CHETAN - PURI - CHOLE Version 1.1
CHETAN - PURI - CHOLE Version 1.1
CHETAN - PURI - CHOLE Version 1.1
KACHOURI
WALA
BY,
SOUV-ENIR’
PGDM-I & III
* GROUP MEMBERS
SHWETA NEGI
SHWETA SHARMA
SHIVANI GAUR
SHIVDUTT TYAGI
PAVAN GUPTA
RAKHI KHURANA
ARJUN SINGH
TARNI DHASMANA
* CONTENTS
1) INTRODUCTION
2) SERVICE MARKETING
3) MARKET SEGEMENTATION
4) SWOT ANALYSIS
5) FINDINGS
6) RECOMMENDATIONS
7) QUESTIONAIRE
8) INFORMATION REGARDING DATA
9) PIE CHARTS
* INTRODUCTION
NAME: CHETAN KACHOURI WALA
LOCATION: HANUMAN CHOWK
STARTED: 1985
FOUNDER ASHWINI (FATHER)
MEMBERS: 7
SPECIALITY: PURI,SABZI,KACHOURI,CHOLE
CAPITAL: 2000/- RS
OPENING TIME: 8:00 AM
CLOSING TIME: 4:OOPM
7 PPPPPPPS
The Indian style of service differs in believes and objectives in food
industry some times its associated with the term ‘SEVA’ so a difference
we might see in 7 Ps which we have studied.
Customers
20%
Families
Couples
20% Individuals
60%
SWOT ANALYSIS
• STRENTH • WEAKNESS
• Strong goodwill • Limited scope
• hygienic and tasty food • No Intention to
• Affordable price expansion
• Location
S
W
O
T
• THREATS • OPPURTUNITIES
• Fast food culture • Name can be used
• Emerging competition for franchising
• Standardization • Higher profits can
be gained by
expansion
FINDINGS
• Food is really very tasty and this taste and quality is seems to be
unaffected throughout these 25 years
• While most of the restaurants have their peak times in evening this
restaurant closes at 4 PM daily opposite to the other market players.
• It receives it’s most of the revenue from the families, which come for
the temple visit.
• The other branches of restaurant can be opened at other places for business
Because opening the same after 4PM might go against the current image of
restaurant and at those places as well same taste and quality can be served.
• If the owner do not want to directly expand the business then they can go
with the franchisee system which will result in direct royalty for the name
which earned in long run family business.
* QUESTIONAIRE
1.CUSTOMER TYPE
A)LOWER CLASS
B)MIDDLE CLASS
C)UPPER MIDDLE CLASS
2.PRICE
A)VERY CHEAP
B) CHEAP
C) HIGH
3. QUALITY
A)GOOD
B)AVERAGE
C)BAD
Cont’d…
4.TASTE
A)GOOD
B) AVERAGE
C)BAD
5.HYGIENE
A)VERY HYGIENE
B)HYGIENE
C)NOT HYGIENE
6.CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
A)FULLY SATISFIED
B)SATISFIED
C)NOT SATISFIED
7.ENVIORNMENTAL SATISFACTION
A )YES
B) NO
* INFORMATION
REGARDING DATA
DATA: PRIMARY DATA
METHOD: CONVIENCE SAMPLING
* CUSTOMER TYPE
10
50 Lower Class
Middle Class
40 Higher Middle Class
* PRICE
5 35
Very Cheap
Cheap
High
60
* QUALITY
5
25
Good
Average
70 Bad
* TASTE
9 1
Good
Average
90 Bad
* HYGIENE
10
40
Not Hygiene
Average
50
Hygiene
* CUSTOMER
SATISFATION
15
5
Fully Satisfied
Satisfied
Not Satisfied
80
* ENVIRONMENTAL
SATISFACTION
40
yes
60
No
EXPERIENCES
THANK YOU