Bonnie's Reviews > The Quick
The Quick
by
by
There has been much hush-hush about the true reality of this novel but I think hiding this does it an injustice. The true genre of this story is the supposed ‘twist’ and it’s not much of a twist in all actuality. For those who wish to be kept in the dark, stop reading. Bottom line: The Quick is nothing more than an attempt to combine the enthralling historical fiction aspects of Sarah Waters’ writing and the Gothic mystery of a classic Anne Rice novel. Suffice it to say it was a failed attempt.
The main issue with The Quick is the pacing. The beginning part of the novel introduces the main character James and his sister Charlotte who separate when James moves to London to complete his schooling. James spends his time writing poetry and plays, falls in love and tragedy soon follows. I enjoyed this part of the novel and even the ‘twist’ but instead of cashing in on this heightened intrigue due to the shocking nature of what occurred, the author instead switches gears and changes to a completely new characters point-of-view.
The introduction of the new character, Augustus Mould, also brings a new writing style: epistolary. Normally I adore anything epistolary, however, this was not only dull but tedious and encompassed far too many pages. Once we return to James’ story and point-of-view I had officially lost any and all interest in what had happened to him. What follows is the introduction of several other characters that lacked a much needed differentiation but certainly wasn’t lacking in excessive detail or back story. Much of what we’re given in this novel regarding the back stories of individuals and the tedious details of their lives felt like a ridiculous amount of inconsequential filler by the time I had turned the final page.
Inevitably, this is indistinguishable from the mass of books that share genres. The attempt to create a mysterious element and keep the true genre secret did not make this novel surprising and did not make the ponderous pages that followed any more palatable.
The main issue with The Quick is the pacing. The beginning part of the novel introduces the main character James and his sister Charlotte who separate when James moves to London to complete his schooling. James spends his time writing poetry and plays, falls in love and tragedy soon follows. I enjoyed this part of the novel and even the ‘twist’ but instead of cashing in on this heightened intrigue due to the shocking nature of what occurred, the author instead switches gears and changes to a completely new characters point-of-view.
The introduction of the new character, Augustus Mould, also brings a new writing style: epistolary. Normally I adore anything epistolary, however, this was not only dull but tedious and encompassed far too many pages. Once we return to James’ story and point-of-view I had officially lost any and all interest in what had happened to him. What follows is the introduction of several other characters that lacked a much needed differentiation but certainly wasn’t lacking in excessive detail or back story. Much of what we’re given in this novel regarding the back stories of individuals and the tedious details of their lives felt like a ridiculous amount of inconsequential filler by the time I had turned the final page.
Inevitably, this is indistinguishable from the mass of books that share genres. The attempt to create a mysterious element and keep the true genre secret did not make this novel surprising and did not make the ponderous pages that followed any more palatable.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Quick.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
January 16, 2014
– Shelved as:
not-yet-released-2014
January 16, 2014
– Shelved
January 21, 2014
– Shelved as:
to-read
January 21, 2014
– Shelved as:
historical-fiction
April 4, 2014
– Shelved as:
pn-vampires
April 24, 2014
–
Started Reading
April 29, 2014
–
47.8%
"I've been having trouble sleeping lately. Taking this with me to bed has sufficiently solved that."
page
250
May 8, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-12 of 12 (12 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Heidi
(new)
May 07, 2014 11:59AM
Is this one any good?
reply
|
flag
I can't recommend it. I'm a bit stuck at the moment and have moved on to other books but I'm about 60% done and it wouldn't break my heart to not finish that's for sure.
Bonnie wrote: "I can't recommend it. I'm a bit stuck at the moment and have moved on to other books but I'm about 60% done and it wouldn't break my heart to not finish that's for sure."
Ok thanks, I was tempted to read it but then I sad mixed reviews so I will skip it.
Ok thanks, I was tempted to read it but then I sad mixed reviews so I will skip it.
Stumbled across your review after I stalled around PG 127. Agree with you: Not liking the sudden, clumsy shift to boring epistolary entries. What a ruin of a good beginning.
Thanks for the totally truthful and well written review. Exactly the way I felt after slogging through this novel. Tedious is an understatement and I wonder what the "twist' was supposed to be?
Nicole wrote: "Just wanted to tell you that, the whole time I read this book, I was also thinking that Owen's was a big Anne Rice and Sarah Waters fans, but unfortunately hadn't the ability to engage the reader l..."
Thank you, Nicole!
Thank you, Nicole!
Im really glad i checked back in on GR over this book and found your post; I'm 40% of the way through this book and totally disappointed where its ended up...I usually finish all my books but this one is going on the "abandoned" list. Feel the premise over promises and doesnt actually spell out what it is *SPOILER*
Victorian era vampire fiction; I would never have bought this knowing that :/
Victorian era vampire fiction; I would never have bought this knowing that :/