Is 800 - 1984 & 2007 Comparative Study

A MAJOR PROJECT ON COMPARATIVE STUDY OF IS : 800 (2007) CODE & IS : 800 (1984) CODE (GENERAL CONSTRUCTION IN STEEL CODE
E OF PRACTICE)
SUBMITTED IN THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING (STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING) SUBMITTED BY: ASHISH GOYAL COLLEGE ROLL NO. 04/STR/09 UNIVERSITY ROLL NO. 9072
Under the esteemed Guidance of, PROF. KONGAN ARYAN Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
DELHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING NEW DELHI 2009-2011
CERTIFICATE
It is certified that the work presented in this thesis entitled COMPARATIVE STUDY OF IS : 800 (2007) CODE & IS : 800 (1984) CODE (GENERAL CONSTRUCTION IN STEEL CODE OF PRACTICE) by me, University Roll No. 9072 in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of Master of Engineering in Structural Engineering, Delhi Technological University (Formerly Delhi College of Engineering), Delhi, is an authentic record. The work has been carried out by me under the guidance and supervision of Prof. Kongan Aryan in the academic year 2010-2011.
This is to hereby certify that this work has not been submitted by me, for the award of any other degree in any other institute.
Date:
Ashish Goyal College Roll No. 04/Str/09 University Roll NO. 9072
This is to certify that the above statement made by ASHISH GOYAL bearing roll no. is correct to the best of my knowledge.
Prof. Kongan Aryan (Associate Professor) Project Guide Structural Engineering Division Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Delhi College of Engineering Delhi-110042
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It give me immense pleasure to present this report entitled COMPARATIVE STUDY OF IS : 800 (2007) CODE & IS : 800 (1984) CODE (GENERAL CONSTRUCTION IN STEEL CODE OF PRACTICE) .I wish to acknowledge with deep sense of gratitude, my indebtedness to my guide Prof. Kongan Aryan for his valuable guidance. In spite of his busy schedule, hespared time, took keen interest, reviewed my work, good company, discussed at length, gave me constant encouragement and moral support to complete this dissertation. I am also thankful to Dr. Jashpreet Kaur, member of British library for extending relevant facilities during this work, giving wise advice helping with various applications and so on. On many occasions, Er. Siddharth Harit (researcher) took part in discussion and enlightened about the current practice in the field . I am thankful for his helpful suggestions and providing me to the reference section when I needed.. Last but not least, I am deeply grateful to my family members, all my friends and well encouraging and helping me directly or indirectly, throughout my project work. wishers for
CONTENTS
Sub Topic
Topic List of Tables List of Figures Section A : - Introduction
Page No. i ii 1 - 15 18 9 - 15
A.1 A.2
General About IS 800 : - 2007
Section B : - Study of both codes
16 - 97 16 20 21 44 45 57 58 80 81 87 88 - 97
B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4 B.5 B.6
Basis of Design Design of Tension Member Design of Compression Member Design of Member subjected to Bending Design of Member subjected to Combined forces Connections
Section C :- Project Problem
98 - 113 98 106 107 - 113
C.1 C.2
Problem Data and Analysis Design by both codes
Conclusions
114 - 116
References
117
List of Tables
A.1.1 A.2.1 A.2.2 A.2.3 B.1.1 B.2.1 B.3.1 B.3.2 B.3.3 C.1.1 C.2.1 Countries and their design formats Contents of IS 800 : -2007 Appendix of IS 800 :- 2007 General comparison b/w IS 800 -1984 and IS 800 - 2007 Limit states maximum Slenderness ratios Imperfection factor Constant k1 , k2 and k3 Buckling length of Prismatic compression member as per both codes Analysis of design capacity of various elements of FOB by both codes Comparison of design capacity of various elements of FOB by both codes
[Type the document title](1984)

List of figures
A.1.1 A.1.3 B.1.1 B.1.2 B.1.3 B.1.4 B.2.1 B.2.5 B.2.6 B.2.3 B.2.4 B.2.7 B.3.2 B.4.1 B.4.2 B.4.3 B.4.4 B.6.1 B.6.2 B.6.3 C.1.1 C.1.2 Cost breakdown index Evaluation of portal frame Variability of yield stress Representation of design principle for variable effect and resistance Ultimate failure condition Serviceability failure conditions Cross section of tension member Influence of residual stresses on the behaviour of a cross section Distribution of stresses across a section with holes Block shear failure of plate Block shear failure of angle Determination of net area in case of staggered holes European buckling curves (ECCS curves) Laterally supported beam Laterally unsupported cantilever Behaviour of simply supported beam Transition from elastic to plastic stage of cross section in bending Connections in multi- storyed building Simple connections Rigid beam to column connection Geometry of FOB Modelling of FOB in STAAD PRO

SECTION : - A INTRODUCTION A.1 GENERAL
A.1.1 Development in Steel Construction:During last two decades many changes had occurred in the science of Structural Engineering. Steel quality and construction methods are continually being improvement and these factors help in development of Rational Design Technique. Design in steel is reached a level of competence after 20 years of hard won experience. The designer is now much better supported and is able to be more accurate. Codes of practice have become more comprehensive. The advent of Limit State design concentrates the designers mind on t he most important aspect of a particular design. Steel is a essential components of building and civil engineering structures .It is used in a wide range of application in the commercial, residential and industrial building sectors and in civil engineering infrastructures such as bridges, car-parks ,stadia, wind turbines and masts .The emphasis of this strategy is on building sustainability within the broader civil engineering. Steel construction has a great deal to offer sustainable development. It is important for us all that the sector flourishes in a way that the sector qualities of steel and steel construction to be fully realized and to contribute to broader construction industry. This in turn is of vital importance if we are to be achieve together our wider sustainable goals and ensure a better quality of life for everyone now and for future generation. In modern constructions, the key issue is how the choice of materials can create a scope for reducing burdens. The sector recognizes that there is an onus on manufacturers and suppliers to develop system and methods for using their product that will allow design for reduced impacts. There is a further onus on specifiers to use these property. The steel construction sectors long term comm itment to greater efficiency and
competitiveness has already delivered many of the actions required to achieve a sustainable future as defined by Government. The plans for the future outlined in this strategy will, when adopted across the sector , promote the continued development of this successful and progressive industry and enable it to become a major assets in achieving the goal of sustainable construction. There has been a concerted effort, particularly over the past 30 years, to improve the competitiveness of all parties in the sector. The productivity of steel manufacturing has been improved, new fabrication technologies have been introduced. The economic benefits of this collective effort is demonstrated by steels healthy market share of 70% of sin gle storey industrial structures.
Fig:A.1.1
A review of progress made by the sector has demonstrated. Steel construction is efficient, competitive and makes a significant contribution to the national economy. Building can be rapidly constructed using steel based components that are efficiently manufactured at site and therefore are of high quality and with few defects.

Steel framing and cladding systems provide the scope, in association with other materials, to design buildings with low overall environments impacts. Steel based construction systems provide flexible spaces which have the potential to be easily modified and adopted so that the life of the building can be extended by accommodating changes in use, layout and size.
Fig:-A.1.2 At the end of useful life of buildings steel components can be dismantled relatively easily. Reclaimed steel products can be re-used or recycled without degradation of properties.
FIg A.1.3 A.1.2 Design Codes /Code of Practice:A design code should be a set of minimum requirements for any construction covering safety and serviceability. The safety involves life, health, fire and structural stability. The Code may be administered by a county, or state, or city or by a combination of the three. Essential of an efficient code of practice for design of steel structure:It should be based upon Rational Design Theory. The Code should be simple, understandable and easy to use. It should be updated regularly to cater the development in the field of research and technology.

As per above discussion of design codes and its essentials we will overview our existing IS: 800 -1984 (Code of practice for use of steel in structures),IS:800 -2007 as well as Countries and their Design Formats A.1.2.1 About IS: 800-1984 (Code of practice for use of steel in structures):IS 800 (Code of practice for use of steel in structures), which was prepared in 1984 and reaffirmed in 1991, is based on Allowable Stress Design procedure (ASD). The methodology of design of steel structures as per existing IS 800 has not been updated to cater to changes due to research and the state-of-the-art knowledge all over the world. Since the technical knowledge generated through research is generic in nature and can be applied across the world, it is essential to evolve Indian code provisions based on efficient design philosophies. Considering that the current practice all over the world is based on Limit State Method (LSM) or Load and Resistance Factor design Method, it has been felt by experts that the IS 800 should modified to Limit State Method (LSM) while maintaining Allowable Stress Design (ASD) as a transition alternative, which will help the designers to understand both the design methods and utilize the most advantageous one, and only recently the Indian Standards Institution has taken up the job of revising IS 800 to the Limit state method design which is at present at an advanced stage, with a purpose of evolving a code which will be understandable, easy to use and based on good and widely practiced structural theory to deal properly with elastic instability, dynamic loads and fatigue. A.1.2.2 Countries and their Design Formats Almost all advanced countries are now taking advantage of efficient code stipulations, and current practice all over the world is based on either Limit State Method (LSM) or Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Following table shows the various major countries and their Design Format Table A.1.1:- Countries and their Design Formats Countries Design Formula(For steel Structure)
Australia , Canada , China , Europe Limit State Design(LSM) ,Japan , UK U.S.A. Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) India a) IS 800 - 1984 b) IS 800 2007 Allowable Stress Design(ASD) Limit State Design
IS: 800 :2007 The total Draft is prepared is based on the stipulations of International Standards as applicable and Teaching Resource for Structural Steel Design of INSDAG (a committee comprising experts from IIT, SERC) Following International Standards are referred for IS: 800 -2007 AISC-1999 :-Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, INC, Chicago, Illinois. AS 4100-1998 :-Steel Structures (second edition), Standards Australia (Standards Association of Australia), Homebush, NSW 2140.
BS 5950-2000
10

:-Structural Use of Steelwork in Buildings: Part1Code of practice for design in simple and continuous construction: hot CAN/CSA-S16.1-94 :-Limit States Design of Steel Structures, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale (Toronto), Ontario, Canada M9W 1R3. rolled sections, British Standards Institution, London.
A.1.3 Objectives of Dissertation (i.e. Comparative Study of IS: 800 -1984 and IS 800 2007) Through the comparison of IS: 800 -2007 and IS :800 - 1984 following objectives are to be achieved. 1) Becoming familiar with new design methodology i.e. Limit State Design for design of steel structure. 2) Learning as well as understanding the basis (why and how?) of various clauses concerned with different section (such as design of tension member, compression member, flexural member, member subjected to combined forces etc). 3) Comparing similarities as well as differences between both codes and also examining the efficient way of designing and if possible finding how best we can incorporate it in our code. 4) Searching limitations of both codes and if possible trying to overcome it through detailed study. 5) To document step-by step procedure for designing different types of structural elements, clearly highlighting different methodology adopted in two different codes so that it may be helpful for undergraduate student as well as practicing engineer. 6) To study economy achieved by designing through both code.
A.1.4 Scope of Present work IS 800 : 2007 consists of total 17 section and 9 appendices where as IS 800:1984 Consists of 12 section and 7 appendices covering the specifications , standards and rule for design off steel structure. It is considered cover the basic and elementary section for in detail study purpose . The study is broadly divided in to following three parts Part 1 : Basis of Design Tension Member Compression Member Member Subjected to combined forces Connections
This consists of studying the basis of clauses ( for above mentioned sections ) mentioned in both codes followed by illustrated examples by corresponding codes. Part 2 : - A Detail Design Problem Analysis of Foot Over Bridge (FOB) Design of Foot Over Bridge By IS 800-1984 & IS 800 2007 This will give the full design process by both code followed by comparison in terms of economy feasibility and safety.
11

SECTION A : - INTRODUCTION SECTION A.2 : - ABOUT IS 800: 2007 Table A.2.1 :- Contents of IS 800 : 2007 Sections / Chapters Sections 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15 Section 16 Section 17 Table A.2.2:- Appendix of IS : 800 2007 Appendix Appendix A Name of Appendix Chart showing highest maximum Name of Sections General Materials General design requirements Method of Structural Analysis Limit State design Design of tension member Design of compression member Design of member subjected to bending Member subjected to combined forces Connection Working load design format Design and detailing for earthquake load Fatigue Design assisted by testing Durability Fire resistance Fabrication and erection
temperature Appendix B Chart showing lowest minimum
temperature Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Advanced method of analysis and design Design against floor vibration Method for determining effective length of columns in frame Appendix F Appendix G Appendix F Lateral torsional buckling Connections General recommendations for steelwork tenders and contract Appendix I Plastic properties of beams
12

A.2.2 Overview of IS: 800 - 2007 with respect to IS: 800 -1984 As far as for comparison purpose the IS: 800:2007 should be first broadly compared with respect to existing IS: 800-1984 so that we can appreciate the changes due to change in design methodology (i.e. from ASD to LSM)
Table A.2.3:- General comparison between IS: 800-1984 and IS:800 -2007 Points of comparison Number of pages Number of sections Number of appendices Number of symbols Number of IS code referred Number of terms defined IS 800 1984 137 12 7 79 54 13 IS 800 2007 206 17 9 327 87 111
There were 12 (Twelve) sections in IS: 800-1984 whereas in IS: 800 (Draft Code) there are 17 (Seventeen) sections are included. In Draft Code newly introduced sections are 8 (Eight). From IS: 800-1984 (Old Code) the Section-10 Design of Encased Member has been removed, where the Section-12 Steel Work Tenders and Contracts is considered under Appendix- H of Draft Code. The Section-9 Plastic Design of IS: 800-1984 which was introductory in old code is removed and the Concept of Plastic Analysis is considered in Draft code. The newly
introduced Sections in IS: 800-2006(Draft Code) are discussed in brief as below :Newly added Sections and Appendices Sections:Following are 8 newly introduced sections:1) SECTION-4 METHODS OF STRCTURAL ANALYSIS In this section; the methods of determining the action effects (i.e. Structural analysis) have been discussed. These methods are a) Elastic analysis b) Plastic analysis c) Advanced analysis The assumptions, requirements and application of each above method have been discussed in detail in this section. In addition to the above method of analysis, for the purpose of analysis and design the Classification of structural frames, Forms of constructions assumed for analysis are described. 2) SECTION -5 LIMIT STATE DESIGN In this section; basis for limit state design, two limit state viz Limit state of strength and Limit state of serviceability are discussed The actions (Load), classification of actions, design action, strength, design strength, ultimate strength, and partial safety factors for loads (f ) and material strength (m) are described in detail.
13

The Sections 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 (considering Design of -Tension member, Compression member, Members subjected to bending, Member subjected to combined forces) deals with Limit State Design format. 3) SECTION-11 WORKING LOAD DESIGN FORMAT This section deals with working load design format In old code design is based on working stress method which is modified and presented under Working Load Design Format in the Draft Code This section deals with design criteria for a) Tension member b) Compression member c) Member subjected to bending d) Member subjected to combined stresses 4) SECTION-12 DESIGN AND DETAILING FOR EARTHQUAKE LOADS This section covers the requirements for designing and detailing of steel frames so as to give them adequate strength, stability and ductility to resist sever earthquake in all zones of IS:1893 without collapse. In this section additional load combination for earthquake are mentioned. The design details of lateral load resisting systems (Such as Braced frame system, Moment frame system) from point of view of earthquake load combination are discussed. 5) SECTION-13 FATIGUE This new section deals with design against fatigue. Terms like fatigue, fatigue strength, stress range, stress cycle counting, S-N curves are defined In this section different details of member and connection (such as non welded details, welded details in hollow and non hollow section, bolted connection details) are classified under different fatigue classes and design stress ranges corresponding to various number of cycles of loading are given for each fatigue class. 6) SECTION-14 DESIGN ASSISTED BY TESTING This section is introduced not only to provide an alternative to calculation methods (if these methods are not adequate for design of a particular structure, its element or when design or construction is not entirely in accordance with section of given standard) but also necessary in special circumstances (such when the actual performance of an existing structure capacity is in question or when confirmation is required on the consistency of production of material components members or structures originally designed by calculation) In this section types of tests a) Acceptance test (such as NDT) b) Strength test c)Test to failure d)Check test along with Test conditions ,Test loading and Criteria for acceptance have been discussed. 7) SECTION-15 DURABILITY This section deals with durability of steel structure, it discuss requirement for durability, environmental exposure condition (Table15.2), corrosion protection methods, surface protection methods. Table15.3 gives protection guide for steel work application in detail.
14

8) SECTION-16 FIRE RESISTANCE This newly introduced section applies to steel building elements designed to exhibit a required fire resistance level as per given specification This section include definition of related terms, different fire exposure condition, fire resistance level, periods of structural adequacy as well as the variation of mechanical properties of steel with temperature (i.e. variation of yield stress fy and modulus of elasticity Es ) Appendices:Following are 3(three) newly introduced appendices:1) APPENDIX -C ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHODS ( ADVANCED STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN) This appendix gives advanced structural analysis and design methods for a frame comprising members of compact section with full lateral restraints (i.e. laterally supported members) and Second Order Elastic and Design 2) APPENDIX- D DESIGN AGAINST FLOOR VIBRATION This section applicable for design of floors with longer spans and of lighter section and less damping as these structure are more sensitive to vibrations under normal human activities. The appendix gives the determination of floor frequency, peak acceleration and table for critical damping which required for dynamic analysis. 3) APPENDIX-G CONNECTIONS In this appendix requirements for design of splice (Beam splice, Column splice) and beams to column connections as well as recommendations for their design are discussed.
15

SECTION B: - STUDY OF BOTH CODES SECTION B.1 : - BASIS OF DESIGN
IS 800 -2007 adopts the Limit State Design Format for design of steel structures. The basics, requirement, advantages of LSM are discussed in this chapter.
B.1 Limit State Method:The Object of limit state design can be Paraphrased as Achievement of an acceptable probability that a part or whole of structure will not become unfit for its intended use during it s life time owing to collapse, excessive deflection etc., under the actions of all loads and load effects. The acceptable limits of safety and serviceability requirements before failure occurs are called as limit state.
B.1.1 Principles of Limit State Design:At its most basic level limit state design simply provides a framework within which explicit and separate consideration is given to a number of distinct performance requirements . It need not necessarily imply the automatic use of statistical and probabilistic concepts, partial safety factors etc. nor of plastic design, ultimate load design etc. Rather it is a formal procedure which recognizes the inherent variability of loads, materials, construction practices, approximations made in design etc. and attempts to take these into account in such a way that the probability of the structure becoming unfit for use is suitably small. The concept of variability is important because the steel designer must accept that , his performing his design calculation he is using quantities which are not absolutely fixed or deterministic. Examples include values for loadings and the yield stress of steel although must less variable that the properties of some other structural materials, is known to exhibit a certain scatter. Account must be taken of these variations in order to ensure that the effects of loading do not exceed the resistance of the structure to collapse. This approach is represented schematically in figure which shows hypothetical frequency distribution curves for the effect of loads on a structural elements and its strength or resistance where two curves overlap, shaped area , the effect of loads is greater than the resistance of the element , and the element will fail shown by the shaded area, the effect of the loads is greater than the resistance of the element, and the element will fail.
16
The procedure of Limit State design can therefore be summarized as follows: Define relevant limit states at which the structural behavior is to be checked. For each limit state determine appropriate action to be considered.
Using appropriate structural models for design and taking account of the inevitable variability of parameters data, verify that none of the relevant limit state is exceeded.
Limit States are classified as Ultimate limit state Serviceability limit state
Table B.1.1 Limit States
Ultimate Limit States Strength(yield & buckling) Stability against overturning and Sway Fracture due to sway Brittle failure
Serviceability Limit States Deflection Vibration
Fatigue Corrosion
Ultimate Limit States Strength(yield & buckling) Stability against overturning and Sway Fracture due to sway Brittle failure
Serviceability Limit States Deflection Vibration
Fatigue Corrosion
17

The Ultimate Limit State include: Loss of equilibrium of the structure as a whole or any of its parts or components. Loss of sway of the structure (including the effect of sway where appropriate and overturning or any of its parts including supports and foundation.) Failure of excessive deformation ,rupture of the structure or any of its parts or components. Fracture due to fatigue.
The Limit State of Serviceability include
18

Deformation and deflection which may adversely affect the use of the structure or may cause improper Functioning of equipment or services or may cause damages to finishes and non-structural members.
B.1.2 Limit State Design:For ensuring the design objectives , the design should be based on characteristics values for materials strengths and applied loads (actions) which take into account the probability of variation in the materials strengths and in the loads to be supported. The design values are derived from the characteristics values through the use of partial safety factors,the reliability of design is ensured by requiring that Design Action Design Strength
SECTION B : - STUDY OF BOTH CODES Section B.2 Design of Tension Member

19

B.2.1 General A structural member subjected to two pulling (tensile) forces applied at its ends is called a tension member. Steel tension member are probably the most common and efficient member. These are efficient because the entire cross- section is subjected to almost uniform stress.( in other words the whole crosssectional area is utilized). The stress in such members is assumed to be uniformly distributed over the net section and hence members subjected only to axial tension are supposed to be the most efficient and economical. On the other hand , if some eccentricity exists either due to the member not being perfectly straight or due to some eccentricity in connections, either bending stresses are considered in the design or specifications are provided to account for reduction in the net area. The strength of these members is influenced by several factors such as length of connection, size and
spacing of fasteners, net area of cross section, and type of fabrication, connection eccentricity, and shear lag at the end connection.
B.2.2 Cross section of tension member (fig. B.2.1)
B.2.3 Behaviour of Tension Members :As per IS 800 - 2007 Tension members are linear members in which axial forces act to cause elongation (stretch). Such members can sustain loads up to the ultimate load, at which stage they may fail by rupture at a critical section. However , if the gross area of the member yields over a major portion of its length before the
20

rupture load is reached , the member may become non-functional due to excessive elongation. Plates and other rolled sections in tension may also fail by block shear of end bolted regions. Modes of failure of tension member:Following are different modes of tension member Gross section yielding Net section rupture Block shear failure
Gross section yielding Generally a tension member without bolt hole can resists loads up to the ultimate load without failure. But such a member will deform in longitudinal direction considerably (nearly 10% - 15% of its original length) before failure. At such a large deformation a structure will become unserviceable. Hence in limit state design, addition of gross section yielding in modes of failure must also be considered , so as to prevent excessive deformation of the member. Net section rupture When a tension member is connected using bolts , tension members have holes and hence reduced cross- section, being referred to as the net area. Holes in the member causes stress concentration. Block shear failure Block shear commonly refers to the tearing of block of material, and it presumes a combination of tension rupture and shears yield or a combination of shear rupture and tension yield. Block shear failure is usually associated with bolted details because a reduced area is present in that case, but in principle it can also be present in welded details.
21
The influence of Residual stresses and connection (Effect of holes) :-
Residual stresses develop when the member is formed and are due to the production process . Their origin can be thermal , either developed during solidification of the steel or they can be mechanically induced when trying to produce counter-deflection or straightening the member. The induced stresses are self equilibrated and although they do not affect the ultimate resistance of the member they induce non linearities in the strain stress behaviour as well as greater deformability.
Fig B.2.5 Influence of Residual Stresses on the behaviour of cross-section
Connections ( Effect of holes on tension capacity) :-
22

Connections are generally made either by bolting or welding. When several members have to be connected , additional plates must be used which introduce secondary effects due to the moments developed.The holes that are needed to fix the bolt significantly distort the ideal behaviour of the cross section. Firstly , there is an area reduction and also a distortion in the stresses distribution that induces a non uniformity in the strain (fig. 2.2.6)
As per IS 800 1984 Structural members that are subjected to axial tensile force ,any cross sectional configuration may be used , since the only determinant of strength is the net cross-sectional area.The net sectional area of a tension member is the gross sectional area of the member minus the sectional area of the maximum number of holes. Stresses in atension member are calculated on the basis of minimum net cross-sectional area available . The reason for considering the net section in the calculation of stresses is the failure of sections with holes. The unit stress in a tension member is increased due to the presence of a hole even if the hole is occupied by a rivet. This is because the area of steel to which load is distributed is reduced and some
concentration of stress occurs along the edge of the hole. But for static loading this increase in unit stress is neglected because at yielding , the effect of stress concentration is nullified and tension is therefore assumed to be uniformly distributed over the net section.
23

Although there are some parameter like residual stress and connection which result in a non-uniform distribution of stresses, it is generally assumed that the distribution of stresses in cross-sections of members subjected to axial tensile force is uniform.
B.2.4 Codal provisions for design of tension member IS 800 1984 The permissible stress in axial tension at in MPa on the net effective area of the section shall not exceed at = 0.6 fy (where fy = minimum yield stress of steel ) (clause 4.1) IS 800 2007 Factored design tension T in the member shall be :T < Td Member = least of Tdg , Tdn, Tdb Tdg = design strength due to yielding of gross section Tdn = design strength due rupture of critical section Tdb = design strength due to block shear About Net area :According to both codes the net area of a cross section or element section shall be taken as its gross area less appropriate deductions for all holes other opening. Provided that the fastener holes are not staggered the total area to be deducted shall be the maximum sum of the sectional areas of the holes in any cross-section perpendicular the member axis. (clause 6.1)
Where Td = Design tensile strength of the
24
IS 800 1984 Net effective area =Anet = A1+ KA2 For angles and Tees (clause 4.2) With bolted and welded connection Provide a reduction coefficient to take Account of the unavoidable Eccentricities , stress concentrations etc. In case of single angle connected Through one leg K = 3A1 /(3A1 + A2) A1 = area of connected leg A2 = area of outstanding leg
IS 800 2007 For angles (clause 6.3.3) With bolted and welded connection Tdn = 0.9 x fu x Anc/m1 + x Ago x fy/ mo or = An x fu/m1 = 0.6 for one or two rivets = 0.7 for three rivets = 0.8 for four or more rivets = 1.38-0.076 x w/t x fy/fu x bs/L
w and bs are shown in fig In case of double angle connected same side of the gusset plate K = 5A1/(5A1 + A2) An = net area of the total cross section Anc = net area of the connecting leg Ago = gross area of outstanding leg t = thickness of leg L = length of end connection
About angle connected by one leg In many cases , angles are connected to gusset plate by welding or bolting only through one of the two legs. This type of connection results in eccentric loading, causing non-uniform distribution of stress over
25

the cross-section. Further since the load is applied by connecting one leg of member there is a shear lag at end connection.
Fig B.2.7 Angle eccentrically loaded through gusset plate
Fig B.2.8 Shear lag effect when angle is connected by one leg
Effect of shear leg:The force is transferred to a tension member ( angles,channels,or T-section) by a gusset or the adjacent member connected to one leg either by bolting or by welding.The force thus transferred to one leg by the end connection as tensile stress over the entire cross-section by shear.Hence the tensile stress on the section from the first bolt up to the last bolt will not be uniform.The connected leg will have higher stresses even of the order of ultimate stress while outstanding leg stresses may be below the yield stress.Thus transfer of stress from connected leg to outstanding leg will be by shear and because one part Lags behind the other , this phenomenon is referred to as shear lag. However at the section away from the end connection, the stress distribution is more uniform.Hence shear lag effect reduces with increase in connection length. Therefore to account for eccentric loading due to the shea r lag effect the reduction factor is introduced in IS 800 2007. If we calculate the design strength at net cross section by both codes , we can say that IS 800 2007 consider that connected leg of an angle is stressed up to ultimate stress f u and outstanding leg is stressed up to yield stress f y .The reduction factor is applied to connected leg strength. The value of increases with length of connection.
26

In IS 800 1984 the reduction factor is applied to net area of outstanding leg to account of effect of unavoidable eccentricities due to shear lag.The value of reduction factor depends upon type of connection with the gusset. The connection should be designed so as to reduce the effect of bending to a minimum due to eccentricities.
B.2.5 Design process by both codes Stiffness requirement : Although the stiffness is not required for the strength of a tension member since stability is of little concern. However they may be subjected to load reversals during transportation , shipping , erection etc. In order to provide adequate rigidity to prevent undesirable lateral movement or excessive vibrations , design specifications usually contain a limiting slenderness ratio for tension members. Table B.2.1 Maximum Slenderness Ratios S.NO. 1. Member A tension member in which a reversal of direct stress due to loads other than winds or seismic forces occurs. 2. A member normally acting as a tie in a roof 350 Max. Slenderness ratio 180
truss or a bracing system but subjected to to possible reversal of stresses resulting from the action of the wind or earthquake forces 3. Tension members (other than pre-tensioned 400 member)
B.2.6 Worked Example of Tension member :The worked example include analysis and design of the tension member by IS 800 1984 and IS 800 2007 PROBLEM OF TENSION MEMBER BY IS: 800 1984 Analysis Problem:-
27

A Single unequal angle 125 mm x 75 mm x 8 mm is connected to 12 mm thick gusset plate at ends with 6 no. 16 mm diameter rivets to transfer tension as shown in fig. Determine the tensile Strength of the unequal angle section if (a) Longer leg is connected to gusset plate (b) Shorter leg is connected to gusset plate The value of yield stress (fy) = 250 MPa
(Fig B.2.9)
Analysis Steps
References
28
Sectional Properties A = 1538 mm2 , b = 125 mm , d = 75 mm IS Handbook NO. 1 t = 8 mm , g = 75 mm Properties of the angle Nominal dia of rivet = 16 mm Effective dia of rivet (d) = 16+1.5 = 17.5mm When longer leg is connected to gusset plate Area of connected leg (A1) = (125-17.5-8/2)x8 = 828 mm2 Area of outstanding leg(A2)=(75-8/2)x8 = 568 mm2 K = 3A1/(3A1+A2) K = 3 x 828 / (3x828 + 568) = 0.814 Anet = A1 + KA2 Clause 4.2.1.1 Clause 3.6.1.1 section
29

= 828 + 0.814x568 = 1290.35 mm2 Strength of member = at Anet = 0.6x250x1290.35 = 193.55 KN When Shorter leg is connected to gusset plate Area of connected leg (A1) = (75-17.5-8/2)x8 = 428 mm2 Area of outstanding leg(A2)=(125-8/2)x8 = 968 mm2 K = 3A1/(3A1+A2) K = 3 x 428 / (3x428 + 968) = 0.570 Anet = A1 + KA2 = 428 + 0.570x968 = 979.76 mm2 Strength of member = at Anet = 0.6x250x979.76 = 147 KN
PROBLEM OF TENSION MEMBER BY IS: 800 2007 Analysis Problem:-
30

A Single unequal angle 125 mm x 75 mm x 8 mm is connected to 12 mm thick gusset plate at ends with 6 no. 16 mm diameter rivets to transfer tension as shown in fig. Determine the tensile Strength of the unequal angle section if (a) Longer leg is connected to gusset plate (b) Shorter leg is connected to gusset plate The value of yield stress (fy) = 250 MPa (refer same figure as in problem discussed by IS 800-1984)
Analysis Sectional Properties A = 1538 mm2 , b = 125 mm , d = 75 mm t = 8 mm , g = 75 mm Nominal dia of rivet = 16 mm Effective dia of rivet (do) = 16+2.0 = 18.0 mm When longer leg is connected to gusset plate Net area of connecting leg Anc = (125-18-8/2)x8 = 824 mm2 Gross area of outstanding leg Ago = (75-8/2)x8
References IS handbook no. 1
Clause 3.6.1
31

= 568 mm2 Gross area of section Ag = 1538 mm2 Design strength due to yielding of cross section Tdg = Agfy/mo = 1538 x 250 /1.1 = 349.5 KN Design strength due to rupture of critical Section Tdn = 0.9 x fu x Anc/m1 + x Ago x fy/ mo or = An x fu/m1 = 0.6 for one or two rivets = 0.7 for three rivets = 0.8 for four or more rivets For our case = 0.8 fy = 250 MPa mo = 1.10 m1 = 1.25 So , Tdn = 0.8 x ( 824 + 568) x 410/1.25 = 365.26 KN Design strength due to Block Shear Tdb Tdb = Avg x fy/(3 x m0) + (Atn x fu) / m1
32
Clause 6.2
Clause 6.3.3
Clause 6.4.2

.or Avn x fu /(3 x m1) + Atg x fy/m0 Where Avg & Avn = Minimum gross and net area in shear Along a line of transmitted force respectively Atg & Atn = Minimum gross and net area in tension From hole to toe of an angle or next last row of bolts In plate Here Avg = Lvg x t Avg = (5 x 50 + 50) x 8 = 2400 mm2 Avn =( 5 x 50 + 50 5.5 x 18 )x 8 = 1608 mm2 Atg = Ltg x t Atg = 50 x 8 = 400 mm2 Atn = (50 0.5 x 18) x 8 = 328 mm2 Therefore Tdb = 2400 x 250 /(3 x1.10) + 328 x 410/1.25 = 422.50 KN Or , Tdb = 1608 x 410 /(3 x 1.25) + 400 x 250/1.10 = 395.42 KN Considering lower value for Tdb = 395.42 KN Design tensile strength of ISA 125 x 75 x 8 if longer leg
33

connected to gusset plate Td = Least of Tdg , Tdn , Tdb = 349.5 KN When shorter leg is connected to gusset plate Net area of connecting leg Anc = (75-18-8/2)x8 = 424 mm2 Gross area of outstanding leg Ago = (125-8/2)x8 = 968 mm2 Gross area of section Ag = 1538 mm2 Design strength due to yielding of cross section Tdg = Agfy/mo = 1538 x 250 /1.1 = 349.5 KN Design strength due to rupture of critical Section Tdn = 0.9 x fu x Anc/m1 + x Ago x fy/ mo or = An x fu/m1 = 0.6 for one or two rivets = 0.7 for three rivets = 0.8 for four or more rivets
34
Clause 6.1
Clause 6.2
Clause 6.3.3

For our case = 0.8 fy = 250 MPa mo = 1.10 m1 = 1.25 So , Tdn = 0.8 x ( 424 + 968) x 410/1.25 = 365.26 KN Or, = 1.38-0.076 x w/t x fy/fu x bs/L In our case w = 125 -4 = 121 mm , w1 = 40 mm bs = 161 mm , L = 250 mm , fy = 250 MPa fu = 410 MPa , m0 = 1.10 , m1 = 1.25 then , = 0.93 considering the value of = 0.93 Tdn = (0.9 x 410 x 424)/1.25 + 0.93 x (968 x 250)/1.10 Tdn = 329.77 KN Hence take the lower value of Tdn = 329.77 KN Design strength due to Block Shear Tdb Tdb = Avg x fy/(3 x m0) + (Atn x fu) / m1 .or Avn x fu /(3 x m1) + Atg x fy/m0 Where Avg & Avn = Minimum gross and net area in shear
35
Clause 6.4.2

Along a line of transmitted force respectively Atg & Atn = Minimum gross and net area in tension From hole to toe of an angle or next last row of bolts In plate Here Avg = Lvg x t Avg = (5 x 50 + 50) x 8 = 2400 mm2 Avn =( 5 x 50 + 50 5.5 x 18 )x 8 = 1608 mm2 Atg = Ltg x t Atg = 35 x 8 = 280 mm2 Atn = (35 0.5 x 18) x 8 = 208 mm2 Therefore Tdb = 2400 x 250 /(3 x1.10) + 208 x 410/1.25 = 383.14 KN Or , Tdb = 1608 x 410 /(3 x 1.25) + 280 x 250/1.10 = 368.14 KN Considering lower value for Tdb = 368.14 KN Design tensile strength of ISA 125 x 75 x 8 if longer leg connected to gusset plate Td = Least of Tdg , Tdn , Tdb = 329.77 KN Conclusion from problem
36
Clause 6.1

design tensile strength capacity of unequal section Will be more if longer leg is connected to gusset plate Than if shorter leg connected to gusset plate.
PROBLEM OF TENSION MEMBER BY IS 800 1984 Design Problem Design a tension member to carry the design axial tension of 375 KN with riveted connections (provided rivets in a single row). Use fy = 250 MPa DESIGN STEPS 1 Data P = 375 KN Rivetted connections 2. Allowable tensile stress at = 0.6 fy = 0.6 x 250 = 150 N/mm2 3. Net cross section area required = 375 x 103 / 150 = 2500 mm2 Increase the net area about 40% (to Account for rivet hole) to find the gross Clause 4.1 REFERENCES
37

Area. Gross sectional area required = 1.4 x 2500 = 3500 mm2 4. Trial Section Let us try a Single angle section(longer Leg connected to the gusset plate) Try ISA 150 x 115 x 15 mm Sectional area = 3752 mm2 Provide 20 mm dia rivets. Gross dia d = 20 + 1.5 = 21.5 mm Area of connected legs A1 = (150 21.5 15/2) x 15 = 1815 mm2 Area of outstanding legs A2 = (115 15/2) x 15 = 1612.50 mm2 K = 3A1/(3A1+A2) = 0.77 Net area provided = 1815 + 0.77 x1612.5 = 3056.63 mm2 Strength of the member =3056.63 x 150 = 458.50 KN > 375 KN
38
IS Handbook no.1
Clause 4.2.1.1

Which is all right
PROBLEM ON TENSION MEMBER BY IS 800 2007 Design Problem Design a tension member to carry the design axial tension of 375 KN with riveted connections (provided rivets in a single row). Use fy = 250 MPa
Design Steps 1 Data P = 375 KN Rivetted connections 2. Trial Section (Ag)req = P x mo /fy = 375 x 103 x 1.10/250 = 1650 mm2 Increase in by 5% so that (Ag)req = 1.05 x 1650 = 1733 mm2
References
Let us try 150 x 75 x 8 mm with longer leg is connected to IS Handbook no.1 gusset plate. Sectional properties A = 1742 mm2 , b= 150mm ,d=75mm
39

t = 8 mm, g = 75 mm
3. Connection design Diameter of rivet d = 6.03 x t = 6.03 x 8 18 mm ( To avoid failure of rivet in bearing) Effective dia of rivet = 18 + 2 = 20 mm Rivet value = Shear capacity of rivet in single shear = Vns = /4 x 202 x 410/(3 x1.25) = 59.50 KN Therefore no. rivet required = 375/ 59.50 7 Provide edge distance = 40 mm > 30 mm for 18 mm dia rivet Pitch (p):Clause 3.6.1
For tension member max. pitch = 16 x t or 200 mm whichever is less , minimum pitch = 2.5 x d Clause 10.2.3.2 Hence , provide p = 60 mm Therefore length of end connection L = 360 mm
40

4. Tension capacity of section Table 10.10
Anc = Net area of connected leg = (150-20-8/2)x8 = Clause 10.2.2 1008mm2 Clause 10.2.1
Ago = Gross area of outstanding leg = (75-8/2)x8 = 568 mm2 Ag = Gross area of whole section mm2 An = Net area of total cross section = Anc mm2
+
= 1742
Ago
= 1576
Design strength due to yielding of gross section Tdg = Agfy/mo = 1742 x 250 / 1.1 = 395.90 kN Design strength due to Rupture of Critical Section Tdn = 0.9 x fu x Anc/m1 + x Ago x fy/ mo or = An x fu/m1 = 0.6 for one or two rivets = 0.7 for three rivets = 0.8 for four or more rivets Tdn = 0.8 x 1576 x 410/1.25 = 413.54 kN Design strength due to Block Shear Tdb = Avg x fy/(3 x m0) + (Atn x fu) / m1 .or Avn x fu /(3 x m1) + Atg x fy/m0 Here
41
Clause 6.2
Clause 6.3.3
Clause 6.4.2

Avg = (6 x 60 + 40) x 8 = 3200 mm2
Avn = (6 x 60 + 40 6.5 x 20) x 8 = 2160 mm2 Atg = 75 x 8 Atn = (75- 0.5 x 20) x 8 = 600 mm2 = 520 mm2
Therefore , Tdb = 3200 x 250/(3 x 1.10) +520 x410/1.25 = 590.45 kN Or, Tdb = 2160 x 410/(3 x 1.25) + 600 x 250/1.10 = 545.40 kN Considering lower value for Tdb = 545.40 kN Design Tensile Strength of ISA 150 x 75 x 8 mm Td = Least of Tdg ,Tdn , Tdb = 395.90 kN > 375 kN (which is all right) Clause 6.1
42
Design of Single angle member connected by single row of rivets by both codes Points Section for tensile force P = 375 kN IS 800 1984 ISA 150 x 115 x 15 mm IS 800 2007 ISA 150 x 75 x 8 mm
13 nos 18 mm dia of Length of end connection Rivets p = 60 mm c/c Hence L = 720 mm
7 no. 18 mm dia of rivetsp p = 60 mm c/c Hence L = 360 mm
Failure mode
Failure along net cross Section at holes
Yielding of gross section
43
SECTION B : - STUDY OF BOTH CODES Section B.3 Design of Compression Member B.3.1 Introduction The term Compression member is generally used to describe structural components subjected to axial compression loads. Columns, top chord of trusses, diagonals and bracing members are all examples of compression members .Columns are usually thought of as straight compression members where lengths are considerably greater than their cross sectional dimensions.
B.3.2 Cross-sections of Compression members:For optimum performance compression members need to have a high radius of gyration in the direction where buckling can occur; circular hollow sections should, therefore, be most suitable in this respect as they maximize this parameter in all directions. The connections to these sections are, however, expensive and difficult to design. It is also possible to use square or rectangular hollow sections whose geometrical properties are good (the square hollow sections being the better); the connections are easier to design than those of the previous shape, but again rather expensive. Hotrolled sections are, in fact, the most common cross-sections used for compression members. Most of them have large flanges designed to be suitable for compression loads. Their general square shape gives a relatively high transverse radius of gyration and the thickness of their flanges avoids the effect of local buckling. Welded box or welded I-sections are suitable if care is taken to avoid local flange buckling. They can be designed for the required load and are easy to connect to other members; it is also possible to reinforce these shapes with welded cover plates. Built-up columns are fabricated from various different elements; they consist of two or more main components, connected together at intervals to form a single compound member (Figure B.5.1).
44

Channel sections and angles are often used as the main components but it is also possible to use I sections; they are laced or battened together with simple elements (bars or angles or smaller channel sections).
Fig B.3.1 Cross- section of compression member It should be noted that : In the design of compression member design the type of connection is important it defines the effective length to be taken into account in the evaluation of buckling. Circular section do not represent the optimum solution if the effective length is not the same in the two principle directions , in this case , non symmetrical shapes are preferable.
45
B.3.3 Behaviour of Compression member :Columns are sometimes classified as long , short and intermediate . Short compression member Short compression member are characterised by very low slenderness , are not effected by buckling and can be designed to the yield stress f y. According to the IS 800 2007, if local buckling does not affect the compression resistance (as can be assumed for Plastic (class 1) , compact (class 2) , semi-compact(class 3) crosssections), the mode of failure of such theoretically occurs when each fiber of the cross-section reaches fy . It is to be noted that residual stresses aand geometrical imperfections are practically without influence on the ultimate strength of this kind of column and most experimental short columns fail above the yield stress because of strain hardening. According to IS 800 1984 , very short columns usually fail by crushing or yielding . A very short column is not really a column as such but is considered to be block without buckling. IS 800 2007 had adopted same multiple column curves (modified ECCS curves developed by European countries) . The ECCS curves considers that columns are stocky when their effective slenderness ratio is such that 0.2. IS 800 1984 had adopted some maximum compressive stress can be set as a limit of strength , and a allowable maximum working compressive stress is chosen accordingly .Also it is logical to apply a smaller factor of safety for the short compression members. Long compression member (High slenderness) For these compression member the Euler formula , predicts the strength of long compression member very well, where the axial buckling stress remain below the proportional limit . Such compression member buckles elastically. Intermediate length compression member ( member slenderness) For intermediate length compression member , some fibres would have yielded and some fibre will still be elastic. These compression members will fail both by yielding and buckling and their behaviour is said to be inelastic.
46

The European buckling curves IS 800 2007 uses multiple column curves (Modified ECCS buckling curves) which are based on perry-Robertson approach.The following terms are defined in accordance with these curves. Non dimensional slenderness ratio is = (fy/fcc) = fy(KL/r)2/2E for all cross sections
where fcc = Eulers critical stress and (KL/r) = Slenderness of compression member Basis of the ECCS Buckling Curves From 1960 onwards, an international experimental programme was carried out by the ECCS to study the behaviour of standard columns. More than 1000 buckling tests, on various types of members (I, H, T, U, circular and square hollow sections) , with different values of slenderness (between 55 and 160) were studied. A probabilistic approach, using the experimental strength, associated with a theoretical analysis, showed that it was possible to draw some curves describing column strength as a function of the reference slenderness ).
Fig:-5.3.2 ECCS curves
47

These give the value for the reduction factor X of the resistance of the column as a function of the reference slenderness for different imperfection factor ). The imperfection factor depends on the shape of the column cross -section considered, the direction in which buckling can occur (y axis or z axis) and the fabrication process used on the compression member (hot-rolled, welded or cold- formed); values for , which increase with the imperfections. As stated earlier the imperfection factors take in to account the initial out-of- straightness, residual stresses, eccentricity of axial applied loads and strain-hardening. Table B.3.1 Imperfection factor , kinds of cross-sections (referred to different values of the
Buckling Curve a b c d
Imperfections Quasi perfect shapes Shapes with medium imperfections Shapes with a lot of imperfections Shapes with maximum imperfections
Imperfection factor 0.21 0.34 0.49 0.76
B.3.4 Codal provisions for designing the Compression member IS 800 1984 The direct stress in compression on the cross- (clause 5.1.1) IS 800 2007 The design compression strength of a member is given by (clause 7.1.2)
sectional area of an axially loaded compression Pd = Ae fcd member is limited to 0.6 fy. Therefore for where , Ae = Effective area in compression formula for permissible compressive stress derived from the Merchant Rankine formula is, ac = 0.6 x fcc fy / {(fcc)n + (fy)n}1/n where ac = permissible stress in axial compression fy = yield stress of steel fcc = elastic critical stress in compression = 2E/2 = slenderness ratio fcd = design stress in compression fcd = x(fy/m0) (fy/m0) x = stress reduction factor x = 1/ { + (2 2)}0.5 in which = 0.5{1+(-0.2)+2} = Imperfection factor = Non dimensional slenderness ratio = (fy/fcc) = fy(KL/r)2/2E fcc = Euler buckling stress
48

n = A factor assumed as 1.4
n should be in the range 1.0 3.0
KL/r = Effective slenderness ratio ratio of effective length KL to appropriate radius of gyration r m0 = Partial safety factor for material strength
The designer is supposed to select a section which provides a large radius of gyration without providing more area and in which the average compressive stress does not exceed the allowable
The designer is supposed to select a section which provides a large radius of gyration without providing more area and in which the design compressive strength just exceed the factored compressive load.
compressive stress.
Allowable compressive stress in the section is Estimate
of
slenderness
ratio
or
design
assumed. It should not be more than the upper compressive strength. limit for the column formula specified in the If average column height is 3 to 5 m the relevant code. For struts it may be 60 85 MPa For columns , 85 110 MPa The cross sectional area required to The cross sectional area required to carry the factored load at the assumed compressive stress is computed. slenderness ratio will generally fall between 40 and 60. (Use Table 8 and Table 9 of IS code)
carry the load at the assumed allowable stress is
A = P / allowable compressive stress
Ag = Pu / assumed compressive stress
As per IS 800 2007 (Clause 7.5.1.2)
49

For a single angle section loaded concentrically , the flexural buckling strength strength of single angle loaded in compression through one of its leg may be determined using the equivalent slenderness ratio :e = (k1 + k2vv2 + k32 ) where , k1 , k2 and k3 are constants depending upon the end condition as given in Table 12 of IS 800 2007 vv = (l / rvv) / (2E/250) = (b1 + b2)/ { (2E/250) x2t} = yield stress ratio (250 /fy)0.5 Table B.3.2 constants k1 , k2 and k3 No of bolts at Gusset/connecting k1 each connection 2 Fixed hinged 1 Fixed hinged 0.20 0.70 0.75 1.25 0.35 0.60 0.35 0.50 20 5 20 60 end member Fixity k2 k3
Buckling curve to be used = c curve Imperfection factor = 0.49 for curve c
NOTE
50

If the design compressive strength of the column exceeds the factored load over the column by more than 5% the section needs a revision (being over safe and economical) (As per IS 800 2007) If the load carrying capacity of the column exceeds the load over the column by more than 5% , the section needs a revision. (As per IS 800 1984) Effective Length KL (Buckling length l) of a Compression member:The effective length, KL, is calculated from the actual length, L, of the member, considering the rotational and relative translational boundary conditions at the ends. The actual length shall be taken as the length from center to center of its intersections with the supporting members in the plane of the buckling deformation, or in the case of a member with a free end, the free standing length from the center of the intersecting member at the supported end. Table B.3.3 Buckling Length of Prismatic Compression member as per both codes
B.3.5 Worked examples for Compression member
51

The worked example include Analysis problem on single angle strut and design problem on build up column by IS 800 1984 and IS 800 2007 Single angle discontinuous strut by IS 800 1984 Analysis Problem Calculate load carrying capacity of a single angle discontinuous strut of length 2.7 m connected by two or more rivets in line along the angle at each end (imparting partial restraints against in plane rotation ) if ISA 100 x 65 x 8 is used.(use fy = 250 MPa) Analysis steps References
Data Unsupported length of strut = L = 2.7 m IS Handbook no.1 No. of rivets at each end = 2 or more When ISA 100 x 65 x 8 is used Sectional Properties A = 1257 mm2 , b = 100 mm , d = 65 mm t = 8 mm rvv = 13.9 mm The effective length = 0.85 x 2.7 = 2.30 mm I /r = 2300 / 13.9 = 165.46 Table 5.1 of IS 800 1984 clause 5.1.1
52

< 350 for this slenderness ratio , allowable working compressive stress (ac ) = 38.46 MPa Strength of the strut = 38.46 x 1257 = 48.34 kN
Single angle discontinuous strut by IS 800 2007 Analysis Problem Calculate load carrying capacity of a single angle discontinuous strut of lengh 2.7 m connected by two or more rivets in line along the angle at each end (imparting partial restraints against in plane rotation ) if ISA 100 x 65 x 8 is used.(use fy = 250 MPa)
Analysis Problem
References
53
Data Unsupported length of strut = L = 2.7 m No. of rivets at each end = 2 or more When ISA 100 x 65 x 8 is used Sectional Properties A = 1257 mm2 , b = 100 mm , d = 65 mm t = 8 mm rvv = 13.9 mm Equivalent slenderness ratio e = (k1 + k2vv2 + k32 ) for our case, the fixity as partial so take the average value of fixed and hinged condition Here, k1 = 0.45 , k2 = 0.475 , k3 = 12.5 Table 7.6 of IS 800 -2007 vv = 2700/13.9 /{1x( x2x10 /250)} =2.186 = (100+65)/{1x(2x2x105/250)x2x8} = 0.116
2 5
IS Handbook No.1
clause 7.5.1.2
54

Therefore, e = clause 7.1.2.1
(0.45+0.475x2.1862+12.5x0.1162) = 1.7 = 0.5[1+(-0.2)+ ] = 2.313 stress reduction factor X = 1/[ +{2 2}0.5 = 0.257 Design compressive stress fcd = x fy/mo fy/mo = 0.257 x 250/1.10 = 58.41 N/mm2 Design compressive strength =Pd = Ad x fcd Section classification b/t = 100/8 =12.5 < 15.7 (Hence not slender class) d/t = 65/8 = 8.13 < 15.7 (Hence not slender class) (b+d)/t =(100+65)/8 = 20.63 < 25 (Hence not slender class) Hence whole section is of non slender class and group cross sectional area is effective in compression therefore Ag = Ae = 1257 mm2 capacity of ISA 100 x65 x8 Pd = 1257 x 58.41 = 73.42kN while designing the compression member avoid
2
clause 7.1.2
Table 3.1 of IS 800 - 2007
55

to design the slender cross section because whole cross sectional area will not be effective in compression .
Analysis of single angle discontinuous strut by both codes Points Allowable/design compressive stress IS 800 1984 ac = 38.46 MPa (Directly calculated on the basis of slenderness ratio) IS 800 2007 fcd = 58.41MPa (Effective dimensional slenderness ratio , non
stress reduction factor and partial safety factor are responsible to
calculate. )
SECTION B :- STUDY OF BOTH CODES Section B.4 :-Design of Member Subjected to Bending B.4.1 Introduction :A structural member subjected to transverse loads (loads perpendicular to its longitudinal axis ) is called a beam. It is obvious , of course , that a beam is combination of a tension member and a compression member.The concepts of tension members and compression members are combined in
56

the treatment of a beam. A beam may , in general , be subjected to either simple , unsymmetrical or biaxial bending. For simple bending to occur , the loading plane must coincide with one of the principle planes of doubly- symmetrical section ( I section) and for singly symmetrical section ( a channel section) it must pass through the shear centre. When the plane of loading does not pass through the shear centre the bending is called unsymmetrical. Beams are supposed to be most critical members in any structure. Their design should therefore not only be economical but also safe. The main considerations in the design of beams are the following : They should be proportioned for strength in bending keeping in view the lateral and local stability of the flange and the capacity of the selected shape to develop the necessary strength in shear and local bearing. They should be proportioned for stiffness , keeping in mind their deflections and deformations under service conditions. They should be proportioned for economy , paying attention to the size and grade of steel to yield the most economical design.
B.4.2 Classification of beams on the basis of lateral restraints provided:Depending upon the lateral restrained provided along the compression element (one of the flange) the beams can be categorized in to Laterally supported beams (restrained beams) Laterally unsupported beams (Unrestrained beams) Here a general introduction of classification of beam is given Laterally supported beams (Restrained beams)
57

Laterally supported beam is one whichUnable to move laterally Unaffected by out of plane of buckling (lateral torsional instability) Lateral torsional instability will not occur if any of the following conditions apply The section is bent about its minor axis. Full lateral restrained is provided , e.g. by positive attachment of the top flange of a simply supported beam to a concrete slab. Closely spaced , discrete bracing is provided so that the weak axis slenderness (KL/r) of the beam is low.
Fig B.4.1 Laterally Supported Beam Laterally unsupported beams (Unrestrained beams) The beam is considered laterally unsupported when Compression flange of beam is not restrained laterally against the lateral buckling Bending take place in weaker direction.
58

For hot rolled beams and channel section which have very small moment of inertia about minor axis as compared to that about major axis , this make section relatively weak against torsion and bending about weaker axis . This bending usually accompanied by twisting. This phenomenon of bending in the weaker direction and twisting may be called as Lateral Torsional Instability.
Fig B.4.2 Laterally Unsupported beam B.4.3 Design theory for beams IS 800 2007 uses Limit State Method design approach but IS 800 1984 uses Working Stress Method design approach . The clear benefits of LSM verses WSM are observed in the design of flexural member. Limit state design of beams Limit state design of beams When a restrained steel beam of "compact (Class 2)" proportions is subjected to loads producing vertical bending, its response will consist of a number of stages. Initially it will behave elastically, with vertical deflections being related linearly to the applied load. As the loading is increased, the most highly stressed regions will develop strains in excess of yield, resulting in a local loss of stiffness. For the beam as a whole, deflections will now start to increase rather more rapidly. Additional load will cause this process to continue until complete plasticity is reached at one cross- section. For a simply supported beam, this point will correspond to the maximum load that can be carried without strain
59

hardening and will also be the point at which deflections become very large. On the other hand, for continuous structures, further increases of load are possible as redistribution of moments takes place. B.4.4 Behaviour of steel beams in bending Statically Determinate beams (fig B.4.3)
60

Statically Indeterminate Beams (fig B.4.4) If the steel beam is continuous and Plastic class (Class 1), then the formation of the first plastic hinge at the point of maximum moment, previously obtained from an elastic analysis, will not mark the limit of its load-carrying resistance. it signifies a change in the way in which the beam responds to further loads. For the two-span beam of Figure B.5.5 the insertion of a real hinge at the central support (B) would cause each span to behave as if it were simply supported. Thus both would be capable of sustaining load, and would not collapse until this load caused a plastic hinge to form at mid-span. The formation of a plastic hinge at produces qualitatively similar behaviour. Thus continuous structures do not collapse until sufficient plastic hinges have formed to convert them into a mechanism. At collapse, the beam will appear as shown in Figure
B.4.5:- Concept of section classification

61

The critical local buckling stress of the constituent plate element of a beam, for a given material and boundary conditions is inversely proportional to its breadth to thickness ratio. Hence by suitably reducing the slenderness of the plate elements , its resistance to local buckling could be enhanced. Once the local buckling is prevented , the beam can develop its full flexural moment capacity or the limit state in flexure. Hence depending upon the slenderness of the constituent plate element of the beam , they are classified as slender , semi-compact,compact and plastic . This section classification is new to the Indian structural designers who are familiar with the code of practice for structural steelwork in India , the IS 800 1984 .Since IS 800 1984 is based on Allowable Stress Method the extreme fibre stress in the beams is restricted to 0.66 f y . In addition, the I sections rolled in India are found to be at least semi-compact in which the section classification for Indian standard I beams have been presented.In other words the flange outstands of the I beams rolled in India are so proportioned that they attain yield stress before local buckling . Because of these two reasons, there was no need for section classification in the design of beams using IS 800 -1984 . However , in the limit state design of steel beams , section classification becomes very essential as the moment capacities of each classified section takes different values .
B.4.6 :-Codal provision for design of laterally supported and laterally unsupported beam
62

As per IS 800 1984 As per IS 800 2007
The calculated stress in a member subjected to The factored design moment , M at any section, bending shall not exceed any of the appropriate in a beam due to external actions shall satisfy maximum permissible stresses. M Md A) Laterally Supported BeamA) Laterally supported beamThe maximum bending stress in tension (at,cal ) or in compression (bc
,cal)
clause 8.2.1 when V 0.6 Vd Md = b Zp fy / mo 1.2 Zefy /mo where b = 1.0 for plastic and compact section b = Ze/Zp for semi-compact section Zp = plastic section modulus Ze = Elastic section modulus fy = yield stress of material mo = partial safety factor here IS 800 2007 doesnt specify the moment capacity of slender section.
in
extreme fibre calculated on the effective section of a beam shall not exceed the maximum permissible bending stress in tension (bt ) or in compression (bc) obtained as follows nor the values specified in clause 6.2.2 , 6.2.3 , 6.2.5 and 6.2.6 of IS 800 -1984 as appropriate bt or bc = 0.66 fy
(clause 6.1.1
The average shear stress in a member calculated on the cross-section of the web shall not exceed va = 0.4 fy clause The bearing stress in any part of the
when V > 0.6 Vd Md = Mdv 9.2 where clause
beam when calculated on the net area of Mdv = design bending strength under high shear contact shall not exceed the value of p determined by the following formula p = 0.75 fy = Md-(Md-Mfd) for plastic and compact section = Zefy / mo for semi compact section
63

= [(2V/Vd)-1]2 V = Factored applied shear force.As governed by web yielding or web buckling. Vd = design shear strength as governed by web yielding or web buckling Mfd = plastic design strength of the area of the cross section excluding the shear area.
Codal provision for design of laterally supported beam ( As per IS 800 2007) About effect of shear force on Mp ( capacity of section under high shear)
If the design value of shear force is greater than 50% of the plastic design shear resistance in shear , a member subjected to co-existing bending and shear has to use its web to resists the shear force as well as to assists the flanges in resisting moment . Thus a cross section subjected to co-existing bending and shear has to reduced moment resistance in presence of high shear. The interaction between moment and shear is shown.
About holes in tension zone

64

A reduction in the moment carrying capacity on account of holes in tension flange is justifiable. The plastic moment capacity is computed using yield stress acting over the net area. For cases where ultimate capacity in bending is My. or less negligence of holes in tension flange gives no more change in factor of safety , stress concentration adjacent to holes provide carrying capacity to replace that lost by making holes. If the ultimate capacity is Mp . The holes will reduce the factor of safety because M p will reduce almost in proportion to the area of holes. Shear lag effects ( clause 8.2.1.5)
The shear lag effects in flanges may be disregarded provided: For outstand elements ( supported along one edge) b0 L0 /20 For internal elements (supported along two edge) bf L0 /10 where L0 = Length between poins of zero moments. b0 = Outstand width bf = Internal element width When these limits are exceeded , the effective width of flange for design strength may be calculated using specialist literature or conservatively taken as the value , satisfying the limit given above. Codal provisions for design of laterally unsupported beamAs per IS 800 1984 As per IS 800 2007
The maximum bending compressive stress on Effect of Lateral Torsional Buckling (LTB)on the extreme fibre , calculated on the effective flexural strength need not be considered if LT section shall not exceed the maximum 0.4 (clause 8.2.2) where, LT = Non dimensional slenderness ratio for = 0.66 fcb . fy /[(fcb)n + (fy)n ] 1/n lateral torsional ratio for lateral torsional permissible bending stress bc
65

where , fcb = elastic critical stress in bending fy = yield stress of steel n = a factor assumed as 1.4 buckling Then Md = bZpfbd fbd = design bending compressive stress, obtained as follow Elastic critical stress If an elastic flexural analysis is not carried out , fbd = XLT x fy/mo where ,
the elastic critical stress fcb for beams shall be XLT = stress reduction factor for LTB calculated using the following formula XLT = 1/[LT + { LT2 LT2}0.5 ] 1 LT = 0.5[ 1+ LT ( LT 0.2) + LT2 ] fcb = k1 ( X + k2 Y ) c2/c1 where, X = Y [1+(1/20)(l T/ry D)2 ] MPa Y = 26.5 x 105 /(l /ry)2 k1 MPa LT = Imperfection factors 0.21 for rolled section 0.49 for welded section LT = [(b x Zp x fy) / Mcr]
= a coefficient to allow for reduction in
thickness or breadth of flanges between points where of effective lateral restraints and depends on , the ratio of the total area of both flanges at the point of least bending moment to Mcr = elastic critical moment
2 2 2 2 the Mcr = [ { EIy /(KL) } {GIt + ( EIw/(KL) }]
corresponding area at the point of greatest bending moment between such points of restraint . The following simplified conservative equation may be used in the case of prismatic members made of standard rolled I- sections and welded k2 = A coefficient to allow for the inequality of doubly symmetric sections , for calculating the flanges ,and depends on , the ratio of the
66

moment of inertia of the compression flanges , elastic lateral buckling moment, each calculated about its own axis parallel to the y-y axis of the girder, at the point of maximum bending moment. Mcr C1 &C2 = respectively the lesser and greater distances from the section neutral axis to the extreme fibres. It = torsional constant Iw = warping constant Iy & Ix = moment of inertia of the whole section lying in the plane of bending and normal to the plane of bending respectively. Values of X & Y are given in Table 6.5 of IS 800 -1984 for appropriate values of KL = effective laterally unsupported length of D/T and l/ry Values of K1 and K2 for beams are given in Table 6.3 and Table 6.4 respectively. tf = thickness of the flange Values of fcb shall be increased by 20 % when LT = 1.2 for plastic and compact sections with T/t is not greater than 2.0 and d1/t is not greater tw/tf =2 than 1344/fy. LT = 1.0 for semi compact sections or the member h = depth of the section Iy = moment of inertia about the weaker axis ry = radius of gyration of the section about the weak axis = LT2EIyyh/2(kl)2 x [ 1+ 1/20
x(KL/ryy)2/(h/tf)2]
Guidance for calculating elastic buckling force sections with may be found in the references listed in Appendix E of IS 800-1984 tf/tw > 2 Method of calculating Mcr for different beam sections , considering loading , and a support condition as well as for non-prismatic member is given in
67
Appendix F of IS 800-

2007
Design problem on beams by IS 800 1984 The secondary beam of a floor beam system is simply supported at both ends. The beam carries working dead load = 12 kN/m and working live load = 12.5 kN/m from slab.The compression flange of beam is fully embedded in R.C.C. slab.Design the floor beam and apply usual checks.Take f y = 250 MPa
DESIGN STEPS Loading on beam dead load from slab = 12 kN/m
REFERENCES
68

Self wt. of beam = 1 kN/m --------------------------------------------------------Total dead load = 13 kN /m --------------------------------------------------------------Total Live load = 12.5 kN/m
Total load(DL+LL) = 13 + 12.5 = 25.5 kN/m
Maximum bending moment M = wl2 / 8 = 25.5 x 7.52 /8 = 179.30 kN-m
maximum shear force = V
25.5 x 7.5 /2 = 95.63 kN
Modulus of section required = M /bc = 179.30 x 106/ 165 = 1087 cm3
Trial section
69

IS Handbook No. 1 Let us try 450 @ 0.710kN/m
sectional properties A = 9227 mm2 h = 450 mm B = 150 mm b = 75 mm tw = 9.4 mm tf = 17.4 mm h2 = 35.40 mm Ixx = 30390.8 x 104 mm4 Iyy = 834.0 x 104 mm4 Zxx = 1350.7 x 103 mm3 Check for shear
va= V / (h x tw) 95.63 x 103 / ( 450 x 9.4) = 22.61 N /mm2 clause 6.4.2
< 0.4 fy ( 100 N /mm2 for steel

70

fy = 250 n/mm2 which is safe
Check for defection
allowable = L /325 = 7.5 x 103 / 325 = 23.08 mm
cal = (5/384)( wl4/EI) = 5 x 25.5 x (7.5 x 103 )4 /( 384 x 2 x 105 x 30390 .8 x 104) = 17.28 mm < 23.08 mm which is safe
Check for crippling Let 75 mm bearing length clause 6.3
= 25.5 x 103 /[( 75 + 35.40 x 3) x 9.4] = < 0.75 fy 19.90 N /mm2
71
Design problem on beams by IS 800 2007 The secondary beam of a floor beam system is simply supported at both ends. The beam carries working dead load = 12 kN/m and working live load = 12.5 kN/m from slab.The compression flange of beam is fully embedded in R.C.C. slab.Design the floor beam and apply usual checks.Take f y = 250 MPa
DESIGN STEPS Loading on beam dead load from slab = 12 kN/m
REFERENCES
Self wt. of beam = 1 kN/m --------------------------------------------------------Total Permanent action Gk = 13 kN /m --------------------------------------------------------------Total Variable action Qk = 12.5 kN/m
72

Partial Safety Factors for Permanent action ( for variable action Fd = G,sup Gk + Q .Qk = 1.5 x 13 + 1.5 x 12.5 = 38.25 kN /m Design Moment Msd = Fd x L2 /8 = 38.25 x 7.52 /8 Design Shear force Vsd = Fd x L /2 = 38.25 x 7.5 / 2 = 143.45 kN = 269 kN m Clause 5.3.3 G,sup)
=
1.5
Table 5.1 of IS 800 :2007
( Q)
= 1.5
Trial section Let us try ISMB 450 @ 0.710 kN/m Sectional properties A = 9227 mm2 h = 450 mm B = 150 mm b = 75 mm tw = 9.4 mm
73

tf = 17.4 mm h2 = 35.40 mm Ixx = 30390.8 x 104 mm4 Iyy = 834.0 x 104 mm4 Zxx = 1350.7 x 103 mm3 section classification (250 / fy) = 1 Flange :b /tf = 75 / 17.4 = 4.31 < 9.4 Hence flange is plastic Web : d / tw = 379.2 / 9.4 = 40.34 < 83.9 where, d = distance between fillet ( h 2 h2) = 450 2 x 35.40 = 379.2 mm Table 3.1 of IS 800:2007
Hence the web is plastic Shear capacity Design shear strength of cross section Vd = Vp as ( d/tw) < 67 Vp = plastic shear resistance = Av fy/(3 x mo)
74

= 450 x 9.4 x 250 /( 3 x 1.1) = 555 x 103 N As V (design shear force) < 0.6 Vd . the effect of shear force on plastic moment capacity Mp . Moment capacity Since the section is plastic and there is not effect of shear force on plastic moment capacity Therefore , design bending strength of cross section Md = b x Zp x (fy/ mo ) = 1 x 1553 .36 x 103 x (250 / 1.10) = 348.5 kN m > 269 kN m ( M = design moment) Hence safe Checks Deflection checks :deflections are to be checked for most adverse but realistic combination of service load and their arrangements by elastic analysis using load factor 1. Clause 8.2.1.2
Now , max = 5 x w x L4 /( 384 x E x Ixx) here w = 1.0 x 13 + 1.0 x 12.5 25.5 kN So , Clause 8.2.1
75

max = 17.28 mm < L/300 ..( not susceptible to cracking) < L/350..( susceptible to cracking ) Hence safe
Web buckling check :The buckling resistance of the web is given by Pw = width of stiff bearing plate n1 = dispersion of load through the web @ 450 to the level of half the depth of cross section fcd = design calculated strength as per 7.1.2.1 Clause 5.6.1 and Table 5.3 of IS 800 - 2007
Let 75 mm stiff bearing plate
76

therefore , b1 = 75 mm n1 = 225 mm To find fcd = X x (fy mo) here , X = stress reduction factor X = 1 /[ + (2 2)0.5] = 0.5[ 1+ ( 0.2) + 2 ] = imperfection factor = non dimensional effective slenderness ratio Clause 8.7.3.1
KL = 0.7 x d = 0.7 x 379.2 = 265.44 mm rzz = tw / 12 = 2.71 mm therefore , = 1.102 for solid web section we have to use buckling curve c irrespective of axis of bending Therefore , = 0.49 therefore, = 1.558
77

So , then , fcd = 2.66 x 250 / 1.10 = 85.46 kN / mm2 Hence , the buckling resistance of the web Pw = [ (75 + 225) x 9.4] x 85.46 = 241 kN > 143 kN Hence safe Web Bearing or Web Crippling checks : The crippling resistance of web is given by Fw = ( b1 + n2) x tw x fyw / mo where, b1 = stiff bearing length n2 = length obtained by dispersion through the flange to web junction at a slope of 1:25 to the plane of flange fyw = yield stress of web X = 2.66
78
Let 75 mm stiff bearing length b1 = 75 mm n2 = 2.5 x h2 = 2.5 x 35.40 = 88.5 mm tw = 9.4 mm fyw = 250 n/ mm2 mo = 1.1 Therefore web crippling resistance Fw = (75 + 88.5 ) x 9.4 x 250 / 1.1 = 350 kN > 143.45 kN (safe ) Clause 8.7.4
79
SECTION B : - STUDY OF BOTH CODES Section B.5 :- Design of Member Subjected to Combine Forces / Combined stresses B.5.1 General Depending upon the extreme actions over the members in structural framing system , the combined forces or stresses may be broadly classified as Combined Axial compression and bending Combined Axial tension and bending Combined bending and shear
B.5.2 :- Cross Sectional behaviour for combined axial compression and bending Given fig.(B.5.1) shows a point somewhere along the length of an I section column where the applied compression and moment about the z axis produce the uniform and varying stress distributions.
80
B.5.3 :- Elastic behaviour of cross section in compression and bending:Note : - Beam columns are defined as members to combined bending and compression . In principle , all members in frame structures are actually beam columns. If full plasticity is allowed to occur , then the failure condition for combined axial load ( compression) and bending will be as shown in fig.B.5.2
81
Full plastic under axial compression and moment Where, NM = Reduced plastic resistance of gross section allowing moment. MN = Reduced plastic resistance moment of cross section Now if full plasticity is allowed to occur , then the failure condition will be For yn (h 2tf)/2 neutral axis lies in web
NM = 2fytwyn MN = fy b tf (h tf) + fy[ { (h-2tf)/2}2 yn2 For yn > (h-2tf ) /2 Neutral axis lies in flanges NM = fy [ tw ( h 2 tf ) + 2 b [ tf h/2 + yn] MN = fy b [ h/2 yn] [ h yn]
82
Interaction curve between moment and axial force. Theoretical curve
As per IS 800 :2007 The design interation curve is lower bound when plastic neutral axie lies flange ( when the applied moment is smaller a compare to applied axial force )
B.5.4 :- Codal provisions for design of member subjected Combined axial compression and bending:As per IS 800 1984 Combined Axial compression and bending As per IS 800 2007 Combined axial force and bending moment
Member subjected to axial compression and (clause 5.4.8) bending shall be proportioned to satisfy the 1 ) Section strength following requirements : 1.a ) For plastic and compact section (clause 9.3.1.1) ac , cal / ac + Cmx . bcx cal/ [ {1- ac,cal /0.6fccx} Following relationship should be satisfy bcx] + Cmy .bcy ,cal / [{1 - ac,cal /0.6fccy} bcy] [My/Mndy]1 + [Mz / Mndz ]2 1.0 or conservatively N/Nd + My / Mdy + Mz/ Mdz
83
1.0

where , 1.0 However if the ratio ac
, cal
My, Mz = Factored applied moments about the minor and major axis of the cross section
/ ac is less than 0.15 , the following ,respectively Mndy , Mndz = design reduced flexural strength under combined axial force and the respective uni axial moments acting alone.
expression may be used in lieu of the above ac , cal / ac + bcx cal / bcx + bcy ,cal / bcy 1.0 above formula shall
The value of bcx and bcy to be used in the N = factored applied axial force (Tension or each of lesser of the comp.) values of the maximum permissible stresses bc Nd = Design strength in tension or comp. given in section 6 if IS 800 -1984 Combined axial tension and bending Mdy , Mdz = design strength under corresponding moment acting alone. 1 ,2 = constants (as per table 9.1 of IS 800
A member subjected to both axial tension and :2007) bending shall be proportioned so that the n = N / Nd following condition is satisfied : at,cal / 0.60 fy + btx,cal / 0.66 fy + bty,cal /0.66 fy 1.0 1.b) For Semi compact section 9.3.1.3) ( clause
ac , cal = calculated average axial compressive In the absence of high shear force semistress at,cal = calculated average axial tensile stress in extreme fibre compact section design I satisfactory under combined axial force and bending , if the
bc,cal = calculated bending compressive stress maximum longitudinal stress under combined axial force and bending , fx fy/mo for the cross section without holes above criteria ac = permissible axial compressive stress In reduced to the member subjected to axial compressive N/Nd + My / Mdy + Mz/ Mdz load only at = permissible axial tensile stress in the IS 800 2007 member subjected to axial tensile load only 2) Overall member strength
84
bt,cal = calculated bending tensile stress in fx satisfying the following criteria extreme fibre.
1.0
1.c) For slender section , No guideline given by

bc = permissible bending compressive stress in a) Bending and axial tension (clause 9.3.2.1) extreme fibre bt Member shall be checked for lateral torsional = permissible bending tensile stress in buckling under reduced moment Meff due to tension and bending Meff = [ M - T Zec/A] Md Cm = 0.85 where , ( For members in frames where sideway is not M , T = Factored applied moment and prevented and if sideway is prevented in the tension,respectively plane of loading and subjected to transverse A =area of cross section loading between their supports , ends are Zec = Elastic section modulus of the section restrained against rotation) with respect to extreme compression fibre = 0.8 if T and M vary independently Cm = 1.0 = 1.0 otherwise
extreme fibre
( For members whose ends are unrestrained b ) Bending and axial compression against rotation) Members Bending and shear subjected to (clause 9.3.2.2) combined axial
compression and bi axial bending shall satisfy the following interaction relationship
Irrespective of any increase in the permissible P/Pd + KyMy / Mdy + Kz Mz / Mdz 1.0 stress,the equivalent stress e,cal ,due to co- Ky , Kz existent = Moment amplification factor about minor and major axis respectively
bending (tension and compression ) and shear P = Factored applied axial compression stresses obtained from the formula given if My , Mz = Maximum factored applied bending clause 7.1.4.1 shall not exceed the value e = 0.9 fy where , maximum permissible equivalent stress moments about y and z axis of the member Pd , M
dy
,Mdz = Design strength under axial
compression , bending about y and z axis respectively , as governed by overall buckling Design bending strength about major axis and
The equivalent stress e,cal is obtained from the minor axis following formula : e,cal = [bt2 ,cal + 3vm2,cal] or About major axis Mdz= Md
85

Md = design flexural strength about z axis given = [bc2 ,cal + 3vm2,cal] by section 8.2.1 of IS 800 2007 when lateral torsional buckling is prevented and by section 8.2.2 of IS 800 -2007 where lateral torsional buckling governs about minor axis Mdy = Md Md = Design flexural strength about y axis calculated using plastic section modulus for plastic and compact sections and elastic section modulus for semi compact sections.
Comments : -IS 800 2007 mention one interaction formula and it covers Plastic Compact and semi compact class and both failure mode (i.e. flexural buckling and lateral torsional buckling).About slender class IS 800 2007 doesnt give any guidelines because slender (class 4) section shall be avoided as far as possible in design of member subjected to axial compression and bending . As such design of compression member and flexural member is based on section classification.
86
SECTION B : - STUDY OF BOTH CODES Section B.6 : - Connections B.6.1 : - Introduction The various elements of a steel structure like tension member, compression member and flexural member are connected by fasteners .Different types of structural elements ,each of which has to be properly attached to the neighbouring parts of the structure. This will involve the use of several forms of connection. The main classes of connection are :Where a change of direction occurs , e.g. beam to- column connections , beam to beam connections and connections between different members in trusses. To ensure manageable sizes of steelwork for transportation and erection e.g. columns are normally spliced every two or three storeys. Where a change of component occurs , including connection of the steelwork to other parts of the building , e.g. column bases , connections to concrete cores and connections with walls , floors and roofs.
87
(Fig B.6.1) B.6.2 :-Classification of connection Connection may be classified : By rigidity
By component used in connection Classified by rigidity Simple connection Rigid connection Semi- rigid connection
Simple connection (shear connection) A simple connection ix designed in such a manner that the significant moment (which might be adversely affect the member of structure ) will not develop. Simple connections are assumed to transfer only shear at some nominal eccentricity and typically used in frames up to about five stories in hight , where strength rather than stiffness govern the design.
88
Fig B.6.2
Rigid connections ( moment connections) Rigid connections are capable of transmitting the forces and moments . A rigid connection shall be designed that its deformation has no significant influence neither on the distribution of internal forces and moments in the srtecture. Nor on its overall deformation. These are necessary in sway frames for stability and also contribute in resisting loads.
Fig B.6.3
Semi- rigid connection

89

A connection which does not meet the criteria for a rigid connection or a simple pinned connection as discussed above shall be classified as a semi-rigid connection. In actual practice simple connections do have some degree of rotational rigidity the developments in the semi-rigid connections. Similarly rigid connections do experience some degree of joint deformation and this can be utilized to reduce the joint design moments.
Classified by components used for connection Riveted Bolted Welded
Based on above classification the following combination can be achieved Riveted or bolted shear connection Riveted or bolted moment connection Welded shear connection Welded moment connection
B.6.3 :-DESIGN OF BEAM COLUMN DATA A column in a building 4m in height bottom end fixed , top end hinged. Reaction load due to beam is 500 kN at an eccentricity of 100 mm from major axis of section. DESIGN Column is subjected to axial compression of 5 X 105 N with bending moment of 50 X 106 Nmm. Taking design compressive stress for axial loading as 80 Mpa. Ae reqd = 500 X 103 / 80 = 6250 mm2
90

To account for additional stresses developed due to bending compression. Try ISHB 300 @ 0.58 kN/m Ag = 7485 sq.mm, rxx = 129.5 mm, ryy = 54.1 mm fy = 250 Mpa Classification of section b/tf = 125 / 10.6 = 11.79 > 10.5 (limit for compact section) Flange is semi compact h1/tw = 249.8 / 7.6 = 32.86 < 84 Web is plastic Therefore overall section is semi compact. a) Section strength as governed by material failure (clause 9.3.1) Axial stress = N/Ae = 500 X 103 / 7485 = 66.80 N/mm2 Bending stress Mz/Ze = 50 X 106 / 836.3 X 103 = 59.78 N/mm2 As the section is semi compact use clause 9.3.1.3 (p. no. 71) Due to bending moment at top, horizontal shear developed V is 18.75 kN = 18750 N Shear strength of section Vd = ((fy / 3) . h . tw) / 1.10 = 299 kN
91

As V/Vd = 18750 / 299 X 103 = 0.062 < 0.6 Reduction in moment capacity need not be done. As per clause 9.3.1.3 (p. no. 71) Total longitudinal compressive stress fx = 66.80 + 59.78 = 126.58 < fy/mo = 227.27 OK Alternately N = 500 kN Nd = Ag . fy / mo = 7485 X 250 / 1.1 = 1701.136 kN Mz = 50 X 106 Nmm = 50 kNm Mdz = Ze . fy / mo = 836.3 X 103 X 250 /1.10 = 190.068 kN Hence, (500 / 1701.136) + (50 / 190.068) = 0.557 < 1 . OK
b) Member strength as governed by buckling failure clause 9.3.2 (p. no. 71) In the absence of My, equations are reduced to Where, P = 500 X 103 N Mz = 50 X 106 Nmm
Mdz = b . Zp . fbd
92

b = Ze / Zp as section is semicompact Therefore Mdz = Ze fbd fbd = LT fy / mo LT = bending stress reduction factor to account torsional buckling. LT = 0.21 for rolled section fcr,b depends on following factors kL / ryy = 0.8 X 4000 / 54.1 = 59.15 h / tf = 300/10.6 = 28.30 Using table 14, (p. no. 57) fcr,b = 691.71 N/mm2 = 0.060 < 0.4 As per clause 8.2.2 (p. no. 54) Resistance to lateral buckling need not be checked and member may be treated as laterally supported. Mdz=Ze . fy / mo = 190 kNm Evaluation of Pdy buckling load @ yy axis Referring table 10 (p. no. 44) h/bf=300/250 = 1.2 buckling @ yy axis is by class c tf = 10.6 mm < 100mm buckling @ zz axis is by class b
93
ly / ry = 3200/54.1 = 59.15 For fy = 250 and using Table 9 (c), (p. no. 42) Fcdy = 169.275 N/mm2 Pdy = Ag. fcdy = 1267.02 kN Evaluation of Pdz buckling @ zz axis lz /rz = 3200 / 129.5 = 24.71 For fy = 250 and using Table 9 (b), (p. no. 41) fcdz = 220.76 N/mm2 Therefore pdz = Ag . fcdz = 1652.38 kN Kz = 1 + (z 0.2)nz Where, lz /rz = 24.71, h/tf = 300 / 10.6 = 28.30 From table 14 (p. no. 57) fcr,z = 4040 N/mm2 Ratio of actual applied load to axial strength, nz = 500 / 1625.38 = 0.30 ny = 500 / 1267.02 = 0.39 z = 250/4040 = 0.246
94
Kz =1 + (z 0.2) nz = 1.0138 < 1+0.8 nz < 1.24. OK = ratio of minimum to maximum BM = -25 / 50 = -1 / 2 Cmz = 0.6 + 0.4 X () = 0.4
= 0.844
< 1 . OK < 1 . OK Hence select ISHB 300 @ 0.58 kN/m as a section for eccentrically loaded column. Design of Beam Column Working Stress Method IS : 800 1984 Checking section ISHB 300 @ 0.58 kN/m A = 7485 sq mm ac,cal = P/A = 66.80 N/mm2 slenderness ratio = L / ryy = 59.15 for fy = 250 Mpa, ac = 121.15N/mm2 from table 5.1 (p. no. 39) =ratio of smaller to larger moment = 0.5
95

Therefore, Cmx = 0.6 0.4 X 0.5 = 0.4 0.4 OK bcx,cal. = 50000 / 836.3 = 59.78 N/mm2 fcc = elastic critical stress in compression = 2E / 2 = 563.6 N/mm2 bcx = Permissible bending stress in compression. As column is laterally unsupported following ratios are evaluated. D/T = 28.30, L / ryy = 59.15 As T / L = 10.6 / 7.6 < 2 for fy = 250 using table 6.1 B (p. no. 58) bcx = 150 N/mm2 < 1 .. OK Hence requirement of section for a column under eccentric load is same as ISHB 300 @ 0.58 kN/m Thus reserve strength in a section by LSM is more than WSM.
LSM Interaction betn axial & uniaxial bending is considered taking buckling due to axial loading about both axes of c/s
96

Cmx = 0.4 Combined interaction is considered for buckling @ both axes of cross section. Interaction values are @ yy axis 0.612 @ zz axis 0.406 WSM Interaction is countered only by taking buckling due to axial load @ weaker axis with bending @ major axis. Cmx = 0.4 Combined interaction is considered for buckling @ yy axis only. Interaction value is @ yy axis 0.7486
97
SECTION C : - PROJECT PROBLEM Section C.1 : - Problem Data and Analysis The project problem consists of analysis of a foot over bridge by STAAD PRO and then design by IS 800 2007 & IS 800 1984. This design example covers design of all basic structural members ( axial , flexural and combined). Data of railway foot over bridge :Clear span Walk way width Clear height above top of rail Type of truss configuration Depth of truss girder = Lateral restrain for compression chord Assumption : - ( For design by both codes ) 1) Dead load and live loads 2) Earthquake loading 3) Wind loading 4) Grade of steel (fy) 5) Cross sections used IS 875 part I & II IS 1893 2002 IS 875 part III 250 MPa Indian standard hot rolled sections = = 34 m = 2.444 m = 6.5 m = N type 2.3 m X bracing
6) While designing care is taken that strength of system is governed by member and not by the connections.Therefore connection details are not covered. Loading calculation as per IS : 875 ( part I to V ) 1) Dead load :a) RCC slab 110 mm thick. Contributory width of floor beams = 2.266 m
98

Density of concrete = 25 kN/m3 UDL on beams ( 602 to 617) = 0.11 x 25 x 2.266 = 6.3 kN/m UDL on beams ( 601 & 618) = 3.2 MTon /m Say
B ) vertical cladding@ 15 kg/m2 Height of cladding = 2.3 m
UDL on beams (18 to 32, 80 to 94 , 305 ,307, 601 ,618) = 2.3 x 0.015 = 0.0345 MTon /m b) Staircase load Total rise to climb = Height b/w FGL and bottom of girder + depth of bottom girder + chord (ssumed as ISMC 300) + Thickness of R.C.C. slab = 6.5 + 0.3 + 0.11 = 6.9 m Rise say = 200 mm No of risers = 6.9/0.2 = 34.5 say 35 Hence no. of trends = 35 -1 = 34 Say tread of 300 mm , hence total going = 0.3 x 34 = 10.2 m Let there be central landing of 1.2 m Hence total plan length of staircase ,provide central column = 10.2 + 1.2 = 11.4 m Provide central column , Hence contributory span on bridge structure , = 11.4/4 = 2.85 Staircase width = 2.3 m Hence plan area for one column DL @ 0.2 MTon/m2 = Joint load applied (17 65 112 117) = 0.64 MTon 2) Live Load @ 0.5 Ton/m2
99
depth of bottom
3.2 x 0.2 = 0.64 MTon

Contributory width of floor beams = 2.26 m UDL on beams (602 to 617 ) = 0.5 x 2.266 = 11.4 kN/m = 1.14 MTon/m UDL on beams (601 & 618) = 0.57 MTon /m say Staircase LL @ 0.5 MTon/m2 = 3.2 x 0.5 = 1.6 MTon Wind Load (IS 875 III) Design wind pressure (N/m2) is given by Pz = 0.Vz2 where Vz is design wind speed in (m/s) Vz = Vb k1k2k3 Here, Vb = Basic wind speed in m/s for given region . = 44 m/s K1 = probability factor (risk coefficient) (risk coefficient) (see 5.3.1) = 1.0 (Table 1 all general building and structure) K2 = terrain , height and structure size factor (see 5.3.2) = 0.98 ( Terrain category 2 & class B i.e. max dimension is greater than 20 m) K3 = topography factor ( see 5.3.3) = 1.0 Vz = 44 x 1 x 0.98 x 1 = 43.12 m/s Pz = 0.6 x 43.12/1000 = 0.1 MTon/m2 Min. value of Pz is = 0.15 MTon/m2 Considering side cladding of ht . = 2.3 m Uniform wind load applied on structure ( top and bottom chord) = 2.3/2 x 0.15 = 0.17 MTon/m Joints loads to be applied = 0.17 x 2.27 = 0.38 MTon (joints 1 to 14 , 110 ,111 ,34 to 46 ,104 ,114 and 127) At end joints = 0.38 x 0.5 = 0.19 MTon (joints 64 , 105 , 116 and 128) UDL applied on column = 0.15 x 2.27/2 = 0.17 MTon/m (members in Z direction only ,not considered in X direction as projection area in X is less) 3 ) Earthquake loading (IS 1893 2002) Z = 0.16 (Zone factor for Delhi) I = 1.0 ( Importance factor)
100

R = 5 (eccentricity braced frame) T = 0.085 x H0.75 (time period) (H is the height of the structure) = 0.085 x 8.80.075 = 0.43 sec
Soil type assumed as soft hence Sa/g = 2.5 , Damping C = 1.4 for steel structures Hence An = C xZ/2 x I/R x Sa/g = 1.4 x 0.16/2 x 1/5 x 2.5 = 0.056 Dead load mass = 54.5 MTon (from static check) 50% live load mass = 60.5/2 = 30.25 MTon (from static check) Hence minimum base shear = 0.056 x (54.5 +30.25) = 4.75 MTon Appiled to two joints 116 & 117 only = 2.375 MTon (Applied in x direction only , not considered in Z direction as wind is governing)
Analysis:(Analysis is done using staad-pro-2006 )
STAAD SPACE START JOB INFORMATION
101

JOB NAME FOB JOB CLIENT VEERMATAT JIJABAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JOB NO 01 JOB PART ILLUSTRATIVE DESIGN OF ROB ENGINEER NAME S.B.Kharmale CHECKER NAME B.A.Naik ENGINEER DATE 20-Jan-07 END JOB INFORMATION INPUT WIDTH 79 UNIT METER MTON JOINT COORDINATES 1 0 0 0; 2 2.266 0 0; 3 4.532 0 0; 4 6.798 0 0; 5 9.064 0 0; 6 11.33 0 0; 7 13.596 0 0; 8 15.862 0 0; 9 18.128 0 0; 10 20.394 0 0; 11 22.66 0 0; 12 24.926 0 0; 13 27.192 0 0; 14 29.458 0 0; 17 0 0 2.44; 18 2.266 0 2.44; 19 4.532 0 2.44; 20 6.798 0 2.44; 21 9.064 0 2.44; 22 11.33 0 2.44; 23 13.596 0 2.44; 24 15.862 0 2.44; 25 18.128 0 2.44; 26 20.394 0 2.44; 27 22.66 0 2.44; 28 24.926 0 2.44; 29 27.192 0 2.44; 30 29.458 0 2.44; 34 2.266 2.3 0; 35 4.532 2.3 0; 36 6.798 2.3 0; 37 9.064 2.3 0; 38 11.33 2.3 0; 39 13.596 2.3 0; 40 15.862 2.3 0; 41 18.128 2.3 0; 42 20.394 2.3 0; 43 22.66 2.3 0; 44 24.926 2.3 0; 45 27.192 2.3 0; 46 29.458 2.3 0;
50 2.266 2.3 2.44; 51 4.532 2.3 2.44; 52 6.798 2.3 2.44; 53 9.064 2.3 2.44; 54 11.33 2.3 2.44; 55 13.596 2.3 2.44; 56 15.862 2.3 2.44; 57 18.128 2.3 2.44;
58 20.394 2.3 2.44; 59 22.66 2.3 2.44; 60 24.926 2.3 2.44; 61 27.192 2.3
2.44; 62 29.458 2.3 2.44; 64 -2.266 0 0; 65 -2.266 0 2.44; 66 0 -6.5 0; 67 0 -6.5 2.44; 68 -2.266 -6.5 0; 69 -2.266 -6.5 2.44; 82 -2.266 -3.25 2.44; 83 0 -3.25 2.44; 84 0 -3.25 0; 85 -2.266 -3.25 0; 103 0 2.3 2.44; 104 0 2.3 0; 105 -2.266 2.3 0; 106 -2.266 2.3 2.44; 110 33.99 0 0; 111 31.724 0 0; 112 33.99 0 2.44; 113 31.724 0 2.44; 114 31.724 2.3 0; 115 31.724 2.3 2.44; 116 36.256 0 0; 117 36.256 0 2.44; 118 33.99 -6.5 0; 119 33.99 -6.5 2.44; 120 36.256 -6.5 0; 121 36.256 -6.5 2.44; 122 36.256 -3.25 2.44;
102

123 33.99 -3.25 2.44; 124 33.99 -3.25 0; 125 36.256 -3.25 0; 126 33.99 2.3 2.44; 127 33.99 2.3 0; 128 36.256 2.3 0; 129 36.256 2.3 2.44; MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 104 105; 2 34 104; 3 34 35; 4 35 36; 5 36 37; 6 37 38; 7 38 39; 8 39 40;
9 40 41; 10 41 42; 11 42 43; 12 43 44; 13 44 45; 14 45 46; 15 114 46;

16 114 127; 17 127 128; 18 1 2; 19 2 3; 20 3 4; 21 4 5; 22 5 6; 23 6 7; 24
7 8;
25 8 9; 26 9 10; 27 10 11; 28 11 12; 29 12 13; 30 13 14; 31 111 14; 32 110
111; 33 2 34; 34 3 35; 35 4 36; 36 5 37; 37 6 38; 38 7 39; 39 8 40; 40 9 41; 41 10 42; 42 11 43; 43 12 44; 44 13 45; 45 14 46; 46 111 114; 47 104 2; 48 34 3; 49 35 4; 50 36 5; 51 37 6; 52 38 7; 53 39 8; 54 8 41; 55 40 9; 56 42 9; 57 43 10; 58 44 11; 59 45 12; 60 46 13; 61 114 14; 62 127 111; 63 103 106; 64 50 103; 65 50 51; 66 51 52; 67 52 53; 68 53 54; 69 54 55; 70 55 56; 71 56 57; 72 57 58; 73 58 59; 74 59 60; 75 60 61; 76 61 62;
77 115 62; 78 115 126; 79 126 129; 80 17 18; 81 18 19; 82 19 20; 83 20 21;
84 21 22; 85 22 23; 86 23 24; 87 24 25; 88 25 26; 89 26 27; 90 27 28; 91 28 29;

92 29 30; 93 112 113; 94 113 30; 95 117 112; 96 50 19; 97 24 57; 98 56 25;
99 51 20; 100 52 21; 101 53 22; 102 54 23; 103 55 24; 104 25 58; 105 26 59; 106 27 60; 107 28 61; 108 29 62; 109 103 18; 110 115 30; 111 126 113; 112 18 50; 113 19 51; 114 20 52; 115 21 53; 116 22 54; 117 23 55; 118 24 56;
119 25 57; 120 26 58; 121 27 59; 122 28 60; 123 29 61; 124 30 62; 125 113
115; 301 64 84; 302 85 66; 303 116 124; 304 125 118; 305 64 1; 306 84 85; 307 116 110; 308 124 125; 309 65 17; 310 82 83; 311 82 67; 312 65 83; 313 122 123; 314 122 119; 315 117 123; 316 83 84; 317 85 82; 318 82 68; 319 17 84; 320 65 85; 321 66 83; 322 64 106; 323 123 124; 324 125 122; 325 122 120; 326 112 124; 327 117 125; 328 118 123; 329 116 129; 401 68 85; 402 85 64; 403 64 105; 404 66 84; 405 84 1; 406 1 104; 407 118 124; 408 124 110; 409 110 127; 410 120 125; 411 125 116; 412 116 128; 413 69 82; 414 82 65; 415 65 106; 416 67 83; 417 83 17; 418 17 103; 419 119 123; 420 123 112; 421 112 126; 422 121 122; 423 122 117; 424 117 129; 501 105 106; 502 103 104; 503 50 34; 504 51 35; 505 52 36; 506 53 37; 507 54 38; 508 55 39; 509 56 40; 510 57 41; 511 58 42; 512 59 43; 513 60 44; 514 61 45; 515 62 46;
516 115 114; 517 126 127; 518 128 129; 519 105 103; 520 104 50; 521 34 51;
522 35 52; 523 36 53; 524 37 54; 525 38 55; 526 39 56; 527 56 41; 528 40 57;
529 57 42; 530 58 43; 531 59 44; 532 60 45; 533 61 46; 534 114 62; 535 127
115;
536 128 126; 601 65 64; 602 17 1; 603 18 2; 604 19 3; 605 20 4; 606 21 5;
607 22 6; 608 23 7; 609 24 8; 610 25 9; 611 26 10; 612 27 11; 613 28 12; 614 29 13; 615 30 14; 616 113 111; 617 112 110; 618 117 116; 619 1 18;
620 2 19; 621 3 20; 622 4 21; 623 5 22; 624 6 23; 625 7 24; 626 8 25; 627
24 9;
628 25 10; 629 26 11; 630 27 12; 631 28 13; 632 29 14; 633 64 17; 634 111
30;
103

635 110 113; 636 116 112; 637 69 85; 638 67 84; 639 68 84; 640 69 83;
641 82 17; 642 85 1; 643 82 64; 644 83 1; 645 65 105; 646 121 123; 647 120
124; 648 119 124; 649 121 125; 650 122 112; 651 125 110; 652 122 116; 653 123 110; 654 117 128; START GROUP DEFINITION MEMBER _MAIN_GIRDER 2 TO 16 18 TO 62 64 TO 78 80 TO 94 96 TO 125 404 TO 409 416 TO 421 _FLR_BMS 601 TO 618 _TPGRDER 1 TO 17 63 TO 79 501 TO 536 _BPGRDER 18 TO 32 80 TO 95 305 307 309 601 TO 636
_W_Z_BRAC 316 TO 329 401 TO 405 407 408 410 TO 417 419 420 422 TO 424 501
-518 601 602 617 618 _BU_PR_BR 501 TO 536 _EQX_BRAC 95 303 304 307 308 313 TO 315 407 408 410 411 419 420 422 423 END GROUP DEFINITION DEFINE MATERIAL START ISOTROPIC STEEL E 2e+007 POISSON 0.3 DENSITY 7.85 END DEFINE MATERIAL CONSTANTS MATERIAL STEEL ALL MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN 619 TO 636 TABLE SD ISA50X50X6 SP 0.008 95 305 307 309 601 618 TABLE ST ISMB150 1 TO 32 63 TO 94 TABLE D ISMC300 SP 0.008 *1 TO 32 63 TO 94 TABLE SD ISA100X100X10 SP 0.01 401 TO 403 410 TO 415 422 TO 424 TABLE ST ISMB300
301 TO 304 306 308 310 TO 329 637 TO 654 TABLE SD ISA50X50X6 SP 0.008
38 TO 41 50 TO 59 97 98 100 TO 107 117 TO 120 TABLE SD ISA50X50X6 SP 0.008
602 TO 617 TABLE TB ISMB150 WP 0.065 TH 0.008 509 510 524 TO 531 TABLE SD ISA50X50X6 SP 0.008 37 42 116 121 TABLE SD ISA60X60X6 SP 0.008 47 TO 49 60 TO 62 96 99 108 TO 111 TABLE SD ISA65X65X8 SP 0.008 35 36 43 44 114 115 122 123 TABLE SD ISA65X65X8 SP 0.008 33 34 45 46 112 113 124 125 TABLE SD ISA75X75X8 SP 0.008 523 532 TABLE SD ISA60X60X6 SP 0.008 519 TO 522 533 TO 536 TABLE SD ISA65X65X8 SP 0.008 508 511 TABLE SD ISA60X60X6 SP 0.008
504 TO 507 512 TO 515 TABLE SD ISA75X75X8 SP 0.008
501 TO 503 516 TO 518 TABLE SD ISA100X100X8 SP 0.008 404 TO 409 416 TO 421 TABLE ST ISMB500 *78 92 122 TABLE TB ISMB300 WP 0.17 TH 0.025 SUPPORTS 66 TO 69 118 TO 121 FIXED *66 TO 69 118 TO 121 PINNED MEMBER RELEASE 601 TO 618 START MZ 601 TO 618 END MZ MEMBER TRUSS
104

2 TO 16 18 TO 62 64 TO 78 80 TO 94 96 TO 125 MEMBER TRUSS 306 308 310 313 MEMBER TRUSS 316 317 323 324 MEMBER TRUSS 18 TO 32 80 TO 95 305 307 309 619 TO 636 MEMBER TRUSS 1 TO 17 63 TO 79 501 TO 536 MEMBER TENSION 301 TO 304 311 312 314 315 639 TO 642 646 647 650 651 MEMBER TENSION 318 TO 322 325 TO 329 637 638 643 TO 645 648 649 652 TO 654 LOAD 1 DEAD LOAD (DL) SELFWEIGHT Y -1.05 *5 % EXTRA WEIGHT ADDED TO TAKE CARE OF CONNECTIONS MEMBER LOAD 602 TO 617 UNI GY -0.63 601 618 UNI GY -0.32 *THICKNESS OF SLAB 125MM, WEIGHT = 2.5*0.11 = 0.275 T/SQM *CW = 2.266 M, HENCE UDL = 0.275*2.266 = 0.63 T/M SAY *CLADDING AT 15 KG/SQM W = 0.015*2.3 = 0.0345 18 TO 32 80 TO 94 305 307 601 618 UNI GY -0.0345 *STAIRCASE LOAD *Total rise to climb = 6.5 + 0.3+0.11 = 6.9 m *Rise say = 200 mm *No of Risers = 6.9/0.2 = 34.5 say 35 *Hence No of treads = 35-1 = 34 *Say Tread of 300 mm, hence Total going = 0.3x34 = 10.2 m *Let there be central landing of 1.2m *Hence Total Plan length of staircase = 10.2+1.2=11.4m *Provide central column,
*Hence contributory span on Bridge structure = 11.4/4 =2.85
*Staircase width = 2.3 m *Hence plan area for one column = 2.85x2.3/2 = 3.2 sqm *DL @ 0.2 T/sqm = 3.2 x 0.2 = 0.64 MTon *LL @ 0.5 T/Sqm = 3.2 x 0.5 = 1.6 MTon JOINT LOAD 17 65 112 117 FY -0.64 LOAD 2 LIVE LOAD (LL) MEMBER LOAD 602 TO 617 UNI GY -1 601 618 UNI GY -0.57 *STAIRCASELOAD JOINT LOAD 17 65 112 117 FY -1.6 *INTENSITY CONSIDERED = 0.5 T/SQM *CW = 2.266 M, HENCE UDL = 0.5*2.266 = 1.14 T/M SAY LOAD 3 WIND LOAD IN Z DIR JOINT LOAD 1 TO 14 34 TO 46 104 110 111 114 127 FZ 0.38 64 105 116 128 FZ 0.19 MEMBER LOAD 401 402 404 405 407 408 410 411 UNI GZ 0.17 *PLEASE NOTE IN X DIRECTION WIND WILL NOT GOVERN AS PROJECTED AREA IS LESS *HENCE WIND LOAD IS NOT APPLIED AND GOVERNING LOAD CASE IS EQX WHICH IS
105

CONSIDERED LOAD 4 EQ X *Z=0.16(ZONE FACTOR IS MUMBAI) *I=1.0(IMPORTANCE FACTOR) *R=5(ECCENTRIC BRACED FRAME) *TIME PERIOD T= 0.085 * H^0.75 =0.085 *8.8^0.75 = 0.43 SEC *SOIL TYPE ASSUMED AS SOFT HENCE SA/G = 2.5 *DAMPING C = 1.4 FOR STEEL STRUCTURES *HENCE Ah = (0.16/2)*2.5*(1/5)*1.4=0.056 *DL MASS = 54.5 MTON (APPROX) *50%LL MASS = 60.5/2 =30.25 MTON *HENCE MIN BASE SHEAR = 0.056(54.5+30.25)=4.75 MTON SAY JOINT LOAD 116 117 FX 2.375 *NOTE THIS LOAD CASE IS USED ONLY TO DESIGN OF TOP PLAN BRACING LOAD 5 2.5% LATERAL DL APPLIED JOINT LOAD 103 104 126 127 FZ 0.2 34 50 114 115 FZ 0.3 35 46 51 62 FZ 0.5 36 45 52 61 FZ 0.65 37 44 53 60 FZ 0.75 38 43 54 59 FZ 0.85 39 TO 42 55 TO 58 FZ 0.9 LOAD 6 2.5% LATERAL DL+LL APPLIED JOINT LOAD 103 104 126 127 FZ 0.4 34 50 114 115 FZ 0.6 35 46 51 62 FZ 0.95 36 45 52 61 FZ 1.25 37 44 53 60 FZ 1.5 38 43 54 59 FZ 1.65 39 TO 42 55 TO 58 FZ 1.8 LOAD COMB 101 DL + LL 1 1.0 2 1.0 LOAD COMB 102 DL + LL + WZ 1 1.0 2 1.0 3 1.0 LOAD COMB 103 DL + LL + EQX 1 1.0 2 1.0 4 1.0 PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT STATICS CHECK FINISH
106
107
108
109
110
Fig C.1.2:- Modeling of FOB in STAAD PRO 2006
Section C.2:- Design by both codes (Table C.2.1) :s.no. staad member Nature Sections as per IS :800(1984) Sections as per IS :800 (2007) Capacity KN or KN - m
IS :800 (1984) Pd 648
IS :800 (2007) Pu A(cm2) IR 1026.8 45.2 0.95
1.
21 to 29 83 to 91
2ISA 2ISA 110x110x15 100x100x12
A(cm2) IR Pd 61.62 0.70 972
2.
18to20 ,30 to 32 ,80 to 82 and 92 to 94 ,47 to 50,59 to 62
2ISA 70x70x10
2ISA 60X60X8
268
26.04
0.68 401
407
17.92
0.99
3.
96,99,100, 107 to 111
2ISA 70x70x10
2ISA 60x60x8
270
26.04
0.69 405
407
17.92
1.00
4.
51 to 58 101 to 106 98 and 99 302 and 301 303 ,304and 311,312,314
ISA 75x75x10
ISA 70x70x6
145
14.02
0.69 173
183
8.06
0.96
5.
ISA 50x50x5
ISA 55x55x5
48
4.79
0.67 57
119.78 5.27
0.48
111

315 6. 633,619 to 632 and 634 to 636 519 to 523 and 532 to 536 524 to 531 318 to 320 325 to 328 33 to 37 and 42 to 45 ,112 to 116 and 121 to 125 T T 10. ISA 65x65x8 C 2ISA 70x70x6 ISA 60x60x8 2ISA 70X70X8 100 9.76 0.69 120 203.5 8.96 0.59 ISA 110x110x8 ISA 65x65x8 180 17.02 0.71 215 221 9.76 0.97 T ISA 50x50x5 ISA 50x50x6
47
4.79
0.67 56
129.1
5.68
0.43
7. 8. 9.
2ISA 70x70x10
2ISA 60x60x8
272
26.04
0.70 408
407
17.92
1.00
168
16.12
0.70 252
264.5
21.20
0.95
11.
38 to 41 and C 117 to 120 , 316,317,323and 324 306,310,313 and 308 ,305,95,309 ,307 5 to 13 and 67 to 75 1 to 4 and 63 to 66 ,14 to 17 76 to 79 501 to 505 514 to 518 506 to 513
ISA 45x45x5
ISA 70x70x8
44.1
4.28
0.69 52.9
74
10.59
0.71
12.
ISA 30x30x5
ISA 60x60x6
25
2.77
0.60 30
38.85
7.44
0.77
13.
2ISA 2ISA 691.3 73.62 130x130x15 110x110x15 2ISA 90x90x12 2ISA 90x90x12 424 40.38
0.63 1037 1090.6 51.7
0.95
0.70 635
636
40.38
1.00
14.
15. 16.
2ISA 90x90x6 ISA 75x75x8
2ISA 70x70x10 ISA 65x65x8
200
20.94
0.64 299
302
26.04
0.99
120
11.38
0.70 180
206
9.76
0.87
17.
401 to 403 and 413 to 415, 410 to 412,
flexure ISMB 350
ISMB 200
122 112
66.71
0.95 183
204
32.33
0.98

422 to 424 18. 19. 601 to 618 404 to 409 & 416 to 421 flexure ISMB 175 flexure ISMB 600 ISMB 175 ISMB 500 17.5 395 24.02 0.70 21 28.53 24.02 0.74
156.24 0.78 474
1442.6 110.74 0.78
113

CONCLUSIONS
The main objective of this comparative study of IS: 800 (2007) & IS :800 (1984) is to study the Limit State Method for design of steel structure and then compare the design methodology for basic structural element by both codes Following conclusions are drawn and summarized from the Section B Study of both codes and Section C Project problem of this dissertation. From Section B Study of both codes Basis of design The design methodology by IS :800 (2007) is based on Limit State and IS 800(1984) is based on Working/Allowable Stress Method . Even though IS: 800 (2007) doesnt disregard the allowable/working stress design format completely but in the section 11 of IS: 800 (2007) it has been proposed that wherever it is not possible or feasible one can adopt the working stress design format.
Section classification IS 800 1984 is based on Allowable Stress Method the extreme fibre stress in the beams is restricted to 0.66 fy . In addition, the I sections rolled in India are found to be at least semicompact in which the section classification for Indian stan dard I beams have been presented. In other words the flange outstands of the I beams rolled in India are so proportioned that they attain yield stress before local buckling . Because of these two reasons, there was no need for section classification in the design of beams using IS 800 -1984 . However , in the limit state design of steel beams , section classification becomes very essential as the moment capacities of each classified section takes different values .
IS :800 (2007) classify the cross section based on limiting width to thickness ratio of individual plate element to avoid the local buckling and remains silent on this matter about slender class. (As such some of ISA section falls in slender class.)
114

Design of Tension member It is generally assumed that the distribution of stresses in cross-sections of members subjected to axial tensile forces is uniform. However some parameters like residual stresses and connection which result in a non-uniform distribution of stresses but they dont affe ct the ultimate resistance of the member. To account for eccentric loading in case of angle connected by one leg due to shear lag effect etc. , the reduction factor is introduced in IS 800 (2007) and a coefficient k is introduced in IS 800 (1984) with the area of outstanding leg which depends upon the type of connection with the gusset plate. In LSD ,in addition to net section failure and block shear failure , yielding of the gross section must also be considered so as to prevent excessive deformation of the member.
Design of Compression member :IS 800 (2007) uses multiple column curves (modified ECCS buckling curves) which are based on Party Robertson approach. The factors, non-dimensional slenderness ratio, imperfection factor and the stress reduction factor are responsible for evaluating the strength of single angle strut. However, as per IS 800 (1984) only slenderness ratio is responsible for deciding allowable stress for section.
Design of flexural member :In IS 800 (1984) the local buckling is avoided by specifying b/t limits . Hence we dont consider local buckling explicitly . However, In IS 800 (2007) , the local buckling would be the first aspect as far as the beam design is concern ( by using section classification). The section designed as per LSD is having more reserve capacity for BM and SF as compared to WSM beam designed by LSM is more economical. Plastic design strength of flexural member by IS 800 (2007) governs by flexural-torsional buckling mode of failure so this code may prove economical .
Design of Beam Column :115

As per LSM , Interaction both axial & uniaxial bending is considered taking buckling due to axial loading about both axis of cross-section . As per WSM Interaction is countered only by taking buckling due to axial load @ weaker axis with bending @ major axis. Combined interaction is considered for buckling @ both axis of cross-section. However as per WSM combined interaction is considered for buckling @ yy axis only . So reserve strength in a section by LSM is more than WSM. From Section B Project Problem In Project problem the interaction ratios (IR = Action / Strength ) are designed by both codes .As per IS 800 (2007) the IRs are found more closer than the IRs are found from IS 800 (1984).From load combination sections are designed by both codes (Table C.1.1) and it is found that in most of the cases sections designed by LSM is more economical than the sections designed by WSM.
116

REFERENCES
Indian Standards : IS : 800 1984 Code of Practice for general construction in Steel IS : 800 2007 Code of Practice for general construction in Steel IS 875 1975 (part I V) Code of practice for design loads IS 1893 2002 Criteria for earthquake resisting design of structure IS: 808-1989 Dimensions for hot rolled steel beam, column, channel and angle sections BS: 5950:Part1:2000:-Structural Use of Steelwork in Buildings: ( Part1 Code of practice for design in simple and continuous construction)
Books
Behaviour and Design of Steel Structure -By N.S. Trahair Design of Steel Structure -By B.S. Krishnamachar and D.Ajitha Simha Design of Steel Structure- By B.C. Punmia Design of Steel Structure- By S.K.Duggal Limit state Design of Steel Structure By S.K.Duggal
Websites
www.sefindia.org www.nptel.iitm.ac.in www.access-steel.com
Papers and Journals
117

Refresher course on proposed revision of IS 800 & Composite construction (INSDAG) Indian Society of Structural Engineers Volume 6-1 Jan-March 2004 Reliability-based code calibration of partial safety factors By-P. Friis Hansen & J. Dalsgard Sorensen
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150

Is 800 - 1984 & 2007 Comparative Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Is 800 - 1984 & 2007 Comparative Study

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Is 800 - 1984 & 2007 Comparative Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the thesis about?

What is the thesis about?

What codes are being compared?

What codes are being compared?

A MAJOR PROJECT ON COMPARATIVE STUDY OF IS : 800 (2007) CODE & IS : 800 (1984) CODE (GENERAL CONSTRUCTION IN STEEL CODE

DELHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING NEW DELHI 2009-2011

Topic List of Tables List of Figures Section A : - Introduction

General About IS 800 : - 2007

Section B : - Study of both codes

B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4 B.5 B.6

Section C :- Project Problem

98 - 113 98 106 107 - 113

Problem Data and Analysis Design by both codes

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

temperature Appendix B Chart showing lowest minimum

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

Table B.1.1 Limit States

Serviceability Limit States Deflection Vibration

Serviceability Limit States Deflection Vibration

[Type the document title](1984)

The Limit State of Serviceability include

[Type the document title](1984)

SECTION B : - STUDY OF BOTH CODES Section B.2 Design of Tension Member

[Type the document title](1984)

B.2.2 Cross section of tension member (fig. B.2.1)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

The influence of Residual stresses and connection (Effect of holes) :-

Fig B.2.5 Influence of Residual Stresses on the behaviour of cross-section

Connections ( Effect of holes on tension capacity) :-

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

Where Td = Design tensile strength of the

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

Fig B.2.7 Angle eccentrically loaded through gusset plate

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

PROBLEM OF TENSION MEMBER BY IS: 800 2007 Analysis Problem:-

[Type the document title](1984)

References IS handbook no. 1

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)

[Type the document title](1984)