Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 80 views

    Debate Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Indri Soedarjo
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student performance in a debate. It assesses students in four categories: performance during the opening and closing statements and questions asked/answered, group dynamic, individual contribution, and debate results. Each category lists criteria for "excellent/very good," "good/acceptable," and "needs improvement" performance. Points are awarded based on the criteria and debate outcomes.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Debate Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Indri Soedarjo
    80 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student performance in a debate. It assesses students in four categories: performance during the opening and closing statements and questions asked/answered, group dynamic, individual contribution, and debate results. Each category lists criteria for "excellent/very good," "good/acceptable," and "needs improvement" performance. Points are awarded based on the criteria and debate outcomes.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student performance in a debate. It assesses students in four categories: performance during the opening and closing statements and questions asked/answered, group dynamic, individual contribution, and debate results. Each category lists criteria for "excellent/very good," "good/acceptable," and "needs improvement" performance. Points are awarded based on the criteria and debate outcomes.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    80 views1 page

    Debate Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Indri Soedarjo
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student performance in a debate. It assesses students in four categories: performance during the opening and closing statements and questions asked/answered, group dynamic, individual contribution, and debate results. Each category lists criteria for "excellent/very good," "good/acceptable," and "needs improvement" performance. Points are awarded based on the criteria and debate outcomes.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    DEBATE RUBRIC

    Name ___________________________________________ Period _____ MWH Honors

    Excellent/ Good / Needs


    CATEGORY Very Good Acceptable Improvement
    (10 – 8.5) (8 – 6) (5 – 1)
    PERFORMANCE I (Opening & Questions Asked)
    ▪ Student delivered an appropriate opening statement.
    ▪ Student asked questions during debate; quality and
    quantity of questions asked considered. Questions
    asked are linked to thematic essential questions.
    Willingness to engage in debate.
    ▪ Use of visuals to support position.
    ▪ Student played a supporting role and assisted other
    team members with their tasks.
    PERFORMANCE II (Closing & Questions Answered)
    ▪ Student delivered a closing statement
    ▪ Student answered questions during debate; quality and
    quantity of questions answered considered. Willingness
    to engage in debate. (Since jurors do not answer
    questions, they will be assessed again on quality of
    questions asked and follow-up questions.)
    ▪ Use of visuals to support position.
    ▪ Student played a supporting role and assisted other
    team members with their tasks.
    GROUP DYNAMIC
    ▪ Team addressed, through questions and answers,
    most historical topics of the theme.
    ▪ Group members cooperated and were on task
    throughout planning phase of debate.
    ▪ Tasks divided equitably among members.
    ▪ Group was prepared for scheduled and surprise
    conferences with teacher.
    ▪ Group was able to discuss approach to debate and
    progress with teacher.
    INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION
    ▪ You made meaningful contributions to your group
    during planning and execution of debate.
    ▪ You were a force of unity and focus for the group, as
    opposed to a negative influence
    ▪ You assumed an active role in the group as opposed to
    a passive one.
    ▪ Based on my observations throughout Phase III and
    the evaluations completed by group members
    DEBATE RESULTS
    ▪ Members of the winning team automatically receive 10
    points.
    ▪ Members of losing team and jury receive up to 10
    points at teacher’s discretion.

    POINTS EARNED
    BONUS POINTS

    TOTAL ________/50

    You might also like