Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13K views

    Henry Garrett Ranking Techniques

    Uploaded by

    Syed Zia-ur Rahman
    This document describes the Henry Garrett ranking technique used to evaluate problems faced by health insurance policy holders. Policy holders ranked issues according to their magnitude. These ranks were converted to scores using a formula and Garrett's ranking table. The scores were averaged and issues were arranged from highest to lowest average score. For example, one analysis found the top ranked issue was [ISSUE] with 64.9 Garrett points, second was [ISSUE] with 61.1 points, third was [ISSUE] with 43.9 points, and fourth was [ISSUE] with 30.3 points.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Henry Garrett Ranking Techniques

    Uploaded by

    Syed Zia-ur Rahman
    13K views3 pages
    This document describes the Henry Garrett ranking technique used to evaluate problems faced by health insurance policy holders. Policy holders ranked issues according to their magnitude. These ranks were converted to scores using a formula and Garrett's ranking table. The scores were averaged and issues were arranged from highest to lowest average score. For example, one analysis found the top ranked issue was [ISSUE] with 64.9 Garrett points, second was [ISSUE] with 61.1 points, third was [ISSUE] with 43.9 points, and fourth was [ISSUE] with 30.3 points.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document describes the Henry Garrett ranking technique used to evaluate problems faced by health insurance policy holders. Policy holders ranked issues according to their magnitude. These ranks were converted to scores using a formula and Garrett's ranking table. The scores were averaged and issues were arranged from highest to lowest average score. For example, one analysis found the top ranked issue was [ISSUE] with 64.9 Garrett points, second was [ISSUE] with 61.1 points, third was [ISSUE] with 43.9 points, and fourth was [ISSUE] with 30.3 points.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    13K views3 pages

    Henry Garrett Ranking Techniques

    Uploaded by

    Syed Zia-ur Rahman
    This document describes the Henry Garrett ranking technique used to evaluate problems faced by health insurance policy holders. Policy holders ranked issues according to their magnitude. These ranks were converted to scores using a formula and Garrett's ranking table. The scores were averaged and issues were arranged from highest to lowest average score. For example, one analysis found the top ranked issue was [ISSUE] with 64.9 Garrett points, second was [ISSUE] with 61.1 points, third was [ISSUE] with 43.9 points, and fourth was [ISSUE] with 30.3 points.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Henry Garrett Ranking Techniques

    This technique was used to evaluate the problems faced by the policy

    holders of Health Insurance policy. In this method, the policy holders were asked

    to rank the given problem according to the magnitude of the problem. The orders

    of merit given by the respondents were converted into ranks by using the following

    formula.

    100 ( Rij −0 .5 )

    Percentage Position = Nj

    Where,

    Rij = Rank given for ith item jth individual

    Nj = Number of items ranked by jth individual

    The percentage position of each rank thus obtained was converted into

    scores by referring to the table given by Henry Garrett. Then for each factor the

    scores of individual respondents were added together and divided by the total

    number of respondents for whom the scores were added. These mean scores for all

    the factors were arranged in the order of their ranks and inferences were drawn.
    GARRET’S RANKING TABLE

    PERCENTAGE SCORE PERCENTAGE SCORE


    0.09 99 52.02 49
    0.20 98 54.03 48
    0.32 97 56.03 47
    0.45 96 58.03 46
    0.61 95 59.99 45
    0.78 94 61.94 44
    0.97 93 63.85 43
    1.18 92 65.75 42
    1.42 91 67.48 41
    1.68 90 69.39 40
    1.96 89 71.14 39
    2.28 88 72.85 38
    2.63 87 74.52 37
    3.01 86 76.12 36
    3.43 85 77.68 35
    3.89 84 79.12 34
    4.38 83 80.61 33
    4.92 82 81.99 32
    5.51 81 83.31 31
    6.14 80 84.56 30
    6.81 79 85.75 29
    7.75 78 86.89 28
    8.33 77 87.96 27
    8.17 76 88.97 26
    10.16 75 89.94 25
    11.03 74 90.83 24
    12.04 73 91.67 23
    13.11 72 92.45 22
    14.25 71 93.19 21
    15.44 70 93.86 20
    16.69 69 94.49 19
    18.01 68 95.08 18
    19.39 67 95.62 17
    20.93 66 96.11 16
    22.32 65 96.57 15
    23.88 64 96.99 14
    25.48 63 97.37 13
    27.15 62 98.72 12
    28.86 61 98.04 11
    30.61 60 98.32 10
    32.42 59 98.58 9
    34.25 58 99.82 8
    36.15 57 99.03 7
    38.06 56 99.22 6
    40.01 55 99.39 5
    41.97 54 99.55 4
    43.97 53 99.68 3
    45.97 52 99.80 2
    47.98 51 99.91 1
    50.00 50 100 0
    TABLE No.1

    S.No Total Mean Rank


    Opinion
    . Score Score
    1. 12986 64.9 I
    2. 12213 61.1 II
    3. 8775 43.9 III
    4. 6055 30.3 IV

    It could be seen from the above table that __________ was ranked first with

    a score of 64.9 Garrett points. ________________was the second reason with a

    score of 61.1 points. __________________ was ranked as the third and

    _________ was ranked as the fourth with a score of 43.9 Garrett points and 30.3

    Garrett points respectively.

    You might also like