Read My Desire, Joan Copjec
Read My Desire, Joan Copjec
Read My Desire, Joan Copjec
novIede.
To the etent at oucauIt dened is proect as tbe estabIish
ment oFayeaea|eyy, raterthan 3 strcture, ofhistorcalevents, that is,
to te ent thathendertoo to account for theceas|||a||ea ofdomains
ofob ects andnovledes, or the meJee]|he|as|||u||eaofte sociaI, and
couId not rest content vith a mere anaIysis ofthe reIations therein, he
seems, inintentatIeast, to escapethischareofhistoricism. or,Iiethe
poIticaI phIosopher IadeeFot, oucaItdoesappearto aruethat
society cannot in itseIFbe conceived as a system ofreIations, no
matter ov complex ve imaine that system to be. n the
contrary, itis its overalI schema, th
rent postios but rom the act that no position denes a resolute
identity onknovledge orinvisibilityis notregistered as the vavern
andnegotiations betveen tvocertainties, tvomeaningsorpositions, but
astheunderminingoevery certainty, theincompletenessoeverymean
ingandposition. ncapableoarticulatingthismoreradicalunderstanding
ononnovledge,thepanopticargumentisultimatelyrcsistent te rcsisten:c,
unable to conceive o a discourse that vould reuse rather than reuel
poer
ypurposehereisnotsimplytopointoutthecrucialdierences
beteen Foucault' s theory and Lacans but also to elain hov the tvo
e LtbUgQcDtc bUDgect 1H
theorieshave ailedtobeperceiedas dierent hoapsychanlytically
inFormed lm theory came to see itsel as expressible in Focauldian
terms, despite the act that these very terms aimed at dispensing ith
psychoanalysis as a method oexplanation n Foucault' sor thetech
niues otdisciplinary poer othe construction othe subj ect) ae con
ceied as capable o materially penetrating the body in deph ithout
dependingevenon the mediation othesubject'sonrepresentations.
pover takes hold on the bdy, this is' t thoughits haing st o be
interiorized in people's consciousness. " ForFoucault, the conscious and
the unconscious are categories constructed by psychoanalysis and oter
discoures philosopy, literature, la, etc ) lie other soci all con
structedcategories, they providea means orendering thesubj ectisile
goernable, trackae They are categories through which the moern
sub ect sapprehendedandapprehendsitseltethcr then as psychoanalysis
maintais) processes oapprehension they are not processes that engage
or are engaged by social discourses lm texts, Forexample. hat the
Kc tst editors orceus to contront is the tact thatin lm theorythese
radical dierences have largely gone unnoticed or have bee nearly an
nulled. hus, thoughthegazei sconceivedasametapsychologicalconcept
central to the description otthe subj ect s psychic engagemet with the
cinematic apparatus, the concept, as ve shall see, is ormuated n a vay
that makes any psychical egagement redundant.
y argument i sthatlm theory operated akindooucauldi
zation"oLacanian theory an early misreading oFLacanturned hiinto
a spendthriFt" Foucault one ho vasted a bit too much theoretical
enegy on such notions as the antithetical meaning oFvords or repres
sion, o the unconscious tis the perceived rugality oFoucault about
ich vevil have more to say later) , every bit as much 3 the recent
and videly proclaimed interest in history thathas guarantee Foucault' s
ascendancy overLacanintheacademy.
t vas through the concept othe apparatusthe econoc, technical,
ideological institutionFcinema that the break beteen contemporary
(@tez Z
l theory ad its past vas eected. his break meant that cinematic
epresentationvas considered to benot a clear or distorted reection o
a prior and eternaI reaIity but one among many sociaI discourses that
helpedto constructrealityandthespectatoriaIsubject. sis vell novn,
the concept othe apparatus vas not original to lm theory but vas
i mportedroepistemoIogicalstudiesoscienceheactualtermJispcsitg
aparatus) usedinhlm theory isborrovedrom aston Bachelard, vho
eployedittocounterthereigning philosophyophenomenology Bach
elard proposed instead the study o phenomeno " believing
thatphenomeaarenot giventousdirectlybyanindependentrealitybut
are, rather, constructed c the ree tc:hnc, produced by a regular
method omaing rather than oundin nature") by a range opractices
and techniques that dene the eId o historical truth The obj ects o
s cience are materiaIizabIe concepts, not natural phenomena
venthough itborrovs histermandtheconceptitnames , m
theorydoesnotIocateits beginningsinthevoroachelardbutrather
inthat ooneohis students, Louis lthusser. his history is bynov
relatively amiliar, but since a number osignihcant points have been
overIooed or misinterpreted, it is necessary to retrace some othe de
tails. ) lthusser vasj udged to have advanced and corrected the theory
oBacheIard in a vay that oregrounded the t o science. ow,
although he had argued that the scientihc subject vas ormed in and by
the eld oscience, Bachelard had aIso maintained that the subject vas
never ormedinthis vay. neothereasons o this merel partiaI
sucess, he theorized, vas an obstacle that impeded the subject' s deveI
opment this obstacIehe called the imaginary Butthe probIem vith this
imaginary, as Ithusser l ater pointed out, vas that it vas itselIargeIy
untheorized and vas thus that is, almost by deault) accepted by Bach
elardasai aseternaIandpriorto ratherthanasanttt ohistorical
determinations. The scienticsubjectwassplit, then, betveentvomodes
othought one governedby historically determined scienticorms, the
e LWU@cHc bUDgec Z1
other b orms that ere eternaI, spontaneous, ad aImos reIy
mythical
gmmhn
L0
Ca0. eiotics ot optics, is the science that enlightens For s
the s trcture othe visual domain. Becauseit aIone is capable oFIending
hins sense, the sinihe aIone maes visionpossible. There is and can
be no brute vision no vision totaIIyindependent otlanguage. ainting,
draing, aII fos oFpitre aking, then, are fundaentaIIy graphic
arts . nd becasesigniers are ateriaI, thatis, because they are opaue
rathe than transIcent, reter to othersignihers ratherthan directIy to a
signihed, the ed ofvision is neither cIear nor easiIy traversabIe. t is
instead abigous and treacheous, tulI oF traps Lacans einar
reFes ontantly, but amiguousIy, to these traps When Lacan says that
the sbj ect is trapped in the imaginary, he eans that the subect can
iaginenothingoutsideit theimaginarcannotitseIfprovidethemeans
that vouId aIIovthe subject to transcend it. Whehesays, ontheother
hand, thatapainting oranyotherepresentation, isa traptorthegaze,
veunderstand this phrase as echoingthe expression to trap one'satten
tion. That is, the representation a||ra:|s the gaze, induces us to iagine
a gae outside theheId otrepresentation t is thissecond senseoFtrap
ping, vhereb representation appears to generate its own beyond to
generate, ve might say recaIling Lacans diagra, the se:cnJ triangle,
vhihthescience oFoptics negIectsto consider) thatpreventsthesubj ect
Fro ever being trapped in the iaginary. Where the FoucauIdian and
the hltheoreticaI positions aIvays tend to trap the subject in represen
tation an ideaIist FaiIing , to conceive otIanguage as constructing the
prisonvaIIsotthesubject sbeing, acanarguesthatthesubjectseesthese
valIsas |rcmc | 'ce/|, and is thusconstrctedbysomething|eycnJthem.
Forbeyond everything thati sdispIayedt othe subject, the ues
tion is ased, What is being conceaIed fro me What in this graphi
spae does not sho, does not stop nc| vriting itseIF This point at
vhich soething appears to be visibIe, this point at which something
appeas tobemissingFromrepresentation, some meaningIettunreveaIed,
is the point otthe acanian gae Itmarksthe a|sen:e ofa signied itis
an unc::u|a||e point, not, as I theory cIaims, becase it gures an
De LzU0@scDtc UD_ect Jb
unreaIiableidealbutbecauseitindicatesanimpossibIereal. nthFrmer
case oe wouId expect to nd at te point otthegae a si gnie bt
herethesignier is absentand so is the subject. e sub ect, i shot,
cannotbelocatedorlocate itselFat thepoint otthegaze, sincethis poit
mars on the contrary, its very annihiIation t te moment the gazeis
discerned, theimage theentire visuaIeId, taes ona terriying aIterity.
t loses its belongtome aspect and suddenIy assumes the Fnction ot
a screen
Lacanis certainlynet oFFering an agnostic descripti oFthe vay
thereaobj ect is cut oFFFrom thesubject' sviewbylanguage, oFthe vay
theaob ct scapes captr in the network oFsigniers e dos not
assume an ideaIist stance arging the waylatodoesthat the obect is
splitbetweenits real being and its semblance. Lacan argues, rather, that
beyon the signiFying netvor, beyond the visuaI eId there is iFact,
nothingatall TheveiloFrepresentationactuaIIyconceaIsothing there
isnothingbehind representation etthe Fact thatrepesentationsccms to
hide, t put an arbored screen oFsigniers in FrontoFsomething hidden
beneat, is not treated by Lacan as a simple error that the subject can
undo nor is this deceptiveness otlanguage treated as something that
undoesthe sub ect, deconstructs itsidentity by menacing is bounaries
ater, Ianguage sopactyis takenas the very :cusc otthe sbj ectseing,
thatisitsdesire, orwant to be. TheFactthatit is materialIy impssible
to say the whoIe trththat truth always bacs away Frm Ianguage,
that wrds always all short oFtheir goal the sub ect. ontrary
to e idealist position that makes]erm the cause oFbeing, Lacan locates
thecauseoFbeinginthin]ermc. theun]ermcJ thatwhichhas nosignied
nosignicantshapeinthevisualeIdandtheinquiq theuestion posed
to repesentation s presumed reticence The subj ect is th eFtect oF the
impossibility oF seeing what is lacing in the representation, hat the
subject, theeFore, wants to see. Te gaze, the objectcause otdesire, I
theobject cause oFthesubject oFdesirein theeIdotthevisibIe nother
LNu Z JO
wors, it is wat the subject does not see an not simply wht it sees
that Founs it
t shoId e lear by nohowdierent this description is Frm
that oered b Im theory n m theory, the gaze is Iocated in Front
oF the image, as its signied, the point oFmaximal meaning or sumoF
aIl that appears in te image anJ the point that gives" meaning The
su ect is, then, thoght to i dentiFy with an thus, ina sense, to cc|nc|Je
u|th the gaze n Lacan, on the other hand, the gaze is located behin"
the image, as that wich FaiIstoappearinitanthus as that which makes
all its meanings sspect nd the subject, instea oFcoinciding with or
identiFying with the gaze, i srathercu|c_[cm it Lacandoes not ask you
to think oFte gaze as elonging to an ther who cares about what or
where you are, wh pries, keeps tabs on your whereabouts, an takes
note oFaIl your steps and missteps, as the panoptic gaze is said to o
When you encounter the gaze ofthe ther, you meet not a seeing eye
but a blin one The gaze is not clear or penetrating, not Iled with
knowledge or recognition it is cloudd over and turne ack on itselF,
asorbedin its own enjoyment The horribIetruth, reveaIed to Lacan by
etitean, is that |he yaze Jces nc| see ycu. o, i Fyou are looking For
conrmation oFthe truth oFyourbeingorthe clarity oFyourvision, yo
are on yor own the gaze oFthe ther is not conrming it wilI not
vaIiateyou
ow, thesuject institute by the Lacanian gazedoesnot come
into being as the reaIization oFa possibility opene up bythelaw oFthe
ther. t is rather an impossiilit that is crucial to the constittion oF
the subjectthe impossibiIity, preciseIy, oFany ultimate conrmation
Fromthether Thesub ect emerges, as areslt, asa desiringbein, that
is to say, an efFet oFthe Ia but certainIy not a realization oFit, sce
esire as such can never be conceived as a realization esire ls no
possibiIity but seeks aFter an impossibility this makes esire always,
constitutionally, contentless
Tbe Opcbic Sb]ec C
arcissism, too, taes onadierentmeaninginLacan one moe
inaccodwithFreud' sown. incesomethingalaysappearstobemissing
From ay representation, narcissism cannc|consist in nding satistaction
inonesownvisualimage tmust, rathe, cosistin thebelietthatone s
ownbeingexceedstheimperFectionsoF i tsimage acissism, then, sees
the selt beyond the selFimage, with which the subject constantly ns
Fault ad in which it constantly Fails to recognize itselt. What one loves
in one s image is something Ht than the image in you more than
yo . Thusis narcissismthesourceotthemalevolecewithwhichtbe
subj ect regards its image, the aggressivity it unleashes o alI its on
representations. nd thus does the subect coe into being as a
transgression oF, rather than in conFormityto, the law tis not the la,
but the tault in te lawthe desire that the la cannot ultimately co
cealthat isassumedby the subject as its ovn. he subject, intaingup
the buden oFthelaw sguilt, goesbeyondthelaw.
uch othis denition oFarcissism tae to be compacted I
Lacans otherwise totally enigmatic sentences The eect omiicr is
camoage in the strictly technical sense. t is nota estion oFbarmo
niing ith the background, bt against a mottled bacground, otbe
comin mottledexactly like the techniue oF camoage practiced in
human warFare " he eect oFrepresentation miicry, in an older,
idealist vocabulary is not a subj ect who will harmoize ith, or adapt
to, i tsenvironment thesubect' snarcissisticrelationtotherepresetation
that constructs himdoesnotpacehim in happy accordviththe reality
that the apparats constructs For him . The eect o represetatio is
instead, thesuspicionthatsomerealityis being camouaged, thatweare
being deceived as to the exact natre oF some thing in itselt that lies
behindrepresentation n respose to such a representation, againstsuch
a backgound oFdeception, the subj ects ovn beingreas up beteen
its unconscious being and its conscious seblance. t war both itits
world and with itselF, the subject becomes guilty othe very deceit it
fDat
suses is cahardIy, hever, be caIIed mimicry, in the oId sense,
sincotin isingmime.
sum, te conictal nature oFLacan s cuIpabIe subject sets it
worId aar Frothe stabIe sbj ect oFImtheory. Butneitherdoes the
Laana subject rsembIe th oFBacheIard ForwhiIein BacheIard r
thoschisinrovidingaoportunitytorthecorrecionoFthought s
iperecti osalIvs the sbject to vander From its moorings, con
statI to dritt om one sition to another, in Lacan orthopsy
chisne ihes toretantheterm in order to indicate thesbject s
Fndaental deedence on the FauIts it nds in representation and in
itseI rounds the subject. he desire that it precipitates |rans]xes the
subet, aIbeit in d conictaI pIace, so that aII the sub ects visions and
revisions, allitsatasies, mereIycircumnavigatetheabsecethatanchors
the sbectandipedes its progress
LuttH@ 1@
n cotemporaryanaIysesoFthereIation oFpsychoanaIysis topoIitis, the
real has noplace the psychicaI and the sociaI areconceivd as a realtight
unitIed by a principIe oFpIeasure proposeto show that/| is thc rcal
that uaitcs thc sychic tc thc secia|, that this reIation is ruIe by the death
drive Taing seriousIy thoseFormuIationsyvhich te subect and the
unconscious are termed the c_cc| oFthe social order, wilI describe this
relationas a causaI one But, reader, pIease beware a eition oFcause
that depens on and is produced through a denition otthe death drive
wiIIcertainlynotbe FamiIiar.
irst, thereal owhasit been evictedFro currnt discussions
Within psycanaIysis the stats oF the reaI is probIeatic From the
begining nce it is observed that pIeasure is te goal oFaII psychic
mecanisms and that the psyche is abIe to obtain pIeasure by means ot
its ovn internaI processesthat is, by producing a haIlcinatory pIea
srthesub ectappearstobeindependentoFwhatredcaIIs ate,'
anhatvewiIl caIthereaI . sychicalreaIitycanindeniteIydeFer, and
tusrepIace, the reaIity otbrteFact. appiness is thereFore denedin
Civi|i:aticn anJ Its Disccntcnts as essentiaIIy subjective hismeansthat
eve iFve were to magine the most unhappy historical sitationsa
peasant during the Thirty ears War, a victim oFtheoly nuisition,
a ew awaiting thepogromit would be ipossibIe t o assume trom
the ob ective Facts aIone how, or even that, the victims suered as a
conseuene ottheirsituations ne vouId also have to reaII that there
is a hoIe range oFpsychic operations to whic we do not have direct
access) , which, by numbing, blunting, or distorting the harmFuI sensa
tions, might shieId te victim From pain
L@t +
tisneertheless rongto thin thatthis Freudiandescription oF
the peasure principle natl separates psychial and social reality. The
reaIit ith hich the reaIity priniple puts us in touch is not simply a
percptal obj ect, hicb can test the adeuacy oF the object oFhalluci
nation rodced by the pIeasure principle. That this is so is clear trom
the act that Freud does not set social reaIitciviIization the
pleasreprincipIe, butrather denes the tormers aproductotthelatter
iiIizationdoes not test, but realizes our Fantasies it does not put us in
toucb ith Fate the real , but protects s From it. The social subject is
thus pitured as akind oFprostheticod hosetantasmatic, articiaI
limbs substitute For the inFerior, natural ones Fate bestos. iviIization
endowsthesubjectwitbaFantasmaticbodyandFairytalelikepoers. The
subjects otmodern cuItures bave telescopes, microscopes, cameras tor
ees microphones, radios, telephonesFormouthsshis trains, cars, and
planes For legs and aII oF these instruments that extend ourgrasp tor
arms .
ForFreud, this enition oFciviIization doesnot, otourse, end
the uestion otthe real the reaI is not thereby banished from civilized
existence, hich brings discontent as eIl as pIeasure. lthough the reaI
that is associated ith discontent an no Ionger be onceived simpIy as
that which opposes itseltto theiaginar ofthepsyhical, Freudretains
the reterence to the real.
For much oF ontemporar theor, hoever, the uestion |s
Iosed incetherealisconceived asradicaIlyoutsideourken, inacessible
to us, it is thereFore thought to have no bearing on us. Beteen the
sbj ect and the real, civiIizationthe social orderis interposed. This
order is now conceived not only as that which, in equipping the subject
ith a tantasmatic bod, satises its desires but more, as that which
roduces the desires it satises. appiness is thus dened no longer as
subjective, bt as c|e:||vc. For alI the mirrors, cameras, teIephones, mi
rophones, pIanes, passenger Iists, and statistics can beseen as so mch
social arapheaIia ot surveiIIance b which aIone the subject is made
LUtMU @ +1
visblven to itseI fve cannotudgeimmediately vhat measure oF
paino pleasure beIongedtoahistoricaIindividuaI, thisisot ecausee
cannotpro ect ourselves into her suective position, her priate metal
sphere but rather because ve cannot so easily proect oureles into er
obective sc:|a| sphere in order to discern the categories othought tbat
constrcted her epectations, narcotized her against disappointet,
made er obtuse toher ovn suering
onsider tor eample, certain analyses otthe hytericiation o
vome s odies, ofthe inentio oFhysteria. ccordig to these, an
investgation oturno thecentury medial practices, codes ofphotg
raphy, discourses othe hurch an opsychoanalysis, and so on i
teII usnot hov hysteria vas looke at then but, ore acuratey, o it
vas cnstructed as a historical entity om the point oF iev of the
hysteric, hoveer, hovdoesthisargumentvorkyassumingimIi
itIyoepIicitlythatitisher desire"thattheseractices construct. er
compicityandevenherpIeasurearesecuredassheIooksatandonstcts
herseIthrough thecategoriesprovided bthese discourses.
onsider also the eample of contemporary Hm theor he
concetothegazeelaboratedthereis Foundedonassumptiossimilar to
thoseust named. The gaze is conceied as a poit costructed b the
tetuIsystem ofthelmFromvhich thesubectisobIidtoIook i t is
the condition oFthe possibility oFtheviewer' svision. Te gazeactasa
kindFkeyhold, theonly openingintothevisualpleasurethe m aords.
nesees and desirestosee vhatit isgiento seeand desire oneassues
vith leasureeven imasochistic her ovn subectiveposition.
ntheseeampIes, thesociaIsystemoFrepresentationisconeied
aslaful, reguIatory, andonthisaccountthe causeothe sub ect, hi ch
the rmer subsumes as one ofits eects. The subect is assued to be
alreay virtuay there in the sociaI and to come into being by actualIy
vantng vhat socialIavs vantittovant Theconstructinothesbect
depeds, then, onthesub ect' s takng soial representations asimaes of
itsonidealbeing, onthesbect sderivinganarcissistipIeasuretrom
LDagOt +Z
these representations. Thisnotion otpleasure, hovevervaguelyinvoked,
is atmaestheargmntorconstructionstickitcements "orglues"
te raIm otthe psycic to that othe sociaI. ume described cause as
te ementofthe uiverse" themetaphor heIps to determine a certain
cocption ofcause The point oinsertion otthe subect into society
ths ecomes a point ofesemIance, convergence, attachment.
This is the undrstanding by vhich the subect is thought to
reonize itselin representationsthat intend to counter. viIl begin
yopposing to it tvo images eant toindicatethe complexities thatare
curntly razed. The rst, taen trom C|v|||za||cn anJ l|s D|sccn|en,
foIlos the description otheairytalelike prostheses thatdene the con
tours othe mode bodily ego. an, " Freud vrites, rst appeared on
earth as teeble animaI orgaism, " and no matter hov ar the society
into vich he is orn has succeeded in making this earth serviceable to
him, each individual othe species mustonce moremakeits entry oh,
inch onture ') as a helpless suckling " t is the parenthetical phrase,
ohinchonature "thatinterests us particuIarIy. Ts tractionisIiteralIy
rctious, an oxymoron Forthe very segmentation and measurement ot
nture denatures it an inch otnature is itself unntural, tound not in
nture butin the rods andruIesby vichculturecalculates tisperhaps
thisveryunruIinessoFtheimagetatres|s|stheinterpretationvhichclaims
thatit providesthemeasureoftheIittle man, vhovouIdthus bedened
bsolutely by the yardstick o the society into vhich he enters. he
resistant image reuses to ofFer itsel as the eu|va|en| o the man, that
little piece onature that |s man. ather, the inch ofnature, " ve vill
argue, isthatvhichisnc|incorporatedintosociety, thatvichissacriced
upon entry into the socil.
ThesecondimageisopposedspecicallytoImtheory' sconcept
otthe gaze, vhichasksustoassumetheperectfunctioningofapparatuses
otsurveillance The image, taken rom amuel Beckett's ha||, describes
the unctionig oa vema eamining committee hey then began
to look at oe another nd much time passed before they succeeded in
LUt@ @
J
doing so. ot that they ooked at each other Iong no, they had ore
sensehanthat. ut vhen ve menookat one another, thouhintheory
only tventy looks are necessary, every an looking tour times, yet n
practicethisnumeris seldom suFcient. Andthenitsees thatseveral
more pages descriing the tvistings, turnings, and other maneverings
oFth hve men is stil not suFcient to estaIish that echange oFlooks
y vhich the committee voud succeed in looking at itsel. For some
ook alvays goes unrecprocated, spoiling indenitely the prect
echnge
Beckett s description is presented hee asnomereanecdote t is
otterd uite seriousy as the means oFrethinking the signicance of the
recalcitrant inch oFnature. "
De eaU zWe: zeu aU MezsOU
o one ever accused Freud oFeing a cutup, except Fliess, as you vill
rememer, vho pointed out a resemblance etveen The ln|crc|a||en e[
Drcams and a book oFokes. Freud took Fliess s oservation one s tep
Furthr y vritinge|es anJ The|r Rc|a||ea |e |hc La:ens:|cus invhich he
noted some more specic resemancesetveenhis theor andthat pre
senteinenriergson s Laughter, " pulishedin the sameyeara Tne
ln|cre|a||ea e[ Drcams. reud cies Bergson' s essay severa ties, indi
catin alvays that he nds it oth charing and canny o support his
ovn, economic viev ofpleasure, heuotes the Foloving s entenceFom
Bergson What isIivng shoudnever, accordng to ourepectation, e
epeated eacty the same. When ve d such a repetition, ve alvays
suspct some echanism ying ehind theIivingthing. "Theconstanty
chaning nature oflite, Freud argues, demands a perpetuaI ependitue
oF eergy by or understanding epetition, then, the rediscovery of
somthng aready Familiar, is pleasurale ecause it economizes energy
Laughter s thedscharge oFthe ecess oFenergycaedupyorexpec
tatios oFthe nev and made superuousy the recognition oFthe same.
Lpe J ++
n dditoto this spcic eferece, vend more general references and
raer gtures of apprval f Bergson s plausible train ofthought
o tmatism to autata,
s|er|ctatpartoherbodyvillnc|bevisible,orpresnt t er. he
inert limbs and the tacial paralyses othe ysterics are tstimoies oa
cut to oten ignored by those vh vould turn Lacan s ther to a
linguistic orculturaldeterminism. hosevho speak oth inventin ot
hysteia asthepureiposition onthe subject oanidentity tored by
thesocialneglectt oconsiderthathysteriai sconceivedbypsycoanaysis
asa calenge to thesubject ssocial identity hysteais therstaaled
instance othe subject s essential division, its uestioning and reusal o
socialdictates.
e are nov in a position to reconsider the mattr otte]||ure
oidentity. arlier, ve citedtheexampleoBeckett'sveaneaming
comittee vhich tails innitely in the exchange otloos tat vud
establishitsidentity. mmediatelyveturnedtoBergson steoryoagh
ter, vhich vould account tor the impossibility othe loo's cpletion
bi t simitless segmentation. ndeed, the almost compete deeeration
o mvement in Beckett' s hction n general seems to resul rom its
divisin into endless inventories ot its exact spatial possibities. e
humo seems to result romthe overl analytic attempt t gras mve
ment. et, at the outset otthe Beckettian hero' s trector, 8 ese is
expressed that can be seen to impelthe vhole narrative achine. his
desiregivesus an entirel dierentunderstandingothetions relation
toaire his desireis expressedbyurphy, vhoyearns, itisreealed,
to participate i n the bliss heimagines to be the hysteric' s ovn d i t
vouldnotsurprisemeithegreatclassicparalsesveretooterunspa
abesatistactions. o beliterallincapableotmotionatlast, that stbe
someting And mute into the bargain Andjstenough raitact t o
allov you to exul t
Wa J bZ
It is this identication vth the hysteric, more specically vith
h aalyses, that yields te succession ofheroes vho slough ofFmore
adore otheir bodies, tei possessions, theirpositiveexistence, and
aproach asymtotically theirov oblivion, vithoutever being able to
rac it omething avaysremains, uneaceable. Letus nov reconsider
en spaadoxin its proe, psychoanalyticerspective. heimmutabe
eing in hich eno elieves is not, as Bergson maintains, the conse
uece othe illusion that our being is only equal to the practical" or
abstract denitions thatlanguages imposes on it Itis the consequence,
ather, o the illusion that art ofour being resides beyond languages
limits. or Lacan tis the being beyond, not thebengvithinlanguage,
that is perceived as immutable, as theinertpound ofesh, the inch of
natre, hich theblankimemoy orsightsignalsas missingfromour
ovnself image Thesubj ect constctedbylanguagendsiselfdetaced
ro a art of itself. nd it is this primary detachment that renders
ruiless all the subjects eorts For a reunion vith its comlete being.
harc ofits strivins apears to thesubject as eno' s arrovan end
Iessly interruted ight that can only asymptotically aproach its goal . t
is the cutting oofthesubject from a artofitself, this partbeing the
objectcauseofits desire, thataccounts or thecuttingupofthe subject's
moveents and the reJuc||c aJ surJum, that is, the reduction to innite
series o its relaceable obj ects. While Bergson argues that the leatic
tradtion errs by making the future, all time, resent at once, and thus
ablihing time, change, and succession, Lacanian psychoanalysis sovs
tht, on thecontrary, it is thenonresenceoFthesubjectto itsvholeself
thttermines te formulation ofteleatic aradoxes.
Bergson and Lacan ae in agreement, hovever, on one point at
Iest they bot oppose the ogico implicative notion of language. Bu
il Bergson understands Ianguage according to this notion and thus
atcslanguageoritstenselessness,forbeingabletoderiveconsequence
oy assomehingalready containedin a premise, Lacantakesthelogio
i lative as a m|s|a|ea notion ofIanguage. is task becomes, then, the
LUMU @
JJ
clariction ofthe wa conseuence |s, in fact, deried fro languag
ewilthusdenethesubect not asaneectcontained vithinlanguage
but as surplus productofit, theexcess that language appears to cut.
Lacan ill say, in short, that itis this missing partthis additionalnot
ingtat :auscs the subect the subj ect is created enihilo.
his position could not be more directl opposed to tat of
Bergso, for whom, recall, duration (Jurc, the name Bergson gives t
his proressivetemporality) is thoughtto grov out ofall thatprecees
it he process he describes is one of intususception, in vhich h
presentis conceied not as something added to the past but assomethn
incorpratdinto it. The present, andall thatcomesinto being, depeds
absolutely on the eistence ofeverything that comes before it othn
comesromnothing. or Beron, nothingis simpl a meaningless co
cept. Tereisnodierence, hemaintains, betveen thining ofsomethin
andthingofit as eisting e believed, asman hae, that existenc
is an attribute ofall that can be thought t is this assumption that must
be discedited ifone is to imagine creation e nihilo
LUttD g JV
The tact or eect the signature eect, the institution eect, the
subj ect eect) is posited, then, in the face ofand against the otherside
otthe coin) the deterral installed by semiotic dierence butand this
is striingly the casthe mechanism by which these eects take eect
isneveforegroundedandalvaysremainsobscure. symtomaticsilence
installsitselttimeandagain. Take, torexample, errida' scritiueof. L
ustin s theory otspeech acts. While errida rightfully deconstrcts the
contention that the pertormative depends on a determinable contet, he
safegrds, in the end, ustin' s maor premise vords d and do not
merelydescribe)things. Theyconstructsubects, producesi gnatures es,
buthov imilarly, in losure and clusion, for all te astuteess o
his argments concerning eirce' ssolutionofthearadothataictshis
theory Weber curiouslyfails tolinkup successivelythevriospoints o
eirces intervention sem|ct|c, in vhich the linuist posits the notionofa
commnityvithoutlimitsinplaceotaussure' stemorall denedcol
lective consciousness" raymat|c, in vhich he suplemets thought, or
reason vith purposetul behavior andhcncmcnc|cy|ca|, in vhic he in
troduces the notion ofa real that isnotatthedisposal othman tought.
Thislst, vhicheircecallssecondness, " denestherealofcaseand
ths idicates that he did not believe cause vas conceptual. espite the
lucidit vith which Weber discsses all three points, one cannot help
feeling that he never eplains hov the parado is solved. This failure is
not tobe ascribed to Webers carelessness btis symptoatic otthefact
thaterrideantheorycannot|u| encounteranobstacleto theformulation
otthissolution
his obstacle, vould suggest, is precisely its ommitent to
decontruction, tothendoingofeverytotality, toetrayingtheillusory
caracter ot the whole notion otthe whole, deconstruction vould
have s believe, alvays disguises the innite play ofditference. uring
the period in which this erridean tenet vas embraced y lm theory,
tor eample, the closure of mainstream cinema vas denegrated as
ideologically compromised, while the disrution otever satial, aural,
L@tez J
o arrai continuity vas automaticaIly celebated as politically pro
gresive What this gross dichotomy vas incapabIe ofconceiving vas d
morecopIex notion ofcIosureand totaIity that vas not simpIyiIlusory
ad that, far rom suppressing dierence, vas the very condition ofits
possibiIity This unthinkabIe notion is the very basis ofthe soIution to
eo' s paradox onIy a cIosed totality can be considered inhnite onIy a
liit guarantees that the production of meaing viII continuousy be
subject o revision, never ending ather than baring the device ofdi
erncebehindtheiIIusionototaIity, Lacaniantheoryreverses these terms
and shovs the inhnite pIay ofdierence to be dependent on a Iimit, a
closed totality. In orderto assert this truth, Lacan continuousIyrsorts to
the paradoxes oeno to make the same cIaim that eirce himselfmade
To the extent that a number has a Iimit, it is inhnite Iearly, chiIIes
can only overtake the tortoise, he cannot catch up vith her. e reoins
her onlyin inhnity."
heparadoxderivesroadehnitionothe vhoIesuchthatone
o its essentiaI features is its superiority to its parts. The faIlacy ofthis
reasoning rests on its orgetting the Iimit tovard vhich chiIIes pro
gresses. The series ofhis steps is thus not a diverging, but a converging
series the set to vhich they beIong is, in other vords, cIosed. t is the
cIosureotheset that gves rise totheperformativedimension, aIIoving
hiIIes to cverta|ethe tortoise, to cver:cme the impasse ofthe diverging
series she represents Theperformativecannot comeintoeistence vith
out this internal Iimit.
ubsequent chapters viII expIore the vay Lacan deveIops and
makes use ofthisparadoxicalloicofthevholevithin hispsychoanalytic
thorythetheoriesofsuture, oFgroups ofsexualdierence, allemerge
r this logic For the moent, hovever, ve vant only to note one
dierence betveen Lacan and rrida on this point. Lacan alIovs us to
se that theerridean deconstction ofthesubecterrsby conatingthe
innity ofthesubect sdesirevith thesubectitseIf hepsychoanaIyticaI
sbj ect is not inhnite, it is}n|tc, limited, and it is this limit that causes
LUtUH g J
the innity, or unsatisabiIit
XICa C_ICs
ClmCOCInIsn~a OCunOCO sQaCC Is aOyssay InHnIlC anO Ils QCslmCdCtn
InVCtsICn~an CQCn Ct CmadIC sQaCC, OCHnCO Oy shCCt CCnlI_UIly, Is
CausltCQhCOICay HnIlC, CnCCsCs us VIlhIn tIValC anO sCnsCCss OCIn_.
hIs OIslInClICn tCuItCs anClhCt OClVCCn CslmCOCtnIsm anO a sCCCnO,
QataC lyQC C mCOCtnIsm, VhICh Is asC OCQCndCnl Cn lhC aOsCnCC Cl
a ImIl hCtC In lhC Htsl mCOCtn saCC lhC unImIlCO numOCt Cl CO
]CCls lhal CCmC lC OC InCuOCO lhCtC assumC a unIVCtsa CQuIVaCnCC,
a CCnnCnsutOIIly, I lhC sCCO CO]CCls atC InCCmmCnsutaOC.
QCslCdCtnI8m lhC mCOCtn aQOtIa OClVCCn CCmmCnsutaOIIly anO In
CCmnCnsutaOIIly Is OIssCVCO lhtCu_h an unOattIn_ CllhC lhCt, lhal
Is, lhtCu_h an annIhIalICn CllhC QuOIC sQhCtC lhal CtCalCO lhIs aCtIa.
e aD aDasa OeasOD
hIs Is Vhal CnCCIns mC a _tCVIn_ sCnsC lhal In lhCOtI2In_ sC VC atC
Cn_a_CO In a KInO Ol CulhanasIa ClQutC ICasOn OCItCV |Is asl
QhtasClICm anl, VhC usCO Il lC aOC CnCCllVO QCssIOC tCsQnsCs lO
lhC anlInCmIs CltCasCn, lhal Is, lC lhC InlCtna CCnHIls ClICasn VIlh
IlsC CasOn, hC saIO, las InCIlaOy InlC CCnltaOIClICn VhCnCC lCCs
lC aQQy IlsCllO COsmOC_ICa IOCas, lC lhIn_s lhal COuO nCCt CCmC
OO] CCls CuCQCtICnCC. aCCOVIlhlhCaQQatCnlunICOVaOIIly CllhCsC
CCnHICls, ICsCn CIlhCI CIn_s mOIC COsy lO Ils OC_malIC assumQ|IOns
OI aOanOCns IlsClanO lhIs Is lhC CQlIOn lOt VhIC anl tCsCtVCO hIs
ImQassICnCO Qul OCVn~a OCsQaIIIn_ sKCQlICIsm. VI su__Cs lhal lhC
allCmQl lC CnlCmQalC sCX asC lhtOVs ICasOn InlC CCnHICl VIlh IlsCl
anOVIhCt OCCatC my CQQOsIlICn lO lhCalCInalIVCs VC laCC as a tCsul,
QatlICuaIy lC lhC allCI, Cny OCCasIn CtIlICa CItCCs, al Cas~lhIs Is
lhC OnC lhal CuItCnly CaIms Cut allCnlICn
uOlh ulCts slICn_y at_uCO CenJc Treu|c. Fem||s aJthc
Su|v:rs|ca c] |Jc|||y Is an CXCCCnl COnlCmQCtaIy CXamQC OllhIs sCCCnO
alCInalIVC. hCunCnlCslaOC VauC OlhIs OOCICs In lhC Va Il OClly
shaKCs C a lhC tCmaInIn_ OIls Ol sCCQy OC_malIsm lhal CnlInC lC
allaCh lhCsCCs lO Out lhInKIn_ aOCul sCXua IOnlIly hC nClICn Cl
sCX as an OIOIn_, a QtICtI suOslanCC Is uy anOIl CatClu aI_mCnl
VCtC CnO_h lC QtCVaI~Hnay CtIlIQUCO. IlhCul In any a VIshIn_
lO OCltaClCm lhC tCa aCCOmQIshmCnls CllhIs OOCK OIlhC sOQIslICalIOn
OlIls aI_mCnI, VOuO IKC lC Chan_C sOmC C Ils lunOaCnla as
sumQlICns Cn lhC _IOunOs lhal lhCy may nOl suQQOt| lhC QOItIa _Oas
lhC OCC als lO OCCnO hC QtOOCm, as sCC Il, VIlh lhIs XCmQaty
OCCK Is la Ils haQQy VCIOanC Ol lhC OO_malIC CQlICn sIm CCaIs a
sQaCC O lhC assCIlIOn Cl Ils OInaIy CQQCsIlC, IlnCl Ct lhC OCsQaItIn_
Le ZZ
8KCQlC8m aOCul VhICh anl VatnCO u8, lhCn Ct 8KCQlICI8m 8 8unny
8IQ8IC a CCnOCnl OunlatI8m. aVIn_ 8uCCC88uy CtIlICO lhC mC
laQhy8ICa nClI Cn lhal sCX I8 a 8u8lanCC In8CtICO al lhC CtI_In C Cut
aCl8, Out OI8CCut8C, lCt OCnC8 8CX a8 a `QCtCtmalIVCy CnaClCO 8I_
nICalICn . . . OnC lhal, tCCa8CO tCm Il8 nalutaI2CO InlCtICtIly anO
8utaCC, Can CCCa8ICn lhC QatCOIC QtCICtalICn anO 8uOVCt8IVC Qay C
_CnCtCO mCaIn_ ) . n ClhCt VCtO8, ulCt QtCCCCO8 a8 lhCu_h8hC
CICVC8 lhal lhC CCCn8ltuClICn ClhC ClICn CInnalC Ct C88CnlIa 8CX I8
a8C, Ct mu8l CaO l, a tC CClICn ClhC nClICn lhal lhCtC I8 anylhIn_
CCn8lanl Ct InatIaOC aCul 8CXua OICtCnCC, lhal 8CX I8 anylhIn_ ul a
CCn8ltuCl C8lCtICa atIaOC I8Cut8IC QtaClICC8 InlC VhICh VC may
InlCtVCnC In CtOCt lC 8CV `8uOVCt8IC CCnu8ICn P KInO8 CQtaClICC8
CCn8ltuCl ma8CuInIly anO CnInInIly a8 OI8CtClC CnlIlIC8, anO lhCtC I8 nC
OCnyIn_ lhC CCClIVCnC88 lhC tCaIly Clh8 CCn8ltuClICn, 8hC at_uC8 Oul
I 8CX I8 8CmClhIn_ lhal I8 `maOC uQ, Il Can a8C OC unmaOC. hal8
OCnC, alCt a, Can aVay8 OC unOCnIn lhC CtOCt C 8I_nICalICn, al
Ca8l. hal8 amIIat, nalutaI2CO, CtCOIOC Can OC maOC8ltan_C OCamI
IatI2CO, OCnalutaI2CO, `InCtCOIIIC. C_alC
F|rstcam|:x efquest|eas. PtC lhC alCtnalIC8 CCtCO hCt8CX I8
8uO8lanCC 8CX I8 8I_nICalICnlhC Cny CnC8 aVaIaC: PnO InCl, Vhal
C8C I_hl 8CX OC:
hal ulCt I8 QtImatIy InlCnl Cn unOCIn_ I8 `lhC 8laOIIly C
OInaty 8CX 8InCC 8hC laKC8 Il lC C lhC CCCl CQtaClICC88CCKIn_ lC
In8la a CCmQu8Cty hClCtC8CXuaIly. II8 lhC VCty tueaessC8CX, lhC Vay
Il OIVIOC8 a 8uOCCl8 aO8CulCy nlC lV 8CQatalC, muluay CXCu8IVC
CalC_OtIC8, lhal 8CtC8 lhC aIn8 C hClCtC8CXI8m. CV, lhI8 at_umCnl
maKC8 nC 8Cn8C unC88 VC 8lalC Il8 hIOOCn a88umQlICn lhal lVC haVC a
lCnOCnCy lC CnC, lC CCuQC ul tCn VhCtC CC8 lhIs a88umQlICn 8QtIn_:
tCm lhC CCnCCQlICn ClhC Inaty lCtm8, ma8CuInIly anO CmInInIly, a8
CmQCmCnlaty. hal I8, Il I8 Cny VhCn VC OCnC lhC lVC lCtm8 a8
haVIn_ a tCCIQtCCa tCalICn, lhC mCanIn_ C lhC CnC OCQCnOIn_ Cn lhC
mCanIn_ ClhCClhCt anOVICC VCt8a, lhalVCInCInClhCmmCtC8ltCn_y,
ex G e Ut&aUasa U Me Z
CCmQC lhCmlOVaIO unICn, aOCIl CnC lhal I8 8u8laInCO lhtOuh VICCnl
anlaCI8m8. Ct, lhC CCmQCmCnlaty tCalICn I8, In aCan8 lCtm8, an
Ima_Inaty OnC, Il CnlaI8 OClh aO8OulC unIOn and aO8OulC a_IC88ICn.
SecenJ cem|e e]quest|ens. u8l 8CXua OI!!CtCnCC C CCnCCIVCO
Ony as an Ima_Inaty tCalICn: t, I8 lhCtC a OICtCnl Va lO lhInK lhC
OIVI8ICn O! 8uOCCl8InlC lVC 8CXC8, OnC lhal OCC8 nCl8uQQCtl a nCtmalIVC
hClCtCsCXuaIly:
hC 8laOIly OlhC maCCmaC OInaty I8 nCl unOnC, hCCVCt
8ImQy Oy ChIQQIn aVay al lhC OattICt lhal sCQatalC8 lhC, CIn_ InlC
QuC8lICn lhC nCalnC8s C! lhCIt OIVI8IOn lhC CalCCtICs CCan, !Cm
InInIly CmInI8m CannCl ulImalCy hCO, ulCtlaKIn a tCQuCnly
aOVanCCO CCnlCmQCtaty QC8IlICnlCs u8, lhI8 I8 asC OuC l lhC aCl lhal
lhC8C CalC_OtIC8 atC CtC88CO Oy a 8Ctls O OlhCt8taCC, Ca88, ClhCIly,
ClC. lhal unOCtmInC lhC InlC_tIly ClhC !OtmCt I8l C CalC_CtIC8. hC
VCty hClCtC_CnCIly ClhC CalC_Cty C! VOman I8 CVIOCnCCd In lC CQQC
8IlICn lC CmInI8m Oy VOmCn lhCm8CVCs hCIC VI nCVCI anO Can nVCt
OC a !CmInI8m unIHCO In Ils QCIlIC8
Th|rJcem|ee]quest|ens.88CXua OI!CtCnCCCQualaOCVIlhClhCt
CalCCIIC8 O! OICtCnCC: 8 OnC8 8CXa IOCnlIly COn8ltuClCd In lhC 8amC
ay, CC8 Il CQCtalC On lhC 8amC CVC, a8 CnCs taCIa Ct Ca88 IOCnlIly CI
I8 8CXua dI!CtCnCC a OICtCnl KInO COICtCnCC tCm lhCsC OlhCt8:
Feurth cem|e e]quest|ans. 8 lhC hClCtC_CnCIly C! lDC CalC_CIy C
OmC, lhC VCty aIutC C!CmInIsm lC CnI8l a VCmCn 8ImIat lC lhC
autC lO CnI8l a mCn In a 8In_C Cau8C: 8 lhC taClICusnC88 CCnI8m
alltOulaOC 8CCy lC taCIa, QtC!C88ICna, Ca88 OI!!CtCnCC8: hy Can l
CmInIsm Ot_C a unIlyan aC! CmCn:
atisse, cnyuay? y t8l QuC8lICn I8 a8O lDC CnC lhal IlIalCs lhC
InQuIIy O! CenJer Treu||e. ChCIn_ tCuO 8 CCnlCnlICn lhal 8CXua OICt
CnCC nCl unamIuCu8y matKCO CIlhCt analOmICay, ChtCmC8Cmay,
Ct hCmOnay, lhal I8, QuC8lICnIn_ lhC QtCOI8CutsIVC CXIlCnCC O sCX
ulCtulCmalICay a88umC8, a8 nClCO CatICt, lhal 8CX u8l OC dI8Cut
LMagteF8 Z+
sICy Ct Culutay CCns|tClCO. u| tCuO hImsClescheueJlhC ImI|alICn
Cl|hCsC a|CtnalIVCs, hC CunOCO QsyChCanaysIs Cn |hC tCUsa lC _IVC
Vay CI|hCt |C analCmy Ct CCnVCn|ICn, at_uIn_ |ha| nIlhCt C lhCsC
CCuO aCCCnl lCt lhC CXI|CnCC Cl sCX. hIC sCX Is, Ct QsyChCanaysIs,
nCVCt sImQy a naluta aCl, Il Is asC nCVCt tCOuCIOC lC any IsCutsIVC
CCns|tuClICn, |C sCnsC, nay. Ct Vhal suCh a tCOuC|ICn VCuO tCmaIn
COIVICu |C Is the raJ|ca|atage|s|etueesexaJsese. s aCan Qul I|,
`CtylhIn_ ImQICO Oy lhC anay|IC Cn_a_CmCnl VI|h human OChaVICut
InICa|Cs nCl lhal mCanIn_ tCHCCls |hC sCXua, Ou| |hal I| maCs Q Ct
Il. bCX Is lhC s|umOIn_ OCCK C snsC. hIs Is nC| |C say |ha| sCX Is
QtCOIsCutsIVC, VC haVC nC In|Cn|ICn Cl OCnyIn_ lha| human sCXuaIly Is a
QtCOuC| C sI_nICalICn, Ou| VC In|CnO, talhCt, lC tCHnC lhIs QCsI|ICn Oy
at_In_ lha| sCX Is QtCOuCCO Oy lhC InlCtna ImIl, |hC aIutC CsI_nI
CalICn. | Is Cny |hCtC VhCtC OIsCutsIVC QtaClICCs la|Ct~anO nCl a| a
VhCtC |hCy suCCCCO In QtCOuCIn_ mCanIn_~lhal sCX CCmCs lC OC.
u|Ct, Cl CCutsC, nCVs sCmClhIn_ aOCu| |hC ImI|s C sI_nI
Ca|ICn. bhC KnCVs, Ct CXamQC, lha| |hCtC Is nC "te|es lhal _CVCtns |hC
QtCCCss ) Cl OIsCCutsC, |ha| OIsCutsIVC QtaClICCs atC nCVCt CCmQClC
hIs Is Vhy shC maKCs lhC CaIm lha| "ueaI|sCIs a lCtm In QtCCCss,
a OCCCmIn_, a CCns|tuC|In_ lha| CannCl tI_hly OC saIO |C CtI_Ina|C Ct
CnO ) bC at sC _CCO VC nO nC|hIn_ hCtC VIlh VhICh VC VCuO
anl |C QUattC . hC CttCt, lhC suOtCQlICn, CCCuts Cny In lhC nCX| s|CQ
VhCn lhC at_umCn| nCCn_Ct CCnCCtns Cny |hC lCtm ueaOul OCCCmCs
Ins|CaO an at_umCnl aOCu| VCman as suCh. Ct lhC |hCsIs C|hC OCCK Is
nC| lhal lhC mCanIn_ C|hC lCtm uemahas shIllCO anO VI CCn|InuC lC
shI| lhtCu_hCul hIs|Cty Oul |hal I| Is `nCVCt QCssIOC nay lC OCCCmC a
Cman [) , |hal CnC s sCXa IOCn|I|y Is IlsClnCVCt CCmQC|C, Is aVays
In HuX n ClhCt VCtOs, u|Ct CCnCuOCs tCm lhC Chan_In_ cecets Cl
CmCn sCmClhIn_ aOCul |hC |e| y, |hC e|stece ClVCmCn. VI at_uC
lha| hCt CCnCusICn Is IC_IlImalCy OCtIVCO VC CannCl at_uC |ha| sCX Is
InCCnQClC anO In HuX OCCausC lhC |Ctms CsCXua OICtCnCC atC unslaOC
hIs Is tsl Cla a
OClCtmInC8 b
anJ b OClCtmInC8 b lhal I8, tCCIQtOCa OQQC8IlICn8 8laOII2C mCanIn_8
OClVCCn CCCXI8lCnl lCtm8 anO OICtCnlIa tCalICn8nO On_Ct lhtCalCn lhC
ltan8VaualICn Cla QtCCCOIn_ 8I_nICt8
P CCtlaIn `QC8l8ltuCluaI8l tC8QCn8C lO lhI8 8ltuClutaI8l lhC8I8
ha8 laCn an anlIlhClICa QO8IlIOn Oy 8ImQy I_nCtI_ lhC tCQuItCmCnl lOt
lhC COnQClIOn O mCanIn_. ulCt8 QC8IlIOn In CcnJc eu||c l8 InlO
lhC 8CCOnO CalC_Oty OltC8QCn8C lO lhC anlInCmIC tuCOlan_ua_C IlnOlC8
mCtCy lhal 8I_nIHCalICn I8 aVay8 In QtOCC88 anO lhCn COnCuOC8 tCm
lhI8 lhal lhCtC I8 nC 8laOIly Ol 8CX. anl VCuO at_uC lhal hCt CttOt
COn8I8l8 In IC_IlImalCy ` alltIOulIn_ OO]CClIVC tCaIly lO an IOCa VhICh
I8 VaIO Ony a8 a tuC , lhal I8, In COnu8In_ a tuC O an_ua_C VIlh
a OC8CtIQlICn O lhC hIn_ In Il8C In lhI8 Ca8C VIlh 8CX. ul lhI8 I8
mI8CaOIn_, Ot Il 8CCm8 lO ImQy lhal 8CX I8 8OmClhIn_ lhal I8 OCyOnO
an_ua_C, 8OmClhIn_ lhal an_ua_C OtCVCt laI8 lO _ta8Q C Can COV
anl On lhI8 QOInl Cny Il VC aOO lhC QtOVI8O lhal VC unOCt8lanO lhC
hIn_ In Il8CllC mCan nClhIn_ Oul lh ImQO88IOIIly OlhInKIn_~atlIC
ualIn_~Il. hCn VC 8QCaK Oan_ua_C8 lautC VIlh tC8QCCl lO 8CX, VC
8QCaK nOl OIl8 aIn_ 8hOtl Ol a QtCOI8Cut8IVC OO]CCl Oul OlIl8 aIn_
InlOCOnltaOIClIOnVIlhIl8C bCX COInCIOC8VIlhlhI8 ja||uc, lhI8InCVIlaOC
COnltaOIClIOn. bCX I8, lhCn, lhC ImQO88IOIIly OlCOmQClIn_ mCan_, nOl
a8 ulCt8 hI8lOtICI8lOCCCn8ltuClIOnI8l at_umCnl VOuO haVC Il) a mCan
In_ lhal I8 InCOmQClC, un8laOC. t, lhC QCInl I8 lhal 8CX I8 lhC 8ltuCluta
InCOmQClCnC88 Olan_ua_C nCl lhal 8CX I8 Il8ClInCOmQClC. hC ulCt
at_umCnl COnVCtl8 lhC QtCtC88IVC tuC Ct Jctcm|n|n CanIn_ lhC tuC
beX aU0 e Ut&aUasta ut MeasuU
lDaI tCQuItCs usIC dCnC mCanIn_ tCItCaCIIVCy InlC a Jeterm|eJmCanIn_.
hC alIanQsyChCanaylIC at_umCnl, IKC lhIs CIDCt, Vanls lC CsuO
slanIIaIC sCX, OuI Il OCCs sC In a OICtCnl Va. ItsI, I I 1CKnCVC_Cs
talhCt Ian I_nCtCs lhC CCnItadICIICn CIhC tuC CtCasCn. hCn I InKs
sCX lC lC CCnHICl CtCasCn VIlD IIsC, nCl sImQy lC CnC ClhC QCs C
lDC CCnICI
hIs CCnslIlulCs a CtC tadICa dCsuOsIanlIaI2alICn C 8C, a
_tCalCt uOVCtsICn CIIs CCnCCQlICn as suOslanCC, lhan lhC CnC aIICQICU
OylhC ulCt QCsIlICn CtsCX Is hCtC nClan |cemle|eCnlII Oula Clay
CmQly CnIl Is CnC IC VhICh nC QtCOICalC Can OC aIlaChCd 1y InIn_
sCX lC lDC sI_nICt, IC IDC QtCCCss C sI_nIHCalICn, uIc aKs Cut
sCXuaII sCmCIhIn_ lhal CCmmunICaICs IIsC lC CIhCts DI!C IC aCl
lDaI CCmunICalICnIs a QtCCCss, anO Ihus Cn_CIn_, QtCCudCs a CCQClC
unCU_ CKnCCd_C al any _IVCn CmCn, utlhCt KnCCd_C Is slI
QaCCO IlDIn IhC tCam C QCssIOIIly hCn, Cn lhC CCnttaty, sCX Is
J|se|eJtCm IhC sI_nIHCt II OCCCmCs lhaI VhICD OCCs nCl CmmunIC1lC
IIsC lhal VhICh HatKslhCsuO]CCIas unKnCVaOC C say laI IhCsuO]CCl
Is sCXCd Is lC say lDal II Is nC Cn_Ct QCssIOC lC DaVC any KnCVC_C C
h|m Ct er. Sex scrves e eher]nct|e than te l|m|t rease, te remave the
suec|em the rea|m ejess||le exer|ece erure unJes|aJ|. hIs Is IhC
CanIn, VhCn a Is saId anO OCnC, CaCan s nClCtICus assCtIICn IhaI
`lhCtC I nC sCXua tCalICn sCX, In CQQCsIn_ IlsC lC sCnsC, Is a8C, y
dCHnIlICn, CQQCsCd lC tCaIICn, lC CCmmnICaIICn.`
hIs QsyChCanaylICa OCHnIIICn C sCX OtIn_s s lC Cut lhItO
CCmQC C uCslICns, Ct, OCHnCO nCl sC muCh Oy IsCCutsC as y Ils
dCaul, sCXua! UICtCnCC Is uIKC taCIa, Cass, Ct ClhnIC UICtCnCCs .
hCtCa lhCsC UCtCnCCs atC InsCtIOCU In IDC symCIC, sCXua OItCnCC
Is nCl Cny IhC autC CIIs InsCtIQlICn Is matKCO In lhC symOCIC. CXua
UICtCnC, In ClhCt VCts, Is a tCa anO nCI a symOCIC dICtCnCC. hIs
dIslInCIIn OCCs nCl OIsQata_C IhC ImQCtlanCC CtaCC, Cass Ct ClhnIIly,
Il sImQ CCnlCsls lDC CuttCnl OCXa lDal sCXua OICtCnCC CCts IhC saC
|nJ C dCsCtIQlICn C IDC suO]CCl as lhCsC CIhCts OC. Ct shCu lhIs
L&agtcF Zd
OIslInClIOn Oc usCO lO IsCalC CCnsIOCtalICns CsC tCm CCnsIOCtalICns C
ClhCt dICtCnCCs. l Is aVas a sCXCO suO] CCl VhC assumCs CaCh taCIa
Cass Ot ClhnIC IOCnlIl
h InsIsl, thC, Cn lhC dIslInClICn: hC ansVCt Is lhal lhC VCt
sCVctCI_nl OlhC suO]CCl OcQCnOs Cn Il, and Il Is Cn lhC CCnCCQlICn C
lhC suO]cCl s sCVCtCInly lhal slanOs an ChanCC CQtClCClIn_ OICtCnCC
In _CnCta. l Is Cn hCn VC OC_I lC OCnC lhC suO] CCl as segere|ng,
as suO]CCl lC Ils CVn aVs, lhal VC CCasC lC CCnsIdCt hCt as ca|cu|a||e, as
suO]cCl lC as atCad KnCVn and lhus manIQuaOC l Is Cn VhCn lhC
sCVCtCI_n InCaCuaOIIly C thC suO]CCl Is aCKnCVCO_CO lhal QCtCCQlICns
CdICtcnCC VI nC Cn_Ct nCutIsh OCmands Ct lhC suttCndCt COICt
CnCC lC QtCCcssCs ChCmC_CnI2alICn, `QutIHCalICn, Ct an ClhC ClhCt
CtImCs a_aInsl ClhCtnCss VIlh VhICh lhC tIsC C taCIsm has OC_un lC
aCQaInl s hIs OCcs Cl mCan lhal VC VCuO suQQCtl a CCnCCQlICn C
lhC suO] CCl as QtCCXIslCnl Ct In an Va ltansCCndCnl lC lhC aVs C
an_ua_C Ct lhC sCCIa CtOCt, a suO]CCl VhC CaCualCs, usIn_ lhC aVs C
an_ua_c as a lCC lC aCCCmQIsh VhalCVCt _Ca shC VIshC. hC suO]CCl
VhC sImQ OCCs Ct OCICVCs as shC VIshCs, VhC maKCs hCtsC suO] CCl
Cn lC lhC aV shC uaats lC COC, Is sImQ a VatIalICn Cn lhC lhCmC C
lhC CaCuaOC suOCCl. Ct Il Is Cas lC sCC lhal CnC Is QuICKy maslCtCO
O CnCs sCnsuCus InCInalICns CVCn as CnC sCCKs lC ImQCsC lhCm.
hC Cn Vay lC tCsCVC lhIs QatlICuat anlInCm~lhC suO]CCl Is
nJer[I. C. , lhC dclctmInCO CCCl C lhC aVlhC suO]CCl Is a|erelhC aV
Is lC OCmCnsltalC lhal, as lICnnC 1aIat has tCCCnly Qul Il,
shC Is ncIlhCt Cn aOCVC, nCt Cn unOCt lhC aV Oul atexact|y
the same |eve| s |t . . + t Cl anClhCt Va lhCtC musl OC an
CXaCl CCttCsQCndCnCC OClVCCn lhc aOsCulC aClIVIl ClhC CIlI2Cn
[C_IsalICn anO hCt aOsCulc QassIVIl [COCOICnCC lC lhC aV,
VIlh VICh CnC OCCs nCl Oat_aIn, VhICh CnCs OCCs nCl `lCK
. . In anl, Ct CXamQC, lhIs mClaQhsICs C lhC suO]CCl VI
beX 0 t&e UtMaUasa uI MeasuU V
QtCCccO tCm lhc dCuOc OclctmInalICn Clhc CCnCQl CtIhl a8
tccdCm anO as CCQusICn.
C CIm lhal lhc suO]cCl Is al thescme |ce|cs the |auIs nCl cQuIVacnl l
CaImIn_ lhal shc |slhc aV, sInCcany CCnalICn CsuO]cClIlhaV Cn
tcOuCcs hct, suO]cCls hct aOsCulc te lhc aV. Pl lhc sa cVc as an
ycl nCl lhc aV, lhc suO]cCl Can Cn!y Oc CCnCcIVcO as lhc aI!utc C lhc
!aV, C an_ua_c. |aan_ua_c anO cl mercthcanua_c lc suO]cCl Is a
Causc t VhICh nC sI_nct Can aCCCunl. Cl OcCausc shc lansCcnOs lhc
sI_nIHc Oul OcCausc shc InhaOIls Il cs ||m|t. hI8 suO]cCl, aOICa un
nCVac taOICa!!y InCaCuaOc Is lhc Cny _uatanlcc V haVc aaInl
taCI sm hIs Is a _uatanlcc lhal sQs tCm us VhcncVct Vc OIstc_at lhc
nCnltansQatcnCy C suO]cCl lC sI_nIct, VhcncVct Vc ac lhc 8uO]cCl
CCInCIO VIlh lhc sI_nIHct talhct lhanIls IsHtc.
C my Hsl, QhCsCQhICa! CO]cClICn lC lhc 1ulct OcnIlICn
scX Cncmusl aOO nCl Cn!y lhcQtcVICus clhICa CO]cClICn Ol a QsyChCan
a!ylICa! Cnc as Vc. nClcO a!tcaO lhal lhctc Vas a CtuIa! OIctcnCc
OclVcc hcts anO lhc QsyChCanaylIC QCsIlICn Cn scX. Val nCV lC _C
utlhct Oy cXQCsIn lhc lCla InCCmQalIOIIl C lhc lV CsIlICns
ChCCsc lhIs Qhtasc In CtOct lC cChC lhc Chat_c taIscO a_aInsl un_ O
tcuO, VhCsc ChataClctI2alICn C lhc Ctmcts slanCc In c_atO lC lhc
IOIOC Is aQQICaOc lC Cut OIsCus8ICn. hIs slanCc, tcuO as , `QICKs
Cul a V Cu!luta CVctlCncs tCm lhc sQhCny C !Ic 1O . . . CnCc
mCtc I!s lC hcat lhc mI_hl anO QCVctu! mcCOy Clc OtIcs.
tcuO ctc aCCuscs un_ CcVaCualIn_ lhc IOIOC Ca scXa! CCnlcnl O
assCCIalIn_ Il cXC!usIVcy VIlh Culuta QCCcsscs. l Is lhIs as8CCIalICn lhal
caOs n_ lC sltcss lhc csscnlIa! QaslICIly Ct macaOIIl lhc IOIOC
scX daCcs lC d Culuta! lunc. tcuO a_Ucs Cn lhc CCnlta, lhal scX I s
lCOc_tasQcOnClCn lhc lcttaIn CCulutcOulCnlhclcttaIn lhc dtIVcs,
VhICh~OcsQIlc lhc aCl lhal lhcy haVc nC cXIslcnCc CulsIOc Culutatc
nCl Culuta . hcy atc, InslcaO, lhc Clhct CCulutc anO as 8uCh, ac nCl
susCcQlOc lC Ils manIQualICns.
Lba@tez Z1
CX Is OCHnCO Oy a aV C lhC OtIVC8 VIlh VhICh lC tClutn lC
1aOats QhasC `OnC dCC8 nCl Oat_aIn, VhICh CnC OCCs nCl ltIC.
P_aInsl lhCn_Ian anO COnlCnQCtaty CtIlICa OCICIn lhC Qa8lICIly C
8C, VC atC lCmQlCO lC at_uC lhal, tCm lhC slanOQCInl C CulutC, sex
Jeesoat|uJye.hIs I8 lC8ay, amCn_ ClhCtlhIn_s, Ihalsex,sexua|Jrece,
canet |c Jc:eostructeJ, sInCC OCCCn8ltuClICn Is an CQCtalICn lhal Can OC
aQQICO On lCCulutC, lC lhC sI_nIHCt, anOhas nC QuChasC Cn lDIs ClhCt
tCam. C sQcaK ClhC OCCCnsltuClICn C8C maKC8 aOCul as muCh 8CnsC
a8 8CaKIn_ aOCul CtCCCsIn_ a dCCt, aClICn anO CO]CCl OC nCl OCCn_ lC
lhC sanC OIsCut8IVC sQaCC. hu8 VC VI at_uC lhaI VhIC lhC 8uO]CCl
VhO Is nCl QInnCO lC lhC sI_nIHCt, VhC I8 an CCCl, Oul nCl a tCaIalICn
C s CCIa dI8CCut8C8 Is, In lhIs 8CnsC, tCC CaO8CuIC sCCIa CCn8ltaInl,
hC Ot 8hC I8 nCVCtlhCC8s at tCC lC OC a suO]CCl an VhICh Va VIlhIn
any OIsCCutsC lhC 8uO] CCl Can Cny assumC CIlhCt a maC C a CnaC
QC8IlICn.
hC un_Ian~anO CCnlCmQCtaty `nCC un_Ian~QCsIlIOn, tC
maInIn_ OCa lC lhC `mCCOy C lhC OtIVCs, dCC8 nCl tCCC_nI2C lhI8
CCnQu8Cty dImCnsICn C8C, Ils InC8CaQaOIIly. CCu8In_ nCtCy Cn lhC
Culuta `tCC Qa ClhC sI_nIHCt, lhIs QC8IlICn dI8] CIns tCCOCn tCn
CCnQusICn Il Is Ct lhIs VCty tCasCn ve|utar|st, OC8QIlC a Ils CVn QtC
CaulICns, UCsQIIC a lhC slCQs laKCn lC InCCualC IlsCa_aInsl lhIs Chat_C.
CenJer Treu|e, Ct CamQC, Is nCl CatCC8s Cn lhIs QCInl. hC OOCK8
CCnCusICn anlI CIQalCs anO allCnQls a OCCnsC a_aInsl lhC aCCu8alICn C
VCunlatIsn lhal Il KnCVs aVaIls Il. COCHnIn lhCnClICn Ca_CnCy, lDC
Hna ChaQlCt aIns lC CCaIC lhC suO] CCl `Cn lhC samC CVC as an_ua_C,
nCIlhCt aOCVC VhCtC lhC naIVC nClICn C a_CnCy VCuO QaCC Il) nt
OCCV Il [VhCtC Il VCuO OC QCsIlICnCO Oy a OClCtnInI8l nClICn OCCn
sltuClIOn . hal snIs8In_, hCVCVCt, anOVhallhusCaVCs1ulCtOCCnsC
C8s OCCtC lhC Chat_C shC ltICs lC 8IOCslCQ, Is any QtCQCt nClICn C lhC
un8utQa8saOC InIl, IhC InQC8sIOIIly lhal ham8ltIn_s CVCty OI8Cut8IVC
QtaClICC VCn VhCn 8hC 8QCaK8 OCCmQusICn anO aIutC, shC sas lhIs
bx aU0 Ue UtbaUa MeWU Z1J
lhC tuCs _CVCtnIn_ sI_ICalICn nCl Cny tCsltIC, Out CnaOC
lhC assCttICn CalCtnatIVC OCmaIns CCuluta InlCI_IOIIly, IC ,
nCV QCssIOIIlICs Ct _CnOCt lhal CCnlCsl lhC tIIO CdCs C hICt
atChICa OInatIsms, thCn IlIs Cny |th|n lhC QtaCtICCs CltCQClIlIVC
sI_nIyIn_ thal a suOVCtsICn C IOCnlIly OCCCmCs QOsIOC. hC
nunClICn lC |e a _IVCn _CndCt QtCOuCCs nCCCssaty a1utCs .
hC CCCXIslCnCC Ct CCnVCt_CnCC ClOICtCnl dIsCts1VC InunC
lICns QtCOuCCs lhC QCssIOIIly Ca CCmQCX tCCCntatICn and
tCOCQCymCnl )
halVatCQtCVIOCOVIth hCtC Is adCsCtIQlICnCthC ec|CthCInhCtCnt
aIutC OIsCCutsCa tICl C sCnsC In VhICh CnC mCanIn CCnstanly
CCIdCs VIlh anClhCt, a mulIQICatICn C thC QCssIOIIlIC C CaCh O1s
CCutsCs mCanIn_Oul nC tCa aCKnCVCO_mCnl CIls CausC hC ImCs
sIOIIty C sayIn_ CVCtyth_ In an_ua_C. C tCCal, tCud lau_hl us,
OCCausC VC CannCl tCmCmOCt PnO Vhal VC CannCl tCmCHOCt Is lhat
VhICh C nCVCt CXCtICnCCO, nCVCt ha lhC QCssIOIIly C CQCtICnCIn_,
sInCC Il as nCVCt QtCsCnt as suCh. l Is lhC dCaOCCK C an_ua_C s CCnICt
VIlh Ils lhal QtCOuCCs lhIs CXQCtICnCC ClhC InCQCtICnCaOC VhICh
Can nCIlCt OC tCmCmOCtCO nCt sQCKCn) , Il Is lhIs OCaOCK lhal thus
nCCCssIlalCs tCQClIlICn. ul lhC CCnsltaInl QtCQCt lC tCQClIlICn Is CCCuOCd
In lhC sClCnCCs uClCO hCtC, anO sC, lCC, Is sC bCX Is lhal hCh CannCt
OC sQCKCn Oy sQCCCh, Il Is nCl any ClhC mutIludC CmCanIn_s lhal lty
lC maKC uQ Ct thIs ImQCssIOIIly n CImInlIn_ lhIs taOICa mQassC C
OIsCCuts, CcnJcr Treu||c, Ct a Its laK aOCul sCX, CImInals sCX IlsC.
CX OCCs nCl Oud_C, and Il Is nCl hClCtCsCXIsl tC say sC n aCl,
lhC CQQsIlC may OC ltuC Ct Il Is Oy maKIn_ It CCnCtm lC thC sI_nICt
lhal yCu COI_C sC lC CCnCtmlCsCCIa OIClalCs, lC laKC Cn sCCIa CCnlCnl
n lhC CO, ulCt, VanlIn_ lC QaCC thC suOCCl Cn lhC samC CVC as
an_ua_C, CnOs uQ QaCIn_ hCt |eeth Il, as Ils tCaI2atICn tCCdC,
a_CnCy, Is 1nCCnCCIVaOC VIlhIn a sChCma suCh as thIs
fba4 Z1Z
Ue Uac UDct1OD
cl c nCV CCntCnl lhC CO]CClICn8 KnCV aVaIl mC. haVc OCCn
Qtc8nlIn_ lhC Q8yChCanaylIC QC8Il Cn u8In_ at_umCnl8 OCttCVCO tCm
CtIlICa QDIC8CQhy. nO yCllhc8uO] CCl QC8CO Oy lhI8 QhIC8CQhy 8CmC
lIC CCtcO lC a8 lhc `unIVCt8a 8uO]CCl, a8 CQQC8CO lC lhC CCnCtClC
InOIVIOuaCCm8, Oy OCnIlICn, lC OC aeu|e, lC OC 8CXCO, VhIC lhC
8OCCl CQ8yChCanay8I8 I8, CQuay Oy OCHnIlICn, aVay8 8CXCO. CV,
lhcn, OCC8 lhC 8CXuay dICtCnlIalCO 8uO] CCl CnlCt lhC tamCVCtK C
CtIlICa QDIC8CQhy: 1y VhaltCulc haVc VCattIVCO al Vhal VI nC OCuOl
aQQCat lO Oc lhC CXymCtCnC CCnCu8ICn lhal lhc unIVCt8a 8uO] CCl I8
aecessc||8CXCd:
ul Vhy, VC ma a8K In Cut lutn, I8 Il 8C tCaOIy a88umCd lhal
lhc QhIC8CQhICa 8uO]cCl mu8l Oc nCulCt: tCm Cut Qct8QCClIVc Il I8 lhI8
a88unQlICn lhal 8CCm8 unVattanlCO. hal _tCunO8 Il, lhC8cVhC hCd Il
8uQQO8C, I8 lhC 8uO]CCl8 VCty OCHnIlICn a8 CCn8lIlulICnay dCVCIO Ca
QC8IlIVC CDataClCtI8lIC8. tCm lhI8VCmayInCtlhallhC8CVhCdC8cXuaI2C
lhc 8uO] CCl tC_atO 8CX a8 a QC8IlIVC ChataClCtI8lIC. VCtylhIn_ VC haVC
8aIO sC at OCI8 dCVn lC a dCnIa ClhI8 ChataClCtI2alICn. hCn VC 8lalcd,
Ct CamQC, lhal 8CXua dICtCnCC I8 nCl CQualaOC VIlh ClhCt KInO8 C
OICtcnCC, VC VCtC8ayIn_lhalI lOCC8nClQC8IlIVCy OC8CtIOC lhC 8uO] CCl.
c CCuO Qul Il lhI8 Vay mc|e caJemc|e, |||e |e|ay, ce ac|eJ|ca|es,
uh|chmecas|hc|c|he|hca |acecs|ayc|au|eJyecj|hes|ec|, |heyqc|
|he moJe cf|hec||uecu kacu|eJye.
C haVC OCcn dCnIn_ lhc 8uO]CCl a8 lhC InlCtna ImIl Ct nC_a
lICn, lhC aIutC Can_ua_C~lhI8 In CtOCt lC at_uC lhal lhC 8uO]CCl ha8
nC 8uO8lanlIa CXI8lCnCC, lhal Il I8 nCl an CO] CCl CQC88IOc CXQctICnCC.
lhI8 8uO] CCl I8 lhCu_hl lC OC un8CCO, Il I8 nCl Cny OcCau8C 8CX I8 naIVCy
a88uCd lC OC a QC8IlIVc ChataClCtI8lIC Oul a8C OCCau8c aIutC I8 a88umCO
lC OC 8In_uat. lhI8 VCtC ltuC, Ilan_uaCt tCa8Cn~had Cny CnC
mCdC CmI8tc, lhCn lhC 8uO]CCl VCuO In aCl Oc nCulCt. 1ul lhI8I8 nCl
be U t&e 1ut&aHasa uI Measu Z1
lh CaC an_uaC anO tCasCn may aI In CnC ClVC UICtnl ays . hC
UIslInClICn OClVCCn lhCsC mCUaIlICs C mIsHtOClVCCn lDC lVC Vays
In VhCh tCasCn as InlC CCnltaUIClICn VIlh IlsC Vas tsl maUC Oy
anlI T|eC|||qeejurceaseanOVasCmQCyCOa_aInn T|ttuc
e]Jyme|. n OClh VCtKs hC OCmCnsltalCU lhal lhC aIutC CtCasCnas
nCl sIQC, Oul CnOCtCO uQCn an alInCmIC ImQass lhtu_h lC sCQ
atalC tulCs lhC tsl Vas malhCmalICa, lhC sCCCnU OynamICa
any haVC allCmQlCU lC CCalC sCXua UICtCnCC In anls lCls,
OlVhal lhCy In aCl VCtC CCKIn_ Ct Vas sCua OIas Ct sCua InOICt
CnCC. CmC haVC OIsCCtnCU In lhC UCsCtIQlICns C lhC OCaUlIu anU lhC
suOImC, Ct CamQC, a UICtCnlIalICn C a sCXua sCtl hCs CtlICs
haVCI may say sC OCCn CKIn Ct sC In a lhC tCn_ Q aCCs .
am QtCQCsIn lal sCua OICtCnCC Can, I nOCCU, OC Cun In al, nCl
In an CCIUCnla Vay, In hIs usC C aU]CClIVCs Ct CamQCs Oul, nUa
mCnlay In hIs UIslInClICn OClVCn lhC malhCmalICa anU lhC OynamICa
anlInCmICs . hal Is lC say Ka| uas ||e]rs| |c t|ee|e, | meaas cj |h|s
J|s|ic|c, ||eJecet|a| jeaJssyc|eaa|ys|s's J|r|s|c cj a||s|ecsitc
|ucmta||y exc|s|re:|asses. ma|e aaJ jema|e.
InlCnO, lhCn, Ct lhC tCsl, lC InlCtQtCl QsyChCanaysIs s sCualICn
C lhC sUO]CCl In lCtms Cl anls anaysIs C lhC anlInCmICs C tCasCn
CtC QCCIHCay my CCus VI OCCnlhCCtuas ClsCualICn QtQCsCO
Oy aCan In hIs Cmnat 77 cce. n lhIs sCmInat aCa tCIlCtalCs lhC
QCsIlIC Cl QsyChCanaysIs VIlh tC_atU lC sCua OICtCnC Cut sCO
OCIn, hC maInlaIns, Is nCl a OICC_ICa QhCnCmCnCn, Il UCC nCl Qass
lhtCu_h lhC OCUy, Oul tCsuls tCm lhC CICa OCmanUs CsQCh
10
hCsC C_I Ca OCmanOs CaO s lC an CnCCunlCt VIlh a unamCnla OCO
tCC C ImQass VhCn VC InCVIlaOy slumOC Cn lhC aCl hal sayn_ Il
a Is IlCtay InQCssIOC VCtUs aI. CtCCVCt, VC atC nC In
QCsIlIC lC aOU lhCy aI In lVC UICtCnl Vays, Ct as aCan Quls Il In
cee, hCtC atC lVC Vas Ct lhC aaIt lhC sua tCalIC, lC Ist
. . CtC Is lhC maC ay . . . anU lhC CmaC Vay.
LWao 6 Z1A
hC Cts CsCuIICn, as IhCy atC dtaVn In CVC ClICt,
lhC sVCnIh sCssIC CIC sCmIat, CCK IKC IhIs
X
X
X
X
Ch CIhC Cut Ctmua Is a sImQC C_ICa QtCQCsIIICnand, IKC
a QCQCsIIICns, Das OClh ua|||y nO a quc|||y. hC QuanIIly C a
QCQCsIIICnIs OCICtInCd Oy IhC uanlIly CIIs suO]CCI ICtm IhC symOCs
an atC QuanIICts, Ihal Is lhCy InOICalC IhC QuanIIly CIhC suO]CCI
lCtn. , lhC uIVCtsa QuanlIHCt Is sCtIhanO C VCtOs suCh as ere,
c||, ce, OuI II Is ImQCtInI lC CIC lhaI QtCQCt nCuns atC asC CCnsIdCtCO
uICtsa s , lC CIsICnlIa QuanlIHct, slands Ct VCtds suC as sme,
e, c| |ecs| e, cer|c|, ms|. hc QuIIy Ca QtCQCsIlICn Is dCICtmInCO
O lhC QuaIIy CIls CCQu, CIlhCt atmaIIVCCt nC_aIIVC hCatmalIVC
Is unmatKCd, VhIC IhC nC_IIVc Is matKCO Oy a Oat QaCCd CVCt IC
QtCUICaIC lCtm.
InCC IhC symOC Is atCady amIIat lC s tCm aCan s CIhCt
ICIs, a ItansalICn CIhC QtCQCsIlICns Is nCV QCssIOC
hCtC Is aI CasI CnC 7 lhI Is
nCI suOmIIICO IC IC QhaIC
unCIICn
P X
'
atC [CVCt Is suOmII
lCd lC lhC QhaIC unClICn
CtC Is nCl CnC X IhaI Is nCl
suOmIIICO lC IhCQhIC unCIICn
CI a nCI CVCty 7 Is suOmII
lCd lC IDC QhaIC unCIICn
C cI sIOC C lhC sChCma Is dCsI_naICd IhC maC sIOC, VDIC IhC tI_I
sIOC I cmaC DC HtsI lhIn_ lC nClICC Is IhaI lhC IVC QtCQCsIlICns IhaI
CCmQCsc CaCh sIC aQQCat IC haVC an c||m|:tcaIICn lC CaCh CIDCt, IhaI
Is Ihy aQQCat I CCnItadICl CaCD ClhCt CV haVC lhCsC QQatCnI anII
nCmIs CCn QtCuCCU, and hCV dC lCy CCmC lC OC dCsI_nlCO Oy IhC
be aUd t&e utUaUasa uI MeasuU
<1b
lCtms CsCXua OICtCnCC CCtc ansVCtIn_ IhCsC uCstICns, VC nCCO lC
KnCV a IIIC mCtC aOCul lhC Ctmuas.
Can aOanOCns IVC CIhC lCtms CC2ssICa C_C lhal VC usCU
In lhC QtCVICus OCsCtIQlICn, InstcaO C s|ec| 2nO rcJ|cce, hC usCs tDC
ICtms aryume|anUc||e. hIs suOsIIluIICn matKs a CCnCCQIua dICt
CnCC lhC tVC CassCs maC anO CaC, atC nC Cn_Ct CtmCO Oy _athCtIn_
lC_ClCt suO]CCIs VIlh sImIat aIItIOutCs as Vas thc CasC Ilh IhC CdCt
lCtms hC QtInCIQC CsCtlIn_ Is nC Cn_Ct OCsCtIQlIVC, Ihal Is, Il Is nCl
a mallCt CshatCU ChataCICtIslICs Ct a CCmmCn suOsI2nCC. hCIhCt CnC
as IlC Ihc Cass CmaCs Ct CmaCs UCQCnds, tathCt, Cn VhCtC CnC
QaCCs CnCsCl as at_umCnI In tCalICn lC lhC unCIIOn, thal Is, VhICh
CnunCalVCQCsIIICn CnC assumCs
haIC_IlImalCs aCan saOanOCnmCnI CsCC CIhC ICtms and
CVCn CmC ClhC QtCmIsCs , C CassICa C_IC Is thC uClICn~lC QhaIC
unClIn~IhaI aQQCats In CaCh Cl IhC Cut QtCQCsIIICns. hIs unCln,
andQ1tIICuaty IhC Cl thalI l UCCs aQQCatCnCIh sIUCs CthC laOC, has
OCCn 1I IhC CCnICt CCCnItCVCtsy sInCC tCuU HtsI OCan CaOCtalIn hIs
lhCCt CCmInInC sCXuaIly. CInIsls haVC aay tCVCtCU a_aInsI lhC
nClIC IhaI IhC Qhaus shCuO Oc aOC tC aCCOunI Ot IhC CIsICnCC C
OClh sCCs IhaI lhC dICtCnCC CIVCCn IDCm shCuU OC OCtCtmInCO VIth
tCCtCCC tC IhIs sIn_C ICtm hC haVC dCQCtCU Vhat thCy aVC unOCt
sICCU IC OC a tCOuClICn COICtCnCC lC a sImQC atnalICn Ct nC_aIICn
haVIn Ct nCI haVIn_ lhC Qhaus. uI IhIs CCmQaInl sttIKCs Cul a_aInsI
lhC VtCn_ lat_CI Ct lhC QCCuIatIIy, Ct sIn_uatIly, CthCQhaICsI_nIHCt
Is UuC QtCCIsCy IC IhC aCl lDaI Il tuIns lhC QCssIOIIly C any sIQC
atmaIICn Ct nC_aIICn l Is IhC QhaIC sI_nICt Ihal Is tCsQCnsI!c Ct
lhC QtOuCIICn Cn CaCh sIOC Clhc IaOC nCl Ca sIQC sIaICmCnt OUI C
lVC CnHICtIn_ slaICmCnls. aCh sIdC Is UCHnCd Clh Oy an atmalICn
anU a nC_alICn C lhC QhaIC unClICn, an InCusICn anO CXCusIC C
aOsCuIC nCnQhaICeu|ssace. Cl Cny Is IhC nCICtICus nCl2 ClhC
CmaC sIUC~nCI a atC suOmIllCU lC IhC QhaC uClICCHnCU Oy a
unOaCnta unOCCIdaOIIly tC_atOIn_ lhC QaCCmCnlCVCm2n VIthI IhC
LDte B Z1b
Ca8s C lDIns suOIlcd lC QDaIC tuc, Oul lhC maC sIOC CmOtaCcs a
sIIat unOCIdaOIIly lDC InCu8ICn C a|| mCn VIlhIn lhC OCmaIn C
QhaIC uc Is CCnOIlICcd Oy lhc aCl lhal a| |eas| e CsCaQCs Il C VC
CCunl lIs man CsCaQcd aCn lhC a, Ct OCn l Vc: hal sCtl C a
man Is Il hCsce|sa ceIs nCl ImIlCO lC lhC maC VatICly anO Vhal
sCtl an `a Is Il lhal Is mIssIn_ Cnc CIls CCmCnls:
C yCu scC, lDccs nC u8C ltyIn_ lC lCaCh QsyChCanaysIs aOCul
undCCIOaOIIly, aCul lDc Va sCXua sI_nICts tCusC lC sCtl lhCmscVCs
Cul InlC lVC scQatalC CassCs ls nC usC QtCaChIn_ OCCCnsltuClICn lC
QsyChCanaysIs OCCausC Il atcady nCVs a aOCulIl. 1IsCXuaIly Vas Cn_
a QsyChCanaylICa CCnCcQl OCCtC Il Vas CVc a OCCnsltuClICnIsl CnC. ut
|he Jerece|etueeJecstrc|| aJsychaa|ys|s |sthat|he |a|ter Jes |
cse the]c| ] ||sexa||ty-tha| |s, the]c| |ha| ma|e aJ]ema|e s|yers
caat |e J|st|yu|sheJ a|s|ute|y u|th a Je|a| ] sexua| Jerece. cCCn
sltClICn as InlC lhIs CCnusICn Cny Oy OIstC_atOIn lhC OICtcnCC
OClVcCn lhC Vays In VDICh lhIs aIutC laKcs QaCC. C_atOIn_ aIutC as
unICtm, OCCCnsltuClICn cnOs uQ CCaQsIn_ sCXua OIctCnCC InlC scXua
InOIslInClncss . hIs Is In aOdIlICn lC lDC aCl lhal, Cn lhIs QCInl al Casl,
OCCCnsltuClICn aQQCats lC OCOuQCOOylhCQtClCnlICn Can_ua_C lCsQCaK
CCIn_, sInCC Ilcualcs a CCnusICn CsCXua sI_nICs VIlha CCnusICn
CsCX IlsC.
hIs, In OtIC, Is lhC cssCn C lhC Ctmuas CsCXualICn, Il Is a
CssCn catnCO tCm anl, as VI nCV lty lC shCV In _tCalCt OClaI.
Itsl, hCVCVCt, VC nCO lC say a OIl mCtC aOCul lhCQhaIC unClICn lhal
Is lhC sCuCC Ca lhIs unOcCIOaOIIly. ls aQQCatanCCn ||h sIOcs C
lhC laOInOICalCs lhal VC atc CCnCctnCO VIlh sQCaKIn_ OCIn_s, OCIn_s,
aCCCtOIn lC aCan s lansalICn C lDC tcuOIan CCnCCQl C CaslalICn,
VhC suttCnOct lhCI aCCCss lCu|ssaceuQCn cnlCtIn_ anua_C. hIs nCl
Cny tcslalCs Vhal VC haVC Occn at_uIn_ a aCn~Il Is lhC ImQasscs C
/aayayelhal CtCalClhCCXQCtIcnCCClhCInCXQCtICnCCaOC, lhCnsayaOC
Il asC CXQCscs lhC CCIshnCss Clhal tcaOIn_ CaCans lhCCty CscXua
UICCnCCVIChassCtlslhalIl sltanOs VCman Cn aOaKCCnlInCnl, CulsIOC
be aHd t&e ut&aUasa uI MeasuU J
anu_C aCh 8IOC ClhC laOC OC8CtIOC8 a dICtCnl ImQ288C Oy mC2n8
C VhICh lhI8 QuC8lICn C lhC Cul8IdC C an_u2_C I8 taI8CO, 2 ICtCnl
mannt C tCVC2In_ lhC C88CnlIa QCVCtC88nC88 C8QCCCh. 1ul VhIC lhC
QhaI unClICn QtCOuCC8 Cn CaCh 8IdC a aIutC, Il OCC8 nCl QtCu a
8ymmClty OClVCCn lhC 8IOC8
De cUae be: NatDeUatca aUFe
C atC nCl _CIn_ lC OC_In Cut tCadIn_, 28 I8 Cu8lCm2ty, Cn lDC Cl, Ol
t2lhCt Cn lhC tI_hl, Ct Cm2C, 8IOC C lhC Ctmua8. P8 CQQC8Cd lC lhC
aIty CCmmCn QtC]uOICC lh2l Q8yChCanay8I8 CCn8ltuCl8 hC VCman 28
8CCCnO2ty, a8 a mCtC alCtalICn C lhC man, lhC QtImaty lCtm, lhC8C
Ctmu28 8u__C8l lhal lhCtC I8 a KInO C QtICtIly lC lDC tIhl 8IdC. DI8
tCaOIn CllhC Ctmua8 I8 CCn8I8lCnl VIlh lhC QtIVIC_C _IVCn lhC malC
m2lIC2 anlInCmIC8 Oy anl, VhC nCl Cny Oa8 VIlh lhCm t8l Oul a8C
_t2nl8 lhC malhCmalIC2 8ynlhC8I8 a mCtC ImmCdIalC lyQC C CCtlIlOC
lhan Il8 OyamICa CCunlCtQatl n anl 8 anay8I8, Il I8 hC dyn2mIC2
anlInCmIC8 [lhC maC 8IdC ClhC Ctmua8, In Cut tCadIn lhal 2QQCat
In many Vay8 8CCCnd2ty, a KInO C csc|u||ea lC a mCtC undamCnla
|esc|r||||ty, a lCla an CCmQClC I mQa88C m2nIC8lCO Oy lDC 2lhCmal
ICa CCHICl. nC C lhC lhIn_8 VC VI V2n lC allCnO lC VhIC InVC8lI
_alIn_ lhC OICtCnCC8 OClVCCn lhC8C lVC mCdC8 CCCnHICl lhC Vay lhC
VCty nClICn8 C CCnHICl anO 8CulICn 8hIl tCm lhC t8 mCOC lC lhC
8CCCnd. [In2y, hCVCVCt, lhI8 nClICn Clh QtICtIly CCnC ClDC 8CC8
Ct anlICmIC8 CVCt lhC ClhCt mu8l OC tC_atOCO 28 a mIt2_C 2lhCt lh2n
lVC 8QCIC8 C lhC 8amC _Cnu8, lhC 8CC8 2n lhC anlInCmIC8 8hCuO OC
tCaO a8 QC8IlICn8 CnaCCOIu88ltIQ hCtCI8anunmI8laKaOCa8ymlty
OClVCC lhCmalhCmalIC2 anOlhCdynamICaanlInCmIC8 Cn mCVIn_ tCm
CnC lC lhC ClhCt, VC 8Ccm lC CnlCt a CCmQClCy OICtCnl QaCC. alhCt
lhan tCmaInIn_ OaCd Oy lhI8 OIllCtCnCC, a8 8C many CnI8 CCmCn
lalCt8 h2VC OCCn talCt lhan a8CtIOIn_ Il lC a CCnu8ICn ClhCu_hl, VC
VI lty Ilh lhC hCQ C2Can, lC dtaV Cul lhC C_IC lhal 8u8l2In8 Il
LDa@tez B Zb
hal Is 1 alhCmalICa anlInCm, hCV VCuO VC OCsCtIOC lhC
CCnICl lhal OCCs Il anl ana2Cs lVC `CCsmCC_ICa IOCas lhal QtC
CIQIlalc lhIs VatICl C CCnICl, VC VI OIsCuss Cn thC tsl sInCC Il Is
lhIs CnC lhal sCCms lC us lC CCttCsQCnO mCsl CCsC lC lhC anlInCm
CuO Cn lhC `CmaC sIOC Clhc Ctmuas CsCXuatICn. hC tsl anlI
nC Is CCCasICnCO O lhC allCmQl lC lhInK lhC `VCtO, O VhICh anl
mCns `lhC malhCalICa lCla C a QhCnCmCna anO lhC lClaIl ClhCIt
snlhCsIs [ , lhal Is lC sa, lhc unIVCtsC CQhCnCmCna suCh lhal Il Is
nC Cn_Ct nCCCssat lC QtCsuQQCsC an ClhCt QhCnCmCnCn lhal VCuO
sCt as lhC CCnOIlIn Ct lhIs unIVCtsC. CasCn aIms, lhCn, al thC unCCn
OIlIncO VhCC, lhc 1OsCulC a CQhCnCmCna. hIs allCmQl QtCOuCCs
lV CCnHIClIn_ QtCCsIlICns tC_atOIn_ lhC nalutC ClhIs a a lhCsIs lhC
VCtO has a OC_InnIn In tImC 1nO Is asC ImIlCO In tC_atO lC sQaCC anO
Ils anlIlhCsIs lhC VtO has nC Oc_InnIn_ anO nC ImIls In sQaCC Oul Is,
In tCalICn OClh lC lImC anO sQaCC, InHnIlC
PlCt CXamInIn_ OClh at_umCnls, anl CCnCuOCs lhal VhIC CaCh
suCCCssu OCmCnsltalCs lhC asIly ClhC ClhCt, nCIlhCt Is aOC lC CslaO
Ish CCnVInCIn_Ils CVn ltulh. hIsCCnCusICn CtCalCs a sKCQlICa ImQassC
tCmhICh hC VI h1VC lC CXltICalChImsC sInCC CnC ClhCOasIC lCnCls
ChIs QhICsCQh, hICh CQQCsCs ItsClC sKCQlICIsm, Is lhal CVCt QtCO
Cm C tCasCn aOmIls Cl a sCulICn hC sCulICn hC attIVCs al Is lhC
CCVIn_ talhCt lhan OCsQaItIn_ CVCt lhC aCl lhal VC CannCl ChCCsC
OClVCCn lhC lVC alCtnalIVCs, VC musl CCmC lC lhC tCaI2alICn lhal VC
nCCO nCl ChCCsC, sInCC OClh alCtnalIVCs atC asC hal Is lC sa, lhC lhCsIs
anO anlIlhCsIs slalCmCnls, VhICh InIlIay aQQCatCO lC CCnslIlulC a ctrc
J|ct CQQCsIlIC, lutn Cul uQCn InsQCClICn lC OC ctrcr|es.
n C_IC a CCnltaOIClCt CQQCsIlICn Is CnC lhal CXIsls OClVCCn
lVC QtCQCsIlICns CVhICh CnC Is lhC sImQC OCnIa ClhC ClhCt, sInCC lhC
lVC lC_ClhCt Chausl lhC CnlItC tan_C C QCssIOIIlICs, lhC ltuth C CnC
CslaOIshCs lhC a sIl ClhC ClhCt, anO VICC VCtsa CnltaOIClICn Is a 2CtC
sum aaIt. hC nC_1lICn, VhICh OCats Cn lhC CCQua, CaVCs nClhIn_
OCCnO IlsC, Il CCmQ ClC annIhIalCs lhC ClhCt QtCQCsIlICn. P CCnltat
be aU0 Ue uUaHasa uI Mea suU Z1V
CQQCsIlIOn, Cn lhCClhCthanO, IsCnClhalCXIslsOClVCCn l QtCQCsIlICns
C VhICh CnC OCCs nCl sImQy OCny lhC ClhCt Oul maKCs an asstlICn In
lhC OItCClICn C lhC ClhCt CXltCmC. hC nC_alICn, VhICh Cats lhIs lImC
Cny Cn lhC QtCOICalC, OCCs nCl CXhausl a lhC QCssIOIItICs Oul CaCs
OChInO s CmClhIn_ Cn VhICh Il OCCs nCl QtCnCunCC Ct lI8 tCasCn |cth
slalCmCnls may sImulanCCusy OC asC
n CtOCt lC maKC lhIs C_IC Css asltaCl, anl tCsCtls lC an
unChataClCtIslICay Qun_Cnl CXamQC lhal suCCCssuy IustalCs Vhal Is
al slaKC In lhC malhCmatICa anlInCmICs. C CQQCsCs lhC slaCmCnl `1CO
ICs smC _CCO lC a CCnltaty, `1COICs smC aO, In CtOC tC shCV lhal
lhC sCCCnO OCCs nCl sImQy nC_alC lhC Htsl Ct VhICh `OOICs atC nCl
_CCO smCIn_ VCud haC OCCn suCICnl ul _CCs Cn lC CsIl anClhCt
smC, lhIs lImC a aO CnC. hIC Il Is nCl QCssIOC Ct Olh C lhCsC
QtCQCsIlICns lC OC ltusInCC ta_tanCC anO CunCss CanCC CaCh ClhCt
Cul~Il Is QCssIOC Ct OClh lC OC assInCC nCIlhCt laKCs InlC aCCnl
anClhC CssIOIIly, lhal COICs may OC COCt ItCC
C IusltalC lhIs C_ICa QCInl OICtCnly, VC mI_l nOtC lhat Il
Is lhC sltulutC CCCnltaty CQQCsIlICn lhat QtCOuCCs lhC `hC OIO yCu
slCQ OCalIn_ yCut VIC CKC hC Cm ClC QuCslICn, IC sCCmIn_
lC aC lhC aOOtCssCC lC suQQy any ansVCt hC ChCCsCs, In aCl aCVs
hI Cy lC ChCCsC amC_ CCnltatICs. l OCCs nCt aCV IH lC nC_1lC
lhC aCusalICn ImQICIl In lhC QuCslICn.
anl aVOIOs lhC sKCQlICa ImQassC y tCusIn_ l ansVCt lhC
QuCslICn `s lhC VCtO HnIlC Ct InItC anO y InslCaO nC_alIn_ lhC
assumQlIOn ImQICIl In lhC uCslICn lhC VCtO |s. sOn_ a8 OnC assumCs
lhal lhC VCtO CXIsls, lhC lhCsIs anO anlIlhCsIs ClhC CCsmCC_ICa anlI
nCmy aVC lC OC tC_atOCO as CnltaOIClCty, as Huluay CXCsC anO
CXhauslIVC alCtnalIVCs. nC Is lhus CtCCO lC ChOCsC 1ul OnCC lhIs as
sumQlICn Is shCVn lC OC I CunOCO, nCIlhCt alCtnalIVC nCO OC laCn as
ltuC a hCICCIs nC Cn_Ct nCCCssaty. hCsCulICn lC lhIs antInCy, lhCn,
ICs In OCHCnsltalIn_ lhC Cty InCChCtCnCy CIlhIs assumQlICn lhCa|se|te
|mcss|||||ty 294) [anl s VCtOs ClhC VCtO s CXIslCnCC hIs Is OCnC
LUagtex 6 ZZ
y shIn_ lhal lhC CtO Is a sCI CCnltaOIClCty CCnCCQl, lhal lhC aO
sCulC llaIly Can CnCss QtC_tCssICn Is InCCnCCIVaOC Oy OCHnIlICn.
CV sC lhC VCtO Is an CO]CCl CCXCtICnCC, as lhCsCsC Ca_Ct
lC OCltInC Ils ma_nIluOC suQQCsC, lhCn lhC CCnOIlICns CIlhC QCssIOIIly
CCXQCtICnCC muslOCClIn CCnCCIVIn_ Il. hus, lhC CssCnlIaOanKtuQlCy
ClhC IOCa ClhC VCt VI OC maOC VIsIOC Oy lhC OCmCnsltalICn CIls
InaOII ly lC mCCl lhCsC Ctma CCnOIlICns hCsC CCnOIlICns sQCCIy lhal a
CssIC COCCl Ct CXQCtICnCC musl OC CCalaOC lhtCu_h a QtC_tCssICn Ct
tC_tCsICn CQhCnCmCn1 In lIC anO sQaCC. hC CCnCCQl Can aOsCulC
lClaIl QhCnCmCn1, hCVCVCt, QtCCuOCs lhC QCssIOIIly CsuCh a scces
s|ca OCCausC Il Is _tasaOC Cny as lhC s|mu|tcae|ty C QhCnCmCna. hC
tuCCtCasCn lhal tCQuItCs us lC sCCKalCtCCnOIlICns Is lhCtCCtC aOtIO_CO
Oy lhC CCnCCQlICn ClhC tuC s lCla salIsaClICn, lhal Is, Oy lhC CCnCClICn
CtlhC VCtO. POhCtCnCC lC lhC tuC anO lhC CCmClC salIsaClICn CIlhC
tuC aC, Il lutns Cul, anlInCmIC. hC VCtO Is an CO]CCl lhal OCsltCys lhC
mCan CnOIn_ Il Il Is Ct lhIs tCsCn IC_IlImalC lC Ca Il an CO]CCl al
a . P unIVCtsC CQhCnCmCna Is a ltuC CCnltaOIClICn In lCtms, t|e ucr|J
ccact caJJces ct e|st.
aVIn_ OCmCnsltalCO lhC ImQCssIOIIly C lhC CXIslCnCC C lhC
VCtO, anl Can lhCn OIsmIssOClh lhC lhCsIs anO lhC anlIlhCsIs slalCmCnls.
hIs Is InOCCO Vhal hC OCCs VhCn hC slalCs hIs sCulICn lVICC, Htsl I n a
nC_alIVC anO lhCn In an atmalIVC Ctm. `hC VCtO has nC OC_InnIn_
In lImC anO nC aOsCulC ImIl In sQaCC, Is lhC nC_alIVC sCulICn, Il OCnICs
lhC lhCsIs VIlhCul _CIn_ Cn, as lhC anlIlhCsIs OCCs, lC maKC a CCunlCtas
sCtlIC hCtC Can OC nC ImIl lC QhCnCmCna In lhC QhCnCmCna tCam,
Ct lhIs VCuO tCQuItC lhC CXIslCnCC Ca QhCnCCnCn Can CXCCQlICna
sCtl, CnC lhal Vas nCl IlsC CCnOIlICnCO anO VCuO lhus aCV us lC hal
Cut tC_tCss , Ct CnC lhal lCCK nC QhCnCmCna Ctm, I C. , lhal Vas CmQly
a VCIO sQaCC Ct a VCIO lImC. 1ul CCaty lhCsC sC CCnltaOIClICns aOmIl Ct
nC tCa QCssIOIIlICs. C QhCnCmCna atC CXCmQl tCm lhC tuCs CtCasCn
lhalaCnC HaKClhCm CO] CCls CCu CXQCtICnCC. t, there|sc|ececa
be aU tDe utDaUasa U MeasUU ZZ1
t|c| | s c| c c|ec| O oss|||e exe|ece [ Ct nCl sUO CCl tC lhC tuC
tC_tCss
X.
anl lhCn _OCs Cn lC OIsmIss lhC anlIlhCsIs Oy statIn_ lhat thC
tC_tCss In lhC sCtICs CQhCnCmCn~as a OClCtnInlICn lhC COsmIa
uanlIty, QtCCCCOs |e]||um" 294) . al Is, Cut aCKnCVCO_mCnl ClhC
aOsCnCC Ca ImIt lC lhC sCl CQhCnCmCna OCCs nClCOI_CuslC maInlaIn
lhC antIlhClI Ca QCsIlICn~lhat lhCy atC talhCt, I COI_Cs us tO
tCCCnI2C lhC OasIC|tuJe Ca QhCnCmCna, lhC aCl lha lhCy atC InCs
CaQaO suO] CCl lC COnOIlICns Cl lImC anO sQaCC 1nO nusl thCtCCtC OC
CnCCunlCtCO CnC Oy OnC, InOCnIlCy, VIlhCul lhC QCssIOIIly CtCaChIn_
an CnO a QCInl VhCtC a QhCnCmCna VCuO OC KnCVn. C slatus CthC
VCtO Is nCl InHnIlC Out InOClCtmInalC c| c|| ecmeoc cre c css|||e
c|ec|cexer|ece.
X .
hC sCulICn CCtCO Oy ant s CtIlICa QhICsCQhyuslOCsl1lCd
lVICCsC as lC _uatOa_aInslanyQCssIOCmIsunOCtstandIn_ CtlhC sImQC
slalCmCnl lhal lhCtC Is nC ImIl lC QhCnCmCna VI mQy lC lhCsC _Cn
lC ltansCCnOCnla IusICns thalthCVCtO Is ImItCss, VhCtCas lhC sImQC
slalCmCnl thal lhal nCl a QhCnCmCna Can OC nCVn VI ImQy thl al
Casl CC hCnCmCnOn CsCaQCs CutCXQCtICnCC.
CV, Il shCuO OC COVICus lhal lhC Ctuas VCaC QtOOCCO
tCm anl lVC slalCmCnls tC_atOIn_ lhC CtICn C lC Htsl malhC
malICa anlInCmy Otmay tCOUQICalC thCsC lal aCan _IVCs Ct lhC
VCman, VhO, IC lhC VCtO, OCCs nCt CXIsl. ul hCV Can lhIs QataC
OClVCCn VCman anO VCtO OC suslaInCO hCV Is Il lhal aCan Can sQCa
ClhC nCnCXIslCnCC ClhC VCman ut tCsQCnsC musl OC_In VIlh aCans
CVn CQanalICn I arJe |cscy ' ||ex|sts, ' |t|sa|sc ecess tc |ec||e tc
ccstruc| ||, t|c||s tcscy, |c |cu |cu |c]Ju|ere t||s ex|s|cce |s.' Ou
VI OC aOC lC hCat In lhIs CXQanalICn Ils 1nlIan lCnCs, Oul yCu shCuO
hCat In Il as VC CChCCs C tCuO, VhC at_uCO lhal In CtOCt lC HnO an
CO] CCl, yCu musl asC OC aOC lC tCHnd Il. lhC VCnan OCCs nOl CIst,
lhIs Is OCCausC shC CannCl OC tCCunO. Pl lhIs QCInl CQan1tCy
tCslalCmCnl CaCans nCl Cty VCundCtslCCO OItu VI sCCn nC Css
LMatc ZZZ
CQC lhan Ils C_Ia y InlCnlICn, hCVCVCt, Is lC CatIy lhIs CXQa
nC as tCCCCO tDtCu_h lhC CXICalICn ClhC OynamICa anlInCmICs
a, Oy lhI ulhCt lC CslaOIsh lhC InK OClVCCn anl anO tCuOIan
QCDCanaysIs
Ct lhC mnt Cl us CCnlInuC lC allCnO lC lhC QutCy anlIan
lnCs CIaCan s lalCCnl. aCan I unOCuOlCOy a_uIn_ lhal a CCnCCQl
CVman CannCl OC CnsltuClCO OCCausC lhC lasK Cuy unCOIn_ hCt
COIlICns Is CnC haI CannCI, In aIuaIIy, OC CattICO CuI. bInCC VC atC
HnIlC OCIn_, OCuO Oy sQaCC anO lImC, Cut KnCVCO_C Is suO]CCl lC
hIlCICa CCnOIlIns u CCnCCQlICn C VCman CannCl `tun ahCaO C
lDCsC ImIls anO lDs CannCl CCnsltuCl a CCnCCQl ClhC VhCC CVCman
ut C OCCs lDIs anlIan QCsIlICn OICt tCm lhC CnC alICualCO Oy
ulCt and ClhCt s Cut QCsIlICn tCay sC muCh al COOs VIlh lhC CnC
lDal CV sC ClCn QCsCs IlsC a_aInsl CVCty unIVCtsaIsm lhCtC Is nC
_CnCa CalC_Cty CVCman Ct Cman, nC _CnCta CalC_Cty ClhC suO] CCl
lDCtC atC Cny hIlCtICay sQCCIHC CalC_CtICs C suO]CCls as dCHnCO Oy
QatlICuat anO OIVCtsC OIsCCutsCs hal Is lhC OICtCnCC OClVCCn Ct
InlCtQtClalICn C`lhC VCman OCCs nCl CXsl anO lhC ICCVIn_ CnC VC
aC mIs_uIOCO VhCn C maKC CaIms Ct lhC CXIslCnCC ClhC VCman, Ct
lh CalC_Cty CI `VCmCn Is nCtmalIVC anO CXCusICnaty anO
InVCKCO VIlh lhC unmatKCO OImCnsICns CCass and taCIa QtIV
IC_C InlaCl n ClhCt VCtOs, lhC InsIslCnCC uQCn lhC CChCtCnCC
anO unIly ClhC CalC_Cy C VCmCn has CCClIVCy tCusCO lhC
muIQICIly CCulutC, sCCIa, anO QCIlICa InlCtsCClICns In VhICh
lhC CCnCClC attay C`VCmCn atC CCnsltuClCO [1ulCt,
CtC Il I OCIn_ u__CslCO lhal lDC unIVCtsa CalC_Cty CVCman CCnlta
dICls and Is CCnltadIClCO Oy CuttCnt VCtK lhal InVCslI_alCs lhC Cass anO
taCIa OICtCnCCs aCn_ VCmCn as lhCy atC CCnsltuClCO Oy VatICus QtaC
lICCs. C C_IC ClhC at_umCnl I tIslClCIan, lhal Is, Il CCnCCIVCs lhC
unIVCtsa a a QCsIlIVC, HnIlC lCtm [`nCtmalIVC anO CXCuICnaty lhal
be a tUe utDaUa UtMeasuU ZZ
nOs Ils ImIl In anClhCt QCsIlIVC, HnIlC lCt QatlICuat OmCn C `lhC
CCnCtClC attay C VCmCn hC nC_alICn ClhC a QtCOuCs lhCn, lhC
QatlICuat. hC CCnOCmnalICn ClhC OInatIsm CsCX lhal I s aunChCO
tCm lbIs QCsIlICn tmy _tCunOs IlsCIn a OInaty C_IC lhal CCnCCIVCs
lhC unICtsa anO lhC QatlICuat as CXhauslIC QCssIOIIlICs.
anlhaO sCClhIn_ CsC In mInOVhCnhCat_uCOlhal lhC malh
CmalICa anlInCmICs OCmCnsltalCO lhC ImIls CtCasCn Is QCInl~VhICh
OCats tQCalIn_ Is lhal Cut tCasCn Is IIlCO OCCausC t|er:eue jur
kau|eye |are ac |e, ae ||m|t, u|a| ||m||s recsa |s a |ac j/|m||. Is
InsI_hl Is CCmQtCmIsCOnCl CCntCO~VhCCVCt VC CCnCCIVClhCnCl
a Cn lhC sIOC CCXlCnsICn lhal Is hCnCVCt VC CCnCCIV lhC nC_alICn
ClhC CtO, Ct CunIVCtsa tCasCn anO Ils QtClCnsICnlC OC aOC lC sQCa
Ca QhCnCmCna as sImQy ImQyIn_ lhal a VC may QtCQCty KnCV atC
nIlC atlICuat QhCnCmCna. Ct In lhIs CasC, VC sImQy 8uQQy tCasOn
VIlh a extec| ImIl Oy suQQCsIn_ a sC_mCnl ClImC, lh ultC lhal
CXlCnOs OCyCnO anO lhCtCOy CsCaQCs tCasCn hIs CImInalC8 tOm tCasCn
Ils |atera|ImIl, VhICh aCnC OCHnCs Il
CCa lhal anl maInlaInCO lhal lhC tsl anlInCHy QtCVIOCO
InOItCC QtCCC`lhC ltansCCnOCnla IOCaIly CQhCnCmCna CtC Is lhC
QtCC as anl summatI2Cs Il
lhC VCtO s a VhCC CXIslIn_ In IlsC, Il musl C CIlhCt HnIlC
CtInnIlC. 1ulIlIsnCIlhCtHnIlCnCtInHnIlas has OCCnshCn,
Cn lhCCnC sIOCOy lhC lhCsIs, CnlhCClhCt sIOC, Oy thC anlIlhCsIs.
hCtCCtC lhC VCtO~lhC CCnlCnl C a QhCnCCna~Is nCl a
VhCC CXIslIn_ In IlsC l CCVs lha QhCnCmCna 2tC nClhIn_,
aQatl tCm Cut tCQtCsCnlalICns .
anls C_IC VCuO aQQCat lC OC HaCO IlhC nC_alICn CCnlaInCO
In lhC QCnulImalC slalCmCnl VCtC laKCn as a ||m||a||caCa hCnCmCna,
Ct C lhC VCtO, lC QatlICuat QhCnCmCna. l Is QCssIOC lO Qass lC hIs
CCnCusICn Cny I CnC laKCs lhC QCnulIalC slalCmCnl a8 an |aJe]a/|e
L0 ZZ4
u
eat . ' ' al Is, Vhal Is nVOCO hCtC Is nC lhC nC_alICn Oa CCQua
su lal a QhCnCmCna s COQClCy CanCCCO Ct CImInalCO, CaVIn_
Ils mQCmCnl~sCmC Ct tlICuat QhCnCmCna~lC CCmmanO lhC HCd,
Ou aDCt th atmalICn a nC_alIVC tCOICalC. hICh Is lC say, anl
Is tIn_ Da lhC Ony Va lC aVCIO lhC anlInCmICs In VhICh lhC IOCa C
Vt CnltaQs us I s lC a tDl lhC VCtO Is nCl a QCssIOC CO]CCl C
CXCICnCC VIlhCul QtCnCnCIn_ OCyCnO lhIs Cn lhC CXIslCnCC C lDC
Vt O. hIs CCnCCIVCs tCasOn as ImIlCO Oy nClhIn_ Oul Ils CVn nalutC
[Il CQCnOCnCC Cn lhC mCy tC_ualIVC IOCa C lClaIly , as |ateraa||y
IIlCO
hIs Is lhCVCty CtX OlhC OICtCnCC OClVCCn IhC anlIan QC
sIlI anO thC hIslCtICIsl CC. t, VC shCuO say, OClVCCn lDC anlIan
Lccn|cn QCsIlICn anO lhC IslCCIsl CnC, sInCC aCan aOCQls a sImIat
slanCC VIlD tC_atO lC lhC VCan. hCn hC says `hC Cman Is nCl
a hC OCmanOs lhal VC tCaO hIs slalCmCnl as an |aJe]a|teuJymcat.
Dus, VhIC hC OCCs InOCCO aI, as hIs tCaOCtshaVC ClCn OCCn hCttIHCO
lC COsCtVC, lhal lhC IOCa ClhC VCman Is a CCnltaOIClICn CItCasCn, anO
lha shC lhCtCCtC CCs nCl CXIsl, hC asC CaIms, anO lhIs has nCl OCCn as
tCaOIy COsCtVCO, lhal hCt CXIslCnCC caaae| OC CCnltaOIClCO Oy tCasCn
Ct, COVICusy, Can Il OC CCnHtmCO. n ClhCt VCtOs, hC CaVCs CQCn lhC
QCssIOIIy C lhCtC OCIn_ sCmClhIn_~a CmInInCeu|sscac lhal Is un
CCalaOC In CXQCtICnCC, lhal CannCl, th, OC saIO lC CXIsl In lhC symOCIC
CtOCt hC CX sIslCnCC ClhC VCman Is nCl Cny ae|OCnICO, Il Is asC nCl
CCOCmnaOC as a `nCtmalIVC anO CXCusICnaty nClICn, Cn lhC CCnltaty,
lhC aCanIan QCsIlICn at_uCs lhal Il Is Cny Oy tCusIn_ lC dCny~Ct
CCHtm~DCt CX sIslCnCC lhal nCtmalIVC anO CXCusICnaty lhInKIn_ Can
OC aVCIOCO haI Is, IlIs Cny Oy aCKnCVCd_In_ lhal a CCnCCQl CVCman
caaae| CXIsl, lhal Il Is sltuClutay ImQCssIOC VIlhIn lDC symOCIC CtOCt,
lhal CaCh DslCtICa CCnsltuClICn C hCt Can OC ChaCn_CO. Ct, alCt a,
nClhIn_ QtChIOIls lhCsC hIslCtICa CCnsltuClICns tCm assCtlIn_ lhCIt un
VCtsa ltulD VIlnCss lhC hIsCtICa assCtlICn lha a _CnCta, ltanshIslCtICa
e aD te utUaUasa UMeasUU ZZb
CalC_Cy C VCman Jees net CXIsl. hC ltulh C lhIs assCtICn Is sImQy
nCl aaIaOC lC a hIslCtICa suO]CCl
Cl us OC CCat lhal CnC C lhC CCnsCQuCnCCs C lhC aCanIa
at_umCnl Is lhal Il, lCC, IKC hIslCtICIsm, Cas InlC QuCslIC lhC COCCI
OIIly CVCmCn InlC a VhCC. l lhus asC tC_atOs a CCtls al a CaIlIC
QCIlICs as QtCOCmalIC. ul unIKC lhC hIslCtICIsls, aCan sCs lhC CCCC
lIOIIly CVCmCn as ImQCICO nCl Oy lhC CXlCa CCIsICns COICCnl
OCHnIlIns Oul Oy lhC InlCtna ImIl C CaCh anO CCty OCHIlIC, VhIC
aIs sCmChCV lC `CnCCHQass hCt. aCan s QCsIlICn CQCns Cul OnlC 3
OCyCnO lhal Il Is ImQCssIOC lC CCnHtm Ct OCny.
uO_In_ tCm lhC CmInIsl OtCuhaha lhal has suttCunCO lhC
tCCtCnCC lC lhIs OCyCnO, VC Can saCy assumC lhal Il CCOs utlhCt
CXQanalICn anO OCCnsC l has tCQuCnly OCCn laKCn lC CCnsIsl OCnC
mCtC tCC_alICn ClhC VCman lC lhC CulsIOC Can_ua_C nO lhC sCCIa
OOCt, CnC mCtC allCmQl lC OanIsh hCt lC sCmC `OatK CCnlInCnl as I
anyCtm CIC haO CCt OCCn CunO lC sutIC VIlhIn lhC OCaO sluClutCs
C an_ua_C C musl lhCtCCtC OC mCtC CXQICIl aOCul usl Vhal Is
mCanl y lhC `aIutC ClhC symOCIC VIlh tCsQCCl lC lhC Cman, Vhal
Is sI_naCO Oy lhC InOCHIlC ]uO_mCnl. hC symOCIC aIs lC CCnslIlu|C
nCl lhC rea|||y Oul, mCtC sQCCIHCay, lhC ex|steaceClhC VOma. C bC
HCtC QtCCIsC Vhal aIs, Vhal OCCCmCs ImQCssIOC, Is lhC tCnOCtIn_ Ca
]uO_mCnl C CXIslCnCC. Ps Cn_ as Il Can OC OCmCnsltalCO hal VOtO Ct
VCman CannCl Ctm a VhCC, a unICtsC~lhal Is, lhallhCC Is nC ImIl
lC QhCnCmCna C an_ua_C, nC QhCnCmCnCn lhal Is nCl an CO] CCl C
CXQCtICnCC, nC sI_nIHCt VhCsC auC OCCs nCl OCQCnO Cn aClhCtlhC
lhC QCssIOIIly C]uO_In_ VhClhCt Ct nCl lhCsC QhCnCmCna Ct lhCsC sI_
nIHCts _IC us InCtmalICn aOCul a tCaIlyInOCQCnOCnl Cu8 anIshCs
CtOCt lC OC aOC lC OCCatC lhal a lhIn_ CXIsls, Il Is nCCCssaty asC lC bC
aOC l CnCuOC ClhCtVsClhal Il OCCs nCl. ul hCV Is lhIs sCCCnO,
nC_alIC]uO_mCnl QCssIOCIlhCtCIs nC QhCnCmCnCn lhal Is nClan COCCl
CCutCXQCtICnCC, lhalIs, I lhCtC atCnC mClaQhCCmCna lhalCsCaQCCut
CXQCtICnCC anO atClhus aOC lC ChaCn_ClhCaIOIlyClhCsC lhal OOnCl
fat ZZb
C CK C a IIl lC hCnCmCna anO lC sI_Cts QtCCus QtCCIsCy
lhIs H mClaan_a_C, VIlhCul VhICh VC atC tCsltIClCO lC CnCss at
malIn, hal Is, lC atmIn_ VIlhCul CnO~anO VIlhCul OCIn_ aC lC
nC_al anylhC CCnlIn_Cnl sCtICs CQhCnCmCna lhal QtCsCnl lhCmsCVCs
lC s hCtC Is, as tCu saIO ClhC unCCnsCICus, nC nC VhCtC nC Iml
Is QCsIC nO as VIlh lhC unCCsCICus sC hCtC, lCC, CCnltaOIClICn Is
nCCCsatIy I_nCtCO, sICC CVCtylhIn_ as lC C CCnsIOCtCO CQuay ltuC
hCt atC nC aVaaC mCans CCmInalIn_ InCCnsIslCnCy VhCtC nClhn_
may OC]uO_CO asC
C, VhCtCas hslCtICIslCmInIsls CuttCnly QtCQCsClhal VC tC_atO
lhCa_tC_alICn `CmaCsuO]CCl QCsIlICns as lhC sCulICn lC lhC `tIOOC
CCInInIly, lalIs, lhal VCaCKCVCO_ClhC JereaccsIn lhCsC VaCus
CCsltuClICns C VCman anO lhC nCnnCCCssIly ClhCIt tCalICn lC CaCh
ClhCt In CtOCt nay lC ay lC tCsl lhC QuCslICn C Vhal a Cman Is,
aCa QtCQCsCs lhal lhIs `sCulICn Is a Oalum In nCCO C CXQanalICn.
Is Il~aCan tCQuItCs us nCl lCtCslCCnlCnl VIl lhCCsCtalICn Ol
lC InQuItC utlhCt~ Is Il lhal VCman OCCs nCl Ctm anahyIs Il
lhal VC musl sCC In lhC IsCutsIVC CCnsltuClICns C VCmCn a sCtICs C
ICtCnCCs, anO nCVCt CnCCunlCt amCn_ lhCm VCman as suCh aCan
ansVCts lhal lhC VCman Is nCl a CCausC shC aCKs a ImIl, Oy VhICh hC
Cans shCIs nCl susCCQlIOC lC lhC thtCal CCasltalICn lhC nC CmCOICO
Oy lIs lhtCal OCCs nCl unClICn Ct hCt. 1ul lIs may OC mIsCaOIn_, Ct
hIC Il Is ltuC lhal lhC lhtCal has nC QutChasC Cn lhC VCman, Il s CtuCIa
lC nClC lhal lhC VCman Is lhC CCnsCQuCnCC anO nCl lhC CausC C lhC
nCnnClICnIn_ CnC_alICn. hC I8 lhC aIutC ClhC ImIl, nCl lhC CausC
CthC aIutC
n sum, VCman Is lhCtC VhCtC nC ImIl nlCtVCnCs lC nhIIl lh
QtC_tCssIVC unCOIn_ CsI_nIHCts, VhCtC, lhCtCCtC, a]u_mCnl CCX
IslCnCC OCCCmCs ImQCssIOC. hIs mCans lhal CVCtylhIn_ Can C anO Is
8aI aOCul hCt, Oul lhal nCnC CIl Is sO] CCl lC `tCaly lCslIn_~nCnC C
ha Is saIO amCunls lC a CCnHtmalICn Ct OCnIa ChCt CXIslCnCC, VhICh
lhCty CuOCs CVCty symOCIC atlICualICn. hC tCalICn ClhC VCman lC
be tDe UtD m sa UeasUU
Z
lhC symOCIC an lC lhC QhaIC tunClICn Is CCnsIOCtaOy CQICatO Oy
lhIs at_umCnl. Ct IlI sQtCCIsCy OCCausCshCIs lClay, lhalIs, IHIlCssy
InsCtIOCO VIlhIn lhC symOCIC lhal shC Is In sCmC sCnsC Vhy CulsIOCIt,
VhICh Is lC say lhC QuCslICn CthCt CXIstCnCC Is aOsCutC unOCCIOaOC
VIlhIn Il.
tCm lhIs VC atC COI_CO lC tCCC_nI2C lhal lhC VCman Is InOCCO
a QtCOuCl ClhC syOCIC. 1ul VCmusl asC tCCC_nI2C thal In QtCOuCIn_
hCt, lhC symOCIC OCCs nCl unCtICn In lhC Vay lhal VC atC aCCuslCmCO
lC thInKIn_ Il OCCs tOInatIy VClhInK ClhC syOCIC as s ynCnymCus
In aCaan tCtms, VIlh lhC lhCt. hC lhCt Is, hCVCVCt Oy OCHnItICn
lhal VhICh _uatanlCCs Cut CCnsIstCnCy, anO, as VC haVC sCCn, lhCtC Is nC
suCh _uatanlCC VhCtC lhC VCman Is CCnCCtnCO. bhC, Ct lhC syOCIC thal
CCnsltuCls hCt, Is ttau_hl VIlh InCCnsIstCnCICs C atC lhus CO lC lhC
CCnCusCnlhallhC VCmanIs a QtCuClCa `symOCICVIlhulan lhC.
Ct lhIs nCVy CCnCCIVC CntIly aCan, In hIs asl VtIlIn_s, CCInCO lhC
lCtm |aayue. Cman Is lhC QtCOuCl C|a|ayue.
D0 a0 b0t aUca aMUte
t VC VCtC lC Qay Oy lhC tuCs ChIslCtICIsm, VC VCuO aVC lC at_uC
lhal, IC lhC VCman, lhC man OCCs nCl CXIsl, lhal nC _CnCta CatC_Cty
Ct man Is InslanlIalC In lhC mulIQICIly C maC sO CCl CsItICns thal
CVCty Cta CnsltCls hus, a nCmInaIsl at_umCnl, IKC 3 InO CtlhCC
tClICa sCVCnl, CuttCnly mana_Cs lC OIssCVC lhC CalC_CtIC8 Cman aO
VCman aIKC. PCCCtOIn_ lC aCan, hCVCVCt, VC ccnt symmCltICay
a_uC lhal thC man OCCs nCl CXIsl C haVC, IlhC Cl hanO sIOC C lhC
sCXuatIn laOCIs lC OCOCICVCO, nCQtCOCmInCCalIn_ I, In QtCCaI
In_ hIs CXIslCnCC
hIs slalCmCnl may CCmC as a sutQtIsC an nCl ny lC hIslC
tICIsls. Ct Cut IsCussICn has CO us lC assumC lhat lhC tuC C tCasCn,
VhICh IQCs us lC sCCK atlCt a lClaIty CtCCnOIlICns, musl CtCVCt tCnOCt
any uO_Cnl C CXIslCnCC ImQCssIOC. C atC lhCtCCtC uQtCQatCO Ct
Lbagtez 8
buDD8ty O lDC f_uuCnl O! Cy an lhC ulhan88I8 O HC8>un
1ynauIC8l/aC
DC8I8. lau88lIly 8CCOfOIn_ lO lDC 8V8
Ol n8lUtC I8 nOl lhC Ony C8u88Ily OQCt
alIn_ lO OtI_In8lC lC VOtlU. C8u8aIly
Ol ltCCOOu i8 al8O nCCC888ty lO 8CCOunl
uly Ot lhC8C QhCnOmCn8.
nlIlDC8I8. hCfC I8 nO 8uCh lhIn_ 88
ltCCUOu, Dul CVCtylhin_ In lhC VOlO
h8QQCn8 8OlC y 8CCOfdin_ lO lhC aV8 O
n8lufC.
3x
Vx
0x
0x
8lhCu8lIC8llCu8C
3x
Vx
0x
x
ZZb
lhC CCn]utIn_ aVay CllhIs ImQCssIOIIly, VhICh sCCms lC OC ImQICO Oy
lhC CCnHtmalICn CllhC CXIslCnCC Cman. P sImIat sutQtIsC Is tC_uaty
CXQtCssCO Oy anls CCmmCnlalCts, VhC VCnOCt al lhC suOOCn CasC VIlh
VhICh a tCsCulICn C lhC OynamICa anlInCmICs Is CunO hCtC lhCsIs
anO anlIlhCsIs C lhC malhCmalICa anlInCmICs VCtC OClh OCCmCO lC OC
asC OCCausC OClh IC_IlImalCy assCtlCO lh CIslCnCC Cl lhC VCtO Ct
lhC CCmQCsIlC suOslanCC , lhC lhCsIs anO anlIlhCsIs C lhC OynamICa an
lInCmICs atC OClh OCCmCO Oyanl lCOC ltuC. n lhC Htsl CasC, lhC CCnHICl
OClVCCn lhC lVC QtCQCsIlICns Vas lhCu_hl lC OC ttCsCVaOC sInCC lhCy
maOC CCnltaOIClCty CaIms aOCul lhC samC CO]CCl In lhC sCCCnO CasC, lhC
CCnHIClIs `mItaCuCusy tCsCCO OylhCassCtlICnlhallhClVCslalCmCnls
OC nCl CCnltaOICl CaCh ClhCt Il VCtC mCtCy a mallCt ClhC lhCsIs, CnC
VCuO haC nC OICuly InaCCCQlIn_ lhIs at_umCnl lhClhCsIs , ausaIly
aCCCtOIn_ lC lhC aVs C nalutC Is nCl lhC Cny CausaIly CQCtalIn_ lC
be aH tbe UtaHas1a u MeasuH ZZV
CtI_Inal lhC QhCnCmCna C thC VCtO P CausaIty C tCCOOm Is asC
nCCCssaty lC aCCCunluy Ct lhCsC QhCnCmCna, CCnCCOCs lhC IQCtlanCC
Cnaluta CausaIly anO mCtCy InsIsls Cn a suQQCmCnt ClltCCdC. t Is,
hCVCVC, nCl sC C1sy lC OtIn_ lhC anlIlhCsIs In InC VIl at s OCnIa O
CCnltaOIClICn. hC slalCmCnt `hCtC Is nC suCh lhIn_ as lCCCm, Oul
CVCtylhIn_ In lhC VCtO haQQCns sCCy aCCCtOIn_ lC lhC as OlnalutC
manIlCslytCsIslsCtnC_alCslhCthCsIs. VCatC lCaCCCQlanl 8at_umCnl
lhat OCl slalCCnls atC sImulanCCusy ltuC, C atC _CIn_ O aVC lC OC
sC Jcsp|tlhC CCat CCnltaOIClICn. n shCtl, VC IhaVC lC aVaI CutsCCs
C a nCn PtIslClCIan C_IC~usl as V OIO VIlh lhC malhCmatICa
anlInCmICs .
C VI nCl OC CCnCCtnCO In Vhal CCVs VIlh lhC 8CCICs C
anls at_umCnts aOCul lhC CCsmCC_ICa IOC1s CtCCOC anO CO sC
muChasVIlhlhC Vay lhCsCCCnOsClCanlInCmICs CVCtCCmC8 lCImQassC
QtCsCnlCO Oy lhC Htsl sCl. C musl asC nClC lhat lhC Cl h1nO, Ct m1C,
sIOC ClhC lCtmuas C sCXualICn tCQCals lhC C_IC Canl s tCsCulICn
`hCtC Is al Cast CnC lhal Is nCl suOmIllCO lC lhC QhaIC lClICn 1nO
`P s atC suOmItlCO lO lhC QhaIC unCtICn atC OClh laKn lO OC ltuC,
OCsQIlC thC aCt that lhC antIlhCsIs s CaIm lC InCusIVCnCss Is OOVICsy
asIHCO Oy lhC thCsIs, lhat Is, thC a ClhC antIlhCsIs Is n_alCO Oy lhC
lhCsIs.
PnO yC anl says lhal lhC anlIthCsIs Is te, hC CCntms lhC
CXIslCnCC ClhC 1, lhC unIVCtsa, ]usl as aCan CCnHts lhC CXIslCnCC C
lhCunICtsC ClmCn. InCC lhCCXIslCnCC ClthC unIVCtsC V18 tC_atOCO I n
lhCCasCCllhC Cman as ImQCssIOC OCCausC nC ImIl CCu OC lCunO lC
lhCChaIn CsI_nIHCts, Il VCuO OC smatl lC assumC lhallhCCtmalICn C
lhC a Cn lhC maC sIOC OCQCnOs Cn lhC QCsItIn_ Cl a ImIl 1ul thIs
tCsCulICn Is CtC CasIy sutmIsCO lhan suQQCtlCO, sInCC C VCtC QtC
sCnlCO Cn thC lCmaC sIOC VIlh _CCO tCasCnslCtOCICVIn_ lh1l lC QCsIlIn_
C a ImIt V1s ImQCssIOC, lhal lhCtC CCuO OC nC ClaQhCnCmCna, nC
mClaan_ua_C. C CannOl Cn lhC maC sIOC, OCQatt ltCm lhC C Csl1O
IshCO tC CltCasCn~nCt OC VC.
Lt ZJ
n aCl, lhC ImIl Cn lhC sInIslCt, Ct OynamICa, sIOC OCCs nCl
QtCdCC lbC QCssIOIIly ImClaa_a_C Oul sImQy CCVCts CVCt Ils aCK.
bI s Is aCCCQIshC Oy 1OOIn_ l ClhC sCtICs CQhCnCmCna [Ct sI_nIHCts
1 nCalIVCud_mCnltC_atdIn_ Vhal CannCl OCInCuOCOIn lhC sCtICs. hC
Qbta8C hCtC Is nC suC lhIn_ as tCCOCm, VhICh aQQCats In lhC anlIlb
CsIs lhClhItO anlInCmy [lC laKC lhIs CnCas an CXamQC , sCtVCs QtCCIsCy
lhIs unClIC, lhC unClICn CImIl y mCans ClhIs nC_alIVCuO_mCnl,
lhC InCCnCCIVaOIIly CI tCCOCm Is CCnCCQluaI2CO anO lhC sCtICs CQhC
nCmCna CCasCs lC OC CQCn CndCd Il OCCCmCs a CCsCO sCl, sInCC Il nCV
InCudCs~aOCIl In nC_alIVC Ct~lhal VhICh Is CXCuOCO tCm Il lbal
Is, Il nCV ICuOCs eve|h|ny. Cu VI nClC lhal lhIs ereryth|ay aQQCats
as a CCnsCQuCnCC In lbC sCCCnd Qbt1sC ClhC lhItO anlInCmys anlIlhCsIs
`1ul CVCtylhIn_ In lhC VCtO haQQCns sCCy aCCCtOIn_ lC lhC aVs C
n1lutC udOCy lhC VCtO, VhICb Vas QtChIOIlCO tCm CtmIn_ In lhC
malhCmalICa anlInCmICs, CCmCs InlC OCIn_ Cn lhC OynamICa sIOC.
n sQCaKIn_ C lhIs ImQCsIlICn C a ImIl as an aOOIlICn, as a
su| emea|at|ea C naluta CausaIly, VC haVC In aCl QtCsCnlCO lhC lhCsIs
VCtsICn C Vhal laKCs QaCC. ul anClhCt CQuay aCCutalC, CQuay ltuC
OCsCtIQlICn Is CCtCO Oy lhC anlIlhCsIs. PCCCtOIn_ lC lhIs VCtsICn, Vhal
Is InVCVCO In lhC shIl tCm lhC CmaC lC lhC maC sIOC Is a su||rac||ea.
CCa anl s CCmQaInl lhal lhC lhsIs anO anlIlhCsIs ClhC malhCmalICa
anlIlhCsCs OClh CVCtslCQQCO lhCIt CCIa unClICns, sInCC lhCy OClh `Cn
CunCCd HCtC lhan Vas tCQuIsIlC Ct a u anO CCmQClC CCnltaOIClICn
285) , lhal Is, OClh s1IO tee much. P sutQus OCCausC IC_IlImalC, at
malICn CCXIslCnCC OutOCnCO CaCb slalCmCnl . n lhCOynamICa sIOC, lhIs
sutQus Is u|tracteJtCm lhC QhCnCmCna CO anO~VC C1n CCK al Il lhIs
Vay~Il Is lhIs suOltaClICn lhal Inslas lhC ImIl hC tCmCVa Ct sCQata
lICn CtCCOCm tCm lbC tCam CmCChanICa CausaIly Is Vhal OIssCVCs
lhC taOICa InCCnsIslCnCy lhC aOsCulC ImQassC, Cn lhC OynamICa sIOC
hCtC lhC malhCmalIC1 HCO Vas OCHnCO Oy lhC hCmC_CnCIly C Ils
CCmCnls hICh VCtC a QhCnCmCna, COCCls C CXQCtICnCC anO lhC
InCCnsIslCy C Ils slalCmCnls [sInCC nCnC CCuO OC CCunlCO asC , lhC
be aU0 Ue UtaUasa U MeasUU Z1
OynamICa CO Is OCnCO Oy lhC hClCC_CnCIly C Ils CCmCns lhC Csl
ClhC secrc||ea ClhC lVC lyQCs CCausaIly, sCnsuCus anO InlCI_IC,
InlC OICtCnl tCams anO Vhal hal Is Illhal CCttCsQCnOs ClhIssIOC
lC lhC nCCnsIslCnCy Cn lhCClhCtnCCmQClCnCss
!
'halIs, lhCaICtns
Cn lhC OynamICa sIOC, Oul Il Is mIssIn_ an CCmCnl tCCOCm hC Ila
CausC CannCl OC lCCtalCO y, Ct OIsaQQCats tCm, lhC mChanICa CO
lhal Il ICunOs ' ` hICh mCanslhal Cn lhIs sIOC Il V aVays OC a mallCt
CIsayIn_ |ee||t|| e.
!
"
n aCan s Ctmuas, lhC QataCs OClVCCn lhC lVC 8IOCs atC mCtC
VIsIOC, sInCC lhC samC symOCs atC usCO lhtCu_hCul. hus VC Ca sCC
lhal lhC QuCslICn CCXIslCnCC Is CattICO CVC OItCCly lC lhC OynamICa
sIOC hal Is lC say, lhC sutQus OCCatalICns CCXIslCnCC lhal CausCO lDC
CCnIC Cn lhC CmaC sIOC atC sICnCCO Cn lhC maC sIOC OCCausC Is
QtCCIsCy CXIslCnCCCt OCIn_ lhal Is su||rc:|eJ tCm lhC nIVCtsC lhal
Ctms hCtC. hIs I shCVCnC shCuO tCaO aCan sQaCIn_ClhCCXIslClIa
uanlICt as lhC ImIl ClhC a, VhICh IstuCO OylhC unIVCtsa QuanlICt.
, lhCtCCtC, a VCtO CQCtalIn_ sCCy aCCCtOIn_ lC lhC aVs OnaltC
Ct unICtsC CmCn Can OC saIO lC CXIsl Cn lhC OynamICa Ct maC sIOC,
VC musl nCl Ct_Cl lhal Il Is mCtCy a CnCClua CXIslCnCC lhal Is OCIn_
CaImC Ct Il 1CIn_ as suCh CsCaQCs lhC CtmalICn C lhC OnCCl C
VCtO. hC unIVCtsC lhal Ctms I s lhus OCHnCO Oy a CCtlaIn ImQClCCC,
sInCC CCtylhIn_ Can OC InCuOCO lhCtCIn ece| OCIn_, VhICh Is hClCtO
_CnCCus lC lhC CCnCCQlua VCtO.
hal lhCsIs anO anlIlhCsIs X
DC as
Lh@tez B <O
I uaIl lhalallaChC Il l lhC OynaICay suOImC has ClCn sltuCK
CCnl1lCts a CutICs. al OCCs anl mCan Oy sQCaKIn_ Ca Catu
C] CCl CDIChC aCluay haC nC CatC Cans lhal tCmCut QCsIlICn
In thC QhCCa tO, C Ca CtualC Cny lhC ess|||||y C lhIs
lCtIC tCC aO nCl Ils c|cace, ]usl as C Can CtmualC Cny lhC
QssIOIl and Cl lhC CXIslCCC CCO, tCCOCm, lhC sCu . hIs QCssI
OIIly C 1 tCa OCyCnO, uImItCO Oy Ct QhCnCCna CCnOIlICns, Is
QtCCIsCy CQCnOCnl Cn lhC CCCCsutC ClhC]uO_mCnl CCXIslCnCC.
hIs saC CXQanalICn aCCCunls Ct lhC QataOCXCs ClhC suQCt
C_C CtC, a_aIn, lhC CtCCIly ClhC suQCtC_C Is nCl CXaCly lC OC CatCO,
Ct lhIs CtCIly OCQCnOs nCl Cn lhC hatshnCss CIls QtChIOIlICns In lhC
sCnsC lhal lhC suQCtC_C mI_hl OC QCsIlIVCy Ima_InCO as a KInO CsltICl
alhCt Ct lhal hIs InlCtdIClICns I_hl OC QCsIlIVCy sQCCO Cul) Oul Cn lhC
CCnVCtsICn Clh alhCt InlC an I mQCssIOC tCa, lhal Is, a OCIn_ Cn VhCsC
CXIslCnCC VC CannCl QtCnCunCC. hC QtChIOIlICn QtCQCt lC lhC suQCtC_C
CnOCts sCnClhIn_ unsayaOC anO unOCaOC, lC OC sutC, Oul Il OCCs nCl
say ua| VC shCuO nCl say C OC Il mCtCy ImQCsCs a ImIl lhal maCs
CVCtylhIn_ VC OC anO say sCCm as nCu_hl CCmQatCO lC Vhal VC CannCl
Ps aCan CXQaIns, hC suQCtC_C . . lhC CCmmanOCnl n]Cy Is
lhC CCttCalIVC CCasltalICn, hIC Is lhC sI_n lhal aOCtns Ct aOmIssICn
lhal lDCeu|ssaace ClhC lhCt, lhC OCOy ClhC lhCt, Is Cny QtCmIsCO
In InnIly.
Chagter I
1. Pctcr cvs, Thc ^coc|/c Phi|cscphic and Foucaut " rcncmy and Scrir ,
no. 2 a I 7) , p. ! J4 This cssa i sancxcclcnt account oFocault s thco
rctcalrclation to tccvcnts ola I 68 andthcrcactions to thcm.
Z. ahan Morris and Paul Patton ds , Povcrs and tratcics , in ch
Icora|r Pcuct, 1torh, 5rtarcgy dnc Fcra Publications, 9) , p. 2.
Scc or cxamplc, uman Rihts and thc Wclar ttc, " in cmcctary and
Pc/irir| 1hcct inncapolis nivcrsit olinncsotaPrcs I88) and "Politic
anduman Rihts, " in 1hcPc|irira| Icms cNcdctn 5cricryocaortary, cmcc
tary, cra/iratianism [Cambridc A Thc MI rcss I 86) , both b Cladc
cort
4. orris and Patton Truth and Povcr " in trhc| lcorau/r, . J
5.Lclrt, "ThcPcrmancnccolthcThcoloicalPolitical "in Lcmcrtay andPc|iria|
1hcct, p. 2I8.
. Focat ncvcr abandons hovvcr t hc notion that dicrcnt cvcn drcctl
contradictor, discorscs must bc shovn to occupy thc samc pacc, that thcrc
mst somc accout olthcir common condition ut thcrc arc somc Foucaul
dianshoarclcssviilanton thspoint thcdscourscsthcanalcarcconcciv
as morc complctcl autonomous. Thc cmphass in thcsc instancc shits to thc
conits thatariscbctvccndiscourscs and thcspaccthatsuppors thcmbccoc
abcntrathcr than cmpt
7. Moris and Patton, Ntrhc|Icorao|r, p JJ
b. For this cncountcr bctvccn thc studcnts and Lacan scc Imromptu at n
ccnncs " n 1c/cvisicnA Cha|/cngc rc rhc Psyrhcana/yrir Lsraa|thmcnt, cd. oan
Copc, trans. Ocnis ollicr Rosalind rauss and Anncttc ichcson Mc
or W W orton, IO) .
Utes tO Va@es 1Z~1
ZJO
. Scculct lovcr ManncIIs 1bc Kcgimc crbcrcrhcr cr rhc Parriarrhy
[c ork and ondon RoutIcdgc, ! ! ) lor an cxccIlct bookIcngth thcori
atio olthis socicty.
I0. s rcading olthcdcath drivcis briIIintly statcdin ilIcs Oclcuzcs chaptcr
Thccath Instinct" inisCo/dncss adCroc/ry [Mcv ork oncBooks, ! ! ) .
I). aqucs aca "Thc ircction o thc trcatmcnt and thc principlcs ol its
ovcr, " in Errirs A Sc/rricn, trans AIan Shcridan [Mcv ork W. W orton,
!77) , p 240.
IZ. Ibid. , p. 257.
Chagter Z
I. In bc Ioor Iondamcna/ Conrcp c[Psyrhc-Ana/ysis, cd. )acucsAIain MiIlcr,
trans. Alan Shcrian [ondon Thc oarth Prcss and thc Istitutc olPsycho
AnaIysis, I 77, p. 274) , acanspcaksolthc "phantasics" othc mass mcdia, " as
hc vcry uickly suggcsts a critiquc olthc lamiIar notion olthc socicty othc
spcctaclc " This notionisrcpIaccdin acan byvhatmightbccaIIcd thc socicty
o lormcd lrom thc nonspccularizablc. "
Z. Lddc// and Srcrrs Crcc Eng/isb Lcxiron, I 06, aI transIationso ancicnt rcck
tcrms arc lromthis sourc.
acqucsacan, 1c/cvisionA Cha//cngcrorhcPsyrhcana/yrirEsaa/ishmcnr, cd )oan
op cc, trans. Ocnis ollicr, Rosalind rauss, and Anncttc Michclson, [c
ork W. W. Morton, ! 0) p. J.
4. Mary AnnOoancpoits out that it is orvcryasciationviththcmodcl o
thc scrccn as mirrotathasmadcit rcsstant tothoscthcocticaI obcctions that
shc hcrscIlmakcs [ "Misrcconition and I dcntity, " Cinc1arrs no. !! FaII I B0] ,
p. 2B
. Mary nn Ooanc, atricia Mcllcncamp, and inda Willias, cds . , c-vision
[osAngIcsThcAmcrican FiImInstitutc, I B4) , p !4. Thcintroductiontothis
cryusclulcoIcctionolcssaysalso attcmpts todctaisomcolthchistorical shilts
incministthcorics olrcprcscntation I amonIy attcmpting to argucthc nccd lor
nc morc shilt, this timc avaylrom thc panoptic modcl ocincma
.cc, cscially,Tcrcsadcaurctis Tcrhno/ogicsc[Ccndc[BloomigtonIndiana
nicrsit Prcss, ! B7) .
Wutes tu a@os 1~ZI ZV
7. |. 3. ohcn, in What is a ucstion makcs this motantistinctin cIcarly
" Indctcrmination or doubt i s not, as is otcn maintaincd, a avcrin bctccn
dicrcnt ccrtaintics, butthc grasping oan incomplctcorm [ hconisr, no. 8
! p. J54, n. 4) .
b. Mchcl FoucauIt PoucrKnou/cdgc, cd. oIin ordon [Mcv or. anthco,
! 86) p. ! 86. Thc intcrvicv vith Luccttc Finas in vhich this statccnt ocurs
vasalso publishcd inNirhc|Ioorao/tPoucr, 1toth, 5tratcgy, cd. Mcaghanorris
and aul Patton [ydncy. Fcral ublications, ! 97) Th statccnt isqotcd and
cmphasicd in Mark ousins and Athar ussainscxccllcnt bookNirh/ oorau|t
[Mc ork t. Martin srcss, ! 84) , p. 44.
. AIhouh somcmightclaimthatitvas thcintroductionothclinguiticmdc
intoI mstudicsthatinitiatcthc brcak, itcancmorcaccuratcIyargucthat thc
brcakvas prccipitatcd bya shit inthcIinguistic modclitscI roan ccIuivc
cmphasisonthcrclationbctvccnsignicrstoancmphasisonthcrcIationbctvccn
signcrs ad thc sbcct, thcir signiying ccct. That is, i t vas not util tc
rhctorra| apcct olanguagc vas madc visibI mcas orhc onrcpt orhc appa
that thc cld o lm studics vas dcnitivcIy rcormc I am arguing,
hovccr thatonccthis shit vas madc, somc othc sophistications i ntrducc
bysciology vcrc, unortunatcly, lrgottcn.
Todcnca[rathcrthanacontinuity)bctccnvhatisotcnrcrrcd
to as to stagcs , or thc rst and sccond scmiology, is analogous to cning a
brcak bctvccn Frcud s rst and sccond conccpt otranscrcncc. It vas ony vit
thc scon, thc privilcging o thc anaIystanalysand rcIationsip, that psycho
anaIyis[propcrlyspcaking) vasbcgun. Biograhyratcrthanthcoryis thcsourcc
othcdcand or thccontinuity othcscconccpts.
1. Tc bcst discussion othc rclations bctvccn Bachclard and AIthuscrcan bc
oud in ticnncBaIibar, "From Bachclard to Althusscr thc cnccpt olcpistc
ooica brcak, Lronomy and5oricr 5, no. 4 [Movcmbcr ! 76) , pp. 85 4 ! .
11. Tis imagco thcscicntistdiscontinuous vith him orhcrscIcanb c givcn 3
prccisc guration, thc aIchcmical imagc o thc clusincs crcaturcs oposcd
partiaIy oincrior, lossclikc orms that rcach back into thc distant past thc
imagiary) and partialIy osupcrior, cncrgctic [scicntihc) activity. In c |cri
o5prc [Boston. Bcacon Prcss, ! 6) , p. ! , Bachclard, vhosc notin o thc
Otc9tu c9 Z1~Z Z+
uconscious is morc ungian than Frcudian, rclcrs to this i magc lromungs
yr|cgy ndA|rhcmy
IZ. hc oc rcscrvation Mctz has to thc othcrvisc opcrativc analogy bctvccn
irrrand scrccn is that, atthc cincma, "thcspcctatoris abscntlrom thc scrccn
cntrry to thc child in thc mirror" [hstian ctz, 1hc lmagtnaty Stgnr
loomington Indiana nivcrsity Prcs, ! 8 p. 48) . acquclinc Rosc claricd
tc crror i mpIicd in this rcscrvation by pointing out that "thc phcnomcnon ol
tansitivism dcmonstratcs that thc subccts mirror idcntihcation can bc vith
aothcr chiId, " that onc alays locatcs oncs oun imagc in ancrhcr and thus thc
iaginary i dcntihcationdocs notdcpcndon alitcral mirror [ "ThcImaginary, " in
xua|tty in thcIic|doistcnondon crso, ! 86, p. ! 6). Whatis mostoltcn
lrgottcn, hocvcr, is thc corollry olthis act. onc alvays locatcs thc crhct t
ccs un imagc Thc ccct olrhts lacton thc constitution olthc subcctisacans
lnamcntal conccrn.
IJ. acan, 1c Icur Iudamcnta| Ccnrcprs, p. 8! .
I4.I t ascanouisBaudryvhohrstlormulatcdthisdchnitionolthcimprcssion
olrcality. cc his sccond apparatus cssay, "Thc Apparatus, " i nCamcta asruta !
[ ! 76) , cspcciaIIy pp. ! ! 8 ! ! .
I5. Mctz s tvostagcsccnario is critiqucdby corcy MovcIlmithin A Motc
on istoryiscoursc, " [Ldtnautgh ', pp. 6 J) and by Mary Ann Ooancin
"isrccognition and Idcntity "
I. havc cIscvhcrc rclcrrcd to thc azc as "mctcmpsychotic" although it is a
conccpt abhorrcntto lcministrcason, thc targct olconstant thcorcticaI sallics, thc
gazc continucs to rccmcrgc, to bc rcincorporatcd, as an assumption olonc Im
analysis altcr anothcr. Thc argumcnt I am making is that it is bccausc vc havc
notpropcrly dctcrmincd vhat thc gazc is, vhcncc it has cmcrgcd, that c havc
bccn nabIc to climinatc it. It is gcncrally argucd that thc gazc is dcpcndcnt on
psychoanaIyticstructurcs olvycurismandlctishism, prcsumcdto bcmalc I am
cIaiming instcad thatthcgazcariscs out ol|tnguisrir assumptions andthat thcsc
assumptions, in turn, shapc [and appcar to bc naturaIizcd by) thc psychoanalytic
conccpts.
I. icl Borchacobscns intcrcsting book, 1hc Itcudian Suacrr [tanlord
Stanlord nivcrsity Prcss, ! 88) grappIcs ith this ncrcssa_ distinction vith
rcsults vcry dicrcnt lromLacan s
WUtos tU a@es Z~Z Z1
I8. aul irst, "lthsscrs Thcory oIdology, " ronomy and ri 5 o. 4
[Movcmbcr I 7) , pp. J8 I .
I. ikcl Borch)acobscn, in "ThcavosychoanaIysis, " [Licritir Summcr
! 85 pp Z J) discusscs Frcudsargumcnt vith antin 1otcm aaoo e This
articlc rIics, it appcars, on acans vork in 1hc Lthirs o[ s
/
a
/
s, cd.
)acqucs-lainMiIIcr, trans Ocnnis ortcr[Mcvor W W. ortn, I Z) and
thc unpbishcd scminar on anicty. scc cspccialy thc scssion oOccccr IZ,
Z, vcrcacandchncsobscssionasthatvhicocrsocrthcd|rc nthcthcr
uitb thc thcr's dcmaad. This rcmar rcIatcs obscssional ncurosis to a ccrtain
[antan) conccpt oora consciousncss.
Z. Signd Frcud, 1hc taadard Ld|tion o[ t c omp/ctc Psrhogira| Horks o[
5igmundlrcod, trns )acs and AIix Straccy [odon Thc oarth rcss and
thc nstiutc osychoAnalysis, 5J 74) , vol. !J, pp. 70.
Z1. In odcr to dissociatc his conccpt oscicncc ro that oidlis, convcn
tionals and ormaIism, BachcIard ormlatcd tc conccpt o ppicd ration
alism a scicntic conccpt mst intcgratc vitn itscI thc cditions ol its
rcaIizatin. [It is on thc basis olthis inunction that ciscnbcrg cud dismiss as
iIIcgitimatc any taIk o a clcctron s location that could not ao proposc an
cxpcricnta cthod ol ocatin i t. ) And in ordcr to dissociatc is conccpt o
scicccomthat othcpositivists, cmpiricists, andrcalists, Bachcrdormlatcd
thc concpt o "tcchnica matcriaIism" tc instrumcnts and thc potocols o
scicnticcxpcricnts ustbcthcorcticaIly ormuIatcd Tcsystcochccksand
baIanccs according to vich thcs tvo impcrativcs opcratc is hat BachcIard
norall mcansbyortbopsyrhism ccxtcndsthcnotionincratio/scapp|iqo,
ovcc, to includc thc oration othc scicntic sub cct
ZZ. aston Bacclard, rationa||smc app/|o [aris. rcsscs ivcrsitairs dc
Francc, 4) , pp. 8I
Z. aston Bachclard Th ^cu 5ricntr 5pirit [oston Bcaco rcss, 84) ,
J2
. aca, 1c/cv|sioa, p 7
Zb. aca, 1hclooluadamcata/ Conrcpts, p .
. Scc spcciaIIy)canouis Baudry, "Idcological ccts othc asic incma
tographiApparatus[rstpubIishcdinFrcnchin inthioc, nos. 8 I7and,
innglih, inli/oartcr/, no. Z8 Wintcr 4 I7)and)canouomoI,
WOte8 tu a@e8 Z~ Z+Z
cchniqucan Idcoogy amcra, Pcrspcctivc, Ocpth olFicId" [rst publishcd
in Frcnch in Cahicrs du rtncma, nos. , 2JO, J! and JJ ! 7O !7! and
ciculatcdinnlishtranslationasaBritishFimInstitutcoprint) . Thishistorical
continuity has bccn tacn lor grantcd by lm thcory cncrally. For a history o
thc continuity bctccn Rcnaissancc tcchniqucs olobscrvation and our on,
scconathan Crary Tcrhniqucs othc ascrtcr. [ambridgc, A Thc ITPrcss,
O) . Inthisboo rarydicrcntiatcsthccamcraobscuralromthcphysiological
modcls ovision that succccdcd it. acan, in his scminars on thc azc, rccrs to
both thcsc modcls as thcy arc rcprcscntcd by thc scicnccoloptics andthcphilos
ohy olphcnomcnology. c cxhibits thcm as to "ays obcin rong about
this lunction othc subjcctin thc domainolthc spcctaclc.
Z. Lacan 1hc IourIundamcnta| Conrcpts, . 6.
M. hc qucstions Moustapha Salouan poscs to Lacan during Scminar I [ Thc
Iour Iundamcnta| Conrcpts, p. ! OJ) lorcc him to bc quitc clcar on this point
Bcyondappcaranccthcrc is nothin in itscl thcrcis thc gazc "
Z. his is thc titlc givcnto thc last scssion olthc scminarpubishcd as Thc Iour
Indamcnta| Conrcpts Although thc "you" olthc titlc rclcrs to thcanayst, it can
rclcrjustas casily to thc idcal imacin thc mirror.
. acquclinc Roscs "Paranoia and thc Fim Systcm" [5rrccn ! 7, no. 4 Wintcr
! 76 ! 77) is a lorcclul critiquc [dircctcd spccihcally at Raymond Bcllours
analyscsolitchcoc, butalsoat arangc olmthcorctical assumptions) olthat
notion olthccincmathat sccs it as a succcsslul rcsolution oconictand rclusal
ol dicrcncc. Rosc rcminds us that cincma, as "tcchquc ol thc imaginary"
[Mctz) , ncccssarilyunlashcs a conict, anagrcssivity, thatisirrcsolvablc. Whc
I am, lor thc most part, in agrccmcnt ith this important cssay, I am arin
hcrcthataggrcssivityis notdcpcndcnton thcshotcountcrshotstructurc. Itis not
thc rcvcrsibility olthc look but thc unrcturnc oo, thc oo that ill not tu
thc subjcct into a lully obscrvablc bcin, that thrcatcns thc subcct. acan says
himscl [ Thc Lgo in Ircuds 1hcoy and in thc Tcrhniquc o Psyrhoana|ysis c
ork an ondon W. W. orton ! 78 , p. J) , "Thc phcnomcnon ol agrcs
sivity isnt to bc cxplaincd simpy on thc lvcl olimaginary idcntication. "
1. Lacan Thc ouIundamcnta| Conrcpts, p
/. In "nothcr acan, [aran 5tudy lotcs !, no J) acqucs Alain Millcr is
conccrnc to undcrlinc thc clinicaldimcnsion olacans or, particularly his
Wotes tU a@es B~40
Z+
conccpt o "thc pass " hc dicrcncc bctvccn thc "dcconstrctioist" nd thc
caniannotion olantasyis thus alsomadc cIcar.
Chagter 3
I. Sigmund Frcud, 1hc 5tndard Ldir|on o[ thc Comp|ctc |syrhc|cgira| orks o[
5|mundItcud [5L tans.)amcsndAIi Strachcy, [Londo hcogart Prcss
and thcInstitutc olPscho-Aaysis, 5J !74) , oI 2! , . B2.
Z.Ibi d p. 8.
J.Ibi d , p. 2.
4. Scc cspccialIy ary Ann Ooancs 1hc Lcsirc ro Lcsirc [Boointon ndiana
nivcrsity Prcss ! B7) in vhich oanc shos ho thc "omans l" olthc
!4Os madcthclcmaIcspcctator spIcasurcsimuItancousitha asochisticvic
inposition crhistocaIlyspccicargumcntissubtIcandconvining. I obcct
ntto thiskind olarumcnt but rathcr to a ccral aIinmct ollcalcplcasurc
andmasochismsuchasoncnds, orcamlc,inthcvorksolRaymondcIlour.
5.Frcud 5L, p. ! .
. Samucl Bccctt, atr [Mcv ork rovc ! 72) , p !75.
7. Frcud, 5L, vol 8, ?0.
8.cnri Bcrgson "aughtcr " in Comcdy [c ork oblcday, I 56) .
.Bcrgsons thcorics aso had a grcat impact on Iitcrary and artistic odcrism
Fr Bcrson thc artist vas oncho as lrcc olthcncccssity to victhc orld
intcrms oits practical utiIityand as thus capablc, throuhthcuniqucuIitics
ohisorhcrpcrccption to"crcatc " thatistomodilyphcnomcnalrcaIitythrough
thc activc cngagccnt ol ind Art, thcn, is sccn to occupy a rcal scparatc
lr that ol thc cvcryday Thc "postodcrn" attcntion o art and Iitcratrc to
thc practiccs olcvcryday lilc and thc crasurc othc absolutc boudarics bctvccn
thc "scicntic" ad thc "artistic tcxtsigna, in thisrcspcctatIcast a anig ol
thc inucncc olBcrso
I0. Bcrgson, n lnrrcdurr|cn tc %craphys|s, trans. T.
ulc [c ork
Bbbs-crriIl, ! 55), p. J7.
II. rcud, 5L, vol !8, p. J6.
I2.WithinpsychoanaIysisitscllthcconccptolthcdcathdchasbcnrcpcatcdly
qcstioncd and rc cctcd n rcsponsc to onc such rcpudiation, adc this timc by
WUtes tO a@es R Z++
Rudolph Lovcstin, Lacan vrotc, "t is ccrtain that man distinguishcs himscl
in thcbioloica dmain, in thathcis thc only bcing vho commits suicidc, vho
has 2 supcrcgo quotcd in lisabcth oudincsco, La aarat|c dc rcnr ans, voI 2
Paris Scuil, 6 , p. ! J6) . Man str distinguishcshimscIaIso as thonlybcig
vho spcaks, an it is ccausc orhts thathc acquircs thc othcr distinction.
IJ.)acqucsLaca, i 1hcLrhtrscPsrhcana|ss, trans . OcnnisPortcrcvYork.
W W. orton, !2) clcarly constructs this distinction in doing so hc statcs
straightorvardl that thc dcath drivc is "aunction othcsigniying chain and
thus "is tobc sitatd in thchistorical domain p. 25) .
I4. Samucl lcxndcr, anothcr cvolutionary" philosophcr, i s citcd by Louis S
Sass in Introspction, Schiophrcnia and thc ragmcntation othc Scl"
rcscnrar|cns Smcr ! 7) in support oa dcnition oschiophrcnia that
runs dircctly countcr to currcntLacanian-inucnccdlitcary dchnitions . Ananal
ysis othc rcutation oBcrgsonian)anctist, that is, "cvolutionary, psychiatry
bythcstructuralpychoanalsis oClcrambaultLacanvouldrcvcalthcproblcms
inhcrcnt in Sasss dcition.
I5.Aristotlcalsos pcclatcsctymoIogicallythatthctcrmaorcmarcnmaybcdcrivcd
rommarcn, "in vain.
I.)acqucs Lacan, 1hc IcorIondamcnra| Ccnrcprs c[Psyrhc-na|sts, cd. )acqucs
AIain Millcr, trans. lan Shcridan London Thcogarth Prcss and thc Institutc
osychoAnalysis, 77) , p. 2J.
I. ristotlc, Phystr, . 7 8b.
I8.Aristotlc, Lc Ncro Antma|tom, 7.
I.)acqucs Lacan, "' Anoissc, unpublishcd scminar, ay8, 6J
Z0. )acqucs Lacan, c|ctstcnA Cha|/cngc rc rhc Psrhcana|yrr sra|tshmcnr cd.
)oanopcc, trans . cnisoIlicr,osalindrauss, andAnncttcichclsoncv
York W. W. orton, ) , . 6.
ZI. Samucl Bccctt, Noh cvYorkrovcPrcss, ! 5) , p ! 8.
ZZ. Lacans ullcst discussion othc crcationcxnihilo ot hcsub cct can bcound
in 1hcLrh|rs c[Psyrhcana|ysts
ZJ. Samucl Wcbcr, ourc andclusion, " Ltarrtrtrs ! O, no. 2 Summcr O) .
. Ibid. , p. 44.
Z5. )acqucs Ocrrida, "Signaturc, vcnt, Contct, " |yph ! 77) , p. ! 4. his
cssay, ancxtcndcd critiqucandcclcbrationo). L. Austin s thcory ospccchacts,
s tu a@es Z+D
is lIovcd y a sccond tcxt, Limitcd, Inc. , [C|yph ) , vhch macs
mayothcsamcpoitsasthchrst, thistimin rcsponsc toohn ScarIcs cIsy
dccc olAustin.
2. amucl Wcbcr, Intoduction, in Lcmarrating thc Lisri| ics inncapolis.
nicrsitolinncsota Prcss, !86) , p. ix.
27.acqucsLacan, Lnrorc Paris Scuil, ! 75), p. I J
. cc, lorcxamplc rikPorgc, 5cromptcttrois Lcrcmps |o_iqocdcLaan Paris
rs, ! 8) , pp. ! ! !7.
2. acan, 1hc IourIondamcnta| Conrcpts, p . A scntcnc otcdcarIicrn this
chaptcr can nov ccoplctcd. Causci s to bc distinguishcd lrom that vhichis
dctcminatc in a chain, in othcr vords thc |a. Cascis both vhat capcs and
londs thc lav.
J0.) L. Austin, APlcalorxcuscs , "|rorccdin_s orhcAristo|c|ianSoricy, o. o
! 5 58) . Austin dcmonstratcs in this papcr an intcrcst in contct ad aiIrc
similar to that rcvcalcd in his vork on spccch act thcory
JI. . L. A. art and A. . onorc Causaton in thcLau xlord. Clarcndon
Prcss, !5) .
JZ. Itsccmslikcly that Lacansitcrcstinthcburningchild drca ovcs mcthing
to thctradition olphilosophy thatmakcshrcanaImostcblcaticphcomcnon
lor tc considcration ocausc.
Chapr 4
I vold lic to thank Rachcl BovIy and Abigail Solomon-odcau lor assstig
mcithtcphotographicrcscarchorthischaptcandorthcirhcIulcomcts
I.oscph csscl, n soir rivc gauchc . Lc ligaro, cccmbcr 4 !J
rcpritcdinolandcPapctti, BcrnardOcrcminviIc, ranoiscaIicr, ad crc
Tisscron Lapassiondcs ctos rhun ncuropsrhiatc, . C dc|raaao|tPari.
Solin 8! ) , p. ! ! .
Z. L0 doctcur CIramauIt mcdicin chcldc inhrmcrics spcaIcdu Opt s cst
donn la mort, Lc li_aro, ovcmbcr O, !J4 rcprintcd i Papctti ct a , La
passio dcs rocs, p. ! ! !
WO tU aes bb~7Z Z+
. )aqcs Lacan, "ropos suracausalitc psychiqc, in rrits Paris Scil, ! 966 ,
p. .
4. tcrinc Clcmct, ThcLicsandLcgcnds oarqucsLaran, trans. Arthrod
hacr c York Columba nivcrsity Prcss, 98J , p. 55. Clcrambault is
gvca bitmorcattcntioninlsabcthoudincsco saatai||cdcrcara Histoirc
dc |a psyrhana|ysc ca lranrc Paris Scil, ! 86 and in Oavid accys amazingly
hast Laran in Contcxts Londo. crso, ! 88 .
5. Scc notc ! .
. otcdb y Slavo
ic, Thc 5oa|imc Cacrt ccc|c_y [London and Mcv York. crso,
Wutes tU aes 1Z~11 Z
I 99) , pp ! 69 I7J. Iso scc)acucs~AlainMillcr, "Suturc clcmcnts olth logc
olthcsignicr) , 5rtccn I 8, no 4Wintcr! 977 ! 78) , pp 2J, or itsinuctial
cxlication othis logic oncgation
II. Lacan, in 1hcLrhirs cPsyrhcana|ysis, p 7O, isuotingthc vords oa poct
lrind
1Z. acan, 1hcEgc in ltcos 1hcc, p. ! 5J
1. Rousscau Em|c, pp 4J 4
I4. Wolstonccrat, 1hcoghrs cn rhc Edoraricn caoghcts, p. J and b.
1b. Lacan s passin rcmarksonvampirisma s a nanxict proling thc drig u
olhcbrast arc loundinhisscminaronanxicty a I 5, 9J) .
I. Although it usuall spccics thc ncck as thc bodil onc o vhic thc
vapir drains its victim, othi tion rctains tc traccs o th truc targct o
attck both in thc odc othc thrcat, sucking, and in thc scx ol thc ictim
lcalc. ostvisual i magcs oampirism ccntcr onthccmalc brcast .
I7. )acqucs-Aain MiIlcr, i nhi s unpublishcd scminaronxtiit [ 985 I6 ,
dcclopcd thc tcrm cxrimirc, vhich appcars only a cv timcs in aca, into a
ccnral thcorctical conccpt
I8.hc vork on thc "cmalc othic is cxtcnsivc I vouldlikc to acknovlcdgc
spciall Mar nn Ooanc s analsis occrra oan, hc cstrc rc csitt
Blomngton Indiana nicrsitPrss, I 987, pp. 2J ! 75 and laichancs
thicMirrors and cminincIdcntit, " 1hc Cctcnnia| Kcvcu 24, no ! [ I )
pp J 64
I. Thc Frcudian dcntion o consciousncss as that vhic ariscs insrcad c 3
mcortacc, and thus as aprotctivcshicldagainsttrauma, is oltcn undcrstood
scric/cgira||y, cvcnbrcudhimscl Thatis consciousncss, "imcdiatclabutting
as i docs on t xtcnal vorld rcud, Bcond thc lcasurc rincipIc, SE,
vo !8, p. 26) , issccn asa shicldagainstshocks produccd bthiscxtcrnalvorId.
Th drcam oIrmas icction aIlovs us to scc consciousncss , rathcr, as a shicld
aganst thc unconscious ral.
Z. crcud cgation, 5E, vol I8, p 2J8). udgingisthcintcllctualaction
vhic dccidcs thc choicc ol motor action, ich puts an cnd to . .
postponmcnt.
ZI. Th distinction bctvccn ncgation and thc ncgatism opschotics is adc
bcanppolitcin hisommcntar on rcuds ctncinong, publishcdinacucs
WUtes tU @es 11~14 ZD+
Lacan, lrcd's Papcrs ca Tcrhaiqoc, I5J-IJ1, cd. acqucsAIain MiIlcr, trans .
ohn orrctcr[cvYok and London . Morton, I 988), pp. 289 297.
ZZ. This Iast scntcncc is a paraphrasc lLacans dcscription olthc lnction ol
scring i nadc Lacan, ThcLrhirs oPsyrhcana|ysis, p. 26! .
Z. nthc laIsc choicc bctvccn a vcrtical and a horiontaI conccptiono l rights,
scc Luc cry, Kighrs Thc lcu oarc| actuccn rhc Anricnrs and thc odcs
[hicago. nivcrsity olhicago Prcss, ! 99O)
2. Inhcr articlc on Thc MucIcar SubIimc, Liarririrs [Summcr ! 98 , pp. I O,
ranccs cguson spcaksolthc modcproIilcration olrights as producing this
cpcricncc ol "consciousncssimpingingonconsciousncss. I amarguinghatthis
mispcrccpion is not thc incvitablc concqucncc olthc cxpansion othc dmain
olrights but dcpcnds lurthcr on thc rcduction orights to dcmands. Sccoan
opcc, "hc Subj cctOcncd by Suragc, Laraniaaink7[SpringSummcr! 99J)
lormorc on thc rcIationbctvccn dcsirc and rights
Chag
I. acqucs Lacan, "Scminar on Thc Purloincd Lcttcr trans.crcy MchIman,
in a|c lrcnrh 5tudics, no 48 [ I 97J) , hich is a partial translation olthc cssay
pubIishcd inLrrs ancarIicrvcrsionolLacans argumcntappcarsin 1hc5cminar
cjarqocs Laran. bock ll ThcLgo ialrcods Thcc_aadin thc Tcrhnqoc c[Psyrhc
ana|ysis, cd. acucs AIain MiIIcr trans SyIvanaomasclIi [McvYork. orton
! 988) .
Z. "Intcrsubjcctivc is not to bc takcn hcrc in thcpsychologicaIscnsc it docs not
rclcr to a rcIation bctvccn subjccts vho can i dcntily vithcithcrthc position or
thinkingolcach othcr.
RoIandarthcs, "ThcrcaIisticccct, Ii|m KcadcrJ [ ! 978) , trans. crald Mcad
lrom "L cctdcrcI Commonirarioas I [ I 968) , pp 84 89.
4. Scc cst MandcI, Lc|igh| Nurdcr A 5cria| Hisrc_ c rhc Cimc 5to_
[Lonon PIuto Prcss, ! 984)
. RichardAlcvyn, "Thc riginolthcctcctivcMovcI, in ThcPccrirsc%ordcr,
cd. Icnn Mostc and iIIiam . Stovc [cv York arcourt, Bracc,ovanov
ich, I 98J) , p 65 Whcncvcr thc Iin bctvccn dctcctivchction and dcmocracy is
madc, it is usuay attributcd to thc csabIishmcnt olIavs olcidcncc. Scc, lor
WUtes tU aes 141 ZJO
cxampIc, ovardaycrat, NrdcrrP|casorc [cvYork. AppIctoncntur,
I 942 , pp J!2 JI 8
. I hcrc acknovIcdgc my dcbt to thc briiant vork oIaudc cort, vho has
thcorizcd modc dcmocracy not simply as a orm o govcrnmcnt but morc
radicalIy as a "mutation o thc symboIic ordcr Thc oIlovig chaptcr vl
dcscribcmorc luIIy vht this mutation cntailcd and hov it is bcginnng to bc
rcpIaccd by asccondmutation.
7. lcis dcTocucvic, Lcmorrary in mcrira, part 2 [cvYok nopl I945)
pp. J 7 InhisunpublishcdscminarLxrimirc, [ ! 985 !986) ,acs-lainMicr
aIso strcsscs thc rcIation bctvccn artcsianism and dcmocrac as hc simulta
ncousIy skctchcs out thcir Iiation vith psychonlysis. Mics discussio is
muchmorc cxtcndcd and thcoricd than dc ocucvcs .
8. Indcscribing hcr athcr, ora uscdthcphrasc "cin vcrmgcndcr Nann a man o
mcans , " bchindvhichFrcuddctcctcdthcphrasccin onvcrmgcdcran aman
vithout mcans unabIc, i mpotcnt " In procring hcr dcscription, oa vas
dccIarig hcrdcmand or a mastcr in rcintcrprcting hcr dcscri ption Frcud vs
indicatingthcsortolmastcrthchystcric prccrs.
. Lcort uscs this paradox to makc a dicrcnt point, vhich is that uivcrsaI
sullrc prcvcnts thc notion ol"thc pcoplc" rom matcriaIiig, sincc numbcrs
arc inimical to substancc. Thcy csubstantiy thc vcry imagc othc pcopIc
Lcort, Lcmorrary and Poirira| Thcoq [MinncapoIis nivcrsit o inncsota
Prcss, ! 988 , pp 8 9
I. dcTocucvilc, Lcmorrary in mcrira, p. J!9
11. hcdistinction bctvccn thcprimal andthcidcal or cipaI athcr onvhich
this part omy discussion is bascd is dravn by Michcl iIvcstc in "Lc prc, sa
lonction dans Ia psychanalysc, " Cmirar, no. J4 [uIy cpt . I 5) , pp !
ilvcstrc, ocoursc, is claboratingLacansoriginaIdistinctionmadci thchaptcr
"cdipcctMoscctcprcdcIahordc" oLcnvcrs dc |apsyrhanaysc[Pais Scuil ,
99I , pp I !7 IJ5.
I2. corgcBush sspcch vritcr, or thoscvhohavc alrcady orgottcn cr.
J. Lcort, LcmorrayandPo/irira| Thcoq, p. 2. I havcdcvclopcd thclogicots
dicrcncc bctvccn thc tvo inds o"no onc" in a sIightly dicrct vay in m
cssay Thc ubcct cncd by uragc, "Laranian ink [prigumcr I 99J ,
pp 4 58
WUte9 tU 0 117 ZD
I4. ichcl Foucalt Lisrip|inc andPunish cv Yor intagc, ! 7) , p. 2O?.
I. ind Frcd, Thc 5tandard Lditioa o thc Comp|ctc Psyrho/ogira| Horks o[
5iuadIrcud, trans )amcs and Alix Strachcy London Thc ogarth Prcss and
thc InstitutcolPsyco-nalysis, ! 55 I74) , vol. J, p. 74.
Cbagter 7
I. aroricMi colson, "Thc Prolcssorand thc Octcctivc" [ I2) , in Thcrt othc
%ystc Sto_, cd. ovard aycra cv York. Simon and Schustcr, I 46) ,
p I 26
Z. an acking, "Biopovcr andthcAvalancc olPrintcd umcrs , " Humanitics
in 5oricty 5, nos. J 4 SummcrFall ! 8?) , p ?8I .
J, acking s vork docs not acknovlcdgc this ccct olstatistics it is Claudc
Lclort s rcmarks on numbcrs in Lcmorray aad Po|itira| Thcory Minncapolis
nivcrsity olMinncsota Prcss, I 88) , pp. I 8 , that dircctcd my attcntion to
this iportant ccct
4. Ian acking, "ov Should Wc Oo thc istory ol Statistics" lC, no 8
Spring I 8?) , p 25.
. ora conciscstatcmcntolthisthcsis, sccFranoisvald, "Morms, Oisciplinc,
and thc av, " Kcptcscnrations JJ Spring ! 0) , pp. IJ8 6I .
. Ian acking, "inctccnthCcntury Cracks in thc Conccpt olOctcrminism, "
Thc ourna| ot hcHisto oldcas )ly I8J) , p 46.
7. D A. Millcr, Thclovc|and thcPo|ircBcrkclcy. nivcrsityolCalilorniaPrcss,
! 88) .
. Thc phrascis acing s sc his "Making p Pcoplc" in Kcrcnstrring ndivid
ua|ism Stanlord Stanlord nivcrsity Prcss, I 86) , pp 222 2J6. spccially intcr
cstinglor this discussion olLou|c lndcmaity isthclolloving passagc. "vcry lact
about thc suicidc bccomcs lascinating Thc statisticians composc lorms to bc
complctcdbydoctors and policc, rccordingcvcrythinglrom thc timcoldcath to
thc objcctslondinthcpockcts olthc corpsc Thc variousvaysolkillingoncscl
arcabrptly charactcrizcd and ccomc symbols olnational charactcr Thc Frcnch
lavor carbon monoidc and drovning thc nglish hang or shoot thmsclvcs "
. acing, "Biopocr and thc Avalanchc olPrintcd umcrs p ??.
I. illcr, Thc ovc| and thc Po|irc, p. I 6?.
II. raois Trault, Hitrhrork McvYork Simon and Schustcr, ! 8J) , p ?57.
WUtes tu aes I7174
ZO
)acucsLacan 1bc Scminao[arqocsLaran. book ll ThcLgo in Ircud's 1hco
and in thc 1crhniquc o[ Psyrhoana|ysis, l J+ 5J, cd. )acqucsAlain illcr, trans
SylvaaTomasclli cv York W. W. orton, ! 9) , pp. J2 JJ
acqucsLacan, " ScminaronThcPurloincdLcttcr
a|cIrcnrh5todcs, no 4
[ 972) p. 54.
)acqucs-Alain Millcr Suturc lcmcnts othcLogicolthcSignicr rrccn
no. 4 Wintcr ! 9777) p. 27.
lmutcisscnbttcl ThcRulcsothcamcothc rimc ovcl "in Thc
Poctirs c[Nordcr, cd. lcnn ostcand William W. Stovc [c York arourt
Bracc and)ovanovich 9J) p. 8.
Itis intcrcsting to comparc Roan)akobsons dcscription othc dicrcntial
rclatin. As)akobsondcmonstrtcs thc rclation bctvccn paad ma is not to
bcuncrstood as a simplcopposition butas tuoscts o[oppositic, bctvccn pa,
vhich is itscIlan opposition purc scl-opposition or diacriticality and thc op
positin bctvccn p and ma. n othcr vords pa appcars ticc tcc scts
oopositions as thc only clcmcnt o thc rst opposition ad as onc o thc
clcmcts othc sccond although tc sccond appcarancc rctroactivcly caccs thc
rst. ocl incman, in "Thc Struturc o Allcgorical Ocsirc rtoac, no. !2
Sprig! 9O) p. 59, summarizcs)aobsonsargumcntthus "paloscsi tsoriginal
status as mark ol purc diacriticality vhcn it is promotcd to thc lcvcl o thc
signicant signicr vithin thc systcm as a vholc. This ncv si gnicant pa is
uttcrl unrlatcd to thc rst simply diacritical pa that it rcplaccs nd it is
prcciscly this occultation othc original pa, nov structurally unspcakablc b
causc rcvalucd as somcthing clsccntircly that allovs thc systc to nction as 3
structurc in th rstplacc In othcr vords thcarticulation opa and a ca
only tac placc by rcndcring visiblc a ccrtain cmpty placc, a ccrtain structural
impossibility vhich is not purcly cxcludcd rom thc systc A diagra o
)akobson s dcscription vould looklikcthis.
0c 0 a@es I741
ZJO
c sadcd arca rprcscnts thc pt placc, thc structural cxcss produccd y
c ariculation ohc tvo signicrs in short, thc logi osuturc is disccrniblcin
obon as cll ain Frcgc.
J. ashicll amctt, "Bodics ilcd p, ollcctcdin b|ark Nask bcys Nastcrs
thc Hard-bci|cd rhcc| c[ Lccrtitc Iirtcn, cd. William olan [cv or.
ilia Morrov, I 85), p. 84.
I8. )aqucs-lain illcrs unpulishcd !87 88 scminar, "Cc qui ait insignc, "
vics tc most cmplctcanalsisto datc oLacan sdistinctionbctvccn dcsirc
an drivc.
I. )aqucs aan c|ctisicn Cha||cngc tc thc Psyrhcana|ytir taa|ishmcnt, cd.
oanop cc, trans cnisollic, Rosalidrauss, andAnncttcMichclson[cv
or W. W oron, I O) p. 4 Thclmcd intcrvicv is morccxpliiton this
oint han is thc publishcd tcxt.
Z0. PascalBonitzcr, Thc Silcnccs ocoicc, " inlarratitc, Apparatus, ldcc|c_y,
cd. PiIip Roscn [cv or Colmbianivcrsity Prcss, ! 6), p J?J.
ZI. Ibid. , pp J?8, J?.
Z2. oland Barthcs, "Thc rain othc oicc, " lma_c/Nusir/Tcxt, trans. Stcphcn
cath [Mcv or ill and Wag, ! 7) p I 82.
. onitzcr, "Thc Silcnccs otc oicc, " p. J?8.
Z. Ibid. , p. J?.
Z5. arthcs, "Thc rain othc oicc, " . ! 8.
Z. I bid. , p. ! 8.
Z.)aqucs acan, hcIcutIundamcnta| Ccnrcpts c[Psyrhc-Ana|ysis, 5cminarl,
c aqucs-lain illcr, trans Alan Shcridan [ondon Thc ogarth Prcss and
th Institutc oPsyho-nalysis, ! 77) p ! 5
M. hc introduction o thc notion o tvo dicrcnt |ctc|s in noirs dcning
caratcristics oncprimaryandthcothcrsccondary, arcaction against thcrst
al so clps to cIari somcothc onusion that surrounds tc thcory onoir. Thc
cali prcscncc onoirlikclightingtcchniqucsdocsnotinvalidatcthcbclicinthc
si, discrctc phcnomcnon onoir, sinc thcir carlicrusc vas dcscriptivc and
not cstorativc, " as thcy arc in nor that is, chiarosuro lighting unctions
dicrntlyin noirth