Nurs 440, Quality Improvement Process Paper, Fall 2014
Nurs 440, Quality Improvement Process Paper, Fall 2014
Nurs 440, Quality Improvement Process Paper, Fall 2014
focused issue despite its ease of application and use (Feist, Andrade, Nass, 2011). According to
Kahn et al. (2013) the prevention of VTE continues to be the number one preventable cause of
hospitalized death. The risk of developing venous thrombosis 24 hours post-orthopedic
procedure such as a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be as high as 86% (Windisch et al., 2011).
The purpose of quality and safety initiatives is to discuss the strategy that needs to be
implemented to ensure patients compliancy with VTE mechanical prophylaxis usage, such as
antiembolism stockings (AESs), intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCDs), foot
impulse devices (FIDs), and their correct placement and function post-orthopedic procedures.
The desired outcome is to increase patient compliancy and ensure the proper usage rate of VTE
prevention, which assists in reducing soft-tissue swelling. Additionally, this prevention can lead
to early patient mobilization, a shorter hospital stay, and lower treatment costs for both the
patient and the institution (Windisch et al., 2011).
Designing an Interdisciplinary Team
Most healthcare institutions operate as open systems, and are particularly receptive to a
wide variety of influences (Yoder-Wise, 2014). In order for change to take place, leaders,
managers, nurses, and other healthcare staff must be educated and be committed to the proposed
change, but ultimately the institution as a whole needs to be actively involved, holding top-level
leaders and managers accountable (Yoder-Wise, 2014). The role/responsibilities of Senior
Leaders is to lead, set patient health and staffing effectiveness outcomes, build infrastructure,
define procedures and treatments, and provide support to fellow staff (Yoder-Wise, 2014). The
role of the nursing manager is to be accountable for quality and safety performance with the
assistance of quality and risk management, monitoring and reporting progress, and forming and
submitting action plans (Yoder-Wise, 2014).
Implementation Strategies
According to AJN (2011) evidence-based practice (EBP) is a problem-solving approach
that integrates the best evidence from research studies, patient care data with clinician expertise
and patient preferences and values of those who will be affected. The implementation process
consists of four processes: planning, engaging, executing, and evaluating (Damschroder et al.,
2009). Overall, this process of planning and implementing strategies, along with the validity and
applicability of the focused issue will be critically reviewed. Where staff education will take
place with a safe environment, encouraging open communication, and where new policies and
procedures will be examined and possibly rewritten to reflect best, standard practice (YoderWise, 2014). The first step in the implementation process is for the multidisciplinary team to
meet and plan a course of action, then set up a meeting with the key stakeholders, administrators,
and the review board, securing support, and keeping them engaged by clearly identifying the
purpose and estimated cost of the VTE prevention on postoperative orthopedic patients,
measured outcomes, and condition of proposal (Gallagher-Ford, Fineout-Overholt, Melnyk, &
Stillwell, 2011). Next is the executing and evaluation of the steps, where the plan is carried out
with or without formal planning and is continuously reflected on before, during, and after
implementation to promote shared learning and improvements of the process (Damschroder et
al., 2009). The process should involve appropriate individuals that are essential in employing a
combined strategy of social marketing, reporting of key issues, and drafting of the unit
educational plans and trainings (Damschroder et al., 2009).
6
Evaluation
In the evaluation phase, the outcomes are evaluated and revised endlessly to meet desired
outcomes or to prevent new problems (Yoder-Wise, 2014). The nursing managers
responsibilities during the evaluation phase are to publicize and reward success, and to
constantly evaluate the individual and team effort and performance (Yoder-Wise, 2014). In
ensuring effective integration of EBP, new and current active protocol models need to be
periodically inspected and monitored by risk management, quality improvement, including the
Joint Commission in ensuring the practice is up to standard in meeting the hospitals safety goals
in delivering safe and high-quality patient care (ECRI Institute, 2009).
Conclusion
As healthcare organization evolves, professional leadership and nursing excellence are
encouraged. Nursing is to be empowered, fostering the initiatives and accountability in
improving processes and outcomes, reducing waste and cost to patients and the organization in
delivering effective and safe, quality patient care. Being that VTE continues to be the number
one preventable cause of hospitalized deaths, this leads to the need for quality and safety
initiatives to implement a new protocol model to ensure patients compliancy with VTE
mechanical prophylaxis usage in an effort to prevent VTE complications. Countless fatal VTEs
are the consequence of patients failure to comply with DVT prophylaxis protocol due to the
discomfort of the device and lack of education to follow recommended guidelines. Healthcare
providers need to take the initiative in providing essential VTE prophylaxis education and
reinforcement, whether it be reviewing or checking placement with patients on routine
assessments or wrapping a pillowcase around the lower extremities to prevent direct skin contact
and enhancing device comfort for patients.
7
References
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C.
(2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a
consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science,
4(50). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
ECRI Institute (Ed.). (2009). Risk management, quality improvement, and patient safety [special
issue]. ECRI Institute, 2 Retrieved from
https://www.ecri.org/documents/secure/risk_quality_patient_safety.pdf
Feist, W. R., Andrade, D., & Nass, L. (2011). Problems with measuring compression device
performance in preventing deep vein thrombosis. Thrombosis Research, 128(3), 207-209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2011.04.005
Gallagher-Ford, L., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Stillwell, S. (2011). Evidence-based
practice, step by step: implementing an evidence-based practice change. AJN, American
Journal of Nursing, 111(3), 54-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000395243.14347.7e
Kahn, S., Morrison, D., Cohen, J., Emed, J., Tagalakis, V., Roussin, A., & Geerts, W. (2013).
Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and
surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. The Cochrane Collaboration, (7),
1-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008201.pub2.
Windisch, C., Kolb, W., Kolb, K., Grutzner, P., Venbrocks, R., & Anders, J. (2011). Pneumatic
compression with foot pumps facilitates early postoperative mobilisation in total knee
arthroplasty. International Orthopeadics, 35(7), 995-1000.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1091-8