Cofferdam Design
Cofferdam Design
Cofferdam Design
Thk (m) ' (kN/m3) 19 20 5 25 0.3 0.5 ' 2 Su (kPa) c' (kPa) Ko Permeability **** (m/s) E' Granular (Mpa) 2
Strata
River deposit
Recent Silt
Eu Cohesive (Mpa) 3
Jolimont Clay 5 6 7 6 18 30* 20 5 35 20 0.35 19 0 35 50 0.35 0.4 0.4** 19 110 22 37 21 16 0.3 1.5 19 110 22 37 21 16 0.3 1.3
Assumed as FBS
19
110
22
37
21
16
0.3
Upper Fishermens Bend Silt (FBS) Lower Fishermens Bend Silt (FBS)
Slightly Overconsolidated Stiff Silty Clay Slightly Overconsolidated Stiff Silty Clay
Dense Sand
Colluvium
Mudstone
0.35
0.5 ***
1 x 10-7
* Value need to be reviewed. FBS is overconsolidated and above the Colluvium, so Colluvium is likely to have a higher value than FBS. ** Value need to be revised as using this value with low Su, in the insitu stage, the soil has failed. Either Su or Ko has to be revised to be more realistic.
*** Value need to be reviewed. **** Permeability values need to be reviewed. They are assumed based on typical values.
Strata
Analysis
1 x 10-4 -9 1 x 10 1 x 10-9
1 x 10-9
River deposit Jolimont Clay Upper Fishermens Bend Silt (FBS) Lower Fishermens Bend Silt (FBS) Moray Street Gravel Colluvium
Recent Silt Assumed as FBS Slightly Overconsolidated Stiff Silty Clay Slightly Overconsolidated Stiff Silty Clay Dense Sand loose rock debris accumulated due to gravity 5 22 100 70 20 31 50 0.35 0.5
1 x 10 1 x 10-7
-7
Drained Undrained
Mudstone
1 x 10-7
Undrained