CORE-LOC™ Design Table 2012 0

CORE-LOC Design Guide Table
TESTATA
Unit Volume (m)
V = 0.2211H
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
11.0
Unit Height (m)
H = (V/0.2211)(1/3)
1.65
2.08
2.39
2.63
2.83
3.01
3.31
3.56
3.68
Equivalent Cube Size (m)
Dn = V1/3
1.00
1.26
1.44
1.59
1.71
1.82
2.00
2.15
2.22
Armour Thickness (m)
T = 1.52 Dn
1.52
1.92
2.19
2.41
2.60
2.76
3.04
3.27
3.38
Packing density F (-)
0.640
0.633
0.629
0.626
0.624
0.622
0.619
0.617
0.616
Consumption (m/m)
0.640
0.798
0.907
0.994
1.067
1.130
1.238
1.329
1.370
Number of units (u/m)
0.640
0.399
0.302
0.248
0.213
0.188
0.155
0.133
0.125
Porosity (%)
57.89
58.35
58.62
58.81
58.95
59.07
59.26
59.41
59.47
0.17
0.34
0.50
0.67
0.84
1.01
1.34
1.68
1.85
Armour concrete
consumption and coverage
Standard
NLL (tons)
Min/Max*
Filter stone underlayer
to meet the following
requirement
NUL/NLL < 3.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.34
Standard
0.4
0.4
0.67
0.7
0.5
1.01
0.9
0.6
1.34
1.1
0.7
1.68
1.3
0.9
2.02
1.7
1.2
2.69
2.2
1.3
3.36
2.4
3.70
NUL (tons)
Min/Max*
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.9
0.7
1.3
0.9
1.7
1.2
2.2
1.4
2.6
1.9
3.5
2.4
4.4
2.6
4.8
Kt=1,15
1.06
1.33
1.52
1.68
1.81
1.92
2.11
2.28
2.35
Kt=0.9*
0.83
1.04
1.19
1.31
1.41
1.50
1.65
1.78
1.84
Thickness (m)
This table is to be used together with the note "Additional essential information regarding the tables" here appended.
: Geometrical characteristics of unit
: Recommended values for use at preliminary design stage
: (*)The information in this section is to be used with a compulsory analysis by a experienced coastal engineer even at preliminary stage - Ratio NUL/NLL should be kept between 2 and 3
This proprietary information of CLI is provided for preliminary guidance only. Hence, it is not a substitute for analysis by an experienced coastal Engineer. CLI provides assistance to the owners, developers, designers and contractors at all stages of projects. CLI reserves the right to
make changes to the guidelines for improvement of its products. The validity of this document is therefore limited, but CLI will maintain accurate the version available online.
Please Contact us : [email protected]
Website : www.concretelayer.com
CORE-LOC is a trademark of the US army Corps of Engineers, USA.
01/02/2012 -CLI - CORE-LOC Design Table - En
Guidelines for design Graph 1-Relationship between the design wave height as a
function of the armour unit volume.
CORE-LOC Design Guide Table
Sketch 1 : 3D view of the roudhead and transition with the trunk part
This graph is valid for trunk section. For roundhead the unit volume should
be increased by min 23%.
1.23 W
6
Graph 2-Relationship between the KD stability
coefficient and the seabed slope.
5
16
14
KD
Significant wave height (m)
12
10
Where :
8
6
0
3
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
3 4 5 6 7
Seabed slope (%)
8.0
9.0
10
10.0
Armour unit volume (m3)

Seabed slope 1%
Seabed slope 5%
Seabed slope 2.5%

Seabed slope 10%
11.0
HWL
Hs
W
L
refers to High Water Level;

is the significant wave height (H1/3);
is the unit weight on the trunk section;
is the recommended minimum width for the bedding layer ;
The transition between two sizes of armour unit, in this case the roundhead armour and the trunk
armour, is to be built with an angle of 45 in the plane of the underlayer.
These preliminary guidelines for design shall be adpated case per case to projects. We recommend to contact CLI in order to share the expertise gained on many project completed worldwide and CLI
updated knowledge. Please refer to the note "Additional essential information regarding the tables" here appended. A calculator is available on the CLI website.
Please Contact us : [email protected]
Website : www.concretelayer.com
CORE-LOC is a trademark of the US army Corps od Engineers, USA.

01/02/2012 -CLI - CORE-LOC Design Table - En
Additional Essential information regarding the Tables

The proprietary information presented in this
document is not a substitute for calculations
undertaken by a professional engineer during the
design of a breakwater. The information is only
intended as guidance to assist the design engineer
in completing preliminary calculations.
Equivalent Cube Size
The final design of a breakwater may include

consideration of many items including the seabed
geotechnical conditions, the bathymetry of the
seabed, the design wave conditions, the quality of
concrete for the armour units, the availability of
quarried rock, the required performance of the
breakwater (such as overtopping) and may involve
a physical model of the breakwater subjected to
wave action.
Armour Layer Thickness
The aim of this document is to provide additional

information and preliminary recommendations
regarding the parameters provided in the Design
Guide Table.
This parameter is derived based on the following

formula:
=
The armour layer thickness is a theoretical value

obtained by multiplying Dn by the thickness
coefficient (Kt). The following Kt values are
applicable for the different CLI concrete units:
CORE-LOC
Kt = 1.52
Coverage
Packing density: a non-dimensional parameter that
characterizes placement density and allows
comparison of the different types of armour units.
=
First page
Consumption: concrete volume /m of armour.
The following information is presented in each

table:
Number of units: number of units /m of armour.
Unit Volume
The CLI tables indicate some standard values of
unit volume. However, other values can be used,
notably the unit sizes already used in the past for
which moulds are already available.
Armour unit volumes lower than 1.0m3 are most of
the time not cost-effective.
Note that a CORE-LOC unit should not exceed 11
cubic metres.
Height of Armour Unit

The unit height of the armour unit is calculated
using the shape coefficient, based on the following
expression:
=
With the following coefficient values for each CLI
armour unit:
CORE-LOC
KS = 0.2211
01/02/2012 - CLI CORE-LOC Design Guide Tables / EN
Porosity: percentage of voids in the armour taking

into consideration the theoretical armour
thickness.
Underlayer
The underlayer rock categories presented in the
tables give standard Nominal Lower Limit (NLL) and
Nominal Upper Limit (NUL) (respectively 7% and
14% of the armour unit mass) of the underlayer
filter stone. These values have been calculated
assuming a concrete specific gravity of 2.4 t/m3
and a rock specific gravity of 2.6 t/m3.
An extension of 30% below (NLL) and above (NUL)
has been successfully used in projects and is
acceptable in most standard cases and the values
Min/Max indicate the maximum possible extension
of NLL and NUL if NUL/NLL remains less than 3.0.
It remains the design engineers to determine the
most suitable underlayer stone categories for
underlayers on his specific project. Meeting the
underlayer rock grading limits for use under the CLI
armour units is only a part of the issues. Stability of
the underlayer profile during works is to be
carefully considered.
Additional Essential information regarding the Tables

The thickness of the underlayer presented in the
tables is calculated using thickness coefficients (Kt)
of 1.15 and 0.9. The value 1.15 is considered by CLI
to be appropriate in any site condition for
preliminary calculations. It is noted that the CIRIA
rock manual (CIRIA 2007) recommends a thickness
coefficient around 0.9, varying in function of rock
shape. Such low thickness coefficient should only
be used in controlled conditions during works.
Second page
The following notes describe the information that
can be obtained from the graphs.
Graph 1 and 2 illustrate the possible influence of
the seabed slope on the armour stability.
The roundhead of the breakwater requires extra

protection. CLI recommends that the armour unit
size at the roundhead be increased by 23% over
the size calculated for the trunk section.
CLI also recommends a minimum distance of 2.5 Hs
between the central point of the roundhead and
the high water level on the armour layer. This is
equivalent to a radius of 2.5 Hs, as illustrated in the
sketch. This minimum radius is recommended to
achieve the required interlocking between the
armour units.
The transition between two different sizes of CLI
armour units, or between a CLI unit and rock
armour, should be achieved with a 45 slope in the
plane of the underlayer.
Graph 1
Graph 1 presents armour unit volume (V) as a
function of wave height (Hs = H1/3) for different
seabed slopes (1, 2.5, 5 and 10%). The calculation
is based on the Hudson formula:
=
cot
KD is the stability coefficient (please refer to

Graph 2 and Sketch 1).
D is the relative buoyant density of the
material.
Cota is the armour slope. Note that with the
CLI single layer units, gravity has a significant
influence on the interlocking of the units and
the stability of the armour layer. Flatter slopes
do not result in an increase in stability. In the
preliminary design phase, CLI recommends that
slopes of 4/3 or 3/2 be used. CLI does not
recommend a slope flatter than 3/2
References
Denechere, M. Thomson, I. (1999). Experience
with single-layer breakwater armour. Proceedings
of COPEDEC99, Cape Town, South Africa.
CIRIA, CUR, CETMEF (2007). The Rock Manual. The
use of rock in hydraulic engineering (2nd edition).
C683, CIRIA, London.
CLI ACCROPODE, ACCROPODE II / ECOPODE
and CORE-LOC brochures and tables.
Web site Computing tool.
Contact
For further details, please do not hesitate to
contact CLI. Assistance is available through
telephone, Email, or Internet link.
These graphs are valid only for permeable core and

permeable underlayer.
Tel:
+33 (0)2 47 74 18 10
Graph 2
Email:
[email protected]
Graph 2 presents the value of the stability

coefficient KD as a function of seabed slope. This
curve is appropriate for structures located in the
breaking zone. For non-breaking wave conditions,
the KD value for the 1% seabed slope can be used.
Contact link :
http://www.concretelayer.com/form-specificrequests
Sketch 1
Sketch 1 illustrates several design aspects and
provides some preliminary information to assist
the designer.
01/02/2012 - CLI CORE-LOC Design Guide Tables / EN
Also visit our Website:
www.concretelayer.com

CORE-LOC™ Design Table 2012 0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CORE-LOC™ Design Table 2012 0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CORE-LOC™ Design Table 2012 0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the different types of information provided in the tables?

What are the different types of information provided in the tables?

What factors influence the stability of armour units?

What factors influence the stability of armour units?

CORE-LOC Design Guide Table

Unit Height (m)

Equivalent Cube Size (m)

Armour Thickness (m)

Packing density F (-)

Number of units (u/m)

Please Contact us : [email protected]

CORE-LOC is a trademark of the US army Corps of Engineers, USA.

01/02/2012 -CLI - CORE-LOC Design Table - En

CORE-LOC Design Guide Table

Significant wave height (m)

Armour unit volume (m3)

Seabed slope 2.5%

refers to High Water Level;

CORE-LOC is a trademark of the US army Corps od Engineers, USA.

Additional Essential information regarding the Tables

Equivalent Cube Size

The final design of a breakwater may include

Armour Layer Thickness

The aim of this document is to provide additional

This parameter is derived based on the following

The armour layer thickness is a theoretical value

Consumption: concrete volume /m of armour.

The following information is presented in each

Number of units: number of units /m of armour.

Height of Armour Unit

01/02/2012 - CLI CORE-LOC Design Guide Tables / EN

Porosity: percentage of voids in the armour taking

Additional Essential information regarding the Tables

The roundhead of the breakwater requires extra

KD is the stability coefficient (please refer to

These graphs are valid only for permeable core and

Graph 2 presents the value of the stability

01/02/2012 - CLI CORE-LOC Design Guide Tables / EN

Also visit our Website:

You might also like