Using Wavelet Analysis in Crack Detection at The Arch Concrete Dam Under Frequency Analysis With FEM
Using Wavelet Analysis in Crack Detection at The Arch Concrete Dam Under Frequency Analysis With FEM
Using Wavelet Analysis in Crack Detection at The Arch Concrete Dam Under Frequency Analysis With FEM
Using Wavelet Analysis in Crack Detection at the Arch Concrete Dam under Frequency Analysis with FEM
Mohammad Ali Lotfollahi-Yaghin and Mohammad Amin Hesari Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: The dam is a part of civil works for the irrigation and flood control purposes. Specially, arch concrete dams have important characteristics because of high safety, economical design, designing complexity and its applications. Most of structure failures take place because of ingredients fracture. This event occurred by cracks witch their development is considered as a serious threat for the behavior of the structure. The exhibition methods of the cracks are classified in groups of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) methods. The effect of cracks on the behavior of a structure is local stiffness differences that have great effects on the dynamic treatment of the structure. This matter is very significant in the difference between natural frequency and mode shapes, so analysis it will be lead to detect the crack. The new and useful method that has located in the of signal Analysis discussion has encounter with researches reception that is named as Wavelet Transform (WT). This transform is one of the useful mathematic transform methods witch have a high ability in recognition of inconsistencies by index of Wavelet Transform graph in the shape of one or two close points that have noises in relation which other points. So, in this paper, first the theory of wavelet analysis is presented including continuous and discrete wavelet transform followed by its application to SHM. Then, using frequency analysis response of dam with ABAQUS software, crack detection possibility has been researched in dam structure under Wavelet analyzing in MATLAB software toolbox. Key words: Arch dam frequency analysis crack wavelet analysis ABAQUS
INTRODUCTION Water with good quality and in sufficient quantity is a basic requirement for humanity. Reservoirs and concrete dams that create those reservoirs provide a means to balance the fluctuation of natural water flow. Multipurpose reservoirs can serve for drinking water, irrigation in agriculture, production of clean renewable energy, recreation and flood protection. So, concrete arch dams and detection of probable damage on its body play a vital role in the infrastructure of many states for the provision of water resource and saving money. It is necessary to use scientific methods for reducing cost and time and also to meet industry requirements. Finite Element Method (FEM) is employed to solve different engineering problems in permanent, temporary, linear and nonlinear states [1]. Among finite element method software, the ABAQUS software is used because of high accuracy and ability of dynamic analysis such as earthquake and water wave loading on structures. This software is accurate research software and is employed in industry and university settings [2]. In order to Detection of damage, 691
investigation of its incidence effects is necessary. According to theoretical principles of structure, there is a relationship between dynamic and static response and stiffness as a result [3]. Any sudden change in stiffness leads to dynamic and static response variation. This condition will help to an estimate damage and investigation of structural response before and after failure (Structural health monitoring) [4]. Wavelet method is a new and effective method for the realization of structural damage. There is a close relationship among wavelet method and frequency and time issues. The ability of this method is high in recognition of damage location. Wrong and lieu (1998) proposed articles about fracture discovery by wavelet method. They explained fracture recognition in beam by simple support (5). Currently, L ie and Chen (2001) published another article and they proposed a method based on Wavelet Finite Element Method (WFEM) in order to recognition of damage specifications. This method addresses to realization of damaged location like beam Fracture [6]. For many years, damage identification methods have been studied by a number of researchers while the importance of Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) of the
Corresponding Author: Dr. M.A. Lotfollahi Taghin, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
civil infrastructure has been significantly increasing. Damage detection is the first level of the more general problem of damage identification. A further analysis and subsequent levels of damage identification of a structure include: classification and severity of damage, determination of the location of damage, prediction of possible breakdown or failure, and estimation of the remaining service life [7, 8]. The modal analysis method one of many NDE methods, is based on the fact that the change of structural properties causes a variation in the different modal parameters; namely natural frequencies, damping ratios and mode shapes. Many analytical and experimental studies have been conducted to establish analytical correlations between damage severity and modal parameters. About 60 years ago Kirmser reported the relationship between natural frequencies and the introduction of a crack in an iron beam [9]. The use of mode shapes to study the dynamic behavior of structures requires that a number of accelerometers be installed on the structure. However, a wavelet analysis can make it possible to evaluate the soundness of structures by using only one accelerometer strategically located on the structure [10, 11]. Moreover, in order to detect damage using modal based methods, a complete dynamic analysis is often required and is usually performed by a finite element analysis method to locate and quantify the damage. This procedure has several difficulties: First, it is not always possible or convenient to measure the vibration response of a structure before damage. Second, it is often not feasible to conduct a detailed dynamic analysis of a complete structure. Third, it is sometimes difficult to obtain accurate material properties for a dynamic analysis. Furthermore, it is not easy to extract local information caused by small damage from modal parameters that characterize the global behavior of a structure [12]. In order to eliminate these difficulties wavelet-based damage detection has been considered by several researchers over the last decade. Historically, wavelets were first applied in geophysics to analyze data from seismic surveys, which are used in oil and mineral exploration, to get pictures of layering in surface rock. In fact, geophysicists only rediscovered wavelets; mathematicians had developed them to solve abstract problems some twenty years earlier but had not anticipated their applications in signal processing [13]. While Fourier analysis consists of the breaking up of a signal into sine waves of various frequencies and phases, wavelet analysis is a breaking up of a signal into shifted and scaled versions of a mother wavelet or basis function. These results in variable sizes of a window function and make it possible to detect the discontinuities and breakdown points of data that other analyzing methods usually 692
miss. The first researcher known to have applied wavelet to vibration analysis is Newland [14-16]. He applied a wavelet analysis for the study of vibration of buildings caused by underground trains and road traffic by which he found the similarities between the response signals in each floor. WAVELET THEORY Basis function: The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is a perfect tool for finding the frequency components in a signal. A disadvantage of the FFT is that frequency components can only be extracted from the complete duration of a signal. The frequency components are obtained from an average over the whole length of the signal. Therefore it is not a suitable tool for a nonstationary signal such as the impulse response of cracked beams, vibration generated by faults in a gearbox, and structural response to wind storms, just to name a few. These types of problems associated with FFT can be resolved by using wavelet analysis. Consequently, wavelet analysis has recently been considered for damage detection and Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). It provides a powerful tool to characterize local features of a signal. Unlike the Fourier transform, where the function used as the basis of decomposition is always a sinusoidal wave, other basis functions can be selected for wavelet shape according to the features of the signal. The basis function in wavelet analysis is defined by two parameters: scale and translation. This property leads to a multi-resolution representation for non-stationary signals. As mentioned before, a basis function (or mother wavelet) is used in wavelet analysis. For a wavelet of order N, the basis function can be represented as
(n) = ( 1) jc ( j 2 n + j N + 1)
j= 0 N 1
(1)
Where cj is coefficient. The basis function should satisfy the following two conditions [17, 19]: The basis function integrates to zero, i.e.
(t)dt = 0
(2)
(t) dt <
(3)
Eq. (2) suggests that the basis function be oscillatory or have a wavy shape. Eq. (3) implies that
most of the energy in the basis function is confined to a finite duration. The important properties of basis functions are orthogonality and biorthogonality. These properties make it possible to calculate the coefficient very efficiently. There is no redundancy in the sense that there is only one possible wavelet decomposition for the signal being analyzed. However, not all basis functions have these properties. A frequently mentioned term in the definition of a basis function is compact support, which means that the values of the basis function are non-zero for finite intervals. This property enables one to efficiently represent signals that have localized features. CONTINUOUS WAVELET TRANSFOM (CWT) The CWT is defined as:
tb W(a,b) = f(t). ( )dt a a 1
2
(t)
d <
(8)
(9)
Therefore, CWT is a collection of inner products of a signal f (t) and the translated and dilated wavelets a,b (t). The value of the scale a is proportional to the reciprocal of the frequency which results from:
F ( t a ) = a (a)
(10)
Where F[] daenotes the Fourier transform. (4) DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFOM (DWT) The main idea of DWT is the same as that of CWT. While the CWT requires much calculation effort to find the coefficients at every single value of the scale parameter, DWT adopts dyadic scales and translations (i.e. scales and translations based on powers of two) in order to reduce the amount of computation, which results in better efficiency of calculation. Filters of different cutoff frequencies are used for the analysis of the signal at different scales. The signal is passed through a series of high-pass filters to analyze the high frequencies, and through a series of low-pass filters to analyze the low frequencies. In DWT the signals can be represented by approximations and details. The detail at level j is defined as
Dj = a j,k j.k (t)
k z
Where a and b are scale and translation parameters, respectively and * w is the complex conjugate of . The basis function is represented as
j.k (t) = 2 2 ( 2j t k)
j
(5)
If the scaling parameter a, is 0<a 1, it results in very narrow windows and is appropriate for high frequency components in the signal f (t). If the value of a, is a1 it results in the very wide windows and is suitable for the low frequency components in the signal. According to the uncertainty principle (also known as Heisenberg inequality), the resolution in time and frequency has the following relationship:
t f 1 4
(11)
(6)
Where a Z is the set of positive integers. The approximation at level J is defined as:
Aj = D j
j> J
(7)
(12)
Where C is a constant. Therefore, the time resolution becomes arbitrarily good at high frequencies, while the frequency resolution becomes arbitrarily good at low frequencies [19]. This property helps to overcome the limitation of Short Time Fourier Transforms (STFT) in which the time-frequency resolution is fixed. In order for an inverse wavelet transform to exist, the mother wavelet should satisfy the admissibility condition defined as: 693
(13)
As opposed to the CWT where only a wavelet function is used, in DWT a scaling function is used, in addition to the wavelet function. These are related to low-pass and high-pass filters, respectively. The
scaling function (t) must satisfy the following three conditions [18]: It integrates to one:
(t)dt = 1
(14)
(t)dt = 1
(15)
main objective w as to develop an on-line system to monitor the damage rate of a structure to assure its safety during severe environ-mental loading such as earthquake events. Estimating the damage rate of structures caused by low cycle fatigue loads is important to assure the safety of structures. However, it is difficult to detect the fatigue signals and to estimate the damage rate of structures from the detected signals. They applied the orthonormal discrete wavelet transform to the detection of fatigue signals from the observed signals contaminated by noise. In the orthonormal basis, the wavelet expansion of a function x(t) and the coefficients of wavelet expansion are defined as:
(t) = j,k j , k (t)
j k
(16)
(19)
(20)
(17)
j , k (t) = 2 2 ( 2j t k)
(18)
Where j,k are the coefficients of the wavelet expansion of x(t). The structure in the study is represented by a simple mass-spring-dashpot model and the governing differential equation of motion of the system is given by:
m d2 d x(t) + c x(t) + kx(t) = f ( t ) = y(t) + dt 2 dt
Which are similar to Eq. (1) and (5), respectively. Not all wavelet functions have scaling functions. Only orthogonal wavelets have their scaling functions. This DWT can be very useful for on-line health monitoring of structures, since it can efficiently detect the time of a frequency change caused by stiffness degradation. Further details about wavelet theory can be found in the literature [17, 19, 20]. STRUCTURAL HELTH MONITORING (SHM) In order to extend the life of facilities more attention should be given to infrastructures and buildings. Even though structures are normally designed to last 50-100 yr, overloads, excessive usage, exposure to extreme weather or environmental conditions and other unexpected factors can cause more rapid deterioration of structures. In general, the development of successful health monitoring methods depends on two key factors: sensing technology and the associated signal analysis and interpretation algorithm. Over the past 10 yr, wavelet theory has been one of the emerging and fast-evolving mathematical and signal processing tools for vibration analysis [21]. This new signal processing tool made it possible to decompose and reconstruct the measured raw data efficiently. Al-khalidy et al. published numerous papers about damage detection using wavelet analysis [22, 23]. Their 694
S(t )
i i =1
(21)
Where m, c and k are system mass, viscous damping coefficient, and stiffness, respectively; x(t) is the displacement response and f(t) the external excitation is assumed to be a sum of the seismic excitation, y(t) and a sequence of impulses occurring at random times. The impulses model the fatigue damages occurring at random times i (i=1,2,n) with a magnitude S. The wave-let transform clearly picked up the exact time of impulse occurrence in the input. The researchers found that several factors played a role in the successful detection of the impulses in the input force, such as sampling rate, wavelet regularity, and signal-to-noise ratio. They also found that increasing the sampling rate makes it easier to detect the impulses. The higher the sampling rate is, the more the signal will overcome the noise. However, the magnitude of the wavelet coefficients j,k decreases by 2 -3 orders of magnitude when increasing the sampling rate from 8 to 100 Hz. They suggested that if the noise level is low, high sampling rates should be adopted and vice versa. Robertson et al. [24] presented a wavelet-based method for the extraction of impulse response functions (Markov parameters) from measured input and output data. The input data and the Markov parameters are
approximated by the locally orthogonal 8 term Dubieties wavelet functions, which leads to a simple representation of the convolution integral in the wavelet domain. They also performed structural system identification using the Markov parameters extracted by the wavelet analysis [25]. The modes, mode shapes and damping parameters of the state space based model were found. Kitada [26] proposed a method of identifying nonlinear structural dynamic systems using wavelets. This method made it possible to determine stiffness and damping coefficients of a structure with severe material nonlinearity without any assumption about nonlinear characteristics of the structure. Other research studies aimed at determining modal parameters using wavelets can be found in the literature [27-29]. Hou et al. [30] provided numerical simulation data from a simple structural model with breakage springs. The governing equation of motion of the system is given by
m d2 d x(t) + c x(t) + k(t)x(t) = f(t) 2 dt dt
Fig. 1: A sketch of three DOF spring-mass-dashpot model (from [25] with permission from CRC Press) severity. They provided a delectability map that represents a qualitative relationship between the noise intensity and damage level. In conclusions, the authors state that structural damage or the change in system stiffness may be detected by spikes in the details of the wavelet decompositions of the response data. In another research performed by Hou and Noori [31] a MDOF model with three degrees of freedom is used, as shown in Fig. 1, instead of a SDOF model. The total inter-mass stiffness ki (t) is expressed by:
ki (t) = kij (t)
j= 1 ni
(22) (26)
(23)
Where ki (t) represents the stiffness of the ith spring in the system at time t. If breakage of a spring occurs due to an excessive response, ki (t) is defined by:
* x k if (x(t)) i t t ki( t ) = i0, 0,otherwise
(24)
* Where ki0 and x i are the initial stiffness and the thresh-old value of the ith spring, respectively. However, if a spring is broken because of fatigue, ki (t) is determined by:
Where kj (t) represents the stiffness of the jth spring of the ith mass in the system at time t. The objective (compared to their previous study) is to identify the location of damage in the structure. The details in discrete wavelet transform of each external excitation show the moment when a spring is broken. Therefore, the location of damage can be identified. Hou and Hera [32] proposed pseudo-wavelets to identify system parameters, and the associated pseudowavelet transform was developed. One of the pseudo wavelets that is based on the Fourier amplitude response function for a linear SDOF system subjected to an impulse input is defined as
* W(; * 0; 0) =
* 0
2
2 * 2 2 (2 * 0 ) + (2 0 0 )
(27)
(25)
Where N(t) is the total number of cycles of the response in the time interval [0, t] and Ni is the allowable number of cycles for the i th spring. In order to calculate Eq. (22) fourth-order Runge-Kutta integration is used. The discrete wavelet transformation of the response curve showed clear spikes, which they attributed to the occurrence of structural damage. The authors also investigated the noise intensity and damage 695
Where 0 * is the shifting parameter, 0 * is the scaling factor, and b is a normalizing factor. The pseudowavelet transform (PWT) can then be defined as:
* * C F (0* , * o ) = 0 F()W(; 0; 0 )d
(28)
Where Cf is the pseudo-wavelet transform of F(). For a MDOF system, the truncated PWT was used and was found to be much more accurate compared to the
non-truncated pseudo-wavelet transform approach. The truncated PWT involves constructing a truncated response spectrum by setting the transform to zero for any frequency outside the frequency range determined in the neighborhood of a local maximum. Another approach to locate damage is to study the curvature mode shapes and wavelet maps. The residual of a mode shape is the difference between the damaged and undamaged mode shapes. The curvature of the residual of a mode shape is the second derivative of the residual of this mode shape. This is referred to as the curvature mode shape. Wavelet transforms can then be applied to the curvature mode shapes. However, when applied to stationary signals (such as mode shapes of a vibrating structure), curvature mode shapes and wavelet maps fail to determine the exact location of the damage. Amaravadi et al. [33] proposed a new technique that combines these two methods for enhancing the sensitivity and accuracy in damage location. First, the curvature mode shape is calculated from the residual of individual mode shapes. Then a wavelet map is constructed for each curvature mode shape. The proposed technique was experimentally verified using a lattice structure made of vertically stacked aluminum beams, and a cantilever beam. Damage was simulated as side notches in one of the beams. The results show that the proposed method accurately predicts the location of the damage. Since the wavelet number indicates the location of damage, the accuracy of this method depends on the number of wavelet coefficients contained in the signal. In WT analysis, the frequency resolution becomes quite poor in the high frequency region. To overcome this drawback Sun and Chang [11] applied the wavelet packet transform (WPT) instead of WT to the dynamic signals measured from a structure. WPT is another extension of WT that provides complete level-by-level decompositions. The wavelet packet component signal fi j (t) can be expressed by a linear combination of wave let packet functions i j,k (t) as follow:
f ij (t) = cij,k ij,k (t)
is to calculate the component energy at each level and this energy is used as inputs into neural network models for damage assessment. The researchers found that a neural network model is capable of identifying the presence of damage that corresponds to as small as 4% of the rigidity reduction in any element. For damage location and severity, another neural network model could locate and quantify moderate (10-20% EI reduction) and severe (20-30% EI reduction) damages. Liu et al. [34], Wu and Du [35], and Hwang et al. [36] also used the wavelet packets or wavelet basis neural network for damage detection. Gurley et al. [37] developed a wavelet-based coherence and bi coherence technique in order to detect intermittent first-and higher-order correlation between a pair of signals. The classical approach for reduction of variance is to perform ensemble averaging by using localized time integration. In this study, the introduction of a variable integration window was predicated on the multi resolution character of wavelets and high-lighted that the lack of ensemble averaging results in much of the observed spurious coherence. These correlation schemes can be applied in problems involving wave-structure interactions or seismic response of structures where intermittent correlation between linear and nonlinear processes is of interest. Accordingly, by obtaining geometrical dimensions of karoon1 case studied dam from r elated designing map and also its mechanical and physical characteristics in damaged and safe cases, the damage was modeled by ABAQUS software. Support condition and physical properties are the same for both sates. MODELINGOF THE DAM BY ABAQUS SOFTWARE A case study has been done to make finite element model. It can be a real model or simulated one. Besides of difficulty of creating and analyzing a real model rather than a simulated one, its results will be accurate and real. Meanwhile, by investigation of dam model and prediction of structure behavior, probable weak points under applied load can be realized. So, the information of Karoon1 (Fig. 1 and 2), doublecurvature arch dam, was prepared and its real model was created exactly from designing map. In this dam, internal and external radiuses, internal and external angles of arches are vary depend on their level. The axis which passes through arches center is not asymmetrical. So, this dam is considered as one of the most complex dams. Table 1 summarized the specifications of mentioned dam body. The finite element model of both safe (Fig. 3) and damaged (Fig. 4 and 5) states of dam was created by 696
(29)
(30)
provided that the wavelet packet functions are orthognormal. For damage detection, location and severity, a three-span bridge model is used. The response of the bridge model to an impact force is measured and then decomposed by WPT. The next step
Thickness at Crest Normal water level Poason concerete coefficent Concrete density
Table 2: The frequencies of the first four modes Fourth mode freqency 3.3423 3.3181 Third mode freqency 2.9860 2.9735 Secound mode freqency 2.1455 2.1354 First mode freqency 1.8680 1.8614 Sample Safe Cracked
Fig. 2: Upstream view of karoon1 dam ABAQUSE software and then analyzed in the frequency bond of (0-100 Hz). The dam has a quadratic surface. Therefore the 3-dimension solid element (C3D20RH) was used in modeling of dams geometry to fit the finite element model with its real geometry. A crack with dimensions of 10m (in height) by 4m (in depth) by 0.2m (in width) has been supposed at the crest level in midpoint of up stream of dam (Fig. 5). 697
Fig. 4: The model of cracked dam under frequency analysis FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF DAM In this study, the responses of two Frequency analyses were studied. Results showed that the frequency has been reduced in models that have crack. Table 2 presents the values of the first four frequencies of both cracked and safe models.
Fig. 6: SWT window in MATLAB software GRAFICAL WINDOW OF STATIONARY WAVELET TRANSFORM A set of frequencies, which are being created during the short period of time, could repeat in another period of time. These types of signals are called stationary signals. Figure 6 shows SWT window. According to Fig. 4, followings are identical in graphical window: Input signal 2-Signal without noise Signal with noise 4. Decomposed: signal with noise Decomposed: signal with out noise software in special toolbar of wavelet. In safe model, in the first frequency mode, the displacement responses of 96 points at crest level with equal distances have been took in two directions; involve width direction of dam (U1) and reservoir length direction (U2). This response that had 1.8650 Hz frequency has been analyzed in different scales. Because of paper space limitation, five results by Sym2 wave (scale 2) have been shown in Fig. 7 and 8. ANALYSIS OF CRACK-DAM WITH WAVELET Similarly, the response of cracked dam was considered in first frequency mode in ninety-six points of dam at crest level in equal distances. Displacements are in width direction of dam (U1), reservoir direction (U2) and perpendicular direction to dam width axis (U3). Figure 9 shows cracked dam analyzed model. Fig. 10-12 indicate results. According to the figures, the graphs involve considerable rise at or around crack location. But there 698
The indices of analyzed signals (d 1 , d2 ) relate to selected level number. ANALASIS OF SAFE-DAM WITH WAVELET After analysis of dam by ABAQUS software, the responses were used for wavelet analysis by MATLAB
Fig. 7: The graph of SWT for safe sample response under Sym2 wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U1)
Fig. 8: The graph of SWT for safe sample response under Sym wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2)
Fig. 10: The graph of SWT for response of cracked dam under Sym2 wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U1)
Fig. 11: The graph of SWT for response of cracked dam under sym2 wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2) 700
Fig. 12: The graph of SWT for response of cracked dam under sym2 wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U3)
Fig. 13: SWT for response of safe dam under Ciof wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2)
Fig. 15: SWT for response of safe dam under Bior wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2)
Fig. 14: SWT for response of cracked dam under Ciof wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2) 701
Fig. 16: SWT for response of cracked dam under Bior wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2)
Fig. 17: SWT for response of safe dam under Db wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2)
was no noise or any harmony in graphs of safe dam (Fig. 7 and 8). In other words, the location of crack is in central of crest level in location of 48th point (center of 96 selected points).Wavelet-transform has been used to recognition of damage place for characteristic of SWT which are different from other methods. It has high clearance ability to distinguish of different frequencies. SWT can show the location of frequency changes that these locations are points that they have been damaged. The results of analysis with other wavelets have been shown in Fig. 13-20 only in noise state (because of paper limitation) in safe and damaged dam in reservoir direction (U2). As figures indicate, recognition of crack location is possible. CONCLUSION Wavelet-transform has high ability in analysis of static and dynamic response signals. This property is clear in recognition of discrete and uncoordinated situations such as sudden fluctuation in stiffness. The effects of damage on wavelet coefficient graph are more compressed in low scales and the location of noise is clear. Meanwhile, increase in scale which is corresponding with decrease in frequency leads to wide spreading noise and low clearness. Selection of proper scale is important in wavelet analysis. Higher scales are recommended for recognition of small damages and low scales are recommended for recognition of damages near support. By investigation of wavelets type in low scales, Dmey, Sym, Bior, Ciof, Db and Haar wavelets are introduced as a useful wavelets in crack detection. As experienced in this research, Coif, Db and Sym wavelets have suitable efficiency in recognition of crack location rather than other wavelets. REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. Bathe, Klaus-Jurgen, 1996. Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall Inc. ABAQUS Analysis Users Manual, (V6.6), 2006. Gudmaunson, P., 1982. Engine Frequency Changes of Structures Due to Cracks, notches or other geometrical changes. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 30: 339-353. Banks, H.T., D.J. Inman, D.J. Leo and Y. Wang, 1996. An experimentally validated damage detection theory in smart structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 191: 859-880.
Fig. 18: SWT for response of cracked dam under Db wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2)
Fig. 19: SWT for response of safe dam under Dmey wavelet analyzer (mode1-U2)
4. Fig. 20: SWT for response of cracked dam under Dmey wavelet analyzer (Mode1-U2) 702
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
19.
Wang, Q. and M. Liew, 2002. Application of Wavelet theory for crack identification in structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124: 152-157. Li, B., X.F. Chen, J.X. Ma and Z.J. He, 2004. Detection of Crack Location and Size in Structures Sing Wavelet Finite Element Methods. Journal of Sound and Vibration. Doebling, S.W., C.R. Farrar, M.B. Primee and D.W. Shevitz, 1996. Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Report LA 13070-MS, UC-900, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. Rytter, A., 1993. Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark. Kirmser, P.G., 1944. The e.ect of discontinuities of the natural frequency of beams. In: Proceedings American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA. Surace, C. and R. Ruotolo, 1994. Crack detection of a beam using the wavelet transforms. In: Proceedings the 12th International Modal Analysis Conf. Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 1141-1147. Sun, Z. and C.C. Chang, 2002. Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transforms. J Struct Engng, 128 (10): 1354-1361. Wang, Q. and X. Deng, 1999. Damage detection with spatial wavelets. Intl. J. Solids Struct., 36: 3443-3468. Meyer, Y., 1993. Wavelets and applications. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Newland, D.E., 1994. Wavelet analysis of vibration. Part 1: Theory. J. Vibr. Acoust., 116: 409-416. Newman, D.E., 1993. An introduction to random vibrations, spectral and wavelet analysis. 3rd Edn. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical. Mallat, S.A., 1998. Wavelet tour of signal processing. New York: Academic Press. Rioul, O. and M.W. Vetterli, 1991. Wavelets and signal processing. IEEE SP Mag, pp: 14-38. Daubechies, I., 1992. Ten lectures on wavelets. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Staszewski, W.J., 1998. Structural and mechanical damage detection using wavelets. Shock Vibr. Digest., 30 (6): 457-472. 703
20. Al-khalidy, A., M. Noori, Z. Hou, S. Yamamoto, A. Masuda and A. Sone, 1997.. health monitoring systems of linear structures using wavelet analysis. In: International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, pp: 164-175. 21. Al-khalidy, A., M. Noori, Z. Hou, R. Carmona, S. Yamamoto and A. Masuda et al., 1997. A study of health monitoring systems of linear structures using wavelet analysis. ASME PVP, 347: 49-58. 22. Robertson, A.N., K.C. Park and K.F. Alvin, 1998. Extraction of impulse response data via wavelet transform for structural identification. J. Vibr. Acoust., 120: 252-260. 23. Robertson, A.N., K.C. Park and K.F. Alvin, 1998. Identification of structural dynamics models using wavelet-generated impulse response data. J. Vibr. Acoust., 120: 261-266. 24. Kitada, Y., 1998. Identification of nonlinear structural dynamic systems using wavelets. J. Engng. Mech., 124 (10): 1059-1066. 25. Ruzzene, M., A. Fasana, L. Garibaldi and B. Biombo, 1997. Natural frequencies and dampings identification using wavelet transform: Application to real data. Mech. Syst. Signal. Process, 11 (2): 207-218. 26. Lamarque, C.H., Pernot and A. Cuer, 2000. Damping identification in multi degree-of-freedom systems via a wavelet-logarithmic decrement-part 1: Theory. J. Sound Vibr., 235 (3): 361-374. 27. Hans, S., E. Ibraim, S. Pernot, C. Boutin and C.H.A. Lamarque, 2000. Damping identification in multi-degree-of-freedom systems via a wavelet-logarithmic decrement-part 2: Study of a civil engineering building. J. Sound Vibr., 235 (3): 375-403. 28. Hou, Z., M. Noori and R.S. Amand, 2000. Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126 (7): 677-683. 29. Hou, Z. and M. Noori, 2000. Application of wavelet analysis for structural health monitoring. In: 2nd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, pp: 946-955. 30. Hou, Z. and A. Hera, 2001. System identification technique using truncated pseudo wavelet transform. Smart structures and materials. Proc. SPIE, 4326: 198-267. 31. Amaravadi, V., V. Rao, L.R. Koval, M. Derriso, 2001. Structural health monitoring using wavelet transforms. Smart structures and inte grated systems. Proc. SPIE, 4327: 258-269.
32. Liu, B., S.F. Ling and Q. Meng, 1997. Machinery diagnosis based on wavelet packets. J Vibr Control, 3: 5-17. 33. Wu, Y. and R. Du, 1996. Feature extraction and assessment using wavelet packets for monitoring of machining processes. Mech. Syst. Signal Process, 10 (1): 29-53. 34. Hwang, K., S. Mandayam, S.S. Udpa, L. Udpa, W. Lord and M. Atzal, 2000. Characterization of gas pipeline inspection signals using wavelet basis function neural networks. NDT and E Intl., 33: 531-545. 35. Gurley, K., T. Kijewski, A. Kareem, 2003. First and high order correlation detection using wavelet transforms. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 129 (2): 188201. 36. Chang, C.C. and L.W. Chen, 2003. Detection of the location and size of cracks in the multiple cracked beam by spatial Wavelet based approach. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 19: 139-155. 37. Quek, S.T., Q. Wang, L. Zhang, K.K. Ang, 2001. Sensitivity analysis of crack detection in beams by wavelet technique. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 43: 2899-2910. 38. Army Corps of Engineers, 1994. Arch Dam Design US. Manual No: 1110-2-2201 39. Hou, Z., M. Noori and R.S. Ahmad, 2000. Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126: 677.
40. Yanfang Han and Pengfei Shi, 2007. An adaptive level-selecting wavelet transform for texture defect detection Image and Vision Computing, pp: 1239-1240. 41. Kim, H. and H. Melhem, 2005. Damage detection in Concrete by Fourier and Wavelet Analyses. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 129: 571-577. 42. Mallat, S.G., 1999. A Wavelet tour of Signal processing, London: Academic Press. 43. Hseyin, T., E. Mehmet and Z. Erkan, 2007. Enhancement of time-frequency properties of ECG for detecting micro potentials by wavelet transform based method expert systems with applications, pp: 46-753. 44. Robert, J. et al., 2007. Spike detection in human muscle sympathetic nerve activity using the kurtosis of stationary wavelet transform coefficients. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, pp: 359-367. 45. Ravan, M., S.H. Sadeghi and R. Moini, 2007. Using a wavelet network for reconstruction of fatigue crack depth profile from AC field measurement signals NDT and E International, pp: 537-544. 46. Barj, E.M., 2006. Speckle correlation fringes de noising stationary wavelet transform. Application in the wavelet phase evaluation technique. Journal of Optics and Technology, 38: 506-511.
704