Ming Chen - Green Cabin Evaluation Proforma (2015 7 1)
Ming Chen - Green Cabin Evaluation Proforma (2015 7 1)
Ming Chen - Green Cabin Evaluation Proforma (2015 7 1)
2. Explain how your final product reflects your Investigation. (Does your final product look like
your final sketch in your design brief, if not explain why not).
3. What processes did you use to develop your design? (e.g. Google-ing, brain storming,
sketching, research). Provide a short explanation as to how useful each of these processes
where.
4. What were some of the elements that restricted the development and design of your
product? (e.g. time, resources, costs, materials, information or other commitments.)
5. If you where to make this project again, what would you consider doing differently in the
design and/or making of your project and why?
Individual Evaluation
1. What new knowledge, skills and processes did you personally learn or develop during the
process of designing and making your green cabin?
I have search the knowledge from the internet, I have change the words in website for my own
words.
2. Explain how satisfied you are with the way in which your group worked together in the
project.
I am happy with my group because we have worked together. We have done plenty of
research.
3. Describe your own level of satisfaction with your personal input and achievement during
this project.
I think I am not done too much work on it. I only do some research, some renewable energy
that we can use in our life.
Evaluating
Comprehensiv
e evaluation of
how well the
design brief
requirements
have been met.
Wellinformed
evaluation of
how well the
design brief
requirements
have been
met.
Insightful and
detailed
evaluation of
the
effectiveness of
the product
realisation
process.
Sophisticated
and focused
consideration
of possible
modifications to
improve ideas
or procedures.
Informed
evaluation of
how well the
design brief
requirements
have been
met.
Some
description of
how well the
design brief
requirements
have been
met.
Identification
of some
aspects of
the design
brief
requirements
that were
attempted.
Wellconsidered
and detailed
evaluation of
the
effectiveness
of the product
realisation
process.
Considered
evaluation of
the
effectiveness
of the product
realisation
process.
Some
description of
the
effectiveness
of the product
realisation
process.
Identification
of some
aspects of
the
effectiveness
of the product
realisation
process.
Thorough
and focused
consideration
of possible
modifications
to improve
ideas or
procedures.
Some focus
in
consideration
of possible
modification
to improve
ideas or
procedures.
Some
consideration
of a possible
modification
to improve
ideas or
procedures.
Emerging
recognition of
the need for
modification
to improve
ideas or
procedures.