Preface to the Container Handbook When the first container ship docked in Bremen on 6 May 1966, it caused, as does

any novelty, a great deal of excitement. But back then, nobody could imagine the extent of the revolution that had been set in motion. Initially, people smiled condescendingly at the "boxes", but soon it was the rationalization potential that became the focus of attention. Labor-intensive and damaging cargo handling processes at the ports were no longer necessary. Transshipment times were cut to a fraction of those previously required on general cargo ships thanks to the possibility of moving entire truck loads on to ships in the form of containers. The real revolution, however, only began as an increasing number of ports developed facilities for the transshipment, storage and clearance of containers. In parallel to this, the slot capacities for containers on ships rose from a few hundred TEU to the current figure of eight thousand TEU, and larger shipping units are now being planned. Ship speeds, which have almost doubled since containerization first got under way at the end of the 1960s, are also a significant factor that has enabled containerization to grow at the rate it has. Ever faster and more economical transportation using logistics systems that span the entire globe have made it possible to achieve the division of labor that we know today. These are synergetic processes that will continue to lead to above average growth rates in container transport. Many recurrent problems associated with traditional general cargo transport, such as petty theft ( = furturi mici ), load damage as a result of repeated transshipment, etc. appeared to have been solved at once with the introduction of the "container" transport system. Its supporters were soon proclaiming a new age of damagefree transportation thanks to the huge metal boxes. These unrealistic hopes were soon dispelled ( to dispel = a imprastia ) in the face of new types of damage which were specific to containers. Organized crime emerged in place of petty theft, with entire containers being stolen to order. Professional cargo care, as provided by an experienced and well-trained crew during transportation on general cargo ships, is not carried out for containers, and the cargo is instead left 'to its own devices'. Professional stowage of the cargo by dock workers on board the general cargo ships now takes the form of stuffing (packing) the containers inland, either at "stuffing centers" or by the forwarder. This has resulted in a new and typical pattern of damage. Moisture, mold ( = mucegai ) and corrosion are equally responsible for damage as the failure to secure cargo correctly. There is a close connection between the latter and accidents related to cargo securing on large container ships, which cause hundreds of containers to be lost or destroyed and can threaten the existence of entire container ships and their crew. Employing untrained staff to load containers can also have a negative effect on the quality of the transport operations, as does the reduction in packaging, which was initially to be welcomed on environmental grounds, but soon fell foul of an exaggerated cost awareness. In the face of the current damage situation, the German transport insurers' loss prevention committee at GDV saw it as their duty to make a contribution to securing a fundamental improvement in the quality of container transport. This Container Handbook is the result of more than four years' work by three authors, based on the latest internationally recognized CTU (Cargo Transport Unit) packing guidelines. Users can call up fundamental or detailed information from this online resource, and can use it for personal study or to support their daily work. But despite the comprehensive nature of this work, it is still essential that those who are responsible for loading a container correctly have completed the proper training. More information on training programs and objectives as well as a training plan will also be available at this web address in the near future, thanks to the Container Handbook team. Through the comprehensive explanations in the Container Handbook, the committee wants to make it possible for all users to put the CTU packing guidelines into practice. If this standard is strictly adhered to, around seventy percent of all damage in container transportation could be avoided. In order that these standards are applied and implemented not only in German-speaking regions, the Container Handbook will be available globally in English as of September 2003. The global economy depends on the smooth exchange of goods. Any damage results in a waste of resources. Loss prevention measures are not only economically necessary but also directly protect the environment. Surveys of transport practice have revealed that almost seventy percent of all packed containers, swap bodies, road and rail vehicles or other cargo transport units exhibit shortcomings in packing and load securing which could result in damage. The aim of this section of the Container Handbook, "Securing the product in the container", is to prevent damage due to negligent packing and inadequate load securing. The author's original intention was to present mainly good examples of packing and to complement these some

bad examples as a deterrent. However, the real situation was so bad that he was unfortunately compelled to write the Handbook in such a way that lessons could be learnt from the load securing errors which had been made. Detailed comments are provided as to how these errors could be remedied or avoided. The author very deeply regrets the fact that so very few properly secured container loads could be found in practice which could have served as good examples for a Handbook. 1.1 The history of the container / In May 2001, Malcolm P. McLean, the "Father of Containerization", died aged 87. He used to say that he had the idea of rationalizing goods transport by avoiding the constant loading and unloading from one means of transport to another way back at the end of the 1930s at the port of Hoboken, when still operating as a small-scale hauler. To start with, McLean would load complete trucks onto ships, in order to transport them as close as possible to their destination. The development of standardized containers and trailers, moved by tractors, made it possible to ship just the trailers with the containers, so saving on space and costs. Later, the trailers were also left behind and the ships transported just the containers. Shipowners were more than a little skeptical about McLean's idea. This prompted him to become a shipowner himself and he appropriately named his company Sea-Land Inc. At the end of the 1990s, McLean sold his company to the Maersk shipping company, but his company name lives on in the name Maersk Sealand. In the literature, the "Ideal X" is mentioned as the first container freighter. This ship left Newark on 26th April 1956 carrying 58 containers, which it transported to Houston. The first ship designed to carry only containers is the "Maxton", a converted tanker, which could carry 60 containers as deck cargo. That was in 1956. Another decade passed before the first container ship moored in Europe. The first container on German soil was set down by the "Fairland" at Bremer berseehafen on 6th May 1966. The first containers used by SeaLand in Northern Europe were 35' ASA containers, i.e. they were constructed to American standards. In other regions, 27' ASA containers and other ASA dimensions were often used. Shipowners in Europe and Japan quickly recognized the advantages of the container and also invested in the new transport technology. Since American standards could only be applied with difficulty to conditions in Europe and other countries, an agreement was eventually reached with the Americans after painstaking negotiations. The resulting ISO standards provided for lengths of 10', 20', 30' and 40'. The width was fixed at 8' and the height at 8' and 8'6". For land transport within Europe, agreement was reached on a 2.50 m wide inland container, which is mainly used in combined road/rail transport operations. The majority of containers used worldwide today comply with the ISO standard, with 20'and 40'-long containers predominating. For some years, the ISO standard has come repeatedly under pressure. As stowage factors increase for most goods, many forwarders want longer, wider and higher containers, preferably all at once. Some shipowners have given in to the pressure and containers of dimensions larger than provided for by the ISO standard are now encountered distinctly more frequently. "Jumbo" containers of 45' and 48' in length, widths of 8'6" (2.60 m) and heights of 9'6" (2.90m) have been in existence for some years. Efforts to build even larger containers, e.g. 24' (7.43m) and 49' (14.40m) boxes 2.60 m wide and 2.90 m high, are mostly confined to the USA. Even 53' long containers have been in use for some time throughout the USA, while some states will even allow 57'. In Europe and on other continents, narrower roads are a limiting factor. Developing countries are understandably against changing the standards. More details are given in the section entitled "Container dimensions and weights".

1.2

Container flows / The huge investments made in containerization have paid off and container traffic is still continuing to grow. Although growth will not be as unbridled as in the past, it will continue until all conventional transport operations have, within a container's limits of capacity and weight, been containerized. By then, it is estimated that there will be some 8000 ships in operation with a total slot capacity of nine to ten million standard containers. There will be approximately the same number of containers ashore being packed or unpacked, awaiting stuffing or unstuffing or being transferred. The majority of these containers are standard 20 foot box containers. While there are special containers for many applications, growth rates for these are not significant.

From the standpoint of container traffic, it would be ideal for there to be a balance between incoming and outgoing containers in a particular region, not only in terms of numbers, but also in terms of container type and weight. Unfortunately, such a balance is not achievable. There will thus always be empty containers to be transported in one direction or another. From the shipping company's standpoint, general purpose containers usable in any circumstances would be a major advantage. Forwarders, on the other hand, would prefer special containers if they could be carried at identical cost, as packing and securing is much easier in a special container than in a standard container.

For example, steel sheet in coils can very quickly be loaded onto coil containers and straightforwardly secured. They are rather more difficult to pack and secure on flatracks, while they are particularly difficult to pack and secure in box containers. Shipowners accepting containers loaded with coils for transport to Colombia would, if the rolls of sheet steel were shipped in coil containers, also have to take a large number of empty standard ventilated containers to Colombia in order to transport coffee from Colombia to Europe. Moreover, the coil containers, which are of no further use in Colombia, would have to be transported empty to somewhere where they could be used again. As a result, steel sheet in coils will be transported to Colombia in "coffee containers" which are less suitable for carrying such cargoes. Another example: in order to save on the higher freight costs associated with using tank containers, flexitanks are placed inside normal standard box containers, the walls of which are frequently damaged by surging of the liquid in the flexitanks. A further example: experience has shown that containers exported from Europe to East Asia are, on average, heavier than those imported from East Asia. In order to be able to carry the same weight of cargo in containers in both directions, empty containers have to be transported out to East Asia. If many 40 foot containers are required to carry "light" cargoes from East Asia to Europe, it is sensible also to use these containers in Europe to carry "heavy" cargoes to East Asia. Users of these containers get plenty of transport space, which is not actually required, plus a "securing problem" because such containers cannot be tightly packed. The majority of the world's container stocks are owned by shipping companies. Quite a few are, however, leased in both large and small numbers to shipowners or other interested parties by leasing companies. Some forwarders ship goods in their own containers, but these are generally special containers for bulk cargoes, tank containers for chemicals or beverages or coil containers for the steel industry etc.

1.3.1.1

Container-carrying vessels, part 1 Foreword

Anyone using containers for maritime transport should have at least some kind of idea of what kinds of vessels are used for this purpose. When people who are not shipping professionals read press articles about gigantic new container ships, they find it hard to imagine that such ships could experience problems at sea. It is very often also forgotten that even containers which have been carried for the vast majority of their voyage on ultra-modern ships will have to be carried for the remainder of their voyage, quite possibly highly adventurously, on very different kinds of ships. This section of the Container Handbook is thus intended to provide an overview of the different kinds of ships which may be used to carry containers. Reference should be made to the appropriate specialist literature if detailed information is wanted or required.

Ships - general

Ships may be distinguished on the basis of various different criteria, for example by

type of propulsion; region of service; function; tonnage or measurement; arrangement of decks or superstructures etc.

Type of propulsion will not be a major concern for most maritime shipping customers. In most cases, users will assume that the goods will be carried by motor or turbine ships. The following and similar abbreviations are often found in the shipping documents prefixing the ship's designation: MS = motor ship;

TS = turbine ship; CMV = container motor vessel; CTV = container turbine vessel. However, it is still good to know whether containers will be carried onwards with other vessels, perhaps even sailing ships or open flatboats. This is not uncommon in some parts of the world, for example in the Indonesian archipelago. Differentiation by region of service is often clear simply from the ship's name. Examples are lakers (for use on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway), coasters (for coastal shipping), European inland waterway vessels, oceangoing vessels etc.. For shipping professionals, the name is enough to give them a picture of the nature and appearance of the ship and how it accommodates cargo etc.. A ship's function is also generally reflected in its name, for example underwater vehicle, fishing vessel, tugboat, buoy-laying vessel, warship or the like. As their name would suggest, feeder ships, for example, carry goods for onward carriage by other ships. Classification by tonnage, measurement, arrangement of superstructures etc. is generally only of interest to the specialist. Laypeople will be largely unconcerned whether goods are being carried on a full scantling, open-deck, shelter-deck or flush-deck vessel, a three-island or any other kind of vessel, although knowing the kind of vessel makes it possible to draw important conclusions about the type of carriage, transport risks, handling stresses etc.. The interested layperson should, however, be aware that gross or net register tonnages are not directly indicative of the size of a vessel, while the more recent terms gross and net tonnage are little more help. Every shipper or charterer should know the term deadweight, which is the ship's payload in metric tons. And it certainly does no harm to know that the ship's displacement or displacement tonnage is its total weight, i.e. the sum of the weight of the empty, operational ship plus all permitted payload. This section of the Container Handbook will now outline some essential distinguishing features of those merchant ships which carry containers and comparable "combined transport units". Press articles often refer to the "type of freight" in this connection, but strictly speaking this is incorrect as freight is the amount of money the shipowner or carrier receives for transporting the cargo.

Before taking a closer look at various types of ship, a breakdown by handling method may be helpful:

Breakdown by handling method

Lo-lo stands for lift-on/lift-off The cargo is lifted in and out of the ship (loaded and unloaded) using on-board lifting gear or loading gear, such as derricks, on-board cranes or gantries, or also on-shore lifting gear. This is the traditional handling method and is used for most ships throughout the world.

Ro-ro stands for roll-on/roll-off, meaning that the cargo is moved on and off the ship on wheels. This is achieved in various different ways. Loaded trucks drive on/off ship under their own power, the driver either traveling with the truck and continuing onward carriage or leaving the truck to continue its journey unaccompanied. In either case door-to-door transport is possible. Trailers or chassis are driven on board with special terminal tractors. Roll trailers are packed at the port of departure, hauled on board with special ro-ro tractors, hauled off at the port of destination and unpacked there. A similar situation applies to cassettes or container bolsters packed in port, which are lifted up with special terminal vehicles and rolled on board and back off again. This method covers all types of ship involved, for example, in ferry traffic. Containers and swap-bodies are here (virtually) exclusively embarked and disembarked on roll trailers, chassis and similar means. Sto-ro stands for stow and roll. In this case, the cargo is rolled on or off ship using one of the above methods, but is conventionally stowed when on board, usually by means of forklift trucks. This method is not used for container traffic. Flo-flo stands for float-on/float-off. Other variants are possible. Floating goods or goods loaded onto floating cargo carriers are floated in and out of dock-like holds in the ship. Alternatively, the carrier vessel semisubmerges, moves under the cargo, refloats and lifts the cargo into the predetermined stowage space. The cargo is unloaded by performing the process in reverse. This method may be used for container transport if floating cargo carriers, such as barges, have already been loaded with containers. In the truck-to-truck method, the cargo is set down using ground conveyors, such as forklift trucks, onto on-board lifts, raised/lowered to the appropriate loading level, where it is loaded using ground conveyors. Discharge proceeds in the reverse order. This method is not suitable for container traffic. In the lift-and-roll method, the cargo is lifted on board with on-board loading gear or winch platforms and then rolled into place. This method is preferably used with a special type of barge carrier. This method is suitable for container traffic if the containers have previously been loaded onto or into the barges. Wo-wo or walk-on/walk-off sounds comical, but is in fact the commonest handling method for livestock carriers. The animals walk onto and off the ship. The same principle applies to all passenger vessels. A rough classification of ship type by kind of cargo carried could look as follows:

Overview of merchant ship types

The above list is not exhaustive, but does give a relatively good overview of common types of merchant vessel. In many ships, there is some overlap between the various options for carrying goods and the vessels cannot be assigned as strictly to one category or another as the list might suggest. There have always been many different kinds of vessel, but recent years have seen the introduction of many more. There is an unmistakable trend towards multipurpose ships. This makes it difficult to make general statements about what ships look like and how they are equipped. Ships virtually always exhibit individual differences. Even sister and standard type vessels are not identical in every respect. In terms of naval architecture, there are no problems finding suitable vessels for cargo transport operations. Organizationally, however, it is more difficult to find the correct ship. It may be that certain vessels only serve specific ports or that certain cargos can only be carried in ships of a particular nationality. One major issue is the increasing lack of skilled crews and stevedores in some parts of the world. In relation to container shipping, ro-ro and ferry traffic, packing and securing in and on cargo transport units is a significant problem. Non-seafarers underestimate the hazards of maritime transport and so for the most part pack and secure cargoes inadequately. The following paragraphs contain some comments on a selection from the huge range of different ships which may be of interest to container importers and exporters. General cargo ships are only included to the extent that they also carry containers in many regions. For the most part, the many different kinds of vessels will be described only briefly. At the beginnings of container traffic, most containers were carried on conventional general cargo vessels.

General cargo ship

Such vessels are designed to carry dry cargoes. Each hold comprises one or more relatively low 'tween decks and a lower hold. The ships generally have a relatively large quantity of light cargo handling gear. Virtually every ship is equipped with appropriate loading gear for heavy-lift cargoes in the central hatch area. Lockers are provided for carrying particularly valuable cargoes. Some ships also have relatively small capacity sweet oil tanks. General cargo ships of this old design are no longer being built, but many are still in use throughout the world. The seakeeping ability of most such vessels at sea, low stowage heights and the like generally mean that carriage is safe and loss-free if individual containers are located in favorable stowage spaces and carefully secured. Further information in this connection is provided in the shipping stresses section. Modern general cargo ships are built to perform different transport functions; to distinguish them from other multipurpose freighters, they are sometimes known as break-bulk freighters. In addition to the equipment which makes them suitable for carrying break-bulk cargoes, they generally also have facilities to allow them to accommodate containers. Such ships are of open construction, i.e. the hatch area is very large relative to the deck area. This ensures that lifting gear can gain direct access to containers. The same applies to general cargo or access is at least facilitated to such an extent that below deck stowage can (very largely) be avoided. Specific construction features may increase handling efficiency in port and reduce the loss ratio.

Multipurpose container vessel

Semi-container vessels are suitable for carrying both normal general cargo and containers. Hold dimensions, deck loading values, the load-carrying capacity of the loading gear etc. are tailored to the carriage of standard shipping containers. Such vessels have 'tween decks generally with flush-closing mechanical hatch covers.

Semi-container vessel

All-container ships are in principle of open construction as it must be possible to gain direct access to each container with lifting gear such as top spreaders and similar gear. In order to obtain smooth, squared holds, these vessels are often constructed with a double hull. Any holds which are unsuitable for carrying containers are often fitted out as tanks. There are no 'tween decks. All-container ships primarily carry containers and are specially equipped for this purpose. If the ports of the region of service are equipped with sufficiently powerful lifting gear, container ships are generally operated without loading gear. In other regions of service, container ships too need loading gear in the form of derricks, cranes or gantries. Particular attention must be paid to the hydrodynamic design of container ships which operate at high cruising speeds. The tall, heavy deck loads cause problems with righting capacity. In order to ensure adequate stability, most all-container ships thus have to carry special solid or liquid ballast and/or be broader amidships. The capsize risk of the vessels can be kept within acceptable limits by high values of the roll moment of inertia. Large ballast capacities and high power pumps are absolutely essential, both for trimming the ships and for offsetting longitudinal bending moments. Shipbuilders can tailor characteristics by selecting appropriate ratios between length, beam, molded depth, draft and other dimensions. The deadweight and hold capacity of container ships may also be stated in metric tons and cubic meters. The number of available slots for 20' or 40' containers, however, is more meaningful. TEU means "Twenty foot Equivalent Unit", while FEU means "Forty foot Equivalent Unit". All-container ships are divided into generations depending upon their container capacity. Roughly speaking, the generations can be divided as follows: Generation up to 1000 TEU Generation up to Generation up to 2000 TEU 3000 TEU

Generation more than 3000 TEU Generation more than 6000 TEU Generation more than 8000 TEU

2nd generation container ship This Figure shows a second generation container ship. This is a Bremer Vulkan standard vessel which was built in various sizes over several generations. (BV 1000, BV 1600, BV 1800, BV 1800 S, BV 1900 and BV 2200, 2200 OH and BV 3800). The variant shown has on-board lifting gear.

3rd generation container ship

CTV "Bremen Express" is a third generation vessel and has a container capacity of 2950 TEU, while CMV "Frankfurt Express", which was built in 1981, has a capacity of more than 3400 TEU.

4th generation container ship

One of the first fourth generation vessels, which have slots for more than 4000 TEU, was put into service by American President Lines. Hapag-Lloyd's Hannover Express class container ships, which were put into service in 1992, are similar to the American President Line vessels and were designed as Panamax ships. Technical data: Class: GL + 100 A 4 E + MC AUT "container ship" Length overall Length between perpendiculars Molded beam Depth to main deck Design draft 294.00 281.60 32.25 21.40 12.00 m m m m m

Maximum draft Deadweight, 12.00 m draft Deadweight, 13.52 m draft Cruising speed Cruising range Fuel consumption at 12 m draft and 23 kn as above with auxiliary diesel engines Container capacity on deck Container capacity below deck Total container capacity Reefer connections on deck Reefer connections below deck Total reefer connections Main engine: MAN B&W 9K 90 MC + TCS (Hyundai license) Power output at 93 rpm Power output at 93 rpm Diesel generators, total of 4, of which 2 Daihatsu/Taiyo Diesel generators, total of 4, of which 2 Daihatsu/Taiyo Emergency diesel generator, one Total diesel generator power output Bow thruster, power output Bow thruster, thrust Heavy oil tank capacity Diesel oil tank capacity Ballast water tank capacity Fresh water tank capacity

13.52 52,600 64,500 23 24,000 138 148 2125 2282 4407 348 104 452

m metric tons metric tons kn sm metric tons/day metric tons/day TEU TEU TEU units units units

36,500 49,640 2200 1650 350 8050 2500 324,000 7360 360 16,770 280

kW HP kW kW kW kW kW kN m m m m

Approx. 48.25% of the containers can thus be carried on deck and approx. 51.75% below deck. A special design makes it possible to carry up to 11 rows of containers below deck and up to 13 rows on deck up to heights of 10 tiers below deck and 5 tiers on deck. The forebody has 29 bays available, while the afterbody has 6. The versatility of the ships is enhanced by the possibility of lowering "flaps" in the guide system so that containers can be stopped at a certain height. Ordinary general cargo can be stowed in the resultant holds. This option is, however, also available in other ships. Hapag-Lloyd was the first to install the system on the "Humboldt-Express". In order, as required by regulations, to be able to transport hazardous cargo containers of certain classes below deck, five holds are specially fitted out for this purpose. Better segregation also makes it possible to increase the dangerous goods capacity in general relative to other ships. There is a huge variety of different container ships in operation, as is shown, for example, by the ten new container vessels built in 1998 in Japan for the United Arab Shipping Company (UASC), Kuwait, each with a slot capacity of 3802 TEU, 2068 TEU of which, or 54.4% of the containers, can be carried in the hold.

Vessel characteristics: Length overall 276.5 m m m m m

Length between perpendiculars 259.9 Beam Molded depth Design draft Propulsion Speed 32.2 21.2 12.5

34 348 kW 24.1 kn

When loading container vessels, the ship's command must comply with the maximum stacking load of the containers. This is especially important with the latest design of "hatchless" container ships. According to ISO minimum requirements, six fully loaded containers can be stacked one on top of the other. However, many containers are designed for a stack height of nine or more full containers. In 1998, the first container ships with slot capacities of more than 6000 TEU came into service. Examples are the "Karen Maersk", "Regina Maersk" and the Maersk shipping company's "Sovereign Maersk", which has a stated capacity of 6600 TEU. With a length of 347 m, a beam of 42.8 m and a design draft of 14.50 m, it may be assumed that this vessel actually has a slot capacity of the order of 8000 TEU.

Silhouette of a 5th generation container ship

Aftermost container bay on the "Regina Maersk"

In the silhouette, the containers in the aftermost bay are stacked "only" five high, while in the photograph of the Regina Maersk it can be seen that they have been stacked as high as six high on deck. The Mller group shipping company currently known as Maersk-SeaLand is the world's largest container ship operator. November 2001 saw the launch of what is, to date, Hapag-Lloyd's largest container ship, the "Hamburg-Express". With a length of 320 meters and a beam of 42.8 meters, 17 containers can be stowed side by side across a single bay. Molded depth is 24.5 meters, which means that containers can be stacked nine high in the hold. On deck, the containers are stacked six high. When fully laden, the ship has a draft of 14.5 m. The freighter can carry 7500 standard containers (TEU) or 100,000 metric tons, a distinct increase over earlier vessels. Propulsion is provided by

a 68,640 kilowatt marine diesel engine, corresponding to approx. 93,000 horsepower, which is capable of propelling these giant container vessels at a cruising speed in excess of 25 knots. Three further vessels in this series are to be delivered by spring 2003. 2002 itself saw the launch of what are to date the world's largest container ships of approx. 8000 TEU. Container ships of the future with lengths of approx. 400 m and a capacity of approx. 12-14,000 TEU are no longer purely in the realms of fantasy. Future generations of container ships with capacities of more than 15,000 TEU and lengths exceeding 400 m are already on the drawing board. These colossi will probably have beams of 64 m, and will require drafts of approx. 18 - 21 m. Such vessels would not at present be able to call at any European ports. It remains to be seen whether such vessels can be operated economically. It is indisputable that transport costs per container or "slot costs" will drop in line with "economies of scale". A fundamental requirement for still larger ships is regular and continual growth in cargo volumes to be carried on the relevant routes. Such growth is also anticipated in coming years. However, it should not be forgotten that operating risks increase hand in hand with vessel size. Such still larger ships will have longer container handling times. In order to cut operating costs, the still larger vessels will have to lengthen their sailing intervals, i.e. they will call into fewer ports than the smaller vessels. As a result, more containers will have to be transported in precarriage and onward carriage operations to and from the ports which they do serve. Various other factors will also have to be taken into account, but these are outside the scope of this Container Handbook.

Delivery of super gantries to the Bremerhaven.

post Panamax Stromkaje at

The North Sea Terminal Bremerhaven (NTB), for example, has already adjusted to the dimensions of future vessels. These "super post Panamax" container gantry cranes were installed as long ago as 2000 and are capable of handling vessels with up to 22 containers stowed side by side. With raised crane jibs, the gantries are more than 110 meters high and weigh approx. 1600 metric tons. 1.3.1.2 Container-carrying vessels, part 2

Hatchless container ship with rain roofs

Hatchless container ships first appeared around the beginning of the 1990s. They are intended to make cargo handling more economic. In 1993 and 1994, Howaldstwerke-Deutsche Werft AG (HDW) delivered four hatchless container ships to the Swiss shipping company Norasia Line. These vessels were equipped with an innovative cargo

protection system. These 2780 TEU vessels are a further development of the "ship of the future". Except for holds 1 and 2, which are equipped with pontoon hatch covers to allow the carriage of dangerous goods, these vessels have no hatch covers. Since, on their usual route between Europe and Far East, these vessels are exposed to heavy tropical rain, the shipping company decided to equip holds 3 to 7 with twelve rain protection roofs of lightweight steel construction. Each rain roof rests on the transverse coaming of the container cell guides and is secured by rapid fastenings. The coamings extend in each case up to the highest container which, in some holds, amounts to twelve tiers. Before and after cargo handling, the roofs have to be removed and replaced by on-shore lifting gear. Moreover, the roofs constitute part of the aerodynamic hull shape. Windtunnel testing revealed that the shape of the forecastle deck in conjunction with the rain roofs and the deckhouse will save fuel. The rain roofs protect not only the stowed containers, but the ship as well, as large quantities of rain water in the holds cause stability problems. Other owners of "open top" container ships use high power bilge pumps to combat this problem.

Reefer container vessel

Reefer container vessel: Almost all container ships have separate connections for refrigerated containers. If these connections are present in relatively large numbers and in a certain ratio to the total TEU capacity, this is reflected in the ship's designation.

Container passenger vessel

Container passenger vessels are a relatively recent phenomenon. In certain countries such as China, Indonesia, Russia and others, they are becoming increasingly important in coastal or island traffic.

Feeder ship off the Stromkaje at Bremerhaven

Feeder ships: These ships carry containers between major container terminals and other ports which are not served by the major shipping lines. Most Indian ports, for example, are served by feeder ships from Colombo, while the ports of western Denmark are served from Bremerhaven. The term "feeder ship" provides no indication as to the size of the vessels, nor as to whether they are equipped with on-board lifting gear. Most feeder ships, however, are relatively small or medium-sized vessels.

The vessels used in feeder service to and from container ports are often customized, as least when put in service. For example, a ship built in 1998 for Caribbean container trade has the following data: Length Beam Molded depth Draft Deadweight Container capacity Engine power Speed 90.95 m 15.40 m 7.35 5.65 4150 312 3520 15 m m tdw TEU kW kn units

Loading gear: on-board cranes 2

Ore Bulk Container carrier: The multipurpose "OBC" freight carriers developed in the GDR are highly versatile. The abbreviation stands for Ore, Bulk and Container. Double hull construction means that all the internal surfaces of the hold are smooth. Since these vessels are fitted with high capacity on-board electrohydraulic cranes with a long reach, even poorly equipped ports can be served. In one specific class of vessel, alternate holds (I, III and V) are suitably reinforced for carrying ore. Due to their high strength and large hatches without tween, decks, these vessels are well suited to carrying rolling mill products and long goods. A half-height, double-walled longitudinal girder fitted below deck acts as a grain bulkhead. With the exception of dangerous goods and cement, all possible kinds of bulk cargoes may thus be carried. 576 TEU can be stowed in the holds and on deck. There are also 36 reefer connections available.

Open bulk container carrier

Open bulk container carriers also have several unusual features which make such vessels highly versatile, even suiting them for container traffic. These bulk carriers are designed like pure container ships, i.e. a very large proportion of the deck area can be opened and the hatch lengths are arranged in a 40 foot grid. Structures delimiting the hold, such as double bottoms, transverse bulkheads and wing bulkheads are designed to withstand the pressure applied by bulk cargoes. Smooth walls and floors are required to allow straightforward loading and unloading with grabs and wheel loaders, which is why the container foundations are recessed in the double bottom and the ISO holes are covered with plastic or steel lids. In the vessel shown, containers can be stowed up to seven high in the holds. The stacks are secured at the bottom by twist locks in the tank deck. Container guides providing lateral restraint are folded out from the bulkheads. In each hold, three blocks are formed using single and double stacking cones, with container guides providing guidance and restraint in two planes, so making it possible to withstand the forces arising when the vessel rolls. Such stacking aids are generally provided between the 3rd and 4th and between the 5th and 6th tiers of containers and are sized in line with the maximum admissible container corner loading of 600 kN. A combination of general cargo and/or bulk cargo plus containers may also be stowed in the holds. This is achieved by folding "container brackets" out from the bulkheads onto which a maximum of four tiers of containers, each applying a load of 300 kN, may be loaded over the bulk cargo or general cargo.

As has already been mentioned, ro-ro stands for roll-on/roll-off, i.e. it is a description of how the cargo is handled. The type of cargo being carried is not automatically known as it may comprise any kind of rolling cargo or cargo which has been made rollable. In many cases ro-ro ships also carry other cargoes without this being clear from the vessel's designation. There is, however, one feature common to all ro-ro ships - they can be loaded via bow, stern or side ports. If the ships have several decks, access is provided by elevators or ramps. Ferries are equipped to carry both passengers and rolling cargo, which may comprise automobiles, trucks, chassis, trailers or railroad vehicles. In many cases, cargo is carried on "cassettes" which are packed and unpacked in port and transferred on and off the vessel with special tractors. Containers are only loaded or unloaded indirectly using roll trailers or the like. Stern, bow and/or side ports ensure rapid cargo handling. In many types of vessel, a oneway system is used, ensuring "first in first out" traffic flow. In ferry transport, a distinction is drawn between accompanied vehicles, where the driver drives on board, travels with the vehicle and drives off again, and unaccompanied vehicles. Only auxiliary loading gear is usually present.

Ferry with bow and stern doors

Many passenger/railroad ferries and ferries capable of carrying both railroad vehicles and trailers, chassis or other road vehicles are in service in short-sea ro-ro traffic in the North Sea, Baltic and also Mediterranean. These vessels have bow thrusters to ensure rapid berthing and casting off. Maneuvering is often facilitated by pitch propellers or a multiscrew design of the vessel. Ferries are often symmetrical in structure and may be operated and accessed from either end. Special cargo securing systems are provided, but are often used only in poor weather. Most cargo damage and sinkings are caused by inadequate stowage and securing on the vehicles, as has been shown by many incidents of loss and accidents in recent years.

Container/ro-ro ship

Container/ro-ro ships (conro) carry both containers and rolling cargo. Ro-ro cargoes are mainly loaded below deck, while containers are primarily stowed on deck. In some vessels, e.g. ACL or Polish Ocean Line, special container shafts are provided in the forward third of the ship to accommodate containers below deck. In regions of service with high cargo volumes, container handling is carried out by on-shore gantry cranes. The ships rarely have their own loading gear. The "Finnsailor" is one such ship which carries rolling or rollable cargo below deck and containers, plant, general cargo etc. on deck. However, these facts were not taken into account by the shipyard when determining the ship's designation.

Ro-ro/lo-lo carriers are ships which are capable of loading and stowing cargoes both via ramps using roll-on/rolloff methods and with on-board lifting gear using the lift-on/lift-off method. Such vessels accordingly also have upper deck hatches and, in some cases, holds divided by transverse bulkheads.

Ro-ro/lo-lo carrier

Ro-ro/lo-lo/container ship

This double hull ship is an example of a ro-ro/lo-lo/container vessel. It has a ro-ro component in the form of a stern door. On the port side it has an internal vehicle ramp to provide access to the two 'tween decks. The fitted on-board cranes allow containers to be handled in ports without on-shore lifting gear. Barge carriers are specialized container transport vessels. Barge carriers are very largely capable of operating independently of ports, they depend on relatively calm areas of water or "floating areas" for transferring the barges. This fact explains the great strategic significance of the system because barges can be set down and picked up at virtually any coast. Barge transport operations are only worthwhile between economic areas which have virtually identical volumes of goods passing in each direction, and in particular where inland waterways lead inland so that good use can be made of the advantages of the floating containers. The high cost of building the ships and the capital expenditure for three sets of barges mean that such systems are not economically viable everywhere. There are various different systems:

LASH carrier

LASH stands for Lighters Aboard SHip. In the LASH system, barges are carried athwartships in holds and on deck.

The barges are picked up and set down at the stern by the LASH's on-board gantry crane using spreaders. Distinguishing external features of these carriers are the far forward location of the superstructures or deck houses, the location of the exhaust stacks to the aft and sides, the stern outriggers and the large gantry crane with a lifting capacity of more than 500 metric tons. This type of vessel hit the headlines some years ago with the sinking of the "Mnchen". Twenty six vessels of this class are still in operation worldwide. Deadweight is approx. 43,000 metric tons, i.e. approx. 73 - 83 barges can be carried in addition to equipment, bunker fuel and stores.

Embarking LASH barges in the floating area

The dimensions of the barges are 18.50 m x 9.50 m x 3.90 m. Fully laden, the draft is 2.61 m. With a tare weight of approx. 140 metric tons, the deadweight of the barges is 376 metric tons. The difference in draft between bow and stern or "trim" must not exceed one foot as the barges otherwise can no longer be lifted by the spreader.

Stern embarkation of LASH barges by gantry crane

Special framework platforms have been developed so that not all goods need to be carried in the barges with their high tare weight. Floored platforms of this kind are available for general cargo, automobiles etc., while there are also floorless versions for containers. For cargo handling purposes, these platforms are set down on "feeder" barges which are towed to and from the ship. The framework platforms are also handled by the gantry crane.

SEABEE carrier in a floating area

SEABEE carriers are capable of embarking barges at the stern using winch-driven lift platforms with a loadcarrying capacity of more than 2,000 metric tons. Barges are loaded, usually in pairs, by being floated into the dock-like afterbody of the ship over the lowered lifting platforms, then lifted up to deck height, from where they are rolled into the ship on very flat rail-mounted trolleys. This type of transfer is thus known as "lift and roll". The Lykes Line's SEABEE ships can stow 38 barges on three decks. Special fittings allow the upper deck to be loaded with containers instead of barges. SEABEE ships are able to carry containers and other cargoes on deck, but these ships do not have on-board lifting gear for such cargoes.

Floating platform

barge

over

the

lowered

winch

SEABEE barges measure 29.72 m x 10.67 m x 5.18 m. With a tare weight of 171.5 metric tons, the unladen draft is 0.62 m. With a full payload of 844 metric tons, the maximum draft is 3.22 m. There may be slight differences depending upon the particular type and lighter. The barges can accommodate 6 FEU or 12 TEU. 16 FEU can be located on the barge's hatch covers.

Side view and plan view of a BACO liner

BACO liners (barge/container liners) operate in accordance with the dock principle. In this German-developed system, the barges are floated through bow doors into the carrier, which has been lowered by taking on ballast. Once the bow doors have been closed, the water is pumped out of the dock and the barges are secured with special fittings. The special BACO barges measure 24 m x 9.50 m and, at a deadweight of 800 metric tons, have a draft of 4.10 m. However, the particular dimensions of the carrier ships are such that other types of barge and even inland waterway vessels and lighters can also be carried. Several tiers of containers can be carried on deck and be loaded and unloaded with on-board lifting gear. CONDOCK is derived from container and dock ship. A large hold can be loaded with rolling cargo via a stern ramp as well as from above using the lo-lo method. These vessels have their own, very high capacity lifting gear for carrying heavy-lift cargoes. Containers can be carried in three tiers on deck. By flooding their ballast tanks, they can be lowered in the water like floating docks, and can take on floating cargoes. The dimensions of those vessels which are in service are such that LASH, BACO and sometimes even SEABEE barges can be accommodated. This class of vessel is still more versatile. Its gantry cranes are capable of handling individual items of cargo of up to 1000 metric tons by the lo-lo method. Using the ro-ro method, heavy items of up to 2000 metric tons can be loaded into the hold via a 20 m x 10 m ramp, while heavy and bulky items can be rolled on deck via two stern outriggers and selfpropelled bogies. Floating cargo can be stowed either in the hold using the flo-flo method or on deck using the piggyback system. The following examples are intended to illustrate how good design can enormously increase the versatility of modern ships.

Coastal motor vessel capable of navigating the Rhine and canals

Coastal motor vessels capable of navigating the Rhine and canals have a continuous box shaped cargo hold and a deadweight of 1550 metric tons. The essential difference between other classes of sea/river-going vessels resides in this vessel's crane, which is of collapsible construction and so does not exceed the maximum height for navigating the Rhine and canals. The vessel's hatch covers can accommodate 20' or 40' containers in several bays. The wheel house can be lowered and raised hydraulically, while the masts can be folded down.

Container handling at Duisburg port

The majority of the inland waterway motor vessels in service in Germany are used to carry dry cargoes. Lengths vary between 38.50 m and 110 m, beams between 5 m and 11 m and drafts between 2 m and 3.50 laden. The deadweight of such vessels is between 220 metric tons and 3000 metric tons. Many of these vessels are equipped to carry containers. Some single hold motor freighters have been specially tailored to the conditions prevailing on the Rhine on the way to Basel. They have the largest possible hold volume for light bulk cargoes, but can also carry heavy-lifts and bulky cargoes. Heavy goods can be rolled from land via an external ramp onto the forebody, from where they can be rolled into the hold via an internal ramp with a gradient of 5. Low loaders, trailers or other special purpose trucks and crawlers can be used for this purpose. Loading and unloading operations can be assisted by hydraulic equipment, trim tanks and a pump system.

1.3.2

Positioning and securing of containers on board / Introductory remarks

This section is intended to provide the interested layperson with some basic information about how to stow and secure containers on board ocean-going vessels, so as to give him/her a better idea of the problems involved and possibly of how to select the appropriate carrier. Those actually involved with securing containers on board ships should refer to other specialist literature.

General on-board stowage On most ships which are specially designed for container traffic, the containers are carried lengthwise:

Containers stowed lengthwise fore and aft stowage on board a ship

This stowage method is sensible with regard to the interplay of stresses in rough seas and the loading capacity of containers. Stresses in rough seas are greater athwartships than fore and aft and the loading capacity of container side walls is designed to be higher than that of the end walls. However, on many ships the containers are stowed in athwartships bays or are transported athwartships for other reasons. This must be taken into consideration when packing containers and securing cargo.

Containers stowed athwartships (athwartships stowage) on board a ship

This stowage method is not sensible with regard to the stresses in rough seas and the loading capacity of containers. Stresses in rough seas are greater athwartships than fore and aft but the loading capacity of container end walls is lower than that of the side walls.

Containers stowed both ways on board ship

Even unusual stowage methods like this, where some of the containers are stowed athwartships and others fore and

aft,

are

used,

but

they

require

greater

effort

during

packing

and

securing

operations.

The above two pictures show how important it is to find out about the various carriers and their way of transporting containers, either in order to rule out certain modes of transport or to be able to match cargo securing to mode of transport. If the method of transporting a container is not known, then packing and securing have to be geared to the greater stresses.

General securing information When securing containers on board, the stresses resulting from the ship's movements and wind pressure must be taken into account. Forces resulting from breaking-wave impact can only be taken into account to a certain degree. All the containers on board must be secured against slippage and toppling, with care being taken to ensure that the load-carrying parts of the containers are not loaded beyond admissible levels. Except in the case of individually carried containers, securing is effected by stacking the containers in vertical guide rails or by stowing them in stacks or blocks, the containers being connected together and fixed to parts of the vessel.

Securing in vessel holds by cell guides alone

Cell guides in an all-container ship

Virtually all all-container ships are provided with cell guides with vertical guide rails as securing means for hold cargoes. The greatest stress the containers are exposed to stems from stack pressure. Since the containers are not connected together vertically, lateral stress is transmitted by each individual container to the cell guides. When positioned in such cell guides, individual containers are not usually able to shift. If the corner posts of one of the containers at the bottom of a stack collapse under excessive pressure, containers stowed above it generally suffer only slight damage. The risk of damage to containers in adjacent stacks is kept within tight limits.

Guide rails of two adjacent slots

The containers are guided by these rails of the cell guides during loading and unloading. The photo shows clearly that the upper ends of the guide rails each take the form of insertion guides.

Securing in vessel holds by cell guides and pins Feeder ships, multipurpose freighters and container ships in certain regions have to be particularly flexibly equipped, in order to be able to carry containers of different dimensions. To this end, convertible stowage frames have been developed, in which 20', 24', 30', 40', 45', 48' and 49' containers may be stowed securely without appreciable delay. Most of these frames are produced as panels which are brought into the required positions by cranes. At the bottom they mainly have fixed cones, which engage in pockets welded into the tank top area. At the sides, the frames are secured by pins, which engage in bushes which are let into the wing bulkheads. Such frames are often manaccessible, so that the containers can be locked in place by means of pins. If it is necessary to be able to carry containers 2500 mm wide, the frames are arranged on the basis of this dimension. To secure standard containers of normal width, closure rails are then fitted on both sides of the guide rails by means of screw connections. If necessary, these adapters may be removed. Removable container guides have also been developed and constructed for multipurpose freighters, reefer vessels and the like. Such guides allow containers to be carried in regular or insulated holds without any risk of damage to the holds themselves. If other cargoes are carried, the stowage guides may be removed using ship's or shore-based loading or lifting gear and deposited in special holders on deck. Securing in vessel holds by conventional securing and stacked stowage On older, conventional general cargo vessels and multipurpose freighters, stacked stowage methods are used in the hold, combined with various securing methods:

Example of stacked stowage with conventional securing

The lower containers stand on foundations capable of withstanding the stack pressures which arise. Dovetail foundations, into which sliding cones fit, are provided to prevent slippage. The containers are connected together by single or double stacking cones or twist locks. The entire stack or container block is lashed using lashing wires or rods and turnbuckles. This system entails a lot of lashing work and material and, moreover, is less secure than securing in cell guides.

Securing in vessel holds by block stowage and stabilization This securing method is found less and less frequently, but it is still found on some conbulkers and other multipurpose freighters. Containers are interconnected horizontally and vertically using single, double and possibly quadruple stacking cones. The top tiers are connected by means of bridge fittings:

Fastening containers together

To the sides, the containers are supported at their corner castings with "pressure/tension elements".

Examples of block stowage method with stabilization

The term "pressure/tension elements" should not be understood to mean that these elements exert pressure or tension, but rather that they are capable of absorbing compressive or tensile forces. With more up-to-date variants, the lateral supporting structures are moved hydraulically towards the container corner castings. This type of container securing has two marked disadvantages:

If an individual container breaks, it is not just one container stack which is affected, but the whole container block. Due to dimensional tolerances and wear and tear to the stacking cones, the entire block can move constantly in rough seas. This causes the intermediate stacking cones to break and an entire block may collapse.

Securing on deck using container guides On some ships, containers are also secured on deck in cell guides or lashing frames. Some years ago, Atlantic Container Lines used only cell guides on deck. Certain ships belonging to Polish Ocean Lines had combined systems. In other ships, cell guides can be pushed hydraulically over the hatch cover as soon as loading below deck is completed and the hatches have been covered up.

Securing on deck using block stowage securing This method was used a lot in the early days of container ships, but has been used less and less in recent years for economic reasons.

Example of block stowage securing on deck

The containers in the bottom layer are positioned in socket elements or on fixed cones. Double stacking cones are used between the layers and the corner castings of adjoining containers are connected at the top by bridge fittings. The containers are held together over the entire width of the ship or hatch cover by cross lashings. A distinct disadvantage of this method is reduced flexibility when loading and unloading, since adjoining containers have always to be moved as well if access to a particular container is required. Numerous variants, not listed any greater detail here, are available for attaching the lashings. Sometimes the lashings from different stacks cross one another.

Crisscross lashings from different container stacks

This

securing for

method lashing

is on

being

used

increasingly ships are

in

very in

large

container

ships.

Instructions

board

displayed

obvious

places:

Lashing system for 40' and 45' containers

Lashing system for 20' containers from the lashing bridges of the end hatches

Lashing system for 20' containers from the hatch covers of the middle hatches

Securing on deck using stacked stowage securing This securing method is the one used most frequently. Cargo handling flexibility is its key advantage. The containers are stacked one on top of the other, connected with twist locks and lashed vertically. No stack is connected with any other stack. The system thus allows loading or unloading of an individual stack. The container lashings do not cross over the lashings from other stacks, except for the "wind lashings" on the outer sides of the ship.

Principle of stacked stowage securing

Securing of on-deck containers with lashing rods and Securing of on-deck containers with twist locks twist locks and chains

Securing of a 3-tier stack on board a semi-container ship

container

stack

of

this

type

has

to

be

secured

due

to

the

risk

of

toppling.

An absence of special equipment for securing containers and unfavorable stowage spaces increase the risk for container cargoes. "Sloppy" carriers should be avoided wherever possible. This applies quite generally, not only to the operators of aging ships. Timely information about as many as of the circumstances and procedures encountered during carriage as possible can be extremely useful. 1.3.3 Container stowage plans Working stowage plans are drawn up to assist in advance planning. General stowage plans definitively document the positioning of containers on board. The bay-row-tier system follows a system of numerical coordinates relating to length, width and height. The stowage space of the container on board the ship is unambiguously stated in numbers and is (almost always) recorded in the shipping documents. It is then also possible to establish at a later date where the container was carried during maritime transport.

Principle of bay-row-tier coordinates

According to this principle, bays are the container blocks in the transverse direction, rows are the lengthwise rows and tiers are the vertical layers.

38 20' container bays on a ship

Theoretically, the 38 bays could be numbered continuously from 1 to 38. However, that would only be sensible if only 20' containers could actually be loaded.

19 40' container bays on a ship

If the ship could only transport 40' containers, the 19 bays could be numbered continuously from 1 to 19.

Bay numbering system

Since, however, the ship can transport both 20' and 40' containers, the bay spaces for 20' containers are numbered throughout fore to aft with odd numbers, i.e. in this case 01, 03, 05 and so on up to 75. The bay spaces for 40' containers are numbered throughout with even numbers: 02, 04, 06 and so on up to 74. The purple 20' container in the first bay has the bay number 01. The light-brown 20' container in the 2nd bay has the bay number 03 and the light-blue 40' container, which occupies a space in the first and second bays, has the bay number 02. The magenta-colored container has the bay number 25, the dark-green number 27 and the lightgreen number 26.

To illustrate a cross-section through a bay, one needs to imagine that one is standing in front of or behind the ship:

In the case of bay plans, the respective bay is always viewed from behind.

The rows of containers on a ship are numbered with even numbers from the center leftwards and odd numbers from the center rightwards.

Row numbering where there is an even number of rows

Where

there

is

an

odd

number

of

rows,

the

middle

row

is

numbered

00.

Row numbering where there is an odd number of rows

Numbering of the port rows on board ship

On close inspection, the photograph shows left-hand row 16, which is designed to be filled with containers only on deck, and rows 14, 12, 10, 08, 06, which may be filled both on deck and in the holds. Rows 04, 02, 00, 01 and 03 are likewise designed to be occupied in the hold and on deck. However, the hatch covers are already on in this case.

Numbering of the starboard rows on board ship

Rows 03, 07, 09, 11 and 13 are still empty in this bay. Row 15 is designed only for on deck occupation, and is still free in this bay.

Row numbers of the aft bay of a ship

The container tiers are numbered with even numbers, starting from the bottom. The conventional way is start with 02 in the hold and then count up with 04, 06 etc. In the case of deck cargoes, it is conventional to start numbering with 80 or 82. There are sometimes slight differences between ships.

Numbering tiers

of

horizontal

container

layers,

or

On this ship, the containers standing directly on the main deck are numbered 80 and those standing on the hatches are number 82. The number is incremented by two for each higher layer.

These bay, row and tier numbers are noted in the bay plans:

Bay plan

The stuffed containers, with their alpha prefix, their container numbers, the port of destination or discharge and other important details are noted in the bay plans.

Color-labeled containers in a bay plan

According to the bay-row-tier system, the colored containers were given the following stowage space numbers:

a 20' container in the red-colored slot: 531212 a 40' container in blue-colored slot: 540788 a 20' container in green-colored slot: 551184 The system illustrated is the most widely used. However, other numbering systems do exist, in which the coordinates are stated in a different order, for example row-bay-tier systems and similar combinations. On ro-ro ships, the slots are usually organized along lanes running lengthwise. In individual cases and if required, such information may be obtained from shipping companies, cargohandling companies or other competent persons.

1.4.1 General Approximately three sixths of all the containers used worldwide belong to leasing companies, another two sixths to shipping companies and the final sixth to other owners*.

1.4.2

Containers and cargo insurance to material damage to goods.

/ In principle, cargo insurance only covers claims relating

Exceptionally, the proprietor's interest in the container as packaging may also be insured if a special agreement is reached or through inclusion thereof in the damage liability invoice value. Interest in a leased container is not in principle insured. The purpose of packaging is to allow transport of goods and to protect them from possible damage. If the above aim has been fulfilled, it is most common for only the packaging to be damaged, and not the goods. ADS 1919 or ADS 1973/1994 (ADS = Allgemeine Deutsche Seeversicherungsbedingungen [General German Marine Insurance Conditions]) and the DTV - Gterversicherungsbedingungen [Association of German Transportation Insurers - Cargo insurance conditions] do not include any particular provisions in this respect. The following may be inferred from the general principles of transport insurance law*: If the packaging does not have any separate, intrinsic value, no independent loss may occur. Packing paper, which is discarded after the arrival of the cargo and suffers wear during transport, cannot therefore form the basis of a claim for damages. If the goods have reached their destination, the only relevant question is whether the goods have suffered loss and not whether the packaging is damaged. This also applies to cases. Consideration can only be given to any such claim if the goods have depreciated in value solely as a result of the damage to the packaging. This is the case for example with preserved foods and certain branded goods. Another example is cement, which retains its normal commercial value only in its original bags. If cement which is in itself sound is sold in unmarked bags because the original bags have been damaged, it automatically suffers depreciation. In such cases, compensation may be paid despite the damage being limited to the bags. Otherwise, compensation may only be paid for packaging damage if a separate value is assigned to the packaging either in the policy or in the invoice (e.g. barrels or containers). This only applies if the packaging is expected to have a longer service life than the duration of one transport operation. A different matter entirely is the cost of repairing or replacing packaging, if this has to be performed en route. It may be possible to claim compensation for these costs, though not in the form of packaging losses but as loss minimization costs, which are expended to return the goods to a transportable state and to prevent losses on the remaining insured journey. For such a claim to be allowable, the packaging must have been satisfactory at the start of the journey. If the journey is complete or the remainder of the journey is uninsured, the insurer will not meet such costs, because, the insurance contract having expired, no more insured losses can be incurred. Because of the uncertainties involved in using cargo insurance to insure a container as packaging, it is better to provide separate hull insurance by way of special conditions for container insurance. As far as the proprietor's interest is concerned, double insurance cover may then be provided by the cargo insurance and the container & hull insurance.

1.4.3

Containers and container & hull insurance Containers cannot be easily defined as either hull or cargo. To distinguish them more readily from insurance for the container cargo, the special conditions are known as hull clauses. Nonetheless, the nature of the cargo remains the predominant factor, for which reason the special conditions should only be agreed in conjunction with DTV cargo insurance conditions.

In general, therefore, containers are not covered as packaging by cargo insurance, but instead by special all-risks insurance by way of special conditions for container insurance. However, compensation

is only paid for damage to machinery and tarpaulins, if it is an immediate consequence of an accident involving the means of transport or of stranding. The special conditions may also be applied to leased containers, if the lessee bears the risk. However, to clarify the situation, this should be expressly stated in the corresponding "written conditions".

1.4.4.1

Container provided by shipper / Whether the shipper uses his own container or one borrowed, rented or leased from a third-party, he is using the container as packaging*. The transport company is liable for material damage to the cargo and the container under the corresponding carriage conditions, since, when calculating liability, the gross weight is to be understood to mean the total weight including packaging.

1.4.4.2

Container provided by carrier / There are several different conceivable situations, whether the carrier uses his own container or one borrowed, rented or leased from a third-party*: Permanently mounted container

If the container is mounted permanently on the chassis of a truck. i.e. is completely fixed thereto, it fulfills the requirements of a fundamental component of the vehicle for the purposes of 93 BGB [German Civil Code]. The transport company is liable for material damage to the cargo under the corresponding carriage conditions. This liability does not include the weight of the container, since the contract of carriage relates only to the cargo and not additionally to the container. Leased containers If, on the express wish of the shipper, the carrier makes available to said shipper a freely handleable container which is not connected permanently to the vehicle, for instance because the shipper's intention is for the container to be transferred between several means of transport during carriage, the carrier will generally demand additional remuneration for handover of the container. This gives rise to a leasing agreement between the carrier and the shipper. The transport company is liable for material damage to the cargo under the corresponding carriage conditions. Material damage to the container is covered by the content of the leasing agreement.

Containers as ancillary transportation equipment If the carrier makes the container available to the shipper to simplify transport without any special additional agreement of the type mentioned above, the contract of carriage as a rule relates only to the transport of cargo in a vehicle suitable therefor. The transport company is liable for material damage to the cargo under the corresponding carriage conditions. This liability does not include the weight of the container, since the contract of carriage relates only to the cargo and not additionally to the container. 1.5 Responsibility for packing Storage, cargo handling and transport of goods are covered by both national and international regulations, which set out minimum requirements for treatment of goods, vehicle use etc.. Public regulatory guidelines are supplemented by private agreements and terms and conditions of business. Careful packaging and marking of goods for dispatch should be accompanied by proper packing, stowing, securing and unpacking. When carrying dangerous goods, additional provisions must be taken into account with regard to packaging, labeling, documentation etc..

A high percentage of goods are intended for carriage by combined road, rail, water and air transport, whether through repeated transshipment or intermodally using containers, swap-bodies or other transport units. Packaging, labeling, stowage and securing deficiencies can generally only be established during dispatch by spot checks. Since minor carelessness may cause serious losses, expert packing and securing are essential for loss-free carriage. This handbook pays particular attention to negligence with regard to dispatch, which may result in losses and/or (could) form the basis of compensation payments. It has as its central theme issues relating to transport legislation, some of which will be explained and commented on in more detail. The fundamental rules to which reference will frequently be made are contained in CTU packing guidelines Guidelines for the packing of cargoes, other than bulk cargoes, into or onto cargo transport units (CTUs) applicable to transport operations by all surface and water modes of transport / 17th February 1999 guidelines replace the revised container packing guidelines which previously applied.

These

The abbreviation CTU stands for "Cargo Transport Unit" and has the same meaning as the expression "Intermodal Transport Unit"/"ITU".

Empty containers at a sea port

The preamble of the CTU packing guidelines points out that the use of containers, swap-bodies, vehicles or other CTUs substantially reduces the physical hazards to which cargoes are exposed.

Inadequately secured cargo on a flatrack, loaded on a roll trailer

However, they also emphasize that improper or careless packing of cargoes into or onto CTUs or improper cargo securing may cause accidents with involving personal injury during handling or transport of CTUs.

Damage caused to several inadequate cargo securing

containers

by

It is

also

pointed

out

that

considerable

damage

may

additionally

be

caused

to

the

cargo

or

CTU.

Container packer adding the finishing touches

It is also stressed that the person who packs and secures the cargo is often the last person able to look inside a CTU before it is opened by the receiver at its destination. The preamble actually states: Most of the people involved in the transport chain consequently rely on the skills of this individual, especially

drivers of road vehicles and other road users if the CTU is transported by road; railroad employees and others, if the CTU is carried by rail; crews of inland waterway vessels, if the CTU is carried on inland waterways; handling staff at inland terminals when the CTU is transferred from one means of transport to another; dock workers when the CTU is loaded and discharged; ships' crews, who often accompany the CTU under the most severe transport conditions; those who unpack the CTU.

All persons, such as the above and passengers, may be at risk from a poorly packed container, swap-body or vehicle, particularly one which is carrying dangerous cargoes. If containers have been closed with seals and locked, it is impossible for road vehicle drivers to check how well they have been packed and secured. Even if the transport units are freely accessible, it would still only be possible, for the most part, to inspect the cargo in the door area of box containers.

Truck combination with (safely packed) hazardous materials containers

Improperly packed containers could reduce the safety of road vehicles, e.g. due to weights shifting within the container, and encourage vehicles to overturn. Containers transported on trailers constitute a particular hazard if they are poorly packed and the cargo is inadequately secured. Switchmen and other railroad employees are not responsible for checking that CTUs have been properly packed. Their inspection duties may extend to the proper securing of CTUs on freight cars, but not to the situation inside locked CTUs. If deficiencies are detected in open CTUs, a responsible employee is sure to intervene.

Rail vehicle with container during switching

Poorly packed and inadequately secured cargoes may put not only the switchmen but also rail passengers and other innocent parties at risk.

Unsecured cargoes can put people's lives at risk

Poorly secured cargoes have frequently been known to smash through the end walls of a CTU in the event of a switching impact or even through the side walls during carriage by rail.

Containers on an inland waterway vessel

Naturally, the crews of inland waterway vessels cannot be expected to inspect the CTUs delivered to them for secure packing.

Transfer of a container

Cargo handling crews at inland terminals are put at risk by poorly packed, inadequately secured CTU cargoes, if they have to transfer them from one means of transport to another, as are dock workers when loading and discharging the CTU:

Loading and discharging operations at the sea port

As far as marine transport is concerned, the ship's command does not have any possibility, on a day to day basis, of influencing how CTUs are packed or how cargoes are secured in them.

Captain of a container ship with visitors on the bridge

In the early days of container shipping, it was common practice for the cargo-officer to carry out at least occasional spot checks at the ports on the containers delivered for shipment. Today, due to high cargo volumes, short laytimes in port and reduced crewing levels, this is possible only very occasionally. The long-established practice of having containers checked and inspected by experts employed by the shipping companies or loss adjusters instructed by the carriers has also mostly been abandoned for cost reasons. These days, containers are only occasionally inspected by experts before loading onto the ship.

Water police inspecting a trailer to be carried by ferry

Occasionally, authorities such as the water police carry out spot checks on CTUs carrying hazardous materials. The results of such inspections are shocking. Around seventy percent of containers, swap-bodies, semitrailers and other "cargo transport units" reveal clear deficiencies.

From a legal standpoint, an inspection by the ship's command is unnecessary, since the people who pack a container are responsible for ensuring that all regulations are observed. In the case of containers carrying hazardous materials, such compliance must even be confirmed by a signature on the container packing certificate. Accordingly, in the case of FCL/FCL and FCL/LCL containers, the shipper is usually responsible. The bill of lading documents this in the "shipper's load, stowage and count" clause. In the case of LCL/FCL and LCL/LCL containers, those responsible are those instructed to pack. With regard to legal liability, they bear the consequences of any deficiencies or omissions, insofar as these are not caused by the customer, for example because the latter fails to pay for necessary work to be carried out or for securing or has only very specifically defined work carried out. If people or the environment are harmed by deficient container packing, those responsible may be prosecuted. The potential for risk is particularly great when packing dangerous goods.

Theoretically, it is only possible for the crew of a ship to inspect cargo securing where "open" CTUs are used, such as flatracks, platforms etc., and then only when the cargo is not additionally covered by tarpaulin or otherwise hidden from view. Those who unpack a CTU are the last people in the transport chain who may be put at risk by packaging deficiencies, poor packing and inadequate cargo securing.

Forklift truck driver stripping a container

The CTU packing guidelines do not mention the danger to individuals who inspect CTUs in the course of their work, such as police, loss adjusters and cargo inspectors.

Motorway police inspecting containers

The container is packed with hazardous materials. This should have been packed in the door area, but instead was "hidden" under other items of cargo and could not be found. Without at this point going into individual paragraphs, articles or points of regulations, laws or guidelines relating to railroad traffic, it should be noted that with this type of transport too it is the shipper's duty to ensure proper packing and securing.

Poorly packed, inadequately secured container loads may also put innocent third-parties at risk if shifting items of cargo smash through the container walls or cause a vehicle carrying the container to overturn.

Inadequately secured container load

Normally, a CTU trucker cannot be held liable for losses arising due to improper packing of containers, swap-bodies, semitrailers etc., if the latter are closed with seals and are loaded in operationally safe manner, which is the case if the vehicle is roadworthy and working safely. A trucker's contract of carriage usually applies only to transport of the CTU. His duty to load the CTU in operationally safe manner is fulfilled if the appropriate total weights and axle loads are complied with, appropriate locking of the CTU is ensured and hitching is performed correctly. If a vehicle is sealed, the trucker does not have any way of influencing, supervising or even checking packing and securing of the load. Losses due to such deficiencies, or even to packaging deficiencies, cannot therefore lie within his area of responsibility, but instead lie squarely with the shipper. If truckers notice obvious deficiencies when they take delivery of CTUs or later due to the driving behavior of their vehicle, they must respond accordingly, however. It is advisable to ask the shipper for information or instructions. In the case of unsealed vehicles, an internal visual inspection is advisable. Any gross errors may then be discovered. In practice such inspections are hardly ever performed, but this may make the driver partly responsible. The shipper must always ensure that cargoes are loaded and secured in such a manner as to be safe for transport, as he is not only liable for damage to the cargo but also for damage to the vehicle or injury to third-parties resulting from dereliction of his duty. The following is stated in 22 of the German road traffic code, para. 1: (1) The load, together with clamping chains, gear and other loading equipment, must be stowed so as to be safe during transport and be secured especially so as to prevent it from falling off and from making avoidable noise. This paragraph is worded very generally and does not name any particular target individual or group. It must therefore be adhered to by all those responsible for loading road vehicles.

2.3.10 Chemical stresses Influence of packaging containers and packaging aids on cargo securing.

Introductory remarks There are undoubtedly many companies in which responsible, quality-conscious staff plan and devise optimum transit procedures so that the goods to be shipped reach the receiver having suffered the least possible damage. In such companies, prevention of damage is a priority since it is common knowledge that economic success is to a great extent dependent upon customer satisfaction. Considerable effort is taken to avoid shipping damage or to restrict the extent of such damage. But what about those personnel who don't care as much about preventing damage? Virtually inevitably, their actions or omissions cause damage and accidents.

Human failure as a cause of damage

It's not the ship's management or crew who have fallen short here, but those who were responsible for packing some of the containers. Nothing has happened to properly packed and secured containers, while poorly packed containers with inadequately secured cargoes have been destroyed. This Container Handbook only occasionally takes a look at spectacular incidents of damage and instead primarily focuses on the numerous small and medium-sized cases of carelessness in shipping which are responsible for the majority of losses as they rapidly add up to huge sums of money.

Human failure - from another perspective

Only poorly packed containers with inadequately secured cargoes have been destroyed. Even the vehicles labeled 1 and 2, which were not ideally secured, have withstood the effects of the rough seas. Analysis of shipping losses frequently focuses on technical issues and takes human shortcomings more or less as read. Such an approach is mistaken, ultimately meaning that the necessary staff training is not provided because it is not regarded as sufficiently important, an attitude shared by the decision-makers.

Damaged containers should not be used

Insufficient knowledge and inadequate skills on the part of many of those involved in cargo shipping are the root causes of subsequent losses. Errors in the planning and execution of transport operations are for the most part human in origin.

Inadequate training promotes damage

Poor understanding on the part of many of those in charge about the complex interrelationships involved in the provision of transportation services together with what is in most cases a very low level of training among the personnel involved with the physical handling of cargoes conspire to cost the world's economy billions every year. Insufficient knowledge and inadequate skills on the part of very many of those involved in cargo shipping are the root causes of subsequent losses.

Basic errors are sometimes made as early as during design and production of the goods which are ultimately to be shipped. While this area will be addressed separately in the section "Packaging errors and deficiencies", some explanatory examples are given below.

Non-regulation dangerous cargo unit

Even trained packers would have difficulty packing this cargo unit safely into a container, in fact it would be impossible without additional labor and materials costs.

Non-regulation dangerous cargo unit

Given the differing heights of the drums, this cargo unit is even more difficult to pack into a container.

Machine without securing means: not fit for shipping

Designers not only have to take account of a machine's subsequent function, but also of the fact that it must first be transported to where it will be used and installed there without suffering damage. Every machine should have slinging and lashing points so that it can be handled and secured without problem.

Earth borer without securing means: not fit for shipping

This earth borer has no lashing points. In such cases, securing means are generally attached arbitrarily to components which are not suitable for this purpose. The absence of lashing points is particularly disadvantageous since this machine will be used at many different sites. Every time the machine is moved, more effort will be required for securing, so increasing the shipping risk, which is why:

Attention must be paid to lashing points for easy transport securing from the design stage. 2.1 Loss prevention through training The section "Scope" of the CTU packing guidelines contains an important statement: These Guidelines, which are not all-inclusive, are essential to the safe packing of CTUs by those responsible for the packing and securing of the cargo and by those whose task it is to train people to pack such units. Training is essential if safety standards are to be maintained. According to section 7.2 of the CTU packing guidelines, this is a management responsibility: Management should ensure that all personnel involved in the packing of cargo in CTUs or in the supervision thereof are adequately trained and appropriately qualified, commensurate with their responsibilities within their organization. Section 7.3 states the following requirement for personnel: All persons engaged in the transport or packing of cargo in CTUs should receive training on the safe packing of cargo in CTUs, commensurate with their responsibilities. Section 7.4 relates to training, the various subsections providing as follows: 7.4.1 General awareness/familiarization training: All persons should receive training on the safe transport and packing of cargo, commensurate with their duties. The training should be designed to provide an appreciation of the consequences of badly packed and secured cargo in CTUs, the legal requirements, the magnitude of forces which may act on cargo during road, rail and sea transport, as well as basic principles of packing and securing of cargoes in CTUs. 7.4.2 Function-specific training: All persons should receive detailed training concerning specific requirements for the transport and packing of cargo in CTUs which are applicable to the functions that they perform. 7.4.3 Verification: The adequacy of the knowledge of any person to be employed in work involving the packing of cargo in CTUs should be verified or appropriate training provided. This should be supplemented by periodic training, as deemed appropriate by the regulatory authority. 7.5 Recommended course syllabus - overview: The adequacy of the knowledge of any persons to be employed in work involving the packing of cargos in CTUs should be verified, in the absence of which appropriate training is considered essential and should be provided. The function-specific training should be commensurate with the duties required to be performed by an individual in the packing and securing of cargo in CTUs. Topics for consideration, to be included in the training as appropriate, are given in Annex 6.

Annex 6

Topics to be included in a training programme for the packing and securing of cargoes in cargo transport units (CTUs)

1 Consequences of badly packed and secured cargo 1.1 Injuries to persons and damage to the environment 1.2 Damage to ships and CTUs 1.3 Damage to cargo 1.4 Economic consequences

Many may still remember the case of the French container ship "Sherbro" which lost a number of containers overboard in the English Channel. As a result, hundreds of thousands of plastic sachets containing the pesticide Apron plus entered the sea and were subsequently washed up on the coasts of France, the Netherlands and Germany.

Injuries to persons and damage to the environment may be the result

Damage to ships and CTUs

Damage to cargo

Economic consequences

Liabilities 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Different parties involved in cargo transport Legal responsibility Goodwill responsibility Quality assurance

Forces acting on the cargo during transport 3.1 3.2 3.3 Road transport Rail transport Sea transport

Basic principles for cargo packing and securing 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Prevention from sliding Prevention from tipping Influence of friction Basic principles for cargo securing Dimensions of securing arrangements for combined transportation

CTUs - types 5.1 5.2 Containers Flats

5.3 5.4 5.5 6

Swap-bodies Road vehicles Rail cars/wagons

Cargo care consciousness and cargo planning 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 Choice of transport means Choice of CTU type Check of CTU prior to packing Cargo distribution in CTUs Requirements from the receiver of cargo regarding cargo packing Condensation risks in CTUs Symbols for cargo handling

Different methods for cargo packing and securing 7.1 7.2 7.3 Lashing Blocking and bracing Increasing friction

Equipment for securing and protection of cargo 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Fixed equipment on CTUs Reusable cargo-securing equipment One-way equipment Inspection and rejection of securing equipment

Packing and securing of unitized cargo (bulk) 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 Cases (boxes) Palletized cargoes Bales and bundles Bags on pallets Big Bags/flexible IBCs Slabs and panels Barrels Pipes Cartons

10 Packing and securing of non-unitized cargo (break-bulk) 10.1 Different types of packaged cargoes loaded together 10.2 Packing of heavy and light cargoes together 10.3 Packing of rigid and non-rigid cargoes together 10.4 Packing of long and short cargoes together 10.5 Packing of high and low cargoes together 10.6 Packing of liquid and dry cargoes together 11 Packing and securing of paper products 11.1 General guidelines for the packing and securing of paper products

11.2 Vertical rolls 11.3 Horizontal rolls 11.4 Sheet paper on pallets 12 Packing and securing of cargo requiring special techniques 12.1 Steel coils 12.2 Cable drums (reels) 12.3 Wire coils 12.4 Steel slabs 12.5 Steel plates (sheet) 12.6 Big pipes 12.7 Stone blocks 12.8 Machines 13 Packing and securing of dangerous cargoes 13.1 Regulations for the transport of dangerous cargoes 13.2 Definitions 13.3 Packing regulations 13.4 Packing, separation and securing 13.5 Labeling and placarding 13.6 Information transfer when transporting dangerous cargoes 13.7 Liabilities

Comprehensive and regularly recurring training sessions are necessary in order to ensure sufficient familiarity. On request, the German Insurance Association (GDV e.V.) can supply the names of training organizations which carry out or assist with internal and external training. 2.2 Examples of damage

The cargo in this container had obviously not been sufficiently secured. As a result, the container was destroyed from the inside.

Considerable damage to the cargo and the ship itself due to inadequate cargo securing.

Cargo from the destroyed containers on deck

Container with gaps in the stow. It is essential to avoid even the smallest gaps.

A cargo unit has been packed with gaps on both sides. Moreover, the cargo unit was inappropriately unitized.

Perfect example of how to fill gaps

Avoidable shipping stresses are attributable to human shortcomings. Incidents of damage often occur because the cargo has been inadequately packed, stowed or secured or because equipment has been used incorrectly. The CTU packing guidelines also attempt to counter these human causes by providing in Annex 6 a list of topics to be included in a training program for the packing and securing of cargoes in cargo transport units (CTUs), which requires in point 3 that packers be instructed as to the forces acting on the cargo during transport, whether by road, rail or sea. This requirement stated in the CTU packing guidelines deserves strong support as observation of day-today practice reveals a frightening lack of knowledge in precisely this area. Unavoidable shipping stresses are determined by the nature of the transport operation and lie largely outside the sphere of human influence. Very large numbers of incidents of damage are attributable to the fact that many of those involved in shipping are unaware of shipping stresses or assess them incorrectly. This ought not to be the case as information of this kind is available from many different sources. Section 1 "General conditions" in the CTU packing guidelines provides important information about how cargoes are affected particularly during sea voyages. Information about road, rail and inland waterway transport and about cargo handling is also provided. In addition, the German vehicular accident prevention regulations (BGV D 29) and VDI guidelines also state values for road transport. Values for the stresses arising in rail transport may be obtained from publications from the German railroad company Deutsche Bahn AG or the UIC. It is not without reason that the CTU packing guidelines contain the following important statement in the point "Scope": These Guidelines are not intended to conflict with, or to replace or supersede, any existing regulations or recommendations which may concern the carriage of cargo in CTUs. In other words, there is no intention to reinvent the wheel in the CTU packing guidelines; much of the information they provide has already been published in other guidelines and specialist publications. Carriage denotes the movement of cargo using one or more modes of transport.

The terms "carriage" and "shipping" are superordinate terms covering storage, handling and transport and any associated operations. The stresses arising during shipping may thus be summarized as shown below:

Overview of shipping stresses

It is extremely difficult to put exact values on storage, handling and transport stresses because they are determined by many different parameters. In addition to the stresses shown in the overview, other factors of course also play a part, such as the means of transport used, the selected routes, the nature of the roads and railroads or the particular weather conditions prevailing during maritime transport. Protection from shipping damage may be provided with regard to economic viability without consequently being less

effective. Effective and economic protective measures can be implemented if enough is known about the stresses to which the cargo is exposed during transport. As experience has shown and measurements have confirmed, the shipping stresses of different modes of transport differ markedly. Nevertheless, there are similarities and even common features which should be taken into account in the following explanations. However, it is not feasible to generalize about transport operations, each one will be somewhat different and will also be affected by randomly occurring factors. The better trained are those involved, the better will they be able assess the transport risks and take effective action to counter them. Training and quality control are two key concepts which should play a central part in cargo securing.

2.3.1

Static mechanical shipping stresses

Static mechanical stresses primarily cause damage due to harmful levels of pressure. In the transport sector, cargoes are often thought of only as light or heavy, so neglecting the fact that these are relative terms which it is highly advisable to verify.

Stated using conventional abbreviations:

The official SI unit of calculation is the pascal, which is a pressure of one newton per square meter (Pa = N/m). This very small unit is rarely used for practical calculations. Atmospheric pressures are calculated in hectopascals (hPa), while tire pressures, stacking pressures etc. are usually calculated in kilopascals (kPa) or megapascals (MPa). In the pressure formula, force is above the fraction line, which means that, given an identical area, a larger force will result in a larger pressure. Area is beneath the fraction line, i.e. the smaller the area, the greater the pressure and vice versa. If the maximum permitted stack pressure in containers is not known, it may relatively easily be determined. Point 3.1.7 of the CTU packing guidelines provides an indirect indication of how this is done: Stowage planning should take account of the fact that CTUs are generally designed and handled assuming the cargo to be evenly distributed over the entire floor area. Where substantial deviations from uniform packing occur, special advice for preferred packing should be sought. The permitted payload in a container is the net mass which is obtained when the tare weight is deducted from the maximum gross mass. The following worked examples are for two different 20' and 40' containers:

Payload in kilograms 18370 21780 26700 29650

Force in newtons 180209.70 213661.80 261927.00 290866.50

Internal length in meters 5.935 5.895 12.033 12.069

Internal width in meters 2.370 2.393 2.352 2.350

Pressure in pascals 12811.77 15146.08 9254.84 10255.45

Pressure in kilopascals 12.81 15.15 9.25 10.26

Example calculation of permitted stack pressure in containers In the literature, values of 14 kN/m for 20' containers and of 10 kN/m for 40' containers are frequently stated as maximum floor loading values. However, as has been shown, this value varies from container to container and may easily be calculated. The maximum stack pressure in a container would be the same as the maximum container floor loading value if the container were packed absolutely evenly.

Official pressure units are only very rarely used for calculations in the transport sector. Since it is masses which are handled, pressure is often assumed to be the product of dividing mass by area: Instead of the official units, units such as kg/cm, kg/m, metric tons/m or the English-speaking world's psi (pounds per square inch) are used. While, strictly speaking, this is incorrect, such units are widely used in practice and are more readily comprehensible to many of the personnel involved. The following relations apply when converting such units into the official units and vice versa.

Hectopascals (hPa) correspond to the old unit millibar (mbar). One bar corresponds to 100 kPa or 0.1 MPa. Kilogram/square centimeter (kg/cm) roughly corresponds to one bar or 100 kPa or 0.1 MPa. One kilogram/square centimeter corresponds to 10 metric tons/square meter One kilopascal (kPa) = 1000 N/m and corresponds to 100 kg/m or 0.1 metric tons/m. One kilogram/square centimeter roughly corresponds to 14 lb/square inch (psi).

A forklift truck tire pumped up to a pressure of 8.5 bar accordingly has a pressure of 85 kPa, 0.85 MPa or, roughly, 8.5 kg/cm or 85 metric tons/m. In the English-speaking world, the tire is at a pressure of 119 psi. The stacking crush pressure is the pressure exerted by an item of cargo on underlying items of cargo or components. Even with a straightforward product such as a pallet, elevated values may occur. The example calculation is based on pallets with a total area of approx. 1 m which are packed with just under one metric ton of cargo and have a total mass of one metric ton. The boards or blocks are all assumed to have a width or edge length of 120 mm.

Pallet structure

Force in newtons

Area of base in m

Crush pressure kN/m = kPa

9810

1.000

9.81

9810

0.432

22.71

9810

0.288

34.06

9810

0.0864

113.54

9810

0.0576

170.31

Crush pressures for different pallets

Crush pressures are significantly higher for some pressboard pallets and similar types. Unless appropriate measures are taken to distribute the pressure, it is not possible to guarantee that transport will proceed without damage.

Elevated stacking crush pressures due to small contact areas

Extremely high pressures may occur if buckets, pails, barrels and similar cargoes are packed without an intermediate layer. For example, if a barrel of a mass of 183.5 kg and a total area of the barrel rim of 90 cm is placed on the floor, a pressure of 200 kN is generated. Assuming the barrel rim to have a width of 0.5 cm, offset stowage of another barrel on top will result in a contact area of 0.00015 m, generating a pressure of 12,000 kPa.

Type of packing / contact areas

Force [N]

Area [m]

Pressure [kPa]

1800

0.0090

200

1800

6 x 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm = 1.5 cm = 0.00015 m

12000

The only way forwarding personnel can prevent damage due to static mechanical stresses is by taking steps to distribute the pressure, as it is not possible to modify the shipping packages themselves or to change the masses involved. However, many warehouses and packing centers do not hold stocks of appropriate materials in the form of walking boards, hardboard, wooden dunnage etc.. Appropriate intermediate layers are often not used due to ignorance, for reasons of false economy or other motives. It is essential to take the nature of the shipping packages into account. A skilled appraisal of the external appearance, such as the base of cases, cargo units and pallets, can provide valuable information as to how to load them. Efficient handling methods using lifting gear or ground conveyors usually require the use of beams or squared lumber beneath or between the items of cargo and such use can produce damaging levels of pressure. Even strapping packages may cause damage due to excessive pressure if edge protectors are not used to distribute the pressure in order to offset the weakness of the packages. Very high pressures are generated by narrow or point bearing areas. Negative effects are magnified by multiple tiers or the angles of rest which arise, for example, when stowing pipes, rolls or similar cargoes:

Packing in tiers

Cantline 1

Cantline 2

Packing in tiers generates extremely high pressures, as the pipes are only bearing on narrow strips corresponding to the edge lengths of the lumber. The resultant stack pressures are distinctly higher than in either of the two cantline stows. Due to the greater angles of rest or spread, cantline stow 2 generates greater forces than cantline stow 1. Further explanations in this respect may be found in the section, Basic stowage methods. The crush pressure bearing down on underlying layers of packages or the container floor is increased by the ship's motion. It is often forgotten that pressure does not only act downwards from above due to the force of gravity, but may also act laterally due to dynamic stresses. In this case, the packages are pressed against one another or the container walls. This pressure and in particular slipping and subsequent collision of inadequately secured packages may result in damage. Very few packers anticipate "home-grown" static mechanical stresses due to inadequate cargo securing, but such stresses are predictable: if cargo stacks can move, critical and dangerously high pressures may arise as tipping occurs due to the resultant very small contact area:

"Home-grown" static mechanical stresses

The reduction in contact area with a simultaneous increase in pressure may cause the edges of the packages to cave in, resulting in damage to the shipping packages and collapse of the stack. In particularly unfavorable cases, this may result in the loss of whole batches or even of the container. The actual tipping, collision or collapse of packages will be addressed in the dynamic mechanical shipping stresses section. 2.3.2 Dynamic mechanical shipping stresses / In relation to dynamic stresses, a primary distinction is drawn between vibration and jolting. In physical terms, the two phenomena are similar, but the distinction is made because they differ in their effects on packages and means of transport. Vibration comprises periodic oscillations which generally occur in large numbers, such as vehicle or engine vibration, movement of ship in rough seas etc.. Jolting comprises occasional events, as may be observed on impact, dropping or tipping. Bumping, kicking or switching impacts are all words which paint a sufficiently clear picture. The absolute magnitude of both types of stress is measured from their amplitude. For vibration, the second important parameter is frequency, i.e. the number of periodically repeating oscillations within a specific period [cycles/second]. For jolting, pulse duration and frequency are the other determining factors in addition to amplitude.

Dynamic mechanical shipping stresses are accordingly primarily caused by acceleration arising from changes in direction or speed. Acceleration values are particularly high if these changes occur very rapidly. The formulae clarify the relationship:

since

it

follows

that

linear

acceleration

may

be

calculated

from

the

following

formula:

If a car accelerates from 0 km/h to 108 km/h in 12 seconds, its speed has changed by 9 km/h or 2.5 m/s each second. Its acceleration, a, is thus 9 km/h/s or, stated in other terms, 2.5 m/ss or 2.5 m/s. If a truck traveling at a speed of 90 km/h takes five seconds to come to a standstill, it is decelerating at 18 km/h per second or 5 m/s per second. This is precisely the braking deceleration of 5 m/s specified in the German road traffic licensing regulations (StVZO) and German accident prevention regulations. A ship which, while pitching in a heavy sea, suffers a loss of speed from 21 knots to 9.3 knots within 2 seconds undergoes negative acceleration of -11.7 kn/2 s = -5.85 kn/s = -10.834 km/h/s = -3 m/s and is thus decelerated. Acceleration arising from a change in direction may be calculated in accordance with the following formula:

If a road vehicle takes a tight curve with a curve radius of 20 m at a speed of 36 km/h, which corresponds to 10 m/ s, it undergoes radial acceleration of 5 m/s. Driving through potholes also causes radial acceleration because there is a change in direction from the horizontal to the vertical and back again. In vehicles with poor shock absorption, this causes considerable acceleration as the curve radii are very small and the speeds at which they are driven through are relatively high. In this case, only the suspension and other design parameters protect the vehicle and its load from severe damage. In roll trailers without suspension, rough ground in the terminal may result in high levels of acceleration and consequent damage to the cargo. It is a relatively frequent occurrence for shipping packages to fall off the trailers during such transport operations within cargo handling facilities.

The action of gravity subjects any object on the earth to downwards acceleration, which is known as acceleration due to gravity. The value of this acceleration is constant. Acceleration due to gravity, rounded to two decimal places, is 9.81 m/s and is designated 1 g. For rough calculations, 1 g may also be assumed to have a value of 10 m/s. In order to appreciate quite what an acceleration of 1 g means, imagine a road vehicle accelerating from 0 km/h to just about 106 km/h in 3 seconds. The calculation is as follows:

If the magnitude of an acceleration is known, the force it applies to a mass may be calculated from Newton's second law of motion:

The formulae are conventionally written:

On earth, force and weight are physically identical. As a result of acceleration due to gravity, an object of a mass of 100 kg exerts a force of F = 100 kg 9.81 m/s = 981 N on whatever is supporting it. Stated in other units, this force amounts to 98.1 daN (decanewtons) or 0.981 kN (kilonewtons). Weight-force should accordingly be taken to mean the force with which an object is attracted by the earth's gravity. This force always acts perpendicularly downwards. The formula used is as above, but replacing the general abbreviation F for Force with G.

Some publications, such as for example the VDI Guidelines, mention normal force and the abbreviation F is provided with the index N, giving FN = normal force. Force and acceleration are vector quantities, i.e. quantities in which both magnitude and direction must be stated. Acceleration due to gravity g, however, is always in the same direction as weight.

A motorcycle rider traveling around a corner with a radius of 50 m at 72 km/h will experience radial acceleration of 8 m/s (ar = v/t = 20 m/s20 m/s / 50 m = 8 m/s).

Composition of forces in a parallelogram of forces

The blue vector of acceleration due to gravity of 1 g or 9.81 m/s acts perpendicularly downwards, the yellow vector of radial acceleration of 8 m/s acts horizontally in the direction of the curve and corresponds to 81.5% of acceleration due to gravity (0.815 g). The green vector is the resultant acceleration of 12.658 m/s. The direction of the resultant vector is also described as the apparent vertical.

A motorcycle rider must lean into the curve by 39.2, relative to the vertical, in order to offset this force. His motorcycle will then be at an angle of 50.8 to the horizontal (tan \alpha; = 9.81 m/s 8 m/s = 1.22625) and he will be pressed down towards the ground with approx. 1.3 times his normal force (12.658 m/s 9.81 m/s).

If, instead of being stated in m/s, acceleration values are given in fractions or multiples of acceleration due to gravity (g), the forces may be determined with sufficient accuracy directly in decanewtons (daN), if mass is stated in kilograms (kg). If the mass is located within a frame of reference under acceleration, the vector exhibits an inertia force acting on the mass in the opposite direction to the acceleration. An example of this is the automobile driver who, on accelerating, is pressed back into his seat (positive acceleration and negative inertia force) or, on braking, is pulled forward (negative acceleration and positive inertia force). Friction forces are passive forces, which come into play when objects on a substrate are to be set in motion by forces (static friction) or are to be kept in motion (sliding friction and rolling friction). Static friction also comes into play when the direction of motion of an object (already subject to sliding or rolling friction) is changed. An automobile cornering is a good example, as all that keeps the vehicle on its desired path is the sufficient static friction of the tires. Friction forces counteract incident forces. The following formulae may be used to calculate the size of friction forces.

The normal force perpendicular to the sliding surface may be stated in N, daN, kN or similar units of force. Since the various coefficients of friction fo or f are dimensionless, the determined friction force has the same calculation dimension as for the normal force perpendicular to the sliding surface. Since friction is of great significance to cargo securing, more detailed explanations will be provided in another section. Vibration and jolting of the vehicles and equipment used, together with the fundamental and resonant vibration of goods, packaging and cushioning material together largely define the risk of damage to which the goods are exposed during carriage. The magnitude of the pulses, i.e. the duration of forces or velocity of masses, is of vital significance in this connection. Note: If sensitive goods are to be packaged and carried without suffering damage, it is essential to be aware not only of the frequency spectra which arise during storage, handling and transport but also of the natural frequencies of the goods being shipped, the shipping packages, cushioning material etc.. In the high frequency range, extremely high acceleration values of several dozen to a few hundred g have been measured. However, due to the mass inertia of the shipping packages, such short duration impacts rarely cause damage due to inadequate cargo securing. However, the consignor must provide appropriate packaging for sensitive goods in order to mitigate such vibration. In the low frequency range, acceleration values encountered during transport and handling are of the order of some fractions of a g to several g. The longer period of action may result in shifting of the cargo and consequent mechanical damage. These low "normal values" applying to cargo securing on or in vehicles are stated by various organizations. Those involved with shipping should be aware of usual g values. The effects of dynamic mechanical shipping stresses are frequently underestimated, despite the "normal values" being widely available or easily obtainable. The CTU packing guidelines contain various comments on this issue. 2.3.3 Mechanical stresses in maritime transport Section 1 "General conditions" in the CTU packing guidelines clearly states, for example in point 1.1: Sea voyages are made in a variety of weather conditions which are likely to exert a combination of forces upon the ship and its cargo over a prolonged period. Such forces may arise from pitching, rolling, heaving, surging, yawing or swaying or a combination of any two or more. Point 1.2 continues: Packing and securing of cargo into/onto a CTU should be carried out with this in mind. It should never be assumed that the weather will be calm and the sea smooth or that securing methods used for land transport will always be adequate at sea.

The acceleration values to be anticipated in maritime transport depend on the shape of the surface or subsurface vessel, its beam, the position of the center of gravity and center of buoyancy and similar parameters which determine the behavior of ships at sea. All kinds of ship movement may be divided into three types of linear motion and three types of rotational motion:

Ship movement at sea

Linear motion Surging is motion along the longitudinal axis. Swaying is motion along the transverse axis Heaving is motion along the vertical axis Summary of ship movement

Rotational motion Rolling is motion around the longitudinal axis Pitching is motion around the transverse axis Yawing is motion around the vertical axis

It can in general be stated that the outwardly directed centrifugal accelerations brought about by any rotational motion are not significant. This accordingly applies to yawing, pitching and rolling.

Yawing is motion around the ship's vertical axis

Yawing involves rotation of the ship around its vertical axis. This occurs due to the impossibility of steering a ship on an absolutely straight course. Depending upon sea conditions and rudder deflection, the ship will swing around its projected course. Yawing is not a cause of shipping damage.

Heaving is motion along the ship's vertical axis

Heaving involves upward and downward acceleration of ships along their vertical axis. Only in an absolute calm are upward and downward motion at equilibrium and the ship floats at rest. Buoyancy varies as a ship travels through wave crests and troughs. If the wave troughs predominate, buoyancy falls and the ship "sinks" (top picture), while if the wave crests predominate, the ship "rises" (bottom picture). Such constant oscillation has a marked effect on the containers and their contents.

Surging is motion along the ship's longitudinal axis

Swaying is motion along the ship's transverse axis

In surging and swaying, the sea's motion accelerates and decelerates the ship forward and backward and side to side. Depending upon the lie of the vessel, these movements may occur in all possible axes, not merely, for example, horizontally. If a vessel's forebody is on one side of a wave crest and the afterbody on the other side, the hull may be subjected to considerable torsion forces.

Pitching is the movement of a ship around its transverse axis

In pitching a ship is lifted at the bow and lowered at the stern and vice versa. Pitching angles vary with the length of vessel. In relatively short vessels they are 5 - 8C and sometimes more, while in very long vessels they are usually less than 5. In a container ship 300 m in length with a pitching angle of 3, a container stowed in the bay closest to the bow or stern at a distance of approx. 140 m from the pitching axis will cover a distance of 29 m within a pitching cycle, being raised 7.33 m upwards from the horizontal before descending 14.66 m downwards and finally being raised 7.33 m again and then restarting the process. During upward motion, stack pressures rise, while they fall during downward motion.

Rolling is the movement of a ship around its longitudinal axis, the rolling angle in this case being 10

Rolling involves side-to-side movement of the vessel. The rolling period is defined as the time taken for a full rolling oscillation from the horizontal to the left, back to horizontal then to the right and then back to horizontal. In vessels with a high righting capacity, i.e. stiff ships, rolling periods of 10 seconds and below are entirely usual. Rolling angle is measured relative to the horizontal. Just in moderate seas, even very large vessels roll to an angle of 10.

Rolling angles of 30 are not unusual in heavy weather

In bad weather, angles of 30 are not unusual. Even the largest container ships must be expected to roll to such angles. Stabilizers and other anti-heeling systems may help to damp ship movements. However, not all systems are usable or sufficiently effective in bad weather.

Rolling angle of 45

On rare occasions, rolling angles may reach 45 and above. It is easy to imagine what that means for inadequately secured container cargoes. Rolling and pitching of a vessel generate upward and downward acceleration forces directed tangentially to the direction of rotation, the values of which increase with distance from the rolling or pitching axis and are inversely proportional to the square of the rolling or pitching periods. At an identical distance from the axis, if the rolling or pitching period is halved, acceleration forces are quadrupled, while if the rolling or pitching period is doubled, acceleration forces are quartered. Rolling or pitching angles generate downslope forces. Steeper, tilting, as occurs during rolling, promote cargo slippage. The outwardly acting centrifugal accelerations generated by rotational motion are of no significance in rolling and pitching. Overall, containers and packages may be exposed to such accelerations for very long periods. Moreover, the oscillations may be superimposed one on the other and be intensified.

Damage to containers in rolling motion, caused by inadequately secured cargo ... ... in a container stowed athwartships ... in a fore and aft stowed container

It must be emphasized that it was not the "hazards of the sea" which caused the damage, but instead inadequate securing inside the container. While such damage has indeed occurred in association with the rolling motion of the ship, the root cause is the "home-grown" acceleration forces arising from shortcomings in packing and securing.

Slamming describes the hydrodynamic impacts undergone by a ship

Slamming is the term used to describe the hydrodynamic impacts which a ship encounters due to the up and down motion of the hull, entry into wave crests and the consequent deep immersion of the ship into the sea. Vibration from the hull can be transferred to the cargo. Goods are exposed to stresses from the extremely low frequency oscillations generated by sea conditions and by higher frequency machinery and propeller vibration. Such risks can and must be avoided by using seaworthy shipping packages which are fit for purpose. The absolute acceleration values encountered on board ship are not excessively high. In favorable stowage spaces, they may even be considerably lower than those encountered in land or air transport. In many cases, not even the values stated in the following Table occur. However, the frequency with which the motion occurs must definitely be borne in mind. At a rolling period of 10 s, a ship moves side to side 8640 times daily. Over several days' bad weather, the cargo will thus be exposed to alternating loads tens of thousands of times.

Mode of vessel Baltic Sea North Sea Unrestricted

transport:

ocean-going

Forward acting forces 0.3 g (b) 0.3 g (c) 0.4 g (d)

Backward acting forces 0.3 g (b) 0.3 g (c) 0.4 g (d)

Sideways acting forces 0.5 g 0.7 g 0.8 g

1 g = 9.81 m/sec The above values should be combined with static gravity force of 1.0 g acting downwards and a dynamic variation of: (b) = 0.5g Extract from a table in the CTU packing guidelines In relation to the Table, it is stated in point 1.7 of the CTU packing guidelines that examples of accelerations are given which could arise during transport operations; however, national legislation or recommendations may require the use of other values. The values stated in footnotes (a), (b) and (c) in principle describe accelerations in the vertical direction. Such accelerations are particularly high in pitching and rolling movements and, in exposed positions in very bad weather, can easily reach 1 g. The CTU packing guidelines here state the maximum at 0.8 g. Vertical acceleration reduces friction forces and increases stack pressure. (c) = 0.7g (d) = 0.8g

Overview of acceleration forces prevailing on board a ship

Annex 13 of the CSS Code contains tables for determining acceleration forces as a function of stowage space on

board, the ship's length and speed. However, these tables are not suitable for use when packing CTUs and securing cargoes in or on CTUs. If containers, road vehicles, rail cars or the like and road trailers, roll trailers and semitrailers are loaded inland for maritime transport, their ultimate stowage space on board is unknown. The least favorable conditions should thus always be taken into account. As a rule of thumb, loads of 1 g in the vertical direction and 0.8 g in the horizontal direction should be anticipated for worldwide transport. The shipowner will not accept any attempt by the shipper to specify a particular container slot in advance. Even notes on the bill of lading requiring loading below deck are ineffective. All shipping packages must accordingly be constructed so as to be able to withstand 0.8 times the weight of all adjacently stowed cargo and twice the mass of the cargo loaded on top. If this is not the case, appropriate protective measures must be taken. Additional rigid receptacles, frames, false decks and similar measures may be helpful. Modern cargo handling procedures and the ships developed for this purpose have made maritime transport faster and cheaper and, in particular, have reduced cargo handling stresses in port. In order to ensure great flexibility in terms of loading and unloading, modern ships, in particular ro-ro freighters and ferries, inevitably have poorer seakeeping ability than conventional general cargo or heavy-lift vessels. For reasons of stability during loading, they require a high righting capacity. As "stiff" vessels they initially oppose heeling movements with a very high righting moment. The high roll moment of inertia of these vessels entails shorter rolling periods and high transverse acceleration forces. Due to the particular nature of ro-ro shipping, the ship's command is not generally able to influence the stability behavior of these ships by adjusting the weight distribution. The risk of accidents is particularly high because, given the large free surfaces in the ship, overturning cargo and the possible consequent ingress of water may result in an abrupt capsize. Most readers will remember major accidents of this kind. Inadequate cargo securing in transport receptacles such as containers, swap-bodies etc. may consequently have a very significant impact on ship safety.

Ro-ro freighter listing as a result of water ingress

Free surfaces risk of capsize

on

board

always

increase

the

"Home-grown" acceleration forces in maritime transport are the commonest cause of cargo damage on board ship:

Damage caused by "home-grown" acceleration forces

Because container packers do not have the appropriate knowledge and skills, they underestimate the effect of gaps in the stow. The consequent motion has a devastating effect on the cargo.

Damage caused by "home-grown" acceleration forces

"Home-grown" acceleration can readily be identified on board ship if the stowage spaces have been subjected to similar forces, but only some of the goods have suffered damage. It is even clearer when goods stowed in an exposed location remain undamaged, while other goods suffer damage despite being exposed to lower acceleration forces. The cases on the platform at the top left were exposed to higher acceleration forces than the cargoes in the containers, which were stowed beneath or further inwards. Although the cases were only secured with a single belt each, they have only shifted slightly, while the containers and their contents have been completely destroyed.

Effects of "home-grown" acceleration forces

In the lower container, the poorly secured machine has been set in motion and has forced the container doors open. The tank on the platform stowed above is secured with only two belts and thus also inadequately. Nevertheless, it has withstood the acceleration forces and has slipped only a little. This is a clear indication that the acceleration forces were still relatively slight.

The following pictures clearly show the results of home-grown acceleration forces. It should be noted that almost all of the containers have been exposed to stresses from the inside outwards, i.e. they have bulges rather than dents.

Bulges in containers as a result of home-grown acceleration forces

Container "ripped apart" as a result of home-grown acceleration forces

The fiber structure of the plywood walls of the container clearly reveals that the forces were acting from the inside outwards. The container was destroyed by gaps in the stow. These gaps resulted in extremely high acceleration forces and shocks.

Damage as a result of home-grown acceleration forces

Annex 13 of the CSS Code provides tools to assist in calculating wind pressure and the effects of spray. The details provided in this publication may possibly be of assistance in dimensioning cargo securing on open containers such as flatracks, platforms etc., but they are otherwise of interest only to the ship's command, but not to container packers working inland. As a rough guide, wind pressure may be estimated, for example for fastening tarpaulins etc., at 100 daN/m. Closed containers are spray-tight provided that they have no technical defects.

Effects of breaking-wave impact

Cargoes stowed on deck may be exposed to breaking-wave impact. Even for experts, the magnitude of these forces and their effects are difficult to estimate. Additional securing measures cannot prevent such effects or only to a very limited extent. While securing can never withstand breaking-wave impact, cargoes on open containers should, as a precaution, be secured against floating away. In conventional shipping, damage prevention is the responsibility of the ship's command. Responsible ship's commands will accordingly use any means available to them to keep the effects of rough seas and breaking-wave impact as small as possible. Cargo loading officers will stow cargoes which are particularly sensitive or require particularly extensive securing in locations which are subjected to less acceleration. In container trade, no consideration can be given to special requirements with regard to stowage space for particular containers. Moreover, the central stowage planning offices, which prepare initial plans, and the ship's command have no knowledge as to what is loaded in the containers. Dangerous cargo containers are an exception. In this case, the contents are known and the containers receive special stowage spaces.

Breaking-wave impact means that "green water" has come onto the deck.

Damage caused by breaking-wave impact

Container ripped open by breaking-wave impact

Summary of mechanical stresses arising during maritime transport In very general terms, it can be stated that cargo transport units may be exposed to very different stresses during maritime transport than they are in road, rail or inland waterway transport. Unless the voyage proceeds very calmly in good weather, the containers and their cargoes will be exposed to oscillation/vibration which is primarily caused by rolling and pitching. It is almost exclusively during rolling, due to the tilt/rolling angles which arise, that shipping packages are pressed against the container walls and are squashed against the walls or the surfaces of adjacent shipping packages. The same occurs in "open" containers if parts of the cargo are pressed against the lashings or bracing. The oscillations of rolling and pitching alternately increase and reduce stack pressure. These changes peak at the moment the motion is reversed. Assuming a vertical acceleration of 1 g, a package can thus alternate between "twice its weight" and "weightless". Appropriate deductions or additions may be made for other acceleration values. When containers are incorrectly packed or the cargoes inadequately secured, the packages may shift, be dented, squashed, jumbled up etc..

Jumbled cartons in a container

2.3.4 Mechanical stresses in road transport The short section 1.4 of the CTU packing guidelines is devoted to the stresses occurring on roads, specifically: Road transport operations may generate short-term longitudinal forces upon the cargo and the CTU. They may also cause vibrations that may vary considerably due to different suspension systems, different road surface conditions and different driving habits. The guidelines also contain several explanatory sketches. In a nutshell: anticipated stresses are determined by structural parameters of the goods and of the vehicle/vehicle combination, the position of the goods on the loading area, how fully laden the vehicle is, the condition of the roadway, the driver's habits etc.. Special transport operations entail obtaining comprehensive information about the circumstances to be taken into account. Stowing and securing measures may then be tailored to the particular transport situation. If precise data are unobtainable, the values stated in the CTU packing guidelines, or the assumed loads specified by the relevant national organizations, should be taken into account: Mode of transport: road VDI guidelines CTU packing guidelines Swiss road transport regulations British regulations Forward acting forces Backward acting forces Sideways acting forces 0.8 g 1.0 g 1.0 g 1.2 g 0.5 g 0.5 g 0.5 g 0.5 g 0.5 g 0.5 g 0.5 g 0.8 g

In relation to the Table, it is stated in point 1.7 of the CTU packing guidelines that examples of accelerations are given which could arise during transport operations; however, national legislation or recommendations may require the use of other values. It is unsatisfactory that the tables state no values for vertical stresses, although any road user will know just how how much road vehicles can vibrate up and down.

Forces in longitudinal direction according to VDI guidelines

Forces in longitudinal direction according to CTU packing guidelines

The forward acceleration of 0.8 g according to the VDI guidelines or of 1.0 g according to the CTU packing guidelines means that forces of 80% or 100% respectively of the package weight will act on the packages in this direction. Both sets of guidelines assume backward acceleration of 0.5 g, i.e. forces of 50% of the package weight will act on the packages in this direction.

Forces in the sideways direction according to the CTU packing guidelines and VDI guidelines

Again, both sets of guidelines assume identical sideways acceleration values of 0.5 g. Forces amounting to 50% of the package weight will accordingly also apply sideways.

What value should be assumed for vertical acceleration?

The guidelines make no mention of vertical acceleration. Most road users will know from their own observation that loads can even lift off during road transport, i.e. values of just above 1 g vertically are quite readily achieved. A brochure published by the former German federal railroad company, Deutsche Bundesbahn, states: Considerable stresses .... in the vertical direction also occur during road delivery operations. .... Forces of up to 0.85 times*) the weight-force of the load must be anticipated in the vertical direction. *) Measurements, filtered at 32 Hz, carried out by the Institute for automotive transport, Hanover University of Technology.

Consequences of "home-grown" acceleration forces

As for every means of transport, the values stated in the guidelines only apply to loads which have been secured so that they cannot shift. If load items are able to move, considerably higher acceleration forces may come into play.

Consequences of "home-grown" acceleration forces in a container carried by road

An example: 8000 kg of goods in cartons had been loaded into the container in the photograph. The articulated truck carrying the container had to brake rather harder than usual at traffic lights. Although the braking deceleration was distinctly less than 0.8 g, this maximum value will be used for the purposes of the calculation. The coefficient of sliding friction of the cartons on the container floor and between the individual cartons will be assumed to be = 0.3. The cartons would then have been able to exert a force of only 8000 kg 0.5 g = 3924 daN against the front end wall of the container. As will be described in greater detail elsewhere, the loading capacity of the container end wall must amount to 0.6 times the payload. In the container shown, this would amount to 10,595 daN. The forces which actually occurred were accordingly at least 2.7 times higher. A very clear case of home-grown acceleration as a result of gaps in container packing.

Consequences of "home-grown" acceleration forces on a small truck

An example: A 1000 kg package had been loaded into the vehicle shown in the photograph. The vehicle was going around a curve with a radius of 25 m at a moderate speed of 36 km/h. This generated a sideways acceleration of 4 m/s. A force of 392.4 daN was accordingly applied to the load. Assuming a coefficient of sliding friction of = 0.3, this force was counteracted by passive friction forces of 294.3 daN. The difference of 98.1 daN would never have been enough to smash through the sideboards and cause such damage to the vehicle. However, because the package was lying unsecured in the middle of the loading area, it was able to get a "run-up" and develop its destructive force. The provisions governing the loading of road vehicles and the relevant accident prevention regulations specifically state that the load must be packed and secured in such a manner that, under normal traffic conditions, nothing can

fall over, drop or roll off the vehicle and that any risk to life must be excluded. Usual traffic conditions in road transport include evasive maneuvers, hard braking and unevenness of the roadway which may occur simultaneously not merely separately. It should accordingly be assumed, as the basis for proper load securing, that a vehicle on a poor section of road suddenly has to brake hard and additionally execute an evasive maneuver. If the load can pass through such a situation unscathed, it may be deemed secure. It should be borne in mind that the acceleration values which must be assumed for road vehicles according to VDI guidelines and the BGF, the German road vehicle maintenance employers' liability insurance association, correspond to the following tilts in degrees.

0.8 g forward acceleration in road transport 0.5 g backward acceleration corresponds to a tilt of 53 corresponds to a tilt of 30

in

road

transport

0.5 g sideways acceleration in road transport corresponds to a tilt of 30

The loading capacity of cargo transport units is specified in standards and the International Convention for Safe Containers. The relevant sections provide comprehensive information in this respect. However, the values will also be stated here by way of comparison with shipping stresses:

The loading capacity of the front end walls of standard swap bodies and containers corresponds to an inclination of 23.6

With a uniformly applied load, the front end walls of standard swap bodies and containers must be able to withstand forces of 0.4 times the payload. This corresponds to an angle of 23.58.

The loading capacity of the side walls of standard swapbodies corresponds to a tilt of 17.5

With a uniformly applied load, the side walls of standard swap-bodies must be able to withstand forces of 0.4 times the payload. This corresponds to an angle of 17.46.

The loading capacity of the side walls of standard containers and of swap-bodies with a CSC plate corresponds to a tilt of 36.9

With a uniformly applied load, the side walls of standard containers or of swap-bodies with a CSC plate which are used in maritime transport must be able to withstand forces of 0.6 times the payload. This corresponds to an angle of 36.87.

2.3.5 Mechanical stresses in rail transport The short section 1.5 of the CTU packing guidelines is devoted to the stresses occurring in rail transport, specifically: Rail transport, in addition to subjecting cargo to vibrations (16 Hz), may also lead to shocks as a result of shunting [switching] operations. Many railways have organized their operations in such a way as to avoid shunting [switching] of railway wagons [rail cars] incurring high forces (e.g. by operating dedicated block trains) or by moving CTUs on wagons [cars] with high performance shock absorbers that are normally able to reduce shunting [switching] shock forces. It may be advisable to ensure that such operational features have been established for the rail journey. Several explanatory sketches are additionally included. The Definitions section of the CTU packing guidelines explains the terms shunting [switching] and block train: Shunting [switching] means the operation when single railway wagons [cars] or groups of railway wagons [cars] are pushed to run against each other and be coupled together.

Switching engine with dangerous cargo container on a special rail car

Operationally, switching includes quite wide-ranging activities which will not be addressed in greater detail here. In modern switching yards, trains are divided up and reassembled by being pushed (for example with a switching engine) up and over a hump yard, so automating hump switching operations. The speed of the rail cars as they run down the hump is kept within the desired range by special braking or driving systems. Major switching impacts are a thing of the past. In a conventional system, the rail cars running down the hump are brought to a standstill with drag shoes. If the worker laying the drag shoes makes a mistake, switching impacts involving considerable deceleration may occur. If no hump yard is available, groups of rail cars are "kicked" by switching engines and the individual cars run into the appropriate sorting sidings, where they are again conventionally brought to a standstill with drag shoes. In this case too, high deceleration values may occur when the cars collide. Lower levels of deceleration occur when the cars are pushed to activate the couplings. The UIC specifies an acceleration value of 4 g for normal switching operations. Containers are not constructed for such stresses and should not be exposed to such acceleration forces. Rail cars with high-performance buffers, as mentioned by the CTU packing guidelines, cut the "normal" switching impacts of 4 g in half to 2 g. In Germany, these rail cars with high-performance buffers have a lower case j in their name, for example Lgjs, Sgjs, Sgjkkms etc. etc..

Rail car with high-performance shock absorbers

Rail cars with high-performance buffers

According to railroad operating procedures, a whole range of different rail cars must not be switched normally. This is determined by the type of rail vehicle, the type of loading or certain features.

Reasons for operating under caution ticket scheme

Rail cars operated under this scheme are either specially marked "from the outset", e.g. "Hump yard switching and kicking prohibited", "Switch carefully" etc., or they may be provided with special tickets bearing a yellow triangle standing on its apex, a red circle ticket or the standard caution tickets. Rail cars operating under the caution ticket scheme are divided into three classes.

Caution ticket marking, class 1

Caution ticket marking, classes 1, 2 and 3

The CTU packing guidelines also define block trains as follows: Block train means a number of permanently coupled railway wagons [rail cars], normally running directly between two selected terminals or entities without shunting [switching]. Such block trains are known as "point-to-point" services or "rail cars not switched in transit". A customer of the European UIC railroads can assume that any rail cars loaded with containers or other CTUs will be transported in block trains or handled under the caution ticket scheme. Accordingly, the only values which need be taken into account from the CTU packing guidelines table stating the acceleration forces applying in railroad transport are those for combined transport:

Mode of transport: rail

Forward acting forces

Backward acting forces 4.0 g 1.0 g

Sideways acting forces 0.5 g (a) 0.5 g (a)

Rail cars subject to shunting 4.0 g [switching]* Combined transport** 1 g = 9.81 m/sec 1.0 g

The above values should be combined with static gravity force of 1.0 g acting downwards and a dynamic variation of: (a) = 0.3g *The use of specifically equipped rolling stock is advisable (e.g. high-performance shock absorbers, instructions for shunting [switching] restrictions); **"Combined transport" means "wagons [cars] with containers, swap-bodies, semitrailers and trucks, and also block trains (UIC and RIV)". Table from the CTU packing guidelines

In relation to the Table, it is stated in point 1.7 of the CTU packing guidelines that examples of accelerations are given which could arise during transport operations; however, national legislation or recommendations may require the use of other values.

The statement in the table: "The above values should be combined with static gravity force of 1.0 g acting downwards and a dynamic variation of: (a) = 0.3 g" means that the CTU packing guidelines have adopted the UIC railroad values for acceleration. In accordance with these values vertical acceleration is calculated at 0.3 g. The same values are also specified by the VDI guidelines for intermodal transport. In road-rail intermodal transport, the following values are thus obtained: 1 g in the longitudinal direction, 0.5 g sideways and 0.3 g

vertically.

Acceleration values in intermodal transport

From the standpoint of the cargo, a longitudinal force of 1 g is the same as if the container had been stood up vertically.

Longitudinal acceleration in intermodal Sideways acceleration of 0.5 g corresponds to a tilt transport is the same as if the CTU had angle of inclination of 30 been placed vertically

Sideways acceleration values in road-rail intermodal transport are identical for both modes of transport. They correspond to a tilt of 30.

Effect of vertical rail transport

acceleration

of

0.3

in

The effects of acceleration of 0.3 g are similar to each package in the container alternately becoming 30% heavier and then 30% lighter than its true weight. Note: In the case of carriage by railroad companies in other continents or countries such as Africa, China, India, Canada, Russia, USA etc., information should be obtained about the prevailing conditions in each case. In some cases, stresses may be higher than in Europe. For example, in winter many containers destined for receivers close to the Great Lakes are unloaded in Halifax and carried by rail, for example to Detroit, because the sea route via the St. Lawrence Seaway is impassable due to ice. 2.3.6 Mechanical stresses in inland waterway transport With regard to the acceleration forces encountered, inland waterway vessel is regarded by the CTU packing guidelines as a very low risk means of transport, an opinion which is borne out in practice. Point 1.6 states: Inland river and water transport is generally smooth. It will not normally exert any forces higher than those of road transport on the cargo and the CTU. Diesel engines of inland river and waterway vessels may create some low-frequency vibrations which under normal conditions should not give reason for any concern.

Negligible acceleration forces in inland waterway transport

Higher frequency vibrations which could result in cargo damage are not a cargo securing but instead a packaging issue. Harmful vibration must be avoided in this case by means of appropriate cushioning materials. One error which is frequently encountered is providing excessive cushioning travel. 2.3.7 Mechanical stresses during cargo handling

View of a container terminal - Bremerhaven in this case.

The definition stated in the CTU packing guidelines for handling reads: Handling includes the operation of loading or unloading/discharging of a ship, railway wagon [rail car], vehicle or other means of transport (CTUs). The meaning of "ship" is common knowledge; the CTU packing guidelines definition reads: Ship means a seagoing or non-seagoing watercraft, including those used on inland waters. The stresses occurring during cargo handling can be divided into two classes:

stresses which act on an empty or packed cargo transport unit due to the use of suitable equipment when handling the whole CTU and those

stresses which arise during packing and unpacking of the containers by manual methods and/or by using mechanical aids and equipment.

Handling a container with a reachstacker and top spreader

Transferring barrels into a container with a forklift truck and barrel lifter

The CTU packing guidelines define a forklift truck as follows: Forklift truck means a truck equipped with devices such as arms, forks, clamps, hooks, etc. to handle any kind of cargo, including cargo that is unitized, overpacked or packed in CTUs. In addition to these general distinctions drawn between handling the cargo during loading and unloading a CTU and handling of the CTU itself, it is also possible to draw a distinction between

avoidable unavoidable stresses.

stresses

and

Avoidable cargo handling stresses during unpacking of a container

Packing and unpacking containers or other cargo transport units involves procedures which are no different from those previously used in conventional loading - the same risks are encountered and must be taken into account. Purely manual handling of packages generally entails exposure to more impact and dropping than in the case of mechanized handling using tried and tested industrial aids. Properly packaged and palletized goods are at little risk when forklift trucks and similar ground conveyors are used. The risk is distinctly greater for incorrectly packaged and palletized goods. However, if personnel are untrained, the risks associated with the use of mechanical aids are particularly high.

Avoidable handling stress during container handling with a forklift truck

In this case, the attempt had been made to use a forklift truck to position a flatrack. In attempting to get the tines of a forklift truck under the flatrack and shift it, the fork slipped off, bending the side rail and puncturing the flatrack.

Avoidable handling stresses

If containers are handled with the equipment specially developed for this purpose, the impact stresses to which the various cargo transport units are exposed are comparatively uniform, irrespective of whether they are being transferred between road or rail vehicles or watercraft. The CTU packing guidelines also provide some indications about cargo handling: 1.8 Container movements by terminal tractors may be subject to differing forces as terminal trailers are not equipped with suspension. Additionally, ramps can be very steep, causing badly stowed cargo inside CTUs to be thrown forward or backward.

Cargo handling activities at a seaport terminal

Terminal tractors (Tugmaster units) and terminal chassis are normally only used for moving containers on the flat. Various methods are used in terminals for this purpose. With regard to ramps, the guidelines relate to ro-ro tractors

in conjunction with roll trailers. Both types of tractor require a hydraulically liftable fifth wheel coupling to allow access to the ramps. The normal chassis or semitrailers pulled by the tractors have suspension. The stated effects on badly packed cargo have already been mentioned several times.

Ship/shore transfer with container gantry cranes and fully automatic spreaders

Intermodal cargo transfer with grapplers on a reachstacker and a gantry crane

The CTU packing guidelines also provide some information about the use of lifting gear and ground conveyors. 1.9 Considerable forces may also be exerted on CTUs and their cargoes during terminal transfer. Especially in seaports, containers are transferred by shore-side gantry cranes that lift and lower containers, applying considerable acceleration forces and creating pressure on the packages in containers. Lift trucks and straddle carriers may take containers, lift them, tip them and move them across the terminal ground.

Deformed container floor due to the interplay of acceleration and incorrect packing methods

Even when equipment is expertly operated, stresses of approx. 1 g must generally be anticipated during cargo handling. Skilled operation assumes that the goods are lifted up and set down gently. Jerky lifting and setting down may generate very much higher g values. Normal setting down impacts cannot always be avoided and additional crush pressures must thus always be expected. This applies both to setting down the receptacle and to setting down the spreader on the containers. If

spreaders without flippers are used carelessly (the flippers center the spreader on the container), damage to container roofs must be expected. There is still a risk of damage even when manual spreaders or "overheight frames" are used.

Handling with manual spreader

Overheight frame with manual locking (in this case only set down on the container)

Especially in the case of onward carriage in countries with poor infrastructure, higher levels of stress must be anticipated during handling and unloading operations. So that no damage is caused during unpacking of the cargo transport units, packing must always be designed in such a way that the containers can be stripped as simply as

possible.

Handling with on-shore container gantry cranes

It is also to be expected that containers will not always be handled as properly as they are here, but that during onward carriage they may possibly be unloaded under the most basic conditions from an old ship in the roads. "Bumping" against obstructions is not at all unusual under such circumstances. Packing and securing should be designed to withstand such occurrences.

Individual containers on an old design general cargo ship - in the roads

Handling stresses during packing and unpacking of containers are generally the result of carelessness. It is not unusual for

personnel packages

to to

walk

on be

cargo

which

cannot during

withstand manual

such

loads; working;

dropped

poorly packed pallets to come apart during forklift truck operations and for individual packages to fall out; packages packages to to be be crushed or punctured squashed with with the the forklift forks; truck;

damage to be caused by the use of tools and cargo securing materials etc..

The best protection from these and the above-stated risks is good training and constant staff motivation.

The carton has already been crushed to 2/3 of its original dimensions

Another

case

of

human

failure

due

to

inadequate

skills

and

insufficient

supervision.

Stowing symbol: Do not walk here.

The cargo could be marked with a stowing symbol like this. 2.3.8 Climatic stresses Detailed information on this subject can be found in the Container Handbook section entitled "The product in the container" by Dr. Renate Scharnow, but the purpose of this section is merely to take a brief look at the subject. An undamaged, tightly closed box container protects its contents from external influences such as ice, snow, rain, salt spray, dust, thermal radiation, ultraviolet light and other conceivable environmental influences.

Water damage in a container

However, box containers cannot provide protection from direct exposure to water because they are only spray-tight, not water-tight. The CTU packing guidelines state that moisture damage must be avoided, point 3.2.7 reading: In order to avoid cargo damage from moisture, wet cargoes, moisture-inherent cargoes or cargoes liable to leak should not be packed with cargoes susceptible to damage by moisture. Wet dunnage, pallets or packaging should not be used. In certain cases, damage to equipment and cargo can be prevented by the use of protective material such as plastic films. The section on dunnage indicates how the risks in the first sentence can be combated. The second sentence is very important - this principle is often ignored. Cargoes, wooden dunnage and other aids are often literally left outside in the rain before being placed in the container:

Rain-wettened cartons on wet pallets - moreover inadequately palletized

If containers are packed in the open, there is always a risk in rainy weather that ground conveyors and personnel will bring moisture into the container with them. Cargoes in a container in which air exchange is prevented may suffer spoilage or be damaged if temperatures and humidities during carriage reach a level which is incompatible with the goods or their packaging containers. Point 1.3 of the CTU packing guidelines points out the negative effects of changes in temperature and humidity on container cargoes: During longer voyages, climatic conditions (temperature, humidity etc.) are likely to vary considerably. These may affect the internal conditions in a CTU which may give rise to condensation (sweating) 1 on cargo or internal surfaces. Where cargo is liable to damage from condensation, expert advice should be sought. 1) see Annex 1

Ice formation on a ship

If relatively warm air is cooled to below its dew point,

the resultant condensation may result in cargo damage:

Wetting damage on bags of raw cocoa due to condensation

Additional information is provided in the stated Annex 1 "Condensation". 1. Cargoes in transit may be affected by the conditions to which they are subjected. These conditions may include changes in temperature and humidity and particularly cyclic changes that may be encountered. An understanding of condensation phenomena is desirable because condensation may lead to such damage as rust, discoloration, dislodging of labels, collapse of fiberboard packages or mold formation. 2. Solar radiation can produce air temperatures under the inner surfaces of a CTU which are significantly higher than external air temperatures. The combination of these effects can result in a range of day and night cyclic temperature variations in the air adjacent to the inner surfaces of a CTU which is greater than the corresponding range of temperatures just outside. 3. Cargoes closest to the wall or roof will be more affected by external temperature variations than those in the center of a CTU. If the possible extent of temperature variations or their full significance is not known, advice should be obtained from specialists. 4. Under the circumstances described, condensation may occur either on the surface of the cargo (cargo sweat) or on the inside surfaces of a CTU (container sweat) either during transport or when the unit is opened for discharge. 5. The main factors leading to condensation inside a CTU are: 5. sources of moisture inside the unit which, depending upon ambient temperature conditions, will affect 1 the moisture content of the atmosphere of the unit; 5. 2 a difference between the temperature of the atmosphere within the unit and the surface temperature of either the cargo or the inner surfaces of the unit itself; and

5. changes in the temperature of the outer surface of the unit which affect the two factors above. 3 6. Warming the air in a CTU causes it to absorb moisture from packagings or any other source. Cooling the air below its dew point* causes condensation. 7. If, after high humidity has been established inside a CTU, the outside of the unit is cooled, then the temperature of the unit surface may fall below the dew point of the air inside it. Under these circumstances moisture will form on the inner surfaces of the unit. After forming under the roof, the moisture may drop onto the cargo. Cyclical repetition of cargo or container sweat phenomena can result in a greater degree of damage. 8. Condensation can also occur immediately after a CTU is opened if the air inside the unit is humid and the outside air is relatively cool. Such conditions can produce a fog and even precipitation but, because this phenomenon usually occurs only once, it seldom results in serious damage. 9. The risk of damage and dangerous situations** can be minimized if the moisture content of the packaging and securing materials is kept low. *The dew point is the temperature at which air saturated with moisture at the prevailing atmospheric pressure will start to shed moisture by condensation. **For example, when goods of class 4.3 (substances which evolve flammable gases on contact with water) are packed into a container. Where necessary, the information provided in Annex 1 "Condensation" may have to be supplemented by additional information from other sources 2.3.9 Biotic stresses Detailed information on this subject can be found in the Container Handbook section entitled "The product in the container" by Dr. Renate Scharnow, but the purpose of this section is merely to take a brief look at the subject. Both biotic and chemical stresses are closely interrelated both with each other and with climatic stresses. It may accordingly be assumed to be generally known that biotic and chemical reactions proceed particularly well when exposed to certain temperature and moisture conditions. Biotic stresses are deemed to be present if goods, packaging or parts thereof are damaged by living organisms of whatever kind. Chewing damage may, however, cause considerable losses as may, of course, damage caused by animal excreta. The risk is relatively low in closed containers, provided that no animals have taken up residence before packing or "sneak in" during packing. Since many rodents are nocturnal creatures, CTUs which are being packed should be closed during work breaks or at the end of a shift especially during the hours of darkness. Prior inspection of cargo

transport units for tightness is a basic requirement. Insects, for example, can nonetheless still get into such closed containers which, although classed as unventilated, still have openings of small cross-section. It will be virtually impossible to avoid damage if goods and/or packaging are infested before packing and such infestation is not noticed. In the case of "open" cargo transport units, infestation can only be prevented by providing sufficiently tight packaging or suitable preservation.

Beetle chewing damage on a paper roll

Other frequently observed phenomena include infestation of the packed goods or packaging by fungi, especially molds, bacteria or other microorganisms. Heat and high relative humidity encourage the development of mold and the multiplication of e.g. bacteria. Slight air movement also encourages growth. It is advisable to stack cargo securing lumber with spacing battens and store it under cover; in this way, air can pass between the layers of lumber and mold formation is prevented. While the CTU packing guidelines do not mention biotic stresses, they do point out that certain countries, wishing to prevent the introduction of pests, place specific conditions on the lumber to be used for packaging and securing. Point 3.3.2 of the CTU packing guidelines states: If a CTU is destined for a country with wood treatment quarantine regulations, care should be taken that all wood in the unit, packaging and cargo complies with the regulations. It is a useful practice to place a copy of the wood treatment certificate in a conspicuous place inside and, where appropriate, outside the unit in a weatherproof pouch. This primarily relates to the mandatory and usual treatment against the Sirex wasp for voyages to Australia and New Zealand. Even if no lumber is packed into the container as cargo or packaging, lumber may nevertheless still be required for cargo securing or as dunnage. In such cases, it is worthwhile having the necessary lumber

appropriately treated in advance. Treated lumber should be colored in order to differentiate it from untreated lumber.

Lumber treated against the Sirex wasp - colored for differentiation

2.3.10 of

Chemical stresses Substances which react together and can cause damage to the cargo or its packaging are relevance to cargo securing.

One of the most familiar chemical reactions is corrosion and goods must be provided with protection from it by a protective coating, sealed packaging or using the VCI method. However, this is not in principle the responsibility of packing or cargo securing personnel, but instead of the shipper or his packer. However, corrosion protection must not be impaired or eliminated as a result of packing or cargo securing operations. Appropriate steps should also be taken to prevent the introduction of corrosion-promoting substances into a cargo transport unit. It must not be forgotten that the salt aerosols present in sea air can have an effect on cargoes in closed containers. Unless special precautions are taken, the risk is very much greater in all open containers. In general, this also applies to all other solid, liquid or gaseous substances which can impair the cargo in any way. To take one extreme example: even a few molecules of a chemical, e.g. a poison, could "migrate" through one physically completely tight package into another and harm the goods inside. Preventing chemical effects requires a considerable knowledge of chemistry and so is not a responsibility which can be left to loading personnel. Appropriate instructions are absolutely essential. Simple but nevertheless very effective preventive measures against chemical stresses are:

Only use cargo transport units which are fit for packing, i.e. which are clean and neutral in odor; Do not ignore basic stowage rules, for example never stow odor-releasing goods with goods which can absorb odors, unless odor contamination can be prevented by special measures; Protect any chemically sensitive cargo from extraneous substances which could cause damage.

The CTU guidelines provide advice on fitness for loading. Point 2.2.4 requires: A CTU should be clean, dry and free of residue and persistent odors from previous cargo. Point 3.1.4 additionally states: Packing should be planned before it is started. ... The possibility of cross-contamination by odor or dust, as well as physical or chemical compatibility, should be considered. It is generally the case for dangerous goods that compliance with the relevant dangerous goods regulations will prevent impairment of other goods. 3 Containers - Explanation of terminology 3.1 Container design 3.1.1 Container design and types 3.1.1.1 Part 1 3.1.1.2 Part 2 3.1.1.3 Part 3 3.1.2 CSC & structural and testing regulations 3.1.3 Cargo-securing equipment 3.2 Container dimensions and weights 3.3 Identification system 3.4 Size and type codes 3.5 Operational markings 3.6 Other markings 3.7 Arrangement of obligatory and optional

markings 3.8 Labeling and placarding of containers carrying dangerous cargoes This section deals with the technical aspects of CTUs and the cargo securing aspect of containers, but not the general use of containers; nor is it intended to address the economic viability of using containers. Explanation of terminology

There is some ambiguity in English about the meaning of the word "container" (from the Latin: continere = to enclose), but for the purposes of this Handbook the word should be taken to mean a shipping container, whether large or small. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines a container as a "large reusable receptacle that can accommodate smaller cartons or cases in a single shipment, designed for efficient handling of cargo". In common American parlance, this type of container is often called a "van", although a van is defined in most dictionaries as a motor vehicle or truck or wagon. In the past, the term container, when used in the field of goods traffic, was taken to mean standardized transport units of different types, whose dimensions were so matched to one another that they could be combined together as "transport modules". This is still generally true today; however, usage of the term has moved more and more towards large or bulk containers, which are transported by road, rail, water and (in modified form) even by air.

This part of the Container Handbook deals in particular with the packing and securing of cargoes in freight containers. However, the packing and securing instructions are equally applicable to CTUs as defined in the CTU packing guidelines, which are referred to extensively here. The "Guidelines for the packing of cargo, other than bulk cargo, into or onto cargo transport units (CTUs) applicable to transport operations by all surface and water modes of transport", in force since 17th February 1999, define the following terms: For the purposes of these guidelines, the term "Cargo Transport Unit" ("CTU") has the same meaning as the expression "Intermodal Transport Unit" ("ITU") and the following definitions apply: cargo transport unit (CTU) means a freight container, swap-body, vehicle, railway wagon [railroad car] or any other similar unit.

Freight container, in this case a partially ventilated 20' plywood box container

Swap-body

Vehicle

Railroad car, in this case a sliding wall bogie car

Other CTUs: Roll trailers Cassette

Other CTU, in this case roll trailer Freight container/container means an article of transport equipment that is of a permanent character and accordingly strong enough to be suitable for repeated use; it is designed to transport a number of receptacles, packages, unit loads and overpacks together from the packing point to its final destination by road, rail, inland waterway and/or sea without intermediate separate handling of each package, unit load or overpack. The word "freight" is not repeated throughout these Guidelines.

Freight container/container, in this case a 40' high-cube corrugated steel container

... the "permanent character, sufficient strength and suitability for repeated use" are no use, however, if a container is incorrectly packed and secured:

Damage to containers due to packing and securing deficiencies Intermediate Bulk Container, (IBC) means a rigid, semirigid or flexible portable packaging that:

1. 2. 3.

has a capacity of not more than 3.0 m (3000 liters) for solids and liquids; is designed for mechanical handling; and is resistant to the stresses produced in handling and transport, as determined by tests.

Rigid IBC

Semirigid IBC

Flexible IBC, in this case a Big Bag

Intermodal Transport Unit (ITU) means a container, swap-body or semitrailer suitable for intermodal transport.

Freight container used for intermodal transport

Swap-body used for intermodal transport

Articulated truck consisting of truck tractor and trailer used for intermodal transport Swap-body means a CTU with at least four fittings for accomodating twist locks that take into account ISO standard 1161: 1984 not permanently attached to an underframe and wheels or to a chassis and wheels. A swap-body need not be stackable but is usually equipped with support legs, designed especially for combined road/rail transport.

Swap-body

The term swap-bodies has come to be used in modern German parlance. Vehicle means a road vehicle or railway freight wagon [railroad freight car], permanently attached to an underframe and wheels or to a chassis and wheels, which is loaded and unloaded as a unit. This term also includes a trailer, semitrailer or similar mobile unit except those used solely for the purposes of loading and unloading.

Road vehicle

Railroad car

A distinction is drawn according to size between

Large Medium Small containers

containers containers

This handbook deals in particular with cargo securing in large containers, with the main emphasis on those which spend at least part of their journey at sea. In principle, the cargo securing rules set out also apply to other containers. pa Containers are medium containers designed especially for rail transport. Small containers are used in groupage traffic and are carried by both road and rail vehicles. Neither of the above-mentioned groups will be dealt with here, however. Depending on container design and the applicable standard, the following distinctions may be drawn:

ISO ASA

container

(also

known

as

an

overseas

container

or

transcontainer) container

ISO inland container

An international standard is necessary for the standardization of transport and handling operations, e.g. to ensure uniform practice in the picking up and setting down of containers using lifting gear and ground conveyors or the marking of containers. In addition, a series of other national and international publications, some of which have

legal force, cover the widest possible range of characteristics of these special containers for rationalized goods transport or give instructions for their use. We shall not list the individual standards here, as they are of only limited relevance to packing and cargo securing. Should a particular standard be of relevance, the reader will be referred to it. Technical Committee 104 (TC 104) of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) was involved in drawing up many of the ISO standards. German interests were represented with regard to some standards by the ISO Container sub-committee (SC). The international standards are applied in Germany as ISO or these days for the most part as EN ISO. One important regulation which has legal force has been published in the German federal law gazette as the "Internationales bereinkommen ber sichere Container (CSC)" [International Convention for Safe Containers]. The Convention defines the term container as follows: Article Definitions For the purpose of the present Convention, unless expressly provided II

otherwise:

1 "Container" means an article of transport equipment: . a of a permanent character and accordingly strong enough to be suitable for repeated use; ) b specially designed to facilitate the transport of goods, by one or more modes of transport, without ) intermediate reloading; c) designed to be secured and/or readily handled, having corner castings for these purposes; d of a size such that the area enclosed by the four outer bottom corners is either: ) i) ii) at least 14 sq. m. (150 sq. ft.) or at least 7 sq. m. (75 sq. ft.) if it is fitted with top corner castings.

The term "container" includes neither vehicles nor packaging; however, containers when carried on chassis are included.

In both DIN ISO 668, entitled "Series 1 ISO containers - Classification, dimensions and ratings" and in DIN ISO 830 "Containers - Vocabulary", containers are defined as follows: "Container": a transport container which

is of a permanent character and accordingly is strong enough to be suitable for repeated use, is specially designed to facilitate the transport of goods, by one or more modes of transport, without intermediate reloading, is is designed suitable to be for readily mechanical packed and handling, unpacked

has a capacity of at least 1 m.

Vehicles and packaging are not containers. In principle, the only difference between the "International Convention for Safe Containers (CSC)" and the DIN ISO standards is that the former provides for a container surface area of at least 14 m or 7m, as a function of the corner castings, while the latter deem receptacles with volumes of 1 m or more to be containers. We will not at this point go into the specific definitions of the term container given in dangerous goods legislation, but if the need arises, the relevant references will be cited at the appropriate point.

3.1

Container design 3.1.1 Container design and types 3.1.1.1 Part 1 3.1.1.2 Part 2 3.1.1.3 Part 3

3.1.2 CSC & structural and testing regulations 3.1.3 Cargo-securing equipment A container user should be aware of the most important structural differences between containers, so that he/she is in a position to make appropriate preparations for packing and cargo securing and correctly to assess container loading capacity. Problem-free dispatch has been assisted by the standardization of transport units, such as containers, while the standardization of certain components and some dimensions permits the use of standard handling equipment and means of transport. We will describe fundamental components and designs first of all with reference to standard box containers. More detailed information is given under the heading "Container types".

Basic container frame

The load-carrying element of all box containers is a steel framework, consisting of four corner posts and two bottom side rails, two top side rails, two bottom cross members, a front top end rail and a door header.

Bottom cross members serve as supports for the container floor

Additional bottom cross members are fitted between the bottom side rails, to serve as supports for the floor covering.

Side walls

End walls

Roof panel

The side and end walls and the roof are the components of a standard box container which are capable of bearing the least load. To a certain degree, this naturally also depends on the construction materials used for them.

Essential components of a container

This and the following two Figures illustrate the essential components of standard box containers.

Not included by name are, for example, the door bar handles, the locking components required for sealing, etc.. Where necessary, descriptions of and comments about these components are provided at other points in the Handbook.

Part names in the area of the container floor

comparison

of

German

and

English

part

names

is

given

below:

German name Eckbeschlag Ecksule (Unterer) Seitenlngstrger (Oberer) Seitenlngstrger / Dachlngstrger

English name corner fitting / corner casting corner post bottom side rail top side rail

Unterer Quertrger front also known as: Stirnschwelle bottom end rail; door sill rear also known as: Trschwelle / Truntergurt Oberer Quertrger / Dachquertrger front top front also known as: Stirntrger door header rear also known as: Trtrger / Trobergurt Boden Stirnwand Bodenquertrger Dach Dachspriegel (e.g. in open-top containers) Seitenwnde Gabelstaplertasche Trverschlustange Scharnier Nocke Nockenhalterung Trdichtung floor front end wall bottom cross member roof panel roof bows side panel / side wall forklift pocket door locking bar hinge cam cam keeper door gasket end rail

In the early days of container shipping, the majority of containers were constructed according to ASA standards, but now the containers used for maritime transport are almost without exception ISO containers.

ISO Corner Casting

ASA Corner Casting

They differ both in dimension and in the shape of the corner fittings or "corner castings". Most ASA containers, i.e. containers like those used by Sealand constructed according to "American Standards Association" standards, have since been adapted to match ISO dimensions. To simplify handling, special universal spreaders were used, which

could

handle

both

types

without

difficulty.

ISO corner castings - horizontal and vertical mirror images

ISO standard 1161 specifies different shapes for top and bottom and mirror images for right and left. The eight corner castings of a container or a corresponding CTU have to be particularly strong, since they work with the corner posts and the other basic components of the container frame to absorb the forces which lock units or lashings exert on containers when they are stacked on top of one another, during handling and during

transport.

Securing on board

Cargo handling

Securing on a chassis

DIN/ISO standards specify certain minimum requirements for the loading capacity and stackability of containers; while higher levels of performance may be provided for individual properties, lower levels may not. It must be possible to stack six ISO containers packed to the maximum weight vertically on top of one another. Maximum offset is set as follows: widthwise - 24.4 mm (1"), lengthwise - 38 mm (1").

The actual values of modern containers are generally higher. Many are designed to be stacked 8 high. The maximum stacking load must be marked on the CSC plate. (More details are given in the relevant section of the Handbook).

According to safety regulations, stacked containers must where necessary be secured against toppling and shifting. On larger container ships, the containers are stowed 9 - 12 high in the hold. In such cases, the containers loaded must either be only partly full or designed to have greater stackability.

Indicating stacking heights on a container

The latter is generally the case with modern containers, but it is possible to use fold-out flaps

which

subdivide

the

in the cell guides, stacks.

Inland containers are only designed to be stacked 3 high when fully loaded:

Irrespective of the material used to build a box container, it is essential for it to be

spray-tight.

In standard box containers, the load-carrying parts are made of steel profiles, i.e. at least the entire frame including the bottom cross members and possibly also the elements serving as reinforcements, such as bottom side rails in the area of the gooseneck tunnel etc.. Three main types of material are used for the walls and roof:

steel aluminum sheet in

sheet, conjunction with stiffening

corrugated profiles

plywood with glass fiber-reinforced plastic coating (plywood + GRP)

These are reflected in the conventional container names:

steel aluminum

container container

plywood container

Variously corrugated steel sheet

In steel sheet containers, a wide range of differently profiled corrugated steel sheet may be used for the outer walls. It is protected against corrosion by painting or similar processes.

Indication of container wall material

Repair instructions on a steel container

The cost advantages of this type of container have led to its current dominance. Of all the containers currently in use, a rough estimate would suggest that 85% are made of steel sheet.

Aluminum container skin

These containers are built either with a pure aluminum skin or with a plywood inner lining; they may also either be riveted or with a smooth or lightly riveted finish. In plywood containers, the outer walls are made of plywood coated with glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GRP). Plywood is a popular material for "coffee containers".

Container doors are often also made of plymetal, which consists of a plywood core with sheet metal adhered to it on both sides.

Materials information on containers

It is clear from these examples that containers are not generally made from a single material but various material combinations, here including steel, aluminum and plywood. The information even covers the type of preservatives used.

Wood treatment information

Special impregnation against insect or other pests is required for certain regions of service. Most container floors or wooden parts undergo preventive treatment:

Wood treatment information

Materials used for a flatrack

Container

floors

are

preferably

made

of

wood:

Plywood floor

Repair to floor

mostly 25 mm thick, more rarely 30 mm thick. Although wood is relatively expensive, it has substantial advantages over other materials: it is strong and resilient, does not dent, may be easily replaced during repairs and, when appropriately finished, has an adequate coefficient of friction. The latter does not apply to the virtually new container in the left-hand Figure, which has a mirror-bright finish.
Box containers are predominantly provided with coverings of plywood or textured coated board

Cross-section through a seven-ply plywood board

Planking

Steel floor

Planking is preferred for flatracks and other similar platform containers. 20' platforms or half-height open-top containers often have a floor of steel, e.g. of "tear drop" or otherwise textured sheet. The floors of ISO containers have to be capable of bearing the evenly distributed payload, the emphasis being on "evenly distributed".

The

following

test

criteria

apply

where

ground

conveyors 12,040 2,730 142 180 760

have lbs kg

access

to

container

floors.

axle load wheel load contact surface per wheel wheel width wheel gage

cm mm mm

The wheel contact area of 142 cm corresponds approximately to the size of a postcard. Forklift trucks with a loadcarrying capacity of 2 metric tons have axle loads of just under 5 metric tons when loaded. Most 2.5 metric ton forklifts are within the admissible range. However, some electrically operated 2.5 metric ton forklift trucks reach front axle loads of over 6000 kg when loaded. It is of course possible for even heavier forklift trucks to drive into containers, provided they are not fully loaded and the equipment and cargo dimensions allow it. It is essential to note that add-ons reduce the load-carrying capacity of forklifts. Goods may only be stacked in box containers using equipment with a suitable telescopic mast. Using equipment with twin tires may reduce the wheel loads, but it doesn't completely resolve the issue of axle load. It shouldn't therefore be regarded as a license to use heavier equipment. The strength of ISO containers is laid down in the relevant DIN standards and/or the International Convention for Safe Containers: ISO containers must be capable of absorbing the horizontal forces arising during regular service at the level of the end frames.

Longitudinal loading capacity in the floor area

Containers must withstand loads in the lengthwise direction which correspond to external acceleration of 2 g acting horizontally on the floor fastening elements. This takes into account loads which are transmitted via twist locks and

other vehicle locking elements to containers. Special railroad container cars with hydraulic shock absorption limit forces to 2 g; examples of these cars are Lgjs, Sgjs and Sgjkmmns cars and other cars with a j in their name, the j indicating high-performance (long-stroke) shock absorbers or buffers.
According to the CSC, end walls must be so constructed that forces of 0.4 times the uniformly applied payload may be absorbed, i.e. 40% of the container payload or 0.4 g. Higher or lower values should be marked on the containers.

End wall loading capacity

The loading capacity of the side walls must correspond to 0.6 times the uniformly applied payload, i.e. 60% of the payload or 0.6 g. Higher or lower values should again be marked on the containers. More details are given in Section 3.1.2 CSC & structural and testing regulations

Side wall loading capacity

Since the values for end and side walls are valid only for large-area loads, any point loading of the walls should be avoided. Because the weight-carrying capacity of many general purpose containers is not fully utilized, loading is kept below the maximum values in the case of compact and even packing. However, if the rate of utilization is high and/or uneven, countermeasures must be taken.

In the case of container roof panels, an evenly distributed 200 kg load may be applied to a surface area of 600 x 300 mm, so meaning that two people may stand next to one another on the container roof. Under no circumstances may container roof panels be covered with cargo.

Some containers are fitted with forklift pockets for handling with ground conveyors. Appropriate regulations relating to the required dimensions may be found in appendix C of ISO 1496/1. The pockets are cavities formed crosswise

in the floor structure and allow insertion of the forks from the side; the forks must be pushed fully into the pockets. Forks which are too short must under no circumstances be used for lifting, since they may cause damage to the floor.

Unmarked forklift pockets on a box container

The forklift pockets generally only allow handling of empty containers. Packed containers must not be picked up in this way unless specifically permitted. This is not the case here; hence, the container may only be picked up with forks when empty.

Forklift pockets on a flatrack marked EMPTY

Forklift pockets on a flatrack not marked EMPTY

Both containers may only be picked up when empty.

For the most part, no marking is provided or no explicit instruction is given to pick up only empty containers. To rule out errors, marking should be made a requirement.

Marking variant: the arrows bear the mark "Tare"

The containers shown here merely bear the marking "Tare" at the inner forklift pockets. The outer pairs of pockets lack markings or symbols. It is obvious here that the arrangement of these pockets also allows handling of the full container by forklift truck, but one can never be sure. This example shows that there is a need for marking to be mandatory.

Forklift pockets on a "tilt" container

With this container, it is even less certain how the forklift pockets are to be used. Standardized regulations and compliance therewith in practice could help in the avoidance of many losses resulting from the incorrect use

of

these

components.

Straddle carrier recess

Some containers have a recess along the longitudinal sides which allows the containers to be picked up using straddle carrier load suspension devices for transport within cargo handling facilities. Straddle carriers are

specially

built

(low)

van

carriers

with

which

loads

may

be

lifted

but

not

stacked.

Handling a swap-body in grappler pockets

with

grappler

Grappler pocket in a semitrailer

Grappler pocket in a swap-body

Grappler pockets are slots or recesses in the bottom side rails of containers or other CTUs, especially inland containers and swap-bodies. Grapplers slot into them during cargo handling. Such grapplers may also be used with gantry cranes, if no spreaders are used. Grappler pockets also allow direct pick-up of the containers with the

tongs

of

van

carrier.

Detailed images of grapplers

Gooseneck tunnel

Many containers have recesses in the bottom of the front end This centrally located recess is known as a gooseneck tunnel. A large number of CTUs, especially flatracks have them at both ends. The tunnel does not have any effect

on loading space, the inside of the container floor or the flatrack loading area being flat. This recess serves in centering the container on a gooseneck chassis.

Container with gooseneck tunnel on a normal Container with gooseneck container chassis gooseneck chassis

tunnel

on

Containers with goosenecks can be carried on both normal chassis and gooseneck chassis. Containers without goosenecks can only be carried on normal chassis. Depending on the construction of the chassis, a lower road vehicle overall height may be achieved with gooseneck chassis. In this way, many articulated trucks can see their height reduced by approx. 150 mm.

40' flatrack with gooseneck tunnel

20' flatracks without gooseneck tunnel

In accordance with the standards, gooseneck tunnels are only provided for 40' containers. 3.1.1.1 Container design and types, Part 1 Over 50 percent of the containers available internationally belong to shipping companies. Alongside these are a large number of leasing companies, which lease their containers both to shipowners and to direct customers. Containers belonging to forwarders tend to carry dry and liquid bulk goods, for which bulk and tank containers are mostly used. Specific details about the appearance of the containers, their external and internal dimensions, their weights and volumes, temperature control, cargo-securing equipment and other special features may in general be found in the brochures published by the respective companies. Of necessity, the following can only deal with a few types of container (www.tis-gdv.de). According to DIN ISO 4346 of January 1996, a distinction may be drawn between the following types:

General Dry Named Thermal Open-top Platform Tank Air/surface containers bulk

purpose containers/bulk cargo

containers containers containers containers containers containers

containers

Further distinctions are drawn within these groups depending on design and principal characteristics. Information relating to the respective code, the group and type code, is to be found in Section 3.4 "Size and type codes". Over the years, expressions have become established which do not always correspond to the standards or which are used in addition to the standard expressions. Some of these need to be explained. The term standard container was used for the first containers in their basic form. As these were closed and were primarily suitable for the loading of general cargo, they were/are also known as general purpose containers, dry cargo containers or box containers. The initial height of 8' has already very nearly been consigned to history. Most box containers have an external height of 8'6". Unventilated general purpose containers have openings on either one or both end(s).

Unventilated general purpose containers of sheet steel

The two steel containers of virtually identical construction can be designated standard containers. Both containers have an external height of 8'6" and no gooseneck tunnel. This is stated in coding 2210 on the one hand and 22G1 on the other. Both containers have forklift pockets and straddle carrier recesses.

Vents in a container

Containers equipped with such vents also count as unventilated general purpose containers, although they have small vents in the upper part of the cargo space.

20' plywood container with vents in the top side rail

This container too falls into the category of "unventilated general purpose container" although individual vents are provided all the way along the upper part of the cargo space.

Containers with end doors and side doors occupying the entire length

Another subgroup of unventilated general purpose containers specified in DINEN ISO 4346, January 1996, has "openings at one or both end(s) plus full openings on one or both sides".

Container with end wall doors and partial openings at the side

Another subgroup consists of container with "openings at one or both end(s) plus partial openings on one or both sides". The expression high-cube container originally covered all containers higher than 8'6". The expression is now used in practice almost only ever for containers which have an external height of 9'6". Particular attention needs to be given to possible height restrictions when these containers are carried by for road and rail. It may be necessary to use special chassis or carrying cars.

Comparison of a high-cube container (9'6") with an 8'6" container

The yellow and black marking on the top edges of the high-cube container serves as a warning about its height. More details about operational markings are given in Section 3.5.

40' containers: left 8'6" high, right 9'6" high (high-cube)

Forty foot containers have a larger volume-to-payload ratio than 20' containers, i.e. they are suitable for goods with a higher cargo stowage factor. Open-sided containers (OS) have solid end walls and a solid roof panel. The sides may be closed at the bottom by folding down wooden, aluminum profile or steel sheet side walls, which may be divided into sections. Roof bow holders and roof bows are provided for the upper part, which may be covered with tarpaulins. The container is packed from the side. Open-sided containers also exist which are open only on one side. If bars are positioned over one open side, the containers can be used for transporting livestock. Another variant is the "folding side wall" container, a type of inland container.

Open-sided container, here in the form of a "tilt" container with end wall door

Open-sided container, here in the form of a "tilt" container with end wall door

As is clear from the pictures, open-sided containers are also available with doors at the rear of the container. The statement found in many brochures to the effect that "lateral load securing consists of planks, which are suspended between the removable central support and the corner posts" is not to be trusted. It is essential to check what forces these structures can absorb.

Open-top open-sided containers (OTOS) combine the features of open-sided and open-top containers, i.e. the roofs and sides are open and need to be covered with tarpaulins. Since it is American transport that gave rise to the 8' wide standard overseas container, these containers are not suitable for the interchangeable pool pallets used in Europe, which have dimensions of 800 mm x 1200 mm. To counter this problem, pallet-compatible containers 2.50 m in width have been constructed, which must not, however, be confused with the pre-existing inland containers 2.50 m in width.

Pallet-compatible 40' containers

20' x 8'6" container with side doors

2.50 m wide 20' inland containers provided by DB (German Railroads)

20' x 8'6" container with two end wall doors

General purpose container - special design with side doors

10' wide general purpose container

General purpose containers with special features are intended to make it possible to transport particular cargoes which could not otherwise be safely transported without damage. Containers for hanging garments belong to this group: they are equipped with clothes rails which are attached to special supporting bars. Textiles, hanging on coat-hangers, can be carried in these containers. Passively ventilated containers, also known as ventilated containers, hardly differ from standard containers in external appearance. They are used for the most part to transport organic cargoes with high moisture contents, such as coffee and cocoa beans. Special equipment is intended to ensure that, as far as possible, sweat is prevented from forming. In general parlance, the containers are also named after the type of cargo carried in them, hence the widespread use of the expression coffee container. There are two basic variants:

Containers with natural ventilation use pressure differences between the internal and external air for air exchange purposes. Warm air rises in the container and exits at the top through the roof ventilation strips. Cooler external air then enters through the floor ventilation strips. Forced ventilation containers use fans and air ducts and/or ventilation flaps to achieve the necessary air exchange.

Container vent slots or air openings are often constructed as a labyrinth to prevent the penetration of spray or precipitation. Often, there are openings in the bottom and top side rails, which form regular air ducts. Sometimes, only relatively small, perforated areas are provided at regular intervals in the outer skin. DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996, lists ventilated general purpose containers under Code V, allocating to them either group code VH or type codes such V0, V2 or V4. A distinction is drawn between

Containers Containers

with

non-mechanical

ventilation

at

the

lower

and

upper in

parts the

of

the

cargo

space and

with

mechanical

ventilation

installed

container

Containers with mechanical ventilation located outside the container.

General purpose containers with non-mechanical ventilation

Non-mechanical ventilation at the upper and lower parts of the container

General purpose containers with mechanical ventilation installed in the container

There are plenty of other designs of general purpose container, in addition to those described above. A more unusual example is the container illustrated below.

General purpose container with flaps on the end and side walls

Dry bulk containers or bulk containers may be used to transport loose, free-flowing goods. DIN EN ISO 6346 of January 1996 distinguishes, under Code B, between the group codes BU and BK as well as various type codes for non-pressure-resistant dry bulk containers which are closed or air-tight and dry bulk containers with horizontal or tipping discharge pressure-resistant at test pressures respectively of 150 kPa and 265 kPa.

Loading hatches and discharge outlets in different bulk containers

Externally, normal bulk containers are of identical construction to standard containers except for the loading hatches and discharge outlets. The loading hatches or domes are arranged in the roof. To gain access to these, some containers are provided with swivelable ladders. To prevent contact between the cargo and the container walls, "inlets" or liner bags may be introduced into the containers and fixed in place. The unloading hatches are normally at one of the ends, generally incorporated into the doors. Sometimes, short hoses are also incorporated, so as to be able to direct the cargo as it is unloaded. Less frequently, the discharge outlets are arranged at the side. In all the above cases, unpacking is achieved by the force of gravity, generally assisted by tipping the containers.

Chassis with containers

tipping

equipment

for

emptying

bulk

Some special dry bulk containers resemble tank containers. In addition to emptying by gravity, some containers are available which may be emptied by means of compressed air.

Bulk container with compressed air-assisted emptying

Bulk container

By fitting "inlets" or liner bags, normal general cargo containers may also be used as bulk containers:

"Inlets" in a general purpose container, for transporting bulk cargo

Reusable

"inlets"

are

available,

as

well

as

single-use

"inlets"

or

disposable

liners.

DIN EN ISO 6346 of January 1996 specifies under Code S and group code SN "named cargo containers". Examples of these include containers for transporting livestock (type code S0), containers for transporting automobiles (type code S1) and containers for transporting live fish (type code S2). 3.1.1.2 Container design and types, Part 2 Thermal containers are divided into refrigerated, refrigerated/heated and merely insulated types. A distinction is also drawn between those with fixed and removable equipment. Refrigerated or heated containers allow goods to be transported irrespective of ambient temperature. The question of whether the container heats or refrigerates is relative. Nonetheless, the term refrigerated container or reefer has become established in common parlance. The correct term would be temperature-controlled container.

Thermal container with integral unit - rear

Thermal container - side and end with integral unit

Depending on container quality, the entire outer skin may be appropriately insulated, thereby reducing the internal dimensions of the container. According to ISO 1496/2, the internal width must amount to 2200 mm. The container (reefer) floor is generally made of T-shaped aluminum profiles and is also known as a T grating. The floor is strong enough to allow access by forklift trucks. The type code distinguishes between thermal containers according to type of refrigeration unit and/or coefficients of heat transmission (k values). The temperature of insulated containers may be controlled by external refrigeration units.

Mobile refrigeration unit, in this case in stationary use

Mobile refrigeration unit, for stationary use

DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996 lists thermal containers under Code R, namely:

mechanically refrigerated under group code RE and type code R0 mechanically refrigerated and heated under group code RT and type code R1 self powered mechanically refrigerated under group code RS and type code R2 self powered mechanically refrigerated and heated under group code RS and type code R3

20' x 8'6" thermal container, mechanically refrigerated/heated

40' x 9'6" thermal container, mechanically refrigerated/heated

Code H of the same standard covers refrigerated and/or heated thermal containers with removable equipment, with group code HR applying to

refrigerated and/or heated with removable equipment located externally, coefficient of heat transfer k = 0.4 W/(m K), type code H0 refrigerated and/or heated with removable equipment located internally, type code H1 refrigerated and/or heated with removable equipment located externally, coefficient of heat transfer k = 0.7 W/(m K), type code H2

Group code HI covers insulated containers, namely

Type code H5 = insulated, coefficient of heat transmission k = 0.4 W/(mK) Type code H6 = insulated, coefficient of heat transmission k = 0.7 W/(mK)

These containers also resemble standard containers externally, but inside they have a heat-insulating lining, generally of polyurethane foam-based insulating material. Their wall thickness of 50 - 100 mm reduces stowage space a little compared to normal containers. The insulation is intended to protect the cargo from over-rapid temperature variations. If lower temperatures or refrigeration are required, refrigerants may be added. Ice is seldom used nowadays, since it requires special ice boxes; instead, dry ice is often used. Another method is to vaporize liquefied gases. Such containers are used for the most part to carry heat-sensitive cargoes. Insulated containers and refrigerated containers may also be used without refrigeration or heating. Since temperature variations in the container are delayed relative to the external temperature, using such containers can be entirely appropriate for certain goods. Refrigeration and/or heating may be achieved by

compressors directly driven by electrical motors compressors directly driven by internal combustion engine externally generated cooling or heating air

The electrical power required for driving refrigerating/heating machines is supplied by on-shore or on-board power supply systems or by a separate generator driven by an internal combustion engine, diesel engines mostly being used for this purpose. A distinction is drawn between fixed generators and so-called clip-on generators, which are only fitted on a temporary basis.

Integral refrigerating/heating machine for connection to on-shore or on-board power supply system

Fixed

refrigeration

units

(integral

units)

reduce

the

useful

length

and

payload

of

containers.

Clip-on units for temporary fitting to thermal containers

Clip-on units increase the overall length of the containers. These heating/refrigerating machines are individual units which may be stored on shore or on board and temporarily attached to the end walls of containers. Each apparatus may be individually adjusted and does not affect the cargo space atmosphere for other containers. Supply air is input at the bottom and return air is extracted at the top.

Openings for supply and return air in an external unit

Such containers are also known as "porthole containers", the name arising from the similarity between these openings and the round ships' windows known as portholes.

Thermal container/insulated container with externally fitted supply device

Supply device for a thermal container - detail

Externally generated cooling or heating air may be supplied via on-shore or on-board central refrigeration systems. Containers supplied by this system also have two openings in the end wall for the supply and removal of cargo space air subject to artificial temperature control. The term Conair container is a brand name often used for "insulated container".

Open-top containers are suitable in general for all types of general cargo but especially for heavy, overheight cargo. Since their roofs are openable, they may also be packed from above. They have doors at least at the rear and their roofs are openable or removable. The roof covering consists either of a tarpaulin supported by roof bows or a solid, fully removable hard-top. Containers with the latter type of roof covering are known as hard-top opentop containers.

Open-top container with tarpaulin and roof bows

Hard-top open-top containers

Cover removed from a 20' hard-top open-top container

So that it is possible not only to introduce cargoes from above but also to load overheight cargoes through the doors, some containers have removable or swing-out top members or top door rails. This also facilitates packing using lifting gear at floor level.

Open-top container with top member removed

The roof bows of an open-top container serve both to support the tarpaulin and to stabilize the whole container. Such containers are therefore also made wholly of steel, so that the structure is still sufficiently stiff despite the absence of a roof. If overheight cargoes are carried, the stabilizing effect of the roof bows is absent. In some cases, therefore, it would be sensible to investigate whether it would not be equally possible to use flatracks or indeed whether that would not be the better solution from the point of view of cargo securing. The lashing equipment with which some open-top containers are provided have higher load-carrying capacities than those of general purpose containers. Half-height open-top containers are open at the top, as their name suggests. There are two types in existence: either completely open or with a tarpaulin and roof bows. The rear door may often be folded down and used as a ramp.

20' and 40' half-height open-top containers, with and without cover

DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996 lists open-top containers, abbreviated as OT, under Code U. The group code for all such containers is UT. The following types are distinguished by the type codes indicated:

U0 - Opening(s) at one or both end(s) U1 - Opening(s) at one or both end(s) plus removable roof in end frame U2 - Opening(s) at one or both end(s) plus opening(s) on one or both sides U3 - Opening(s) at one or both end(s) plus opening(s) on one or both sides plus removable top members

U4 - Opening(s) at one or both end(s) plus opening(s) on one side plus full openings on the other side U5 - Full, solid side and end walls (no doors)

20' x 8' x 4'3" Half-height open-top - external and internal view

With this container, the rear end wall (at the front in the left-hand picture) can be folded out and used as an access ramp for forklift trucks. A warning is attached:

Warning about the "ramp" of a half-height open-top container

Two OTs: each with rear doors and removable top members

The

old,

but

still

valid,

number

combination

4351

would

today

be

replaced

by

the

code

42U3.

Platforms and flatracks are also known in common parlance as open containers. Although such containers may have special equipment, such stanchions, fold-down end walls, lashing equipment etc., they are often described in specialist literature as containers without additional equipment.

Platform: 20' long, 8' wide and 1'1" high

Platforms consist of reinforced container floors with sheet steel or planking. A large number of lashing points are provided for cargo securing; these may be welded-on or recessed lashing lugs or rings, or lashing bars attached to the outsides of the side rails.

Two 20' platforms 1'1" high

If agreed with the shipping companies, several platforms may be combined to form larger loading areas for carrying oversize goods. Acceptance and delivery then require special attention and coordination of operations between the ship's command, shipping companies and terminal operator is recommended. When empty, platforms can be stacked into piles to save space during transport. Since loaded platforms are not stackable, they are loaded on board ship as the top layer of a hold or deck stack. If a ship's cell guides are equipped with flaps, any stowage space can be used. 20' platforms are generally 335 mm (1'1") high, while 40' platforms are generally 610 mm (2') high. There are 40' platforms with gooseneck tunnels at both ends.

Flatracks, also known as flats, consist of container floor and end walls. Flatracks with folding or collapsible end walls or end frames are commonly known as collapsible flats or collapsible flatracks.

20' flatrack with fixed end walls

Flatracks are also known as "open-top open-sided containers".

2.50 m wide 20' flatrack, one of the inland containers provided by DB (German Railroads)

20' collapsible flatracks, erected and collapsed

The advantage of collapsible flatracks is that several unloaded flats can be stacked on top of one another to save space during transport. For cargo securing purposes, the flats are equipped with lashing bars, lugs or hooks of appropriate strength. Stanchion pockets and insertable stanchions are often provided. If agreed with the carriers, a number of flatracks may be combined together so as to be able to transport particularly large items of cargo. 3.1.1.3 Container design and types, Part 3 DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996 allocates Code P to platform containers, with this edition of the standard combining both pure platforms and flatracks under this letter. Pure platforms bear group code PL or type code P0.

40' platform: 8' wide and 2' high with gooseneck tunnel at both ends

Group code PF covers type codes P1 and P2.

Half-height stanchions

flats

falling

under

P1,

with

lateral

insertable

P1 platforms have two complete, fixed end walls, irrespective of how high they are.

Platform containers falling under P2 with corner posts and special load retainers

P2 platforms have fixed posts, either free-standing or with removable top members. The containers illustrated here are specially constructed to accommodate stacking boxes. The boxes are carrying cargo securing materials for securing the containers on board. They are naturally also ideal for transporting other heavy small parts. Group code PC covers type codes P3 and P4. P3 platforms have folding complete end walls.

40' platform with folding complete end walls - collapsed

40' platform with folding complete end walls

P4

platforms

have

folding

posts,

either

free-standing

or

with

removable

top

members.

20' platform with folding free-standing corner posts folded down in pairs

Group code PS covers type codes P5 to P9. P5 platforms are open at the top and ends (skeletal).

Frames for suspension of clip-on units

In the January 1996 edition, type codes P6 to P9 had not been assigned, but were kept as spares. Here is an example of how one of these codes has been assigned by Hapag-Lloyd:

40' x 8' x 9'6" P8 platform

Detail of P8 platform

40' collapsible flatrack with overheight, collapsible end walls

Coil container with folding end walls

Coil containers are built like flats or flatracks, i.e. they consist of a container floor and flat or frame-like end walls. The container floor has cargo troughs for accommodating coils/rolls of steel sheet. Cargo securing costs are lower, since less complex lashing and blocking is required than on/in normal containers. However, when overall transport costs, including the return transport of empty containers, are taken into account, normal carriage may be more economical. Coil containers could be included amongst named cargo containers, but they are not covered by the standard.

20' flatracks, with fold-down end walls and coil wells (coil containers)

Tank containers are provided for carrying liquids and gases. The characteristics of the substances to be carried determine the material of which the tank is made, while the pressure under which the cargo has to be transported influences its construction. Tank containers almost always have as their basis a steel frame, into which tanks of various shapes may be inserted. Various fittings and accessories are incorporated, depending on type and method of filling and emptying. Temperature-controlled tank containers require special heating or cooling devices. They may be filled via domes or tubes and emptied downwards via floor drains or upwards via riser pipes and pressure generators or in any other suitable manner. The products to be carried may be any types of liquid, liquefied or gaseous substance, ranging from harmless to very dangerous.

Tank containers for non-dangerous liquids come under group code TN. Type codes T0, T1 and T2 distinguish between minimum pressures of 45 kPa, 150 kPa and 265 kPa.

Tank container for non-dangerous liquids

Tank containers intended for liquid foodstuffs must be clearly marked as being intended for this purpose:

Half-height tank containers or half-height liquid containers serve to carry high-density liquids which cannot be carried in normal tank containers because they cannot be filled to a high enough level and are therefore subject to surging.

Half-height liquid container

Tank containers for dangerous liquids come under group code TD. Type codes T3, T4, T5 and T6 distinguish between minimum pressures of 150 kPa, 265 kPa, 400 kPa and 600 kPa.

Tank containers for carrying dangerous liquids

Such containers are subject, among other things, to the regulations governing the carriage of dangerous goods and may also have to be tested for compliance with the regulations of the Department of Transportation (DOT) or the German Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM).

20' x 8'6" tank container for dangerous goods with a test pressure of 600 kPa

Tank containers for gases are assigned to group code TG and type codes T7, T8 and T9. T7 and T8 cover minimum pressures of 910 kPa and 2200 kPa, while T9 does not as yet have a pressure assigned to it. Tank containers must be at least 80% full for safety reasons, so as to prevent dangerous surging of the liquids in transit. As a rule of thumb, they should not be filled more than 95% full, so as to allow for thermal expansion of the contents. The CTU packing guidelines state under the heading "Scope": ... They [the Guidelines] do not cover the filling or emptying of tank containers, portable tanks or road tank vehicles, or the transport of any bulk cargo in bulk packagings. For this reason, nothing more will be stated with regard to tank containers at this point in the Handbook. Tank containers may be replaced by introducing "flexible tubes" into standard containers, so turning them into temporary tank containers. However, a major problem associated with this is surging of the liquids, which may result in damage to the container walls.

Frequently used terms and comments Closed containers include all non-ventilatable general purpose, dry bulk and tank containers. These containers allow no or only very slight air exchange. They are consequently gas-tight or at any rate virtually gas-tight. They are not suited to transporting goods which require an exchange of gases. The phrase design for ease of opening is found in container literature in relation to the desire for rapid packing and unpacking. It is often used in relation to dry bulk containers with special openings. Half-height containers are lower than standard containers. The size codes distinguish between those 1295 mm (4'3") high and those of a height less than or equal to 1219 mm (4'). The containers are specially designed for goods with low stowage factors and for high-density cargoes, such as heavy barrels, metal sheet etc.. The following needs to be said with regard to special containers: from a technical point of view, these meet the needs of many forwarders and are desirable with regard to cargo securing. Their special fittings simplify packing and cargo securing, reducing securing costs and shipping risks. However, since they are adapted to one product or group of products to be transported, it is more difficult to use them on all routes, resulting in higher freight rates than for standard containers due to more frequent carriage of empty containers. From the point of view of cargo safety, however, special containers developed for a particular product are preferable to conventional containers. All wooden parts of containers traveling to Australia and New Zealand, including packaging and securing lumber, must be treated, and proof must be provided in the form of appropriate wood treatment certificates. The wooden parts of most containers are impregnated against insect infestation. Australia's and New Zealand's quarantine regulations require proof in the form of a plate:

This provides documentary evidence that the wooden parts have been treated against the Sirex wasp.

3.1.2 CSC & structural and testing regulations / The technical requirements placed on containers are enshrined in the respective standards and in the "International Convention for Safe Containers" or CSC. The aim of the Convention is to achieve the highest possible level of safety of human life in the handling, stacking

and transporting of containers. The Convention applies to all containers used for international transport, except containers developed especially for air travel. Article III, entitled "Application" states 2. Each new container shall be approved either in accordance with the provisions for type-testing or for individual testing as contained in Annex I. The Convention specifies precise requirements which individual components must meet. Annex II of the CSC gives examples of structural safety requirements and tests. According to the CSC, ... a container made from any suitable material which satisfactorily performs the following tests without sustaining any permanent deformation or abnormality which would render it incapable of being used for its designed purpose, shall be considered safe. ... Every contracting state must ensure that effective procedures are put in place to enforce the regulations in Annex I of the Convention. This Annex sets out regulations for the testing, inspection, approval and maintenance of containers. However, the text of the Convention does allow duly authorized organizations to be entrusted with all these tasks, other than maintenance. In many countries, the national classification societies are entrusted with these tasks, e.g. Germanischer Lloyd in Germany. A Safety Approval Plate must be permanently affixed to every container at a readily visible place, where it cannot be easily damaged. Annex I to the International Convention for Safe Containers" (CSC) sets out regulations for the testing, inspection, approval and maintenance of containers. Regulation 1 deals with the Safety Approval Plate. Point 1 makes the following statements:

CSC plate

The Plate shall contain the following information in at least the English or French language:

"CSC SAFETY APPROVAL" Country of approval and approval reference Date (month and year) of manufacture Manufacturer's identification number of the container or, in the case of existing containers for which that number is unknown, the number allotted by the Administration Maximum operating gross weight (kilograms and lbs) Allowable stacking weight for 1.8 g (kilograms and lbs) Transverse racking test load value

The Safety Approval Plate ... shall take the form of a permanent, non-corrosive, fire-proof rectangular plate measuring not less than 200 mm by 100 mm. The words "CSC Safety Approval" of a minimum letter height of 8 mm and all other words and numbers of a minimum height of 5 mm shall be stamped into, embossed on or indicated on its surface in any other permanent and legible way.

Country of Approval and Approval Reference is in this case the USA, the certifier is AB, standing for the American Bureau of Shipping, the reference is 745.

Test of Shipping

plate

from

American

Bureau

Date (month and year) of manufacture is year: 1998 and month: September (stated according to ISO standard as 98-9) Manufacturer's identification number of the container is JDK ...and so on. Maximum operating gross weight (kilograms and lbs is stated as 24,000 KGS and 52,910 LBS (i.e. pounds). According to the original DIN/ISO standards, the maximum total mass for a 20' container is 20,320 kg. In the example it is therefore higher, which is not uncommon these days. Containers with a markedly higher total weight are available.

Allowable stacking weight for 1.8 g (kilograms and lbs) According to ISO standards, fully loaded containers must be stackable 6 high. The container given by way of example may be stacked 8 high (192,000 kg 24,000 kg = 8).

These days, higher permissible loading capacities are practically the rule. On many containers, this is not only pointed out on the CSC plate but is also highlighted by the provision of special plates.

Transverse racking test load value. In this instance, this value is 15,240 KGS or 33,600 LBS.

Transverse racking test

The values stated for the racking test are approximately in line with the standard; if the stated units of mass (kilograms) are converted into newtons, a slight difference remains. The longitudinal racking test value is not stated on the CSC plate.

Longitudinal racking test

The test must be performed from both sides. The ISO standard requires loading of only 75 kN, Lloyd's Register requires 100 kN and Germanischer Lloyd applies 125 kN in its tests.

If important, legally prescribed data are no longer visible, a complaint should be lodged.

Damaged Safety Approval Plate

CSC plate ... The country of Approval should be indicated by means of the distinguishing sign used to indicate country of registration of motor vehicles in international road traffic. ... The F in the above example stands for France. BV is the abbreviation for the classification society Bureau Veritas, which operates in France.

Test plate from Bureau Veritas

Paragraph 2 b) states: A blank space should be reserved on the Plate for insertion of end and/or side-wall strength values (factors) in accordance with Regulation 1, paragraph 3 and Annex II, texts 6 and 7. A blank space should also be reserved on the Plate for first and subsequent maintenance examination dates (month and year) when used. The CSC Safety Approval Plates illustrated above do not carry these details. With good reason, since the regulations subsequently state: End Wall Strength to be indicated on plate only if end walls are designed to withstand a load of less or greater than 0.4 times the maximum permissible payload, i.e. 0.4 P. Side Wall Strength to be indicated on plate only if the side walls are designed to withstand a load of less or greater than 0.6 times the maximum permissible payload, i.e. 0.6 P. This is based on Paragraph 3 of Regulation 1, which states: Where the Administration considers that a new container satisfies the requirements of the present Convention in respect of safety and if, for such container, the end and/or side-wall strength value (factor) are designed to be greater or less than that stipulated in Annex II such value shall be indicated on the Safety Approval Plate.

Positioning of data on the Safety Approval Plate

"A blank space should also be reserved on the CSC Plate for first and subsequent maintenance examination dates (month and year) when used." In the example illustrated, this blank space has been left not at the bottom but on the right of the other required data (see arrow). This is common practice. In the "International Convention for Safe Containers", Regulation 2 of Annex I deals with maintenance, and reads as follows: 1. 2. The owner of the container shall be responsible for maintaining it in safe condition. The owner of an approved container shall examine the container or have it examined in accordance with the procedure either prescribed or approved by the Contracting Party concerned, at intervals appropriate to operation conditions. The date (month and year) before which a new container shall undergo its first examination shall be marked on the Safety Approval Plate. The date (month and year) before which the container shall be re-examined shall be clearly marked on the container on or as close as practicable to the Safety Approval Plate and in a manner acceptable to that Contracting Party which prescribed or approved the particular maintenance procedure involved.

3.

Next examination date not stated

Correct: Next examination date entered

4.

The interval from the date of manufacture to the date of the first examination shall not exceed five years. Subsequent examination of new containers and re-examination of existing containers shall be at intervals of not more than 24 months. All examinations shall determine whether the container has any defects which could place any person in danger.

Correct: Interval between date of manufacture and first examination amounts to 5 years

The container was manufactured in 1998. On the CSC Plate, the first re-examination date is given as being month 09, i.e. September, 2003 (this is difficult to read on the Figure). 5. For the purposes of this Regulation, "the Contracting Party concerned" is the Contracting Party of the territory in which the owner is domiciled or has his head office.

For some years now, owners have in most cases been responsible for examining their own containers. Regulators have provided for this by establishing an "Approved Continuous Examination Program", in which owners participate. The ACEP is a recognized repair and maintenance system providing for regular examinations and servicing. To participate actively in this program, it is necessary to register with the competent authorities. Registration is indicated on the container. The owner has then to take responsibility for the necessary inspections and the date for re-examination need no longer be indicated on the CSC plate.

A valid ACEP renders it unnecessary to indicate a next examination date

"Approved Continuous Examination Program" registration data

Most container owners participate in the ACEP

Chapter II of the "International Convention for Safe Containers" sets out regulations for approval of new containers by design type, as quoted in detail below: Regulation 3 Approval of new containers To qualify for approval for safety purposes under the present Convention all new containers shall comply with the requirements set out in Annex II. Regulation 4 Design type approval In the case of containers for which an application for approval has been submitted, the Administration will examine designs and witness testing of a prototype container to ensure that the containers will conform with the requirements set out in Annex II. When satisfied, the Administration shall notify the applicant in writing that the container meets the requirements of the present Convention and this notification shall entitle the manufacturer to affix the Safety Approval Plate to every container of the design type series. Regulation 5 sets out the provisions for approval by design type: 1. Where the containers are to be manufactured by design type series, application made to an Administration for approval by design type shall be accompanied by drawings, a design specification of the type of container to be approved, and such other data as may be required by the Administration. 2. The applicant shall state the identification symbols which will be assigned by the manufacturer to the type of container to which the application for approval relates. 3. The application shall also be accompanied by an assurance from the manufacturer that he shall: (a) produce to the Administration such containers of the design type concerned as the Administration may wish to examine; (b) advise the Administration of any change in the design or specification and await its approval before affixing the Safety Approval Plate to the container; (c) affix the Safety Approval Plate to each container in the design type series and to no others; (d) keep a record of containers manufactured to the approved design type. This record shall at least contain the manufacturer's identification numbers, dates of delivery and names and addresses of customers to whom the containers are delivered. 4. Approval may be granted by the Administration to containers manufactured as modifications of an approved design type if the Administration is satisfied that the modifications do not affect the validity of tests conducted in the course of design type approval. 5. The Administration shall not confer on a manufacturer authority to affix Safety Approval Plates on the basis of design type approval unless satisfied that the manufacturer has instituted internal productioncontrol features to ensure that the containers produced will conform to the approved prototype. Regulation 6 relates to "Examination during production": In order to ensure that containers of the same design type series are manufactured to the approved design, the Administration shall examine or test as many units as it considers necessary, at any stage during production of the design type series concerned. Regulation 7 covers "Notification of Administration": The manufacturer shall notify the Administration prior to commencement of production of each new series of containers to be manufactured in accordance with an approved design type. Chapter III of the CSC sets out "Regulations for approval of new containers by individual approval" and chapter IV sets out "Regulations for approval of existing containers". In Germany, Germanischer Lloyd is the "administration" responsible for type testing of containers. Containers are certified if they fulfill the requirements of Annex II with regard to "Structural safety requirements and tests" and of

course

the

other

standards

to

be

complied

with.

In

the

case

of

box

containers,

the

test

plate

is

generally

affixed

to

the

left

door

leaf:

Germanischer Lloyd test plates for approval by design type

The classification societies mentioned above are just a few examples of the many in existence. Other examples are the Belgian Bureau Veritas, Lloyd's Register in Great Britain, Nippon Kaiji Kyokai in Japan and Det Norske Veritas in Norway. The Figures show additional plates affixed to the container and/or markings written thereon. In the "International Convention for Safe Containers", Regulation 1, Point 4 comments on this issue as follows: 4. The presence of the Safety Approval Plate does not remove the necessity of displaying such labels or other information as may be required by other regulations which may be in force.

An international customs agreement ensures that empty containers do not count as imported merchandise in member states and are thus free of duty provided that the containers remain only temporarily in the customs

territory.

In

addition,

the

container

itself

is

deemed

to

be

bonded

space.

Type test approval, Germanischer Lloyd

Although this container was manufactured in China for an owner in Bermuda, it was certified by Germanischer Lloyd. Of interest is the fact that Great Britain is the country of registration of participation in an "Approved Container Examination Program" (ACEP) - a clear demonstration of the globalization of container traffic.

Container certified by Germanischer Lloyd (GL) with British ACEP

Container certified by Bureau Veritas (BV) with American ACEP

The various contracting states each recognize one another's national approving bodies. Although the states are bound by the CSC's structural safety requirements and tests, there is nothing to stop them enforcing additional safety requirements for their own containers. Type testing involves a wide range of test procedures, covering, for example, lifting from top corner castings, lifting from bottom corner castings, lifting using other additional devices on the container such as forklift pockets, grappler arm positions and other methods. The test procedures also extend to stacking and to concentrated loads on roof and floor. Transverse racking is another aspect which is subject to testing. Furthermore, containers must undergo permissible loading capacity tests with regard to longitudinal restraint, the end walls and the side walls. The introduction to "Structural safety requirements and tests" reads as follows:

In setting the requirements of this Annex, it is implicit that in all phases of the operation of containers the forces as a result of motion, location, stacking and weight of the loaded container and external forces will not exceed the design strength of the container. In particular, the following assumptions have been made: the container will so be restrained that it is not subjected to forces in excess of those for which it has been designed; (b) the container will have its cargo stowed in accordance with the recommended practices of the trade so that the cargo does not impose upon the container forces in excess of those for which it has been designed. This is significant in relation to the later Sections about packing of containers and cargo securing. Only if containers are selected in accordance with the cargo to be carried and properly packed are they in a position to justify the trust placed in them. Testing and certification always relate to a particular type. A valid CSC plate affixed to a particular container tells the user what type of container he has before him. Nonetheless, some CSC plates give further details about this and about other supplementary standards: (a)

The character combination 1AA indicates a 40' long, 8'6" high standard container, while the letter C here stands for Closed.

This container has also been type tested (yellow arrow). The character combination 1AA indicates a 40' long ISO container 8'6" high. The abbreviation OT stands for open-top (green arrow). The container is not subject to an "Approved Container Examination Program" (ACEP) and the Plate therefore carries the date of its next examination (blue arrow), fully in accordance with regulations. Since the container was built in 1997, its first test falls due in 2002, with subsequent examinations at two year intervals. 3.1.3 Cargo-securing equipment Owing to their cargo space being closed on all sides, box containers offer good possibilities for cargo securing by compact loading. For securing individual items, a tight fit may be achieved using bracing, especially in corrugated steel containers. On the other hand, the possibilities for lashing are very limited. Useful lashing lugs or rings are provided in all inland containers. Problems arise if lashing points are overstowed and are no longer available or reachable. Their strength also presents a problem: in general, their Maximum Securing Load (MSL) or Lashing Capacity (LC) is only 1000 daN per lashing point.

Lashing points on the frame parts of a container

The lashing points for containers are not currently covered by standards and may therefore differ greatly. Not all lashing points may be loaded in all directions.

Lashing bars on the corner posts in the door area

Lashing points must be attached to the frame parts of a container, since only these components are adequately capable of absorbing forces.

"Lugs" in the area of the top side rails

Lugs fitted in the area of the top side rails and sometimes also the front top end rails can only be used to a minimal degree for traditional cargo securing by lashing.

Nonwoven fabric providing protection against condensation water

Attaching nonwoven fabric

Single-use liner bag ("inlet")

Lugs are suitable, indeed almost too strong, for attaching "inlets" or special nonwoven fabric for catching sweat. In any case, such measures serve to protect the cargo, and therefore to keep it safe: nonwoven fabrics provide protection against moisture or wetness dripping from the container ceiling and "inlets" protect against contact with the container walls. Some containers have lashing bars halfway up the container walls. In corrugated steel containers, they are welded in between the corrugations. The maximum securing load of these bars is not very high and they can only be used to secure relatively light individual items or small blocks of palletized cargo. The same applies to individual lashing rails fitted into the wooden linings of aluminum containers. Platform containers, i.e. the group comprising platforms and flatracks, have a relatively large number of reasonably strong securing elements.

Stanchion pocket in a 40' collapsible flatrack

To achieve a tight fit by application of pressure, stanchions or stakes are very often provided, which may be inserted into corresponding stanchion (or stake) pockets.

Although the stanchion (or stake) pocket closing bar looks suitable for use as a lashing bar, this is expressly forbidden.

Do not attach lashings to stanchion (or stake) pocket components

Lashing points next to stanchion pockets on flatracks

Flatrack with lashing rings

Lashing point on the bottom rail of a flatrack

Safe Working Load

Maximum Pull Strength

It is regrettably often the case that no details are given about the strength of lashing points. Even if information is provided, it is mostly of no practical use because of the wording chosen. Further explanations relating to this problem are provided in the section headed Lashing materials, which states: The maximum securing load (MSL) can be calculated using a rule of thumb, according to which the diameter of the lashing points is determined, squared and multiplied by 10; i.e. diameter diameter 10. The result of the calculation is in decanewtons (daN) if the diameter is stated in millimeters and kilonewtons (kN) if the diameter is stated in centimeters.

Determining the maximum securing load of lashing points using rule of thumb method

According to the above-stated rule of thumb, the maximum securing load of the lashing point is determined as follows: In decanewtons: 20 20 10 = 4000 daN In kilonewtons: 2 2 10 = 40 kN The rule of thumb can only be applied if the weld seams look good and the weld substrate appears sufficiently strong. If lashing points are welded to excessively thin metal sheet, the rule of thumb must not be used for calculation.

The rule cannot be applied, either, if the lashing points, e.g. rings, are held on with pop rivets, thin screws or the like, despite the rings "looking good".

Integral belt system in a 40' flatrack - one side

... and the other side.

This flatrack has fixed belt reels, all on one side. The eyelets of the textile belts can be secured on hooks on the other side. Unfortunately, this securing system is virtually unusable, because the "tie-down lashing/over-top lashing/friction loop" method has only a frictional effect, and this only with one-sided, uneven pretension. The belts do not allow a homogeneous tight fit to be achieved. If four of the total of eight lashing reels were fitted on each side, appropriate securing could be achieved for many types of goods. The containers themselves are secured on ships and road and rail vehicles by means of the container corner castings. Appropriate securing systems, such as rods on board ship, twist locks or other lock units etc., may be attached in or to the corner castings, which are also responsible for load transfer if the containers are stacked in ship cell guides.

Securing of a container to a chassis

Occasionally, complaints arise during road-side cargo securing inspections because not all of the lock units have been firmly tightened, when of course they should be. The CTU packing guidelines provide advice on this matter. Section 6.4 states, on the subject of "CTUs on vehicles": 6.4.1 CTUs should be firmly secured on vehicles before the vehicle is moved. The most appropriate points for fixing containers and swap-bodies are the bottom corner castings of the unit. Before and during transport, it should be checked that the unit is properly secured on the vehicle. 6.4.2 For transport on public roads or by rail, containers and swap-bodies should be secured to the road or rail vehicle by all bottom corner castings, in the absence of which, appropriate alternative measures should be taken. The main forces during the transport operation should be transferred to the unit through these bottom corner castings. Some additional forces may be transferred between the road vehicle chassis or railcar surface and the unit bottom through load transfer areas in the unit bottom and in the vehicle surface. The securing devices on the vehicle may be twist locks, securing cones or securing guides. All such securing devices should be designed in such a way that the "open" or "locked" position of such securing devices is readily apparent. It is very common for problems to arise when containers, loaded in particular on road vehicles and attached firmly thereto, have to be carried by combined road/ship/road transport. Only occasionally do the vehicles have the legally prescribed lashing points, and even if they are present, they tend to be positioned extremely unfavorably or to be

incorrectly or defectively designed. As at 2003, this is true of approx. 80% of all vehicles which have to be carried by sea. On this matter, Point 2.1.6 of the CTU packing guidelines states: A vehicle should be provided with points for securing it aboard ships (refer to European Standard EN 29367I (ISO 9367-1): Lashing and securing arrangements on road vehicles for sea transportation on Ro/Ro ships - General requirements - Part 1: Commercial vehicles and combinations of vehicles, semitrailers excluded, and to EN 29367-2 (ISO 9367-2): Lashing and securing arrangements on road vehicles for sea transportation on Ro/Ro ships - General requirements - Part 2: Semitrailers).

Strong, well-positioned lashing point on a semitrailer

Will the screws withstand the stresses of maritime transport?

Unfavorably located lashing point - unusable 3.2 Container dimensions and weights The lengths of freight receptacles as were and sometimes still are used for example in inland transport, and of conventional large containers are based on a modular system, for which the starting point was and indeed still is a 40' (12,192 mm) long container. The other nominal sizes have arisen by division, with 3 inches being taken off each time to allow the containers to be combined together in practice.

A = 40'

B = 30' D = 10' B+D=A C = 20' C+C=A

C+D+D=A

E = 6 2/3' 3E = C / 6E=A 3E + C = A etc. F = 5' 4F = C 6F = B 8F = A etc. Example of module combination

Freight containers A, B, C, D etc. are 8' high. If the containers are 8'6" high, the letters are doubled to give AA, BB, CC, DD, for example. Container dimensions as stipulated in DIN/ISO 668 or DIN 15190, Part 1

At the moment, the following lengths are stated and defined in the metric and/or English customary systems. They relate not only to freight receptacles such as containers but also to swap-bodies:

Current widths are:

Containers of the following heights are in use:

Containers 7.43 m long are in principle half-size 49' containers. With a width of 2.50 m and a height of 2.60 m, such containers fulfill the technical requirements and traffic laws of many countries.

Containers suitable for international use

Proposed size unacceptable in the majority of cases

The above-mentioned container is virtually identical to the CEN standard C-type swap-body, which is 7.45 m long. However, attempts to introduce such a container with widths of over 2.55 m and heights of over 2.90 m may well meet with resistance.

Container used mainly in the USA

The appropriate specialist committees have devoted time to discussing the introduction of 49'/14.9 m long containers with a width of 8'6"/2.60 m. However, such a container is unacceptable to most of the countries in Africa, Asia, Australasia and Europe. The same applies to a half-length container 24'4"/7.43 m long, because of the 2.60 m width.

Maximum mass for a 20' container according to the old standard

The significant feature of this container is that the term used is the more correct "mass", the unit of mass being correctly stated as the kilogram.

Maximum mass for a 20' container according to DIN ISO 688

The term used in this example is weight, as is more usual, but the unit used is that of mass. The correct unit would be the newton, with the decanewton or kilonewton [daN, kN] also being possible.

Maximum mass for a 40' container according to the old standard or optionally for a more recent 20'

The external dimensions of the containers are specified in ISO 668, with the maximum allowable dimensional tolerances being 10 mm. The internal dimensions are stated as minimum values. The current internal container dimensions are dependent on the structural material used and the container type selected.

Many of the following statements fall equally within the scope of the operational markings covered in Section 3.5, where additional information may be found. If real data relating to containers to be ordered and subsequently packed are required for the purpose of forward planning, it is best to refer to the brochures published by shipping companies or other container owners. When packing a container, it is important to cast an eye over the plates affixed to it: Pallet-compatible containers are 2.50 m wide, for example, and usually carry an appropriate warning:

Warning affixed to a 2.5 m wide container

This warning also counts as an operational marking. More detailed information is also to be found in this section:

External, internal and door dimensions, metric system

Internal and door dimensions, in both feet and inches and millimeters

Dimensions, stated solely in inches and meters

The following two tables give the lengths and gross weights for 20', 30' and 40' ISO containers and 10' to 40' inland containers.

20' container with maximum total weight of 30,480 kilograms

The ISO standard maximum gross weights for inland containers are specified as follows:

The minimum dimensions for the loading areas and volumes of ISO containers are specified as follows:

Data relating to loading areas are very seldom found. Volumes, on the other hand, are almost always stated:

As a rough guide, values are approx. 30 m for 20' containers and approx. 67 m for 40' containers. For tank containers, preferred practice is to state their volume in liters rather than in cubic meters:

Volume in liters on a French tank container

As already described in Section 3.1.2 CSC & structural and testing regulations, the International Convention for Safe Containers specifies that the maximum gross weight must be marked on the CSC plate. Other regulations require the maximum gross weight and the tare weight to be indicated. This constitutes the minimum information with which the user of the container must be provided by law.

Minimum information on a half-height open-top

The maximum payload can be calculated as the difference between the maximum gross weight and the tare weight, but this information is already indicated on most containers. Of interest in this context are the different terms selected by the various container owners. It would be altogether desirable if these terms were to be standardized.

Maximum gross weight - tare weight = permissible payload

The calculation may also be performed the other way round:

Tare weight + permissible payload = maximum gross weight

Markings on platform containers, including weights and other data

On platform containers, the data are located on the end walls or frame parts. Max Gross 45,000 kg or 99,210 lb. Tare 5,700 kg or 12,570 lb.

Markings on a collapsible flatrack with a 45,000 kg maximum weight

Volumes are almost always to be found together with the weight information. On box containers, all the abovementioned values are usually marked large and clear on the right door leaf.

Weights and volumes on 20' reefers and 40' general purpose containers

Weights and volumes on high-cube reefers and general purpose containers

Nothing should be stuck over these important data on a container: The text of the sticker refers limited quantities of dangerous goods and has nothing to do with the maximum gross weight.

Unfavorably positioned sticker

Loading area and loading capacity depend principally on wall thickness and structural height. Containers often carry information about these aspects (picture to the right): In practice, the ISO standard minimum values for weights and volumes are generally exceeded. Depending on the intended goods transport operation, it may therefore be worth making a comparison and choosing the most favorable container. A comparison of the stowage factor with the volume-to-payload ratio of the respective transport receptacles is always appropriate.

Details of the materials used in a container

Sometimes, data about dimensions, weights, volumes etc. are also given on the CSC plates themselves or on separate plates:

Separate plate giving virtually CSC plate giving virtually full information full information

Separate plate giving weights and dimensions

An English foot is divided into 12 inches and corresponds to 30.48 cm. An English inch corresponds to 25.4 mm. While inches are conventionally each subdivided into 16ths, the larger fractions, such as 1/2", 1/4", 1/8", are also used. An English pound (lb) corresponds to 453.6 g. A cubic foot (cu.ft.) corresponds to 28.35 liters. Metric units may be roughly converted by rule of thumb into English customary units and vice versa, as follows:

Meter 10 3 = foot Foot 10 3 = meter Kilogram 2 + 10% = pound Pound 2 - 10% = kilogram Cubic meter 35 = cubic foot Cubic foot 35 = cubic meter

3.3 Identification system The current standard which deals with the coding, identification and marking of containers is DIN EN ISO 6346, dated January 1996. Among other things, this standard specifies that the previous standards with similar content have equal validity, since a number of older versions of containers with different markings naturally remain in service alongside the brand new ones. This Section will provide only certain essential explanations with regard to the systems used - for more detailed information, the reader should refer to the corresponding standards and more extensive specialist literature. The foreword to the standard states, among other things, that it includes not only the statutory units but also corresponding sizes stated in Anglo-American units. Under the German Units of Measurement Act, 22nd February 1985, the use of such units nationally and commercially in Germany is proscribed. Such units may only be quoted to aid business relationships with countries which still use these units.

Marking on the door of a container

A distinction is drawn between compulsory and optional marking. Compulsory ISO marking must be used on all containers, while optional marking does not have to be: they are included in the standard to improve understanding and to promote uniform application of marking. However, if a particular style of representation is specified for an optional mark, it must be complied with. The terms "compulsory" and "optional" used in the standard do not apply

to the requirements of any legislative bodies, however. The following is a basic version of horizontal container marking:

Container identification marking

This Figure shows a version of vertical container marking:

Marking on the front end of a container

The container identification system specified in DIN EN ISO 6346 consists solely of the elements shown, which can only be used together:

owner code, consisting of three capital letters product group code, consisting of one of capital letters U, J or Z six-digit registration number check digit

The owner code must be unique and registered with the International Container Bureau (BIC - Bureau International des Containers - 14, Rue Jean Rey, 75015 Paris), either directly or through a national registration organization. The German BIC representative is the Studiengesellschaft fr den kombinierten Verkehr e.V., Brsenplatz 1, 60313 Frankfurt am Main. [Telephone: +49 69 28 35 71 or +49 172 6700597] The SGKV can provide information and handle applications for registration of an owner code. In the Figures shown, the owner code consists respectively of the letter combinations SUD and TEX. The product group code consists of one of the following three capital letters: U - for all freight containers J - for detachable freight container-related equipment Z - for trailers and chassis The term owner code may also apply to the combination of owner code and product group code, which is also known as an alpha prefix.

Alpha prefix absent

If the owner code is absent, the container cannot be identified. The registration or serial number consists of six digits. In the examples shown, these numbers are 307007 and 452149. If the container number consists of fewer than six digits, it is preceded by enough zeros to make a six-digit number sequence. The check digit, 9 and 6 respectively in the two examples shown, is always a single-digit number. It is usually in a box, to make it stand out from the registration number. The check digit can be used to validate whether the owner code, product group code and registration number have been accurately transmitted. No freight information system (FIS), transport information system (TIS) or similar data processing system will accept a container number, if the result of the automatic checking procedure does not show agreement with the check digit. The procedure is deliberately designed to ensure that a number of transmission errors cannot cancel one another out, resulting in the acceptance of incorrect data. The checking procedure is as follows: An equivalent numerical value is assigned to each letter of the alphabet, beginning with 10 for the letter A (11 and multiples thereof are omitted):

The individual digits of the registration number keep their everyday value, i.e. 1 = 1, 2 = 2 etc.. The following numerical values are accordingly obtained for the two examples with the alpha prefixes "SUDU" and "TEXU":

Each of these numbers is multiplied computationally, as a function of its position, by numerical values of 20 to 29: the first number by 1, the second by 2, the third by 3 and the 10th by 512.

The following calculations are performed for the two examples:

If the check digits 9 and 6 respectively are correctly input in each case during data entry, the system accepts the data. If someone makes a mistake when transmitting a container number and inputs the alphanumeric sequence TEXU 452159 into a corresponding system instead of TEXU 452149, the program would perform the following calculation:

Since the correct check digit for this container is 6, the system would indicate an error.

Disadvantage of check digit

The check digit 0 may occur twice, since it arises where the final difference is 0 and where it is 10. To ensure that this does not happen, the standard recommends that registration numbers should not be used which produce a final difference of 10. This is the case, however, with the registration number shown.

Correct identification using check digit

3.4 Size and type codes The following photo shows a variant of horizontal marking which additionally includes country, size and type codes (in accordance with the 1985 version of DIN ISO 6346, use of which is still permitted):

Container identification including country, size and type codes

Appropriate abbreviations are used for the various countries, here US for United States of America, GB for Great Britain etc.. The first digit of the size code indicates the length of the container, with the number 4 standing for a 40' container. The second digit indicates height and whether or not a gooseneck tunnel is present. In our example, the number 3 stands for a height of 8'6" with gooseneck tunnel. The first digit of the type code indicates container type. Here, 1 means that the container is a closed container with ventilation openings. The second digit of the type code relates to special features. The 0 used here means opening at the end. In the associated standard, columns are set out vertically:

The corresponding data are laid out underneath. The abbreviation g.n.t. stands for gooseneck tunnel. A differently laid out size code summary is shown below:

In the type code, the first digit (i.e. the 3rd digit overall) indicates the container type and the second (i.e. the 4th digit overall) indicates special features. However, there is a connection between the respective digits, which the following representation is intended to explain:

Incorrectly marked platform container

The digit sequence 4364 means: 40' long container 8'6" high with gooseneck tunnel and folding, free-standing posts. It should carry the digit sequence 4363, since the platform container has complete, folding end walls.

Here are some examples of marking in accordance with this older standard:

This container is 40' long (4), 8'6" high and has a gooseneck tunnel (3). The type code 00 states that it is a general purpose container which has opening(s) at one or both end(s).

This container is 20' long (2) and 8'6" high (2). It is a ventilated standard container (1), with narrow, passive vents in the upper part (0).

This container is 40' long (4), 8'6" high and has a gooseneck tunnel (3). It is a ventilated standard container (1), with narrow, passive vents in the upper part (0).

Both of these are 20' containers (2), 8'6" high and constructed as tank containers (7) suitable for transporting dangerous goods to a pressure of 6.0 bar.

According to the old Annex F "size code designations" annexed to DIN ISO 6346 of August 1985, the two containers are 40' long (number 4) and 8'6" high with a gooseneck tunnel (number 3). According to Annex G "type code designations", both containers are partially ventilated closed containers, which have passive vents in the upper part of the cargo space, the total cross-sectional area of the vents being less than 25 cm per meter of container length (number combination 10). However, the coding does not indicate that the green container is 2.50 m wide:

Warning due to 2.50 m width

The January 1996 edition of the standard bearing the same number includes another "size code", which has

eradicated these inadequacies.

Like the above containers, this container is 40' long, 8' high and has a gooseneck tunnel (number sequence 4 and 3). The type code 51 states that it is an open-top container, with openings at one or both end walls and a removable top member in the end frame.

The number sequence 43 stands for a length of 40' and a height of 8'6" plus gooseneck tunnel. In each case the container is a flatrack, but

... the number sequence 63 is the code for a platform with complete folding end walls

... and the number sequence 64 is the code with a platform with folding, free-standing corner posts.

This flatrack allows verification of the coding, identification and marking according to old DIN EN ISO 6346 (1985), showing clearly that it is still valid, since the photo was taken in 2001. The marking beneath the container number reads RCX 4364. According to the old country code, RCX stands for China (Taiwan). The size code (43) states that it is a 40' container 8'6" high and with a gooseneck tunnel. The number combination 64 states that it is a platform with folding, free-standing corner posts.

Similar flatracks exist which are 20' long and 8'6" high, of course, but they don't have goosenecks. This is clear from the number sequence 22. The type code 64 is the same as for the previous example: platform with folding, free-standing corner posts.

Both containers have a nominal length of 40', but are higher than 8'6" and each have a gooseneck tunnel (size code number sequence 45). According to type code 10, both containers are partially ventilated closed containers, which

have passive vents in the upper part of the cargo space, the total cross-sectional area of the vents being less than 25 cm per meter of container length. According to the old 1984 standard: 4 = 40' container; 5 = > 8'6" high with gooseneck tunnel; 3 = thermal; 2 = refrigerated & heated

These photos show clearly that the container is a 40' long refrigerated container. According to the size code, the container height is > 8'6" - this is correct, as the container is 9 feet high. The number combination 32, given as the type code, states that the container may be refrigerated or heated. The following photo shows a variant of horizontal marking with size and type codes:

Size and type codes additionally stated in accordance with current standard

The container, which is 12,192 mm (40') long, 2438 mm (8') wide and 2591 mm (8'6") high, is a general purpose container without ventilation but with vents in the upper part of the cargo space. The current standard, used for this marking, is not limited to numbers but also uses letters to make marking more precise. In addition, swap-bodies and the like are also covered by the coding. The superordinate term for both numbers and letters is character. The introductory country code has been discontinued. The first character of the size code indicates the length of the receptacle:

In the example, the 4 accordingly stands for a 40' container. The second character is the code for the height and width of the container:

The standard type code allows identification of container type and other characteristics. Since this system is not yet complete, the standard recommends use of the group code if special characteristics of the container type have not yet been fixed or are unknown. The highest unassigned code character should be used as a provisional mark when it is necessary to represent significant characteristics which are not yet included in the table.

) 100 kPa = 1 bar = 105 Pa = 105 N/m = 14.5 lbf/in (PSI)

) 100 kPa = 1 bar = 105 Pa = 105 N/m = 14.5 lbf/in (PSI)

This Figure shows a variant of vertical container marking, with size and type code: The identifying details are more or less clearly visible.

Vertical container marking

Identifying mark plus size and type codes

The container is 12,192 mm or 40' long (number 4 or 1st character of the size code). Its height is 2895 mm or 9'6" and its width is greater than 2438 mm or 8' and is less than or equal to 2500 mm (letter E or second character of the size code). As regards type, the container is a general purpose container without ventilation, whose main characteristic is that it has vents in the upper part of the cargo space (characters G1 of the type code). The owner code box: and product group code are also known as the alpha prefix. The check digit is often written in a

There now follows a number of examples of marking according to DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996:

According to the two characters 42 of the size code, the container is 12,192 mm or 40' long, 2591 mm or 8'6" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters G0 state that the container is a general purpose container without ventilation but with openings at one or both end(s).

According to the two character combinations 22 and 42 of the size code, the container on the left is 6058 mm or 20' long and the two containers on the right are 12,192 mm or 40' long. All the containers are 2591 mm or 8'6" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters G1 state that the container is a general purpose container without ventilation but with vents in the upper part of the cargo space.

According to the two characters 22 of the size code, the container is 6058 mm or 20' long, 2591 mm or 8'6" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters P3 state that the container is a platform based container with folding complete end walls. According to the two characters 22 of the size code, the container is 6058 mm or 20' long, 2591 mm or 8'6" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters R1 state that the container is a thermal container which can be mechanically refrigerated and heated.

According to the two characters 28 of the size code, the container is 6058 mm or 20' long, 1295 mm or 4'3" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters P2 state that the container is a platform container with fixed posts, either freestanding (as here) or with removable top members.

According to the two characters 42 of the size code, the container is 12,192 mm or 40' long, 2591 mm or 8'6" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters U1 state that the container is an open-top container which may additionally be equipped with opening(s) at one or both end(s) plus removable top member in the end frame.

According to the two characters 45 of the size code, the container is 12,192 mm or 40' long, 2895 mm or 9'6" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters G1 state that the container is a general purpose container without ventilation but with vents in the upper part of the cargo space.

According to the two characters 45 of the size code, the container is 12,192 mm or 40' long, 2895 mm or 9'6" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code character P indicates that the container is a platform based container with complete superstructure. The standard still gives type code P8 as being "spare".

Type code P8 has been used here for a "collapsible flat", i.e. the end walls are collapsible for empty carriage.

According to the two characters 45 of the size code, the container is 12,192 mm or 40' long, 2895 mm or 9'6" high and 2438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters R1 state that the container is a thermal container which can be mechanically refrigerated and heated.

According to the character 4 of the size code, the container is 12,192 mm or 40' long. The character C indicates that the container has a height of 2591 mm or 8'6" and a width ranging between > 2438 mm and < 2500 mm. According to type code G1, the container is a general purpose container without ventilation, which nonetheless has vents in the upper part of the cargo space.

The character 4 stands for the length 12,192 mm or 40'. E states that the container has a height of 2895 mm or 9'6" and a width ranging between > 2438 mm and < 2500 mm. The type code characters G1 state that the container is a general purpose container without ventilation but with vents in the upper part of the cargo space.

Given the large number of containers available today, it is impossible to tell how long the current codings will suffice and when more characters will need to be introduced.

3.7

Arrangement of obligatory and optional markings

Top and selective enlargements below: Arrangement of obligatory and optional markings

The relevant standard allows for the areas of yellow and black stripes next to the corner castings to be reduced to a length of 300 mm (12 inches). It will be noted that the standard does not conform with the regulations in the German road traffic code and those of other countries, since in the standard the diagonal black and yellow stripes always run in the same direction:

Standard arrangement of black and yellow stripes

More sensible, mirror-image arrangement of black and yellow stripes

Marking error

The yellow and black stripes at a and b conform to the standard. At c, in contrast, the yellow and black stripes are absent.

More sensible affixing of yellow and black stripes

Non-standard but sensible affixing of black and yellow stripes

Red and white plates: correct

Right: red and white plates: incorrect

Correctly affixed red and white warning plates

Only this symmetrical arrangement of the warning plates, as provided for in the regulations, makes any sense.

This vehicle with correctly affixed warning is a particularly clear illustration.

Correctly painted red and white warning

Desired arrangement of black and yellow warning markings

It would be a good idea if this were taken into consideration when the standards are revised.

Top and selective enlargements below: Optional details are indicated by colored arrows

The standards allow for optional affixing of size and type codes to the roof and front end wall (green arrows). The same applies to affixing a data medium for automatic identification (blue arrow) and to marking of the net cargo weight (yellow arrow). 3.8 Labeling and placarding of containers carrying dangerous cargoes

The CTU packing guidelines state in Section 4.4.1 in relation to placarding of containers carrying dangerous cargoes: 4.4.1.1 Placards (enlarged labels) (minimum size 250 mm x 250 mm) and, if applicable for maritime transport, "MARINE POLLUTANT" marks (minimum size of a side 250 mm) and other signs should be affixed to the exterior surfaces of a CTU or unit load or overpack to provide a warning that the contents of the unit are dangerous cargoes and present risks, unless the labels, marks or signs affixed to the packages are clearly visible from the exterior of the unit.

Correct marking on a container side

The container is loaded with Class 4.1 flammable solids.

Correct marking on a container side

The container is loaded with Class 3 goods, i.e. flammable liquids, which are also marine pollutants. The CTU packing guidelines give additional instructions for affixing placards, these being explained in more detail in the CTU packing guidelines Point 4.4.1.2: This paragraph reads: (4.4.1.1 contd.) If possible, the placards, hazard labels, markings or warning symbols on the outsides of the CTU should not be obscured when the CTU is opened.

Non-regulation affixing of a placard 4.4.1.2 CTUs containing dangerous cargoes or residues of dangerous cargoes should clearly display placards and, if applicable for maritime transport, "MARINE POLLUTANT" marks or other signs as follows: 1. 2. 3. a container, one on each side and, in the case of carriage by ocean-going vessel, also one on each of the ends of the unit; a railway wagon [railroad car], at least one on each side; any other CTU, at least one on both sides and on the back of the CTU and, in the case of a semitrailer, also one on the front of the CTU.

Correct marking of a container for maritime transport according to the CTU packing guidelines

It has been proposed to mark the roof with a corresponding placard, in order to warn lifting gear or ground conveyor operators when picking up such a container. However, the regulations do not as yet contain any such obligation. Point 4.4.1.2 of the CTU packing guidelines continues: Placards on the sides of a CTU should be affixed in such a position that they are not obscured when the unit doors are opened. The "if possible...not be obscured" of 4.4.1.1 has become an obligation: "should be affixed". Point 4.4.1.3 deals with dangerous cargoes which present several risks: Whenever dangerous cargoes present several risks, subsidiary risk placards should be displayed in addition to primary risk placards. The regulations covering this area were amended in 2002. According to the old regulations, the primary risk placards had to carry the correct class number, while the subsidiary risk placard was not supposed to carry any class numbers.

Three old variants of primary and subsidiary risk placards

The way this requirement was fulfilled was open to choice and it was of no significance whether the class numbers were obscured by being painted or stuck over or cut off.

According to the regulations in force since 2002, both primary and subsidiary risk placards must carry the class numbers:

New regulation: Primary and subsidiary risk placards bear class number

With regard to the example illustrated, it should be noted that, in the case of actual maritime transport of flammable liquids, the class number stated must be the correct one according to the flash point. Class 3.1 - Low flash point liquids; i.e. liquids with a flash point of below -18C c.c. (closed cup test) Class 3.2 - Medium flash point liquids; i.e. liquids with a flash point of from -18C up to, but not including, 23C, c.c. (closed cup test) Class 3.3 - High flash point liquids; i.e. liquids with a flash point of from 23C to 61C inclusive, c.c. (closed cup test) Point 4.4.1.3 of the CTU packing guidelines continues: ... CTUs containing cargoes of more than one class, however, need not bear a subsidiary risk placard if the hazard represented is already indicated by the primary risk placard.

Dangerous cargo container carrying dangerous goods of various classes

For dangerous cargo containers carrying dangerous goods of only one class, the regulations in point 4.4.1.6 of the CTU packing guidelines apply: Consignments of packaged dangerous cargoes of a single commodity, other than cargoes of class 1, which constitute a full load for the CTU should have the UN Number for the commodity displayed in black digits not less than 65 mm high either against a white background in the lower half of the class placard or on an orange rectangular panel not less than 120 mm high and 300 mm wide, with a 10 mm black border, to be placed immediately adjacent to the placard (see Annex 2). In those cases the UN Number should be displayed immediately adjacent to the Proper Shipping Name. According to the IMDG Code, the regulation applies from a mass of 4000 kg.

Primary and subsidiary risk placards plus UN Number.

The container contains only one dangerous cargo, i.e. Class 5.1 oxidizing substances (agents), which increase the risk and intensity of fire, and are also corrosive. The (yellow) primary risk placard correctly carries the number 5.1, but the subsidiary risk placard does not carry the number 8 (also correct according to the old regulations), which has been obscured. According to the currently applicable regulations, this placard would also have to carry the class number 8. The placards have been incorrectly positioned. They are obscured when the door is opened.

Correct: One class 4000 kg, therefore UN Number stated

Correct: One class < 4000 kg, no UN Number stated

Incorrect: One class < 4000 kg, no UN Number stated

Correct: Two classes, therefore no UN Number

Point 4.4.1.9 of the CTU states the following: When solid carbon dioxide (CO2 - dry ice) or other expendable refrigerant is used for cooling purposes, a warning sign should be affixed to the outside of the doors so that it is clearly visible to any person operating the doors. The sign should warn of the possibility of an asphyxiating atmosphere. .... The name of the gas used as refrigerant should be inserted beneath the word WARNING.

Warning sign for CTUs in which dry ice or other expendable refrigerants are used for refrigeration purposes

The IMDG Code recommends the following wording for the "Container Packing Certificate": When solid carbon dioxide (CO2 - dry ice) is used for cooling purposes, the container/vehicle is externally marked or labelled in a conspicuous place, such as, at the door end, with the words: "DANGEROUS CO2 (DRY ICE) INSIDE. VENTILATE THOROUGHLY BEFORE ENTERING. The CTU packing guidelines contain a reminder that cargoes under fumigation may require special precautions: 4.4.1.10 As CTUs offered for shipment under fumigation may require special precautions, they should only be accepted with the agreement of the carrier and they should be identified to him prior to loading. CTUs under fumigation are now included in class 9 of the IMDG Code. The following is stated about the labeling of such CTUs: 4.4.1.11 When a closed CTU or its contents has been fumigated and is to be shipped under fumigation, a warning sign should be affixed to the outside of the doors so that it is clearly visible to any person operating the door. An example of such a warning sign is given in Annex 2. The sign should state the fumigant, the method of fumigation employed and the date and time when it took place. The sign should only be removed when the unit has been ventilated after fumigation, to ensure that no harmful concentration of gas remains.

The intention of this Section was merely to provide some tips for marking dangerous cargo containers. In a real packing situation, obviously, the other regulations in the CTU packing guidelines should be consulted, especially the valid dangerous cargo regulations.

Picture of the warning sign "FUMIGATION WARNING"