MSC Mar2013
MSC Mar2013
MSC Mar2013
IN THIS ISSUE
Healthcare
Bridges
Miscellaneous Metals
MSC
March 2013
Free Webinars
4 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION (Volume 53, Number 3. ISSN (print) 0026-8445: ISSN (online) 1945-0737. Published monthly by the American Institute of Steel
Construction (AISC), One E. Wacker Dr., Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60601. Subscriptions: Within the U.S.single issues $6.00; 1 year, $44. Outside the U.S. (Canada
and Mexico)single issues $9.00; 1 year $88. Periodicals postage paid at Chicago, IL and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Please send address changes to
MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION, One East Wacker Dr., Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60601.
AISC does not approve, disapprove, or guarantee the validity or accuracy of any data, claim, or opinion appearing under a byline or obtained or quoted from
an acknowledged source. Opinions are those of the writers and AISC is not responsible for any statement made or opinions expressed in MODERN STEEL
CONSTRUCTION. All rights reserved. Materials may not be reproduced without written permission, except for noncommercial educational purposes where fewer than
25 photocopies are being reproduced. The AISC and MSC logos are registered trademarks of AISC.
March 2013
ON THE COVER: Detroit Medical Center Heart Hospital, p. 30. (Photo: Douglas Steel Fabricating Corp.)
24
Rapid Response
BY JASON D. PERRY, S.E., P.E.
BIM and BRBs bring big benefits to a hospital
project in southeast Missouri.
30
Cardio Construction
BY ANDREW HERMIZ AND LAWRENCE F.
KRUTH, P.E.
BIM is at the heart of the design process for
an upcoming hospital in Detroit.
36
Changing of the Guard
BY NILS D. OLSSON, P.E.
A Tampa-area bridge undergoes a
rehabilitation involving the replacement of
thousands of rivets with high-strength bolts.
40
The Long and Short of It
BY MARK J. PAVLICK, P.E., MICHAEL
DILLON, P.E. AND TYSON HICKS
A short-span bridge in suburban Pittsburgh
comes together over a long weekend.
44
Go with the Flow
BY PAUL CHUNG, P.E., AND JASON FANG,
P.E., PH.D.
In car-centric Southern California, a highway
overcrossing replacement project allows traffic
to flow uninterrupted.
48
Big Roll
BY DIANE CAMPIONE, S.E., P.E.
Placing the preeminent piece of a transit
project puzzle.
52
Still Swinging
BY JIM TALBOT
Connecticut crossing to celebrate century of
service this summer.
56
Holding Court
BY STEPHEN H. LUCY, P.E., AND MARK D.
LEMAY, AIA
Multiple Texas county courthouses look to
steel to bring them into the future while
preserving their past.
product expert
17
Miscellaneous MetalsThe
Devil is in the Details, Part II:
VUCA Prevails
BY TED HAZLEDINE
Misinterpreting miscellaneous metal
methods makes for a problematic project.
But enhanced expectations, communication
and coordination can create construction
clarity.
business
22
Dont Get Lost in Translation
BY ANNE SCARLETT
Studying up on your prospects preferences,
terminology and context will strengthen
your connectionand your ultimate impact.
people to know
66
An Unexpected Journey
When one adventure is thwarted, another
often takes its place.
columns features
departments
6 EDITORS NOTE
9 STEEL INTERCHANGE
12 STEEL QUIZ
60 NEWS & EVENTS
resources
64 MARKETPLACE
65 EMPLOYMENT
in every issue
48
36
52
Proud to be a USA manufacturer for over
125 years, lets build something great together!
2000 Access Blvd
Madison, IL 62060
Phone: 800-237-7059
Fax: 314-389-7510
Email:
[email protected]
Web:
www.stlouisscrewbolt.com
1887
A325 & A490 HEAVY HEX
STRUCTURAL BOLTS
F1852 & F2280
TENSION CONTROL BOLTS
ANCHOR BOLTS, ASSEMBLIES,
AND MANY OTHER STRUCTURAL
FASTENERS
Visit us at
Booth#
NASCC
2013
6 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
Editorial Offices
1 E. Wacker Dr., Suite 700
Chicago, IL 60601
312.670.2400 tel
312.896.9022 fax
Editorial Contacts
EDITOR & PUBLISHER
Scott L. Melnick
312.670.8314
[email protected]
SENIOR EDITOR
Geoff Weisenberger
312.670.8316
[email protected]
ASSISTANT EDITOR
Tasha Weiss
312.670.5439
[email protected]
DIRECTOR OF PUBLISHING
Areti Carter
312.670.5427
[email protected]
GRAPHIC DESIGNER
Kristin Egan
312.670.8313
[email protected]
AISC Officers
CHAIRMAN
William B. Bourne, III
VICE CHAIRMAN
Jeffrey E. Dave, P.E.
SECRETARY & GENERAL
COUNSEL
David B. Ratterman
PRESIDENT
Roger E. Ferch, P.E.
VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
Charles J. Carter, S.E., P.E., Ph.D.
VICE PRESIDENT
Jacques Cattan
VICE PRESIDENT
John P. Cross, P.E.
VICE PRESIDENT
Scott L. Melnick
Advertising Contact
Account Manager
Louis Gurthet
231.228.2274 tel
231.228.7759 fax
[email protected]
For advertising information, con-
tact Louis Gurthet or visit
www.modernsteel.com
Address Changes and
Subscription Concerns
312.670.5444 tel
312.893.2253 fax
[email protected]
Reprints
Betsy White
The Reprint Outsource, Inc.
717.394.7350
[email protected]
editors note
A FEWMONTHS AGO, my daughter was the only high school student in an otherwise
all-adult production of The Producers. Besides being a fun few weeks (yes, I saw it three
times!), it was one of those events that would make any parent proud.
But I was even more proud of her a few weeks ago when she auditioned for a roll in her
high school musicaland didnt make it. Rather than sulk, however, shes still participating
as part of the costume and stage crew. She
adapted to the changing circumstances
and as a result will have a great experience.
I thought about that the other day when
one of my colleagues told me a story about
his previous job as an engineer with a rm
specializing in designing connections. In
the story, a well-known fabricator told him
his shop wouldnt bid on any of the projects
my colleague designed. Why? Because the
projects were designed using shear tabs
and this fabricator preferred clip angles.
The fabricator was very successful for a
time but when hard times hit and they still
werent exible, they went bankrupt.
Today, a lot of rms (both fabricators and
engineers) seem to have their heads stuck
in the sand when it comes to technologi-
cal changes. Are you sharing models be-
tween designers and fabricators? Are you
using models for the shop and drawing
approval process? Fortunately, AISC has
created a conference specically for de-
signers, fabricators and detailers who need
to better understand where the industry is
going, how they can avoid being left be-
hind and the risks and benets of adopt-
ing new technologies. The Technology in
Steel Construction conference is being
held in conjunction with the 2013 NASCC:
The Steel Conference (to see a full listing of
the sessions offered at the conference, visit
www.aisc.org/nascc). For example, Will
Ikerd from Ikerd Consulting, Baris Lostuvali
from Herrero Contractors and Rob Schoen
from Axis Detailing will provide an in-depth
discussion of best practices in how to ad-
dress risk and model handoffs. And David
Ruby from Ruby & Associates, Tom Faraone
from Banker Steel and John Palacios from
Woodward Design-Build will introduce at-
tendees to three pioneering companies
who are taking models to the next level by
using them in the review process in concert
withor even in lieu oftraditional shop
drawings.
Of course, its not just technology thats
changing. NASCC offers a wide range
of sessions to keep you current, ranging
from The Direct Analysis Method What
Happened to the K-Factor to Economi-
cal Joist Selection. Youll learn about HSS
connections and the seismic behavior of
multi-tier concentrically braced frames. And
this year there are a lot business sessions,
such as Working with Difcult People
and Employee Development Strategies
for Engaging and Retaining a Productive
Workforce.
Finally, the conference offers you the op-
portunity to see the latest equipment and
tools, ranging from full fabrication lines to
innovative connections. More than 200 ex-
hibitors have signed up and attendance is
expected to exceed 3,500.
Dont get left behind. Visit www.aisc.
org/nascc and sign up for the steel design
and construction industrys most important
and informative conference.
SCOTT MELNICK
EDITOR
[email protected] | sds2.com | 800.443.0782
Introducing
SDS/2 v7.3 Software Solutions
New, more affordable pricing options
for SDS/2 software solutions mean that you can get the latest in cutting-edge detailing technology for less.
Only in SDS/2 Detailing can you get steel connections that are designed intelligently and automatically
including fitup and constructability checks along with long-hand connection design calculations.
SDS/2 v7.3 features the latest AISC design codes, including ASD 14th and LRFD 14th, and 2D reference draw-
ings can now be overlaid in the 3D model. The new status transfer functionality makes it even easier for your BIM
partners to approve project models.
Find out more about whats new to SDS/2 v7.3 at sds2.com/solutions.
VISIT BOOTH
#905
at NASCC to learn more about
subscription pricing
NEW YEAR. NEW TECHNOLOGY.
NEW PRICING.
MARCH 2013 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION 9
Double-Angle Compression Members
How is the number of intermediate connectors calculated
in AISC Steel Construction Manual Table 4-8 for the
design of double-angle compression members? Using the
75% rule found in AISC 360 Chapter E, my results do
not always match those shown in the table.
AISC Specification Section E6.2 requires that the slenderness
of the individual components of the built-up member must
not exceed three-quarters of the controlling slenderness of
the overall built-up member. I believe this is what you are
referring to as the 75% rule. This criterion is used in Table
4-8 in the AISC Manual. However, as a practical matter aimed
at the efficient use of materials, the AISC Committee on
Manuals chooses to use an additional criterion in the creation
of this table.
The tabulated values for axial strength and corresponding
number of intermediate connectors given in the table are
such that the available compression buckling strength
about the Y-Y axis is equal to or greater than 90% of that
for compression buckling of the two angles as a unit. In
many cases, using only the 75% rule in AISC Specification
Section E6.2 would require fewer connectors than the number
tabulated in the table. However, if this were done, then the
tabulated values cannot be used and the compression strength
must be recalculated using the corresponding modified
slenderness from Section E6.1.
This information is outlined in the description for Table
4-8 found on page 4-7 of the 14th Edition Manual.
Heath Mitchell, S.E., P.E.
Specifying Clevises and Pins
The 14th Edition AISC Steel Construction Manual Table
15-4 provides the maximum diameter of the connecting
rod (D) for various clevis sizes, and Table 15-5 provides a
range of clevis sizes to match possible rod and pin sizes. It
seems to me that this implies, on the contract documents,
that we should not only specify the clevis size but also the
pin size to match the connecting rod size. Is this correct
or is it sufficient to just specify the clevis size?
Not exactly. The size of the clevis does not set the size of the
pin. Both the clevis and pin must be sized for the required
strength. If you are providing the design of the connection,
then you should provide both the pin and the clevis sizes on
the structural drawings. If you are delegating the design of the
connection, then you should provide the required strength on
the structural drawings.
Larry S. Muir, P.E.
OCBF Work-Point Eccentricities
I am working on a project using braced frames for the
lateral force resisting system. Originally, the frames were
configured as truly concentrically braced; the member
centerlines all intersected coincident with the work
points. A recent change has led to the work points at the
base of the columns being raised up 18 in. to 24 in. Does
this system still qualify as an ordinary concentrically
braced frame (OCFB)? If not, is my only option to use an
R=3 system? (I am in a low-seismic area.)
The 2010 AISC Seismic Provisions have a basis-of-design
section that specifically addresses this issue for OCBFs and
SCBFs (special concentrically braced frames). Section F1.2 for
OCBFs states:
This section is applicable to braced frames that consist
of concentrically connected members. Eccentricities less than
the beam depth are permitted if they are accounted for in the
member design by determination of eccentric moments using
the amplified seismic load.
This is obviously not aimed specifically at base
connections, but I think the intent is the same. Small
eccentricities are allowed if they are accounted for in design.
It is a matter of engineering judgment how column base
offsets are dealt with and the acceptable magnitude of such
eccentricities. This same judgment should be exercised when
permitting eccentricities in R=3 systems.
However, this may be more of an academic discussion
if you are in Seismic Design Category C or less. Using an
OCBF instead of an R=3 braced frame only results in a slight
decrease in the design loads for the brace (R=3 vs. R=3), but
that is coupled with a dramatic increase in design loads for the
columns, beams and connections. Typically an R=3 system will
be the more cost-effective choice, when it is permitted.
Heath Mitchell, S.E., P.E.
Welding Machine Calibration
Could you direct me to the code that addresses how often
I need to calibrate a welding machine?
AWS D1.1 Clause 5.11 states that welding equipment shall
be in such condition as to enable personnel to follow the
procedures and attain the results. Common industry practice
is to calibrate welding machines on an annual basis, though
this frequency is not specifically mandated anywhere. If you
are welding to the AWS D1.5 Bridge Code, then Clause 4.31.1
requires that welding machine calibration be performed every
three months.
Keith Landwehr
steel
interchange
If youve ever asked yourself Why? about something related to
structural steel design or construction, Modern Steel Constructions
monthly Steel Interchange column is for you! Send your
questions or comments to [email protected].
10 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
steel interchange
Erection Marks
Do AISC specifications or codes contain requirements for
how beam erection marks are placed?
The system used for erection marks is a contractual matter
and is not specifically addressed in the AISC Code of Standard
Practice. However, typical industry practice related to erection
marks is discussed in the 3rd Edition of AISCs Detailing
for Steel Construction. The section on Locating Marks in
Chapter 6 describes common practice as follows:
The shop places erection marks on the left end of pieces
detailed in horizontal or diagonal positions and at the bottom
of pieces detailed in the vertical position. Therefore, placement
of these marks on the erection drawings must follow the same
system. This marking system, along with the fact that the marks
are placed on steel to read right-side up, enables the erector to
position most of the members in a structure by referring to the
location of marks on the drawings.
Some fabricators prefer to use variations of this system. For
example, the compass direction is noted on some members,
notably columns. Thus: Mark Face A North. Likewise,
members such as long girders or trusses, which cannot be
turned at a job site, will require a compass direction on the
appropriate end so it will be shipped that way (i.e., with the end
pointed in the proper direction upon its arrival at the job site).
Although there are no requirements in the AISC Specification
or Code, this guidance reflects what is common in the industry.
Erin Criste
Free Edge Buckling of Gusset Plates
When designing connecting gusset plates for braces in an
inverted-V braced frame to the beam above, what are the
requirements to determine the thickness and the width of
the stiffeners that are placed between two braces on the
gusset plate to limit the free edge buckling length?
That is a very good question, and it is not well-known that
these stiffeners are not necessarily required.
The use of intermediate stiffeners in the gusset plate and the
corresponding stiffeners at the gusset edges is based on a 1998
publication in the Steel Tips series. It recommends a maximum
free edge buckling length, but if this maximum length was
exceeded, there were not any recommendations on how to
size or connect these stiffeners. The result is that nominal
stiffeners and welds were used with little research or design
guidance to justify the design. Example 3.10 in the 1st Edition
of the AISC Seismic Design Manual includes these stiffeners
because the free edge criterion is exceeded, and the stiffeners
and welds are sized and shown on the final figure (Figure 3-14).
However, these sizes are simply stated as nominal values using
normal plates and corresponding weld sizes.
Later research and investigation into the requirements for
these stiffeners, intended to improve the guidance provided, has
actually changed the current thinking. It is now thought that these
stiffeners do not serve the purpose they were proposed to serve
and that the gussets do not have free edge buckling problems.
Furthermore, use of stiffeners to limit the free edge length may
actually be detrimental to the performance of the connection as
they introduce a point of high local stiffness and can have the
tendency to increase and concentrate deformational demands at
the stiffener location. As a result, the free edge buckling check has
been removed in the 2nd Edition AISC Seismic Design Manual
examples. The technical justification for this is provided in the
Commentary to Section F2.6c in AISC 341-10:
Certain references suggest limiting the free edge length
of gusset plates, including SCBF brace-to-beam connection
design examples in the Seismic Design Manual, (AISC, 2006),
and other references (Astaneh-Asl et al., 2006; ICC, 2006).
However, the committee has reviewed the testing cited and
has concluded that such edge stiffeners do not offer any
advantages in gusset plate behavior. There is therefore no
limitation on edge dimensions in these provisions.
Therefore, it is AISCs recommendation that stiffeners not
be used to limit the free edge length of gusset plates in OCBFs
or SCBFs.
Heath Mitchell, S.E., P.E.
Preheat Requirements for Heavy Shapes
The 1999 LRFD Specification Section J2.8 requires a
minimum preheat of 350 F for welded splices in Group 4
and 5 shapes. I cannot find this requirement in AISC 360-
05 or AISC 360-10. Has this requirement been removed?
Yes, this requirement has been removed. Regarding
terminology, a significant change was made in the 2005
Specification. Following a similar change in ASTM A6, AISC
360 dropped the group designations and now refers to heavy
sections. Generally, these are what used to be called Group
4 and 5 shapes. Essentially, these are W-shapes with flanges
greater than 2 in. thick. If you review the beam tables in the
13th or 14th Editions of the AISC Steel Construction Manual,
youll see that the heavy shapes are annotated with footnote h.
As to preheat requirements for splices in heavy sections,
youll now want to review AISC 360-10 Section J1.5. The
350 F preheat requirement was deleted primarily because
it was determined that the AWS D1.1 preheat requirements
were sufficient in this application. Therefore, AWS D1.1
should be consulted for specific preheat requirements. In
addition, if you follow the references made in AISC 360
Section J1.5, you will find that the 150 F preheat is still
required by Section M2.2 for thermal cutting of copes and
weld access holes.
Keith Landwehr
The opinions expressed in Steel Interchange do not necessarily represent an official position of
the American Institute of Steel Construction and have not been reviewed. It is recognized that the
design of structures is within the scope and expertise of a competent licensed structural engineer,
architect or other licensed professional for the application of principles to a particular structure.
If you have a question or problem that your fellow readers might help you solve, please
forward it to us. At the same time, feel free to respond to any of the questions that you
have read here. Contact Steel Interchange via AISCs Steel Solutions Center:
1 E Wacker Dr., Ste. 700, Chicago, IL 60601
rel: 8.ASK.ASC lox: 312.803.470
[email protected]
The complete collection of Steel Interchange questions and answers is available online.
Find questions and answers related to just about any topic by using our full-text search
capability. Visit Steel Interchange online at www.modernsteel.com.
Heath Mitchell is director of technical assistance and Erin Criste is staff engineer,
technical assistance at AISC. Keith Landwehr and Larry Muir are consultants to AISC.
Free PDH/AIA course, BIM component & catalogs and more: www.newmill.com/build
NASCC
Booth
#
1225 Come see us at
Spec|o| proh|e & srondord sree| [o|sr eperr|se
W|de ronge o| roo|, |orm & compos|re Boor dec||ng
Cosr-e||ecr|ve lreeSpon
F
I
E
L
D
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
T
E
C
H
N
I
C
A
L
E
X
P
E
R
T
I
S
E
email: [email protected]
Training video link
Scan with smartphone
or go to our website
1 800 552 1999
the best way to bolt!
SquirterDTIs SquirterDTIs
USAs only Quenched and Tempered DTIs per
ASTM, RCSC and the Fastener Quality Act.
AASHTO Spec Includes Squirters!
www.appliedbolting.com
14 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
ANSWERS steel quiz
1 e) A Howe Truss has vertical and
di agonal web members. The
diagonal members slope down
and away from the center of the
truss. This is opposite to the slope
of the diagonals in a Pratt Truss.
Under uniform gravity loading,
the diagonal web members are in
compression and the vertical web
members are in tension.
2 a) A Warren truss has alternately
sloping diagonal web members
along its length. A Warren Truss can
also have vertical web members in
addition to the diagonals.
3 d) A Queen Post truss has two
vertical queen posts. The outside
di agonal s sl ope to the queen
posts, which are connected by a
horizontal member.
4 c) A King Post is one of the simplest
truss styles. It consists of two
outside diagonals that slope to a
single vertical king post.
5 b) A Pratt Truss has verti cal
and di agonal web members.
The di agonal members sl ope
down and toward the center
of the truss. This is opposite to
the sl ope of the di agonal s i n
a Howe Truss. Under uni form
gravi ty l oadi ng, the di agonal
web members are in tension and
the vertical web members are in
compression. A Pratt truss with a
Vierendeel opening is a common
configuration for a staggered truss
system. See AISC Steel Design
Guide 14 for more information on
the staggered truss system.
6 The Quebec Bridge or Pont de
Quebec in French. This bridge
appear ed i n t he December
2012 news secti on as part of
t he St eel Day St udent Phot o
Contest. To learn more about this
steel bridge and the SteelDay
Student Photo Contest, please
vi si t www. ai sc. org/content.
aspx?id=20024.
7 a) There are various steel bridge
t ypes t hat provi de ef f i ci ent
solutions for a range of bridge
spans. Chapter 7 of the Steel
Br i dge Handbook pr ovi des
guidance for selecting the right
steel bridge for your project. You
can download it from the NSBA
website (www.steelbridges.org).
8 False. The Direct Analysis Method
can be used in any stability design
application. This is discussed in the
Q1 2009 AISC Engineering Journal
paper A Model Specification for
Stability Design by Direct Analysis
by Shankar Nair.
9 An alternative approach is to model
the out-of-plumbness directly. This
alternative is especially useful when
the actual out-of-plumbness is
known, such as when assessing an
existing building.
10 True. When the forces i n the
branches normal to the chord
balance each other and the welds
develop the wall, the hidden weld
can be tacked and not welded. See
the Commentary to Section K2 of
the AISC Specification (specifically,
the last paragraph in that section
on page 16.1-436).
Its here. TnA 144 Torque and Angle Fastening
System. Snug and nal tension with the ip of a
switch using a one-man crew. Discover the new
standard at TightenRight.com or (800) 872-2658.
TightRight
GET
YOUR
SWITCH TO THE ULTIMATE FASTENING SYSTEM
M I N N E A P O L I S | H O U S T O N | L O S A N G E L E S | S E A T T L E
SWITCH TO AUTO-PILOT
WITH A VOORTMAN!
SAW
ING
DRILLING
LAYOUT MARKING
THERM
AL CUTTING
SHOT BLASTING
MULTI SYSTEM INTEGRATION
by Voortman
A V O O R T M A N S T E E L G R O U P C O M P A N Y
AUTOMATIC
MATERIAL HANDLING:
Loads and unloads the
processing system
Intelligently decides which
system to load next in a
Multi System Integration
Unmanned systems which
reduces man hours
SINGLE SOURCE
PROVIDER
Plasma & oxy-fuel cutting
Sawing and drilling
Layout marking
Shot blasting & painting
Punching & shearing
All products are designed
and manufactured in house
BRIAN RITCHIE FROM SHEPARD STEEL:
The Voortman V808 Robotic Cutting System
has been in use in our production facility for
over 5 months and has exceeded our
expectations. We are using the V808 as a
fabrication station cutting to size, burning holes and coping.
We could not be happier with the production, service and
support on all of our Voortman machines. Great equipment!
VOORTMAN USA CORP.
Building F - 450 South Spruce st. | Manteno, IL 60950
(t) 1 815 468 6300 | (f) +1 815 - 468 6333
[email protected] | www.voortmancorp.com
MARCH 2013 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION 17
EVER HEARD OF VUCA?
The acronym, whose origins are in the military, stands for
volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity. It can be ap-
plied to a vast range of organizations, processes and industries,
including construction.
No element of the construction process is more emblematic
of VUCA than miscellaneous metals (keep in mind that I say this
as the president of a fabrication shop that specializes in miscel-
laneous metals). There are several culprits that fuel VUCA in the
miscellaneous metals worldand the steel construction world in
generalbut luckily there are also ways to address them.
Design Deciencies
In my opinion no element of the construction industry has cre-
ated more confusion than design defciencies, both in plans and
specifcations. This is largely caused by slow decision making and
late changes by owners and architects, and their demands of en-
gineers to reduce fees and maintain already-short schedules. The
combination of inadequate budget and time constraints does not
allow suffcient attention to details or proper coordination with the
other project design professionalsthus creating ambiguity and un-
certainty. The fabricator assumes considerable risk when making de-
cisions affecting the bid price. Constructability very often becomes
a central issue since method and means are the responsibility of the
contractor team. Ultimately, it is all too often the case that design
work gets pushed down the line to keep the project moving.
Connection designs are a common example, but all of this
also affects the miscellaneous metals segment of the industry. For
example, fabricators are now called upon to employ or retain an
engineer to provide signed and sealed designs for stairs to fll a
stairwell shown on design documents. Often the design intent is
not indicated at all or is called out in specifcations. This design
service is not free and must be added to the bid price. Other ex-
amples include the specifcation of catwalks, lintels, mechanical
supports and railings in a similar manner. Recently we encoun-
tered a project specifcation that required the steel contractor to
determine and account for the thermal expansion of a lintel and
the supporting masonry! (It was excluded from our proposal.)
The coordination of design intent between architectural and
structural details can be even more problematic. Very often it
is apparent that there was little or no discussion regarding ele-
ments of canopies, overhangs or mansards. The details are very
different, with huge consequences to the fnal risk and price.
Low Price Mentality
It is well known but should be constantly reinforced that a low
bid price does not always result in the low fnal cost. Unfortunately
there is often a lack of understanding of the design and construc-
tion process, and the low price mentality actually leads to many
change orders and related confictsand eventually higher costs.
This is often coupled with a lack of knowledge of what constitutes
a good design and a misunderstanding of what constitutes adequate
construction documents. Owners and architects tend to rely on the
engineers, whom they have hamstrung with low fees. Years ago ar-
chitects were considered the master builder and were adequately
compensated for and expected to provide reasonably detailed docu-
ments in a coordinated manner, on which fair pricing and subse-
quent construction could proceed. But the increasing complexity
of our industry and the forces demanding lower design fees have
combined to increase the ambiguity of the resultant construction
documents, thus increasing the risks of the construction team.
Another reality also weighs in here: Bid proposals from mis-
cellaneous metals contractors are generally provided in the last
minutes before general contractor bids are due (an unfortunate
outgrowth of bid-shopping by contractors), and there is sel-
dom adequate time to evaluate the bid and scope of work, thus
Misinterpreting miscellaneous
metal methods makes for a
problematic project. But enhanced
expectations, communication
and coordination can create
construction clarity.
BY TED HAZLEDINE
product expert series
MISCELLANEOUS
METALS THE DEVIL
IS IN THE DETAILS,
PART II:
VUCA PREVAILS
Ted Hazledine (tedhazledine@
benchmarksteel.com) is president
of Benchmark Fabricated Steel
(AISC member), a Terre Haute, Ind.-
based fabricator of miscellaneous
metals and structural steel.
18 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
increasing the risk of the contractor who uses the low bid.
The scope of work that makes up the fabricators bid can be
very complex and confusing. The list of items included can be
several pages depending on the project magnitude, often refer-
ring to specifc architectural and structural design details that
will eventually need clarity before they can be builtand the
list of exclusions is as important as the list of inclusions. Most of
these issues can be traced to inadequate and ambiguous details
created by design professionals who were hired on the basis of
low bid and were not able to develop more concise documents.
Adding to the complexity, miscellaneous metals contractors
often bring problems on themselves by also allowing the low
price mentality to prevail in their fabrication and erection pro-
cedures. The simple fact of the matter is that a product will not
be fabricated properly if it is not drawn correctly. Shop drawings
are the last line of defense and the detailing work, whether in-
house or outsourced, must be done correctly as well as effciently.
This requires adequate time to interpret a less-than-adequate
construction document. If the detailer has been beat down on
pricing, the resulting drawings may be defcient. Sometimes you
fnd this out in the fabrication shop, which is fortunate but costly.
Other times the errors are not discovered until the product is
being erected; we all know how expensive that can be. And back-
charging the detailer is usually out of the question, since the huge
costs associated with feld fxes usually dwarf the detailing budget.
The same low price approach to the various suppliers of spe-
cialty products and servicessuch as non-ferrous metal handrails,
galvanizing, blasting and painting, wire mesh partitions, gates and
otherscan lead to serious quality issues. VUCA is at work!
Enhanced Expectations
So how can we deal with the VUCA factor of the construc-
tion industry as it relates to miscellaneous metals and other
steel team players? There are many opportunities to establish
procedures that can mitigate, and in some cases eliminate, the
risk factors that can lead to costly remediation of problems cre-
ated by ourselves or others. Following are some recommenda-
tions that will likely help.
Choose the correct customers and suppliers. You must
establish expectations that refect your company philosophy
in all areas. Expect attention to detail, prompt response to
inquiries, RFIs, etc. Expect quality and timely deliveries to
your shop or the feld. Expect proper attention to payment
terms and billing procedures. Expect teamwork with every-
body pulling in the same direction. Do you do whats best for
the project or whats easiest or quickest, with little regard for
the downstream consequences? Choose customers and sup-
pliers with good feld, plant and administrative leadership.
They are part of your team. Doesnt it make sense that they
should be good at what they do?
Request a pre-job conference. Do so as early as possible
following receipt of authorization to proceed. Its amazing how
enlightening it can be to discover and resolve conficts or mis-
understandings regarding scope of work, interpretation of doc-
product
expert series
Architectural structural columns
at the Union Hospital Bone and
Joint Center. (All three of these
miscellaneous metals examples
were fabricated by Benchmark and
are located in Terre Haute, Ind.)
An architectural metal handrail at a Rose-
Hulman Institute of Technologya typical
miscellaneous metals project involving
field measuring of steps following the
concrete pour.
Architecturally exposed structural steel for
the canopy of an Indiana State University
building.
continued on page 20
Photos: Benchmark Fabricated Steel
2013 Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. SFCFS12-E
Fewer screws
=
lower installed cost
Our latest innovation for cold-formed steel construction is the new Simpson Strong-Tie
SUBH wall-stud bridging connector. It requires only one screw for most installations,
reducing the installed cost over conventional clip-angle connections that require four screws.
The SUBH connector features a unique geometry that grabs the stud web and ts
snug over 1.5" U-channel, enabling superior rotational and pull-through resistance.
It is self stabilizing and does not require an extra hand or C-clamps to hold the
connector while a screw is being driven. The SUBH connector is the only
bridging connector/device that has been extensively tested as a system so
that the tabulated design values reect stud web size and thickness.
The SUBH can be used with a wide range of stud sizes and gauges.
Learn more by visiting www.strongtie.com/subh or calling (800) 999-5099.
20 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
uments, delivery requirements, coordination of crafts and prod-
ucts, contract terms, payment schedules, interfacing with other
team members, etc. What exactly does your customer think hes
buying and what exactly do you intend to furnish? And when?
Stick to your shop drawing plan. What are the expectations
of shop drawing guidelines, schedule, review time and approval?
Erection drawings should be submitted as early as possible to allow
for feld dimensions, RFIs, clarifcations and other issues that are
impacted by a miscellaneous metals package. Stipulate that full shop
details will be developed only after proper and meaningful answers
to questions and proper feld dimensions are resolved. Avoid redun-
dancy in the detailing process. We are already challenged to meet
detailing budgets with ongoing document defciencies.
Develop and implement an action item list. Be proactive
in the communicaton process and initiate an action item list.
This will assist the construction team in establishing timelines,
statements of issues, needed response time and the responsible
party for particular action or information. Publish and review
the list regularly, and communicate it to all construction team
members. This is particularly important for RFIs or statements
of feld conditions that may need to be mitigated. Of course, de-
sign decisions or interpretation are ongoing issues that require
prompt and substantive response.
In addition, be proactive and offer practical solutions when
requesting clarifcation or information. Design professionals and
contractors appreciate the insight, and it will get the dialogue
cooking over an issue. Always do whats best for the project, not
necessarily whats easiest or quickest. Your credibility will increase.
Embrace QA/QC programs. While the AISC Code of Stan-
dard Practice is not intended to apply to the product group known
as miscellaneous metals (see CSP Section 2.2 and commentary),
it can certainly be referenced as a guideline to establish specifc,
applicable standards that are not addressed elsewhere in your mis-
cellaneous metals contracts. In addition, the procedures and pro-
grams of the AISC Certifcation Program can be helpful in estab-
lishing a quality standard that will make a fabrication shop more
consistently productive and reach a higher level of quality.
Pay attention to details. I was fortunate early in my career
to encounter a construction superintendent for a very large
frm who told me in no uncertain terms, The big stuff has a
tendency to take care of itself due to the enormity, potential
impact and number of people involvedbut if you pay proper
attention to the details, you will be successful.
Establish ground rules for change orders. Most design
professionals understand the diffcult situations that arise from
defcient details and understand that the construction team is
their ally in bringing the project to a successful conclusion. Un-
fortunately owners often either do not understand the diffculties
and extra expenses brought on by defcient or conficting details,
or they fatly state that no change orders will be accepted. This
is very often the case in public projects where budget-challenged
agencies, schools and governmental units, for example, have lim-
ited resources. This is another reason for picking your projects
properly. Do your due diligence. In times where public work is
the only game in town, the pre-job conference where these issues
can be put on the table becomes very important. The action item
list can be very helpful in establishing the timelines and antici-
pating issues. Be sure that your erector has work order change
procedures and the general contractors personnel know that you
expect to be paid if warranted. Negotiations and discusssions are
enhanced by proper documentation.
Be an important member of the team. Be the go-to per-
son on your team when issues arise that relate to your specialty
and materials. Regular communication between detailers, archi-
tects, engineers, all project contractors and owners will reveal
defciencies early in the game before expensive feld labor and
equipment run up huge costs. Dont limit your review to only
your product or service. As a miscellaneous metals contractor,
we often touch virtually every part of the project to some extent,
so we are in a position to see issues on paper early in the process.
This requires considerable insight and foresight, not to men-
tion time and knowledge. Isnt it cheaper to make this effort in
advance rather than fght for a change order after youve spent
the money? I have encountered only a few design professionals
that dont appreciate this capability. They know how it works.
Do your homework. Many of the above issues are often ad-
dressed in the specifcations or proposal request. Contract lan-
guage is very important particularly where the miscellaneous
contractor is bound by the general contractor/owner contract.
If you dont exclude onerous provisions in your proposal, youre
stuck with them in most cases. Do your best to have your work
proposal incorporated by reference in your contract.
Payment terms should be discussed. The procedure for
downstream fow of cash should be made abundantly clear to
all parties including forms to be used. If youre responsible for
your customers accounts receivable, which is the de facto result
of payment clauses, then you have a right to know where the
money is and when you will see it.
Enjoy yourself! Have fun doing your job. Try to pick custom-
ers and suppliers that accept the challenges straight on and enjoy
their work. This business is tough enough without dealing with a
bunch of malcontents whose sole purpose in life is to make your
life miserable because theyre not happy for whatever reason or,
worse yet, they want to transfer money from your pocket to theirs.
Ever-Elusive Perfection
Perfect construction documents simply do not exist. There
will always be some level of volatility, uncertainty, complexity
and ambiguity. Even when adequately compensated the design
team simply cannot create drawings that address every single is-
sue. Thats the job of shop drawings, other document submittals
and subsequent review and discussions. The construction team
should come together under the direction of the general contrac-
tor or construction manager to bring all the pretty pictures to
life. The power and synergy of a team of dedicated construction
professionals can be incredible, but only if there is mutual trust,
respect and understanding of the construction process.
Read Miscellaneous Metals: The Devil is in the Details (Part I) in the
February 2009 issue of MSC, available at www.modernsteel.com.
product
expert series continued from page 18
22 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN in a situation where you were
surrounded by people who didnt speak your language?
Perhaps it was overt, such as when you were traveling
abroad and realized that crucial information was being shared
rapid-fre, but it was all going over your head. Or perhaps it
was closer to home, such as being called upon by a sales per-
son who foods the conversation with unfamiliar specialized
jargon, or attending a business conference where the content
is beyond your expertise.
What did you
feeland think
in these moments?
Perhaps you were
overcome with
feelings of impa-
tience, frustra-
tion or dread, or
thought, Im stu-
pid, or even, Get
me out of here!
But it isnt just
about you not un-
derstanding them.
Its also about them
not understanding you.
A literal example: My in-laws are German. They speak
German 85% of the time and English 15% of the time. Un-
til recently, I spoke exactly zero German. Clearly, there was
a disconnect. So imagine their joy when I started learning
their language and surprised them with some limited con-
versation in German during our last visit to Germany. Boost-
ing my conversation to 15% German resulted in a new level
of familiaritywhich led to openness, camaraderie and, yes,
more trust.
Business Speak
In the construction world, the selling cycle can be quite
long. Depending upon the market sector, along with the size
and scale of a particular client or project, the sales cycle can
sometimes extend well over a year.
During this cycle, we have a lot to gain by speaking the
language of our
prospects. Its one
method toward
keeping the sales
process moving
forward rather
than letting it fz-
zle out. Converse-
ly, if we dont speak
their language, the
prospects may be
patient with us
or they may not.
Why take the risk?
Err on the side of
learning their language. Doing so will not only help you on
your current project but also on future ones. Plus, its never a
bad thing to add to your skill set.
So what does a prospects language mean in this context?
And how can we become fuent? Consider these tips:
Ask the good questions; parrot back their language.
Years ago, a fellow consultant told me, No one will argue with
their own words. Listen very carefully to everything your pros-
pects say, and weave their exact words into your own materials/
content/conversation when appropriate. Try it; it really works!
Use their technical jargon, not yours. Lets say your frm
has a presence in the healthcare sector but youve personally
only been exposed to corporate offce projects. You can read up
on the sector but you should also talk with folks that have frst-
hand experience. Get a crash course in the relevant technical
jargon. Listen carefully to the terminology. Identify any jargon
similarities between the two sectors. Take notes and ask ques-
tions so that you dont misuse terms. And be sure to stay current.
While some jargon has been around for a while, remember that
languagesincluding business terminology and technical jar-
gonevolve over time.
Studying up on your prospects
preferences, terminology and context
will strengthen your connection
and your ultimate impact.
BY ANNE SCARLETT
business issues
DONT GET LOST
IN TRANSLATION
Anne Scarlett is president of
Scarlett Consulting, a Chicago-
based company specializing in AEC-
specic strategic marketing plans,
marketing audits and coaching.
She is also on the adjunct faculty
of Columbia College of Chicago
and DePaul University, and can be
contacted through her website,
www.annescarlett.com.
Your prospect wants to be heard and understood,
yet you are the one doing the selling.
Therefore you are the one that has the most to lose
if they dont understand you.
MARCH 2013 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION 23
Offer industry insight, especially that
of a competitor. It doesnt always have to
be frsthand knowledge. Perhaps its some-
thing youve read about the current state
of their industry and/or their competitors.
Make sure you use your RSS feed (an on-
line reader service such as Google Reader)
to track the prospect, their industry and
their competitors. Keeping up on the news,
so to speak, communicates sharpness and
interest.
Adjust the way you frame your mes-
sage. In professional services marketing,
a one-size-fts-all approach is a bad way
to go. From sector to sector, prospects
will differ. What resonates with a uni-
versity prospect may not resonate with
a municipal prospect. While your value
propositions and core messages may be
the same for everyone, you must couch
them within the prospects own language.
In other words, know (and talk like) your
audience.
During a conversation, check in of-
ten and always watch for the twitch fac-
tor. Of course the prospect wants to be
heard and understood. Yet you are the one
doing the selling. Therefore you are the
one that has the most to lose if they dont
understand you. Watch them carefully and
check in often during a conversation to
make sure they are feeling comfortable and
are clear with what youre sayingand in a
perfect world, in agreement or at least on
the same page.
Architects, engineers and other con-
struction professionals are all expected to
sell, to some degree, on behalf of their frm.
Make a concerted effort to speak the lan-
guage of your prospects, and watch eyes
light up, connections strengthen and sales
processes move forward more effectively
and effciently. In this area of communica-
tion, a little effort goes a long way and a lot
of effort goes even further.
IES, Inc. | 519 E Babcock St. Bozeman MT 59715
800-707-0816 | [email protected]
www.iesweb.com
Free 30-Day Trial
5ttoctotol 5ofwote ueslqoeJ fot oot 5occess
* Easy to Learn and Use
* Analyze Just about Anything
* Friendly, responsive support
Sir, can I interest you in
one of our hard to
nd domestics?
Ask About
Our Services...
FLAME CUTTING
SAWING
CAMBERING
888.538.9022
Fax: 908.754.8728
At AZCO, specialties of
the house always include
unusual shapes,
sizes and grades
from a 30,000
ton domestic
inventory. Mill
certication is available
on all material as well as
24-36 hour delivery
even to Canada and Mexico.
A-588, A-992,
A-572, A-36
Jumbo Beams
MC Channels
Thick Plates
1-Beams
Bars, Angles
A Division Of Bushwick Metals, LLC.
24 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
BIM and BRBs
bring big benefts to a
hospital project in
southeast Missouri.
Rapid
Response
POPLAR BLUFF is known as the Gateway to the Ozarks.
The southeast Missouri town of roughly 17,000 is also home
to a newly opened hospital that hopes to be recognized as the
premiere medical facility in the region.
The area had long been served by the two campuses of
Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center, but in early 2011 the
facilitys owner, Health Management Associates, determined
that the facilities had become outdated and no longer met the
needs of the community. In May 2011 the company approached
architect Thomas, Miller and Partners (TMP) about designing
a replacement. The new facility, at 424,000 sq. ft and with a
capacity of 250 patient beds, would not only need to meet pres-
ent needs but also be required to accommodate a future expan-
sion of an additional 50 beds.
Besides the expansion requirements, the design also needed to
address a grade change on the site as well as high seismic require-
ments (thanks to Poplar Bluffs location near the New Madrid
Seismic Zone), as well as a request from Health Management
Associates that the facility be fully operational by January 2013.
After receiving the Certifcate of Need for the new facility from
the State, that left only 20 months for the space programming, all
of the various design phases, permitting and construction to occur.
Planning for Growth
One of the frst challenges for the structural engineer, Stanley
D. Lindsey and Associates, Ltd. (SDL) and TMP was to defne
the best location for the future patient rooms. The hospital was
designed as a seven-story building with a partial basement that
featured a U shaped patient room foor. It was determined that
the two legs of the U would be four stories for now and that three
additional stories could be added in the future.
Next, the gravity load resisting system needed to be selected.
Due to the building height and column locations, two primary
systems were considered. The frst system was a composite
lightweight concrete slab with steel wide-fange beams, and the
second was a one-way concrete structure consisting of mildly
reinforced concrete beams and girders. The composite struc-
tural steel system was selected because it minimized the con-
struction time at the site when compared to a concrete system.
In addition, the steel structure provided greater fexibility of the
design, which overlapped with construction.
The existing soils on the site were not adequate to support
the proposed facility on conventional shallow foundations. The
geotechnical engineer provided two foundation systems suit-
able for the project. The frst option was to support the build-
ing with deep foundations consisting of drilled concrete shafts.
The second consisted of bearing conventional spread footings
on soils strengthened with rammed aggregate piers (Geopiers).
The contractor evaluated both options and the Geopier option
Jason Perry is an associate with
Stanley D. Lindsey & Associates,
Ltd., in Brentwood, Tenn. You can
reach him at [email protected].
All images this spread: Stanley D. Lindsey and Associates, Ltd.
BY JASON D. PERRY, S.E., P.E.
TYP.
TYP.
D.C.
EACH SIDE
TYP., D.C.
1.3 PLATE
THICKNESS
STIFFENER
PLATES TO
MATCH BEAM
FLANGES
GUSSET PLATE
1.3 PLATE
THICKNESS
0.65 WEB PLATE
THICKNESS
TYP. @
FLANGES, D.C.
D.C.
5
16
NOTES 2,3,& 4
TYP. @ FLANGES
D.C. TYP.
@ FLANGES
SHEAR
CONNECTION
WELD ACCESS
HOLE
SEE 3/S501
BUILT UP BEAM PLATES
TO MATCH BEAM (MIN.)
W.P.
was selected because it was less expensive
and, like the chosen gravity load resisting
system, had a considerably shorter con-
struction schedule when compared to the
drilled shaft option.
Given Poplar Bluffs proximity to the
New Madrid Fault, the project was classi-
fed as high-seismic and therefore required
a highly ductile system as the lateral load
resisting system. SDL determined that
three systems could be well-suited for the
project: special concrete shear walls, eccen-
trically braced frames (EBF) and buckling
restrained braced frames (BRBF). Because
of the schedule, the contractor, M. J. Harris
(MJH), was selected early in the design pro-
cess and provided feedback on the systems
being considered. MJH eliminated special
concrete shear walls due to the adverse
impact they would have on the schedule,
leaving a choice between the two structural
steel systems. SDL prepared a typical frame
for a cost comparison between the EBF
and BRBF systems. The respective costs of
the two systems, including the proprietary
braces, were approximately equal. However,
the BRBF system would save approximately
7,000 shop hours and decrease the over-
all fabrication time; thus this system was
selected as the lateral force resisting system.
During the design process the BRB (buck-
ling restrained brace) supplier, Star Seismic,
worked closely with SDL, giving guidance
on the best brace confguration to minimize
beam and column sizes as well as reviewing
the lateral design.
Once the fnal design of the structure
was complete, the structural steel weight
was 11.3 lbs. per sq. ft. This encompassed
the main structural steel, connection mate-
rial, bolts, canopies, screen walls and miscel-
laneous steel including the owner-furnished
equipment supports. Overall, nearly 2,400
tons of structural steel were used on the
project, not including the BRBs.
A building information modeling (BIM)
approach, with Autodesk Revit at the center,
was used to create the construction documents
MARCH 2013 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION 25
SEISMIC PROTECTION
FROM TAYLOR DEVICES
Stand firm. Dont settle for less than the seismic protection
of Taylor Fluid Viscous Dampers. As a world leader in
the science of shock isolation, we are the team you
want between your structure and the undeniable forces
of nature. Others agree. Taylor Fluid Viscous Dampers
are currently providing earthquake, wind, and motion
protection on more than 350 buildings and bridges.
From the historic Los Angeles City Hall to Mexicos
Torre Mayor and the new Shin-Yokohama High-speed
Train Station in Japan, owners, architects, engineers,
and contractors trust the proven
technology of Taylor Devices
Fluid Viscous Dampers.
YOU BUI LD I T.
WE LL PROTECT I T.
Taylor Devices Fluid Viscous Dampers give you the seismic protection
you need and the architectural freedom you want.
North Tonawanda, NY 14120- 0748
Phone: 716.694.0800 Fax: 716.695.6015
www. tayl ordevi ces. com
Structural Detailing
SDS/2 connection rendering of a 400-kip
collector.
Theres always a solution in steel.
American Institute of Steel Construction
One E Wacker Drive, Suite 700
Chicago, IL 60601
www.aisc.org 312.670.2400
Registration begins April 1, 2013 Class begins June 3, 2013
AISC
Night School
www.aisc.org/nightschool
Individual Session
any number can attend
1.5 PDHs per session
$185/member*
$285/non-member*
$155/student/faculty*
8-session Package
for one person
up to 12 PDHs for one person
$500/member*
$900/non-member*
$250/student/faculty*
Fundamentals of Stability for Steel Design
presented by Members of the Structural Stability Research Council
Monday nights 7 p.m. Eastern Time (90 minutes each)
Two ways to register:
June 3: Course Introduction and Behavior
of Compression Members
June 10: Design of Compression Members
June 17: Behavior of Flexural Members
June 24: Design of Flexural Members
July 8: Stability of Structural Systems
July 15: Design of Members Subject to
Compression and Flexure
July 22: Fundamental Concepts of Bracing
Compression and Flexural Members
July 29: Design of Bracing for
Columns and Beams
*price per connection
30 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
BIM is at the heart of
the design process for
an upcoming hospital
in Detroit.
Cardio
Construction
WHAT BETTER PLACE for a new heart hospital than the heart
of the city?
Upon its completion next year, the $78 million, steel-framed
Detroit Medical Center Heart Hospital will house cardiology
centers, surgical rooms and clinical offces on a vast hospital
complex in the Midtown area of Detroit near the campus of
Wayne State University.
Rising six stories and designed for two stories of future verti-
cal expansion, the new facilitywhich uses 2,014 tons of struc-
tural steelis connected to an existing, adjacent Harper Uni-
versity Hospital building at the lower and upper levels. Access
to a concurrently constructed parking deck is provided via a
150-ft-long steel-framed pedestrian bridge, and an 80-ft-long
steel-framed canopy defnes the main entry, which leads into a
large clear-story space.
Soil Conditions
Soil conditions on the site were not conducive to the use of
shallow foundations. Belled and straight-shaft drilled piers were
required to transfer the building loads to competent hardpan,
which was nearly 140 ft below grade.
The use of a steel-framed structure signifcantly reduced
the applied loads on the foundations. Taking advantage of the
composite action between the steel beams and the concrete slab
further reduced the building self-weight and corresponding
foundation loads. Not only was the direct dead load reduced,
but also a reduction in the applied seismic loads was possible
since seismic loads are a function of the building mass.
These factors reduced the drilled pier diameters, leading
to a reduction in the total required excavation, volume of con-
crete and pier reinforcing, and also minimizing the number of
belled piers required. On a site with substantial groundwater, this
resulted in signifcant savings in expense and schedule.
Expansion and Flexibility
The new hospital is designed with two foors of verti-
cal expansion capability, and the current roof level has been
designed to act as a future seventh foor. The columns and
BY ANDREWHERMIZ AND LAWRENCE F. KRUTH, P.E.
Photos courtesy of Douglas Steel Fabricating
MARCH 2013 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION 31
braces have been designed to accommodate the additional loads
imposed by the two future foors. To further ease the future expan-
sion process, the columns at the top level have been extended to the
top of slab and prepped with cap plates, and this will allow for mini-
mal intrusion when the time comes for vertical expansion.
The building is laterally supported via moment frames in the
long direction and fve braces in the short direction. The braces are
a mix of single-strut and inverted chevron confgurations. To accom-
modate architectural and mechanical requirements, work points are
shifted away from column-beam centerlines as needed.
The use of steel braced frames in lieu of concrete shear walls yielded
signifcant architectural and mechanical advantages. Braced frames allow
contiguous space in an otherwise narrow footprint. Not only are corri-
dors and spaces capable of passing through the brace lines, but also the
steel braces allowed the engineers and architects to vary the strut loca-
tions and confgurations from bay to bay along the height of the struc-
ture. At one point, a space usage requirement forced a column relocation
on the sixth foor after construction had commenced. Luckily, the design
team was quickly able to fnd a solution without negatively affecting the
construction schedule. (This type of change would have been extremely
diffcult, if not impossible, in concrete construction.)
Designer-Fabricator Collaboration
Harley Ellis Devereaux (HED), the projects structural engineer,
was able to seamlessly collaborate and communicate with Doug-
las Steel, the fabricator, through 3D modeling, resulting in pain-
less problem solving and signifcantly speeding up the shop draw-
ing review process. HEDs Revit model was translated into a CIS/2
model and imported, including all end reactions, into SDS/2. This
provided two distinct benefts. The frst was time savings. The hos-
pital contains nearly 200,000 sq. ft of steel framing, and beginning
with a complete model from the outset saved the detailer a signif-
cant amount of input time. This approach also helped avoid a bottle-
neck by allowing multiple people to start work on the detailing pro-
cess instead of forcing one person to build an entire model before
the detailing process can being.
The second benefit was accuracy. Since all beams, columns,
braces and end reactions are transferred into the detailing
model, minimal verification of the geometry, beam sizes or loca-
tions was required. The design model and the detailing model
matched exactly. If the detailer inputs the model from 2D draw-
ings, then there is greater potential for errors to occur, and by
using only 2D drawings for a large project such as the Heart
Hospital, this would create the possibility for these errors to be
missed until erection begins.
A distinct advantage of the SDS/2 3D environment, in con-
junction with steel construction, is automated connection design.
Using the detailing software, Douglas Steel was able to automati-
cally design connections for each beam, brace, column and framing
condition. This design ability is not only helpful for the fabricator,
but is also extremely helpful for the reviewing engineer, and allowed
HED engineers to quickly validate the connection capacities against
the required values per the construction documents. As mentioned
above, certain brace struts shift bays at the higher foors. Using the
Framing for the Detroit Medical Center Heart Hospital, which will
be completed next year.
A rendering of the final project.
Andrew J. Hermiz ([email protected]) is a structural
engineer at Harley Ellis Devereaux. Lawrence F. Kruth, P.E.,
([email protected]) is vice president of engineering,
technology and safety with Douglas Steel Fabricating
Corporation, Lansing, Mich. He is also the chair of the AISC
Safety Committee as well as the AISC Board oversight.
Installing a staircase.
Fitting up a column.
When you own a
Since 1968
34 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
mere 2% difference between the preliminary estimate and fnal
cost of the entire steel structure.
Bridge
Possibly the most striking element of the Heart Hospi-
tal is the 150-ft steel-framed pedestrian bridge that spans
to the concurrently constructed concrete parking deck. The
bridge is made up of two HSS trusses boxed together and
uses 55 tons of steel in all. The bottom chord consists of an
HSS208
5
8 and the top chord is a W1855 with HSS66
3
8
web members. The bridge is clad in glass, exposing the steel
trusses on each face, and the BIM approach was taken with
this portion of the project as well. The bridge serves as a
visual focal point to what the design team hopes will become
a landmark in the heart of Detroit.
Owner
Detroit Medical Center
Architect and Structural Engineer
Harley Ellis Devereaux, Southeld, Mich.
Construction Manager
Jenkins-Skanska Joint Venture
Steel Fabricator, Erector and Detailer
Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation, Lansing, Mich.
(AISC Member/AISC Certied Fabricator and Erector)
A Tampa-area bridge
undergoes a rehabilitation
involving the replacement
of thousands of rivets with
high-strength bolts.
Changing
of the
Guard BY NILS D. OLSSON, P. E.
36 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
Nils Olsson
MARCH 2013 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION 37
THE RIVET IS A SYMBOL of a bygone steel construction era.
But there is a signifcant family of existing steel structures
in America that are still held together with rivetssuch as the
Empire State Building and the Golden Gate Bridge.
Another one, though not as well-known as those two icons,
is the Columbus Drive Bridge, which spans the south-fowing
Hillsborough River in Tampa, Fla., and opened to traffc in
1927. The city of Tampa was frst developed on the east side
of the river, but with the infux of new residents following
World War I, developers were anxious to expand into the area
west of the river, so bridges were built to foster this westward
expansion; the Columbus Drive Bridge (then known as the
Michigan Avenue Bridge) was one of these. Early in its life,
the bridge was opened an average of 10 times per day; today
the openings mostly occur on weekends at the rate of three or
four times per week.
The original confguration was for two lanes of automobile
traffc, one track in the middle for streetcars and sidewalks on
both sides. The heavily counterbalanced, 57-ft, 10-in. back span
rotated about its pivot point in a counterclockwise direction when
opening, and the 106-ft, 6-in main span responds in the counter-
clockwise direction to accommodate the skewed river channel.
The west approach consisted of seven concrete spans, and the east
IMCA
sponsored by
To view the advance program, visit
www.aisc.org/nascc
St. Louis Missouri
April 1719 2013
AMERICA'S CENTER
convention complex
Incorporating the SSRC Annual Stability Conference and the
Technology in Steel Construction Conference
Learn. Meet. See.
Join more than 3,500 structural engineers, erectors,
detailers, educators and others involved in the
design and construction industry when they gather
this April at the NASCC: The Steel Conference,
incorporating the SSRC Annual Stability Conference
and the Technology in Steel Construction Conference.
One registration fee includes all three conferences.
Learn from more than 100 specialized sessions on
all aspects of steel building and bridge design and
construction. Meet with the nation's leading designers,
fabricators, and erectors. See the latest equipment and
software in the 200+ booth exhibit hall.
earn up to
27.5
PDHs!
44 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION MARCH 2013
A short-span bridge in suburban Pittsburgh comes together over a long weekend.
The Long and
Short of It
NOTHING SAYS THANKSGIVING like football, family,
foodand bridge replacements.
While the latter may seem out of place on this list, it was a
major part of the long Thanksgiving Day weekend for a con-
struction team in Allegheny County, Pa.
The Montour Run Bridge No. 6 (MT06) carries Scott
Road over the Montour Run, a stream in North Fayette
Township, Pa., a few miles west of downtown Pittsburgh.
The existing bridge needed to be replaced, as the concrete
box beams supporting it had become deteriorated; a similar,
nearby bridge over Interstate 79 experienced a beam collapse
a few years ago, and the county didnt want a repeat of that
scenario. Thus, a replacement plan was developed.
Complete Closure
The bridge serves as the only means of access to fve busi-
nesses on one side of the stream. To minimize disruptions to
these businesses, the design called for prefabricated bridge
elements and systems, with the goal of demolishing the old
bridge and building the new one in just a few days.
It was initially assumed that the bridge could be replaced
using staged construction and maintaining a single 11-ft-wide
lane on the existing bridge. However, during preliminary
design, one of the fve affected businesses notifed Allegheny
County that they regularly have 15-ft-wide permit loads mov-
ing rental equipment to and from their facility. The need to
move these wide loads across Montour Run at this location
Mark J. Pavlick (mark.pavlick@
hdrinc.com) is a professional associate
and senior project manager with HDR
Engineering, Michael Dillon (michael.
[email protected]) is a bridge
engineering assistant manager with the
County of Allegheny Department of
Public Works and Tyson Hicks (thicks@
jbfayco.com) is a construction project
manager with Joseph B. Fay Company.
BY MARK J. PAVLICK, P.E.,
MICHAEL DILLON, P.E.,
AND TYSON HICKS
HDR Engineering
MARCH 2013 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION 45
made staged construction impractical. The affected
businesses agreed upon complete closure for a few
days for the demolition and erection to take place,
and the long Thanksgiving weekend proved to be
the best time frame.
At the request of the Allegheny County
Department of Public Works. structural engi-
neer HDR investigated using accelerated bridge
construction (ABC) techniques to build the new
bridge and used Pennsylvania Department of
Transportations BRADD (Bridge Automated
Design and Drafting) program to design the
superstructure.
Span width for the replacement structure was
restricted by a pumping station located on the
east side of the bridge, a sewer line interceptor
manhole, a power line and a business on the west
side of the bridge. The new bridge, nearly 48 ft
long, consists of one 11-ft, 6-in. lane, a 6-ft-wide
shoulder and a 2-ft-wide shoulder. With an over-
all width of 22 ft, 6 in., including barriers, the
deck is supported by five W18119 rolled beams
spaced at approximately 5 ft. The new superstruc-
ture was assembled at a staging area adjacent to
the existing bridge and uses 17 tons of steel in all.
The deck is a concrete overfilled 5-in. steel grid
(7
3
16 in. total thickness) with reinforced concrete
barriers and was placed on the superstructure
The various crossings of the 30th Street and Torrence Avenue reconfiguration.
The new bridge spans over Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks.
Reuse of the structural steel floor framing for the Newton County
Courthouse.
Structural steel framing at the third-floor balcony in the courtroom.
The structural steel framing survived a major fire.
Photos this page by JQ
Thomas Vossmeyer,
president of
International Design
Services.
Intelligent
Structural Design
Model, Analyze, Design, Document, and
Deliver... in an Integrated Workow
Having all the structural design applications you need, along with
the ability to synchronize all project information and integrate project
workows, benets your whole team by reducing time, cost, and risk.
With RAM
, STAAD
, ProStructures
, and ISM