Matrix Converters
Matrix Converters
Matrix Converters
AENSI Journals
Research Scholar, Department of Electrical Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai nagar 608002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai nagar 608002, Tamil Nadu, India.
3
Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Mailam Engineering College, Villupuram 604 704, Tamil Nadu, India.
1
2
ARTICLE INFO
Article history:
Received 2 March 2014
Received in revised form
13 May 2014
Accepted 28 May 2014
Available online 23 June 2014
Keywords:
AC-DC-AC
conversion,
Indirect
Matrix Converter, Space Vector Pulse
Width Modulation, Total Harmonic
Distortion.
ABSTRACT
A matrix converter is used as an alternative ACDC-AC power converter that has
received wide research concentration as an alternative scheme to fixed ACDCAC
converter. To convert the energy from an AC source to an AC load without the need of
bulky and limited-lifetime energy-storage elements matrix converters are preferred.
This paper presents a simulation of different topologies of the indirect matrix converter
under different load conditions driven by space vector PWM technology. The purpose
of proposed work is to evaluate the performance of the different indirect matrix
converter based on voltage and current harmonics generated at the load end. The effect
of harmonics on load voltage and current are analysed using space vector pulse width
modulation scheme. The simulations were carried out for sparse, very sparse and ultrasparse indirect matrix converters for R, RL and motor loads. The performances of
indirect matrix converter output voltage, current and THD are analysed and verified
using Matlab/Simulink.
INTRODUCTION
In recent researches for direct frequency conversion technique focus is made on using a matrix converter
(MC). The main reason for the interest in MCs is that it provides a compact solution for a four quadrant
frequency converter producing sinusoidal input and output currents without passive components in dc link. The
absence of dc link also has its disadvantages: input and output disturbances are not filtered and additional
commutation strategies are needed to avoid a short circuiting of the supply voltage or open circuiting of the load
current path (P. W. Wheeler, 2002). The IMC offers the same benefits and disadvantages as the DMC, but it
also provides an option to reduce the number of switches of the line bridge to three if no bidirectional power
flow is needed (J. W. Kolar, 2007 and L. Wei, 2002). Safe commutation and semiconductor devices produce
voltage variation in converter output voltage. In sensor fewer motor drives this is a disadvantage especially in
the low speed region and needs to be compensated (A. R. Munioz, 1999, J. Holtz, 2002 and K. B. Lee, 2004).
To develop suitable compensation methods the construction and effectiveness of the used converter have to be
known.
The nonlinear models of voltage source inverters have been widely studied, e.g. in (A. R. Munioz, 1999, J.
Holtz, 2002) and some study has also been done on a direct matrix converter in (K. B. Lee, 2004), but so far no
model has been presented for indirect matrix converter. This paper presents the voltage transfer characteristics
analysis of the IMC in space-vector form. The analysis is also confirmed in measurements and simulations.
Figure.1 shows the schematic representation of AC/AC converter. Researches on the indirect matrix converter
has mainly focused on modulation schemes and the digital generation of the PWM switching patterns (P. W.
Wheeler, 2002, L. Helle, 2004 and C. Klumpner, 2006). The derivation of alternative topologies that exhibit
identical functionality but utilize a reduced number of unipolar turnoff power semiconductors has not received
much attention. The proposed scheme focuses on switching technology for different structures of the indirect
matrix converter.
Corresponding Author: Natarajan Rajavel, Research Scholar, Department of Electrical Engineering, Annamalai
University, Annamalai nagar 608002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Phone: +91-9944581444, E-mail: [email protected].
573
AC/AC Converter
Converter
with DC link
AC/DC
DC/AC
converter
with
voltage
DC link
Hybrid Matrix
Converter (HMC)
AC/DC
DC/AC
converter
with
current
DC link
Hybrid
Direct
MC
Matrix Converter
Indirect
Matrix Converter
(IMC)
Direct
Matrix Converter
(DMC)
Hybrid
Indirect
MC
Conventional
Matrix
Converter
Full bridge
Matrix
Converter
AC/DC
DC/AC
converter
without
DC link
capacitor
Sparse Matrix
Converter
Sparse
Very Sparse
Ultra Sparse
Three level
Matrix
Converter
AC
DC
Motor
DC
AC
Three Phase
output
574
a
A
b
B
u
A
B
C
a
u
b
A
B
C
575
load with lower total harmonic distortion. In this Space Vector PWM (SVPWM) method, the reference signal is
sampled regularly. After sampling each signal the non-zero active switching vectors are adjacent to the
reference vector. For variable frequency drive application this is the best technique to implement and provides
better results. This is an advanced; computation intensive PWM method. Every switching state can be
represented as a vector in the converters - Space vector plane. The three phase currents can be transformed
into two phase currents in - Plane as represented below. Figure.6 show the space vector pulse generation of
proposed Indirect Matrix Converter (IMC).
1 1
i ( t ) 2 1 2
2
i (t )
3 3
3 0
2
2
i a ( t )
i ( t )
b
i c ( t )
(1)
S1
2
1
0
-1
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
S2
2
1
0
-1
S3
2
1
0
-1
S4
2
1
0
-1
S5
2
1
0
-1
S6
2
1
0
-1
Time in sec
Vinabc, V
a abc, V a
V
0
in
0
500
0
-500
Vinabc, V0a
5000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
-500
48000
480
-500
VDCV
DC
(a)
500
430 0
0.002
430
480
380
VDC
0
380
430
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
Time0.01
in sec
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
1.5
(b)
1.5
380
11
0.002
0.018
0.02
S1
S1
S1
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
-0.5
-0.500
0
-0.5
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
Time0.01in sec
Time in sec
(c)
Fig. 7: Indirect matrix converter responses for space vector switching state S 1
Figure.7.a shows the three phase 50Hz input voltage (dotted lines) and phase A output voltage, Figure.7.b
shows the average phase voltage of Indirect Matrix Converter (IMC) for a modulation index of 0.9. Average
input DC link input voltage can be controlled by varying the source side bidirectional switches. From Figure.7.b
576
also describes that the instantaneous dc link voltage doesnt reach zero. Figure.7.c shows the switching state of
S1 of Indirect Matrix Converter.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Performance evaluation of different topologies of Indirect Matrix converter (Sparse, Very Sparse & Ultra
Sparse) with different Load Conditions (R, RL and Motor) using Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation
(SVPWM) is carried out using MATLAB/Simulink. Switching pulses for the proposed converter is generated
using Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation (SVPWM). All the topologies/structures of IMC are assigned to be
having the parameters of ma=0.9, fs=50 Hz, fc=10 kHz on source side end and for load side end having ma = 0.8
frequency =150 Hz and fc=2 kHz. Parameters of different loads used to evaluate the performance of IMC
structures are tabulated in Appendix. Figures.8-55 show the simulated response of the indirect matrix converters
such as Sparse, very sparse and ultra-sparse performance evaluations for various loads.
A. Simulated results of Sparse Matrix converter for R load with ma=0.8:
400
Source Side V a
400
200
0
-200
-400
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.06
Time in sec
x 10
Source Side I a
0.03
0
-1
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0
-1
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
-0.2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Time in sec
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0
-0.2
-0.4
x 10
-2
0.06
Load Side Ia
0.06
-200
0.06
-0.4
0.05
200
Time in sec
-2
0.04
-400
0
0.03
400
200
Load Side Va
200
Time in sec
Figures.8-11 shows the simulated waveforms for sparse matrix converter for R load with modulation index
0.8. Figures.8 and 10 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix converter for three phase,
Figures. 9 and 11 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A respectively.
577
Source Side V a
400
200
0
-200
-400
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
Load Side Va
200
200
0
-200
-400
200
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Time in sec
Time in sec
x 10
1
0
-1
-2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0
-1
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0
-0.2
-0.4
0.06
x 10
-2
0.06
Load Side Ia
Source Side I a
Time in sec
Time in sec
Figures.12-15 shows the simulated waveforms for sparse matrix converter for RL load with modulation
index 0.8. Figures.12 and 14 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix converter for three
phase, Figures. 13 and 15 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A respectively.
C. Simulated results of Sparse Matrix converter for Motor load with ma = 0.8:
400
Source Side V a
400
200
0
-200
-400
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
Load Side Va
200
200
0
-200
-400
200
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Time in sec
0.06
Time in sec
578
x 10
Source Side I a
2
1
0
-1
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
1
0
-1
-2
0.06
40
40
20
20
Load Side Ia
-2
0
-20
-40
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
x 10
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
-40
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Speed in rad/sec
Stator Voltage (V d )
0.06
Time in sec
400
200
0
-200
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
400
200
0.06
20
Torque in N-m
Stator Current (I d )
0.05
10
0
-10
-20
0.04
-20
Time in sec
-400
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
-5
0.06
Time in sec
Time in sec
Figures.16-21 shows the simulated waveforms for sparse matrix converter for Motor load with modulation
index 0.8. Figures.16 and 18 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix converter for three
phase, Figures. 17 and 19 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A only, Figs.20 and 21 shows
the response of stator voltage, current, speed and torque characteristics.
D. Simulated results of Very Sparse Matrix converter for R load with ma = 0.8:
Source Side V a
400
200
0
-200
-400
0
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Load Side Va
400
200
0
-200
-400
Time in sec
579
1
0
-1
-2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0
-1
0.06
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.06
Time in sec
Time in sec
0.03
-0.2
-0.4
x 10
-2
Load Side Ia
x 10
Source Side I a
Figures.22-25 shows the simulated waveforms for very sparse matrix converter for R load with modulation
index 0.8. Figures.22 and 24 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix converter for three
phase, Figures.23 and 25 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A respectively.
E. Simulated results of Very Sparse Matrix converter for RL load with ma = 0.8:
400
Source Side V a
400
200
0
-200
-400
200
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
200
0
-200
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.06
Time in sec
x 10
Source Side I a
1
0
-1
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0
-1
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
-0.2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Time in sec
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0
-0.2
-0.4
x 10
-2
0.06
Load Side Ia
0.03
0.06
-200
0.06
-0.4
0.05
200
Time in sec
-2
0.04
-400
-400
0.03
400
Load Side Va
400
Time in sec
Figures.26-29 shows the simulated waveforms for very sparse matrix converter for RL load with
modulation index 0.8. Figures.26 and 28 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix
converter for three phase, Figures.27 and 29 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A
respectively.
580
F. Simulated results of Very Sparse Matrix converter for Motor load with ma = 0.8:
400
Source Side V a
400
200
0
-200
200
0
-200
-400
-400
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
Load Side Va
400
200
0
-200
200
0
-200
-400
-400
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Time in sec
Time in sec
x 10
Source Side I a
0
-1
-2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0
-20
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0
-20
-40
0.06
Time in sec
Time in sec
400
600
Speed in rad/sec
Stator Voltage (V d)
20
Load Side Ia
0
-1
40
20
-40
-2
40
x 10
200
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
200
0
-200
0
-10
-20
10
Torque in N-m
Stator Current (I d )
20
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Time in sec
-5
Time in sec
Figures.30-35 shows the simulated waveforms for very sparse matrix converter for Motor load with
modulation index 0.8. Figures.30 and 32 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix
converter for three phase, Figures.31 and 33 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A only,
Figures.34 and 35 shows the response of stator voltage, current, speed and torque characteristics.
G. Simulated results of Ultra Sparse Matrix converter for R load with ma = 0.8:
581
400
Source Side V a
400
200
0
-200
200
0
-200
-400
-400
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
200
Load Side Va
400
0
-200
200
0
-200
-400
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
-400
0.06
Time in sec
Time in sec
5
5
Source Side I a
1
0
-1
-2
x 10
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0
-1
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0
-0.2
-0.4
0.06
x 10
-2
0.06
Load Side Ia
Time in sec
Time in sec
Figures.36-39 shows the simulated waveforms for ultra-sparse matrix converter for R load with modulation
index 0.8. Figures.36 and 38 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix converter for three
phase, Figures.37 and 39 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A respectively.
H. Simulated results of Ultra Sparse Matrix converter for RL load with ma = 0.8:
400
Source Side V a
400
200
0
-200
-400
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
400
Load Side Va
200
200
0
-200
-400
200
0
-200
-400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Time in sec
0.06
Time in sec
582
Source Side I a
1
0
-1
-2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0
-1
-2
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0
-0.2
-0.4
0.06
x 10
0.06
Load Side Ia
x 10
Time in sec
Time in sec
Figures.40-43 shows the simulated waveforms for ultra-sparse matrix converter for RL load with
modulation index 0.8. Figures.40 and 42 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix
converter for three phase, Figures.41 and 43 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A
respectively.
I.
Simulated results of Ultra Sparse Matrix converter for Motor load with ma = 0.8:
500
Source Side V a
500
-500
3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
-500
3
3.06
3.02
3.01
3.02
Load Side Va
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.06
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
x 10
Source Side I a
3.05
Time in sec
Time in sec
1
0
-1
-2
3
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
1
0
-1
3.01
3.02
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
10
Load Side Ia
5
0
-5
-10
3
x 10
-2
3
3.06
10
3.04
-500
3
-500
3
3.03
500
500
3.01
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
Time in sec
3.06
5
0
-5
-10
3
Time in sec
583
600
Speed in rad/sec
Stator Voltage (V d )
500
-500
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
400
200
0
-200
0.06
20
0
-20
-40
10
Torque in N-m
Stator Current (I d )
40
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
-5
0.06
Time in sec
Time in sec
Figures.44-49
shows the simulated waveforms for ultra-sparse matrix converter for Motor load with
200
modulation
index
0.8.
Figures.44 and 46 shows the voltage, current and load responses of sparse matrix
0
converter for three phase, Figures.45 and 47 shows the voltage, current and load responses for phase A only,
-200
Figures.48
and 49 shows the response of stator voltage, current, speed and torque characteristics.
0
J.
Mag (% of Fundamental)
2
200
0
0
4
6
Harmonic order
-200
10
5
4
3
2
20
1
10
0
0 0
-10
Fig. 50:
of sparse 0.2
0 Voltage
0.05 harmonic
0.1 analysis0.15
matrix converter Time (s)
Mag (% of Fundamental)
Mag (% of Fundamental)
6
8
Harmonic order
10
10
10
4
6
Harmonic order
Fig.
51: Current
harmonic
analysis
of 0.2
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
sparse matrix converter
Time (s)
12
8
6
4
2
0
6
8
Harmonic order
10
12
Figures.50-55 shows the FFT analysis of Sparse, Very Sparse and Ultra Sparse matrix converter for Motor
load with ma = 0.8 respectively. From the results Total Harmonic Distortion (THD in %) is considered to
evaluate the performance of different topologies of Matrix converter for Different Loads, which is calculated
using FFT analysis, shown in Table I.
584
2000
20
-2000
0
10
4
6
Harmonic order
10
RL LOAD
MOTOR LOAD
60
40
20
4
6
Harmonic order
10
Table 1: FFT analysis of indirect sparse matrix converter for various types of loads
SMC
VSMC
Modulation
Voltage
Current
Voltage
Current
Index (ma) 0.8
Harmonics
Harmonics
Harmonics
Harmonics
R LOAD
Mag (% of Fundamental)
USMC
Voltage
Harmonics
Current
Harmonics
25.14
26.08
25.02
24.31
26.75
25.48
24.03
21.74
22.84
22.88
26.12
24.03
22.13
4.31
20.48
3.11
27.13
16.46
Conclusion:
From Table. I, concluded that current harmonics will be having significant change while considering
voltage harmonics of the system as for different load as well as different topologies. It is also clear that Sparse
and Very Sparse, both matrix converter having a similar performance, and ultra-sparse matrix converter will be
having a poor performance when comparing with other topologies with same modulation index. Since Very
Sparse have minimum requirement of switches when compared with sparse matrix converter we can conclude
that Very sparse matrix converters superiority over sparse matrix converter with reduction in requirement of
switches and for ultra-sparse matrix converter have improved performance when comparing especially motor
load. For further research we may improve ultra-sparse matrix converter to achieve improved performance over
other type of matrix converter with having advantage of reduction in switching requirement. Selective harmonic
Elimination is one such technique which is requires greater attention may help to improve the performance of
ultra-sparse matrix converter
LOAD:
R= 1k, RL = 1k, 10mH and
Motor load =5.4 HP (4KW), 400V, 50Hz, 1430 RPM, Squirrel Cage
Stator Resistance 1.405
Stator Inductance - 5.839 mH
Rotor Resistance 1.395
Rotor Inductance - 5.839 mH
Mutual Inductance 172.2 mH
Inertia J 0.0131 Kg/m2
No of Poles 2
SVPWM:
Carrier Frequency- 2 kHz
Ref Frequency 150 Hz
Modulation Index 0.8
REFERENCES
Helle, L., K.B. Larsen, A.H. Jorgensen, S. Munk-Nielsen and F.Blaabjerg, 2004. Evaluation of modulation
schemes for three-phase to three-phase matrix converters, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 51(1):
158-171.
585
Holtz, J. and J. Quan, 2002. Sensor less vector control of induction motors at very low speed using a
nonlinear inverter model and parameter identification, IEEE Transactions Industrial Applications, 38: 1087 1095.
Klumpner, C., F. Blaabjerg and P. and Nielsen, 2001. Speeding-up the Maturation Process of the Matrix
Converter Technology, Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Power Electronics Specialist Conference, 2001, IPESC,
2: 1083 -1088.
Klumpner, C., F. Blaabjerg, I. Boldea and P. Nielsen, 2006. New modulation method for matrix
converters, IEEE Transactions Industrial Applications, 42(3): 797-806.
Kolar, J.W., M. Baumann, F. Schafmeister and H. Ertl, 2007. Novel three-phase AC-DC-AC sparse matrix
converter, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 22(5): 1649-1661.
Lee, K.-B. and F. Blaabjerg, 2004. Performance improvement of sensorless vector control for induction
motor drives fed by matrix converter using nonlinear model and disturbance observer, Proceedings of IEEE
Power Electronics Specialists Conference, IPESC 2004, pp: 1341-1347.
Munioz, A.R. and T.A. Lipo, 1999. On-line dead-time compensation technique for open-loop PWM-VSI
drives, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 14: 683-689.
Wei, L. and T.A. and Lipo, 2001. A novel Matrix Converter Topology with Simple Commutation, Record
on the 26th IEEE Industrial Applications Society Annual Meetings, IIASAM 2001, 3: 1749-1754.
Wei, L., T.A. Lipo and H. Chan, 2002. Matrix converter topologies with reduced number of switches,
Proceedings of IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1: 57-63.
Wheeler, P.W., J. Rocriguez, J.C. Clare, L. Emprinligam, A. Weinstein, 2002. Matrix converters: a
technology review, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 49: 276-288.
Youm, J. and B. Kwom, 1999. Switching Techniques for Current -Controlled AC-to -AC Converter,
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 46(2): 309-318.