Frequency Chirp Characteristics On WDM External Modulation
Frequency Chirp Characteristics On WDM External Modulation
Frequency Chirp Characteristics On WDM External Modulation
cc
rs n
an exteral modulation technique. The fequency chIrpmg 10
exteral modulated link categorized in four tpes; the loss
modulator, directional coupler tpe modulator,
.
Mach
Zehnder interferometer modulator ad total mteral
refection tpe modulator. The fequency chirping in each of
this modulator tpe can be expressed by a parameter known
as alpha factor (a). The parameter is used to characterize the
chirp behavior using the parameter symmetr factor, k as the
following equation (1)
k
= a-I- sign(a)
a+ 1- sign(a)
(1)
Typical values of k may vary fom -1 (m
duation
without any chirp) to 1 (:1 actually). The followmg IS the
meaning of k in special cases: [1][6]
k = -1 means that the MZ modulator modulates the
intensit of the light wave with zero chirp.
k = 0 means that the MZ modulator modulates the
intensit of the light wave but a considerable
amount of chirp is present.
k 2 1 means that the mmodulator modulates the phase
of the light wave and not its intensit.
Normally, the appearance of chirp in directly modulaed
link normally is eliminated by using the exteral modulatIOn
with mmodulator. Therefore these modulation categories
were well investigated in order for better understanding the
efect of chirp on the optical communication link. The
evaluations were based on the simulation experiment using
OptiSystem simulation sofare.
II. OBJECTIVES
I this paper, a simulation approach is used to d
te
mi
e
the channel capacit in the presence of fequency chIrpmg 10
WDM exteral modulation system. The objective of this
experiment is to distinguish the efect of varing alpha (a)
factor on the optical signal chirp. The efects of the
modulator ER on BER were also being monitored.
III. SIMULATION
A. Simulation Set up
The simulation setup is based on Fig. 3, performed with
Optiwave simulation sofware. In this setup radio fequency
input of a mmodulator were connected to the PRS, m
pulse generator and low pass flter modules. A laser is also
applied to the other input of the MZ modulator. BR
performance is measured using a variable attenuator .
.
WhIe
the power of the optical signal at input to the receIver IS
measured by using an optical power meter. Data recover
module is used to observe the eye diagram and BER for the
various chirp and ER values.
215
........................... ::::.:.: ... ::.::.::.:.::::: .. :::.: .. :::::.::::.:::::::::.::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ' :
Dala
Recovery
f
1- 0. ---j'' .
`.enCY=1552.52nm Mach-Zehnder
Attenualor
_ OPlia
'
Receiver
Power=O dBm Modulalor:
Allenua"18dB
Culof frequency=0.75Bil rale Hz
Oplical Power Meier Visualizer
ult
in intensit modulation with chirp as only one arm was bemg
driven by the input signal. Thus, the amount of chirp can be
reduced by decreasing the value of k value (smaller k, less
chirp). In addition, knowing the varing a is important as its
interaction with chromatic dispersion will limits the
transmission distance without regenerating the signal.
2010 Interational Conference on Networking and Information Technolog
a =-1
a=O
a=0.5
Figure 3. Eye diagram for different a factor
B. ER Measurement
From te results in Table II and the semi-logarithmic
graph plotted as in Fig 4, ER is proportionally increases as
BER increased. The fgure gives visual representation of the
efects of ER on the qualit of the link. The graph clearly
shows that the BER rises each time ER increases.
Furthermore, only small changes in ER are required to
relatively make large diferences in the power in order to
maintain a constant bit error rate (BER).
TABLE II. ER MASUREMENT
ER(dB)
30
20
10
5
Bit Rate = 2.5 Gbits
k=-l
BER
4.458 x 10.
11
1.506 X 10-
1
0
1.476 X 10.7
6.120 X 10-4
V. CONCLUSION
The completion of the simulation experiment enables
detail investigation on the infuence of chirp in WM
exteral modulation. Based on the result, the amount of
chirp in exteral modulation can be reduced by varing the
value of a. The chir is practically zero as symmetr factor
k is set to -1. I contrast, the chirp is much higher when the
a factor is set to 1. I brief smaller k will results in less
chirp.
216
ER (dB) agains BER Grol)"
ExtincUon Ratio, ER (d8)
10 15 20 25 30 35
1.00E02
1.00E03
1.00E-04
1.00E-OS
f
1.00E-06
.
1.00E-07
1.00E-08
1.00E-09
1.00E-10
1.0DE-11
Figure 4. Graph ER against BER
Besides, ER was also an important parameter in relation
to exteral modulation characteristics. The studies specif
that ER is proportionally increases as BER increased.
This concludes tat the a parameter is an important
parameter to express the performance of an exteral
modulated link. As ER is proportionally increases as BER
increased, therefore only small changes in ER are required to
relatively make large diferences in the power in order to
maintain a constant bit error rate (BER). As a result, lowest
chirp were created by using MZ modulator and thus
increased the transmission performance of optical
communication link.
ACKNOWLEDGMNT
To ever special people at Universiti Teknikal Malaysia
Melaka (UTeM) who provided necessit, fnd and
enthusiastic assistance, thank you.
REFERENCES
[I] F.Koyama, K. Iga, "Frequency Chirping in Exteral Modulators,"
Journal ojLightwfe T echnolog, Vol 6, Jan 1988, pp.87-93.
[2] Zaiton Abdul Mutalip, "Frequency Chirp Chaacteristics on WDM
Direct Modulation," Proc. The 2nd Interational Conference on
Computer Engineering and Applications (ICCEA 2010), Mar. 2010.
[3] G. Breed, A Tutorial to Optical Modulation Techniques, May 2007,
High Frequency Electronics Magazine.
[4] R Ramaswani, K.N. Sivarajan, Optical Network: A Practical
Perspective, 2nd Edition, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, CA, USA,
2002
[5] Green, P. E. Fiber optic network. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1994.
[6] Lee Nguyen Binh, Adv Photonic Comm: Techniques and Applications
(Optical Science and Engineering, CRC Press, USA, 2008