Strategic HRM: Talent Management Week 13
Strategic HRM: Talent Management Week 13
Strategic HRM: Talent Management Week 13
Talent management
Week 13
Aims
Define
talent management
Review latest research
Consider impact of current economic climate
on talent management practices
Reflection
Your own thoughts
How
What is talent?
Inclusive or Exclusive??
Definition of Talent
Management
What is it really?
Lack of consistency in approaches
Lack of consistency of understanding
BUT
Doesnt stop organisations engaging in it
2014: 54% organisations engaged in TM but
down from 61% in 2011 (and only 7% believe
their activities to be effective!) (CIPD Learning
and Talent Development Report, 2014)
Some definitions:
Nine-box matrix
Other views?
Competency-based
Different views?
A collection of typical HR practices, functions
or specialist areas: HR doing what they always
have but faster, wider, more specialised
A concept of talent pools: need to ensure flow
of people into jobs throughout the
organisation: internal focus, what have we got
Talent = good, critical, must-have, packing
entire companies with A players
(Lewis & Heckman, 2006)
TM as a framework
Organisation design
Role design
Non-financial rewards
Working environment
Working methods
(Cunningham, 2007)
TM as a strategy: features
Aligned
to corporate strategy
Inclusive versus exclusive notion of talent
Inclusive versus exclusive involvement of
people
Inclusive versus exclusive consideration of
HRM practices
(CIPD, 2009)
Talent management = ?
Whos included in talent management
strategies?
2014
% age
2013
2012
43
55
73
Senior managers
25
48
62
Graduates
13
44
51
Middle managers
21
38
48
Technical specialists
11
36
39
Junior managers
11
35
38
45
42
44
Exclusive?
All staff
Inclusive?
Advantages of exclusive
approach
Provides identifiable strategic resource for
succession planning if aimed at future leaders of
the organisation
Targets finite resources financial and nonfinancial
More opportunity to offer individualised
development programmes to the talent pool
Easier to track and evaluate benefits
(CIPD, 2007)
Disadvantages of exclusive
approach
Potential for reduced engagement and increased
turnover among staff not included in talent pool
Less scope to increase diversity
Reduced development opportunities for
employees not on talent programme
If focus is on one group or grade, other talent may
be overlooked
(CIPD, 2007)
TM as a loop
Attract:
Values, brand,
CSR
Evaluate:
Quantitative,
qualitative,
consistently
(CIPD,
2009)
Develop:
In/formal,
coaching,
career plans
Manage:
Retain,
engage,
performance
management
TM as a pipeline
Talent
pipelin
e
Rewarding
Attracting/recruiti
ng
Developin
Deploying
Engaging/retaining
g
Performance
Exitin
Trackin
managing
g
g
TM as interrelated elements
(Armstrong, 2009)
TM as architecture
Difficulty to
replace:
labour
market
factor
(training
time, skills
shortages)
Difficult to
replace
Low value
added
HR specialist?
Difficult to
replace
High value
added
Specialist sales
staff?
Easy to replace
Low value
added
Administrator?
Easy to replace
High value
added
Receptionist?
(Zuboff,
1988)
Possible Implications?
Difficult to replace
Low value added:
Consult them, tap their
knowledge
Difficult to replace
High value added:
Find it, nurture it
Easy to replace
Low value added:
Automate, outsource
Easy to replace
High value added:
Redesign, outsource
Key Challenges
Increasingly global labour market
Increasingly cultural workplace
Vastly diverse workforce
Workforce has independent views about
lifestyle/career opportunities
(CIPD 2007)
Further challenges
How to reward or appraise talent: on performance
or on potential?
How to deploy talent: special roles (e.g. job
rotation) or proper role?
How to track talent: human capital metrics e.g.
promotion rates; but self-fulfilling prophesy?
How to attract talent: brand, prospects,
opportunities, pay, USP?
How to develop talent: fast-track schemes?
specialist skills? leadership focus?
Strategic considerations
How is the organisation defining talent and talent
management?
Where do professional and specialist staff fit into
the talent management process?
What key features of the external environment
will impact?
What are the challenges and how to overcome
them?
How to measure aspects of talent?
integration
How to assess potential
Measurement of success
Evaluation of benefits
(CIPD 2007)
the management of a companys pool of talent is
now too important to be left to the HR department
alone and has become the responsibility of the
top executive (Economist, 2006)
Women
Generation Y
Older workers
High flyers...?
Same
or different?
How do we balance internal and external
talent?
(The Economist, 2012)
A strategic TM process?
Talent management
component
Strategy implications for Where will improvements in talent quality drive strategic gains?
talent
Where will improvements in talent flexibility drive strategic gains?
Talent pool strategy
Talent management
system
Talent practices
10 Critical Components of a
Talent Management Programme
Explicitly test candidates in ability, engagement & aspiration
2. Emphasise future competencies
3. Manage quality and quantity
4. Place talent in intense assignments
5. Identify the riskiest, most challenging positions
6. Create individual development plans
7. Re-evaluate top talent annually
8. Offer significantly differentiated compensation
9. Hold regular open dialogues
10. Replace broadcast communications
(Martin & Schmidt, 2010)
1.
Examples
Energis used TM as a means of getting itself out of serious
difficulties. Used talent to differentiate itself in the market
went from a rescue package to a dominant partner with
Cable & Wireless
Kleinwort Benson identified need for customer-facing staff to
be entrepreneurial and managers to drive the change; huge
expansion in UK with new branches in Leeds, Manchester,
Birmingham, Newbury & Cambridge
O2 recognised need to differentiate from other mobile
suppliers; set up Sales Academy. Developed talent pipeline:
core skills (core values, core behaviours, core sales
process) top performers (additional competencies, trusted
advisor status)
Critical view?
Talent management does not often appear in peer-reviewed
literature: 95hits in Emerald (12 Jan 2015)
Search for talent management in Google: 34 million hits!! And
talent: 563 million hits!!! (12 Jan 2015)
CIPD Report (2006):There are as many definitions of talent, it
seems to me, as there are pebbles on Brighton beach!
Is Talent management another name for Barneys resource-based
view (RBV) of strategic HRM? (valuable, rare, hard to imitate)
Who takes responsibility for TM, is it HR, the line manager or the
CEO? The Economists survey of 20 corporate leaders across 10
countries identified that the management of a companys pool of
talent is now too important to be left to the HR department alone
and has become the responsibility of the top executive (2006).
Employer Brand
how
HR influences?
Brand
Human
insight
Thoughtfulne
ss
Competenc
e
Courag
e
Realism
Realism
Courage
Reflective questions
What