EE233 Lab1
EE233 Lab1
EE233 Lab1
These values are approximately the same with the recorded data in the
lab, there are some small differences but it will not affect.
2)
1
1
1
out S
S
S out
S
out
R
V V
R R
V V
R R
V
Vin
Vout
R1 = 50 RS R1 = 27 RS
400mV 200mV 50 400mV 0
500mV 248mV 50 495mV 52.9
600mV 300mV 50 594 mV 89.1
700 mV 349mV 49.7 699 mV 0
800 mV 399 mV 50 798 mV 33.5
900 mV 452 mV 49.4 899 mV 0
1000 mV 500 mV 49.6 998 mV 0
Thus,
Rs=37.44
3)
When R1 = 50, the value of Vout is half of Vin .
When R1 = 27k, the value of Vout is close to Vin.
Explain: there are differences between the values of Vout in computing and
measuring. Because the condition in prelab section is ideal.However, in
reality, conductors have small resistance, generators has an identified internal
resistance, and the values of resistors are not exactly equal to the value which
we want to have (resistors values are only approximately equal). Therefore,
there are some differences between computing values and measuring values.
Step response of first-order RC circuits
1)
( ) = 5 5 when 5
t t
RC RC
out S
V t A Ae e V V
Compute Measure
Max of Vout 5V 4.95V
Min of Vout 0V 0V
Reason: due to the effect of the resistance of conductors, internal resistors of
generator. Therefore, measuring values cannot accurately be equal to the
computing values.
2) The case V=5V
10 0.01 R k C F
Time Compute Measure Error by
neglecting RS
t10% 10.55s 10s 5.2%
T50% 71s 68s 4.4%
T90% 233.26s 226s 3%
Reason: due to the effect of the resistance of conductors, internal resistors of
generator. Therefore, measuring values cannot accurately be equal to the
computing values.
3)
10 0.01 R k C F
Time Compute Measure
trise 219s 218s
tfall 219s 218s
tPHL 69s 67s
tPLH 69s 68s
Reason: due to the effect of the resistance of conductors, internal resistors of
generator. Therefore, measuring values cannot accurately be equal to the
computing values.
Step response of cascaded RC sections
Q: From the measurements in section 7.4 item 3, are the delay times for the
cascaded circuit in Figure 3 (of 2 identical RC sections) twice as large as the
delay times for the simple RC circuit? Do the delay times scale with the
number of sections? Explain.
From prelab, the formular of time delay in simple RC circuit is:
In figure 4, when Vs=0, we have:
C//(C+R) => t=(C+C)R=2CR
Thus
However, the time delay that we measured in reality is three times larger than
delay time in section 7.3 (for example 190us vs 67us) due to some mistakes in
measurement and quality of resistors and conductors.
Q: Estimate the number of cascaded RC sections so that the propagation
delay time is about T/2 (T is the period of the input square wave). Explain
how you arrive at this estimate. How would you verify that this is a
good estimate (i.e. within 10% of the correct number of sections)? This
estimate basically is related to the longest bus line that can be driven by the
signal before there is a timing error in the system.
From the above answer, we have:
Then we choose f=300Hz
According to those values of R and C, we can have a delay time=T/2. If
the values of C and R are approximately equal to the above calculation,
the error is within 10%.