Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Kulliyyah of Engineering: Report Assessment Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Azizi Badrulzaman
    This document contains an assessment rubric used to evaluate engineering reports at the Kulliyyah of Engineering. The rubric assesses reports based on several items, including compliance with formatting guidelines, timeliness, content in various sections, writing skills, and logical arguments. Reports are evaluated on a scale of unacceptable to outstanding and assigned scores in each item area by the instructor. Weightings are given to each item area and a total mark is calculated based on the scores and weightings to determine the final report percentage.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Kulliyyah of Engineering: Report Assessment Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Azizi Badrulzaman
    29 views2 pages
    This document contains an assessment rubric used to evaluate engineering reports at the Kulliyyah of Engineering. The rubric assesses reports based on several items, including compliance with formatting guidelines, timeliness, content in various sections, writing skills, and logical arguments. Reports are evaluated on a scale of unacceptable to outstanding and assigned scores in each item area by the instructor. Weightings are given to each item area and a total mark is calculated based on the scores and weightings to determine the final report percentage.

    Original Title

    Report Assessment Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an assessment rubric used to evaluate engineering reports at the Kulliyyah of Engineering. The rubric assesses reports based on several items, including compliance with formatting guidelines, timeliness, content in various sections, writing skills, and logical arguments. Reports are evaluated on a scale of unacceptable to outstanding and assigned scores in each item area by the instructor. Weightings are given to each item area and a total mark is calculated based on the scores and weightings to determine the final report percentage.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    29 views2 pages

    Kulliyyah of Engineering: Report Assessment Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Azizi Badrulzaman
    This document contains an assessment rubric used to evaluate engineering reports at the Kulliyyah of Engineering. The rubric assesses reports based on several items, including compliance with formatting guidelines, timeliness, content in various sections, writing skills, and logical arguments. Reports are evaluated on a scale of unacceptable to outstanding and assigned scores in each item area by the instructor. Weightings are given to each item area and a total mark is calculated based on the scores and weightings to determine the final report percentage.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    KULLIYYAH OF ENGINEERING

    REPORT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC


    Course Code

    Semester

    Instructor:

    Student Name

    Items

    Matric:

    Unacceptable

    Compliance
    to Format
    guideline
    (W = ____)

    Timeliness
    (W = ____)

    Outstanding/Excellent Score Mark


    (S) (S x W)
    (8 10)

    Satisfactory

    Good

    (4 <6)

    (6 <8)

    Do not follow the


    guideline, no
    consistency in
    format. Intelligible
    writing, loose pages.

    Follow few of the


    guidelines but with
    significant mistakes.
    Legible writing, some
    ill-formed letters, print
    too small or too large,
    papers stapled together.

    Generally follows the


    engineering format
    with some but no
    significant mistakes.
    Legible writing, wellformed characters,
    clean and neatly bound
    in a report cover.

    Fully in accordance to
    engineering format as
    specified
    Legible writing, wellformed characters,
    clean and neatly bound
    in a report cover.

    Report handed in
    more than one week
    late.

    Up to one week late.

    Up to two days late.

    Report handed in on
    time.

    Demonstrate poor
    understanding on
    the topic.
    Insufficient
    explanations and
    elaboration.

    Demonstrate limited
    understanding on the
    topic by giving limited
    explanations and
    elaboration.

    Demonstrate some
    understanding on the
    topic by giving fair
    amount of
    explanations and
    elaboration.

    Demonstrate high
    understanding on the
    topic by giving proper
    explanations and
    elaboration.

    the overall purpose


    for undertaking the
    research or
    experiment(s) is not
    stated fully, and is
    unclear

    the overall purpose for


    undertaking the
    research or
    experiment(s) is stated
    fully, but in an unclear
    manner

    the overall purpose for


    undertaking the
    research or
    experiment(s) is stated
    fully, but could have
    been worded more
    concisely/directly

    the overall purpose for


    undertaking the
    research or
    experiment(s) is stated
    in a clear, concise
    manner.

    Fairly addresses and


    cites techniques and
    procedures
    appropriately.
    Explanations are vague,
    some times confusing
    but can be understood.
    Provides some analysis
    of the data. Presents
    some logical
    explanation of findings
    but some times
    confusing.
    Demonstrates some
    ability to draws
    conclusions based on
    the data. Does not
    address many of the
    questions raised in the
    objectives.

    Clearly addresses the


    techniques and
    procedures used,
    Explanations are fairly
    organized and clear.

    Clearly addresses the


    techniques and
    procedures used,
    Well organized, clear
    and concise narrative.

    Provides sufficient
    analysis of the data.
    Presents a logical
    explanation of
    findings.

    Provides rich analysis


    of the data. Presents a
    logical and convincing
    explanation of findings

    Draws valid
    conclusions based on
    the data. Addresses
    some of the questions
    raised in the
    objectives.

    Draws insightful
    conclusions based on
    the data. Addresses
    most of the questions
    raised in the objectives.

    Not properly cited or

    Most are properly

    All are properly cited,

    Score
    (0 <4)
    General report format

    Report Content
    Introduction
    / background
    (W = ____)

    Objectives
    (W = ____)

    Experimental
    or
    theoretical
    work
    (W = ____)
    Result and
    discussion
    (W = ____)
    Conclusion
    (W = ____)

    Reference

    No clear description
    of techniques and
    procedures used.
    Disorganized and
    unclear narrative.
    Provides limited
    analysis of the data.
    Presents an illogical
    explanation of
    findings
    Demonstrates
    limited ability to
    draw conclusions
    based on the data.
    Does not address
    any of the questions
    raised in the
    objectives.
    No or poor

    KULLIYYAH OF ENGINEERING
    (W = ____)

    reference,
    improperly cited,
    questionable sources

    incomplete, some
    sources are
    questionable for an
    academic work.

    cited with minor


    inconsistency in
    formatting of list.
    Sources are
    appropriate and
    reputable.

    list of reference are in


    order, Sources are
    appropriate and
    reputable

    Writing skills
    Grammar,
    punctuation
    and
    vocabulary
    (W = ____)

    Poor grammatical
    structure with many
    grammatical errors,
    improper
    punctuation and lack
    of proper
    vocabulary

    Fair grammatical
    structure with some
    grammatical errors.
    Proper use of
    punctuation and fair
    usage of vocabulary

    Uses proper grammar


    and spelling; clear
    transitions. Grammar
    structure adequate.

    Excellent grammatical
    structure used. Proper
    use of punctuation and
    rich of vocabulary.

    Coherence of
    discussion
    (W = ____)

    Writing information
    in a terrible manner
    and contain
    disjointed sentences.

    Writing information in
    a simple way with less
    continuity.

    Writing information in
    adequate manner and
    flows well.

    Writing information in
    interesting way and
    flows well.

    Logical
    argument
    and clarity
    (W = ____)

    Weak/poor
    statement of
    explanation with no
    evidence for support

    Provides statements of
    explanation, weak
    evidence for support.

    Provides clear
    argument with fair
    evidence to support.

    Provides strong, clear,


    convincing argument
    Provides relevant
    evidence to support.

    W =

    Total Mark
    Final score percentage (%) = (Total Mark/W)*10

    You might also like