IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN)

ISSN (e): 2250-3021, ISSN (p): 2278-8719

www.iosrjen.org

Synergistic Effects of Varing Combined Mass Of Catalyst (Mgcl2

Department of S.L.T 2Department of Pre N. D Federal Polytechnic Bauchi, Nigeria.

Abstract: - Tri and tetra methylol urea, penta and hexa methylol melamine resins were synthesized at various
combined mass of catalyst (MgCl2 and citric acid) and the rheological properties were investigated. The results
show that the refractive index of 10% tri and tetra methylol urea resins gave maximum values of 1.339 and
1.336, 10% penta and hexa methylol melamine resins gave maximum values of 1.340 and 1.335 at 1.0 and 0.5g
mass of catalyst. Melting point results of 10% tri and tetra methylol urea resins gave maximum values of 215oC
and 175C,while10% penta and hexa methylol melamine resinated cotton fabrics gave maximum values of
250C and 200C at l.0 and 0.5g mass of catalyst .Dry crease recovery angle of 10% tri and tetra methylol urea
gave maximum values of 760 and 65o, while that of 10% penta and hexa methylol melamine gave maximum
values of 77 and 80 at 0.5g of catalyst mass in weft direction. In warp direction, the dry crease recovery angle
of tri and tetra methylol urea resin gave maximum values of 80 and 65o at 0.5 and 1.50g of catalyst mass
respectively, while penta and hexa methylol melamine resinated cotton fabrics samples gave maximum values
of 83 and 68 at 0.7 and 1.50g of catalyst. The result of the breaking load experiment revealed a gradual
increase in tear strength of resinated fabrics as the degree of substitution and mass of catalyst increases. Tri and
tetra methylol urea gave maximum values of 8.0kgf and 5.2kgf, while penta and hexa gave l0.0 kgf and 5.8kgf,
at l.0g mass of catalyst in weft direction .In warp direction, tri and tetra urea methylol resinated fabrics gave
maximum values of 9.2kgf and 5.2kgf at 0.75 and 0.5g of catalyst mass, while the results of penta and hexa
melamine methylol resinated samples gave maximum values of l0.0 kgf and of 6.0kgf at catalyst mass of 1.50g.
The catalyst proved friendly on cotton samples even at higher concentrations. The overall results suggest that
cotton fabrics may be resinnated with combined catalyst mass to impact synergistic properties.
Key words: Combined Catalyst Mass, Refractive Index, Dry Crease Recovery, Breaking Load, and Synergistic
Effect.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Methylol urea and Melamine named for their common synthetic pathways and overall structure is a
transparent thermosetting resin made from condensation reaction between the nucleophilic nitrogen of urea and
melamine and the electrophilic carbonyl carbon of formaldehyde (Wikipedia, 2007), in the presence of catalyst
to form a branch copolymer. The presence of catalyst in the reaction increases the number of collision between
active centres and monomers. These lead to the production of resins with a higher molecular mass viscosity,
refractive index and density (Othman, 1978). When the catalysts are added, there is a new path hence a different
activation energy barrier. Acid catalyses the reaction of the N- methylol compounds with cellulose. The stronger
the acid, the faster the reaction. Maxwell-boltzmann (2002), explained that catalyst provides an alternative route
for reaction. That alternative route has lower activation energy, The new reaction path corresponds to a new
mechanism that permits the reaction to occur via the different activated complex, thus particles can get over the
new lowered energy barrier and the rate of reaction increase (Ezeribe and Bello, 2007). The most common
catalyst for N-methylol compounds are Zinc nitrate, magnesium chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate,
citric acid or combination of magnesium chloride and citric acid (Cook et al, 1982). Each of the catalyst type
has one advantage over the other but a combination may lead to synergistic effect on the rheological properties
of methylol resins on treated cotton fabric (Peterson, 1987) Naturally, cellulose fabric is prone to crease thus
distorting aesthetic appeal on the surface of fabric (Ezeribe and Bello, 2007). These make resin-finishing
treatment an important operation. In addition, it confers smooth drying, high strength greater elasticity and
smoothness of fabrics (Ezeribe, 2007). Hypothetically, the hydroxyl group in methylol resin may react with the
Hydroxyl group in the cellulose. The reaction forms a resin fibre - net work during curing process. The cross
linkage formed between the resin and the fibre provide excellent anchorage in the substrates.
II.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Fabrics Purification

International organization of Scientific Research

27 | P a g e

Synergistic Effects Of Varing Combined Mass Of Catalyst (Mgcl 2 And Citric Acid) On The
The fabrics were chemically purified and pre treated by scouring, bleaching, mercerization and then resinated
with methylol urea and melamine.
Resins preparation
Preparation of methylol urea and melamine resins
Polymerization of urea and melamine formaldehyde resins were carried out in two stages (Trotman,
1975). The low molecular mass fusible and soluble resins were prepared by reacting 1 mole of urea with 90cm3
and 120cm3 formaldehyde to yield tri and tetra methylol urea resins respectively, in 0.5g, 0.75g, l.0g 1.25g, and
1.50g of magnesium chloride and citric acid. Few drops of sodium carbonate solution were added to maintain
the pH at about 8-7 at 40C for 8-12 hours. The resulting syrup was dried in the oven for 2 hours at 40 C.
Preparation of methylol melamine resins
I mole of Melamine was reacted with 5 and 6 moles of formaldehyde to produce penta and hexamethylol melamine respectively. Here, melamine weighing 126g was dissolved in 90cm3 and 120cm3 of
formaldehyde to produce penta and hexa-methylol melamine respectively in 0.5g, 0.7g, l.0g 1.25g and 1.50g of
magnesium chloride and citric acid. Few drops of sodium carbonate were also added to maintain the pH at about
7-8, at 40C for 8-12 hours. 10% resins of four substitutions of tri, tetra methylol urea and penta and hexa
methylol melamine resins were prepared by dissolving l0g of each sample in 100ml of distilled water and were
thoroughly mixed together using a magnetic stirrer on an electric hot plate at 40C for 30 minutes (Trotman,
1975).
Refractive Index determination
The test samples were diluted to 10% and dropped at the lower lens of Abee Refractometer and spread
evenly using a glass rod. Then the lens was sealed with the upper lens and the refractive index was determined
through the eyes piece-lens. The refractive index is a point at which the velocity of light changes as it moves
from less dense medium to denser medium. The refractive index is given by;
Sin i /Sin r = refractive index (Rl)
Melting point Determination
The melting point apparatus was switched on and allowed to warm up for 20 minutes. The already
dried 10% resin samples were packed in a capillary tube. Each of tri and tetra methylol urea and penta and hexa
melamine formaldehyde resins at various catalysts mass was inserted together with thermometer into their
respective compartments. The melting temperature of each sample was taken and recorded in degrees.
Resin Application (Pad-dry-cure method)
The mercerized cotton samples were impregnated with 30mls each of 10% 0.5g to 1.50g of Magnesium Citrate
(C6H607Mg) catalyzed tri, tetra methylol urea and penta and hexa methylol melamine for 30minutes followed by
occasional padding on a smooth surface to achieve even treatment and also to remove excess resins. The
samples were dried in the oven at 100C for 45 minutes and cured at 150C for 45 minutes
Breaking Load
Testometric tester model 220D, was calibrated and allowed to warm up for 20 minutes. The cotton
sample measuring 1cm x 5.0cm both warp and weft directions were mounted on the instrument. The instrument
was operated at a speed of 0l0mm/minute and the load extension values of the instrument were recorded for
various 10% tri and tetra substituted methylol urea and melamine resinated cotton fabrics in (kgf) .
Dry Crease Recovery Angle
The test was carried out in accordance with the British Standard Specification. The device was
calibrated and balanced to face the 0 mark. Resinated samples were folded end to end and held by tweezers,
gripping not more than 5mm from the ends. The samples were then placed on the marked area of the lower plate
of the loading device and the load gently applied to it. This was done face-to- face, back-to-back of samples.
The samples were kept under this load for 5minutes. After which the load was removed and samples were
allowed to recover for 5 minutes. The recovered samples were transferred to crease recovery tester in warp and
weft directions. The crease recovery angle was then read and recorded in degrees.

III.

RESULTS

Figure 1 shows the graph of varying combined mass of catalyst on the refractive index of 10% solution
of tri, tetra urea methylol; penta and hexa methylol melamine resin. Figure 2 shows the graph of varying
combined mass of catalyst on melting point of 10% tri, tetra methylol urea, and penta, hexa methylol melamine
resins. Figure 3 shows the graph of varying combined mass of catalyst on dry crease recovery angle (DCRA) of
10% tri, tetra urea, and penta, hexa methylol melamine resinated cotton fabrics (weft) direction. Figure 4 shows
the graph of varying combined mass of catalyst on DCRA of 10% tri, tetra methylol urea, and penta, hexa
methylol melamine resinated cotton fabrics (warp) direction. Figure 5 shows the graph of varying combined
mass of catalyst on the breaking load (kgf) of 10% tri, tetra methylol urea, and penta and hexa melamine
methylol resin (weft) direction. Figure 6 shows the graph of varying combined mass of catalyst on the breaking

International organization of Scientific Research

28 | P a g e

Synergistic Effects Of Varing Combined Mass Of Catalyst (Mgcl 2 And Citric Acid) On The
load (kgf) of the 10% tri, tetra methylol urea, and penta, hexa methylol melamine resinated cotton fabrics (warp)
direction.
IV.
DISCUSSION
Effects of combined mass of catalyst on refractive index of 10 % tri, tetra methylol urea and 10% penta,
hexa methylol melamine resins.
Resins are known to have varying degrees of opacity or transparency depending on the amount of light
transmitted or reflected from the surface of resins. The gloss of resins is a function of refractive index of the
surface and particle size (Barminas and Osemeahon, 2006). Also the gloss of resin is a function of refractive
index of the surface, the angle of incident light, nature of light and the material (Trezza and Krochta, 2001). The
effect of combined mass of catalyst on the refractive index of methylol urea and melamine resins is shown in
figure l.

Figure 1: Effect of combined mass of catalyst and degree of substitution of 10% tri,tetra methylol urea,penta
and penta, hexa methylol melamine resin on refractive index
It is observed from figure 1 that refractive index of tri-substituted methylol urea showed a gradual
increase from 1.335 to 1.339 with increases in mass of catalyst from 0.5g to l.0g and decrease with further
increase in mass of catalyst. The result of 10% tetra substitution of the same resin also revealed an increase in
refractive index from 1.336 to 1.340 as catalyst mass increase from 0.5 to l.0g and thereafter decreases with
further increase in catalyst mass. 10% penta methylol melamine resins gave an increase in refractive index from
1.334 to 1.337 and 10 % hexa substitutions an increase from 1.335 to 1.338 as mass of catalyst increase from 0.5
to l.0g, then decreases with further increase in mass of catalyst in both substitutions. The higher values of
refractive index observed in hexa methylol melamine may be due to difference in molecular weight and features
of the copolymer (Trezza and Krochta, 2001). The decrease in refractive index with further increase in catalyst
mass is attributed to micro phase separation between the resins, mass of catalyst and interaction with light
(Gupta et al., 2001).
Effects of combined mass of catalyst on melting point of 10 % tri, tetra methylol urea and 10% penta,
hexa methylol melamine resins.
The melting point of a polymer resin has a direct bearing on its thermal property, molecular weight, degree of
cross linking and the level of rigidity (Osemeahon et al, 2007). Figure 2. Shows the effect of combined

International organization of Scientific Research

29 | P a g e

Synergistic Effects Of Varing Combined Mass Of Catalyst (Mgcl 2 And Citric Acid) On The

Figure 2: Effect of combined mass of catalyst and degree of substitution of 10% tri,tetra methylol urea and
penta, hexa methylol melamine resin on melting point.
mass of catalyst on melting point of 10% tri and tetra methylol -urea resin and 10% methylol melamine. The
graph of 10 % tri methylol urea resin shows increase in melting point from 150C to 210C, 10 % tetra methylol
urea resin, increase in melting point from 175 to 225C, while the 10 % penta methylol melamine resin, gave a
gradual increase in melting point from 175C to 275C with increase in mass of catalyst mass from 0.5g - 1.0g
and then decrease from 275C to 165C as the mass of catalyst increase from l.0g to 1.5g. The graph of 10%
hexa-methylol melamine resin shows a progressive increase in the melting point from 200 to 250C with
increase in mass of catalyst of 0.5g to 0.75g and decreases with further increase in mass of catalyst. This trend
can be explain in term of inherent nature of resin which is semi solid at cure state (Osemeahon and Barminas,
2006)
Effects of combined mass of catalyst and degree of substitution on dry crease recovery angle of 10% Tri,
Tetra methylol urea and Penta, Hexa methylol melamine resinated cotton fabrics
Crease recovery is the ability of resinated fabric to regain its normal shape when stressed. The angle formed
when stress is removed is known as angle of crease recovery. The results obtained as shown in figure 3, gave a
gradual increase in dry crease recovery angle with maximum values of 75 and 76, 77 and 80 for tri, tetra urea
methylol

Figure 3: Graph of combine mass of catalyst and degree of substitution on dry crease recovery angle (SCRA) of
10% methylol urea/melamine resonated cotton fabrics (weft) cured at 150 oC
and penta, hexa substituted methylol melamine resinated cotton fabrics with increase in mass of catalyst
between 0.75g and 1.0g in weft direction. The result also showed increase in crease recovery angle values of 78,
80 in tri and tetra substituted urea methylol resinated cotton fabrics and 78 and 73 for penta and hexa methylol
melamine resinated cotton fabrics with increase in mass of catalyst of 0.5 and l.0g respectively at 150C in warp

International organization of Scientific Research

30 | P a g e

Synergistic Effects Of Varing Combined Mass Of Catalyst (Mgcl 2 And Citric Acid) On The
direction. This increase in crease recovery angle is due to lowering of activation energy of reactant molecules
thereby allowing more molecules of resin to participate in reaction. Creasing is due to weak Van der Waal
forces which characterized amorphous region of cotton fabrics. It was observed that angle of relaxation in warp
direction is greater than angle of relaxation in weft direction. This is chiefly due to numbers of threads present in
both directions. The higher the number of thread count, the lower the recovery angle and vice-versa. Increase in
DCRA is also not infinite since there are finite numbers of glucose residue per unit of cellulose molecules (Moji,
2000). This reason may account for the gradual decrease in DCRA as mass of catalyst increase. This result is
consisted with the result of Ajayi et al.., (2001).
Effects of combined mass of catalyst and degree of substitution on breaking load of 10 % Tri, Tetra
methylol urea and Penta, Hexa methylol melamine resinated cotton fabrics.

Figure 4: Combined mass of catalyst and degree of substitution on breaking load (Kgf) of 10 % Tri, Tetra
methylol urea and Penta, Hexa methylol melamine resinated cotton fabric (weft) cured at 150oC
Effects of catalyst mass and degree of substitution on breaking load of 10 % methylol urea and melamine
resinated cotton fabrics in weft and warp directions are as shown in figure 4 and 5. The results revealed that
breaking load of tri and tetra urea methylol gave highest breaking load values of 7.8kgf and 9.2kgf, while penta
and hexa substituted methylol melamine gave 7.0 kgf and 8.0kgf at l.0g of catalyst mass in weft directions
respectively.

Figure 5: Graph of combined mass f catalyst and degree of substitution on the breaking load of 10% tri, tetra
and penta and hexa methylol resonated cotton fabric (warp) cured at 150oC
While penta and hexa methylol melamine have values of 8.8kgf, 10.0kgf and 9.0kgf and l0.0kgf at 0.75g and
l.0g catalyst mass in weft and warp directions respectively. Amorphous region of cellulose are filled up with
resins and strengthened by chemical cross-linking between cellulose and resins molecules (Norma et al., 1979).
Cross-linking provides anchoring points for chains in the network (Ajayi et al., 2001). The higher breaking load
of methylol melamine resinated samples cured at150C can be ascribed to longer chain length of melamine

International organization of Scientific Research

31 | P a g e

Synergistic Effects Of Varing Combined Mass Of Catalyst (Mgcl 2 And Citric Acid) On The
compared to urea formaldehyde resins. This improves flexibility in cotton fibre with improved mechanical
properties (Andrews, 1995).

V.

CONCLUSION

The effects of catalyst mass were visible throughout the experiment. High breaking load values and angle of
relaxation achieved was due to high catalytic activities of mixtures of MgCl2 and Citric acid, most probably
influence by synergistic effect of combined catalyst for better performance of resins in the investigated areas,
synthesis of resin should be carried out with combined mass of catalyst. This is because a fabric sample
resinated with excess of catalyst mixture does not lead to fabric degradation compared with acid catalyst
(KH2P04) which can causes distortion of cellulose fabrics especially at higher concentrations.
Recommendation
From the result obtained so far, using combined catalyst (MgCl2 and Citric acid), We hereby
recommend that combined catalyst should be used for preparation of methylol urea resins used in treatment of
cotton fabrics for the following reasons: It does not degrade or change colour to cotton fabrics during resination,
unlike zinc nitrate catalyst but also increases angle of relaxation of cotton fabrics.

REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]

[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]

[23]

Ajayi, J.O, Bello K.A and Boyede, F. F (2001). Effect of liquid Ammonia pretreatment On the Crease recovery
properties of Resinated Cellulose Fabric. Journal of Chemical Society of Nigeria, 26(1): 120-123.
Andrews,B.A.K. (1995).Wrinkle Resistant Cotton and Formaldehyde Release Colourage, Pp.41, 87-93.
Anon, (1989). The Encyclopedia Americana. Groker Incorporated, USA,Vol.6, pp. 139-140.
American Society for Testing Materials (1995). ASTM D 5053-95 Standard Test For Breaking Force and Elongation
of Textile Fabrics (7.02). Philadelphia, PA:ASTM, Pp 24, 17-22
Bertoniere, N.R., Blouin, F.A., Martin, L.F.and Rowland, S.P. (1974). An effect of pre-treatment of fabric upon the
Development of Durable Press Properties in Cotton Fabrics by the Wet-Fixation process. Textile Research Journal,
PpA4, 630-635.
Choi, H.M. (1992). Non-formaldehyde Polymerization-Cross-linking Treatment of Cotton Fabric for Improved
Strength Retention. Textile Research Journal 62:14-618.
Cooke, T.F. and Weigmann, H.D. (1982b) The Chemistry of formaldehyde Release from Durable Press Fabrics.
Textile Chemistry and Colourist 14:126-144.
Ezeribe A.I and Bello K.A (2007). Effect of catalyst and degree of substitution on the rheological Properties of
Urea/ Melamine formaldehyde resinated cotton fabrics. An M.sc, Thesis, ATBU Bauchi Pp 10-15
Gupta P.N.and Trezza R.E., (2002).The effects of Refractive Indexes on the Synthetics Resin.Vol.76,Pp.l7:ll-15.
Hollies, N.R.S. and Getchell, N.F. (1967). Wet-Fixation Process for Improve Durable-Press Cotton. Textile Research
Journal 37:70-76.
Landells, G. (1956). Modem Resin Finishing of Textiles Practice and Research. Journal of Society of Dyers and
Colourist, 2 (3) pp.14-23.
Morton, W.E. and Hearle, J.W.S. (1975). Physical Properties of Textile Fibres. Textile Institute, Heinemann,
London, 2th ed., pp. 25-454.
Moji, A.B. (2000). Polymers: The chemistry and technology of Modern Materials. Yola, Lagos, Concept
Publications Ltd, Pp. 193-268.
Maxwell- Boltz Mann (2002). Effect of catalyst on the rate of reaction, University Pres Pp 25:11-15.
Norma, H.,Jane,S. And Anna,L.L. (1979). Mordern Textile. 5th ed., Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc, USA, Pp. 153159.
Osemeahon SA, Barminas JT, Aliyu A, Kubmarawa D (2007a). Effect of Copolymerization Temperature on the
Properties of Urea. Formaldehyde copolymer Composite. Africa .J. Pure Applied.Chemistry.,3(4):06-065.
Othman (1978). Synthetic Resin and their industrial Application. Small Business Publication, Delhi, Pp 11:19-25
s Pp 25:11-15.
Peterson, H. (1978) The Chemistry of crease-Resistant Cross-Linking Agents Review of Progress in coloration
and Related Topics. Pp 14:16-18.
Siriwan,K.and Marjorie,J,T.N. (2000).Polymerisation cross linking fabrics finishing Non formaldehyde catalyst
combination to important durable press Properties Department of wear environment, Virgina Polytechnic
Institute and University Blacks burg, USA VA 2406,.Pp 20: 180-200.
Sadov, F. Korchagin, M. And Matetsky, A. (1967) Chemistry Technology of Fibrous Material MIR Publishers,
Pp. 12,512,642.
Trezza and Krochta, (2001). The gloss of paint Coating is a function of the refractive Index of the surface, angle
of incident of the beam of light, the nature of Light and the nature of the material vol. 7, Pp 17:11-15.
Trotman, E.R. (1957). Dyeing and Chemical Technology of Textile Fibres. Charles Griffin Co. Ltd, London, 4th
ed., Pp.318-325.
Wikipedia,(2007) Chemistry and Material Science Published online. www.wikipedialink.com.

International organization of Scientific Research

32 | P a g e