Guidelines For Contributors of Articels

The default review policy for LAB is double blind review.
While the authors names and affiliations will always remain anonymous for the first round of review, reviewers can choose to sign their reviews. In such a case, authors can then choose to make their identity known before the second round of review and get in touch with the signed reviewer to discuss comments. The editors of LAB will be responsible for screening submissions for quality as well as screening reviews for tone (and quality). We will adopt a strict policy of constructive civility. Guidelines for reviewers will be sent to them with the invitation for review. Guidelines for Contributors Types of articles: General Research articles: 8,000-10,000 word articles that present original empirical research pertinent to the study of cognitive-linguistic bilingualism. Squibs and Research Reports: These small articles should not exceed 5,000 words and should present research on ongoing theoretical projects or subsets of data sets making significant contributions that are time sensitive. Accelerated review will be conducted. Epistemological Topics: these articles on topics of general epistemological interest in the sub-disciplines that contribute research to the journal will be between 8,000 and 12,000 words and will be by invitation only. Spotlight issue: Annually, one Spotlight issue will be published focusing on research of one particular language, language family or a cohort of articles addressing the same theoretical questions within the remit of the journal. Proposals for guest editing this issue should be sent to the editors and not exceed 3 pages. 1. All inquiries should be directed towards the editors by e-mailing the journal at [email protected] 2. Contributions must be in English and spelling should be either American English or British English and should be consistent throughout the paper. If not written by a native speaker, it is advisable to have the paper checked by a native speaker prior to submission. 3. All articles published in LAB are double-blind peer reviewed. For initial submission, authors should therefore deliver their MANUSCRIPT in electronic form (Word or rtf, accompanied by an identical PDF file), double-spaced with 3 cm/1 inch margins. The first page should contain the title of the article; the name, affiliation, and address of each author; a self-contained abstract in English (100-150 words), and five to ten keywords. The pdf file, however, should be anonymous. 4. Upon acceptance, the author will be requested to furnish the FINAL VERSION in electronic form (Word or rtf), accompanied by an identical PDF file. For the final accepted version the following standards MUST be followed: 5. Authors are responsible for observing copyright laws when quoting or reproducing material. The copyright of articles published in LAB is held by the publisher. Permission for the author to use the article elsewhere will be granted by the publisher provided full acknowledgement is given to the source. 6. Papers should be reasonably divided into sections and, if appropriate subsections. The headings of these subsections should be numbered in Arabic numerals (1.; 1.1.; 1.1.1.). 7. Line drawings (FIGURES) should be submitted as reproducible originals. They should be numbered consecutively, and appropriate captions should be provided. Reference to any FIGURES should be given in the appropriate place where they should appear. 8. TABLES should be numbered consecutively and should be referred to in the main text. 9. NOTES should appear as FOOTNOTES and should be concise, kept to a minimum, and numbered consecutively throughout the paper. 10. REFERENCES in the text should be formatted according the following style: A Work by Two Authors: Name both authors in the signal phrase or in the parentheses each time you cite the work. Use the word and between the authors names within the text and use the ampersand in the parentheses.
Research by Wegener and Petty (1994) supports... (Wegener & Petty, 1994) A Work by Three to Five Authors: List all the authors in the signal phrase or in parentheses the first time you cite the source. (Kernis, Cornell, Sun, Berry, & Harlow, 1993) In subsequent citations, only use the first authors last name followed by et al. in the signal phrase or in parentheses. (Kernis et al., 1993) In et al., et should not be followed by a period. Six or More Authors: Use the first authors name followed by et al. in the signal phrase or in parentheses. Harris et al. (2001) argued... (Harris et al., 2001) Two or More Works in the Same Parentheses: When your parenthetical citation includes two or more works, order them the same way they appear in the reference list, separated by a semi-colon. That means that they are in alphabetical, not chronological order. (Berndt, 2002; Harlow, 1983) Authors With the Same Last Name: To prevent confusion, use first initials with the last names. (E. Johnson, 2001; L. Johnson, 1998) Two or More Works by the Same Author in the Same Year: If you have two sources by the same author in the same year, use lower-case letters (a, b, c) with the year to order the entries in the reference list. Use the lower-case letters with the year in the in-text citation. Research by Berndt (1981a) illustrated that... Book (monograph): Montrul, S.A. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Dissertation: Anderson, B. (2002). The fundamental equivalence of native and interlanguage grammars: Evidence from argument licensing and adjective position. Unpublished dotoral dissertation, Indiana University. Book (edited volume): Brinton, D., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.). (2008). Heritage language education. A new field emerging. London: Routledge. Article (in book): Bullock, B.E., & Toribio, A.J. (2009). Trying to hit a moving target: On the sociophonetics of codeswitching. In L. Isurin, D. Winford, & K. de Bot (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to code switching (pp. 189-206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Articles (in journal): Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals. Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131-149. Bobaljik, J.D., & Wurmbrand, S. (2002). Notes on agreement in Itelmen. Linguistic Discovery, 1(1). Available from http://linguistic-discovery.dartmouth.edu
Electronic, online sources: Liberman, M. 2006. Uptalk is not HRT. Language Log, 28 March 2006, retrieved on 30 March 2006, from http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002967.html 11. Authors are kindly requested to check their manuscripts very carefully before submission in order to avoid delays in publication. The first author will receive a PDF file with page proofs for final correction. One set must be returned with corrections by the dates determined by the publication schedule. Any authors alterations other than typographical corrections in the page proofs may be charged to the author. 12. Authors of main articles as well as reviews will receive a complementary copy of the issue in which their paper appears. 13. Manuscripts should be submitted through the journals online submission and manuscript tracking site: http://www.editorialmanager.com/lab/. If you are not able to submit online, or for any other editorial correspondence, please contact the editors: [email protected].

Guidelines For Contributors of Articels

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidelines For Contributors of Articels

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidelines For Contributors of Articels

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The default review policy for LAB is double blind review.

You might also like