International Journal of Mechanical Sciences: Emil Manoach, Sylwester Samborski, Andrzej Mitura, Jerzy Warminski
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences: Emil Manoach, Sylwester Samborski, Andrzej Mitura, Jerzy Warminski
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences: Emil Manoach, Sylwester Samborski, Andrzej Mitura, Jerzy Warminski
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 31 October 2011
Received in revised form
8 May 2012
Accepted 11 June 2012
Available online 18 June 2012
In this work numerical and experimental study of the vibration of laminated beams with damage,
subjected to dynamic loading and temperature variations is presented.
The goal of the study is to check the applicability of the damage detection technique based on an
analysis of the Poincare maps of the beam response. The geometrically nonlinear version of the
Timoshenko beam theory is used to model the beam behavior. The damage is represented as a
reduction of the effective elastic modulus of the beam material in a small area of the structure.
The beams are subjected to a harmonic loading, leading to large amplitude vibrations and to
temperature changes. The main results are focused on establishing the inuence of the damage on
the vibration response of heated or unheated structures and the change in the time-history diagrams
and the Poincare maps, caused by a damage and elevated temperature. The damage detection criterion
formulated earlier for nonheated plates, based on analysing of the Poincare maps of the damaged and
healthy plate, is modied and tested for the case of beams additionally subjected to elevated
temperatures. The importance of taking into account the actual temperature in the process of damage
detection is shown. Performed experimental tests (by an optical method) conrm the applicability and
sensitivity of the proposed method.
& 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Composite beam
Nonlinear vibrations
Damage detection
Poincare map
1. Introduction
Vibration-based structural health monitoring (VSHM) methods
are quite popular and are of extensive use for monitoring
structures and fault identication. They are based on the fact that
a damage will alter the stiffness, mass or energy dissipation
properties of the structure which in turn will alter its measured
vibration response. The vibration based damage detection is an
effective method due to its simplicity of implementation and
ability of acquiring both the global and the local information of
the structure.
Many of the previous efforts of researchers on VSHM were
directed towards methods based on changes in the dynamic
characteristics of the structures such as natural frequencies,
vibration mode, and modal curvature [17]. The simplest way
to perform a fault detection is the usage of the rst several natural
frequencies of a structure which can be determined from a
conventional experiment. However, it seems that the lower order
resonance frequencies are not always very sensitive to a damage,
n
Corresponding author at: Institute of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
Acad. G. Bonchev Street, bl.4, Soa 1113, Bulgaria.
E-mail address: [email protected] (E. Manoach).
1
On leave of absence from the Institue of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of
Sciences, Soa 1113, Bulgaria.
0020-7403/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.06.006
(i)
(i)
where
Nl
X
Ek zk zk1 b
k1
A55 b
Nl
X
Nl
X
Ek h
k1
Gk zk zk1 b
k1
A11 b
2. Theoretical model
121
Nl
X
Gk h
k1
Nl
3
3
bX
Ek zk zk1 ,
3k1
aT
Nl
X
ak
T
k1
Fig. 1. Geometry of the beam. x1 and x2 denote the beginning and the end of the
damaged part of the beam.
@N
@u
@2 u
c1
RH 2 0,
@x
@t
@t
h=2 r z rh=2
5a
122
@M
@c
@2 c
Q c2
RI 2 0, 0 ox o l, t 4 0
@x
@t
@t
!
@Q
@2 w
@N @w
@w
@2 w
N
c1
RH 2 px,t
@x
@x @x
@x
@x2
@t
5b
5c
RI b=3
ri zi3 zi13
Nl
X
6a
ri hi
6b
aT DT
0
7a
@x
@x 2 @x
@
@c
@w
@2 c
s
D11
c RI 2 0
k A55
@x
@x
@x
@t
7b
"
#
@
@w
@u 1 @w 2 @2 w
A55
c A11
@x
@x
@x 2 @x
@x2
A11 aT DT
@2 w
@2 w
RH 2 p
2
@x
@t
7c
c0,t cl,t 0
9a
_
_0
wx,0
w
9b
cx,0 c0
9c
c_ x,0 c_
N
X
Ei =Nl ,
i1
i1
u u=l,
x x=l,
z z=h,
t tc=l,
c2 E=r
10
where
i1
RH b
9d
N
X
ri =N l
11
i1
aT DT
0
12a
@x
@x 2 @x
@
@c
@c
E @2 c
s
2 @w
D11
c d2
k A55 l
RI
0,
@x
@x
@x
@t
r @t2
0 ox o l, t 4 0
@w
@w
E @2 w
s @
A55
c d1
RH
pl GL2 GT2
k
@x
@x
@t
r @t2
12b
12c
where by GL2 and GT2 the component of the following, the so-called
pseudo-load vectors (see [20,28]) due to the geometrical nonlinearities and thermal changes are denoted
"
2 # 2
@u
@w
@ w
GL2 A11
0:5
13a
@x
@x
@x2
GT2 A11 aT DT
@2 w
@x2
13b
15
G
d
x
GuT dx C 2
ux C
11
w
0
14
16
C
17
A111
A211
A111
0
Here A111 and A211 denote elastic constants dened by Eq. (4) for a
healthy and damaged part of the beam, correspondingly.
Thus, if one considers Guw andGuT as known functions, the sum of
the components of pseudo-load vectors due to the large displacements and the temperature changes, can be expressed using Eqs.
(13)(15) and (17) as
"
#
@u
1 @w 2 @2 w
@2 w
@2 w
vibrations of the beam do not correspond to those of the nonlinear system, these modes are called pseudo-normal or quasinormal modes [31,32]. Thus, the generalized displacements
vector v {c,w}T is expanded as a sum of the product of
pseudo-normal modes vn and the time dependent functions
qn(t) as
v
Nf
X
vn xqn t
19
n1
21
The initial conditions dened by Eqs. (9) are transformed also
in terms of qn 0 and q_ n 0. Eqs. (20) are strongly coupled due to
the nonlinear terms on the right hand sides of the equations
(which depend on the solution).
Let the total time interval in which the dynamic response is
desired be divided into a sequence of time increments [ti,ti 1].
Using the methodology developed by Kukreti and Issa [31], the
pseudo-load vector {P G} is interpolated by a quadratic polynomial of time, i.e.
0 r t r Lt
22
where Lt ti 1 ti represents the time increment and the variable t, dened as t t ti, identies a new time origin for each
time increment.
Denoting
P0 x Px,0,
0oxo1
23a
0 o x o1
P1 x Px,mLt ,
23b
P2 x Px,Lt ,
0 ox o 1
23c
G0 x Gx,0,
0 o m o1
23d
G1 x Gx,mLt ,
G2 x Gx,Lt ,
0 o m o1
23e
0 o mo 1
23f
24
Idi
9Sui Sdi 9
Sui
26
where
Sui
NX
p 1 q
_ ui,j 1 w
_ ui,j 2
wui,j 1 wui,j 2 w
j1
27a
Sdi
NX
p 1 q
_ di,j 1 w
_ di,j 2
wdi,j 1 wdi,j 2 w
j1
27b
20
123
28
124
structure at the same span of the supporting rolls. Next, inclination angles of experimental curves in their straight parts were
compared. The ratio of the inclination angles tangencies was
assumed to be the equivalent of bending-moduli ratio in case of
the delaminated and the healthy beam, respectively. According to
the measured results the value of the ratio was 0.62. These tests
dened for us that the upper limit of the Youngs modulus
reduction in our numerical calculation to be 50% (Case A).
The location of the damage for Cases B and C is the same as for
Case A.
The aim of the following numerical examples is to test the
procedure for DD at the presence of temperature changes, to
detect and localize damage (delamination), to check the sensitivity of the method and to estimate the temperature inuence on
the process of damage detection.
Table 1
Comparison of the natural frequencies of the healthy and damaged beams.
Mode no.
Damaged beams
Edef 0.5Eef
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
11,330
30,996
60,171
98,265
144,702
198,818
259,887
Edef 0.8Eef
Edef 0.9Eef
Frequencies
(rad/s)
Relative
differences (%)
11,278
29,365
57,293
96,239
140,329
190,244
249,922
0.46
5.26
4.78
2.06
3.02
4.31
3.83
0.05
1.05
1.31
0.52
0.38
1.04
1.16
0.09
0.84
1.13
0.70
0.58
0.74
0.79
11,324
30,671
59,381
97,756
144,145
196,753
256,881
11,320
30,737
59,494
97,580
143,857
197,348
257,840
0.0050
0.002
0.0025
w/l
w/l
0.004
125
0.000
-0.002
16000
0.0000
20000
24000
28000
32000
-0.0025
10000
20000
dimensionless time
dimensionless time
30000
0.0050
w/l
0.0025
0.0000
-0.0025
10000
15000
20000
dimensionless time
25000
30000
Fig. 2. Time histories of the beam center for different temperatures. p 50 N, oe 5665 rad/s (Case A). (a) DT 0; (b) DT 10; (c) DT 30. Black line, healthy beam;
red line, damaged beam. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure caption, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
126
0.050
0.050
0.025
w/l
w/l
0.025
0.000
0.000
-0.025
-0.025
0
10000
20000
30000
10000
dimensionless time
20000
30000
dimensionless time
0.06
w/l
0.03
0.00
-0.03
0
10000
20000
30000
dimensionless time
Fig. 3. Time history diagrams of the beam center at different temperatures. (a) DT 0; (b) DT 10; and (c) DT 30. p 50 N, oe 11,330 rad/s (Case A). Black line,
healthy beam; red line, damaged beam. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure caption, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
0.0002
dimensionless velocity
0.0002
dimensionless velocity
127
0.0000
-0.0002
-0.002
0.000
w/l
0.0000
-0.0002
-0.002
0.002
0.000
w/l
0.002
dimensionless velocity
0.00025
0.00000
-0.00025
-0.002
0.000
w/l
0.002
Fig. 4. Poincare maps for the response of the beam center at different temperatures. p 50 N, oe 5665 rad/s (Case A). (a) DT 0; (b) DT 10; and (c) DT 30. Black
dots, undamaged beam; red dots, damaged beam. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure caption, the reader is referred to the web version of this
article.)
7. Experimental tests
7.1. Specimens and experimental set-up
The goal of the paper is to validate the proposed method for
DD and to check its applicability by the series of experimental
laboratory tests. The specimens are composite beams prepared
from 10-layer glass-epoxy composite. The laminates were fabricated according to the prepreg technology in a form of plates.
For this purpose the TVR380M12/26%/R glass-epoxy roving tape
128
0.004
dimensionless velocity
dimensionless velocity
0.004
0.000
-0.004
-0.02
0.00
w/l
0.02
0.000
-0.004
-0.02
0.00
w/l
0.02
dimensionless velocity
0.005
0.000
-0.005
-0.03
0.00
w/l
0.03
Fig. 5. Poincare maps for the response of the beam center at different temperatures. p 50 N, oe 11,330 rad/s (Case A). (a) DT 0; (b) DT 10; and (c) DT 30. Black
dots, undamaged beam; red dots, damaged beam. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure caption, the reader is referred to the web version of this
article.)
129
Fig. 9. Damage index for a beam subjected to harmonic mechanical loading with
an amplitude p 10 N, excitation frequency oe 11,330 rad/s computed taking
the response for unheated healthy beam and heated (DT 15) damaged beam.
Fig. 7. Damage index for a beam subjected to harmonic mechanical loading with
an amplitude p 50 N, excitation frequency oe 11,330 rad/s and different
thermal loads.
then another healthy beam has been again tested together with
three damaged beams, etc.
Case 1. For Case 1 the beams are tested with two slightly different
excitation frequencies oe 140.625 Hz and oe 140 Hz.
The results from all performed experiments are very similar. In
some of them some errors arise in the displacements and velocity
in node 10 and for these experiments node 10 has been excluded
from the computations of the damage index. Due to the limited
130
0.06
T=0
Damage index
0.04
T=15
0.02
For the second set of beams, by changing the beams which are
simultaneously clamped, 10 tests have been performed. Three
healthy and three damaged beams have been used in various
combinations. The healthy and damaged beams have been excited
with a frequency of 125 Hz and acceleration equal to 10 g.
Actually, in 9 of all 10 experiments were obtained identical
results.
Phaseplot diagrams with Poincare maps on them for node
6 for the healthy and damaged beams are shown in Fig. 15.
A typical plot of the measured damage index obtained for the
second sets of beams (Case 2) is shown in Fig. 16. The experimentally obtained damage index has its maximum in node 6 that
is the edge of the delamination in a direction of increasing
displacements. This result has been obtained in 9 of 10 experimental series. The magnitude of the damage index varies slightly
in each experiment. This value depends on the starting time of the
sampling of the trajectories which the nodes describe in the phase
space. Only in one experiment the maximum has been obtained
in node 7.
1.5
1
2.5
0.5
0
0
1
11
21
Node numbers
31
41
-0.5
1.5
-1.5
-1
Fig. 10. Damage index for a beam (Case C) subjected to harmonic mechanical
loading with an amplitude p 10 N, excitation frequency oe 11,330 rad/s at
two thermal loads.
w, mm
1
0.5
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
time, s
Fig. 11. Scheme of the tested beams with the markers. (a) Beam Case 1 and
(b) beam Case 2.
Fig. 13. Time history diagram for point 6. Healthy (black color) and damaged (red
color) beams. Excitation frequency oe 140 Hz. (For interpretation of the
references to color in this gure caption, the reader is referred to the web version
of this article.)
131
4
Damage index
Damage index
3
2
1
0
1
Node numbers
4
6
Node numbers
10
Fig. 14. Damage indexes (Case 1). (a) oe 140 Hz and (b) oe 140.625 Hz.
1500
5
Poincare maps
1000
Damage index
velocity, mm/s
500
-500
-1000
0
-1500
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
w, mm
1.5
Fig. 15. Phase diagram of the response of healthy (black lines) and damaged (red
line) beams in Node 6. The Poincare map of the damaged beam is ploted with
black dots and the Poincare map of the healthy beam with red dots
oe 125 Hz. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure caption,
the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
All experimental results allow us to conclude that the proposed damage index is quite sensitive to the presence of delamination and it shows exactly the edge of the delamination in the
direction of the increasing displacements. These experimental
results correspond to the results obtained numerically (see
Section 5). Obviously, the end of the defect is the location where
a sharp change of the properties of the material occurs, which
lead to the biggest disturbance in the stress and strain elds of the
beam. These changes affect the damage index.
It should be noted that the experimental study was performed
only for beams at room temperature. With these experimental
tests we proved only the capability of the proposed method for
damage detection to predict a damage and its location. The
sensitivity of the damage index to the temperature inuence is
not studied experimentally due to lack of laboratory equipment.
8. Conclusions
A numerical approach has been applied to study the geometrically nonlinear vibration of thermally loaded composite beams
5
6
Node numbers
10
Fig. 16. Damage index for the beams excited with oe 125 Hz (Case 2).
132
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has received funding
from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/
2007-2013), FP7-REGPOT-2009-1, under Grant agreement no.
245479. The support by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher
EducationGrant no 1471-1/7.PR UE/2010/7 is also acknowledged. The rst author wishes to acknowledge the partial support
received through Bulgarian NSF Grant DCVP 02/1.
References
[1] Zou Y, Tong L, Steven GP. Vibration based model-dependent damage
(delamination) identication and health monitoring for composite
structuresa review. J Sound Vib 2000;230(2):35778.
[2] Rizos PF, Aspragathos N, Dimarogonas AD. Identication of crack location and
magnitude in a cantilevered beam from the vibration modes. J Sound Vib
1990;138:3818.
[3] Banks HT, Inman DJ, Leo DJ, Wang Y. An experimentally validated damage
detection theory in smart structures. J Sound Vib 1996;191:85980.
[4] Verboven P, Parloo E, Guillaume P, Overmeire MVan. Autonomous structural
health monitoringPart I: modal parameter estimation and tracking. Mech
Syst Signal Process 2002;16:63757.
[5] Parloo E, Verboven P, Guillaume P, Van Overmeire M. Autonomous structural
health monitoringPart II: vibration-based in-operation damage assessment.
Mech Syst Signal Process 2002;16:65975.
[6] Andreaus U, Casini P, Vestroni F. Frequency reduction in elastic beams due to
a stable crack: numerical results compared with measured test data. Eng
Trans 2003;51(1):116.
[7] Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW. Damage identication and
health monitoring of structural systems from changes in their vibration
characteristics: a literature review. Report LA-12767-MS. NM, USA: Los
Alamos National Laboratory; 1996.
[8] Andreaus U, Baragatti P. Fatigue crack growth, free vibrations and breathing
crack detection of aluminium alloy and steel beams. J. Strain Anal Eng Des
2009;44(7):595608.
[9] Reddy AD, Reheld LW, Haag RS. Inuence of prescribed delaminations of
stiffness-controlled behaviour of composite laminates, effects of defects in
composite materials. ASTM STP 836. Am Soc Test Mater 1984:7183.
[10] Lee BT, Sun CT, Liu D. An assessment of damping measurements in the evaluation
of integrity of composite beams. J Reinf Plast Compos 1987;6:11425.
[11] Cattarius J, Inman DJ. Time domain analysis for damage detection in smart
structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 1997;11:40923.
[12] Todd. M, Nichols JM, Pecora LM, Virgin L. Vibration-based damage assessment utilizing state space geometry changes: local attractor variance ratio.
Smart Mater Struct 2001;10:10008.
[13] Moniz L, Nichols JM, Nichols CJ, Seaver M, Trickey ST, Todd MD, et al.
A multivariate, attractor-based approach to structural health monitoring.
J Sound Vib 2005;283:295310.