Thomas's Reviews > Intermezzo
Intermezzo
by
by
Okay, wow. This book, though imperfect, blew me away. By far my favorite Sally Rooney novel, and I’m so happy I can finally give one of her books more than three stars!
Rooney’s writing is just superb. Her dialogue and the way she so fully embodies her characters’ voices – so impressive. The way she can write about an interaction between two people and capture all the subtle nuances and tiny yet significant emotional grooves of human interaction. Her ability to write scenes like these made me feel like I was right there in the novel with the characters, or right in their heads as they introspected. There were a handful of passages where I literally gasped from how beautiful her writing was (e.g., Ivan reflecting on his late father and feeling grief, Peter missing Ivan and wanting him to know he’s been on his side even though he hasn’t shown it, Margaret contemplating her life taking a different route than she expected). There’s so much brilliance in these pages about grief, the painful ways we hurt those we care about, and illness and trauma.
I think these deeper themes help explain why I liked this book so much more than her other novels. I’ve always found her writing extremely engaging, which is why I didn’t hesitate to pick up Intermezzo from my local library. But, with her past novels, I felt annoyed because the characters were messy and uncommunicative in a repetitive way that was frustrating because the miscommunications carried the whole plot. But in this book, even though the characters were still messy and still miscommunicated, I felt a maturity in Rooney’s characterization that wasn’t there before. Even though none of the characters were perfect, they were doing their best, and the plot didn’t only rely on them miscommunicating with one another. Also, a lot of the characters grew by the end of the book, thank goodness.
Also, I *loved* Sylvia and Ivan. To be honest I still think Sylvia is way better than anything Peter deserves, but whatever she’s amazing and selfishly she reminds me of myself, two college professors doing our thing and being better than any mediocre man around us (lol). I also was so engaged with Ivan’s perspective. He was such a sympathetically earnest character, and while Rooney captured all of her characters’ voices well, I was particularly endeared by his.
The one thing I felt most annoyed by about this book was how men (specifically Peter) used women as a way to heal from their mental health issues?? Let me say, I totally get that we can ask our friends, romantic partners, family, etc. to support us when we have mental health issues, like I’m not saying we should never rely on other people. But I feel like Rooney has this odd trope in her novels where men are extremely emotionally stunted and the way they get over it is by having the extremely emotionally intelligent women in their lives teach them how to be better communicators and to actually understand themselves more – which is literally what happened in this book with Peter. None of the female characters in this book were perfect, thankfully, and Peter himself did grow and even though he got on my nerves the most I did empathize with him, but still, the idea of women being men’s therapists (and in an unreciprocated way) bugs me. Like I think about Post-Traumatic by Chantal Johnson, Sea Change by Gina Chung, and Transcendent Kingdom by Yaa Gyasi, all some of my favorite realistic fiction novels of the past few years, and while the main characters did have female friends in their lives who helped them, they also had to seek help in other ways, either through therapy or other means. Meanwhile Peter was just educated by Sylvia and Naomi.
Anyway, I still really enjoyed this novel and was definitely riveted by it. The Peter and Ivan conflict was masterfully done in my opinion, and her writing evoked feelings from within me related to grief, family, and even friendship. I also appreciate that Rooney doesn’t try to shoehorn characters of color into her cast – like, people of color don’t need to be thrust into books with white people, we have our own stories and we can just read those. It’s nice to read a book and not have to worry if the author is going to horribly portray people of color. As you can discern this book brought up a lot for me based on the length of this review. If the synopsis interests you, I’d recommend you read it!
Rooney’s writing is just superb. Her dialogue and the way she so fully embodies her characters’ voices – so impressive. The way she can write about an interaction between two people and capture all the subtle nuances and tiny yet significant emotional grooves of human interaction. Her ability to write scenes like these made me feel like I was right there in the novel with the characters, or right in their heads as they introspected. There were a handful of passages where I literally gasped from how beautiful her writing was (e.g., Ivan reflecting on his late father and feeling grief, Peter missing Ivan and wanting him to know he’s been on his side even though he hasn’t shown it, Margaret contemplating her life taking a different route than she expected). There’s so much brilliance in these pages about grief, the painful ways we hurt those we care about, and illness and trauma.
I think these deeper themes help explain why I liked this book so much more than her other novels. I’ve always found her writing extremely engaging, which is why I didn’t hesitate to pick up Intermezzo from my local library. But, with her past novels, I felt annoyed because the characters were messy and uncommunicative in a repetitive way that was frustrating because the miscommunications carried the whole plot. But in this book, even though the characters were still messy and still miscommunicated, I felt a maturity in Rooney’s characterization that wasn’t there before. Even though none of the characters were perfect, they were doing their best, and the plot didn’t only rely on them miscommunicating with one another. Also, a lot of the characters grew by the end of the book, thank goodness.
Also, I *loved* Sylvia and Ivan. To be honest I still think Sylvia is way better than anything Peter deserves, but whatever she’s amazing and selfishly she reminds me of myself, two college professors doing our thing and being better than any mediocre man around us (lol). I also was so engaged with Ivan’s perspective. He was such a sympathetically earnest character, and while Rooney captured all of her characters’ voices well, I was particularly endeared by his.
The one thing I felt most annoyed by about this book was how men (specifically Peter) used women as a way to heal from their mental health issues?? Let me say, I totally get that we can ask our friends, romantic partners, family, etc. to support us when we have mental health issues, like I’m not saying we should never rely on other people. But I feel like Rooney has this odd trope in her novels where men are extremely emotionally stunted and the way they get over it is by having the extremely emotionally intelligent women in their lives teach them how to be better communicators and to actually understand themselves more – which is literally what happened in this book with Peter. None of the female characters in this book were perfect, thankfully, and Peter himself did grow and even though he got on my nerves the most I did empathize with him, but still, the idea of women being men’s therapists (and in an unreciprocated way) bugs me. Like I think about Post-Traumatic by Chantal Johnson, Sea Change by Gina Chung, and Transcendent Kingdom by Yaa Gyasi, all some of my favorite realistic fiction novels of the past few years, and while the main characters did have female friends in their lives who helped them, they also had to seek help in other ways, either through therapy or other means. Meanwhile Peter was just educated by Sylvia and Naomi.
Anyway, I still really enjoyed this novel and was definitely riveted by it. The Peter and Ivan conflict was masterfully done in my opinion, and her writing evoked feelings from within me related to grief, family, and even friendship. I also appreciate that Rooney doesn’t try to shoehorn characters of color into her cast – like, people of color don’t need to be thrust into books with white people, we have our own stories and we can just read those. It’s nice to read a book and not have to worry if the author is going to horribly portray people of color. As you can discern this book brought up a lot for me based on the length of this review. If the synopsis interests you, I’d recommend you read it!
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Intermezzo.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 25, 2024
– Shelved
October 11, 2024
–
Started Reading
October 15, 2024
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Elijah
(new)
-
added it
Oct 15, 2024 08:03PM
Great review! I've been looking forward to this one myself ever since I found out about it. Stories about brothers is one of my favorites things, and I can never find enough good ones lol, so hopefully this will be a win for me, too. Judging from your review, it will be!! :D
reply
|
flag
Does this book feature emotional cheating? Just wondering because the blurb makes it sound like it does. Appreciate the review
Thank you for your very good review, makes me want to read that book! I was not very enthusiastic by the other ones so I will surely give a chance to this new one !
This is so helpful! I smiled at the part about your male colleagues, followed by a bracketed "lol." Thanks for your review!
Whenever I see a review by you, Thomas, I get so excited! Especially in this case.. the famous Sally Rooney’s work 🤩
Elijah wrote: "Great review! I've been looking forward to this one myself ever since I found out about it. Stories about brothers is one of my favorites things, and I can never find enough good ones lol, so hopef..."
Aw thanks so much Elijah! Hope you enjoy the book if you read it :)
Lindsey wrote: "The trope is emotionally stunted millennials. Speaking as an emotionally stunted millennial 😅"
So interesting because there were millennial women in the book who def were not as emotionally stunted as Peter! Thanks for commenting.
Elaine wrote: "Does this book feature emotional cheating? Just wondering because the blurb makes it sound like it does. Appreciate the review"
Thanks, Elaine! And great question. Not to be vague but I think it depends on your conceptualization of emotional cheating. I'd say there's the possibility that that is featured though it depends on your definition and whether miscommunication/things being ambiguously potentially poly counts.
BarbaraBrubru_gingertiger wrote: "Thank you for your very good review, makes me want to read that book! I was not very enthusiastic by the other ones so I will surely give a chance to this new one !"
I feel that! I wasn't enthusiastic about her other books either but I think this one is my favorite. Hope you like it or find it a meaningful experience in some way.
Sam wrote: "This is so helpful! I smiled at the part about your male colleagues, followed by a bracketed "lol." Thanks for your review!"
Haha glad you appreciated it Sam! Thanks for taking the time to read the review. :)
Tanzila Tabassum wrote: "I can't wait to dig into this one"
Hope you enjoy it or find it meaningful!
Carol wrote: "Whenever I see a review by you, Thomas, I get so excited! Especially in this case.. the famous Sally Rooney’s work 🤩"
Aw that's so sweet Carol! Thanks for making the time to check out some of my reviews. :)
Aw thanks so much Elijah! Hope you enjoy the book if you read it :)
Lindsey wrote: "The trope is emotionally stunted millennials. Speaking as an emotionally stunted millennial 😅"
So interesting because there were millennial women in the book who def were not as emotionally stunted as Peter! Thanks for commenting.
Elaine wrote: "Does this book feature emotional cheating? Just wondering because the blurb makes it sound like it does. Appreciate the review"
Thanks, Elaine! And great question. Not to be vague but I think it depends on your conceptualization of emotional cheating. I'd say there's the possibility that that is featured though it depends on your definition and whether miscommunication/things being ambiguously potentially poly counts.
BarbaraBrubru_gingertiger wrote: "Thank you for your very good review, makes me want to read that book! I was not very enthusiastic by the other ones so I will surely give a chance to this new one !"
I feel that! I wasn't enthusiastic about her other books either but I think this one is my favorite. Hope you like it or find it a meaningful experience in some way.
Sam wrote: "This is so helpful! I smiled at the part about your male colleagues, followed by a bracketed "lol." Thanks for your review!"
Haha glad you appreciated it Sam! Thanks for taking the time to read the review. :)
Tanzila Tabassum wrote: "I can't wait to dig into this one"
Hope you enjoy it or find it meaningful!
Carol wrote: "Whenever I see a review by you, Thomas, I get so excited! Especially in this case.. the famous Sally Rooney’s work 🤩"
Aw that's so sweet Carol! Thanks for making the time to check out some of my reviews. :)
Interesting. I'd vowed to never read her again as she seemed to write the same unlikeable people over and over in each book. This sounds much better. I think only you couldve persuaded me to remotely consider picking her up again.
Tina wrote: "Interesting. I'd vowed to never read her again as she seemed to write the same unlikeable people over and over in each book. This sounds much better. I think only you couldve persuaded me to remote..."
Awww so sweet for you to say that about my review. I can't guarantee you'll enjoy it though your assessments of her previous books is congruent with mine. So perhaps this one may have a chance of being enjoyable!
Justin wrote: "I keep going back and forth on reading this or passing… Normal People was terrible for me."
I also did not love Normal People and gave it two stars! But if you found anything remotely redeeming or interesting about Rooney's writing or characterization I may give this one a try. Though also fair if you do not!
Awww so sweet for you to say that about my review. I can't guarantee you'll enjoy it though your assessments of her previous books is congruent with mine. So perhaps this one may have a chance of being enjoyable!
Justin wrote: "I keep going back and forth on reading this or passing… Normal People was terrible for me."
I also did not love Normal People and gave it two stars! But if you found anything remotely redeeming or interesting about Rooney's writing or characterization I may give this one a try. Though also fair if you do not!
Great review :) on your point about the men using women to heal their mental health issues - I totally see how you're perceiving that as portrayed here. Unfortunately I think it is quite realistic; not to speak for all men or all women but just from my experience.I thought Intermezzo really delicately portrayed how hard it is for men e.g. the weight of expectation and ambition without room for them to have and express their emotions. I was so glad that Ivan found Margaret, and that Peter had Sylvia and Naomi looking out for him, and a brief healing encounter with his mum. I don't think this was presented as a personal failing of Peter's, or of men's, but is perhaps a comment on how society neglects men beyond the roles they are expected to inhabit.
Olivia Behjat wrote: "Great review :) on your point about the men using women to heal their mental health issues - I totally see how you're perceiving that as portrayed here. Unfortunately I think it is quite realistic;..."
Oh, this is a great point, as is Thomas’ initial observation. Both offer a really interesting perspective on the novel.
Oh, this is a great point, as is Thomas’ initial observation. Both offer a really interesting perspective on the novel.