Date:
1. Draw the structures of the three possible Diels-Alder adducts of cycloheptatriene and maleic anhydride:
2. Draw the mechanism for the Diels-Alder reaction between cycloheptatriene (in its norcaradiene form) and maleic anhydride to form the major product 3:
3. Explain in one sentence why the Diels-Alder reaction of maleic anhydride with cycloheptatriene gives primarily the norcaradiene adduct rather than the open form adduct:
4. Draw the structures of the three possible N-phenylimide derivatives that could form from reaction
Date:
1. Draw the structures of the three possible Diels-Alder adducts of cycloheptatriene and maleic anhydride:
2. Draw the mechanism for the Diels-Alder reaction between cycloheptatriene (in its norcaradiene form) and maleic anhydride to form the major product 3:
3. Explain in one sentence why the Diels-Alder reaction of maleic anhydride with cycloheptatriene gives primarily the norcaradiene adduct rather than the open form adduct:
4. Draw the structures of the three possible N-phenylimide derivatives that could form from reaction
Date:
1. Draw the structures of the three possible Diels-Alder adducts of cycloheptatriene and maleic anhydride:
2. Draw the mechanism for the Diels-Alder reaction between cycloheptatriene (in its norcaradiene form) and maleic anhydride to form the major product 3:
3. Explain in one sentence why the Diels-Alder reaction of maleic anhydride with cycloheptatriene gives primarily the norcaradiene adduct rather than the open form adduct:
4. Draw the structures of the three possible N-phenylimide derivatives that could form from reaction
Date:
1. Draw the structures of the three possible Diels-Alder adducts of cycloheptatriene and maleic anhydride:
2. Draw the mechanism for the Diels-Alder reaction between cycloheptatriene (in its norcaradiene form) and maleic anhydride to form the major product 3:
3. Explain in one sentence why the Diels-Alder reaction of maleic anhydride with cycloheptatriene gives primarily the norcaradiene adduct rather than the open form adduct:
4. Draw the structures of the three possible N-phenylimide derivatives that could form from reaction
The Reaction of Maleic Anhydride and Cycloheptatriene
Synthesis of anti-Tricyclo[3.2.2.0 2,4 ]non-6-en-endo,endo-8,9-dicaboxylic Anhydride A Valence Isomer Trapping Procedure Adapted by R. Minard and Carolyn S. Yatsko (Penn State Univ.) from D.W. Kurtz and R.P. Johnson, J. Chem. Ed. 66, 873-874 (1989). Revised 10/5/00 Introduction: This experiment illustrates valence isomerization and trapping of a reactive intermediate. Valence isomerism is usually defined as a thermal equilibrium between two isomeric species of different bond lengths and angles achieved without passing through an electronic excited state or intermediate loss of any atom. Species displaying such a thermal equilibrium are termed fluctional molecules 1 . Well- known cases of fluctional behavior include cycloheptatriene-norcaradiene (eq 1), cycloctatetraene-bicyclo[4.2.0]octa-2,4,7-triene (eq 2), and fluctionally degenerate molecules such as semibullvalene 2 and bullvalene 3 (eqs 3 and 4 below). norcaradiene cycloheptatriene (4) (3) (2) (1) Although the photoconversion of benzene to benzvalene and Dewar benzene is sometimes termed valence isomerization, being nonthermal, it is not a case of fluctional behavior. benzvalene Dewar benzene hn Nor are keto-enol tautomerizations considered valence isomerizations, since their equilibria are generally mediated through intermolecular proton shifts. However, many common sigmatropic shifts such as the Claisen, Cope, and vinylcyclopropane rearrangements are essentially valence isomerizations with large enthalpy differences between the isomers. The rearrangements and cycloadditions of cycloheptatrienes have been scrutinized for over a century and continue to be investigated 4 . The cycloheptatriene system seems almost profligate in the variety of its reactions; the ene reaction 5a , 2 + 2 5b , 2 + 4 5c , and even 4 + 6 cycloadditions 5d are documented. The earliest investigations of cycloheptatriene reactions by Buchner revealed difficulties in separating and identifying the reaction products of cycloheptatriene with diazoacetic esters. In 1939, the Diels-Alder reaction between cycloheptatriene and maleic anhydride was first studied, but the major adduct defied structure elucidation until 1953, when Alder and Jacobs demonstrated that it contained a cyclopropane ring 6 . By that time Doering 7 and Corey 8 had formulated the hypothesis that cycloheptatriene is in rapid equilibrium with bicyclo-[4.1.0]hepta-2,4-diene (norcaradiene, eq 1) and used this hypothesis to explain the presence of a three-membered ring in many of the cycloaddition products of cycloheptatriene. The most thoroughly investigated system displaying this equilibrium is the parent hydrocarbon, cycloheptatriene. Cycloheptatriene preponderates in the equilibrium, with norcaradiene estimated to be less than 0.1% of the mixture at ambient temperature 9 . None of the numerous direct spectroscopic attempts to detect norcaradiene in the equilibrium mixture have succeeded; thus, although norcaradiene has been photolytically produced and directly observed in low-temperature argon matrix 10 , its experimental heat of formation and exact percentage in equilibrium with cycloheptatriene remain conjectural. The cycloheptatriene form is estimated to be 4 - 6 kcal/mol more stable than the norcaradiene form. In view of the small amount of norcaradiene tautomer present in unsubstituted cycloheptatriene, it is somewhat surprising that most dienophiles give Diels-Alder adducts only with the norcaradiene tautomer. Indeed, the only reactants presently known to give any "normal" 2 + 4 adduct with the open form of cycloheptatriene are nitroso benzene 13 and maleic anhydride 14 . O O O O O O H H O O O H H O O O H H 1 2 3 4 5 maleic anhydride A thorough reinvestigation of the Diels-Alder reaction between cycloheptatriene and maleic anhydride established that three 2 + 4 adducts are formed (see figure above) 14 . The major product, 3, composing slightly more than 90% of the product mixture, is the adduct from endo addition of maleic anhydride to norcaradiene in which the cyclopropane ring is syn to the double bond. Next most plentiful is 4, the exo adduct of norcaradiene with its cyclopropane ring again syn to the alkene; 4 is about 9% of the total product. The adduct 5 from maleic anhydride and open cycloheptatriene is 0.5-1% of the product mixture; this minor product might be called the "expected" or "normal" Diels-Alder adduct. Prelaboratory Exercises: Xylenes contain conjugated double bonds; why doesn't maleic anhydride undergo a Diels-Alder reaction with the solvent? Draw electron movement arrows to show how bond rearrangement and formation takes place to form 3. O O O H H O O O H H 3 Cautions: Aniline is a suspected carcinogen. Handle with care and do all manipulations in a hood. Ether is extremely flammable. Work in a hood and be alert for open flames or spark sources. Synthesis: To a dry, tared reaction tube, add 0.276 g cycloheptatriene, 0.274 g finely powdered maleic anhydride, and 2 mL mixed xylenes. Insert a boiling stick and reflux the mixture for 30 minutes. Then, a 10-drop sample of the reaction mixture is withdrawn and placed in a reaction tube for conversion to derivatives and TLC analysis. Isolation and Purification: The remainder is left in the open reaction tube in your locker to allow evaporation of the mixed xylenes. Alternatively, the xylenes can be removed by an instant microscale distillation until only about 0.5 to 0.7 mL of liquid remains. Then 0.6 mL ethyl acetate and 2 mL hexane are added and the solution chilled in an ice bath yielding large, cream colored needles of 3 containing a small amount of the exo-adduct, 4, and an Exp't 41 even smaller amount of 5. Remove the solvent by pipet filtration and allow the crystals to dry until the next lab period. Then take a melting point (lit m.p. for pure 3 is101C 14 ) and determine the yield. TLC Analysis: TLC analysis is performed on the N-phenylimide derivatives, 6, 7, and 8, formed by reacting the reaction product mixture of3, 4, and 5 with aniline, Ph-NH 2 . N O O H H N O O H H N O O H H 6 7 8 Ph Ph Ph If the aniline is badly discolored, it should be purified by distillation. In a hood, carry out an instant microscale distillation of aniline (b.p. = 184C). You only need about 0.5 mL of the impure aniline from the side shelf to do the distillation. Use a boiling stone. Discard the first two or three cloudy pipet fractions from the instant microscale distillation as these contain mainly water. The material to be used should be clear, not cloudy. (You may need several small collections to get a total of 0.5 mL.) Also discard the undistilled aniline into the Nonhalogenated Organics Waste container. Unused, but distilled aniline can be returned to the side shelf bottle. One drop of purified aniline is added to the 10 drop sample from the synthesis above and the mixture is heated for three minutes, then cooled to room temperature. Dilution with 4 mL of diethyl ether (use the wet ether found in a supply bottle in each hood) yields a solution for TLC spotting on silica gel plates. TLC development in ethyl acetate yields a high R f spot for 6, a low R f spot for 8 (very faint), and an intermediate R f spot for 7. Cleaning Up: Dispose of the filtrate, the unused TLC solution, and the aniline distillation residue in the Nonhalogenated Organics Waste container. Analysis: Analyze your product by the method assigned in your Experiment Assignment sheet. (See the Lab Guide for specific details on the method of analysis.) In most cases, the TLC analysis described above is all that is required. Final Report: Include properly annotated TLC plates, including R f 's, taped to your report. Turn in product. Give yield and melting point. Answer the following questions at the end of your report: 1. Given that cycloheptatriene is the major valence isomer (99.9%) at equilibrium, explain how the Diels-Alder reaction with maleic anhydride can give such a high yield of the norcaradiene valence isomer adduct, 3? Use LeChatelier's principle in your answer. 2. Propose a mechanism for the reaction between aniline and the maleic anhydride/cycloheptatriene Diels-Alder product. 3. Draw all possible products of the cycloheptatriene tautomer of
C 7 H 8 reacted with maleic anhydride Literature Cited: 1. For reviews see (a) Schrder, G.; Oth, J.F.M.; Merenyi, R. Angew. Chem Int'l Ed. Engl. 1965, 4, 762; (b) Maier, G. Angew. Chem Int'l Ed. Engl. 1967, 6, 402. 2. Cheng, A.K.; Anet, F.A.L.; Mioduski, J.; Meinwald, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 2887. 3. Doering, W.v.E.; Roth, W.R. Tetrahedron 1963, 19, 715. 4. (a) Buchner, E.; Curtius, T. Ber. 1885, 18, 2377; (b) Baren, W.; Buchner, E. Ber. 1901, 34, 982; (c) Leitich, J.; Sprintschnik, G. Ber. 1986, 119, 1640. 5. (a) Cinnamon, J.M.; Weiss, K. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 2644; (b) Kato, M.; Okamoto, Y.; Chickamoto, Y.; Miwa, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 1978, 51, 1163; (c) Kanematsu, K.; Morita, S.; Fukushima, S.; Osawa, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5211; (d) Bower, D.H.; Howden, M.E.H. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I 1980, 672. 6. (a) Kohler, E.P.; Tischler, M.; Potter, H.; Thompson, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 1057; (b) Alder, K.; Jacobs, B. Ber. 1953, 86, 1528. 7. Doering, W.v.E.; Knox, L.H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 2305. 8. Corey, E.J.; Burke, H.J.; Remers, W.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 4941. 9. Huisgen, R. Angew. Chem. Int'l Ed. Engl. 1970, 9, 755. 10. Rubin, M.B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 7791. 11. Ciganek, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 2207. 12. Hoffman, R. Tet. Letts. 1970, 2907. 13. Krese, G.; Schulz, G. Tetrahedron 1961, 12, 7. 14. Ishitobi, H.; Tanida, H.; Tori, K.; Tsuji, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 1971, 44, 2293. 15. Pickering, M. J. Chem. Educ. 1988, 65, 143. Synthetic Experiment PreLab Grading Sheet Name(s): TA: Date: PreLab For Exp't #:41 Title: The Reaction of Maleic Anhydride with Cycloheptatriene Possible Missed Points Points Date, Name, Desk #, Experiment # & Title(abbreviated after 1 st pg), Section & TA Name 4 Summary 10 Goals 10 Reactions, structures, conditions, diagrams 14 Completeness of Chemical Data Table(s) 10 PreLab Exercise 16 Chromatographic Behavior Comparison 12 Spectral Features Comparison 12 Work-up- isolation and purification 12 TOTAL FOR PRELAB 100 Date Handed in: General Comments: Total Points: Synthetic Experiment Final Report Grading Sheet Name: TA: Date: Final Report For Exp't #: 41 Title: The Reaction of Maleic Anhydride with Cycloheptatriene Possible Missed Points Points Name, Date, Experiment Title (abbreviated after 1st page) and every page numbered 4 OBSERVATION and DATA - Overall organization, readability, completeness 8 Data: Weighing data, molecular weights, moles, d, v, R f 's, analysis conditions for TLC, TLC plates. 12 Yield: Show % yield calculations, wt & limiting reagent clearly stated. Purity: melting point, color of crystals. 12 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - Overall organization, readability, completeness 8 Results; Achievement of goals 16 Product Analysis Data: Quality and Interpretation Structure(s) drawn on each Spectrum or Chromatogram TLC analysis and discussion of spots 24 POSTLAB QUESTIONS & TLCs 16 TOTAL POINTS 100 Date Handed in: General Comments: Total Points: