Kisuna

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Most critics usually regard consistency in architecture an important aspect of the design.

However in the Vanna Venturi House Robert Venturi took the road less travelled and tested
complexity and contradiction in architecture, going against the norm. Located in Chestnut
Hill,Pennsylvania on a flat site isolated by surrounding trees, Venturi designed and built the
house for his mother between 1962 and 1964. In testing his beliefts on complexity and
contradition (for which he also wrote the book Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture),
Venturi went through six fully worked-out versions of the house which slowly became known as
the first example of Postmodern architecture.
More on the Vanna Venturi House after the break.
Approaching the Vanna Venturi house, one can detect the symbolic imagery of shelter through
its exterior with its wide symmetrical gable like a classical pediment, which in this case is
split, and the chimney poking out in an exaggerated manner from the back. The main entrance
is in the center, creating a sense of symmetry that both is and is not there due to the
placement of the windows. These windows are located based on function in the interior. For
instance, there is a Modernist ribbon window for the kitchen and square windows serving the
bedroom and bathroom on the other side of the front facade.
The interior is centered around the fireplace, the hearth of the home, but still Venturis design
is a generic house with unusual twists. The plan contains only five functional rooms, and on
the outside it relates to public scale, seeming much larger than it actually is. The generic
fireplace is actually placed next to a stair that competes with the fireplace to be the core of the
house. The fireplace is void, the stair is solid and both vertical elements contort in shape to
make room for the other.
Upon entering there is the main living space. Also located on the first floor due to a request
from Venturis mother are the kitchen and the bedroom. The second floor contains another
bedroom, storage space, and a terrace. A nowhere stair on the second floor also integrates
itself into the core space. It rises up at an awkward angle, and its function on one level is
completely useless due to its steep slope, while on the other level it serves as a ladder to clean
the high window on the second level.
Upon entering there is the main living space. Also located on the first floor due to a request
from Venturis mother are the kitchen and the bedroom. The second floor contains another
bedroom, storage space, and a terrace. A nowhere stair on the second floor also integrates
itself into the core space. It rises up at an awkward angle, and its function on one level is
completely useless due to its steep slope, while on the other level it serves as a ladder to clean
the high window on the second level.
In order to create more contradiction and complexity, Venturi experimented with scale. Inside
the house certain elements are too big, such as the size of the fireplace and the height of the
mantel compared to the size of the room. Doors are wide and low in height, especially in
contrast to the grandness of the entrance space. In the rear elevation of the house is an
oversized lunette window, which follows the main elements of the exterior that are
exaggerated in size. Venturi also minimized circulation space in the design of the house, so
that it consisted of large distinct rooms with minimum subdivisions between them.

Venturi referred to the exterior as a layering system. The effect intended was to make the
exterior walls both walls and screens. For example, the east glass wall is recessed in order to
form a covered yard screened by the back wall. This same idea is used on a smaller scale for
the bedroom on the other side of the house.
A manifesto for Postmodern architecture, the Vanna Venturi house is a composition of
rectangular, curvilinear, and diagonal elements coming together (or sometimes juxtaposing
each other) in a way that inarguably creates complexity and contradiction.

You might also like