Best Practice Viacombi
Best Practice Viacombi
Best Practice Viacombi
Content
Promit cases
BOHEMIAKOMBI ......................................................................................................................................................................4
BOXXPRESS Germany ..............................................................................................................................................................7
BOXXPRESS Hungary .............................................................................................................................................................10
GYOR-GNYU KIKTO ............................................................................................................................................................13
KUSTER Transport ..................................................................................................................................................................17
MV Kombiterminl................................................................................................................................................................20
POLZUG ................................................................................................................................................................................29
TRANSFENNICA .....................................................................................................................................................................32
ACCIONA ...............................................................................................................................................................................35
AGRO HANDEL ......................................................................................................................................................................38
AMBROGIO ............................................................................................................................................................................41
ATLAS COPCO .......................................................................................................................................................................44
BAXTER.................................................................................................................................................................................47
BIARD SOMADEM ..................................................................................................................................................................50
CONSTRURAIL .......................................................................................................................................................................53
CORMAN ...............................................................................................................................................................................56
CORUS ..................................................................................................................................................................................59
DECATHLON ..........................................................................................................................................................................62
DHL Freight ...........................................................................................................................................................................65
EWALS CARGO CARE .............................................................................................................................................................68
GRIMALDI ..............................................................................................................................................................................71
KOMBISZTAR / PHILIPS ..........................................................................................................................................................74
LES RAPIDES BLEUS ..............................................................................................................................................................77
MEPAVEX LOGISTICS .............................................................................................................................................................79
METRANS..............................................................................................................................................................................82
OKD ......................................................................................................................................................................................85
SOUFFLET .............................................................................................................................................................................88
TANG FRRES ........................................................................................................................................................................91
TRANSFESA...........................................................................................................................................................................94
TRANS Italia ..........................................................................................................................................................................68
VOLVIC ................................................................................................................................................................................100
WHIRLPOOL Europe .............................................................................................................................................................103
Supported by:
Introduction
This compendium of intermodal freight transport & logistics best practices has been selected and published by the
European Intermodal Association, which is the voice of intermodal transport.
Sources: PROMIT promoting innovative intermodal freight transport; BESTLOG logistic best practices, VIACOMBI
the gateway for transport intermodality, all three projects funded by the European Commission, in addition to a
number of specifically labelled EIA Intermodal Award winners. Neutral Jury: EU Commission, EU Parliament, various
single EU transport associations.
New cases can be added at a later stage. Contact EIA or its research partners to find out how your company could
be included, or the conditions for winning an Intermodal Award.
Sustainable mobility has been at the heart of EIAs EU Transport policy, promotional and communications activities
since its foundation. All transport modes and industries from port to hinterland are welcome,
with the aim of developing smart and profitable logistics solutions.
(Nr. 1)
(Nr. 1)
Bohemiakombi
Route
Route
Lovosice-Hamburg
573 km
Operation elements
Frequency
Lovosice Hamburg: 3 times per week v.v.
Timetable: http://www.kombiverkehr.de/web/Deutsch/Startseite/Kundeninformationen/Fahrplan/Fahrplanauskunft/
Distance: Hamburg 573 km
Operation time: Lovosice - Hamburg 12 h (incl. transhipmen tin a terminal)
Equipment: tank-containers, semi-trailers, swap bodies
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Comparison between intermodal transport and alternative road scenario in terms of:
Transport price: terminal terminal (incl. transhipment) 25 % less than road, in some cases (tankcontainers vs. road
tank truck) 50 %.
Basic prices for tank-container up to 34 t (in Euro 2007) in turn from Lovosice to Hamburg are euro 629 (empty-loade)
and 750 (loaded-loaded).
Investment cost: ILU are fully paid by road haulers, shippers or forwarders, wagons are owned and financed by DB.
Infrastructure costs (terminal) subsidised from national support programmes (Czech and German).
Financial support: Two years (2005-2007) operational subsidy for German section of another leg (Lovosice-Duisburg)
trains up to 30 % of operational costs.
Contacts:
Operator website:
www.bohemiakombi.cz
www.kombiverkehr.de
BoxXpress Germany
Route
<>
Route
Port of Hamburg
EUROKOMBI
BoxXpress.de
800 km
Munich,
50 km
.
LOGISTICS AND TECHNICAL ORGANIZATION
Eurogate, Intermodal GmbH organise the total transport chain from the port of Hamburg via the Eurokombi railway
terminal and inland terminals to consignees in the region of Munich. Port operators are Eurogate, HHLA, NTB and
MSC, Eurokombi, DUSS and Wincanton are inland terminal operators, bosXpress.de, Railion, ERS and TX-Logistik
cooperate in transport activities. The transport out of the port is operated by Railion(Hafenbahn). The main haulage is
performed by train (BoxXpress.de) and the post haulage by truck (2 axels and container chassis 3 axels). Transported
are containers (also reefer containers which have to be cooled at the terminals. The boxXpress equipment consist of 15
locos and 280 90 container railcars.
The Key elements
The offer is used by 70% as intermodal split. The offer provides data processing support using internet portal to ensure
timely exchanges of information on status data reflection goods locations and movements. Support can be provided
concerning vehicle technology, energy supply and storage. The offer fits with logistic transport requirements particular
for long distance transport without break bulk
Operation elements
The train operates five times a week between ports and inland terminals, carrying 92 TEU per train, with 9,5 tons per
TEU on average. The total transport volume amounts to 365.000 TEU per year. The advantages are the high frequency,
reliability and punctuality, high degree of security
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Price of terminal-toterminal main haulage
Price of pre-haulage
(from shipper to terminal)
Price of post-haulage
(from terminal to
consignee)
Transhipment / handling
costs
Other costs / fees
Total
costscosts
(%) (%)
Total
No subsidies ar involved in the operation of boxXpress. However there are some support in financing new projects for
port shunting.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
Comparison between intermodal transport and alternative road scenario in terms of:
Avoided emissions in tons of CO2: 29149
% of avoided emission: 65%
Total emissions (tons of CO2eq/year)
Number of equivalent heavy vehicles avoided:47760
Avoided fuel consumption: 10.9 m litres
Fax:
Tel:
BoxXpress Hungary
10
Route
Route
Port of Hamburg/Bremerhaven
Hamburg-Budapest
1560 km
Budapest area
35 km
11
Economic aspects
Price
of
terminal-toterminal main haulage
Price of pre-haulage (from
shipper to terminal)
Price of post-haulage (from
terminal to consignee)
Transhipment / handling
costs
Other costs / fees
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
Comparison between intermodal transport and alternative road scenario in terms of:
Avoided emissions in tons of CO2: 101591
% of avoided emission: 79%
Total emissions (tons of CO2eq/year)
Number of equivalent heavy vehicles avoided:55974
Avoided fuel consumption: 38 m l
LESSONS LEARNT
boxXpress.hu offers a very fast (27 hours) transit time, due to own traction by one electronic loco for the whole route.
Own modern 80 railcars are in use. No Loco changes are necessary at the borders. Only the train drives will be
changed on the route. No other train is offering 96 TEUs capacity per departure. Own agency staff is organizing the
operation at the Bilk-Kombiterminal at Budapest. To offer connections for the empty equipment from the overflow area
of Hungary (to much import containers and less export volumes for maritime containers) to the export area of southern
Germany (More Export Volume than Import. Demand of empty containers).
Contacts:
Contact name:
Lars Hedderich
12
Position:
Man. Director
Email:
Fax:
Tel:
13
eg.:
Brazil,
Shippers: variable eg.: Brazil,
Netherland,
Germany,
Croatia,
Netherland, Germany, Croatia,
Spain
Spain
Forwarders: MAHART
MAHART Cargo,
Cargo,
Forwarders:
BDSG
BDSG
Takers: merchants
merchants -- Agrograin
Agrograin
Takers:
Zrt., Glencore
Glencore Kft.,
Kft., UBM
UBM Kft.
Kft.
Zrt.,
Nature of
of the
the Project
Project
Nature
Type of
of combined
combinedtransport:
transport:ininType
land
waterway
road
land waterway - road
Sector of
of activity:
activity:wholesaler,
wholesaler,
Sector
distributor,
food
industry
distributor, food industry
Type of
of goods:
goods: grains:
grains:corn,
corn,
Type
wheat,
soya
wheat, soya
Starting date:
date:2000
2000
Starting
Route
Route
ROAD
ROAD
::
14
Economic aspects
There are many favourable factors of fluvial shipping. The first one is that it is a cheaper solution than the road
or rail transport (by 30% and 10% respectively). Other factors are that the rivers are given by the nature, the
only thing to be taken care of is their quality, while in case of roads and railways, goods have to be repaired
and reconstruted. The in-land water maintenance is more cheaper than that of the roads, thus the transport
can become less expensive and merchants can offer their products cheaper, which means an advantage for
them in competition. Using barges is better to optimise the spendings of transport, as every single barge
equals to 40-45 trucks.
Environmental aspects
The in-land waterway transport between Rotterdam and the port of Gyr Gny has lots of environmental
advantages. In road transport there is a huge emission of CO2, while the emission resulted from the traffic of
in-land water is less. If the emission of a barge is as much as that of a truck, then the in-land waterway is a
more environmentally-friendly solution, because the capacity of a truck is only about 25 tons, while the
capacity of a ship is about 1000-1600 tons.
The Gyr - Gny Kikt Zrt. plays attention to other environment protecting aspects, though it means extra
expenditures. All of the roads in the port are covered with concrete; there are channels driving the
precipitation, with separators (a kind of filter) at their ends. These are very useful when the goods or oil run
out. The fuel of the trucks transporting the consignment is diesel. After the intoduction of the rail into the area
of the port, the traffic of this region can be reduced resulting in a decreased CO2 emission and other
pollutions as well.
15
Lessons learnt
A factor that contributed to the success of Gyr Gny Kikt Zrt. may be that this is the only port in this
region dealing with intermodal transport. The nearness of Gyr, one of the most rapidly developing town in
Hungary, makes the port more significant. The port is eager to satisfy the demand of the towns factories. In
order to achieve this goal, the port continuously purchases the most modern assets. It takes all the
opportunities to obtain all the possible support from the EU and the Hungarian State. Until now the most
important investments and developments were financed with the help of their support. Articles about the GyrGny Kikt Zrt. are published frequently in different newspapers, as the firm lays an important stress upon
marketing. It catches all the possibilities to present its innovations to his partners with frequently organised
receptions, giving an opportunity to tighten the relationships and make their cooperation more effective.
Gyr-Gny Kikt Zrt (E-mail: [email protected] - Web: www.portofgyor.hu)
Tel.: (36) 96-544-200 Fax: (36) 96-544-204
Pintr kos, [email protected] - Szakonyi Frigyes, [email protected]
16
Kusters
17
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
ROUTE
Key elements
- The road hauls will be performed by Kusters with its own fleet of trucks and
chassis.
- Heavily congested roads affected: in and around the port and between Lanaken and
Antwerp during peak hours
- % empty return trips: various
- Flexibile hours: the barge can load/unload during the evening and navigate during
the night. The containers only have to be present along the Canal at a certain time in
the afternoon/evening or will be present along the Canal in the morning (for import
containers).
18
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
KEY DATA
n.a.
The price per ILU may not be higher than the transport costs
of the road alternative. Provisional calculations have
revealed that the intermodal transport of 20 containers has
the highest feasibility. For 40 containers, road transport still
offers a cost advantage. For the time being, the best option
therefore is to transport the 20 ctrs by barge and the 40 ctrs
by road between Antwerp and Lanaken.
Financial support can be obtained
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
KEY DATA
LESSONS LEARNT
According to the operator:
One problem is that the site of Kusters is located at a distance of some 3 km from the Albert Canal. Therefore, they do not have
direct access to the inland waterway. Nevertheless, Kusters is prepared to cooperate in a pilot project which will start during the
next months. In this project, containers will be collected at the deepsea terminals and transported to Lanakan by a container barge
with its own crane to load / unload containers. This barge has the advantage that no loading/unloading equipment is needed at
Lanaken. The containers will be transported by a shuttle service to the site of Kusters at only 3 km distance from the Canal.
This is a pilot project. The success of this pilot will largely influence the future use of this model. Other parties are interested in
case the pilot turns out to be successful and cost-efficient.
Contacts
@ Websites
Kusters : www.kusters-transport.be
e-mail : [email protected]
19
MV Kombiterminl
20
Kombisztr
BILK
Kombiterminl
Kelenfld Kontner Dep
T.S.M.
MV Raktr
Hungria Intermodal
MTMG Logisztikai Zrt.
Globllog(Praelog)
21
TYPICAL ROADS:
The north way
From the ports of North-Germany to Hungary
Transportation with boxcars
The south way
Koper, (Slovenian port) to Hungary
Start Finish
Koper-Szolnok
Koper-Szeged
Koper-Szombathely
Customer
Samsung
Mogyi Ltd.
Flextronics
BP road
Kiskundorozsma- Wels
area: 24 240 m2
3 tracks with crane (230 m)
1 loading/unloading track (275 m)
Szeged
Area, trucks:
area: 5 680 m2
2 loading/unloading track with crane (200
m)
1 loading/unloading track (320 m)
Tools:
22
1 electric bock-crane (2 t, 24 m)
1 fork lift truck [20' - 40'
spreaders, Hyster 12,5 t]
1 self-loading truck [Klaus 40']
1 truck [20']
8 connection places for reefer
containers
Tools:
1 electric bock-crane [33/16 t; 20 m]
1 fork lift truck [Hyster 12,5 t]
1 self-loading truck [Klaus 20']
2 truck outfit [40']
1 semi-trailer [40']
Pcs
Szolnok
Area, tracks:
Area, trucks:
area: 16 714 m2
2 tracks with crane (230 m)
1 loading/unloading track (256 m)
area: 5 050 m2
3 loading/unloading track (280 m)
Tools:
Tools:
Type of ILUs:
Swap bodies
Semi trailers
Containers
23
Transported Goods
The total transport volume which is managed by the company uses 100% of intermodal
transport solutions.
TECHNICAL ASPECTS
Specifities of terminals and routes
Kiskundorozsma-Wels (Austria)
Services:
loading, unloading and transshipment of containers
loading and unloading of swap bodies
placing the loaded and empty containers in the depot
handling of reefer containers
road transport to and from the terminal
investigation, repair and cleaning of containers
uninterrupted security guard service
parking
24
Area, tracks:
area: 24 240 m2
3 tracks with crane (230 m)
1 loading/unloading track (275
m)
Tools:
1 electric bock-crane (2 t, 24 m)
1 fork lift truck [20' - 40'
spreaders, Hyster 12,5 t]
1 self-loading truck [Klaus 40']
1 truck [20']
8 connection places for reefer
containers
Subsidy from the Hungarian
State (Operationnal support)
900mFt
Development assistance
33000 trailer, trucks( Turkish,
Rumanian,
Greek
and
Bulgarian) are transact by the
terminal.
3 pairs train (6 pieces of trains)
start pro day,,,/ day
The MVKombi doesnt delay, the MVs trains can delay. Example for damages: Last
year the Ltd. does not have any damage, but if we meet any type of damage that is tenth.
25
Passages salesmanship
At the set crossing points:
Nagylak
rtnd
Gyula
Rszke
Tompa
At the Ro-La terminal (Kiskundorozsma)
26
Nagyvrad-Wels v.v
Destination: from Romania Biharkeresztes-Ferencvros-Hegyeshalom to Austria
Method: 3 pairs train pro week
Time: 9 hours
E-mail: [email protected]
Tel:+43 1 33156-0
Fax:+43 1 33156-300
Operator: kombi
Arad-Wels v.v
Destination: from Romania Lkshza-Ferenvros-Hegyeshalom to Austria
Method :5 pairs train pro week
Operator: kombi
E-mail: [email protected]
Tel: +43 1 33156-0
Fax: :+43 1 33156-300
Time:9 hours
Economic aspect
Effects of the company budget
Additional investment costs for transshipment.
Increase/decrease of storage areas
Additional management/operational costs
Additional investment costs for new loading units
27
LESSONS LEARNT
Success factors:
Cost effectiveness
Agility
Additional actions:
Communication campaigns
Training
Change in the regulatory framework
Feasibility studies
Operational and development support
Increasing factors:
Higher transported volume
Higher frequencies
Introduction of innovative equipment
Higher competition between services
Higher number of shippers
The future:
Increase in the flow of goods
Diversification in the types of flows
Diversification of the shippers
Optimizations
The company is working on a new terminal in Krts (Railport Arad). The route will be the
Koper-Krts relationship.
Contacts:
MV Kombiterminl Ltd:
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: www.mavkombi.hu
Tel: (36) 1 334 1174
E-mail.: [email protected]
More informations:
Co-operation:
Hungria Intermodal Kft.
Web.: www.intermodal.hu
Homepages of the partners:
Bilk Kombiterminl Rt.
Web: www.bilkkombi.hu
Globllog (Praelog) Kft.
Web: www.praelog.hu
Mv Raktr Kft.
E-mail: [email protected]
Kombisztr Kft.
E-mail: [email protected]
28
Polzug
29
Polzug
Involved Actors
Route
Route
Port of Hamburg
port terminal
terminal in Warsaw
800 km
30
Polzug offers a roundtrip 3 5 times a week and transports around 56 TEU per train. The majority of the import
containers are full whereas the export containers are empty. The MoT capacity is up to 300 TEUs per week and
direction. The average load is 8 tons per TEU. In 2006 the company consist of 140 employees, owns or operates 8
inland terminals in Poland and transport volumes amount to 120.000 TEUs. For pre or pst road haulage 2/3 axel trucks
and 273 axel container chassis are used. The fuelconsumption is estimated with 30l/100km.
There is some pilferage and sometimes there are delays in the delivery. Sometimes clients complain. However
forwarder are satisfied, if the cargo is delivered and the container is returned in time.
ECONOMIC
ECONOMICASPECTS
ASPECTS
Price
Price ofof terminal-toterminal-toterminal
terminalmain
mainhaulage
haulage
Price
Priceofofpre-haulage
pre-haulage
(from
(fromshipper
shippertoto
terminal)
terminal)
Price
Priceofofpost-haulage
post-haulage
(from
(fromterminal
terminaltoto
consignee)
consignee)
Transhipment
//
Transhipment
handling
costs
handling costs
Other
Othercosts
costs/ /fees
fees
40
40Unit
Unitwith
withless
lessthan
than16,5
16,5t t
740,-EURO
or
1250,-SL
740,-EURO or 1250,-SL
Paid
Paidbybythe
theclient
clienttotoshipping
shipping
line
line
Total
Totalcosts
costs(%)
(%)one
oneway
way
150,-150,--EURO
EUROfor
forfirst
firstring
ring3535
km
km
Included
Includedininrail
railcost
cost
Interchange
InterchangeT1
T1ininPoland
Poland50,50,-EURo
-EURo
Transport price: Roundtrip is almost the same price between Polzug and road transport. The oneway price of train
transports amounts to around 70% of raod transport.
Polzug GmbH did not receive any subsidies.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
During the marketing campaign Polzug particularly stresses the environmental badvantages of rail transport.
Comparison between intermodal transport and alternative road scenario in terms of:
Avoided emissions in tons of CO2: 28317
% of avoided emission: 74%
Total emissions (tons of CO2eq/year)
Number of equivalent heavy vehicles avoided:31134
Avoided fuel consumption: 10.6 m litres
Email
Tel:
31
Transfennica
32
Transfennica
Actors involved
Shipper: Unknown
Forwarder: Road haulage
company A
Operator: Transfennica
Route
Route
Hinterland to Bilbao
250 km
Bilbao to Zeebrugge
1400 km
Zeebrugge to hinterland
200 km
Transfennica
operate the service
running from Zeebrugge to Bilbao on 26th September. Every Monday,
Logistics actions/transport
chain
Wednesday
andAFriday
there
is a sailing
from both
ports.
Thefruit
transit
time between
both
ports
is only 38 hours.
Fruit Company
is a fruit
producer
in Morocco.
They
export
on pallets,
and one
of the
destinations
is
The
vessels, in
mvBarcelona.
Friedrich Russ
and mv Elisabeth
Russ,
take
up each
to 190
trailersconsists
as well as
some45
containers.
Mercabarna
Two deliveries
a week are
made
and
delivery
of four
pallet wide
reefer containers weighing approximately 25 tonnes. An average of 400 containers per year are sent. The
A
number ofbelong
leading
companiesThe
haveoperation
decided time
to ship
a largeofpart
of their
North-European
containers
to Spanish
Acciona transport
Transmediterrnea.
consists
1 day
for transport
to
freight
through
the Bilbao-Zeebrugge
of Transfennica.
Casablanca,
1 day
transport per ship route
and then
1 day transport to Barcelona. Reliability is high with over 70%
of deliveries arriving with a delay of less than 1 hour A delay of 24 hours would be the maximum allowed for
They
example of companies like Bridgestone, LKW Walter, Ewals Cargo Care and Heitrans. This
thesefollow
type ofthe
goods.
development is seen as a big breakthrough in the Spanish market. Also the well known Grupo TT and Chin
S.A.
have decided
to use
the services
of Transfennica.
On a
yearly
basisthat
140,000
of May
cargo2008.
is shifted
The shipping
service
described
is an initial
trial by Acciona
Rail
Services
lastedtonnes
until 31
from
road to
Following
theshortsea.
success of the trial, Acciona Transmediterranea is planning on starting the service again.
Logistic and technical organization
The operation is principally conditioned by the infrastructures in the port of Bilbao that currently consist of a
special portainer and double lane Ro-Ro ramps. The port also has a parking space for 366 lorries, a direct
access to the port from the principal motorways and a railway connection. At the port of Bilbao the loading and
unloading ramp is being adapted. The ramp is also being broadened to allow faster loading and unloading.
Road haulage company A ships on average ten 40 containers on each of the 3 weekly shippings. These all
contain paletized goods and do not require any special handling. The average load in a container is 12 tonnes.
The operation time is composed of a half day from pick up to port, 38 hours shipping and then most drop-off
points for this company lie within a half days journey of Zeebrugge. The shipping company places its own
containers at disposal (20ft & 40ft palletwide and palletwide high cube) and it also offers opportunities for the
shipment of trailers and shippers owned containers.
33
Economic aspects
Road Haulage Company A estimates that the shipping via the ro-ro service is 15% cheaper per ILU than the
alternative route by road. The change from the all road route to the route with shipping involved no investment
costs on behalf of Road Haulage Company A. The shipments sent with Transfennica account for
approximately 40% of the total transport volume moved by the Road Haulage Company A. They use no other
intermodal services where road transport is an alternative. No financial support is provided by either local or
national governments in Spain. The initiative has requested an EC grant of 6,800,000 euros under the Marco
Polo support scheme.
Environmental aspects
In this best practice, ten 40containers are sent 3 times a week from Bilbao to Zeebrugee. This avoids the
transport emissions caused by roughly 1500 trucks per year making the journey of 1200km (Bilbao Paris Zeebrugge). There are also some areas of congestion along this route. When road transport is used, roughly
30% of return trips are empty whereas with shipping transport nearly 90% of returns are taken advantage of.
KEY DATA
Emissions avoided in tons of CO2: 464
% of emissions avoided: 13%
Number of equivalent heavy vehicles
avoided: 1500
Fuel consumption avoided: 174k l
Lessons learnt
This project has been very succesfull. An additional investment of 950,000 is now being made in Bilbao Port
which will make it possible to load and unload trailers and other heavy means of transport, as well as
machines, up to no less than 250 tonnes. The work started in September and will be completed in December
of this year.
In the future, Transfennica intends to increase the service to 6 departures per week. It can be seen that a
good reliable integral service can provide a competitive alternative to road transport.
34
Acciona
35
Route
Route
Moulouya to
Casablanca
270 km
Casablanca Port to
Algeciras
380 km
Algeciras to
Barcelona
950 km
Barcelona to
market
10 km
36
Economic aspects
Fruit Company did not wish to reveal any pricing arrangements it had in place before adopting the service or
prices of the current service. The change from the all road route to the route with shipping involved no
investment costs on behalf of Fruit Company. The shipments sent with Acciona Rails Services accounted for
approximately 10% of the total transport volume moved by the Fruit Company. They use no other intermodal
services where road transport is an alternative. No financial support is provided by either local or national
governments in Spain nor Morocco.
Environmental aspects
In this best practice, eight 45 reefer containers a week are sent by train from Algeciras to Barcelona. This
avoids the transport emissions caused by roughly 400 trucks per year making the journey of 1100km
(Algeciras Madrid Barcelona). When road transport is used, roughly 50% of return trips are empty whereas
with rail transport nearly 90% of returns are taken advantage of.
KEY DATA
Emissions avoided in tons of CO2:
304
% of emissions avoided: 31%
Number of equivalent heavy
vehicles avoided: 400
Fuel consumption avoided: 114k l
Lessons learnt
ACCIONA Rail Services, is the first private rail company to operate in Spain. It is the first intermodal land, sea
and rail route between Morocco and Europe. It could thus be deduced that the privatisation of the rail services
in Spain increases the opportunities for intermodal transport.
This service proved beneficial to Fruit Company from a purely logistical point of view as well as from an
environmental point of view. In fact the logistical advantages are what prompted them to use this solution.
Fruit Company are examining if similar services are available in Italy.
CONTACT:
Website: http://www.acciona-railservices.com/
Acciona Rail Services, S.A
Avda. Suiza 18-20, 28820 Coslada (Madrid)
Tel. 91 722 78 24 Fax: 91 670 82 14
Email: [email protected]
37
AgroHandel
38
Agro Handel
Actors involved
Route
39
Economic aspects
Financing of the project was completed with national and regional /local support. National support derived
from the Szechenyi Plan program and they obtained special Environmental Support as well. The gained
supports nature meant tax relief and grants to investment.
As it was mentioned above the State has guaranteed the operation of the port. The declared aim of Baja
Public Port has been to manage the assets entrusted to it by the State in the most profitable way and to
become a moving force in the development of not only the town, but also of the whole region.
Tariffs of the services depend on the transported quantity but there is a minimum amount below which
shipping business can not be transacted. Quotation is affected by the seasonal nature of agricultural industry
as well but the seasonal loading price is between 450 and 650 HUF +V.A.D.
The expectation of the concerned examples evolution within the next 5-10 years is like increase in the flow of
goods, diversification in types of flows and diversification of shippers.
Environmental aspects
Baja Public Port and Agro Handel Hungaria Kft. took into particular consideration the concerned environmental
aspects from the beginning of the project and separated financial resources for them. Harsh noise, dust and
water pollution acts and rules regulate the operation. This claims a closed system with special filters, noise
screens etc environmental equipment.
It is also relevant that whit this environmental conscious operation the cooperation gets benefits to its image
meaning more contracts with new partners and expanding market at both of national and international level.
Lessons learnt
Success factors attributed to the concerned operation are decrease of cost unit, development of service
quality and rise in quantity, attainment of new markets, widening the clientele. Additional actions helped the
success of course like communication campaigns, feasibility studies, change in the regulatory framework and
non-financial support by the public.
As Agro Handel Hungaria Kft. settled from Germany the main obstacle encountered to the practice was the
lack of information and knowledge of environmental and other regulations. The lack of knowledge of the local
customs and relations also derives from this fact resulting difficulty thus disadvantage and the need of external
help. Another obstacle was the delayed support causing deferred implementation.
Question of buy/rent: Because all the territories are state owned, there is no possibility to buy them. Like in
every Hungarian port you can only rent the development territories for long term. It depends on special
agreement but mostly you can rent them for 10-50 years and in addition you get an optional right for farther
rent.
Factors supposed that would increase the efficiency of the operation are higher transported volume, higher
frequencies, wider mix of goods transported, higher number of shippers, higher competition between services
and introduction of innovative equipment.
It is well known that waterway transport is the most cost-effective way of moving goods. The strongly EU
supported intermodal transport is gaining more and more ground. In 2000 the Flemich Waterwegen en
Zeekanaal NV and the Hungarian Baja Public Port signed a cooperation agreement for know-how transfer and
information exchange with the final purpose of promoting waterway and intermodal transport between the two
countries. They trust that their present and future clients will be the ultimate beneficiaries of this cooperation
by providing them with a complex and all-round professional service, up-to-date and detailed database and an
international network of expertise.
CONTACT:
Laszlo Nagy Baja Public Port Managing Director
Tel.: + 36 79 442-502
Timea Bakos Baja Public Port, Head Clerk, International Contact Person
Tel.: +36 (30) 474-8675
Email: [email protected]
Site: www.portofbaja.hu
40
Ambrogio
41
Shipper: Various
Operator: Various
Route
Gallarate-Muizen
1100 km
42
Operation elements
Frequency: 8 trains per week
Timetable: n.a.
Distance: 1300 km (1100 km by rail)
Operation time: A-C
Equipment: The shuttle is composed by 17 flat wagons (owned and leased) carrying 34 swap
bodies, all owned by Ambrogio and marked with its logo.
Reliability on time delivery: 100%
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Comparison between intermodal transport and alternative road scenario in terms of:
Transport price: The railway solution costs about
Total costs (%)
1100/1200 /ILU, whereas the road solution costs
1400/1500 /ILU.
Support: the project has been receiving a support
from CH, amounting to about 60-70 /ILU: it is
granted to intermodal trains operators as an
incentive to modal shift.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
Comparison between intermodal transport and alternative road scenario in terms of:
Avoided emissions in tons of CO2: 6162
Total emissions (tons of CO2eq/year)
% of avoided emission: 30%
No. of equivalent heavy vehicles avoided: 12,998
Avoided fuel consumption: 2.3 million litres
Contacts
@ Websites
Ambrogio : www.ambrogio.it
Email : [email protected]
43
AtlasCopco
44
Involved Actors
Route
Forwarder:
Shipper: Atlas Copco
Airpower
Terminal Operator: TCT
Willebroek
Route
Wilrijk Willebroek
12 km
45
Key elements
Reliability and punctuality. Flexibility: containers can be picked up or returned to the inland
terminal during the entire day. Fits with transport/logistic requirements of specific goods. High
frequency: two sailings per day between TCT and Willebroek. Other: empty depot and other
facilities at TCT.
Operation elements
Frequency: 2 sailings per day. 100 containers per week, ca 5000 containers per year, Average
tonnage per ILU: variable
Timetable: n.a.
Distance: 62 km
Operation time: n.a.
Equipment: Containers: owned by the shipping lines and stored (empty) at the inland terminal.
Reliability on time delivery: 100%
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
The intermodal alternative has resulted in a 2%
reduction of the total logistics costs
(for container logistics).
Environmental aspects
Comparison between intermodal transport and alternative road scenario in terms of:
Avoided emissions in tons of CO2: 194
Total emissions (tons of CO2eq/year)
% of avoided emission: 45%
No. of equivalent heavy vehicles avoided: 4,760
Avoided fuel consumption: 74 k litres
Contacts
@ Websites
46
Baxter
47
Baxter Healthcare
e
Involved Actors
Forwarder:
Shipper: Baxter
Terminal Operator: Avelgem
container terminal
Route
Route
Avelgem Lessines
OR
35 km
48
Key elements
Higher reliability and punctuality because if the elimination of the road congestion factor.
Environmental awareness. Transport lead-time: 14 hours out of Antwerp and 18 hours out of
Rotterdam: every container that leaves the port in the evening arrives the next morning in Avelgem.
High frequency: respectivily four and six sailings per week from and to Antwerp and Rotterdam.
Opportunity for moving storage: AVCT has a storage capacity of 1200 containers. Very good
service level: AVCT is now also in charge of the organisation of the transports.
Operation elements
Frequency: Antwerp Avelgem : 4 sailings / week and Rotterdam Avelgem : 6 sailings / week
- Number of ILUs per trip : between 2 and 12
- Number of ILU per year: some 2000 import containers per year
Timetable: n.a.
Distance: 185 km (from Antwerp), 285 km (from Rotterdam)
Operation time: 14 hrs (from Antwerp), 18 hours (from Rotterdam)
Equipment: Liner containers
Reliability on time delivery: 100%
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
Comparison between intermodal transport and alternative road scenario in terms of:
Avoided emissions in tons of CO2: 280
Total emissions (tons of CO2eq/year)
% of avoided emission: 62%
No. of equivalent heavy vehicles avoided: 1,146
Avoided fuel consumption: 105 k litres
Contacts
@ Websites
Baxter : www.baxter.be
49
Biard-Somadem
50
Biard Somadem
&
Combidem Investissements / Combidem Transports
Involved Actors
Forwarder: Combidem
Transports (Gentlemen du
Dmnagement - Demeco)
Shipper: Biard Somadem
Route
Operator: Novatrans
50 km to the platform
51
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(Road transport base 100)
KEY DATA
CT estimated cost is about 10 % lower
than road transport cost.
40 swap bodies: 650 000 , for buying
them (2 swap bodies and 1 chassis)
Monetary grants (20% of the total price)
from ADEME
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
CO2 emissions tCO2eq/year)*
KEY DATA
Emissions avoided in tons of CO2: 420
% of emissions avoided: 83 %
Number of equivalent heavy vehicles
avoided: 322 return journeys
Fuel consumption avoided: 160,000 l
LESSONS LEARNT
According to the forwarder:
The most attractive points of this service are the reliability and the quality of the services.
Contacts
@ Websites
52
Email : [email protected]
Construrail
53
Construrail
Actors involved
Shipper: Construction materials
manufacturer
Forwarder: Construrail
Operator: Construrail
Route
Route
Madrid to Coslada
25 km
Coslada to Valencia
350 km
Valencia to Genoa
800 km
Genoa to Parma
200 km
54
Economic aspects
The construction materials manufacturer did not wish to reveal any pricing arrangements it had in place before
adopting the service or prices of the current service. The change from the all road route to the route with rail
transport and ship transport involved no investment costs on behalf of the construction materials
manufacturer. The shipments sent by the customer via this route accounted for approximately 20% of the total
transport volume moved. They use no other intermodal services where road transport is an alternative.
No financial support is provided by either local or national governments in Spain.
Environmental aspects
In this best practice, three 40 containers are sent twice a week by train from Coslada to Valencia and then to
Genoa. This avoids the transport emissions caused by roughly 300 trucks per year making the journey of
1600km on sometimes heavily congested roads (Madrid Barcelona Marseille - Parma). When road
transport is used, roughly 40% of return trips are empty.
Example of February 2008 operational data for the train service from Coslada to Valencia:
Manipulation of 630 containers, with 26 trains (entries + departures). The containers are containers of 20 ', 40'
and 45 '. It moves an average of 25-26 containers by train. The length train varies from 380 m, 400 m, 420 m.
KEY DATA
Emissions avoided in tons of CO2:
443
% of emissions avoided: 44%
Number of equivalent heavy
vehicles avoided: 300
Fuel consumption avoided: 166k l
Lessons learnt
The customer does not think that the positive environmental impact of the combined transport gives any
benefits to the image of your company as they have no real opportunity to broadcast the fact that transport
mode has been changed. The decision to change routes was based purely on economical and logistical
motives. The service is now very well established and serves a very important route, as Valencia is the main
export port for the Madrid region.Construrail wish to increase the service to four times per week in each
direction in the near future. The liberalization of the rail cargo transport sector is a decisive factor to allow the
successful development of this kind of operations.The principal actors in the rail section of this operation are
quite interested in organizing new intermodal connections between Coslada and the ports of Barcelona, Bilbao
and Algeciras.
Contacts
CONSTRU-RAIL, S.A. C/Orense, 11. 2 Planta, 28020 MADRID
Telf.: 915980770 Fax: 915980774 [email protected]
55
@ Websites
Constru-Rail : www.constru-rail.es
Corman
56
Corman
General cargo, dairy products
ACTORS INVOLVED
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Forwarder :
Shipper : Corman
Operator : a barge operator
and various road haulage
companies
ROUTE
Liege Rotterdam
230 km
40 km
OPERATION ELEMENTS
Frequency: daily
Timetable:
Distance: 270 km (245km by road)
Operation time: 3 days (1day road)
Reliability on delivery time:100 %
Equipment: Containers (among
which 50% reefer containers),
owned by shipping lines. Trucks
and barges, owned by the relevant
trucking or barge companies
Key elements
Punctual arrivals: so far, no closings have been missed. Moreover, the barge service
has improved significantly since the beginning of the project, coming from one
barge and two sailings per week to daily departures with two barges.
57
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
KEY DATA
No significant differences on economic aspects in comparison
to the all road solution
When using intermodal transport, it takes about three days to
transport a container from the port to the production site and
back. The road haul takes only one day.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
KEY DATA
LESSONS LEARNT
According to the shipper:
The main problem are the empty containers. In theory, an import container could be reloaded after unloading at the production
plant. In reality however this is not feasible. The shipping lines differ for import and export and the containers are owned by these
shipping lines. Therefore, containers mostly have to be returned to an empty container depot. The same is true for export
containers, which mostly have to be picked up empty in the port area prior to loading. Hence every container still involves two
transports of which one is empty.
Another problem concerns the availability of reefer containers. Most shipping lines are not willing to release an empty reefer
container three days before closing, the time that is needed in case of intermodal transport.
The factors that would increase the frequency of the operations are :
- Higher frequencies
- Introduction of innovative equipment
- Other : introduction of innovative concepts
Contacts
@ Websites
Corman : www.corman.be
E-mail : [email protected]
Laurent Avella Shaw: Managing Director, Corman
58
Corus
59
Corus
General (palletised) cargo :steel products
ACTORS INVOLVED
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Shipper : Corus
Operator : Corus
ROUTE
Ijmuiden - Gelsenkinrchen
232 km
Key elements
Concerning North & South flows the flows are unbalanced, with full cargoes in the
northbound route and empty ones in the southbound route.
Distance: 232 Km
Operation time: Reliability on delivery time: 100
%
Equipment: -
60
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
KEY DATA
CT estimated cost is about 19 % lower than road transport cost.
Corus reduces its total logistic costs
Corus obtained a national support in order to facilitate the
operation
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
KEY DATA
LESSONS LEARNT
According to the forwarders:
The success factors behind the concerned operations are:
- Structured approach
- The modal shift has been realised in a professional and a well-considered way
- Good agreements with intermodal operators
61
Decathlon
62
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Forwarder : Dcathlon
Type of CT: Rail/road
Sector of activity:
specialized distribution
Shipper : TAB
Operator : T3M
ROUTE
Marseille / Valenton
(rail transport)
840 km
LOGISTICS
AND
TECHNICAL
ORGANISATION
LOGISTICS
AND
TECHNICAL
ORGANISATION
Description of transport chain
Sport articles made in China are carried by sea to the port of Fos. Those made in Spain, Portugal,
Italy and France are carried by road.
All the items are then gathered in the terminal of Saint Martin de Crau. Inland haulages from/to
Marseille-Canet are provided by TAB, 6 days a week, 3 times a day (except to Caen).
In the terminal of Marseille-Canet, stevedoring is provided by Naviland Cargo. Swap bodies are
transhipped on T3M trains thanks to 3 reach stackers. A single train can be loaded in 2h30. It is
noteworthy that measures have been overtaken in order to reinforce safety on the site.
From Marseille-Canet, trains leave at 8 pm and arrive in Valenton at 6 am. 40% of the goods are then
OPERATION ELEMENTScarried to Brtigny-sur-Orges, 40%to Bussy-St-Georges and 20% to Caen.
Key elements
Dcathlon has demanded high quality of services from TAB: 95% of the required swap bodies must
be delivered, 90% of reliability in loading delays and 95% of reliability achieved in the final
deliveries.
Seasonality peaks are observed from November to December and then from April to September.
Actually, TAB benefits from an increase in volume-absorbing capacity. Indeed, on one hand, TAB
works for different companies having different sensualities, and, on the other hand, TAB, calling for
T3M, benefits from the controlling of railway and road supplies.
63
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
KEY ELEMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
CO2 emissions (tCO2eq/year)*
KEY DATA
LESSONS LEARNT
To the forwarder, this service is reliable (reliability is reinforced by the strong links between TAB and T3M), fast, safe. Besides
CT alternative is cheaper and benefits from volume-absorbing capacity. It is pretty interesting all the more so as the railway link is
longer than the road link. Ideed, it enables the forwarder to depreciate transhipment fixed cost
To a certain extent reliability can be improved since railway transport had suffered from strikes and breakdowns.
In order to optimize the service, several bottlenecks have to be reduced:
Connections between maritime and railway links should be improved.
Increase the CT connections between France and Spain/Italy.
Increase in the numbers of (un) loading points and in frequency. Indeed Bordeaux, Toulouse, Lyon and Perpignan
demands in transport are very high but those cities are poorly connected.
In order to offset the limited capacity of the railway network, TAB envisages to use 800 m trains.
Reducing the transit time by 2 hours may enable earlier deliveries and then improve Decathlon selling in shops located
far from the railway terminals.
64
DHL Freight
65
DHL Freight
Actors involved
Route
Operator: various
Route
Hinterland to Bari
50 km
Bari to Zeebrugge
1900 km
Zeebrugge to Tilbury
290 km
Road operators usually do not offer domestic and international transport together;
The main direction of domestic traffic is North-South: its difficult to find lines coming back to Northern Italy;
To use the cargo unit both for domestic and international lanes
66
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Generally speaking, the intermodal solution offer a better level of service in terms of security (thefts and accidents) in
comparison with the road transport. In this specific case, the choice of intermodal rather than road transport produced an
economic benefit to DHL Freights customer, since DHL was able to offer a rate for Bari-UK intermodal relation 14%
lower than all-road solution.
The main drivers that made the intermodal solution cheaper than
all-road were:
The cost of the rail traction, more convenient than road transport for distances over 900 km (estimation made by
DHL Freight)
Environmental aspects
DHL Freight is engaged in different green development projects. For this reason DHL Freight offers innovative and
ecological logistic service, reducing the undesired and negative consequences on the environment.
This is the reason why DHL Freight is used to develop and push the rail transport: DHL put his own know how to support
the intermodal transport development, improving the service level on an European scale.
67
68
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Forwarder :
Type of CT: Rail/road
Sector of activity:
Distribution industry
Type of goods: rice,
agrobulk
Starting dates:
2008 Ewals Cargo
Shipper :
Operator : Ewals Cargo
Care
ROUTE
North / South route
South:Nort(h route
Genk - Olen
Genk - Olen
60 km
60 km
One of the clients from Ewals, a food company, imports rice from Italy to Belgium.
The company cooperates with several rice producers around Vercelli and Novara.
Ewals Cargo Care collects the consignments and transports them by road to the
intermodal terminal at Novara. From Novara the goods are transported by train to a
terminal at the inland port of Genk in Belgium. Upon arrival in Genk, all goods were
loaded on trucks for the final haul to Olen. In order to reduce the number of truck
moves, new and multimodal solutions have been examined. The results revealed that
there were no significant alternatives for the truck hauls in Italy. However, on the end
hauls, a modal shift can be generated from truck to barge between the inland port of
Genk and the production site in Olen, a distance of some 60 km. Upon arrival of the
trains at Genk, the containers are stored on the terminal. When the critical mass is
reached, and upon request of the client, 24 to 40 containers, which corresponds to a
consignment of 650 to 1100 tons, are discharged in a barge. Upon arrival at Olen, the
barge is discharged according to the production needs. This way, a part of the storage
at the production site is significantly reduced and shifted towards the barge.
Key elements
Heavily congested roads
69
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
KEY DATA
When only considering the transport costs per ton or per container,
the multimodal transport costs for the traject Genk-Olen are lower
than the road alternative.
n.a.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
KEY DATA
LESSONS LEARNT
According to the operator:
These are the factors that would increase the efficeny of the operations :
- Higher transported volume
- Higher frequencies
- Wider mix of goods transported
- Higher number of shippers (i.e. customers, or competitors using the same service)
- Introduction of innovative equipment
70
Grimaldi
71
Grimaldi S.A.
Actors involved
Forwarder: Company A
Shipper: Various
Operator: Grimaldi S.A.
Route
Route
Lleida to Barcelona
180 km
Civitavecchia to Rome
100 km
72
Economic aspects
Company A did not wish to reveal any pricing arrangements it had in place before adopting the service or
prices of the current service.
The change from the all road route to the route with shipping involved no investment costs on behalf of
Company A nor its clients that use the service.
No financial support is provided by either local or national governments in Spain.
Environmental aspects
In this best practice, eighteen 40 containers a week are shipped from Barcelona to Civitavecchia. This avoids
the transport emissions caused by roughly 900 trucks per year making the journey of 1300km.
KEY DATA
Emissions avoided in tons of CO2:
768
% of emissions avoided: 47 %
Number of equivalent heavy
vehicles avoided: 900
Fuel consumption avoided: 288k l
Volume
Low
Very High
Cost
Economical
Economical
Environmental
Aggressive
Clean
Lessons learnt
The service is well established, and has, among others, the advantage of operating under mixed cargo and
passenger, which ensures the viability of the service.
Company A stresses that a good disposition of Italians carriers for cabotage services was a key factor in
ensuring the success of the service.
Company A is examining the possibilities of expanding it services on other routes from Barcelona to Italy.
73
Kombisztar / Philips
74
Kombisztar/Philips
Actors involved
Shipper: Philips et al
Forwarder: Eurosped
Operator: Kombisztar
Route
Route
Koper
Szkesfehrvr
437 km
Terminal Philips
factory
1.7 km
75
Economic aspects
Being part of the intermodal transport and installing the buck crane, created a favourable position for the
LSCSZ from an economic point of view. Launching shuttle trains also helped to create this favourable position,
compared to the use of only road transport. Since railway transport is less effected by the changes of the oil
prices, it is a more economic way of transport and huge amount of cargo can be transported at one time. They
can deliver 80 TEU-s on one shuttle train as the rules say.
By installing the buck crane the LSCSZ can function in a more economical way.
On the one hand the time of craning has decreased to its one third, so the company is able to receive more
shuttle trains so it increased the capacity. On the other hand the buck crane works with electricity whereas the
previously used mobile trucks work with gas-online.
Unit cost of one lift was reduced by 20% replacing the mobile track.
Environmental aspects
The usage of the train and a buck crane is also essential from the environmental aspect. Because the train is
more advantageous from economic aspect it is more favourable, than the road transport alone, it is meet
environmental protection requires. The company has not only kept thrift in mind when the buck crane was
installed, it was important for the company that the operation pollutes the environment with using of mobile
truck because it uses diesel. While the buck crane uses electricity and it does not pollute the environment so
the air pollution from transhipment has declined to zero. For LSCSZ, such as todays biggest leading
companies, besides thrift environment protection lays emphasis on bigger and bigger emphasis lays on
environment protection. The aims of the company includes the development, the extension of intermodal
transport, the re-route of public traffic to railroad and the application of effective mechanized material
transport. Currently only 7-8 % of transports materializes only on a public road, which may increase, because
of the emergency demand to 10-15% in autumn.
Lessons learnt
The installation of the buck crane the way of intermodal forwarding of LSCSZ and took further steps to protect
the environment. The development of the combiterminal happening with the buck crane the centre has filled
the requirement of the has already been prepared for the traffic expansion of earlier mentioned containers.
With the acquisition and installation of the buck crane the company didnt meet with difficulties. The LSCSZ is
an important traffic hub on national and international level. This development was national interest, this is the
reason why they could get the buck crane.
Contacts
Lszl Firnicz chief executive
KOMBISZTR Kft .- Combiterminal Operation and Development Ltd of Szkesfehrvr,
7. Vsrhelyi t, Szkesfehrvr 8000 Hungary
Telephone: +36-22-522-222 . Fax: +36-22-522-227
E-mail: [email protected]
76
77
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
ROUTE
North / South route
Survilliers - Valenton
38 km
Valenton - Avignon
rail transport
593 km
South:Nort(h route
Avignon St Martin de Crau
40 km
Eyragues Avignon
25 km
Avignon - Valenton
rail transport
593 km
Valenton - Rungis
10 km
Avignon Paris
20h00 4h00
Les Rapides Bleus provides inland transport collecting 15 fresh vegetables & fruits
producers in Eyragues region. The 40 controlled temperature swap bodies are then
loaded on the train at day A night in Avignon. It is noteworthy that Froidcombi uses
an information system which enables loading optimization.
Goods arrive early in the morning of the next day in Valenton Terminal. Then, they
are carried to Rungis Market and are delivered to more than 80 clients.
Office Depot office equipments are carried from Survilliers (Paris region) to Valenton
when they are loaded on the trains to Avignon. Equipments are then carried from
Avignon to Office Depot warehouse in St Martin de Crau.
Office Depot subcontractes inland transport from St Martin de Crau to shops located
in the South of France.
Key elements
Distance: 593 km (680km by road)
Operation time: 8h30 (9 h by road)
Reliability on delivery time: 95 %
Equipment: 4 swap bodies
Concerning North & South flows, thanks to the great diversity of products carried,
there are no unbalanced flows, even if fresh fruits & vegetables flows are seasonal
with a decrease in spring and autumn.
Timetables from Paris or Avignon are actually well adapted to shippers and
forwarders needs. Besides, reliability of the service is good (i.e. 95%)
78
Mepavex Logistics
79
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
ROUTE
70 km
1 km
OPERATION ELEMENTS
After production, the goods are transported by truck to a warehouse with freezing
facilities in Bergen-op-Zoom where value added logistics activities are performed and
where the goods are loaded into reefer containers and further transported by truck to
the ports of Antwerp and Rotterdam. For these reasons a modal shift is realised from
truck to barge. After production, the goods will still be transported by truck to the
warehouse in Bergen op Zoom. After stuffing the reefer containers are further
transported by truck to an inland terminal, also in Bergen op Zoom, at about 1 km
from the warehouse. From this terminal a barge service will dispatch the reefers to the
export terminals in the ports of Antwerp and Rotterdam.
Key elements
The aim is to transport all reefer containers between Bergen op Zoom and the ports of
Antwerp and Rotterdam by barge.
80
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
KEY DATA
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
KEY DATA
LESSONS LEARNT
According to the operator:
In the next five years, the new terminal will be a public terminal, i.e. other parties can use the terminal as well against the
applicable market rates. Already, other parties are showing interest in the terminal. The location of the terminal near to two
mainports, the promotion of multimodal transport, together with the increasing road congestion and the growing awareness of
environmental issues will certainly attract more volumes. The more volumes that are attracted, the more (cost-)efficient the
terminal can operate and the more connections to the ports can be offered.
81
Metrans
82
Metrans
Involved Actors
Route
Route
Prague - Hamburg
681 km
Prague - Bremerhaven
759 km
Lipa/Zlin - Hamburg
929 km
D.Streda - Hamburg
1051 km
83
84
OKD
85
OKD
Involved Actors
Forwarder:
OKD, Doprava
Bohemiakombi
Kombiverkehr
Shipper: OKD
Operator: OKD, Doprava,
RBH, Bayerische CargoBahn,
Railion Deutschland
Route
Route
Ostrava - Gladbeck
1085 km
86
Contacts
@ Websites
OKD, Doprava : www.okd-doprava.cz
Bohemiakombi: www.bohemiakombi.cz
Kombiverkehr: www.kombiverkehr.de
87
Soufflet
88
Soufflet-SNTC
ACTORS INVOLVED
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Forwarder: Soufflet
Operators: SNTC/ SCAT
Inland waterways
shipper: SCAT
Road carrier: CARline
ROUTE
Polisot-Le Havre
512 kms
Key elements
Presently flows are homogenous and do not suffer from
seasonal variations. Cereal products transport do not have
specific needs but has to deal with maritime ships closing
dates.
89
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
The putting into service of this transport chain, has benefited
from public aids:
To buy a reach stacker (partly financed by ADEME
and VNF)
For handling operations (10,04 / break bulk)
According to Soufflet, CT costs are little lower than road
transport costs. However, handling operations in the port of Le
Havre mean other costs: 30/ container + 15 /container
carried to the new port terminal.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
KEY DATA
LESSONS LEARNT
This service can be considered as a success story thanks to the great cooperation between the forwarder and the shipper which led
to the creation of a new shared capital company and new service operating on inland waterways.
The service benefits from:
High load rate, mass transportation
High frequency of turn rounds
Transit time reliability
A single interlocutor for a global service
Besides the service does not seem such oil- prices- fluctuation-sensitive.
However, the inland waterway infrastructure in Nogent could be more efficient. Indeed, barges size is limited. That is the reason
why, Soufflet in cooperation with CCI and VNF, are planning to invest in a new terminal (6 ha). This new terminal would be a trimodal platform able to store and load 40 containers and benefiting from a railway connection. An investment in bigger barges is
also planned.
Besides the shippers deplore the fact that handling, in the port of le Havre, is made by dockers which it is not supposed to be as the
service is not maritime.
Contacts
Fabrice DUBOIS, Director of Logistics Soufflet ; SNTC manager
Tel : 03.25.39.41.11
Email : [email protected]
Philippe MAUGE, Directeur du Dveloppement de la SCAT,
Tl : 01.39.22.25.24
90
@Websites
Soufflet: http://www.soufflet-group.com
Tangs Freres
91
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Type of combined
transport:
Inland waterway / road
(extension of a maritime
line)
OPERATOR : LOGISEINE
Sector of activity:
Distribution industry
Type of goods:
Non-perishable food
LE HAVRE-GENNEVILLIERS
Le Havre-Gennevilliers
Fleuve
340 km
Gennevilliers-Vitry Sur
seine/Alfortville
35 km
OPERATION ELEMENTS
Frequency: 4 times a week
Timetable: Le Havre (7am-7pm)
Gennevilliers (from 6am)
Distance: 390 km
Operation time: 36 h
Equipment: barge-pusher,
20container, gantry cranes
Reliabity of transit time: 100%
Unitised import flows are handled by CMA/CGM from Far East to port of Le Havre.
Containers are handled by gantry cranes towards barges owned by CFT. Then,
LOGISEINE provides combined door-to-door transport services. It handles those
containers 4 times a week which enables LOGISEINE face emergencies (e.g. increase in
demand). When the containers arrive in Gennevilliers, they are transhipped on lorries (44
T with 3 axles or 40 T with 2 axles) in order to be carried to Tang Frres distribution
centres located in Vitry-sur-Seine. Tang Frres, after centralizing goods, dispatches them,
using its own fleet, to all Ile-de-France. Concerning international deliveries (mainly
towards Spain an d Belgium), Tang Frres subcontracts transport.
Key Elements
As Tang Frres flows are seasonal, orders are established in advance and thus transport
operations are pretty simplified. Besides, only non perishable goods are carried on inland
waterway thus long transit time does not matter.
92
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
25
50
75
100
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
KEY DATA
100
200
300
400
LESSONS LEARNT
To the forwarder, this operation is actually a success thanks to the high quality and reliability of service.
According to the operator, this success story is due to the creation of the EIG which enabled the internalisation of income items.
On one hand, LOGISEINE found it hard to change the forwarders working habits in the field of transport demand expectation.
Indeed, inland waterways transport needs scheduling and anticipation. On the other hand, Tang Frres did not encounter any
difficulty.
Both actors foresee an increase in forwarders demand of inland waterways transport. In order to satisfy its potential needs, various
goals have to be reached. Actors have to:
Carry on improving reliability and efficiency of inland waterways transport.
Improve the existing infrastructures and to remove bottlenecks (canal locks)
Reduce handling costs in order to make the inland waterways transport more competitive in relation to road transport.
Contacts
Mr PRASIT, TANG FRERES, Logistics director,
Tel : 01.49.60.56.24 Email : [email protected]
93
@ Websites
http://www.cft.fr
http://www.logiseine.com
Transfesa
94
Transfesa-Renault
ACTORS INVOLVED
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Forwarder : Renault
Type of CT: Rail/road
Sector of activity: Car
industry.
Type of goods: engines
Operator & Shipper :
Transfesa
ROUTE
La Chapelle - Valladolid
1196 kms
OPERATION ELEMENTS
Renault loads 20 swap bodies per day (200 days per annum) to Spain on the
Paris-Madrid Transfesa train (loading capacity: 40 swap bodies). On the
northbound going train, half of the swap bodies are filled with empty
packaging and motors made in Valladolid, the remaining swap bodies are filled
with other goods. Transfesa uses Megacombi swap bodies which are wellplanned for parts of motor vehicles transportation (13m40x2m95x2m45).
The Paris-Madrid train leaves La Chapelle terminal at 8:30 pm. Transfesa uses
an axle-changing system at the border which lasts 5 hours (actually faster than
transhipment). Total transit time accounts for 23 hours.Inland transport from
Valladolid to the plants are also operated by Transfesa.
Key elements
Transit time reliability is fundamental since Renault plants use just-in-time
system of production. On the Flins-Valladolid axis the reliability of transit time
is 85% (< 30 min). Only 3% of the lorries have 2-hours delay.
95
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
CO2 emissions (tCO2eq/year)*
KEY DATA
Emissions avoided in tons of CO2: 22 315
% of emissions avoided: 65 %
Number of equivalent heavy vehicles
avoided: 11,000
Fuel consumption avoided: 8,380,000 l
LESSONS LEARNT
Renault has drastically reduced handling costs building a platform within its plant in Valladolid.
However, presently, there is only one departure scheduled from Paris and reliability on transit time has to be high in order to meet
the just-in-time production standards.
In order to face those constraints, Renault has increased its stocks and has adapted its organisation to supply and productions
logics.
Contacts
Jean-Louis Legout, Transfesa, DDG
Tel : 01.41.11.57.40 Email : [email protected]
Thomas Vernier, Renault Head of plant parts and accesories supply
Department
Tel : 01.76.82.82.64 Email : [email protected]
96
@ Websites
Transfesa : www.transfesa.com
Renault : www.renault.fr
Transitalia
97
ACTORS INVOLVED
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Forwarder : Transitalia
Shipper : various
Operator : Grimaldi Lines
ROUTE
Salerno - Valencia
Valencia - Madrid
593 km
400 km
100 km
Key elements
Concerning Italy Spain flows, thanks to the great diversity of products carried and the
expertise of Transitalia in gaining load returns, there are no unbalanced flows.
Timetables from Salerno are actually well adapted to shippers and forwarders needs,
with a tri-weekly connection. Besides, reliability of the service is good (i.e. 100%)
98
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Total medium cost estimation
(road transport base 100)
KEY DATA
Transitalia estimated cost is about 10 % lower than road
transport cost
The total intermodal price per ILU is about 1,850 , divided in
25% for the main haulage, 35% for the pre-haulage and 45%
for the post haulage.
Transitalia does not benefit from a State aid to facilitate the
operation
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
KEY DATA
LESSONS LEARNT
According to the forwarder:
The success factors behind the concerned operation are the arc effect (reduction of the overall distance by using the intermodal
solution, due to the geographical conformation of the West Med area). Also road congestion, feasibility of the service and low
prices concur in advantaging the intermodal solution.
Another problem rose by Transitalia is the weak competition among shipping lines on Italy Spain routes: nowadays only Grimaldi
offers this type of connection and Transitalia argues that the entrance of a new company would probably benefit the competiveness
of the intermodal solution.
Contacts
Ugo Zingaropoli, Transitalia, Manager
Email : [email protected]
@ Websites
Transitalia : www.transitaliasrl.it
Grimaldi : www.grimaldi,napoli.it
99
Volvic
100
ACTORS INVOLVED
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
ROUTE
Forwarder: Volvic
Type of CT: Inland
waterways/road (extension
of a maritime line)
Operator : RSC
ROUTE
CEBAZAT-LYON TERMINAL-FOS SUR MER
CEBAZAT-LYON
TERMINAL
(road 190 km)
LYON TERMINAL-FOS
SUR MER (320 km)
Exports to Japon
Origin
of theELEMENTS
project
OPERATION
Volvic flows used to be carried by railways from Plane Logistique platform by CNC (Compagnie Nouvelle de Conteneurs). In 2005,
CNC stopped providing this service so Plane had to seek other alternatives to railway transport thus it started a new collaboration
with transports Klinzing. Since then, 95% of the Volvic flows towards Asia are carried by inland waterways.
Plane uses its own fleet and provides shuttle services to carry bottles of water
by road from Volvic plant to its platform in Cbazat.
Pallets are loaded in 40 containers after a quality control (Danone standards).
Transports Klinzing carries empty containers from Lyon in the morning and
then carries the full containers to Lyon terminal
Containers are then loaded on removable ballast barge fitted out with pushers
and carried towards the port of Fos sur mer.
Key elements
The combined alternative is safe, reliable. Besides the quality of service is
high.
Barge transport is ideal for carrying sea-borne cargo. Besides, at Lyon
terminal, the forwarder benefits from a duty-free provision for the storage of
containers. It lasts 3 days for empty containers and 7 days for full containers.
101
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
CO2 emissions (tCO2eq/year)*
KEY DATA
Emissions avoided in tons of CO2: 378
% of emissions avoided: 16 %
Number of equivalent heavy vehicles
avoided: 2,350
Fuel consumption avoided: 141,900 l
* Data calculated from ADEMEs carbon balance methodology for transport
between Cebazat and port of Fos from January 2006 to December 2006.
LESSONS LEARNT
Success factors
- Good cooperation between RSC and transports Klinzing
-
Lagging factors
The main impediment was the mis-knowledge of the system and means. Besides, the operators had to deal with the working habits
of the forwarders: any transportation must be scheduled at least 8 days in advance.
There exists also congestion on inland waterways at the locks all the more so as passenger ships always have the priority. At last,
ports infrastructures do not enable fast handling operations.
Further developments
Concerning the operation 3 factors may enable improving and optimising the transport:
- Improve in the waterways infrastructures in order to reduce congestion
- It seems indispensable for the road carrier being able to load empty containers the night before at Lyon terminal so
that, the logistician can load them earlier in the morning
- Considering the forwarder: increase in frequency which means increase in the number of barges.
Contacts
Philippe ROUMEAU, PLANE LOGISTIQUE, CEO
Tel : 04.73.16.30.58 Email : [email protected]
Mourad BOUHAMDANI, Transports Klinzing, Director
Tel : 04.75.78.48.94 Email : [email protected]
102
@ Websites
http://www.groupe-plane.com
Whirpool Europe
103
pp
ACTORS INVOLVED
NATURE OF THE
PROJECT
Forwarder : LKW,
Hangartner
ROUTE 1
ROUTE 2
Shipper : Whirlpool
Operator (MTO):
Hangartner, Hupac,
ROUTE 1
ROUTE 2
Rostock (DE)
Trelleborg (SE)
150 km
Route 1
OPERATION ELEMENTS
104
Route 2
ECONOMIC ASPECTS
Cost estimation (road transport base 100)
Cost savings compared to the all-road solution
are relevant; they certainly represent the major
driver of this operation.
Total
(%)
Total costs
costs (%)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
CO2 emissions (tCO2eq/year)
KEY DATA
Emissions avoided in tons of CO2:
3308
% of emissions avoided: 83 %
Number of equivalent heavy
vehicles avoided: 1336
Fuel consumption avoided: 1,2 m l
105
LESSONS LEARNT
According to the shipper:
Intermodal transport is used as long as it is economically convenient compared to the all-road solution. This happens
because the economic factor is predominant in this supply chain compared to other factors, such as lead-time or
delays. The environmental aspects are also a driver of the companys decisions and initiatives are implemented in this
sense at all levels of the companys operations, though they do not directly affect the transport choice.
Linked to the flexibility advantage given by the use of swap bodies, an agreement with intermodal operators is
potentially feasible, which would overcome problems of availability due to overbooking, by leaving a certain amount of
swap bodies at the disposal of the shipper. For the next 5-10 years an increase in the flow of goods carried by
intermodal transport is foreseen: road transports will be shifted to both rail and intermodal. The United Kingdom,
though at present impossible to serve via intermodal transport, is one of the most promising markets.
For the future, the present success of intermodal solutions in Whirlpool is triggering the concept of European Corridors
that would link their production sites (10 in Europe) to their Regional Distribution Centres (around 25 in Europe).
Contacts
@ Websites
Hangartner: www.hangartner.it
106