) above the landing surface must be not
less than 21% with
(i)
position;
(iv) The wing flaps in the approach
position(s) in which VSI for these
positions(s) does not exceed 110% of the
VSI for the related all-engines-operating
landing position(s); and
(v) A climb speed established in
connection
with
normal
landing
procedures but not exceeding 15 VSI.
CS 23.69
(a)
En-route climb/descent
All engines operating
The steady gradient and rate of climb must be

determined at each weight, altitude and ambient
temperature within the operational limits
established by the applicant with
(1) Not
more
than
continuous power on each engine;
(b)
maximum
(2)
(3)
(4)
A climb speed not less than 13 VS1.
One-engine-inoperative
The steady gradient and rate of climb/descent

must be determined at each weight, altitude and
ambient temperature within the operational limits
established by the applicant with
Glide (Single-engined
aeroplanes)
The maximum horizontal distance travelled in

still air, in km per 1000 m (nautical miles per
1 000 ft) of altitude lost in a glide, and the speed
necessary to achieve this, must be determined with
the engine inoperative and its propeller in the
minimum drag position, landing gear and wing
flaps in the most favourable available position.
CS 23.73
Reference
speed
landing
approach

reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes of 2 722
kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight, the
reference landing approach speed, VREF, must not
be less than the greater of VMC, determined under
CS 23.149 (b) with the wing flaps in the most
extended take-off setting, and 13 VSO.
utility and aerobatic category, the reference
landing approach speed, VREF, must not be less
than the greater of VMC, determined under
CS 23.149 (c), and 13 VS0.
(c) For commuter category aeroplanes, the
reference landing approach speed, VREF, must not
be less than the greater of 105 VMC, determined
under CS 23.149 (c), and 13 VSO.
CS 23.75
Landing distance
The horizontal distance necessary to land and

come to a complete stop from a point 15 m (50 ft)
above the landing surface must be determined, for
standard temperatures at each weight and altitude
within the operational limits established for
landing, as follows:
(a) A steady approach at not less than VREF,
determined in accordance with CS 23.73 (a), (b) or
1B9
CS-23
BOOK 1
(3) The wing flaps in the landing

position, except that if the flaps may safely be
retracted in two seconds or less without loss of
altitude and without sudden changes of angle of
attack, they may be retracted; and
(c) as appropriate, must be maintained down to 15

m (50 ft) height and
(1) The steady approach must be at a
gradient of descent not greater than 52% (3)
down to the 15 m (50 ft) height.
(2) In addition, an applicant may
demonstrate by tests that a maximum steady
approach gradient, steeper than 52% (3),
down to the 15 m (50 ft) height is safe. The
gradient must be established as an operating
limitation and the information necessary to
display the gradient must be available to the
pilot by an appropriate instrument.
(b) A constant configuration must be maintained throughout the manoeuvre;
(4) A climb speed equal to VREF, as

defined in CS 23.73 (a).
each reciprocating engine-powered aeroplane of
more than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) maximum weight
and turbine engine-powered aeroplanes in the
normal, utility and aerobatic category, the steady
gradient of climb must not be less than 25%
with
(1) Not more than the power or thrust
that is available 8 seconds after initiation of
movement of the power controls from the
minimum flight-idle position;
(c) The landing must be made without

excessive vertical acceleration or tendency to
bounce, nose-over, ground loop, porpoise or water
loop.
(d) It must be shown that a safe transition to
the balked landing conditions of CS 23.77 can be
made from the conditions that exist at the 15 m
(50 ft) height, at maximum landing weight or the
maximum landing weight for altitude and
temperature of CS 23.63 (c) (2) or (d) (2), as
appropriate.
(e) The brakes must not be used so as to
cause excessive wear of brakes or tyres.
(f) Retardation means other than wheelbrakes
may be used if that means
(1)
(2)
(3) The wing flaps in the landing

position; and
(4) A climb speed equal to VREF, as
defined in CS 23.73 (b).
(c) For each commuter category aeroplane,
the steady gradient of climb must not be less than
32% with
(1) Not more than the power that is available
8 seconds after initiation of movement of the
power controls from the minimum flight idle
position;
Is safe and reliable;
(2) Is used so that consistent results can

be expected in service; and
(g) If any device is used that depends on the
operation of any engine, and the landing distance
would be increased when a landing is made with
that engine inoperative, the landing distance must
be determined with that engine inoperative unless
the use of other compensating means will result in
a landing distance not more than that with each
engine operating.
CS 23.77
Balked landing
(a) Each normal, utility and aerobatic

category reciprocating engine-powered aeroplane
of 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight
must be able to maintain a steady gradient of climb
at sea-level of at least 33% with
(1)
(2)
The landing gear extended;
The landing gear extended;
(2)
Landing gear extended;
(3)
Wing flaps in the landing position; and
(4) A climb speed equal to VREF, as defined

in CS 23.73 (c).
FLIGHT CHARACTERISTICS
CS 23.141
General
The aeroplane must meet the requirements of

CS 23.143 to 23.253 at all practical loading
conditions and all operating altitudes, not
exceeding the maximum operating altitude
established under CS 23.1527, for which
certification has been requested, without requiring
exceptional piloting skill, alertness or strength.
1B10
BOOK 1
CS-23
CONTROLLABILITY AND
MANOEUVRABILITY
CS 23.143
General
(a) The aeroplane must be safely controllable

and manoeuvrable during all flight phases
including
(1)
Take-off;
(2)
Climb;
(3)
Level flight;
(4)
Descent;
(5)
Go-around; and
(6) Landing (power on and power off)

with the wing flaps extended and retracted.
Values in Newton (pounds

force) applied to the relevant
control
Roll
Yaw
267 N
133 N
(60
lbf)
(30
lbf)
334 N
222 N
(75
lbf)
(50
lbf)
222 N
111 N
(50
lbf)
(25
lbf)
(150lbf)
89 N
44,5 N
22 N
(20
lbf)
(10
lbf)
(5 lbf)
For temporary application

Stick
Wheel (two hands on rim)
Wheel (one hand on rim)
Rudder pedal
For prolonged application
(b) It must be possible to make a smooth

transition from one flight condition to another
(including turns and slips) without danger of
exceeding the limit load factor, under any probable
operating condition, (including, for multi-engined
aeroplanes, those conditions normally encountered
in the sudden failure of any engine).
CS 23.145
(c) If marginal conditions exist with regard to

required pilot strength, the control forces required
must be determined by quantitative tests. In no
case may the control forces under the conditions
specified in sub-paragraphs (a) and (b), exceed
those prescribed in the following table:
Pitch
667 N
Longitudinal control
(a) With the aeroplane as nearly as possible

in trim at 13 VS1, it must be possible, at speeds
below the trim speed, to pitch the nose downward
so that the rate of increase in airspeed allows
prompt acceleration to the trim speed with
(1) Maximum
each engine;
continuous
power
(2)
Power off; and
(3)
Wing flaps and landing gear

(i)
Retracted; and
(ii)
Extended.
on
(b)
It must be possible to carry out the
following manoeuvres without requiring the
application of single handed control forces
exceeding those specified in CS 23.143 (c), unless
otherwise stated. The trimming controls must not
be adjusted during the manoeuvres:
(1) With landing gear extended and
flaps retracted and the aeroplane as nearly as
possible in trim at 14 VS1, extend the flaps as
rapidly as possible and allow the airspeed to
transition from 14 VS1 to 14 VS0, with
(i)
1B11
Power off; and
CS-23
BOOK 1
(ii)
Power necessary to maintain
level flight in the initial condition.
(2) With landing gear and flaps
extended, power off and the aeroplane as nearly
as possible in trim at 13 VSO, quickly apply
take-off power and retract the flaps as rapidly as
possible to the recommended go-around setting
and allow the airspeed to transition from 13
VSO to 13 VS1. Retract the gear when a
positive rate of climb is established.
(3) With landing gear and flaps
extended, power for and in level flight at 11
VSO and the aeroplane as nearly as possible in
trim, it must be possible to maintain
approximately level flight while retracting the
flaps as rapidly as possible with simultaneous
application of not more than maximum
continuous power. If gated flap positions are
provided, the flap retraction may be
demonstrated in stages with power and trim
reset for level flight at 11 VS1 in the initial
configuration for each stage
(d) It must be possible, with a pilot control

force of not more than 445 N (10 lbf), to maintain
a speed of not more than VREF during a power-off
glide with landing gear and wing flaps extended.
(e) By using normal flight and power
controls, except as otherwise noted in subparagraphs (e) (1) and (e) (2) , it must be possible
to establish a zero rate of descent at an attitude
suitable for a controlled landing without exceeding
the operational and structural limitations of the
aeroplane, as follows:
(1) For single-engined and twin-engined
aeroplanes, without the use of the primary
longitudinal control system;
(2)
(i)
Without the use of the primary
directional control; and
(ii) If a single failure of any one
connecting or transmitting link would
affect both the longitudinal and
directional primary control system,
without the primary longitudinal and
directional control system.
(i)
From the fully extended
position to the most extended gated
position;
(ii) Between intermediate
positions, if applicable; and
gated
(iii) From the least extended gated

position to the fully retracted position.
(4) With power off, flaps and landing
gear retracted and the aeroplane as nearly as
possible in trim at 14 VS1, apply take-off
power rapidly while maintaining the same
airspeed.
CS 23.147
(c) At speeds above VMO/MMO and up to the

maximum speed shown under CS 23.251, a
manoeuvring capability of 15g must be
demonstrated to provide a margin to recover from
upset or inadvertent speed increase.
Directional and lateral control
(a) For each twin-engined aeroplane, it must

be possible, while holding the wings level within
5, to make sudden changes in heading safely in
both directions. This must be shown at 14 VS1
with heading changes up to 15 (except that the
heading change at which the rudder force
corresponds to the limits specified in CS 23.143
need not be exceeded), with the
(1) Critical engine inoperative and its
propeller in the minimum drag position;
(5) With power off, landing gear and

flaps extended and the aeroplane as nearly as
possible in trim at VREF, obtain and maintain
airspeeds between 11 VS0 and either 17 VS0 or
VFE, whichever is lower, without requiring the
application of two-handed control forces
exceeding those specified in CS 23.143 (c).
(6) With maximum take-off power,
landing gear retracted, flaps in the take-off
position and the aeroplane as nearly as possible
in trim at VFE appropriate to the take-off flap
position, retract the flaps as rapidly as possible
while maintaining speed constant.
For twin-engined aeroplanes;
(2) Remaining
continuous power;
(3)
(4)
engine
at
maximum
Landing gear
(i)
Retracted; and
(ii)
Extended; and
Flaps retracted.
(b) For each twin-engined aeroplane, it must

be possible to regain full control of the aeroplane
without exceeding a bank angle of 45, reaching a
dangerous attitude or encountering dangerous
characteristics, in the event of a sudden and
complete failure of the critical engine, making
allowance for a delay of 2 seconds in the initiation
of recovery action appropriate to the situation,
with the aeroplane initially in trim, in the
following conditions
1B12
BOOK 1
CS-23
(1) Maximum
each engine;
continuous
(2)
Wing flaps retracted;
(3)
Landing gear retracted;
power
(5) All propeller controls in the

recommended take-off position throughout.
on
(c) For all aeroplanes except reciprocating

engine-powered aeroplanes of 2 722 kg (6 000 lb)
or less maximum weight, the requirements of subparagraph (a) must also be met for the landing
configuration with
(4)
Speed equal to that at which
compliance with CS 23.69 (a) has been shown;
(1) Maximum available take-off power

initially on each engine;
(5) All propeller controls in the position

in which compliance with CS 23.69 (a) has
been shown.
(2) The aeroplane trimmed for and

approach with all engines operating at VREF at
an approach gradient equal to the steepest used
in the landing distance demonstration of
CS 23.75;
(c) For all aeroplanes, it must be shown that

the aeroplane is safely controllable without the use
of the primary lateral control system in any allengine configuration(s) and at any speed or
altitude within the approved operating envelope.
It must also be shown that the aeroplanes flight
characteristics are not impaired below a level
needed to permit continued safe flight and the
ability to maintain attitudes suitable for a
controlled landing without exceeding the
operational and structural limitations of the
aeroplane.
If a single failure of any one
connecting or transmitting link in the lateral
control system would also cause the loss of
additional
control
system(s),
the
above
requirement is equally applicable with those
additional systems also assumed to be inoperative.
CS 23.149
(2)
The aeroplane trimmed for take-off;
(3)
Flaps in the take-off position(s);
(4)
Landing gear retracted; and
(4)
Landing gear extended; and
(d) A minimum speed to intentionally render

the critical engine inoperative must be established
and designated as the safe, intentional, one-engineinoperative speed, VSSE.
(a) VMC is the calibrated airspeed at which,

when the critical engine is suddenly made
inoperative, it is possible to maintain control of the
aeroplane, with that engine still inoperative, and
thereafter maintain straight flight at the same
speed with an angle of bank not more than 5. The
method used to simulate critical engine failure
must represent the most critical mode of
powerplant failure with respect to controllability
expected in service.
(1) Maximum available take-off power

initially on each engine;
Flaps in the landing position;
(5) All propeller controls throughout in

the position recommended for approach with all
engines operating.
Minimum control speed
(b) VMC for take-off must not exceed

12 VS1, (where VS1 is determined at the maximum
take-off weight) and must be determined with the
most unfavourable weight and centre of gravity
position and with the aeroplane airborne and the
ground effect negligible, for the take-off
configuration(s) with
(3)
(e) At VMC, the rudder pedal force required

to maintain control must not exceed 667 N
(150 lbf) and it must not be necessary to reduce
power of the operative engine . During the
manoeuvre the aeroplane must not assume any
dangerous attitude and it must be possible to
prevent a heading change of more than 20.
(f) VMCG, the minimum control speed on the
ground, is the calibrated airspeed during the takeoff run, at which, when the critical engine is
suddenly made inoperative and with its propeller,
if applicable, in the position it automatically
achieves, it is possible to maintain control of the
aeroplane with the use of the primary aerodynamic
controls alone (without the use of nose-wheel
steering) to enable the take-off to be safely
continued using normal piloting skill. The rudder
control force may not exceed 667 N (150 lbf) and,
until the aeroplane becomes airborne, the lateral
control may only be used to the extent of keeping
the wings level. In the determination of VMCG,
assuming that the path of the aeroplane
accelerating with all engines operating is along the
centreline of the runway, its path from the point at
which the critical engine is made inoperative to the
point at which recovery to a direction parallel to
the centreline is completed, may not deviate more
than 91m (30ft) laterally from the centreline at
any point. VMCG must be established, with:-
1B13
CS-23
BOOK 1
(1)
The aeroplane in each take-off
configuration or, at the option of the applicant,
in the most critical take-off configuration;
(2)
Maximum
available
take-off
power or thrust on the operating engines;
(3)
gravity;
The most unfavourable centre of
(4)
off; and
The aeroplane trimmed for take-
668 N (15 lbf), whichever is greater, except

that it need not be greater than 156 N (35 lbf).
(b) The requirement of sub-paragraph (a)
must be met with wing flaps and landing gear
retracted under each of the following conditions
(1) At 75% of maximum continuous
power for reciprocating engines or maximum
continuous power for turbine engines.
(2) In a turn, after the aeroplane is
trimmed with wings level, at the minimum
speed at which the required normal acceleration
can be achieved without stalling, and at the
maximum level flight trim speed except that the
speed may not exceed VNE or VMO/MMO,
whichever is appropriate.
(5)
The most unfavourable weight in
the range of take-off weights.
CS 23.151
Aerobatic manoeuvres
Each aerobatic and utility category aeroplane

must be able to perform safely the aerobatic
manoeuvres for which certification is requested.
Safe entry speeds for these manoeuvres must be
determined.
CS 23.153
CS 23.157
Control during landings
It must be possible, while in the landing

configuration, to safely complete a landing without
exceeding the one-hand control force limits
specified in CS 23.143 (c) following an approach
to land
(a)
(c) There must be no excessive decrease in

the gradient of the curve of stick force versus
manoeuvring load factor with increasing load
factor.
Rate of roll
(a) Takeoff. It must be possible, using a

favourable combination of controls, to roll the
aeroplane from a steady 30 banked turn through
an angle of 60, so as to reverse the direction of
the turn within
(1) For an aeroplane of 2 722 kg
(6 000 lb) or less maximum weight, 5 seconds
from initiation of roll; and
At a speed of VREF 9.3 km/h (5 knots);
(b) With the aeroplane in trim, or as nearly as

possible in trim and without the trimming control
being moved throughout the manoeuvre;
(2) For aeroplanes of over 2 722 kg

(6 000 lb) maximum weight,
(c) At an approach gradient equal to the

steepest used in the landing distance demonstration
of CS 23.75;
W + 200
but not more than 10 seconds, where
590
W is the weight in kg,
(d) With only those power changes, if any,

which would be made when landing normally from
an approach at VREF.
W + 500
but not more than 10 seconds, where

1 300
W is the weight in lb.)
CS 23.155
Elevator
control
manoeuvres
force
in
(a) The elevator control force needed to

achieve the positive limit manoeuvring load factor
may not be less than
(b) The requirement of sub-paragraph (a)

must be met when rolling the aeroplane in each
direction in the following conditions
(1) For wheel controls, W/10N (where

W is the maximum weight in kg) (W/100 lbf
(where W is the maximum weight in lb)) or
89 N (20 lbf), whichever is greater, except that
it need not be greater than 222 N (50 lbf); or
(1)
Flaps in the take-off position;
(2)
(3) For a single-engined aeroplane, at

maximum take-off power and for a twinengined aeroplane, with the critical engine
inoperative, the propeller in the minimum drag
position and the remaining engine at maximum
take-off power; and
(2) For stick controls, W/14N (where W

is the maximum weight in kg) (W/140 lbf
(where W is the maximum weight in lb)) or
1B14
BOOK 1
CS-23
(4) The aeroplane trimmed at a speed

equal to the greater of 12 VS1 or 11 VMC or as
nearly as possible in trim for straight flight.
trim in level flight with the landing gear and wing

flaps retracted as follows:
(1) For normal, utility and aerobatic
category aeroplanes, at a speed of 09 VH, VC
or VMO/MMO, whichever is lowest; and
(c) Approach. It must be possible using a

favourable combination of controls, to roll the
aeroplane from a steady 30 banked turn through
an angle of 60, so as to reverse the direction of
the turn within
(1) For an aeroplane of 2 722 kg
(6 000 lb) or less maximum weight, 4 seconds
from initiation of roll; and
(2) For commuter category aeroplanes,

at all speeds from 14 VSI to the lesser of VH or
VMO/MMO.
(c) Longitudinal trim. The aeroplane must
maintain longitudinal trim under each of the
following conditions:
(2) For and aeroplane of over 2 722 kg

(6 000 lb) maximum weight,
(1)
W +1 300
but not more than 7 seconds
1 000
where W is weight in kg.
(i)
Take-off power, landing gear
retracted, wing flaps in the take-off
position(s), at the speeds used in
determining the climb performance
required by CS 23.65; and
W + 2 800
but not more than 7 seconds

2 200
where W is weight in lb.)
(ii) Maximum continuous power at

the speeds and in the configuration used
in determining the climb performance
required by CS 23.69 (a).
(d) The requirement of sub-paragraph (c)

must be met when rolling the aeroplane in each
direction in the following conditions
(1)
Flaps in the landing position(s);
(2)
Landing gear extended;
(2) Level flight at all speeds from the

lesser of VH and either VNO or VMO/MMO (as
appropriate), to 14 VS1, with the landing gear
and flaps retracted.
(3) A descent at VNO or VMO/MMO,
whichever is applicable, with power off and
with the landing gear and flaps retracted.
(3) All engines operating at the power

for a 3 approach; and
(4)
The aeroplane trimmed at VREF.
(4) Approach
extended and with
landing
gear
(ii) A 3 angle of descent, flaps in

the landing position(s) at VREF; and
Trim
(a) General. Each aeroplane must meet the

trim requirements
after being trimmed and
without further pressure upon, or movement of, the
primary controls or their corresponding trim
controls by the pilot or the automatic pilot. In
addition, it must be possible, in other conditions of
loading, configuration, speed and power to ensure
that the pilot will not be unduly fatigued or
distracted by the need to apply residual control
forces exceeding those for prolonged application
of CS 23.143 (c). This applies in normal operation
of the aeroplane and, if applicable, to those
conditions associated with the failure of one
engine for which performance characteristics are
established.
with
(i)
A 3 angle of descent, with
flaps retracted and at a speed of 14 VS1;
TRIM
CS 23.161
A climb with;
(iii) An approach gradient equal to

the steepest used in the landing distance
demonstrations of CS 23.75, flaps in the
landing position(s) at VREF.
(d) In addition, each twin-engined aeroplane
must maintain longitudinal and directional trim
and the lateral control force must not exceed 22 N
(5 lbf), at the speed used in complying with CS
23.67 (a) or (b) (2) or (c) (3) as appropriate, with
(1) The critical engine in-operative and
(2) The remaining engine at maximum
continuous power;
(b) Lateral
and
directional
trim. The
aeroplane must maintain lateral and directional
1B15
(3)
(4)
CS-23
BOOK 1
(5)
An angle of bank of not more than
5.
(e) In addition, each commuter category
aeroplane for which, in the determination of the
take-off path in accordance with CS 23.57, the
climb in the take-off configuration at V2 extends
beyond 122 m (400 ft) above the take-off surface,
it must be possible to reduce the longitudinal and
lateral control forces to 445 N (10 lbf) and 22 N
(5 lbf) respectively and the directional control
force must not exceed 222 N (50 lbf) at V2 with
(2)
power;
(3)
(1) For all aeroplanes, plus or minus

10% of the original trim airspeed; and in
addition;
plus or minus 75% of the original trim airspeed
for the cruising conditions specified in
CS 23.175 (b).
(c) The stick force must vary with speed so
that any substantial speed change results in a stick
force clearly perceptible to the pilot.
CS 23.175

flaps
in
the
take-off
An angle of bank not exceeding 5.
CS 23.173
Static longitudinal stability
static
(a) Climb. The stick force curve must have a

stable slope, at speeds between 85% and 115% of
the trim speed, with
General
The aeroplane must be longitudinally,

directionally and laterally stable under CS 23.173
to 23.181. In addition, the aeroplane must show
suitable stability and control feel (static
stability) in any condition normally encountered in
service, if flight tests show it is necessary for safe
operation.
Demonstration
of
longitudinal stability
Static longitudinal stability must be shown as

follows:
STABILITY
CS 23.171
The
The remaining engine at take-off
(4) Wing
position(s); and
(5)
range specified in sub-paragraph (a) .

applicable tolerances are
(1)
Flaps retracted;
(2)
(3)
Maximum continuous power ; and
(4) The aeroplane trimmed at the speed

used in determining the climb performance
required by CS 23.69 (a).
(b) Cruise. With flaps and landing gear
retracted and the aeroplane in trim with power for
level flight at representative cruising speeds at
high and low altitudes, including speeds up to VNO
or VMO/MMO as appropriate, except that the speed
need not exceed VH
category aeroplanes, the stick force curve must
have a stable slope at all speeds within a range
that is the greater of 15% of the trim speed plus
the resulting free return speed range, or 74 km/h
(40 knots) plus the resulting free return speed
range, above and below the trim speed, except
that the slope need not be stable
Under the conditions specified in CS 23.175

and with the aeroplane trimmed as indicated, the
characteristics of the elevator control forces and
the friction within the control system must be as
follows:
(a) A pull must be required to obtain and
maintain speeds below the specified trim speed
and a push required to obtain and maintain speeds
above the specified trim speed. This must be
shown at any speed that can be obtained, except
that speeds requiring a control force in excess of
178 N (40 lbf) or speeds above the maximum
allowable speed or below the minimum speed for
steady unstalled flight, need not be considered.
(i)
At speeds less than 13 VSI; or
(ii) For aeroplanes with VNE

established under CS 23.1505 (a), at
speeds greater than VNE; or
(iii) For aeroplanes with VMO/MMO
established under CS 23.1505 (c), at
speeds greater than VFC/MFC.
(b) The airspeed must return to within the

tolerances specified when the control force is
slowly released at any speed within the speed

the stick force curve must have a stable slope at
all speeds within a range of 93 km/h (50 knots)
1B16
BOOK 1
CS-23
plus the resulting free return speed range, above

and below the trim speed, except that the slope
need not be stable
(i)
At speeds less than 14 VSI; or
(ii) At
VFC/MFC; or
speeds
greater
than
(iii) At speeds that require a stick

force greater than 222 N (50 lbf).
(c)
Landing. The stick force curve must
have a stable slope at speeds between 11 VS1 and
18 VS1 with
(1)
Flaps in the landing position;
(2)
Landing gear extended; and
(3)
The aeroplane trimmed at
(i)
VREF, or the minimum trim
speed if higher, with power off; and
(ii) VREF with enough power to
maintain a 3 angle of descent.
CS 23.177
Static directional and lateral

stability
(a) The static directional stability, as shown

by the tendency to recover from a wings level
sideslip with the rudder free, must be positive for
any landing gear and flap position appropriate to
the take-off, climb, cruise, approach and landing
configurations.
This must be shown with
symmetrical power up to maximum continuous
power and at speeds from 12 VS1 up to maximum
allowable speed for the condition being
investigated. The angle of sideslip for these tests
must be appropriate to the type of aeroplane. At
larger angles of sideslip up to that at which full
rudder is used or a control force limit in CS 23.143
is reached, whichever occurs first, and at speeds
from 12 VS1 to Vo the rudder pedal force must not
reverse.
(b) The static lateral stability, as shown by
the tendency to raise the low wing in a sideslip,
must be positive for all landing gear and flap
positions. This must be shown with symmetrical
power up to 75% of maximum continuous power
at speeds above 12 VS1 in the take-off
configuration(s) and at speeds above 13 VS1 in
other configurations, up to the maximum allowable
speed for the configuration being investigated, in
the take-off, climb, cruise and approach
configurations. For the landing configuration, the
power must be up to that necessary to maintain a
3 angle of descent in co-ordinated flight. The
static lateral stability must not be negative at
12 VS1 in the take-off configuration, or at 13 VS1
in other configurations. The angle of sideslip for

these tests must be appropriate to the type of
aeroplane but in no case may the constant heading
sideslip angle be less than that obtainable with 10
bank, or if less, the maximum bank angle
obtainable with full rudder deflection or 667 N
(150 lbf) rudder force.
(c) Sub-paragraph (b) does not apply to
aerobatic category aeroplanes certificated for
inverted flight.
(d) In straight, steady sideslips at 12 VS1 for
any landing gear and flap positions and for any
symmetrical power conditions up to 50% of
maximum continuous power, the aileron and
rudder control movements and forces must
increase steadily (but not necessarily in constant
proportion) as the angle of sideslip is increased up
to the maximum appropriate to the type of
aeroplane. At larger sideslip angles up to the
angle at which full rudder or aileron control is
used or a control force limit contained in
CS 23.143 is reached, the aileron and rudder
control movements and forces must not reverse as
the angle of sideslip is increased. Rapid entry
into, or recovery from, a maximum sideslip
considered appropriate for the aeroplane must not
result in uncontrollable flight characteristics.
CS 23.181
Dynamic stability
(a) Any short period oscillation not including

combined lateral-directional oscillations occurring
between the stalling speed and the maximum
allowable speed appropriate to the configuration of
the aeroplane must be heavily damped with the
primary controls
(1)
Free; and
(2) In a fixed position, except when

compliance with CS 23.672 is shown.
(b) Any combined lateraldirectional oscillations (Dutch roll) occurring between the stalling
speed and the maximum allowable speed
appropriate to the configuration of the aeroplane
1
must be damped to 10 amplitude in 7 cycles with
the primary controls
(1)
Free; and
(2) In a fixed position, except when

compliance with CS 23.672 is shown.
(c) Any long-period oscillation of the flight
path (phugoid) must not be so unstable as to cause
an unacceptable increase in pilot workload or
otherwise endanger the aeroplane. When, in the
conditions of CS 23.175, the longitudinal control
force required to maintain speeds differing from
1B17
CS-23
BOOK 1
(ii) 75% maximum continuous

power. If the power-to-weight ratio at
75% of maximum continuous power
results in extreme nose-up attitudes, the
test may be carried out with the power
required for level flight in the landing
configuration at maximum landing weight
and a speed of 14 VS0, but the power may
not be less than 50% maximum
continuous power.
the trimmed speed by at least plus or minus 15% is

suddenly released, the response of the aeroplane
must not exhibit any dangerous characteristics nor
be excessive in relation to the magnitude of the
control force released.
STALLS
CS 23.201
Wings level stall
(5) Trim. The aeroplane trimmed at a

speed as near 15 VS1 as practicable.
(a) It must be possible to produce and to

correct roll by unreversed use of the rolling control
and to produce and to correct yaw by unreversed
use of the directional control, up to the time the
aeroplane stalls.
(6) Propeller. Full

increase
position for the power off condition.
(b) The wings level stall characteristics must

be demonstrated in flight as follows. Starting from
a speed at least 18.5 km/h (10 knots) above the
stall speed, the elevator control must be pulled
back so that the rate of speed reduction will not
exceed 1.9 km/h (one knot) per second until a stall
is produced, as shown by either
(1) An
uncontrollable
downward
pitching motion of the aeroplane; or
(2) A downward pitching motion of the
aeroplane which results from the activation of a
device (e.g. stick pusher); or
(3)
CS 23.203
(a) Establish and maintain a co-ordinated turn

in a 30 bank. Reduce speed by steadily and
progressively tightening the turn with the elevator
until the aeroplane is stalled, as defined in
CS 23.201 (b). The rate of speed reduction must
be constant, and
(1) For a turning flight stall, may not
exceed 1.9 km/h (one knot) per second; and
(2) For an accelerated turning stall, be
5.6 to 9.3 km/h (3 to 5 knots) per second with
steadily increasing normal acceleration.
(b) After the aeroplane has stalled, as defined
in CS 23.201 (b) it must be possible to regain level
flight by normal use of the flight controls but
without increasing power and without
(d) During the entry into and the recovery

from the manoeuvre, it must be possible to prevent
more than 15 of roll or yaw by the normal use of
controls.
(2) Landing
extended;
(3) Cowl
configuration;
(4)
and
flaps. Appropriate
to
Power
(i)
fully
normal
gear. Retracted
(1)
Excessive loss of altitude;
(2)
Undue pitch-up;
(3)
Uncontrollable tendency to spin;
(4) Exceeding a bank angle of 60 in the

original direction of the turn or 30 in the
opposite direction, in the case of turning flight
stalls;
(e) Compliance with the requirements must

be shown under the following conditions:
(1) Wing
flaps. Retracted,
extended and each intermediate
operating position;
Turning flight and accelerated

turning stalls
Turning flight and accelerated turning stalls

must be demonstrated in tests as follows:
The control reaching the stop.
(c) Normal use of elevator control for

recovery is allowed after the downward pitching
motion of (b) (1) or (b) (2) has unmistakably been
produced, or after the control has been held against
the stop for not less than the longer of 2 seconds or
the time employed in the minimum steady flight
speed determination of CS 23.49.
rpm
(5) Exceeding a bank angle of 90 in the

original direction of the turn or 60 in the
opposite direction, in the case of accelerated
turning stalls; and
(6) Exceeding the maximum permissible
speed or allowable limit load factor.
(c) Compliance with the requirements must
be shown under the following conditions:
Power off; and

1B18
BOOK 1
CS-23
(1) Wing
flaps. Retracted,
extended and each intermediate
operating position;
(2) Landing
extended;
(3)
ration;
(4)
gear. Retracted
fully
normal
and
(f) For aerobatic category aeroplanes, an

artificial stall warning may be mutable, provided
that it is armed automatically during take-off and
re-armed
automatically
in
the
approach
configuration.
Cowl flaps. Appropriate to configuSPINNING

Power
(i)
Power off; and
CS 23.221
(ii) 75% maximum continuous

power. If the power-to-weight ratio at
75% of maximum continuous power
results in extreme nose-up attitudes, the
test may be carried out with the power
required for level flight in the landing
configuration at maximum landing weight
and a speed of 14 VS0, but the power may
not be less than 50% maximum
continuous power.
(a) Normal Category aeroplanes. A single

engined, normal category aeroplane must be able
to recover from a one-turn spin or a three-second
spin, whichever takes longer, in not more than one
additional turn, after initiation of the first control
action for recovery. In addition
(1) For both the flaps-retracted and
flaps-extended conditions, the applicable
airspeed limit and positive limit manoeuvring
load factor must not be exceeded;
(5) Trim. The aeroplane trimmed at a

speed as near 15 VS1 as practicable.
(6) Propeller. Full
increase
position for the power off condition.
CS 23.207
(2) No control forces or characteristic

encountered during the spin or recovery may
adversely affect prompt recovery;
rpm
(3) It must be impossible to obtain

unrecoverable spins with any use of the flight or
engine power controls either at the entry into or
during the spin; and
Stall warning
(a) There must be a clear and distinctive stall

warning, with the flaps and landing gear in any
normal position, in straight and turning flight.
(b) The stall warning may be furnished either
through the inherent aerodynamic qualities of the
aeroplane or by a device that will give clearly
distinguishable
indications
under
expected
conditions of flight. However, a visual stall
warning device that requires the attention of the
crew within the cockpit is not acceptable by itself.
(c) During the stall tests required by
CS 23.201 (b) and CS 23.203 (a) (1), the stall
warning must begin at a speed exceeding the
stalling speed by a margin of not less than 9.3
km/h (5 knots) and must continue until the stall
occurs.
Spinning
(4) For the flaps extended condition, the

flaps may be retracted during the recovery but
not before rotation has ceased.
(b) Utility category aeroplanes. A utility
category aeroplane must meet the requirements of
sub-paragraph (a) . In addition, the requirements
of sub-paragraph (c) and CS 23.807 (b) (7) must
be met if approval for spinning is requested.
(c) Aerobatic
category
aeroplanes. An
aerobatic category aeroplane must meet the
requirements of sub-paragraph (a)
and CS
23.807 (b) (6).
In addition, the following
requirements must be met in each configuration for
which approval for spinning is requested
(1) The aeroplane must recover from
any point in a spin up to and including six turns,
or any greater number of turns for which
certification is requested, in not more than one
and one-half additional turns after initiation of
the first control action for recovery. However,
beyond three turns, the spin may be
discontinued if spiral characteristics appear;
(d) When following the procedures of

CS 23.1585, the stall warning must not occur
during a take-off with all engines operating, a
take-off continued with one engine inoperative or
during an approach to landing.
(e) During the
stall tests required by
CS 23.203 (a) (2), the stall warning must begin
sufficiently in advance of the stall for the stall to
be averted by pilot action taken after the stall
warning first occurs.
(2) The applicable airspeed limits and

limit manoeuvring load factors must not be
exceeded. For flaps-extended configurations
1B19
CS-23
BOOK 1
for which approval is requested, the flaps must

not be retracted during the recovery;
(3) It must be impossible to obtain
unrecoverable spins with any use of the flight or
engine power controls either at the entry into or
during the spin; and
(4) There must be no characteristics
during the spin (such as excessive rates of
rotation or extreme oscillatory motion) which
might prevent a successful recovery due to
disorientation or incapacitation of the pilot.
GROUND AND WATER HANDLING

CHARACTERISTICS
CS 23.231
Longitudinal
control
stability
absorbing mechanism must not damage the

structure of the aeroplane when the aeroplane is
taxied on the roughest ground that may reasonably
be expected in normal operation and when takeoffs and landings are performed on unpaved
runways having the roughest surface that may
reasonably be expected in normal operation.
CS 23.237
Allowable water surface conditions and any

necessary water handling procedures for seaplanes
and amphibians must be established.
CS 23.239
and
CS 23.233
Directional stability and control
(a) A 90 cross-component of wind velocity,

demonstrated to be safe for taxying, take-off and
landing must be established and must be not less
than 02 VS0.
(b) The aeroplane must be satisfactorily
controllable in power-off landings at normal
landing speed, without using brakes or engine
power to maintain a straight path until the speed
has decreased to less than 50% of the speed at
touchdown.
(c) The aeroplane must have
directional control during taxying.
adequate
(d) Seaplanes must demonstrate satisfactory

directional stability and control for water
operations up to the maximum wind velocity
specified in sub-paragraph (a).
CS 23.235
Operation on unpaved surfaces
(a) The aeroplane must be demonstrated to

have satisfactory characteristics and the shock-
Spray characteristics
Spray may not dangerously obscure the vision

of the pilots or damage the propellers or other
parts of a seaplane or amphibian at any time during
taxying, take-off and landing.
(a) A landplane may have no uncontrollable

tendency to nose over in any reasonably expected
operating condition, including rebound during
landing or take-off. Wheel brakes must operate
smoothly and may not induce any undue tendency
to nose over.
(b) A seaplane or amphibian may not have
dangerous
or
uncontrollable
purpoising
characteristics at any normal operating speed on
the water.
Operation on water
MISCELLANEOUS FLIGHT
REQUIREMENTS
CS 23.251
Vibration and buffeting
There must be no vibration or buffeting severe

enough to result in structural damage and each part
of the aeroplane must be free from excessive
vibration, under any appropriate speed and power
conditions up to at least the minimum value of VD
allowed in CS 23.335. In addition there must be
no buffeting in any normal flight condition severe
enough to interfere with the satisfactory control of
the aeroplane or cause excessive fatigue to the
flight crew. Stall warning buffeting within these
limits is allowable.
CS 23.253
High speed characteristics
If a maximum operating speed VM0/MM0 is

established under CS 23.1505 (c), the following
speed increase and recovery characteristics must
be met
(a) Operating conditions and characteristics
likely to cause inadvertent speed increases
(including upsets in pitch and roll) must be
simulated with the aeroplane trimmed at any likely
speed up to VM0/MM0. These conditions and
characteristics include gust upsets, inadvertent
control movements, low stick force gradient in
relation to control friction, passenger movement,
levelling off from climb and descent from Mach to
airspeed limit altitude.
1B20
BOOK 1
CS-23
(b) Allowing for pilot reaction time after

occurrence of effective inherent or artificial speed
warning specified in CS 23.1303, it must be shown
that the aeroplane can be recovered to a normal
attitude and its speed reduced to VMO/MMO
without
(1) Exceeding VD/MD, the maximum
speed shown under CS 23.251, or the structural
limitations; or
(2) Buffeting that would impair the
pilots ability to read the instruments or to
control the aeroplane for recovery.
(c) There may be no control reversal about
any axis at any speed up to the maximum speed
shown under CS 23.251. Any reversal of elevator
control force or tendency of the aeroplane to pitch,
roll, or yaw must be mild and readily controllable,
using normal piloting techniques.
1B21
CS-23
BOOK 1
1B22
BOOK 1
CS-23
SUBPART C - STRUCTURE
GENERAL
CS 23.305
CS 23.301
Loads
(a) Strength requirements are specified in

terms of limit loads (the maximum loads to be
expected in service) and ultimate loads (limit loads
multiplied by prescribed factors of safety). Unless
otherwise provided, prescribed loads are limit
loads.
(b) Unless otherwise provided, the air, ground
and water loads must be placed in equilibrium with
inertia forces, considering each item of mass in the
aeroplane. These loads must be distributed to
conservatively approximate or closely represent
actual conditions. Methods used to determine load
intensities and distribution on canard and tandem
wing configurations must be validated by flight
test measurement unless the methods used for
determining those loading conditions are shown to
be reliable or conservative on the configuration
under consideration.
(c) If deflections under load would
significantly change the distribution of external or
internal loads, this redistribution must be taken
into account.
(d) Simplified structural design criteria may
be used if they result in design loads not less than
those prescribed in CS 23.331 to 23.521. For
aeroplanes described in appendix A, paragraph
A23.1, the design criteria of Appendix A of CS-23
are an approved equivalent of CS 23.321 to
23.459.
If Appendix A is used, the entire
Appendix must be substituted for the
corresponding paragraphs of this CS-23.
CS 23.302
Canard or tandem
configurations
wing
The forward structure of a canard or tandem

wing configuration must
(a) Meet all requirements of subpart C and
subpart D of CS-23 applicable to a wing; and
(b) Meet all requirements applicable to the
function performed by these surfaces.
CS 23.303
Strength and deformation
(a) The structure must be able to support limit

loads without detrimental, permanent deformation.
At any load up to limit loads, the deformation may
not interfere with safe operation.
(b) The structure must be able to support
ultimate loads without failure for at least three
seconds, except local failures or structural
instabilities between limit and ultimate load are
acceptable only if the structure can sustain the
required ultimate load for at least three seconds.
However, when proof of strength is shown by
dynamic tests simulating actual load conditions,
the three second limit does not apply.
CS 23.307
Proof of structure
(See AMC 23.307)
(a) Compliance with the strength and

deformation requirements of CS 23.305 must be
shown for each critical load condition. Structural
analysis may be used only if the structure
conforms to those for which experience has shown
this method to be reliable.
In other cases,
substantiating load tests must be made. Dynamic
tests, including structural flight tests, are
acceptable if the design load conditions have been
simulated.
(b) Certain parts of the structure must be
tested as specified in Subpart D of CS-23.
FLIGHT LOADS
CS 23.321
General
(See AMC 23.321 (c))
(a) Flight load factors represent the ratio of

the aerodynamic force component (acting normal
to the assumed longitudinal axis of the aeroplane)
to the weight of the aeroplane. A positive flight
load factor is one in which the aerodynamic force
acts upward, with respect to the aeroplane.
(b) Compliance with the flight load
requirements of this subpart must be shown
Factor of safety
Unless otherwise provided, a factor of safety of

15 must be used.
(1) At each critical altitude within the

range in which the aeroplane may be expected
to operate;
(2) At each weight from the design
minimum weight to the design maximum
weight; and
1C1
CS-23
BOOK 1
(3) For each required altitude and

weight, for any practicable distribution of
disposable load within the operating limitations
specified in CS 23.1583 to 23.1589.
(c) When
significant
the
effects
compressibility must be taken into account.
CS 23.331
(c)
(1) The aeroplane is assumed to be

subjected to symmetrical vertical gusts in level
flight. The resulting limit load factors must
correspond to the conditions determined as
follows:
of
(i)
Positive (up) and negative
(down) gusts of 50 fps at VC must be
considered at altitudes between sea level
and 6096 m (20 000 ft). The gust velocity
may be reduced linearly from 50 fps at
6096 m (20 000 ft) to 25 fps at 15240 m
(50 000 ft); and
Symmetrical flight conditions
(a) The appropriate balancing horizontal tail

load must be accounted for in a rational or
conservative manner when determining the wing
loads and linear inertia loads corresponding to any
of the symmetrical flight conditions specified in
CS 23.331 to 23.341.
(ii) Positive and negative gusts of

25 fps at VD must be considered at
altitudes between sea level and 6096 m
(20 000 ft). The gust velocity may be
reduced linearly from 25 fps at 6096 m
(20 000 ft) to 125 fps at 15240 m (50 000
ft).
(b) The incremental horizontal tail loads due

to manoeuvring and gusts must be reacted by the
angular inertia of the aeroplane in a rational or
conservative manner.
(c) Mutual influence of the aerodynamic
surfaces must be taken into account when
determining flight loads.
CS 23.333
(iii) In addition, for commuter

category aeroplanes, positive (up) and
negative (down) rough air gusts of 66 fps
at VB must be considered at altitudes
between sea level and 6096 m (20 000 ft).
The gust velocity may be reduced linearly
from 66 fps at 6096 m (20 000 ft) to 38
fps at 15240 m (50 000 ft).
Flight envelope
(a) General. Compliance with the strength

requirements of this subpart must be shown at any
combination of airspeed and load factor on and
within the boundaries of a flight envelope (similar
to the one in sub-paragraph (d) ) that represents
the envelope of the flight loading conditions
specified by the manoeuvring and gust criteria of
sub-paragraphs (b) and (c) respectively.
(2)
made:
The following assumptions must be

(i)
The shape of the gust is
U=
(b) Manoeuvring envelope. Except where

limited by maximum (static) lift coefficients, the
aeroplane is assumed to be subjected to
symmetrical manoeuvres resulting in the following
limit load factors:
2s
Ude
1 cos
2
25C
where
s=
(1) The positive manoeuvring load

factor specified in CS 23.337 at speeds up to
VD;
(2) The negative manoeuvring
factor specified in CS 23.337 at VC; and
Gust envelope
Distance
(ft.);
penetrated into gust
C = Mean geometric chord of wing

(ft.); and
load
Ude =
(3) Factors varying linearly with speed

from the specified value at VC to 00 at VD for
the normal and commuter category, and -10 at
VD for the aerobatic and utility categories.
Derived gust velocity referred to

in sub-paragraph (1)
linearly
with speed between VC and VD.
(ii) Gust load factors vary linearly

with speed between VC and VD.
1C2
BOOK 1
(d)
CS-23
Flight envelope
Note: Point G need not be investigated when the supplementary condition specified in CS 23.369 is investigated.
CS 23.335
Design airspeeds
(2) With
VC min,
the
required
minimum design cruising speed, VD may not
be less than
Except as provided in sub-paragraph (a) (4) ,

the selected design airspeeds are equivalent airspeeds (EAS).
(i)
140 VC min for normal and
commuter category aeroplanes;
(a) Design cruising speed, VC. For VC the

following apply:
(1)
than
(ii) 150 VC min

category aeroplanes; and
VC (in knots) may not be less
(iii) 155 VC min

category aeroplanes.
(i)
33
W / S (for normal,
utility
and
commuter
category
aeroplanes); and
W/S
(ii) 36
category aeroplanes).
for
for
utility
aerobatic
(3) For values of W / S more than 20,

the multiplying factors in sub-paragraph (2)
may be decreased linearly with W / S to a
value of 135 where W / S = 100.
(for aerobatic
(4) Compliance with sub-paragraphs

(1) and (2) need not be shown if VD/MD is
selected so that the minimum speed margin
between VC/MC and VD/MD is the greater of
the following:
where W/S = wing loading at design

maximum take-off weight lb/ft2.
(2) For values of W / S more than 20,

the multiplying factors may be decreased
linearly with W / S to a value of 286 where
W / S = 100.
(i)
The speed increase resulting
when, from the initial condition of
stabilised flight at VC/MC, the aeroplane
is assumed to be upset, flown for
20 seconds along a flight path 75
below the initial path and then pulled up
with a load factor of 15 (05 g.
acceleration increment). At least 75%
maximum
continuous
power
for
reciprocating engines and maximum
cruising power for turbines, or, if less,
the power required for VC/MC for both
kinds of engines, must be assumed until
(3) VC need not be more than 09 VH

at sea level.
(4) At altitudes where an MD is
established, a cruising speed MC limited by
compressibility may be selected.
(b) Design dive speed, VD. For VD the
following apply:
(1) VD/MD may not be less than
125 VC/MC; and
1C3
CS-23
BOOK 1
CS 23.337
the pull-up is initiated, at which point

power reduction and pilot-controlled
drag devices may be used; and
(a)
factor
(ii) Mach 005 for normal, utility,

and aerobatic category aeroplanes (at
altitudes where MD is established).
(1)
2.1 +
(2)
44 for utility category aeroplanes;
(3) 60
aeroplanes.
for
aerobatic
category
(b) The negative limit manoeuvring load

factor may not be less than
(1) 04 times the positive load factor
for the normal, utility and commuter
categories; or
(2) 05 times the positive load factor
for the aerobatic category.
(c) Manoeuvring load factors lower than

those specified in this paragraph may be used if
the aeroplane has design features that make it
impossible to exceed these values in flight.
(i)
VS is a computed stalling
speed with flaps retracted at the design
weight, normally based on the maximum
aeroplane normal force coefficients,
CNA; and
CS 23.341
(ii) n is the limit manoeuvring

load factor used in design.
Gust load factors

(See AMC 23.341 (b))
(a) Each aeroplane must be designed to

withstand loads on each lifting surface resulting
from gusts specified in CS 23.333(c).
(2) The value of VA need not exceed

the value of VC used in design.
(d) Design speed for maximum gust
intensity, VB. For VB, the following applies:
(b) The gust load for a canard or tandem

wing configuration must be computed using a
rational analysis, or may be computed in
accordance with sub-paragraph (c) provided that
the resulting net loads are shown to be
conservative with respect to the gust criteria of
CS 23.333(c).
(1) VB may not be less than the speed

determined by the intersection of the line
representing the maximum positive lift
CN MAX and the line representing the rough
air gust velocity on the gust V-n diagram, or
VS1 n g , whichever is less, where
(c) In the absence of a more rational

analysis the gust load factors must be computed
as follows:
(i)
ng the positive aeroplane gust
load factor due to gust, at speed VC (in
accordance with CS 23.341), and at the
particular weight under consideration;
and
n =1
kg o Ude Va
2(W/S)
where
(ii) VS1 is the stalling speed with

the flaps retracted at the particular
weight under consideration.
(2)
The positive limit manoeuvring load

may not be less than
or
(c) Design manoeuvring speed VA. For VA,

the following applies:
VA may not be less than VS
load
24 000
for normal and
W + 10 000
commuter category aeroplanes (where
W = design maximum take-off weight lb),
except that n need not be more than 38;
(iii) Mach 007 for commuter

category aeroplanes (at altitudes where
MD is established) unless a rational
analysis, including the effects of
automatic systems, is used to determine
a lower margin. If a rational analysis is
used, the minimum speed margin must
be enough to provide for atmospheric
variations (such as horizontal gusts, and
the penetration of jet streams or cold
fronts), instrument errors, airframe
production variations, and must not be
less than Mach 005.
(1)
where
Limit
manoeuvring
factors
kg =
0.88g
= gust alleviation factor;
5.3 + g
g =
2( W / S)
VB need not be greater than VC.
1C4
Cag
= aeroplane mass ratio;
BOOK 1
CS-23
Ude
= Derived gust velocities referred to in

CS 23.333 (c) (m/s);
= Density of air at sea-level (kg/m )
(ii)
Gust velocities equal to 85
percent of the values prescribed in CS
23.333(c).
(2)
The fatigue evaluation of the
structure must account for any increase in
operating stresses resulting from the design
condition of sub-paragraph (c)(1).
= Density of air (kg/m ) at the altitude

considered;
W/S
= Wing loading due to the applicable

weight of the aeroplane in the
particular load case (N/m2);
= Mean geometric chord (m);
= Acceleration due to gravity (m/sec2);
= Aeroplane equivalent speed (m/s);

and
= Slope of the aeroplane normal force

coefficient curve CNA per radian if
the gust loads are applied to the
wings and horizontal tail surfaces
simultaneously by a rational method.
The wing lift curve slope CL per
radian may be used when the gust
load is applied to the wings only and
the horizontal tail gust loads are
treated as a separate condition.
(3)
The flutter, deformation, and
vibration requirements must also be met with
zero fuel in the wings.
CS 23.345
CS 23.343
High lift devices

(See AMC 23.345 (d))
(a) If flaps or similar high lift devices are to

be used for take-off, approach or landing, the
aeroplane, with the flaps fully extended at VF, is
assumed to be subjected to symmetrical manoeuvres and gusts within the range determined by
(1) Manoeuvring, to a positive limit
load factor of 20; and
(2) Positive and negative gust of
7.62 m (25 ft) per second acting normal to the
flight path in level flight.
(b) VF must be assumed to be not less than
14 VS or 18 VSF, whichever is greater, where
(1)
VS is the computed stalling speed
with flaps retracted at the design weight; and
Design fuel loads

(See AMC 23.343 (b))
(2)
VSF is the computed stalling
speed with flaps fully extended at the design
weight.
(a) The disposable load combinations must

include each fuel load in the range from zero fuel
to the selected maximum fuel load.
However, if an automatic flap load limiting

device is used, the aeroplane may be designed
for the critical combinations of airspeed and flap
position allowed by that device.
(b) If fuel is carried in the wings, the

maximum allowable weight of the aeroplane
without any fuel in the wing tank(s) must be
established as maximum zero wing fuel weight
if it is less than the maximum weight.
(c) In determining external loads on the

aeroplane as a whole, thrust, slip-stream and
pitching acceleration may be assumed to be zero.
(c) For commuter category aeroplanes, a

structural reserve fuel condition, not exceeding
fuel necessary for 45 minutes of operation at
maximum continuous power, may be selected. If
a structural reserve fuel condition is selected, it
must be used as the minimum fuel weight
condition for showing compliance with the flight
load requirements prescribed in this sub-part
and:-
(d) The flaps, their operating mechanism

and their supporting structures, must be designed
for the conditions prescribed in subparagraph (a) . In addition, with the flaps fully
extended at speed VF the following conditions,
taken separately, must be accounted for:
(1) A head-on gust having a velocity
of 7.6 m (25 ft) per second (EAS), combined
with propeller slipstream corresponding to
75% of maximum continuous power; and
(1)
The structure must be designed to
withstand a condition of zero fuel in the wing
at limit loads corresponding to:
(2) The effects of propeller slipstream

corresponding to maximum take-off power.
(i)
90
percent
of
the
manoeuvring load factors defined in CS
23.337, and
1C5
CS-23
CS 23.347
BOOK 1
Unsymmetrical
conditions
(See AMC 23.347 (b))
flight
CS 23.351
The aeroplane must be designed for yawing

loads on the vertical surfaces resulting from the
loads specified in CS 23.441 to 23.445.
(a) The aeroplane is assumed to be

subjected to the unsymmetrical flight conditions
of CS 23.349 and 23.351.
Unbalanced
aerodynamic moments about the centre of gravity
must be reacted in a rational or conservative
manner, considering the principal masses
furnishing the reacting inertia forces.
CS 23.361
Engine torque
(a) Each engine mount and its supporting

structure must be designed for the effects of
(1) A
limit
engine
torque
corresponding to take-off power and propeller
speed acting simultaneously with 75% of the
limit loads from flight condition A of
CS 23.333 (d);
(b) Aerobatic category aeroplanes certified

for flick manoeuvres (snap-roll) must be
designed for additional asymmetric loads acting
on the wing and the horizontal tail.
CS 23.349
Yawing conditions
(2) A
limit
engine
torque
corresponding to maximum continuous power
and propeller speed acting simultaneously
with the limit loads from flight condition A of
CS 23.333 (d); and
Rolling conditions
The wing and wing bracing must be designed

for the following loading conditions:
(a) Unsymmetrical wing loads appropriate
to the category. Unless the following values
result in unrealistic loads, the rolling
accelerations may be obtained by modifying the
symmetrical flight conditions in CS 23.333 (d) as
follows:
(3) For turbo-propeller installations, in

addition to the conditions specified in subparagraphs (a) (1) and (a) (2) , a limit engine
torque corresponding to take-off power and
propeller speed, multiplied by a factor
accounting for propeller control system
malfunction, including quick feathering,
acting simultaneously with 1g level flight
loads. In the absence of a rational analysis, a
factor of 16 must be used.
(1) For the aerobatic category, in

conditions A and F, assume that 100% of the
semi-span wing air load acts on one side of
the plane of symmetry and 60% of this load
acts on the other side; and
(b) For turbine-engine installations, the

engine mounts and supporting structure must be
designed to withstand each of the following:
(2) For the normal, utility and

commuter categories, in condition A, assume
that 100% of the semi-span wing air load acts
on one side of the aeroplane and 75% of this
load acts on the other side.
(1) A limit engine torque load

imposed by sudden engine stoppage due to
malfunction or structural failure (such as
compressor jamming); and
(b) The loads resulting from the aileron

deflections and speeds specified in CS 23.455, in
combination with an aeroplane load factor of at
least two thirds of the positive manoeuvring load
factor used for design. Unless the following
values result in unrealistic loads, the effect of
aileron displacement on wing torsion may be
accounted for by adding the following increment
to the basic airfoil moment coefficient over the
aileron portion of the span in the critical
condition determined in CS 23.333 (d).
(2) A limit engine torque load

imposed by the maximum acceleration of the
engine.
(c) The limit engine torque to be considered
under sub-paragraph (a) must be obtained by
multiplying the mean torque by a factor of
(1) 125
installations;
for
turbo-propeller
(2) 133 for engines with five or more

cylinders; and
Cm = 0 . 01 where
Cm is the moment coefficient increment;
(3) Two, three, or four, for engines

with four, three or two cylinders, respectively.
and
is the down aileron deflection in degrees

in the critical condition.
1C6
BOOK 1
CS 23.363
CS-23
Sideload on engine mount
(1) At speeds between VMC and VD,

the loads resulting from power failure because
of fuel flow interruption are considered to be
limit loads;

structure must be designed for a limit load factor
in a lateral direction, for the sideload on the
engine mount, of not less than
(1)
(2) At speeds between VMC and VC,

the loads resulting from the disconnection of
the engine compressor from the turbine or
from loss of the turbine blades are considered
to be ultimate loads;
133; or
(2) One-third of the limit load factor

for flight condition A.
(3) The time history of the thrust

decay and drag build-up occurring as a result
of the prescribed engine failures must be
substantiated by test or other data applicable
to
the
particular
engine-propeller
combination; and
(b) The sideload prescribed in subparagraph (a) may be assumed to be independent

of other flight conditions.
CS 23.365
Pressurised cabin loads
For each pressurised

following applies:
compartment,
the
(4) The timing and magnitude of the

probable pilot corrective action must be
conservatively estimated, considering the
characteristics of the particular enginepropeller-aeroplane combination.
(a) The aeroplane structure must be strong

enough to withstand the flight loads combined
with pressure differential loads from zero up to
the maximum relief valve setting.
(b) Pilot corrective action may be assumed

to be initiated at the time maximum yawing
velocity is reached, but not earlier than 2 seconds
after the engine failure. The magnitude of the
corrective action may be based on the limit pilot
forces specified in CS 23.397 except that lower
forces may be assumed where it is shown by
analyses or test that these forces can control the
yaw and roll resulting from the prescribed engine
failure conditions.
(b) The external pressure distribution in

flight and any stress concentrations, must be
accounted for.
(c) If landings may be made, with the cabin
pressurised, landing loads must be combined
with pressure differential loads from zero up to
the maximum allowed during landing.
(d) The aeroplane structure must be strong
enough to withstand the pressure differential
loads corresponding to the maximum relief valve
setting multiplied by a factor of 133, omitting
other loads.
CS 23.369
(a) If a rear lift truss is used, it must be

designed for conditions of reversed airflow at a
design speed of
(e) If a pressurised cabin has two or more

compartments, separated by bulkheads or a floor,
the primary structure must be designed for the
effects of sudden release of pressure in any
compartment with external doors or windows.
This condition must be investigated for the
effects of failure of the largest opening in the
compartment. The effects of intercompartmental
venting may be considered.
CS 23.367
Rear lift truss
V = 87 W/S + 87(knots)
where W/S = wing loading at design
maximum take-off weight (lb/ft2).
(b) Either aerodynamic data for the
particular wing section used, or a value of CL
equalling -08 with a chordwise distribution that
is triangular between a peak at the trailing edge
and zero at the leading edge, must be used.
Unsymmetrical loads due to

engine failure
(a) Turbopropeller aeroplanes must be

designed for the unsymmetrical loads resulting
from the failure of the critical engine including
the following conditions in combination with a
single malfunction of the propeller drag limiting
system, considering the probable pilot corrective
action on the flight controls.
CS 23.371
Gyroscopic
aerodynamic loads
(See AMC 23.371 (a))
and

structure must be designed for the gyroscopic,
inertial and aerodynamic loads that result, with
1C7
CS-23
BOOK 1
CS 23.393
the engine(s) and propeller(s), if applicable at

maximum continuous rpm, under either
(1) The conditions
CS 23.351 and 23.423; or
prescribed
in
Loads parallel to hinge line

(See
AMC 23.393 (a)
and
AMC 23.393 (b))
(a) Control surfaces and supporting hinge

brackets must be designed to withstand inertial
loads acting parallel to the hinge line.
(2) All possible combinations of the

following:
(i)
A yaw velocity of 25 radians
per second;
(b) In the absence of more rational data, the

inertia loads may be assumed to be equal to KW,
where
(ii) A pitch velocity of 10 radian

per second;
(1) K = 24 for vertical surfaces;

(2) K = 12 for horizontal surfaces; and
(iii) A normal load factor of 25;
(3) W = weight
surfaces.
and
(iv)
Maximum continuous thrust.
(b) For aeroplanes approved for aerobatic

manoeuvres each engine mount and its
supporting structure must meet the requirements
of sub-paragraph (a)
and be designed to
withstand the load factors expected during
combined maximum yaw and pitch velocities.
CS 23.395
movable
Control system loads
(1) The system limit loads need not

exceed the higher of the loads that can be
produced by the pilot and automatic devices
operating the controls. However, autopilot
forces need not be added to pilot forces. The
system must be designed for the maximum
effort of the pilot or autopilot, whichever is
higher. In addition, if the pilot and the
autopilot act in opposition, the part of the
system between them may be designed for the
maximum effort of the one that imposes the
lesser load. Pilot forces used for design need
not exceed the maximum forces prescribed in
CS 23.397 (b).
Speed control devices
If speed control devices (such as spoilers and

drag flaps) are incorporated for use in en-route
conditions
(a) The aeroplane must be designed for the
symmetrical manoeuvres and gusts prescribed in
CS 23.333, 23.337 and 23.341 and the yawing
manoeuvres and lateral gusts in CS 23.441 and
23.443, with the device extended at speeds up to
the placard device extended speed; and
(2) The design must, in any case,

provide a rugged system for service use,
considering jamming, ground gusts, taxying
downwind, control inertia and friction.
Compliance with this sub-paragraph may be
shown by designing for loads resulting from
application of the minimum forces prescribed
in CS 23.397 (b).
(b) If the device has automatic operating or

load limiting features, the aeroplane must be
designed for the manoeuvre and gust conditions
prescribed in sub-paragraph (a) at the speeds
and corresponding device positions that the
mechanism allows.
(b) A 125% factor on computed hinge

movements must be used to design elevator,
aileron and rudder systems. However, a factor as
low as 10 may be used if hinge moments are
based on accurate flight test data, the exact
reduction depending upon the accuracy and
reliability of the data.
CONTROL SURFACE AND SYSTEM

LOADS
CS 23.391
the
(a) Each flight control system and its

supporting structure must be designed for loads
corresponding to at least 125% of the computed
hinge moments of the movable control surface in
the conditions prescribed in CS 23.391 to
23.459. In addition, the following apply:
(c) For aeroplanes certificated in the

commuter category, each engine mount and its
supporting structure must meet the requirements
of sub-paragraph (a) and the gust conditions
specified in CS 23.341.
CS 23.373
of
Control surface loads
The control surface loads specified in

CS 23.397 to 23.459 are assumed to occur in the
conditions described in CS 23.331 to 23.351.
(c) Pilot forces used for design are assumed

to act at the appropriate control grips or pads as
1C8
BOOK 1
CS-23
they would in flight and to react at the

attachments of the control system to the control
surface horns.
CS 23.397
Limit control
torques
forces
these specified minimum forces or

torques
inapplicable,
values
corresponding to the present hinge
moments obtained under CS 23.415, but
not less than 06 of the specified
minimum forces or torques, may be
used.
and
3 The critical parts of the aileron

control system must also be designed for
a single tangential force with a limit
value of 125 times the couple force
determined from the above criteria.
(a) In the control surface flight loading

condition, the air loads on movable surfaces and
the corresponding deflections need not exceed
those that would result in flight from the
application of any pilot force within the ranges
specified in sub-paragraph (b) . In applying this
criterion, the effects of control system boost and
servo-mechanisms and the effects of tabs must be
considered. The automatic pilot effort must be
used for design if it alone can produce higher
control surface loads than the human pilot.
D = wheel diameter ((metres)/

(inches)).
5 The unsymmetrical force must be
applied at one of the normal handgrip
points on the control wheel.
(b) The limit pilot forces and torques are as

follows:
Maximum forces
or torques for
design weight,
weight equal to or
less than 2 268 kg
(5 000 lb)1
Control
CS 23.399
Dual control system
(a) Each dual control system must be

designed to withstand the force of the pilots
operating in opposition, using individual pilot
forces not less than the greater of
Minimum
forces or
torques 2
(1) 075 times those obtained under

CS 23.395; or
(2) The minimum forces specified in
CS 23.397 (b).
Aileron:
Stick .............. 298 N (67 lbf) ........
178 N (40 lbf)
Wheel 3 .......... 222 DNm ..............

(50 D in lbf)4
178 DNm
(40 D in lbf)4
(b) Each dual control system must be

designed to withstand the forces of the pilots
applied together in the same direction, using
individual pilot forces not less than 075 times
those obtained under CS 23.395.
Elevator:
Stick .............. 743 N (167 lbf) ......
445 N (100 lbf)
CS 23.405
Wheel
(symmetrical) . 890N (200 lbf) .......
445 N (100 lbf)
Wheel (unsymmetrical) 5 .... ..............................
445 N (100 lbf)
Rudder........... 890N (200 lbf) .......
667 N (150 lbf)
Secondary control system

(See AMC 23.405)
Secondary controls, such as wheel brakes,

spoilers and tab controls, must be designed for
the maximum forces that a pilot is likely to apply
to those controls.
For design weight (W) more than

2 268 kg (5 000 lb), the specified
maximum values must be increased
linearly with weight to 118 times the
specified values at a design weight of
5 670 kg (12 500 lb), and for commuter
category aeroplanes, the specified values
must be increased linearly with weight
to 135 times the specified values at a
design weight of 8 618 kg (19 000 lb).
CS 23.407
Trim tab effects
The effects of trim tabs on the control surface

design conditions must be accounted for only
where the surface loads are limited by maximum
pilot effort.
In these cases, the tabs are
considered to be deflected in the direction that
would assist the pilot. These deflections must
correspond to the maximum degree of out of
trim expected at the speed for the condition
under consideration.
If the design of any individual

set of control systems or surfaces makes
1C9
CS-23
BOOK 1
CS 23.409
Tabs
Control surface tabs must be designed for the

most severe combination of airspeed and tab
deflection likely to be obtained within the flight
envelope for any usable loading condition.
Surface
(a) Aileron
(b) Aileron
(c)
CS 23.415
Ground gust conditions
(a) The control system must be investigated

as follows for control surface loads due to
ground gusts and taxying downwind:
(d)
(e)
(f)
}
}
075 Control column locked or

lashed in mid-position.
050 Ailerons at full throw;
+ moment on one aileron,
- moment on the other.
Elevator 075
Rudder
Position of controls
075
{
{
(c) Elevator full up (-).

(d) Elevator full down (+).
(e) Rudder
in
neutral.
(f) Rudder at full throw..
(c) At all weights between the empty weight

and the maximum weight declared for tie-down
stated in the appropriate manual, any declared
tie-down points and surrounding structure,
control system, surfaces and associated gust
locks must be designed to withstand limit load
conditions that exist when the aeroplane is tieddown, and that result from wind speeds of up to
120 km/h (65 knots) horizontally from any
direction.
(1) If an investigation of the control

system for ground gust loads is not required
by sub-paragraph (2) , but the applicant elects
to design a part of the control system for these
loads, these loads need only be carried from
control surface horns through the nearest
stops or gust locks and their supporting
structures.
(2) If pilot forces less than the
minimums specified in CS 23.397 (b) are used
for design, the effects of surface loads due to
ground gusts and taxying downwind must be
investigated for the entire control system
according to the formula
HORIZONTAL TAIL SURFACES
H = KcSq
CS 23.421
where
(a) A horizontal surface balancing load is a

load necessary to maintain equilibrium in any
specified flight condition with no pitching
acceleration.
H = limit hinge moment (ft lbs);
c = mean chord of the control surface

aft of the hinge line (ft);
Balancing loads
(b) Horizontal balancing surfaces must be

designed for the balancing loads occurring at any
point on the limit manoeuvring envelope and in
the flap conditions specified in CS 23.345.
S = area of control surface aft of the

hinge line (sq ft);
q = dynamic pressure (psf) based on a

design speed not less than
146 W / S + 146
(fps)
(where W / S = wing loading at
design
maximum
weight
(lbs/ft2)) except that the design
speed need not exceed 88 (fps);
and
CS 23.423
Manoeuvring loads
(See AMC 23.423)
Each horizontal surface and its supporting

structure, and the main wing of a canard or
tandem wing configuration, if that surface has
pitch control, must be designed for manoeuvring
loads imposed by the following conditions:
K = limit hinge moment factor for

ground gusts derived in subparagraph (b) . (For ailerons and
elevators, a positive value of K
indicates a moment tending to
depress the surface and a
negative value of K indicates a
moment tending to raise the
surface).
(a) A sudden movement of the pitching

control, at the speed VA to the maximum aft
movement, and the maximum forward
movement, as limited by the control stops, or
pilot effort, whichever is critical.
(b) A sudden aft movement of the pitching
control at speeds above VA, followed by a
forward movement of the pitching control
resulting in the following combinations of
normal and angular acceleration:
(b) The limit hinge moment factor K for

ground gusts must be derived as follows:
1C10
BOOK 1
CS-23
surfaces, unless its use elsewhere is shown to be

conservative:
Normal
acceleration
(n)
Angular
acceleration
(radian/sec.2)
Nose-up pitching
10
39
+
nm (nm 1.5)
V
Nose-down
pitching
nm
39
nm (nm 1.5)
V
Condition
Lht =
where
Lht
where (1) nm = positive limit manoeuvring

load factor used in the design of the
aeroplane; and
(2)
V = initial speed in knots.
The conditions in this paragraph involve loads

corresponding to the loads that may occur in a
checked manoeuvre (a manoeuvre in which the
pitching control is suddenly displaced in one
direction and then suddenly moved in the
opposite direction). The deflections and timing
of the checked manoeuvre must avoid
exceeding the limit manoeuvring load factor.
The total horizontal surface load for both noseup and nose-down pitching conditions is the sum
of the balancing loads at V and the specified
value of the normal load factor n, plus the
manoeuvring load increment due to the specified
value of the angular acceleration.
CS 23.425
= Density
(kg/m3)
of
air
at
sea-level
Kg
= Gust alleviation factor defined

in CS 23.341;
Ude
= Derived gust velocity (m/s);
= Aeroplane
(m/s);
aht
= Slope of aft horizontal tail lift

curve (per radian);
Sht
= Area of aft horizontal tail (m2);

and
CS 23.427
equivalent
speed
Unsymmetrical loads
(a) Horizontal surfaces other than main

wing and their supporting structure must be
designed for unsymmetrical loads arising from
yawing and slipstream effects, in combination
with the loads prescribed for the flight conditions
set forth in CS 23.421 to 23.425.
Gust loads
(1) Gust velocities specified

CS 23.333 (c) with flaps retracted; and
= Incremental horizontal tail load

(N);
1
= Downwash factor
d
(a) Each horizontal surface other than a

main wing, must be designed for loads resulting
from
(b) In the absence of more rational data for

aeroplanes that are conventional in regard to
location of engines, wings, horizontal surfaces
other than main wing, and fuselage shape
in
(2) Positive and negative gusts of

7.62 m/s (25 fps) nominal intensity at VF
corresponding to the flight conditions
specified in CS 23.345 (a) (2).
(b)
KgUdeVahtSht
d
1
2
d
(1) 100% of the maximum loading

from the symmetrical flight conditions may be
assumed on the surface on one side of the
plane of symmetry; and
Reserved.
(2) The following percentage of that

loading must be applied to the opposite side:
(c) When determining the total load on the

horizontal surfaces for the conditions specified in
sub-paragraph (a) , the initial balancing loads for
steady unaccelerated flight at the pertinent
design speeds, VF, VC and VD must first be
determined. The incremental load resulting from
the gusts must be added to the initial balancing
load to obtain the total load.
% = 100-10 (n-1), where n is the

specified positive manoeuvring load factor,
but this value may not be more than 80%.
(c) For aeroplanes that are not conventional
(such as aeroplanes with horizontal surfaces
other than main wing having appreciable
dihedral or supported by the vertical tail
surfaces) the surfaces and supporting structures
must be designed for combined vertical and
(d) In the absence of a more rational

analysis, the incremental load due to the gust
must be computed as follows only on aeroplane
configurations with aft-mounted, horizontal
1C11
CS-23
BOOK 1
horizontal surface loads resulting from each

prescribed flight condition taken separately.
Maximum Pilot Rudder Force

1000
890
CS 23.441
Rudder Force - N
VERTICAL SURFACES
Manoeuvring loads
(See AMC 23.441)
(a) At speeds up to VA the vertical surfaces

must be designed to withstand the following
conditions. In computing the loads, the yawing
velocity may be assumed to be zero:
594
600
400
200
0
Vs
Va
Vc
Vd
Design Airspeed
(1) With
the
aeroplane
in
unaccelerated flight at zero yaw, it is assumed
that the rudder control is suddenly displaced
to the maximum deflection, as limited by the
control stops or by limit pilot forces.
(2)
The rudder must be suddenly
displaced from the maximum deflection to the
neutral position.
(2) With the rudder deflected as

specified in sub-paragraph (1) , it is assumed
that the aeroplane yaws to the overswing sideslip angle. In lieu of a rational analysis, an
overswing angle equal to 15 times the static
sideslip angle of sub-paragraph (3) may be
assumed.
(c) The yaw angles specified in subparagraph (a) (3) may be reduced if the yaw
angle chosen for a particular speed cannot be
exceeded in
(1)
Steady slip conditions;
(2) Uncoordinated rolls from steep

banks; or
(3) A yaw angle of 15 with the

rudder control maintained in the neutral
position (except as limited by pilot strength).
(3) Sudden failure of the critical

engine with delayed corrective action.
(b) For commuter category aeroplanes, the

loads imposed by the following additional
manoeuvre must be substantiated at speeds from
VA to VD/MD. When computing the tail loads:-
CS 23.443
(1)
The aeroplane must be yawed to
the largest attainable steady state sideslip
angle, with the rudder at maximum deflection
caused by any one of the following:(i)
800
Gust loads
(See AMC 23.443)
(a) Vertical surfaces must be designed to

withstand, in unaccelerated flight at speed VC,
lateral gusts of the values prescribed for VC in
CS 23.333 (c).
Control surface stops;
(b) In addition, for commuter category

aeroplanes, the aeroplane is assumed to
encounter derived gusts normal to the plane of
symmetry while in unaccelerated flight at VB,
The derived gusts and
VC, VD and VF.
aeroplane speeds corresponding to these
conditions, as determined by CS 23.341 and
23.345, must be investigated. The shape of the
gust must be as specified in CS 23.333 (c) (2) (i).
(ii) Maximum available booster

effort;
(iii) pilot rudder force as shown
below:-
(c) In the absence of a more rational

analysis, the gust load must be computed as
follows:
Lvt =
where
Lvt =
o Kgt Ude V avt Svt

2
Vertical surface loads (N);
088 gt
= gust alleviation factor;
Kgt =
53 + gt
1C12
BOOK 1
gt =
o
CS-23
Density of air at sea-level (kg/m )
Ude =
Derived gust velocity (m/s);
Air density (Kg/m );
the applicable weight of the

aeroplane in the particular load
case (N);
AILERONS AND SPECIAL DEVICES
Svt
Area of vertical surface (m2);
Ct
Mean geometric chord of vertical

surface (m);
avt =
K
on the horizontal surface and moments or forces

exerted on the horizontal surfaces by the vertical
surfaces, must be applied simultaneously for the
structural loading condition.
K
lateral mass ratio;
CtgavtSvt 1vt
2W
(1) In the neutral position during

symmetrical flight conditions; and
(2) By the following deflections,
except as limited by pilot effort, during
unsymmetrical flight conditions:
Radius of gyration in yaw (m);

Distance from aeroplane c.g. to lift
centre of vertical surface (m);
Acceleration
(m/sec2); and
Aeroplane equivalent speed (m/s)
due
to
Ailerons
(a) The ailerons must be designed for the

loads to which they are subjected
Lift curve slope of vertical surface

(per radian);
1v t =
CS 23.445
CS 23.455
(i)
Sudden maximum displacement of the aileron control at VA.
Suitable allowance may be made for
control system deflections.
gravity
(ii) Sufficient deflection at VC,

where VC is more than VA, to produce a
rate of roll not less than obtained in subparagraph (a)(2)(i).
Outboard fins or winglets
(a) If outboard fins or winglets are included

on the horizontal surfaces or wings, the
horizontal surfaces or wings must be designed
for their maximum load in combination with
loads induced by the fins or winglets and
moment or forces exerted on horizontal surfaces
or wings by the fins or winglets.
(iii) Sufficient deflection at VD to

produce a rate of roll not less than onethird of that obtained in sub-paragraph
(a)(2)(i).
(See AMC 23.455(a)(2))
(b) If outboard fins or winglets extend

above and below the horizontal surface, the
critical vertical surface loading (the load per unit
area as determined under CS 23.441 and 23.443)
must be applied to
CS 23.459
Special devices
The loading for special devices using

aerodynamic surfaces (such as slats and spoilers)
must be determined from test data.
(1) The part of the vertical surfaces

above the horizontal surface with 80% of that
loading applied to the part below the
horizontal surface; and
GROUND LOADS
CS 23.471
(2) The part of the vertical surfaces

below the horizontal surface with 80% of that
loading applied to the part above the
horizontal surface;
General
The limit ground loads specified in this

subpart are considered to be external loads and
inertia forces that act upon an aeroplane
structure.
In each specified ground load
condition, the external reactions must be placed
in equilibrium with the linear and angular inertia
forces in a rational or conservative manner.
(c) The endplate effects of outboard fins or

winglets must be taken into account in applying
the yawing conditions of CS 23.441 and 23.443
to the vertical surfaces in sub-paragraph (b) .
(d) When rational methods are used for
computing loads, the manoeuvring loads of
CS 23.441 on the vertical surfaces and the one-g
horizontal surface load, including induced loads
1C13
CS-23
CS 23.473
BOOK 1
Ground load conditions and

assumptions
values will not be exceeded in taxying at speeds

up to take-off speed over terrain as rough as that
expected in service.
(a) The ground load requirements of this

subpart must be complied with at the design
maximum weight except that CS 23.479, 23.481
and 23.483 may be complied with at a design
landing weight (the highest weight for landing
conditions at the maximum descent velocity)
allowed under sub-paragraphs (b) and (c) .
CS 23.477
Landing gear arrangement
CS 23.479 to 23.483, or the conditions in

Appendix C, apply to aeroplanes with
conventional arrangements of main and nose
gear, or main and tail gear.
(b) The design landing weight may be as

low as
CS 23.479
(1) 95% of the maximum weight if the

minimum fuel capacity is enough for at least
one-half hour of operation at maximum
continuous power plus a capacity equal to a
fuel weight which is the difference between
the design maximum weight and the design
landing weight; or
Level landing conditions
(a) For a level landing, the aeroplane is

assumed to be in the following attitudes:
(1) For aeroplanes with tail wheels, a
normal level flight attitude;
(2) For aeroplanes with nose wheels,
attitudes in which
(2) The design maximum weight less

the weight of 25% of the total fuel capacity.
(i)
The nose and main wheels
contact the ground simultaneously; and
(c) The design landing weight of a twinengine aeroplane may be less than that allowed
under sub-paragraph (b) if
(ii) The main wheels contact the

ground and the nose wheel is just clear
of the ground.
(1) The aeroplane meets the oneengine-inoperative climb requirements of CS

23.67; and
The attitude used in subdivision (i) of this

sub-paragraph may be used in the analysis
required under subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph.
(2) Compliance is shown with the fuel

jettisoning
system
requirements
of
CS 23.1001.
(b) When investigating landing conditions,

the drag components simulating the forces
required to accelerate the tyres and wheels up to
the landing speed (spin-up) must be properly
combined with the corresponding instantaneous
vertical ground reactions, and the forward-acting
horizontal loads resulting from rapid reduction of
the spin-up drag loads (spring-back) must be
combined with vertical ground reactions at the
instant of the peak forward load, assuming wing
lift and a tyre sliding coefficient of friction of
08. However, the drag loads may not be less
than 25% of the maximum vertical ground
reaction (neglecting wing lift).
(d) The selected limit vertical inertia load

factor at the centre of gravity of the aeroplane for
the ground load conditions prescribed in this
subpart may not be less than that which would be
obtained when landing with a descent velocity
(V), in feet per second, equal to 44 (W/S) ,
except that this velocity need not be more than
3.0 m (10 ft) per second and may not be less than
2.1 m (7 ft) per second.
(e) Wing lift not exceeding two-thirds of
the weight of the aeroplane may be assumed to
exist throughout the landing impact and to act
through the centre of gravity. The ground
reaction load factor may be equal to the inertia
load factor minus the ratio of the above assumed
wing lift to the aeroplane weight.
(c) In the absence of specific tests or a more

rational analysis for determining the wheel spinup and spring-back loads for landing conditions,
the method set forth in Appendix D must be
used.
If Appendix D is used, the drag
components used for design must not be less than
those given by Appendix C.
(f) If energy absorption tests are made to

determine the limit load factor corresponding to
the required limit descent velocities, these tests
must be made under CS 23.723 (a).
(d) For aeroplanes with tip tanks or large

overhung masses (such as turbo-propeller or jet
engines) supported by the wing, the tip tanks and
the structure supporting the tanks or overhung
(g) No inertia load factor used for design

purposes may be less than 267, nor may the
limit ground reaction load factor be less than 20
at design maximum weight, unless these lower
1C14
BOOK 1
CS-23
masses must be designed for the effects of

dynamic responses under the level landing
conditions of either sub-paragraph (a) (1)
or (a) (2) (ii) . In evaluating the effects of
dynamic response, an aeroplane lift equal to the
weight of the aeroplane may be assumed.
CS 23.481
ground contact point and the drag loads may be

assumed to be zero.
CS 23.493
Under braked roll conditions, with the shock

absorbers and tyres in their static positions, the
following applies:
Tail down landing

conditions
(a)
133.
(a) For a tail down landing, the aeroplane is

assumed to be in the following attitudes:
(c) A drag reaction equal to the vertical

reaction at the wheel multiplied by a coefficient
of friction of 08 must be applied at the ground
contact point of each wheel with brakes, except
that the drag reaction need not exceed the
maximum value based on limiting brake torque.
(2) For aeroplanes with nose wheels,

a stalling attitude, or the maximum angle
allowing ground clearance by each part of the
aeroplane, whichever is less.
(b) For aeroplanes with either tail or nose
wheels, ground reactions are assumed to be
vertical, with the wheels up to speed before the
maximum vertical load is attained.
CS 23.497
One-wheel landing
conditions
conditions
(a) For the obstruction load, the limit

ground reaction obtained in the tail down landing
condition is assumed to act up and aft through
the axle at 45. The shock absorber and tyre may
be assumed to be in their static positions.
(b) For the sideload, a limit vertical ground
reaction equal to the static load on the tail wheel,
in combination with a side component of equal
magnitude, is assumed. In addition
Sideload conditions
(a) For the sideload condition, the aeroplane

is assumed to be in a level attitude with only the
main wheels contacting the ground and with the
shock absorbers and tyres in their static
positions.
(1) If a swivel is used, the tail wheel is

assumed to be swivelled 90 to the aeroplane
longitudinal axis with the resultant ground
load passing through the axle;
(2) If a lock, steering device, or
shimmy damper is used, the tail wheel is also
assumed to be in the trailing position with the
sideload acting at the ground contact point;
and
(b) The limit vertical load factor must be

133, with the vertical ground reaction divided
equally between the main wheels.
(c) The limit side inertia factor must be
083, with the side ground reaction divided
between the main wheels so that
(1)
side; and
Supplementary
for tail wheels
In determining the ground loads on the tail

wheel and affected supporting structures, the
following applies:
For the one-wheel landing condition, the

aeroplane is assumed to be in the level attitude
and to contact the ground on one side of the main
landing gear.
In this attitude, the ground
reactions must be the same as those obtained on
that side under CS 23.479.
CS 23.485
The limit vertical load factor must be
(b) The attitudes and ground contacts must

be those described in CS 23.479 for level
landings.
(1) For aeroplanes with tail wheels, an

attitude in which the main and tail wheels
contact the ground simultaneously.
CS 23.483
Braked roll conditions
(3) The shock absorber and tyre are

assumed to be in their static positions.
05 (W) is acting inboard on one
(c) If a tail wheel, bumper, or an energy

absorption device is provided to show
compliance with CS 23.925 (b), the following
applies:
(2) 033 (W) is acting outboard on the

other side.
(d) The side loads prescribed in subparagraph (c) are assumed to be applied at the
1C15
CS-23
BOOK 1
CS 23.505
(1) Suitable design loads must be

established for the tail wheel, bumper, or
energy absorption device; and
Supplementary
for nose wheels
conditions
In determining ground loads for ski-planes

and assuming that the aeroplane is resting on the
ground with one main ski frozen at rest and the
other skis free to slide, a limit side force equal to
0036 times the design maximum weight must be
applied near the tail assembly with a factor of
safety of 1.
(2) The supporting structure of the tail

wheel, bumper, or energy absorption device
must be designed to withstand the loads
established in sub-paragraph (c) (1) .
CS 23.499
Supplementary
for ski-planes
conditions
CS 23.507
In determining the ground loads on nose

wheels and affected supporting structures and
assuming that the shock absorbers and tyres are
in their static positions, the following conditions
must be met:
Jacking loads
(a) The aeroplane must be designed for the

loads developed when the aircraft is supported
on jacks at the design maximum weight assuming
the following load factors for landing gear
jacking points at a three-point attitude and for
primary flight structure jacking points in the
level attitude.
(a) For aft loads, the limit force components

at the axle must be
(1) A
vertical
component
of
225 times the static load on the wheel; and
(1) Vertical load factor of 135 times

the static reactions.
(2) A drag component of 08 times the

vertical load.
(2) Fore, aft and lateral load factors of

04 times the vertical static reactions.
(b) For forward loads, the limit force

components at the axle must be
(1) A
vertical
component
of
(b) The horizontal loads at the jack points

must be reacted by inertia forces so as to result in
no change in the direction of the resultant loads
at the jack points.
(2) A forward component of 04 times

the vertical load.
(c) The horizontal loads must be considered

in all combinations with the vertical load.
(c) For
sideloads,
the
limit
components at ground contact must be
force
CS 23.509
(1) A
vertical
component
of
Towing loads
The towing loads must be applied to the

design of tow fittings and their immediate
attaching structure.
(2) A side component of 07 times the

vertical load.
(a) The towing loads specified in subparagraph (d) must be considered separately.
These loads must be applied at the towing
fittings and must act parallel to the ground. In
addition
(d) For aeroplanes with a steerable nose

wheel which is controlled by hydraulic or other
power, at design take-off weight with the nose
wheel in any steerable position the application of
133 times the full steering torque combined with
a vertical reaction equal to 133 times the
maximum static reaction on the nose gear must
be assumed. However, if a torque limiting
device is installed, the steering torque can be
reduced to the maximum value allowed by that
device.
(1) A vertical load factor equal to 10

must be considered acting at the centre of
gravity; and
(2) The shock struts and tyres must be
in their static positions.
(b) For towing points not on the landing
gear but near the plane of symmetry of the
aeroplane, the drag and side tow load
components specified for the auxiliary gear
apply. For towing points located outboard of the
main gear, the drag and side tow load
components specified for the main gear apply.
Where the specified angle of swivel cannot be
(e) For aeroplanes with a steerable nose

wheel, that has a direct mechanical connection to
the rudder pedals, the mechanism must be
designed to withstand the steering torque for the
maximum pilot forces specified in CS 23.397 (b).
1C16
BOOK 1
CS-23
CS 23.511
reached, the maximum obtainable angle must be

used.
(c) The towing loads specified in subparagraph (d) must be reacted as follows:
Ground load; unsymmetrical

loads
on
multiple-wheel
units
(a) Pivoting loads.

The aeroplane is
assumed to pivot about one side of the main gear
with
(1) The side component of the towing

load at the main gear must be reacted by a
side force at the static ground line of the
wheel to which the load is applied.
(1) The brakes on the pivoting unit

locked; and
(2) The towing loads at the auxiliary

gear and the drag components of the towing
loads at the main gear must be reacted as
follows:
(2) Loads corresponding to a limit

vertical load factor of 1 and coefficient of
friction of 08, applied to the main gear and its
supporting structure.
(i)
A reaction with a maximum
value equal to the vertical reaction must
be applied at the axle of the wheel to
which the load is applied. Enough
aeroplane inertia to achieve equilibrium
must be applied.
The loads
(b) Unequal tyre loads.
established under CS 23.471 to 23.483 must be
applied in turn, in a 60/40% distribution, to the
dual wheels and tyres in each dual wheel landing
gear unit.
(c) Deflated tyre loads.
tyre condition
(ii) The loads must be reacted by

aeroplane inertia.
(1) 60% of the loads established under

CS 23.471 to 23.483 must be applied in turn
to each wheel in a landing gear unit; and
(d) The prescribed towing loads are as

follows, where W is the design maximum
weight:
Load
Tow point
Position Magnitude No.
Main gear
Auxiliary
Gear
0225 W per
main gear
unit
Swivelled
forward
03W
Swivelled
Aft
03W
Swivelled 015W
45 from
forward
Direction
(2) 60% of the limit drag and

sideloads and 100% of the limit vertical load
established under CS 23.485 and 23.493 or
lesser vertical load obtained under subparagraph (1) , must be applied in turn to each
wheel in the dual wheel landing gear unit.
Forward,
parallel to
drag axis
Forward, at
30 to drag
axis
Aft, parallel to
drag axis
Aft, at 30 to
drag axis
Forward
Aft
Forward
Aft
(b) Unless a rational analysis of the water

loads is made, CS 23.523 through 23.537 apply.
Forward, in
plane, of
wheel
CS 23.523
10 Aft, in plane
of wheel
Swivelled 015W
45 from
aft
For the deflated
11 Forward, in
plane of
wheel
12 Aft, in plane
of wheel
1C17
WATER LOADS
CS 23.521
Water load conditions
(a) The structure of seaplanes and

amphibians must be designed for water loads
developed during take-off and landing with the
seaplane in any attitude likely to occur in normal
operation at appropriate forward and sinking
velocities under the most severe sea conditions
likely to be encountered.
Design weights and centre

of gravity positions
(a) Design weights.

The water load
requirements must be met at each operating
weight up to the design landing weight except
that, for the take-off condition prescribed in
CS 23.531, the design water take-off weight (the
CS-23
BOOK 1
maximum weight for water taxi and take-off run)

must be used.
the minimum value of step load factor of

233).
(b) Centre of gravity positions. The critical

centres of gravity within the limits for which
certification is requested must be considered to
reach maximum design loads for each part of the
seaplane structure.
(3) Vso = seaplane stalling speed in

knots with flaps extended in the appropriate
landing position and with no slipstream effect.
CS 23.525
(4) = Angle of dead rise at the

longitudinal station at which the load factor is
being determined in accordance with figure 1
of Appendix I of CS-23.
Application of loads
(5) W = seaplane
weight in pounds.
(a) Unless otherwise prescribed, the

seaplane as a whole is assumed to be subjected to
the loads corresponding to the load factors
specified in CS 23.527.
(7) rx = ratio of distance, measured

parallel to hull reference axis, from the centre
of gravity of the seaplane to the hull
longitudinal station at which the load factor is
being computed to the radius of gyration in
pitch of the seaplane, the hull reference axis
being a straight line, in the plane of symmetry,
tangential to the keel at the main step.
(c) For twin float seaplanes, each float must

be treated as an equivalent hull on a fictitious
seaplane with a weight equal to one-half the
weight of the twin float seaplane.
(c) For a twin float seaplane, because of the

effect of flexibility of the attachment of the floats
to the seaplane, the factor K1 may be reduced at
the bow and stern to 08 of the value shown in
figure 2 of Appendix I of CS-23. This reduction
applies only to the design of the carry through
and seaplane structure.
(d) Except in the take-off condition of

CS 23.531, the aerodynamic lift on the seaplane
during the impact is assumed to be /3 of the
weight of the seaplane.
Hull and main float load

factors
CS 23.529
(a) Water reaction load factors nw must be

computed in the following manner:
(1)
nw =
C1 Vso 2
2/3
(1) For symmetrical step landings, the

resultant water load must be applied at the
keel, through the centre of gravity, and must
be directed perpendicularly to the keel line;
W1/ 3
(2) For the bow and stern landing

cases
nw =
(b)
C1 Vso
x
2
Tan / 3 W1 / 3
K1
Hull and main float landing

conditions
(a) Symmetrical step, bow, and stern

landing. For symmetrical step, bow, and stern
landings, the limit water reaction load factors are
those computed under CS 23.527. In addition
For the step landing case
(Tan
landing
hull
station
(6) Kl = empirical
weighing factor, in accordance with figure 2
of Appendix I of CS-23.
(b) In applying the loads resulting from the

load factors prescribed in CS 23.527, the loads
may be distributed over the hull or main float
bottom (in order to avoid excessive local shear
loads and bending moments at the location of
water load application) using pressures not less
than those prescribed in CS 23.533 (b).
CS 23.527
design
(2) For symmetrical bow landings, the

keel, one-fifth of the longitudinal distance
from the bow to the step, and must be directed
perpendicularly to the keel line; and
2/3
1 + rx 2
The following values are used:
(1) nw = water reaction load factor

(that is, the water reaction divided by seaplane
weight).
(3) For symmetrical stern landings the

keel, at a point 85% of the longitudinal
distance from the step to the stern post, and
must be directed perpendicularly to the keel
line.
(2) C1 = empirical seaplane operations

factor equal to 0012 (except that this factor
may not be less than that necessary to obtain
1C18
BOOK 1
CS-23
(b) Unsymmetrical landing for hull and

single float seaplanes
= angle of dead rise at the main step

(degrees); and
Unsymmetrical step, bow, and stern landing

conditions must be investigated. In addition
= design water take-off weight in

pounds.
(1) The loading for each condition

consists of an upward component and a side
component equal, respectively, to 075 and
025 tan times the resultant load in the
corresponding symmetrical landing condition;
and
CS 23.533
(a) General.
The hull and main float
structure, including frames and bulkheads,
stringers, and bottom plating, must be designed
under this paragraph.
(2) The point of application and

direction of the upward component of the load
is the same as that in the symmetrical
condition, and the point of application of the
side component is at the same longitudinal
station as the upward component but is
directed inward perpendicularly to the plane
of symmetry at a point midway between the
keel and chine lines.
(b) Local pressures. For the design of the

bottom plating and stringers and their
attachments to the supporting structure, the
following pressure distributions must be applied:
(1) For an unflared bottom, the
pressure at the chine is 075 times the pressure
at chinkeel, and the pre
(c) Unsymmetrical landing; twin float

seaplanes. The unsymmetrical loading consists
of an upward load at the step of each float of
075 and a side load of 025 tan at one float
times the step landing load reached under
CS 23.527. The side load is directed inboard,
perpendicularly to the plane of symmetry
midway between the keel and chine lines of the
float, at the same longitudinal station as the
upward load.
CS 23.531
Hull and main float take-off

condition
For the wing and its attachment to the hull or

main float
(a) The aerodynamic wing lift is assumed to
be zero; and
(b) A downward inertia load, corresponding
to a load factor computed from the following
formula, must be applied:
n=
C VS1 2
(Tan )W
2/3
1/ 3
where
n
= inertia load factor
CTO
= empirical seaplane operations factor

equal to 0004;
VS1
= seaplane stalling speed (knots) at the

design take-off weight with the flaps
extended in the appropriate take-off
position;
Hull and main float bottom

pressures
1C19
CS-23
BOOK 1
(i)
A downward ultimate inertia
force of 3g; and
(ii) A coefficient of friction of
05 at the ground.
(d) If it is not established that a turnover is
unlikely during an emergency landing, the
structure must be designed to protect the
occupants in a complete turnover as follows:
(1) The likelihood of a turnover may
be shown by an analysis assuming the
(i)
The
most
adverse
combination of weight and centre of
gravity position;
(ii)
Longitudinal load factor of
90g;
(iii) Vertical load factor of 10g;
and
(iv) For aeroplanes with tricycle
landing gear, the nose wheel strut failed
with the nose contacting the ground.
(2) For determining the loads to be
applied to the inverted aeroplane after a
turnover, an upward ultimate inertia load
factor of 30g and a coefficient of friction
with the ground of 05 must be used.
(e) Except as provided in CS 23.787 (c) the
supporting structure must be designed to restrain,
under loads up to those specified in subparagraph (b) (3) , each item of mass that could
injure an occupant if it came loose in a minor
crash landing.
1C22
BOOK 1
CS-23
CS 23.574
(ii) Proof testing must be

conducted on each production article
that will apply the critical limit design
load to each critical bonded joint; or
Metallic damage tolerance

and fatigue evaluation of
commuter
category
aeroplanes
For commuter category aeroplanes:-
(iii) Repeatable and reliable nondestructive inspection techniques must

be established that ensure the strength of
each joint.
(a) Metallic
damage
tolerance.
An
evaluation of the strength, detail design, and
fabrication must show that catastrophic failure
due to fatigue, corrosion, defects, or damage will
be avoided throughout the operational life of the
aeroplane. This evaluation must be conducted in
accordance with the provisions of CS 23.573,
except as specified in sub-paragraph (b), for each
part of the structure that could contribute to a
catastrophic failure.
(6) Structural components for which

the damage tolerance method is shown to be
impractical must be shown by component
fatigue tests, or analysis supported by tests, to
be able to withstand the repeated loads of
variable magnitude expected in service.
Sufficient
component,
subcomponent,
element, or coupon tests must be done to
establish the fatigue scatter factor and the
environmental effects. Damage up to the
threshold of detectability and ultimate load
residual strength capability must be
considered in the demonstration.
(b) Fatigue
(safe-life)
evaluation.
Compliance with the damage tolerance
requirements of sub-paragraph (a) is not required
if it can be established that the application of
those requirements is impractical for a particular
structure. This structure must be shown, by
analysis supported by test evidence, to be able to
withstand the repeated loads of variable
magnitude expected during its service life
without detectable cracks. Appropriate safe-life
scatter factors must be applied.
If the
(b) Metallic airframe structure.
applicant elects to use CS 23.571(c) or CS
23.572(a)(3), then the damage tolerance
evaluation must include a determination of the
probable locations and modes of damage due to
fatigue, corrosion, or accidental damage. The
determination must be by analysis supported by
test evidence and, if available, service
experience. Damage at multiple sites due to
fatigue must be included where the design is
such that this type of damage can be expected to
occur. The evaluation must incorporate repeated
load and static analyses supported by test
evidence. The extent of damage for residual
strength evaluation at any time within the
operational life of the aeroplane must be
consistent with the initial detectability and
subsequent growth under repeated loads. The
residual strength evaluation must show that the
remaining structure is able to withstand critical
limit flight loads, considered as ultimate, with
the extent of detectable damage consistent with
the results of the damage tolerance evaluations.
For pressurised cabins, the following load must
be withstood:
CS 23.575
Inspections
procedures
and
other
Each inspection or other procedure, based on

an evaluation required by CS paragraphs 23.571,
23.572, 23.573 or 23.574, must be established to
prevent catastrophic failure and must be included
in the limitations section of the instructions for
continued airworthiness required by CS 23.1529.
(1)
The normal operating differential
pressure combined with the expected external
aerodynamic
pressures
applied
simultaneously with the flight loading
conditions specified in this subpart, and
(2)
The
expected
external
aerodynamic pressures in 1g flight combined
with a cabin differential pressure equal to 1.1
times the normal operating differential
pressure without any other load.
1C25
CS-23
BOOK 1
(i)
A downward ultimate inertia
force of 3g; and
(ii) A coefficient of friction of
05 at the ground.
(d) If it is not established that a turnover is
unlikely during an emergency landing, the
structure must be designed to protect the
occupants in a complete turnover as follows:
(1) The likelihood of a turnover may
be shown by an analysis assuming the
(i)
The
most
adverse
combination of weight and centre of
gravity position;
(ii)
Longitudinal load factor of
90g;
(iii) Vertical load factor of 10g;
and
(iv) For aeroplanes with tricycle
landing gear, the nose wheel strut failed
with the nose contacting the ground.
(2) For determining the loads to be
applied to the inverted aeroplane after a
turnover, an upward ultimate inertia load
factor of 30g and a coefficient of friction
with the ground of 05 must be used.
(e) Except as provided in CS 23.787 (c) the
supporting structure must be designed to restrain,
under loads up to those specified in subparagraph (b) (3) , each item of mass that could
injure an occupant if it came loose in a minor
crash landing.
1C22
BOOK 1
CS-23
CS 23.574
(ii) Proof testing must be

conducted on each production article
that will apply the critical limit design
load to each critical bonded joint; or
Metallic damage tolerance

and fatigue evaluation of
commuter
category
aeroplanes
For commuter category aeroplanes:-
(iii) Repeatable and reliable nondestructive inspection techniques must

be established that ensure the strength of
each joint.
(a) Metallic
damage
tolerance.
An
evaluation of the strength, detail design, and
fabrication must show that catastrophic failure
due to fatigue, corrosion, defects, or damage will
be avoided throughout the operational life of the
aeroplane. This evaluation must be conducted in
accordance with the provisions of CS 23.573,
except as specified in sub-paragraph (b), for each
part of the structure that could contribute to a
catastrophic failure.
(6) Structural components for which

the damage tolerance method is shown to be
impractical must be shown by component
fatigue tests, or analysis supported by tests, to
be able to withstand the repeated loads of
variable magnitude expected in service.
Sufficient
component,
subcomponent,
element, or coupon tests must be done to
establish the fatigue scatter factor and the
environmental effects. Damage up to the
threshold of detectability and ultimate load
residual strength capability must be
considered in the demonstration.
(b) Fatigue
(safe-life)
evaluation.
Compliance with the damage tolerance
requirements of sub-paragraph (a) is not required
if it can be established that the application of
those requirements is impractical for a particular
structure. This structure must be shown, by
analysis supported by test evidence, to be able to
withstand the repeated loads of variable
magnitude expected during its service life
without detectable cracks. Appropriate safe-life
scatter factors must be applied.
If the
(b) Metallic airframe structure.
applicant elects to use CS 23.571(c) or CS
23.572(a)(3), then the damage tolerance
evaluation must include a determination of the
probable locations and modes of damage due to
fatigue, corrosion, or accidental damage. The
determination must be by analysis supported by
test evidence and, if available, service
experience. Damage at multiple sites due to
fatigue must be included where the design is
such that this type of damage can be expected to
occur. The evaluation must incorporate repeated
load and static analyses supported by test
evidence. The extent of damage for residual
strength evaluation at any time within the
operational life of the aeroplane must be
consistent with the initial detectability and
subsequent growth under repeated loads. The
residual strength evaluation must show that the
remaining structure is able to withstand critical
limit flight loads, considered as ultimate, with
the extent of detectable damage consistent with
the results of the damage tolerance evaluations.
For pressurised cabins, the following load must
be withstood:
CS 23.575
Inspections
procedures
and
other
Each inspection or other procedure, based on

an evaluation required by CS paragraphs 23.571,
23.572, 23.573 or 23.574, must be established to
prevent catastrophic failure and must be included
in the limitations section of the instructions for
continued airworthiness required by CS 23.1529.
(1)
The normal operating differential
pressure combined with the expected external
aerodynamic
pressures
applied
simultaneously with the flight loading
conditions specified in this subpart, and
(2)
The
expected
external
aerodynamic pressures in 1g flight combined
with a cabin differential pressure equal to 1.1
times the normal operating differential
pressure without any other load.
1C25
CS-23
BOOK 1
1C26
BOOK 1
CS-23
SUBPART G - OPERATING LIMITATIONS AND INFORMATION
GENERAL
CS 23.1501
General
(a) Each operating limitation specified in

CS 23.1505 to 23.1527 and other limitations and
information necessary for safe operation must be
established.
(b) The operating limitations and other
information necessary for safe operation must be
made available to the crew members as prescribed
in CS 23.1541 to 23.1589.
CS 23.1505
CS 23.1507
Manoeuvring speed
The maximum operating maneuvering speed,

VO, must be established as an operating limitation.
VO is a selected speed that is not greater than VSn
established in CS 23.335(c).
Airspeed limitations
(a) The never-exceed speed VNE must be

(1) Not less than 09 times the minimum
value of VD allowed under CS 23.335; and
(2)
operations. The speed margin between VMO/MMO

and VD/MD or the maximum speed shown under
CS 23.251 may not be less than the speed margin
established between VC/MC and VD/MD under
CS 23.335(b), or the speed margin found
necessary in the flight tests conducted under
CS 23.253.
CS 23.1511
Flap extended speed
(a) The flap extended speed VFE must be

(1) Not less than the minimum value of
VF allowed in CS 23.345 (b); and
Not more than the lesser of

under
(2) Not more than VF established under

CS 23.345 (a), (c) and (d).
(ii) 09 times the maximum speed

shown under CS 23.251.
(b) Additional combinations of flap setting,

airspeed and engine power may be established if
the structure has been proven for the
corresponding design conditions.
(i)
09 VD
CS 23.335; or
established
(b) The maximum structural cruising speed

VNO must be established so that it is
(1) Not less than the minimum value of
VC allowed under CS 23.335; and
(2)
Not more than the lesser of
(i)
VC
23.335; or
established
(ii) 089 VNE

sub-paragraph (a) .
under
established
CS
CS 23.1513
Minimum control speed
The minimum control speed(s) VMC, determined

under CS 23.149 (b), must be established as an
operating limitation(s).
under
CS 23.1519
(c) Sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) do not apply to

turbine aeroplanes or to aeroplanes for which a
design diving speed VD/MD is established under
CS 23.335 (b) (4).
For those aeroplanes, a
maximum operating limit speed (VMO/MMO
airspeed or Mach number, whichever is critical at
a particular altitude) must be established as a
speed that may not be deliberately exceeded in any
regime of flight (climb, cruise, or descent) unless a
higher speed is authorised for flight test or pilot
training operations. VMO/MMO must be established
so that it is not greater than the design cruising
speed VC/MC and so that it is sufficiently below
VD/MD and the maximum speed shown under
CS 23.251 to make it highly improbable that the
latter speeds will be inadvertently exceeded in
Weight and centre of gravity
The weight and centre of gravity ranges,

determined under CS 23.23 must be established as
operating limitations.
CS 23.1521
Powerplant limitations
(a) General. The powerplant limitations prescribed in this section must be established so that
they do not exceed the corresponding limits for
which the engines or propellers are type
certificated.
(b) Take-off operation. The powerplant takeoff operation must be limited by
1G1
(1)
The
maximum
rotational
speed
CS-23
BOOK 1
(rpm);
determination must consider the following:
(2) The maximum allowable manifold

pressure (for reciprocating engines);
(3) The maximum allowable
temperature (for turbine engines);
gas
(4) The time limit for the use of the

power or thrust corresponding to the limitations
established in sub-paragraphs (1) to (3) ; and
(1)
gas
Collision avoidance,
(3)
Navigation,
(4)
Communications,
Command decisions, and
(7) The accessibility and ease of

operation of necessary controls by the
appropriate crew member during all normal and
emergency operations when at the crew member
flight station.
The maximum rotational speed;
(3) The maximum allowable

temperature (for turbine engines); and
(2)
(6)
The continuous
(2) The maximum allowable manifold

pressure (for reciprocating engines);
Flight path control,
(5) Operation and monitoring of all

essential aeroplane systems,
(5) The maximum allowable cylinder

head (as applicable), liquid coolant and oil
temperatures.
(c) Continuous operation.
operation must be limited by
(1)
(b) The accessibility and ease of operation of

necessary controls by the appropriate crew
member; and
(c) The kinds of operation authorised under
CS 23.1525.
(4) The maximum allowable cylinder

head, oil and liquid coolant temperatures.
(d) Fuel grade or designation. The minimum
fuel grade (for reciprocating engines), or fuel
designation (for turbine engines), must be
established so that it is not less than that required
for the operation of the engines within the
limitations in sub-paragraphs (b) and (c) .
(e) Ambient temperature. For all aeroplanes
except reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes of
2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight,
ambient temperature limitations (including
limitations for winterisation installations if
applicable) must be established as the maximum
ambient atmospheric temperature at which
compliance with the cooling provisions of
CS 23.1041 to 23.1047 is shown.
CS 23.1522
Auxiliary power unit limitations
If an auxiliary power unit is installed, the

limitations established for the auxiliary power unit
must be specified in the operating limitations for
the aeroplane.
CS 23.1523
CS 23.1524
Maximum passenger seating

configuration
The maximum passenger seating configuration

must be established.
CS 23.1525
Kinds of operation
The kinds of operation (such as VFR, IFR, day

or night) and the meteorological conditions (such
as icing) to which the operation of the aeroplane is
limited or from which it is prohibited, must be
established appropriate to the installed equipment.
CS 23.1527
Maximum operating altitude
(a) The maximum altitude up to which

operation is allowed, as limited by flight,
structural, powerplant, functional, or equipment
characteristics, must be established.
(b) A maximum operating altitude limitation
of not more than 7620 m (25 000 ft) must be
established for pressurised aeroplanes, unless
compliance with CS 23.775 (e) is shown.
Minimum flight crew
The minimum flight crew must be established

so that it is sufficient for safe operation
considering
(a) The workload on individual crew
members and, in addition for commuter category
aeroplanes, each crew member workload
CS 23.1529
Instructions
for
airworthiness
continued
Instructions for continued airworthiness in

accordance with Appendix G must be prepared.
1G2
BOOK 1
CS-23
MARKINGS AND PLACARDS
CS 23.1541
(a)
paragraph (1) to the upper limit of the green

arc specified in sub-paragraph (3) .
(3) For the normal operating range, a
green arc with the lower limit at VS1 with
maximum weight and with landing gear and
wing flaps retracted, and the upper limit at the
maximum structural cruising speed VNO
established under CS 23.1505 (b).
General
The aeroplane must contain
(1) The markings and placards specified

in CS 23.1545 to 23.1567; and
(2) Any
additional
information,
instrument markings and placards required for
the safe operation if it has unusual design,
operating, or handling characteristics.
(4) For the flap operating range, a white

arc with the lower limit at VSO at the maximum
weight and the upper limit at the flaps-extended
speed VFE established under CS 23.1511.
(b) Each marking and placard prescribed in

sub-paragraph (a)
(5) For
reciprocating
twin-enginepowered aeroplanes of 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or
less maximum weight, for the speed at which
compliance has been shown with CS 23.69 (b)
relating to rate of climb, at maximum weight
and at sea-level, a blue radial line.
(1) Must be displayed in a conspicuous

place; and
(2) May not be easily erased, disfigured
or obscured.
(1) One category upon which the

placards and markings are to be based must be
selected for the aeroplane; and
(6) For
reciprocating
twin-enginepowered aeroplanes of 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or
less maximum weight, for the maximum value
of minimum control speed (one-engineinoperative) determined under CS 23.149 (b),
VMC, a red radial line.
(2) The
placards
and
marking
information for all categories in which the
aeroplane is to be certificated must be furnished
in the Aeroplane Flight Manual.
(c) If VNE or VNO vary with altitude, there

must be means to indicate to the pilot the
appropriate limitations throughout the operating
altitude range.
(c) For aeroplanes which are to be certificated

in more than one category
CS 23.1543
Instrument markings: general

(See AMC 23.1543 (b))
For each instrument

(a) When markings are on the cover glass of
the instrument, there must be means to maintain
the correct alignment of the glass cover with the
face of the dial; and
(b) Each arc and line must be wide enough
and located to be clearly visible to the pilot.
(c) All related instruments must be calibrated
in compatible units.
(d) Sub-paragraphs (b) (1) to (b) (3) and subparagraph (c) do not apply to aircraft for which a
maximum operating speed VMO/MMO is established
under CS 23.1505 (c). For those aircraft there
must either be a maximum allowable airspeed
indication showing the variation of VMO/MMO with
altitude or compressibility limitations (as
appropriate), or a radial red line marking for
VMO/MMO must be made at lowest value of
VMO/MMO established for any altitude up to the
maximum operating altitude for the aeroplane.
CS 23.1547
Magnetic direction indicator
Airspeed indicator
(a) A placard meeting the requirements of

this section must be installed on or near the
magnetic direction indicator.
(a) Each airspeed indicator must be marked as

specified in sub-paragraph (b) , with the marks
located at the corresponding indicated airspeeds.
(b) The placard must show the calibration of

the instrument in level flight with the engines
operating.
CS 23.1545
(b)
The following markings must be made:
(1) For the never-exceed speed VNE, a

radial red line.
(2) For the caution range, a yellow arc
extending from the red line specified in sub-
(c) The placard must state whether the

calibration was made with radio receivers on or
off.
(d) Each calibration reading must be in terms
of magnetic headings in not more than 30
1G3
CS-23
BOOK 1
be
marked
to
indicate the position
corresponding to each tank and to each existing
cross feed position;
increments.
(e) If a magnetic non-stabilised direction
indicator can have a deviation of more than 10
caused by the operation of electrical equipment,
the placard must state which electrical loads, or
combination of loads, would cause a deviation of
more than 10 when turned on.
CS 23.1549
(2) If safe operation requires the use of

any tanks in a specific sequence, that sequence
must be marked on or near the selector for those
tanks;
(3) The conditions under which the full
amount of usable fuel in any restricted usage
fuel tank can safely be used must be stated on a
placard adjacent to the selector valve for that
tank; and
Powerplant
and
auxiliary
power unit instruments
For each required powerplant and auxiliary

power unit instrument, as appropriate to the type
of instruments
(a) Each maximum and if applicable,
minimum safe operating limit must be marked with
a red radial or a red line;
(b) Each normal operating range must be
marked with a green arc or green line not
extending beyond the maximum and minimum safe
limits;
(4) Each valve control for any engine of

a twin-engine aeroplane must be marked to
indicate the position corresponding to each
engine controlled.
(d) Usable fuel capacity must be marked as
follows:
(1) For fuel systems having no selector
controls, the usable fuel capacity of the system
must be indicated at the fuel quantity indicator.
(c) Each take-off and precautionary range

must be marked with a yellow arc or a yellow line;
and
(d) Each engine, auxiliary power unit or
propeller range that is restricted because of
excessive vibration stresses must be marked with
red arcs or red lines.
CS 23.1551
(2) For fuel systems having selector

controls, the usable fuel capacity available at
each selector control position must be indicated
near the selector control.
(e) For accessory, auxiliary and emergency
controls
(1) If retractable landing gear is used,
the indicator required by CS 23.729 must be
marked so that the pilot can, at any time,
ascertain that the wheels are secured in the
extreme positions; and
Oil quantity indicator
Each oil quantity indicator must be marked in

sufficient increments to indicate readily and
accurately the quantity of oil.
CS 23.1553
Fuel quantity indicator
A red radial line must be marked on each

indicator at the calibrated zero reading, as
specified in CS 23.1337 (b) (1).
CS 23.1555
Control markings
(See AMC 23.1555 (e) (2))
(a) Each cockpit control, other than primary

flight controls and simple push-button type starter
switches, must be plainly marked as to its function
and method of operation.
(b) Each secondary control must be suitably
marked.
(c)
For powerplant fuel controls

(1)
(2) Each emergency control must be red

and must be marked as to method of operation.
No control other than an emergency control
shall be this colour.
Each fuel tank selector control must
CS 23.1557
Miscellaneous markings and

placards
(a) Baggage and cargo compartments and

ballast location.
Each baggage and cargo
compartment, and each ballast location, must have
a placard stating any limitations on contents,
including weight, that are necessary under the
loading requirements.
(b) Seats. If the maximum allowable weight
to be carried in a seat is less than 77 kg (170 lb), a
placard stating the lesser weight must be
permanently attached to the seat structure.
(c) Fuel, oil and coolant filler openings. The
following apply:
1G4
BOOK 1
CS-23
(1) Fuel filler openings must be marked

at or near the filler cover with
(i)
For
reciprocating
powered aeroplanes
engine-
(A)
The word Avgas; and
(B)
The minimum fuel grade.
(ii) For
aeroplanes
(A)
turbine
CS 23.1561
engine-powered
The words Jet Fuel; and
(B) The permissible fuel

designations, or references to the
Aeroplane Flight Manual (AFM) for
permissible fuel designations.
(iii) For pressure fuelling systems,
the maximum permissible fuelling supply
pressure and the maximum permissible
defuelling pressure.
(2) Oil filler openings must be marked
at or near the filler cover with
(i)
The word Oil; and
(ii) The
permissible
oil
designation, or references to the
Aeroplane Flight Manual (AFM) for
Permissible oil designations.
(3) Coolant filler openings must be
marked at or near the filler cover with the word
Coolant.
(d) Emergency exit placards. Each placard
and operating control for each emergency exit
must be red. A placard must be near each
emergency exit control and must clearly indicate
the location of that exit and its method of
operation.
(e) The system voltage of each direct current
installation must be clearly marked adjacent to its
external power connection.
CS 23.1559
(c) There must be a placard in clear view of

the pilot that specifies the kind of operations to
which the operation of the aeroplane is limited or
from which it is prohibited under CS 23.1525.
(a) Safety equipment must be plainly marked

as to method of operation.
(b) Stowage provisions for required safety
equipment must be marked for the benefit of
occupants.
CS 23.1563
(a)
The operating manoeuvring speed, Vo;
(b) The maximum landing gear operating

speed VLO; and
(c) For
reciprocating
engine-powered
[aeroplanes of more than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb)]
maximum weight and turbine engine-powered
aeroplanes, the maximum value of the minimum
control speed (one-engine-inoperative) determined
under CS 23.149 (b), VMC.
CS 23.1567
Flight manoeuvre placard
(a) For normal category aeroplanes, there

must be a placard in front of and in clear view of
the pilot stating: No aerobatic manoeuvres
including spins, approved.
(b)
be
For utility category aeroplanes, there must
(1) A placard in clear view of the pilot

stating: Aerobatic manoeuvres are limited to
the following........ (list approved manoeuvres
and the recommended entry speed for each);
and
(2) For those aeroplanes that do not
meet the spin requirements for aerobatic
category aeroplanes, an additional placard in
clear view of the pilot stating: Spins
Prohibited.
(a) There must be a placard in clear view of

the pilot stating
(1) That the aeroplane must be operated
in accordance with the Aeroplane Flight
Manual; and
(b) For aeroplanes certificated in more than

one category, there must be a placard in clear view
of the pilot, stating that other limitations are
contained in the Aeroplane Flight Manual.
Airspeed placards
There must be an airspeed placard in clear view

of the pilot and as close as practicable to the
airspeed indicator. This placard must list
Operating limitations placard
(2) The certification category of the

aeroplane to which the placards apply.
Safety equipment
(c) For aerobatic category aeroplanes, there

must be a placard in clear view of the pilot listing
the approved aerobatic manoeuvres and the
recommended entry airspeed for each. If inverted
flight manoeuvres are not approved, the placard
must bear a notation to this effect.
1G5
CS-23
BOOK 1
(d) For aerobatic category aeroplanes and

utility category aeroplanes approved for spinning,
there must be a placard in clear view of the pilot
(1) Listing the control actions
recovery from spinning manoeuvres; and
for
(2) Stating that recovery must be

initiated when spiral characteristics appear, or
after not more than 6 turns or not more than any
greater number of turns for which the aeroplane
has been certificated.
Manual must be the same as those marked on the

appropriate instruments and placards.
(d) All Aeroplane Flight Manual operational
airspeeds must, unless otherwise specified, be
presented as indicated Airspeeds.
(e) Provisions must be made for stowing the
Aeroplane Flight Manual in a suitable fixed
container which is readily accessible to the pilot.
(f) Revisions and/or Amendments.
Each
Aeroplane Flight Manual must contain a means for
recording the incorporation of revisions and/or
amendments.
AEROPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL

CS 23.1583
CS 23.1581
General
(a)
An Aeroplane Flight Manual must be
submitted to the Agency and it must contain the
following:
Operating limitations
The Aeroplane Flight Manual must contain

operating limitations determined under CS-23,
including the following:
(1) Information required by CS 23.1583

to 23.1589.
(a)
Airspeed limitations
(2) Other information that is necessary

for safe operation because of design, operating
or handling characteristics.
(1) Information necessary for the

marking of the airspeed limits on the indicator
as required in CS 23.1545, and the significance
of each of those limits and of the colour coding
used on the indicator.
(3) Further information necessary to

comply with the relevant operating rules.
(2) The speeds VMC, Vo, VLE and VLO

and their significance.
(b)
(3) In addition, for turbine powered

commuter category aeroplanes
Approved information
(1) Except as provided in sub-paragraph

(b)(2), each part of the Aeroplane Flight
Manual containing information prescribed in
CS 23.1583 to 23.1589 must be approved,
segregated, identified and clearly distinguished
from each unapproved part of that Aeroplane
Flight Manual.
(i)
The maximum operating limit
speed, VMO/MMO and a statement that this
speed must not be deliberately exceeded
in any regime of flight (climb, cruise or
descent) unless a higher speed is
authorised for flight test or pilot training;
(2) The requirements of sub-paragraph

(b) (1) do not apply to reciprocating enginepowered aeroplanes of 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or
less maximum weight, if the following is met:
(i)
Each part of the Aeroplane
Flight Manual containing information
prescribed in CS 23.1583 must be limited
to such information and must be
approved,
identified
and
clearly
distinguished from each other part of the
Aeroplane Flight Manual.
(ii) The information prescribed in
CS 23.1585 to 23.1589 must be
determined in accordance with the
applicable requirements of CS-23 and
presented in its entirety in a manner
acceptable to the Agency.
(c)
The units used in the Aeroplane Flight

1G6
(ii) If an airspeed limitation is

based upon compressibility effects, a
statement to this effect and information as
to any symptoms, the probable behaviour
of the aeroplane and the recommended
recovery procedures; and
(iii) The airspeed limits must be
shown in terms of VMO/MMO instead of
VNO and VNE.
(b)
Powerplant limitations
(1)
Limitations required by CS 23.1521.
(2) Explanation of the limitations, when

appropriate.
(3) Information necessary for marking
the instruments required by CS 23.1549 to
23.1553.
BOOK 1
(c)
CS-23
for ambient temperatures within the range

selected by the applicant.
Weight
(1)
The maximum weight; and
(ii) The
landing
distance
determined under CS 23.75 for standard
temperatures is equal to the available
runway length; and
(2) The maximum landing weight, if the

design landing weight selected by the applicant
is less than the maximum weight.
category
reciprocating
engine-powered
aeroplanes of more than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb)
maximum weight and for turbine enginepowered aeroplanes in the normal, utility and
aerobatic category, performance operating
limitations as follows:
(i)
The maximum take-off weight
for each aerodrome altitude and ambient
temperature within the range selected by
the applicant at which the aeroplane
complies with the climb requirements of
CS 23.63 (c) (1).
(6) The maximum zero wing fuel weight

where relevant as established in accordance
with CS 23.343.
(d) Centre of gravity. The established centre
of gravity limits.
(e) Manoeuvres. The following authorised
manoeuvres, appropriate airspeed limitations, and
unauthorised manoeuvres, as prescribed in this
section.
(1) Normal category aeroplanes. No
aerobatic manoeuvres, including spins, are
authorised.
(ii) The maximum landing weight

for each aerodrome altitude and ambient
temperature within the range selected by
the applicant at which the aeroplane
CS 23.63 (c) (2).
(2) Utility category aeroplanes. A list

of authorised manoeuvres demonstrated in the
type flight tests, together with recommended
entry speeds and any other associated
limitations. No other manoeuvre is authorised.
(3) Aerobatic category aeroplanes. A
list
of
approved
flight
manoeuvres
demonstrated in the type flight tests, together
with recommended entry speeds and any other
associated limitations.

the maximum take-off weight for each
aerodrome altitude and ambient temperature
within the range selected by the applicant at
which
(4) Aerobatic category aeroplanes and

utility category aeroplanes approved for
spinning. Spin recovery procedure established
to show compliance with CS 23.221 (c).
(i)
The aeroplane complies with

the
climb
requirements
of
CS 23.63 (d) (1); and
(ii) The accelerate-stop distance
determined under CS 23.55 is equal to the
available runway length plus the length of
any stopway, if utilised; and either,
(iii) The
take-off
distance
determined under CS 23.59 (a) is equal to
the available runway length; or
(iv) At the option of the applicant,
the take-off distance determined under
CS 23.59 (a) is equal to the available
runway length plus the length of any
clearway and the take-off run determined
under CS 23.59 (b) is equal to the
available runway length.
the maximum landing weight for each
aerodrome altitude within the range selected by
the applicant at which
(i)
The aeroplane complies with
the climb requirements of CS 23.63(d)(2)
(5) Commuter category aeroplanes.

Manoeuvres are limited to any manoeuvre
incident to normal flying, stalls (except whip
stalls) and steep turns in which the angle of
bank is not more than 60.
(f) Manoeuvre load factor. The positive limit
load factors in gs, and in addition the negative
limit load factor for aerobatic category aeroplanes.
(g) Minimum flight crew. The number and
functions of the minimum flight crew determined
under CS 23.1523.
(h) Kinds of operation. A list of the kinds of
operation to which the aeroplane is limited or from
which it is prohibited under CS 23.1525, and also
a list of installed equipment that affects any
operating limitation and identification as to the
equipments required operational status for the
kinds of operation for which approval has been
granted.
1G7
(i)
Maximum
operating
altitude.
The
CS-23
BOOK 1
maximum altitude established under CS 23.1527.

(j) Maximum
passenger
seating
configuration. The maximum passenger seating
configuration.
(k) Allowable lateral fuel loading.
The
maximum allowable lateral fuel loading
differential, if less than the maximum possible.
(b) In addition to sub-paragraph (a), for all

single-engined aeroplanes, the procedures, speeds
and configuration(s) for a glide following engine
failure in accordance with CS 23.71 and the
subsequent forced landing, must be furnished.
(c) In addition to sub-paragraph (a), for all
twin-engined
aeroplanes,
the
following
information must be furnished:
(l) Baggage and cargo loading.

The
following information for each baggage and cargo
compartment or zone:
(1)
The maximum allowable load; and
(2)
The maximum intensity of loading.
(1) Procedures,
speeds
and
configuration(s) for making an approach and
landing with one engine inoperative;
(2) Procedures,
speeds
and
configuration(s) for making a go-around with
one engine inoperative and the conditions under
which a go-around can be performed safely, or
a warning against attempting a go-around.
(m) Systems. Any limitations on the use of

aeroplane systems and equipment.
(n) Ambient temperatures. Where appropriate
maximum and minimum ambient air temperatures
for operation.
(o) Smoking. Any restrictions on smoking in
the aeroplane.
(3)
(d) In addition to sub-paragraphs (a) and (b)

or (c) as appropriate, for all normal, utility and
aerobatic category aeroplanes, the following
information must be furnished.
(p) Types of surface. A statement of the types

of surface on which operation may be conducted
(see CS 23.45 (g) and CS 23.1587 (a) (4), (c)(2)
and (d)(4)).
CS 23.1585
(1) Procedures,
speeds
and
configuration(s) for making a normal take-off in
accordance with CS 23.51 (a) and (b) and
CS 23.53 (a) and (b) and the subsequent climb
in accordance with CS 23.65 and 23.69 (a);
Operating procedures
(a) For
all
aeroplanes,
information
concerning normal, abnormal (if applicable) and
emergency procedures and other pertinent
information necessary for safe operation and the
achievement of the scheduled performance must be
furnished, including
The VSSE determined in CS 23.149.
(2) Procedures for abandoning a takeoff due to engine failure or other cause.
(e) In addition to sub-paragraphs (a), (c) and
(d) for all normal, utility and aerobatic category
twin-engined aeroplanes, the information must
include
(1) Procedures
and
speeds
for
continuing a take-off following engine failure
and the conditions under which take-off can
safely be continued, or a warning against
attempting to continue the take-off;
(1) An explanation of significant or

unusual
flight
or
ground
handling
characteristics;
(2) The maximum demonstrated values
of crosswind for take-off and landing and
procedures and information pertinent to
operations in crosswinds;
(2) Procedures,
speeds
and
configurations for continuing a climb following
engine failure, after take-off, in accordance with
CS 23.67, or en-route, in accordance with
CS 23.69 (b).
(3) A recommended speed for flight in

rough air. This speed must be chosen to protect
against the occurrence, as a result of gusts, of
structural damage to the aeroplane and loss of
control (e.g. stalling);
(f) In addition to sub-paragraphs (a) and (c),

for commuter category aeroplanes, the information
must include
(4) Procedures for restarting any engine

in flight, including the effects of altitude;
(1) Procedures,
speeds
and
configuration(s) for making a normal take-off;
(5) Procedures,
speeds
and
configuration(s) for making a normal approach
and landing in accordance with CS 23.73 and
23.75 and a transition to the balked landing
condition.
(2) Procedures and speeds for carrying

out an accelerate-stop in accordance with
CS 23.55;
1G8
(3)
Procedures and speeds for continuing a
BOOK 1
CS-23
take-off following engine failure in accordance

with CS 23.59 (a) (1) and for following the flight
path determined in accordance with CS 23.57 and
23.61 (a).
reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes of 2 722

kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight, the steady
angle of climb/descent determined under
CS 23.77 (a) must be furnished.
(g) For twin-engine aeroplanes, information

identifying each operating condition in which the
fuel system independence prescribed in CS 23.953
is necessary for safety must be furnished, together
with instructions for placing the fuel system in a
configuration used to show compliance with that
section.
(c) In addition to sub-paragraph (a) and

paragraph (b) if appropriate, for normal, utility and
aerobatic category aeroplanes, the following
(1) The take-off distance, determined
under CS 23.53 and the type of surface for
which it is valid;
(h) For each aeroplane showing compliance

with CS 23.1353 (g) (2) or (g) (3), the operating
procedures for disconnecting the battery from its
charging source must be furnished.
(2) The effect on take-off distance of

operation on other than smooth hard surfaces,
when dry, determined under CS 23.45 (g);
(3) The effect on take-off distance of
runway slope and 50% of the headwind
component and 150% of the tailwind
component;
(i) Information on the total quantity of usable

fuel for each fuel tank and the effect on the usable
fuel quantity as a result of a failure of any pump,
must be furnished.
(4) For twin reciprocating enginepowered aeroplanes of more than 2 722 kg

(6 000 lb) maximum weight and twin turbineengined aeroplanes, the one-engine-inoperative
take-off climb/descent gradient, determined
under CS 23.66;
(j) Procedures for the safe operation of the

aeroplanes systems and equipment, both in
normal use and in the event of malfunction, must
be furnished.
CS 23.1587
Performance information
(5) For twin-engined aeroplanes, the enroute rate and gradient of climb/descent with
one engine inoperative, determined under CS
23.69 (b); and
Unless otherwise presented, performance

information must be provided over the altitude and
temperature ranges required by CS 23.45 (b).
(a) For all aeroplanes,
the
(6) For single-engine aeroplanes, the

glide performance determined under CS 23.71.
following
(1) The stalling speeds VSO, and VS1

with the landing gear and wing flaps retracted,
determined at maximum weight under CS 23.49
and the effect on these stalling speeds of angles
of bank up to 60;
(d) In addition to paragraph (a), for commuter

category aeroplanes, the following information
must be furnished:
(2) The steady rate and gradient of

climb with all engines operating, determined
under CS 23.69 (a);
(3) The landing distance, determined
under CS 23.75 for each aerodrome altitude and
standard temperature and the type of surface for
which it is valid;
(4) The effect on landing distance of
operation on other than smooth hard surfaces,
when dry, determined under CS 23.45 (g); and
(5) The effect on landing distance of
runway slope and 50% of the headwind
component and 150% of the tailwind
component.
(b) In addition to sub-paragraph (a), for all
normal,
utility
and
aerobatic
category
1G9
(1) The
accelerate-stop
determined under CS 23.55;
distance
(2) The take-off distance determined

under CS 23.59 (a);
(3) At the option of the applicant, the
take-off run determined under CS 23.59 (b) ;
(4) The effect on accelerate-stop
distance, take-off distance and, if determined,
take-off run, of operation on other than smooth
hard surfaces, when dry, determined under
CS 23.45 (g);
(5) The effect on accelerate-stop
distance, take-off distance and, if determined,
take-off run, of runway slope and 50% of the
headwind component and 150% of the tailwind
component;
(6) The net take-off
determined under CS 23.61 (b);
flight
path
CS-23
BOOK 1
(7) The
en-route
gradient
of
climb/descent with one engine inoperative,
determined under CS 23.69 (b);
(8) The effect, on the net take-off flight
path and on the en-route gradient of
climb/descent with one engine inoperative, of
50% of the headwind component and 150% of
the tailwind component;
(9) Overweight landing performance
information (determined by extrapolation and
computed for the range of weights between the
maximum landing and maximum take-off
weights) as follows:
(i)
The maximum weight for each
aerodrome
altitude
and
ambient
temperature at which the aeroplane
CS 23.63 (d) (2); and
(ii) The
landing
distance
determined under CS 23.75 for each
aerodrome
altitude
and
standard
temperature.
(10) The relationship between IAS and
CAS
determined
in
accordance
with
CS 23.1323 (b) and (c); and
(11) The altimeter system calibration
required by CS 23.1325 (e).
CS 23.1589
Loading information
The following loading information must be

furnished:
(a) The weight and location of each item of
equipment that can easily be removed, relocated,
or replaced and that is installed when the
aeroplane was weighed under CS 23.25.
(b) Appropriate loading instructions for each
possible loading condition between the maximum
and minimum weights established under CS 23.25,
to facilitate the centre of gravity remaining within
the limits established under CS 23.23.
1G10
BOOK 1
CS-23
APPENDICES
Appendix A Simplified Design Load Criteria for Conventional, Single-Engine Airplanes of

2722 kg (6 000 Pounds) or Less Maximum Weight
A23.1
General
(See AMC A23.1)
(a) The design load criteria in this appendix

are an approved equivalent of those in paragraphs
23.321 through 23.459 of CS 23 for an aeroplane
having a maximum weight of 2722kg (6,000 lbs)
or less and the following configuration:
(c) Unless otherwise stated, the nomenclature

and symbols in this Appendix are the same as the
corresponding nomenclature and symbols in CS23.
A23.3
Special symbols
(1) A single engine excluding turbine

powerplants;
n1
= aeroplane positive
limit load factor.
manoeuvring
(2) A main wing located closer to the

aeroplanes centre of gravity than to the aft,
fuselage-mounted, empennage;
n2
= aeroplane negative
limit load factor.
manoeuvring
(3) A main wing that contains a quarterchord sweep angle of not more than 15 degrees
fore or aft;
n3 = aeroplane positive gust limit load

factor at vc.
n4 = aeroplane negative gust limit load
factor at vc.
(4) A main wing that is equipped with

trailing-edge controls (ailerons or flaps, or
both);
(5)
than 7;
nflap = aeroplane positive limit load factor

with flaps fully extended at VF.
A main wing aspect ratio not greater
(6) A horizontal tail aspect ratio not

greater than 4;
(7) A horizontal tail volume coefficient
not less than 0.34;
(8) A vertical tail aspect ratio not
greater than 2;
(9) A vertical tail platform area not
greater than 10 percent of the wing platform
area; and
(10) Symmetrical airfoils must be used in
both the horizontal and vertical tail designs.
(b) Appendix A criteria may not be used on
any aeroplane configuration that contains any of
the following design features:(1) Canard,
tandem-wing,
closecoupled, or tailless arrangements of the lifting
surfaces;
(2) Biplane
arrangements;
or
multiplane
wing
(3) T-tail, V-tail, or cruciform-tail (+)

arrangements;
(4) Highly-swept wing platform (more
than 15-degrees of sweep at the quarter-chord),
delta planforms, or slatted lifting surfaces; or
(5) Winglets or other wing tip devices,
or outboard fins.
* VF min = minimum
design
flap
= 110 n 1 W / S kts.
speed
* VA min = minimum design manoeuvring speed

= 150 n 1 W / S kts.
* VC min = minimum design cruising
= 170 n 1 W / S kts.
speed
* VD min = minimum
design
dive
= 240 n 1 W / S kts.
speed
* Also see sub-paragraph A23.7 (e) (2) of this

Appendix.
A23.5
Certification in more than one

category
The criteria in this appendix may be used for

certification in the normal, utility, and aerobatic
categories, or in any combination of these
categories. If certification in more than one
category is desired, the design category weights
must be selected to make the term n1W constant
for all categories or greater for one desired
category than for others. The wings and control
surfaces (including wing flaps and tabs) need only
be investigated for the maximum value of n1W,
or for the category corresponding to the maximum
design weight, where n1W is constant. If the
1App A1
CS-23
BOOK 1
Appendix A (continued)
aerobatic category is selected, a special

unsymmetrical flight load investigation in
accordance with sub-paragraphs A23.9 (c) (2) and
A23.11 (c) (2) of this Appendix must be
completed. The wing, wing carry-through, and the
horizontal tail structures must be checked for this
condition. The basic fuselage structure need only
be investigated for the highest load factor design
category selected. The local supporting structure
for dead weight items need only be designed for
the highest load factor imposed when the
particular items are installed in the aeroplane. The
engine mount, however, must be designed for a
higher sideload factor, if certification in the
aerobatic category is desired, than that required for
certification in the normal and utility categories.
When designing for landing loads, the landing
gear and the aeroplane as a whole need only be
investigated for the category corresponding to the
maximum design weight. These simplifications
apply to single-engine aircraft of conventional
types for which experience is available, and the
Agency may require additional investigations for
aircraft with unusual design features.
A23.7
Flight loads
(a) Each flight load may be considered

independent of altitude and, except for the local
supporting structure for dead weight items, only
the maximum design weight conditions must be
investigated.
(b) Table 1 and figures 3 and 4 of this
Appendix must be used to determine values of n1,
n2,, n3 and n4, corresponding to the maximum
design weights in the desired categories.
(c) Figures 1 and 2 of this Appendix must be
used to determine values of n3 and n4
corresponding to the minimum flying weights in
the desired categories, and, if these load factors are
greater than the load factors at the design weight,
the supporting structure for dead weight items
must be substantiated for the resulting higher load
factors.
(d) Each specified wing and tail loading is
independent of the centre of gravity range.
However, a c.g. range must be selected, and the
basic fuselage structure must be investigated for
the most adverse dead weight loading conditions
for the c.g. range selected.
normal to the relative wind, and to have a

magnitude of 105 times the aeroplane normal
loads (as determined from sub-paragraphs
A23.9 (b) and (c) of this Appendix) for the
positive flight conditions and a magnitude equal
to the aeroplane normal loads for the negative
conditions.
Each chordwise and normal
component of this wing load must be
considered.
(2) Minimum design airspeeds. The
minimum design airspeed may be chosen by the
applicant except that they may not be less than
the minimum speeds found by using figure 3 of
this Appendix. In addition, VC min need not
exceed values of 09 VH actually obtained at
sea-level for the lowest design weight category
for which certification is desired. In computing
these minimum design airspeeds, n1 may not be
less than 38.
(3) Flight load factor. The limit flight
load factors specified in Table 1 of this
Appendix represent the ratio of the aerodynamic
force component (acting normal to the assumed
longitudinal axis of the aeroplane) to the weight
of the aeroplane. A positive flight load factor is
an aerodynamic force acting upwards, with
respect to the aeroplane.
A23.9
Flight conditions
(a) General. Each design condition in subparagraph (b) and (c) must be used to assure
sufficient strength for each condition of speed and
load factor on or within the boundary of a V-n
diagram for the aeroplane similar to the diagram in
figure 4 of this Appendix. This diagram must also
be used to determine the aeroplane structural
operating
limitations
as
specified
in
CS 23.1501 (c) to 23.1513 and 23.1519.
(b) Symmetrical flight conditions.
The
aeroplane must be designed for symmetrical flight
conditions as follows:
(1) The aeroplane must be designed for
at least the four basic flight conditions, A,
D, E, and G as noted on the flight
envelope of figure 4 of this Appendix. In
addition, the following requirements apply:
(e) The following loads and loading

conditions are the minimums for which strength
must be provided in the structure:
(1) Aeroplane equilibrium. The aerodynamic wing loads may be considered to act
1App A2
(i)
The design limit flight load
factors corresponding to conditions D
and E of figure 4 must be at least as
great as those specified in Table 1 and
figure 4 of this Appendix, and the design
speed for these conditions must be at least
equal to the value of VD found from
figure 3 of this Appendix.
BOOK 1
CS-23
(ii) Cmres = Cm - 0.01d (down
aileron side)
(ii) For conditions A and G of

figure 4, the load factors must correspond
to those specified in Table 1 of this
Appendix, and the design speeds must be
computed using these load factors with
the maximum static lift coefficient CNA
determined by the applicant. However, in
the absence of more precise computations,
these latter conditions may be based on a
value of CNA = 135 and the design
speed for condition A may be less than
VA min.
(iii) Conditions C and F of
figure 4 need only be investigated when
n3 W/S or n4 W/S are greater than
n1 W/S or n2 W/S of this Appendix,
respectively.
Where:
Cmres = resultant moment coefficient;
Cm = moment coefficient of the wing
basic airfoil;
u = up aileron deflection in degrees;
d = down aileron deflection in
degrees.
(both
positive)
(i)
Compute a
the formulae:
a =
taken
and b
from
VA
p
VD
where p = the maximum total

deflection
(sum of
both
aileron
deflections) at VA with VA, VC, and VD
described in sub-paragraph (2) of A
23.7 (e) of this Appendix
(ii)
(1) The aft fuselage-to-wing attachment

must be designed for the critical vertical surface
load determined in accordance with subparagraph A23.11 (c) (1) and (2) of this
Appendix.
K=
Compute K from the formula:
(Cm 001b )VD 2

(Cm 001a )VC 2
where a is the down aileron

deflection corresponding to a and b is
the down aileron deflection corresponding
to b as computed in step (i).
(2) The wing and wing carry-through

structures must be designed for 100% of
condition A loading on one side of the plane
of symmetry and 70% on the opposite side for
certification in the normal and utility categories,
or 60% on the opposite side for certification in
the aerobatic category.
Cmres = Cm + 0.01u (up aileron
be
VA
p and
VC
b = 05
(c) Unsymmetrical flight conditions. Each

affected structure must be designed for
unsymmetrical loads as follows:
(i)
must
(4) critical, which is the sum of

u + d, must be computed as follows:
(2) If flaps or other high lift devices

intended for use at the relatively low airspeed of
approach, landing, and take-off, are installed,
the aeroplane must be designed for the two
flight conditions corresponding to the values of
limit flap-down factors specified in Table 1 of
this Appendix with the flaps fully extended at
not less than the design flap speed VF min from
figure 3 of this Appendix.
(3) The wing and wing carry-through

structures must be designed for the loads
resulting from a combination of 75% of the
positive manoeuvring wing loading on both
sides of the plane of symmetry and the
maximum wing torsion resulting from aileron
displacement.
The effect of aileron
displacement on wing torsion at VC or VA using
the basic airfoil moment coefficient modified
over the aileron portion of the span, must be
computed as follows:
deflections
(iii) If K is less than 10, a is

critical and must be used to determine u
and d. In this case, VC is the critical
speed which must be used in computing
the wing torsion loads over the aileron
span.
(iv) If K is equal to or greater than
10, b is critical and must be used to
determined u and d. In this case, VD
is the critical speed which must be used in
computing the wing torsion loads over the
aileron span.
(d) Supplementary conditions; rear lift truss;
engine torque; side load on engine mount. Each
of the following supplementary conditions must be
investigated:
side)
1App A3
CS-23
BOOK 1
(1) In designing the rear lift truss, the

special condition specified in CS 23.369 may be
investigated instead on condition G of figure
4 of this Appendix. If this is done, and if
certification in more than one category is
desired, the value of W/S used in the formula
appearing in CS 23.369 must be that for the
category corresponding to the maximum gross
weight.
(2) Each engine mount and
supporting structures must be designed for:
its
the condition under consideration. The tab load,

however, need not exceed the value specified in
Table 2 of this Appendix.
(c) Surface loading conditions. Each surface
loading condition must be investigated as follows:
(1) Simplified limit surface loadings for
the horizontal tail, vertical tail, aileron, wing
flaps and trim tabs are specified in figures (A)5
and (A)6 of this Appendix.
(i)
The distribution of load along
the span of the surface, irrespective of the
chordwise load distribution, must be
assumed proportional to the total chord,
except on horn balanced surfaces.
(i)
the maximum limit torque
corresponding to maximum take-off power
(MTO Power) and propeller speed acting
simultaneously with 75% of the limit loads
resulting from the maximum positive
manoeuvring flight load factor n1,
(ii) The load on the stabiliser and

elevator, and the load on fin and rudder,
must be distributed chordwise as shown in
Figure A7 of this Appendix.
(ii) the maximum limit torque

corresponding
to
MCP
(maximum
continuous power) and propeller speed
acting simultaneously with the limit loads
resulting from the maximum positive
manoeuvring flight load factor n1; and
(iii) In order to ensure adequate

torsional strength and also to cover
manoeuvres and gusts, the most severe
loads must be considered in association
with every centre of pressure position
between leading edge and the half chord
of the mean chord of the surface
(stabiliser and elevator, or fin and rudder).
(iii) The limit torque must be

obtained by multiplying the mean torque by
a factor of 133 for engines with five or
more cylinders. For 4, 3, and 2 cylinder
engines, the factor must be 2, 3, and 4,
respectively
(iv) To ensure adequate strength

under high leading edge loads, the most
severe stabiliser and fin loads must be
further considered as being increased by
50% over the leading 10% of the chord
with the loads aft of this appropriately
decreased to retain the same total load.
(3) Each engine mount and its

supporting structure must be designed for the
loads resulting from a lateral limit load factor of
not less than 147 for the normal and utility
categories, or 20 for the aerobatic category.
A23.11
(v) The most severe elevator and

rudder loads should be further considered
as being distributed parabolically from
three times the mean loading of the
surface (stabiliser and elevator, or fin and
rudder) at the leading edge at the elevator
and rudder respectively to zero at the
trailing edge according to the equation
(a) General. Each control surface load must

be determined using the criteria of sub-paragraph
(b) and must lie within the simplified loadings of
sub-paragraph (c) .
(b) Limit pilot forces. In each control surface
loading condition described in sub-paragraphs (c)
to (e) , the airloads on the movable surfaces and
the corresponding deflections need not exceed
those which could be obtained in flight by
employing the maximum limit pilot forces
specified in the table in CS 23.397 (b). If the
surface loads are limited by these maximum limit
pilot forces, the tabs must either be considered
to be deflected to their maximum travel in the
direction which would assist the pilot or the
deflection must correspond to the maximum
degree of out of trim expected at the speed for
cx
P( x) = 3.w
cf
1App A4
BOOK 1
CS-23
3.w
leading edge
of elevator
and rudder
respectively.
P(x)
cf
c
leading
edge
trailing
edge
Where
P(x)
local pressure at the chordwise

stations x
chord length of the tail surface,
cf
chord length of the elevator and

rudder respectively, and
average surface loading as

specified in Figure A5
jamming,
ground
gusts,
taxying
downwind, control inertia, and friction.
(2) Acceptable maximum and minimum
limit pilot forces for elevator, aileron, and
rudder controls are shown in the table in
CS 23.397 (b). These pilots loads must be
assumed to act at the appropriate control grips
or pads as they would under flight conditions,
and to be reacted at the attachments of the
control system to the control surface horn.
(b) Dual control. If there are dual controls,
the systems must be designed for pilots operating
in opposition, using individual pilot loads equal to
75% of those obtained in accordance with subparagraph (a) , except that individual pilot loads
may not be less than the minimum limit pilot
forces shown in the table in CS 23.397 (b).
(c) Ground gust conditions. Ground gust
conditions must meet the requirements of
CS 23.415.
(d) Secondary
controls
and
systems.
Secondary controls and systems must meet the
requirements of CS 23.405.
TABLE 1-Limit flight load factors
(vi) The
chordwise
loading
distribution for ailerons, wing flaps and
trim tabs are specified in Table 2 of this
Appendix.
(2) If certification in the aerobatic
category is desired, the horizontal tail must be
investigated for an unsymmetrical load of 100%
w on one side of the aeroplane centreline and
50% on the other side of the aeroplane
centreline.
A23.13
LIMIT FLIGHT LOAD FACTORS

Normal
category
n1
60
Flaps
n2
-05n1
Load
Up
n3
Find n3 from Fig. 1
n4
Find n4 from Fig. 2
Flaps
nflap
05n1
Down
nflap
Zero*
(a) Primary flight controls and systems. Each

primary flight control and system must be
designed as follows:
(1) The flight control system and its
supporting structure must be designed for loads
corresponding to 125% of the computed hinge
moments of the movable control surface in the
conditions prescribed in A23.11 of this
Appendix. In addition
44
FLIGHT
Factors
Control system loads
38
Utility Aerobatic
category category
* Vertical wing load may be assumed equal to

zero and only the flap part of the wing need be
checked for this condition.
(i)
The system limit loads need not
exceed those that could be produced by the
pilot and automatic devices operating the
controls; and
(ii) The design must provide a
rugged system for service use, including
1App A5
CS-23
BOOK 1
TABLE 2 Average limit control surface loading
AVERAGE LIMIT CONTROL SURFACE LOADING

SURFACE
HORIZONTAL
TAIL 1
VERTICAL
DIRECTION OF
LOADING
MAGNITUDE OF
LOADING
(a) Up and Down
Figure A5 Curve (2)
(b) Unsymmetrical
loading (Up and
Down)
100% w on one side

aeroplane CL 65% w on
other side aeroplane CL
for normal and utility
categories. For aerobatic
category see A3.11(C)
Right and Left
Figure A5 Curve (1)
(a) Up and Down
Figure A6 Curve (5)
CHORDWISE DISTRIBUTION
See figure A7
Same as above
TAIL II
AILERON III
C
L
(c)
WING FLAP
IV
(a) Up
Figure A6 Curve (4)
(b) Down
25 x Up Load (a)
(D)
Hinge
2W
W
TRIM TAB V
(a) Up and Down
Figure A6 Curve (3)
Same as (D) above
NOTE: The surface loading I, II, III, and V above are based on speeds VA min and VC min. The loading of
IV is based on VF min. If values of speed greater than these minimums are selected for design, the
2
V selected
appropriate surface loadings must be multiplied by the ratio
. For conditions I, II, III,
V min imum
2
VA sel.
VC sel.
and V the multiplying factor used must be the higher of
or
.
VC min .
VA min .
1App A6
BOOK 1
CS-23
APPENDIX A
FIGURE A1 - Chart for finding n3 factor at speed VC
FIGURE A2 - Chart for finding n4 factor at speed VC.
1App A7
CS-23
BOOK 1
VD min = 240
W but not
S
n1
exceed 14
n1
38
VC min
VC min = 170
n1
W but not exceed 09 VH

S
VA min = 150
n1
W but not exceed VC used in design

S
VF min = 110
n1
W
S
FIGURE A3 - Determination of minimum design speeds - equations.

(Speeds are in knots.)
VA
CNA = 135
VC
VD
A
D
VS
+
n1
n3
n2
n4
E
CNA = 135
G
F
1. Conditions C or F need only be investigated when n3

W
S
is greater than
W
n1 S
or
W
n2 S
W
S
or n4
, respectively.
2. Condition G need not be investigated when the supplementary

condition specified in CS 23.369 is investigated.
FIGURE A4 - Flight envelope.
1App A8
BOOK 1
CS-23
70
(1) w = 366 (n1
60
w = 534 (n
50
W
W
) for n 1 < 47 and AR < 20
S
S
W
W
) for n1
> 47
S
S
(2) w = 48 + 534 (n
40
W
)
S
(1)
(2)
30
20
(1) VERTICAL TAIL
(2) HORIZONTAL TAIL (UP & DOWN LOADS)
10
20
40
60
DESIGN MANOEUVRING WING LOAD n 1
80
100
120
W
POUNDS/SQ. FT.
S
FIGURE A5 - Average limit control surface loading.
70
(3) w = 78 n 1
60
W
(C /80)
S n
(4) w = 64 n 1 W (Cn /16)

S
50
(5) w = 466 n W
1
S
40
(3) TAB
30
(4) FLAP
20
(5) AILERON
10
0
20
40
60
DESIGN MANOEUVRING WING LOAD n 1
80
W
POUNDS/SQ. FT.
S
FIGURE A6 - Average limit control surface loading.
1App A9
100
120
CS-23
BOOK 1
Elevator or rudder
leading edge
Leading
edge
(1-E).C
E.C
Trailing
edge
2 E 3d '
1 = 2 w
1 E
2 = 2 w (3d'+ E 1)
where:
Note:
average surface loading (as specified in figure A.5).
ratio of elevator (or rudder) chord to total stabiliser and elevator (or fin and rudder)
chord.
ratio of distance of centre of pressure of a unit spanwise length of combined stabiliser

and elevator (or fin and rudder) measured from stabiliser (or fin) leading edge to the
local chord.
local chord.
Positive value of w , ! 1 and ! 2 are all measured in the same direction
Figure A7 Chordwise load distribution for stabiliser and elevator or fin and rudder.
1App A10
BOOK 1
CS-23
Appendix C
Basic Landing Conditions
C23.1
Basic landing conditions

Tail wheel type
Condition
Notes
Tail-down
landing
Tail-down
landing
23.479(a)(1)
23.481(a)(1)
nW
KnW
0
nW
0
0
nW
KnW
0
nW
KnW
0
nW
0
0
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Note (2)
Vr
Dr
100%
Static
(n-L)W
KnW
100%
Static
(n-L)Wb/d
0
100%
Static
(n-L)Wa'/d'
KnWa'/d'
100%
Static
(n-L)W
KnW
100%
Static
(n-L)W
0
Vf
Df
0
0
(n-L)Wa/d
0
(n-L)Wb'/d'
KnWb'/d'
0
0
0
0
(1), (3), and

(4)
(4)
(1)
(1), (3), and

(4)
(3) and (4)
Vertical component at c.g.

Fore and aft component at c.g.
Lateral component in either direction at c.g.
Shock absorber extension (hydraulic shock
absorber)
Shock absorber deflection (rubber or
spring shock absorber)
Tyre deflection
Tail (nose) wheel loads
Level landing Level landing

with inclined with nose wheel
just clear of
reactions
ground
Level landing
Reference paragraph
Main wheel loads (both wheels)
Nose wheel type
{
{
23.479(a)
(2)(i)
23.479(a)
(2)(ii)
23.481(a)
(2) and (b)
NOTE (1) K may be determined as follows: K=0.25 for W=1361 kg (3,000 pounds) or less;
K=0.33 for W=2722 kg (6,000 pounds) or greater, with linear variation of K between these weights.
NOTE (2) For the purpose of design, the maximum load factor is assumed to occur throughout
the shock absorber stroke from 25% deflection to 100% deflection unless otherwise shown and the
load factor must be used with whatever shock absorber extension is most critical for each element of
the landing gear.
NOTE (3) Unbalanced moments must be balanced by a rational conservative method.
NOTE (4) L is defined in CS 23.725(b).
NOTE (5) n is the limit inertia load factor, at the c.g. of the aeroplane, selected under CS
23.475 (d), (f), and (g).
1-App C-1
CS
1-App C-2
BOOK 1
CS-23
Appendix D
Wheel Spin-Up Loads
D23.1
Wheel spin-up loads
(a) The following method for determining

wheel spin-up loads for landing conditions is based
on NACA T.N. 863. However, the drag component
used for design may not be less than the drag load
prescribed in CS 23.479 (b).
FH max =
1 2Iw (VH VC )n FV max

re
tz
where
FH max
= maximum rearward horizontal force acting

on the wheel (in pounds);
re
= effective rolling radius of wheel under

impact based on recommended operating
tyre pressure (which may be assumed to be
equal to the rolling radius under a static
load of njWe) in feet;
Iw
= rotation mass moment of inertia of rolling

assembly (in slug feet);
VH
= linear velocity of aeroplane parallel to

ground at instant of contact (assumed to be
12 VSO, in feet per second);
VC
= peripheral speed of tyre, if pre-rotation is

used (in feet per second) (there must be a
positive means of pre-rotation before prerotation may be considered);
= effective coefficient of friction (080 may

be used);
FV max
= maximum vertical force on wheel

(pounds = njWe, where We and nj) are
defined in CS 23.725;
tz
factor for the specified rate of descent and forward

velocity. For exceptionally large wheels, a wheel
peripheral velocity equal to the ground speed may
not have been attained at the time of maximum
vertical gear load. However, as stated above, the
drag spin-up load need not exceed 08 of the
maximum vertical loads.
(c) Dynamic spring-back of the landing gear
and adjacent structure at the instant just after the
wheels come up to speed may result in dynamic
forward acting loads of considerable magnitude.
This effect must be determined, in the level landing
condition, by assuming that the wheel spin-up loads
calculated by the methods of this appendix are
reversed. Dynamic spring-back is likely to become
critical for landing gear units having wheels of large
mass or high landing speeds.
= time interval between ground contact and

attainment of maximum vertical force on
wheel (seconds). However, if the value of
FH max, from the above equation exceeds
08 FV max, the latter value must be used
for FH max.
(b) This equation assumes a linear variation of

load factor with time until the peak load is reached
and under this assumption, the equation determines
the drag force at the time that the wheel peripheral
velocity at radius re equals the aeroplane velocity.
Most shock absorbers do not exactly follow a linear
variation of load factor with time. Therefore, rational
or conservative allowances must be made to
compensate for these variations. On most landing
gears, the time for wheel spin-up will be less than the
time required to develop maximum vertical load
1App D1
CS-23
BOOK 1
1App D2
BOOK 1
CS-23
Appendix F
Test Procedure for Self-Extinguishing Materials in accordance with CS 23.853, 23.855 and
23.1359
(a) Conditioning. Specimens

must
be
conditioned to 21 3C (70 5F), and at
50% 5% relative humidity until moisture
equilibrium is reached or for 24 hours. Only one
specimen at a time may be removed from the
conditioning environment immediately before
subjecting it to the flame.
(b) Specimen configuration. Except as provided
for materials used in electrical wire and cable
insulation and in small parts, materials must be tested
either as a section cut from a fabricated part as
installed in the aeroplane or as a specimen simulating
a cut section such as: a specimen cut from a flat sheet
of the material or a model of the fabricated part. The
specimen may be cut from any location in a
fabricated part; however, fabricated units, such as
sandwich panels, may not be separated for test. The
specimen thickness must be not thicker than the
minimum thickness to be qualified for use in the
aeroplane, except that: (1) thick foam parts, such as
seat cushions, must be tested in 13 mm (-in)
thickness; (2) when showing compliance with CS
23.853 (d) (3) (v) for materials used in small parts
that must be tested, the materials must be tested in no
more than 3 mm ( 18 in) thickness; (3) when showing
compliance with CS 23.1359 (c) for materials used in
electrical wire and cable insulation, the wire and
cable specimens must be the same size as used in the
aeroplane. In the case of fabrics, both the warp and
fill direction of the weave must be tested to
determine the most critical flammability condition.
When performing the tests prescribed in subparagraphs (d) and (e) of this Appendix, the
specimen must be mounted in a metal frame so that;
(1) in the vertical tests of sub-paragraph (d), the two
long edges and the upper edge are held securely; (2)
in the horizontal test of sub-paragraph (e), the two
long edges and the edge away from the flame are
held securely; (3) the exposed area of the specimen is
at least 5 cm (2 in) wide and 30 cm (12 in) long,
unless the actual size used in the aeroplane is
smaller; and (4) the edge to which the burner flame
is applied must not consist of the finished or
protected edge of the specimen but must be
representative of the actual cross-section of the
material or part installed in the aeroplane. When
performing the test prescribed in sub-paragraph (f) of
this Appendix, the specimen must be mounted in a
metal frame so that all four edges are held securely
and the exposed area of the specimen is at least
20 cm by 20 cm (8 in by 8 in).
(c)
Apparatus. Except as provided in subparagraph (e) of this Appendix, tests must be
conducted in a draft-free cabinet in accordance with
Federal Test Method Standard 191 Method 5903

(revised Method 5902) which is available from
the General Services Administration, Business
Service Centre, Region 3, Seventh and D Streets
SW. Washington, D.C. 20407, or with some other
approved equivalent method. Specimens which are
too large for the cabinet must be tested in similar
draft-free conditions.
(d) Vertical test. A minimum of three specimens
must be tested and the results averaged. For fabrics,
the direction of weave corresponding to the most
critical flammability conditions must be parallel to
the longest dimension. Each specimen must be
supported vertically. The specimen must be exposed
to a Bunsen or Tirrill burner with a nominal 95 mm
( 3 8 -in) I.D. tube adjusted to give a flame of 38 mm
(1 in) in height. The minimum flame temperature
measured by a calibrated thermo-couple pyrometer in
the centre of the flame must be 843C (1550F). The
lower edge of the specimen must be 19 mm ( 3 4 in)
above the top edge of the burner. The flame must be
applied to the centre line of the lower edge of the
specimen.
For
materials
covered
by
CS 23.853 (d) (3) (i) and 23.853 (f), the flame must
be applied for 60 seconds and then removed. For
materials covered by CS 23.853 (d) (3) (ii), the flame
must be applied for 12 seconds and then removed.
Flame time, burn length, and flaming time of
drippings, if any, must be recorded. The burn length
determined in accordance with sub-paragraph (h) of
this Appendix must be measured to the nearest 25
mm ( 110 in).
(e) Horizontal test. A minimum of three
specimens must be tested and the results averaged.
Each specimen must be supported horizontally. The
exposed surface when installed in the aeroplane must
be face down for the test. The specimen must be
exposed to a Bunsen burner or Tirrill burner with a
nominal 95 mm ( 3 8 in) I.D. tube adjusted to give a
flame of 38 mm (1 in) in height. The minimum
flame temperature measured by a calibrated
thermocouple pyrometer in the centre of the flame
must be 843C (1550F). The specimen must be
positioned so that the edge being tested is 19 mm (
in) above the top of, and on the centre line of, the
burner. The flame must be applied for 15 seconds
and then removed. A minimum of 25 cm (10 in) of
the specimen must be used for timing purposes,
approximately 38 mm (1 in) must burn before the
burning front reaches the timing zone, and the
average burn rate must be recorded.
(f) Forty-five degree test. A minimum of three
specimens must be tested and the results averaged.
The specimens must be supported at an angle of 45
1App F1
CS-23
BOOK 1
to a horizontal surface. The exposed surface when

installed in the aircraft must be face down for the
test. The specimens must be exposed to a Bunsen or
Tirrill burner with a nominal 95 mm ( 3 8 in) I.D. tube
adjusted to give a flame of 38 mm (1 in) in height.
The minimum flame temperature measured by a
calibrated thermocouple pyrometer in the centre of
the flame must be 843C (1550F). Suitable precautions must be taken to avoid drafts. The flame must
be applied for 30 seconds with one-third contacting
the material at the centre of the specimen and then
removed. Flame time, glow time, and whether the
flame penetrates (passes through) the specimen must
be recorded.
discoloured, nor areas where material has shrunk or

melted away from the heat source.
(g) Sixty-degree test. A minimum of three

specimens of each wire specification (make and size)
must be tested. The specimen of wire or cable
(including insulation) must be placed at an angle of
60 with the horizontal in the cabinet specified in
sub-paragraph (c) of this appendix with the cabinet
door open during the test or placed within a chamber
approximately 0.6 m (2 ft) high by 0.3 m by 0.3 m (1
ft by 1 ft), open at the top and at one vertical side
(front), that allows sufficient flow of air for complete
combustion but is free from drafts. The specimen
must be parallel to and approximately 15 cm (6 in)
from the front of the chamber. The lower end of the
specimen must be held rigidly clamped. The upper
end of the specimen must pass over a pulley or rod
and must have an appropriate weight attached to it so
that the specimen is held tautly throughout the
flammability test. The test specimen span between
lower clamp and upper pulley or rod must be 61 cm
(24 in) and must be marked 20 cm (8 in) from the
lower end to indicate the centre point for flame
application. A flame from a Bunsen or Tirrill burner
must be applied for 30 seconds at the test mark. The
burner must be mounted underneath the test mark on
the specimen, perpendicular to the specimen and at
an angle of 30 to the vertical plane of the specimen.
The burner must have a nominal bore of 95 mm
( 3 8 in), and must be adjusted to provide a 76 mm (3
in) high flame with an inner cone approximately onethird of the flame height. The minimum temperature
of the hottest portion of the flame, as measured with
a calibrated thermocouple pyrometer may not be less
than 954C (1750F). The burner must be positioned
so that the hottest portion of the flame is applied to
the test mark on the wire. Flame time, burn length,
and flaming time of drippings, if any, must be
recorded. The burn length determined in accordance
with sub-paragraph (h) of this appendix must be
measured to the nearest 25 mm ( 110 in). Breaking of
the wire specimen is not considered a failure.
(h) Burn length. Burn length is the distance
from the original edge to the farthest evidence of
damage to the test specimen due to flame
impingement, including areas of partial or complete
consumption, charring, or embrittlement, but not
including areas sooted, stained, warped, or
1App F2
BOOK 1
CS-23
Appendix G
Instructions For Continued Airworthiness
G23.1
General
(a) This appendix specifies requirements for the

preparation of instructions for continued airworthiness as required by CS 23.1529.
(b) The instructions for continued airworthiness
for each aeroplane must include the instructions for
continued airworthiness for each engine and
propeller (hereinafter designated products), for
each appliance required by CS-23, and any required
information relating to the interface of those
appliances and products with the aeroplane. If
instructions for continued airworthiness are not
supplied by the manufacturer of an appliance or
product installed in the aeroplane, the instructions for
continued airworthiness for the aeroplane must
include the information essential to the continued
airworthiness of the aeroplane.
G23.2
Format
(a) The instructions for continued airworthiness

must be in the form of a manual or manuals as
appropriate for the quantity of data to be provided.
(b) The format of the manual or manuals must
provide for a practical arrangement.
G23.3
(b)
Maintenance Instructions
(1) Scheduling information for each part

of the aeroplane and its engines, auxiliary power
units, propellers, accessories, instruments, and
equipment that provides the recommended periods
at which they should be cleaned, inspected,
adjusted, tested, and lubricated, and the degree of
inspection, the applicable wear tolerances, and
work recommended at these periods. However,
reference may be made to information from an
accessory, instrument, or equipment manufacturer
as the source of this information if it is shown that
the item has an exceptionally high degree of
complexity requiring specialised maintenance
techniques, test equipment, or expertise. The
recommended overhaul periods and necessary
cross reference to the airworthiness limitations
section of the manual must also be included. In
addition, an inspection programme that includes
the frequency and extent of the inspections
necessary to provide for the continued
airworthiness of the aeroplane must be included.
(2) Trouble-shooting
information
describing probable malfunctions, how to
recognise those malfunctions, and the remedial
action for those malfunctions.
Content
The contents of the manual or manuals must be

prepared in a language acceptable to the Agency.
The instructions for continued airworthiness must
contain the following manuals or sections, as
appropriate and information:
(a)
(4) Servicing information that covers

details regarding servicing points, capacities of
tanks, reservoirs, types of fluids to be used,
pressures applicable to the various systems,
location of access panels for inspection and
servicing, locations of lubrication points,
lubricants to be used, equipment required for
servicing, tow instructions and limitations,
mooring, jacking, and levelling information.
Aeroplane maintenance manual or section
(1) Introduction information that includes

an explanation of the aeroplanes features and data
to the extent necessary for maintenance or
preventive maintenance.
(2) A description of the aeroplane and its
systems and installations including its engines,
propellers, and appliances.
(3) Basic
control
and
operation
information describing how the aeroplane
components and systems are controlled and how
they operate, including any special procedures and
limitations that apply.
(3) Information describing the order and

method of removing and replacing products and
parts with any necessary precautions to be taken.
(4) Other general procedural instructions
including procedures for system testing during
ground running, symmetry checks, weighing and
determining the centre of gravity, lifting and
shoring, and storage limitations.
(c) Diagrams of structural access plates and
information needed to gain access for inspections
when access plates are not provided.
(d) Details for the application of special
inspection techniques including radiographic and
ultrasonic testing where such processes are specified.
(e) Information needed to apply protective
treatments to the structure after inspection.
1App G1
CS-23
BOOK 1
(f) All data relative to structural fasteners such

as identification, discard recommendations, and
torque values.
(g)
A list of special tools needed.
(h) In addition, for commuter category

aeroplanes, the following information must be
furnished:
(1) Electrical loads applicable to the
various systems;
(2)
Methods of balancing control surfaces;
(3) Identification
secondary structures; and
of
primary
and
(4) Special repair methods applicable to

the aeroplane.
G23.4
Airworthiness
section
Limitations
The instructions for continued airworthiness must

contain a section titled airworthiness limitations that
is segregated and clearly distinguishable from the
rest of the document. This section must set forth
each mandatory replacement time, structural
inspection interval, and related structural inspection
procedure required for type certification. If the
instructions for continued airworthiness consist of
multiple documents, the section required by this
paragraph must be included in the principal manual.
This section must contain a legible statement in a
prominent location that reads: The airworthiness
limitations section is approved and variations must
also be approved.
1App G2
CS-23
BOOK 1
Appendix H
Installation of an Automatic Power Reserve (APR) System
H23.1
General
(a) This appendix specifies requirements for

installation of an APR engine power control system
that automatically advances power or thrust on the
operating engine in the event an engine fails during
take-off.
(b) With the APR system and associate systems
functioning normally, all applicable requirements
(except as provided in this appendix) must be met
without requiring any action by the crew to increase
power or thrust.
H23.2
Terminology
(a) Automatic power reserve system means the

entire automatic system used only during take-off,
including all devices both mechanical and electrical
that sense engine failure, transmit signals, actuate the
fuel control or the power lever on the operating
engine, including power sources, to achieve the
scheduled power increase and furnish cockpit
information on system operation.
(b) Selected take-off power means the power
obtained from each initial power setting approved for
take-off.
(c) Critical time interval, as illustrated in figure
H1, means that period starting at V1 minus one
second and ending at the intersection of the engine
and APR failure flight path line with the minimum
performance all engine flight path line. The engine
and APR failure flight path line intersects the oneengine-inoperative flight path line at 122 m (400
feet) above the take-off surface. The engine and
APR failure flight path is based on the aeroplanes
performance and must have a positive gradient of at
least 0.5 percent at 122 m (400 feet) above the takeoff surface.
H23.3
Reliability and
requirements.
performance
(a) It must be shown that, during the critical

time interval, an APR failure that increases or does
not affect power on either engine will not create a
hazard to the aeroplane, or it must be shown that
such failures are improbable.
(b) It must be shown that, during the critical
time interval, there are no failure modes of the APR
system that would result in a failure that will
decrease the power on either engine or it must be
shown that such failures are extremely improbable.
(c) It must be shown that, during the critical
time interval, there will be no failure of the APR
system in combination with an engine failure or it
must be shown that such failures are extremely
improbable.
(d) All applicable performance requirements
must be met with an engine failure occurring at the
most critical point during take-off with the APR
system functioning normally.
H23.4
Power setting.
The selected take-off power set on each engine at

the beginning of the take-off roll may not be less
than(a) The power necessary to attain, at V1, 90
percent of the maximum take-off power approved for
the aeroplane for the existing conditions;
1App H1
BOOK 1
CS-23
(b) That required to permit normal operation of

all safety-related systems and equipment that are
dependent upon engine power or power lever
position; and
(c) That shown to be free of hazardous engine
response characteristics when power is advanced
from the selected take-off power level to the
maximum approved take-off power.
H23.5
Powerplant control-general.
(a) In addition to the requirements of

CS 23.1141, no single failure or malfunction (or
probable combination thereof) of the APR, including
associated systems, may cause the failure of any
powerplant function necessary for safety.
(b)
H23.6
Powerplant instruments.
In addition to the requirements of CS 23.1305:

(a) A means must be provided to indicate when
the APR is in the armed or ready condition.
(b) If the inherent flight characteristics of the
aeroplane do not provide warning that an engine has
failed, a warning system independent of the APR
must be provided to give the pilot a clear warning of
any engine failure during take-off.
(c) Following an engine failure at V1 or above,
there must be means for the crew to readily and
quickly verify that the APR has operated
satisfactorily.
The APR must be designed to-
(1) Provide a means to verify to the flight

crew before take-off that the APR is in an
operating condition to perform its intended
function;
(2) Automatically advance power on the
operating engine following an engine failure
during take-off to achieve the maximum attainable
take-off power without exceeding engine
operating limits;
(3) Prevent deactivation of the APR by
manual adjustment of the power levers following
an engine failure;
(4) Provide a means for the flight crew to
deactivate the automatic function. This means
must be designed to prevent inadvertent
deactivation; and
(5) Allow normal manual decrease or
increase in power up to the maximum take-off
power approved for the aeroplane under the
existing conditions through the use of power
levers, as stated in CS 23.1141(c), except as
provided under paragraph (c) of H23.5 of this
appendix.
(c) For aeroplanes equipped with limiters that
automatically prevent engine operating limits from
being exceeded, other means may be used to increase
the maximum level of power controlled by the power
levers in the event of an APR failure. The means
must be located on or forward of the power levers,
must be easily identified and operated under all
operating conditions by a single action of any pilot
with the hand that is normally used to actuate the
power levers, and must meet the requirements of
CS 23.777(a), (b), and (c).
1App H2
BOOK 1
CS-23
Appendix I
Seaplane Loads
1App I1
CS-23
BOOK 1
Appendix I (continued)
1App I2
BOOK 1
CS-23
Appendix J
Anthropomorphic Test Dummies for showing compliance with 23.562
SUBPART A-GENERAL
component assemblies under the following nine

headings:
SA 150 M070-Right arm assembly
J23.1
Scope
This Appendix describes the anthropomorphic test

dummies that are to be used for compliance testing
of aeroplane and aeroplane equipment with
aeroplane safety standards.
SA 150 M071-Left arm assembly

SA 150 M050-Lumbar spine assembly
SA 150 M060-Pelvis and abdomen assembly
SA 150 M080-Right leg assembly
SA 150 M081-Left leg assembly
J23.2
Purpose
The design and performance criteria specified in

this Appendix are intended to describe measuring
tools with sufficient precision to give repetitive and
correlative results under similar test conditions and
to reflect adequately the protective performance of
an aeroplane or item of aeroplane equipment with
respect to human occupants.
J23.3 Application
This Appendix does not in itself impose duties or
liabilities on any person. It is a description of tools
that measure the performance of occupant protection
systems required by the safety standards that
incorporate it. It is designed to be referenced by, and
become a part of, the test procedures.
J23.4
Terminology
(a) The term dummy, when used in this

Subpart A, refers to any test device described by this
part. The term dummy, when used in any other
subpart of this part, refers to the particular dummy
described in that part.
(b) Terms describing parts of the dummy, such
as head, are the same as names for corresponding
parts of the human body.
SUBPART B-50TH PERCENTILE MALE
J23.5
General description.
(a) The dummy consists of the component

assemblies specified in Figure 1, which are described
in their entirety by means of approximately 250
drawings and specifications that are grouped by
SA 150 M010-Head assembly

SA 150 M020-Neck assembly
SA 150 M030-Shoulder-thorax assembly.
(b) The drawings and specifications referred to
in this Appendix that are not set forth in full are
incorporated by reference.
(c)
Reserved.
(d) Adjacent segments are joined in a manner

such that throughout the range of motion and also
under crash impact conditions there is no contact
between metallic elements except for contacts that
exist under static conditions.
(e) The structural properties of the dummy are
such that the dummy conforms to this Appendix in
every respect both before and after being used in
aeroplane tests.
J23.6 Head
(a) The head consists of the assembly shown as
number SA 150 M010 in Figure 1 and conforms to
each of the drawings subtended by number
SA 150 M010.
(b) When the head is dropped from a height of
25 cm (10 inches) in accordance with subparagraph
(c) , the peak resultant accelerations at the location of
the accelerometers mounted in the head form in
accordance with J23.11(b) of this Appendix shall be
not less than 210g, and not more than 260g. The
acceleration/time curve for the test shall be unimodal
and shall lie at or above the 100g level for an interval
not less than 09 milliseconds and not more than 15
milliseconds. The lateral acceleration vector shall
not exceed 10g.
(c)
Test procedure:
(1) Suspend the head as shown in Figure

2, so that the lowest point on the forehead is 13
mm (05 inches) below the lowest point on the
1App J1
CS-23
BOOK 1
dummys nose when the midsagittal plane is

vertical.
longitudinal centreline. Mount the neck directly

to the pendulum as shown in Figure 4.
(2) Drop the head from the specified

height by means that ensure instant release onto a
rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate, 51 mm
(2 inches) thick and 0.6 meter (2 feet) square,
which has a clean, dry surface and any microfinish
of not less than 0.2 m (8 microinches) (rms) and
not more than 2 m (80 microinches) (rms).
(2) Release the pendulum and allow it to

fall freely from a height such that the velocity at
impact is 7.2 0.6 m/s (235 20 feet per second
(fps)), measured at the centre of the accelerometer
specified in Figure 4.
(3) Decelerate the pendulum to a stop with
an acceleration-time pulse described as follows:
(3) Allow a time period of at least 2 hours

between successive tests on the same head.
J23.7
(i)
Establish 5g and 20g levels on
the a-t curve.
(ii) Establish t1 at the point where
the rising a-t curve first crosses the 5g level,
t2 at the point where the rising a-t curve first
crosses the 20g level, t2 at the point where
the decaying a-t curve last crosses the 20g
level, and t4 at the point where the decaying
a-t curve first crosses the 5g level.
Neck
(a) The neck consists of the assembly shown as

number SA 150 M020 in Figure 1 and conforms to
each of the drawings subtended by number
SA 150 M020.
(b) When the neck is tested with the head in
accordance with subparagraph (c) , the head shall
rotate in reference to the pendulums longitudinal
centreline a total of 68 5 about its centre of
gravity, rotating to the extent specified in the
following table at each indicated point in time,
measured from impact, with a chordal displacement
measured at its centre of gravity that is within the
limits specified. The chordal displacement at time T
is defined as the straight line distance between (1)
the position relative to the pendulum arm of the head
centre of gravity at time zero, and (2) the position
relative to the pendulum arm of the head centre of
gravity at time T as illustrated by Figure 3. The peck
resultant acceleration recorded at the location of the
accelerometers mounted in the head form in
accordance with J23.11(b) of this Appendix shall not
exceed 26g.
The pendulum shall not reverse
direction until the heads centre of gravity returns to
the original zero time position relative to the
pendulum arm.
Rotation (degrees)
Time (ms)
(2+08T)
0..........................
30........................
60........................
Maximum ...........
60........................
30........................
0..........................
(c)
0
30
46
60
75
95
112
Chordal
Displacement
mm 13
(inches 05)
00
66 (26)
122 (48)
140 (55)
122 (48)
66 (26)
00
(iii) t2-t1 shall be not more than 3

milliseconds.
(iv) t3-t2 shall be not less than 25
milliseconds and not more than 30
milliseconds.
(v) t4-t3 shall be not more than 10
milliseconds.
(vi) The
average
deceleration
between t2 and t3 shall be not less than 20g
and not more than 24g.
(4) Allow the neck to flex without impact
of the head or neck with any object other than the
pendulum arm.
J23.8 Thorax
(a) The thorax consists of the assembly shown
as number SA 150 M030 in Figure 1, and conforms
to each of the drawings subtended by number
SA 150 M030.
(b) The thorax contains enough unobstructed
interior space behind the rib cage to permit the
midpoint of the sternum to be depressed 51 mm (2
inches) without contact between the rib cage and
other parts of the dummy or its instrumentation,
except for instruments specified in subparagraph
(d)(7) .
Test procedure:
(1) Mount the head and neck on a rigid

pendulum as specified in Figure 4, so that the
heads midsagittal plane is vertical and coincides
with the plane of motion of the pendulums
(c) When impacted by a test probe conforming

to J23.11(a) of this Appendix at 4.3 m/s (14 fps) and
at 6.7 m/s (22 fps) in accordance with subparagraph
(d) , the thorax must resist with forces measured by
the test probe of not more than 6450 N (1450
pounds) and 10008 N (2250 pounds), respectively,
1App J2
BOOK 1
CS-23
and shall deflect by amounts not greater than 28 mm

(11 inches) and 43 mm (17 inches), respectively.
The internal hysteresis in each impact shall not be
less than 50% and not more than 70%.
(d)
Test procedure:
(1) With the dummy seated without back

support on a surface as specified in J23.11(i) of
this Appendix and in the orientation specified in
J23.11(i) of this Appendix , adjust the dummy
arms and legs until they are extended horizontally
forward parallel to the midsagittal plane.
(b) When subjected to continuously applied force

in accordance with subparagraph (c) , the lumbar
spine assembly shall flex by an amount that permits
the rigid thoracic spine to rotate from its initial
position in accordance with Figure 11 by the number
of degrees shown below at each specified force level,
and straighten upon removal of the force to within
12 of its initial position in accordance with Figure
11.
Flexion (degrees)
0......................................
20....................................
30....................................
40....................................
(2) Place the longitudinal centre line of

the test probe so that it is 45 0.3 cm (177 01
inches) above the seating surface at impact.
(3) Align the test probe specified in
J23.11(a) of this Appendix so that at impact its
longitudinal centreline coincides within 2 of a
horizontal line in the dummys midsagittal plane.
(c)
(2) Attach the rear mounting of the pelvis

to the pelvic instrument cavity rear face at the four
in cap screw holes and attach the front
mounting at the femur axial rotation joint.
Tighten the mountings so that the pelvic-lumbar
adapter is horizontal and adjust the femur friction
plungers at each hip socket joint to 27 Nm (240
inch-pounds) torque.
(5) Impact the thorax with the test probe

so that its longitudinal centreline falls within 2 of
a horizontal line in the dummys midsagittal plane
at the moment of impact.
(6) Guide the probe during impact so that
it moves with no significant lateral, vertical, or
rotational movement.
(3) Flex the thorax forward 50 and then

rearward as necessary to return it to its initial
position in accordance with Figure 11
unsupported by external means.
(7) Measure the horizontal deflection of

the sternum relative to the thoracic spine along the
line established by the longitudinal centreline of
the probe at the moment of impact, using a
potentiometer mounted inside the sternum.
(4) Apply a forward force perpendicular

to the thorax instrument cavity rear face in the
midsagittal plane 38 cm (15 inches) above the top
surface of the pelvic-lumbar adapter. Apply the
force at any torso deflection rate between 5 and
15 per second up to 40 of flexion but no
further, continue to apply for 10 seconds that force
necessary to maintain 40 of flexion, and record
the force with an instrument mounted to the thorax
as shown in Figure 5. Release all force as rapidly
as possible and measure the return angle 3 minutes
after the release.
(8) Measure hysteresis by determining the

ratio of the area between the loading and
unloading portions of the force deflection curve to
the area under the loading portion of the curve.
Lumbar spine, abdomen, and

pelvis
(a) The lumbar spine, abdomen and pelvis

consist of the assemblies designated as numbers SA
150 M050 and SA 150 M060 in Figure 1 and
conform to the drawings subtended by these
numbers.
Test procedure:
(1) Assemble the thorax, lumbar spine,

pelvic, and upper leg assemblies (above the femur
force transducers), ensuring that all component
surfaces are clean, dry, and untreated unless
otherwise specified, and attach them to the
horizontal fixture shown in Figure 5 at the two
link rod pins and with the mounting brackets for
the lumbar test fixtures illustrated in Figures 6 to
9.
(4) Adjust the dummy so that the surface area

on the thorax immediately adjacent to the projected
longitudinal centre line of the test probe is vertical.
Limb support, as needed to achieve and maintain this
orientation, may be provided by placement of a steel
rod of any diameter not less than 6.3 mm (onequarter of an inch) and not more than 9.5 mm (threeeights of an inch), with hemispherical ends,
vertically under the limb at its projected geometric
centre.
J23.9
Force 27 N
( 6 pounds)
0
125 (28)
178 (40)
231 (52)
(d) When the abdomen is subjected to

continuously applied force in accordance with
subparagraph (e) , the abdominal force-deflection
curve shall be within the two curves plotted in Figure
10.
1App J3
CS-23
(e)
BOOK 1
Test procedure:
(1) Place the assembled thorax, lumbar

spine and pelvic assemblies in a supine position
on a flat, rigid, smooth, dry, clean horizontal
surface, ensuring that all component surfaces are
clean, dry, and untreated unless otherwise
specified.
(2) Place a rigid cylinder 15 cm (6 inches)
in diameter and 46 cm (18 inches) long
transversely across the abdomen, so that the
cylinder is symmetrical about the midsagittal
plane, with its longitudinal centreline horizontal
and perpendicular to the midsagittal plane at a
point 23.4 cm (92 inches) above the bottom line
of the buttocks, measured with the dummy
positioned in accordance with Figure 11.
(3) Establish the zero deflection point as
the point at which a force of 44.5 N (10 pounds)
has been reached.
(4) Apply a vertical downward force
through the cylinder at any rate between 6.3 (025)
and 8.9 (035) mm (inches) per second.
(5) Guide the cylinder so that it moves
without significant lateral or rotational movement.
J23.10
Limbs
(a) The limbs consist of the assemblies shown

as numbers SA 150 M070, SA 150 M071, SA 150
M080, and SA 150 M081 in Figure 1 and conform to
the drawings subtended by these numbers.
(b) When each knee is impacted at 2.1 m/s (69
ft/sec.) in accordance with subparagraph (c) , the
maximum force on the femur shall be not more than
11120 N (2500 pounds) and not less than 8229 N
(1850 pounds), with a duration above 4448 N (1000)
pounds of not less than 17 milliseconds.
(c)
Test procedure:
(1) Seat the dummy without back support

on a surface as specified in J23.11(i) of this
Appendix that is 44 0.5 cm (173 02 inches)
above a horizontal surface, oriented as specified in
J23.11(i) of this Appendix , and with the hip joint
adjustment at any setting between 1g and 2g.
Place the dummy legs in planes parallel to its
midsagittal plane (knee pivot centreline
perpendicular to the midsagittal plane) and with
the feet flat on the horizontal surface. Adjust the
feet and lower legs until the lines between the
midpoints of the knee pivots and the ankle pivots
are at any angle not less than 2 and not more than
4 rear of the vertical, measured at the centreline
of the knee pivots.
(2) Reposition the dummy if necessary so

that the rearmost point of the lower legs at the
level 25 mm (one inch) below the seating surface
remains at any distance not less than 13 cm (5
inches) and not more than 15 cm (6 inches)
forward of the forward edge of the seat.
(3) Align the test probe specified in
J23.11(a) of this Appendix so that at impact its
longitudinal centreline coincides within 2 with
the longitudinal certreline of the femur.
(4) Impact the knee with the test probe
moving horizontally and parallel to the midsagittal
plane at the specified velocity.
(5) Guide the probe during impact so that it
moves with no significant lateral, vertical, or
rotational movement.
J23.11
Test
conditions
instrumention
and
(a) The test probe used for thoracic and knee

impact tests is a cylinder 15 cm (6 inches) in
diameter that weighs 23.4 kg (515 pounds)
including instrumentation. Its impacting end has a
flat right face that is rigid and that has an edge radius
of 13 mm (05 inches).
(b) Accelerometers are mounted in the head on
the horizontal transverse bulkhead shown in the
drawings sub-referenced under assembly No. SA 150
M010 in Figure 1, so that their sensitive axes
intersect at a point in the midsagittal plane 13 mm
(05 inches) above the horizontal bulkhead and 48
mm (19 inches) ventral of the vertical mating
surface of the skull with the skull cover. One
accelerometer is aligned with its sensitive axis
perpendicular to the horizontal bulkhead in the
midsagittal plane and with its seismic mass centre at
any distance up to 7.6 mm (03 inches) superior to
the axial intersection point. Another accelerometer is
aligned with its sensitive axis parallel to the
horizontal bulkhead and perpendicular to the
midsagittal plane, and with its seismic mass centre at
any distance up to 33 mm (13 inches) to the left of
the axial intersection point (left side of dummy is the
same as that of man). A third accelerometer is
aligned with its sensitive axis parallel to the
horizontal bulkhead in the midsagittal plane, and
with its seismic mass centre at any distance up to 33
mm (13 inches) dorsal to the axial intersection point.
(c) Accelerometers are mounted in the thorax by
means of a bracket attached to the rear vertical
surface (hereafter attachment surface) of the
thoracic spine so that their sensitive axes intersect at
a point in the midsagittal plane 20.3 mm (08 inches)
below the upper surface of the plate to which the
neck mounting bracket is attached and 81 mm (32
1App J4
BOOK 1
CS-23
midsagittal plane is vertical and centred on the test

surface and the rearmost points on its lower legs at
the level of the test surface are at any distance not
less the 13 cm (5 inches) and not more than 15 cm
(6 inches) forward of the forward edge of the test
surface.
inches) perpendicularly forward of the surface to

which the accelerometer bracket is attached. One
accelerometer has its sensitive axis oriented parallel
to the attachment surface in the midsagittal plane,
with its seismic mass centre at any distance up to 33
mm (13 inches) inferior to the intersection of the
sensitive axes specified above.
Another
accelerometer has its sensitive axis oriented parallel
to the attachment surface and perpendicular to the
midsagittal plane, with its seismic mass centre at any
distance up to 5 mm (02 inches) to the right of the
intersection of the sensitive axes specified above. A
third accelerometer has its sensitive axis oriented
perpendicular to the attachment surface in the
midsagittal plane, with its seismic mass centre at any
distance up to 33 mm (13 inches) dorsal to the
intersection of the sensitive axes specified above.
Accelerometers are oriented with the dummy in the
position specified in J23.11(i) of this Appendix.
(2) The pelvis is adjusted so that the upper

surface of the lumbar-pelvic adapter is horizontal.
(3) The shoulder yokes are adjusted so
that they are at the midpoint of their anteroirposterior travel with their upper surfaces
horizontal.
(4) The dummy is adjusted so that the rear
surfaces of the shoulders and buttocks are tangent
to a transverse vertical plane.
(5) The upper legs are positioned
symmetrically about the midsagittal plane so that
the distance between the knee pivot bolt heads is
29.5 cm (116 inches).
(d) A force-sensing device is mounted axially in

each femur shaft so that the transverse centreline of
the sensing element is 10.8 cm (425 inches) from the
knees centre of rotation.
(e) The outputs of acceleration and forcesensing devices installed in the dummy and in the
test apparatus specified by this Part are recorded in
individual data channels, with channel classes as
follows:
(1)
Head acceleration - Class 1000.
(2)
Pendulum acceleration - Class 60.
(3)
Thorax acceleration - Class 180.
(4)
Thorax compression - Class 180.
(5)
Femur force - Class 600.
(6) The lower legs are positioned in planes

parallel to the midsagittal plane so that the lines
between the midpoint of the knee pivots and the
ankle pivots are vertical.
(j) The dummys dimensions, as specified in
drawing number SA 150 M002, are determined as
follows:
(1) With the dummy seated as specified in
subparagraph (i) , the head is adjusted and secured
so that its occiput is 43 mm (17 inches) forward
of the transverse vertical plane with the vertical
mating surface of the skull with its cover parallel
to the transverse vertical plane.
(f) The mountings for sensing devices have no

resonance frequency within a range of 3 times the
frequency range of the applicable channel class.
(g) Limb joints are set at 1g, barely restraining
the weight of the limb when it is extended
horizontally. The force required to move a limb
segment does not exceed 2g throughout the range of
limb motion.
(h) Performance tests are conducted at any
temperature from 19 C (66F) to 25.5 C (78F) and
at any relative humidity from 10% to 70% after
exposure of the dummy to these conditions for a
period of not less than 4 hours.
(i) For the performance tests specified in J23.8,
J23.9 and J23.10 of this Appendix, the dummy is
positioned in accordance with Figure 11 as follows:
(1) The dummy is placed on a flat, rigid,
smooth, clean, dry, horizontal, steel test surface
whose length and width dimensions are not less
than 41 cm (16 inches), so that the dummys
1App J5
(2) The thorax is adjusted and secured so

that the rear surface of the chest accelerometer
mounting cavity is inclined 3 forward of vertical.
(3) Chest and waist circumference and
chest depth measurements are taken with the
dummy
positioned
in
accordance
with
subparagraph (j)(1) and (2) .
(4) The chest skin and abdominal sac are
removed and all following measurements are
made without them.
(5) Seated height is measured from the
seating surface to the uppermost point on the
head-skin surface.
(6) Shoulder pivot height is measured
from the seating surface to the centre of the arm
elevation pivot.
(7) H-point locations are measured from
the seating surface to the centre of the holes in the
pelvis flesh covering in line with the hip motion
ball.
CS-23
BOOK 1
(8) Knee pivot distance from the backline

is measured to the centre of the knee pivot bolt
head.
(9) Knee pivot distance from floor is
measured from the centre of the knee pivot bolt
head to the bottom of the heel when the foot is
horizontal and pointing forward.
(10) Shoulder width measurement is taken
at arm elevation pivot centre height with the
centreline between the elbow pivots and the
shoulder pivots vertical.
(11) Hip width measurement is taken at
widest point of pelvic section.
(k) Performance tests of the same components,
segment, assembly, or fully assembled dummy are
separated in time by a period of not less than 30
minutes unless otherwise noted.
(1) Surfaces of dummy components are
not painted except as specified in this part or in
drawings subtended by this part.
1App J6
BOOK 1
CS-23
1App J7
CS-23
BOOK 1
1App J8
BOOK 1
CS-23
1App J9
CS-23
BOOK 1
1App J10
BOOK 1
CS-23
1App J11
CS-23
BOOK 1
1App J12
BOOK 2
CS23
EASA Certification Specifications

for
Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category
Aeroplanes
CS-23
Book 2
Acceptable Means of Compliance
2-0-1
CS23
BOOK 2
2-0-2
BOOK 2
CS-23
AMC - SUBPART C
AMC 23.307
Proof of structure
In deciding the need for and the extent of testing including the load levels to be achieved the following
factors will be considered by the Agency.
a.
The confidence which can be attached to the constructors' overall experience in respect to
certain types of aeroplanes in designing, building and testing aeroplanes.
b.
Whether the aeroplane in question is a new type or a development of an existing type having
the same basic structural design and having been previously tested, and how far static strength testing
can be extrapolated to allow for development of the particular type of aeroplane.
c.
The importance and value of detail and/or component testing including representation of parts
of structure not being tested, and
d.
The degree to which credit can be given for operating experience.
Analyses including finite element models used in place of tests must be demonstrated to be reliable for
the structure under evaluation and the load levels that have to be covered. This would normally be
provided by correlation with experimental results on the same structure or through comparison with
other known and accepted methods and results or through a combination of both.
If the structure or parts thereof are outside the manufacturer's previous experience, the manufacturer
should establish a strength test programme. In the case of a wing, wing carry through, fuselage and
empennage this will usually involve ultimate load testing.
.
When ultimate load static tests are conducted it is recommended that preliminary tests to limit load and
back to zero are performed first, in order to demonstrate that no detrimental permanent deformation
has taken place. During the ultimate test however, the limit load need not be removed provided that
continuous readings of strains and deflections of the structure are measured at an adequate number of
points, and also provided that a close examination of the structure is maintained throughout the tests
with particular emphasis being placed upon close observation of the structure at limit load for any
indications of local distress, yielding buckles, etc.
Static testing to ultimate load may be considered an adequate substitute for formal stress analysis
where static loads are critical in the design of the component. In cases where a dynamic loading is
critical, dynamic load tests may be considered equivalent to formal stress analysis. An example of
components on which dynamic loading is usually critical is the landing gear and the landing gear
structure of an aeroplane. The same yield criteria apply to dynamic tests as to static tests.
Where proof of structure is being shown by an ultimate load test, the test article should conform to the
same design specifications as the production article.
The manufacturer should ensure through his quality assurance organisation that the strength (e.g.
material properties and dimensions) of the component tested conservatively represents the strength of
the components used in production aeroplanes.
Test correction factors should be used to allow for process and material variability during production.
This may be expected particularly when wood or composite-material is used. This factor may be varied
according to the coefficient of variation that the manufacturer is able to show for his product (see Table
1 ).
2C1
CS-23
BOOK 2
TABLE 1
Test factor [Tf] vs. Coefficient of Variation [Cv%]
Cv%
Tf
5
100
6
103
7
106
8
110
9
112
10
115
12
122
14
130
15
133
20
155
Definition of Coefficient of Variation

For a population with mean M and standard deviation , the coefficient of variation expressed as a
percentage, Cv%, is defined by
Cv% = 100 * /M
AMC 23.321(c)
Flight loads General
For aeroplanes with an Md less than 0.5 the effects of compressibility are unlikely to be significant.
AMC 23.341(b)
Gust loads factors
The gust alleviation factor Kg as specified in CS 23.341(c) will not provide the conservatism required by
23.341(b).
Using a gust alleviation factor of Kg = 1.2 in the calculation of the gust load of canard or tandem wing
configuration may result in conservative net loads with respect to the gust criteria of CS 23.333(c).
AMC 23.343(b)
Design fuel loads
Fuel carried in the wing increases the inertia relief on the wing structure during manoeuvres and gusts
which results in lower stresses and deflections. However, if the wing fuel tanks are empty the inertia
load of the wing is reduced which, depending on the particular design, may lead to an increase of the
bending stresses in the wing structure itself and in the wing attachments. In order not to over stress the
aeroplane's structure the maximum weight of the aeroplane without any fuel in the wing tanks should
therefore be established, taking into account the applicable manoeuvre and gust loadings.
ACJ 23.343(c)
Design fuel loads
In case of fuel tanks in the fuselage and in the wings, as much as possible of the reserve fuel
must be assumed in the fuselage tanks and only the rest of the reserve fuel should be assumed in
the wing tanks.
AMC 23.345(d)
High lift devices
The effect of propeller slipstream on the extended flaps may be limited to the flap area behind the
propeller circle area.
2C2
BOOK 2
CS-23
AMC 23.347(b)
Unsymmetrical flight conditions
In establishing loading due to flick manoeuvres (snap roll), consideration should be given to the aircraft
response to full elevator and rudder deflection in combination.
In the absence of better data the air load resulting from an unchecked manoeuvre at Va should be
distributed as follows:
On one wing the aerodynamic load corresponding to CLmax, on the opposite wing no air load,
(100/0 percent of the semi-span wingload). On the horizontal tail the unsymmetrical distribution of the
balancing load as defined in CS 23.423(a) shall be obtained by multiplying the air load on one side of
the plane of symmetry by (1+X) and on the other side by (1X). The value of X shall be 0.5 for point A
of the Vn envelope and for all points representing aerodynamic stall.
The unsymmetrical load acting on the wing and on the horizontal tail are assumed to be turning the
aeroplane in the same direction around the roll (XX) axis.
The unbalanced aerodynamic loads (forces and moments) should be considered in equilibrium with
inertia forces.
AMC 23.371
Method of evaluation of gyroscopic loads
For a two-bladed propeller the maximum gyroscopic couple (in Nm) is given by 2Ip12. For three or
more evenly spaced blades the gyroscopic couple is Ip12, where:Ip
(kg m2)
is the polar moment of inertia of the propeller
(radians/second)
is the propeller rotation, and
(radians/second)
is the rate of pitch or yaw.
AMC 23.371(a)
Gyroscopic and aerodynamic loads
The aerodynamic loads specified in CS 23.371 include asymmetric flow through the propeller disc.
Experience has shown that the effects of this asymmetric flow on the engine mount and its supporting
structure are relatively small and may be discounted, if propellers are installed having diameters of
2.74 m (nine feet) or less.
AMC 23.393(a)
Loads parallel to hinge lines
On primary control surfaces and other movable surfaces, such as speedbrakes, flaps (in retracted
position) and all-moving tailplanes the loads acting parallel to the hinge line should take into account
the effect of wear and axial play between the surface and its supporting structure.
Compliance may be shown by analysis or by test.
2C3
CS-23
BOOK 2
AMC 23.393(b)
Loads parallel to hinge lines
For control surfaces of a wing or horizontal tail with a high dihedral angle and of a V-tail configuration
the K-factor may be calculated as follows:
K = 12 x 4
2
1 + Tan
where : = dihedral angle measured to the horizontal plane
As a simplification the following K-factors may be assumed:
for dihedral angles up to 10
K = 12
and for dihedral angles between 80 and 90
K = 24
AMC 23.405
Secondary control system
Hand and foot loads assumed for design of secondary control systems and engine controls should not
be less than the following:
1
Hand loads on small hand-wheels, cranks, etc., applied by finger or wrist-force;

P = 150 N
Hand loads on levers and hand-wheels applied by the force of an unsupported arm without
making use of the body weight;
P = 350 N
Hand loads on levers and hand grips applied by the force of a supported arm or by making
use of the body weight;
P = 600 N
Foot loads applied by the pilot when sitting with his back supported (e.g. wheel-brake
operating loads);
P = 750 N
AMC 23.423
Manoeuvring loads Horizontal surfaces
a.
For unpowered control surfaces, if a manoeuvre analysis is used to predict the manoeuvring
loads on the pitch control surfaces the time for sudden deflection from neutral position to the stops or
vice-versa may be assumed as:
for aerobatic category aeroplanes
0.1 sec for stick controlled surfaces
0.2 sec for wheel controlled surfaces
for normal, utility and commuter category aeroplanes
b.
For power-controlled surfaces the deflection time should be measured.
2C4
BOOK 2
CS-23
AMC 23.441
Manoeuvring loads Vertical surfaces
a.
loads on the yaw control surfaces the time for sudden deflection from neutral position to the stops or
vice-versa may be assumed as:
0.2 sec for pedal controlled surfaces;
for normal, utility and commuter category aeroplanes
0.3 sec for pedal controlled surfaces.
b.
c.
For aeroplanes where the horizontal tail is supported by the vertical tail, the tail surfaces and
their supporting structure including the rear portion of the fuselage should be designed to withstand the
prescribed loadings on the vertical tail and the rolling moment induced by the horizontal tail acting in
the same direction.
d.
For T-tails, in the absence of a more rational analysis, the rolling moment induced by sideslip
or deflection of the vertical rudder may be computed as follows:
Mr = 0 3Sh
o
V 2bh
2
where:
Mr = induced rolling moment at horizontal tail (Nm)
Sh. = area of horizontal tail (m2)
bh. = span of horizontal tail (m)
= effective sideslip angle of vertical tail (radians)
AMC 23.443
Gust loads Vertical surfaces
For aeroplanes where the horizontal tail is supported by the vertical tail, the tail surfaces and their
supporting structure including the rear portion of the fuselage should be designed to withstand the
prescribed loading on the vertical tail and the rolling moment induced by the horizontal tail acting in the
same direction.
For T-tails, in the absence of a more rational analysis, the rolling moment induced by gust load may be
computed as follows:
Mr = 0 .3S h o VUb hK gt
2
where:
Mr = induced rolling moment at horizontal tail
Sh = area of horizontal tail
Bh = span of horizontal tail
U
= gust velocity (m/s) as specified in CS 23.333(c)
Kgt = gust alleviation factor of vertical tail as specified in CS 23.443(c)

In computing Sh and bh the horizontal tail root has to be assumed on a vertical plane through the
centreline of the aeroplane fuselage.
2C5
CS-23
BOOK 2
AMC 23.455(a)(2)
Ailerons
a.
loads on the lateral control surfaces the time for sudden deflections from neutral position to the stops
or vice-versa may be assumed as :
for normal, utility and commuter aeroplanes
b.
AMC 23.562
Emergency landing dynamic conditions
FAA Advisory Circular No. 23.5621 provides additional information and guidance concerning an
acceptable means of demonstrating compliance with the requirements of CS 23 regarding dynamic
tests of seat/restraint systems.
AMC to 23.571 and 23.572

Fatigue evaluation: metallic pressurised cabin structures, metallic wing, empennage and
associated structures
In assessing the possibility of serious fatigue failures, the design should be examined to determine
probable points of failure in service. In this examination, consideration should be given, as necessary,
to the results of stress analysis, static tests, fatigue tests, strain gauge surveys, test of similar
structural configurations, and service experience. Locations prone to accidental damage or to corrosion
should also be considered.
Unless it is determined from the foregoing examination that the normal operating stresses in specific
regions of the structure are of such a low order that serious damage growth is extremely improbable,
repeated load analysis or tests should be conducted on structure representative of components or subcomponents of the wing (including canard and tandem wings, winglets and control surfaces),
empennage, their carry-through and attaching structures, fuselage and pressurised cabin, landing
gear, and their related primary attachments.
Test specimens should include structure representative of attachment fittings, major joints, changes in
section, cut-outs and discontinuities.
Service experience has shown that special attention should be focused on the design details of
important discontinuities, main attachment fittings, tension joints, splices, and cut-outs such as
windows, doors, and other openings.
Any method used in the analyses should be supported, as necessary, by tests or service experience.
The nature and extent of tests on complete structures or on portions of the primary structure will
depend upon evidence from applicable previous design and structural tests, and service experience
2C6
BOOK 2
CS-23
with similar structures. The scope of the analyses and supporting test programmes should be agreed
with the Agency.
AMC 23.573(a)(1)&(3)
Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure composite airframe structure
In addition to the guidance material described in AMC 23.603 the following procedure may be adopted
for residual strength tests of structure with built-in barely visible damages (BVID) and visible damages.
Tests should be performed up to limit load level, then the visible damages may be repaired without
substantially exceeding the original strength or characteristics of the type design and the test should be
continued up to at least* ultimate load level in order to validate the BVID in the unrepaired structure.
* Experience has shown that continuation of testing to rupture should be considered in order to identify failure modes.
Extrapolation by analysis of residual strength tests would not normally be acceptable for further development of the
aeroplane.
AMC 23.573(b)
Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure Metallic airframe structure
The damage-tolerance evaluation of structure is intended to ensure that, if serious fatigue, corrosion,
or accidental damage occurs within the operational life of the aeroplane, the remaining structure can
withstand reasonable loads without failure or excessive structural deformation until the damage is
detected.
Design features which should be considered in attaining a damage-tolerant structure include the
following:
Multiple load path construction and the use of crack stoppers to control the rate of crack growth,
and to provide adequate residual static strength;
Materials and stress levels that, after initiation of cracks, provide a controlled slow rate of crack
propagation combined with high residual strength. For single load path discrete items, such as
control surface hinges, wing spar joints or stabiliser pivot fittings the failure of which could be
catastrophic, it should be clearly demonstrated that cracks starting from material flaws,
manufacturing errors or accidental damage including corrosion have been properly accounted for
in the crack propagation estimate and inspection method;
Arrangements of design details to ensure a sufficiently high probability that a failure in any critical
structural element will be detected before the strength has been reduced below the level
necessary to withstand the loading conditions specified in CS 23.573(b) so as to allow
replacement or repair of the failed elements.
2C7
CS-23
BOOK 2
2C8
BOOK 2
CS-23
AMC - SUBPART D
AMC 23.603
Material and workmanship
Composite Aeroplane Structure (Acceptable Means of Compliance)
1
Purpose. This AMC sets forth an acceptable means, but not the only means, of showing
compliance with the provisions of CS23 regarding airworthiness type certification requirements for
composite aeroplane structures, involving fibre-reinforced materials, e.g. carbon (graphite), boron,
aramid (Kevlar), and glass-reinforced plastics. Guidance information is also presented on associated
quality control and repair aspects.
This AMC material is identical, apart from minor editing, to the structural content of FAA Advisory
Circular AC 20.107A, dated 25 April 1984.
The individual CS paragraphs applicable to each AMC paragraph are listed in Table 1 of this AMC.
2
Definitions
2.1
Design Values Material, structural element, and structural detail properties that have been
determined from test data and chosen to assure a high degree of confidence in the integrity of the
completed structure (see CS 23.613(b)).
2.2
Allowables. Material values that are determined from test data at the laminate or lamina level
on a probability basis (e.g. A or B base values).
2.3
Laminate level design values or allowables. Established from multi-ply laminate test data
and/or from test data at the lamina level and then established at the laminate level by test validated
analytical methods.
2.4
Lamina level material properties. Established from test data for a single-ply or multi-ply singledirection oriented lamina layup.
2.5
Point design. An element or detail of a specific design which is not considered generically
applicable to other structure for the purpose of substantiation (e.g. lugs and major joints). Such a
design element or detail can be qualified by test or by a combination of test and analysis.
2.6
Environment. External, non-accidental conditions (excluding mechanical loading) separately
or in combination, that can be expected in service and which may affect the structure (e.g.
temperature, moisture, UV radiation and fuel).
2.7
Degradation. The alteration of material properties (e.g. strength, modulus, coefficient of
expansion) which may result from deviations in manufacturing or from repeated loading and/or
environmental exposure.
2.8
Discrepancy. A manufacturing anomaly allowed and detected by the planned inspection
procedure. They can be created by processing, fabrication or assembly procedures.
2.9
Flaw. A manufacturing anomaly created by processing, fabrication or assembly procedures.
2.10
Damage. A structural anomaly caused by manufacturing (processing, fabrication, assembly
or handling) or service usage. Usually caused by trimming, fastener installation or foreign object
contact.
2.11
Impact Damage. A structural anomaly created by foreign object impact.
2D1
CS-23
BOOK 2
2.12
Coupon. A small test specimen (e.g. usually a flat laminate) for evaluation of basic lamina or
laminate properties or properties of generic structural features (e.g. bonded or mechanically fastened
joints).
2.13
Element. A generic element of a more complex structural member (e.g. skin, stringers, shear
panels, sandwich panels. joints, or splices).
2.14
Detail. A non-generic structural element of a more complex structural member (e.g. specific
design configured joints, splices, stringers, stringer runouts, or major access holes).
2.15
Subcomponent. A major three-dimensional structure which can provide complete structural
representation of a section of the full structure (e.g. stub-box, section of a spar, wing panel, wing rib,
body panel, or frames).
2.16
Component. A major section of the airframe structure (e.g. wing, body, fin, horizontal
stabiliser) which can be tested as a complete unit to qualify the structure.
3
General
3.1
This AMC is published to aid the evaluation of certification programmes for composite
applications and reflects the current status of composite technology. It is expected that this AMC will
be modified periodically to reflect technology advances.
3.2
The extent of testing and/or analysis and the degree of environmental accountability required
will differ for each structure depending upon the expected service usage, the material selected, the
design margins, the failure criteria, the data base and experience with similar structures, and on other
factors affecting a particular structure. It is expected that these factors will be considered when
interpreting this AMC for use on a specific application.
4
Material and Fabrication Development
4.1
To provide an adequate design data base, environmental effects on the design properties of
the material system should be established.
4.2
Environmental design criteria should be developed that identify the most critical environmental
exposures, including humidity and temperature, to which the material in the application under
evaluation may be exposed. This is not required where existing data demonstrate that no significant
environmental effects, including the effects of temperature and moisture, exist for material systems and
construction details, within the bounds of environmental exposure being considered. Experimental
evidence should be provided to demonstrate that the material design values or allowables are attained
with a high degree of confidence in the appropriate critical environmental exposures to be expected in
service. The effect of the service environment on static strength, fatigue and stiffness properties should
be determined for the material system through tests (e.g. accelerated environmental tests, or from
applicable service data). The effects of environmental cycling (i.e. moisture and temperature) should
be evaluated. Existing test data may be used where it can be shown directly applicable to the material
system.
4.3
The material system design values or allowables should be established on the laminate level
by either test of the laminate or by test of the lamina in conjunction with a test-validated analytical
method.
4.4
For a specific structural configuration of an individual component (point design), design values
may be established which include the effects of appropriate design features (holes, joints, etc.).
4.5
Impact damage is generally accommodated by limiting the design strain level.
Proof of Structure Static

2D2
BOOK 2
CS-23
5.1
The static strength of the composite design should be demonstrated through a programme of
component ultimate load tests in the appropriate environment, unless experience with similar designs,
material systems and loadings is available to demonstrate the adequacy of the analysis supported by
subcomponent tests, or component tests to agreed lower levels.
5.2
The effects of repeated loading and environmental exposure which may result in material
property degradation should be addressed in the static strength evaluation. This can be shown by
analysis supported by test evidence, by tests at the coupon, element or subcomponent level, or
alternatively by relevant existing data.
5.3
Static strength structural substantiation tests should be conducted on new structure unless the
critical load conditions are associated with structure that has been subjected to repeated loading and
environmental exposure. In this case either :
a.
The static test should be conducted on structure with prior repeated loading and environmental
exposure, or
b.
Coupon/Element/Subcomponent test data should be provided to assess the possible
degradation of static strength after application of repeated loading and environmental exposure, and
this degradation accounted for in the static test or in the analysis of the results of the static test of the
new structure.
5.4
The component static test may be performed in an ambient atmosphere if the effects of the
environment are reliably predicted by subcomponent and/or coupon tests and are accounted for in the
static test or in the analysis of the results of the static test.
5.5
The static test articles should be fabricated and assembled in accordance with production
specifications and processes so that the test articles are representative of production structure.
5.6
When the material and processing variability of the composite structure is greater than the
variability of current metallic structures, the difference should be considered in the static strength
substantiation by :
a.
Deriving proper allowables or design values for use in the analysis, and the analysis of the
results of supporting tests, or
b.
test.
Accounting for it in the static test when static proof of structure is accomplished by component
5.7
Composite structures that have high static margins of safety may be substantiated by analysis
supported by subcomponent, element and/or coupon testing.
5.8
It should be shown that impact damage that can be realistically expected from manufacturing
and service, but not more than the established threshold of detectability for the selected inspection
procedure, will not reduce the structural strength below ultimate load capability. This can be shown by
analysis supported by test evidence, or by tests at the coupon, element or subcomponent level.
6
Proof of Structure Fatigue/Damage Tolerance
6.1
The evaluation of composite structure should be based on the applicable requirements of CS
23.573(a). The nature and extent of analysis or tests on complete structures and/or portions of the
primary structure will depend upon applicable previous fatigue/damage tolerant designs, construction,
tests, and service experience on similar structures. In the absence of experience with similar designs,
approved structural development tests of components, sub components, and elements should be
performed. The following considerations are unique to the use of composite material systems and
should be observed for the method of substantiation selected. When selecting the damage tolerance
2D3
CS-23
BOOK 2
or safe life approach, attention should be given to geometry inspectability, good design practice, and
the type of damage/degradation of the structure under consideration.
6.2
Damage Tolerance (Fail-Safe) Evaluation
6.2.1 Structural details, elements, and subcomponents of critical structural areas should be tested
under repeated loads to define the sensitivity of the structure to damage growth. This testing can form
the basis for validating a no-growth approach to the damage tolerance requirements. The testing
should assess the effect of the environment on the flaw growth characteristics and the no-growth
validation. The environment used should be appropriate to the expected service usage. The repeated
loading should be representative of anticipated service usage. The repeated load testing should
include damage levels (including impact damage) typical of those that may occur during fabrication,
assembly, and in service, consistent with the inspection techniques employed. The damage tolerance
test articles should be fabricated and assembled in accordance with production specifications and
processes so that the test articles are representative of production structure.
6.2.2 The extent of initially detectable damage should be established and be consistent with the
inspection techniques employed during manufacture and in service. Flaw damage growth data should
be obtained by repeated load cycling of intrinsic flaws or mechanically introduced damage. The
number of cycles applied to validate a no-growth concept should be statistically significant, and may be
determined by load and/or life considerations. The growth or no growth evaluation should be performed
by analysis supported by test evidence, or by tests at the coupon, element or sub component level.
6.2.3 The extent of damage for residual strength assessments should be established. Residual
strength evaluation by component or sub component testing or by analysis supported by test evidence
should be performed considering that damage. The evaluation should demonstrate that the residual
strength of the structure is equal to or greater than the strength required for the specified design loads
(considered as ultimate). It should be shown that stiffness properties have not changed beyond
acceptable levels. For the no-growth concept, residual strength testing should be performed after
repeated load cycling.
6.2.4 An inspection programme should be developed consisting of frequency, extent, and methods
of inspection for inclusion in the maintenance plan. Inspection intervals should be established such that
the damage will be detected between the time it initially becomes detectable and the time at which the
extent of damage reaches the limits for required residual strength capability. For the case of no-growth
design concept, inspection intervals should be established as part of the maintenance programme. In
selecting such intervals the residual strength level associated with the assumed damage should be
considered.
6.2.5 The structure should be able to withstand static loads (considered as ultimate loads) which are
reasonably expected during the completion of the flight on which damage resulting from obvious
discrete sources occur (i.e. uncontained engine failures, etc.). The extent of damage should be based
on a rational assessment of service mission and potential damage relating to each discrete source.
6.2.6 The effects of temperature, humidity, and other environmental factors which may result in
material property degradation should be addressed in the damage tolerance evaluation.
6.3
Fatigue (Safe-Life) Evaluation. Fatigue substantiation should be accomplished by component
fatigue tests or by analysis supported by test evidence, accounting for the effects of the appropriate
environment. The test articles should be fabricated and assembled in accordance with production
specifications and processes so that the test articles are representative of production structure.
Sufficient component, subcomponent, element or coupon tests should be performed to establish the
fatigue scatter and the environmental effects. Component, subcomponent and/or element tests may be
used to evaluate the fatigue response of structure with impact damage levels typical of those that may
occur during fabrication, assembly, and in service, consistent with the inspection procedures
employed. The component fatigue test may be performed with an as-manufactured test article if the
effects of impact damage are reliably predicted by sub component and/or element tests and are
accounted for in the fatigue test or in analysis of the results of the fatigue test. It should be
2D4
BOOK 2
CS-23
demonstrated during the fatigue tests that the stiffness properties have not changed beyond
acceptable levels. Replacement lives should be established based on the test results. An appropriate
inspection programme should be provided.
7
Proof of Structure Flutter. The effects of repeated loading and environmental exposure on
stiffness, mass and damping properties should be considered in the verification of integrity against
flutter and other aeroelastic mechanisms. These effects may be determined by analysis supported by
test evidence, or by tests of the coupon, element or subcomponent level.
8
Additional Considerations
8.1
Impact Dynamics. The present approach in airframe design is to assure that occupants have
every reasonable chance of escaping serious injury under realistic and survivable impact conditions.
Evaluation may be by test or by analysis supported by test evidence. Test evidence includes, but is not
limited to, element or sub component tests and service experience. Analytical comparison to
conventional structure may be used where shown to be applicable.
8.2
Flammability. (See appropriate CS requirements in Table 1 of this AMC.)
8.3
Lightning Protection. (See appropriate CS requirements in Table 1 of this AMC.)
8.4
Protection of Structure. Weathering, abrasion, erosion, ultraviolet radiation, and chemical
environment (glycol, hydraulic fluid, fuel, cleaning agents, etc.) may cause deterioration in a composite
structure. Suitable protection against and/or consideration of degradation in material properties should
be provided for and demonstrated by test.
8.5
Quality Control. An overall plan should be established and should involve all relevant
disciplines (i.e. engineering, manufacturing and quality control). This quality control plan should be
responsive to special engineering requirements that arise in individual parts or areas as a result of
potential failure modes, damage tolerance and flaw growth requirements, loading, inspectability, and
local sensitivities to manufacture and assembly.
8.6
Production Specifications.
Specifications covering material, material processing, and
fabrication procedures should be developed to ensure a basis for fabricating reproducible and reliable
structure. The discrepancies permitted by the specifications should be substantiated by analysis
supported by test evidence, or tests at the coupon, element or subcomponent level.
8.7
Inspection and Maintenance. Maintenance manuals should include appropriate inspection,
maintenance and repair procedures for composite structures.
8.8
Substantiation of Repair. When repair procedures are provided in maintenance documentation,
it should be demonstrated by analysis and/or test, that methods and techniques of repair will restore
the structure to an airworthy condition.
2D5
CS-23
BOOK 2
AMC 23.603 (continued)
TABLE l
AMC Paragraphs
AMC Paragraphs and related CS texts

CS23 Paragraphs
Purpose
No relevant CS paragraph
Definitions
General
Materials and Fabrication Development
23.603
23.605
23.613
23.619
Proof of Structure Static
23.305
23.307(a)
Proof of Structure Fatigue/Damage Tolerance
23.573(a)
Proof of Structure Flutter
23.629
8
8.1
Additional Considerations
Impact Dynamics
8.2
Flammability
8.3
Lightning Protection
8.4
Protection Structure
8.5
8.6
Quality Control
Production Specifications
23.561
23.601
23.721
23.783(c)(5) and(e)
23.785
23.787
23.807
23.963(f)
23.609(a)
23.853
23.855
23.863
23.865
23.903(d)(2)(i) and (e)(2)
23.967(d)
23.1121(c)
23.1181
23.1182
23.1183
23.1189(b)(2)
23.1191
23.1193(c),(d),(e),(f)and(g)
23.609
23.867
23.954
23.609
23.1529
**
23.603
23.605
2D6
BOOK 2
CS-23
AMC 23.607(b)
Fasteners
Locking devices of fasteners installed in engine compartments or other compartments affected by
temperature and/or vibration should be of a type and material which is not influenced by such
temperatures encountered under normal operating conditions.
AMC 23.611
Accessibility provisions
1
Non-destructive inspection aids may be used to inspect structural elements where it is
impracticable to provide means for direct visual inspection if it is shown that the inspection is effective
and the inspection procedures are specified in the Maintenance Manual required by CS 23.1529.
2
For inspections repeated at short intervals (such as pre-flight or daily inspections) the means
of inspection should be simple, e.g. visual with the aid of easily removable or hinged access panels.
However, for inspections required only a few times, for example once or twice in the lifetime of the
aeroplane some disassembly of structure, e.g. deriveting a small skin panel may be acceptable.
AMC 23.613
Metallic strength properties and design values
Material specifications should be those contained in documents accepted either specifically by the
Agency or by having been prepared by an organisation or a person which the Agency accepts has the
necessary capabilities.
Such specifications are for example:
1
MilHDBK5 Metallic Materials and Elements for Flight Vehicle Structure
MilHDBK17 Plastics for Flight Vehicles
MilHDBK23 Composite Construction for Flight Vehicles
ANC18 Design of Wood Aircraft Structures
In defining design properties the material specification values must be modified and/or extended as
necessary by the designer to take account of manufacturing practices (e.g., methods of construction,
forming, machining and subsequent heat treatment ).
For composite structure CS23 AMC 23.603 contains guidance information relevant to the
requirements of CS 23.613.
AMC 23.629
Flutter
Flight flutter testing is the most satisfactory way of demonstrating freedom from flutter. Therefore CS
23.629 requires for new designed aeroplanes a rational flutter analysis, based on the results of a
ground vibration test, or a simplified analysis of rigidity and mass balance criteria (for specially defined
small aeroplanes), and flight flutter tests performed with well instrumented aeroplanes.
2D7
CS-23
BOOK 2
Unless the rational analysis or simplified analysis using Airframe and Equipment Engineering Report
No. 45, as specified in CS 23.629, and the model and assumption used therein have been verified by
some flight flutter tests, the validity of such analysis is unknown. The extent of flight flutter testing
depends on the analysis prepared and the experience with similar designs and should be agreed with
the Agency.
To show compliance with CS 23.629(g) and CS 23.629(h) needs an analysis using a verified basic
analysis.
Full scale flight flutter test should be carried out when the adequacy of flutter analysis has not been
confirmed by previous experience with aeroplanes having similar design features, and when
modifications to the type design have such a significant effect on the critical flutter modes that only
limited confidence could be given to rational analysis alone.
For modifications to the type design which could effect the flutter characteristics, and for derivatives of
existing aeroplanes freedom from flutter, control reversal and divergence may be shown by rational
analysis alone, if this analysis (including any Finite Element Model used) has been verified during the
certification of the basic aeroplane model.
Aeroplanes showing compliance with the damage-tolerance criteria of CS 23.573 with the extent of
damage for which residual strength is demonstrated may alter their stiffness and their natural
frequencies of main structural elements; for composite structures this can also happen due to
environmental conditions (temperature and humidity). If no exact measurements are available a
variation in stiffness of at least +/ 20% should be assumed.
FAA Advisory Circular AC 23.6291A and in addition for composite structures CS23 AMC 23.603,
provide additional information and guidance concerning an acceptable means of demonstrating
compliance with the requirements of CS 23.629.
AMC 23.671
Control systems General
In designing and manufacturing control systems attention should be given to minimise friction in the
systems and to avoid jamming and interference with other parts in operation, due to vibration and
accelerations.
AMC 23.683
Operation tests
One method, but not the only one, for showing compliance with the requirements of CS 23.683 is as
follows:
Conduct the control system operation tests by operating the controls from the pilot's compartment with
the entire system loaded so as to correspond to the limit control forces established by the regulations
for the control system being tested. The following conditions should be met:
(1)
Under limit load, check each control surface for travel and detail parts for deflection. This may
be accomplished as follows:
(i)
Support the control surface being tested while positioned at the neutral position.
(ii)
Load the surface using loads corresponding to the limit control forces established in the
regulations.
(iii)
Load the pilot's control until the control surface is just off the support.
2D8
BOOK 2
CS-23
(iv)
Determine the available travel which is the amount of movement of the surface from neutral
when the control is moved to the system stop.
(v)
The above procedure should be repeated in the opposite direction.
(vi)
The minimum control surface travel from the neutral position in each direction being measured
should be 10 percent of the control surface travel measured with no load on the surface.
Regardless of the amount of travel of the surface when under limit load, the aircraft should have
adequate flight characteristics as specified in paragraph 23.141. Any derivative aircraft of a previous
type certificated aircraft need not exceed the control surface travel of the original aircraft; however, the
flight characteristics should be fight tested to ensure compliance.
(2)
Under limit load, no signs of jamming or of any permanent set of any connection, bracket,
attachment, etc., may be present.
(3)
Friction should be minimised so that the limit control forces and torques specified by the
regulations may be met.
AMC 23.729(g)
Equipment Located in the Landing Gear Bay
In showing compliance with this requirement, consideration should include the effects that likely
damage from hazards arising from other items of equipment such as high brake temperature and
external sources such as slush, water and tyre burst/loose tyre tread will have on equipment/systems
located on the landing gear or in the landing gear bay that are essential to continued safe flight and
landing.
AMC 23.735(c)
Brakes
As specified in the requirement, the pressure on the wheel brake must not exceed the pressure that is
specified by the brake manufacturer. The requirement does not specify how the force that is applied to
the brake pedals is transmitted to the brakes. This means may be mechanical, hydraulic or some other
system, such as an electronic control system. By clarifying the applicability of the requirements to the
force applied to the wheel brake assembly, it can be applied to any braking system that is included in
the aeroplane design.
AMC 23.773
Pilot compartment view
See CS23 Flight Test Guide Paragraph 23.773 Pilot Compartment View.
AMC 23.775(f)
Windshields and windows
For windshields and windows that include a transparency heating system, compliance with CS
23.775(f) should include the use of CS 23.1309. Compliance with 23.1309 should be established by
identifying all of the probable malfunctions or single failures that may occur in the system. Any of the
identified malfunctions or failures that would result in an increase of the windshield temperature should
be corrected so that the temperature rise will not occur, or there should be a means to limit the
temperature rise to a value that is less than the value where the windshield, or the materials around it,
will ignite and burn. The importance of avoiding overheat conditions for acrylic materials must be
strongly emphasised particularly for stretched acrylics in relation to the relaxation temperature for the
2D9
CS-23
BOOK 2
material. It should be shown that there will be no occurrences of temperature rise that will reduce the
structural integrity of the windshield or the structure around it below the requirements of 23.775.
AMC 23.775(g)
Windshields and windows
To comply with this requirement, side panels and/or co-pilot panels may be used, provided it can be
shown that continued safe flight and landing is possible using these panels only, whilst remaining
seated at a pilot(s) station.
The requirement to safeguard the aeroplane against a bird strike with a relative velocity up to the
maximum approach flap speed is intended to represent the most critical approach situation. For
clarification the speed to be applied should be the maximum VFE for normal operation.
AMC 23.783(b)
Doors
When considering door location, potential hazards should be taken to include hot surfaces or sharp
objects a person is likely to contact when entering and exiting the aeroplane.
AMC 23.851(c)
Fire extinguishers
Acceptance of existing FAA AC 20-42C as AMC to 23.851(c) pending the results of research into
Halon replacement.
AMC 23.865
Fire protection of flight controls, engine mounts and other flight structure
Engine mounts or portions of the engine mounts that are not constructed of fire proof material should
be shielded to provide an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the use of fireproof materials.
Care should be taken that any shielding does not invalidate the type certification of the engine.
2D10
BOOK 2
CS23
AMCs SUBPART E
AMC 23.905(e)
Propellers
Ice shed from the forward fuselage and the wings may cause significant damage to pusher propellers
that are very close to the fuselage and well back from the aeroplane nose. Simlarly, ice shed from the
wing may cause significant damage to wind mounted pusher propellers. Account should be taken of
these possibilities.
The term during any operating condition may require tests also for intentional, or temporary
unintentional entry into icing conditions. This may also be shown by analysis or a combination of
both.
AMC CS 23.905(g)
Propeller
In most pusher propeller installations, the engine exhaust gases pass through the propeller disc.
Many factors affect the temperature of these gases when they contact the propellers and propeller
tolerance to these gases varies with propeller design and materials.
AMC CS 23.907(a)
Propeller Vibration
The definition of a conventional fixed pitch wooden propeller should be taken to include a propeller
with a wooden core and a simple cover of composite material, but not a propeller where the load
carrying structure is composite and the wood simply provides the form.
AMC CS 23.909(d)(1)
Turbo charger systems
Intercooler mounting provisions should have sufficient strength to withstand the flight and ground
loads for the aeroplane as a whole in combination with the local loads arising from the operation of
the engine.
AMC 23.959(a)
Unusable fuel supply
The term most adverse fuel feed condition is not intended to include radical or extreme manoeuvres
not likely to be encountered in operation. Judgement should be used in determining what
manoeuvres are appropriate to the type of aeroplane being tested.
A tank that is not needed to feed the engine under all flight conditions should be tested only for the
flight regime for which is was designed (e.g. cruise conditions). Tests for this kind of tank should
include slips and skids to simulate turbulence. Suitable instructions on the conditions under which
the tank may be used should be provided in a placard or in the Aeroplane Flight Manual.
Analyse the fuel system and tank geometry to determine the critical manoeuvres for the specific tanks
being considered, e.g. main, auxiliary, or cruise tanks and conduct only those tests considered
applicable to the aeroplane being tested. Particular attention should be directed towards the tank or
cell geometry and orientation with respect to the longitudinal axis of the aeroplane and location of
supply ports. Care should be taken in planning how the critical altitude manoeuvres are tested so
that the test procedure does not result in unconservative unusable fuel. The test manoeuvres should
2E1
CS23
BOOK 2
be selected using good judgement with regard to the kind of manoeuvres the aeroplane under test
will be subjected to in operation.
Ground tests using equipment which accurately simulate the aeroplane fuel system and inflight
inertial effects may be considered acceptable.
The quantity of fuel to be used for the tests should be sufficient for determination of unusable fuel by
allowing the manoeuvres described herein to be performed. The manoeuvres are to be repeated until
first evidence of engine malfunction. Repeated manoeuvres may result in fuel refilling some bays or
tanks; therefore, minimum fuel should be used.
For the tests, a malfunction will be considered when engine roughness, partial or total loss of power,
fuel pressure loss of below minimum, or fuel flow fluctuations are experienced.
To assure the most conservative unusable fuel supply value for each tank, another tank should be
selected at the first indication of fuel interruption. The fuel remaining in the test tank at the time of
malfunction should be drained, measured and recorded as unusable fuel. If header tanks (small
tanks that accumulate fuel from one or more fuel tanks and supply the engine directly) are utilised,
the fuel remaining in the header tank should be added to the unusable fuel but would not be shown
on the fuel gauge marking.
All tests should be conducted at a minimum practical weight or weight determined to be critical for the
aeroplane being tested.
The flight testing of a single-engine aeroplane with a one-tank system requires a separate temporary
fuel system to supply the engine after fuel starvation occurs.
The flight tests for the unusable fuel determination should be conducted as follows :
a.
Level flight at maximum recommended cruise
Maintain straight co-ordinated flight or bank angles not exceeding 5, until a malfunction
occurs.
Simulate turbulent air with half-ball width oscillations at approximately the natural
yawing frequency of the aeroplane, until a malfunction occurs.
Skidding turns with 1-ball skid. Hold for 30 seconds and then return to co-ordinated
flight for 1 minute.
Repeat until malfunction occurs. Direction of skidding turn should be in the direction most
critical with respect to fuel feed.
b.
Climb with maximum climb power and at a speed in accordance with CS 23.65
Straight co-ordinated flight or bank angle should not exceed 5, until a malfunction
occurs.
Simulate turbulent air with half-ball width oscillations at approximately the natural
yawing frequency of the aeroplane, until a malfunction occurs.
Skidding turns with 1-ball width skid or full rudder if 1-ball width cannot be obtained.
Hold for 30 seconds and then return to co-ordinated flight for 1 minute. Repeat until a
malfunction occurs.
Direction of skidding turn should be in the direction most critical with respect to fuel feed.
c.
Descent and Approach.
2E2
BOOK 2
CS23
Make a continuous power-off straight descent at VFE with gear and flaps down or follow emergency
descent procedures contained in the Aeroplane Flight Manual (AFM). Continue the test until the first
indication of interrupted fuel flow is observed.
Make a continuous power-off glide at 1.3 VSO until first indication of interrupted fuel flow is observed.
Simulate turbulent air or smooth air condition, whichever is most critical. Verify that with the
unusable fuel quantity established with critical tests no interruption of fuel flow will occur when
simultaneously making a rapid application of MCP and a transition to a speed in accordance with CS
23.65 from a power-off glide at 1.3 VSO.
Establish a power-off 1.3 VSO descent in a landing configuration. Maintain a 1 ball sideslip in
direction found to be critical for fuel system design with sufficient aileron to maintain constant heading
(or utilise the maximum side slip anticipated for the type of aeroplane). The test should be conducted
by slipping for 30 seconds. Continue the test until the first indication of interrupted fuel flow is
observed. Verify that with the unusable fuel quantity established with critical tests no interruption of
fuel flow will occur when slipping for 30 seconds, followed by a maximum power straight ahead
baulked landing climb for 1 minute.
If there are any other conditions which will result in higher unusable fuel quantities, these conditions
should also be examined.
AMC 23.961
Fuel system hot weather operation
Any fuel system that uses aviation gasoline is considered conductive to vapour formation. However a
fuel system having a fuel pump with suction lift, is more critical with respect to vapour formation.
Critical operating conditions which need to be considered during evaluation of hot weather tests
should include at least the maximum fuel flow, high angles of attack, maximum fuel temperature, etc.
The weight of the aeroplane should be the weight with critical fuel level, minimum crew necessary for
safe operation, and the ballast necessary to maintain the centre of gravity within allowable limits.
The critical fuel level in most cases would be low fuel; however, in some cases, full fuel may be
critical.
A flight test is normally necessary to complete the hot weather operation tests, however, if a ground
test is performed, it should closely simulate flight conditions.
Several methods of heating the fuel are available, such as circulating hot water or steam through a
heat exchanger placed in the fuel tank to increase the fuel temperature, placing black plastic or other
material on the fuel tanks in bright sunlight, or blowing hot air over the fuel tank. The fuel should not
be agitated or handled excessively during the heating operation. The heating process should be
completed in the shortest time period possible without causing excessive local temperature
conditions at the heat exchanger.
Raise the temperature of the fuel to the critical value as follows :
For aviation gasoline, 43 C 0 to + 3 C (110 F 0 to + 5 F)
For turbine fuel, 43 C 0 to + 3 C (110 F 0 to + 5 F)
For automobile gasoline, 43 C 3 to + 0 C (110 F 5 to + 0 F)
Testing should commence immediately after the fuel temperature reaches its required value.
The desirable outside air temperature measured 1.2 to 1.8 m (4 to 6 feet) above the runway surface
should be at least 29 C (85 F). If tests are performed in weather cold enough to interfere with the
2E3
CS23
BOOK 2
test results, steps should be taken to minimise the effects of cold temperature. This may be
accomplished by insulating fuel tank surfaces, as appropriate, fuel lines, and other fuel system
components from the cold air to simulate hot-day conditions.
The take-off and climb should be made as soon as possible after the fuel in the tank reaches the
required test temperature, and the engine oil temperature should be at least the minimum
recommended for take-off.
The airspeed in the climb should be the same as that used in demonstrating the requirements of CS
23.65, except the aeroplane should be at minimum weight with a critical quantity of fuel in the tanks.
Power settings should be maintained at the maximum approved levels for take-off and climb to
provide for the maximum fuel flow.
The climb should be continued to the maximum operating altitude approved for the aeroplane. If a
lower altitude is substantiated, appropriate limitations should be noted in the Aeroplane Flight
Manual.
The following data should be recorded :
Fuel temperature in the tank
Fuel pressure at the start of the test and continuously during climb noting any pressure
failure, fluctuation, or variations
Main and emergency fuel pump operation, as applicable
Pressure altitude
Ambient air temperature, total or static as applicable
Airspeed
Engine power, i.e. engine pressure ratio, gas generator speed, torque, rpm, turbine inlet
temperature, exhaust gas temperature, manifold pressure, and fuel flow, as appropriate
Comments on engine operation
Fuel quantities in the fuel tank(s) during take-off
Fuel vapour pressure (for automobile gasoline only), determined prior to test
Fuel grade or designation, determined prior to test
A fuel pressure failure is considered to occur when the fuel pressure decreases below the minimum
prescribed by the engine manufacturer or the engine does not operate satisfactorily.
The emergency fuel pump(s) should be inoperative if being considered for use as backup pump(s).
This test may be used to establish the maximum pressure altitude for operation with the pump(s) off.
If significant fuel pressure fluctuation occurs during testing of the critical flight condition but pressure
failure does not occur, additional testing should be considered to determine that pressure failure may
not occur during any expected operating mode. Also, the fuel system should be evaluated for vapour
formation during cruise flight at maximum approved altitude in smooth air at low to moderate power
setting and low fuel flow and idling approach to landing.
The hot weather tests may have to be repeated if the critical tank cannot be positively identified.
Any limitations on the outside air temperature as a result of hot weather tests should be included in
the Aeroplane Flight Manual.
2E4
BOOK 2
CS23
AMC 23.1011(b)
Oil System General
The minimum allowable usable oil capacity can be determined from the endurance and the maximum
allowable oil consumption. For either wet or dry sump engines, the maximum allowable fuel/oil
supply ratio is equal to the minimum obtainable fuel/oil consumption ratio. This is expressed
mathematically as follows:
Maximum Allowable Usable Fuel Capacity
Minimum Allowable Usable Oil Capacity
Minimum Obtainable Specific Fuel Consumptio n

Maximum Allowable Specific Oil Consumptio n
Therefore, for both wet and dry sump engines, fuel/oil supply ratio equal to or less than the minimum
obtainable fuel/oil consumption ratios are considered acceptable.
For twin engine installations, unless an adequate oil reserve is provided, the endurance of a twinengined aeroplane employing a fuel crossfeed system or common fuel tank should be established on
the basis that 50% of the specific total initial fuel capacity provided for a shutdown engine will be
available to the other engine. The engine power levels to be considered for a twin engine aeroplane
having a crossfeed system are those that will allow maximum published endurance with both engines
operating and adjusted as necessary (including mixture setting) to complete safely the flight with one
engine inoperative after 50% of the fuel supply is consumed.
AMC 23.1045(b)
Cooling test procedures for turbine engine-powered aeroplanes
For the cooling tests, a temperature is stabilised when its rate of change is less than 1C (2 F) per
minute.
AMC 23.1141(g)(2)
Powerplant controls: general
The required means to indicate the valve position may be of
a system which senses directly that the valve has attained the position selected, or
other indications in the cockpit which give the flight crew a clear indication, that the
valve has moved to the selected position.
Although a continuous display indicator would enable compliance with these requirements the
alternative use of lights showing the fully open and fully closed position or transit of the valves are
also acceptable means of compliance.
AMC 23.1143(g)
Engine controls
When throttle linkage separation occurs, the fuel control should go to a setting that will allow the pilot
to maintain level flight in the cruise configuration.
AMC 23.1147(b)
Mixture controls
When mixture linkage separation occurs, the mixture control should go to a full rich setting.
2E5
CS23
BOOK 2
AMC 23.1182
Nacelle areas behind firewalls
For each affected area that contains a retractable landing gear, compliance need only be shown with
the landing gear retracted.
AMC 23.1189(a)(5
Shut-off means
The hazardous amount of flammable fluid for this requirement is established as 1 l (one quart).
2E6
BOOK 2
CS23
AMC Subpart F
AMC 23.1351(a)(2)
Electrical Systems and Equipment, General
If for normal, utility or aerobatic category aeroplanes compliance is shown by electrical measurements,
the procedures should include sufficient testing to show that the electrical systems meet the
requirements of Paragraph 23.1351. When laboratory tests of the electrical system are conducted
(1)
The tests may be performed on a mock-up using the same generating equipment used in the
aeroplane;
(2)
The equipment should simulate the electrical characteristics of the distribution wiring and
connected loads to the extent necessary for rated test results; and
(3)
Laboratory generator drives should simulate the actual prime movers on the aeroplane with
respect to their reaction to generator loading, including loading due to faults.
AMC 23.1351(b)(5)(iv)
Electrical Systems and Equipment, General
Throwover switching refers to the means used for the selection of an alternative independent supply
to ensure the continued operation of equipment or systems. This system can be achieved by manual
or automatic means.
AMC 23.1419
Ice protection
Acceptance of FAA AC 23.1419-2 as AMC to CS 23.1419.
AMC 23.1431 (e)

Electronic equipment
For those installations where all warnings are not provided through the radio/audio equipment,
consideration should be given to the pilot(s) ability to hear and recognise warnings when headsets are
used, including noise cancelling headsets.
AMC 23.1459(b)
Flight Recorders
The phrase as far aft as practicable should be interpreted as a position sufficiently aft as to be
consistent with reasonable maintenance access and in a position to minimise the probability of damage
from crash impact and subsequent fire.
2F1
CS23
BOOK 2
2F2
BOOK 2
CS23
AMCs SUBPART G
AMC 23.1543(b)
Instrument Markings: General
FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 20-88A provides guidance on the marking of powerplant instruments.
AMC 23.1555(e)(2)
Control markings
Reciprocating engine mixture control and turbine engine condition levers incorporating fuel stopcocks,
or fuel stopcocks themselves, are considered to be emergency controls since they provide an
immediate means to stop engine combustion.
2G1
CS23
BOOK 2
2-G-2
BOOK 2
CS23
AMC - APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED DESIGN LOAD CRITERIA FOR CONVENTIONAL, SINGLE-ENGINE

AEROPLANES OF 2722 KG (6000 POUNDS) OR LESS MAXIMUM WEIGHT
AMC-A23.1
General
Definition of aspect ratio of wing, horizontal and vertical tail, and of the tail volume factor.
The design load criteria in Appendix A are limited to conventional aeroplanes of which wing and tail
surfaces do not exceed certain aspect ratio and of which the horizontal tail configuration has a tail
volume of not less than a specified value.
The aspect ratio of the wing and of the horizontal tail as specified in A23.1(c) and (d) is defined as
follows:
AR =
b2
S
where:
b = span of the particular surface
S = area of the particular surface
The aspect ratio of the vertical tail as specified in A23.1(e) is defined as follows:
AR =
h2vt
2Svt
where:
hvt = height of vertical tail
Svt = area of vertical tail
The tail volume is defined herein as:
Vt =
S ht 1ht
S w MAC
where:
Sht
Sw
1ht
MAC
=
=
=
=
area of horizontal tail

area of wing
distance between neutral point of horizontal tail and the cg-point of the aeroplane
mean aerodynamic chord of the wing
As a simplification 1ht can be chosen as distance between 25% C of the wing and 25% C of the
horizontal tail.
Values for spans, areas and heights to be inserted in the formulae should be agreed with the Agency in
respect to the limits of applicability in Appendix A.
2Appx A1
CS23
BOOK 2
AMC-A23.11(c)
Load distribution on tail surfaces
To ensure adequate bending and torsional strength of the tail structure, the most severe loads should
be considered in association with the most critical centre of pressure position for that structural part.
In most cases three centre of pressure positions may result in the most critical loads for the main parts
of the structure:
1
To cover the torsion load case select the centre of pressure at the leading edge.
2
To cover the bending load case for the main spar select the centre of pressure at the main
spar position.
3
To cover the bending load case for the auxiliary spar select the centre of pressure at the
auxiliary spar position.
2Appx A2
CS-23
ACCEPTABLE MEANS
OF COMPLIANCE
FLIGHT TEST GUIDE

(FTG)
FOR CERTIFICATION OF
CS-23 AEROPLANES
2-FTG-i
2-FTG-ii
CS23
BOOK 2
FLIGHT TEST GUIDE
FOR CERTIFICATION OF CS23 AEROPLANES
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 GENERAL
Paragraph
Referenced Book 1 Paragraph
1
2
35
PARAGRAPH 23.1
PARAGRAPH 23.3
RESERVED
APPLICABILITY
AEROPLANE CATEGORIES
CHAPTER 2 FLIGHT
Section 1 GENERAL
6
7
8
9
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
23.21
23.23
23.25
23.29
10
11
1215
PARAGRAPH 23.31
PARAGRAPH 23.33
RESERVED
PROOF OF COMPLIANCE
LOAD DISTRIBUTION LIMITS
WEIGHT LIMITS
EMPTY WEIGHT AND CORRESPONDING CENTRE
OF GRAVITY
REMOVABLE BALLAST
PROPELLER SPEED AND PITCH LIMITS
Section 2 PERFORMANCE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3138
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.45
23.49
23.51
23.53
GENERAL
STALLING SPEED
TAKE-OFF SPEEDS
TAKE-OFF PERFORMANCE
23.55
23.57
23.59
23.61
23.65
23.66
23.67
23.71
23.75
23.77
ACCELERATE-STOP DISTANCE
TAKE-OFF PATH
TAKE-OFF DISTANCE AND TAKE-OFF RUN
TAKE-OFF FLIGHT PATH
CLIMB: ALL ENGINES OPERATING
TAKE-OFF CLIMB, ONE ENGINE INOPERATIVE
CLIMB: ONE ENGINE INOPERATIVE
GLIDE (SINGLE-ENGINED AEROPLANES)
LANDING
BALKED LANDING CLIMB
Section 3 FLIGHT CHARACTERISTICS

39
4044
PARAGRAPH 23.141 GENERAL

RESERVED
Section 4 CONTROLLABILITY AND MANOEUVRABILITY
2FTGC1
CS-23
BOOK2
CONTENTS (continued)
Paragraph
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
5362
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.143
23.145
23.147
23.149
23.151
23.153
23.155
23.157
GENERAL
LONGITUDINAL CONTROL
DIRECTIONAL AND LATERAL CONTROL
MINIMUM CONTROL SPEED
ACROBATIC MANOEUVRES
CONTROL DURING LANDINGS
ELEVATOR CONTROL FORCE IN MANOEUVRES
RATE OF ROLL
Section 5 TRIM
63
6469
PARAGRAPH 23.161 TRIM

RESERVED
Section 6 STABILITY
70
71
72
73
74
75
7685

PARAGRAPH 23.173 STATIC LONGITUDINAL STABILITY
PARAGRAPH 23.175 DEMONSTRATION OF STATIC LONGITUDINAL
STABILITY
PARAGRAPH 23.177 STATIC DIRECTIONAL AND LATERAL STABILITY
PARAGRAPH 23.179 RESERVED
PARAGRAPH 23.181 DYNAMIC STABILITY
RESERVED
Section 7 STALLS
86
87
88
89
9099
PARAGRAPH 23.201 WINGS LEVEL STALL

PARAGRAPH 23.203 TURNING FLIGHT AND ACCELERATED
TURNING STALLS
PARAGRAPH 23.207 STALL WARNING
RESERVED
Section 8 SPINNING
100
101105
PARAGRAPH 23.221 SPINNING

RESERVED
Section 9 GROUND AND WATER HANDLING CHARACTERISTICS

106
107
108
109
110
111119
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.231
23.233
23.235
23.237
23.239
LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AND CONTROL

DIRECTIONAL STABILITY AND CONTROL
OPERATION ON UNPAVED SURFACES
OPERATION ON WATER
SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS
2FTGC2
CS23
BOOK 2
Paragraph
Section 10 MISCELLANEOUS FLIGHT REQUIREMENTS

120
121
122131
PARAGRAPH 23.251 VIBRATION AND BUFFETING

PARAGRAPH 23.253 HIGH SPEED CHARACTERISTICS
RESERVED
CHAPTER 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
Section 1 GENERAL
132
133137
PARAGRAPH 23.629 FLUTTER

RESERVED
Section 2 CONTROL SYSTEMS

138
138a
139
140
140a
141
142
143
144153
PARAGRAPH 23.671 GENERAL (RESERVED)

PARAGRAPH 23.672 STABILITY AUGMENTATION AND AUTOMATIC
AND POWER OPERATED SSTEMS (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.677 TRIM SYSTEMS
PARAGRAPH 23.679 CONTROL SYSTEM LOCKS
PARAGRAPH 23.691 ARTIFICAL STALL BARRIER SYSTEM (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.697 WING FLAP CONTROLS (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.699 WING FLAP POSITION INDICATOR (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.701 FLAP INTERCONNECTION (RESERVED)
RESERVED
Section 3 LANDING GEAR

154
155
156160
PARAGRAPH 23.729 LANDING GEAR EXTENSION AND RETRACTION

SYSTEM
PARAGRAPH 23.735 BRAKES (RESERVED)
RESERVED
Section 4 PERSONNEL AND CARGO ACCOMMODATIONS

161
162
162a
163
163a
164
165
166
167175
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
23.771
23.773
23.775
23.777
23.785
PILOT COMPARTMENT (RESERVED)

PILOT COMPARTMENT VIEW
WINDSHIELDS AND WINDOWS
COCKPIT CONTROLS (RESERVED)
SEATS, BERTHS, LITTERS, SAFETY BELTS AND
SHOULDER HARNESSES
PARAGRAPH 23.803 EMERGENCY EVACUATION
PARAGRAPH 23.807 EMERGENCY EXITS
PARAGRAPH 23.831 VENTILATION
RESERVED
2FTGC3
CS-23
BOOK2
Paragraph
Section 5 PRESSURISATION
176
177
178188
PARAGRAPH 23.841 PRESSURISED CABINS

PARAGRAPH 23.843 PRESSURISATION TESTS (RESERVED)
RESERVED
CHAPTER 4 POWERPLANT
Section 1 GENERAL
189
190
191
192
192a
193
194
195
196
197206
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.901
23.903
23.905
23.909
23.925
23.929
23.933
23.939
23.943
INSTALLATION (RESERVED)
ENGINES
PROPELLERS
TURBO SUPER-CHARGERS
PROPELLER CLEARANCE (RESERVED)
ENGINE INSTALLATION ICE PROTECTION
REVERSING SYSTEMS
POWERPLANT OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
NEGATIVE ACCELERATION
Section 2 FUEL SYSTEM

207
208
209220
PARAGRAPH 23.959 UNUSABLE FUEL SUPPLY

PARAGRAPH 23.961 FUEL SYSTEM HOT WEATHER OPERATION
RESERVED
Section 3 FUEL SYSTEM COMPONENTS

221
222237
PARAGRAPH 23.1001 FUEL JETTISONING SYSTEM

RESERVED
Section 4 OIL SYSTEM

238
239244
PARAGRAPH 23.1027 PROPELLER FEATHERING SYSTEM

RESERVED
Section 5 COOLING
245
246
247
248
249254

PARAGRAPH 23.1043 COOLING TESTS
PARAGRAPH 23.1045 COOLING TEST PROCEDURES FOR TURBINE ENGINE POWERED AEROPLANES
PARAGRAPH 23.1047 COOLING TEST PROCEDURES FOR
RECIPROCATING ENGINE-POWERED AEROPLANES
RESERVED
2FTGC4
CS23
BOOK 2
Paragraph
Section 6 INDUCTION SYSTEM

255
256
257265
PARAGRAPH 23.1091 AIR INDUCTION

PARAGRAPH 23.1093 INDUCTION SYSTEM ICING PROTECTION
RESERVED
Section 7 POWERPLANT CONTROLS AND ACCESSORIES

266
267
268
269278
PARAGRAPH 23.1141 POWERPLANT CONTROLS: GENERAL

PARAGRAPH 23.1145 IGNITION SWITCHES (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1153 PROPELLER FEATHERING CONTROLS
RESERVED
Section 8 POWERPLANT FIRE PROTECTION

279
280285
PARAGRAPH 23.1189 SHUTOFF MEANS

RESERVED
CHAPTER 5 EQUIPMENT
Section 1 GENERAL
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293299
(RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.1301 FUNCTION AND INSTALLATION

23.1303
23.1305
23.1307
23.1309
FLIGHT AND NAVIGATION INSTRUMENTS

POWERPLANT INSTRUMENTS
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (RESERVED)
EQUIPMENT, SYSTEMS, AND INSTALLATIONS
Section 2 INSTRUMENTS: INSTALLATION

300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311318
PARAGRAPH 23.1311 ELECTRONIC DISPLAY INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS

PARAGRAPH 23.1321 ARRANGEMENT AND VISIBILITY (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1322 WARNING, CAUTION, AND ADVISORY LIGHTS
(RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1323 AIRSPEED INDICATING SYSTEM
PARAGRAPH 23.1325 STATIC PRESSURE SYSTEM
PARAGRAPH 23.1326 PITOT HEAT INDICATION SYSTEMS (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1327 MAGNETIC DIRECTION INDICATOR (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1329 AUTOMATIC PILOT SYSTEM
PARAGRAPH 23.1331 INSTRUMENTS USING A POWER SUPPLY
(RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1335 FLIGHT DIRECTOR SYSTEMS (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1337 POWERPLANT INSTRUMENTS
RESERVED
2FTGC5
CS-23
BOOK2
Paragraph
Section 3 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT

319
320
321
322
323
324328
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.1351
23.1353
23.1357
23.1361
23.1367
GENERAL (RESERVED)
STORAGE BATTERY DESIGN AND INSTALLATION
CIRCUIT PROTECTIVE DEVICES (RESERVED)
MASTER SWITCH ARRANGEMENT (RESERVED)
SWITCHES (RESERVED)
Section 4 LIGHTS
329
330
331335.
PARAGRAPH 23.1381 INSTRUMENT LIGHTS (RESERVED)

PARAGRAPH 23.1383 LANDING LIGHTS (RESERVED)
RESERVED
Section 5 SAFETY EQUIPMENT

336
337
338
339
340349
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.1411
23.1415
23.1416
23.1419
GENERAL (RESERVED)
DITCHING EQUIPMENT (RESERVED)
PNEUMATIC DEICER BOOT SYSTEM
ICE PROTECTION
Section 6 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357364
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
23.1431
23.1435
23.1441
23.1447
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT (RESERVED)

HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS (RESERVED)
OXYGEN EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY (RESERVED)
EQUIPMENT STANDARDS FOR OXYGEN
DISPENSING UNITS (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1449 MEANS FOR DETERMINING USE OF OXYGEN
(RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1457 COCKPIT VOICE RECORDERS (RESERVED)
PARAGRAPH 23.1459 FLIGHT RECORDERS (RESERVED)
RESERVED
CHAPTER 6 OPERATING LIMITATIONS AND INFORMATION
Section 1 GENERAL
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
23.1501
23.1505
23.1507
23.1511
23.1513
23.1519
23.1521
GENERAL
AIRSPEED LIMITATIONS
MANOEUVRING SPEED
FLAP EXTENDED SPEED
MINIMUM CONTROL SPEED
WEIGHT AND CENTRE OF GRAVITY
POWERPLANT LIMITATIONS (RESERVED)
23.1523
23.1524
23.1525
23.1527
MINIMUM FLIGHT CREW

MAXIMUM PASSENGER SEATING CONFIGURATION
KINDS OF OPERATION
MAXIMUM OPERATING ALTITUDE
2FTGC6
CS23
BOOK 2
Paragraph
377386
.
RESERVED
Section 2 MARKINGS AND PLACARDS

387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
23.1541
23.1543
23.1545
23.1547
23.1549
23.1551
23.1553
23.1555
23.1557
396
397
398
399
400409
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.1559
23.1561
23.1563
23.1567
GENERAL
INSTRUMENT MARKINGS: GENERAL
AIRSPEED INDICATOR
MAGNETIC DIRECTION INDICATOR
POWERPLANT INSTRUMENTS (RESERVED)
OIL QUANTITY INDICATOR (RESERVED)
FUEL QUANTITY INDICATOR (RESERVED)
CONTROL MARKINGS
MISCELLANEOUS MARKINGS AND PLACARDS
(RESERVED)
OPERATING LIMITATIONS PLACARD
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
AIRSPEED PLACARDS
FLIGHT MANOEUVRE PLACARD
Section 3 AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL AND APPROVED MANUAL MATERIAL

410
411
412
413
414
415424
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
PARAGRAPH
RESERVED
23.1581
23.1583
23.1585
23.1587
23.1589
GENERAL
OPERATING LIMITATIONS
OPERATING PROCEDURES
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
LOADING INFORMATION
Appendix 1
POWER AVAILABLE
Appendix 2
CLIMB DATA REDUCTION
Appendix 3
STATIC MINIMUM CONTROL SPEED EXTRAPOLATION TO SEA LEVEL
Appendix 4
CS23 MANUALS, MARKINGS & PLACARDS CHECKLIST
Appendix 5
RESERVED
Appendix 6
SAMPLE KINDS OF OPERATING EQUIPMENT LIST
Appendix 7
USEFUL INFORMATION
Appendix 8
CONVERSION FACTORS TABLE
Appendix 9
AIRSPEED CALIBRATIONS
Appendix 10 GUIDE FOR DETERMINING CLIMB PERFORMANCE AFTER STC MODIFICATIONS
2FTGC7
CS-23
BOOK2
2FTGC8
CS23
BOOK 2
CHAPTER 1 GENERAL
PARAGRAPH 23.1 APPLICABILITY
a.
Explanation
(1)
Aeroplane Categories. Paragraph 23.1(a) is introductory and prescribes the aeroplane
categories eligible for certification under CS-23. Applicants should refer to Part 21 for certification
procedures.
(2)
Design Data. Part 21.20 requires an applicant to demonstrate compliance by some acceptable
means even though the Agency has previously certificated an identical alteration for someone else and
has the supporting data on file. Design data submitted with an application for certification is not
releasable to the public or any other applicant without the consent of the data holder.
PARAGRAPH 23.3 AEROPLANE CATEGORIES
a.
Explanation. For Normal/Utility Category as well as for Commuter Category Aeroplanes Stalls
(except whip stalls) are approved manoeuvres. In this context approved stalls are to be understood to
be stalls as defined in 23.49, 23.201 and 23.203.
2FTG11
CS-23
BOOK 2
2FTG12
BOOK 2
CS23
CHAPTER 2 FLIGHT
Section 1 GENERAL
6
PARAGRAPH 23.21 PROOF OF COMPLIANCE
a.
Explanation
(1)
Determining Compliance. This paragraph provides a degree of latitude for the Agency test
team in selecting the combination of tests or inspections required to demonstrate compliance with the
regulations. Engineering tests are designed to investigate the overall capabilities and characteristics of
the aeroplane throughout its operating envelope and should include sufficient combinations of weight,
centre of gravity, altitude, temperature, airspeed, etc., necessary to define the envelope and show
compliance within. Testing should be sufficiently rigorous to define the limits of the entire operating
envelope and establish compliance with the regulations at these points. If compliance cannot be
established between these points, additional testing should be conducted to determine compliance.
Testing should confirm normal and emergency procedures, performance information, and operating
limitations that are to be included in the Aeroplane Flight Manual (AFM).
(2)
Flight Tests. Part 21.35 requires, in part, that the applicant make flight tests and report the
results of the flight tests prior to official Agency Type Inspection testing. After the applicant has
submitted sufficient data to the Agency showing that compliance can be met, the Agency will conduct
any inspections, flight, or ground tests required to verify the applicant's test results. Compliance may
be based on the applicant's engineering data, and a spot check or validation through Agency flight
tests. The Agency testing should obtain validation at critical combinations of proposed flight variables
if compliance cannot be established using engineering judgement from the combinations investigated.
(3)
Use of Ballast. Ballast may be carried during the flight tests whenever it is necessary to
achieve a specific weight and centre of gravity (c.g.) location. Consideration should be given to the
vertical as well as horizontal location of the ballast in cases where it may have an appreciable effect on
the flying qualities of the aeroplane. The strength of the supporting structures should be considered to
preclude their failure as a result of the anticipated loads that may be imposed during the particular
tests.
(4)
Flight Test Tolerances. The purpose of the tolerances specified in 23.21(a)(5) is to allow for
variations in flight test values from which data are acceptable for reduction to the value desired. They
are not intended for routine test scheduling at the lower weights, or to allow for compliance to be
shown at less than the critical condition; nor are they to be considered as allowable inaccuracy of
measurement (such as in an airspeed calibration). Where variation in the parameter on which a
tolerance is allowed will have an effect on the results of the test, the result should be corrected to the
most critical value of that parameter within the operating envelope being approved. If such a
correction is impossible or impractical, the average test conditions should assure that the measured
characteristics represent the actual critical value.
(5)
Following are additional tolerances that are acceptable:

Item
Tolerance
Airspeed
Power
Wind (takeoff and
landing tests)
5,6 km/h (3 kt) or 3%, whichever is greater

5%
As low as possible but not to exceed approximately 12% VS1
or 19 km/h (10 kt), whichever is lower, along the runway
measured at a height of 1,8 m (6 ft) above the runway
surface. At higher wind velocities, the data may be unreliable
due to wind variations and non-smooth flight conditions.
(6)
The following list indicates cases in which corrections to a standard value of the parameter are
normally allowed:
2FTG21
CS23
BOOK 2
Test
Weight
Density
Power
Airspeed
Other
Takeoff Performance
Wind, runway gradient
Landing Performance
Wind, runway gradient
Stall Speed
Climb Performance
Vmc
Acceleration
(7)
Function and Reliability Test. Part 21.35(b)(2) specifies the requirements of Function and
Reliability Tests, which are required for aircraft with a Maximum Certificated Weight over 2 722 kg
(6 000 lb).
b.
Procedures
(1)
Test Plan. Efforts should begin early in the certification programme to provide assistance to
the applicant to ensure coverage of all certification requirements. The applicant should develop a test
plan which includes the required instrumentation.
(2)
Instrument Calibration. Test instrumentation (transducers, indicators, etc.) should be
calibrated (removed from the aeroplane and bench checked by an approved method in an approved
facility) within 6 months of the tests. When electronic recording devices are used, such as
oscillographs, data loggers, and other electronic data acquisition devices, pre-flight and post flight
parameter re-calibrations should be run for each test flight to ensure that none of the parameters have
shifted from their initial zero settings. Critical transducers and indicators for critical tests (for example,
airspeed indicators and pressure transducers for flight tests to VD) should be calibrated within 60 days
of the test in addition to the other requirements mentioned above. The instrument hysteresis should be
known; therefore, readings at suitable increments should be taken in both increasing and decreasing
directions. Calibration records, like the one shown below, should be signed by the agent of the repair
or overhaul facility doing the work and be available to the test pilot prior to beginning test flying. It
should be emphasised that these calibrations must be accomplished at an approved facility. For
example, using a leak checker to calibrate an airspeed indicator, whether in or out of the aeroplane, is
not acceptable.
SAMPLE PORTION OF AIRSPEED INDICATOR CALIBRATION
XYZ INSTRUMENT SERVICE, INC.
ABC CITY AIRPORT
-APPROVED REPAIR STATION NO. 1234
8/12/80
P/N 1701DX8-04
S/N AF55-17044
A/S Ind.
Master Test
40
50
60
70
80
KNOTS
Ascent
Indicator Reads
380
490
595
700
800
2FTG22
Descent
Indicator Reads
390
505
610
710
810
BOOK 2
CS23
Chapter 2 Paragraph 23.21 (continued)
(3)
Use of Ballast
(i)
Loading. Ballast loading of the aeroplane can be accomplished in a number of ways to
achieve a specific weight and c.g. location as long as the loading remains within the physical confines
of the aeroplane. In flight test work, loading problems will occasionally be encountered making it
difficult to obtain the desired c.g. location. Those cases may require loading in engine compartments
or other places not designed for load carrying. When this condition is encountered, care should be
taken to ensure that local structural stresses are not exceeded or that aeroplane flight characteristics
are not changed due to changes in moments of inertia caused by adding a very long arm (tail post,
etc.).
(ii)
Solid and Liquid Ballast. There are basically two types of ballast that may be used in
aeroplane loading: solid or liquid. The solids are usually high-density materials such as lead or
sandbags, while the liquid is usually water. In critical tests, the ballast should be loaded in a manner
so that disposal in flight can be accomplished and be located at a point which will produce a significant
c.g. shift when jettison takes place. In any case, the load should be securely attached in its loaded
position. In aeroplanes with multiple fuel tank arrangements, the fuel load and distribution should be
considered for weight and c.g. control.
(4)
Function and Reliability Tests, for aeroplanes over 2722 kg (6 000 lb). Maximum Certificated
Weight
(i)
A comprehensive and systematic check of all aircraft components should be made to assure
that they perform their intended function and are reliable.
(ii)
Function and reliability (F&R) testing should be accomplished on an aircraft which is in
conformity with the approved production configuration. F&R testing should follow the type certification
testing to assure that significant changes resulting from type certification tests can be incorporated on
the aircraft prior to F&R tests.
(iii)
All components of the aircraft should be periodically operated in sequences and combinations
likely to occur in service. Ground inspection should be made at appropriate intervals to identify
potential failure conditions; however, no special maintenance beyond that described in the aircraft
maintenance manual should be allowed.
(iv)
A complete record of defects and failures should be maintained along with required servicing
of aircraft fluid levels. Results of this record should be consistent with inspection and servicing
information provided in the aircraft maintenance manual.
(v)
A certain portion of the F&R test program may emphasise systems, operational conditions, or
environments found particularly marginal during type certification tests.
PARAGRAPH 23.23 LOAD DISTRIBUTION LIMITS
a.
Explanation
(1)
C.G. Envelope. The test tolerance of 7% of the total c.g. range (given in 23.21) is intended to
allow some practical relief for in flight c.g. movement. This relief is only acceptable when the test data
general scatter is on either side of the limiting c.g. or when c.g. correction from test c.g. to limit c.g. is
acceptable. Sufficient points inside the desired weight and balance envelope should be explored to
ensure that the operational pilot will not be placed in an unsafe condition. Should unsatisfactory flight
characteristics be present, the limits of the envelope should be reduced to ensure safe margins.
Where variation in the c.g. position may have a significant effect on the result of a test (e.g. Spins and
VMCs), the result should be corrected to the most critical c.g. position within the operating limits to be
approved. If such a correction is impractical or may be unreliable, the actual test should ensure that
the measured characteristics represent the critical value.
2FTG23
CS23
BOOK 2
(2)
Narrow Utility C.G. Envelope. Some utility category aeroplanes, for which spin approval is
sought, may have a very narrow c.g. range. If a limited fuel load is required to achieve the narrow c.g.
envelope, the test pilot should ensure that loading instructions or aids (such as fuel tank tabs) will
enable the operational pilot to stay in the approved c.g. envelope.
(3)
Gross Weight Effects. The test pilot is expected to determine the effect that gross weight,
including low-fuel state, may have on the aeroplane's flight characteristics. If it is found the flight
characteristics would be adversely affected, tests should be performed for trim, stability, and
controllability including VMC, stalls, and spins under the most adverse weight condition. Separate
loading restrictions may apply to certain flight operations, such as spins.
(4)
Lateral Loads. If possible loading conditions can result in a significant variation of the lateral
centre of gravity, this lateral range of centre of gravity must be established:
(i)
the limits selected by the applicant;
(ii)
the limits for which the structure has been proven; or
(iii)
the limits for which compliance with all the applicable flight requirements has been
demonstrated. The demonstrated weight and c.g. combinations should consider asymmetric loadings.
When investigating the effects of asymmetric lateral loads the following paragraphs in this FTG
represent applicable flight requirements:
23.143
23.147
23.151
23.157
23.149
23.161
23.177
23.201
23.203(b)(1)
23.221
23.233
23.701
Controllability and Manoeuvrability, General

Directional and Lateral Control
Aerobatic Manoeuvres
Rate of Roll
Minimum Control Speed
Trim
Static Directional and Lateral Stability
Wings Level Stall
Turning Flight and accelerated turning stalls
Spinning
Directional Stability and Control
Flap Interconnection
b.
Procedures. None.
PARAGRAPH 23.25 WEIGHT LIMITS
a.
Explanation
(1)
Maximum Weight Limits. The maximum weight may be limited in three ways: at the election of
the applicant, by structural design requirements, or by flight requirements.
(2)
Maximum Weight Exceptions. The regulations concerning design maximum weight allows an
exception in that some of the structural requirements may be met at a lesser weight known as a design
landing weight which is defined in 23.473. Also, in many cases, due to changes in the operational
requirements of an owner/operator, the need arises to modify and substantiate the structure for an
increase in maximum weight and/or maximum landing weight. Any one of these increases affects the
aeroplane basic loads and structural integrity and could affect the limitations and performance.
If an aeroplane was certificated with maximum landing weight equal to maximum weight, some
applicants, via the supplemental type certificate (STC) process, take advantage of the 5 percent
difference between design landing and design maximum weight permitted by paragraph 23.473(b) so
that re-substantiation of the landing gear for landing loads is not required when increasing the
2FTG24
BOOK 2
CS23
maximum weight by as much as 5 percent. For those programs involving more than 5 percent increase
in maximum weight, some re-substantiation of the landing gear should be accomplished.
Other applicants are replacing piston engines with turbopropeller engines, thus requiring that gasoline
be replaced with jet fuel, which weighs as much as 17 percent more. In some cases, the quantity of
fuel is being increased at the same time as engine replacement, but the maximum zero fuel weight
remains the same.
All of the above types of modifications should be investigated to verify that critical loads have not
increased or that those loads which have increased are capable of being carried by the existing or
modified structure.
(3)
Weight, Altitude, Temperature (WAT). For all aeroplanes with a maximum take-off weight
exceeding 2722 kg (6000 lb) and turbine engined aeroplanes a WAT chart may be used as a
maximum weight limitation.
(4)
Ramp Weight. The applicant may elect to use a ramp weight provided compliance is shown
with each applicable paragraph of CS 23. Ramp weight is the takeoff weight at brake release plus an
increment of fuel weight consumed during engine start, taxiing, and runup. Generally, this increment of
fuel should not exceed 1% of the maximum permissible flight weight up to a maximum of 57 kg (125
lb). The pilot should be provided a means to reasonably determine the aeroplane gross weight at
brake release for takeoff. A fuel totaliser is one way of providing the pilot with fuel on board.
Alternately, a mental calculation by the pilot may be used, if the pilot is provided the information to
make the calculation and the calculation is not too complex. Normally, fuel for engine start and runup
will be sufficiently close to a fixed amount that taxi can be considered as the only variable. If the pilot
is provided with taxi fuel burn rate in kg/minute (lb/minute), then the resulting mental calculation is
acceptable. The pilot will be responsible to ensure that the takeoff gross weight limitation is complied
with for each takeoff, whether it be limited by altitude, temperature, or other criteria. The maximum
ramp weight should be shown as a limitation on the Type Certificate (TC) Data Sheet and in the AFM.
(5)
Lowest Maximum Weight. 23.25(a)(2)(i) and 23.25(a)(2)(ii) require that each of the two
conditions, (i) and (ii), must be considered and that the maximum weight, as established, not be less
than the weight under either condition. This has to be shown with the most critical combinations of
required equipment for the type of operation for which certification is requested.
(6)
Placarding of Seats. When establishing a maximum weight in accordance with 23.25(a)(2)(i),
one or more seats may be placarded to a weight of less than 77 kg (170 lb) (or less than 86 kg (190 lb)
for utility and aerobatic category aeroplanes). An associated requirement is 23.1557(b). The AFM
loading instructions, required by 23.1589(b), should be specific in addressing the use of the placarded
seats.
b.
Procedures. None.
PARAGRAPH 23.29 EMPTY WEIGHT AND CORRESPONDING CENTRE OF GRAVITY
a.
Explanation
(1)
Fixed Ballast. Fixed ballast refers to ballast that is made a permanent part of the aeroplane as
a means of controlling the c.g.
(2)
Equipment List. Compliance with 23.29(b) may be accomplished by the use of an equipment
list which defines the installed equipment at the time of weighing and the weight, arm, and moment of
the equipment.
b.
Procedures. For prototype and modified test aeroplanes, it is necessary to establish a known
basic weight and c.g. position (by weighing) from which the extremes of weight and c.g. travel required
by the test program may be calculated. Normally, the test crew will verify the calculations.
2FTG25
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter 2 (continued)
10
PARAGRAPH 23.31 REMOVABLE BALLAST
a.
Explanation. This regulation is associated only with ballast which is installed in certificated
aeroplanes under specified conditions. The ballasting of prototype aeroplanes so that flight tests can
be conducted at certain weight and c.g. conditions is covered under 23.21, paragraph 6, of this AMC
b.
Fluid Cargo. For those aeroplanes configured to carry fluid cargo (such as agricultural
chemical tanks, minnow tanks, slurry tanks, etc.), aeroplane handling qualities should be evaluated for
controllability and non exceedance of limitations at full and the most critical partial fluid loads. Also,
when so equipped, the effects of in-flight jettison or dumping of the fluid load should be evaluated to
establish that the pilot is able to exercise sufficient control to prevent unacceptably large flight path
excursions or exceedance of operational/structural limits.
11
PARAGRAPH 23.33 PROPELLER SPEED AND PITCH LIMITS
a.
General. Paragraph 23.33(a) requires that propeller speed and pitch be limited to values that
will ensure safe operation under normal operating conditions.
b.
Procedures. The following applicable tests should be conducted:
(1)
Fixed Pitch Propellers
(i)
Maximum Revolutions per Minute (R.P.M.). The regulation is self-explanatory.
(ii)
Static R.P.M. Determine the average static r.p.m. with the aeroplane stationary and the engine
operating at full throttle under a no-wind condition. The mixture setting should be the same as used for
maximum r.p.m. determination. If the wind is light (5 knots or less), this static r.p.m. can be the
average obtained with a direct crosswind from the left and a direct crosswind from the right.
(iii)
Data Sheet R.P.M. Determination. For fixed pitch propellers, the static r.p.m. range is listed in
the TC Data Sheet; for example, not more than 2 200 r.p.m. and not less than 2 100 r.p.m. The
allowable static r.p.m. range is normally established by adding and subtracting 50 r.p.m. to an average
no-wind static r.p.m. An applicant may desire to obtain approval for one or more additional propellers
and retain only one r.p.m. range statement. An applicant may also choose to extend the propeller's
static r.p.m. range.
(A)
Lower R.P.M. The static r.p.m. range may be extended on the low side by obtaining approval
for a propeller with a lower static r.p.m. In this case, the approval must be accomplished with due
consideration of performance requirements. The aeroplane with the new propeller installed must be
able to meet the minimum climb performance requirements.
(B)
Higher R.P.M. If the static r.p.m. range is to be extended upward, the new propeller would
have to be tested to ensure that it did not cause an engine speed above 110% of maximum continuous
speed in a closed throttle dive at the never-exceed speed. It must not exceed the rated takeoff r.p.m.
of the engine up to and including the best rate of climb speed of the aeroplane. An engine cooling
climb test may also be required due to the additional power produced by the faster turning propeller.
2FTG26
BOOK 2
CS23
(2)
Controllable Pitch Propellers Without Constant Speed Controls
(i)
Climb R.P.M. With the propeller in full low pitch, determine that the maximum r.p.m. during a
climb using maximum power at the all-engine(s)-operating climb speed does not exceed the rated
takeoff r.p.m. of the engine.
(ii)
Dive R.P.M. With the propeller in full high pitch, determine that the closed throttle r.p.m. in a
dive at the never-exceed speed is not greater than 110% of the rated maximum continuous r.p.m. of
the engine.
(3)
Controllable Pitch Propellers With Constant Speed Controls
(i)
Climb R.P.M. With the propeller governor operative and prop control in full high r.p.m.
position, determine that the maximum power r.p.m. does not exceed the rated takeoff r.p.m. of the
engine during takeoff and climb at the all-engine(s)-operating climb speed.
(ii)
Static R.P.M. With the propeller governor made inoperative by mechanical means, obtain a
no-wind static r.p.m.
(A)
Reciprocating Engines. Determine that the maximum power static r.p.m., with the propeller
blade operating against the low pitch stop, does not exceed 103% of the rated takeoff r.p.m. of the
engine.
(B)
Turbopropeller Engines. Although this rule references manifold pressure, it has been
considered to be applicable to turbopropeller installations. With the governor inoperative, the propeller
blades at the lowest possible pitch, with takeoff power, the aeroplane stationary, and no wind, ensure
that the propeller speed does not exceed the maximum approved engine and propeller r.p.m. limits.
Propellers that go to feather when the governor is made inoperative need not be tested.
(iii)
Safe Operation Under Normal Operating Conditions
(A)
Reciprocating Engines. For Normal and Utility Category Aeroplanes. Descent at VNE or VMO
with full power, although within the normal operating range, is not a normal operating procedure.
Engine r.p.m., with propeller on the high pitch blade stops, that can be controlled by retarding the
throttle may be considered as acceptable in showing compliance with 23.33(a).
(B)
Turbopropeller Engines. Perform a maximum r.p.m. at maximum torque (or power) descent at
VMO to ensure that normal operating limits for the propeller are not exceeded.
(4)
Data Acquisition and Reduction. The observed r.p.m. data in each case must be corrected for
tachometer error. The airspeed system error must also be taken into consideration to determine the
proper calibrated airspeed. True airspeed may also need to be considered because propeller angle of
attack is a function of true airspeed.
1215 RESERVED
2FTG27
CS23
BOOK 2
Section 2 PERFORMANCE
16
a.
Explanation
(1)
Atmospheric Standards. The purpose of 23.45(a) is to set the atmospheric standards in which
the performance requirements should be met. The air should be smooth with no temperature
inversions, mountain waves, etc. This is essential to obtaining good data and repeatable results. Nonstandard conditions of temperature, pressure, etc., can be corrected to standard, but there are no
corrections to compensate for poor quality data due to turbulence or poor pilot technique. A thorough
knowledge of the limitations of the testing procedures and data reduction methods is essential so that
good engineering judgement may be used to determine the acceptability of any tests.
(i)
Reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes below 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) Maximum Weight.
Performance tests will normally be conducted in non-standard atmospheric conditions, but ideally for
accuracy in data reduction and expansion, tests should be conducted in still air and atmospheric
conditions as near those of a standard atmosphere as possible. Accounting for winds and nonstandard conditions requires testing procedures and data reduction methods that reduce the data to
still air and standard atmospheric conditions.
(ii)
Reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes of more than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) Maximum Weight
and Turbine-engined powered aeroplanes. Performance tests should be conducted in the range of
atmospheric conditions that will show compliance with the selected weight, altitude, and temperature
limits. See paragraph 19 of this AMC for guidance on extrapolation of takeoff data and paragraph 27
for extrapolation of landing data.
(2)
Standard Atmosphere. The Standard Atmosphere is identical to the International Civil Aviation
Organisation (ICAO) Standard Atmosphere for altitudes below 19 812 m (65 000 ft). Appendix 7, figure
1, gives properties of the Standard Atmosphere in an abbreviated format.
(3)
Installed Power. The installed propulsive horsepower/thrust of the test engine(s) may be
determined using the applicable method described in Appendix 1, based on the power approved during
aeroplane certification. The methods in Appendix 1 account for installation losses and the power
absorbed by accessories and services. Consideration should also be given to the accuracy of the
power setting instruments/systems, and the pilot's ability to accurately set the power/thrust.
(4)
Propeller Cut-off. If the aeroplane will be certificated with an allowable cut-off for the propeller,
then the performance flight testing should be done using the most critical propeller diameter. In most
cases this is expected to be the minimum diameter propeller allowed.
(5)
Flight Procedures. The Flight procedures must not be unduly sensitive to less than ideal
atmospheric conditions. The atmospheric conditions reasonably expected to be encountered in
service may be different depending on the class of aircraft but should cover at least the maximum
demonstrated crosswind component established in compliance with Paragraph 23.233(a).
(6)
Flight Test Data. For calibrated engines, test day power would be the calibrated test day
power. For uncalibrated engines, an acceptable method is to assume that the test day power is the
upper tolerance chart brake horsepower. See Appendix 1 for further discussion. The performance
data required by 23.1587 is dependent on the horsepower assumed for the various temperature and
altitude conditions. Refer to Appendix 1, which deals both with test data reduction and expansion.
2FTG28
BOOK 2
CS23
(7)
Humidity Correction. See appendix 1.
b.
Procedures. See appendix I.
c.
Time Delays. The reasonable time delays, required by Paragraph 23.45h(5)(iii), for different
procedures are covered in respective paragraphs, such as accelerate-stop and landing.
d.
Operation on Unpaved Runways
(1)
Small aeroplanes operations from grass runways. For aeroplanes less than 2 722 kg
(6 000 lb) maximum weight, the factors given below may be quoted in the flight manual, as an
alternative to the scheduling of data derived from testing or calculation. It should be noted that these
factors are intended to cover the range of types in this category, and are necessarily conservative.
Manufacturers are therefore encouraged to produce and schedule their own data in accordance with
below to obtain optimised performance for their aeroplane.
Take-off Dry Grass 1.2
Landing Dry Grass 1.2
Notes:
1
Due to the uncertainty of knowing if the grass is dry or wet, it is suggested that the landing factor be
increased to 1.4
2
If the grass is known to be wet, the factors should be
Take-off 1.3
Landing 1.6
3
The above data are for a known smooth flat runway. If the runway is not smooth, the grass is very
long or very short, higher factors may be warranted.
(2)
Aeroplanes with 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or more MTOW
Aeroplanes operations on other than smooth dry hard runway surfaces require specific approval and
the scheduling of information on the effect of those surfaces on take-off and landing distances in the
flight manual. To obtain approval for take-off and landing operations on unpaved runway surfaces
compliance with the following should be shown:
(i)
Each type of surface must be defined so that it can be recognised in operations in service.
The identification should include specification of all characteristics of the surface necessary for safe
operation, such as:
(A)
surface and sub-base bearing strength;
(B)
thickness, compactness and aggregate of the surface material;
(C)
surface condition (e.g. dry or wet).
(ii)
It should be determined that the aeroplane can be operated on each defined surface without
hazard from likely impingement or engine ingestion of any foreign objects that are constituent parts of
the surface.
(iii)
If any special procedures or techniques are found to be necessary, these should also be
determined and scheduled.
(iv)
The take-off and landing performance on each defined surface should be determined in
accordance with 23.53 and 23.75, as modified below.
2FTG29
CS23
BOOK 2
(v)
Take-off and Landing Data. Take-off and landing data must be determined and scheduled for
each type of unpaved surface for which approval is requested.
(A)
The test runways on which the take-off and landing distance measurements are conducted
should be chosen to be representative of the worst characteristics (i.e. high rolling friction, low braking
friction) of each of the types of runway under consideration.
(B)
In establishing the operating limitations for a particular type of unpaved runway, the runway's
load bearing characteristics, rolling and braking friction, and impingement and ingestion characteristics
should be considered.
17
PARAGRAPH 23.49 STALLING SPEED
a.
Explanation
(1)
113 km/h (61 Kt) Stall Speed. The 113 km/h (61 kt or 70 m.p.h.) stalling speed applies to the
maximum takeoff weight for which the aeroplane is to be certificated.
(2)
Background. Since many of the regulations pertaining to performance, handling qualities,
airspeed indicator markings, and other variables which are functions of stall speeds, it is desirable to
accomplish the stall speed testing early in the programme, so the data are available for subsequent
testing. Because of this interrelationship between the stall speeds and other critical performance
parameters, it is essential that accurate measurement methods and careful piloting techniques be
used. Most standard aeroplane pitot-static systems have not been found to be acceptable for stall
speed determination. These tests require the use of properly calibrated instruments and usually
require a separate test airspeed system, such as a trailing bomb, a trailing cone, or an acceptable
nose or wing boom. The stall speed determinations necessary for marking the airspeed indicator are
in terms of indicated airspeed (lAS) corrected for instrument error. The other stall speeds are in terms
of calibrated airspeed (CAS). Thus, a production airspeed system should be available during stall
speed measurements to determine stall speeds in terms of IAS.
(3)
Stall Definition. Paragraph 23.49(d) requires the VS0 and VS1 speeds to be determined using
the procedures specified in 23.201. See CS 1 and 23.49 for definitions of VS0 and VS1. Paragraph
23.201(b) defines when the aeroplane can be considered stalled, for aeroplane certification purposes
when one of three conditions occurs, whichever occurs first, the aeroplane is stalled. The conditions
are:
(i)
Uncontrollable downward pitching motion;
(ii)
Downward pitching motion resulting from the activation of a device (e.g. stick pusher), or
(iii)
The control reaches the stop.
For those aeroplanes where the control reaches the stop, VS is considered to be the minimum speed
obtained while the control is held against the stop. Elevator limited aeroplanes may or may not
develop a minimum steady flight speed. See figure 171 for a graphic representation of stall speed
time histories for various configurations. The time the control is held against the stop for stall speed
determination should be a minimum of 2 seconds and consistent with the time against the stop for stall
characteristics testing (paragraph 23.201). Additionally, for aeroplanes with a stall barrier system, stick
pusher operation has been considered as the stall speed. The term uncontrollable downward pitching
motion is the point at which the pitching motion can no longer be arrested by application of nose-up
elevator and not necessarily the first indication of nose-down pitch.
(4)
Reciprocating Engine Throttle position. For reciprocating engine aeroplanes, the stalling
speed is that obtainable with the propellers in the takeoff position and the engines idling with throttles
closed. As an alternative to throttles closed the regulations allow the use of sufficient power to
produce zero propeller thrust at a speed not more than 10% above the stalling speed. The regulations
2FTG210
BOOK 2
CS23
Chapter 2 Section
Paragraph
23.49
23.49
(continued)
(continued)
do not allow any alternative to the use of propellers in the takeoff position, nor is any alternative
intended except that the use of a feathered propeller in certification stalling speed tests is acceptable
only when it has been determined that the resulting stalling speed is conservative (higher). If the
stalling speed tests are to be conducted with the propellers delivering zero thrust, some dependable
method, such as a propeller slipstream rake, should be available in flight. The practice of establishing
zero thrust r.p.m. by calculation is also acceptable. One calculation method is given in subparagraph
(5) below. Analytical corrections may be acceptable if satisfactory accounting is made for the effects of
propeller efficiency, slipstream, altitude, and other pertinent variables.
(5)
Zero-Thrust R.P.M. Calculation
(i)
Zero-thrust r.p.m. can be calculated by using the propeller manufacturers propeller coefficient
curves. The thrust will be zero when the propeller thrust coefficient is zero for the particular propeller
blade angle. Using the propeller coefficient curves, obtain or construct a chart like figure 172.
where
CT
CP
=
=
=
=
thrust coefficient
power coefficient
blade angle setting
advance ratio
2FTG211
CS23
BOOK 2
Trim
speed
1.1 Vs
Not elevator
limited
Vs
Entry
rate
slope
Nose
down
pitch
Trim
speed
Airspeed
1.1 Vs
Elevator
reaches
stop
Elevator
control
limited *
Entry
rate
slope
Trim
speed
Vs
1.1 Vs
( Minimum steady
Flight speed)
Vs
Entry
rate
slope
Pusher
fired
Time-seconds
* Aeroplanes may or may not develop a minimum steady flight speed.
Figure 171 STALL SPEED
2FTG212
Artificial barrier
(pusher system)
BOOK 2
CS23

B=3 o
0
CT
Cp- power coefficient
B=
B=
B=
B=
25 o
0
= ,1
08
CT = ,
6
CT = ,0
20 o
15 o
CT =
10 o
,04
CT =
,02
CT =
J-Advance ratio
Figure 172 PROPELLER COEFFICIENTS
(ii)
The propeller blade is usually against the low pitch stop position, in the speed range of
interest. Knowing the blade angle setting, the advance ratio J, can be determined to give zero-thrust
for the particular propeller under consideration. Knowing the value of J for zero-thrust, the propeller
r.p.m. for various velocities can be calculated as follows:
propeller r.p.m. =
101 27 V
JD
Where: V = aeroplane true airspeed in knots

J = advance ratio
D = propeller diameter in feet
(iii)
173.
The calculated velocities and propeller r.p.m. for zero-thrust can be plotted as shown in figure
(6)
Turbopropeller Thrust. For turbopropeller aeroplanes 23.49(e)(2) requires the propulsive
thrust not be greater than zero during stall speed determination, or as an alternative to zero thrust, if
idle thrust has no appreciable effect on stall speed, stall speed can be determined with the engines
idling. If the aeroplane has a flight idle position, this would be the appropriate throttle position. Flight
test experience has shown that some turbopropeller-powered aeroplanes may demonstrate a relatively
high positive propeller thrust at the stall speed with the engines at flight idle. This thrust condition may
yield an unconservative (lower) stall speed. Therefore, just as for piston-powered aeroplanes, some
dependable method to determine zero thrust should be available for comparison of zero thrust stall
speed and flight idle stall speed or for determination of zero thrust stall speed. Residual jet thrust
should be considered. Comparisons of zero thrust stall speed and flight idle stall speed should be
investigated at high and low altitudes. Use of feathered propellers is acceptable if the feathered stall
speeds are found to be conservative (higher).
2FTG213
CS23
BOOK 2
RPM
Chapter 2Paragraph
2 Paragraph23.49
23.49(continued)
(continued)
V-TAS in KNOTS
Figure 173 ZERO THRUST
(7)
Fixed Shaft Turboprops. Experience on some fixed-shaft turboprop installations indicates that
stall speeds can be evaluated at mid-altitudes and appear to be totally conservative. However, if stalls
are conducted at altitudes of 1524 m (5 000 ft) or below, the stall speed can increase dramatically.
This occurs because the propeller drag characteristics are a function of true airspeed, and as true
airspeed decreases, the drag goes up substantially and the flow behind the propeller on wing-mounted
engines causes premature inboard wing airflow separation. In addition, if the horizontal tail and the
elevator are exposed to the same flow, the elevator power is decreased and tends to compound the
problem. It is recommended that stall speeds be re-evaluated at low altitudes on all fixed shaft
turboprops to assure that the stall speeds have not increased.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Instrumentation
(i)
Test Systems. As previously mentioned, the production airspeed system is normally not
sufficiently predictable or repeatable at high angles-of-attack to accurately measure the performance
stall speeds of an aeroplane. However, a production airspeed system should be installed during stall
speed tests to define the airspeed indicator markings required by 23.1545. The performance stall
speed test system utilised in a type certification program should be calibrated to a minimum speed at
least as low as the predicted minimum stall speed anticipated on the test aeroplane. Test systems that
have been utilised to accurately define the performance stall speeds include, but not are limited to:
(A)
Boom Systems. Swivel-head, boom-mounted, pitot-static systems with sufficient free-swivel
angle to cover the stall angle-of-attack range of the aeroplane have been found to be acceptable.
Some angle-of-attack compensated fixed pitot heads have also been found to be acceptable over a
wind tunnel defined angle-of-attack range. In all wing-mounted boom systems, the boom mounted
static source should be at least one chord length ahead of the wing leading edge. On nose-boom
mounted systems, it has been generally accepted that the static source should be at least one and
one-half fuselage diameters ahead of the nose. All boom systems should be installed in a manner
which assures that the boom and boom pitot-static head are structurally sound (both static and
dynamic) within the proposed operating range.
(B)
Pitot-Static Bombs. Pitot-static bombs that are stable through the stall manoeuvres have been
found to provide acceptable data.
(C)
Trailing Cones. A trailing cone static source dynamically balanced with a swivel head pitot
source, or dynamically balanced with a fixed pitot source of proven accuracy in the stall angle-of-attack
2FTG214
BOOK 2
CS23
Chapter 22 Section
Chapter
Paragraph
23.49
23.49
(continued)
(continued)
range has been acceptable. The stability of the cone should be verified during stall tests and
throughout its intended operating range. The length of the cone may need to be adjusted on individual
aeroplane installations to assure cone stability.
(ii)
Lag Equalisation. All of the systems described in paragraph (i) could involve the use of long
lengths of pressure tubing and the associated pressure lags then occur whenever speed and/or altitude
are changed. Probably the most important consideration in these installations (on most small general
aviation aeroplanes) is that the test pitot-static systems should be dynamically balanced. This is easily
accomplished experimentally by putting both the total head and static orifices in a common chamber
and varying the pressure in the chamber at a rate corresponding to a 10,2 to 15,2 m/s (2 000 to 3 000
ft/min) rate of descent. Various volumes are inserted in the total head line until the airspeed indicator
has no tendency to move in either direction from zero during the simulated rate of descent. This
method results in approximately the same volume in both systems, and for the same size tubing, the
Reynolds Number of the flow through both lines will be the same. A dynamically balanced airspeed
system has equal lag in both the total and static sides. Use of a balanced system simplifies the
interpretation of recorded stall time histories.
(iii)
Lag Correction. When a balanced test airspeed system is used, it is often unnecessary to
determine the actual amount of lag present. When such a determination is necessary, a method for
accounting for lag errors is described in NASA Reference publication 1046, Measurement of Aircraft
Speed and Altitude, by W. Gracey, May 1980.
(2)
Test
(i)
Stall Speed. The actual test should be commenced with the aeroplane in the configuration
desired and trimmed at approximately 1.5 VS1 or the minimum speed trim, whichever is greater. The
aeroplane should be slowed to about 19 km/h (10 knots) above the stall, at which time the speed
should be reduced at a rate of one knot per second or less until the stall occurs or the control reaches
the stop. Where exact determination of stalling speed is required, entry rate should be varied to
bracket one knot per second, and data should be recorded to allow the preparation of time histories
similar to those shown in figure 171. The indicated airspeed at the stall should be noted, using the
production airspeed system. Both the indicated airspeeds and the calibrated stall speeds may then be
plotted versus entry rate to determine the one knot per second values.
(ii)
Bomb. When using a bomb, caution should be used in recovering from the stall so that the
bomb is not whipped off the end of the hose.
(iii)
Weight and C.G. The stalling speed should be determined at all weight and c.g. positions
defining the corners of the loading envelope to determine the critical condition. The highest stall speed
for each weight will be forward c.g. in most cases except for unconventional configurations. Data
should be recorded so that the weight and c.g. at the time of the test can be accurately determined.
This can often be done by recording the time of takeoff, time of test, time of landing, and total fuel used
during the flight.
(iv)
Power and Configuration. The stall should be repeated enough times for each configuration to
ensure a consistent speed. If a correction is to be made for zero thrust, then the stall speed and power
at several power settings may be recorded for later extrapolation to zero thrust.
(v)
Control Stops. The elevator up stop should be set to the minimum allowable deflection. Flap
travels should be set to minimum allowable settings.
(3)
Data Reduction. The correction involves:
(i)
Correction for airspeed error IAS to CAS (correct for instrument as well as position error)
when CAS is required.
(ii)
Correction for weight multiply the test calibrated stall speed times the square root of the
standard weight divided by the test weight.
2FTG215
CS23
BOOK 2
VS = VST
Ws
Wt
Where Vs = Stall speed (CAS)

Vst = Test stall speed (CAS)
Ws = Standard weight
Wt = Test weight
(CAUTION Do not use for minimum steady flight speed)

(iii)
The correction for weight shown above applies only where the c.g. is not also changing with
weight. Where c.g. is changing with weight, such as between forward regardless and forward gross,
stall speed should account for this. A straight line variation between the measured stall speeds for the
two weight and c.g. conditions has been found to be an acceptable method.
18
PARAGRAPH 23.51 TAKEOFF SPEEDS
a.
Explanation. The primary objective of this paragraph is to determine the normal take-off
speeds for non-weight, altitude and temperature limited aeroplanes and for WAT limited aeroplanes to
determine the take-off speed schedules for all take-off configurations at weight, altitude and
temperature conditions within the operational limits selected by the applicant.
b.
For Normal, Utility and Aerobatic category aeroplanes, the rotation speed, (VR) in terms of inground effect calibrated airspeed, must be selected by the applicant. VR is constrained by 23.51 (a) as
follows:
(1)
For twin-engine landplanes VR must not be less than the greater of 1.05 VMC or 1.10 VS1;
(2)
For single-engined landplanes, VR must not be less than VS1; and
(3)
For seaplanes and amphibians taking off from water, VR may be any speed that is shown to be
safe under all reasonably expected conditions, including turbulence and complete failure of the critical
engine.
c.
For Normal, Utility and aerobatic category aeroplanes, the speed at 15 m (50 ft):
(1)
Twin-engine 15 m (50-ft) Speed. For twin-engine aeroplanes, 23.51(b)(1) requires the speed
at the 15 m(50ft) point to be the higher of:
(i)
a speed that is shown to be safe for continued flight (or land back, if applicable) under all
reasonably expected conditions, including turbulence and complete engine failure; or
(ii)
1.1 VMC, or
(iii)
1.2 VS1.
2FTG216
BOOK 2
CS23
(2)
Single Engine 15 m(50 ft) Speed. For single-engine aeroplanes, 23.51(b)(2) requires the
speed at the 15 m (50 ft) point to be the higher of:
(i)
a speed that is shown to be safe under all reasonably expected conditions, including
turbulence and complete engine failure; or
(ii)
1.2 VS1.
(3)
Takeoff Speed Investigations General
Investigation of the acceptability of the takeoff speed, and of the associated takeoff procedure, should
include a demonstration that controllability and manoeuvrability in the takeoff configuration are
adequate to safely proceed with the takeoff in turbulent crosswind conditions and maximum approved
lateral imbalance.
(4)
Single-engine Aeroplane Takeoff Speeds. The takeoff speed investigation should include
demonstration that controllability and manoeuvrability following engine failure at any time between liftoff and the 15 m (50 ft) point are adequate for safe landing.
(5)
Twin-engine Aeroplane Takeoff Speeds. For twin-engine aeroplanes, the investigation should
include a demonstration that the controllability and manoeuvrability following critical engine failure at
any time between lift-off and the 15 m (50 ft) point are adequate for either safe landing or for safe
continuation of the takeoff. There will be some combinations of weight, altitude, and temperature
where positive climb at the 15 m (50 ft) height with one engine inoperative is not possible. Because of
this, a satisfactory re-land manoeuvre should be demonstrated. Rotation speed should be scheduled
so that the speed at 15 m (50 ft) is in accordance with 23.51(b)(1).
(6)
Multiple Takeoff Weights. For those twin-engine aeroplanes for which takeoff distance data
are to be approved for a range of weights, and for which the takeoff distance is based upon takeoff
speeds which decrease as the weight decreases, the investigations of paragraph (3) also should
include consideration of the minimum control speed, VMC. The 1.2 VS design limit imposed on VMC by
23.149 is intended to provide a controllability margin below the takeoff speed that is sufficient for
adequate control of the aeroplane in the event of engine failure during takeoff. Hence, to maintain the
intended level of safety for the lower takeoff speeds associated with the lighter takeoff weights,
investigation of the acceptability of such speeds for compliance with 23.51(b)(1) should include
demonstration of acceptable characteristics following engine failure at any time between lift-off and the
15 m (50 ft) point during takeoff in accordance with the established takeoff procedures.
(7)
Complete Engine Failure. The term complete engine failure, has been consistently
interpreted to require that for twin-engine aeroplanes which meet the powerplant isolation requirements
of paragraph 23.903(c) in the takeoff configuration, only one engine need be made inoperative in the
specified investigations.
d.
Commuter Category Aeroplanes
(1)
Takeoff Speeds. The following speed definitions are given in terms of calibrated airspeed.
The AFM presentations are required by 23.1581(d) in indicated airspeed (lAS).
(i)
Paragraph 23.51(c)(1) Engine Failure Speed VEF. The engine failure speed (VEF) is defined
as the calibrated airspeed at which the critical engine is assumed to fail and must be selected by the
applicant. VEF cannot be less than 1.05 VMC as determined in 23.149. Ground controllability should
also be determined to be adequate at VEF to ensure meeting the requirements of 23.51(c)(1), i.e. speed
adequate to safely continue the takeoff. During the demonstration, the aeroplanes ground run should
not deviate more than 9 m (30 feet) from the pre-engine-cut projected ground track. VMCg determined
under CS 25.149(e) is acceptable in lieu of 1.05 VMC. At the applicants option, in crosswind
conditions, the runs may be made on reciprocal headings or an analytical correction may be applied to
determine the zero crosswind deviation. If nose wheel steering is an integral part of the rudder system
and is required to be operative, then nose wheel steering may be active. Otherwise, control of the
2FTG217
CS23
BOOK 2
aeroplane should be accomplished by use of the rudder only. If the applicant elects to use VMCg then
the nosewheel steering must be disconnected as changes in CS 25.149(e). All other controls, such as
ailerons and spoilers, should only be used to correct any alterations in the aeroplane attitude and to
maintain a wings level condition. Use of those controls to supplement the rudder effectiveness should
not be used.
(ii)
Paragraph 23.51(c)(1) Takeoff Decision Speed (V1). The takeoff decision speed (V1) may
not be less than VEF plus the speed gained with the critical engine inoperative during the time interval
between VEF and the instant at which the pilot recognises the engine failure. This is indicated by pilot
application of the first decelerating device such as brakes, throttles, spoilers, etc., during acceleratestop tests. The applicant may choose the sequence of events. V1 should include any airspeed system
errors determined during accelerate-takeoff ground runs. Refer to the requirements of 23.1323(c).
(iii)
Paragraph 23.51(c)(2) Rotation Speed (VR)
(A)
The rotation speed, (VR) in terms of in-ground effect calibrated airspeed, must be selected by
the applicant. VR is constrained by 23.51(c)(2), as follows:
(1)
V1, or
(2)
1.05 VMC determined under CS 23.149(b); or
(3)
1.10 VS1; or
(4)
the speed that allows attaining the initial climb-out speed, V2, before reaching a height of 11 m
(35 ft) above the takeoff surface in accordance with 23.57(c)(2).
(B)
Early rotation, one-engine inoperative abuse test.
(1)
In showing compliance with 23.51(c)(5), some guidance relative to the airspeed attained at a
height of 11 m (35 ft) during the associated flight test is necessary. As this requirement dealing with a
rotation speed abuse test only specifies an early rotation (VR 9.3 km/h (5 knots)), it is assumed that
pilot technique is to remain the same as normally used for an engine-out condition. With these
considerations in mind, it is apparent that the airspeed achieved at a height of 11 m (35 ft) can be
somewhat below the normal scheduled V2 speed. However, the amount of permissible V2 speed
reduction should be limited to a reasonable amount as described in paragraphs (2) and (3) as follows:
(2)
In conducting the flight tests required by 23.51(c)(5), the test pilot should use a normal/natural
rotation technique as associated with the use of scheduled takeoff speeds for the aeroplane being
tested. Intentional tail or tail skid contact is not considered acceptable. Further, the airspeed attained
at a height of 11 m (35 ft) during this test is required to be not less than the scheduled V2 value minus
9.3 km/h (5 knots). These speed limits should not be considered or utilised as target V2 test speeds,
but rather are intended to provide an acceptable range of speed departure below the scheduled V2
value.
(3)
In this abuse test, the engine cut should be accomplished prior to the VR test speed (i.e.
scheduled VR 9.3 km/h (5 knots)) to allow for engine spin down. The normal one-engine-inoperative
takeoff distance may be analytically adjusted to compensate for the effect of the early engine cut.
Further, in those tests where the airspeed achieved at a height of 11 m (35 ft) is slightly less than the
VR 9.3 km/h (5 knots) limiting value, it is permissible, in lieu of re-conducting the tests, to analytically
adjust the test distance to account for the excessive speed decrement.
2FTG218
BOOK 2
CS23
(C)
All-engines-operating abuse tests.
(1)
Paragraph 23.51(c)(6) requires that there not be a marked increase in the scheduled takeoff
distance when reasonably expected service variations such as early and excessive rotation and out-oftrim conditions are encountered. This is considered as requiring takeoff tests with all engines
operating with:
(i)
an abuse on rotation speed, and
(ii)
out-of-trim conditions but with rotation at the scheduled VR speed.
NOTE: The expression marked increase in the takeoff distance is defined as any amount in excess of 5% of the takeoff
distance as determined in accordance with 23.59. Thus, the abuse tests should not result in a takeoff distance of more
than 105% of the scheduled take-off distance.
(2)
For the early rotation abuse condition with all engines operating and at a weight as near as
practicable to the maximum sea level takeoff weight, it should be shown by test that when the
aeroplane is over-rotated at a speed below the scheduled VR no marked increase in the takeoff
distance will result. For this demonstration, the aeroplane should be rotated at a speed of 10 knots or
7%, whichever is less, below the scheduled VR. Tests should be conducted at a rapid rotation rate or
should include an over-rotation of 2 degrees above normal attitude after lift-off. Rapid rotation should
be taken to mean significantly above the normal pitch rate of rotation. It should be noted that 4 or 5
degrees per second have previously proved satisfactory. Tail strikes, should they occur during this
demonstration, are acceptable only if a fault analysis (structural, electrical, hydraulic, etc.) has been
accomplished and indicates no possible degradation in the control of aircraft, engines, or essential
systems necessary for continued safe flight after a reasonable, worst case tail strike.
(3)
For out-of-trim conditions with all engines operating and at a weight as near as practicable to the
maximum sea level takeoff weight, it should be shown that with the aeroplane mis-trimmed, as would
reasonably be expected in service, there should not be a marked increase in the takeoff distance when
rotation is initiated in a normal manner at the scheduled VR speed. The amount of mis-trim used should be
with the longitudinal control trimmed to its most adverse position within the allowable takeoff trim band as
shown on the cockpit indicator.
(iv)
Lift-off Speed (VLOF). VLOF is the calibrated airspeed at which the aeroplane first becomes airborne.
(v)
Paragraph 23.51(c)(4) Takeoff Safety Speed (V2). V2 is the calibrated airspeed that is attained at
or before 11 m (35 ft) above the takeoff surface after an engine failure at VEF using an established rotation
speed (VR). During the takeoff speed demonstration, V2 should be continued to an altitude sufficient to
assure stable conditions beyond 11 m (35 ft). Paragraph 23.51(c)(4) requires V2 not be less than 1.1 VMC
or 1.2 VS1. Attainment of V2 by 11 m (35 ft) should be substantiated by use of procedures consistent with
those which will be experienced in service with an actual engine failure i.e. if auto feather is required, then
auto feather should be activated as an integral part of testing.
19
PARAGRAPH 23.53 TAKE-OFF PERFORMANCE
a.
Explanation
(1)
Normal Utility and Aerobatic Category Aeroplanes
(i)
Objective of Take-off Requirement. The primary objective of the take-off requirement is to
establish, for information of the operator, a take-off distance within which the aeroplane may be expected to
achieve a speed and height sufficient to ensure capability of performing all manoeuvres that may become
necessary for safe completion of the take-off, and for safe landing if necessitated by power failure. An
airspeed margin above stall in conjunction with a height of 15 m (50 feet) is presumed to assure the
desired manoeuvring capability.
2FTG219
CS23
BOOK 2
(ii)
AFM Takeoff Distance. Paragraph 23.1587(c)(1) requires the takeoff distance determined
under this paragraph to be furnished in the AFM. The data should be furnished at the most critical c.g.
(usually forward). Paragraph 23.1587 further requires the effect of altitude from sea level to 3048 m
(10 000 ft); and
(A)
temperature from standard to 30C above standard; or
(B)
for aeroplanes greater than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) and turbine-powered aeroplanes, temperature
from standard to 30C above standard, or the maximum ambient atmospheric temperature at which
compliance with the cooling provisions of CS 23.1041 to 23.1047 is shown, if lower, be furnished in the
AFM. Propulsive thrust available should be accounted for in accordance with 23.45 and Appendix 1 of
this FTG. For turbine-powered aeroplanes, distances should be presented up to the maximum take-off
temperature limit. A data expansion method appropriate to the aeroplanes features should be used.
(iii)
AFM Takeoff Technique. For twin-engine aeroplanes, 23.1585 (d)(1) requires the AFM to
furnish the procedures for the 23.53 takeoff. The recommended technique that is published in the AFM
and used to achieve the performance should be one that the operational pilot can duplicate using the
minimum amount of type design cockpit instrumentation and the minimum crew.
(iv)
Tyre Speed Limits. If TSOd tyres are used, it should be determined that, within the weight,
altitude, and temperature for which takeoff performance is shown in 23.1587, that the TSO tyre speed
ratings are not exceeded at VLOF. If the tyre speed rating would be exceeded under some
combinations of weight, altitude, and temperature, then the tyre speed limit should be established as
an operating limitation and a maximum takeoff weight limited by tyre speed chart should be included in
the AFM performance section in compliance with 23.1581(a)(2).
b.
Procedures
(1)
Takeoff Distance Tests. The take-off distance should be established by test, and may be
obtained either by take-offs conducted as a continuous operation from start to the 15 m (50 ft) height or
synthesised from acceleration segments and climb segment(s) determined separately. Recording
theodolite or electronic equipment that is capable of providing horizontal distance and velocity, and
height above the takeoff surface, is highly desirable for takeoff distance tests. Additional required
special ground equipment includes a sensitive anemometer capable of providing wind velocity and
direction, a thermometer capable of providing accurate free-air temperature under all conditions, and
an altimeter or barograph to provide pressure altitude.
(2)
Segment Technique. For the segment technique, the aeroplane should be accelerated on the
surface from brake release to rotation speed (VR) and on to the speed selected for the 15 m (50 ft)
height point. Six acceptable runs are recommended to establish the takeoff acceleration segment. VR
should be selected so that the 15 m (50 ft) speed can be achieved. A climb segment based on the rate
of climb, free of ground effect, is added to the acceleration segment. See paragraph 25 of this FTG
and Appendix 2 for climb performance methods. Total distance is the sum of the acceleration segment
plus the climb segment. For AFM presentation, the ground run would be the ground acceleration
distance to VLOF, and the air distance would be the horizontal distance to climb at the 15 m (50 ft)
speed for 15 m (50 ft) plus the ground acceleration distance from VLOF to the 15 m (50 ft) speed. For
those aeroplanes with retractable gear, the landing gear should be extended throughout, or
alternatively, retraction may be initiated at a speed corresponding to a safe speed for gear retraction
following lift-off in normal operations. If takeoff distance is determined using the segmented method,
actual takeoffs using the AFM takeoff speed schedule should be conducted to verify that the actual
takeoff distance to the 15 m (50 ft) height does not exceed the calculated takeoff distance to the 15 m
(50 ft) height.
(3)
Weight. Takeoff distance tests should be conducted at the maximum weight, and at a lesser
weight if takeoff distance data for a range of weights is to be approved. The test results may be
considered acceptable without correction for weight if a 0.5% weight tolerance is observed.
2FTG220
BOOK 2
CS23
(4)
Nose wheel/Tail wheel. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the critical c.g. position
for takeoff distance tests may be assumed to be forward.
(5)
Wind. Wind velocity and direction should be measured adjacent to the runway during the time
interval of each test run. See paragraph 6a(5) of this FTG for wind velocity and direction tolerances.
For the ground run portion of the segment technique, the following relationship was developed
empirically and is an acceptable method for correction of low wind conditions:
V 185
S g = S gw 1 w
Vtow
Where: Sg
= no-wind take-off ground distance (ft)
Sgw
= takeoff ground distance at a known wind velocity (ft)
Vw
= wind velocity (ft/s)
Vtow
= true ground speed at lift-off with a known wind velocity (ft/s)

+ is used for headwind and for tailwind
Wind, then slope corrections should be applied before further data reduction.
(6)
Runway Slope. The effect of runway gradient can be significant for heavy aeroplanes or for
low thrust-to-weight ratio aeroplanes even if the gradient of the runway is small. Gradient should be
controlled by proper runway selection. The correction is:
S Gs1
SG =
1
Where: SGs1
2gS
Gs1
sin
2
V
to
= ground distance on a sloping runway
= acceleration of gravity, 32.17 ft./s2
Vto
= aeroplane velocity at lift-off in ft./s. (true)
= angle of the slope in degrees (not percent)

+ for upslope and for downslope
c.
(1)
Objective of Takeoff Requirement. Paragraph 23.53(c) requires that performance be
determined that provides accountability for the selected operating weights, altitudes, ambient
temperatures, configurations, and corrected for various wind and runway gradient conditions.
(2)
Takeoff Profile. Tests are required to determine the performance throughout the takeoff path
as specifically defined by 23.55 through 23.59 and as discussed in paragraphs 20 through 23 of this
AMC.
(3)
Expansion of Takeoff Data for a range of Airport Elevations
(i)
These guidelines are applicable to expanding takeoff data above the altitude at which the basic
or verifying tests were obtained.
(ii)
In general, takeoff data may be extrapolated above and below the altitude at which the basic
test data was obtained without additional conservatism within the following constraints.
(iii)
When the basic takeoff tests are accomplished between sea level and approximately 914 m
(3000 ft), the maximum allowable extrapolation limits are 1829 m (6000 ft) above and 914 m (3000 ft)
below the test field elevation. If it is desired to extrapolate beyond these limits, one of two procedures
may be employed.
2FTG221
CS23
BOOK 2
(A)
Extrapolation of Performance Data for a Range of Altitudes When Verifying Tests are Not
Conducted. The approval of performance data for airport elevations beyond the maximum elevation
permitted by basic tests may be allowed without conducting verifying tests if the calculated data include
a conservative factor. This conservatism should result in an increase of the calculated takeoff distance
at the desired airport elevation by an amount equal to zero percent for the highest airport elevation
approved on the results of the basic tests and an additional cumulative 2 percent incremental factor for
each 305 m (1000 ft) of elevation above the highest airport elevation approved for zero percent
conservatism. The 2 percent incremental factor should have a straight line variation with altitude.
When performance data are calculated for the effects of altitude under this procedure, the following
provisions are applicable:
(1)
Previously established calculation procedures should be used, taking into account all known
variables.
(2)
used.
The calibrated installed engine power for the pertinent speed and altitude ranges should be
(3)
The brake kinetic energy limits established by aeroplane ground tests should not be exceeded.
(B)
Extrapolation of Performance Data When Verifying Tests are Conducted
(1)
If data approval is desired for a greater range of airport elevations, the performance may be
calculated from the basic test data up to the maximum airport elevation, provided verifying tests are
conducted at appropriate elevations to substantiate the validity of the calculations. The actual
aeroplane performance data from the verifying tests should correspond closely to the calculated
performance values.
(2)
For the verifying tests, it has been found that normally three takeoffs at maximum weights for
the elevations tested will provide adequate verification.
(3)
If verifying tests substantiate the expanded takeoff data, the data may be further expanded up
to 1829 m (6000 ft) above the altitude at which the verifying tests were conducted. At altitudes higher
than 1829 m (6000 ft) above the verifying test altitude, the 2 percent per 305 m (1000 ft) cumulative
factor discussed in paragraph (i) above should be applied starting at zero percent at the verifying test
altitude plus 1829 m (6000 ft).
20
RESERVED
21
PARAGRAPH 23.55 ACCELERATE-STOP DISTANCE
a.
Explanation. This paragraph describes test demonstrations necessary to determine
accelerate-stop distances for aeroplane performance required to be published in the Performance
Section of the AFM.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Accelerate-stop tests should be determined in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph.
(i)
Number of Test Runs. A sufficient number of test runs should be conducted for each
aeroplane configuration desired by the applicant, in order to establish a representative distance that
would be required in the event of a rejected takeoff at or below the takeoff decision speed V1.
(ii)
Time Delays. The procedures outlined in paragraph 21b(12), as required by 23.45(f)(5), apply
appropriate time delays for the execution of retarding means related to the accelerate-stop operational
procedures and for expansion of accelerate-stop data to be incorporated in the AFM.
2FTG222
BOOK 2
CS23
Chapter 2 Section
Paragraph
23.55
23.55
(continued)
(continued)
(iii)
Reverse Thrust. The stopping portion of the accelerate-stop test may not utilise propeller
reverse thrust unless the thrust reverser system is shown to be safe, reliable, and capable of giving
repeatable results. See subparagraph c.
(2)
Airport Elevation. Accelerate-stop runs at different airport elevations can be simulated at one
airport elevation provided the braking speeds used include the entire energy range to be absorbed by
the brakes. In scheduling the data for the AFM, the brake energy assumed should not exceed the
maximum demonstrated in these tests.
(3)
Braking Speeds. The braking speeds referred to herein are scheduled test speeds and need
not correspond to the values to be scheduled in the AFM, since it is necessary to increase or decrease
the braking speed to simulate the energy range and weight envelope.
(4)
Number of Runs. At least two test runs are necessary for each configuration when multiple
aerodynamic configurations are being shown to have the same braking coefficient of friction, unless
sufficient data is available for the aeroplane model to account for variation of braking performance with
weight, kinetic energy, lift, drag, ground speed, torque limit, etc. These runs should be made with the
aeroplane weight and kinetic energy varying throughout the range for which takeoff data is scheduled.
This will usually require at least six test runs. These tests are usually conducted on hard surfaced, dry
runways.
(5)
Alternate Approvals. For an alternate approval with anti skid inoperative, nose wheel brakes
or one main wheel brake inoperative, autobraking systems, etc., a full set of tests, as mentioned in
paragraph 21b(4), should normally be conducted. A lesser number of tests may be accepted for equal
or better demonstrations, or to establish small increments, or if adequate conservatism is used during
testing.
(6)
Maximum Energy Stop. A brake energy demonstration is needed to show compliance with the
brake energy requirements. A maximum energy stop (or some lesser brake energy) is used to
establish a distance that can be associated with the demonstrated kinetic energy. An applicant can
choose any level of energy for demonstration providing that the AFM does not show performance
beyond the demonstrated kinetic energy. The demonstration should be conducted at not less than
maximum takeoff weight and should be preceded by a 4.8 km (3 ml) taxi, including three full stops
using normal braking and all engines operating. Propeller pitch controls should be applied in a manner
which is consistent with procedures to be normally used in service. Following the stop at the maximum
kinetic energy level demonstration, it is not necessary for the aeroplane to demonstrate its ability to
taxi. The maximum kinetic aeroplane energy at which performance data is scheduled should not
exceed the value for which a satisfactory afterstop condition exists. A satisfactory afterstop condition
is defined as one in which fires are confined to tyres, wheels, and brakes, and which would not result in
progressive engulfment of the remaining aeroplane during the time of passenger and crew evacuation.
The application of fire fighting means or artificial coolants should not be required for a period of five
minutes following the stop.
(7)
Maximum Energy Stop from a Landing. In the event the applicant proposes to conduct the
maximum energy RTO demonstration from a landing, a satisfactory accounting of the brake and tyre
temperatures that would have been generated during taxi and acceleration, required by paragraph
21b(6), should be made.
(8)
Instrumentation. Either ground or airborne instrumentation should include a means to
determine the horizontal distance-time history.
(9)
Wind Speed. The wind speed and direction relative to the active runway should be
determined. The height of the wind measurement should be noted, to facilitate corrections to
aeroplane wing level.
(10)
Configurations. The accelerate-stop tests should be conducted in the following configurations:
(i)
Heavy to light weight as required;
2FTG223
CS23
BOOK 2
(ii)
Most critical c.g. position;
(iii)
Wing flaps in the takeoff position(s).
(iv)
Tyre pressure. Before taxi and with cold tyres, set to the highest value appropriate for the
takeoff weight for which approval is being sought.
(v)
Engine. Set r.p.m. at applicant's recommended upper idle power limit, or the effect of
maximum idle power may be accounted for in data analyses. Propeller condition should also be
considered. See discussion in subparagraph (11), Engine Power.
(11)
Engine Power. Engine power should be appropriate to each segment of the rejected takeoff
and account for thrust decay times. See discussion of 23.57(a)(2) in paragraph 22c(1). At the
selected speed that corresponds to the required energy, the aeroplane is brought to a stop employing
the acceptable braking means. The critical engine's propeller should be in the position it would
normally assume when an engine fails and the power levers are closed.
(i)
High Drag Propeller Position. The high drag position (not reverse) of the remaining engines'
propellers may be utilised provided adequate directional control can be demonstrated on a wet runway.
Simulating wet runway controllability by disconnecting the nose wheel steering may be used. The use
of the higher propeller drag position (i.e. ground fine) is conditional on the presence of a throttle
position which incorporates tactile feel that can consistently be selected in service by a pilot with
average skill. It should be determined whether the throttle motions from takeoff power to this ground
fine position are one or two distinctive motions. If it is deemed to be two separate motions, then
accelerate-stop time delays should be determined accordingly and applied to expansion of data.
(ii)
Reverse Thrust. See subparagraph c for discussion of when reverse thrust may be used.
Demonstration of full single engine reverse controllability on a wet runway and in a 18.5 km/h (10 knot)
adverse crosswind will be required. Control down to zero speed is not essential, but a cancellation
speed based on controllability can be declared and credit given for use of reverse above that speed.
The use of reverse thrust on one engine on a wet runway requires that the reverse thrust component
be equally matched by a braking component and rudder use on the other side. Experience has shown
that using reverse with one engine inoperative, requires brakes to be modulated differently between left
and right while applying only partial reverse thrust, even on dry pavement. Disconnecting nose wheel
steering will not adequately simulate a wet runway for a full reverse condition. The use of a reverse
thrust propeller position is conditional on the presence of a throttle position which incorporates tactile
feel that can consistently be selected in service by a pilot with average skill. Selection of reverse thrust
from take-off power typically requires the power level to be retarded to idle, a gate or latching
mechanism to be overcome and the power lever to be further retarded into the ground/reverse range.
This is interpreted as three distinctive motions, with each regarded as activation of a separate
deceleration device. Accelerate-stop time delays should be determined accordingly and applied to
expansion of data.
2FTG224
BOOK 2
CS23
(12)
Accelerate-Stop Time Delays. Figure 211 is an illustration of the accelerate-stop time delays
considered acceptable for compliance with 23.45:
Engine
failure
Activation
of first decel
device
Engine failure
recognition
trec
VEF
Activation
of second
decel device
ta1
Activation
of third
decel device
ta2
V1
trec
ta1 + t
Demonstration
Time
Delays
Flight Manual
Expansion Time
Delays
ta2 + t
Figure 211 ACCELERATE-STOP TIME DELAYS

(i)
trec = engine failure recognition time. The demonstrated time from engine failure to pilot
action indicating recognition of the engine failure. For AFM data expansion purposes, it has been
found practical to use the demonstrated time or 1 second, whichever is greater, in order to allow a time
which can be executed consistently in service.
(ii)
ta1 = the demonstrated time interval between activation of the first and second deceleration
devices.
(iii)
ta2 = the demonstrated time interval between activation of the second and third deceleration
devices.
(iv)
t = a 1-second reaction time delay to account for in-service variations. For AFM calculations,
aeroplane deceleration is not allowed during the reaction time delays. If a command is required for
another crew member to actuate a deceleration device, a 2-second delay, in lieu of the
1-second delay, should be applied for each action. For automatic deceleration devices which are
approved for performance credit for AFM data expansion, established times determined during
certification testing may be used without the application of additional time delays required by this
paragraph.
(v)
The sequence for activation of deceleration devices may be selected by the applicant. If, on
occasion, the desired sequence is not achieved during testing, the test need not be repeated; however,
the demonstrated time interval may be used.
(13)
The procedures used to determine accelerate-stop distance should be described in the
Performance Information Section of the AFM.
c.
Use of Reverse Thrust. Paragraph 23.55(b) permits means other than wheel brakes to be
used in determining the stopping distance, when the conditions specified in 23.55(b) are met. One of
the conditions is that the means be safe and reliable.
(1)
Reliable. Compliance with the reliable provision of the rule may be accomplished by an
evaluation of the pitch changing/reversing system in accordance with 23.1309. The methods of AC
23.13091 should be used in the evaluation even though type-certificated engine or propeller systems
may not have been subjected to the AC 23.13091 analysis during certification. Additionally, Society
of Automotive Engineers (SAE) document ARP926A, Fault/Failure Analysis Procedure, will assist in
conducting reliability and hazard assessments. Additionally, 23.1309(d) requires the system to be
designed to safeguard against hazards to the aeroplane in the event the system or any component
thereof malfunctions or fails. An acceptable means for showing compliance with the requirement would
2FTG225
CS23
BOOK 2
be to conduct a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) of the system. An acceptable analysis
would show that the effects of any system or component malfunction or failure would not result in a
hazard to the aeroplane and that the propeller reversing system is reliable. SAE document, ARP
926A, Fault/Failure Analysis Procedure, contains acceptable criteria for conducting such an analysis.
(2)
Safe. Compliance with the safe provisions of 23.55(b)(2) and 23.75(f)(1) will require an
evaluation of the complete system including operational aspects to ensure no unsafe feature exists.
Safe and reliable also means that it is extremely improbable that the system can mislead the flight crew
or will allow gross asymmetric power settings, i.e. forward thrust on one engine vs. reverse thrust on
the other. In achieving this level of reliability, the system should not increase crew work load or require
excessive crew attention during a very dynamic time period. Also, the approved performance data
should be such that the average pilot can duplicate this performance by following the AFM procedures.
22
PARAGRAPH 23.57 TAKEOFF PATH
a.
Paragraph 23.57(a)
(1)
Explanation
(i)
The takeoff path requirements of 23.57 and the reductions required by 23.61 are established
so that the AFM performance can be used in making the necessary decisions relative to takeoff
weights when obstacles are present. Net takeoff flight path data should be presented in the AFM as
required by 23.1587(d)(6).
(ii)
The required performance is provided in the AFM by either pictorial paths at various power-toweight conditions with corrections for wind, or by a series of charts for each segment along with a
procedure for connecting these segments into a continuous path.
(2)
Procedures
(i)
Paragraph 23.57(a) requires that the takeoff path extend to the higher of where the aeroplane
is 457 m (1500 ft) above the takeoff surface or to the altitude at which the transition to en route
configuration is complete and a speed is reached at which compliance with 23.67(c)(3) is shown.
(ii)
Paragraph 23.66 requires the aeroplane not be banked before reaching a height of 15 m (50 ft)
as shown by the net takeoff flight path data.
(iii)
The AFM should contain information required to show compliance with the climb requirements
of 23.57 and 23.67(c)(3). This should include information related to the transition from the takeoff
configuration and speed to the en route configuration and speed. The effects of changes from takeoff
power to maximum continuous power should also be included.
(iv)
Generally, the AFM shows takeoff paths which at low power to weight include acceleration
segments between 122 m and 457 m (400 and 1500 ft) and end at 457 m (1500 ft), and at high power
to weight extending considerably higher than 457 m (1500 ft) above the takeoff surface. On some
aeroplanes, the takeoff speed schedules and/or flap configuration do not require acceleration below
457 m (1500 ft), even at limiting performance gradients.
2FTG226
BOOK 2
CS23
b.
Paragraph 23.57(a)(1) Takeoff Path Power Conditions
(1)
Explanation. The takeoff path should represent the actual expected performance at all points.
If the path is constructed by the segmental method, in accordance with 23.57(d)(2) and 23.57(d)(4), it
should be conservative and should be supported by at least one demonstrated fly-out to the completed
en route configuration. This is necessary to ensure all required crew actions do not adversely impact
the required gradients.
(2)
Procedures
(i)
To substantiate that the predicted takeoff path is representative of actual performance, the
power used in its construction must comply with 23.45. This requires, in part, that the power for any
particular flight condition be that for the particular ambient atmospheric conditions that are assumed to
exist along the path. The standard lapse rate for ambient temperature is specified in Appendix 7 of this
FTG under Standard Atmosphere and should be used for power determination associated with each
pressure altitude during the climb.
(ii)
Paragraph 23.57(c)(4) requires that the power up to 122 m (400 ft) above the take-off surface
represents the power available along the path resulting from the power lever setting established during
the initial ground roll in accordance with AFM procedures. This resulting power should represent the
normal expected variations throughout the acceleration and climb to 122 m (400 ft) and should not
exceed the limits for takeoff power at any point.
(iii)
A sufficient number of takeoffs, to at least the altitude above the takeoff surface scheduled for
V2 climb, should be made to establish the power lapse resulting from a fixed power lever. An analysis
may be used to account for various engine bleeds, e.g. ice protection, air conditioning, etc. In some
aeroplanes, the power growth characteristics are such that less than full rated power is required to be
used for AFM takeoff power limitations and performance.
(iv)
Engine power lapse with speed and altitude during the takeoff and climb, at fixed power lever
settings, may be affected by takeoff pressure altitude.
(v)
Most turboprop engines are sensitive to increasing airspeed during the takeoff roll. The
applicant's procedure should be evaluated and, if acceptable, the procedure should be reflected in the
AFM. The AFM takeoff field length and takeoff power setting charts are based on the approved
procedure. Approved procedures should be those that can be accomplished in service by pilots of
normal skill. For example, if a power adjustment is to be made after brake release, the power should
be adjustable without undue attention. Only one adjustment is allowed.
(vi)
A typical non-rolling takeoff procedure is as follows:
(A)
After stopping on the runway, adjust all engines to a static takeoff power setting (selected by
the applicant).
(B)
Release brakes.
(C)
Upon reaching 93 to 111 km/h (50 to 60 knots), adjust power levers to maintain torque and
temperatures within limits. Only one adjustment is allowed.
(vii)
A typical rolling takeoff procedure is as follows:
(A)
Release brakes.
(B)
Adjust power levers to takeoff power in a smooth motion.
(C)
As speed increases, make a small adjustment as necessary to preclude exceeding torque or
temperature limits.
2FTG227
CS23
BOOK 2
c.
Paragraph 23.57(a)(2) Engine Failure
(1)
Explanation. Propeller thrust/drag characteristics should represent conditions which occur
when the engine is actually failed. The power time history used for data reduction and expansion
should be substantiated by test results.
(2)
Procedures. Sufficient tests should be conducted utilising actual fuel cuts to establish the
propeller thrust decay history.
d.
Paragraph 23.57(c)(1) Takeoff Path Slope
(1)
Explanation. For showing compliance with the positive slope required by 23.57(c)(1), the
establishment of a horizontal segment, as part of the takeoff flight path, is considered to be acceptable,
in accordance with 23.61(c). See figure 24-2. See paragraph 24(b)(2) for further discussion.
(i)
The level acceleration segment in the AFM net takeoff profile should begin at the horizontal
distance along the takeoff flight path that the net climb segment reaches the AFM specified
acceleration height. See figure 242.
(ii)
The AFM acceleration height should be presented in terms of pressure altitude increment
above the takeoff surface. This information should allow the establishment of the pressure altitude
increment (Hp) for off-standard ambient temperature so that the geometric height required for
obstacle clearance is assured. For example:
Given:
o
o
o
o
Takeoff surface pressure altitude (Hp) = 610 m (2 000 ft)

Airport std. temp. abs. (TS ) = 11C+273.2 = 284.2K
Airport ambient temp. abs.(TAM) = 20C+273.2 = 253.2K
Geometric height required (h) 457 m (1 500 ft) above the takeoff surface
Find:
o Pressure altitude increment (Hp) above the takeoff surface
Hp = h(TS/TAM) = 457 m (1 500 ft) (284.2k/253.2K)
Hp = 513,3 m (1 684 ft)
e.
Paragraph 23.57(c)(2) Takeoff Path Speed
(1)
Explanation
(i)
It is intended that the aeroplane be flown at a constant indicated airspeed to at least 122 m
(400 ft) above the takeoff surface. This speed should meet the constraints on V2 of 23.51(c)(4).
(ii)
The specific wording of 23.57(c)(2) should not be construed to imply that above 122 m (400 ft)
the airspeed may be reduced below V2, but instead that acceleration may be commenced.
(1)
Explanation
(i)
The intent of this requirement is to permit only those crew actions that are conducted routinely
to be used in establishing the engine-inoperative takeoff path. The power levers may only be adjusted
early during the takeoff roll, as discussed under 23.57(a)(1) (paragraph 22b(2)(ii)), and then left fixed
until at least 122 m (400 ft) above the takeoff surface.
(ii)
Simulation studies and accident investigations have shown that when heavy workload occurs
in the cockpit, as with an engine loss during takeoff, the crew might not advance the operative engines
to avoid the ground even if the crew knows the operative engines have been set at reduced power.
This same finding applies to manually feathering a propeller. The landing gear may be retracted,
2FTG228
BOOK 2
CS23
because this is accomplished routinely, once a positive rate of climb is observed. This also establishes
the delay time to be used for data expansion purposes.
(2)
Procedures
(i)
To permit the takeoff to be based on a feathered propeller up to 122 m (400 ft) above the
takeoff surface, automatic propeller feathering devices may be approved if adequate system reliability
is shown in accordance with 23.1309. Other automatic systems such as one which minimises drag of
the inoperative propeller by sensing negative torque may also be approved. Drag reduction for a
manually feathered propeller is permitted for flight path calculations only after reaching 122 m (400 ft)
above the takeoff surface.
(ii)
For flap retraction above 122 m (400 ft) a speed of not less than the lesser of 11 VMC or 12VS1
should be maintained.
g.
Paragraph 23.57(d) Takeoff Path Construction
(1)
Explanation. To take advantage of ground effect, AFM takeoff paths utilise a continuous
takeoff path from VLOF to 11 m (35 ft), covering the range of power to weight ratios. From that point,
free air performance, in accordance with 23.57(e), is added segmentally. This methodology may yield
an AFM flight path that is steeper with the gear down than up. The aeroplane should not be banked
before reaching a height of 15 m (50 ft) as shown by the net takeoff flight path. This requires
determination of climb data in the wings level condition.
(2)
Procedures. The AFM should include the procedures necessary to achieve this performance.
h.
Paragraph 23.57(e)(2) Takeoff Path Segment Conditions
(1)
Explanation. Paragraph 23.57(e)(2) requires that the weight of the aeroplane, the
configuration, and the power setting must be constant throughout each segment and must correspond
to the most critical condition prevailing in the segment. The intent is that for simplified analysis, the
performance be based on that available at the most critical point in time during the segment, not that
the individual variables (weight, approximate power setting, etc.) should each be picked at its most
critical value and then combined to produce the performance for the segment.
(2)
Procedures. The performance during the takeoff path segments should be obtained using one
of the following methods
(i)
The critical level of performance as explained in paragraph 22h(1);
(ii)
The actual performance variation during the segment.
i.
Paragraph 23.57(d)(4) Segmented Takeoff Path Check
(1)
Explanation. None.
(2)
Procedures. The take-off path should be checked by continuous demonstrated takeoffs. A
sufficient number of these, using the AFM established takeoff procedures and speeds and covering the
range of power-to-weight ratios, should be made to ensure the validity of the segmented takeoff path.
The continuous takeoff data should be compared to takeoff data calculated by AFM data procedures
but using test engine power and test speeds.
j.
Turboprop Reduced Power Takeoffs
(1)
Reduced takeoff power is a power less than approved takeoff power for which power setting
and aeroplane performance is established by corrections to the approved power setting and
performance, when operating with reduced takeoff power, the power setting which establishes power
for take-off is not considered a limitation.
2FTG229
CS23
BOOK 2
(2)
It is acceptable to establish and use a takeoff power setting that is less than the approved
takeoff power if:
(i)
The establishment of the reduced power takeoff data is handled through the type certification
process and contained in the AFM;
(ii)
The reduced takeoff power setting:
(A)
Does not result in loss of systems or functions that are normally operative for takeoff such as
engine failure warning, configuration warning, autofeather, automatic throttles, rudder boost, automatic
ignition, or any other safety related system dependent upon a minimum takeoff power setting.
(B)
Is based on an approved engine takeoff power rating for which aeroplane performance data is
approved.
(C)
Does not introduce difficulties in aeroplane controllability or engine response/operation in the
event that approved takeoff power is applied at any point in the takeoff path.
(D)
Is at least 75% of the approved takeoff power.
(E)
Is predicated on a careful analysis of propeller efficiency variation at all applicable conditions.
(iii)
Relevant speeds used for reduced power takeoffs are not less than those which will show
compliance with the required controllability margins with the approved takeoff power.
(iv)
The AFM states, as a limitation, that reduced takeoff power settings may not be used:
(A)
When the antiskid system (if installed) is inoperative.
(B)
On runways contaminated with standing water, snow, slush or ice.
(C)
On wet runways unless suitable performance accountability is made for the increased stopping
distance on the wet floor.
(D)
Where items affecting performance cause a significant increase in crew workload. Examples
are inoperative equipment (e.g. inoperative engine gauges, reversers or engine systems resulting in
the need for additional performance corrections) or non-standard operations (i.e. any situation
requiring a non-standard take-off technique).
(v)
Procedures for determining and applying the reduced takeoff power value are simple, and the
pilot is provided with information to obtain both the reduced power and approved takeoff power for
each ambient condition.
(vi)
The AFM provides adequate information to conduct a power check, using the approved takeoff
power and if necessary, establish a time interval.
(vii)
Procedures are given to the use of reduced power.
(viii)
Application of reduced power in service is always at the discretion of the pilot.
2FTG230
BOOK 2
CS23
23
PARAGRAPH 23.59 TAKEOFF DISTANCE AND TAKEOFF RUN
a.
Takeoff Distance Paragraph 23.59(a)
(1)
Explanation. The takeoff distance is either of the two distances depicted in figure 231 and
232 and discussed in paragraph 23a(i) or (ii), whichever is greater. The distances indicated below
are measured horizontally from the main landing gears at initial brake release to that same point on the
aeroplane when the lowest part of the departing aeroplane is 11 m (35 ft) above the surface of the
runway and accomplished in accordance with the procedures developed for 23.57.
(i)
The distance measured to 11 m (35 ft) with a critical engine failure recognised at V1. See
figure 231.
Start
V1
VLOF
11 m (35)
Takeoff Distance
Figure 231 TAKEOFF DISTANCE

Critical Engine Failure Recognised at V1
(ii)
One hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the distance measured to 11 m (35 ft) with all engines
operating. See figure 232.
Start
V LOF
11 m (35)
All Engine Distance
Takeoff Distance = 1.15 * All Engine Distance to 11 m (35)
Figure 232 TAKEOFF DISTANCE
All Engines Operating
2FTG231
CS23
BOOK 2
b.
Takeoff Run Paragraph 23.59(b)
(1)
Explanation
(i)
Take-off run is a term used for the runway length when the takeoff distance includes a
clearway (i.e. where the accelerate-go distance does not remain entirely over the runway), and the
takeoff run is either of the two distances depicted in figure 231 and 232 and discussed in paragraph
23b(1)(i)(A) or (B), whichever is greater. These distances are measured as described in 23.59(a).
When using a clearway to determine the takeoff run, no more than one-half of the air distance from
VLOF to the 11 m (35 ft) point may be flown over the clearway.
(A)
The distance from start of takeoff roll to the mid-point between lift-off and the point at which the
aeroplane attains a height of 11 m (35 ft) above the takeoff surface, with a critical engine failure
recognised at V1. See figure 233.
Start
V1
V LOF
Mid-point
11m (35 )
Ground Roll
Takeoff Run
Takeoff Distance
Clearway
Figure 233 TAKEOFF RUN Critical Engine Failure Recognised at V1

(B)
One hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the distance from start of roll to the mid-point between
lift-off and the point at which the aeroplane attains a height of 11 m (35 ft) above the takeoff surface,
with all engines operating. See figure 234.
Takeoff Path
Start
VLQF
Mid-point
11 m (35)
1.15 * Distance to Mid-point

Takeoff Run = Required Runway
Clearway
Takeoff Distance = 1.15 * All Engine Distance to 11 m (35)

Figure 234 TAKEOFF RUN All Engines Operating
(ii)
There may be situations in which the one-engine-inoperative condition (paragraph 23b(1)(i)(A))
would dictate one of the distance criteria, takeoff run (required runway) or takeoff distance (required
runway plus clearway) while the all-engines operating condition (paragraph 23b(1)(i)(B)) would dictate
the other. Therefore, both conditions should be considered.
(iii)
For the purpose of establishing takeoff distances and takeoff runs, the clearway plane is
defined in CS 1. The clearway is considered to be part of the takeoff surface, and a height of 11 m
(35 ft) may be measured from that surface. See figure 235.
2FTG232
BOOK 2
CS23
Chapter 2Paragraph 23.59 (continued)
Takeoff Path
Clearway Plane
1.25%
Maximum
11 m (35)
Clearway
Figure 235 CLEARWAY PROFILES
24
PARAGRAPH 23.61 TAKE-OFF FLIGHT PATH
a.
Take-off Flight Path Paragraph 23.61(a). The takeoff flight path begins 11 m (35 ft) above the
takeoff surface at the end of the takeoff distance determined in accordance with 23.59 and ends when
the aeroplane's height is the higher of 457 m (1 500 ft) above the takeoff surface or at an altitude at
which the configuration and speed have been achieved in accordance with 23.67(c)(3). See figure 24
1.
b.
Net Take-off Flight Path Paragraph 23.61(b) and (c)
(1)
The net takeoff flight path is the actual path diminished by a gradient of 0.8 percent for twoengine aeroplanes. See figure 242.
(2)
The net takeoff flight path is the flight path used to determine the aeroplane obstacle
clearance. Paragraph 23.61(b) states the required climb gradient reduction to be applied throughout
the flight path for the determination of the net flight path, including the level flight acceleration
segment. Rather than decrease the level flight path by the amount required by 23.61(b), 23.61(c)
allows the aeroplane to maintain a level net flight path during acceleration but with a reduction in
acceleration equal to the gradient decrement required by 23.61(b). By this method, the applicant
exchanges altitude reduction for increased distance to accelerate in level flight in determination of the
level flight portion of the net takeoff path.
2FTG233
CS23
BOOK 2
Takeoff flight path

Height
> 1500 feet
1500 feet
Path 2
Height
>
- 400 feet
Takeoff distance
(longer of 1 eng inop takeoff
or 1.15 all eng takeoff)
VEF
Path 1
Heights are referenced to
runway elevation at end
of takeoff distance
VLOF
35 Ft
Segment
Ground
Landing Gear
Roll
1ST
Retraction
Down
Power
All operating
Enroute
position
See note
See note
Accelerating
V2
Accelerating
Airspeed
Propeller
Retracting
Above 400 ft thrust can be reduced
if the requirements of 23.57(c)(3)
can be met with less than taxeoff thrust
Takeoff
Final
Retracted
Takeoff
Flaps
Engines
Acceleration
2ND
Maximum
continuous
VEnroute
One inoperative
Takeoff
One autofeathered or windmilling

Up to 400 feet
One feathered
400 feet or greater
NOTE: The en route takeoff segment usually begins with the aeroplane in the en route configuration and with maximum
continuous thrust, but it is not required that these conditions exist until the end of the takeoff path when compliance with
23.67(c)(3) is shown. The time limit on takeoff thrust cannot be exceeded.
* Segments as defined by 23.67.

Figure 241 TAKEOFF SEGMENTS AND NOMENCLATURE
11 m (35)
122 m (400)
Net Flight Path
Obstacle Clearance
11 m (35)
Level from
Takeoff Surface
Figure 242 NET TAKEOFF FLIGHT PATH
2FTG234
BOOK 2
CS23
25
PARAGRAPH 23.65 CLIMB: ALL ENGINES OPERATING
a.
Explanation
(1)
Objectives. The climb tests associated with this requirement are performed to establish the
aeroplane's all-engine performance capability for altitudes between sea level and not less than 3048 m
(10 000 ft) with wing flaps set to the takeoff position. This is necessary to enable comparison with the
minimum climb performance required, and also for AFM presentation of climb performance data of
3048 m (10 000 ft) and the effect of altitude and temperature (see 23.1587) and the effect of weight for
a/c over 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) MTOW and Turbine Engined a/c.
(2)
Cooling Climbs. Applicants with single engine reciprocating powered aeroplanes may vary the
climb speeds to meet the requirements of 23.1047. If variations in climb speeds are required to meet
the cooling tests, the applicant may wish to establish the variation of rate of climb with speed.
(3)
Sawtooth Climbs. A common method of determining climb performance is sawtooth climbs. A
series of climbs, known as sawtooth climbs, should be conducted at several constant indicated
airspeeds using a constant power setting and a prescribed configuration. A minimum of three series of
sawtooth climbs should be conducted. The mean altitudes through which the sawtooth climbs are
conducted should be:
(i)
As near sea level as practical.
(ii)
Close to the ceiling (where 30 m (100 ft)/minute can be maintained) for sea level engines.
(iii)
An intermediate altitude, taking into consideration the power characteristics of the engine.
b.
Procedures Sawtooth Climbs
(1)
Climb Technique. With the altimeter adjusted to a setting of 1 013 mb (pressure altitude), the
series of climbs should be initiated at a chosen altitude. Stabilise airspeed and power prior to
recording data. The time at the beginning of each run should be recorded for weight-accounting
purposes, and the stabilised climb should be continued for 3 minutes or 914 m (3 000 ft) minimum
while holding airspeed substantially constant. Climbs should be conducted 90 to the wind, and
alternately, on reciprocal headings to minimise the effects of windshear. Since the rate at which the
altitude changes is the primary consideration of the test, particular care should be taken to observe the
precise altimeter indication at precise time intervals. Time intervals of not more than 30 seconds are
recommended for altimeter readings. Airspeed, ambient temperatures, r.p.m. and other engine power
parameters also should be recorded, permissibly at longer intervals. Rates-of-climb/sink observed for
test conditions should be greater than +/- 30 m (100 ft.)/min. Rates of climb near zero tend to be
unreliable.
A running plot of altitude-versus-time provides an effective means of monitoring
acceptability of test data as the run progresses, and a running plot of the observed rate of climb
obtained for each airspeed enables similar monitoring of the sawtooth program. This procedure is
recommended because of the opportunity it affords for promptly observing and economically rectifying
questionable test results.
(2)
Air Quality. In order to obtain accurate results, it is essential that the sawtooth climbs be
conducted in smooth air. In general, the effects of turbulence are more pronounced in test data
obtained at lower rates of climb and, when testing for compliance with minimum climb requirements,
even slight turbulence may produce errors in observed climbs of such magnitude as to render the data
inconclusive with respect both to rate of climb and best climb speed. Less obvious but equally
unacceptable for climb testing is the presence of an inverse gradient in the ambient temperature.
(3)
Test Airspeeds. The airspeeds selected for the sawtooth climbs should bracket the best climb
speed, which for preliminary purposes may be estimated as 140% of the power-off stalling speed. The
lowest climb test speed should be as near the stalling speed as can be flown without evidence of
buffeting, or necessity for abnormally frequent or excessive control movements, which might penalise
the climb performance. Although the example shown in figure 251 has 18.5 km/h (10 knot) intervals,
2FTG235
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter 2 Paragraph
Section 23.65
23.65
(continued)
(continued)
the interval between test speeds should be smaller at the low speed end of the range, and should
increase as the speed increases. Suggested intervals are 9.3 km/h (5 knots) at the low end, varying to
27.8 km/h (15 knots) at the high end. In addition, the maximum level flight speed and VS (or VMIN) at
the approximate midrange test altitude provide a useful aid in defining the curves in figure 252.
(4)
Data Plotting. Sawtooth climb data is plotted on a graph using altitude and time as the basic
parameters as shown in figure 251. After the sawtooth data has been plotted, draw in the mean
altitude line. A tangent line can now be drawn to each of the sawtooth climb curves at the mean
altitude intersection. By determining the slope of the tangent lines, the observed rate of climb at the
mean altitude for each sawtooth can be determined.
5200
90 K CAS
100 K CAS 110 K CAS
120 K CAS
Pressure altitude
130 K CAS
4800
Tangent
Mean ALT
4400
V
V
4000
= 165 K CAS
max
min
= 72 K CAS
Time minutes
Figure 251 OBSERVED DATA
(5)
Data Corrections. For the density altitude method of data reduction (see appendix 2), it is
necessary to correct the data to standard atmospheric conditions, maximum weight, and chart brake
horsepower before proceeding any further with the observed data. These corrections sometimes
change the observed data a significant amount. The maximum level flight speed (VMAX) data points
should also be corrected to assist in defining the curves in figure 252.
(6)
Plotting of Corrected Data. After the observed data has been corrected to the desired
standards, it can be plotted as shown in figure 252 with the rate of climb versus calibrated airspeed at
various density altitudes. It should be noted that the stall speed points are not usually true stabilised
zero rate of climb data points. However, the stall speed points are useful in defining the asymptotic
character of the left hand part of the curve.
(7)
Speed Schedule Data Points. From the curves of figure 252, it is now possible to determine
the aeroplanes best rate of climb speed schedule, VY. This is done by drawing a straight line through
the peaks (highest rate of climb point) of each of the previously drawn curves of R/C vs. CAS. Also, it
is possible to obtain from this graph the best angle of climb speed schedule VX. This is done by
drawing tangent lines to the R/C vs. CAS curves from the graph origin and connecting each of the
tangent intersect points with a straight line. It should be noted that the VX and VY speed lines intersect
at zero rate of climb. This is because zero rate of climb occurs at the aeroplanes absolute ceiling and
VX, VY, VMIN, and VMAX are all the same speed at this point.
2FTG236
BOOK 2
CS23
VX
VY
Rate of climb - FT/min
1000
800
1250 HD
4000 HD
9200HD
600
400
200
0
0
20
60
40
80
100
120
140
160
180
Calibrated airspeed - knots

Figure 252 RATE OF CLIMB VS. AIRSPEED
(8)
Speed and Rate of Climb. Directly from information obtained from figure 252, it is possible to
plot the climb performance of the aeroplane into a more usable form. By reading the rates of climb at
the VY intersect points and plotting them against altitude as shown in figure 253, it is possible to
determine the rate of climb from sea level to the absolute ceiling.
pr
op
en
gi
ne
ne
d
te
ra
pi
as
Constant SPH
ll t
fu
-
e
in
ng
.E
cip
re
Density altitude
bo
gi
En
p.
ci
re
ly
al
rm
No
10,000
Normaly aspirated engine
r
Tu
15,000
SHP varying with altitude

d
ge
ha
oc
rb
Tu
MP varying with
altitude
Constant MP
5,000
VY
90
100
tle
ot
hr
VX
Sea level
0
500
1,000
1,500
Rate of climb
Airspeed. KCAS
Figure 253 RATE OF CLIMB AND SPEEDS
2FTG237
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter
Paragraph 23.65 (continued)
(9)
Cowl Flap and Mixture. Cowl flaps should be in the position used for cooling tests.
mixture setting should be set to that used during the cooling test.
The
(10)
Weight and C.G. For climb performance tests, the aeroplane's test weight, load distribution
and engine power should be recorded. Usually, forward c.g. is critical for climb performance.
c.
Extrapolation of Climb Data. The climb data expansion required by 23.1587 from sea level to
3048 m (10 000 ft) and from ISA to ISA + 30C can be accomplished by the methods in appendix 2.
Normally, the same method used for data reduction should be used for data expansion. Use caution in
extrapolating beyond altitudes that have not been verified by flight tests. Generally, data should not be
extrapolated more than 914 m (3 000 ft) in altitude.
d.
Special Equipment or Instrumentation. Climb performance tests require an airspeed indicator,
sensitive altimeter, and total air temperature indicator with a known recovery factor. For reciprocating
engine-powered aeroplanes, an induction air temperature gauge, engine tachometer, manifold
pressure gauge and cylinder head temperature indicator may be appropriate. For turbine-powered
aeroplanes, indicators of power parameters, such as torque meter, EGT, N1, N2, and propeller r.p.m.,
may be appropriate. A fuel counter and/or fuel flowmeter is useful. All instruments should be
calibrated, and the calibration data should be included with the test records. In addition, a stopwatch
and appropriate data recording board and forms are required.
e.
Climb Performance After STC Modifications. (Reserved)
26
PARAGRAPH 23.66 TAKE-OFF CLIMB, ONE ENGINE INOPERATIVE
(1)
For normal, utility and aerobatic category reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes greater
than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) and turbine-engine powered aeroplanes in the normal, utility and aerobatic
category, the propeller of the inoperative engine is required to be in the position it rapidly and
automatically assumes for the determination of one-engine inoperative take-off climb performance.
This allows performance credit for a reliable system which rapidly drives the propeller to a low drag
setting with no action from the pilot. If no such system is fitted, the propeller should be assumed to be
in the most critical condition.
27
PARAGRAPH 23.67 CLIMB: ONE ENGINE INOPERATIVE
a.
Explanation
(1)
Performance Matrix. For all twin-engine aeroplanes, 23.67 requires the one-engineinoperative climb performance be determined in the specified configuration. The requirements of 23.67
are summarised in the following table:
2FTG238
Regulation
23.67(a)(1)
23.67(a)(2)
Category
Normal, Utility & Aerobatic
Engine type and

aeroplane weight
kg (lb)
VSO km/h (kt)
Recip. 2712(6 000)
23.67(b)(1)
23.67(b)(2)
23.67(c)(1)
23.67(c)(2)
23.67(c)(3)
23.67(c)(4)
Commuter
Recip. >2712(6 000) & Turbine
>113 (61)
113 (61)
MCP
MCP
MTOP
MCP
MTOP
MTOP
MCP
MTOP
Flap and gear

retracted
Flap and gear

retracted
Take-off flap, gear

retracted
Flap and gear

retracted
Take-off flap,
gear extended
Flap and gear

retracted
Approach flap*,
gear retracted
Propeller position
on inoperative
engine
Minimum drag
Minimum drag
Minimum drag
Minimum
drag
Minimum drag
Minimum drag
Attitude
Position it
automatically
and rapidly
assumes
Wings level
Take-off
flap, gear
retracted
Position it
automatically
and rapidly
assumes
Climb speed
1.2VS1
1.2VS1
1.2VS1
V2
V2
1.2VS1
As in
procedures but
1.5VS1
Altitude m(ft)
1524(5 000)
1524(5 000)
Equal to that
achieved at 15 m
(50 ft) in the
demonstration of
23.53
122(400)
457(1 500)
122(400)
457(1 500)
122(400)
Required climb
gradient (%)
1.5
no minimum but
must determine
steady
climb/descent
gradient
Measurably positive
0.75
Take-off
surface
Measurably
positive
2.0
1.2
2.1
Power on
operative engine
Configuration
*Approach position(s) in which VS1 does not exceed 110% of the VS1 for the related all-engines-operating landing positions
CS23
BOOK 2
(2)
Range of Tests. The primary objective of the climb tests associated with this requirement is to
establish the aeroplane's climb performance capability with one engine inoperative for altitudes
between sea level and 3048 m (10 000 ft) or higher and temperatures from ISA to ISA + 30C. This is
necessary to enable comparison with the prescribed climb requirement at 1524 m (5 000 ft) altitude,
and also for AFM presentation of climb performance data for altitudes and temperatures as prescribed
in 23.1587. Secondary objectives are to establish the climb speed to be used in the cooling tests
required by 23.1041 through 23.1047, including the appropriate speed variation with altitude, and to
establish a climb speed (or descent speed, as appropriate) which, irrespective of the speed used in
demonstrating compliance with climb and cooling requirements, is required for presentation in the AFM
in accordance with 23.1587(c)(5).
(3)
WAT Charts. For aeroplanes with a MTOW greater than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) and all turbinepowered aeroplanes, a WAT chart is an acceptable means to meet the performance requirements.
See discussion in paragraph 8 of this FTG.
b.
Procedure
(1)
Critical Engine. To accomplish these objectives, it is necessary that sawtooth climbs be
conducted with the critical engine inoperative and with the prescribed configuration and power
condition. The critical-inoperative-engine for performance considerations is that engine which, when
inoperative, results in the lowest rate of climb. The critical engine should be determined by conducting
a set of sawtooth climbs, one engine at a time.
(2)
Test Technique. One-engine-inoperative climb tests should be conducted at airspeeds and at
altitudes as outlined for all-engine climbs under 23.65. The test technique and other considerations
noted under 23.65 also apply. In climb tests with one engine inoperative, however, trim drag can be a
significant factor and one-engine-inoperative climb tests should be conducted on a steady heading with
the wings laterally level or, at the option of the applicant, with not more than 5 bank into the good
engine in an effort to achieve zero sideslip. A yaw string or yaw vane is needed to detect zero sideslip.
The AFM should describe the method used, and the approximate ball position required to achieve the
AFM performance.
c.
(1)
Climb Gradient. The required climb gradients are specified in 23.67(c).
(2)
Climb Performance Methods. Climb performance should be determined in the configurations
necessary, to construct the net takeoff flight path and to show compliance with the approach climb
requirements of 23.67(c). Some net takeoff flight path conditions will require wings level climb data.
See paragraph 22g(1). If full rudder with wings level cannot maintain constant heading, small bank
angles into the operating engine(s), with full rudder, should be used to maintain constant heading. For
all other conditions, climb performance may be determined with up to 5 bank into the good engine.
Two methods for establishing the critical one-engine-inoperative climb performance follow:
(i)
Method No. 1. Reciprocal heading climbs are conducted at several thrust-to-weight conditions
from which the performance for the AFM is extracted.
(ii)
Method No. 2. Drag polars and engine-out yaw drag data are obtained for expansion into AFM
climb performance. See appendix 2. Reciprocal heading check climbs are conducted to verify the
predicted climb performance.
(3)
Landing Gear Position. The climb performance tests with landing gear extended in
accordance with 23.67(c) should be conducted with the landing gear and gear doors extended in the
most unfavourable in-transit drag position. It has been acceptable to consider that the critical
configuration is associated with the largest frontal area. For the landing gear, it usually exists with no
weight on the landing gear. For gear doors, it is usually with all the gear doors open. If it is evident
that a more critical transitional configuration exists, such as directional rotation of the gear, testing
should be conducted in that configuration. In all cases where the critical configuration occurs during a
2FTG241
CS23
BOOK 2
transition phase which cannot be maintained except by special or extraordinary procedures, it is

permissible to apply corrections based on other test data or acceptable analysis.
(4)
Cooling Air. If means, such as variable intake doors, are provided to control powerplant
cooling air supply during takeoff, climb, and en route flight, they should be set in a position which will
maintain the temperature of major powerplant components, engine fluids, etc. within the established
limits. The effect of these procedures should be included in the climb performance of the aeroplane.
These provisions apply for all ambient temperatures up to the highest operational temperature limit for
which approval is desired.
(5)
Power. See paragraph 22b.
28
PARAGRAPH 23.71 GLIDE (SINGLE-ENGINED AEROPLANES)
a.
Explanation
(1)
Gliding Performance. CS 2371 requires the optimum gliding performance to be scheduled,
with the landing gear and wing flaps in the most favourable position and the propeller in the minimum
drag position.
(2)
Background. The primary purpose of this information is to provide the pilot with the aeroplane
gliding performance. Such data will be used as an approximate guide to the gliding range that can be
achieved, but will not be used to the same degree of accuracy or commercial significance as many
other aspects of performance information. Hence some reasonable approximation in its derivation is
acceptable.
b.
Means of compliance
(1)
Engine-Inoperative Tests. Clearly the simplest way of obtaining accurate data is to perform
actual engine-inoperative glides. These tests should be carried out over an airfield, thereby permitting
a safe landing to be made in the event of the engine not restarting at the end of the test.
(i)
Fixed Pitch Propeller. Most likely, the propeller will be windmilling after the fuel is shut-off. If
this is the case and the propeller does not stop after slowing to the best glide speed, then the gliding
performance should be based on a windmilling propeller. Stalling the aeroplane to stop the propeller
from windmilling is not an acceptable method of determining performance because the procedure could
cause the average pilot to divert attention away from the primary flight task of gliding to a safe landing.
(ii)
Constant-speed / Variable-pitch propeller aeroplanes. For these propellers, the applicant may
assume that the means to change propeller pitch is still operational and therefore the propeller should be
set at the minimum drag configuration. For most installations this will be coarse pitch or feather.
(2)
Sawtooth Glides. If Sawtooth Glides are used to determine the glide performance, these
glides can be flown using the same basic procedures in paragraph 23.65 of this guidance material. For
simplification, the test need only be flown at an intermediate altitude and gross weight generating one
speed for the pilot to use. The best lift over drag speed is frequently higher than the best rate of climb
speed; therefore, the airspeed range to flight test may be bracketed around a speed 10 to 15% higher
than the best rate of climb speed.
(3)
Performance Data. A chart or table should be constructed for the AFM that presents the literal
(over-the-ground) gliding distances for the altitude range expected in service, at the demonstrated
glide speed. As a minimum, a statement of NMs per 305 m (1 000 ft) loss of altitude at the
demonstrated configuration and speed at MTOW, standard day, no wind, has to be given.
2FTG242
CS23
BOOK 2
29
PARAGRAPH 23.75 LANDING
a.
Explanation
(1)
Purpose. The purpose of this requirement is to evaluate the landing characteristics and to
determine the landing distance. The landing distance is the horizontal distance from a point along the
flight path 15 m (50 ft) above the landing surface to the point where the aeroplane has come to a
complete stop, or to a speed of 5.6 km/h (3 knots) for seaplanes or amphibians on water.
(2)
Companion Requirements. Paragraphs 23.143(a)(6), 23.153, 23.231, and 23.233 are
companion requirements, and normally, tests to determine compliance would be accomplished at the
same time. Additionally, the requirements of 23.473 should be considered.
(3)
Approach and Landing. The steady gliding approach, the pilot skill, the conditions, the vertical
accelerations, and the aeroplane actions in 23.75(a), (b), and (c) are concerned primarily with not
requiring particularly skilful or abrupt manoeuvres after passing the 15 m (50-ft) point. The phrase
steady gliding approach, taken in its strictest sense, means power off. However, it has generally been
considered that some power may be used during a steady gliding approach to maintain at least 1.3 VS1
control sink rate on final approach. For those aeroplanes using power during approach, power may be
decreased after passing the 15 m (50-ft) point and there should be no nose depression by use of the
longitudinal control. For those aeroplanes approaching with power off, the longitudinal control may be
used as necessary to maintain a safe speed for flare. In both cases, there should be no change in
configuration and power should not be increased. The landing distance and the procedure specified in
the AFM are then based on the power used for the demonstration. The power used and the technique
used to achieve the landing distances should be clearly stated in the AFM. This applies to portions of
the approach prior to and after the 15 m (50-ft) height. The aeroplane should be satisfactorily
controllable when landing under the most unfavourable conditions to be encountered in service,
including cross winds, wet runway surfaces and with one engine inoperative. Demonstration of landing
with an adverse cross-wind of at least 0.2 VS0 will be acceptable and operation on wet (but not
contaminated) runway surfaces may be simulated by disconnecting nosewheel steering. The effect of
weight on the landing distance due to its influence on controllability of reverse thrust should be
considered.
(4)
Landing Gear Loads. Sink rate at touchdown during landing distance determination should be
considered and should not exceed the design landing gear loads established by 23.473(d).
(5)
Landing Distance Credit for Disking Drag and Reverse Thrust. Most turboprop installations
embody provisions for reduction of propeller blade pitch from the flight regime to a ground regime to
produce a significant level of disking drag and/or reverse thrust following touchdown on landing. For
purposes of this discussion, disking drag is defined as not less than zero thrust at zero airspeed.
Paragraph 23.75(f) permits means other than wheel brakes to be used in determining landing distance,
when the conditions specified in 23.75(f) are met. Such disking drag or reverse thrust may be
acceptable in showing compliance with 23.75(f) provided the means is safe and reliable.
(i)
Reliable. Compliance with the reliable provision of the rule may be accomplished by an
evaluation of the pitch changing/reversing system in accordance with 23.1309. The methods of AC
23.13091 should be used in the evaluation even though type-certificated engine or propeller systems
may not have been subjected to the AC 23.13091 analysis during certification. Additionally, Society
of Automotive Engineers (SAE) document ARP926A, Fault/Failure Analysis Procedure, will assist in
conducting reliability and hazard assessments.
For commuter category aeroplanes, 23.1309 requires the system to be designed to safeguard against
hazards to the aeroplane in the event the system or any component thereof malfunctions or fails. An
acceptable means for showing compliance with the requirement would be to conduct a Failure Modes
and Effects Analysis (FMEA) of the system. An acceptable analysis would show that the effects of any
system or component malfunction or failure would not result in a hazard to the aeroplane and that the
propeller reversing system is reliable. SAE document, ARP926A, Fault/Failure Analysis Procedure,
contains acceptable criteria for conducting such an analysis.
2FTG243
CS23
BOOK 2
Safe and reliable should also mean that it is extremely improbable that the system can mislead the
flight crew or will allow asymmetric power settings, i.e. forward thrust on one engine vs. reverse thrust
on the other. In achieving this level of reliability, the system should not increase crew work load or
require excessive crew attention during a very dynamic time period in the landing phase. Also, the
approved performance data should be such that the average pilot can duplicate this performance by
following the AFM procedures.
(ii)
Safe. Compliance with the safe provisions of 23.75(f)(1) will require an evaluation of the
complete system including operational aspects to ensure no unsafe feature exists.
(iii)
Disking Drag for Twin-engine Installations with Flight Idle and Ground Idle. Symmetrical
power/thrust may be used, with power levers at flight-idle position during air run, and at ground-idle
position after touchdown. Procedures for consistently achieving ground idle should be established to
ensure that the operational pilot gets the power lever back to ground idle, and thus providing consistent
results in service. Two of the designs that have been found acceptable for ground-idle positioning are
a dedicated throttle gate or tactile positioning of the throttle. In effecting thrust changes following
touchdown, allowance should be made for any time delays that reasonably may be expected in service,
or which may be necessary to assure that the aeroplane is firmly on the surface. See sub-paragraph
b(2) for commuter category time delays. Associated procedures should be included in the AFM. If the
disking drag or some other powerplant-related device has significant effect on the landing distance, the
effect of an inoperative engine should be determined and published in the AFM Performance Section.
(iv)
Disking Drag for Single-Engine Installations with Flight Idle and Ground Idle. Landing
distances should be determined with the power levers at flight-idle position during air run, and at
ground-idle position after touchdown. Procedures for consistently achieving ground idle should be
established. Two of the designs that have been found acceptable for ground-idle positioning are a
dedicated throttle gate or tactile positioning of the throttle. In effecting thrust changes following
or which may be necessary to assure that the aeroplane is firmly on the surface. Associated
procedures should be included in the AFM.
(v)
Reverse Thrust for Twin-engine Aeroplanes. In the approval of reverse thrust for turboprop
aeroplanes, due consideration should be given for thrust settings allowed, the number of operating
engines, and control of the aircraft with one engine inoperative. If landing distance depends on the
operation of any engine and if the landing distance would be noticeably increased (2% has been found
acceptable) when a landing is made with that engine inoperative, the landing distance should be
determined with that engine inoperative unless the use of compensating means (such as reverse thrust
on the operating engine) will result in a landing distance not more than that with each engine operating
(this assumes that there are no other changes in configuration, e.g. flap setting associated with one
engine inoperative, that will cause an increase in landing distance). In effecting thrust changes
following touchdown, allowance should be made for any time delays that reasonably may be expected
in service, or which may be necessary to assure that the aeroplane is firmly on the surface. See subparagraph b(2) for commuter category time delays. Associated procedures should be included in the
AFM.
(vi)
Reverse Thrust for Single-Engine Aeroplanes. In effecting thrust changes following
or which may be necessary to assure that the aeroplane is firmly on the surface. Associated
procedures should be included in the AFM.
(6)
Balked Landing Transition. For the power conditions selected for the landing demonstration
(except one engine inoperative) and other steady state conditions of speed and rate of sink that are
established during the landing approach, it should be possible, at the 15 m (50-ft) point, to make a
satisfactory transition to the balked landing climb requirement of 23.77 using average piloting skill
without encountering any unsafe conditions.
2FTG244
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter 2 Paragraph
Section 23.75
23.75
(continued)
(continued)
(7)
Expansion of Landing Data for a Range of Airport Elevations. When the basic landing tests
are accomplished between sea level and approximately 914 m (3 000 ft), the maximum allowable
extrapolation limits are 1829 m (6 000 ft) above and 914 m (3 000 ft) below the test field elevation. If it
is desired to extrapolate beyond these limits, one of two procedures may be employed. These
procedures are given in paragraph 19c(3)(iii).
b.
Procedures
(1)
Technique. The landing approach should be stabilised on target speed, power, and the
aeroplane in the landing configuration prior to reaching the 15 m (50-ft) height to assure stabilised
conditions when the aeroplane passes through the reference height. The engine fuel control should be
adjusted to the maximum flight-idle fuel flow permitted on aeroplanes in service unless it is shown that
the range of adjustment has no effect on landing distance. A smooth flare should be made to the
touchdown point. The landing roll should be as straight as possible and the aeroplane brought to a
complete stop (or 5.6 km/h (3 knots) for seaplanes) for each landing test. Normal pilot reaction times
should be used for power reduction, brake application, and use of other drag/deceleration devices.
See sub-paragraph b(2) for commuter category time delays. These reaction times should be
established by a deliberate application of appropriate controls as would be used by a normal pilot in
service. They should not represent the minimum times associated with the reactions of a highly trained
test pilot.
(2)
Commuter Category Time Delays
(i)
The time delays shown in figure 271 should be used.
(ii)
For approved automatic deceleration devices (e.g. autospoilers, etc.) for which performance
credit is sought for AFM data expansion, established times determined during certification testing may
be used without the application of the 1-second minimum time delay required in the appropriate
segment above.
(3)
Applicant's Procedures. The procedures to be followed should be those recommended by the
applicant.
Pilot actuation
of second
deceleration device
Pilot actuation
of first
deceleration device
Touch
down
Stop
2
Transition from
touchdown to full
braking configuration
Full braking
configuration
to stop
c This segment represents the flight test measured average time from touchdown to pilot actuation of the first
deceleration device. For AFM data expansion, use 1 second or the test time, whichever is longer.
d This segment represents the flight test measured average test time from pilot actuation of the first
deceleration device to pilot actuation of the second deceleration device. For AFM data expansion, see item c
above.
Step d is repeated until pilot actuation of all deceleration devices has been completed and the aeroplane is in
the full braking configuration.
Figure 271 LANDING TIME DELAYS
2FTG245
CS23
BOOK 2
(4)
Number of Landings. At least six landings should be conducted on the same wheels, tyres,
and brakes to establish the proper functioning required by Part 21.35(b).
(5)
Winds. Wind velocity and direction should be measured adjacent to the runway during the
time interval of each test run. See paragraph 6a(5) of this FTG for wind velocity and direction
tolerances.
(6)
Weight. Landing tests should be conducted at maximum landing weight.
(7)
Approach Angles Greater than 3. If the applicant chooses an approach angle greater than 3,
landing distances which result from utilising a 3 approach angle should be determined and published
in the AFM to enable operators to comply with related operational rules.
c.
Data Acquisition
(1)
The data to be recorded for landing distance tests are:
(i)
Vertical and horizontal path of the aeroplane relative to the runway. Two methods that have
been used are runway observers and time histories. Sink rate at touchdown and descent gradients
may be computed from time histories.
(ii)
Pressure altitude.
(iii)
Ambient air temperature.
(iv)
(v)
Aeroplane weight (fuel used or time since engine start).

Engine power or thrust data.
(vi)
Cowl flap position.
(vii)
Wing flap position.
(viii)
Runway slope.
(ix)
Direction of landing run.
(x)
point.
Wind direction and velocity at a height of 1.8 m (6 ft) adjacent to the runway near the touchdown
(xi)
Landing procedures noted for inclusion in the AFM.
(2)
Means of acquiring the required data are listed below:
(i)
Time history data is obtained by use of a takeoff and landing camera, electronic equipment, or
a phototheodolite having a known surveyed location. If landing gear loads are a concern, sink rate at
touchdown may be computed, or alternately, vertical load factor may be measured by an
accelerometer at the c.g..
(ii)
Pressure altitude may be obtained with a calibrated sensitive altimeter.
(iii)
Ambient air temperature should be obtained with a calibrated temperature sensor.
(iv)
The aeroplane weight may be computed from a known weight at start of test minus the fuel
used to the time of test.
(v)
Engine power or thrust data may be determined using calibrated aeroplane powerplant
instruments to provide the basic parameters required.
2FTG246
CS23
BOOK 2
(vi)
Cowl flap position may be obtained from a calibrated indicator or a measured position.
(vii)
Wing flap position may be obtained from a calibrated indicator or a measured position.
(viii)
Slope of the runway can be obtained from the official runway survey or other suitable data
obtained using accepted survey practices.
(ix)
Direction of the landing run will be the direction of the runway used, or an accurate compass
indication.
(x)
The wind direction and velocity should be obtained with an accurate compass and a calibrated
anemometer. Wind data obtained from airport control towers should not be used.
30
PARAGRAPH 23.77 BALKED LANDING CLIMB
a.
Explanation (Normal, Utility, and Aerobatic Category. Reciprocating Engined aeroplanes with
a MTOW of 2 722 kg (6 000 lb) or less)
(1)
Purpose. The configuration that is specified for this climb requirement ordinarily is used in the
final stages of an approach for landing, and the objective of requiring the prescribed climb capability is
to ensure that the descent may readily be arrested, and that the aeroplane will be able to go around
for another attempt at landing, in the event conditions beyond control of the pilot make such action
advisable or necessary.
(2)
Flap Retraction. As an alternative to having the flaps in the landing position, compliance with
the balked landing climb requirement may be demonstrated with flaps in the retracted position,
provided the flaps are capable of being retracted in 2 seconds or less and also provided the
aeroplane's flight characteristics during flap retraction satisfy the constraints imposed by the regulation;
that is, flaps must be retracted with safety, without loss of altitude, without sudden change in angle of
attack, and without need for exceptional piloting skill. Evaluation should include satisfactory
demonstration of ability to promptly arrest the descent by application of takeoff power in conjunction
with rapid retraction of the flaps during final approach to landing.
(3)
Flaps That Will Not Fully Retract in Two (2) Seconds. If the flaps will not fully retract in
2 seconds, the climb available with the flap position at the end of 2 seconds may be used as a
consideration in an equivalent level of safety finding. Other considerations should include flight
characteristics, ease of operation and reliability. If the flap is non mechanical, the flap mechanism
should be reliable in order to receive credit for a partially retracted flap.
b.
Procedures. Climb performance tests are conducted to establish compliance with the prescribed
climb requirement and for inclusion in the AFM. The procedures outlined under 23.65 are equally
applicable to the balked landing climb, except that the cooling and other considerations that recommend
exploration of a speed range by conducting sawtooth climbs do not apply to the balked landing climb. In
lieu of sawtooth climbs, the balked landing climb performance may be established as the average of not
less than three continuous run pairs at the climb speed selected by the applicant.
c.
Explanation. (Normal, Utility and aerobatic a/c with MTOW greater than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb)
and turbine engined a/c and Commuter Category a/c). Paragraph 23.77(b)(1)(b) states that the
engines are to be set at the power or thrust that is available 8 seconds after initiation of movement of
the power controls from minimum flight idle to the takeoff position. The procedures given are for the
determination of this maximum power for showing compliance with the climb requirements of 23.77.
d.
Procedures. (A/c with a MTOW greater than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb). and Turbine Engined a/c)
(1)
Engine Trim. Trim engines to the minimum idle speed/power to be defined in the aeroplane
maintenance manual.
2FTG247
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter
Section
Paragraph
23.75
23.77
(continued)
(continued)
(2)
Engine Power Tests. Engine power tests should be conducted at the most adverse landing
elevation and temperature condition, or the range of landing altitude and temperature conditions if the
most adverse cannot be readily determined.
(i)
In the critical air bleed configuration, if applicable, stabilise the aeroplane in level flight with
symmetrical power on all engines, landing gear down, flaps in the landing position, at a speed of VREF,
at an altitude sufficiently above the selected test altitude so that time for descent to the test altitude
with all throttles closed will result in minimum flight-idle power at test altitude.
(ii)
Retard throttles to flight idle and descend at VREF as defined in 23.73 to approximately the test
altitude. When power has stabilised, advance throttle(s) in less than 1 second to obtain takeoff power.
(iii)
The power that is available 8 seconds after the initiation of movement of the power controls
from the minimum flight idle position is the maximum permitted for showing compliance with the landing
climb of 23.77 for each of the bleed combinations tested.
(iv)
If AFM performance is presented so there is no accountability for various bleed conditions, the
power obtained with the most critical air bleed should be used for landing climb performance for all
operations, including the effects of anti-ice bleed.
e.
Data Acquisition and Reduction. The information presented under 23.65 applies to the balked
landing climb.
3138 RESERVED
Section 3 FLIGHT CHARACTERISTICS
39
a.
Explanation
(1)
Minimum Flight Characteristics. The purpose of these requirements is to specify minimum
flight characteristics which are considered essential to safety for any aeroplane. This paragraph deals
primarily with controllability and manoeuvrability. A flight characteristic is an attribute, a quality, or a
feature of the fundamental nature of the aeroplane which is assumed to exist because the aeroplane
behaves in flight in a certain consistent manner when the controls are placed in certain positions or are
manipulated in a certain manner. In some cases, measurements of forces, control surface positions,
or acceleration in pitch, roll, and yaw may be made to support a decision but normally it will be a
pass/fail judgement by the Agency test pilot.
(2)
Exceptional Skills. The phrase exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength, is used
repeatedly throughout the regulations and requires highly qualitative judgements on the part of the test
pilot. The judgements should be based on the pilots estimate of the skill and experience of the pilots
who normally fly the type of aeroplane under consideration (that is, private pilot, commercial pilot, or
airline transport pilot skill levels). Exceptional alertness or strength requires additional judgement
factors when the control forces are deemed marginal or when a condition exists which requires rapid
recognition and reaction to be coped with successfully.
(3)
Stall Speed Multipliers. For conventional configurations, all flying qualities and trim speeds
may only be based on the forward c.g. stall speeds.
b.
Procedures. None.
4044 RESERVED
2FTG248
CS23
BOOK 2
Section 4 CONTROLLABILITY AND MANOEUVRABILITY
45
a.
Explanation
(1)
Temporary Control Forces. Temporary application, as specified in the table, may be defined
as the period of time necessary to perform the necessary pilot motions to relieve the forces, such as
trimming or reducing power. The values in the table under 23.143 of CS 23 are maximums. There
may be circumstances where a lower force is required for safety. If it is found that a lower force is
necessary for safety, then that lower force should be established under Part 21.21(c)(3).
(2)
Prolonged Control Forces. Prolonged application would be for some condition that could not
be trimmed out, such as a forward c.g. landing. The time of application would be for the final approach
only, if the aeroplane could be flown in trim to that point.
(3)
Controllability. Controllability is the ability of the pilot, through a proper manipulation of the
controls, to establish and maintain or alter the attitude of the aeroplane with respect to its flight path. It
is intended in the design of the aeroplane that it be possible to control the attitude about each of the
three axes, the longitudinal, the lateral, and the directional axes. Angular displacements about the
longitudinal axis are called roll. Those about the lateral axis are called pitch and those about the
directional axis are called yaw. Controllability should be defined as satisfactory or unsatisfactory.
Unsatisfactory controllability would exist if the test pilot finds the controllability to be so inadequate that
a dangerous condition might easily occur and is unacceptable as a showing of compliance with the
regulations.
(4)
Manoeuvrability. Manoeuvrability is the ability of the pilot, through a proper manipulation of
the controls, to alter the direction of the flight path of the aeroplane. In order to accomplish this, it is
necessary that the aeroplane be controllable, since a change about one of the axes is necessary in
order to change a direction of flight. It should also be noted that any change in the direction of flight
involves an acceleration normal to the flight path. Manoeuvrability is so closely related to controllability
as to be inseparable in any real motion of the aeroplane. It is also similarly largely qualitative in its
nature and should be treated in the same manner as has been suggested for controllability above.
(5)
Spring Devices. If a spring device is installed in the control system, 23.687 requires that the
aeroplane not have any unsafe flight characteristics without the use of the spring device, unless the
reliability of the device can be established by tests simulating service conditions.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Landing. Using the AFM recommended approach/landing speeds and power settings,
determine that aeroplane controllability is satisfactory with the wing flaps extended and retracted.
These tests should be accomplished at the critical weight/c.g. combination within the allowable landing
range. For turboprop aeroplanes, the engine fuel control should be adjusted to the minimum flight-idle
fuel flow permitted on aeroplanes in service unless it is shown that the range of adjustment permitted
on aeroplanes in service has no measurable effect on flight-idle sink rate.
(2)
Other Flight Conditions. Controllability and manoeuvrability procedures for other flight
conditions, such as takeoff and VMC, are covered in their respective sections.
(3)
Lateral imbalance. Lateral imbalance flight evaluations should be conducted on all aeroplanes
configured such that lateral trim and controllability may be affected. The following configurations
should be considered and evaluated as appropriate:
(i)
Takeoff All engine, one-engine-inoperative (twin-engine aeroplanes), VMC, and crosswind
operations.
2FTG249
CS23
BOOK 2
(ii)
En Route All engine, one-engine-inoperative (twin-engine aeroplanes), and autopilot coupled
operations.
(iii)
Approach and Landing All engine, one engine inoperative (twin-engine aeroplanes), VMC
(where applicable), crosswind, and autopilot coupled operations.
As a result of flight tests, appropriate lateral imbalance limitations and procedures should be
developed. Different values of imbalance for the various flight configurations may be required.
Imbalance limits, if any, should be included in the AFM.
c.
Data Acquisition and Reduction. A qualitative determination by the test pilot will usually suffice
unless the control force limits are considered marginal. In this case, force gauges are used to
measure the forces on each affected control while flying through the required manoeuvres.
46
PARAGRAPH 23.145 LONGITUDINAL CONTROL
a.
Explanation
(1)
Elevator Power. This regulation requires a series of manoeuvres to demonstrate the
longitudinal controllability during pushovers from low speed, flap extension and retraction, and during
speed and power variations. The prime determinations to be made by the test pilot are whether or not
there is sufficient elevator power to allow pitching the nose downward from a minimum speed condition
and to assure that the required manoeuvres can be performed without the resulting temporary forces
becoming excessive.
(2)
Speeds Below Trim Speeds. The phrase, speeds below the trim speed, as used in 23.145(a),
means speeds down to VS1.
(3)
Wing Flaps If gated flap positions are provided see paragraph 23.697.
(4)
Loss of Primary Control Systems. Paragraph 23.145(e) is intended to cover a condition where
a pilot has sustained some failure in the primary longitudinal control system of the aeroplane (for some
twin-engine aeroplanes, also loss of the directional control system) and is required to land using the
power and trim system without the primary control. It is not intended that this test be demonstrated to
an actual landing; however, a demonstration may be performed using manipulation of trim and power
to a landing, if desired. 23.145(e) is the flight test to demonstrate compliance with the requirement
which specifies a failure of the primary control system.
(5)
Analysis of System. An analysis of the control system should be completed before conducting
the loss of primary control system test. On some aeroplanes the required single longitudinal control
system failure could result in loss of both the downspring and the primary longitudinal control system.
If this failure occurred on an aeroplane utilising an extremely large downspring, the loss of the
downspring may result in a nose-up pitching moment at aft c.g. that could not be adequately countered
by the basic pitch trim system.
b.
Procedures. The wording of the regulation sufficiently describes the manoeuvres required to
show compliance. The selection of altitudes, weights, and c.g. positions to be flight tested by the
Agency will depend on a study of the applicants flight test report. Normally, the following combinations
are checked during the certification tests:
(1)
Altitude. A low altitude and an altitude near the maximum altitude capability of the aeroplane.
A high altitude may not be needed for normally aspirated engine aeroplanes.
(2)
Weight. Maximum gross weight for all tests, except where otherwise described in subparagraph (3) below.
2FTG250
CS23
BOOK 2
(3)
C.G. For conventional configurations Paragraph 23.145(a), most aft c.g. and most aft c.g.
approved for any weight; 23.145(b) 1 through 6, most forward and most aft c.g.; 23.145(c), most
forward c.g.; 23.145(d), most forward c.g. and most forward c.g. approved for any weight; and
23.145(e), both the forward and aft c.g. locations. Paragraph 23.145(e) is sometimes more difficult to
achieve at the aft c.g. than the forward limit, particularly if the aeroplane exhibits neutral to divergent
phugoid tendencies.
(4)
Power or Configuration. Pitching moments resulting from power or configuration changes
should be evaluated under all conditions necessary to determine the most critical demonstration
configuration.
c.
Data Acquisition. No special instrumentation is required. The exception to this would be the
44.5 N (10 lbf) in 23.145(d) which should be measured with a force gauge. All longitudinal forces
should be measured if the forces are considered marginal or excessive.
47
PARAGRAPH 23.147 DIRECTIONAL AND LATERAL CONTROL
a.
Explanation
(1)
Yawed Flight. Paragraph 23.147(a) is intended as an investigation for dangerous
characteristics during sideslip, which may result from blocked airflow over the vertical stabiliser and
rudder.
Rudder lock and possible loss of directional control are examples of the kinds of
characteristics the test is aimed at uncovering. Paragraph 23.177 also addresses rudder lock.
Compliance may be demonstrated if the rudder stop is reached prior to achieving either 15 of heading
change or the 667 N (150 lbf) limit providing there are no dangerous characteristics. The control stop
serves more effectively than the 667 N (150 lbf) to limit the pilots ability to induce a yaw beyond that
which has been demonstrated acceptable.
(2)
Controllability following sudden engine failure. 23.147(b) requires a demonstration of
controllability following sudden engine failure during en-route climb.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Yawed Flight. The aeroplane configurations to be tested according to 23.147(a) are:
(i)
One engine inoperative and its propeller in the minimum drag position;
(ii)
The remaining engines at not more than maximum continuous power;
(iii)
The rearmost allowable centre of gravity;
(iv)
The landing gear:
Retracted; and
extended;
(v)
The flaps retracted;
(vi)
Most critical weight;
(vii)
Aeroplane trimmed in the test condition, if possible.
(2)
Controllability following sudden Engine Failure. In complying with the testing required by
23.147(b), from an initial climb condition of straight flight with wings level, zero sideslip and in trim
simulate a sudden and complete failure of the critical engine. In order to allow for an appropriate delay
no action should be taken to recover the aeroplane for two seconds following first indication of engine
failure. The recovery action should not involve movement of the engine, propeller or trimming controls.
2FTG251
CS23
BOOK 2
At no time until the completion of the manoeuvre should the bank angle exceed 45 or excessive yaw
be developed. The evaluation of dangerous attitudes and characteristics should be based on each
particular aeroplane characteristics and the flight test pilots evaluation.
The method used to simulate engine failure should be:
(i)
for a reciprocating engine, closure of the mixture control; or
(ii)
for a turbine engine, termination of the fuel supply by the means which results in the fastest
loss of engine power or thrust. Engine shut-off procedures would normally be sufficient.
c.
Loss of Primary Control Systems (see also AC 23.17)
(1)
Explanation. Paragraph 23.147(c) is intended to cover a condition where a pilot has sustained
some failure in the primary lateral control system of the aeroplane, and if a single failure in the primary
lateral control system could also cause the loss of additional control, then the loss of the additional
controls must be considered. It must be shown that with the loss of the primary lateral control that the
aeroplane is safely controllable in all configurations and could be landed without exceeding the
operational and structural limitations of the aeroplane. It is not intended that this test be demonstrated
to an actual landing however, a demonstration may be performed using manipulations of lateral trim
and or sideslip generated by the rudder and differential power, if available, to a landing. Paragraph
23.147(c) is the flight test to demonstrate compliance with the requirement which specifies a failure in
the primary lateral control system. This failure implies a disconnection on the primary control system
such that the ailerons are free to float and the lateral trim (if installed) is operational.
(2)
Analysis of System. An analysis of the control system should be completed before conducting
the loss of the primary lateral control test. On some aeroplanes the required single lateral control
system failure could result in loss of a rudder aileron interconnect and perhaps loss of directional
control as well as the primary lateral control. The most critical linkage failure of the primary lateral
control system must be considered.
(3)
Procedures. The wording of the regulation sufficiently describes the manoeuvres required to
show compliance. The selection of altitudes, weights, c.g. position, lateral imbalance and aircraft
configurations to be flight tested by the Agency will depend on the study of the applicants flight test
report and whether the aircraft has a Lateral Trim System or not. Use of the Lateral Trim System to
manoeuvre the aircraft and to hold wings level during an actual or simulated landing flare is authorised
to comply with CS 23.147(c).
Those aircraft that do not have a separate and independent lateral trim system could use the rudder or
differential power of a twin engine aircraft to generate a sideslip which would produce a rolling
movement to control the bank angle. The use of rudder or asymmetric power to control bank angle
implies that the aircraft exhibits lateral stability or dihedral effect. For those aircraft that use a rudder
aileron interconnect to obtain lateral stability for which it is possible for a single failure in the primary
lateral control system to disconnect the aileron rudder interconnect, compliance with CS 23.147(c)
must be performed for the most critical case. If compliance with the continued safe flight provisions of
CS 23.147(c) can only be demonstrated with flap, speed, power and/or procedures, these procedures
should be noted in the Aircraft Flight Manual, in the Emergency Section.
i.
Altitude. A low altitude and an altitude near the maximum capability of the aeroplane. The
high altitude test is to determine controllability with decreased Dutch roll damping.
ii.
Weight. Maximum gross weight for all tests except where otherwise described in subparagraph (3) below.
iii.
C.G. For conventional configuration paragraph 23.147(a) the most aft c.g. is critical, if the
rudder is used to roll the aeroplane. For unconventional configurations the most critical c.g. must be
used.
2FTG252
CS23
BOOK 2
iv.
Lateral Imbalance. The maximum lateral imbalance for which certification is requested must
be used when flight testing for compliance with Paragraph 147(c).
v.
Configuration, Power and Speed. Lateral controllability must be demonstrated with all
practicable configurations and speeds. The maximum flaps used to demonstrate an actual or
simulated landing need not be the maximum deflection possible.
48
PARAGRAPH 23.149 MINIMUM CONTROL SPEED
a.
Background. Paragraph 23.149 requires the minimum control speed to be determined.
Paragraph 23.1545(b)(6) requires the airspeed indicator to be marked with a red radial line showing
the maximum value of one-engine-inoperative minimum control speed. Paragraph 23.1583(a)(2)
requires that VMC be furnished as an airspeed limitation in the AFM. These apply only to twin-engine
aeroplanes. A different VMC airspeed will normally result from each approved takeoff flap setting.
There are variable factors affecting the minimum control speed. Because of this, VMC should represent
the highest minimum airspeed normally expected in service. The variable factors affecting VMC testing
include:
(1)
Engine Power. VMC will increase as power is increased on the operating engine(s). Engine
power characteristics should be known and engine power tolerances should be accounted for.
(2)
Propeller of the Inoperative Engine. Windmilling propellers result in a higher VMC than if the
propeller is feathered. VMC is normally measured with propeller windmilling unless the propeller is
automatically feathered or otherwise driven to a minimum drag position (e.g. NTS-System) without
requiring pilot action.
(3)
Control Position. The value of VMC is directly related to the control surface travel available.
Normally, VMC is based on available rudder travel but may, for some aeroplanes, be based on aileron
travel. For these reasons, VMC tests should be conducted with rudder and aileron (if applicable)
controls set at minimum travel. In addition, rudder and aileron control cable tensions should be
adjusted to the minimum production tolerances. If during VMC tests, control force limits would be
exceeded at full deflection, then a lesser deflection should be used so as not to exceed 23.143 force
limits.
(4)
Weight and C.G. For rudder limited aeroplanes with constant aft c.g. limits, the critical loading
for VMC testing is most aft c.g. and minimum weight. Aft c.g. provides the shortest moment arm relative
to the rudder and thus the least restoring moments with regard to maintaining directional control. VMC
should be determined at the most adverse weight. Minimum practical test weight is usually the most
critical, because the beneficial effect of banking into the operating engine is minimised. Light weight
may be necessary for VMC testing, because the stall speed is reduced.
(5)
Lateral Loading. The maximum allowable adverse lateral imbalance (fuel, baggage etc.)
should be maintained.
b.
Explanation
(1)
Controllability. The determination of VMC is closely related to the controllability requirements.
It is one of the manoeuvres which generally requires maximum rudder and/or maximum aileron
deflection (unless limited by temporary control forces) to maintain aeroplane control. When minimum
control speed is determined using maximum rudder deflection, limited aeroplane manoeuvring is still
available using the ailerons and elevator. When minimum control speed is determined using maximum
aileron deflection, the aeroplane may be incapable of further manoeuvring in the normal sense.
(2)
Critical Engine. The regulation requires that VMC determination be made when the critical
engine is suddenly made inoperative. The intent is to require an investigation to determine which
engine is critical from the standpoint of producing a higher VMC speed. This is normally accomplished
during static VMC tests.
2FTG253
CS23
BOOK 2
(3)
Straight Flight. Straight flight is maintaining a constant heading. Paragraph 23.149(a) requires
the pilot to maintain straight flight (constant heading). This can be accomplished either with wings
level or, at the option of the applicant, with up to 5 of bank toward the operating engine. Normally, 2
3 of bank allows the aeroplane to attain zero sideslip so that at 5 bank, the beneficial effects of
directional stability to counter the yaw produced by asymmetric thrust can be utilised.
(4)
Control Forces. The rudder and aileron control force limits may not exceed those specified in
23.143.
(5)
Deicer Boots, Antennas and other External Equipment. The installation of deicer boots,
antennas, and other external gear could change the VMC speed significantly. Re-evaluation of the VMC
speed should be considered when these installations are made. See AC 23.14192 if a flight into
icing approval is being sought.
(6)
Variable VMC. For reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes of more than 2 722 kg (6 000 lb)
maximum weight and for turbine-engine powered aeroplanes, a VMC which varies with altitude and
temperature is a permissible condition for use in determining 23.51 takeoff speeds, provided that the
AFM does not show a VR below the red radial line speed required by 23.1545(b)(6).
(7)
Autofeather Annunciations. If autofeather is installed, there should be annunciations to advise
of the status. This will include at least green advisory anytime the system is armed. For some
aeroplanes, the autofeather system will be identified as a critical system. This could be because VMC
has been determined with an operative autofeather system or because commuter category takeoff
conditions were predicated on an operative autofeather system. For such installations, additional
annunciations may be necessary to ensure that the system is armed and that malfunctions are
immediately recognised. This could include caution/warning/advisory annunciations as follows:
(i)
Caution or warning, if autofeather switch is not armed.
(ii)
Caution or advisory if the autofeather is armed, then is subsequently disarmed because of a
system malfunction.
All annunciations should be evaluated to verify that they can be easily and quickly recognised. For
critical systems, the AFM limitations should require a satisfactory preflight check and that the
autofeather be armed for takeoff and landing.
c.
Procedures
(1)
Configuration. Prior to conducting VMC tests, rudder and aileron control travels should be set
to the minimum allowable production travels. Rudder and aileron control cable tensions should be
adjusted to the minimum value for use in service. The critical loading for VMC testing is generally
minimum weight and maximum aft c.g.; however, each aeroplane design should be evaluated
independently to be assured that tests are conducted under the critical loading conditions. Variable aft
c.g. limits as a function of weight, tip tanks, etc., can cause the critical loading condition to vary from
one aeroplane to another.
(2)
Power. An aeroplane with a sea-level engine will normally not be able to produce rated takeoff
power at the higher test altitudes. Under these circumstances, VMC should be determined at several
power settings and a plot of VMC versus power will allow extrapolation to determine VMC at maximum
takeoff power. See sub-paragraph c(6) for a further explanation of extrapolation methods. If tests are
conducted at less than approximately 914 m (3 000 ft) density altitude, no corrections to VMC are
normally necessary. If tests are conducted above 914 m (3 000 ft) density altitude, then additional
tests should be conducted to allow extrapolation to sea level thrust. Because propeller thrust
decreases with increasing true airspeed, VMC will increase with decreasing altitude and temperature,
even at constant power.
2FTG254
CS23
BOOK 2
The results of testing are used to predict the VMC for a maximum takeoff power condition at sea level
unless, because of turbocharging or other reasons, some higher altitude prevails as the overall highest
VMC value.
(3)
Propeller Controls. All propeller controls have to stay in the recommended takeoff or approach
position as appropriate throughout the whole procedure.
(4)
Flap Settings. An applicant may want to specify more than one takeoff or landing flap setting
as appropriate which would require VMC investigation at each flap setting.
(5)
Stalls. Extreme caution should be exercised during VMC determination due to the necessity of
operating with asymmetric power, full rudder and aileron at speeds near the aerodynamic stall. In the
event of inadvertent entry into a stall, the pilot should immediately reduce the pitch attitude, reduce
power on the operating engine(s) and return rudder and aileron controls to neutral to preclude possible
entry into a spin.
(6)
Static Minimum Control Speed. The test pilot should select test altitude based on the
capability to develop takeoff power and consistent with safe practices. It will be necessary to
determine which engine is critical to the VMC manoeuvre by conducting static tests with first one then
the other engine inoperative to discover which produces the higher VMC. Power should be set to the
maximum available for the ambient condition. Test weights should be light enough to identify the limits
of directional control without stalling or being in prestall buffet.
For each test altitude condition, the following should be accomplished:
(i)
Flaps and Gear. For the Take-off conditions, the gear should be retracted and the flaps in the
Takeoff position(s). For the landing conditions the gear should be extended and the flaps in the
landing position(s).
(ii)
Trim. The aeroplane should be trimmed to the settings associated with normal symmetrical
power takeoff or approach as appropriate with all engines operating, as indicated.
(iii)
Power. Render the one engine inoperative and set take-off power on the other engine. The
propeller on the inoperative engine should be windmilling, or in the condition resulting from the
availability of automatic feathering or other devices.
(iv)
Test Techniques. Gradually reduce airspeed until it is no longer possible to prevent heading
changes with maximum use of the directional and/or maximum use of the lateral controls, or the limit
control forces have been reached. No changes in lateral or directional trim should be accomplished
during the speed reduction. Usually the 5 bank option will be used (see paragraph 48b(3)) to maintain
straight flight. A yaw string may be used to assist the test pilot in attaining zero sideslip (or minimum
sideslip).
(v)
Critical Engine. Repeat steps (i) through (iv) to identify which inoperative engine results in the
highest minimum control speed.
(7)
Extrapolation to Sea Level. The only VMC test data that can be extrapolated reliably are static
VMC data, where most of the variables can be carefully controlled to a constant value. Because VMC
data are typically collected in ambient conditions less critical than sea level standard day, extrapolation
is nearly always necessary. Therefore, the usual way to establish an AFM VMC is to extrapolate static
VMC data. When VMC is determined for an aeroplane with an automatically feathered propeller, special
techniques may be required. Appendix 3 shows one method for extrapolating static VMC from test
conditions to sea level standard day.
(8)
Dynamic Minimum Control Speed. After determining the critical engine static VMC, and at some
speed above static VMC, make a series of engine cuts (using the mixture control or idle cut-off control)
dynamically while gradually working speed back toward the static speed. While maintaining this speed
after a dynamic engine cut, the pilot should be able to control the aeroplane and maintain straight flight
2FTG255
CS23
BOOK 2
without reducing power on the operating engine. During recovery, the aeroplane should not assume
any dangerous attitude nor should the heading change more than 20 when a pilot responds to the
critical engine failure with normal skill, strength, and alertness. The climb angle with all engines
operating is high, and continued control following an engine failure involves the ability to lower the
nose quickly and sufficiently to regain the initial stabilised speed. The dynamic VMC demonstration will
normally serve as verification that the numbers obtained statically are valid. If, in fact, the dynamic
case is more critical, then the extrapolated static VMC value should be increased by that increment.
Frequently, the dynamic VMC demonstration will indicate a lower VMC than is obtained from static runs.
This may be due to the fact that the inoperative engine, during spooldown, may provide net thrust or
that control force peaks exceed limit values for a short period and go undetected or that due to high
yaw and pitch angles and rates, the indicated airspeed values are erroneous. Because of the
twin-variable nature of the dynamic VMC demonstration, the AFM VMC value should represent the
highest of the static or dynamic VMC test data, corrected to critical conditions. Specially in test
conditions with a high thrust/weight ratio, a modified procedure may be applied to avoid extreme pitch
attitudes. In this case decelerate to below VMC, all engines, accelerate with 2 x MTOP to a
representative climb pitch attitude, cut the critical engine at static VMC (verify before that VMC is
acceptably above actual stall speed).
(9)
Repeatability. Once determined, and if the dynamic VMC seems to be the critical one, the
dynamic VMC should be verified by running a series of tests to determine the speed is repeatable.
(10)
AFM Minimum Control Speed Value. VMC is usually observed at several different power
settings and/or altitudes. Sufficient test data should be obtained such that the VMC for the highest
power and sea level density conditions may be determined. The VMC resulting from this extrapolation
to sea level is the one entered into the AFM and marked on the airspeed indicator. If this VMC is
determined with an autofeather system, the AFM required equipment list, as well as the Kind of
Operation List (KOEL), should list autofeather as a required item and the AFM may state the VMC with
the autofeather system inoperative (propeller windmilling) in the abnormal/emergency procedures
section. The normal procedures section should also require the autofeather to be armed (if applicable)
during takeoff and landing.
(d)
Safe, Intentional, One-engine-Inoperative Speed, VSSE (RESERVED).
49
PARAGRAPH 23.151 AEROBATIC MANOEUVRES
a.
Explanation. This regulation requires each manoeuvre to be evaluated and safe entry speeds
established. Paragraph 23.1567(c), which is associated with this requirement, imposes a requirement
for a placard which gives entry airspeeds and approved manoeuvres. If inverted flight is prohibited, the
placard should so state.
b.
Procedures. The applicant should fly each manoeuvre for which approval is sought.
Agency test pilot should then evaluate those manoeuvres considered most critical.
The
c.
Data Acquisition. A recently calibrated airspeed system, airspeed indicator, accelerometer,
and tachometer should be provided by the applicant for the test aeroplane. The following should be
recorded:
(1)
Load factor.
(2)
Entry airspeeds.
(3)
Maximum airspeeds.
(4)
Maximum r.p.m.
50
PARAGRAPH 23.153 CONTROL DURING LANDINGS
a.
Explanation
2FTG256
CS23
BOOK 2
(1)
Purpose. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that aeroplanes do not encounter
excessive control forces when approaching at a speed of 9.3 km/h (5 knots) lower than normal landing
approach speed, also, a safe landing is required. Safe is considered to include having sufficient flare
capability to overcome any excessive sink rate that may develop.
(2)
Landing Requirements. Paragraph 23.75 is a companion requirement and normally tests to
determine compliance would be accomplished at the same time.
b.
Procedures. The procedures applicable to 23.75 would apply for 23.153 except that for
turbopropeller aeroplanes, the flight-idle fuel flow should be adjusted to provide minimum thrust.
51
PARAGRAPH 23.155 ELEVATOR CONTROL FORCE IN MANOEUVRES
a.
Explanation
(1)
Stick Force Per G. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that the positive stick force
per g levels in a cruise configuration are of sufficient magnitude to prevent the pilot from inadvertently
overstressing the aeroplane during manoeuvring flight. The minimum manoeuvring stability levels are
generally found at aft c.g. loadings. Both aft heavy and aft light loadings should be considered. During
initial inflight investigations, caution should be exercised in the event that pitch-up tendencies or
decreasing stick force per g conditions occur.
(2)
Buffet Boundaries. Low speed buffet onset may occur during high altitude investigations. A
qualitative evaluation should be conducted beyond the boundary of buffet onset to ensure a capability
to manoeuvre out of the buffet regime.
b.
Procedures. Compliance with the requirements of 23.155 may be demonstrated by measuring
the normal acceleration and associated elevator stick force in a turn while maintaining the initial level
flight trim speed. A descent may be required in the turn to maintain the level flight trim speed. As a
minimum, the following conditions should be investigated in the cruise configuration; that is, flaps up
and gear up (if retractable):
Condition
Power
Wings Level
Trim Speed
Altitude
See note
Trimmed (but not

to exceed VNE or
VMO/MMO)
Low
See note
Trimmed
Altitude for highest

dynamic pressure (q)
See note
VA
Low
See note
VA
Highest attainable
approved altitude
NOTE: 75% maximum continuous power (reciprocating engine) or maximum continuous power (turbine).
2FTG257
CS23
BOOK 2
Compliance may be demonstrated by measuring the normal acceleration achieved with the limiting
stick force (222 N (50 lbf) for wheel controls, 156 N (35 lbf) for stick controls) or by establishing the
stick force per g gradient and extrapolating to the appropriate limit. Linear stick force gradients may be
extrapolated up to 0.5 g maximum. Nonlinear stick force gradients that indicate a possible gradient
lightening at higher g levels should not be extrapolated more than 0.2 g.
c.
Data Acquisition and Reduction. The following should be recorded for each test condition:
(1)
Wt./c.g.
(2)
Pressure altitude.
(3)
Outside air temperature (OAT).
(4)
Engine power parameters.
(5)
Trim setting.
(6)
Elevator force.
(7)
Normal acceleration at c.g.
(8)
Gear/flap position.
The test data should be presented in stick force versus g plots. Figure 511 shows a sample plot.
Test results should be compared to the requirements of 23.155(a).
50
40
LBS pull
30
20
CAS=
c.g.=
10
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Normal acceleration - Gs
Figure 511 STICK FORCE PER G
2FTG258
3.0
3.5
4.0
CS23
BOOK 2
d
Stick Force per G. 23.155(c) An increase in pull force should be required to produce an
increase in normal acceleration throughout the range of required load factor and speed. Any reduction
in control force gradient with change in load factor should not be so large or abrupt as to significantly
impair the ability of the pilot to maintain control of normal acceleration and pitch rate. The local value
of control force gradient should not be less than 13 N (3 lbf)/g for stick-controlled aeroplanes or 18 N (4
lbf)/g for wheel-controlled aeroplanes. The elevator control force should increase progressively with
increasing load factor.
Flight tests to satisfy the above must be performed at sufficient points to establish compliance with
23.155(c) throughout the normal flight envelope. During these tests the load factor should be
increased until either:
(1)
the intensity of buffet provides a strong and effective deterrent to further increase of load
factor; or
(2)
further increase of load factor requires an elevator control force in excess of 667 N (150 lbf) for
a wheel control or 556 N (125 lbf) for a stick control or is impossible because of the limitations of the
control system; or
(3)
the positive limit manoeuvring load factor is achieved.
52
PARAGRAPH 23.157 RATE OF ROLL
a.
Explanation. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure an adequately responsive
aeroplane in the takeoff and approach configuration.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Bank Angle. The aeroplane should be placed in a 30 bank and rolled through an angle of 60.
For example, with the aeroplane in a steady 30 left bank, roll through a 30 right bank and measure
the time. Paragraphs 23.157(b) and (d) should be accomplished by rolling the aeroplane in both
directions.
(2)
Controls. Paragraphs 23.157(a) and (c) permit using a favourable combination of controls.
The rudder may be used as necessary to achieve a co-ordinated manoeuvre.
(3)
Weight. The W in the formulas is the maximum Takeoff weight.
5362 RESERVED
Section 5 TRIM
63
PARAGRAPH 23.161 TRIM
a.
Explanation. The trim requirements ensure that the aeroplane will not require exceptional skill,
strength, or alertness on the pilot's part to maintain a steady flight condition. The tests require the
aeroplane to be trimmed for hands-off flight for the conditions specified. It should be noted that for
single-engine aeroplanes, lateral-directional trim is required at only one speed and thus, ground
adjustable tabs are acceptable. For lateral-directional testing, the tabs may be adjusted for the test
trim airspeed and readjusted for subsequent tests. For twin-engine aeroplanes, directional trim is
required for a range of speeds. Lateral baggage loading and fuel asymmetry should be considered in
this evaluation, if appropriate.
b.
Procedures
2FTG259
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter 2 Paragraph
Section 23.161
23.161
(continued)
(continued)
(1)
Actuator Settings. Trim actuator travel limits should be set to the minimum allowable.
(2)
Altitude and Power. Tests for trim should be conducted in smooth air. Those tests requiring
use of maximum continuous power should be conducted at as low an altitude as practical to ensure
attaining the required power.
(3)
Weight and C.G. Longitudinal trim tests should be conducted at the most critical combinations
of weight and c.g.. Forward c.g. is usually critical at slow speeds, and aft c.g. critical at high speeds.
6469 RESERVED
Section 6 STABILITY
70
a.
Explanation
(1)
Required Stability. The stability portion of CS 23 is primarily concerned with static stability.
No quantitative values are specified for the degree of stability required. This allows simple test
methods or qualitative determinations unless marginal conditions are found to exist. The regulations
merely require that the aeroplane be stable and that it have sufficient change in control force, as it is
displaced from the trimmed condition, to produce suitable control feel for safe operation.
(2)
Forces. The magnitude of the measured forces should increase with departure from the trim
speed up to the speed limits specified in 23.175 or up to the 178 N (40 lbf) force limit specified in
23.173. The stick force variation with speed changes should be stable, i.e. a pull force required to fly
slower than trim and a push force required to fly faster than trim and the gradient should be clearly
perceptible to the pilot at any speed between 1.3 VS1 and VNE or VFC/MFC. Fig 70.1 below shows an
example of cruise configuration.
Pull
(+)
FRSR + > 40 KTS or 15%TV
Vi
Fe
F.R.S.R
Push
(-)
FRSR + > 40 KTS OR 15% V T

V
TRIM
Figure 701 STATIC LONGITUDINAL STABILITY DATA

Speed Range = Greater of + 74 km/h (40 kts) or 15% Vtrim + free return speed range (FRSR)
At speeds below 1.3 VS1 for normal, utility and aerobatic aeroplanes and at speeds below 1.4 VS1 for
commuter aeroplanes, the slope need not be stable, see Fig 70.2 and 70.3. The pull forces can
decrease in magnitude with speed decrease down to but not including the stall speed VS1, however, the
pull force should in no case fall below zero before the stall is reached.
Instrumented force measurements are required if there is any uncertainty in the qualitative assessment
of the force gradients.
2FTG260
CS23
BOOK 2
FRSR + > 40 KTS or 15% V
Pull
V
TRIM
V
i
Fe
V
VS1
1+3
VS1
Push
Figure 702 LOW SPEED INSTABILITIES: (i) Normal, Utility and Aerobatic Aircraft
Pull
V
TRIM
Fe
Vi
1+4
VS1
V
SI
FRSR + 50 KTS
Push
Figure 703 (ii) Commuter Aircraft

b.
Procedures. None required for this paragraph.
2FTG261
CS23
BOOK 2
71
PARAGRAPH 23.173 STATIC LONGITUDINAL STABILITY
a.
Explanation
(1)
Demonstration Conditions. The general requirements of 23.173 are determined from a
demonstration of static stability under the conditions specified in 23.175.
(2)
Control Frictions. Paragraph 23.173(b) effectively limits the amount of control friction that will
be acceptable since excessive friction would have a masking effect on stability. If autopilot or stability
augmentation systems are of such a design that they tend to increase the friction level of the
longitudinal control system, critical static longitudinal stability tests should be conducted with the
system installed. Control cable tensions should be set to the maximum.
VFC / MFC
Pull
(+)
Fe
Stick force
Vi
FRSR
1+3 VS1
Push
(-)
V
Trim
VS1
V
NE
x = FRSR + (> 74 km/h (40 kt) or 15% VTRIM)

Figure 704
(3)
Stable Slope. Paragraph 23.173(c) is an extremely general requirement which requires the
test pilot's best judgement as to whether or not the stable slope of the stick force curve versus speed is
sufficiently steep so that perceptibility is satisfactory for the safe operation of the aeroplane.
(4)
Maximum allowable speed. Should be taken to mean VFE, VLE, VNE and VFC/MFC as
appropriate.
b.
Procedures. Refer to paragraph 72.
72
PARAGRAPH 23.175 DEMONSTRATION OF STATIC LONGITUDINAL STABILITY
a.
Explanation. Paragraph 23.175 requires, that for cruise configuration, static longitudinal
stability tests be conducted at representative cruising speeds at high and low altitude up to VNE or
VFC/MFC as appropriate, except that the trim speed need not exceed VH. Paragraph 23.173(a) states
that static longitudinal stability must be shown at any speed that can be obtained, therefore, the
longitudinal stability demonstration must cover the entire range from VS1 to VNE or VFC/MFC. Figure 72.1
shows typical coverage of the speed range in cruise with overlapping data. Midrange trim points
should include speed for best endurance, range and high speed cruise.
(1)
Trim at VS1 + (> 74 km/h (40 kt) or 15%) + an estimate of the free return speed range (FRSR),
perform static longitudinal stability tests from the trim speed within the speed range ensuring that the
aircraft does not stall.
2FTG262
CS23
BOOK 2
(2)
Determine VH at lowest altitude at maximum continuous power (MCP), perform longitudinal
static stability tests within the prescribed speed range but do not exceed VNE.
(3)
Select additional trim points e.g. speed for best range and endurance, etc. until the speed
range covered by data, see figure 72.1.
(4)
Go to highest operating altitude, depending on pressurisation, oxygen requirements etc. trim at
VH and repeat the test to a maximum speed of VFC/MFC or VNE whichever comes first. Note that a
stable slope above VNE or VFC/MFC is not required.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Paragraph 23.175(a) Climb
(i)
Stabilised Method. The aeroplane should be trimmed in smooth air for the conditions required
by the regulation. Tests should be conducted at the critical combinations of weight and c.g. Normally,
light weight and aft c.g. are critical.
After observing trim speed, apply a pull force and stabilise at a slower speed. Continue this process in
appropriate increments (e.g. of 19 to 37 km/h (10 to 20 kt), depending on the speed spread being
investigated), until reaching minimum speed for steady unstalled flight. At some stabilised point, the
pull force should be very gradually relaxed to allow the aeroplane to slowly return toward trim speed
and zero stick force. Depending on the amount of friction in the control system, the eventual speed at
which the aeroplane stabilises will be somewhat less than the original trim speed. As required by
23.173, the new speed, called free-return speed, must be within 10% (7.5% for commuter category
aeroplanes in cruise) of the trim speed.
Starting again at the trim speed, push forces should be applied and gradually relaxed in the same
manner as previously described at speeds up to 115% of the trim speed and the same determination
should be made.
The flight test data band should be +/- 610 m ( 2 000 ft) from the trim altitude to minimise changes in
power/thrust with altitude at a fixed throttle setting that could affect static longitudinal stability. High
performance aeroplanes in the climb configuration sometimes require a number of iterations to stay
within the data band.
(ii)
Acceleration Deceleration Method. The stabilised flight test technique described in Paragraph
(i) above is suitable for low performance aeroplanes or aeroplane configurations with low climb
performance. The acceleration-deceleration method is particularly suitable for aeroplanes with high
cruise speed. The aeroplane is trimmed at the desired airspeed and the power/thrust setting noted.
Power/thrust is then increased to accelerate the aeroplane to the extreme speed of the desired data
band. The Power/Thrust is then reset to the original trim power setting and the aeroplane allowed to
decelerate at a constant altitude back to the original trim speed. Longitudinal static stability data is
obtained during the deceleration to trim speed with the power and the elevator trim position the same
as the original trim data point. The data below trim speed is obtained in a similar manner by reducing
power to decelerate the aeroplane to the lowest speed in the data band, reset the power to trim
conditions and record the data during the level acceleration back to trim speed. If because of
thrust/drag relationships, the aeroplane has difficulty returning towards the trim data point, small
altitude changes within +/- 610 m ( 2 000 ft.) can also be used to coax an aeroplane
acceleration/deceleration back to trim speed, but level flight is preferred if possible. The data to be
measured approximately every 10 kts. would be speed and elevator stick force.
(2)
Other Stability Test Procedures. The balance of the static longitudinal stability requirements is
flown using either the stabilised method or the acceleration/deceleration method, but using the
configurations, trim points and speed ranges prescribed in paragraph 23.175.
2FTG263
CS23
BOOK 2
c.
Data Acquisition and Reduction. Force readings can be made with a hand-held force gauge,
fish scale, or by electronic means, and plotted against calibrated airspeed to determine compliance
with the regulation. See figure 721 for an example of the data plot. Collect test data within a
reasonable altitude band of the trim point altitude, such as +/- 610 m (2 000 ft). Stick force
measurements must be made unless
(1)
Changes in speed are clearly reflected by changes in stick forces; and
(2)
The maximum forces obtained under 23.173 and 23.175 are not excessive.
20
15
Pull
Trim speed
5
0
Push
Stick force (pounds)
10
5
10
90
70
110
130
150
170
1.3 VS1
190
V NE
Calibrated Airspeed (knots)
Figure 721 STATIC LONGITUDINAL STABILITY PLOT (CRUISE CONDITION)
73
PARAGRAPH 23.177 STATIC DIRECTIONAL AND LATERAL STABILITY
a.
Explanation
(1)
Purpose. The purpose of this paragraph is to require positive directional and lateral stability,
and to verify the absence of rudder lock tendencies
(2)
Directional Stability. In 23.177(a), the determination of appropriate wings level sideslip
(previously referred to as skid) angles will depend on sound judgement in considering such things as
aeroplane size, manoeuvrability, control harmony, and forces to determine the magnitude of wings
level sideslip angles the aeroplane will probably experience in service. Tests are continued beyond
these appropriate angles up to the point where full rudder control is used or a force limit of 667 N
(150 lbf), as specified in 23.143, is reached. The rudder force may lighten but may not reverse. The
rudder force tests are conducted at speeds between 1.2 VS1 and VA. The directional stability tests are
conducted at speeds from 1.2 VS1 to VNE or the maximum allowable speed for the configuration,
whichever is limiting.
(3)
Lateral Stability (Dihedral Effect). The static lateral stability tests (reference 23.177(b)) take a
similar approach in that the basic requirement must be met at the maximum sideslip angles
appropriate to the type of aeroplane. Up to this angle, the aeroplane must demonstrate a tendency to
raise the low wing when the ailerons are freed. The static lateral stability may not be negative, but may
be neutral at 1.2 VS1 in the takeoff configuration and 1.3 VS1 in other configurations.
(4)
Forces. The requirement of 23.177(d) is to be tested at a speed of 1.2 VS1 and larger than
appropriate sideslip angles. At angles up to those which require full rudder or aileron control, or until
2FTG264
CS23
BOOK 2
the rudder or aileron force limits specified in the table in 23.143 are reached, the aileron and rudder
force may lighten but may not reverse.
(5)
appropriate.
(6)
Autopilot or Stability Augmentation Systems (SAS). If autopilot or SAS are of such a design
that they tend to increase the friction levels of the lateral and directional controls systems, then critical
lateral and directional tests should be conducted with those systems installed, but not operating.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Altitude. The tests should be conducted at the highest practical altitude considering engine
power and aerodynamic damping.
(2)
Loading. The maximum allowable lateral imbalance should be maintained. Both low fuel and
full fuel loadings should be evaluated for possible effects of fuel movement.
(3)
Directional. To check static directional stability with the aeroplane in the desired configuration
and stabilised on the trim speed, the aeroplane is slowly yawed in both directions keeping the wings
level with ailerons. When the rudder is released, the aeroplane should tend to return to straight flight.
See paragraph 63a for discussion of ground adjustable tabs.
(4)
Lateral. To check lateral stability with a particular configuration and trim speed, conduct
sideslips at the trim speed by maintaining the aeroplanes heading with rudder and banking with
ailerons. See paragraph 63a for discussion of ground adjustable tabs. Paragraph 23.177(b) requires
the slip angle to be appropriate to the type of aeroplane and the bank angle to be at least 10. Some
aeroplanes cannot maintain a heading in a slip with a 10 bank angle. In those cases, the slip should
be performed with no less than a 10 bank and full opposite rudder and the heading allowed to vary.
When the ailerons are released, the low wing should tend to return to level. The pilot should not assist
the ailerons during this evaluation. The pilot should hold full rudder during the evaluation, (either up to
the deflection limit or to the force limit, whichever occurs first).
c.
Data Acquisition. Data recorded should be sufficient for showing compliance.
74
75
PARAGRAPH 23.181 DYNAMIC STABILITY
a.
Explanation Longitudinal Dynamic Stability
(1)
Short and Long Period Modes. Most normally-configured aeroplanes will exhibit two distinct
longitudinal modes of motion. The short period mode is the first response experienced after disturbing
the aeroplane from its trim condition with the elevator control. It involves a succession of pitch
acceleration, pitch rate, and pitch attitude changes which occur so rapidly that the airspeed does not
change significantly. Angle of attack will change in response to the pitching motions and produce
accompanying changes in normal acceleration. Vertical gusts and configuration changes such as
deploying flaps or speed brakes may also excite the short period mode. The influence of control
system springs/bob weights can be significant.
If the disturbance from the trim condition is sustained long enough for the airspeed to change
significantly, and if the pitch attitude excursions are not constrained by the pilot, the long period (or
phugoid) oscillation will be excited, with large but slower changes in pitch attitude, airspeed, and
altitude.
(2)
Damping. Both the short period and long period modes are normally oscillatory in nature.
However, the short period motion tends to be so heavily damped that no significant overshoot or
residual oscillations are perceptible to the pilot, a condition described qualitatively as deadbeat. If this
2FTG265
CS23
BOOK 2
is not the case, it should be determined that the motions do not interfere with performance of any
required manoeuvre or task.
The long period or phugoid oscillation is characteristically lightly damped, sometimes even unstable.
Mild levels of instability are acceptable as long as they do not significantly interfere with normal piloting
tasks such as trimming to a desired speed, holding altitude, or glide slope tracking. Useful guidelines
are that the oscillation should be near neutrally stable if the period is less than 15 sec., or, for motions
with longer period, the time to double amplitude should be greater than 55 sec.
b.
Procedures Longitudinal, Short Period
(1)
General. The test for short period longitudinal dynamic stability is accomplished by a
movement or pulse of the longitudinal control at a rate and degree to obtain a short period pitch
response from the aeroplane. Initial inputs should be small and conservatively slow until more is
learned about the aeroplane's response. Gradually, the inputs can be made large enough to evaluate
more readily the aeroplane's oscillatory response and number of overshoots of the steady state
condition.
(2)
The Doublet Input. The doublet input excites the short period motion while suppressing the
phugoid. It is generally considered to be the optimum means of exciting the short period motion of any
aeroplane. The doublet input causes a deviation in pitch attitude in one direction (nose down), then
cancels it with a deviation in the other direction (nose up). The total deviation in pitch attitude from trim
at the end of a doublet is zero. Thus, the phugoid mode is suppressed. However, the short period
motion will be evident since the doublet generates deviations in pitch rate, normal acceleration, and
angle of attack at a constant airspeed. Short period characteristics may be determined from the
manner in which these parameters return to the original trimmed conditions. The doublet is performed
as follows:
(i)
Flight Condition. Stabilise and trim carefully in the desired configuration at the desired flight
condition.
(ii)
Control Inputs. With a smooth, but fairly rapid motion, apply aeroplane nose-down longitudinal
control to decrease pitch attitude a few degrees, then reverse the input to nose-up longitudinal control
to bring the pitch attitude back to trim. As pitch attitude reaches trim, return the longitudinal cockpit
control to trim and release it (controls-free short period) or restrain it in the trim position (controls-fixed
short period). Both methods should be utilised. At the end of the doublet input, pitch attitude should
be at the trim position (or oscillating about the trim position) and airspeed should be approximately trim
airspeed.
(iii)
Short Period Data. Obtaining quantitative information on short period characteristics from
cockpit instruments is difficult and will be almost impossible if the motion is heavily damped. Short
period oscillations are often of very low amplitude. If the pilot cannot see enough of the motion to
measure and time a half-cycle amplitude ratio, the short period motion should be qualitatively
described as essentially deadbeat.
(iv)
Input Frequency. The frequency with which the doublet input is applied depends on the
frequency and response characteristics of the aeroplane. The test pilot should adjust the doublet input
to the particular aeroplane. The maximum response amplitude will be generated when the time interval
for the complete doublet input is approximately the same as the period of the undamped short period
oscillation.
(v)
Sequence of Control Inputs. The doublet input may be made by first applying aft stick, then
reversing to forward stick. However, this results in less than 1g normal acceleration at the completion
of the doublet and is more uncomfortable for the pilot.
(3)
The Pulse Input. The pulse input also excites the short period nicely; however, it also tends to
excite the phugoid mode. This confuses data analysis since the response of the aeroplane through the
phugoid may be taken as a part of the short period response. This is particularly true for low
2FTG266
CS23
BOOK 2
frequency, slow-responding aeroplanes. Therefore, the pulse can usually only be utilised for high
frequency, quick-responding aeroplanes in which the short period motion subsides before the phugoid
response can develop. The pulse can always be used for a quick, qualitative look at the form of the
short period motion. It is performed as follows:
(i)
Flight Condition. Stabilise and trim in the desired configuration at the desired flight condition.
(ii)
Control Inputs. With a smooth, but fairly rapid motion, apply aeroplane nose-up longitudinal
control to generate pitch rate, normal acceleration, and angle of attack changes, then return the
longitudinal control stick to the trim position. The short period motion may then be observed while
restraining the control stick at the trim position (controls-fixed short period) or with the control stick free
(controls-free short period).
(iii)
Sequence of Control Inputs. Pulses may also be performed by first applying aeroplane nosedown longitudinal control.
(4)
Conditions and Configurations. Short period dynamic longitudinal stability should be checked
under all the conditions and configurations that static longitudinal stability is checked; therefore, the
test pilot may find it convenient to test for both on the same flights. It is not intended nor required that
every point along a stick force curve be checked for dynamic stability; however, a sufficient number of
points should be checked in each configuration to ensure compliance at all operational speeds.
c.
Procedures Longitudinal Long Period (Phugoid) Dynamic Stability
(1)
General. The test for the phugoid mode is accomplished by causing the aeroplane to depart a
significant amount from trim speed (about +10% should be sufficient) with an elevator input and then
allowing the ensuing oscillations in speed, rate of climb and descent, altitude, and pitch attitude to
proceed without attempting to constrain any of the variables as long as airspeed, load factor, or other
limitations are not exceeded.
(2)
The Pulse Input. An appropriate control input for the phugoid test is a relatively slow elevator
pulse to cause the aeroplane to increase or decrease speed from the trim point. Once the speed
deviation is attained, the control is moved back to the original position and released.
(3)
Conditions and Configurations. Long period dynamic stability should be checked under all of
the conditions and configurations for which longitudinal static stability is checked. As in the short
period case, it is not intended that every point along a stick force curve be checked for phugoid
damping; however, enough conditions should be checked to determine acceptable characteristics at all
operational speeds.
(4)
Data. The phugoid motion proceeds slowly enough that it is reasonable to record minimum
and maximum airspeed excursions as a function of time and thus enable construction of an envelope
from which time to half double amplitude may be determined.
d.
Explanation Lateral/Directional Dynamic Stability. Characteristic lateral-directional motions
normally involve three modes: a highly-damped convergence called the roll mode, through which the
pilot controls roll rate and hence bank angle; a slow-acting mode called the spiral which may be stable,
but is often neutrally stable or even mildly divergent in roll and yaw; and an oscillatory mode called the
Dutch roll which involves combined rolling and yawing motions and which may be excited by either
rudder or aileron inputs or by gust encounters. In addition, short period yawing oscillations due to
rudder floating may sometimes be observed. The roll mode will almost always be satisfactory as
judged by the ability to precisely control bank angle and counter gust upsets unless the response is
slowed by high roll inertia or inadequate roll control power. Paragraph 23.181(b) requires that the
Dutch roll mode be investigated and determined to damp to 1/10 amplitude within 7 cycles. Also, any
short period yawing oscillation associated with rudder motions must be heavily damped.
e.
Procedures Lateral/Directional. Two of the methods that may be used are described below:
2FTG267
CS23
BOOK 2
(1)
Rudder Pulsing. The rudder pulsing technique excites the Dutch roll motion nicely, while
suppressing the spiral mode if performed correctly. In addition, this technique can be used to develop
a large amplitude oscillation which aids in data gathering and analysis, particularly if the Dutch roll is
heavily damped. It is performed as follows:
(i)
condition.
(ii)
Control Inputs. Smoothly apply alternating left and right rudder inputs in order to excite and
reinforce the Dutch roll motion. Restrain the lateral cockpit control at the trim condition or merely
release it. Continue the cyclic rudder pulsing until the desired magnitude of oscillatory motion is
attained, then smoothly return the rudder pedals to the trim position and release them (controls free) or
restrain them (controls fixed) in the trim position.
(iii)
Input Frequency. The frequency with which the cyclic rudder inputs are applied depends on
the frequency and response characteristics of the aeroplane. The test pilot should adjust the
frequency of rudder pulsing to the particular aeroplane. The maximum Dutch roll response will be
generated when the rudder pulsing is in phase with the aeroplane motion, and the frequency of the
rudder pulses is approximately the same as the natural (undamped) frequency of the Dutch roll.
(iv)
Spiral Motion. The test pilot should attempt to terminate the rudder pulsing so that the
aeroplane oscillates about a wings-level condition. This should effectively suppress the spiral motion.
(v)
Data. Obtaining quantitative information on Dutch roll characteristics from cockpit instruments
and visual observations requires patience, particularly if the motion is heavily damped.
If
instrumentation is available to record sideslip angle versus time, the dynamic characteristics of the
manoeuvre can readily be determined. The turn needle of the needle-ball instrument can also be used
to observe 1/10 amplitude damping and the damping period.
(2)
Steady Sideslip. The steady sideslip release can also be used to excite the Dutch roll;
however, the difficulty in quickly returning the controls to trim and the influence of the spiral mode often
precludes the gathering of good quantitative results. Full rudder or a very large amplitude sideslip may
cause high loads on the aeroplane. The rudder pulsing technique usually produces better Dutch roll
data. The steady sideslip release technique is performed as follows:
(i)
condition.
(ii)
Control Input. Establish a steady heading sideslip of a sufficient magnitude to obtain sufficient
Dutch roll motion for analysis. Utilise maximum allowable sideslip, using rudder as required. Stabilise
the sideslip carefully. Quickly, but smoothly, return all cockpit controls to trim and release them
(controls-free Dutch roll) or restrain them at the trim position (controls-fixed Dutch roll). Both methods
should be utilised.
f.
Stability Augmentation Systems (SAS). If the aeroplane is equipped with SAS, the aeroplane's
characteristics should be evaluated throughout the approved operating envelope, following failures
which affect the damping of the applicable mode. Following a SAS failure, if unsatisfactory damping is
confined to an avoidable flight area or configuration, and is controllable to return the aeroplane to a
satisfactory operational condition for continued safe flight, the lack of appreciable positive damping
may be acceptable. Control of the aeroplane, including recovery, should be satisfactory using
applicable control inputs. Following a critical failure, the degree of damping required should depend on
the effect the oscillation will have on pilot tasks, considering environmental conditions. The capability
to handle this condition should be demonstrated and evaluated. If a satisfactory reduced operational
envelope is developed, appropriate procedures, performance, and limitations should be placed in the
AFM. If a critical failure results in an unsafe condition, a redundant SAS may be required.
2FTG268
CS23
BOOK 2
g.
Data Acquisition and Reduction. Data acquisition for this test should support a conclusion that
any short period oscillation is heavily damped and any Dutch roll is damped to 1/10 amplitude in
7 cycles.
h.
appropriate.
7685 RESERVED
Section 7 STALLS
86
PARAGRAPH 23.201 WINGS LEVEL STALL
a.
Explanation
(1)
Stall. Paragraph 23.201(c) defines when the aeroplane can be considered stalled, for
aeroplane certification purposes. When one of three conditions occurs, whichever occurs first, the
aeroplane is stalled. The conditions are:
(i)
Uncontrollable downward pitching motion;
(ii)
Downward pitching motion which results from the activation of a device (e.g. Stick Pusher); or
(iii)
The control reaches the stop.
The term uncontrollable downward pitching motion is the point at which the pitching motion can no
longer be arrested by application of nose-up elevator and not necessarily the first indication of nosedown pitch. Figure 171 shows a graphic representation of stall speed time histories for various
configurations.
(2)
Related Paragraphs. The stalled condition is a flight condition that comes within the scope of
23.49, 23.141, 23.143(b), 23.171 and 23.173(a). Paragraph 23.143(b) requires that it be possible to
effect a smooth transition from a flying condition up to the stalled flight condition and return without
requiring an exceptional degree of skill, alertness, or strength. Any need for anticipated or rapid
control inputs exceeding that associated with average piloting skill, is considered unacceptable.
(3)
Recovery. The flight tests include a determination that the aeroplane can be stalled and flight
control recovered, with normal use of the controls. Paragraph 23.201(a) requires that, it must be
possible to produce and correct roll by unreversed use of the roll control and to produce and correct
yaw by unreversed use of the directional control. The power used to regain level flight may not be
applied until flying control is regained. This is considered to mean not before a speed of 1.2 VS1 is
attained in the recovery dive.
(4)
Power
(i)
Power off. The propeller condition for the power-off tests prescribed by 23.201(e)(4) should be
the same as the throttles closed condition prescribed for the stalling speed tests of 23.49, that is,
propellers in the takeoff position, engine idling with throttles closed. The alternative of using sufficient
power to produce zero propeller thrust does not apply to stall characteristics demonstrations.
(ii)
Power on. For the power-on tests according to 23.201(e)(4)(ii) an extreme nose up attitude is
normally considered to be a pitch attitude of more than 30.
(5)
Configurations. Stall characteristics should be evaluated:
2FTG269
CS23
BOOK 2
(i)
At maximum to minimum weights at aft c.g.
aeroplanes with high thrust to weight ratios.
Aft light loadings may be the most critical in
(ii)
With the elevator up stop set to the maximum allowable deflection.
(iii)
With maximum allowable lateral imbalance.
(iv)
At or near maximum approved altitude.
Also, aeroplanes with de-rated engines should be evaluated up to the critical altitude of the engine and
at maximum altitude for which the aeroplane is to be certified. An aeroplane may be approved if it has
stick pusher operation in one configuration, such as power on, and has acceptable stall characteristics
for the remaining configurations.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Emergency Egress. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide adequate provision for
crew restraint, emergency egress and use of parachutes .
(2)
Build-up. Generally, the stalls at more rearward c.g. positions are more critical than at the
forward c.g. position. For this reason, the stall characteristics at forward c.g. should be investigated
first. Altitude should be low enough to ensure capability of setting 75% power, but high enough to
accomplish a safe recovery. The 75% power requirement means 75% of the rated power adjusted to
the temperature and altitude test conditions. Reciprocating engine tests conducted on a hot day, for
example, would require higher manifold pressures to be set so that when chart brake horsepower is
adjusted for temperature, the result is 75% power.
(3)
Pilot Determinations. During the entry and recovery, the test pilot should determine:
(i)
That the stick force curve remains positive up to the stall (that is, a pull force is required the
control force may lighten slightly but not reverse).
(ii)
That it is possible to produce and correct roll and yaw by unreversed use of the rolling and
directional control up to the stall.
(iii)
The amount of roll or yaw encountered during the recovery.
(4)
Speed Reduction Rate. Paragraph 23.201(b) requires the rate of speed reduction for entry not
exceed 0.5 m/s2 (one knot per second).
c.
Data Acquisition and Reduction
(1)
Instruments. The applicant should provide a recently calibrated sensitive altimeter, airspeed
indicator, accelerometer, outside air temperature gauge, and appropriate propulsion instruments such
as a torque meter or manifold pressure gauge and tachometer, a means to depict roll, pitch, and yaw
angles; and force gauges when necessary.
(2)
Data Recording. Automatic data recording is desirable, but not required, for recording time
histories of instrumented parameters and such events as stall warning, altitude loss, and stall break.
The analysis should show the relationship of pitch, roll, and yaw with respect to various control surface
deflections. (See figure 171, stall speed determination.)
d.
Stick Pusher. (RESERVED).
2FTG270
CS23
BOOK 2
87
PARAGRAPH 23.203 TURNING FLIGHT AND ACCELERATED TURNING STALLS
a.
Explanation
(1)
Explanations 86a(2) and (4) for wings level stalls also apply to turning flight and accelerated
turning stalls.
(2)
The only differences between the investigation required for turning flight and accelerated
turning stalls are in the speed reduction rate and the accepted roll off bank angles.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Procedure 86b(1) for wings level stalls applies to turning flight and accelerated turning stalls.
(2)
During the manoeuvre, the test pilot should determine:
(i)
That the stick force remains positive up to the stall.
(ii)
That the altitude lost is not, in the test pilots opinion, excessive.
(iii)
There is no undue pitchup.
(iv)
That there are no uncontrollable spinning tendencies; i.e. while the aeroplane may have a
tendency to spin, a spin entry is readily preventable.
(v)
That the test pilot can complete the recovery with normal use of the controls and average
piloting skill.
(vi)
Roll does not exceed the value specified in the requirements.
(vii)
For accelerated turning stalls, maximum speed or limit load factors were not exceeded.
(3)
Paragraph 23.203(a) requires the rate of speed reduction for a turning flight stall not exceed
one knot per second; for an accelerated turning stall, 1.5 m/s2 to 2.6 m/s2 (3 to 5 knots per second)
with steadily increasing normal acceleration.
c.
Data Acquisition. Same as for wings level stalls.
88
89
PARAGRAPH 23.207 STALL WARNING
a.
Explanation
(1)
Purpose. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure an effective warning in sufficient time to
allow a pilot to recover from an approach to a stall without reaching the stall.
(2)
Types of Warning. The effective warning may be from either aerodynamic disturbances or
from a reliable artificial stall warning device such as a horn or a stick shaker. The aerodynamic
warning is usually manifested by a buffet which vibrates or shakes the aeroplane. The type of warning
should be the same for all configurations.
(3)
Artificial Stall Warning. Stall warning devices may be used in cases where there is inadequate
aerodynamic warning. The warning signal from the devices should be clear and distinctive and not
require the pilot's attention to be directed inside the aeroplane. A stall warning light by itself is not
acceptable. If a stick shaker is installed the warning should be unmistakable even if flying hands off.
2FTG271
CS23
BOOK 2
b.
Procedures. The stall warning tests should be conducted in conjunction with the stall tests
required by 23.201 and 23.203.
9099 RESERVED
Section 8 SPINNING
100
PARAGRAPH 23.221 SPINNING
a.
Explanation
(1)
Spin. A spin is a sustained auto rotation at angles of attack above stall. The rotary motions of
the spin may have oscillations in pitch, roll and yaw superimposed upon them. The fully-developed
spin is attained when the flight path has become vertical and the spin characteristics are approximately
repeatable from turn to turn. Some aeroplanes can autorotate for several turns, repeating the body
motions at some interval, and never stabilise. Most aeroplanes will not attain a fully-developed spin in
one turn.
(2)
Category Spins. Paragraph 23.221 addresses three situations:
(i)
Normal category spins.
(ii)
Utility category spins.
(iii)
Aerobatic category spins.
(3)
Reserved.
(4)
Utility Category Aeroplanes. Utility category is used for aeroplanes intended for limited
aerobatic operations in accordance with 23.3. Spins (if approved for the particular type of aeroplane)
are considered to be a limited aerobatic operation. This type of aeroplane may be approved in
accordance with 23.221(a), normal category, or with 23.221(c), aerobatic category.
b.
Discussion and Procedures Applicable to Both Normal and Aerobatic Category Spins
(1)
Weight and C.G. Envelope. See paragraph 7a of this FTG for discussion of weight and c.g.
envelope exploration.
(2)
Moments of inertia. Moments of inertia should also be considered when evaluating the C.G.
envelope. Most general aviation aeroplanes have low inertias combined with high aerodynamic
damping and relatively similar moments of inertia along the wing and fuselage axis. However, designs
of modifications such as wingtip fuel tanks can change the spin recovery time and possibly the
recovery method. Applicants are encouraged to consider these effects and approach flight testing at
extreme mass distributions with caution.
(3)
Control Deflections. Control surface deflections should be set to the critical side of the
allowable tolerances for the selected critical configurations. For example, a possible spin flight test
program could be to perform the spin matrix with the controls set at the nominal deflection values.
Analysis of the data will show the critical conditions for entry and recovery. Once the critical conditions
are defined and agreed by the Agency , these critical tests are repeated with the control deflections set
to the most critical tolerances. If satisfactory, these tests must be repeated with the antispin system
removed.
2FTG272
CS23
BOOK 2
(4)
Emergency Egress. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide adequate provision for
crew restraint, emergency egress and use of parachutes .
(5)
Spin Recovery Parachutes
(i)
Spin recovery parachutes should be installed on all aeroplanes requiring spin testing for
certification.
(ii)
The anti-spin system installation should be carefully evaluated to determine its structural
integrity, reliability, susceptibility to inadvertent or unwanted deployment or jettison, and adequate or
redundant jettison capability. NASA recommendations should be referred to when evaluating the
design of the chute deployment and jettison systems. The chute type, diameter, porosity, riser length,
and lanyard length should be determined in accordance with NASA recommended practices to
maximise the probability the chute will be effective in spin recovery. Chute sizes and particularly riser
and lanyard lengths depend strongly on such aircraft variables as wing design, fuselage shape, tail
arm, and mass properties. The sizes and lengths shown in the referenced NASA reports are for
particular aircraft that were tested in the NASA Langley Spin Tunnel and will not necessarily be the
correct size to recover other aircraft, even if the aircraft layout is similar. Appropriate NASA
recommendations can be found in the following publications:
(A)
NASA Technical Paper 1076, Spin-Tunnel Investigation of the Spinning Characteristics of
Typical Single-Engine General Aviation Aeroplane Designs, dated November 1977.
(B)
NASA Technical Note D-6866,
Spin-Recovery Parachute Systems.
Summary
of
Design
Considerations
for
Aeroplane
(C)
NASA Conference Paper, CP-2127, l4th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, May 1980,
entitled, A Spin-Recovery System for Light General Aviation Aeroplanes.
The NASA documents are available from:
National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, Virginia 22161
(iii)
Final certification of the spin characteristics should be conducted with the external spin chute
removed unless it is determined that spin chute installation has no significant effect on spin
characteristics.
(6)
Build-Up. When any doubt exists regarding the recovery characteristics of the test aeroplane,
a build-up technique should be employed consisting of spin entries and recoveries at various stages as
the manoeuvre develops. Excessive aerodynamic control wheel back pressure indicates a possibility
of unsatisfactory spin characteristics. Any control force lightening or reversal is an indication of
possible deep stall entry. See sub-paragraph c(7) for definition of excessive back pressure. A yaw
rate instrument is valuable in detecting progress toward a fully-developed spin condition or an
uncontrollable manoeuvre. Unusual application of power or controls has sometimes been found to
induce unrecoverable spins. Leading with elevator in recovery and cutting power as the aeroplane
rolls into a spin have been known to induce unrecoverable spins.
(7)
Entry. Spins should be entered in the same manner as the stalls in 23.201 and 23.203 with
trim at 1.5 VS1 or as close as practical. As the aeroplane stalls, with ailerons neutral, apply full-up
elevator and full rudder in the direction of spin desired. Refer to paragraphs 100c and 100d for further
discussion of spin entries.
(8)
Recovery. Recoveries should consist of throttle reduced to idle, ailerons neutralised, full
opposite rudder, followed by forward elevator control as required to get the wing out of stall and
recover to level flight. For aerobatic category spins, the manufacturer may establish additional
recovery procedures, provided he shows compliance for those procedures with this Paragraph.
2FTG273
CS23
BOOK 2
(9)
Trimmable Stabiliser. For aeroplanes that trim with the horizontal stabiliser, the critical
positions should be investigated.
(10)
Altitude. The effect of altitude should be investigated.
(11)
Initial Investigation. In all cases, the initial spin investigation should be accomplished at as
high an altitude above the ground as reasonably possible and a predetermined, pre-briefed hard
altitude established to be used as the emergency egress altitude. In other words, if the aeroplane
cannot be recovered by that altitude, all occupants should exit the aeroplane without hesitation. The
altitude selected should take into account the opening characteristics of the parachutes, the difficulty of
egress, the estimated number of turns to get out and the altitude loss per turn, the distance required to
clear the aeroplane before deploying the parachutes, etc.
(12)
Power. The use of power for spin entry for both normal and abnormal control use is
recommended in order to determine the effects of power on spin characteristics and spin recovery
procedures. For power on normal category spins, the throttle can be reduced to idle after one turn.
c.
Discussion and Procedures Applicable to Normal Category Spins
(1)
Objective. The basic objective of normal category spin testing is to assure that the aeroplane
will not become uncontrollable within one turn (or 3 seconds, whichever takes longer) if a spin should
be encountered inadvertently and that recovery can be effected without exceeding the aeroplane
design limitations. Type certification testing requires recovery capability from a one-turn spin while
operating limitations prohibit intentional spins. This one-turn margin of safety is designed to provide
adequate controllability when recovery from a stall is delayed. Paragraph 23.221(a) does not require
investigation of the controllability in a true spinning condition for a normal category aeroplane.
Essentially, the test is a check of the controllability in a delayed recovery from a stall.
(2)
Recovery from Spins with Normal Control Usage During Entry and Recovery. Normal category
aeroplanes must recover from a spin in no more than one turn after the initiation of the first control
action for recovery. For example, if you are spinning left with ailerons neutral, recover by reducing
power to idle, if not already at idle, apply full right rudder followed by forward elevator. Start the count
(heading, ground reference, etc.) for recovery with the application of the first action, which may be the
reduction of power. See sub-paragraph c(5) for use of flaps. Spins from normal entries using full up
elevator and full rudder and accelerated entries from a 60 bank turn should be covered.
(3)
Recovery from Spins Following Abnormal Control Usage. Abnormal control usage should be
evaluated during the spin to ensure that unrecoverable spins do not occur. The intent of these tests is
to induce all of the types of control usage, whether they are right or wrong, that might be used during
the operation of the aeroplane. The parameters which need to be investigated depend on the design
of the aeroplane as well as on the results of the Normal Spin Tests. These checks include, as a
minimum, the effect of ailerons with and against the spin, the effect of elevator applied before the
rudder at recovery, the effect of slow elevator release, the effect of entry attitude, the effect of power
on at the entry, and the effect of power left on during the spin. Ailerons with and against the spin
should be applied at entry and during spins. Elevator and rudder against the spin should be applied
during the spin. Spinning should continue for up to three seconds, or for one full turn, while the effects
of abnormal aerodynamic control inputs are observed. Apply normal recovery controls as outlined in
sub-paragraph c(2). Up to two turns for recovery is considered acceptable.
(4)
Recovery with abnormal control usage during recovery. (Reserved)
(5)
Spin Matrix. The effects of gear, flaps, power, accelerated entry and control abuse should be
investigated. A sample matrix for spin investigation is given in figure 1001. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to explore all critical areas. It may be possible to eliminate the need to conduct some of
the additional conditions once the aeroplane responses are known.
2FTG274
CS23
BOOK 2
(6)
Flaps. Paragraph 23.221(a) specifies that for the flaps extended condition, the flaps may be
retracted during the recovery. Flap retraction should not be initiated until after aeroplane rotation has
ceased.
(7)
Aerodynamic Back Pressure. Excessive aerodynamic back pressure is cause for noncompliance. Excessive aerodynamic back pressure is a judgement item and is defined as excessive
force required to pitch the aeroplane down in recovery. Back pressure should not be more than normal
elevator control forces and should not interfere with prompt and normal recovery.
d.
Discussion and Procedures Applicable to Aerobatic Category Spins
(1)
Objective. The basic objective of aerobatic category spin testing is to ensure that the
aeroplane will not become uncontrollable when a spin is intentionally entered and:
(i)
The controls are used abnormally (as well as normally) during the entry and/or during the spin;
(ii)
The aeroplane will recover in not more than 1 turns after completing application of normal or
manufacturer-prescribed recovery controls; and
(iii)
No aeroplane limitations are exceeded, including positive manoeuvring load factor and limit
speeds.
(2)
Pilot Training. It is assumed that the pilot of the aerobatic category aeroplane that spins for six
turns is doing so intentionally. If spinning is intentional, the pilot should have had proper instruction
and proficiency to effect a proper recovery. The pilot should be expected to follow the published
procedure to recover from this planned manoeuvre.
(3)
Abnormal Control Usage. The discussion of abnormal use of controls in paragraph 100c(3)
also applies to aerobatic category spins. Abnormal control usage should be evaluated at several
points throughout the spin to ensure that unrecoverable spins do not occur. These checks include, as
a minimum, the effect of ailerons with and against the spin, the effect of elevator applied before the
rudder at recovery, the effect of slow elevator release, the effect of entry attitude, the effect of power
on at the entry, and the effect of power left on during the spin. Spinning should continue for up to six
full turns while the effects of abnormal aerodynamic control inputs are observed. The effect of leaving
power on in the spin need only be examined by itself up to one full turn. Following abused control
usage, reversion to normal pro-spin controls for up to two turns is acceptable, prior to the normal
recovery control inputs, which must result in recovery in not more than two turns. In addition, going
directly from the control abuse condition to the normal recovery control condition should not render the
spin unrecoverable. For example, after evaluating the effect of relaxing the back stick input during the
spin, it would be reasonable to expect the pilot to apply normal recovery use of rudder and elevator
without first returning to full back stick.
(4)
Flaps. If an aerobatic category aeroplane is placarded against intentional flaps down spins,
then only normal category procedures need be used for the flaps down configurations.
(5)
Spin Matrix. The effects of gear, flaps, power, accelerated entry, and normal and abnormal
control use should be investigated. A sample matrix for spin investigation is given in figure 1001. It is
the responsibility of the applicant to explore all critical areas. It is necessary to expand the matrix to
cover six-turn spins. The normal procedure is to continue the same process and add one additional
turn each time. It may be possible to eliminate the need to conduct some of the additional conditions
once the aeroplane responses are known.
2FTG275
CS23
BOOK 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
18
17
16
Repeat 12 Through 18 From a Right Spin

Repeat 17 Through 18 From Left & Right Turning Flight
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
15
14
X
13
Left Spin Aileron with

12 Thru 18
12
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Repeat 7 Through 12 From a Right Spin
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
11
10
7 Thru 12
8
Left Spin Aileron
Against
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Repeat 1 Through 6 from a right spin.

Repeat 1 Through 6 from left and right turning flight
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
6
Left Spin
1Thru 6
Tests with Abnormal

Spin Controls
Spin Number
Spins from Wing

Level Altitude
Flaps Up
Test with Normal

Spin Controls
Flaps Appch.
(As Approp.)
Flaps Landing
Flight Condition
X
X
X
Gear Up
Gear Down
Cowl Flaps As
Required
Cowl Flaps
Closed
X
X
Power Off
Power On
X
X
X
Forward C.G.
Aft C.G.
Lateral C.G.
Slow Elevator
Release
Figure 100-1 SPIN EVALUATION CONFIGURATION MATRIX
(6)
Spiral Characteristics. The aerobatic spin requirement stipulates that for the flap retracted sixturn spin, the spin may be discontinued after 3 seconds if spiral characteristics appear. This does not
mean that the spin test programme is discontinued. Each test point should stand alone and that spin
be discontinued only after a spiral has developed. Limit speed should not be exceeded in the
recovery. The aeroplane may be certificated as an aerobatic aeroplane whether or not it can spin a
minimum of six turns.
(7)
Recovery Placard. Paragraph 23.1583(e)(4) requires that aerobatic aeroplanes have a
placard listing the use of controls required to recover from spinning manoeuvres. Utility category
aeroplanes approved for spins should also have such a placard. Recovery control inputs should be
conventional. If special sequences are employed, then they should not be so unique as to create a
recovery problem.
(8)
Complex Instrumentation. When complex instrumentation is installed, such as wing tip booms
or a heavy telemetry system, the instrumentation may affect the recovery characteristics. Critical spin
tests should be repeated with the instrumentation removed.
2FTG276
CS23
BOOK 2
e.
Data Acquisition. The test aeroplane should be equipped with a calibrated airspeed indicator,
accelerometer, and altimeter. Control of weight and balance and control deflections is essential.
f.
Optional Equipment. In those cases where an aeroplane is to be certified with and without
optional equipment such as deicing boots, asymmetric radar pods, outer wing fuel tanks, or winglets,
sufficient tests should be conducted to ensure compliance in both configurations.
101105 RESERVED
Section 9 GROUND AND WATER HANDLING CHARACTERISTICS
106
PARAGRAPH 23.231 LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AND CONTROL
a.
Explanation
(1)
For land planes, 23.231(a) and 23.233 are companion requirements to 23.75.
(2)
For float planes, 23.231(b) and 23.233 are companion requirements to 23.75.
(3)
The requirements for both land planes and float planes apply to amphibians.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Land planes should be operated from all types of runways applicable to the type of aeroplane.
Taxi, takeoff, and landing operations should be evaluated for acceptable characteristics. This should
include idle power landings as well as landings and takeoffs with procedures used in 23.75 and 23.51.
(2)
Float planes should be operated under as many different water conditions as practical up to
the maximum wave height appropriate to the type of aeroplane. Taxi (both displacement and step),
takeoff, and landing operations should be evaluated for acceptable characteristics. This includes idle
power landings as well as landings and takeoffs with procedures used under 23.75 and 23.51.
(3)
Amphibians should be evaluated in accordance with both items (1) and (2) above.
c.
Procedures Twin-engine Aeroplanes. Evaluate all of the considerations contained in
paragraph 106(b), plus the effects of one engine loss during water operations.
d.
Aeroplane Flight Manual (AFM). The AFM should include appropriate limitations plus
demonstrated wind and sea state conditions.
2FTG277
CS23
BOOK 2
107
PARAGRAPH 23.233 DIRECTIONAL STABILITY AND CONTROL
a.
Explanation
(1)
Crosswind. This regulation establishes the minimum value of crosswind that must be
demonstrated. Since the minimum required value may be far less than the actual capability of the
aeroplane, higher values may be tested at the option of the applicant. The highest 90 crosswind
component tested satisfactorily should be put in the AFM as performance information. If the
demonstrated crosswind is considered limiting, it should be introduced into Section 2 of the AFM.
(2)
Ground Loops. Paragraph 23.233(a) does not preclude an aeroplane from having a tendency
to ground loop in crosswinds, providing the pilot can control the tendency using engine power, brakes,
and aerodynamic controls. The operating procedures should be placed in the AFM in accordance
with 23.1585(a).
(3)
Controllability. Paragraph 23.233(b) is not related to the crosswind requirement of 23.233(a).
The demonstration of compliance with this requirement is accomplished into the wind. The test pilot is
searching for any unusual controllability problems during landing and must use judgement as to what
constitutes satisfactorily controllable since, at some point in the landing rollout, the aerodynamic
controls may become ineffective.
(4)
Taxi Controllability. Paragraph 23.233(c) requires the aeroplane to have adequate directional
controllability for taxi operations on land for land planes, on water for float planes, and on land and
water for amphibians.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Crosswind
(i)
The aeroplane should be operated throughout its approved loading envelope at gradually
increasing values of crosswind component until a crosswind equivalent to 0.2 VSO is reached. All
approved takeoff and landing configurations should be evaluated. Higher crosswind values may be
evaluated at the discretion of the test pilot for AFM inclusion.
(ii)
For float planes, the use of water rudders or the use of aeroplane attitude on the water to
control weathervaning should be described in the AFM.
(2)
Controllability
(i)
A land plane should demonstrate satisfactory controllability during power off (idle power)
landings through landing rollout. This may be conducted into the existing wind and should be
evaluated at all key loading envelope points.
(ii)
Although power off landings are not expressly required for float planes under 23.233(b), it is
recommended they be evaluated.
(3)
Taxi Controllability
(i)
A land plane should have sufficient directional control available through the use of nose/tail
wheel steering, differential braking (if provided), differential power (twin-engine aeroplanes), and
aerodynamic control inputs to allow taxiing at its maximum demonstrated crosswind value.
(ii)
A float plane should have sufficient directional control available through the use of water
rudders, aeroplane attitude (displacement or plow), taxi technique (displacement or step), differential
power (twin-engine float planes) and aerodynamic control inputs to allow taxiing at its maximum
demonstrated crosswind value. This is not intended to suggest that all of the above must be evaluated
at 0.2 VSO, but that accepted techniques using one or more of the above must allow controllable
taxiing.
2FTG278
CS23
BOOK 2
(iii)
Amphibians should exhibit suitable directional controllability on both land and water in
accordance with the preceding two paragraphs. In addition, amphibians should have suitable
directional controllability to taxi from the water to a land facility and vice-versa unless prohibited by the
operating limitations.
c.
Data Acquisition and Reduction. The determination of compliance is primarily a qualitative
one. However, wind readings (velocity and direction) should be taken and compared to the wind
component chart (appendix 7) to determine that the minimum 90 crosswind component has been
tested.
108
PARAGRAPH 23.235 OPERATION ON UNPAVED SURFACES
a.
Explanation. This requirement says the aeroplane landing gear shock absorbing mechanism
must function as intended throughout the expected operating envelope of the aeroplane.
b.
Procedures. During the development and certification flight testing the aeroplane should be
operated on a variety of runways including those considered to be the worst (in terms of roughness)
appropriate to the type of aeroplane. There should be no evidence of damage to the aeroplane during
these operations.
109
PARAGRAPH 23.237 OPERATION ON WATER
Allowable water surface conditions should be established during the certification flight testing,
dependant on the type of a/c, to ensure safe operation and attainment of the published Takeoff and
landing performance.
110
PARAGRAPH 23.239 SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS
a.
Explanation. This rule is intended to ensure that any spray produced during water operation
does not excessively interfere with the pilots visibility nor damage beyond normal wear-and-tear of
the aeroplane itself.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Taxi, takeoff, and landing operations should be conducted throughout the approved loading
envelope. Spray patterns should be specifically noted with respect to visibility and their contact areas
on the aeroplane. These areas should be monitored to assure compliance with the rule.
(2)
Aeroplanes with reversing propellers should be demonstrated to comply at the highest reverse
power expected to be applicable to the aeroplane operation.
111119 RESERVED
Paragraph 10 MISCELLANEOUS FLIGHT REQUIREMENTS
120
PARAGRAPH 23.251 VIBRATION AND BUFFETING
a.
Explanation
(1)
Flutter. The test required under this paragraph should not be confused with flutter tests which
are required under 23.629. No attempt is made to excite flutter, but this does not guarantee against
encountering it. Therefore, the test should be carefully planned and conducted.
2FTG279
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter 2 Paragraph 23.251(continued)
(2)
Test Speeds. Prior to the test, the pilot should co-ordinate with the airframe engineer to
determine that the flutter requirements of 23.629 have been satisfied and to determine the most critical
weight and c.g. for the test. The flight test engineer and pilot should obtain from the airframe engineer
the dive equivalent airspeed and Mach number to which the test should be conducted. In the absence
of a well calibrated Mach meter, knowing the Mach number and equivalent airspeed, a schedule of
pressure altitude and indicated airspeed should be developed for the test.
(3)
Airspeed Determination. Another major consideration is calibrated airspeed determination
during the test. In this regard, a calibrated, sensitive airspeed indicator should be installed to provide
accurate readability. Careful study of the aeroplane's airspeed position error/correction curve is
required with respect to the characteristics of the slope at the high speed end and how the airspeed
calibration was conducted. This is necessary to determine the adequacy of the airspeed position error
curve for extrapolating to VD/MD. Refer to appendix 7, figure 5, for compressibility corrections. An
expanded Mach No.-calibrated airspeed graph may be found in the Air Force Flight Test Engineering
Handbook (see appendix 2, paragraph f(2) of this FTG).
(4)
Springs. If the aeroplane incorporates spring devices in any of the control systems, the test
should be conducted with the spring devices connected and disconnected. Alternately, if satisfactory
spring reliability is shown in accordance with 23.687, tests with springs disconnected are not required.
Also see paragraph 45 of this FTG.
(5)
Mach Limits. For those aeroplanes that are observing Mach limits, the tests should be
repeated at MD speed. Careful selection of the test altitude for both MD and VD tests will help cut down
on the number of repeat runs necessary to determine compliance. Attempting to combine the tests at
the knee of the airspeed/Mach curve should be approached cautiously since it can result in
overshooting the desired speed.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Configuration. In the clean configuration at the gross weight, most critical c.g. (probably most
aft) and the altitude selected for the start of the test, the aeroplane should be trimmed in level flight at
maximum continuous power. Speed is gained in a dive in gradual increments until VD/MD is attained.
The aeroplane should be trimmed if possible throughout the manoeuvre. Remain at the maximum
speed only long enough to determine the absence of excessive buffet, vibration, or controllability
problems.
(2)
Flaps extended. With flaps extended and the aeroplane trimmed in level flight at a speed
below VFE, stabilise at VFE in a shallow dive and make the same determinations as listed above.
121
PARAGRAPH 23.253 HIGH SPEED CHARACTERISTICS
a.
Explanation
(1)
Related Paragraphs. The design dive speeds are established under the provisions of 23.335,
with the airspeed limits established under the provisions of 23.1505. There is distinction made in both
regulatory paragraphs for aeroplanes that accelerate quickly when upset.
The high speed
characteristics in any case should be evaluated by flight demonstration. Paragraph 23.1303(a)(5)
gives the requirements for a speed warning device.
(2)
Dynamic Pressure and Mach. In general, the same manoeuvres should be accomplished in
both the dynamic pressure (q) and Mach (M) critical ranges. All manoeuvres in either range should be
accomplished at thrust and trim points appropriate for the specific range being evaluated. It should be
realised that some manoeuvres in the Mach range may be more critical for some aeroplanes due to
drag rise characteristics.
(3)
Flight Crew Duties. The aeroplanes handling characteristics in the high speed range should
be investigated in terms of anticipated action on the part of the flight crew during normal and
2FTG280
CS23
BOOK 2
emergency conditions. Consideration should be given to their duties which not only involve piloting the
aeroplane, but also the operational and navigational duties having to do with traffic control and record
keeping necessary to the progress of safe flight.
(4)
Upset Axes. The upset criteria of 23.335(b)(4)(i) is predicated on an upset in pitch while
operational evaluation of upsets expected to occur in service should cover pitch, roll, yaw, and critical
combinations of multi-axis upsets.
(5)
Factors. The following factors are involved in the flight test investigation of high speed
characteristics:
(i)
Effectiveness of longitudinal control at VMO/MMO and up to the demonstrated VD/MD speed.
(ii)
Effect of any reasonably probable mis-trim on upset and recovery.
(iii)
Dynamic and static stability.
(iv)
The speed increase that may result from likely mass movement that occurs when trimmed at
any cruise speed to VMO/MMO.
(v)
Trim changes resulting from compressibility effects. Evaluation should cover Mach tuck,
control reversal, or other phenomena associated with high speed.
(vi)
Characteristics exhibited during recovery from inadvertent speed increase.
(vii)
Upsets due to turbulence (vertical, horizontal, and combination gusts).
(viii)
Effective and unmistakable aural speed warning at VMO plus 11,2 Km/h (6 kt), or MMO plus
0.01M.
(ix)
Speed control during application of devices (power, speed brakes, high speed spoilers, etc.).
(x)
Characteristics and controllability during and after failure or malfunction of any stability
augmentation system.
(6)
Type of Warning. Operational experience has revealed that an important and effective
deterrent to inadvertent overspeeding is an aural warning device, which is distinctively different from
aural warning used for other purposes. Aerodynamic buffeting is influenced by, and is similar to, the
effects of turbulence at high speed and is not normally considered to be suitable as an overspeed
warning.
(7)
Speed Margins. Once it is established whether the aeroplane limits will be VNE or VMO,
appropriate speed margins and markings may be evaluated. The factors outlined in 23.335 have been
considered in establishing minimum speed margins during past type certification programs for the
appropriate speeds. The factors to be considered are:
(i)
Increment allowance for gusts (0.02M).
(ii)
Increment allowance for penetration of jet stream or cold front (0.015M).
(iii)
Increment allowance for production differences of airspeed systems (0.005M), unless larger
tolerances or errors are found to exist.
(iv)
Increment allowance for production tolerances of overspeed warning errors (0.01M), unless
larger tolerances or errors are found to exist.
(v)
Increment allowance M, due to speed overshoot from MMO established by upset during flight
tests in accordance with 23.253, should be added to the values for production differences and
equipment tolerances, and the minimum acceptable combined value should not be less than that
2FTG281
CS23
BOOK 2
required by 23.335(b)(4) between MMO and MD. The value of MMO should not be greater than the
lowest value obtained from each of the following equations and from 23.1505:
MMO = MD M .005M .01M
or MMO = MD the Mach increment required by 23.335(b)(4)
(vi)
Altitudes where q is limiting, the allowances of items (i) and (ii) are applicable and the Mach
increment is converted to the units used for the limits.
(vii)
At altitudes where q is limiting, the increment allowance for production differences of airspeed
systems and production tolerances of overspeed warning errors are 5,6 and 11 km/h (3 and 6 kt),
respectively, unless larger differences or errors are found to exist.
(viii)
Increment allowance V, due to speed overshoot from VMO established by upset during flight
tests in accordance with 23.253, should be added to the values for production differences and
equipment tolerances. The value of VMO should not be greater than the lowest obtained from the
following:
VMO = VD V 5,6 km/h (3 kt) (prod. diff.) 11 km/h (6 kt) (equip. tol.)
or for VNO aeroplanes:
VNO = VD V 5,6 km/h (3 kt) (prod. diff.) 11 km/h (6 kt) (equip. tol.)
b. Procedures. Using the VMO/VNO, MMO, or the associated design or demonstrated dive speeds
determined in accordance with 23.251, 23.335, and 23.1505, the aeroplane should be shown to comply
with the high speed characteristics of 23.253 and that adequate speed margins exist. The aeroplane
characteristics should be investigated at any speed up to and including VNO, VMO/MMO or VD/MD as
required by 23.253; and the recovery procedures used should be those selected by the applicant,
except that the normal acceleration during recovery should not exceed 1.5g (total).
(1)
Centre-of-Gravity Shift. The aeroplane should be upset by the centre-of-gravity shift
corresponding to the forward movement of a representative number of passengers depending upon the
aeroplane interior configuration. The aeroplane should be allowed to accelerate for 3 seconds after
the overspeed indication or warning occurs before recovery is initiated. Note the maximum airspeed.
Do not exceed VD/MD.
(2)
Inadvertent Control Movement. Simulate an evasive control application when trimmed at
VMO/MMO by applying sufficient forward force to the elevator control to produce 0.5g (total) for a period
of 5 seconds, after which recovery should be effected at not more than 1.5g (total). Care should be
taken not to exceed VD/MD during the entry manoeuvre.
(3)
Gust Upset
(i)
Lateral Upset. With the aeroplane trimmed at any likely cruise speed up to VMO/MMO in wings
level flight, perform a lateral upset to the same angle as that for auto pilot approval, or to a maximum
bank angle appropriate to the aeroplane, whichever is critical. Operationally, it has been determined
that the maximum bank angle appropriate for the aeroplane should not be less than 45, need not be
greater than 60 and should depend upon aeroplane stability and inertia characteristics. The lower and
upper limits should be used for aeroplanes with low and high manoeuvrability, respectively. Following
this, with the controls free, the evaluation should be conducted for a minimum of 3 seconds after the
calibrated value of VMO/MMO (not overspeed warning) or 10 seconds, whichever occurs first.
2FTG282
CS23
BOOK 2
(ii)
Longitudinal Upset. Perform a longitudinal upset as follows:
(A)
Trim at VMO/MMO using power required for level flight but with not more than maximum
continuous power. If the aeroplane will not reach VMO/MMO at maximum continuous power, push over
to VMO/MMO and trim.
(B)
If descending to achieve VMO/MMO, return to level flight without changing trim.
(C)
Perform a longitudinal upset from normal cruise by displacing the attitude of the aeroplane in
the range between 612, which has been determined from service experience to be an optimum
range. The value of displacement should be appropriate to the aeroplane type and should depend
upon aeroplane stability and inertia characteristics. The lower and upper limits should be used for
aeroplanes with low and high manoeuvrability, respectively.
(D)
The aeroplane should be permitted to accelerate until 3 seconds after the calibrated value of
VMO/MMO (not overspeed warning).
(iii)
Two-Axis Upset. Perform a 2-axis upset consisting of a longitudinal upset combined with a
lateral upset. Perform a longitudinal upset by displacing the attitude of the aeroplane as in the
previous paragraph, and simultaneously perform lateral upset by rolling the aeroplane to the 1525
bank angle range, which was determined to be operationally representative.
The values of
displacement should be appropriate to the aeroplane type and should depend upon aeroplane stability
and inertia characteristics. The lower and upper limits should be used for aeroplanes with low and high
manoeuvrability, respectively. The established attitude should be maintained until the overspeed
warning occurs. The aeroplane should be permitted to accelerate until 3 seconds after the calibrated
value of VMO/MMO (not overspeed warning).
(4)
Levelling Off From Climb. Perform transition from climb to level flight without reducing power
below the maximum value permitted for climb until the overspeed warning has occurred. Recovery
should be accomplished by applying not more than 1.5g (total).
(5)
Descent From Mach to Airspeed Limit Altitude. A descent should be initiated at MMO and
performed at the airspeed schedule defined in MMO until the overspeed warning occurs. The aeroplane
should be permitted to descend into the airspeed limit altitude where recovery should be accomplished
after overspeed warning occurs by applying not more than 1.5g (total). The manoeuvre should be
completed without exceeding VD.
122131 RESERVED
2FTG283
CS23
BOOK 2
CHAPTER 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Section 1 GENERAL
132
PARAGRAPH 23.629 FLUTTER. This subject is covered in AC 23.6291A.
133137 RESERVED
Section 2 CONTROL SYSTEMS
138
PARAGRAPH 23.671 GENERAL. (RESERVED)
138a
PARAGRAPH 23.672 STABILITY AUGMENTATION AND AUTOMATIC AND POWER

OPERATED SYSTEMS. (RESERVED)
139
PARAGRAPH 23.677 TRIM SYSTEMS
a.
Qualitative Evaluation. Trim should be qualitatively evaluated during all phases of the flight
test program. Cockpit control trim devices should be evaluated for smoothness, sense of motion, and
ease of operation, accessibility, and visibility of the trim tab indicators (both day and night). Ease in
establishing and maintaining a trim condition should be evaluated.
b.
Electric Trim Background. Electrically-actuated, manually-controlled trim systems have been
certificated in several ways, depending on systems design. The simpler systems are tested for failure
in flight. More sophisticated systems, which generally incorporate a dual-wire, split-actuating switches,
may require a dual failure to produce a runaway. Analysis of these systems discloses that one switch
could fail closed and remain undetected until a failure occurred in the other switch or circuit to produce
a runaway. This is still considered acceptable if the applicant provided a pre-flight test procedure that
will detect such a dormant failure. Service experience dictates that evaluation of fail-safe trim systems
by analysis alone is not acceptable and flight testing is required.
c.
Explanation
(1)
Fault Analysis. A fault analysis should be evaluated for each trim system.
(2)
Single Failure and Backup System. For a system in which the fault analysis indicates a single
failure will cause runaway, flight tests should be conducted. For a system with backup features, or a
redundant system where multiple failures would be required for runaway, the certification team should
determine the extent of the flight tests necessary after consideration of the fault analysis and
determination of the probability and effect of runaway. In all cases, flight test evaluations should be
conducted to determine functional system/aeroplane compatibility in accordance with 23.1301.
(3)
Failure. For the purpose of a fault analysis, a failure is the first fault obviously detectable by
the pilot and should follow probable combinations of undetectable failures assumed as latent failures
existing at the occurrence of the detectable failure. When an initial failure also causes other failures,
the initial failure and the subsequent other failures are considered to constitute a single failure for
purposes of fault analysis; that is, only independent failures may be introduced into the fault analysis to
show multiple failure integrity.
(4)
Failure Warning. The first indication a pilot has of a trim runaway is a deviation from the
intended flight path, abnormal control movements, or a warning from a reliable failure warning system.
The following time delays after pilot recognition are considered appropriate:
(i)
Takeoff, approach, landing 1 second.
2FTG31
CS-23
(ii)
BOOK2
Climb, cruise, descent 3 seconds.
(5)
Second Set of Controls. If a set of controls and instruments are provided for a second crew
member, multi-function systems disconnect or quick-disconnect/interrupt switches, as appropriate,
should be provided for both crew members regardless of minimum crew.
d.
Definitions
(1)
Disconnect Switch. A switch which is located within immediate reach and readily accessible to
the pilot, which has the primary purpose of stopping all movement of the electric trim system. A circuit
breaker is not considered to be a disconnect switch.
(2)
Quick-Disconnect/Interrupt Switch. A switch or device that momentarily interrupts all
movement of the electric trim system, which is located on the control wheel on the side opposite the
throttles, or on the stick control, that can be operated without moving the hand from its normal position
on the control. The primary purpose of the switch is to stop all movement of the electric trim system.
e.
Procedures
(1)
Quick-Disconnect or Interrupt Switch. With a quick-disconnect or interrupt switch, disconnect
may be initiated after the delay times given in paragraph 139c(4).
(2)
Disconnect Switch. With a disconnect switch, the time delays given in paragraph 139c(4)
should be applied prior to corrective action by use of primary controls. In addition to these time delays,
an appropriate reaction time to disconnect the systems should be added. When there are other
switches in the immediate area of the quick-disconnect, a time increment should be added to account
for identifying the switch.
(3)
Loads. The loads experienced as a result of the malfunction should normally not exceed an
envelope of 0 to +2 g. The positive limit may be increased if analysis has shown that neither the
malfunction nor subsequent corrective action would result in a load beyond limit load. In this case,
careful consideration should be given to the delay time applied, since it may be more difficult for the
pilot to reach the disconnect switch.
(4)
High Speed Malfunctions. When high speed malfunctions are introduced at VNE or VMO/MMO,
whichever is appropriate, the speed excursion, using the primary controls and any speed reduction
controls/devices, should not exceed the demonstrated upset speed established under 23.253 for
aeroplanes with a VMO/MMO speed limitation and a speed midway between VNE and VD or those
aeroplanes certified with a VNE limitation.
(5)
Speed Limitations. The use of a reduction of VNE/VMO/MMO in complying with paragraph e(4) is
not considered acceptable, unless these new speeds represent limitations for the overall operation of
the aeroplane.
(6)
Forces. The forces encountered in the tests should conform to the requirements of 23.143
for temporary and prolonged application. Also, see paragraph 45 of this FTG.
2FTG32
CS23
BOOK 2
140
PARAGRAPH 23.679 CONTROL SYSTEM LOCKS. This subject is covered in AC 23-17.
140a
PARAGRAPH 23.691 ARTIFICIAL STALL BARRIER SYSTEM. (RESERVED).
141
PARAGRAPH 23.697 WING FLAP CONTROLS. (RESERVED).
142
PARAGRAPH 23.699 WING FLAP POSITION INDICATOR. (RESERVED).
143
PARAGRAPH 23.701 FLAP INTERCONNECTION.. This subject is covered in AC 2317.
144153 RESERVED.
Section 3 LANDING GEAR
154
PARAGRAPH 23.729 LANDING GEAR EXTENSION AND RETRACTION SYSTEM.

subject is covered in AC 2317.
155
PARAGRAPH 23.735 BRAKES. (RESERVED).
This
156160 RESERVED
Section 4 PERSONNEL AND CARGO ACCOMMODATIONS
161
PARAGRAPH 23.771 PILOT COMPARTMENT. (RESERVED).
162
PARAGRAPH 23.773 PILOT COMPARTMENT VIEW
a.
Pilot Position and View. For all evaluations, the pilot(s) should be seated at the intended
design eye level as determined by an installed guide, if established. If an intended design eye level is
not provided, the normal seating position should be used. The field of view that should remain clear
should include the area specified in 23.775(e).
b.
External View. The external vision should be evaluated in all lighting and environmental
conditions (day and night) with the aeroplane in all attitudes normally encountered. Attention to
windshield distortion or refraction should especially be given to the view toward the approach and
runway lights and the runway markings. Since glare and reflection often differ with the suns
inclination, consideration should be given to evaluating the cockpit at midday and in early morning or
late afternoon. If the windshield is heated, evaluations should be conducted with heat on and off.
Distortion and refraction should be so low as to prevent any unsafe condition, unusual eye strain or
fatigue. Safe operation, as used in 23.773(a)(1) includes the ability to conduct straight ahead and
circling approaches under all approved operating conditions, including operations in high humidity and
icing conditions (if appropriate).
c.
Night Approval. If night approval is requested, all lighting, both internal and external, should
be evaluated in likely combinations and under expected flight conditions. Instrument lighting should be
evaluated at night under a variety of ambient conditions, including night IFR. Windshield/side window
reflections that distract from traffic avoidance, landing approach and landing are not acceptable.
Landing lights, strobes, beacons, and recognition lights should be evaluated to ensure no adverse
reflections or direct impingement into the cockpit.
d.
Defog/Defrost/Deice. The adequacy of the defog/defrost/deice systems should be evaluated
under the following conditions:
2FTG33
CS-23
BOOK2
(1)
Extended cold soak at maximum altitudes and minimum temperatures. The aeroplane should
be exposed to a cold environment appropriate to minimum expected temperatures. The aeroplane
should be also evaluated after remaining outside on a cold night.
(2)
The aeroplane should be exposed to cold temperatures (cold soaked) and then descended into
a warmer, more moist air mass to assess ability to maintain a clear field of view. To properly evaluate
internal fogging, the test aeroplane should be flown at night at high altitude for at least two hours (or
until the windshield temperature stabilises). Then, using proposed AFM procedures, the aeroplane
should be rapidly descended to an approach and landing in a high humidity area (recommend dewpoint
of least 21C). If manual clearing by the pilot(s) is required, it should be easily accomplished by an
average pilot. The applicant should provide any special equipment required to accomplish the manual
clearing. Repeated immediate clearing after manually wiping the windshield would not seem to fit the
easily cleared requirements. The easily cleared aspects should also be evaluated considering the
fact that the fogged windshield could frost under certain conditions. If manual clearing is required, pilot
workload should be carefully evaluated if IFR approval is sought.
(3)
Evaluations should be conducted in moderate rain, day and night (if approval is sought),
takeoffs, landings, and taxi.
e.
Two Pilot Aeroplanes. It is recommended that two pilot aeroplanes have pilot visibility in
accordance with Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Aerospace Standard AS 580B, Pilot Visibility
from the Flight Deck Design Objectives for Commercial Transport Aircraft.
f.
Cockpit Camera. An evaluation and documentation of the cockpit using a binocular camera is
highly desirable.
162a
PARAGRAPH 23.775 WINDSHIELDS AND WINDOWS
For commuter category aeroplanes it has to be shown that assuming loss of vision through any one
panel in front of the pilot(s), side panels and/or co-pilot panels may be used, provided it can be shown
that continued safe flight and landing is possible using these panels only, whilst remaining seated at a
pilot(s) station. For aircraft to be certified for IFR it has to be shown that a safe landing can be
demonstrated with IFR certified minimum visibility conditions.
163
PARAGRAPH 23.777 COCKPIT CONTROLS. (RESERVED).
163a
PARAGRAPH 23.785 SEATS, BERTHS, LITTERS, SAFETY BELTS AND SHOULDER

HARNESSES
a.
Explanation. This subpart requires an approved seat for each occupant.
b.
Procedures. Confirm that when approved production seats are in place, that the seats can be
easily adjusted and will remain in a locked position.
164
PARAGRAPH 23.803 EMERGENCY EVACUATION. This subject is covered in AC 20118A.
165
PARAGRAPH 23.807 EMERGENCY EXITS. AC 23-17 addresses this subject.
166
PARAGRAPH 23.831 VENTILATION
a.
Explanation. This subpart requires the Carbon monoxide concentration not to exceed one part
in 20 000 parts of air, which is 0005 of 1% or 50 ppm. A sample Matrix for CO-concentration is given
with Fig. 1661.
2FTG34
CS23
BOOK 2
b.
Procedures
Test for Carbon Monoxide
(1)
Aeroplane may be at any convenient weight and CG position.
(2)
Using a CO indicator reading instrument, record the values for the following tests:
* for Twin-engine aeroplanes

Single-engine climb only
** may be deleted for Twinengined aeroplanes
Climb *
M.C. Power or Full
Throttle Speed VRef
Mixture Full Rich
Cruise **
75% M.C. Power
Mixture
Approach
Configuration
Power: Approach
/Idle Speed VRef
Windows and/or Vents

Partly
open
Closed
Partly
open
Closed
Partly
open
Closed
a. Maximum Reading (Cockpit):

(1) Along Floor
(2) Front of Pilots Face
b. Maximum Reading (cabin):
(1) Front
(2) Centre
(3) Rear
AUXILIARY POWER
UNIT
Installed? No Yes
HEATERS
OTHERS
Installed? No Yes
c. With Tester Directly in Front

of Unit While Unit is Operating
Figure 1661 SAMPLE OF CO-CONCENTRATION MATRIX
167175 RESERVED
Section 5 PRESSURISATION
176
PARAGRAPH 23.841 PRESSURISED CABINS. AC 2317 addresses this subject.
177
PARAGRAPH 23.843 PRESSURISATION TESTS. (RESERVED).
178188 RESERVED.
2FTG35
CS-23
BOOK2
2FTG36
BOOK 2
CS-23
CHAPTER 4 POWERPLANT
Section 1 GENERAL
189
PARAGRAPH 23.901 INSTALLATION. (RESERVED)
190
PARAGRAPH 23.903 ENGINES
a.
Explanation:
(1)
Automatic Propeller Feathering Systems. All parts of the feathering device which are integral
with the propeller or attached to it in a manner that may affect propeller airworthiness should be
considered. The determination of airworthiness should be made on the following basis:
(i)
The automatic propeller feathering system should not adversely affect normal propeller
operation and should function properly under all temperatures, altitudes, airspeeds, vibrations,
accelerations, and other conditions to be expected in formal ground and flight operation.
(ii)
The automatic device should be demonstrated to be free from malfunctioning which may cause
feathering under any conditions other than those under which it is intended to operate. For example, it
should not cause feathering during:
(A)
Momentary loss of power.
(B)
Approaches with reduced throttle settings.
(iii)
The automatic propeller feathering system should be capable of operating in its intended
manner whenever the throttle control is in the normal position to provide takeoff power. No special
operations at the time of engine failure should be necessary on the part of the crew in order to make
the automatic feathering system operative.
(iv)
RESERVED.
(v)
The automatic propeller feathering installation should be such that normal operation may be
regained after the propeller has begun to feather automatically.
(vi)
The automatic propeller feathering installation should incorporate a switch or equivalent means
to make the system inoperative. (Also see 23.67 and 23.1501.)
(vii)
If performance credit is given for the automatic propeller feathering system, there should be
means provided to satisfactorily pre-flight check the system.
(viii)
Some turbopropeller aeroplanes are equipped with some type of engine ignition system
intended for use during flight in heavy precipitation conditions and for takeoff/landing on wet or slushcovered runways. The engine ignition system may be either automatic or continuous. The purpose of
this system is to prevent or minimise the possibility of an engine flameout due to water ingestion.
Compatibility with auto-feather systems should be ensured.
(2)
Negative Torque Sensing Systems. (RESERVED).
b.
Procedures
(1)
Automatic and Manual Propeller Feathering System Operational Tests
(i)
Tests should be conducted to determine the time required for the propeller to change from
windmilling (with the propeller controls set for takeoff) to the feathered position at the takeoff speed
determined in 23.51.
2FTG41
CS-23
BOOK 2
(ii)
The propeller feathering system should be tested at one engine inoperative climb airspeed.
The configuration should be:
(A)
Critical engine inoperative.
(B)
Wing flaps retracted.
(C)
Landing gear retracted.
(D)
Cowl flaps closed.
If the feathered propeller has a residual rotation, this has to be considered for aircraft performance.
(iii)
The propeller should be tested in the actual configuration for an emergency descent. A
sufficient speed range should be covered to assure that any propeller rotation is not hazardous. In
addition, the propeller should not inadvertently unfeather during these tests.
(iv)
In order to demonstrate that the feathering system operates satisfactorily, propeller feather
should be demonstrated throughout both the airspeed and the altitude envelope since engine failure
may occur at any time. Propeller unfeathering manually or automatically need only be demonstrated
up to the maximum one-engine-inoperative service ceiling or maximum airstart altitude, whichever is
higher. Satisfactory propeller unfeathering should also be demonstrated after a 30-minute cold soak.
(2)
Continued Rotation of Turbine Engines
(i)
Means should be provided to completely stop the rotation of turbine engines if continued
rotation would cause a hazard to the aeroplane. Devices such as feathering propellers, brakes, doors,
or other means may be used to stop turbine engine rotation.
(ii)
If engine induction air duct doors or other types of brakes are provided to control engine
rotation, no single fault or failure of the system controlling engine rotation should cause the inadvertent
travel of the doors toward the closed position or the inadvertent energising of braking means, unless
compensating features are provided to ensure that engine failure or a critical operating condition will
not occur. Such provisions should be of a high order of reliability, and the probability should be remote
that doors or brakes will not function normally on demand.
(3)
Engine Operation with Automatic Propeller Control System Installed
(i)
When an automatic control system for simultaneous r.p.m. control of all propellers is installed,
it should be shown that no single failure or malfunction in this system or in an engine controlling this
system will:
(A)
Cause the allowable engine overspeed for this condition to be exceeded at any time.
(B)
Cause a loss of thrust which will cause the aeroplane to fail to meet the requirements of
23.51 through 23.77 if such system is certificated for use during takeoff and climb. This should be
shown for all weights and altitudes for which certification is desired. A period of 5 seconds should be
allowed from the time the malfunction occurs to the initial motion of the cockpit control for corrective
action taken by the crew.
(ii)
Compliance with this policy may be shown by analysis, flight demonstration, or a combination
thereof.
c.
Restart Envelope
(1)
Explanation. The applicant should propose a practicable airstart envelope wherein satisfactory
inflight engine restarts may be accomplished as required by the code.
Airstarts should be
2FTG42
BOOK 2
CS-23
accomplished satisfactorily at critical combinations of airspeed and altitude. During these tests,
normally time history data showing airspeed, altitude, r.p.m., exhaust temperature, etc., are obtained
for inclusion in the Type Inspection Report.
The airstart envelope should be included in the limitations section of the AFM, the procedures used to
restart the engine(s) should be contained in the emergency or abnormal procedures section of the
AFM.
Results of restart tests completed by the engine manufacturer on the same type of engine in an altitude
test facility or flying test bed, if available, and the experience accumulated in other aircraft with the
same engine and engine installation, may be taken into account, if justified.
(2)
Procedures. To establish the required envelope of altitude and airspeed sufficient flight tests
should be made.
i.
From sea-level to the maximum declared restarting altitude in all appropriate configurations
likely to affect restarting, including the emergency descent configuration.
ii.
From the minimum to the maximum declared airspeed at all altitudes up to the maximum
declared engine restarting altitude. The airspeed range of the declared restart envelope normally
should cover at least 56 km/h (30 kt), but should be adapted to the type of aeroplane.
The tests should include the effect on engine restarting performance of delay periods between engine
shut-down and restarting of
iii.
up to two minutes, and
iv.
at least until the engine oil temperature is stabilised at its approximate cold soak value.
191
PARAGRAPH 23.905 PROPELLERS. Included in 23.903 material. See paragraph 190 of
thisFTG.
192
PARAGRAPH 23.909 TURBO SUPERCHARGERS. AC 23.9091 addresses this subject.
192a
PARAGRAPH 23.925 PROPELLER CLEARANCE. (Reserved)
193
PARAGRAPH 23.929 ENGINE INSTALLATION ICE PROTECTION
a.
Explanation. This regulation requires that propellers and other components of the complete
engine installation such as oil cooling inlets, generator cooling inlets, etc., function satisfactorily and
operate properly without an appreciable and unacceptable loss of power when the applicant requests
approval for flight in icing conditions. A unacceptable loss of power may depend on the kind of aircraft
and the power available. For details see AC 23.14192. See 23.1093 for induction system ice
protection requirements.
b.
Procedures. Each propeller and other components of the complete installation that is to be
approved for flight in icing conditions should be evaluated under the icing conditions specified in Part
25, appendix C. If the propellers are equipped with fluid-type deicers, the flow test should be
conducted starting with a full tank of fluid and operated at maximum flow for a time period found
operationally suitable. The operation should be checked at all engine speeds and powers.
194
PARAGRAPH 23.933 REVERSING SYSTEMS
a.
Explanation. Self-explanatory.
2FTG43
CS-23
BOOK 2
b.
Procedures. Reversing systems installations may be approved provided the following is
acceptable:
(1)
Exceptional pilot skill should not be required in taxiing or any condition in which reverse thrust
is to be used.
(2)
Necessary operating procedures, operating limitations, and placards are established.
(3)
The aeroplane control characteristics are satisfactory with regard to control forces
encountered, and buffeting should not cause structural damage.
(4)
The directional control is adequate using normal piloting skill.
(5)
A determination is made that no dangerous condition is encountered in the event of sudden
failure of one engine in any likely operating condition.
(6)
The operating procedures and aeroplane configuration are such as to provide reasonable
safeguards against serious structural damage to parts of the aeroplane due to the reverse airflow.
(7)
It is determined that the pilot's vision is not dangerously obscured under normal operating
conditions on dusty or wet runways and where light snow is on the runway.
(8)
It is determined that the pilot's vision is not dangerously obscured by spray due to reverse
airflow under normal water operating conditions with seaplanes.
(9)
The procedure and mechanisms for reversing should provide a reverse idle setting such that
without requiring exceptional piloting skill at least the following conditions are met:
(i)
Sufficient power is maintained to keep the engine running at an adequate speed to prevent
engine stalling during and after the propeller reversing operation.
(ii)
The propeller/engine does not overspeed during and after the propeller reversing operation.
(10)
The engine cooling characteristics should be satisfactory in any likely operating condition.
(11)
If using ground idle for disking drag credit on landing distance, the ground idle position of the
power levers should be identified with a gate or a detent with satisfactory tactile feel (reference
paragraph 27a(7) of this FTG).
(12)
If compliance with 23.933(a)(1)(ii) is intended to be shown by flight tests, any possible position
of any one thrust reverser has to be assumed.
195
PARAGRAPH 23.939 POWERPLANT OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
a.
Explanation. Self-explanatory.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Stall, Surge, Flameout Tests. For turbine engines, tests should be conducted to determine
that stall, surge, and flameout will not occur, to a hazardous degree, on any engine during acceleration
and deceleration throughout the normal flight envelope of the aeroplane. This would include tests
throughout the approved altitude range and throughout the airspeed range from VS to VMO/MMO using
sideslip angles appropriate to the individual aeroplane. For normal category twin-engine aeroplanes,
an appropriate sideslip angle is generally considered to be approximately one ball width on a standard
slip-skid indicator. The low airspeed tests should be accomplished at light weight and with gear and
flaps extended to further reduce the stall speed. Tests need not be accomplished with gear and flaps
extended at airspeeds above which extension is prohibited in the AFM. At the conditions mentioned
2FTG44
BOOK 2
CS-23
above, the effects of engine bleed air off and on and engine ice protection systems off and on should
be investigated
(2)
Throttle Techniques. With the engine stabilised at maximum continuous power, rapidly retard
the throttle to the flight idle position. Before the engine reaches idle power or r.p.m., rapidly advance
the throttle to maximum continuous power. Repeat this process except begin with the engine stabilised
at flight idle power. Rapid throttle movement is generally defined as one which results in the throttle
moving from maximum continuous power to flight idle, or vice versa, in not more than 0 .5 seconds.
196
PARAGRAPH 23.943 NEGATIVE ACCELERATION
a.
Explanation. Tests should be conducted to show that no hazardous malfunction occurs under
negative accelerations within the flight envelope. A hazardous malfunction in this case usually is
considered to be one which causes a loss or sustained malfunction of the engine, or improper
operation of the engine accessories or systems.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Tests. Critical points of negative acceleration may be determined
Consideration should be given to the possibility of critical level of fuel and oil.
through
tests.
(2)
Normal, Utility and Aerobatic Category Aeroplanes. With engines operating at maximum
continuous power, the aeroplane is flown at a critical negative acceleration within the prescribed flight
envelope. Normally a duration of the negative acceleration in separate tests of 0.2 g for 5 seconds,
0.3 g for 4 seconds, 0.4 g for 3 seconds, and 0.5 g for 2 seconds should reveal any existing
hazardous malfunctioning of the engine. Alternately, 0.5 g for 5 seconds may be used.
(3)
Aerobatic Category Aeroplanes. In addition for aerobatic category aeroplanes, for which
certification is requested for inverted flight or for negative g-manoeuvres, the aeroplane should be
subjected to the maximum value and time of negative acceleration for which approval is requested.
(4)
Commuter Category Aeroplanes. For Commuter Category Aeroplanes one continuous period
of at least 5 seconds at 0.5 g, and separately a period containing at least two excursions to 05 g in
rapid succession, in which the total time at less than zero g is at least 5 seconds has to be shown
without any existing hazardous malfunctioning of the engine.
(5)
In addition, it may be necessary to consider other points within the flight envelope at other
levels of fuel with shorter applications of accelerations. In all cases, the accelerations are measured
as near as practicable to the c.g. of the aeroplane.
197206 RESERVED
2FTG45
CS-23
BOOK 2
Section 2. FUEL SYSTEM

207
PARAGRAPH 23.959 UNUSABLE FUEL SUPPLY. This subject is covered in AC 23.9591.
208
PARAGRAPH 23.961 FUEL SYSTEM HOT WEATHER OPERATION. This subject is covered
in AC 23.9611.
209220 RESERVED
Section 3. FUEL SYSTEM COMPONENTS

221
PARAGRAPH 23.1001 FUEL JETTISONING SYSTEM
a.
Explanation. The basic purpose of these tests is to determine that the required amount of fuel
may be safely jettisoned under reasonably anticipated operating conditions within the prescribed time
limit without danger from fire, explosion, or adverse effects on the flying qualities. The applicant
should have made sufficient jettisoning tests to prove the safety of the jettisoning system.
b.
Procedures
(1)
Fire Hazard
(i)
Fuel in liquid or vapour form should not impinge upon any external surface of the aeroplane
during or after jettisoning. Coloured fuel, or surfaces so treated that liquid or vaporous fuel changes
the appearance of the aeroplane surface, may be used for detection purposes. Other equivalent
methods for detection may be acceptable.
(ii)
Fuel in liquid or vapour form should not enter any portion of the aeroplane during or after
jettisoning. The fuel may be detected by its scent, combustible mixture detector, or by visual
inspection. In pressurised aeroplanes, the presence of liquid or vaporous fuel should be checked with
the aeroplane unpressurised.
(iii)
There should be no evidence of fuel valve leakage after it is closed.
(iv)
If there is any evidence that wing flap (slats/slots) positions other than that used for the test
may adversely affect the flow pattern, the aeroplane should be placarded Fuel should not be jettisoned
except when flaps (slats/slots) are set at ___ degrees.
(v)
The applicant should select, for demonstration, the tanks or tank combinations which are
critical for demonstrating the flow rate during jettisoning.
(vi)
Fuel jettisoning flow pattern should be demonstrated from all normally used tank or tank
combinations on both sides of the aeroplane whether or not both sides are symmetrical.
(vii)
Fuel jettisoning rate may be demonstrated from only one side of symmetrical tank or tank
combinations which are critical for flow rate.
(viii)
Fuel jettisoning rate and flow pattern should be demonstrated when jettisoning from full tanks
using fuel.
(2)
Control
(i)
Changes in the aeroplane control forces during the fuel jettisoning tests should be noted.
(ii)
The capability to shut off the fuel jettisoning system should be demonstrated in flight.
(3)
Residual Fuel. The residual fuel should be measured by draining the tanks from which fuel
has been jettisoned in flight, measuring the total drained fuel, and subtracting from the total the
2FTG46
BOOK 2
CS-23
unusable fuel quantity for each tank to determine if there is sufficient reserve fuel after jettisoning to
meet the requirements of this paragraph. This may be a ground test.
222237 RESERVED
Section 4 OIL SYSTEM

238
PARAGRAPH 23.1027 PROPELLER FEATHERING SYSTEM. Included in 23.903 material.
See paragraph 190 of this FTG.
239244 RESERVED
Section 5. COOLING
245
PARAGRAPH 23.1041 GENERAL. See paragraphs 246, 247 and 248 of this FTG.
246
PARAGRAPH 23.1043 COOLING TESTS
a.
Explanation. Paragraphs 247 and 248 of this FTG provide details on reciprocating engine and
turbine engine cooling tests. Additional procedures for certification of winterisation equipment are
given below.
b.
Weight and C.G. Forward c.g. at maximum gross weight is usually the most critical condition.
For reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes of more than 2722 kg (6000 lb) maximum weight and for
turbine engine-powered aeroplanes, the take-off weight need not exceed that at which compliance with
23.63(c)(1) has been shown. If engine cooling is critical at high altitude it may not be possible to
achieve the critical point with the maximum weight, in which case a lower weight may represent the
most critical weight condition.
c.
Winterisation Equipment Procedures. The following procedures should be applied when
certificating winterisation equipment:
(1)
Other Than a 38C (100F) Day. Cooling test results for winterisation installations may be
corrected to any temperature desired by the applicant rather than the conventional 38C (100F) hotday. For example, an applicant may choose to demonstrate cooling to comply with requirements for a
10C or 16C (50F or 60F) day with winterisation equipment installed. This temperature becomes a
limitation to be shown in the AFM. In such a case, the sea level temperature for correction purposes
should be considered to be the value elected by the applicant with a rate of temperature drop of 2C
(3.6F) per 305 m (1000 ft) above sea level.
(2)
Tests. Cooling tests and temperature correction methods should be the same as for
conventional cooling tests.
(3)
Limit Temperature. The AFM should clearly indicate that winterisation equipment should be
removed whenever the temperature reaches the limit for which adequate cooling has been
demonstrated. The cockpit should be placarded accordingly.
(4)
Equipment Marking. If practical, winterisation equipment, such as baffles for oil radiators or for
engine cooling air openings, should be marked clearly to indicate the limiting temperature at which this
equipment should be removed.
(5)
Installation Instructions. Since winterisation equipment is often supplied in kit form,
accompanied by instructions for its installation, manufacturers should provide suitable information
regarding temperature limitations in the installation instructions.
2FTG47
CS-23
BOOK 2
247
PARAGRAPH 23.1045 COOLING TEST PROCEDURES FOR TURBINE ENGINE-POWERED
AEROPLANES
a.
Explanation
(1)
Purpose. Cooling tests are conducted to determine the ability of the powerplant cooling
provisions to maintain the temperatures of powerplant components and engine fluids within the
temperature limits for which they have been certificated. These limits will normally be specified on the
TC data sheet.
(2)
Components With Time/Temperature Limits. The conventional method of approving engine
components is to establish a temperature limit that will ensure satisfactory operation during the
overhaul life of the engine. However, a component that exceeds the temperature limit can be approved
at the elevated temperature for a specific period of time. To ensure that a component having a
time/temperature limit will operate within the established limitation, a means should be provided to
record the time and temperature of an excessive temperature and warn the pilot accordingly. The
method of recording elapsed time and temperature should be automatic or activated by the pilot with a
simple operation. Operating limitations requiring the pilot to detect a critical aeroplane operating
condition and record the elapsed time in the aeroplane logs would not be acceptable due to the other
pilot duties during the critical aeroplane operating condition.
(3)
Altitude. Cooling tests should be conducted under critical ground and flight operating
conditions to the maximum altitude for which approval is requested.
b.
Test Procedures Applicable to Both Single-Engine and Twin-Engine Aeroplanes
(1)
Performance and Configuration. Refer to 23.45, which have performance requirements
related to engine cooling.
(2)
Moisture. The tests should be conducted in air free of visible moisture.
(4)
Oil Quantity. The critical condition should be tested.
(5)
Thermostat. Aeroplanes which incorporate a thermostat in the engine oil system may have the
thermostat retained, removed, or blocked in such a manner as to pass all engine oil through the oil
cooler. If the thermostat is retained, the oil temperature readings obtained on a cooler day corrected to
hot-day conditions may therefore be greater than those obtained under actual hot-day conditions.
Caution should be exercised when operating an aeroplane with the thermostat removed or blocked
during cold weather to prevent failure of the lubricating system components.
(6)
Instrumentation. Accurate and calibrated temperature-measuring devices should be used,
along with acceptable thermocouples or temperature-pickup devices. The proper pickup should be
located at critical engine positions.
(7)
Generator. The alternator/generator should be electrically loaded to the rated capacity for the
engine/accessory cooling tests.
(8)
Temperature Limitations. For cooling tests, a maximum anticipated temperature (hot-day
conditions) of at least 38C (100F) at sea level must be used. Temperatures at higher altitudes
assume a change at 2C (3.6F) per 305 m (1000 feet) of altitude, up to 56.5C (69.7F). The
maximum ambient temperature selected and demonstrated satisfactorily becomes an aeroplane
operating limitation per the requirements of 23.1521(e).
(9)
Temperature Stabilisation. For the cooling tests, a temperature is considered stabilised when
its observed rate of change is less than 1C (2F) per minute.
(10)
Altitude. The cooling tests should be started at the lowest practical altitude, usually below 914
m (3000 feet) MSL, to provide a test data point reasonably close to sea level.
2FTG48
BOOK 2
CS-23
(11)
Temperature Correction for Ground Operation. Recorded ground temperatures should be
corrected to the maximum ambient temperature selected, without consideration of the altitude
temperature lapse rate. For example, if an auxiliary power unit is being tested for ground cooling
margins, the cooling margin should be determined from the recorded ground temperature, without
regard to the test site altitude.
c.
Test Procedures for Single-Engine, Turbine-Powered Aeroplanes
(1)
A normal engine start should be made and all systems checked out. The engine should be run
at ground idle and temperatures and other pertinent data should be recorded.
(2)
Taxi aeroplane for approximately 2 km (1 mile) to simulate normal taxi operations. Record
cooling data at 1-minute intervals.
(3)
For hull-type seaplanes operating on water, taxi tests should be conducted such that spray
characteristics do not bias the cooling characteristics. Engine cooling during water taxiing should be
checked by taxiing downwind at a speed approximately 9.3 km/h (5 knots) above the step speed for a
minimum of 10 minutes continuous. Record cooling data at 1-minute intervals.
(4)
Establish a pre-takeoff holding condition on the taxiway (crosswind) for 20 minutes minimum or
until temperatures stabilise. Record cooling data at 5-minute intervals.
(5)
On the runway, set takeoff power and record cooling data.
(6)
Takeoff as prescribed in 23.53 and climb to pattern altitude. Record cooling data upon
reaching pattern altitude or at 1-minute intervals if it takes more than 1-minute to reach pattern altitude.
(7)
Retract flaps, if down and continue climb with maximum continuous power at the speed
selected to meet the requirements of 23.65(b). Climb to the maximum approved altitude, recording
cooling data at 1-minute intervals.
(8)
Cruise at maximum continuous power (or VMO/MMO, if limiting) at maximum operating altitude
until temperatures stabilise. Record cooling data at 1-minute intervals. For many components, this will
be the critical temperature operating condition.
(9)
Conduct a normal descent at VMO/MMO to holding altitude and hold until temperatures stabilise.
Record cooling data at 1-minute intervals.
(10)
Conduct a normal approach to landing. Record cooling data at 1-minute intervals.
(11)
From not less than 61 m (200 feet) above the ground, perform a balked landing go-around in
accordance with 23.77. Record cooling data at 1-minute intervals during a traffic pattern circuit.
(12)
Climb to pattern altitude, perform a normal approach and landing in accordance with the
applicable portion of 23.75. Record cooling data at 1-minute intervals.
(13)
Taxi back to ramp. Shut down engines. Allow engine to heat-soak. Record temperature data
at 1-minute intervals until 5 minutes after temperatures peak.
d.
Test Procedures for Twin-Engine, Turbine-Powered Aeroplanes. A twin-engine aeroplane
should conduct the same profile as the single-engine aeroplane, in an all-engine configuration. On
completion of the all-engine profile, conduct the applicable one-engine-inoperative cooling climb test
recording data at 1-minute intervals. Shut down critical engine and with its propeller (if applicable) in
the minimum drag position, the remaining engine(s) at not more than maximum continuous power, or
thrust, landing gear retracted, and wing flaps in the most favourable position. Climb at the speed used
to show compliance with 23.67. Continue until 5 minutes after temperatures peak.
e.
Data Acquisition. The following data should be recorded at the time intervals specified in the
particular test program. The data may be manually recorded unless the quantity and frequency
necessitate automatic or semi-automatic means:
2FTG49
CS-23
BOOK 2
(1)
Outside air temperature (OAT).
(2)
Altitude.
(3)
Airspeed km/h (kt).
(4)
Gas generator r.p.m.
(5)
Engine torque.
(6)
Time.
(7)
Propeller r.p.m.
(8)
Engine oil temperature.
(9)
Pertinent engine temperature.
(10)
Pertinent nacelle and component temperatures.
f.
Data Reduction
(1)
Limitations. A maximum anticipated temperature (hot-day conditions) of at least 38C (100F)
at sea level must be used. The assumed temperature lapse rate is 2C (3.6F) per 305 m (1 000 feet)
altitude up to the altitude at which a temperature of 56,5C (69.7F) is reached, above which altitude
the temperature is constant at 56,5C (69.7F). On turbine engine-powered aeroplanes, the
maximum ambient temperature selected becomes an aeroplane operating limitation in accordance with
the requirements of 23.1521(e). On turbine-powered aeroplanes, the applicant should correct the
engine temperatures to as high a value as possible in order to not be limited.
(2)
Correction Factors. Unless a more rational method applies, a correction factor of 1.0 is
applied to the temperature data as follows:
corrected temperature = true temperature + 1.0 [100 0.0036 (Hp) true OAT].
Sample Calculation
True Temperature
True OAT
Hp
300F
15F
5 000 ft.
The corrected temperature = 300 + 1.0 [100 0.0036 (5 000) 15] = 367F.
The corrected temperature is then compared with the maximum permissible temperature to determine
compliance with the cooling requirements.
2FTG410
BOOK 2
CS-23
248
PARAGRAPH 23.1047 COOLING TEST PROCEDURES FOR RECIPROCATING ENGINEPOWERED AEROPLANES
a.
Procedures
(1)
Additional Procedures. The procedures of paragraph 247b(1) through 247b(6) of this FTG
also apply to reciprocating engines.
(2)
Altitude. Engine cooling tests for reciprocating engine aeroplanes are normally initiated below
610 m (2 000 ft) pressure altitude. Service experience indicates that engine cooling tests started
above 1524 m (5 000 ft) may not assure adequate cooling margins when the aeroplane is operated at
sea level. If an applicant elects not to take the aeroplane to a low altitude test site, additional cooling
margins have been found acceptable. If engine cooling tests cannot be commenced below 610 m
(2 000 ft) pressure altitude, the temperature margin should be increased by 17C (30F) at 2134 m
(7 000 ft) for cylinder heads and 33C (60F) for both engine oil and cylinder barrels with a straight line
variation from sea level to 2134 m (7 000 ft) unless the applicant demonstrates that some other
correction margin is more applicable.
(3)
Hull-Type Seaplanes. Cooling tests on hull-type seaplanes should include, after temperatures
stabilise, a downwind taxi for 10 minutes at 9.3 km/h (5 kt) above the step speed, recording cooling
data at 1-minute intervals.
(4)
Test Termination. If at any time during the test, temperatures exceed the manufacturers
specified limits, the test is to be terminated.
(5)
Climb Transition. At the beginning of the cooling climb, caution should be used in depleting
the kinetic energy of the aeroplane while establishing the climb speed. The climb should not be started
by zooming into the climb. The power may be momentarily reduced provided that the stabilised
temperatures are not allowed to drop excessively. This means that a minimum of time should be used
in slowing the aeroplane from the high cruise speed to the selected cooling climb speed. This may be
accomplished by manoeuvre loading the aeroplane or any other means that provide minimum slowdown time.
(6)
Component Cooling. Accessories or components on the engine or in the engine compartment
which have temperature limits should be tested and should be at the maximum anticipated operating
conditions during the cooling tests; for example, generators should be at maximum anticipated loads.
(7)
Superchargers. Superchargers and turbo-superchargers should be used as described in the
AFM. Engine cooling should be evaluated in the cruise condition at the maximum operating altitude,
since this may be a more critical point than in climb. Also, turbo-charged engines sometimes give a
false peak and the climb should be continued long enough to be sure that the temperatures do not
begin to increase again.
(8)
Single-Engine Aeroplanes. The cooling tests for single-engine aeroplanes should be
conducted as follows:
(i)
At the lowest practical altitude, establish a level flight condition at not less than 75% maximum
continuous power until temperatures stabilise. Record cooling data.
(ii)
Increase engine power to takeoff rating and climb at a speed corresponding to the applicable
performance data given in the AFM/POH, which are criteria relative to cooling. Maintain takeoff power
for 1 minute. Record cooling data.
(iii)
At the end of 1 minute, reduce engine power to maximum continuous and continue climb for at
least 5 minutes after temperatures peak or the maximum operating altitude is reached. Record cooling
data at 1-minute intervals. If a leaning schedule is furnished to the pilot, it should be used.
2FTG411
CS-23
BOOK 2
(9)
Twin-Engine Aeroplanes. For twin-engine-powered aeroplanes that meet the minimum oneengine-inoperative climb performance specified in 23.67 with the aeroplane in the configuration used
in establishing critical one-engine-inoperative climb performance:
(i)
At the lower altitude of 305 m (1 000 ft) below engine critical altitude or 305 m (1 000 ft) below
the altitude at which the minimum one-engine-inoperative climb gradient is 15%, or at the lowest
practical altitude (when applicable), stabilise temperatures of the test engine in level flight at not less
than 75% maximum continuous power. Record cooling data.
(ii)
After temperatures stabilise, initiate a climb at a speed not more than the highest speed at
which compliance with the climb requirement of 23.67 is shown. With the test engine at maximum
continuous power (or full throttle), continue climb until 5 minutes after temperatures peak or the
maximum operating altitude is reached. Record cooling data at 1-minute intervals.
(10)
Performance Limited Twin-Engine Aeroplanes. For twin-engine aeroplanes that cannot meet
the minimum one-engine-inoperative performance specified in 23.67 is shown:
(i)
Set zero thrust on the planned inoperative engine and determine an approximate rate of sink
(or climb). A minimum safe test altitude should then be established.
(ii)
Stabilise temperatures in level flight with engines operating at no less than 75% maximum
continuous power and as near sea level as practicable or the minimum safe test altitude.
(iii)
After temperatures stabilise, initiate a climb at a speed not more than the highest speed at
which compliance with the climb requirements of 23.67 is shown, with one engine inoperative and
remaining engine(s) at maximum continuous power. Continue for at least 5 minutes after temperatures
peak. Record cooling data at 1-minute intervals.
b.
Data Acquisition. The following data should be recorded at the time intervals specified in the
applicable test programs and may be manually recorded unless the quantity and frequency necessitate
automatic or semi-automatic means:
(1)
Time.
(2)
Hottest cylinder head temperature.
(3)
Hottest cylinder barrel temperature (only if a limitation).
(4)
Engine oil inlet temperature.
(5)
Outside air temperature.
(6)
Indicated airspeed km/h (kt).
(7)
Pressure altitude.
(8)
Engine r.p.m.
(9)
Propeller r.p.m.
(10)
Manifold pressure.
(11)
Carburettor air temperature.
(12)
Mixture setting.
(13)
Throttle setting.
2FTG412
BOOK 2
CS-23
(14)
Temperatures of components or accessories which have established limits that may be
affected by powerplant heat generation.
c.
To Correct Cylinder Barrel Temperature to Anticipated Hot-Day Conditions
(1)
Corrected cylinder barrel temperature = true observed cylinder barrel temperature + 0 .7
.
[100 0 0036 (pressure altitude) true OAT].
(2)
For example:
True observed maximum cylinder barrel temperature

Pressure Altitude
True OAT
(3)
244F.
8 330 ft.
+55F.
Corrected cylinder barrel temperature = 244 + 0.7 [100 0.0036 (8 330) 55] = 255F.
(4)
The corrected temperatures are then compared with the maximum permissible temperatures to
determine compliance with cooling requirements.
d.
To Correct Cylinder Head or Other Temperatures to Anticipated Hot-Day Conditions
(1)
Corrected temperature = true temperature + 1.0 [100 0.0036 (pressure altitude) true
outside air temperature].
(2)
For example:
True maximum cylinder head temperature

Pressure Altitude
True OAT
(3)
406F.
8 330 ft.
+55F.
Corrected cylinder head temperature = 406 + 1.0 [100 0.0036 (8 330) 55] = 421F.
(4)
The corrected temperatures are then compared with the maximum permissible temperatures to
determine compliance with cooling requirements.
e.
Liquid Cooled Engines. (RESERVED).
249254 RESERVED.
2FTG413
CS-23
BOOK 2
Section 6. INDUCTION SYSTEM
255
PARAGRAPH 23.1091 AIR INDUCTION.
AC 20124 covers the turbine engine water ingestion aspects of this requirement.
256
PARAGRAPH 23.1093 INDUCTION SYSTEM ICING PROTECTION
a.
Explanation
(1)
Purpose. Tests of engine induction system icing protection provisions are conducted to ensure
that the engine is able to operate throughout its flight power range without adverse effect on engine
operation. Reciprocating engines utilise a preheater or a sheltered alternate air source to provide
adequate heat rise to prevent or eliminate ice formation in the engine induction system. The adequacy
of this heat rise is evaluated during the test. The amount of heat available is determined by measuring
the intake heat rise by temperature measurements of the air before it enters the carburettor. Turbine
engine inlet ducts must be protected to prevent the accumulation of ice as specified in 23.1093(b)(1).
(2)
Reciprocating Sea Level Engine Configurations
(i)
Venturi Carburettor. Paragraph 23.1093(a)(1) requires a 50C (90F) heat rise at 75%
maximum continuous power at -1C (30F) OAT.
(ii)
Single-Engine Aeroplanes With a Carburettor Tending to Prevent Icing (Pressure
Carburettor). Paragraph 23.1093(a)(5) requires an alternate air source with a temperature equal to
that of the air downstream of the cylinders.
(iii)
Twin-Engine Aeroplane With Carburettor Tending to Prevent Icing (Pressure Carburettor).
Paragraph 23.1093(a)(5) requires a 50C (90F) heat rise at 75% maximum continuous power at -1C
(30F) OAT.
(iv)
Fuel Injection With Ram Air Tubes. A heat rise of 50C (90F) at 75% maximum continuous
power is recommended.
(v)
Fuel Injection Without Projections Into the Induction Air Flow. An alternate air source with a
temperature not less than the cylinder downstream air is recommended.
(3)
Reciprocating Altitude Engine Configurations
(i)
Venturi Carburettor. Paragraph 23.1093(a)(2) requires a 67C (120F) heat rise at 75%
maximum continuous power at -1C (30F) OAT.
(ii)
Carburettors Tending to Prevent Icing (Pressure Carburettor). Paragraph 23.1093(a)(3)
requires a heat rise of 56C (100F) at 60% maximum continuous power at -1C (30F) OAT or 22C
(40F) heat rise if an approved fluid deicing system is used.
(iii)
Fuel Injection. Same as for sea level fuel injected engines.
(4)
Turbine Engines. Paragraph 23.1093(b) requires turbine engines to be capable of operating
without adverse effects on operation or serious loss of power or thrust under the icing conditions
specified in Part 25, appendix C. The powerplant should be protected from ice at all times, whether or
not the aeroplane is certificated for flight into known icing conditions.
b.
Reciprocating Engine Test Considerations
2FTG414
BOOK 2
CS-23
(1)
Visible Moisture. The tests should be conducted in air free of visible moisture.
(2)
Instrumentation. All instruments used during the test should be calibrated and all calibration
curves made part of the Type Inspection Report. Calibrations should be made of complete systems as
installed and shall cover the temperature range expected during the tests.
(3)
Heat Rise. All carburettor air heat rise requirements should be met at an outside air
temperature of -1C (30F). If the test cannot be conducted in an atmosphere with an ambient air
temperature of -1C (30F), it will normally be flown at low, intermediate, and high altitudes. If a -1C
(30F) day exists at an altitude where 75% of rated power is available, only one test is necessary.
(4)
Intake Air. Care should be exercised to assure that the method of measuring the temperature
of the air will give an indication of the average temperature of the airflow through the intake and not
just a stratum of air. This may be accomplished by temperature measurements of the intake air at
several points. Usually, the temperature probe is placed at the carburettor deck; however, test data
may be obtained with the pickup at other locations. A carburettor throat temperature pickup in lieu of
carburettor air box temperature instrumentation will not suffice for accurate readings unless calibration
data is made available to correlate carburettor throat temperatures to actual air inlet temperatures.
c.
Test Procedures for Reciprocating Engine Aeroplanes
(1)
At low altitude, stabilise aeroplane with full throttle or, if the engine is supercharged, with
maximum continuous power on the test engine. With carburettor air heat control in the cold position
record data. Manually operated turbochargers should be off. For integrally turbocharged engines,
heat rise data should be taken at lowest altitude conditions, where the turbo is providing minimum
output.
(2)
Apply carburettor heat and after condition stabilises, record data.
(3)
Reduce airspeed to 90% of that attained under item (1). With carburettor air heat control in the
cold position and condition stabilised, record data.
(4)
(5)
Reduce airspeed to 80% of that attained under item (1). With carburettor air heat control in the
cold position and condition stabilised, record data.
(6)
(7)
At the intermediate altitude, repeat steps (1) through (6).
(8)
At high altitude, repeat steps (1) through (6). Data to be recorded.
(i)
Altitude m (feet).
(ii)
Airspeed (IAS) km/h (Knots).
(iii)
Ambient air temperature C (F).
(iv)
Carburettor air temperature C (F).
(v)
Carburettor heat control position.
(vi)
Engine r.p.m.
(vii)
Engine manifold pressure hPa (in Hg).
(viii)
Throttle position.
2FTG415
CS-23
BOOK 2
d.
Data Reduction. Figures 2561 and 2562 show sample carburettor air heat rise
determinations.
e.
Test Procedures for Turbine Engine-Powered Aeroplanes. Tests to determine the capability of
the turbine engine to operate throughout its flight power range without adverse effect on engine
operation or serious loss of power or thrust should be conducted to encompass the icing conditions
specified in CS 1, appendix C. Each aeroplane should be evaluated for compliance. Thermodynamic
exercises and dry air tests alone are not usually adequate, and actual icing encounters or wind tunnel
testing are necessary.
2FTG416
Pressure
(ft.)
Altitude
Full Throttle or
MC Power*
90%IAS
Colums #1
of
INTERMEDIATE ALTITUDE
80% IAS
Column #1
C
of
1500
Full Throttle of
MC Power*
90% IAS
Column #1
of
MAXIMUM ALTITUDE (75%)
80% IAS
Column #1
C
of
1500
Full Throttle or
MC Power*
90% IAS
Column #1
of
80% IAS
Column #1
8000
O.A.T. (F)
83
83
83
83
83
83
72
72
72
72
72
72
60
60
60
60
60
60
C.A.T. (F)
84
215
84
205
84
200
73
201
73
189
73
184
61
190
61
185
61
176
Heat Rise
132
122
117
of
129
117
112
130
125
116
I.A.S. (M.P.H.)
105
99
95
92
84
82
96
88
87
78
77
70
90
80
82
75
72
67
R.P.M.
2850
2730
2690
2590
2430
2310
2800
2640
2555
2400
2410
2280
2770
2525
2665
2480
2525
2310
M.P. (In. Hg.)
264
257
240
235
220
213
235
228
196
193
190
185
212
204
199
194
180
172
Indicated B.H.P.
144
132
120
112
105
99
125
114
92
85
76
72
113
100
101
90
73
65
Std. Temperature
for Pressure Altitude
(F)
54
41
BOOK 2
2FTG417
Figure 256-1 CARBURETTOR AIR HEAT RISE CALCULATIONS
Carburettor Air Heat

Control Position
MINIMUM ALTITUDE
Note: May be flown

at only one altitude
o
if O.A.T. of 30 F is
Available
30
Temperature
Correction
Factor
(See note 1)
974
872
972
879
972
882
970
870
970
879
970
882
970
868
970
871
970
878
Actual B.H.P.
140
115
117
984
102
874
121
992
89
747
74
635
110
868
98
784
71
571
% Rated B.H.P.
100
822
835
702
728
624
864
710
635
534
528
453
785
621
70
560
506
408
FT
FT
FT
FT
Ft
Ft
(See note 2)
Throttle Position
*Supercharged Engines Only

Note 1:
Temperature Correction Factor =
std temp( o F) + 460

CAT( o F) + 460
Rated BHP = 140
Note 3:
Bold numbers indicate data plotted on figure 256-1
CS-23
Note 2:
CS-23
BOOK 2
100
Press. Alt. - 1500 FT.
90
Percent of rated BHP
80
75% BHP
70
60
50
80
Outside air temperature - F
90
70
60
140 oF carb. air
heat rise at 30 oF
outside air temp.
50
40
30
20
110
120
130
140
Caburator air heat rise - o F

Figure 256-2 CARBURETTOR AIR HEAT RISE PLOTS
2FTG418
150
BOOK 2
CS-23
257265 RESERVED
Section 7 POWERPLANT CONTROLS AND ACCESSORIES

266
PARAGRAPH 23.1141 POWERPLANT CONTROLS: GENERAL
a.
Explanation. Powerplant controls for each powerplant function will be grouped for each engine
allowing simultaneous or independent operation as desired. Each control will be clearly marked as to
function and control position. (Also see 23.777). Controls are required to maintain any position set
by the pilot without tendency to creep due to vibration or control loads.
b.
Procedures. None.
267
PARAGRAPH 23.1145 IGNITION SWITCHES. (RESERVED)
268
PARAGRAPH 23.1153 PROPELLER FEATHERING CONTROLS
a.
Explanation. If the propeller pitch or speed control lever also controls the propeller feathering
control, some means are required to prevent inadvertent movement to the feathering position.
b.
Procedures. None.
269278 RESERVED
Section 8 POWERPLANT FIRE PROTECTION

279
PARAGRAPH 23.1189 SHUTOFF MEANS
a.
Explanation The location and operation of any required shutoff means is substantiated by
analysis of design data, inspection, or test. The location and guarding of the control (switch), the
location and clarity of any required indicators and the ability to operate the controls with the shoulder
harnesses locked (if applicable) should be evaluated.
b.
Procedures. Control locations and guarding and indicator effectiveness should be part of the
complete cockpit evaluation. Check the shutoff means function by performing an after-flight engine
shutdown using the fuel shutoff.
280285 RESERVED
2FTG419
CS-23
BOOK 2
2FTG420
CS23
BOOK 2
CHAPTER 5 EQUIPMENT
Section 1 GENERAL
286
(RESERVED)
287
PARAGRAPH 23.1301 FUNCTION AND INSTALLATION.
a.
Explanation. Paragraph 23.1301 gives specific installation requirements. Particular attention
should be given to those installations where an external piece of equipment could affect the flight
characteristics. All installations of this nature should be evaluated by the flight test pilot to verify that
the equipment functions properly when installed.
b.
Avionics Test
(1)
Very High Frequency VHF Communication Systems See AC 2067B. AC 2067B reference
Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) document DO186 DO186, paragraph 3.4.2.3
speaks to ground facility coverage area. FAA Order 6050.32, appendix 2, shows the coverage limits
for various facility parameters.
(2)
High Frequency (HF) Communication Systems
(i)
Ground Station Contacts. Acceptable communication should be demonstrated by contacting a
ground station on as wide a range of frequencies as HF propagation conditions allow. Distances may
vary from 185 (100) to several hundred km (nautical miles). The system should perform satisfactorily in
its design modes.
(ii)
Precipitation Static. It should be demonstrated that precipitation static is not excessive when
the aeroplane is flying at cruise speed (in areas of high electrical activity, including clouds and rain if
possible). Use the minimum amount of installed dischargers for which approval is sought.
(iii)
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC). Electromagnetic compatibility tests should be conducted
on the ground and in flight at 10 Mhz intervals. Any electromagnetic interference (EMI) noted on the
ground should be repeated in flight at the frequency at which the EMI occurred on the ground. Since
squat switches may isolate some systems from operation on the ground (i.e. air data system,
pressurisation etc.), EMI should be evaluated with all systems operating in flight to verify that no
adverse effects are present in the engine, fuel control computer, brake antiskid, etc. systems.
(3)
Very High Frequency Omnirange (VOR) Systems
(i)
Antenna Radiation Patterns. These flight tests may be reduced if adequate antenna radiation
pattern studies have been made and these studies show the patterns to be without significant holes
(with the aeroplane configuration used in flight; that is, flaps, landing gear, etc.). Particular note should
be made in recognition that certain propeller r.p.m. settings may cause modulation of the course
deviation indication (prop-modulation). This information should be made a part of the AFM.
(A)
Reception. The airborne VOR system should operate normally with warning flags out of view
at all headings of the aeroplane (wings level) throughout the standard service volumes depicted in the
Airmans Information Manual (AIM) up to the maximum altitude for which the aeroplane is certified.
(B)
Accuracy. The accuracy determination should be made such that the indicated reciprocal
agrees within 2. Tests should be conducted over at least two known points on the ground such that
data are obtained in each quadrant. Data should correlate with the ground calibration and in no case
should the absolute error exceed 6. There should be no excessive fluctuation in the course deviation
indications.
(ii)
En-Route Reception. Fly from a VOR facility rated for high altitude along a radial at an altitude
of 90% of the aeroplane's maximum certificated altitude to the standard service volume range. The
VOR warning flag should not come into view, nor should there be deterioration of the station
2FTG51
CS-23
BOOK 2
identification signal. The course width should be 20 5 (10 either side at the selected radial). The
tests should be flown along published route segments to preclude ground station anomalies. If
practical, perform an en-route segment on a doppler VOR station to verify the compatibility of the
airborne unit. Large errors have been found when incompatibility exists.
(iii)
Low-Angle Reception. Perform a 360 right and 360 left turn at a bank angle of at least 10 at
an altitude just above the lowest edge of the standard service volume and at the maximum service
volume distance. Signal dropout should not occur as evidenced by the warning flag appearance.
Dropouts that are relieved by a reduction of bank angle at the same relative heading to the station are
satisfactory. The VOR identification should be satisfactory during the left and right turns.
(iv)
High-Angle Reception. Repeat the turns described in (iii) above, but at a distance of
93-130 km (5070 n.m.) (37-56 km (2030 n.m.) for aeroplanes not to be operated above 5486 m
(18 000 ft)) from the VOR facility and at an altitude of at least 90% of the maximum certificated altitude
of the aeroplane.
(v)
En-Route Station Passage. Verify that the to-from indicator correctly changes as the
aeroplane passes through the cone of confusion above a VOR facility.
(vi)
VOR Approach. Conduct VOR approaches with gear and flaps down. With the facility
22-28 km (1215 n.m.) behind the aeroplane, use sufficient manoeuvring in the approach to ensure the
signal reception is maintained during beam tracking.
(vii)
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC). With all systems operating in flight, verify by
observation, that no adverse effects are present in the required flight systems.
(4)
Localiser Systems
(i)
Antenna Radiation Patterns. Flight test requirements should be modified to allow for adequate
antenna radiation pattern measurements as discussed in VOR systems, subparagraph (3)(i).
(A)
Signal Strength. The input to the receiver, presented by the antenna system, should be of
sufficient strength to keep the malfunction indicator out of view when the aeroplane is in the approach
configuration (landing gear extended approach flaps) and within the normal limits of localiser
coverage shown in the Airmans Information Manual (AIM). This signal should be received for 360 of
the aeroplane heading at all bank angles up to 10 left or right at all normal pitch attitudes and at an
altitude of approximately 610 m (2 000 feet) (see RTCA Document D-102).
(B)
Bank Angles. Satisfactory results should also be obtained at bank angles up to 30 when the
aeroplane heading is within 60 of the inbound localiser course. Satisfactory results should result with
bank angles up to 15 on headings from 60 to 90 of the localiser inbound course and up to 10 bank
angle on headings for 90 to 180 from the localiser inbound course.
(C)
Course Deviation Indicator (CDI). The deviation indicator should properly direct the aeroplane
back to course when the aeroplane is right or left of course.
(D)
Station Identification. The station identification signal should be of adequate strength and
sufficiently free from interference to provide positive station identification, and voice signals should be
intelligible with all electric equipment operating and pulse equipment transmitting.
2FTG52
CS23
BOOK 2
(ii)
Localiser Intercept. In the approach configuration and at a distance of at least 33 km (18 n.m.)
from the localiser facility, fly toward the localiser front course, inbound, at an angle of at least 50.
Perform this manoeuvre from both left and right of the localiser beam. No flags should appear during
the time the deviation indicator moves from full deflection to on-course.
(iii)
Localiser Tracking. While flying the localiser inbound and not more than 9 km (5 ml) before
reaching the outer marker, change the heading of the aeroplane to obtain full needle deflection. Then
fly the aeroplane to establish localiser on-course operation. The localiser deviation indicators should
direct the aeroplane to the localiser on-course. Perform this manoeuvre with both a left and a right
needle deflection. Continue tracking the localiser until over the transmitter. Acceptable front course
and back course approaches should be conducted to 61 m (200 ft) or published minimums.
(iv)
observation, that no adverse effects are present in the required flight system.
(5)
Glide Slope Systems
(i)
Signal Strength. The signal input to the receiver should be of sufficient strength to keep the
warning flags out of view at all distances to 19 km (10 n.m.) from the facility. This performance should
be demonstrated at all aeroplane headings between 30 right and left of the localiser course (see
RTCA Document DO1010). The deviation indicator should properly direct the aeroplane back to path
when the aeroplane is above or below the path. Interference with the navigation operation, within 19
km (10 n.m.) of the facility, should not occur with all aeroplane equipment operating and all pulse
equipment transmitting. There should be no interference with other equipment as a result of glide
slope operation.
(ii)
Glide Slope Tracking. While tracking the glide slope, manoeuvre the aeroplane through
normal pitch and roll attitudes. The glide slope deviation indicator should show proper operation with
no flags. Acceptable approaches to 61 m (200 ft) or less above threshold should be conducted.
(iii)
(6)
Marker Beacon System
(i)
Flight Test
(A)
In low sensitivity, the marker beacon annunciator light should be illuminated for a distance of
610 to 914 m (2 000 to 3 000 feet) when flying at an altitude of 305 m (1 000 ft) AGL on the localiser
centreline in all flap and gear configurations.
(B)
An acceptable test to determine distances of 610 to 914 m (2 000 to 3 000 ft) is to fly at a
ground speed listed in table 1 and time the marker beacon light duration.
Table 1 LIGHT DURATION
Altitude = 305 m (1000 ft) (AGL)
Ground Speed
Light Time (Seconds)
(C)
Km/h (Knots)
610 m (2 000
ft)
914 m (3 000
ft)
167 (90)
204 (110)
241 (130)
278 (150)
13
11
9
8
20
16
14
12
For ground speeds other than table values, the following formulas may be used:
2FTG53
CS-23
BOOK 2
Upper limit
=
(seconds)
3287 (1 775)
Ground Speed in km/h (Knots)
Lower limit
=
(seconds)
2191 (1 183)
Ground Speed in km/h (Knots)
(D)
In high sensitivity, the marker beacon annunciator light and audio will remain on longer than
when in low sensitivity.
(E)
The audio signal should be of adequate strength and sufficiently free from interference to
provide positive identification.
(F)
As an alternate procedure, cross the outer marker at normal ILS approach altitudes and
determine adequate marker aural and visual indication.
(ii)
observation, that no adverse effects are present in the required flight system.
(7)
Automatic Direction Finding (ADF) Equipment
(i)
Range and Accuracy. The ADF system installed in the aeroplane should provide operation
with errors not exceeding 5, and the aural signal should be clearly audible up to the distance listed for
any one of the following types of radio beacons:
(A)
139 km (75 n.m.) from an HH facility.
(B)
93 km (50 n.m.) from an H facility. Caution service ranges of individual facilities may be less
than 93 km (50 n.m.)
(C)
46 km (25 n.m.) from an MH facility.
(D)
28 km (15 n.m.) from a compass locator.
(ii)
Needle Reversal. The ADF indicator needle should make only one 180 reversal when the
aeroplane flies over a radio beacon. This test should be made with and without the landing gear
extended.
(iii)
Indicator Response. When switching stations with relative bearings differing by 180 5, the
indicator should indicate the new bearing within 5 in not more than 10 seconds.
(iv)
Antenna Mutual Interaction. For dual installations, there should not be excessive coupling
between the antennas.
(v)
Technique
(A)
Range and Accuracy. Tune in a number of radio beacons spaced throughout the 190535 kHz
range and located at distances near the maximum range for the beacon. The identification signals
should be understandable and the ADF should indicate the approximate direction to the stations.
Beginning at a distance of at least 28 km (15 n.m.) from a compass locator in the approach
configuration (landing gear extended, approach flaps), fly inbound on the localiser front course and
make a normal ILS approach. Evaluate the aural identification signal for strength and clarity and the
ADF for proper performance with the receiver in the ADF mode. All electrical equipment on the
aeroplane should be operating and all pulse equipment should be transmitting. Fly over a ground or
appropriately established checkpoint with relative bearings to the facility of 0, 45, 90, 135, 180,
225, 270, and 315. The indicated bearings to the station should correlate within 5. The effects of
2FTG54
CS23
BOOK 2
the landing gear on bearing accuracy should be determined. (A calibration placard should be provided,
if appropriate.)
(B)
Needle Reversal. Fly the aeroplane over an H, MH, or compass locator facility at an altitude
305 to 610 m (1 000 to 2 000 ft) above ground level. Partial reversals which lead or lag the main
reversal are permissible.
(C)
Indicator Response. With the ADF indicating station dead ahead, switch to a station having a
relative bearing of 175. The indicator should indicate within 5 of the bearing in not more than
10 seconds.
(D)
Antenna Mutual Interaction
(1)
If the ADF installation being tested is dual, check for coupling between the antenna by using
the following procedure.
(2)
With #1 ADF receiver tuned to a station near the low end of the ADF band, tune the #2
receiver slowly throughout the frequency range of all bands and determine whether the #1 ADF
indicator is adversely affected.
(3)
Repeat (2) with the #1 ADF receiver tuned to a station near the high end of the ADF band.
(vi)
(8)
Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)
(i)
Tracking Performances. The DME system should continue to track without dropouts when the
aeroplane is manoeuvred throughout the airspace within the standard service volume of the
VORTAC/DME station and at altitudes above the lower edge of the standard service volume to the
maximum operating altitude. This tracking standard should be met with the aeroplane:
(A)
In cruise configuration.
(B)
At bank angle up to 10.
(C)
Climbing and descending at normal maximum climb and descent attitude.
(D)
Orbiting a DME facility.
(E)
Provide clearly readable identification of the DME facility.
(ii)
observations that no adverse effects are present in the required flight systems.
(iii)
Climb and Maximum Distance. Determine that there is no mutual interference between the
DME system and other equipment aboard the aeroplane. Beginning at a distance of at least 19 km (10
n.m.) from a DME facility and at an altitude of 610 m (2 000 ft) above the DME facility, fly the aeroplane
on a heading so that the aeroplane will pass over the facility. At a distance of 9-19 km (510 n.m.)
beyond the DME facility, operate the aeroplane at its normal maximum climb attitude up to 90% of the
maximum operating altitude, maintaining the aeroplane on a station radial (within 5). The DME should
continue to track with no unlocks to the range of the standard service volume.
2FTG55
CS-23
BOOK 2
(iv)
Long-Range Reception
(A)
Perform two 360 turns, one to the right and one to the left, at a bank angle of at least 10 at
the maximum service volume distance of the DME facility and at an altitude of at least 90% of the
maximum operating altitude.
(B)
Unlocks may occur and are acceptable if they do not interfere with the intended flight path of
the aeroplane or are relieved by a reduction of bank angle at the same relative heading to the station.
(v)
High-Angle Reception. Repeat the flight pattern and observations of (iii) above at a distance of
93-130 km (5070 n.m.) 37-56 km ((2030 n.m.) for aeroplanes not to be operated above 5486 m
(18 000 feet)) from the DME facility and at an altitude of at least 90% of the maximum operating
altitude.
(vi)
Penetration. From 90% of the maximum operating altitude, perform a letdown directly toward
the ground station using normal maximum rate of descent procedures to a DME facility so as to reach
an altitude of 1524 m (5 000 feet) above the DME facility 9-19 km (510 n.m.) before reaching the
DME facility. The DME should continue to track during the manoeuvre with no unlocks.
(vii)
Orbiting. At an altitude of 610 m (2 000 ft) above the terrain, at holding pattern speeds
appropriate for the type of aeroplane and with the landing gear extended, fly at least 15 sectors of left
and right 65 km (35 n.m.) orbital patterns around the DME facility. The DME should continue to track
with no more than one unlock, not to exceed one search cycle, in any 9 km (5 miles) of orbited flight.
(viii)
Approach. Make a normal approach at an actual or simulated field with a DME. The DME
should track without an unlock (station passage expected).
(ix)
DME Hold. With the DME tracking, activate the DME hold function. Change the channel
selector to a localiser frequency. The DME should continue to track on the original station.
(9)
Transponder Equipment
(i)
Signal Strength. The ATC transponder system should furnish a strong and stable return signal
to the interrogating radar facility when the aeroplane is flown in straight and level flight throughout the
airspace within 296 km (160 n.m.) of the radar station from radio line of sight to within 90% of the
maximum altitude for which the aeroplane is certificated or to the maximum operating altitude.
Aeroplanes to be operated at altitudes not exceeding 5486 m (18 000 feet) should meet the above
requirements to only 148 km (80 n.m.)
(ii)
Single Site Tracking. Special arrangements should be made for single-site tracking.
coverage includes remote stations and unless single-site is utilised, the data may be invalid.
ATC
(iii)
Dropout Times. When the aeroplane is flown within the airspace described above, the dropout
time should not exceed 20 seconds in the following manoeuvres:
(A)
In turns at bank angles up to 10.
(B)
Climbing and descending at normal maximum climb and descent attitude.
(C)
Orbiting a radar facility.
(iv)
Climb and Distance Coverage
(A)
Beginning at a distance of at least 19 km (10 n.m.) from and at an altitude of 610 m (2 000 ft)
above that of the radar facility and using a transponder code assigned by the ARTCC, fly on a heading
that will pass the aeroplane over the facility. Operate the aeroplane at its normal maximum climb
attitude up to within 90% of the maximum altitude for which the aeroplane is certificated, maintaining
the aeroplane at a heading within 5 from the radar facility. After reaching the maximum altitude for
2FTG56
CS23
BOOK 2
which the aeroplane is certificated, fly level at the maximum altitude to 296 (or 148) km (160 (or 80)
n.m.) from the radar facility.
(B)
Communicate with the ground radar personnel for evidence of transponder dropout. During
the flight, check the ident mode of the ATC transponder to ensure that it is performing its intended
function. Determine that the transponder system does not interfere with other systems aboard the
aeroplane and that other equipment does not interfere with the operation of the transponder system.
There should be no dropouts for two or more sweeps.
(v)
Long-Range Reception. Perform two 360 turns, one to the right and one to the left, at bank
angles of at least 10 with the flight pattern at least 296 (or 148) km (160 (or 80) n.m.) from the radar
facility. During these turns, the radar display should be monitored and there should be no signal
dropouts (two or more sweeps).
(vi)
High-Angle Reception. Repeat the flight pattern and observations of (iv) above at a distance
of 93 to 130 km (50 to 70 n.m.) from the radar facility and at an altitude of at least 90% of the maximum
operating altitude. There should be no dropout (two or more sweeps). Switch the transponder to a
code not selected by the ground controller. The aeroplane secondary return should disappear from the
scope. The controller should then change his control box to a common system and a single slash
should appear on the scope at the aeroplanes position.
(vii)
High-Altitude Cruise. Fly the aeroplane within 90% of its maximum certificated altitude or its
maximum operating altitude beginning at a point 296 (or 148) km (160 (or 80) n.m.) from the radar
facility on a course which will pass over the radar facility. There should be no transponder dropout
(two or more sweeps) or ring-around.
(viii)
Holding and Orbiting Patterns
(A)
At an altitude of 610 m (2 000 feet) or minimum obstruction clearance altitude (whichever is
greater) above the radar antenna and at holding pattern speeds, flaps and gear extended, fly one each
standard rate 360 turn right and left at a distance of approximately 19 km (10 n.m.) from the ARSR
facility. There should be no signal dropout (two or more sweeps).
(B)
At an altitude of 610 m (2 000 feet) or minimum obstruction clearance altitude (whichever is
greater) above the radar antenna and at holding pattern speeds appropriate for the type of aeroplane,
fly 45 sectors of left and right 19 km (10 n.m.) orbital patterns around a radar facility with gear and
flaps extended. There should be no signal dropout (two or more sweeps).
(ix)
(10)
Weather Radar
(i)
Bearing Accuracy. The indicated bearing of objects shown on the display should be within
10 of their actual relative bearing. Verify that as aeroplane turns to right or left of target, the
indicated display moves in the opposite direction. Fly under conditions which allow visual identification
of a target, such as an island, a river, or a lake, at a range of approximately 80% of the maximum
range of the radar. When flying toward the target, select a course that will pass over a reference point
from which the bearing to the target is known. When flying a course from the reference point to the
target, determine the error in displayed bearing to the target on all range settings. Change heading in
increments of 10 and determine the error in the displayed bearing to the target.
(ii)
Distance of Operation. The radar should be capable of displaying distinct and identifiable
targets throughout the angular range of the display and at approximately 80% of the maximum range.
(iii)
Beam Tilting. The radar antenna should be installed so that its beam is adjustable to any
position between 10 above and below the plane of rotation of the antenna. Tilt calibration should be
verified.
2FTG57
CS-23
(iv)
BOOK 2
Contour Display (Iso Echo)
(A)
If heavy cloud formations or rainstorms are reported within a reasonable distance from the test
base, select the contour display mode. The radar should differentiate between heavy and light
precipitation.
(B)
In the absence of the above weather conditions, determine the effectiveness of the contour
display function by switching from normal to contour display while observing large objects of varying
brightness on the indicator. The brightest object should become the darkest when switching from
normal to contour mode.
(v)
Antenna Stabilisation, When Installed. While in level flight at 3048 m (10 000 ft) or higher,
adjust the tilt approximately 23 above the point where ground return was eliminated. Roll right and
left approximately 15, then pitch down approximately 10 (or within design limits). No ground return
should be present.
(vi)
Ground Mapping. Fly over areas containing large, easily identifiable landmarks such as rivers,
towns, islands, coastlines, etc. Compare the form of these objects on the indicator with their actual
shape as visually observed from the cockpit.
(vii)
Mutual Interference. Determine that no objectionable interference is present on the radar
indicator from any electrical or radio/navigational equipment when operating and that the radar
installation does not interfere with the operation of any of the aeroplanes radio/navigational systems.
(viii)
(ix)
Light Conditions. The display should be evaluated during all lighting conditions, including night
and direct sunlight.
(11)
Area Navigation
(i)
Advisory Circular 9045A. This AC is the basic criteria for evaluating an area navigation
system, including acceptable means of compliance to the FAR.
(ii)
(12)
Inertial Navigation
(i)
Basic Criteria. Advisory Circular 254 is the basic criteria for the engineering evaluation of an
inertial navigation system (INS) and offers acceptable means of compliance with the applicable CS.
The engineering evaluation of an INS should also include an awareness of AC 12113 which presents
criteria to be met before an applicant can get operational approval. For flights up to 10 hours, the radial
error should not exceed 4 km (2 n.m.) per hour of operation on a 95% statistical basis. For flights
longer than 10 hours, the error should not exceed +/- 37 km (20 n.m.) cross-track or +/- 46 km ( 25
n.m.) along-track error. A 4 km (2 n.m.) radial error is represented by circle, having a radius of 4 km (2
n.m.), centred on the selected destination point.
(ii)
(13)
Doppler Navigation
(i)
Doppler navigation system installed performance should be evaluated in accordance with AC
12113.
2FTG58
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter 5 Paragraph
Section 23.1301
23.1301
(continued)
(continued)
(ii)
(14)
Audio Interphone Systems
(i)
Acceptable communications should be demonstrated for all audio equipment including
microphones, speakers, headsets, and interphone amplifiers. All modes of operation should be tested,
including operation during emergency conditions (that is, emergency descent, and oxygen masks) with
all engines running, all pulse equipment transmitting and all electrical equipment operating. If aural
warning systems are installed, they should be evaluated, including distinguishing aural warnings when
using headphones and with high air noise levels.
(ii)
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC). With all systems operating during flight, verify by
(15)
Electronic Flight Instrument Systems. See AC 23.13111.
(16)
VLF/Omega Navigation Systems. See ACs 20101B, 9079, 12031A, and 12037.
(17)
LORAN C Navigation Systems. See AC 20121A.
(18)
Microwave Landing Systems. (RESERVED).
288
(RESERVED)
289
PARAGRAPH 23.1303 FLIGHT AND NAVIGATION INSTRUMENTS
a.
Free Air Temperature (FAT). Paragraph 23.1303(a)(4) requires that reciprocating engine
powered aeroplanes of more than 2722 kg (6 000 lb) maximum weight and turbine engine-powered
aeroplanes have a free air temperature indicator or an air temperature indicator that provides
indications that are convertible to free air. The temperature pickup can be calibrated against a test
pickup of known characteristics, or by flying at various speeds at constant altitude, or by tower fly-by.
This calibration is frequently done in conjunction with one or more of the airspeed calibration methods
described in paragraph 302 of this FTG.
b.
Speed Warning Device. The production tolerances of the Speed Warning Device required with
23.1303(a)(5) must be set to minimise nuisance warnings.
In considering this requirement
manufacturers should endeavour to reduce, lessen, or diminish such an occurrence to the least
practical amount with current technology and materials. The least practical amount is that point at
which the effort to further reduce a hazard significantly exceeds any benefit, in terms of safety, derived
from that reduction. Additional efforts would not result in any significant improvements in reliability.
290
a.
Explanation. Paragraph 23.1305 is specific as to the powerplant instruments required for each
type of installation. The requirement for specific instruments on specific aeroplanes should be
determined by analysis of type design data prior to certification flight test.
b.
Procedures. Verify proper functioning of each required instrument/indicator installed. If the
creation of a required malfunction would require establishing a potentially hazardous condition in flight,
proper functioning of these indicators may be verified by ground test.
c.
Fuel Flowmeters. Advisory Circular (AC) 23.13051 covers the installation of fuel flowmeters
in aeroplanes with continuous-flow fuel injection reciprocating engines.
2FTG59
CS-23
BOOK 2
291
PARAGRAPH 23.1307 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT. (RESERVED)
292
PARAGRAPH 23.1309 EQUIPMENT, SYSTEMS, AND INSTALLATIONS
293299 RESERVED.
Section 2 INSTRUMENTS: INSTALLATION
300
PARAGRAPH 23.1311 ELECTRONIC DISPLAY INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS.

covered in AC 23.13111.
This item is
301
PARAGRAPH 23.1321 ARRANGEMENT AND VISIBILITY. (RESERVED).
302
PARAGRAPH 23.1322 WARNING, CAUTION, AND ADVISORY LIGHTS. (RESERVED).
303
PARAGRAPH 23.1323 AIRSPEED INDICATING SYSTEM
a.
Explanation
(1)
Airspeed Indicator. An airspeed indicator is usually a pressure gauge that measures the
difference between free stream total pressure and static pressure and is usually marked in knots. Pitot
tubes for duplicate airspeed indicators are usually located on opposite sides of an aircraft fuselage but
may be situated on the same side provided that they are separated by at least 30 cm.
(2)
Air Data Computer Systems. (RESERVED).
(3)
Definitions. Paragraph 1.1 of CS-1 defines indicated airspeed (IAS), calibrated airspeed
(CAS), equivalent airspeed (EAS), true air-speed (TAS), and Mach number. These definitions include
the terms position error, instrument error, and system error, which may need further explanation.
(i)
Position Error. Position error is the total-pressure (pitot) and static-pressure errors of the pilotstatic installation. By proper design, the total pressure error may be reduced to the point where it is
insignificant for most flight conditions. NASA Reference Publication 1046 (see subparagraph g) gives
various design considerations. The static pressure error is more difficult to measure and can be quite
large.
(ii)
Instrument Error. Instrument errors are errors inherent in the instrument for mechanical
instruments. These errors are the result of manufacturing tolerances, hysteresis, temperature
changes, friction, and inertia of moving parts. For electronic instruments, these errors are due to
errors in the electronic element which convert pitot-static pressures into electronic signals. Instrument
errors are determined for inflight conditions in steady state conditions. Ground run system calibrations
may require the consideration of internal instrument dynamics as would be affected by takeoff
acceleration.
(iii)
System Error. System error is the combination of position error and instrument error.
(4)
Temperatures. Static air temperature (SAT) and total air temperature (TAT) are not defined in
paragraph 1.1 of CS-1 but may be significant in accurate calibration of airspeed systems. For
stabilised values of pressure altitude and calibrated airspeed, TAS is a function of static air
temperature. Reference f (2) of appendix 2 discusses the heating effect of the airflow on the
2FTG510
CS23
BOOK 2
Chapter 5 Paragraph 23.1325
23.1323 (continued)
temperature sensor and shows how to determine the recovery factor of the sensor.
appendix 7 gives temperature ram rise, if the sensor recovery factor is known.
Figure 7 of
(5)
System Calibration. The airspeed system is calibrated to determine compliance with the
requirements of 23.1323, and to establish an airspeed reference which is used in demonstrating
compliance with other applicable regulations. The airspeed system may be calibrated using the speed
course method, pacer aeroplane method, trailing bomb and/or airspeed boom method, tower flyby
method, or trailing cone method. The method used will depend on the speed range of the aeroplane
tested, the configuration, and the equipment available. System calibration of the airspeed system is
usually determined at altitudes below 3048 m (10 000 ft). For aeroplanes approved for flight above
9449 m (31 000 ft), it is appropriate to verify validity of position errors at the higher operating altitudes.
For aeroplanes where the static ports are located in close proximity to the propeller plane, it should be
verified that sudden changes in power do not appreciably change the airspeed calibration.
Additionally, for commuter category aeroplanes, 23.1323(c) requires an airspeed calibration for use
during the accelerate-takeoff ground run.
(6)
Instrument Calibration. All instruments used during the test should be calibrated and all
calibration curves included in the Type Inspection Report.
b.
Speed Course Method. The speed course method consists of using a ground reference to
determine variations between indicated airspeed and ground speed of the aeroplane. See appendix 9
for test procedures and a sample data reduction.
c.
Trailing Bomb and/or Airspeed Boom Method. See appendix 9 for procedures, test conditions,
and a sample data reduction.
d.
Pace Aeroplane Method. See appendix 9 for test procedures.
e.
Tower Flyby. See paragraph 304 for explanation.
f.
Ground Run Airspeed System Calibration. The airspeed system is calibrated to show
compliance with commuter category requirements of 23.1323(c) during the accelerate-takeoff ground
run, and is used to determine IAS values for various V1 and VR speeds. See appendix 9 for definitions,
test procedures, and sample data reductions.
g.
Other Methods. Other methods of airspeed calibration are described in NASA Reference
Publication 1046, Measurement of Aircraft Speed and Altitude, by W. Gracey, May 1980.
304
PARAGRAPH 23.1325 STATIC PRESSURE SYSTEM
a.
Definitions. Paragraph 302 defines several of the terms associated with the pitot-static
systems. Others may need further explanation.
(1)
Altimeter. An altimeter is a pressure gauge that measures the difference between a sea level
barometer pressure set on the instrument and static pressure, and indicates in units of feet.
(2)
Static Error (error in pressure altitude). The error which results from the difference between
the actual ambient pressure and the static pressure measured at the aeroplane static pressure source
is called static error. Static error causes the altimeter to indicate an altitude which is different than
actual altitude. It may also affect the errors in the airspeed indicating system.
2FTG511
CS-23
BOOK 2
b.
Static System Calibration. The static system is calibrated to determine compliance with the
requirements of 23.1325. The static system may be calibrated by utilising a trailing bomb, cone, or
tower flyby method. Alternately, for properly designed pitot systems, the pitot has minimal effects on
the airspeed position error (dVc), as determined for 23.1323. For these systems, static error (dh)
may be calculated by the following equation:
2
Vc
dh = 08865 dVc 1 + 2

6615
2 5
( )
where
Vc
dVc
=
=
=
Vc
, ft.
calibrated airspeed, knots

ambient air density ratio
airspeed position error
c.
Test Methods. The methods specified for calibration of the airspeed indicating systems,
including test conditions and procedures apply equally for determining static error and error in
indicated pressure altitude, and are usually determined from the same tests and data.
d.
Tower Flyby. The tower flyby method is one of the methods which results in a direct
determination of static error in indicated pressure altitude without the need for calculating from
airspeed position error.
e.
Procedures and Test Conditions for Tower Flyby
(1)
Air Quality. Smooth, stable air is needed for determining the error in pressure altitude.
(2)
Weight and C.G. Same as for calibrations of the airspeed indicating system.
(3)
Speed Range. The calibration should range from 1.3 VSO to 1.8 VS1. Higher speeds up to VMO
or VNE are usually investigated so that errors can be included in the AFM for a full range of airspeeds.
(4)
Test Procedures
(i)
Stabilise the aeroplane in level flight at a height which is level with the cab of a tower, or along
a runway while maintaining a constant height of 15 to 30 m (50 to 100 ft) by use of a radio altimeter. A
ground observer should be stationed in the tower, or on the runway with an altimeter of known
instrument error. Pressure altitude is recorded on the ground and in the aeroplane at the instant the
aeroplane passes the ground observer.
(ii)
Repeat step (i) at various airspeeds in increments sufficient to cover the required range and at
each required flap setting.
(5)
Data Acquisition. Data to be recorded at each test point:
(i)
(ii)
Aeroplane IAS.
Aeroplane indicated pressure altitude.
(iii)
Ground observer indicated pressure altitude.
(iv)
Radar altimeter indication (if flown along a runway).
(v)
Wing flap position.
(vi)
Landing gear position.
(6)
Data Reduction
2FTG512
CS23
BOOK 2
(i)
Method
(A)
Correct indicated pressure altitude values for instrument error associated with each
instrument.
(B)
To obtain test pressure altitude, adjust the ground observed pressure altitude by the height
read from the radar altimeter. No adjustment is required if the aeroplane was essentially the same
level as the ground operator (tower cab). Static errors may be adjusted from test pressure altitude to
sea level by the following:
dh (S.L.) = dh (TEST)
Where:
(ii)
} {(TEST)}
dh(TEST)
Difference in test pressure altitude and aeroplane pressure altitude with

associated instrument errors removed.
(TEST)
ambient air density ratio.
Plotting. Static error at sea level (dh(S.L.) ) should be plotted vs. test calibrated airspeeds.
(7)
Required Accuracy. Paragraph 23.1325(e) requires that the error in pressure altitude at sea
level (with instrument error removed) must fall within a band of +/- 9 m (30 ft) at 185 Km/h (100 kt) or
less, with linear variation of +/- 5 m per 100 km/h ( 30 ft per 100 knots) at higher speeds. These limits
apply for all flap settings and airspeeds from 1.3 VSO up to 1.8 VS1. For commuter category
aeroplanes. The altimeter system calibration should be shown in the AFM.
305
PARAGRAPH 23.1326 PITOT HEAT INDICATION SYSTEMS. (RESERVED)
306
PARAGRAPH 23.1327 MAGNETIC DIRECTION INDICATOR. (RESERVED)
307
PARAGRAPH 23.1329 AUTOMATIC PILOT SYSTEM.
23.13292.
This subject is covered in AC
308
PARAGRAPH 23.1331 INSTRUMENTS USING A POWER SUPPLY. (RESERVED)
309
PARAGRAPH 23.1335 FLIGHT DIRECTOR SYSTEMS. (RESERVED)
2FTG513
CS-23
BOOK 2
310
a.
Explanation
(1)
Fuel Quantity Indicator. The indicator should be legible and easily readable without excessive
head movement. The calibration units and the scale graduations should be readily apparent. Units
should be consistent with AFM procedures and performance data.
(2)
Auxiliary Tanks. A fuel quantity indicator is not required for a small auxiliary tank that is used
only to transfer fuel to another tank if the relative size of the tank, the rate of fuel flow, and operating
instructions are adequate. The requirement for a separate quantity indicator should be determined by
analysis of design data prior to flight test. The relative size of the tanks, intended use of the auxiliary
tanks, complexity of the fuel system, etc., should be considered in determining the need for a fuel
quantity indicator. If an indicator is not installed, flight manual procedures should ensure that once
transfer of fuel is started, all fuel from the selected auxiliary tank can be transferred to the main tank
without overflow or overpressure.
b.
Procedures. Evaluate indicators for clarity and legibility. Review AFM for consistency of units
and validity of procedures.
311318 RESERVED
Section 3 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT
319
320
PARAGRAPH 23.1353 STORAGE BATTERY DESIGN AND INSTALLATION
a.
Explanation. When ascertaining that the installed aeroplane battery capacity is adequate for
compliance with 23.1353(h) account should be taken of any services or equipment essential for the
continued safe flight and landing of the particular aeroplane in accordance with the approved
emergency procedures and in any approved condition of operation. Account should also be taken of
those services which cannot readily be shed. In order to ensure that services will function adequately
for the prescribed period, the duration of battery supply should normally be based on a battery capacity
of 72% of the nameplate rated capacity at the one hour rate. This figure takes into consideration the
battery state of charge, the minimum capacity permitted during service life and the battery efficiency
and is based on a battery capacity of 80% of the nameplate rated capacity, at the one hour rate, and a
90% state of charge. Recognition time may depend on the kind of warning systems.
b.
Procedures. None.
321
PARAGRAPH 23.1357 CIRCUIT PROTECTIVE DEVICES. (RESERVED)
322
PARAGRAPH 23.1361 MASTER SWITCH ARRANGEMENT. This subpart requires a master
switch arrangement to be installed. Confirm that the master switch arrangement is prominently located
and marked. The master switch in accordance with 23.1355(e)(2) is considered to be an emergency
control and should be coloured red.
323
PARAGRAPH 23.1367 SWITCHES. (RESERVED)
324328 RESERVED
2FTG514
CS23
BOOK 2
Paragraph 4. LIGHTS
329
PARAGRAPH 23.1381 INSTRUMENT LIGHTS. (RESERVED)
330
PARAGRAPH 23.1383 LANDING LIGHTS. (RESERVED)
331335 RESERVED
Section 5. SAFETY EQUIPMENT
336
337
PARAGRAPH 23.1415 DITCHING EQUIPMENT. (RESERVED)
338
PARAGRAPH 23.1416 PNEUMATIC DEICER BOOT SYSTEM. See AC 23.14192.
339
PARAGRAPH 23.1419 ICE PROTECTION. See AC 23.14192.
340349 RESERVED
Paragraph 6. MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
349
PARAGRAPH 23.1431 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT. 23.1431(e) requires that the flight crew
members will receive all aural warnings when any headset is being used. For those installations where
not all warnings are provided through the radio/audio equipment, the manufacturers should
demonstrate that all warnings will be heard and recognised when noise cancelling headsets are used.
351
PARAGRAPH 23.1435 HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS. (RESERVED)
352
PARAGRAPH 23.1441 OXYGEN EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY. (RESERVED)
353
PARAGRAPH 23.1447 EQUIPMENT STANDARDS FOR OXYGEN DISPENSING UNITS.

(RESERVED)
354
PARAGRAPH 23.1449 MEANS FOR DETERMINING USE OF OXYGEN. (RESERVED)
355
PARAGRAPH 23.1457 COCKPIT VOICE RECORDERS. (RESERVED)
356
PARAGRAPH 23.1459 FLIGHT RECORDERS. (RESERVED)
357364 RESERVED.
2FTG515
CS-23
BOOK 2
2FTG516
CS23
BOOK 2
CHAPTER 6 OPERATING LIMITATIONS AND INFORMATION

Section 1 GENERAL
365
a.
Explanation
(1)
Flight Crew Information. This paragraph establishes the obligation to inform the flight
crew of the aeroplane's limitations and other information necessary for the safe operation of
the aeroplane. The information is presented in the form of placards, markings, and an
approved AFM. Appendix 4 can be used to assist in determining which methods of
presentation are required.
(2)
Minimum Limitations. Paragraphs 23.1505 thru 23.1527 prescribe the minimum
limitations to be determined. Additional limitations may be required.
(3)
Information Presentation. Paragraphs 23.1541 thru 23.1589 prescribe how the
information should be made available to the flight crew.
b.
Procedures. None.
366
PARAGRAPH 23.1505 AIRSPEED LIMITATIONS
a.
Explanation. This paragraph establishes the operational speed limitations which
establish safe margins below design speeds. For reciprocating engine-powered aeroplanes
there is an option. They may either establish a never-exceed speed (VNE) and a maximum
structural cruising speed (VNO) or they may be tested in accordance with 23.335(b)(4) in
which case the aeroplane is operated under a maximum operating speed concept
(VMO/MMO). For turbine-powered aeroplanes, a VMO/MMO should be established. Tests
associated with establishing these speeds are discussed under 23.253, High Speed
Characteristics.
b.
Procedures. None.
367
PARAGRAPH 23.1507 MANOEUVRING SPEED. This regulation is self explanatory.
368
PARAGRAPH 23.1511 FLAP EXTENDED SPEED. This regulation is self-explanatory.
369
PARAGRAPH 23.1513 MINIMUM CONTROL SPEED. This regulation is self-explanatory.
370
PARAGRAPH 23.1519 WEIGHT AND CENTRE OF GRAVITY.
explanatory.
This regulation is self-
371
PARAGRAPH 23.1521 POWERPLANT LIMITATIONS. (RESERVED)
372
(RESERVED)
2FTG61
CS23
BOOK 2
373
PARAGRAPH 23.1523 MINIMUM FLIGHT CREW
a.
Discussion. The following should be considered in determining minimum flight crew.
(1)
Basic Workload Functions. The following basic workload functions should be
considered:
(i)
Flight path control.
(ii)
Collision avoidance.
(iii)
Navigation.
(iv)
Communications.
(v)
Operation and monitoring of aircraft controls.
(vi)
Command decisions.
(vii)
Accessibility and ease of operation of necessary controls.
(2)
Workload Factors. The following workload factors are considered significant when
analysing and demonstrating workload for minimum flight crew determination:
(i)
The impact of basic aeroplane flight characteristics on stability and ease of flight path
control. Some factors such as trimmability, coupling, response to turbulence, damping
characteristics, control breakout forces and control force gradients should be considered in
assessing suitability of flight path control. The essential elements are the physical effort,
mental effort and time required to track and analyse flight path control features and the
interaction with other workload functions.
(ii)
The accessibility, ease, and simplicity of operation of all necessary flight, power, and
equipment controls, including emergency fuel shutoff valves, electrical controls, electronic
controls, pressurisation system controls, and engine controls.
(iii)
The accessibility and conspicuity of all necessary instruments and failure warning
devices such as fire warning, electrical system malfunction, and other failure or caution
indicators. The extent to which such instruments or devices direct the proper corrective
action is also considered.
(iv)
For reciprocating-engine-powered aeroplanes, the complexity and difficulty of
operation of the fuel system with particular consideration given to the required fuel
management schedule necessitated by centre of gravity, structural, or other airworthiness
considerations. Additionally, the ability of each engine to operate continuously from a single
tank or source which is automatically replenished from other tanks if the total fuel supply is
stored in more than one tank.
(v)
The degree and duration of concentrated mental and physical effort involved in
normal operation and in diagnosing and coping with malfunctions and emergencies,
including accomplishment of checklist, and location and accessibility of switches and valves.
(vi)
The extent of required monitoring of the fuel, hydraulic, pressurisation, electrical,
electronic, deicing, and other systems while en route. Also, recording of engine readings,
etc.
2FTG62
CS23
BOOK 2
(vii)
The degree of automation provided in the event of a failure or malfunction in any of
the aircraft systems. Such automation should ensure continuous operation of the system by
providing automatic crossover or isolation of difficulties and minimise the need for flight crew
action.
(viii)
The communications and navigation workload.
(ix)
The possibility of increased workload associated with any emergency that may lead
to other emergencies.
(x)
Passenger problems.
(3)
Kinds of Operation Authorised. During minimum crew determination, consideration
should be given to the kinds of operation authorised under 23.1525. Inoperative
equipment could result in added workload that would affect minimum crew. It may be
determined that due to minimum crew workload considerations, certain equipment must be
operative for a specific kind of operation.
b.
Acceptable Techniques
(1)
General
(i)
A systematic evaluation and test plan should be developed for any new or modified
aeroplane. The methods for showing compliance should emphasise the use of acceptable
analytical and flight test techniques. The crew complement should be studied through a
logical process of estimating, measuring, and then demonstrating the workload imposed by
a particular flight deck design.
(ii)
The analytical measurements should be conducted by the manufacturer early in the
aeroplane design process. The analytical process which a given manufacturer uses for
determining crew workload may vary depending on flight deck configuration, availability of a
suitable reference, original design or modification, etc.
(2)
Analytical Approach
(i)
A basis for deciding that a new design is acceptable is a comparison of a new design
with a previous design proven in operational service. By making specific evaluations and
comparing new designs to a known baseline, it is possible to proceed in confidence that the
changes incorporated in the new designs accomplish the intended result. When the new
flight deck is considered, certain components may be proposed as replacements for
conventional items, and some degree of rearrangement may be contemplated. New
avionics systems may need to be fitted into existing panels, and newly automated systems
may replace current indicators and controls. As a result of this evolutionary characteristic of
the flight deck design process, there is frequently a reference flight deck design, which is
usually a conventional aeroplane that has been through the test of operational usage. If the
new design represents an evolution, improvement attempt, or other deviation from this
reference flight deck, the potential exists to make direct comparisons. While the available
workload measurement techniques do not provide the capacity to place precise numbers on
all the relevant design features in reference to error or accident potential, these techniques
do provide a means for comparing the new proposal to a known quantity. Service
experience should be researched to assure that any existing problems are understood and
not perpetuated.
(ii)
After studying a new component or arrangement and exercising it in practical flight
scenarios, a test pilot may not be able to grade that design in finer workload units than
2FTG63
CS23
BOOK 2
better or worse than. If the pilot can say with reliability and confidence that it is or is not
easier to see a display or to use an augmented control system than to use a functionally
similar unit of a reference design, then these better or worse than judgements, if
corroborated by a reasonable sample of qualified pilots over various assumed flight regimes,
provide substantial evidence that workload is or is not reduced by the innovation.
(A)
If an early subjective analysis by EASA flight test personnel shows that workload
levels may be substantially increased, a more in-depth evaluation of flight testing may be
required to prove acceptability of the increased workload. In this case, there should be
available workload latitude in the basic flight deck design to accommodate the increase.
(B)
If the new design represents a revolutionary change in level of automation or pilot
duties, analytic comparison to a reference design may have lessened value. Without a firm
data base on the time required to accomplish both normally required and contingency duties,
more complete and realistic simulation and flight testing will be required.
(3)
Testing
(i)
In the case of the minimum crew determination, the final decision is reserved until the
aeroplane has been flown by a panel of experienced pilots, trained and qualified in the
aeroplane. The training should be essentially that required for a type rating. When single
pilot approval is sought by the applicant, the evaluation pilots should be experienced and
proficient in single pilot operations. Paragraph 23.1523 contains the criteria for determining
the minimum flight crew. These criteria contain basic workload functions and workload
factors.
(ii)
The workload factors are those factors which should be considered when evaluating
the basic workload functions. It is important to keep in mind the key terms basic workload
and minimum cues when analysing and demonstrating workload. For example, an
evaluation of communications workload should include the basic workload required to
properly operate the aeroplane in the environment for which approval is sought. The goal of
evaluating crew complement during realistic operating conditions is important to keep in
mind if a consistent evaluation of minimum flight crew is to be accomplished.
(iii)
The flight test program for showing compliance should be proposed by the applicant
and should be structured to address the following factors:
(A)
Route. The routes should be constructed to simulate a typical area that is likely to
provide some adverse weather and Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC), as well as a
representative mix of navigation aids and Air Traffic Control (ATC) services.
(B)
Weather. The aeroplane should be test flown in a geographical area that is likely to
provide some adverse weather such as a turbulence and IMC conditions during both day
and night operations.
(C)
Crew Work Schedule. The crew should be assigned to a daily working schedule
representative of the type of operations intended, including attention to passenger cabin
potential problems. The programme should include the duration of the working day and the
maximum expected number of departures and arrivals. Specific tests for crew fatigue are
not required.
(D)
Minimum Equipment Test. Pre-planned dispatch-inoperative items that could result
in added workload should be incorporated in the flight test program. Critical items and
reasonable combinations of inoperative items should be considered in dispatching the
aeroplane.
2FTG64
CS23
BOOK 2
(E)
Traffic Density. The aeroplane should be operated on routes that would adequately
sample high density areas, but should also include precision and non-precision approaches,
holdings, missed approaches, and diversion to alternate airports.
(F)
System Failures. Consequences of changes from normal to failed modes of
operation should be included in the programme. Both primary and secondary systems
should be considered.
(G)
Emergency Procedures. A sampling of various emergencies should be established
in the test program to show their effect on the crew workload.
NOTE: Prior to selecting the system failure and emergency procedures that will be evaluated in the flight test program,
analytical studies of proposed abnormal and emergency procedures should be conducted. The acceptability of all
procedures should be verified and the crew workload distribution during the execution of these procedures understood to
assure selection of appropriate failure cases.
(4)
Determining Compliance
(i)
The type certification team that serves as pilots and observers should be equipped
with flight cards or other means that allow for record keeping of comments addressing the
basic workload functions. These records should be accumulated for each flight or series of
flights in a given day. In addition, the certification team should record the accuracy of using
operational checklists. For the purposes of this data gathering, the aeroplane should be
configured to allow the team evaluators to observe all crew activities and hear all
communications both externally and internally.
(ii)
Each sub-paragraph of paragraph 373a summarises an observation of pilot
performance that is to be made. Judgement by the certification team members should be
that each of these tasks has been accomplished within reasonable pre-established workload
standards during the test flights. A holistic pilot evaluation rationale is needed in view of the
wide variety of possible designs and crew configurations that makes it unfeasible to assume
that ratings are made against every alternative and against some optimum choices. The
regulatory criteria for determining minimum flight crew do not adapt well to finely-scaled
measurements. Specific feature and activity pass-fail judgements should be made. Pass
means that the aeroplane meets the minimum requirements.
374
PARAGRAPH 23.1524 MAXIMUM PASSENGER SEATING CONFIGURATION.
This regulation is self-explanatory.
375
PARAGRAPH 23.1525 KINDS OF OPERATION
a.
Explanation
(1)
Required Equipment. See discussion under 23.1583(h), paragraph 411 of this
FTG, concerning required equipment for each certificated kind of operation.
(2)
Icing. With respect to operations in icing conditions, it is important that operating
limitations be established in order to specify the required equipment in 23.1583(h) and to
provide the proper placard required by 23.1559 (flight in icing approved or prohibited).
2FTG65
CS23
BOOK 2
376
PARAGRAPH 23.1527 MAXIMUM OPERATING ALTITUDE
a.
Explanation
(1)
Safe Operation. Paragraph 23.1527 requires the establishment of a maximum
operating altitude for all turbine, turbosupercharged, and pressurised aeroplanes based on
operation limited by flight, structural, powerplant, functional or equipment characteristics.
Paragraph 23.1501(a) requires limitations necessary for safe operation be established.
Thus, if an unsafe condition occurs beyond a particular operating altitude for any aeroplane,
that altitude should be established as a limitation under 23.1501(a).
(2)
Windshields and Windows. As stated in 23.1527(a), pressurised aeroplanes are
limited to 7620 m (25,000 ft) unless the windshield/window provisions of 23.775 are met.
(3)
Factors. The maximum operating altitude listed in the AFM should be predicated on
one of the following:
(i)
The maximum altitude evaluated.
(ii)
The restrictions, as a result of unsatisfactory structures, propulsion, systems, and/or
flight characteristics.
(iii)
Consideration of 23.775 for pressurised aeroplanes.
b.
Procedures. Assuming that the structure has been properly substantiated, the flight
evaluation should consist of at least the following:
(1)
Stall characteristics per 23.201 and 23.203 with wing flaps up, gear retracted, and
power at the maximum power that can be attained at the maximum altitude, not to exceed
75% maximum continuous.
(2)
Stall warning, cruise configuration only ( 23.207).
(3)
Longitudinal stability, cruise configuration only ( 23.173 and 23.175).
(4)
Lateral and directional stability, cruise configuration only ( 23.177 and 23.181).
(5)
Upsets, if required ( 23.253).
(6)
Systems operation, including icing system, if installed.
(7)
Propulsion operation, including stall, surge, and flameout tests throughout the speed
range from near stall to maximum level flight speed.
377386 RESERVED
Section 2 MARKINGS AND PLACARDS
387
a.
Required Markings and Placards. The rule specifies which markings and placards
must be displayed. Note that 23.1541(a)(2) requires any additional information, placards,
or markings required for safe operation. Some placard requirements are obscurely placed in
2FTG66
CS23
BOOK 2
other requirements. For example, 23.1583(e)(4) requires a placard for aerobatic category
aeroplanes concerning spin recovery. A checklist is provided in appendix 4 which may
assist in determination of placards and markings required.
b.
Multiple Categories. For aeroplanes certified in more than one category,
23.1541(c)(2) requires all of the placard and marking information to be furnished in the AFM.
This practice is encouraged for all aeroplanes.
c.
Powerplant Instruments. Advisory Circular (AC) 2088A provides additional
guidance on the marking of powerplant instruments.
PARAGRAPH 23.1543 INSTRUMENT MARKINGS: GENERAL. Advisory Circular (AC)
2088A provides guidance on the marking of powerplant instruments.
388
389
PARAGRAPH 23.1545 AIRSPEED INDICATOR. This regulation is self-explanatory.
390
PARAGRAPH 23.1547 MAGNETIC DIRECTION INDICATOR.
explanatory.
391
PARAGRAPH 23.1549 POWERPLANT INSTRUMENTS. This subject is covered in AC
2088A.
392
PARAGRAPH 23.1551 OIL QUANTITY INDICATOR. (RESERVED)
393
PARAGRAPH 23.1553 FUEL QUANTITY INDICATOR (RESERVED)
394
PARAGRAPH 23.1555 CONTROL MARKINGS
a.
Examples of Emergency Controls. Examples for Emergency Controls are:
(i)
Reciprocating engine mixture controls and turbine engine condition levers
incorporating fuel stopcocks or fuel stopcocks itself are considered to be emergency
controls, since they provide an immediate means to stop engine combustion.
(ii)
Quick-disconnect/Interrupt Switch of an electric trim system
b.
Requirements. Paragraph 23.1555(e)(2) covers the requirements for emergency
controls.
395
PARAGRAPH 23.1557 MISCELLANEOUS MARKINGS AND PLACARDS. (RESERVED)
396
PARAGRAPH 23.1559 OPERATING LIMITATIONS PLACARD.
explanatory.
2FTG67
CS23
397
BOOK 2
PARAGRAPH 23.1561 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
a.
Examples of Safety Equipment. Safety equipment includes such items as life rafts,
flares, fire extinguishers, and emergency signalling devices.
b.
Requirements. Paragraphs 23.1411 thru 23.1419 cover the requirements for safety
equipment.
398
PARAGRAPH 23.1563 AIRSPEED PLACARDS. This regulation is self-explanatory.
399
PARAGRAPH 23.1567 FLIGHT MANOEUVRE PLACARD.
explanatory.
400409 RESERVED
Section 3. AEROPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL AND APPROVED MANUAL MATERIAL
410
a.
GAMA Specification No. 1. General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA)
Specification No. 1, Revision No. 1, dated September 1, 1984, provides broad guidance for
contents of a Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) which will fulfil the requirements of an AFM
if the POH meets all of the requirements of 23.1581 thru 23.1589. There is no objection
to the tile, Pilots Operating Handbook, if the title page also includes a statement indicating
that the document is the required AFM and is approved by the Agency.
b.
Optional Presentations. Beginning with amendment 2321, applicants are provided
with an option for the presentation of the required procedures, performance, and loading
information. The regulatory requirements of the two options are given in 23.1581(b)(1)
and 23.1581(b)(2). The options are as follows:
(1)
Paragraph 23.1581(b)(1). The AFM must have approved limitations, procedures,
performance, and loading sections. These approved sections must be segregated,
identified, and clearly distinguished from unapproved information furnished by the applicant
if any unapproved information is furnished. Normally, Agency approval is indicated by the
signature of the Agency , or his representative, on the cover page and a page effectivity
table so that it is clear to the operational pilot exactly which pages are applicable and the
date of approval.
(2)
Paragraph 23.1581(b)(2). The AFM must have an approved limitations section and
this approved section must contain only limitations (no procedures, performance, or loading
information allowed). The limitations section must be identified and clearly distinguished
from other parts of the AFM. The remainder of the manual may contain a mixture of
approved and unapproved information, without segregation or identification. However, the
other required material (procedures, performance, and loading information) must be
determined in accordance with the applicable requirements of CS 23. The meaning of
acceptable, as used in 23.1581(b)(2)(ii), is as follows:
In finding that a manual is acceptable, the Agency would review the manual to
determine that the required information is complete and accurate. The manual would also
2FTG68
CS23
BOOK 2
be reviewed to ensure that any additional information provided by the applicant is not in
conflict with required information or contrary to the applicable airworthiness requirements.
The indication of approval for the approved section should be as discussed in the preceding
paragraph. GAMA Specification No. 1 has been found to comply with the provisions of
23.1581(b)(2).
c.
Noise Limitations and/or Procedures
(1)
If the applicant chooses the 23.1581(b)(1) option, operating limitations required by
the essential requirements for environmental protection as prescribed by article 6 of the
EASA Regulation and/or associated implementing rules, should be placed in the Operating
Limitations portion of the AFM. Any procedures should be placed in the Operating
Procedures portion of the AFM.
(2)
If the applicant chooses the 23.1581(b)(2) option, the approved AFM should
contain the following approved, but separate, portions:
(i)
Operating limitations prescribed in 23.1583. Note that 23.1581(b)(2)(i) limits the
information in this portion to that prescribed in 23.1583. Since the present noise limitation
is a weight limitation, the noise limitation may be included.
(ii)
Operating procedures prescribed by the essential requirements for environmental
protection as prescribed by article 6 of the EASA Regulation and/or associated implementing
rules. Paragraph 23.1581(a) requires noise procedures to be approved.
d.
STC Procedures. ( Reserved)
411
PARAGRAPH 23.1583 OPERATING LIMITATIONS
a.
Limitations Section. The purpose of the Limitations Section is to present the
limitations applicable to the aeroplane model by serial number, if applicable, as established
in the course of the type certification process in determining compliance with CS 23 and the
essential requirements for environmental protection as prescribed by article 6 of the EASA
Regulation and/or associated implementing rules . The limitations should be presented
without explanation other than those explanations prescribed in CS 23 and the essential
requirements for environmental protection as prescribed by article 6 of the EASA Regulation
and/or associated implementing rules. The operating limitations contained in the Limitations
Section (including any noise limited weights) should be expressed in mandatory, not
permissive, language, the terminology used in the AFM should be consistent with the
relevant regulatory language.
b.
GAMA Specification. GAMA Specification No. 1, Revision No. 1 dated September 1,
1984, section 2, provides guidance for the contents of the limitations section. Additional
guidance is provided below for Kinds of Operation, Fuel Limitations, and Commuter
Category.
c.
Kinds of Operation Equipment List (KOEL). The KOEL is to be placed in the
limitations section of the AFM since the KOEL items form part of the limitations applicable to
aeroplane operation. The sample KOEL given in appendix 6 lists systems and equipment
for a specific aeroplane in an acceptable format. Although the sample KOEL may contain
items that are not applicable to all aeroplanes, it may be used as a guide.
2FTG69
CS23
BOOK 2
Although there is no specific format required for the KOEL, we recommend, in the interest of
standardisation, that the KOEL be columned and each item of equipment required for a
specific type of operation for which the aeroplane is approved be noted in the appropriate
column. Regardless of the format used, the KOEL should provide for:
(1)
The kinds of operation for which the aeroplane was type certificated (that is, day or
night Visual Flight Rules (VFR), day or night Instrument Flight Rules (IFR), and icing
conditions).
(2)
The identity of the systems and equipment upon which type certification for each kind
of operation was predicated and must be installed and operable for the particular kind of
operation indicated. Systems and equipment necessary for certification include those:
(i)
required under the basic airworthiness requirements,
(ii)
required by the operating rules,
(iii)
required by special conditions,
(iv)
required to substantiate equivalent safety findings,
(v)
required by airworthiness directives (AD), and
(vi)
items of equipment and/or systems not specifically required under items (i) thru (v) of
this paragraph but used by the applicant in order to show compliance with the regulations.
The KOEL should not:
(1)
Contain those obvious components required for the aeroplane to be airworthy such
as wings, empennage, engines, landing gear, brakes, etc.
(2)
Contain an exceptions column.
d.
Fuel Limitations. The fuel limitations discussion in GAMA Specification 1 may not be
applicable depending on the aeroplane certification basis.
e.
Commuter Category Aeroplanes. For those performance weight limits which may
vary with runway length, altitude, temperature, and other variables, the variation in weight
limitation may be presented as graphs in the Performance Section of the manual and
included as limitations by specific reference in the Limitations Section of the AFM.
412
PARAGRAPH 23.1585 OPERATING PROCEDURES
a.
Explanation. See GAMA Specification 1.
b.
Electronic Checklist Displays
(1)
Background. Checklists, both hard copy and electronic displays, are a method used
by manufacturers to provide (in part) the normal and emergency operating procedures
required by 23.1585. Paragraph 23.1581 is also applicable for the manner and format of
presentation.
(2)
Display Content. For those aeroplanes with approved AFMs, the side variety of
configurations and corresponding flight manual supplements within a single model may
establish a virtually unique set of checklist procedures for each individual aeroplane. The
2FTG610
CS23
BOOK 2
responsibility for electronic checklist display contents rests with the operator. A hard copy of
the AFM should be available to the operator for reference.
(3)
AFM Changes. Incorporation of STCs could necessitate changes to the flight
manual, flight manual supplements, or addition of new supplements. These supplements
could require revision to the checklist for that particular aeroplane. Such changes should be
made by the operator.
(4)
Operator Revisions. Although it is not necessary for equipment manufacturers to
store electronic checklist data in such a manner that it cannot be changed in the field, some
equipment manufacturers have chosen to programme checklist data in a manner that
prevents field alternation. The operator would be responsible for ensuring the checklist data
is revised as necessary upon installation of new/different equipment.
(5)
Disclaimers. Electronic checklists are usually displayed on the same cathode-ray
tube (CRT) as other electronic displays. Certain disclaimer statements may be appropriate.
Presentation of a disclaimer statement each time the equipment is turned on will provide
adequate notification to the pilot. This disclaimer should include statements that clearly
state:
(i)
Contents of the checklists are the responsibility of the operator.
(ii)
The approved AFM takes precedence in case of conflicting checklist information.
(6)
Automatic Display. Automatic display of appropriate checklists during conditions of
engine failure, generator failure, etc., will require a review based upon the specific
application involved. Approval of the checklist content, malfunction prioritisation, and
operation is required.
413
PARAGRAPH 23.1587 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
a.
Performance Information. This paragraph contains the airworthiness performance
information necessary for operation in compliance with applicable performance requirements
of CS 23, applicable special conditions, and data required by the essential requirements for
environmental protection as prescribed by article 6 of the EASA Regulation and/or
associated implementing rules. Additional information and data essential for implementing
special operational requirements may be included. Performance information and data
should be presented for the range of weight, altitude, temperature, aeroplane configurations,
thrust rating, and any other operational variables stated for the aeroplane.
b.
Normal, Utility, and Acrobatic Category Aeroplanes. See GAMA Specification 1.
c.
(1)
General. Include all descriptive information necessary to identify the precise
configuration and conditions for which the performance data are applicable. Such
information should include the complete model designations of aeroplane and engines, the
approved flap, sweep, or canard settings, definition of installed aeroplane features and
equipment that affect performance, together with the operative status thereof (e.g. anti-skid
devices, automatic spoilers, etc.). This section should also include definitions of terms used
in the Performance Section (e.g. IAS, CAS, ISA, configuration, net take-off flight path, icing
conditions, etc.), plus calibration data for airspeed (flight and ground), Mach number,
altimeter, ambient air temperature, and other pertinent information.
2FTG611
CS23
BOOK 2
(2)
Performance Procedures. The procedures, techniques, and other conditions
associated with attainment of the flight manual performance data should be included.
Performance procedures may be presented as a performance subsection or in connection
with a particular performance graph. In the latter case, a comprehensive listing of the
conditions associated with the particular performance may serve the objective of
procedures if sufficiently complete.
(3)
Thrust or Power Setting. Thrust or power settings should be provided for at least
take-off and maximum continuous and the methods required to obtain the performance
shown in the AFM. If appropriate, these data may be required to be shown for more than
one thrust setting parameter.
(4)
Take-off Speeds. The operational take-off speeds V1, VR, and V2 should be
presented together with associated conditions. Paragraph 23.1587(d)(6) requires the
speeds be given in CAS. Since the aircrew flies IAS, the airspeeds should also be
presented in IAS. The V1 and VR speeds should be based upon ground effect calibration
data; the V2 speeds should be based upon free air calibration data.
(5)
Take-off Distance. Take-off distance should be shown in compliance with 23.59.
(6)
Climb Limited Take-off Weight. The climb limited take-off weight which is the most
limiting weight showing compliance with 23.67 should be provided.
(7)
Miscellaneous Take-off Weight Limits. Take-off weight limits, for any equipment or
characteristic of the aeroplane configuration which imposes an additional take-off weight
restriction, should be shown (e.g. tyre speed limitations, brake energy limitations, etc.).
(8)
Take-off Climb Performance. For the prescribed take-off climb aeroplane
configurations, the climb gradients should be presented together with associated conditions.
The scheduled climb speed(s) should be included.
(9)
Take-off Flight Path Data. The take-off flight paths of 23.61 or performance
information necessary to enable construction of such paths, together with associated
conditions (e.g. procedures, speed schedules), should be presented for the configurations
and flight path segments existing between the end of the prescribed take-off distance and
the point of attaining the en route climb configuration airspeed or 457 m (1500 ft), whichever
is higher.
(10) En Route Climb Data. The climb gradients prescribed in 23.67 should be
presented together with associated conditions, including the speed schedule used.
(11) Balked Landing Climb Limited Landing Weight. The climb limited landing weight
which is the most limiting weight showing compliance with 23.77.
(12) Approach Climb Limited Landing Weight. The climb gradient determined in
23.67(e)(3) should be presented. The required climb gradient may limit the landing weight.
(13) Landing Approach Speeds. The scheduled speeds associated with the approved
landing distances should be presented together with associated conditions.
(14) Landing Distance. The landing distance from a height of 15 m (50 ft) should be
presented together with associated ambient temperature, altitude, wind conditions, and
weights up to the maximum landing weight. Operational landing distance data should be
presented for smooth, dry, and hard-surfaced runways. With concurrence by the Agency,
2FTG612
CS23
BOOK 2
additional data may be presented for wet or contaminated runways, and for other than
smooth, hard-surfaced runways.
414
PARAGRAPH 23.1589 LOADING INFORMATION. See GAMA Specification 1.
415424 RESERVED
2FTG613
CS23
BOOK 2
2FTG614
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 1 POWER AVAILABLE
1
GENERAL. The purpose of this appendix is to provide guidance regarding the power
considerations for various kinds of powerplants.
The power output of each airplane/engine
configuration requires special considerations when determining test day performance corrections and
providing the performance expansions for the AFM. The types of powerplants discussed in this
appendix are:
a.
Reciprocating Engines.
(1)
Normally aspirated engine with a fixed pitch propeller;
(2)
normally aspirated engine with a constant speed propeller; and
(3)
turbocharged engine with a constant speed propeller.
b.
Turbopropeller Engines.
RECIPROCATING ENGINES
a.
Power Charts. The horsepower being developed by reciprocating engines is usually identified
by horsepower charts which are provided by the engine manufacturer. These charts are developed
from results of ground runs using a brake-type dynamometer in a test facility and may have no direct
correlation to any particular aeroplane or flight condition. The variations of power with altitude and
temperature are the result of theoretical relationships involving air density, fuel/air ratios, etc. These
charts nearly always assume a best power fuel to air ratio which can rarely be consistently used in
service under normal operating conditions. Many installations, for example, intentionally use fuel to air
ratios which are on the fuel-rich side of best power so that the engine will not overheat. Providing
sufficient cooling air flow over each cylinder to ensure adequate cooling may be more difficult than
cooling with a rich fuel mixture. These horsepower charts were also developed while maintaining a
constant temperature on each cylinder. This is not possible in service. The charts are developed
assuming the following:
(1)
there is no ram airflow due to movement through the air or;
(2)
there are no losses due to pressure drops resulting from intake and air filter design; or
(3)
there are no accessory losses.
b.
Chart Assumptions. Regardless of the test stand conditions which are not duplicated in
service, it is necessary to assume that each given pressure altitude temperature, engine speed, and
manifold pressure combination will result in horsepowers which can be determined from the engine
power chart. To accomplish this requires certain procedures and considerations.
c.
Tolerances.
Each engine power chart specifies a horsepower tolerance from rated
horsepower. These are commonly 2%, +5%, 2%; or +5%, 0%. This means that with all the
variables affecting power being held constant (i.e. constant manifold pressure, engine speed,
temperature, and fuel to air ratio), the power could vary this much from engine to engine. For this
reason, it is appropriate to account for these variations. Calibration of the test engine(s) by the engine
manufacturer is one way of accomplishing this. During engine calibration, the test engine is run on a
test stand at the engine manufacturers facility to identify how it compares with the power output at
conditions under which it was rated. The result is a single point comparison to the rated horsepower.
2FTG App 11
CS23
d.
BOOK 2
Test Day Power
(1)
Calibrated Engines. If an engine, for example, is rated at 200 BHP, the calibration results
might show the particular serial numbered engine to develop 198.6 BHP. This is 0.7% below the rated
power. For this engine, each of the horsepower values obtained from the engine manufacturer's chart
should be adjusted downward by 0.7% to obtain test day horsepower.
(2)
Uncalibrated Engines. If the engine is not calibrated, an acceptable method of accounting for
the unknown factors is to assume that the test engine is putting out rated horsepower plus the plus
tolerance. For example, if the rated horsepower was 350 and the tolerance was 2%, test day sea
level chart horsepower would be assumed to be 350 + 0.025 (350), or 358.8.
(3)
Humidity. Paragraph 23.45(d) requires performance to be based on 80% relative humidity on
a standard day. Experience has shown that conditions such as 80% relative humidity on a standard
day at sea level have a very small effect on engine power because this condition results in a very low
specific humidity. The engine is affected directly by specific humidity (grams of water per grams of air)
rather than relative humidity. For test day power, dry air should be assumed unless the applicant has
an approved method for measuring and determining the effect of humidity.
e.
Chart Brake Horsepower. A chart brake horsepower (BHPc) should be determined for
expansion of the flight test data in the AFM. BHPc is the horsepower at a particular pressure altitude,
manifold pressure and r.p.m. Appropriate inlet temperature corrections should be applied, in
accordance with the manufacturers engine power chart. An 80% relative humidity correction should
be applied if the engine manufacturer has an acceptable method and the correction is significant.
f.
Variation in Methods. Peculiarities of the various types of reciprocating engines require
special considerations or procedures to determine installed power. These procedures are discussed
in subsequent paragraphs.
NORMALLY ASPIRATED ENGINES WITH CONSTANT SPEED PROPELLERS
a.
Manifold Pressure Versus Altitude. As a first step to determine installed horsepower, flight
tests should be conducted to determine manifold pressure versus pressure altitude for the engine
installation. The test manifold pressures would be compared to the engine manufacturer's chart
values, as shown on figure 1. Figure 1 shows an example of test manifold pressure and chart
manifold pressures versus pressure altitude. In this example, the observed manifold pressures are
lower than the chart values. This means that the induction system pressure losses exceed the ram
pressure rise. An induction system in which manifold pressures exceed the zero ram chart values
would reflect an efficient induction system. The term chart brake horsepower indicates that the
horsepower values have yet to be corrected for inlet temperature conditions.
b.
Example Calculation.
The overall corrections to determine installed test day brake
horsepower and chart brake horsepower (BHPc) to be used in the expansion of performance would be
as follows (refer to figure 1):
2FTG App 12
S.L.
18
20000
2FTG App 13
22
24
26
Manifold pressure - IN.Hg.
20
28
30
Full throttle zero ram

chart manifold pressure
2650 RPM
Full throttle, test manifold pressures

at VY
(Obtained from cooling climb or climb
performance data)
240
pressure altitude
vs
280
320
360
400
Full throttle zero ram chart

brake horsepower 2650
RPM
Full throttle installed

chart brake horsepower
2650 RPM
Brake horsepower - BHPc
Full throttle manifold

pressure
BOOK 2
CS23
Figure 1 BRAKE HORSEPOWER VERSUS PRESSURE ALTITUDE
CS23
BOOK 2
Known:
Pressure Altitude
Manifold Pressure
Outside Air Temperature
Inlet Temperature
Engine Speed
Engine Calibration
Engine Tolerance
4 000 feet
24.9 in. Hg.
+55F
+63F
2 650 R.P.M.
0.7%
2%
44.7F
335 BHP
2.3 BHP
326.8 BHP
Standard Temperature @ 4 000 ft.

Installed Chart Brake Horsepower (from figure 1)
44.7F
335 BHP
Test Day BHP = [335 + 0.025(335)] 460 + 447
337.3 BHP
4 670 ft.
326 BHP
42F
323.4 BHP
335 BHP
335 BHP
329.1 BHP
Calculated Test Day BHP for a Calibrated Engine:

Engine Calibration Correction = (335) ( 0 .007)
Correcting for Inlet Temperature
Test Day BHP = (335 2.3)
460 + 447
460 + 63
Calculated Test Day BHP for an Uncalibrated Engine:
460 + 63
Calculated BHPc for Test Day Density Altitude (Hd):

Hd at 4 000 ft. and 55F
Installed BHPc (from figure 1)
Standard Temperature at 4 670 ft.
Correcting for Inlet Temperature Rise
BHPc = 326
460 + 42
460 + 42 + 8
Calculated Test Day BHPc for the AFM Expansion:

For the Same Conditions as Test Day,
BHP (from figure 1)
Correcting for Inlet Temperature, expansion
BHP = 335
460 + 447
460 + 63
TURBOCHARGED ENGINES WITH CONSTANT SPEED PROPELLERS
a.
Manifold Pressure Versus Altitude. From flight tests, it is appropriate to plot manifold pressure
versus pressure altitude used to demonstrate satisfactory cooling and climb performance
demonstrations. The engine manufacturers chart brake kilowatts (horsepower) should be entered at
these manifold pressure values. The result is the chart brake kilowatts (horsepower) to be utilised in
data expansion. For some installations, the manifold pressure and fuel flows are limited by the
airplane manufacturers designed schedule. For these, the full throttle values should be identified.
Whenever the manifold pressures and fuel flows should be manually set to a schedule, corresponding
limitations should be established.
2FTG App 14
BOOK 2
CS23
b.
Horsepower. Refer to figure 2 for an illustration of manifold pressure and horsepower versus
pressure altitude. It is rare for the horsepower values to be constant below the critical altitude. The
horsepower ratings are not necessarily limited and it is common to observe chart horsepower values
at the intermediate altitudes higher than rated power. As with normally aspirated engines, the term
chart brake horsepower indicates that the horsepower values have yet to be corrected for inlet
temperature conditions. The corrections for temperature are usually greater for turbocharged than
normally aspirated. A 1% decrease in power for each 10F increase in temperature above standard
temperature conditions at a constant specific fuel consumption (SFC) is common. The apparent
effects for a particular installation could be more or less than this. Manufacturers data for the
particular engine should be used.
c.
Example Calculation. The overall corrections to determine installed test brake horsepower
and brake horsepower to be used in the expansion of performance would be as follows (refer to figure
2):
Known:
Pressure Altitude
Manifold Pressure
Outside Air Temperature
Compressor Inlet Temperature
Engine Speed
Engine Calibration
Engine Tolerance
9 500 feet
44.3 in. Hg.
53.0F
67F
2 575 R.P.M.
+1 .7%
2%
25.1F
6.98%
351 BHP
+5.97 BHP
332.1 BHP

Power Correction at 1%/10F
25.1F
6.98%
351
Test BHP = 351 (351)(.0698) + 351(0.025)
335.3
11 280 ft.
350 BHP
2.33%
341.8 BHP
Calculated Test Day BHP for a Calibrated Engine:

Power Correction Due to Temperature at
1%/10F (temperature rise = 67 25.1F)
Engine Calibration Correction (351)(0.017)
Test BHP = (351 + 5.97) (0.0698) (356.97)
Calibrated Test Day BHP for an Uncalibrated Engine:
Calculated BHPc for Test Day Density Altitude (Hd):

Hd at 9 500 ft. and 53F
Installed BHPc (from figure 2)
Power Correction Due to Inlet Temperature Rise
at 1%/10F (temperature rise = 14F)
BHPc = 350 (350)(0.0233)
2FTG App 15
t eef - eduti tl a er usser P
2FTG App 16
S.L.
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
24000
36
37
38
39
Figure 2 TURBOCHARGED BRAKE HORSEPOWER VERSUS ALTITUDE

41
42
43
Manifold pressure - In.Hg.
40
44
45
Full throttle
Manifold pressure observed

during cooling climbs and
performance climbs
Manifold pressure VS Pressure altitude
46
290
310
320
330
Brake horsepower - BHPc
300
340
350
Installed chart brake

horsepower 2575 RPM
Brake horsepower VS Pressure altitude
360
CS23
BOOK 2
BOOK 2
CS23
Calculated BHPc for the AFM Expansion:

For the Same Conditions as Test Day, BHPc
(from figure 2)
Temperature
Correction
to
BHPc
= 351 (0.0698)(351)
351.BHP
326.5 BHP
NORMALLY ASPIRATED ENGINES WITH FIXED PITCH PROPELLERS. (RESERVED).
TURBOPROPELLER ENGINES
a.
Power Measurement. Turbopropeller engines (turboprops) are gas turbine engines which
drive a propeller. Power output is a function of the gas turbine air flow, pressure, and temperature.
Power measurement is made by measurement of the propeller shaft speed and torque, from which the
shaft horsepower can be obtained by a simple calculation. Torque is measured by an integral device
which may be mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical and connects to the indicator required by CS
23.1305(m). Shaft horsepower is the same as brake horsepower i.e. the power developed at the
propeller shaft. The total thrust horsepower, or equivalent shaft horsepower (e.s.h.p.) is the sum of
the shaft horsepower and the nominal horsepower equivalent of the net exhaust thrust.
b.
Power Available. The prediction of power available is obtained from the engine manufacturer
as a computer program. Each installation should be evaluated to identify:
Generator Loads (all engine and one engine inoperative)
Bleed Air Extractions (with and without ice protection)
Accessory Pad Extractions
Engine Air Inlet Efficiency (with and without ice protection)
Engine Exhaust Efficiency
Effect of Specific Humidity
With these values as input to the computer program, installed power available and fuel flows at
various airspeeds, temperatures, and altitudes can be calculated.
2FTG App 17
CS23
BOOK 2
2FTG App 18
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 2 CLIMB DATA REDUCTION
1
DRAG POLAR METHOD. This is one method to develop the airplane's drag polar equation
directly from climb flight test data. It is a simplified method which assumes climb speeds where the
compressibility drag is negligible (usually Mach numbers below 0 .6), climb angles of less than 15,
and no propeller slipstream effects on the wing lift and drag characteristics.
a.
Cautions. Propeller airplanes are susceptible to slipstream drag and all airplanes are
susceptible to trim drag. This is most noticeable on airplanes with wing-mounted engines and when
one engine is inoperative. Care should be given so that drag results are not extended from one flight
condition to another. Examples of this are:
(1)
Drag obtained in level cruise configuration cannot be extended to a climb configuration.
(2)
Two-engine climb data cannot be extended to the one-engine-inoperative case.
In summary, the power and trim conditions should remain very close to those existing for the actual
test conditions. Drag results are only as accurate as the available power information and propeller
efficiency information. The cooling airflow through the engine is also a factor.
b.
Calculation of CD and CL. Flight test data for various climb airspeeds, weights and altitudes
should be used to calculate CD and CL. The equations are as follows:
CD
BHPT
295(WT )
CL
( p ) T
AT
(AF)(R/C
TAS
WT
33 000
) 96 209
TAT
1
(AF) R/CO
101
27V
T
(
)
c
AS
(V S)
3
(Ve )2 S
Where: BHPT = test day horsepower (see appendix 1)

p
= propeller efficiency (obtain from propeller manufacturer or may be estimated)
TAT
= test air temperature Kelvin
TAS
= standard air temperature Kelvin
R/CO = observed rate of climb feet/minute

WT
= airplane test weight pounds
Ve
= equivalent airspeed knots
= wing area square feet
= atmospheric density ratio (see appendix 7, figure 1)
2FTG App 21
CS23
BOOK 2
AF
Where :
2
(1+ 02M2 ) 35 1
0 133M + 1
2 2 5
(1+ 02M )
M = Mach number
VC is constant,
altitude below 36 089 feet
c.
Data Plotting. Once CD and CL are calculated from various climb tests at many altitudes,
weights, and airspeeds, a plot is made of CD versus CL2. This choice of parameters reduces the
parabolic drag polar (CL vs. CD) to a straight line relationship. These procedures should be used to
establish CDP and e for each configuration that climb data is obtained.
.08
.07
CD
.06
.05
CDP
.2
.1
.3
.4
.5
.6
CL2
Figure 1 COEFFICIENT OF DRAG VERSUS COEFFICIENT OF LIFT
From this plot the profile drag coefficient (CDP) can be determined graphically and Oswald's efficiency
factor (e) can be calculated.
Where: b
S
CL
or e =
(CD CDP ) 31416 b
DCL 2 / CD
b2
3 1416
S
= wing span feet

= wing area square feet
2FTG App 22
BOOK 2
CS23
d.
Standard Day Correction. Since the CL2 vs. CD data was developed from test day conditions
of weight, altitude, temperature, and power, calculations will be required to determine standard day
conditions.
R/C =
Where:
Where:
THPR
(THP
THPR ) 33 000
WC (AF )
THPA
= thrust horsepower available
THPR
= thrust horsepower required
WC
= aircraft weight to which correction is to be made (pounds)
AF
= acceleration factor (see paragraph b)
THPA
= BHPc p
BHPc
= chart brake horsepower at test day density altitude (see appendix 1)
= propeller efficiency
( ) CD
1 VT
96 209
Where:
(0 2883)( WC )
e1 b VT
atmospheric density ratio
VT
true airspeed knots
CDP =
profile drag coefficient
wing area square feet
efficiency factor
wing span feet
WC
aircraft weight to which correction is to be made pounds
Expansion to Non-Standard Conditions . The methods in paragraph d can be used to expand

e.
the climb data by choosing weight, altitude, temperature, and the corresponding power available.
References. The following references may be of assistance in cases where compressibility
f.
drag is a factor, climb angles are greater than 15, or if the reader wishes to review the basic
derivations of the drag polar method:
(1)
Airplane Aerodynamics and Performance by C. Edward Lan and Jan Roskam. Published and
sold by:
Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation
Route 4, Box 274
Ottawa, Kansas 66067
2FTG App 23
CS23
BOOK 2
(2)
Air Force Technical Report No. 6273, Flight Test Engineering Handbook, by Russell M
Herrington, et. al., dated May 1951. Corrected and revised June 1964-January 1966. Refer to NTIS
No. AD 636.392. Available from:
National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, Virginia 22161
DENSITY ALTITUDE METHOD. This method is an alternate to the Drag Polar Method. The
2
Density Altitude Method is subject to the same cautions as the Drag Polar Method. Item numbers 1, 2,
6, 9, 12, 17, 18, and 19 are observed during flight tests and the remaining items are calculated.
Item No.
Item
Pressure Altitude (Hp) feet
Outside Air Temperature F
Atmospheric Density Ratio
Density Altitude (Hd) feet. Hd = 145 539 1
Std. Temp. @ Hp (Ts) F + 460
IAS knots
CAS knots
TAS =
[ ( )
o
o
oo
4699
Observed rate of climb ft./min.
10
T 2 + 460
=
TS
5
11
Actual R/C =
12
Test Weight, w lbs.
13
o o
o o
o
10
12
1
WC
R/C W = 11
where Wc = aircraft weight to which correction is to be made

14
qe b2 =
e b2
295
2
where b =
e=
15
o
o
12
WC2
Di =
14
wing span in feet

Oswalds efficiency factor (0.8 may be used if a
more exact value cannot be determined)
2
2FTG App 24
BOOK 2
CS23
oo
101 27 15 8
Wc
16
(R / C)Di =
17
Calibrated RPM (reciprocating engine)
18
Calibrated MP (reciprocating engine)
19
Inlet air temperature
20
Test day BHP corrected for temperature from appendix 1 at Hd
22
P propeller efficiency (obtain from propeller

manufacturer or may be estimated)
o oo
o
oo o o
21 20
23
THP = 22
24
(R / C )p =
25
R / Cstd = 11 13 16 + 24
23 33 000
Wc
Items 4, 7, and 25 are used to plot figure 25-2.
2FTG App 25
CS23
BOOK 2
2FTG App 26
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 3 STATIC MINIMUM CONTROL SPEED EXTRAPOLATION TO SEA LEVEL
1
GENERAL. The purpose of this appendix is to identify one method of extrapolating minimum
control speeds (VMC) observed during flight tests, to sea level, standard temperature conditions.
There is a geometrical relationship between the yawing moment about the centre of gravity caused by
the operating engine, and the rudder deflection necessary to offset this tendency and cause an
equilibrium.
2
CALCULATION METHOD. This method involves calculating a geometric constant (C2) for
each observed test value, averaging the results, and calculating a sea level VMC. The equations are
as follows:
VMC =
[(C ) ( )(THP)]
1/ 3
or;
C2
VMC
( )(THP)
Where: C2
a geometric constant
the square root of the density ratio
THP
thrust horsepower (test shaft horsepower or brake horsepower

times propeller efficiency)
3
CAUTIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS. This method has the following associated cautions and
assumptions:
a.
This method is limited to airplanes with a VMC due to lack of directional control. Each test
value of VMC must be observed with full rudder deflection. If, for example, the test conditions result in
reaching the force limit (150 pounds rudder force) prior to achieving full rudder deflection, then
observed VMC values would require special consideration.
b.
The effects of wing lift in the 5 bank angle are ignored.
c.
Do not use this method for fixed-pitch or windmilling propellers.
d.
Any altitude effects which may result from drag on a rotating feathered propeller on the
inoperative engine are ignored.
e.
Computing a VMC value at sea level involves raising to the power of 1/3 (use 0.33333333).
The number of significant digits used affects the resulting computations. For this reason, use at least
8 significant digits.
f.
Propeller efficiencies should be reasonable. They may be obtained from propeller efficiency
charts provided by the propeller manufacturer, or from other acceptable sources.
4
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS. Test data from two-engine turbopropeller airplanes have been
used for illustration. Observations for one takeoff flap setting are presented. The procedures should
be repeated for each additional approved takeoff flap setting. Table 1 presents five data points for
which data were collected at various altitude and temperature conditions, and the resulting C2 values
which were calculated. For these tests, the inoperative propeller was feathered (auto-feather
available).
2FTG App 31
CS23
BOOK 2
Table 1 FLIGHT TEST DATA

OBSERVED
CALCULATED
PRESSURE
ALTITUDE
(FEET)
O.A.T
.(F)
TORQUE
(FT-LB)
PROPELLER
RPM
VMC
(KCAS)
RUN
3 500
86.3
3 219
1 700
91.2
4
4
5
6
88.3
87.3
85.2
83.2
2
3
4
5
200
800
500
300
3
3
3
3
(1)
(2)
219
219
219
219
1
1
1
1
700
700
700
700
91.2
90.7
90.7
90.7
SHAFT
HORSEPOWER
(1)
p
(2)
C2
.9142439
1 041.95
.900795
.8915881
.881668
.8700833
1 041.95
1 041.95
1 041.95
1 041.95
.590
.585
.580
.575
.570
1 349.657
1 381.516
1 384.786
1 412.544
1 443.907
Calculated from observed torque and propeller r.p.m.

Obtained from propeller manufacturer.
The propeller efficiencies were obtained from a power coefficient versus advance ratio map which was
obtained from the propeller manufacturer.
The 4-blade propellers were assumed for these
calculations to have an activity factor = 80; and an integrated lift coefficient = 0.700.
The five C2 values from table 1 were averaged as 1 394.482. The sea level, standard temperature
maximum shaft horsepower was 1 050. At low speeds, the propeller efficiency changes fairly
significantly with speed. For this reason, it is appropriate to determine propeller efficiencies at several
speeds near the estimated sea level VMC value. Table 2 presents the thrust horsepower values
determined for calibrated airspeeds of 90, 95, 100, and 105 knots and the VMC values calculated using
these thrust horsepower values and the average C2 (1 394.482).
Figure 1 illustrates the plot of airspeed versus thrust horsepower. One curve is of thrust horsepower
available versus airspeed. The other represents the calculated VMC values versus thrust horsepower
available at sea level. The intersection of the two curves represents the VMC value associated with
sea level, standard temperature conditions. These calculations resulted in a final VMC value of
98.8 knots calibrated airspeed.
Table 2 TABULATED THRUST HORSEPOWER AVAILABLE AND CALCULATED VMC
VC
(KCAS)
SHAFT
HORSEPOWER
THRUST
HORSEPOWER
AVAILABLE AT
SEA LEVEL
90
1 050
.610
640.5
96.3
95
1 050
.640
672.0
97.9
100
1 050
.665
698.25
99.1
105
1 050
.688
722.4
100.2
2FTG App 32
CALCULATED
VMC
C2 = 1 394.482
BOOK 2
CS23
105
Sea level STD day V

VMC
100
95
CAS
- knots
Calculated
VMC values
Thrust horsepower
available at sea level
90
85
620
640
660
680
700
Thrust horsepower at sea level
Figure 1 THRUST HORSEPOWER AT SEA LEVEL
2FTG App 33
120
140
CS23
BOOK 2
2FTG App 34
2FTG App 41
Support CS
Description
23.25(a)(2)
23.1557(b)
23.31(a)
23.31(b)
23.373(a)
23.415(c)
23.671(b)
23.672(c)(2)
23.677(a)
23.685(d)
23.733(b)
23.777(a)
23.777(h)1)
23.777(h)(2)
23.1557(a)
Occupant weight less than 170 lb (normal and commuter) or 190 lb (utility and
aerobatic).
Marking for placement of removable ballast.
Ballast content and weight limitations.
Placard for maximum speed for extended speed control devices.
Maximum weight for tie-down.
Identification of controls.
Practicable operational flight envelope after system failure.
Direction of movement and position of trim device.
Marking of control system elements.
Marking of specially constructed tyres.
Identification of cockpit controls.
Indication of selected position for mechanical fuel selector.
Indication of tank or function selected for electronic fuel selector. Closed position
indicated in red.
Red marking of OFF position of fuel valve selector.
Marking of means of opening external doors.
Placard for seats in utility and aerobatic aeroplanes which won't accommodate an
occupant wearing a parachute.
Placard for maximum weight capacity of baggage or cargo compartment.
Passenger information signs required for commuter category aeroplanes if flight crew
cannot observe other seats.
Marking of emergency exit location and operation.
External marking of means of opening doors and exits.
Internal sign for exits and doors for commuter category aeroplanes.
Warning placard if maximum differential cabin pressure and landing loads exceed limit.
Placard or illuminated sign prohibiting smoking if/when applicable.
No cigarette disposal placard on/near each disposal receptacle door for commuter
category.
No smoking placards required for lavatories for commuter category.
Marking or placard for piston engine start techniques and limitations.
23.777(h)(3)
23.783(c)(3)-(4)
23.785(h)
23.1555(a)
23.995
23.995
23.995
23.811
23.787(a)(1)
23.X791
23.807(b)(3)
23.811(a)
23.811(b)
23.841(b)(7)
23.853(c),(c)(2)
23.853(d)(1)
23.853(d)(2)
23.903(d)
23.1581(a)(2)
This Appendix is provided as a brief guide; the requirements in CS23 take precedence in case of error or omission.
Manual
Mark
Placard
Sign
CS23
Primary CS
BOOK 2
APPENDIX 4 CS23 MANUALS, MARKINGS & PLACARDS CHECKLIST
Support CS
Description
23.903(e)(1)
23.903(e)(3)
23.905(f)
23.909(e)
23.955(d)(2)
23.973(a)
23.1001(g)
23.1013(c)
23.1045(a)
23.1581(a)(2)
23.1581(a)(4)
23.1047
23.1041
Marking or placard for turbine engine start techniques and limitations.

Marking or placard for turbine engine in-flight restart techniques and limitations.
Marking such that pusher propeller disk is conspicuous.
Turbocharger operating procedures and limitations.
Placard for operating instructions for use of auxiliary fuel tank.
Marking of fuel tank filler.
Placard for fuel jettisoning means if prohibited in some aerodynamic configurations.
Marking oil filler tank connections.
Compliance with 23.1041 must be shown for all flight phases with the procedures
established in AFM (turbines).
Compliance with 23.1041 must be shown for the climb/descent with the procedures
established in AFM (pistons).
Marking coolant tank filler connections.
Marking of powerplant controls.
Labelling of equipment as to its identification, function and/or operating limitations.
Instrument markings on electronic displays.
Provision of alternate static correction card, if required.
Placard for magnetic indicator deviations of more than 10.
Marking of direction of motion of autopilot controls.
Marking of appropriate units on fuel quantity indicator.
Marking of essential circuit breakers and fuses.
Marking of switches as to operation and circuit controlled.
Recommended procedures for use of ice protection equipment.
Placard for oxygen flow, duration and warning of hot generator element.
Operating limitations and other information necessary for safe operation should be
established and furnished to the crew.
Markings and placards specified by 23.1545-23.1567.
23.1061(c)
23.1141(a)
23.1301(b)
23.1311(a)(7)
23.1325(b)(3)
23.1327(b)
23.1329(d)
23.1337(b)
23.1357(d)
23.1367(d)
23.1419(a)
23.1450(c)
23.1501
23.1541(a)(1)
23.1541(a)(2)
23.1581(a)(2)
23.1555(c)(3)
23.1557(c)
23.1557(c)
23.1041
23.1555(a)
23.1541(a)(2)
23.1547(e)
23.1585(a)
23.154123.1589
23.154523.1567
Manual
Mark
Placard
Sign
CS23
2FTG App 42
Primary CS
Additional information, markings and placards required for safe operation.
BOOK 2
Support CS
23.1541(b)
23.1541(c)(1)
23.1541(c)(2)
23.1543
23.1545(a)
23.1545(b)
23.1545(c)
23.1545(d)
23.1547(a)
23.1549(a)
2FTG App 43
23.1549(b)
23.1549(c)
23.1549(c)
23.1551
23.1553
23.1555(a)
23.1555(b)
23.1555(c)(1)
23.1555(c)(2)
23.1555(c)(3)
23.1555(c)(4)
23.1555(d)(1)
23.1555(d)(2)
23.1555(e)(1)
23.1555(e)(2)
23.1557(a)
23.1337(b)(1)
23.955(d)(2)
Description
Specifies characteristics of markings and placards.
Select one category for basis for markings and placards for multi-category aeroplanes.
Placards and marking information for all certified categories must be furnished in the
AFM.
Alignment and visibility of instrument markings.
Marking of speeds on ASI.
Marking of VNE, caution range, flap operating range, OEI en-route climb/descent speed
for pistons less than 2 730 kg (6 000 lb), VMC for pistons less than 2 730 kg (6 000 lb).
Indication of variation of VNE or VNO with altitude.
Indication of variation of VMO/MMO with altitude or lowest value.
Marking of conditions for, and calibration of, magnetic direction indicator.
Marking of powerplant instruments - red radial line for maximum and minimum operating
limits.
Marking of powerplant instruments - green arc for normal range.
Marking of powerplant instruments - yellow arc for caution and take-off range.
Marking of powerplant instruments - red arc for restricted vibration range.
Marking of oil quantity indicator.
Red radial marking at specified zero reading.
Marking of cockpit control as to function and method of operation.
Marking of secondary controls.
Marking of powerplant fuel controls - fuel selector position.
Marking of powerplant fuel controls - fuel tank sequence.
Placard stating conditions under which maximum usable fuel may be used from
restricted usage tank.
Marking of powerplant fuel controls - multi-engine fuel selector position.
Marking of usable fuel at indicator, if applicable.
Marking of usable fuel at selector, if applicable.
Marking of landing gear position indicator.
Marking of emergency controls red and of method of operation.
Placard for baggage, cargo and ballast for weight and content.
Manual
Mark
Placard
Sign
BOOK 2
Primary CS
CS23
Support CS
Description
23.1557(b)
23.1557(c)(1)(i)
23.1557(c)(1)(ii)
23.1557(c)(2)
23.1557(c)(3)
23.1557(d)
23.1557(e)
23.1559(a)(1)
23.1559(a)(2)
23.1559(b)
23.25(c)(2)
23.973(a)
23.973(a)
23.1559(c)
23.1561(a)
23.1561(b)
23.1563(a)
23.1563(b)
23.1563(c)
23.1567(a)
23.1525
Placard for seats not capable of carrying more than 170 lb.
Marking of fuel filler openings (piston).
Marking of fuel filler openings (turbine) and AFM requirement.
Marking of oil filler openings and AFM requirement.
Marking of coolant filler openings.
Placard for emergency exits and controls.
Marking of system voltage of each DC installation.
Placard stating that aeroplane must be operated in accordance with AFM.
Placard stating the certificated category to which placards apply.
For multicategory aeroplanes, a placard stating that other limitations are contained in
the AFM.
Placard specifying the kinds of operation.
Marking of safety equipment as to method of operation.
Marking of stowage provisions for safety equipment.
Placard of VA close to ASI.
Placard of VLO close to ASI.
Placard of VMC close to ASI for pistons greater than 2 730 kg (6 000 lb) and turbines.
Placard prohibiting aerobatic manoeuvres, including spins, for normal category
aeroplanes.
Placard listing approved aerobatic manoeuvres for utility category aeroplanes.
Placard stating spins prohibited for utility category aeroplanes that do not meet the
aerobatic spin requirements.
Placard listing approved aerobatic manoeuvres and recommended entry airspeed; also
stating if inverted manoeuvres are not allowed.
Placard listing conditions and control actions for recovery from a spin.
Requires AFM be submitted to the Agency. AFM must contain information required by
23.1583 - 23.1589, other information necessary for safe operation and information
necessary to comply with the operating rules.
Information required by 23.1583 - 23.1589 must be approved and segregated from
unapproved information.
23.1567(b)(1)
23.1567(b)(2)
23.1567(c)
23.1567(d)
23.1581(a)
23.1581(b)(1)
23.158323.1589
23.158323.1589
Mark
Placard
Sign
BOOK 2
Manual
CS23
2FTG App 44
Primary CS
Support CS
Description
23.1581(b)(2)(i)
23.1583
23.1581(b)(2)(ii)
23.158523.1589
Operating limitations must be approved and clearly distinguished from other parts of the AFM
(does not apply to pistons less than or equal to 2 730 kg (6 000 lb)).
Procedures, performance and loading information must be presented in a manner acceptable to
the Agency (does not apply to pistons less than or equal to 2 730 kg (6 000 lb)).
Units in the AFM must be the same as those marked on the appropriate instruments and
placards.
All AFM operational airspeeds must, unless otherwise specified, be presented as indicated
airspeeds.
Provisions must be made for stowing the AFM in a suitable fixed container readily accessible to
the pilot.
Each AFM must contain a means for recording the incorporation of revisions and/or amendments.
Each AFM must contain operating limitations, including the following:
Information necessary for the marking of airspeed limits as required in 23.1545.
The speeds VMC, VA, VLE and VLO and their significance.
VMO/MMO and a statement that this speed must not be deliberately exceeded without
authorisation (for turbine powered commuters).
If an airspeed limitation is based on compressibility effects, a statement to this effect, further
information and the recommended recovery procedure (for turbine powered commuters).
The airspeed limits must be shown in terms of VMO/MMO for (turbine powered commuters).
Powerplant limitations required by 23.1521 and explanations, when appropriate.
Information necessary for marking powerplant instruments required in 23.1549 to 23.1553.
23.1581(c)
23.1581(d)
23.1581(e)
2FTG App 45
23.1581(f)
23.1583
23.1583(a)(1)
23.1583(a)(2)
23.1583(a)(3)(i)
23.1545
23.1583(a)(3)(ii)
23.1583(a)(3)(iii)
23.1583(b)(1),(2)
23.1583(b)(3)
23.1583(c)(1)
23.1583(c)(2)
23.1583(c)(3)
23.1521
23.154923.1553
23.63(c)1)
23.1583(c)(4)
23.63(d)(1),
23.55, 23.59(a),
23.59(b)
23.1583(c)(5)
23.63(d)(2),
23.75, 23.343
Mark
Placard
Sign
CS23
23.1583(d)
Maximum weight.
Maximum landing weight (if less than maximum weight).
MTOW for each aerodrome altitude and temperature selected by the applicant at which the
aeroplane complies with 23.63(c)(1) (not for pistons less than 2 730 kg (6 000 lb) and
commuters).
For commuter aeroplanes, the MTOW for each aerodrome altitude and temperature selected by
the applicant at which the aeroplane complies with the climb requirements of 23.63(d)(1), the
accelerate-stop distance determined in 23.55 is acceptable, the take-off distance determined in
23.59(a) is acceptable and, optionally, the take-off run determined in 23.59(b) is acceptable.
For commuter aeroplanes, the maximum landing weight for each aerodrome altitude
selected by the applicant at which the aeroplane complies with the climb requirements
of 23.63(d)(2), the landing distance determined in 23.75 is acceptable and the maximum
zero wing fuel weight established in 23.343.
The established centre of gravity limits.
Manual
BOOK 2
Primary CS
23.1583(e)
23.221(c)
23.1583(f)
23.1583(g)
23.1583(h)
23.1523
23.1525
23.1583(i)
23.1583(j)
23.1583(k)
23.1583(l)
2FTG App 46
23.1583(m)
23.1583(n)
23.1583(o)
23.1583(p)
23.1527
23.45(g),
23.1587(a)(5)
23.1585(a)
23.1585(a)(1)
23.1585(a)(2)
23.1585(a)(3)
23.1585(a)(4)
23.1585(a)(5)
23.903(f)
23.73, 23.75
23.1585(b)
23.71
23.1585(c)(1)
Mark
Placard
Sign
BOOK 2
23.1585(c)(2)
Authorised manoeuvres, appropriate airspeed limitations, recommended entry speeds,

spin recovery procedures and unauthorised manoeuvres according to category.
Positive limit load factors and, for aerobatic aeroplanes, the negative limit load factors.
Number and functions of the minimum flight crew.
Lists of kinds of operation according to 23.1525, installed equipment affecting any
operating limitation and identification as to equipment's required operational status.
Maximum operating altitude.
Maximum passenger seating configuration.
Maximum allowable lateral fuel loading differential, if less than the maximum possible.
Maximum allowable load and maximum intensity of loading for baggage and cargo
compartments or zones.
Any limitations on the use of aeroplane systems and equipment.
Where appropriate, maximum and minimum ambient temperatures for operation.
Any restrictions on smoking in the aeroplane.
Types of surface on which operation may be conducted (see 23.45(g) and
23.1587(a)(5)).
Information concerning normal, abnormal and emergency procedures and other
information necessary for safe operation and achievement of scheduled performance;
including.
Explanation of significant or unusual flight or ground handling characteristics.
Maximum demonstrated values of crosswind for take-off and landing and associated
procedures.
A recommended speed for flight in rough air.
Procedures for restarting any engine in flight, including the effects of altitude.
Procedures, speeds and configurations for making a normal approach and landing in
accordance with 23.73 and 23.75 and a transition to the balked landing condition.
For all single-engined aeroplanes, procedures, speeds and configurations for a glide
following engine failure and the subsequent forced landing.
For all twin-engined aeroplanes, procedures, speeds and configurations for making an
approach and landing with one engine inoperative.
For all twin-engined aeroplanes, procedures, speeds and configurations for making a
go-around with one engine inoperative, the conditions under which it can be performed
safely or a warning against attempting a go-around.
Manual
CS23
Primary CS
Support CS
Description
Support CS
Description
23.1585(d)(1)
23.51(a),(b),
23.53(a),(b),
23.65, 23.69(a)
For all normal, utility and aerobatic aeroplanes, procedures, speeds and configurations
for making a normal take-off (23.51(a),(b) 23.53(a),(b)) and the subsequent climb
(23.65, 23.69(a)).
For all normal, utility and aerobatic aeroplanes, procedures for abandoning a take-off.
For all normal, utility and aerobatic twin-engined aeroplanes, procedures and speeds for
continuing a take-off following engine failure, the conditions under which it can be
performed safely or a warning against continuing the take-off.
For all normal, utility and aerobatic twin-engined aeroplanes, procedures and speeds for
continuing a climb following engine failure after take-off (23.67) or en-route (23.69(b)).
For commuter category aeroplanes, procedures, speeds and configurations for making
a normal take-off.
For commuter category aeroplanes, procedures and speeds for carrying out an
accelerate-stop
For commuter category aeroplanes, procedures and speeds for continuing a take-off
following engine failure (23.59(a)(1)) and for following the flight path (23.57, 23.61(a)).
23.1585(d)(2)
23.1585(e)(1)
23.1585(e)(2)
23.67, 23.69(b)
23.1585(f)(1)
2FTG App 47
23.1585(f)(2)
23.55
23.1585(f)(3)
23.57,
23.59(a)(1),
23.61(a)
23.953
23.1585(g)
23.1585(h)
23.1353(g)(2)2
3.1353(g)(3)
23.1585(i)
23.1585(j)
23.1587
23.45(b)
23.1587(a)(1)
23.49
23.1587(a)(2)
23.1587(a)(3)
23.69(a)
23.75
23.1587(a)(4)
23.45(g)
Mark
Placard
Sign
CS23
23.1587(a)(5)
For twin-engined aeroplanes, information and instructions regarding fuel supply

independence.
For each aeroplane showing compliance with 23.1353(g)(2) or (g)(3), the procedures for
disconnecting the battery from its charging source.
Information on the total quantity of usable fuel for each tank and the effect pump failure.
Procedures for the safe operation of the aeroplane's systems and equipment, in normal
use and in the event of malfunction.
Unless otherwise presented, performance information must be provided over the
altitude and temperature ranges required by 23.45(b).
Stalling speeds VS0 and VS1 at maximum weight with landing gear and wing flaps
retracted and the effect on these stalling speeds of bank angles up to 60.
Steady rate and gradient of climb with all engines operating.
The landing distance for each aerodrome altitude and standard temperature and the
type of surface for which it is valid.
The effect on landing distance of operation on other than smooth hard surfaces, when
dry.
The effect on landing distance of runway slope, 50% of the headwind component and
150% of the tailwind component.
Manual
BOOK 2
Primary CS
Description
23.1587(b)
23.77(a)
23.1587(c)(1)
23.53
23.1587(c)(2)
23.1587(c)(3)
23.45(g)
23.1587(c)(4)
23.66
23.1587(c)(5)
23.69(b)
23.1587(c)(6)
23.1587(d)(1)
23.1587(d)(2)
23.1587(d)(3)
23.1587(d)(4)
23.71
23.55
23.59(a)
23.59(b)
23.45(g)
For normal, utility and aerobatic piston aeroplanes of 2 730 kg (6 000 lb) or less, the
steady angle of climb/descent.
For normal, utility and aerobatic aeroplanes, the take-off distance and the type of
surface for which it is valid.
The effect on take-off distance of operation on other than smooth hard surfaces, when dry.
The effect on take-off distance of runway slope, 50% of the headwind component and
For twin piston aeroplanes of more than 2 730 kg (6 000 lb) MTOW and turbine
aeroplanes, the one-engine-inoperative take-off climb/descent gradient.
For twin-engined aeroplanes, the en-route rate and gradient of climb/descent with oneengine inoperative.
For single-engined aeroplanes, the glide performance.
For commuter aeroplanes, the accelerate-stop distance.
For commuter aeroplanes, the take-off distance.
For commuter aeroplanes, the take-off run at the applicant's option.
For commuter aeroplanes, the effect on accelerate-stop distance, take-off distance and,
if determined, take-off run of operation on other than smooth hard surfaces, when dry.
For commuter aeroplanes, the effect on accelerate-stop distance, take-off distance and,
if determined, take-off run of runway slope, 50% of the headwind component and 150%
of the tailwind component.
For commuter aeroplanes, the net take-off path.
For commuter aeroplanes, the en-route gradient of climb/descent with one engine
inoperative.
For commuter aeroplanes, the effect on the net take-off path and the en-route gradient
of climb/descent with one engine inoperative, of 50% of the headwind component and
For commuter aeroplanes, overweight landing performance information (the maximum
weight at which the aeroplane complies with 23.63(d)(2) and the landing distance
determined in 23.75).
For commuter aeroplanes, the relationship between IAS and CAS.
For commuter aeroplanes, the altimeter system calibration.
For commuter aeroplanes, the en-route gradient of climb/descent with one engine
inoperative.
The weight and location of each item of equipment that can be easily removed and was
installed when the aeroplane was weighed.
Appropriate loading instructions for each permissible loading condition of weight and cg.
Instructions for continued airworthiness.
23.1587(d)(5)
23.1587(d)(6)
23.1587(d)(7)
23.61(b)
23.69(b)
23.1587(d)(8)
23.1587(d)(9)
23.63(d)(2), 75
23.1587(d)(10)
23.1587(d)(11)
23.1587(d)(7)
23.1323(b),(c)
23.1325(e)
23.69(b)
23.1589(a)
23.25
23.1589(b)
App. G23-2,3,4
23.23, 23.25
23.1529
Manual
Mark
Placard
Sign
BOOK 2
Support CS
CS23 BOOK 2
2FTG App 48
Primary CS
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 5 (RESERVED)
2FTG App 51
CS23
BOOK 2
2FTG App 52
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 6 SAMPLE KINDS OF OPERATING EQUIPMENT LIST

This aeroplane may be operated in day or night VFR, day or night IFR, and known or forecast icing
conditions when the appropriate equipment is installed and operable.
The following equipment list identifies the systems and equipment upon which type certification for
each kind of operation was predicated. The following systems and items of equipment must be
installed and operable for the particular kind of operation indicated.
The ATA numbers refer to equipment classifications of Air Transport Association Specification Code 100.
VFR
Day
VFR
Night
IFR
Day
IFR
Night
Icing
Conditions
Communications (ATA-23)
1. Communication Radio (VHF)
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Electrical Power (ATA-24)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Battery
D.C. Generator
D.C. Loadmeter
D.C. Generator Warning Light
Inverter
Inverter Warning Light
Feeder Limiter Warning Light
Battery Monitor system
AC Volt Meter
Equipment/Furnishings (ATA-25)
1. Exit Signs Self-Illuminated
Fire Protection (ATA-26)
1. Engine Fire Detector System
2. Firewall Fuel Shutoff System
2FTG App 61
CS23
BOOK 2
VFR
Day
VFR
Night
IFR
Day
IFR
Night
Icing
Conditions
Flight Controls (ATA-27)
1. Flap System
2. Flap Position Indicator
3. Horizontal Stabiliser Trim System Main
4. Horizontal Stabiliser Trim System Standby
5. Stabiliser out-of-trim Aural Warning Indicator
6. Trim-in-Motion Aural Indicator
7. Horizontal Stabiliser Position Indicator
8. Stall Warning Horn
9. Trim Tab Indicator Rudder
10.Trim Tab Indicator Aileron
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PER
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
AFM
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
Limitations
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fuel (ATA-28)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Fuel Boost Pumps (4 are installed)

Fuel Quantity Indicator
Fuel Quantity Gauge Selector Switch
Nacelle Not-Full Warning Light
Crossfeed Light
Fuel Boost Pump Low Pressure Warning Light
Fuel Flow Indicator
Jet Transfer Pump
Ice and Rain Protection (ATA-30)

1. Engine Inlet Scoop Deicer Boot
2. Indicator Propeller/Inlet Deicer
3. Engine Inertial Anti-Icing System
4. Pitot Heat
5. Alternate Static Air Source
6. Engine Auto-Ignition system (if installed)
7. Propeller Deicer System
8. Windshield Heat (Left)
9. Surface Deicer System
10.Stall Warning Mounting Plate Heater
11.Wing Ice Light (Left)
12. Windshield Wiper (Left)
Instruments (ATA-31)
1. Clock
2FTG App 62
BOOK 2
CS23
VFR
Day
VFR
Night
IFR
Day
IFR
Night
Icing
Conditions
Landing Gear (ATA-32)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Landing Gear Position Indicator Lights

Flap-Controlled Landing Gear Aural Warning
Nose Steering Disconnect Actuator
Landing Gear Hydraulic Pump
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
Lights (ATA-33)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Cockpit and Instrument (Required Illumination)

Anti-Collision
Landing Light
Position Lights
Cabin Door Warning Light (Note)
Baggage Door Warning Light (Note)
Note: Where combined into one cabin/baggage annunciator one (1) is required for all conditions.
Navigation (ATA-34)
1. Altimeter
2. Airspeed
3. Magnetic Compass
4. Outside Air Temperature
5. Attitude Indicator (Gyro stabilised)
6. Directional Indicator (Gyro stabilised)
7. Sensitive Altimeter
8. Turn and Bank Indicator or Turn Co-ordinator
9. Vertical Speed Indicator
10.Navigation Radio (VHF)
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
Vacuum System
1. Suction or Pressure Gauge
2. Instrument Air System
Propeller (ATA-61)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Autofeather System
Low Pitch Light
Do Not Reverse Warning Light
Propeller Reversing
2FTG App 63
CS23
BOOK 2
VFR
Day
VFR
Night
IFR
Day
IFR
Night
Icing
Conditions
Engine Indicating (ATA-77)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Tachometer Indicator (Propeller)

Tachometer Indicator (Gas Generator)
ITT Indicator
Torque Indicator
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Engine Oil (ATA-79)

1.
2.
3.
4.
Oil Temperature Indicator

Oil Pressure Indicator
Low Oil Pressure Light
Engine Chip Detector System
Note 1: The zeros (0) used in the above list mean that the equipment and/or system was not required
for type certification for that kind of operation.
Note 2: The above system and equipment list is predicated on a crew of one pilot.
Note 3: Equipment and/or systems in addition to those listed above may be required by the operating
regulations.
Note 4: Further information may be drawn from an approved Minimum Equipment List (MEL), if
applicable.
2FTG App 64
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 7 USEFUL INFORMATION
2FTG App 71
CS23
STANDARD ATMOSPHERE
2FTG App 72
Temp
Temp Ratio
Press
Press Ratio
Density
Density Ratio
T
R
p
psi
3
slug/ft
0
1
2
3
4
5
000
000
000
000
000
590
554
519
483
447
412
5187
5151
5115
5080
5044
5008
150
130
110
91
71
51
1000
9932
9863
9794
9725
9657
1470
1417
1366
1317
1269
1223
1000
9644
9298
8962
8637
8320
23768x10
23081
22409
21751
21109
20481
6 000
7 000
8 000
9 000
10 000
376
340
305
269
233
4973
4937
4901
4866
4830
31
11
09
28
48
9588
9519
9450
9382
9313
1178
1134
1092
1050
1011
8014
7716
7428
7148
6877
11
12
13
14
15
000
000
000
000
000
198
162
126
91
55
4794
4759
4723
4687
4652
68
88
108
127
147
9244
9175
9107
9038
8969
9720
9346
8984
8633
8294
16
17
18
19
20
000
000
000
000
000
19
16
52
88
123
4616
4580
4545
4509
4473
167
187
207
226
246
8900
8831
8763
8694
8625
21
22
23
24
25
000
000
000
000
000
159
195
230
266
302
4438
4402
4366
4331
4295
266
286
306
325
345
8556
8488
8419
8350
8281
Speed of
Sound
Va
ft/sec
1000
97106
94277
91512
88809
86167
1
1
1
1
1
1
1164
1126
1087
1049
1010
0971
19868
19268
18683
18111
17553
83586
81064
78602
76196
73848
1
1
1
1
1
0932
0892
0853
0814
0774
6614
6360
6113
5875
5643
17008
16476
15957
15451
14956
71555
69317
67133
65003
62924
1
1
1
1
1
0734
0694
0654
0614
0573
7965
7647
7339
7041
6754
5420
5203
4994
4791
4595
14474
14004
13546
13100
12664
60896
58919
56991
55112
53281
1
1
1
1
1
0532
0492
0451
0410
0368
6475
6207
5947
5696
5454
4406
4223
4046
3876
3711
12240
11827
11425
11033
10651
51497
49758
48065
46417
44812
1
1
1
1
1
0327
0285
0244
0202
0160
BOOK 2
Geopotential
Altitude
h
ft
2FTG App 73
Temp
T
R
26000
27000
28000
29000
30000
337
373
409
444
480
4260
4224
4188
4153
4117
366
385
405
425
444
8213
8144
8075
8006
7938
5220
4994
4777
4567
4364
31000
32000
33000
34000
35000
516
551
587
622
658
4081
4046
4010
3974
3939
464
484
504
524
543
7869
7800
7731
7663
7594
36000
37000
38000
39000
694
697
697
697
3903
3900
3900
3900
564
565
565
565
40000
41000
42000
43000
44000
697
697
697
697
697
3900
3900
3900
3900
3900
45000
46000
47000
48000
49000
697
697
697
697
697
50000
697
Rankine = F + 4597
Kelvin = C + 2732
Temp Ratio
Press
Press Ratio
Density
Density Ratio
Speed of
Sound
Va
ft/sec
p
psi
3
Slug/ft
3552
3398
3250
3107
2970
10280
9919
9567
9225
8893
43250
41730
40251
38812
37413
1 0117
1 0075
1 0032
9990
9947
4169
3981
3800
3626
3458
2837
2709
2586
2467
2353
8569
8255
7950
7653
7365
36053
34731
33447
32199
30987
9903
9860
9816
9773
9729
7525
7519
7519
7519
3297
3142
2994
2854
2243
2138
2038
1942
7086
6759
6442
6139
29811
28435
27101
25829
9685
9681
9681
9681
565
565
565
565
565
7519
7519
7519
7519
7519
2720
2592
2471
2355
2244
1851
1764
1681
1602
1527
5851
5577
5315
5065
4828
24617
23462
22361
21311
20311
9681
9681
9681
9681
9681
3900
3900
3900
3900
3900
565
565
565
565
565
7519
7519
7519
7519
7519
2139
2039
1943
1852
1765
1455
1387
1322
1260
1201
4601
4385
4180
3983
3796
19358
18450
17584
16759
15972
9681
9681
9681
9681
9681
3900
565
7519
1682
1145
3618
15223
9681
CS23
Geopotential
Altitude
h
ft
BOOK 2
STANDARD ATMOSPHERE
CS-23
BOOK 2
80
20
120
240
70
60
10
110
230
220
50
100
40
0
250
210
200
30
90
190
20
-10
180
10
o
C
0
80
170
-20
-10
-30
-50
60
140
130
-40
-50
160
150
-20
-30
-40
70
50
120
110
-60
40
-70
100
-80
90
-60
30
Figure 2 TEMPERATURE CONVERSION CHART
2FTG74
BOOK 2
CS-23
Determination of air temperature in relation

to international standard atmosphere
26
24
22
18
16
14
F
0
+6
ISA
0 F
+5
ISA
F
0
+4
ISA
F
0
+3
ISA
F
0
+2
F
ISA
0
+1
ISA
Altitude - 1000 Feet
20
12
ISA
F
- 10
ISA
F
- 20
F
ISA
- 30
ISA
F
- 40
ISA
F
- 50
ISA
F
60
10
ISA
SL
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
Air temperature - OF
Figure 3
2FTGApp 75
80
100
120
CS-23
BOOK 2
1.10
20
1.00
30
12000
9000
Density altitude-feet
8000
7000
6000
90 100 oF
0
00
14
1000
16000
00
100
15000
0
00
11
0
00
10
-2000
-3000
-4000
12000
11000
0
600
10000
0
500
9000
8000
7000
0
300
00
90
0
200
00
80
ete
m
i
t
Al
e - Hg
d
itu 2
Alt -29.9
e
r
su ing
es sett
r
P
00
50
6000
5000
0
100
4000
3000
00
-10
2000
00
-20
1000
0
0
-1000
14000
0
700
0
400
00
60
00
40
00
-30
-1000
00
30
00
-40
-2000
00
20
00
-50
-3000
00
10
00
-60
-4000
-5000
-5000
90 100 oF
440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 oF ABS
oC
-10 0
20
10
-20
-30
40
30
-20 -10
10
20
13000
0
00
12
00
70
2000
00
110
0
800
5000
4000
0.60
0
900
0
00
13
10000
80
de
ltitu
A
d
r
nda
Sta
13000
0
00
15
70
0.70
15000
14000
60
0.80
0.90
0
00
17
0
00
16
50
40
16000
10
30
40
50
60
70
80
Figure 4 DENSITY/PRESSURE ALTITUDE CONVERSION
2FTG76
Density altitude-feet
-20 -10
00
34
0
00
0
00
36
0
00
38
32
00
0
0
30
00
28
00
0
26
00
0
0
24
00
22
18
170
0
00
20
300
290
280
270
260
250
240
230
220
210
200
00
180
16
00
0
00
160
00
140
150
Vc ~ knots
140
6
Vc ~ knots
2FTG App 77
Figure 5 COMPRESSIBILITY CORRECTION TO GAS
190
10
310
Ve = Vc ~ Vc
40
P
alt ress
itu ure
d
4 1 e -F
00 T.
0
11
BOOK 2
Compressibility correction to obtain Ve (Equivalent airspeed)
12
12 0
00
4
0
1000
8 00
6 0 00
4 00 0
2000
S.L.
0
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
Vc (Calibrated airspeed) ~ knots
CS-23
CS-23
110
FT
00
0
35
T
0F
00
0
3
100
dh
90
dVc
80
FT
70
KT
T
0F
00
5
2
FT
00
0
0
2
0 FT
1500
0 FT
1000
2FTG App 78
FIGURE 6 ALTIMETER ERROR VS. CAS
o std
661.5
Assumes no error in total
pressure head and airspeed
position error less than 10 knots
FT
2.5
Vc
40
00
0
120
[ (
1+.2
FT
dVc
130
0.08865 Vc
45
00
0
dh
[(
140
50
00
0F
T
150
60
FT
5000
level
SEA
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
320
360
400
440
BOOK 2
Calibrated airspeed ~ KT
280
Mach number
Outside Air Temp. ( oK)
= 1 + ( recovery factor)
BOOK 2
Indicated Temp. ( oK)
Outside air temperature

o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o 270o
o
o
220
300 310 320
330
230 240
250o 260
280
210
290
190o 200
o
o
20o 30o
0o
-90o -80o -70 o -60o -50 o -40o
-30o -20
-10o
10
40o 50 o
60o
180
(oK )
(oC )
1.20
00
1.
=
K 95
0. 90
0. 85
0. 80
0.
1.16
1.14
1.12
1.10
o
80
1.08
o
70
1.06
1.04
o
60
Ratio indicated temp.to outside air temp.
o
100
o
90
o
80
o
0
o
70
o
50
o
-10
o
60
o
40
o
30
o
20
o
10
o
0
o
- 10
o
-20
o
-30
o
- 40
o
-50
2FTG App 79
Figure 7 TEMPERATURE RAM RISE
1.18
1.02
Indicated temperature ( oC)
0.5
0.6
Mach number, M
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
CS-23
o
50
o
40
o
30
o
20
o
10
o
-20
o
-30
0.4
o
-40
o
-50
0.3
o
-60
0.2
o
-70
o
-80
1.00
15o
o
10 20o
30o
o
40o 45
CS-23
Stalling speed as a function of angle of bank -

50o
60o
160
150
Figure 8
2FTG App 710
Stall speed - 0 angle of bank
140
130
120
110
100
Stalling speed as a
function of angle of
bank -
90
80
Vstall = Vstall at 0
cos
70
60
50
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
180
190
200
210
220
230
BOOK 2
Stall speed at bank angle
170
BOOK 2
Vectorial acceleration versus angle of bank

6.0
Figure 9
2FTG App 711
Vectorial acceleration - gs
5.0
g =
L
W
1
cos
Where = angle of bank

4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
Bank angle - degrees
60
70
80
CS-23
CS-23
BOOK 2
o
14% 8 12%
6o10% 9% 5o 8.0%
7.0% 4o
6.0%
5.5%
800
3o
5.0%
4.5%
700
4.0%
Rate of climb- feet/min
600
3.5%
2o
500
3.0%
2.5%
400
2.0%
300
1.5%
es
gre
-de
b
nt
clim
erce
f
p
o
le
nt
Ang gradie
b
im
Cl
200
1.0%
100
0.5%
0
40
60
80
100
Figure 10
2FTG App 712
120
140
160
BOOK 2
CS-23
3.5 % 2 o
4.0%
3.0%
800
2.5%
700
600
Ate of climb - feet/min
2.0%
t
cen
per
t
dien
gra
b
s
Clim
gree
e
d
mb
f cli
o
e
l
Ang
500
400
1.5%
300
1.0%
200
0.5%
100
0
160
180
200
220
240
Flight path velocity - knots (TAS)

Figure 10 (continued)
2FTG App 713
260
280
CS-23
BOOK 2
Flight path
runway centerline
Takeoff and landing crosswind component
60
0
10 o
20 o
o
30
40o
ty,
ci
lo
ve ot
d n
in 0 k
W 6
50
Head component ~ knots
50
50 o
40
30
40
ind
W
30
20
s
ee
gr
e
d
le,
g
an
60
70 o
20
80 o
10
10
90 o
100
-10
180
o
o
160
-20
0
150
10
140
130
20
110o
120
30
40
Crosswind component ~ knots
Figure 11
2FTG App 714
50
60
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 8 CONVERSION FACTORS TABLE
LENGTH
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Centimetres
03937
003281
001
Inches
Feet
Meters
Kilometres
3 281
06214
05399
1 0936
Feet
Miles
Nautical Miles
Yards
Meters
3937
3281
10936
Inches
Feet
Yards
Statute Miles
5 280
08690
1 760
Feet
Nautical Miles
Yards
Nautical Miles
60761
11508
Feet
Statute Miles
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Grams
003527
0002205
1 000
0001
Ounces
Pounds
Milligrams
Kilograms
Kilograms
2205
3527
1 000
Pounds
Ounces
Grams
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Cubic Centimetres
103
00610
Litres
Cubic Inches
WEIGHT
VOLUME
2FTG App 81
CS23
BOOK 2
VOLUME (Continued)
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Cubic Feet
28 317
1 728
003704
74805
2832
Cubic Centimetres
Cubic Inches
Cubic Yards
Gallons (U.S.)
Litres
Cubic Inches
4329 x 103
001732
00164
Gallons (U.S.)
Quarts (U.S.)
Litres
Cubic Meters
61 023
3531
26417
1308
Cubic Inches
Cubic Feet
Gallons (U.S.)
Cubic Yards
Gallons Imperial
2774
1201
4546
Cubic Inches
Gallons (U.S.)
Litres
Gallons, U.S.
231
01337
3785
08327
128
Cubic Inches
Cubic Feet
Litres
Imperial Gallons
Fluid Ounces U.S.
Fluid Ounces U.S.
2959
1805
Cubic Centimetres
Cubic Inches
Litres
6102
02642
1057
Cubic Inches
Gallons (U.S.)
Quarts (U.S.)
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Square Centimetres
01550
0001076
Square Inches
Square Feet
Square Feet
144
01111
Square Inches
Square Yards
Square Inches
64516
Square Millimetres
Square Kilometres
03861
Square Statute Miles
Square Meters
1076
1196
Square Feet
Square Yards
Square Statute Miles
2590
Square Kilometres
AREA
2FTG App 82
BOOK 2
CS23
VELOCITY
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Feet per Minute
001136
001829
05080
001667
Miles Per Hour

Kilometres Per Hour
Centimetres Per Second
Feet Per Second
Feet Per Second
06818
1097
3048
03048
05921
Miles Per Hour

Kilometres Per Hour
Centimetres Per Second
Meters Per Second
Knots
Knots
10
16878
11508
1852
05148
Nautical Miles Per Hour

Feet Per Second
Miles Per Hour
Kilometres Per hour
Meters Per Second
Meters Per Second
3281
2237
3600
Feet Per Second

Miles Per Hour
Kilometres Per Hour
Miles Per Hour
1467
04470
1609
08690
Feet Per Second

Meters Per Second
Kilometres Per Hour
Knots
Radians Per Second
57296
01592
9549
Degrees Per Second

Revolutions Per Second
Revolutions Per Minute
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Atmospheres
29921
14696
2 1162
Inches of Mercury
Pounds Per Square Inch
Pounds Per Square Foot
Inches of Mercury
003342
04912
70727
Atmospheres
Pounds Per Square Foot
Inches of Water
(at 4C)
000246
007355
003613
5204
Atmospheres
Inches of Mercury
Pounds Per square Foot
6895
Kilo Pascals
PRESSURE
2FTG App 83
CS23
BOOK 2
POWER
Multiply
By
To Obtain
BTU Per Minute
1296
002356
Foot Pounds Per Second

Horsepower
Horsepower
33 000
550
07457
Foot Pounds Per Minute

Foot Pounds Per Second
Kilowatts
TEMPERATURE
Degrees Kelvin
Degrees Rankine
=
=
Degrees Celsium Plus 273.2

Degrees Fahrenheit Plus 459.7
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Fahrenheit
5/9 (F32)
Celsius
Celsius
9/5 C+32
Fahrenheit
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Degrees
1745 x 102
Radians
Radians
573
Degrees
Multiply
By
To Obtain
Pounds
4448
Newtons
ANGULAR DISPLACEMENT
FORCE
2FTG App 84
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 9 AIRSPEED CALIBRATIONS

Introduction
The airspeed and altimeter systems on an aircraft depend upon accurate measurements of ambient
static pressure and total pitot pressure. Static and pitot pressures are sensed by the pitot static tube
which gives true readings in an undisturbed freestream when aligned with the flow streamlines,
however, when attached to the aircraft, which generates a pressure when flying, the pitot and the
static reading will be affected by the aircraft pressure field and the flow angularity. The errors caused
by the pressure field and by flow angularity are called position errors due to the fact that the sign and
magnitude of the errors are a function of the position of the pitot-static probe on the aircraft. The
position errors are a function of aircraft angle of attack and Mach number and are determined from
flight test.
In this text corrections are used rather than errors. Normally errors are subtracted and corrections are
added with the result that the position error correction (PEC) are added to the aircraft pitot-static data
to get to the ambient conditions of static and pitot pressures. The ambient static pressure is defined
as PSref and the ambient pitot pressure is defined as PsA/C f. The position error correction of the static
source Ps is defined as
Ps = Psref PsA\ C
and Pp the position error correction for the pitot pressure is defined as
Pp = PPref PPA\ C
The total position error correction for a pitot static system to be used for an airspeed system is Pd where
Pd = Pp Ps
General Discussion of the Various Flight Test Techniques

Each of the flight test techniques (FTTs) that are described in this appendix have certain limitations
and instrumentation accuracy criteria that should be considered prior to selecting a flight test
technique.
Airspeed error ( kts)
The speed course method calibrates the airspeed indicator and considers the position error correction for
both the static and pitot pressures. Use of the speed course data to calibrate the altimeter makes the
assumption that the total position errors of both the pitot and the static sources are in the static source
only. This assumption may not be correct. The main source of error in the ground course FTT is in
timing since a stop watch is used to record the time. Figure A, shows the effect of aircraft airspeed on
airspeed error with various length ground courses due to a 0.5 sec timing error. Obviously, if the
maximum error is limited to one knot then the maximum speed for a three mile ground course would be
about 120 kts. Essentially the ground course method is suitable for slow moving aircraft.
2
2
0.5
timing
error
il e
u
co
3m
e
rs
il
rs
ou
ec
ile
5m
rs
cou
0
50
100
150
200
Airspeed (kts)
Figure A Error Analysis of Ground Course Method

2FTG App 91
CS23
BOOK 2
The trailing bomb method only calibrates the aircraft static source. The bomb should be stable when
flying below and behind the aircraft, any oscillations will make the reference static pressure invalid. At
high speeds the bomb tends to rise up into the wake of the aircraft which causes bomb oscillations,
therefore the trailing bomb has an upper airspeed limit. The trailing bomb is useful for most speeds up
to approximately 200 kts and is particularly useful for helicopters. The trailing bomb deployed behind
and below helicopters tends to keep the bomb and the attaching tube clear of the tail rotor, however,
care should be taken when expanding the speed envelope.
The trailing cone method is capable of a much higher speed range than the trailing bomb and is a
favorite method with the large aircraft manufacturers. The trailing bomb can also be used down to
stall speeds. The trailing cone method only calibrates the aircraft static pressure system.
The pace aircraft technique for pitot static calibration is often the initial calibration method for the first
flight of a new aircraft or the first flights of extensively modified aircraft. The problem with the pace
aircraft method is the accuracy of reading both the altimeter and airspeed indicators in both aircraft
simultaneously and the fact that any errors in the pace aircraft are transferred to the test aircraft.
The pitot-static boom method is a standard for small aircraft, however, prior to use it should be
established that the boom static source is outside the pressure field of the aircraft and the pitot tube is
unaffected by the flow angularity at the boom.
The tower fly-by method only calibrates the aircraft static source and if the data are used to calibrate
the airspeed systems, the assumption is that the pitot has no errors. Accuracy problems exist with the
tower fly-by method if altimeters are used in the tower and in the aircraft. The reading accuracy of an
altimeter is generally 10 ft. therefore the combined error of both altimeters could be 20 ft. which is
very close to the FAR/CS limits of 30 ft. per 100 kts. The use of sensitive pressure transducers in the
tower and the aircraft considerably improve the reading accuracy. An additional improvement in
accuracy can be obtained by taking aircraft ground block data at the base of the fly-by tower i.e.
record the altimeter and temperature and compare the tower data taking into consideration the height
of the tower. The tower fly-by method is also useful is measuring the recovery factor of temperature
measuring systems. The serious limitations of the tower-fly-by method are; the requirement for an
instrumented tower and a fly-by line, the hazard of flying near the stall speeds and the Mach limits of
the aircraft close to the ground and the time consuming procedure of one data point per aircraft circuit.
The GPS Method requires a certified GPS system or a differential GPS system in the local area. Care
should be taken during the runs directly into and out of the prevailing wind that the aircraft is not
drifting. A potential source of error is that the wind velocity may not be the same when the aircraft is
flying in the reciprocal heading. This problem with changes in wind direction and velocity also applies
to the ground course FTT.
A summary of the speed ranges for various PEC flight test techniques is shown in figure B.
GPS Methods
Pacer Aircraft ( assuming similar aircraft perfomance)
Training Cone
9M
Trailing Bomb
FW & RW
Hover
Helicopter pacer car

calibrated 5 th wheel
-100
Ground course
FW & RW 3 mi course
1/2 sec T
100
Tower Fly-by
200
300
.95 M
400
V i (kts)
Figure B Summary of PEC Test Methods
2FTG App 92
BOOK 2
CS23
SPEED COURSE METHOD
The speed course method consists of using a ground reference to determine variations between indicated
airspeed and ground speed of the airplane. An accurately measured ground course is required. The
course distance should be selected to be compatible with the airspeeds being flown. Excessively long
times to traverse the course will degrade the test results.
Generally, airspeeds above 250 knots should be flown over a 5-mile course. Below 100 knots, limit
the course to 1 mile. Perpendicular end lines (roads, powerlines, etc.) should be long enough to
allow for drift and accurate sighting of end line passage. One-second error at 200 k is 6 k on a 2-mile
course.
a.
Test Conditions
(1)
Air Quality. The air should be as smooth as possible with a minimum of turbulence and wind.
The wind velocity, while conducting the test, should not exceed approximately 10 knots.
(2)
Weight and cg. Airspeed calibrations are usually not cg sensitive but may be weight sensitive
especially at low airspeeds (higher angles of attack). Initial airspeed calibration tests should be
conducted with the airplane loaded at or near maximum takeoff gross weight. Additional tests should
be conducted at near minimum weight and at low airspeeds to spot check the maximum weight
airspeed calibration results.
If differences exist, an airspeed system calibration should be
accomplished at minimum weight.
(3)
Altitude. When using a visual reference on the airplane for timing, the altitude throughout the
test run should be as low as practical but should be maintained at least one and one-half wing span
above the highest ground elevation so that the airplane remains out of ground effect. When conditions
permit using the airplane shadow for timing, speed course altitudes of 5002 000 feet AGL can be
used. All run pairs should be conducted at the same altitude.
(4)
Speed Range. The speed should range from 1.3 VS1 to the maximum level flight speed, to
extrapolate to VD. Compressibility effects may be considerable in the extrapolation to V D.
(5)
Run Direction. Reciprocal runs should be made at each speed to eliminate wind effects and
the ground speed obtained in each direction should be averaged to eliminate wind effects. Do not
average the time flown in each direction.
(6)
Heading. The heading should be maintained constant and parallel to the speed course
throughout the run, allowing the airplane to drift, if necessary, so that the effect of crosswinds can be
eliminated.
(7)
Configuration. The airspeed system should be calibrated in each landing gear and wing flap
configuration required in 23.45 thru 23.77. This normally consists of gear up/flaps up, gear up/flaps
takeoff and gear down/flaps down.
b.
Test Procedures
(1)
Stabilize airplane in level flight at test speed, with gear and flaps in the desired configuration,
prior to entering the speed course.
(2)
(3)
Maintain constant speed, altitude, and heading through speed course. Record data.
Repeat steps (1) and (2) of this paragraph on the reciprocal speed run.
2FTG App 93
CS23
BOOK 2
(4)
Repeat steps (1) thru (2) of this paragraph at sufficient increments (minimum of five) to
provide an adequate calibration curve for each of the configurations.
c.
Data Acquisition and Reduction. Data to be recorded during each run:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Time to make run.

Pressure altitude.
Total air temperature (airplane indicator) corrected to static air temperature (SAT).
Indicated airspeed.
Wing flap position.
Direction of run.
d.
Sample Speed Course Data reduction
Speed =
1 knot =
Dis tance
Time
6 076 1 ft/NM
=16878 ft/sec
3 600 sec/hr
Ground Speed =
GSave(TAS) =
10 560
5925( 10 560 )
=
( 16878 )( 471 )
( 471 )
= 1328 kts
132 8 + 125 6
=1292 kts
2
Sample Speed Course Data and Data Reduction
a.
b.
c.
Weigh
Course Distance
Pressure Altitude
cg
ft.
ft. (Altimeter set to 1 013 m.b.)
10 560
1 600
Observed Data
flap
gear
time
IAS
position position
Error Knots
Pressure SAT
Altitude
Ground Average Factor Calibrated Average Airspeed Instrument Position

Speed
1 013m.b
()
0
(up/down) (sec)
fixed
Ground
Airspeed
IAS
System
Speed
(kts)
(ft)
(F)
(kts)
(kts)
(kts)
(kts)
471
128
1 610
55
1328
1292
0975
126
1285
25
15
498
129
1 600
55
1256
1367
0975
1333
136
27
27
1493
0975
1456
148
24
34
445
135
1 600
55
1405
471
137
1 600
55
1328
405
148
1 600
55
1542
433
148
1 600
55
1443
Figure 1 Sample Speed Course Data and Data Reduction
Ground Speed =
C x Course Distance (ft)

Time (sec )
C = 05925 (kts) for course speed

or use C = 06818 for MPH
Factor =
Observed Pressure (In.Hg.)

= 416
(or read from F chart)
o
559 7 + Observed Temperatur e
2FTG App 94
BOOK 2
CS23
(1)
Density Altitude. TAS is greater than CAS if density altitude is above sea level. For density
altitudes below 5 000 feet and calibrated airspeeds below 200 knots, it is considered acceptable to
In this case, density altitude is obtained from figure 4 in
use the term CAS = EAS = TAS
.
appendix 7. At 1 600 ft pressure altitude and SAT 55F we read a density altitude of about 1 700 feet.
This density altitude intercepts
Average GS
TAS
1292
at a value of 0975 CAS = 1292 (0975) = 1260 knots.
CAS
IAS
126
1285
System
=
(CAS IAS)
+ 25
Error
Instrument
+ (Vinst)
+1
Position
(Vpos)
+ 15
(2)
Required Accuracy. Instrument error is determined by applying standard pitot and static pressures
to the airspeed instrument and developing a calibration curve. IAS corrected for +1 knot instrument error =
127.5 knots. The position of the static source is causing +1.5 knot error. Paragraph 23.1323(b) requires
the system error, including position error, but excluding instrument error, not to exceed 3% of CAS or 5
knots whichever is greater, in the designated speed range.
(3)
Compressibility. For many years CAS was used for design airspeeds. However, as speeds and
altitudes increased, a compressibility correction became necessary because airflow produces a total
pressure on the pitot head which is greater than if the flow were incompressible. We now use EAS as a
basis for design airspeeds (23.235). Values of CAS vs. EAS may be calculated or you may use the chart in
appendix 7, figure 5, to convert knots CAS to EAS.
2
Trailing Bomb and Trailing Cone Method
A trailing bomb or cone as depicted in figure 2 is used to measure the static pressure of the ambient
air about the aircraft. The trailing bomb is sufficiently behind and below the aircraft and the trailing
cone is sufficiently far behind the aircraft to be unaffected by the pressure field around the aircraft and
can therefore be referred to as the reference static pressure (Psref).
Figure 2 Sketches of Trailing Static Bomb and the Trailing Static Cone (not to scale)
A trailing bomb or cone can be used to calibrate the aircraft static source or to determine the Position
Error Correction (PECs) for the altimeter. The use of the reference static sources to calibrate the
airspeed systems, assumes that the errors in the total head (pitot tube) are zero. The reference static
sources could be connected to the altimeter which would read the pressure altitude of the aircraft.
The difference between the reference altitude from the trailing cone or bomb and the aircraft altitude,
both corrected for instrument errors would be the position error correction for the altimeter Hpec for a
particular aircraft configuration and speed.
Hpec = (Href + Hic ) (HiA/C + Hic)
Where Href
Hic
HiA/C
is Reference altitude
is the instrument correction to the altimeter
is the indicated aircraft altitude
2FTG App 95
CS23
BOOK 2
The above altimeter method is simple but suffers from the difficulty of accurately reading an altimeter,
with altimeter calibration errors and hysterisis. Hysterisis is the difference in altimeter calibration with
the altitude increasing and decreasing.
A more accurate technique is to connect the trailing static source and the aircraft static source to a
pressure differential gauge so that the pressure difference Ps can be read directly, i.e.,
Ps = Psref PsA/C
where Psref
PsA/C
is the reference static pressure and

is the aircraft static source pressure
Note that the (Ps) as expressed above is a correction which should be added to the aircraft static
pressure (Ps) to get the reference static pressure. The (Ps) data in lb/ft2 can be converted to Hpec
data in feet by the use of the pressure static equation:
Ps = gHpec or Hpec =
Units
Ps
H
Ps
g
in lb/ft2
in ft
in slugs/ft3
Where g is the gravitational constant 32.2 ft/sec2 and is the density of the air in which the
aircraft is flying. Hpec can be determined throughout the speed range of the aircraft in all
configurations and plotted as shown in figure 3:
+60
+30
FAR/JAR limits
Hpec
-30
Vic= (Vi + Vic )kts

100
200
T/O flaps
Land flaps
Flaps 0
-60
Figure 3 Typical Position Error Correction Data for an Aircraft
The FAR/CS 23.1325 limits of 30 ft per 100 kts are also shown on fig 3.
The Trailing Static bomb and cone can be used to calibrate the airspeed systems, if it is assumed that
the total head (pitot tube) has no errors. The total position error correction for a pitot-static system is
defined as Pd where
Pd = Pp Ps
where Pp is the pressure correction for the total head due to flow angularity
Pp Ppref PPA/C
2FTG App 96
BOOK 2
CS23
If Pp is assumed to be zero, then

Pd = Ps =
1
2
M2 M4
o VC2 1 + C + C + ....
4
40
1
2
o Vic2 1 +
Mic
M4
+ ic + ....
4
40
where Vc and Vic are in ft/sec.

For low speed aircraft that fly at speeds of less than 200 kts and at altitudes less than 10,000 ft the
compressibility corrections can be ignored and the above equation reduces to:
Pd = Ps =
1
2
o Vc2 Vic2
Where Vic is the indicated airspeed of the aircraft corrected for instrument errors and Vc is the
calibrated airspeed corrected for instrument and position errors.
Vpec = Vc Vic
Knowing the ps for each indicated speed of the aircraft (Vi), then plots of position error
corrections for the airspeed system can be generated as shown in figure 4.
+5
FAR/JAR limits
Vic= (Vi + Vic )kts
V pec
-5
T/O flaps
Land flaps
Flaps 0O
Figure 4 Typical Position Error Corrections Data for an Aircraft
The FAR/CS 23.1323 limits of 5 kts or 3% whichever is greater are also shown in fig 4.
a.
Test Conditions
Air Quality. Smooth, stable air is needed for calibrating the airspeed indicating system using a
(1)
trailing bomb or trailing cone.
(2)
Weight and cg. Same as speed course method.
Speed Range. The calibration should range from 1.2 Vstall to VMO/VNE or maximum level flight
(3)
speed whichever is greater. If the trailing bomb becomes unstable at high airspeed, the higher
airspeed range may be calibrated using another accepted method; that is, trailing cone or speed
course.
Use of Bomb. Care should be exercised in deploying the bomb and flying the test to ensure
(4)
that no structural damage or control interference is caused by the bomb or the cable. At higher
speeds, the bomb may become unstable and porpoise or oscillate. A means for a quick release of the
trailing bomb should be provided, in the event an emergency arises. Flight tests using a bomb should
be conducted over open (unpopulated) areas.
Free Stream Air. The bomb hose should be of adequate length to assure bomb operations in
(5)
free stream air. This should include consideration of all airplane test configurations which could
2FTG App 97
CS23
BOOK 2
possibly impart body interference upon the bomb. It will usually require that the bomb be at least onehalf wing span away from the airplane.
Qualifications for Use. Under stabilized flight conditions at constant airspeed and altitude,
(6)
trailing cones and airspeed bombs are considered excellent airspeed reference systems. See
paragraph 17b of this F.T.G. for additional discussion.
b.
Test Procedures
(1)
Stabilize airplane in level flight approximately 30 seconds just above stall with flaps and gear
retracted. Record data.
(2)
Repeat step (1) at sufficient increments to provide an adequate calibration curve for each of the
configurations.
c.
Data Acquisition (Data to be recorded at each test point)
Altimeter Method
1.
Airplane airspeed (Vi)
2.
Airplane indicated altitude (HiA/C)
3.
Trailing Cone/Bomb altitude (Hiref)
4.
Flap position
5.
Landing gear position
6.
Fuel used
Pressure Differential Method

1.
Airplane Airspeed (Vi)
2.
Airplane indicated altitude (HiA/C)
3.
Pressure Differential ps = Psref PsA/C
4.
Flap position
5.
Landing gear position
6.
Fuel used.
Data analysis. The data are analyzed according to the methods and equations presented
d.
above. The data could be presented in the form as shown in figures 3 and 4. Data that fall outside
the FAR/CS limits fail the airworthiness codes.
3
PACE AIRPLANE METHOD
An airplane whose pitot static systems have been calibrated by an acceptable flight test method is
used to calibrate the pitot static systems of a test aircraft.
a.
Test conditions. Smooth ambient flight conditions
Test Procedures. The pace airplane is flown in formation with the test airplane at the same
b.
altitude and speed. The aircraft should be close enough to ensure that the relative velocity is zero yet
far enough away so that the pressure fields of the two airplanes do not interact. Readings are
coordinated by radio.
c.
Data to be recorded
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
d.
aircraft
Test Airplane airspeed (ViT) kts

Test Airplane Pressure Altitude (HiT) ft
Pace Airplane airspeed (Vip) kts
Pace Airplane Pressure Altitude (Hip) ft.
Configuration for both airplanes.
Fuel used in both airplanes.
Data Reduction. Correct all the instrument readings for instrument errors and the pace
readings for the known position error.
VpecT = (Vip + Vicp + Vpec) (ViT + VicT) kts
HpecT = (Hip + Hicp + Hpec) (HiT + HicT) ft
Calculate VpecT and HpecT for all data points in each configuration and plot in a manner similar to
figure 3 and figure 4.
2FTG App 98
BOOK 2
CS23
PITOT-STATIC BOOM DATA
If a flight test Pitot-Static boom is mounted on an airplane such that the pitot tube (total head) is not
affected by flow angularity and the static source is outside the pressure field of the aircraft, then it can
be assumed that the boom data is without position errors. The boom data can then be taken as the
pace data.
(a) (b) (c) paragraphs are the same as in Paragraph (3) Pace Airplane Method
d.
Data reduction
Vpect = (ViB + VicB + Vpec) (ViT + VicT) kts

Hpect = (HiB + HicB + Vpec) (HiT + HicT) ft
VpecT and HpecT are calculated throughout the speed range in each configuration and plotted as
shown in figures 3 and 4.
5
TOWER FLY-BY METHOD
The tower flyby method is one of the methods which results in a direct determination of static error in
indicated pressure altitude.
Since the altimeter and airspeed system use the same static source, it is possible to correlate the
altimeter position error directly to the airspeed error. This correlation assumes that there is no error in
the total head system.
F-111
Hc
tower
Ground reference line
D
Figure 5 Tower Fly-By Method
Procedures and Test Conditions for Tower Flyby
(1)
Air Quality. Smooth, stable air is needed for determining the error in pressure altitude.
(2)
Weight and cg. Same as for calibrations of the airspeed indicating system.
Speed Range. The calibration should range from 1.3 VS0 to 1.8 VS1. Higher speeds up to VM0
(3)
or VNE are usually investigated so that errors can be included in the AFM for a full range of airspeeds.
(4)
Test Procedures
(i)
The test technique is to fly the aircraft along a ground reference line, past the tower, in
stabilized flight at a constant airspeed and at the approximate height of the tower. The primary
piloting task is to maintain a constant indicated altitude during the run. The tower is equipped with a
sensitive altimeter and a means of determining the relative angle () of the aircraft. The data recorded
during each run are the indicated pressure altitude of the tower, (Hitower), the angle , and the aircrafts
2FTG App 99
CS23
BOOK 2
indicated pressure altitude, airspeed and temperature (HiA/C, ViA/C, and TiA/C) as it passes the tower.
Note that the tower altimeter should be at the zero grid line position in the tower.
(ii)
Repeat step (i) at various airspeeds in increments sufficient to cover the required range at
each flap setting.
(5)
Data Acquisition. Data to be recorded at each test point:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
Airplane Airspeed ViA/C kts

Airplane indicated pressure attitude. HiA/C kts
Tower observer indicated pressure altitude. Hitower
Angle of aircraft above the tower.
Wing flap position.
Fuel used in airplane.
TiA/C and Titower.
Data Reduction. The actual pressure altitude of the aircraft is Hcref where
Hcref = (Hitower + Hictower) + D tan
Ts
Tt
Where Ts is the standard day absolute temperature at the test altitude and Tt is the test day
temperature in absolute units.
The
Ts
temperature correction is to convert the geometric height of the aircraft above the reference
Tt
zero grid line in the tower (D tan ) to a pressure height that can be added to the pressure altitude of
the tower Hctower. The difference between the actual reference pressure altitude of the aircraft and the
aircrafts instrument-corrected pressure altitude is the position error correction.
Hpec
= Hcref (HiA/C + HicA/C)

= [ (Hitower + Hictower) + D tan
Ts
] (HiA/C + HicA/C)
Tt
Hpec is calculated for every speed and aircraft configuration flown past the tower and the data are
plotted as per fig 3.
The airspeed system position error corrections can be obtained from the tower fly-by method if it is
assumed that the pitot tube (total head) errors are zero.
The hydrostatic equilibrium equation states that the pressure error correction at the static source is
ps = gHpec
and from Paragraph 3.
pd = pp ps =
1
2
2
4
4
2
o Vc2 1 + Mc + Mc + .... 1 oVic2 1 + Mic + Mic + ....

2
40
4
40
4
Since it is assumed that pp = 0 and for lowspeed aircraft, compressibility effects can be ignored then
pd = ps =
1
2
o Vc2 Vic2
The above equation is used to calculate Vc at every test point, then Vpec = Vc Vic. The data are then
plotted as per figure 4.
2FTG App 910
BOOK 2
CS23
GROUND RUN AIRSPEED SYSTEM CALIBRATION
The airspeed system is calibrated to show compliance with commuter category requirements of
23.1323(c) during the accelerate-takeoff ground run, and is used to determine IAS values for various
V1 and VR speeds. The airspeed system error during the accelerate-takeoff ground run may be
determined using a trapped static source reference, or a distance measuring unit which provides
readouts of ground speed which can be converted into CAS.
a.
Definitions
(1)
Ground Run System Error . System error during the accelerate-takeoff ground run is the
combination of position error, instrument error, and the dynamic effects, such as lag, which may be
caused by acceleration on the runway.
(2)
Trapped Static Source. An airtight bottle with sufficient internal volume so as to be infinite when
compared to an airspeed indicators internal changes in volume while sensing various airspeeds. The
bottle should be insulated to minimize internal bottle temperature changes as testing is in progress. For
short periods of time, it can be assumed that the bottle will reflect true static ambient pressure to the test
indicator.
(3)
Production Airspeed Indicator. An airspeed indicator which conforms to the type certification
design standards. The indicator should be installed in the approved instrument panel location since these
tests involve the dynamic effects of the indicator which may result from acceleration.
(4)
Test Airspeed Indicator. A mechanical airspeed indicator with known dynamic characteristics
during acceleration or an electronic transducer which can provide airspeed information.
(5)
Test Reference Altimeter. An altimeter which indicates the altitude of the air trapped in the
bottle or local ambient static air if the valve is opened.
(6)
Ground Run Position Error. Ground run position error is the static-pressure error of the
production static source during ground runs with any ground effects included. Any contributions to
error due to the total-pressure (pitot) are ignored.
(7)
Instrument Error. See paragraph 302a(3)(ii).
(8)
Dynamic Effects on Airspeed Indicator. The dynamic effects on airspeed indicators occur as a
result of acceleration and rapid change in airspeed during takeoff.
This causes many airspeed
indicators to indicate an airspeed lower than the actual airspeed.
NOTE: It is possible for electronic airspeed indicators driven by an air data computer to also have errors due to
dynamic acceleration effects because of characteristics inherent in the basic design.
(9)
Distance Measuring Unit. An instrumentation system normally used to record takeoff distance
measurements. One output of these systems provides the ground speed vs. time as the airplane
accelerates during the accelerate-takeoff ground run. Ground speed may be converted into a
corresponding CAS value by applying wind and air density corrections at intervals during acceleration
where the ships airspeed indications have been recorded.
b.
Trapped Static Source Method
The trapped static source method consists of comparing instantaneous readings of airspeed, as
indicated on a test airspeed indicator, with readings on a production airspeed indicator while
accelerating on the runway. Readings may be recorded by film or video cameras for mechanical
airspeed indicators or by electronic means if a transducer type device is being utilized. See figure 6 for
system schematic.
2FTG App 911
CS23
BOOK 2
(1)
Test Conditions
(i)
Air Quality. The surface winds should be light with a minimum of gusting.
(ii)
Weight and cg. Ground run calibrations are not sensitive to cg. The dynamic effects of
acceleration may be affected by weight. Test weight variations should be sufficient to account for any
measurable effects due to weight.
(iii)
Speed Range. The speeds should range from 0.8 of the minimum V1 to 1.2 times the
maximum V1, unless higher values up to VR are required for expansion of takeoff data.
(iv)
Configuration. The airspeed system should be calibrated during the accelerate-takeoff ground
run for each approved takeoff flap setting.
(2)
Test Procedures
(i)
Align the airplane with the runway.
(ii)
With idle engine power and with the cabin door open, open the valve to expose the bottle to
static ambient conditions, then close the valve. Record the test altimeter reading.
(iii)
Close the cabin door.
(iv)
Conduct a takeoff acceleration using normal takeoff procedures. The camera should be
recording speeds from the two airspeed indicators in increments sufficient to cover the required
airspeed range.
To ships pilot source
Test airspeed indicator

(or electronic device, i.e., transducer)
Production ships
airspeed indicator
Production
rate-of-climb
Test reference
altimeter
Openable
Valve
To ships
static source
Open to ambient static

air conditions
To trapped
static source
Figure 6 Trapped Static Source Schematic
(v)
The takeoff run should be continued, if possible, until beyond the maximum required speed
then aborted. When at rest with engines idling, open valve again and observe the test altimeter. Any
significant jumps or changes in indicated altitude may indicate a system leak, too much runway
gradient or other factors which will invalidate the results of the run.
(vi)
Repeat steps (i) thru (v) of this paragraph until there are sufficient runs to provide adequate
calibration curves for the required configurations.
2FTG App 912
BOOK 2
CS23
(3)
Data Acquisition and Reduction. Read the recorded data (film or video) at increments of
airspeed arbitrarily selected within the required range. See figure 7 for a sample data reduction.
Record and perform the following:
Time
Trapped
Static IAS
(kts)
(1) TS
Airspeed
Instrument
Correction
Corrected
TS IAS
Ships IAS
(kts)
7:41:45
507
0
507
49
:46
561
|
561
54
:47
614
|
614
61
:48
669
|
669
66
:49
719
|
719
72
:50
767
|
767
77
:51
821
|
821
83
:52
868
|
868
88
:53
915
|
915
91
:54
965
|
965
99
:55
1009
|
1009
102
:56
1052
|
1052
107
:57
1101
|
1101
113
:58
1144
|
1144
119
:59
1182
|
1182
123
7:42:00
1229
V
1229
128
Notes: 1. Obtain from instrument calibration.
2. Corrected trapped static IAS minus corrected ships IAS.
3. Corrections are added.
(1) Ships
Airspeed
Instrument
Correction
Corrected
Ships IAS
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
49
54
61
66
72
77
83
88
91
99
102
107
113
119
123
128
(2) Airspeed
Position Error
Correction
+
+
+
+
17
21
04
09
01
03
09
12
05
25
11
18
29
46
48
51
Figure 7 Trapped Static (TS) Data Reduction
(i)
Production indicated airspeed, test indicated airspeed, and configuration.
(ii)
Correct the test indicated airspeed for instrument error and in the case of electronic devices,
any known dynamic effects. Static pressure in the bottle is assumed to result in no position error.
These corrected airspeed values may be assumed to be CAS.
(iii)
Calculate the amount of system error correction (difference between corrected trapped static
indicated airspeed and production indicated airspeed).
(iv)
Plot IAS vs CAS within the required range of speeds. See figure 8 for a sample plot.
2FTG App 913
CS23
BOOK 2
110
Ground
Airspeed
Calibration
100
CAS (kts)
90
80
70
60
50
40
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
IAS (kts)
Figure 8 Ground Airspeed Calibration
c.
Distance Measuring Unit Method
The distance measuring unit method consists of utilizing the readouts of ground speed to obtain CAS
values within the required range of speeds. These values are compared with readings at the same
instant on a production airspeed indicator. Airspeed indicator readings may be recorded by film or
video cameras for mechanical airspeed indicators or by electronic means if a transducer type device is
being utilized. There should be a method of correlating recorded airspeeds with the CAS values
obtained from the distance measuring unit system.
(1)
Test Conditions
(i)
Air Quality. The surface wind velocity should be steady, as low as possible, and not exceed
10 knots. The wind direction should be as near as possible to the runway heading.
(ii)
Weight and cg. Same as for the trapped static source method.
(iii)
(2)
Speed Range. Same as for the trapped static source method.

Test Procedures
(i)
Align the airplane with the runway.
(ii)
Conduct a takeoff acceleration using normal takeoff procedures. The distance measuring unit
should be recording/determining the ground speeds. The camera should be recording speeds from
the production airspeed indicator and the time or counting device utilised to correlate speeds.
(iii)
The takeoff may continue or be aborted when beyond the maximum required speed.
(iv)
Record surface wind velocity and direction; surface air temperature and runway pressure
altitude for each run.
(v)
Repeat steps (i) thru (iv) of this paragraph until there are sufficient runs to provide adequate
calibration curves for the required configurations.
2FTG App 914
BOOK 2
CS23
(3)
Data Acquisition and Reduction. Read the recorded data (film or video) at increments of
airspeed arbitrarily selected within the required range. For these same increments, determine the
ground speeds from the distance measuring unit system. See figure 9 for a sample data reduction.
Record and perform the following:
Time
DMU
Ground
Speed
(kts)
Wind
Component
Down the
Runway
TAS
(kts)
(1) CAS
(kts)
Ships
IAS (kts)
(2) Ships
Airspeed
Instrument
Correction
Corrected
Ships IAS
7:00:09
:10
:11
48
528
568
3
|
|
51
558
598
501
548
587
49
54
59
0
|
|
49
54
59
(3) Ground
Airspeed
Position
Error
Correction
+ 11
+ 08
03
:12
:13
61
642
|
|
64
672
628
66
63
68
|
|
63
68
02
2
:14
:15
673
709
|
|
703
739
69
725
71
75
|
|
71
75
2
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
77
802
837
869
90
936
968
999
1033
1066
1096
756
787
822
853
883
919
951
981
1014
1047
1076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
78
82
83
87
89
92
95
101
103
106
110
24
33
08
17
07
01
+ 01
29
16
13
24
1 240 ft.
52F
Runway 1
Wind 350/3
:16
74
:17
772
:18
807
:19
839
:20
87
:21
906
:22
938
:23
969
:24
1003
:25
1036
:26
1066
Test Conditions:
Pressure Altitude =
Temperature
=
0982
78
82
83
87
89
92
95
101
103
106
110
NOTE:
1.
CAS = TAS x
2.
3.
4.
Obtain from instrument calibration

CAS minus corrected Ships IAS
Corrections should be added
Figure 9 Sample Ground Airspeed Calibration Using a Distance Measuring Unit
(i)
Production indicated airspeed, ground speed, surface air temperature, runway pressure
altitude, wind velocity and wind direction with respect to runway heading.
(ii)
Compute a CAS value for each data point. This is accomplished by identifying the wind
component parallel to the runway; computing the corresponding true airspeed; computing the air
density ratio; then computing the calibrated airspeed.
(iii)
Calculate the amount of system error correction (difference between CAS and production
indicated airspeed).
(iv)
Plot IAS vs. CAS within the required range of speeds. See figure 8 for a sample plot.
GPS METHOD
The GPS method consists of using a GPS to determine ground speed. This is basically the same
technique as the speed course with the exception that the GPS determines the ground speed rather
than timing over a measured ground distance. The GPS should be a certified Time, Space, Position,
Information (TSPI) system.
2FTG App 915
CS23
a.
BOOK 2
Test Conditions
(1)
Air quality. The air should be a smooth as possible with a minimum of turbulence and wind.
The wind velocity, while conducting the test, should be as constant as possible.
(2)
Weight and cg. Same as the speed course method.
(3)
Altitude. The altitude is not critical, but it should be chosen where the air is smooth and the
winds are constant.
(4)
Speed Range. Same as the speed course method.
(5)
Run Direction. Reciprocal runs over the same geographical location should be made at each
speed directly into and away from the wind. Record the ground speed in each direction.
(6)
Heading. The heading should be maintained constant and directly into the wind or directly
downwind.
(7)
Configuration. Same as the speed course method.
b.
Test Procedures
(1)
Stabilise the airplane in level flight at test speed with the gear and flaps in the desired
configuration, prior to starting the GPS run.
(2)
Note the track on the GPS and the heading on the compass. If the track is to the left of the
heading, turn to the right until track and heading are equal. If the track is right of the heading, turn to
the left until track and heading are equal. The amount of the turn is a function of the wind velocity,
direction and the speed of the aircraft. Once the aircraft is headed directly into the wind, maintain the
speed constant for at least 20 seconds. Take a time weighted average of the ground speed.
(3)
Repeat steps (1) and (2) of this paragraph on the reciprocal heading of that flown in step (2).
(4)
Repeat steps (1) through (3) of this paragraph at sufficient increments (minimum of five) to
provide an adequate calibration curve for each of the configurations.
c.
Data Acquisition and Reduction. Data to be recorded during each run.
(1)
Ground speed.
(2)
Indicated pressure altitude.
(3)
Total air temperature (airplane indicator) corrected to static air temperature (SAT).
(4)
Indicated airspeed.
(5)
Wing flap position.
(6)
(7)
Heading.
d.
Sample GPS Data Reduction. This is the same as the speed course method with the
exception that you enter the calculations with the ground speed in each direction as
determined from the GPS.
2FTG App 916
BOOK 2
CS23
APPENDIX 10 GUIDE FOR DETERMINING

CLIMB PERFORMANCE AFTER STC MODIFICATIONS
(not applicable to aeroplanes of more than 2722 kg (6 000 lbs) maximum weight and for turbine
engine-powered airplanes)
1.
INTRODUCTION. Paragraph 23.1587 requires certain performance information to be included
in the AFM. These include the climb requirements and rate of climb information as specified by 23.69,
and 23.77. Additionally some turbine powered airplanes may have the maximum weight of 23.1583(c)
limited by climb performance. If an airplane is modified externally (and/or an engine change) and the
changes are deemed significant enough to produce measurable effects, any appropriate requirements
and information should be determined for inclusion in the AFM supplement.
2.
GENERAL. Supplemental type certificates involve modifications to in service airplanes which
may, for one reason or other, not exactly match type design climb performance data which was
determined and published in the AFM. These effects can be the result of engine power deteriorations,
added antennae, exterior surfaces not polished or smooth, propeller nicks, or a variety of other
reasons. In addition, it is difficult and costly to obtain calibrations of engine power output which may
have been available during the original certification process. The extent of performance degradation
observed after incorporating external modifications could be partially due to deficiencies present in the
airplane prior to modification. In other instances, the results of performance measurements indicate
that there is little or no effect from the modification and the test airplane closely matches the values
contained in the basic AFM, even though analysis indicates some degradation. For either of these
situations, the actual loss in performance could be skewed or masked by these other variables. For
these reasons, any climb performance measurements conducted as part of an STC modification
should be conducted such that the actual effects of the modification are identified. One effective
means of accomplishing this is to measure the performance of the unmodified airplane, then repeat
the same tests with the external modifications incorporated.
Any variations from the basic
performance predictions due to engine power or other variables will be minimised or eliminated.
3.
PROCEDURE FOR EXTENDING CLIMB PERFORMANCE TO ADDITIONAL AIRPLANES
The conditions to be evaluated should be identified from a review of the applicable regulations and
related to the modifications to be incorporated. The instruments which are to be involved in the flight
tests should have recent calibrations. The airspeed system should be verified to be in agreement with
the basic airplane calibrations.
Prior to modifications, conduct a series of climbs utilising the general procedures and information
presented in paragraphs 25, 26 and 28 of this FTG. Test speeds and other conditions may be
abbreviated to those which are presented in the AFM. The AFM can also be utilised as a guide to
identify how climb performance is predicted to vary with altitude and other conditions. Results should
be corrected to some standard in accordance with appendix 2, or some other acceptable method. The
before and after tests should be conducted, as nearly as possible, at the same airplane weight.
After the modification, the series of climbs conducted above should be repeated. Apply the same
procedures and corrections as before. Corrected results of climbs before and after the modification
should be compared by plotting the combined results. The performance in the AFM is useful in
identifying how climb performance was predicted to change with altitude and temperature. It is likely
that there will be some scatter and variations in the final results. With a limited amount of testing, the
effects of the modification should be determined conservatively and identified in a manner suitable for
presentation in the AFM supplement.
2FTG App 101
CS23
4.
BOOK 2
ONE ONLY AIRPLANE
Often, there are circumstances where the full range of performance tests before and after the STC
modification are not warranted. These might include:
a.
A limited effectively such as a one only modification.
b.
An excessively conservative reduction in published climb performance which would not limit
normal operations of the airplane and limitations are not affected.
The conditions to be evaluated should be identified from a review of the applicable regulations and
related to the modifications to be incorporated. The instruments which are to be involved in the flight
tests should have recent calibrations. The airspeed system should be verified to be in agreement with
the basic airplane calibrations.
If the reduction in climb performance is not limiting, then it may be acceptable to conduct tests of the
modified airplane only and provide analysis which could be used to support and compare with the
tests. Values of climb degradation should be selected which are sufficiently conservative to overcome
any variations or discrepancies which may have been present. This should not involve any
requirements of 23.1583. The information required by 23.1587, however, could be excessively
conservative without degrading normal operations of the airplane in service.
For example, analysis predicts that a particular modification will reduce the one engine inoperative
climb performance by 0.25 m/s (50 feet per minute), and limited testing shows a reduction of 0.15 m/s
(30 feet per minute). In order to overcome the introductory considerations and variables, a
degradation in climb performance should be obviously conservative. The higher of the two rate of
climb degradation values could be doubled to achieve this objective. For this example, the AFM
supplement would reflect a degradation in one engine inoperative climb performance of 0.50 m/s (100
feet per minute).
2FTG App 102

CS-23 Decision ED 2003 14 RM

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CS-23 Decision ED 2003 14 RM

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CS-23 Decision ED 2003 14 RM

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ED Decision 2003/14/RM

European Aviation Safety Agency

DECISION NO. 2003/14/RM

THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Done at Brussels, 14 November 2003.

For the European Aviation Safety Agency,

European Aviation Safety Agency

CONTENTS (general layout)

Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes

BOOK 1 AIRWORTHINESS CODE

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

OPERATING LIMITATIONS AND INFORMATION

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

OPERATING LIMITATIONS AND INFORMATION

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

EASA Certification Specifications

This airworthiness code is applicable to

(1) Aeroplanes in the normal, utility and

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

(a) The normal category is limited to nonaerobatic operations.

Any manoeuvre incident to normal

(3) Lazy eights, chandelles and steep turns

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

is shown. The maximum

The load distribution must not exceed

(ii) The required minimum crew,

The selected limits;

(1) The empty weight determined under

(2) The limits at which the structure is

(2) The weight of the required minimum

(3) The limits at which compliance with

Oil at full capacity, and

(B) At least enough fuel for

Load distribution limits

(a) Ranges of weight and centres of gravity

Not less than the weight with:-

(b) The following general tolerances are

Critical items affected by weight

Not more than the least of

(iii) The highest weight at which

(2) By systematic investigation of each

(ii) The design maximum weight,

(1) By tests upon an aeroplane of the

(a) Each requirement of this subpart must be

(a) Maximum weight. The maximum weight

(ii) For other aeroplanes, the fuel

Empty weight and corresponding centre of gravity

(a) The empty weight and corresponding

(2) During a closed throttle glide at

(c) Controllable pitch propellers without

(2) Unusable fuel determined under

(1) The lowest possible pitch allows

Full operating fluids, including

Hydraulic fluid; and

(iii) Other fluids required for

(2) The highest possible pitch allows

(b) The condition of the aeroplane at the time

(2) With the governor inoperative, the