CEN Workshop 10 - European Handbook for Defence Procurement Expert Group 2 Energetic Materials final Report Brussels, June 30, 2011 Table of Contents List of Members References and Vocabulary 2. Generic Introduction 2. Specific Introduction 3. Scope 4. Reduction Process 5. Recommendations for Best Practice 6. Conclusions Annex List of Standards to be transferred to EG10 List of Members Country Code Full Name, Organization e-mail address NATO Darko Topler, NSA Convenor AFNOR Elie Raad,
CEN Workshop 10 - European Handbook for Defence Procurement Expert Group 2 Energetic Materials final Report Brussels, June 30, 2011 Table of Contents List of Members References and Vocabulary 2. Generic Introduction 2. Specific Introduction 3. Scope 4. Reduction Process 5. Recommendations for Best Practice 6. Conclusions Annex List of Standards to be transferred to EG10 List of Members Country Code Full Name, Organization e-mail address NATO Darko Topler, NSA Convenor AFNOR Elie Raad,
CEN Workshop 10 - European Handbook for Defence Procurement Expert Group 2 Energetic Materials final Report Brussels, June 30, 2011 Table of Contents List of Members References and Vocabulary 2. Generic Introduction 2. Specific Introduction 3. Scope 4. Reduction Process 5. Recommendations for Best Practice 6. Conclusions Annex List of Standards to be transferred to EG10 List of Members Country Code Full Name, Organization e-mail address NATO Darko Topler, NSA Convenor AFNOR Elie Raad,
CEN Workshop 10 - European Handbook for Defence Procurement Expert Group 2 Energetic Materials final Report Brussels, June 30, 2011 Table of Contents List of Members References and Vocabulary 2. Generic Introduction 2. Specific Introduction 3. Scope 4. Reduction Process 5. Recommendations for Best Practice 6. Conclusions Annex List of Standards to be transferred to EG10 List of Members Country Code Full Name, Organization e-mail address NATO Darko Topler, NSA Convenor AFNOR Elie Raad,
NATO AOP-38 (Edition 6) Specialist Glossary of Terms and Definitions Related to Ammunition Safety (see 3.5) REACH Regulation (EC) N1907/2006 Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Reastriction of Chemicals and its linked addendum or corrigendum CLP Regulation (EC) N1272/2008 Classification Labelling and Packaging and its linked addendum or corrigendum and its Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP). European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous goods by Road (ADR). CEN/WS10/N0018 - General framework paper - final version CEN/WS10/N0022 - Template for drafting recommendations CEN/WS10/N0027Rev3 - Template for presenting Best Practice standards
2. Introduction
2.1 Generic introduction
The European Commission requested the European Committee for Standardization to establish Workshop 10 to improve the efficiency and enhance the competitiveness of European Defence Industry. The European Handbook for Defence Procurement, EHDP, has been prepared by Experts Groups reporting to CEN Workshop 10. This document is a guide designed as a tool for anyone involved in the European defence procurement contractual negotiations.
The primary target audiences for the Handbook are: The staff in the ministries of defence who are producing procurement specifications and invitations to tender the staff in defence companies who are responding to those requirements
EHDP is designed to provide Defence Procurement Agencies and Defence Industries with a preferential list of selected recommended standards qualified as best practice ones to be included in armament contracts together with concise recommendations for an optimum use of those standards in such a Defence Procurement context. Those types of resulting informative data could be used in the acquisition process by MoD and in the development process by Industry such that system will be built faster, better and cheaper. The aim of a recommendation is to develop good practices in the domain addressed by the Expert Group and to assist the final user in using recommended best practices standards in the best cost-effective way.
Increasing the controlled use of existing standardization, a necessity to harmonise European practices used by defence procurement stakeholders.
The objective is to deploy a common approach through Nations Procurement agencies about an optimized utilization of standards : civil ones and military ones, the possible limitations of civilian standards with respect to military applications, to provide a useful guide to all stakeholders involved in defence procurement process
Description of how to implement standards successfully in armament contracts
The overall result will be a better use of standards in armament contracts
Recommendations are, during the drafting process, designed to allow EHDP final users to be provided with the right information for timely and quickly acquiring the best control in writing standards clausis related to the selected material, in armaments contracts. Thats why the volume of recommendations will be accordingly fully compatible with respect to EHDP vocation and purpose.
2.2 Specific Introduction
In Phase I of CEN/WS10, Expert Group 2 on Energetic Materials (EG2) was created, with the aim to collect and review standards related to energetic materials and prepare recommendations for which of these standards should be included in the European Handbook for Defence Procurement (EHDP) to be used as best practice within defence procurement in Europe.
EG2 produced its Final Report (Phase I) on 22 June 2005. The format of the recommendations contained therein was freelance, as in Phase I no overall agreed and prescribed format, to be used by all EGs, existed.
In Phase II, WS10 agreed on a format for the recommendations, which was used by all EGs of Phase II. During Phase II, EG2 remained in a dormant status.
EG2 was revived in Phase III and tasked to review its Phase I recommendations and reissue them in the format agreed in Phase II. During Phase III, the group held four meetings, namely on 27 April, 28 April, 14 September, and 25 November 2010.
EG2 has identified a list of 42 best practices standards. This document aims at providing recommendations on the best use of those best practice standards in armament contracts. Those standards will be listed, presented (scope), commented as far as the reasons for their selection (reduction process) and the way of implementing them in contracts according a tailored approach (recommendation for best practices) are concerned. Furthermore, an additional feature will focus on possible findings resulting in recommendations impacting the related standardization process to meet up identified needs. General conclusions will sum up the main axis revealed by the investigation work carried out by experts along the recommendation drafting process.
3. Scope
The scope of EG2 recommendations on best practice standards includes NATO standards and UN Orange Book Tests and Criteria related to:
specifications for energetic materials and their ingredients principles, requirements, test methods and procedures to be used for the Qualification of energetic materials Classification for manufacturing, storage and transportation of energetic materials terms and definitions related to ammunition safety, also covering energetic materials safety
The use of all standards has to take into account the REACH Regulation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals substances) and CLP Regulation (Classification, labelling and packaging). General recommendation is to use the last edition of the standards.
4. Reduction Process
Almost half of the EG2 meetings in Phase I were spent to agree on the scope of work. After lengthy discussions, the group made three basic decisions: first, to focus its work on the safety and suitability for service (S3) of energetic materials; second, to expand its initial scope to include S3 and demolition aspects of ammunition; and third, to concentrate on NATO standards.
In Phase II of CEN/WS10, EG10 Ammunition was created which produced a Final Report on 21 April 2008. This report contained some standards which also had been considered in the EG2 Final Report (Phase I), for the reasons explained above.
In Phase III, the Expert Group on Disposal of Munitions (EG19) was created. Some standards related to that topic were included in the EG2 Phase I Final Report.
EG2 found itself in the difficult situation that half of the members of EG2 in Phase I were no longer members of the group, and that half of the nominated members could not attend the Phase III meetings. As a result, the EG2 meetings in Phase III were, apart from the Convenor and the Secretary, attended by one (first and second meeting), two (third meeting) and four (fourth meeting) national experts.
Facing this difficult personnel situation, on the one hand, and the short time available on the other, the group decided to review its Phase I recommendations and strictly confine its Phase III activities to the following:
1. include standards that have been promulgated since the time when the Phase I Final Report was issued;
2. remove standards that have been cancelled since the time when the Phase I Final Report was issued;
3. remove standards that have been considered in the EG10 Phase II recommendations, with exceptions of standards that apply for both energetic materials and ammunition safety;
4. remove standards that belong into the domain of EG10, and provide a list of these standards to EG10;
5. remove standards that belong into the domain of EG19, and provide a list of these standards to EG19;
6. draft its Phase III recommendations for groups of standards, rather for individual standards, in the format prescribed.
5. Recommendations for Best Practice
5.1 Energetic Materials - Ingredients
Standard (or set of standards) : Identification, scope and information on the source
Set of standards containing specifications for energetic materials and their ingredients:
NATO STANAG 4021 (Specification for CE) NATO STANAG 4022 (Specification for RDX) NATO STANAG 4023 (Specification for PETN) NATO STANAG 4024 (Specification for AN) NATO STANAG 4025 (Specification for TNT) NATO STANAG 4026 (Specification for Pictrite (Nitroguanidine)) NATO STANAG 4041 (Specification for DNT) NATO STANAG 4178 (Specification for NC) NATO STANAG 4230 (Specification for HNS) NATO STANAG 4284 (Specification for HMX) NATO STANAG 4299 (Specification for Ammonium Perchlorate) NATO STANAG 4300 (Specification for Aluminum Powder) NATO STANAG 4543 (Specification for NTO) NATO STANAG 4566 (Specification for CL-20)
Scope:
The objective of these agreements is to establish common minimum specifications to ensure that energetic materials and ingredients are suitable for military use and for deliveries from one NATO nation to another. The specified requirements concern the composition, appearance and chemical properties of energetic materials and ingredients. The documents specify the characteristics required and the test methods to determine them.
Source: www.nato.int/nsa Why chosen as best practice? The above set of standards is the only one internationally agreed and used for the subject matter and has been proven suitable for many years. How to use it (them) In order to ensure smooth procurement, energetic materials and ingredients of energetic materials should comply with the specified requirements. These requirements can be verified by using the test methods mentioned in the specifications. What is missing? N/A 5.2 Energetic Materials - Qualification
Standard (or set of standards) : Identification, scope and information on the source
Set of standards containing principles, requirements, test methods and procedures to be used for the Qualification of energetic materials:
1. NATO STANAG 4170 Ed.2 (Principles and Methodology) and AOP-7 Ed.2 (Data Requirements and Tests)
2. NATO STANAGs providing test methods and procedures for the determination of chemical, physical and mechanical properties of explosive materials
NATO STANAG 4147 (Chemical Compatibility) NATO STANAG 4443 (Unaxial Compressive Test) NATO STANAG 4487 (Friction Sensitivity Tests) Procedure A corresponding to UN test 3(b)(i) Procedure B corresponding to UN test 3(b)(ii) NATO STANAG 4488 (Shock Sensitivity Tests) Procedure B corresponding to UN test 1(a) and 2(a) Procedure C corresponding to UN test 7(b) NATO STANAG 4489 (Impact Sensitivity Tests) Procedure A corresponding to UN test 3(a)(v) Procedure B corresponding to UN test 3(a)(iii) Procedure C corresponding to UN test 3(a)(ii) NATO STANAG 4490 (Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Tests) NATO STANAG 4491 (Thermal Sensitiveness and Explosiveness Tests) Procedure C1 corresponding to UN test 1(b) and 2(b) Procedure C3 corresponding to UN test 7(e) and 7(f) NATO STANAG 4506 (Uni-Axial Tensile Test) NATO STANAG 4507 (Stress Relaxation Test in Tension) NATO STANAG 4515 (Thermal Characterisation by DTA, DSC and TGA) NATO STANAG 4525 (Thermomechanical Analysis) NATO STANAG 4540 (Procedures for DMA) NATO STANAG 4556 (Vacuum Stability Test) corresponding to UN test 3(c) NATO STANAG 4581 (Assessment of Ageing Characteristics) NATO STANAG 4582 (NC based Propellants-stability test using HF calorimetry) NATO STANAG 4620 (Stability Test using Stabilizer Depletion) and AOP-48 (Ageing)
Scope:
1. STANAG 4170 and AOP-7 1.1 The objective of STANAG 4170, covering AOP-7, is to establish the concept and requirement for the Assessment and Qualification of explosive materials by a National Authority for military use by NATO nations. 1.2 The objective of AOP-7, covered by STANAG 4170, is to supplement STANAG 4170 by providing more detailed guidance according to the intended role of the explosive materials and identifying the organizational elements and unique national requirements involved in the explosive materials development and Qualification process for each participating country.
2. The objective of the set of test standards is to provide test methods and procedures for the determination of chemical, physical mechanical and sensitivity properties of explosive materials. Source: www.nato.int/nsa Why chosen as best practice?
The above set of standards is the only one internationally agreed and used for the subject matter and has been proven suitable for many years. How to use it (them)
1. STANAG 4170 and AOP-7 shall be applied to ensure that only explosive materials sufficiently characterized and assessed as possessing properties making them safe and suitable for consideration for military use are qualified for an intended role. For each specific application of the explosive material qualified for an intended role, an additional assessment is necessary to determine whether that explosive can be used.
2. The standardized test methods and procedures must be applied in order to facilitate cross-procurement and to ensure that ammunition and other explosive stores have been designed and manufactured with proper regard to the respective properties and safety requirements. What is missing? N/A
5.3 Energetic Materials Storage and Transportation
Standard (or set of standards) : Identification, scope and information on the source
Set of standards related to storage and transportation of energetic materials:
1. NATO STANAG 4440 and AASTP-1 (Safety Principles for the Storage of Military Ammunition and Explosives)
2. NATO STANAG 4441 and AASTP-2 (Safety Principles for the Transport of Military Ammunition and Explosives)
3. NATO STANAG 4123 and AASTP-3 (Principles for the Hazard Classification of Military Ammunition and Explosives)
4. UN Orange Book (Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, Manual of Tests and Criteria)
Scope:
1. The objective of STANAG 4440 is to promote the use, updating and application of AASTP-1. The objective of AASTP-1 is to establish safety principles to be used as a guide between host countries and NATO forces in the development of the mutually agreeable regulations for the layout of ammunition storage depots and for the storage of conventional ammunition and explosives therein.
2. The objective of STANAG 4441 is to promote the use, updating and application of AASTP-2. The objective of AASTP-2 is to establish safety principles and procedures to be used by NATO forces in host countries during the transport of conventional military ammunition and explosives by all modes of transport. The recommendations focus upon the transport of MILITARY ammunition and explosives which are robustly designed for rough handling under wartime conditions and for storage for long periods of time. Continuous condition checks are performed by trained quality assurance personnel to assure that no degradation occurs. The packaging further supports that design and the result is a product which is extremely safe to handle and transport within the civilian community. In different modes of transport carriage of military ammunition and explosives will be done by civilian or military means. Detailed information for these circumstances are also given in the document.
3. The objective of STANAG 4123 is to promote the use, updating and application of AASTP-3. The objective of AASTP-3 is to provide a common basis for use by NATO nations in assessing the risks generated by military ammunition and explosives during transport and storage and to determine their classification. The purpose of using hazard divisions is to simplify the task of making regulations for safe transport and storage, and to facilitate the observance of such regulations by identifying packages or articles by a simple numerical code. 4. The UN Orange Book provides tests, methods and criteria for the worldwide transport of dangerous goods, including explosive materials. STANAG 4441 and AASTP-2 fully take into account the UN regulations. These tests, UN Orange Book methods and criteria are required by the CLP Regulation and by the European Agreement ADR. Source: www.nato.int/nsa Why chosen as best practice?
The above set of standards is the only one internationally agreed and used for the subject matter and has been proven suitable for many years. How to use it (them)
1. AASTP-1 is a manual to serve as a guide for authorities who are engaged in the planning and construction of ammunition storage depots of a capacity of not less than 500 kg of Net Explosive Quantity (NEQ) per storage site and for those who are responsible for the safe storage of ammunition. The manual does not authorize the use of the principles and criteria without consent of the host countries. NEQ per storage site of less than 500 kg are given special treatment.
2. The principles established in AASTP-2 which apply to the movement of ammunition in peacetime should also be taken in consideration in times of tension and war whenever practicable and are also intended to form the basis of national regulations. These principles may also prove useful outside the NATO area where two or more member nations are acting together, bearing in mind such nations would expect to operate under the local rules of a (non-NATO) host nation. Some countries may not have regulations for the transport of military ammunition and explosives in all modes of transport and may use these regulations alone. Other countries may have more stringent regulations to be observed by visiting forces. The principles are not intended to inhibit a visiting force from applying its own more stringent regulations. This manual is not intended to be a substitute either for international codes, recommendations or regulations, or for national regulations, but should be used in conjunction with them.
3. The criteria described in AASTP-3 should be used to assess the transport and storage risks of and attribute the correct hazard division and compatibility group to a given substance or article, to calculate the NEQ for storage purposes, and to show which explosives may be stored or transported together.
4. The regulations contained in the UN Orange Book are implemented in the national laws of the European nations. What is missing? N/A
5.4 Energetic Materials - Glossary
Standard (or set of standards) : Identification, scope and information on the source
Standard containing terms and definitions related to energetic materials:
NATO AOP-38 Specialist Glossary of Terms and Definitions Related to Ammunition Safety
Scope:
AOP-38 provides NATO agreed definitions for terms related to ammunition safety, including energetic materials safety.
Source: www.nato.int/nsa Why chosen as best practice? The above standards is the only one internationally agreed and used for the subject matter and has been proven suitable for many years. How to use it (them) Agreed definitions for terms used in the standards recommended above can be found in AOP-38.
What is missing? N/A
6. Recommendations for Future Standardization
EG 2 suggests to maintain the list of recommended standards on a regular basis.
7. Conclusions
In order to ensure a common understanding, to enhance energetic materials and ammunitions safety, and to make best use of limited defense ressources, it is highly recommended to agree on a minimum set of test methods for explosives for military use, as it is the case for explosives for civil use. Therefore, European standardisation agencies should go further in terms of selection of best practice standards, especially in the above mentionned domain.
Annex
List of Standards to be Transferred to EG10
The following standards were included in the EG 2 Phase I final report but are not included in the EG 10 final report and therefore are proposed to be transferred to EG 10.
AOP-8 (NATO Fuze characteristics catalogue) linked to STANAG 4326 AOP-16 (Fuzing systems: Safety design guides) linked to STANAG 4187 AOP-21 (Fuzing systems: Manual of development, characterisation and safety test methods and procedures for lead and booster for explosive components) linked to STANAG 4363 AOP-22 (Design criteria and test methods for inductive setting of electronic projectile fuzes) linked to STANAG 4369 AOP-34 (Vibration tests for munitions carried in tracked vehicles) and STANAG 4242 AOP-38 (AC/326 glossary of terms and definitions concerning the safety and suitability for service of munitions, explosives and related products) AOP-43 (Electro-explosive device, assessment and test methods for characterisation Guidelines for STANAG 4560) linked to STANAG 4560
STANAG 2916 (Nose fuze contours and matching projectile cavities for artillery and mortar projectiles) STANAG 3786 (Safety design requirements for airborne dispenser weapons) STANAG 4238 (Munition design principles, electrical / electromagnetic environments) STANAG 4242 (Vibration tests for munitions carried in tracked vehicles) STANAG 4325 (Environmental and safety tests for the appraisal of air-launched munitions) STANAG 4326 (NATO fuze characteristics data) STANAG 4333 (Underwater munitions, principles for safe design) STANAG 4337 (Surface-launched munitions appraisal, safety and environmental tests) STANAG 4338 (Underwater launched munitions, safety evaluation) STANAG 4363 (Fuzing systems development testing for the assessment of lead and booster explosive components) STANAG 4369 (Design requirements for inductive setting of electronic projectile fuzes) STANAG 4432 (Air-launched guided munitions, principles for safe design) STANAG 4526 (Shaped charge jet, munition test procedures) STANAG 4547 (Inductive setting of medium calibre electronic projectile fuzes, design requirements)
List of Standards to be Transferred to EG19
The following standards were included in the EG 2 Phase I final report and are proposed to be transferred to EG 19.
AOP-31 (Demolition material; Design principles) linked to STANAG 2818 AOP-32 (Demolition material; Assessment and testing of safety and suitability for service) linked to STANAG 2818 STANAG 2818 (Characteristics of demolition accessories to determine their operational interchangeability) STANAG 4518 (Safe disposal of munitions, design principles and requirements and safety assessment)