Heterogeneous Asymmetric Diels-Alder Reactions Using A Copper-Chiral Bis (Oxazoline) Complex Immobilized On Mesoporous Silica
Heterogeneous Asymmetric Diels-Alder Reactions Using A Copper-Chiral Bis (Oxazoline) Complex Immobilized On Mesoporous Silica
Heterogeneous Asymmetric Diels-Alder Reactions Using A Copper-Chiral Bis (Oxazoline) Complex Immobilized On Mesoporous Silica
ASYMMETRY
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 12 (2001) 29312935
Pergamon
Center for Molecular Catalysis, School of Chemistry & Molecular Engineering, Seoul National University,
Seoul 151 -747, South Korea
b
School of Chemical Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151 -742, South Korea
Received 9 October 2001; accepted 14 November 2001
AbstractA chiral bis(oxazoline)copper complex was immobilized onto mesoporous silica and the resulting heterogeneous
catalyst was employed in asymmetric DielsAlder reactions. Reactions using the catalyst exhibited good enantioselectivity of 78%
enantiomeric excess and endo/exo-selectivity (17:1) better than the corresponding homogeneous reaction. The catalyst could be
easily recovered and reused several times without significant loss of the remarkable reactivity, diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity. 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
Many
lysts
has
been
extensively
pursued.4
homogeneous asymmetric catalysts were immobilized
onto supports including organic polymers5 and inorganic supports such as silicas and zeolites.6 Recently,
various mesoporous silicas7 with pore sizes ranging
from 2 to 10 nm have been successfully applied as
supports for various chiral catalytic systems.8,9 Herein
we report on the heterogeneous asymmetric DA reaction utilizing novel chiral bis(oxazoline) catalysts immobilized on MCF (meso cellular foam).7
The overall procedure for the synthesis and immobilization of the bis(oxazoline) ligand onto MCF is shown in
Scheme 1. A mixture of diethyl malonimidate and
(1R,2S)-1-amino-2-indanol in dichloroethane was
stirred for 2 days.11 The resulting bis(oxazoline) derivative 1 (indabox) was coupled with p-(bromomethyl)phenyl pivalate or benzyl bromide to produce
2a or 2b, respectively. The pivalate esters of 2a were
removed to provide 3 upon treatment with lithium
aluminum hydride.10 Mesoporous Silica (MCF), composed of uniformly sized spherical cells that are interconnected by uniform windows, was prepared by the
reported method.12 The silica material exhibited surface
area of 970 m2 g1, total pore volume of 1.09 cm3 g1,
cell diameter of 8.61 nm, and window diameter of 3.5
nm. A chloropropyl linker was then grafted onto the
MCF by treating with (CH3CH2O)3SiCH2CH2CH2Cl
2932
EtO
. 2 HCl
R1
O
NH2 NH
OEt
R1
HO
N
HO
O
3
2a : R1 = OCOC(Me)3
2b : R1 = H
OH
SiO2
O
SiO2
OEt
Si
Cl
e
SiO2
OEt
OEt
Si
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
SiO2
O
N
OEt
N
HO
OEt
Si
OH
OTMSTMSO
MCF SiO2
OEt
OH
O
O
Scheme 1. Preparation of mesoporous-silica grafted catalysts 5 and 6. Reagents and conditions: (a) (1S,2R)-1-amino-2-indanol,
dichloroethane, 2 days, 70%; (b) p-(bromomethyl)phenyl pivalate or benzyl bromide, LiHMDS, THF, 78C, 3 h, 77 and 82%,
respectively; (c) LiAlH4, THF, 6 h, quant.; (d) chloropropyltriethoxysilane, toluene, reflux, 12 h; (e) 3, toluene, reflux, 12 h; (f)
HMDS, reflux, 12 h.
in refluxing toluene. Reaction of 3 with chloropropylderivatized MCF 4 yielded the indabox-grafted silica 5.
In order to protect the remaining free SiOH groups on
the walls of mesoporous silica, 5 was treated in refluxing hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDS) for 12 h and the
resulting 6 was vacuum-dried (<0.01 torr) at 130C for
12 h. The resulting bis(oxazoline)-ligand grafted, TMScapped MCF 6 exhibited surface area of 542 m2 g1,
total pore volume of 0.65 cm3 g1, cell diameter of 7.48
nm, and window diameter of 3.6 nm. The grafted
amount of chiral ligand was 0.240.17 mmol g1 of
silica support.
2-oxazolidinone 7, 3-(2(E)-butenoyl)-2-oxazolidinone 8,
or 3-((2E)-pentenoyl)-2-oxazolidinone 9 as the
dienophile in CH2Cl2 for 24 h using 10 mol% of the
silica-grafted chiral ligand, which was premixed for 3 h
with varying amounts of Cu(OTf)2 as shown in Scheme
2. The results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
First, a control reaction between cyclopentadiene and
the acryloyl derivative 7 employing the parent homogeneous catalyst 2b (11 mol%) and Cu(OTf)2 (10 mol%)
was carried out at 78C to provide a 96% yield of a
mixture of endo- and exo-adducts in a 9:1 ratio, with
the endo-diastereomer having 88% e.e. by chiral HPLC
analysis (entry 1). When the DA reaction of the same
substrates employing heterogenized chiral ligand 6 (10
The DA reactions were carried out using cyclopentadiene or cyclohexadiene as the diene and 3-(2-propenoyl)-
O
O
SiO2
OEt
Si
O
OEt
O
O
Cu(OTf)2
OH
OEt
OEt
O
OH
CH2Cl2, 3h
OTMS
TMSO
SiO2
Si
OTMS
TMSO
A
n
O
n
+
n = 1, 2
O
N
10 mol % A
7, R = H
8, R = Me
9, R= Et
CH2Cl2, ToC
N
O
O
O
10, R = H (n = 1),
11, R = H (n = 2)
12, R = Me (n = 1)
13, R = Et (n = 1)
Cu2+
2OTf-
2933
1a
2b
3b
4c
5b
6b
7b
8
9
10d
10
6
6
10
10
10
30
10
10
T (C)
78
0
0
0
50
70
70
70
78
78
Yield (%)e
endo/exo f
96
99
99
99
99
97
97
22
99
99
9:1
10:1
8:1
9:1
9:1
12:1
11:1
10:1
13:1
17:1
endo (% e.e.)f
88
15
39
11
50
65
65
75
78
Table 2. Asymmetric DielsAlder reaction between cyclopentadiene (cPt) or cyclohexadiene (cHx) and various dienephiles
79 at 0C in the presence of 10 mol% 6 and 10 mol% Cu(OTf)2
Entry
Diene
Dienophile
Yield (%)d
endo/exo e
endo (% e.e.)e
1a
2
3a
4
5a,b
6c
cPt
cPt
cPt
cPt
cHx
cHx
8
8
9
9
7
7
95
99
95
99
95
53
3:1
4:1 (4:1)f
3:1
4:1 (4:1)f
\99:1
\99:1
85
72 (72)f
82
65 (60)f
61
53
2934
Catalyst 5
Catalyst 6
a
b
14
Method
1st (endo/exo)
2nd (endo/exo)
3rd (endo/exo)
4th (endo/exo)
5th (endo/exo)
A
B
A
75 (15:1)
78 (17:1)
67 (13:1)
71 (13:1)
72 (15:1)a
75 (13:1)
69 (12:1)
73 (16:1)
48 (14:1)
63 (13:1)
70 (14:1)
56 (13:1)b
72 (15:1)b
52 (13:1)
when a DA reaction was carried out using the ligandgrafted silica 6 without copper reagent at 70C for 24 h
(entry 8). This result clearly indicates that the TMScapped silica 6 exerts some catalytic activity in the
DielsAlder reaction even at 70C. When the temperature was lowered to 78C, the highest enantioselectivity was observed (75% e.e., entry 9). It is of particular
note that increased endo/exo-selectivity (13/1) compared to that obtained in the homogenous reaction was
observed using the immobilized catalyst. In the reaction
using catalyst 5, which is not protected with the TMS
group (entry 10), the enantio- and endo/exo-selectivity
were higher than those obtained with catalyst 6 (78%
e.e. and 17/1, respectively). All of the reactions examined in Table 1 employing the immobilized catalyst 5
and 6 afforded almost quantitative yields (>97%) indicating excellent catalyst reactivity.
To examine the scope of the reaction employing the
catalyst 6, we carried out DA reactions using various
dienes and dienophiles, the results are summarized in
Table 2. When a reaction employing cyclopentadiene
and the dienophile 8 in the presence of the homogenous
catalyst 2b was carried out at 0C, the DA cycloadducts
were obtained with 3/1 endo-selectivity and the endoisomer 12 was obtained with 85% e.e. (entry 1). When
the same reactions were carried out using 10 mol% each
of heterogenized ligand 6 and Cu(OTf)2, a 4:1 mixture
of endo- and exo-products was obtained with 72% e.e.
for 12 (entry 2). A homogeneous DA reaction between
cyclopentadiene and dienophile 9 employing 2b gave
the endo-isomer 13 with 82% e.e. and endo-selectivity of
3:1 (entry 3). In heterogeneous reactions employing 6,
the e.e. of 13 was 65% and endo-selectivity was 4:1
(entry 4). In a preliminary attempt to test the recyclability of the catalyst from the reactions of entries 2 and 4,
almost the same diastereo- and enantioselectivities were
observed (numbers in parentheses in entries 2 and 4).
When a homogenous reaction employing cyclohexadiene and the dienophile 7 was carried out at 0C, the
DA cycloadducts were obtained with endo-selectivity of
>99/1 and the endo isomer 11 had 61% e.e. (entry 5).
With heterogenized ligand 6, the endo-product (with
53% e.e.) and endo/exo-selectivity of >99:1 were
observed (entry 6). Both reactions of cyclohexadiene
proceeded very slowly. The fact that there are 817%
differences in the e.e. between homogenous and heterogeneous reactions indicates that some reactions are
catalyzed by sources other than the immobilized catalyst prepared from 6.
Encouraged by the results from the preliminary recycling experiments (entries 2 and 4, Table 2), we further
examined the recycling capability of the catalysts 5 and
6.14 Reactions were carried out with the catalyst prepared from adding 30 mol% of Cu(OTf)2 to 10 mol% of
5 or 6 followed by washing extensively with
dichloromethane. According to different ways of washing the catalyst, two different protocols have been
employed. In method A, after mixing the silica ligand
and Cu(OTf)2 in dichloromethane, the mixture was
stirred for 3 h, washed with dichloromethane and dried
before use. In method B, after stirring the silica ligand
with Cu(OTf)2, the mixture was diluted with a large
amount of dichloromethane and stirred for another 0.5
h, filtered and dried before use. After 24 h reaction, the
mixture was filtered and the solid residue was washed
with hexane twice. The recycling experiments were carried out using new batches of diene and dienophile and
the results are summarized in Table 3. When TMScapped ligand 6 was utilized using method A, almost
consistent endo/exo-selectivity was observed and the
e.e. of the endo-product peaked at the second run (75%)
and gradually decreased. When the ligand 5 was examined under the same method (A), the enantioselectivies
were similar initially and stayed above 60% e.e. up to
the 4th recycle. When method B was employed for
catalyst 5, much more consistent enantioselectivities
(over 70% e.e.s) were observed. Further study will be
required to clarify the reason why catalyst 5 gives better
results than catalyst 6.
To address the possible cause of the observed gradual
decrease in enantioselectivity upon repeated use of the
ligand, we examined the copper quantity after repetition experiment using 5 through EPMA (electron probe
microanalyser) analysis and the results are listed in
Table 4. From the data, it was obvious that the copper
content decreased considerably after each run and this
might have caused the slight reduction of enantioselectivity. In Table 3, after additional Cu(OTf)2 was added,
the reaction enantioselectivity rebounded a little.
Si:Cu
1st
2nd
3rd
89.6:10.4
91.9:8.1
94.2:5.8
Conclusions
In summary, we have prepared a new heterogeneous
catalyst system containing a chiral bis(oxazoline) ligand
immobilized onto MCF. The immobilized catalyst
exhibited good enantioselectivity of up to 78% e.e. and
high endo/exo-selectivity of 17:1 in the reaction
between cyclopentadiene and the dienophile 7. When
cyclohexadiene and other dienophiles were examined
with the heterogeneous catalyst system, the enantioselectivities were found to be 817% lower than the
corresponding homogeneous reaction enantioselectivies.
The catalyst was easily recovered and reused several
times without losing its high reactivity and
enantioselectivity.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Brain Korea 21 Program
supported by the Ministry of Education for the financial support. B.M.K. acknowledges the support from
the KOSEF through the Center for Molecular Catalysis
at Seoul National University.
8.
9.
10.
References
1. (a) Evans, D. A.; Johnson, J. S. In Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N.; Pfaltz, A.; Yamamoto,
H., Eds. DielsAlder reactions; Springer: New York, 1999;
pp. 11781235; (b) Maruoka, K. In Catalytic Asymmetric
Synthesis; Ojima, I., Ed. Asymmetric cycloaddition reaction; VCH: New York, 2000; pp. 467491.
2. Evans, D. A.; Miller, S. J.; Lectka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 6460.
3. Ghosh, A. K.; Mathivanan, P.; Cappiello, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 3815.
4. Pugin, B.; Blaser, H.-U. In Comprehensive Asymmetric
Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N.; Pfaltz, A.; Yamamoto, H., Eds.
Catalyst immobilization: solid support; Springer: New
York, 1999; pp. 13681375.
5. For examples of bisoxazoline ligands, see: (a) Glos, M.;
Reiser, O. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2045; (b) Burguete, M. I.;
Fraile, J. M.; Garcia, J. I.; Garcia-Verdugo, E.; Luis, S. V.;
Mayoral, J. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3905; (c) Annunziata,
R.; Benaglia, M.; Cinquini, M.; Cozzi, F.; Pitillo, M. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3160; (d) Orlandi, S.; Mandoli, A.;
Pini D.; Salvadori, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
2519; (e) Hallman, K.; Moberg, C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2001, 12, 1475.
6. (a) Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic
Compounds; Cornils, B.; Herrmann, W. A., Eds.; VCH:
Weinheim, 1996; (b) Heterogeneous Catalysis and Fine
Chemicals IV; Blaser, H.; Baiker, A.; Prins, R., Eds.;
Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1997; (c) Clark, J. H.; Macquarrie,
D. J. Chem. Commun. 1998, 853.
7. (a) Kresge, C. T.; Leonowicz, M. E.; Roth, W. J.; Vartuli,
J. C.; Beck, J. S. Nature 1992, 359, 710; (b) Zhao, D.; Feng,
J.; Huo, Q.; Melosh, N.; Fredrickson, G. H.; Chmelka, B.
F.; Stucky, G. D. Science 1998, 279, 548; (c) Ying, J. Y.;
Mehnert, C. P.; Wong, M. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
11.
12.
13.
14.
2935