Ques. 1 Rating No - of Respondents 2 1 3 20 4 8 5 11: Query Redressal System at Time Office
Ques. 1 Rating No - of Respondents 2 1 3 20 4 8 5 11: Query Redressal System at Time Office
Ques. 1 Rating No - of Respondents 2 1 3 20 4 8 5 11: Query Redressal System at Time Office
1 rating 2 3 4 5
no.of respondents 1 20 8 11
ques.2 rating 1 2 3 4 5
no.of respondents 1 4 8 15 12
ques.3 rating 1
no.of respondents 1
2 3 4 5
3 15 9 12
ques.4 rating 1 2 3 4 5
no.of respondents 4 6 9 16 5
5, 33%
27%
ques5 rating 1 2 3 4 5
no.of respondents 10 11 10 6 3
no.of respondent 6 4 5 13 12
will online query entry & redreesal pertaining to time improve services
20 15 10 5 0 satisfaction level strongly disagree disagree normal
strongly diagree 6
disagree 4
no.of respondents
normal 6
agree 11
strongly agree 13
yes 85%
no 15%
no.of respondents
1 month 11
2 month 5
6 month 0 8
very high 10
high 10
normal 13
no.of respondents
low 2
very low 5
very high 9
high 11
normal 5
low 7
very low 8
no.of responden
strongly disagree 4
disagree 1
normal 5
agree 16
stronly agree 14
strongly disagree 9
disagree 0
normal 8
no.of respondent
agree 8
strongly agree 15
strongly disagree 7
disagree 7
normal 8
no.of respondent
agree 5
strongly agree 13
strongly disagree 6
disagree 0
normal 5
no.of respondents
agree 5
strongly agree 24
fresh juices/lassi 32
snacks 19
maggie 14
20, 21%
2 3 4
8, 29%
10, 20%
4 5
Series1
41-60% percentage
61-80%
81-100%
strongly agree
sfaction level
Series1
no
no of respondent
41-60%
61-80%
81-100%
Series1
4 month
5 month
6 month
ontent in food
Series1
low
very low
content in food
Series1
low
very low
Series1
agree
stronly agree
Series1
agree
strongly agree
Series1
agree
strongly agree
Series1
agree
strongly agree